Talk:SARS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 June by Johnjbarton in topic Deleted content sourced to Lambert Academic Publishing
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Connected contributor

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".Template:Article history

Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Press Template:Reliable sources for medical articles Template:Top 25 Report Template:Annual readership

  1. REDIRECT Template:Archives

Template:Rcat shell Template:Section sizes User:MiszaBot/config User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

Wiki Education assignment: Technical and Scientific Communication

Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment

— Assignment last updated by Pthoman (talk) 21:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: The Microbiology of College Life

Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment

— Assignment last updated by Jason.DeLaCruz1313 (talk) 00:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deleted content sourced to Lambert Academic Publishing

Lambert Academic Publishing is a self-publishing service, not reviewed and not a reliable source. I deleted related content. Johnjbarton (talk) 23:22, 14 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Also, authority control for the source exists:
Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".. Template:Catalog lookup link
For the OCLC. Quinhonk (talk) 08:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

They have published and translated the book into major European languages, and are legitimately registered publication house.

The deleted content is put here for reference and discussion:

The statistics reported to the WHO, however, have been questioned after the COVID-19 pandemic, for their lack of randomness from the epidemic origin of Guangzhou Province in mainland China, without a patient zero report.[1]

--Quinhonk (talk) 08:10, 15 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Registration or translation of works are not criteria used by Wikipedia in assessing reliability. The key is review by other people, through a combination of peer review process, citation of publications, and wide spread discussion in publications. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
It is a collection of works that is reviewed and it is not verifiable in a way either if the publishing house ONLY publishes unreviewed books. Quinhonk (talk) 11:25, 18 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
You need to buy and read the book first to decide. Quinhonk (talk) 11:26, 18 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Again I deleted this source. Please do not add it back without consensus. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:45, 18 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Reflisttalk

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".