Point (typography)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Point size)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Template:Redirect-distinguish

Template:Infobox unit

In typography, the point is the smallest unit of measure. It is used for measuring font size, leading, and other items on a printed page. The size of the point has varied throughout printing's history. Since the 18th century, the size of a point has been between 0.18 and 0.4 millimeters. Following the advent of desktop publishing in the 1980s and 1990s, digital printing has largely supplanted the letterpress printing and has established the desktop publishing (DTP) point as the de facto standard. The DTP point is defined as <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />172 of an inch (or exactly 0.3527 mm) and, as with earlier American point sizes, is considered to be <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />112 of a pica.

In metal type, the point size of a font describes the height of the metal body on which that font's characters were cast. In digital type, letters of a computer font are designed around an imaginary space called an em square. When a point size of a font is specified, the font is scaled so that its em square has a side length of that particular length in points. Although the letters of a font usually fit within the font's em square, there is not necessarily any size relationship between the two, so the point size does not necessarily correspond to any measurement of the size of the letters on the printed page.[1][2]

History

The point was first established by the Milanese typographer, Francesco Torniella da Novara (c.Template:TrimScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". – 1589) in his 1517 alphabet, L'Alfabeto. The construction of the alphabet is the first based on logical measurement called "Punto", which corresponds to the ninth part of the height of the letters or the thickness of the principal stroke.[3][4]

Notations

A measurement in points can be represented in three different ways. For example, 14 points (1 pica plus 2 points) can be written:

  • <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1P2p (12 points would be just "<templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1P ")—traditional style
  • 1p2 (12 points would be just "1p")—format for desktop
  • 14pt (12 points would be "12pt" or "1pc" since it is the same as 1 pica)—format used by Cascading Style Sheets defined by the World Wide Web Consortium.[5]

Varying standards

Template:More citations

Various point definitions
Name Year mm inch
≈ Script error: No such module "val".
Fournier[6] 1737 ≈ 0.345  Script error: No such module "val".
American 1886 ≈ Script error: No such module "val". Script error: No such module "val".
Japanese[7] 1962 Script error: No such module "val". ≈ Script error: No such module "val".
TeX pt 1982 = 0.Template:Gaps ≈ Script error: No such module "val". = <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />172.27
PostScript, CSS pt, TeX bp 1984 = 0.3527 = 0.0138 = <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />172
≈ Script error: No such module "val".
Didot 1783 ≈ Script error: No such module "val". ≈ Script error: No such module "val".
Berthold 1878 ≈ 0.376 ≈ Script error: No such module "val".
DIN actual,[8] TeX dd 1964 Script error: No such module "val". ≈ Script error: No such module "val".
DIN nominal,[8] TeX nd 1984 Script error: No such module "val". ≈ Script error: No such module "val".
Other
Truchet 1694 ≈ 0.188 ≈ Script error: No such module "val".
L'Imprimerie Nationale nominal 1810 = 0.400 ≈ Script error: No such module "val".
L'Imprimerie Nationale actual 1810 = 0.398 77 mm ≈ Script error: No such module "val".
DIN,[9] Japanese, CSS q 1999 Script error: No such module "val". ≈ Script error: No such module "val".

There have been many definitions of a "point" since the advent of typography. Traditional continental European points at about Script error: No such module "val". are usually a bit larger than English points at around Script error: No such module "val"..

French points

Script error: No such module "Hatnote".

Script error: No such module "anchor". The Truchet point, the first modern typographic point, was <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1144 of a French inch or <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />11728 of the royal foot.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". It was invented by the French clergyman Sébastien Truchet. During the metrication of France amid its revolution, a 1799 law declared the meter to be exactly 443.296 French lines long. This established a length to the royal foot of <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />Script error: No such module "val".Script error: No such module "val". m or about 325 mm. The Truchet point therefore became equal to <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />Script error: No such module "val".Script error: No such module "val". mm or about Script error: No such module "val".. It has also been cited as exactly 0.188 mm.

Script error: No such module "anchor". The Fournier point was established by Pierre Simon Fournier in 1737.[10][11][12]Template:Rp The system of Fournier was based on a different French foot of c. 298 mm. With the usual convention that 1 foot equals 12 inches, 1 inch (pouce) was divided into 12 lines (lignes) and 1 line was further divided into 6 typographic points (points typographiques). One Fournier point is about 0.0135 English inches.

File:FournierScale144pts.jpg
The Fournier scale: two inches in total, divided into four half-inches, the medium intervals are one line (<templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />112 inch), and the smallest intervals are <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />136 inch; no intervals for the point is given, though

Fournier printed a reference scale of 144 points over two inches; however, it was too rough to accurately measure a single point.[11]

The Fournier point did not achieve lasting popularity despite being revived by the Monotype Corporation in 1927.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". It was still a standard in Belgium, in parts of Austria, and in Northern France at the beginning of the 20th century.[12]Template:Rp In Belgium, the Fournier system was used until the 1970s and later. It was called the "mediaan"-system.

Script error: No such module "anchor". The Didot point, established by François-Ambroise Didot in 1783,[13] was an attempt to improve the Fournier system. He did not change the subdivisions (1 inch = 12 subdivisions = 72 points), but defined it strictly in terms of the royal foot, a legal length measure in France: the Didot point is exactly <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1864 of a French foot or <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />172 of a French inch, that is (by 1799) <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />Script error: No such module "val".Script error: No such module "val". mm or about Script error: No such module "val".. Accordingly, one Didot point is exactly two Truchet points.

However, 12 Fournier points turned out to be 11 Didot points,[11]Template:Rp giving a Fournier point of about Script error: No such module "val".; later sources[12]Template:Rp state it as being Script error: No such module "val".. To avoid confusion between the new and the old sizes, Didot also rejected the traditional names, thus parisienne became corps 5, nonpareille became corps 6, and so on.[11]Template:Rp The Didot system prevailed because the French government demanded printing in Didot measurements.[14]Template:Better source needed

Approximations were subsequently employed, largely owing to the Didot point's unwieldy conversion to metric units (the divisor of its conversion ratio has the prime factorization of Template:Gaps).

In 1878, Hermann Berthold defined 798 points as being equal to 30 cm, or 2660 points equalling 1 meter: that gives around Script error: No such module "val". to the point.[15][16][17][18] A more precise number, Script error: No such module "val"., sometimes is given;[16] this is used by TeX as the dd unit. This has become the standard in Germany[8] and Central and Eastern Europe.[19] This size is still mentioned in the technical regulations of the Eurasian Economic Union.[20]

Metric points

pdfTEX, but not plain TeX or LaTeX, also supports a new Didot point (nd) at <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />38 mm or Script error: No such module "val". and refers to a not further specified 1978 redefinition for it.[21]

Script error: No such module "anchor". The French National Print Office adopted a point of <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />25 mm or Script error: No such module "val". in about 1810 and continues to use this measurement today (though "recalibrated" to Script error: No such module "val".).[22][23][24]

Japanese[25] and German[9][16][18] standardization bodies instead opted for a metric typographic base measure of exactly <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />14 mm or Script error: No such module "val"., which is sometimes referred to as the quart in Japan. The symbol Q is used in Japanese after the initial letter of quarter millimeter. Due to demand by Japanese typesetters, CSS adopted Q in 2015.[26][27]

American points

The basic unit of measurements in American typography was the pica,[12][28][29] usually approximated as one sixth of an inch, but the exact size was not standardized, and various type foundries had been using their own.[12]

During and after the American Revolutionary War, Benjamin Franklin was sent as commissioner (Ambassador) for the United States to France from December 1776 to 1785.[30] While living there he had close contact with the Fournier family, including the father and Pierre Simon Fournier. Franklin wanted to teach his grandson Benjamin Franklin Bache about printing and typefounding, and arranged for him to be trained by Francois Ambroise Didot. Franklin then imported French typefounding equipment to Philadelphia to help Bache set up a type-foundry. Around 1790, Bache published a specimen sheet with some Fournier types.[31][32] After the death of Franklin, the matrices and the Fournier mould were acquired by Binny and Ronaldson, the first permanent type-foundry in America. Successive mergers and acquisitions in 1833, 1860 and 1897 saw the company eventually become known as MacKellar, Smith & Jordan. The Fournier cicero mould was used by them to cast pica-sized type.

Script error: No such module "anchor". Nelson Hawks proposed, like Fournier, to divide one American inch exactly into six picas, and one pica into 12 points. However, this saw an opposition because the majority of foundries had been using picas less than one sixth of an inch. So in 1886, after some examination of various picas, the Type Founders Association of the United States approved the pica of the L. Johnson & Co. foundry of Philadelphia (the "Johnson pica") as the most established.[28] The Johnson foundry was influential, being America's first and oldest foundry; established as Binny & Ronaldson in 1796, it would go through several names before being the largest of the 23 foundries that would merge in 1892 to form the American Type Founders Co.[33] The official definition of one pica is Script error: No such module "convert"., and one point is Script error: No such module "convert".. That means 6 picas or 72 points constitute Script error: No such module "val". standard inches. A less precise definition is one pica equals Script error: No such module "convert"., and one point Script error: No such module "convert"..[28][34] It was also noticed that 83 picas is nearly equal to 35 cm, so the Type Founders Association also suggested using a 35 cm metal rod for measurements, but this was not accepted by every foundry.[28]

This has become known as the American point system.[28][34] The British foundries accepted this in 1898.

For the TeX computer typesetting system he invented in the 1970s, Donald Knuth declared the size of the point to be exactly <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />172.27 of the inch.[35] This is sometimes known as the TeX point. Since 1 inch is exactly 25.4 mm, it follows that, 1 TeX pt = <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />172.27 in = 0.01383700 in = 0.35145980 mm. This is trivially different from the American point.

Old English points

Although the English Monotype manuals used 1 pica = Script error: No such module "convert"., their manuals used on the European continent use another definition. There, 1 pica = Template:Cvt, the Old English pica. As a consequence all the tables of measurements in the German, Dutch, French, Polish and all other manuals elsewhere on the European continent for the composition caster and the super-caster are different in quite some details. The Monotype wedges used at the European continent are marked with an extra 'E' behind the set-size: for instance: 5-12E, 1331-15E etc. When working with the E-wedges in the larger sizes, the differences will increase even more.[36]

Desktop publishing point

The desktop publishing point (DTP point) or PostScript point is defined as <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />172 or 0.0138 of an inch, making it equivalent to <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />25.472 mm = 0.3527 mm. Twelve points make up a pica, and six picas make an inch. The PS documentation only calls this length "unit size" and notes:[37]

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

The default unit size (1⁄72 inch) is approximately the same as a “point,” a unit widely used in the printing industry. It is not exactly the same as a point, however; there is no universal definition of a point.

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

This specification was found in the Xerox Interpress language used for its early digital printers and further developed by John Warnock and Charles Geschke when they created Adobe PostScript.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". It was adopted by Apple Computer as the standard for the display resolution of the original Macintosh desktop computer and the print resolution for the LaserWriter printer.[38]Script error: No such module "Unsubst".[39]Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

In 1996, it was adopted by W3C for Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) where it was later related at a fixed 3:4 ratio to the pixel (e.g. 12 pt and 16 px are the same in CSS) due to a general (but wrong) assumption of 96 pixel-per-inch screens.[40]

Apple point

Since the advent of high-density "Retina" screens with a much higher resolution than the original 72 dots per inch, Apple's programming environment Xcode sizes GUI elements in points that are scaled automatically to a whole number of physical pixels in order to accommodate for screen size, pixel density and typical viewing distance.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". This Cocoa point is equivalent to the pixel px unit in CSS, the density-independent pixel dp on Android[41] and the effective pixel epx or ep in Windows UWP.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Font sizes

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

In lead typecasting, most font sizes commonly used in printing have conventional names that differ by country, language and the type of points used.

Desktop publishing software and word processors intended for office and personal use often have a list of suggested font sizes in their user interface, but they are not named and usually an arbitrary value can be entered manually. Microsoft Word, for instance, suggests every even size between 8 and 28 points and, additionally, 9, 11, 36, 48 and 72 points (the font sizes 36, 48 and 72 equal 3, 4 and 6 picas respectively). While most software nowadays defaults to DTP points, many allow specifying font size in other units of measure (e.g., inches, millimeters, pixels), especially code-based systems such as TeX and CSS.

See also

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Various sources give different sizes, namely: ≈ Script error: No such module "val"., ≈ Script error: No such module "val"., ≈ Script error: No such module "val"., (exactly) Script error: No such module "val"., ≈ Script error: No such module "val"., ≈ Script error: No such module "val"..
  7. JIS Z 8305. 活字の基準寸法. Dimensions of Printing Types.
  8. a b c DIN 16507-1:1998 and its predecessors, at least since 1964, for lead typecasting defined 2660 points to measure 1000.333 mm at 20 °C, but for public communication it later introduced a rounder value.
  9. a b DIN 16507-2 (1984, 1999) does not specify a custom unit for electronic typography, but measures using a module.
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. a b c d e Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. L. Ronner, Van leerling tot Zetter, 1913, N.V.De nieuwe Tijd, Amsterdam, pag 30.
  15. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  16. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Template:In lang Статья 8. Пункт 11. // ТР ТС 007/2011. Требования безопасности издательской (книжной и журнальной) продукции, школьно-письменных принадлежностей.
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. JIS X 4052:2000, JIS Z 8125:2004
  26. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. a b c d e Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Benjamin Franklin papers, Kislak Center for Special Collections, Rare Books and Manuscripts, University of Pennsylvania
  31. Updike, I, p. 257, II pp. 152-3
  32. Allen Huet, Fournier the compleat typographer, 1972, London, Frederik Muller Ltd, page 3, 4, 62, 63
  33. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Further reading

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Typography terms