Talk:Antimicrobial resistance
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antimicrobial resistance Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Category handlerScript error: No such module "Copied".
User:MiszaBot/config Template:Archives
Wiki Education assignment: STS 1010
Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
— Assignment last updated by Jessicacariello (talk) 14:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: The Microbiology of College Life
Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
— Assignment last updated by Jason.DeLaCruz1313 (talk) 00:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Repeated reversion of thoroughly referenced edit
I have no idea what user:Bon courage finds to object to in either my edit or its references. The only hint of an objection is a mention of “usability” of “unreliable sources.” If they consider peer-reviewed articles published in Science Advances and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences to be unreliable, then I don’t know what psychic oracle can be trusted. And more to the point, if they do consider them unreliable, then it is for them to make that case.
I hope that some reasoned exchange can resolve this matter, since revert wars are pointless… and contrary to our cultural norms. If I see no reasonable reply to this query after some moderate waiting time, I will reluctantly revert their reversion of my reversion of their reversion.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 18:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- These are primary sources, no? Please see WP:MEDRS. Bon courage (talk) 18:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I have added a secondary source.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 18:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Still not WP:MEDRS (a churned press release on phys.org is most unwelcome). You have been warned for edit-warring. Continue with this and a sanction will likely be necessary to protect the Project from further disruption. To get a wider view please raise a query at WT:MED for more input from experienced medical editors. Thanks. Bon courage (talk) 19:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I have added a secondary source.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 18:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)