Portuguese Wikipedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Unsubst". Template:Use dmy dates Template:Expand Portuguese Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "check for clobbered parameters". The Portuguese Wikipedia (Template:Langx) is the Portuguese-language edition of Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. It was started on 11 May 2001.[1]

Wikipedia is the 19th most accessed website in Brazil[2] and the 10th most accessed in Portugal.[3] since May 2026Template:Dated maintenance category (articles)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., it is the Script error: No such module "Ordinal". largest Wikipedia by article count, containing Template:NUMBEROF articles. The Portuguese edition is one of the Wikipedias that does not allow edits from unregistered users. It disabled edits from IP editors in 2020.

History

The Portuguese Wikipedia was the third edition of Wikipedia to be created, simultaneously with other languages. It started its activities on 11 May 2001,[4] having reached the mark of one hundred thousand articles on 26 January 2006.[5]

Script error: No such module "Multiple image". From late 2004, the edition grew rapidly. In May 2005, it overtook both the Spanish and Italian language Wikipedias. By comparison, in May 2004 it was only the 17th Wikipedia by the number of articles.

Portuguese articles can contain variations of writing, as European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese have differences in vocabulary and usage. Articles can contain written characteristics of one or the other variant depending on who wrote the article.

The Portuguese Wikipedia community decided not to split a separate Brazilian Portuguese version off from the Portuguese Wikipedia.[6] In 2005, a proposal to fork Portuguese Wikipedia and create a Brazilian Portuguese (pt-br) version was voted down by the Wikimedia community.[7]Template:Better source needed In 2007 another one to create a European Portuguese version was rejected too by the Wikimedia community.[8]Template:Better source needed In 2009 another one to create in Brazilian Portuguese was rejected, but this time by the language committee, according to new policies to create new Wikipedia editions,[9]Template:Better source needed with the following explanation: "Brazilian Portuguese is not a separate language.. this is a requirement."[10]Template:Better source needed

Beginning in January 2007,[11] the project experienced a decrease of the share of edits by unregistered users (from around 20 to around 15%) and an increase of the share of such edits being reverted, from about 15% to a peak of 25% in late 2008,[12] which suggests an increase in disruptive editing. In the same month, a JavaScript was added that forced all unregistered users to preview their edit before saving it.[13]Template:Better source needed

In December 2010, the Portuguese Wikipedia overtook the Dutch language Wikipedia in number of articles, but in the first quarter of 2011, it was surpassed by the Russian and Dutch language Wikipedias, ranking in the tenth position. In April 2016, the project had 1388 active editors who made at least five edits in that month.

Characteristics

File:Most popular edition of Wikipedia by country.svg
The countries in which the Portuguese Wikipedia is the most popular language version of Wikipedia are shown in violet.
File:Wikipedia pt - Page views by country over time.png
Origin of viewers on the Portuguese Wikipedia

The Portuguese language Wikipedia is different from the English one in a number of aspects.

  • Until 2009, fair use was not allowed on Portuguese Wikipedia. Debates have been raised before[14]Template:Better source needed[15]Template:Better source needed concerning the fair use policy, all of them failing to have the uploading of such images allowed. Uploading pictures at the Portuguese Wikipedia was even fully disabled until then.[16]Template:Better source needed In August 2009, though, a new debate was raised in order for users to approve or deny the creation of a policy of uploading fair use media (named "Uso Restrito de Conteúdo" there, which translates as Restricted Use of Contents). This debate resulted in 142 votes for "yes" against 120 votes for "no", which means the policy was approved and implemented.[17]Template:Better source needed[18]Template:Better source needed Nowadays, fair use files are labeled as "Conteúdo restrito", meaning restricted content.
  • Like English, Portuguese has regional differences in vocabulary, grammar, and spelling. It is widely accepted that an article written in Brazilian Portuguese should be kept as it is, and the same applies to articles in European Portuguese. However, if one rewrites the article in another variant (provided content was changed, not merely the language), but leaves some words in the former variant, these words should be rewritten in accordance with the new version's variant of the article.[19]Template:Better source needed
  • In order to hinder spamming and trolling, completion of a CAPTCHA image was required for all unregistered users to make any edit. It was disabled on 1 January 2014.[20]
  • Since 2020, after a community vote that lasted from 4 September to 4 October, the Portuguese Wikipedia no longer allows edits from unregistered users (IP addresses).

As of 2019, the Portuguese Wikipedia had 316,000 unique categories, 3.57% of them lacking an appropriate page in the category namespace. The average article in this language version has nine categories, while the ratio of unique categories per article is 0.314. The largest number of articles belong to Arts (16%) and Geography (14%) categories. Articles related to Crime and Events have the highest average quality. Those related to Health are read more often, and articles in the Business category have the highest average author interest.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

In April 2022, the European Union's East StratCom Task Force published its findings that four pro-Russian disinformation outlets (SouthFront, NewsFront, InfoRos and Strategic Culture Foundation) were referenced in 45 articles of the Portuguese Wikipedia. This made it the Wikipedia edition that was the fourth most-affected by such disinformation, after the Russian, Arabic and Spanish Wikipedias.[21] The Task Force wrote: <templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

On the English version of Wikipedia, there seems to be a consensus that state-sponsored disinformation sites aren't legitimate sourcesScript error: No such module "String".[...]. One can only guess whether other language versions will follow suit, but there is nothing stopping anyone from launching that debate, pointing out the English Wikipedia example as a best practice.

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Notes

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Lih, p. 136.
  7. meta:Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Brazilian Portuguese
  8. meta:Requests for new languages/Wikipedia European Portuguese
  9. meta:Language proposal policy
  10. meta:Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Brazilian Portuguese 2
  11. In coincidence with a stalling of editing activity rates across all projects combined, see stats:EN/PlotEditsZZ.png.
  12. stats:EN/EditsRevertsPT.htm and in particular stats:EN/PlotRevertsTrendsPT.png; no data available after early 2010, as of June 2013.
  13. Template:Trim&oldid=Template:Trim MediaWiki:Monobook.js, 2007-01-31; removed from Template:Trim&oldid=Template:Trim MediaWiki:Common.js in 2008-01-25, the same day of introduction of an "emergency captcha" for all edits.
  14. Wikipedia:Votações/Imagens e copyright
  15. Wikipedia:Votações/Revisão do uso do Fair Use na pt.wikipedia
  16. Wikipedia:Votações/Impedir carregamento de imagens
  17. Wikipedia:Votações/Uso Restrito de Conteúdo (fair-use)
  18. Wikipedia:Uso Restrito de Conteúdo/Implementação
  19. Wikipedia:Versões da língua portuguesa
  20. Gerrit 104660
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Bibliography

<templatestyles src="Refbegin/styles.css" />

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

External links

Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:Wikipedias in Romance languages

Template:Authority control