Talk:Angel of the North
Script error: No such module "Message box".[[Category:Script error: No such module "good article topics". good articles|Angel of the North]]
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Angel of the North Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThisTemplate:Archives
Interference with ley lines?
The “Reception” section suggests there were concerns that the Angel would “interfere” with ley lines. Aside from being unsure what that would mean, I’ve checked the two cites which are available online, and can’t see any mention of ley lines. I can’t check the Gormley. Can anyone see if they are actually mentioned? KJP1 (talk) 08:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- I added that statement so can confirm it's in the Gormley. I've clarified the statement a bit further though - the concerns were that the statue would "bend" ley lines. Let me know if this works, but can remove if we don't think it's needed. Unexpectedlydian (talk) 09:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- I think the clarification’s helpful; although how “encyclopaedic” the “bending of ley lines” is, I’m not sure! Many thanks. KJP1 (talk) 10:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm I think you're right, it was presumably more of an unconventional concern. As the original source does not go into more depth than that, I'll remove the reference. Unexpectedlydian (talk) 10:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Given that our article on ley lines suggests they are a pseudoscience, I think that’s probably best. That said, one of my favourite authors, Fred Hando, was an ardent believer! KJP1 (talk) 10:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Tyy 185.85.58.25 (talk) 13:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm I think you're right, it was presumably more of an unconventional concern. As the original source does not go into more depth than that, I'll remove the reference. Unexpectedlydian (talk) 10:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- I think the clarification’s helpful; although how “encyclopaedic” the “bending of ley lines” is, I’m not sure! Many thanks. KJP1 (talk) 10:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Talk now 185.85.58.25 (talk) 13:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- About what? KJP1 (talk) 17:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- I suppose it might also interfere with people's auras, horoscopes and feng shui as they drove by. – AndyFielding (talk) 20:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Your negative attitude is getting right up my chakras. 10mmsocket (talk) 22:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- I suppose it might also interfere with people's auras, horoscopes and feng shui as they drove by. – AndyFielding (talk) 20:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- About what? KJP1 (talk) 17:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Images
Some of the images seem unobtainable? Amitchell125 (talk) 14:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Can you be more specific? Which pictures? What is happening? 10mmsocket (talk) 16:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Looks sorted now. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)