Deutschland-class cruiser

Template:Infobox ship imageTemplate:Infobox ship class overviewTemplate:Infobox ship characteristics

The class was a series of three (armored ships), a form of heavily armed cruiser, built by the officially in accordance with restrictions imposed by the Treaty of Versailles. The ships of the class, , , and , were all stated to displace Template:Convert in accordance with the Treaty, though they actually displaced Template:Convert at standard displacement. The design for the ships incorporated several radical innovations, including the first major use of welding in a warship and all-diesel propulsion. Due to their heavy armament of six Template:Convert guns and lighter weight, the British began referring to the vessels as "pocket battleships". The -class ships were initially classified as , but the reclassified them as heavy cruisers in February 1940.

The three ships were built between 1929 and 1936 by the Deutsche Werke in Kiel and the in Wilhelmshaven, seeing much service with the German Navy. All three vessels served on non-intervention patrols during the Spanish Civil War. While on patrol, was attacked by Republican bombers, and in response, bombarded the port of Almería. In 1937, represented Germany at the Coronation Review for Britain's King George VI. For the rest of their peacetime careers, the ships conducted a series of fleet maneuvers in the Atlantic and visited numerous foreign ports in goodwill tours.

Before the outbreak of World War II, and were deployed to the Atlantic to put them in position to attack Allied merchant traffic once war was declared. remained in port for periodic maintenance. was not particularly successful on her raiding sortie, during which she sank or captured three ships. She then returned to Germany, where she was renamed . sank nine vessels in the South Atlantic before she was confronted by three British cruisers at the Battle of the River Plate. Although she damaged the British ships, she was herself damaged and her engines were in poor condition. Coupled with deceptive false British reports of reinforcements, the state of the ship convinced Hans Langsdorff, her commander, to scuttle the ship outside Montevideo, Uruguay.

and were deployed to Norway in 1942 to join the attacks on Allied convoys to the Soviet Union. conducted Operation Wunderland in August 1942, a sortie into the Kara Sea to attack Soviet merchant shipping, though it ended without significant success. took part in the Battle of the Barents Sea in December 1942, a failed attempt to destroy a convoy. Both ships were damaged in the course of their deployment to Norway and eventually returned to Germany for repairs. They ended their careers bombarding advancing Soviet forces on the Eastern Front; both ships were destroyed by British bombers in the final weeks of the war. was raised and sunk as a target by the Soviet Navy, and was partially broken up in situ, with the remainder of the hulk buried beneath rubble.

Development

Following Germany's defeat in World War I, the size of the German Navy, renamed the , was limited by the Treaty of Versailles. The Navy was permitted a force of six pre-dreadnought battleships and six light cruisers; the ships could not be replaced until they were twenty years old.Template:Sfn To replace the battleships, new vessels were to displace at most Template:Convert; Germany's potential rivals were at this time limited to building vessels of Template:Convert by the Washington Naval Treaty and subsequent agreements.Template:Sfn The gun caliber of any new ship was not regulated by the Treaty itself,Template:Sfn though the Naval Inter-Allied Commission of Control (NIACC) created by the Treaty did have authority to regulate the armament of all new warships.Template:SfnTemplate:Efn The Allies assumed that with these limitations, only coastal defense ships similar to those operated by the Scandinavian navies could be built.Template:Sfn

The Template:'s oldest battleship, Template:SMS, was laid down in 1902 and could therefore be replaced legally in 1922. Design studies were considered starting in 1920, with two basic options: the Navy could build a heavily armored, slow, and small warship similar to a monitor, or a large, fast, and lightly armored vessel similar to a cruiser.Template:Sfn Actual design work on the new type of armored ship began in 1923, but the economic collapse forced a temporary halt to the work. Admiral Hans Zenker, the commander in chief of the , pushed hard for the navy to resume design work, and in 1925 three new proposals were drafted. In addition to two sketches prepared in 1923, this totaled five different designs. Of the first two designs, "I/10" was a Template:Convert cruiser armed with eight Template:Convert guns while "II/10" was a Template:Convert, heavily armored ship armed with four Template:Convert guns. The three designs prepared in 1925—"II/30", "IV/30", and "V/30"—were armed with six Template:Convert guns with varying levels of armor protection. The eventually opted for Template:Convert guns to avoid provoking the Allies and to ease pressures on the design staff.Template:Sfn

The held a conference to evaluate the designs in May 1925, though the results were inconclusive. Of particular importance was the continued French occupation of the Ruhr industrial area, which prevented Germany from quickly building large-caliber artillery. Nevertheless, the design staff prepared another set of designs, "I/35", a heavily armored ship with a single triple turret forward, and "VIII/30", a more lightly-armored ship with a pair of twin turrets. The initially intended to lay down the first armored ship in 1926, but the design had not yet been finalized. The 1926 maneuvers informed the design staff that greater speed was desirable, and that year, a further two designs were submitted to Zenker.Template:Sfn The initial design for , ordered as " A", was prepared in 1926 and finalized by 1928.Template:Sfn Zenker announced on 11 June 1927 that the Navy had settled on one of several proposals for the new warships. The had decided that the new ships would be armed with two triple turrets mounting 28 cm guns.Template:Sfn

Political opposition to the new ships was significant. The therefore decided to delay ordering the ship until after the elections in 1928.Template:Sfn The question over whether to build the new ships was a major issue in elections, particularly with the Social Democrats, who strongly opposed the new ships and campaigned with the slogan "Food not ."Template:Sfn In May 1928, the elections were concluded and enough of a majority in favor of the new ships was elected; this included twelve seats won by Adolf Hitler's Nazi Party. An October 1928 attempt by the Communist Party of Germany to initiate a referendum against the construction failed. The first of the new ships was authorized in November 1928.Template:Sfn

When the particulars of the design became known by the Allies, they attempted to prevent Germany from building them. The offered to halt construction on the first ship in exchange for admittance to the Washington Treaty with a ratio of Template:Convert to Britain's allotment of Template:Convert of capital ship tonnage. In doing so, this would effectively abrogate the clauses in the Treaty of Versailles that limited Germany's naval power. Britain and the United States favored making concessions to Germany, but France refused to allow any revisions to the Treaty of Versailles. Since the ships did not violate the terms of the Treaty, the Allies could not prevent Germany from building them after a negotiated settlement proved unattainable.Template:Sfn

Design

General characteristics

File:Lützow ONI.jpg

Recognition drawing of as she appeared in 1942. It indicates that the armoured belt is 4 inches thick, instead of its actual 3.1 inches.

The three -class ships varied slightly in dimensions. All three ships were Template:Convert long at the waterline, and as built, Template:Convert long overall. and had clipper bows installed in 1940–1941; their overall length was increased to Template:Convert. had a beam of Template:Convert, Template:'s beam was Template:Convert, while Template:'s was Template:Convert. and had a standard draft of Template:Convert and a full-load draft of Template:Convert. Template:'s draft was Template:Convert and Template:Convert, respectively. The displacement of the three ships increased over the class. Standard displacement grew from Template:Convert for to Template:Convert for and Template:Convert for . The ships' full load displacements were significantly higher, at Template:Convert for , Template:Convert for , and Template:Convert for .Template:Sfn The ships were officially stated to be within the Template:Convert limit of the Treaty of Versailles, however.Template:Sfn

The ships' hulls were constructed with transverse steel frames; over 90 percent of the hulls used welding instead of the then standard riveting, which saved 15 percent of their total hull weight.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn These savings allowed the armament and armor to be increased.Template:Sfn The hulls contained twelve watertight compartments and were fitted with a double bottom that extended for 92 percent of the length of the keel. As designed, the ship's complement comprised 33 officers and 586 enlisted men. After 1935, the crew was dramatically increased, to 30 officers and 921–1,040 sailors. While serving as a squadron flagship, an additional 17 officers and 85 enlisted men augmented the crew. The second flagship had an additional 13 officers and 59 sailors. The ships carried a number of smaller boats, including two picket boats, two barges, one launch, one pinnace, and two dinghies.Template:Sfn

The considered the ships to be good sea boats, with a slight roll. As built, they were wet in a head sea, though this was significantly improved by the installation of a clipper bow in 1940–1941. The ships were highly maneuverable, particularly when the maneuvering setting for the diesel engines was used, in which half of the engines for each shaft were run in reverse. The ships heeled over up to 13 degrees with the rudder hard over. The low stern was wet in a stern sea, and equipment stored there was frequently lost overboard.Template:Sfn

Machinery

The -class ships were equipped with two sets of four 9-cylinder, double-acting, two-stroke diesel engines built by MAN.Template:Sfn The adoption of an all-diesel propulsion system was a radical innovation at the time and contributed to significant savings in weight.Template:Sfn Each set was controlled by transmissions built by AG Vulcan. The engines were paired on two propeller shafts, which were attached to three-bladed screws that were Template:Convert in diameter. was initially fitted with Template:Convert diameter screws, before they were replaced with the larger screws. The engines were rated at Template:Convert and a top speed of Template:Convert. They did not meet the expected shaft-horsepower on trials, though they did exceed their design speeds. Template:'s engines reached Template:Convert and Template:Convert, and Template:'s engines reached Template:Convert and Template:Convert. Horsepower figures for are not recorded, though her top speed on trials was Template:Convert.Template:Sfn

could carry up to Template:Convert of fuel oil, which provided a maximum range of Template:Convert at a speed of Template:Convert. An increase in speed by one knot reduced the range slightly to Template:Convert. At a higher speed of Template:Convert, the range fell to Template:Convert. carried Template:Convert and had a correspondingly shorter range of Template:Convert at 20 kn. stored Template:Convert of fuel, which enabled a range of Template:Convert. Electricity was supplied by four electric generators powered by two diesel engines. Their total output was 2,160 kW for , 2,800 kW for , and 3,360 kW for , all at 220 volts. Steering was controlled by a single rudder.Template:Sfn

Armament

File:Lutzow rear turret.jpg

Template:'s rear gun turret

The three -class ships were armed with a main battery of six 28 cm SK C/28 guns mounted in two triple turrets, one on either end of the superstructure.Template:Sfn The turrets were the Drh LC/28 type and allowed elevation to 40 degrees,Template:Sfn and depression to −8 degrees.Template:Sfn This provided the guns with a maximum range of Template:Convert. They fired a Template:Convert projectile at a muzzle velocity of Template:Convert.Template:Sfn The guns were initially supplied with a total 630 rounds of ammunition, and this was later increased to 720 shells.Template:Sfn

The secondary battery comprised eight 15 cm SK C/28 guns,Template:Sfn each in single MPLC/28 mountings arranged amidships.Template:Sfn These mountings allowed elevation to 35 degrees and depression to −10 degrees, for a range of Template:Convert. They were supplied with a total of 800 rounds of ammunition, though later in their careers this was increased to 1,200 rounds.Template:Sfn These shells weighed Template:Convert and had a muzzle velocity of Template:Convert.Template:Sfn

It had been intended to equip the -class ships with a heavy anti-aircraft battery of two dual 8.8 cm SK C/25 guns, but this gun proved to be unsatisfactory and its replacement was not ready in time. Hence received three obsolete 8.8 cm SK L/45 anti-aircraft guns in single mounts. These were replaced in 1935 with six 8.8 cm SK C/31 guns in twin mounts. , which was built later, received the three twin 8.8 cm guns when under construction. Finally was equipped with three twin 10.5 cm L/65 guns. and were rearmed in 1938 and 1940, respectively, with six 10.5 cm L/65 guns.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn For directing the anti-aircraft battery, received two SL-2 director posts which were placed above the bridge and abaft the stack.Template:Sfn On and the place abaft the stack was taken by the catapult so these ship received three SL-4, one above the bridge and on port and starboard of the stack.Template:Sfn

The middle and light anti-aircraft defense consisted of four twin 3.7 cm SK C/30 guns and ten single 2 cm Flak guns, but due to shortages, received her full middle and light armament only during her 1940 refit. During the war, the middle and light armament was continuously reinforced. In August 1944 the two forward pair of 3.7 cm guns on were changed for single Bofors 40 mm L/60 guns, and an additional four singe 40 mm guns were installed as well. Only two single 2 cm guns remained, the others were changed for six twins and three quadruples, totaling twenty-eight 2 cm guns had been rearmed by 1945 with six [[Bofors 40 mm Automatic Gun L/60|Template:Convert]] guns, eight 3.7 cm guns, and thirty-three 2 cm guns.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

The ships were also equipped with eight torpedo tubes placed in two quadruple launchers mounted on their stern.Template:Sfn was completed with Template:Convert torpedo tubes, but immediately after completion these were changed to Template:Cvt. The two other ships received the larger weapons during construction. The torpedo tubes were covered with a protective shield against the gun blast of the aft main guns.Template:Sfn

Aircraft

was built without a catapult. During a refit between November 1935 and 11 January 1936, a catapult was installed between the foretop and funnel. A Heinkel He 60 was carried on the catapult and abaft the funnel fittings were installed to provide capacity to carry a second aircraft. and , which had a much larger tower mast instead of a foretop, had their catapult installed abaft the funnel.Template:Sfn In 1939, the He 60 was replaced with one Arado Ar 196.Template:Sfn

Armor

The ships' main armored belt was Template:Convert thick amidships and reduced to Template:Convert on either end of the central citadel. The bow and stern were unarmored at the waterline. This belt was inclined to increase its protective qualities and supplemented by a Template:Convert longitudinal splinter bulkhead. The upper edge of the belt on and was at the level of the armored deck. On , it was extended one deck higher.Template:Sfn Template:'s underwater protection consisted of a Template:Convert thick torpedo bulkhead; Template:'s and Template:'s bulkheads were reduced to Template:Convert. had a Template:Convert thick upper deck and a main armored deck that ranged in thickness from 18–40 mm. and had Template:Convert main decks and armored decks that ranged in thickness from 17–45 mm. The armored deck in and did not extend over the entire width of the ship due to weight; this matter was rectified in . Likewise, the torpedo bulkheads for and stopped at the inside of the double-bottom but in extended to the outer hull.Template:Sfn The ships' forward conning tower had Template:Convert thick sides with a Template:Cvt thick roof, while the aft conning tower was less well protected, with 50 mm thick sides and a Template:Convert thick roof. The main battery turrets had Template:Convert thick faces and Template:Convert thick sides. Their roofs ranged in thickness from Template:Convert. The 15 cm guns were armored with Template:Convert gun shields for splinter protection.Template:Sfn and had some improvements in armor thickness. The barbettes, 100 mm thick in , became 125 mm for the two sisters. had the belt somewhat improved, and had a much more improved 100 mm belt, instead of 50–80 mm. The armored deck was improved as well, and some places had up to 70 mm thickness.Template:Sfn

Classification

The initially classified the ships as "" (armored ships), but in February 1940 it reclassified the two survivors of the class as heavy cruisers.Template:Sfn Due to their heavy armament of six 28 cm (11 in) guns, high speed and long cruising range, the class was more capable of high seas operation than the old pre-dreadnought battleships they replaced;Template:Sfn for this reason, they were referred to as "pocket battleships", particularly in the British press. In 1938 Jane's Fighting Ships stated the -class "[a]re officially rated as 'Armoured Ships' () and popularly referred to as 'Pocket Battleships'. Actually, they are equivalent to armoured cruisers of an exceptionally powerful type."Template:Sfn

Construction

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-11704, Stapellauf des Panzerkreuzers "Deutschland".jpg

at her launching

was laid down at the Deutsche Werke shipyard in Kiel on 5 February 1929,Template:Sfn under the contract name " A", as a replacement for the old battleship . Work began under construction number 219.Template:Sfn The ship was launched on 19 May 1931; at her launching, she was christened by German Chancellor Heinrich Brüning. The ship accidentally started sliding down the slipway while Brüning was giving his christening speech.Template:Sfn After the completion of fitting out work, initial sea trials began in November 1932.Template:Sfn The ship was commissioned into the on 1 April 1933.Template:Sfn

Serious political opposition to the ships continued after the authorization for , and a political crisis over the second ship, , was averted only after the Social Democrats abstained from voting. As a result of the opposition, " B" was not authorized until 1931.Template:Sfn A replacement for the old battleship Template:SMS, her keel was laid on 25 June 1931 at the shipyard in Wilhelmshaven,Template:Sfn under construction number 123.Template:Sfn The ship was launched on 1 April 1933; at her launching, she was christened by Marianne Besserer, the daughter of Admiral Reinhard Scheer, after whom the ship was named.Template:Sfn She was completed slightly over a year and a half later on 12 November 1934, the day she was commissioned into the German fleet.Template:Sfn

, the third and final member of the class, was also ordered by the from the shipyard in Wilhelmshaven. She was ordered under the contract name " C" to replace the battleship Template:SMS.Template:Sfn Her keel was laid on 1 October 1932,Template:Sfn under construction number 125.Template:Sfn The ship was launched on 30 June 1934; at her launching, she was christened by the daughter of Admiral Maximilian von Spee, after whom the ship was named.Template:Sfn She was completed slightly over a year and a half later on 6 January 1936, the day she was commissioned into the German fleet.Template:Sfn

Possible conversion

After Hitler had given the order in late January 1943 for the two remaining ships to be scrapped, the possibility of instead converting them into aircraft carriers was discussed. The hulls would have been lengthened by approximately Template:Convert, which would have used 2,000 tons of steel and employed 400 workmen. Conversion time was estimated at two years. Their flight deck would have been only Template:Convert shorter than that of the Template:Sclass heavy cruiser , which had been prepared for conversion in 1942, and they would still have attained 28 knots. This plan was not pursued.Template:Sfn

Ships in class

Construction data

Ship	Namesake	Builder	Laid down	Launched	Commissioned	Fate
Template:Efn	Germany	, Kiel	5 February 1929	19 May 1931	1 April 1933	Sunk in weapons tests, July 1947
	Reinhard Scheer	, Wilhelmshaven	25 June 1931	1 April 1933	12 November 1934	Sunk following air attack, 9 April 1945
	Maximilian von Spee		1 October 1932	30 June 1934	6 January 1936	Scuttled following surface action, 17 December 1939

Deutschland

File:Panzerschiff Deutschland in 1936.jpg

Deutschland in 1936

saw significant action with the , including several non-intervention patrols, during which she was attacked by Republican bombers.Template:Sfn At the outbreak of World War II, she was cruising the North Atlantic, prepared to attack Allied merchant traffic. Bad weather hampered her efforts, and she sank or captured only three vessels before returning to Germany, after which she was renamed .Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn She then participated in Operation Weserübung, the invasion of Norway. Damaged at the Battle of Drøbak Sound, she was recalled to Germany for repairs. While en route, she was torpedoed by a British submarine and seriously damaged.Template:Sfn

Repairs were completed by March 1941, and in June steamed to Norway. While en route, she was torpedoed by a British bomber, necessitating significant repairs that lasted until May 1942. She returned to Norway to join the forces arrayed against Allied shipping to the Soviet Union. She ran aground during a planned attack on convoy PQ 17, which necessitated another return to Germany for repairs. She next saw action at the Battle of the Barents Sea with the heavy cruiser , which ended with a failure to destroy the convoy JW 51B. Engine problems forced a series of repairs culminating in a complete overhaul at the end of 1943, after which the ship remained in the Baltic.Template:Sfn Sunk in the Kaiserfahrt in April 1945 by Royal Air Force (RAF) bombers,Template:Sfn was used as a gun battery to support German troops fighting the Soviet Army until 4 May 1945, when she was disabled by her crew.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Raised by the Soviet Navy in 1947, she was reportedly broken up for scrap over the next two years, according to Western works that did not have access to Soviet documents at the time.Template:Sfn The historian Hans Georg Prager examined the former Soviet archives in the early 2000s, and discovered that actually had been sunk in weapons tests in July 1947.Template:Sfn

Admiral Scheer

File:Bundesarchiv DVM 10 Bild-23-63-64, Panzerschiff "Admiral Scheer".jpg

in 1934

saw heavy service with the German Navy, including several deployments to Spain during the Spanish Civil War, to participate in non-intervention patrols. While off Spain, she bombarded the port of Almería following the Republican attack on her sister .Template:Sfn At the outbreak of World War II, she remained in port for a periodic refit.Template:Sfn Her first operation during World War II was a commerce raiding operation into the southern Atlantic Ocean that started in late October 1940. While on the operation, she also made a brief foray into the Indian Ocean.Template:Sfn During the raiding mission, she sank Template:GRT of shipping,Template:Sfn making her the most successful capital ship surface raider of the war.Template:Sfn

Following her return to Germany, she was deployed to northern Norway to interdict shipping to the Soviet Union. She was part of the abortive attack on Convoy PQ 17 with the battleship ; the operation was broken off after surprise was lost. She also conducted Operation Wunderland, a sortie into the Kara Sea.Template:Sfn After returning to Germany at the end of 1942, the ship served as a training ship until the end of 1944, when she was used to support ground operations against the Soviet Army. She was sunk by British bombers on 9 April 1945 and partially scrapped; the remainder of the wreck lies buried beneath a quay.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Admiral Graf Spee

File:Bundesarchiv DVM 10 Bild-23-63-06, Panzerschiff "Admiral Graf Spee".jpg

in 1936

conducted extensive training in the Baltic and Atlantic before participating in five non-intervention patrols during the Spanish Civil War in 1936–1938. She also represented Germany during the Coronation Review for King George VI in May 1937.Template:Sfn was deployed to the South Atlantic in the weeks before the outbreak of World War II, to be positioned in merchant sea lanes once war was declared.Template:Sfn Between September and December 1939, the ship sank nine ships totaling Template:GRT;Template:Sfn in response, the British and French navies formed several hunter-killer groups to track her down. These forces included four aircraft carriers, two battleships, and one battlecruiser.Template:Sfn

operated in concert with the supply ship .Template:Sfn was eventually confronted by three British cruisers off Uruguay at the Battle of the River Plate on 13 December 1939. She inflicted heavy damage on the British ships, but suffered damage as well, and was forced to put into port at Montevideo.Template:Sfn Convinced by false reports of superior British naval forces approaching his ship and the poor state of his own engines, Hans Langsdorff, the commander of the ship, ordered the vessel to be scuttled. Langsdorff committed suicide three days after the scuttling. The ship was partially broken up in situ, though part of the ship remains visible above the surface of the water.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

See also

• Design B-65 cruiser - Japanese proposed counterpart
• Template:Sclass - US counterpart