Phonological history of Spanish coronal fricatives

Template:Short description Template:More footnotes Template:Spanish language Template:IPA notice In Spanish dialectology, the realization of coronal fricatives is one of the most prominent features distinguishing various dialect regions. The main three realizations are the phonemic distinction between and (Template:Wikt-lang), the presence of only alveolar Template:IPAblink (Template:Wikt-lang), or, less commonly, the presence of only a denti-alveolar Template:IPAblink that is similar to (Template:Wikt-lang).

While an urban legend attributes the presence of the dental fricative to a Spanish king with a lisp, the various realizations of these coronal fricatives are actually a result of historical processes that date to the 15th century.

Origins

Castilian 'lisp'

A persistent urban legend claims that the prevalence of the sound in Spanish can be traced to a Spanish king who spoke with a lisp, whose pronunciation spread via prestige borrowing to the rest of the population. This myth has been discredited by scholars. Template:Harvcoltxt traces the origins of the legend to a chronicle of Pero López de Ayala which says that Peter of Castile "lisped a little" (). However, Peter reigned in the 14th century and the sound began to develop in the 16th century (see below). Moreover, a true lisp would not give rise to the systematic distinction between and that characterizes standard Peninsular pronunciation. For example, a lisp would lead one to pronounce Template:Wikt-lang ('I feel') and Template:Wikt-lang ('hundred') the same (as ) whereas in standard Peninsular Spanish they are pronounced and respectively.

The misnomer "Castilian lisp" is used occasionally to refer to the presence of in Peninsular pronunciation (in both and varieties).

Historical evolution

File:Reajuste sibilantes.png

Historical development of the Spanish sibilants. Text is in Spanish; Roman numerals represent centuries AD.

In the 15th century, Spanish had developed a large number of sibilant phonemes: seven by some accounts,Template:Sfnp eight by othersTemplate:Sfnp (depending on whether and are considered contrasting), more than any current dialect. During the 16th and early 17th centuries these phonemes merged differently as they evolved into those of the different modern dialects.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp There were four pairs of voiceless versus voiced sibilants: dental/alveolar affricates vs. (spelled Template:Angbr or Template:Angbr vs. Template:Angbr); dental/alveolar fricatives (spelled Template:Angbr when intervocalic, Template:Angbr otherwise) vs. (intervocalic only, spelled Template:Angbr); postalveolar affricates (spelled Template:Angbr) vs. ; and postalveolar fricatives (spelled Template:Angbr) vs. . Both and were spelled [[Hard and soft G|Template:Angbr before Template:Angbr or Template:Angbr]], and Template:Angbr elsewhere. It is likely that deaffricated and merged with before the year 1500.Template:Sfnp The main difference between the prestige dialect of north central Spain and dialects to the south (such as Andalusian Spanish) was that, in the north, the dental/alveolar continuants were more retracted than the affricates (the former pair can be represented as and and the latter as and ), keeping their phonemic distinction, while in the south they were homorganic.Template:Sfnp The first step away from that system was the deaffrication of in the first quarter of the 16th century. Because of a differing place of articulation, this still contrasted with in the prestige dialect of north central Spain, though it was a complete merger for southern dialects.Template:Sfnp

		Pronunciation	Orthography
voiced affricate → fricative	postalveolar	Template:IPAslink → Template:IPAslink	Template:Angbr before ⟨e⟩, ⟨i⟩; ⟨j⟩ elsewhere
voiceless fricative		Template:IPAslink	Template:Angbr
voiceless affricate		Template:IPAslink	Template:Angbr
voiced fricative	apicoalveolar	Template:IPAslink	intervocalic Template:Angbr
voiceless fricative		Template:IPAslink	Template:Angbr in syllable onset or coda; Template:Angbr between vowels
voiced affricate → fricative	coronal	Template:IPAslink → Template:IPAslink	Template:Angbr
voiceless affricate		Template:IPAslink	Template:Angbr before Template:Angbr, Template:Angbr; Template:Angbr before Template:Angbr, Template:Angbr, Template:Angbr

The second step was the devoicing of voiced sibilants.Template:Sfnp In the north, and were lost, but remained contrastive with its new pronunciation , because there had been no voiceless previously. This sound contrasted with two acoustically similar sounds: dentoalveolar and apicoalveolar . By 1600, , too, had deaffricated and merged with the earlier that had already developed from .Template:Sfnp Subsequent changes to the sound system of Spanish retained the contrasts while enhancing the segments by increasing articulatory distance amongst their rather subtle acoustic contrasts, an appropriate step due to the high productivity of these phonemes in differentiating frequently used minimal pairs. The dentoalveolar one was moved "forward" to interdental , losing its former sibilance in the process (which increased its acoustic distance to the remaining sibilant Template:Angbr), and the prepalatal one was moved "backward" to velar , also losing its former sibilance, all in all resulting in the three-way distinction of modern Standard Peninsular pronunciation:

Original 6-way contrast	Deaffrication 1	Devoicing	Deaffrication 2	Modern	Orthography
–	–	–			Template:Angbr or Template:Angbr (before Template:Angbr, Template:Angbr)
–					Template:Angbr
–					Template:Angbr or Template:Angbr (before Template:Angbr, Template:Angbr)

In the south, the devoicing process and deaffrication of gave rise to new fricatives that were indistinguishable from the existing ones. The process of increasing articulatory distance still applied, however, and retracted to in the south just as it did in the north.Template:Sfnp In a number of areas (particularly the southernmost provinces like Cádiz) developed into a non-sibilant apico-dental , perceptually similar to the interdental used by Standard Peninsular speakers for orthographic Template:Angbr/Template:Angbr. In areas (particularly in the westernmost provinces like Seville and Huelva), the resulting phoneme developed a predorsal alveolar realization (like English Template:Angbr), perceptually similar to the apicoalveolar used by Standard Peninsular speakers for orthographic Template:Angbr. This variety was the pronunciation that most impacted Latin America, as many emigrants to the Americas were from Andalusian and Canarian ports. In addition, several generations of Spanish speakers had lived and grown in the Americas before appeared in Castilian.Template:Sfnp

Original 6-way contrast	Deaffrication 1	Devoicing	Deaffrication 2	Modern	Modern	Orthography
–	– /s/ +	–				Template:Angbr, Template:Angbr (before Template:Angbr, Template:Angbr), Template:Angbr
–
–						Template:Angbr or Template:Angbr (before Template:Angbr, Template:Angbr)

The development of the sibilants in Ladino (which split off from Castilian and other Peninsular varieties in the 15th century) was more conservative, resulting in a system closer to that of Portuguese.Template:Sfnp

Modern changes

Many modern dialects debuccalize the /s/ to [h], some further undergo deletion and compensatory lengthening of nearby vowel or consonant.

Distinction

Distinction (Template:Langx) refers to the differentiated pronunciation of the two Spanish phonemes written Template:Angle bracket and Template:Angle bracket or Template:Angle bracket (only before Template:Angle bracket or Template:Angle bracket, the so-called [[Hard and soft C|"soft" Template:Angle bracket]]):

1. Template:Angle bracket represents a voiceless alveolar sibilant Template:IPAslink (either laminal as in English, or apical);
2. Template:Angle bracket and soft Template:Angle bracket represent a voiceless dental fricative Template:IPAslink (the Template:Angle bracket in think).

By the early 1700s the six sibilant phonemes of medieval Spanish had all merged into three phonemes in the dialects with this distinction and two phonemes elsewhere, but spelling still reflected the older pronunciation system. From 1726 to 1815 the RAE reformed spelling, resulting in a modern Spanish orthography which reflects the system with distinction.Template:Sfnp This distinction is universal in Central and Northern parts of Spain, except for some bilingual speakers of Catalan and Basque, according to Template:Harvcoltxt, as well as some bilingual speakers of Galician whose dialect has this trait (but not all) and some Valencian areas where Spanish is the historical language.

In most of Spain, this distinction is between an apical Template:IPAblink and a dental Template:IPAblink. That said, in most regions of Andalusia which distinguish and , the distinction involves a laminal . According to Template:Harvp, the distinction between a laminal and is native to most of Almería, eastern Granada, most of Jaén, and northern Huelva, while the distinction between an apical and , as found in the rest of Peninsular Spanish, is native to the very northeastern regions of Almería, Granada and Jaén, to northern Córdoba, not including the provincial capital, and to a small region of northern Huelva.Template:Sfnp

Lack of distinction

File:Seseo-ceceo-distinción en el español.png

Most Peninsular Spanish dialects have [s]/[θ] contrast (distinción), while such contrast is absent in Latin America, the Philippines, the Canary Islands, and some parts of southern Spain (seseo/ceceo).

In most Spanish-speaking regions and countries the phonemic distinction between and does not exist. These varieties of Spanish are sometimes said to exhibit Template:Wikt-lang ('neutralization') as opposed to Template:Wikt-lang.

Seseo

is a lack of distinction between /s/ and /θ/ with both being realized as . For example, the words Template:Wikt-lang ('house') and Template:Wikt-lang ('hunt') would be pronounced with the same sound. This can result in ambiguity but can usually be interpreted depending on the context of which the sentence is spoken. is the most widespread pronunciation among Spanish speakers worldwide and occurs in nearly all speakers in Hispanic America. While it is a minority pronunciation in Spain itself, is considered standard in all varieties of Latin American Spanish, as well as in the Philippines. It coexists with and in parts of Spain (e.g. in the Canary Islands, much of Andalusia, historically in southern Murcia, western Badajoz, and the western coast of Galicia).Template:Sfnp Traditional dialect atlases (e.g., Template:Harvcoltxt) show one variant or another used in adjacent regions. In Spain, is considered "more socially acceptable or perhaps 'less substandard' than ".Template:Sfnp

Ceceo

(sometimes transcribed in English sources according to pronunciation as thetheo) is a phenomenon found in a few dialects of southern Spain in which and are not distinguished and there is only one coronal fricative phoneme realized as the voiceless denti-alveolar sibilant , a sibilant sounding somewhat like , but not identical.Template:Sfnp is found primarily in some varieties of Andalusian Spanish, and historically in two villages of southeastern Murcia.Template:Sfnp That said, Hualde reports that there is some evidence of the phenomenon in parts of Central America. A publication of the University of Oviedo also notes that can be found in Argentina and Chile.Template:Sfnp Other linguists have noticed the use of in parts of Puerto Rico, Honduras, and Venezuela.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp A similar sound characterized as a "voiceless apico-or corono-post-dental slit fricative" has been observed in Nicaragua, El Salvador, Honduras, Colombia, Puerto Rico, and Venezuela;Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp In these places, ceceo is a largely rural pronunciation and is often stigmatized.Template:Sfnp

In El Salvador, some speakers use a Template:IPAblink-like fricative in the syllable instead of the usual glottal Template:IPAblink, , or phonetic zero, rendering 'all' (plural) as , more usually pronounced or (the latter homophonous with 'all' (singular)). Salvadoran Spanish occasionally weakens, but almost never completely deletes, in onset positions, and this allophone is more common in onset positions than coda ones.Template:Sfnp According to , this is the result of a gestural undershoot. It is on an acoustic continuum between Template:IPAblink and Template:IPAblink, representing an intermediate degree of lenition.Template:Sfnp identifies this with the of Andalusian and other dialects.Template:Sfnp The following table gives an example of the three pronunciation patterns discussed so far:

	('the house')	('the hunt')
Distinción
Seseo
Ceceo

Ceseo or seceo

Many speakers of and dialects in Spain show sociolinguistic variation in usage. In some cases, this variation may arise when a or speaker more or less consciously attempts to use in response to sociolinguistic pressure (hypercorrection). However, as, for instance, in the case of the variation between the standard velar nasal and alveolar pronunciation of the nasal in -ing in English (walking versus walkinTemplate:'), the switching may be entirely unconscious. It is perhaps evidence of the saliency of three-way variation that inconsistent use has elicited evaluative comments by some traditional Spanish dialectologists. For instance, Template:Harvcoltxt discussed it as "sporadic or chaotic switching [between and ] and the use of intermediate sounds impossible to determine with precision".Template:Sfnp Template:Harvcoltxt proposes the synonymous terms and to refer to these "mixed" patterns, and notes surprise at a speaker who produced all four possible pronunciations of Zaragoza (, , and ) within the space of a few minutes.Template:Sfnp In fact, sociolinguistic variation is typically highly structured in terms of how often each variant will appear given various social and linguistic independent variables. The Spanish spoken by the inhabitants of the Canary Islands is exclusively , but exclusive is quite rare in mainland Spain – even in areas, such as Seville, listed as being majority .

See also

• History of the Spanish language
• Spanish dialects and varieties
• Spanish phonology
• Rhoticity in English

Sources

• Template:Cite thesis

External links

• Articles on seseo and ceceo in the Diccionario panhispánico de dudas of the Real Academia Española
• An explanation of the development of Mediæval Spanish sibilants in Castile and Andalusia
• A recording of the sibilants as they would have been pronounced in medieval Spanish