Mendocino County, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Mendocino County, CA)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Use American English Template:Use mdy dates Script error: No such module "Settlement short description".Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for conflicting parameters".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.

Mendocino County (Template:IPAc-en; Mendocino, Spanish for "of Mendoza")[1] is a county located on the North Coast of the U.S. state of California. As of the 2020 United States census, the population was 91,601.[2] The county seat is Ukiah.[3]

Mendocino County consists wholly of the Ukiah, California Micropolitan Statistical Area (μSA) for the purposes of the U.S. Census Bureau. It is located approximately equidistant from the San Francisco Bay Area and California/Oregon border, separated from the Sacramento Valley to the east by the California Coast Ranges. While smaller areas of redwood forest are found farther south, it is the southernmost California county to be included in the World Wildlife Fund's Pacific temperate rainforests ecoregion, the largest temperate rainforest ecoregion on Earth.[4]

The county is noted for its distinctive Pacific Ocean coastline, its location along California's "Lost Coast", redwood forests, wine production, microbrews, and liberal views about the use of cannabis and support for its legalization. In 2009, it was estimated that roughly one-third of the economy was based on the cultivation of marijuana.[5]

Mendocino is one of three Northern California counties to make up the "Emerald Triangle", along with Humboldt and Trinity counties.

History

File:AntonioMendoza (cropped).jpg
Antonio de Mendoza, the namesake of Mendocino County.

Mendocino County was one of the original counties of California, created in 1850 at the time of statehood. Due to an initially minor settler American population, it did not have a separate government until 1859 and was under the administration of Sonoma County prior to that.[6] Some of the county's land was given to Sonoma County between 1850 and 1860.[7]

The county derives its name from Cape Mendocino (most of which is actually located in adjacent Humboldt County), which was probably named in honor of either Antonio de Mendoza, Viceroy of New Spain, 1535–1542 (who sent the Juan Rodríguez Cabrillo Expedition to this coast in 1542),[8] or Lorenzo Suárez de Mendoza, Viceroy from 1580 to 1583. Mendocino is the adjectival form of the family name of Mendoza.[6]

Neither Spanish nor Mexican influence extended into Mendocino County beyond the establishment of two Mexican land grants in southern Mendocino County: Rancho Sanel in Hopland, in 1844 and Rancho Yokaya that forms the majority of the Ukiah Valley, in 1845.[6][8]

In the 19th century, despite the establishment of the Mendocino Indian Reservation and Nome Cult Farm in 1856, the county witnessed many of the most serious atrocities in the extermination of the Californian Native American tribes who originally lived in the area, like the Yuki, the Pomo, the Cahto, and the Wintun. The systematic occupation of their lands, the reduction of many of their members into slavery and the raids against their settlements led to the Mendocino War in 1859, where hundreds of Indians were killed. Establishment of the Round Valley Indian Reservation on March 30, 1870, did not prevent the segregation that continued well into the 20th century. Other tribes from the Sierra Nevada mountains were also relocated to the Round Valley Indian Reservation during the "California Trail Of Tears", where the Natives were forced to march in bad conditions to their new home in Round Valley.[9] Many of these tribes thrown together were not on good terms with the other tribes they were forced to live with on the reservation, resulting in tensions still evident today.

Boundary dispute with Trinity County

In the first half of the 1850's the California State Legislature established that the boundaries of Mendocino and Trinity counties was the 40th parallel north. Both county boards of supervisors hired the surveyor W.H. Fauntleroy to survey the parallel, which he completed on October 30, 1872. The accuracy of the boundary was doubtful, and by 1891 the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors requested the California surveyor-general to survey the line and establish the boundary between the two counties. The new line, as surveyed by Sam H. Rice and approved by the California Attorney General on December 18, 1891, was found to be two miles north of the common boundary surveyed by Fauntleroy, thereby resulting in Trinity County exercising jurisdiction two miles south of the 40th parallel north. Between 1891 and 1907, both counties claimed that the two-mile-wide strip of land belonged to themselves and not the other, with both counties attempting to levy and collect property taxes on land in the strip. In 1907, Trinity County sued Mendocino County in a Tehama County court to settle the dispute. The trial court in Tehama County ruled in favor of Trinity County, even though the land was situated south of the 40th parallel and state law stated that lands south of that parallel belonged to Mendocino County. The appellate court upheld the ruling of the trial court since Section 10 of the special act of March 30, 1872 (Stats. 1871-2, p. 766), which concerned this boundary and was the act under which Fauntleroy acted under, authorized the survey of the theretofore unknown location of the 40th parallel north, stated that "the lines run out, marked and defined as required by this act are hereby declared to be the true boundary lines of the counties named herein", thereby making the law in the political code which defined the boundary as the 40th parallel north only a suggestion and not a fact.[10] The legislature subsequently affirmed this decision, with the modern statute defining the borders of the two counties referencing the survey of Fauntleroy as being the boundary between the two counties instead of the 40th parallel north.[11]

Geography

File:Mendocino vineyard.jpg
A vineyard in Mendocino County

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the county has a total area of Script error: No such module "convert"., of which Script error: No such module "convert". is land and Script error: No such module "convert". (9.6%) is water.[12]

Adjacent counties

Rivers

File:Fort Bragg California aerial view.jpg
Aerial view of the mouth of the Noyo River on the Pacific Ocean at Fort Bragg

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

Beaches

File:Beach-Elk.jpg
A beach near Elk

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

National and state protected areas

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

Flora and fauna

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Demographics

<templatestyles src="US Census population/styles.css"/>

Historical population
CensusPop.Template:Sronly
185055
18603,967Script error: No such module "String".%
18707,545Script error: No such module "String".%
188012,800Script error: No such module "String".%
189017,612Script error: No such module "String".%
190020,465Script error: No such module "String".%
191023,929Script error: No such module "String".%
192024,116Script error: No such module "String".%
193023,505Script error: No such module "String".%
194027,864Script error: No such module "String".%
195040,854Script error: No such module "String".%
196051,059Script error: No such module "String".%
197051,101Script error: No such module "String".%
198066,738Script error: No such module "String".%
199080,345Script error: No such module "String".%
200086,265Script error: No such module "String".%
201087,841Script error: No such module "String".%
202091,601Script error: No such module "String".%
2024 (est.)89,175[13]Script error: No such module "String".%
U.S. Decennial Census[14]
1790–1960[15] 1900–1990[16]
1990–2000[17] 2010[18] 2020[19]

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

2020 census

As of the 2020 census, the county had a population of 91,601. The median age was 43.2 years. 20.6% of residents were under the age of 18 and 23.1% of residents were 65 years of age or older. For every 100 females there were 100.2 males, and for every 100 females age 18 and over there were 99.2 males age 18 and over.[20]

The racial makeup of the county was 65.0% White, 0.7% Black or African American, 5.1% American Indian and Alaska Native, 2.0% Asian, 0.2% Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, 13.9% from some other race, and 13.2% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino residents of any race comprised 26.1% of the population.[21]

51.5% of residents lived in urban areas, while 48.5% lived in rural areas.[22]

There were 36,280 households in the county, of which 27.7% had children under the age of 18 living with them and 28.0% had a female householder with no spouse or partner present. About 30.1% of all households were made up of individuals and 15.9% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older.[20]

There were 41,370 housing units, of which 12.3% were vacant. Among occupied housing units, 59.3% were owner-occupied and 40.7% were renter-occupied. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.3% and the rental vacancy rate was 3.8%.[20]

Racial and ethnic composition

Mendocino County, California – Racial and ethnic composition
<templatestyles src="Nobold/styles.css"/>Note: the US Census treats Hispanic/Latino as an ethnic category. This table excludes Latinos from the racial categories and assigns them to a separate category. Hispanics/Latinos may be of any race.
Race / Ethnicity (NH = Non-Hispanic) Pop 1980[23] Pop 1990[24] Pop 2000[25] Pop 2010[18] Pop 2020[19] % 1980 % 1990 % 2000 % 2010 % 2020
White alone (NH) 59,740 67,775 64,581 60,249 56,205 89.51% 84.35% 74.86% 68.59% 61.36%
Black or African American alone (NH) 334 482 471 544 607 0.50% 0.60% 0.55% 0.62% 0.66%
Native American or Alaska Native alone (NH) 2,375 2,900 3,438 3,486 3,528 3.56% 3.61% 3.99% 3.97% 3.85%
Asian alone (NH) 455 866 1,006 1,402 1,730 0.68% 1.08% 1.17% 1.60% 1.89%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander alone (NH) x [26] x [27] 107 92 110 0.12% 0.10% 0.12% 0.10% 0.12%
Other race alone (NH) 146 74 152 131 592 0.22% 0.09% 0.18% 0.15% 0.65%
Mixed race or Multiracial (NH) x [28] x [29] 2,297 2,432 4,896 x x 2.66% 2.77% 5.34%
Hispanic or Latino (any race) 3,688 8,248 14,213 19,505 23,933 5.53% 10.27% 16.48% 22.20% 26.13%
Total 66,738 80,345 86,265 87,841 91,601 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

2010 census

The 2010 United States census reported that Mendocino County had a population of 87,841. The racial makeup of Mendocino County was 67,218 (76.5%) White, 622 (0.7%) African American, 4,277 (4.9%) Native American, 1,450 (1.7%) Asian, 119 (0.1%) Pacific Islander, 10,185 (11.6%) from other races, and 3,970 (4.5%) from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 19,505 persons (22.2%).[30]

2000 census

As of the census[31] of 2000, there were 86,265 people, 33,266 households, and 21,855 families residing in the county. The population density was Script error: No such module "convert".. There were 36,937 housing units at an average density of Script error: No such module "convert".. The racial makeup of the county was 80.8% White, 0.6% Black or African American, 4.8% Native American, 1.2% Asian, 0.2% Pacific Islander, 8.6% from other races, and 3.9% from two or more races. 16.5% of the population were Hispanic or Latino of any race. 12.2% were of German, 10.8% English, 8.6% Irish, 6.1% Italian and 5.6% American ancestry according to Census 2000. 84.4% spoke English and 13.2% Spanish as their first language.

There were 33,266 households, out of which 31.4% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 48.9% were married couples living together, 11.7% had a female householder with no husband present, and 34.3% were non-families. 27.0% of all households were made up of individuals, and 10.4% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.53 and the average family size was 3.04.

In the county, the population was spread out, with 25.5% under the age of 18, 8.1% from 18 to 24, 25.6% from 25 to 44, 27.1% from 45 to 64, and 13.6% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 39 years. For every 100 females there were 98.9 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 97.1 males.

The median income for a household in the county was $35,996, and the median income for a family was $42,168. Males had a median income of $33,128 versus $23,774 for females. The per capita income for the county was $19,443. About 10.9% of families and 15.9% of the population were below the poverty line, including 21.5% of those under age 18 and 7.7% of those age 65 or over.

Government

As of 2025, the District Attorney of Mendocino County is C. David Eyster,[32] the elected Sheriff-Coroner is Matthew C. Kendall [33] and the chief executive officer is Darcie Antle.[34]

Mendocino County is legislatively governed by a board of five supervisors, each with a separate district.[35] The first district is represented by Madeline Cline,[36] and serves the central-eastern region of the county, including Potter Valley, Redwood Valley, Calpella, Talmage, and Hopland. The second district, represented by Maureen Mulheren [36], who previously served on the Ukiah City Council, serves Ukiah. The third district, in the northeastern quadrant of the county from Willits north to Laytonville and Covelo, is represented by John Haschak.[37] The fourth district covers the northwestern quadrant of the county, including the coast from Caspar northwards through Fort Bragg and over to Leggett; its supervisor is Bernie Norvell,[36] who previously served as the Mayor of Fort Bragg. The supervisor for the fifth district is Ted Williams;[37] his district covers the southern portion of the county, including the coast from Mendocino to Gualala, the Anderson Valley, and the western outskirts of Ukiah.

Politics

Voter registration statistics

Cities by population and voter registration

Overview

Mendocino is a strongly Democratic county in presidential and congressional elections.[40] The last Republican to win a majority in the county was Californian Ronald Reagan in 1984. However, in the 2016 election, Mendocino County gave Hillary Clinton a reduced margin of victory of any Democrat since Al Gore (though support for third-party candidates more than doubled from 2012). In 2020 the county was won by Joe Biden with an increased margin of victory from the previous election.

Template:PresHead Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresRow Template:PresFoot

Federally, Mendocino County is in Template:Representative.[41]

In the state legislature Mendocino is in Template:Representative,[42] and Template:Representative.[43]

As of February 2025, the California Secretary of State reports that Mendocino County has 53,659 registered voters. Of those, 25,192 (46.9%) are registered Democratic; 12,544 (23.4%) are registered Republican; 4,788 (8.1%) are registered with other political parties, and 11,145 (20.8%) declined to state a political party.

In 2000, Mendocino County voters approved Measure G, which calls for the decriminalization of marijuana when used and cultivated for personal use.[44] Measure G passed with a 58% majority vote, making it the first county in the United States to declare prosecution of small-scale marijuana offenses the "lowest priority" for local law enforcement. Measure G does not protect individuals who cultivate, transport or possess marijuana for sale. However, Measure G was passed at the local government level affecting only Mendocino County, and therefore does not affect existing state or federal laws. The city of Berkeley has had a similar law (known as the Berkeley Marijuana Initiative II) since 1979 which has generally been found to be unenforceable.[45]

In 2008, the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors placed Measure B on the June 3 county-wide ballot. After three months of hard-fought campaigning and national attention, voters narrowly approved "B", which repealed the provisions of 2000's Measure G.[46][47] However, opponents of Measure B intend to continue the challenge in court, as the wording of Measure B relies heavily on S.B. 420's state limitations which were recently ruled unconstitutional by the California supreme court. On July 3, the Sheriff and District Attorneys offices announced that they would not be enforcing the new regulations for the time being, citing pending legal challenges and conflicts with existing state law.[48]

In April 2009, Sheriff Tom Allman issued his department's medical marijuana enforcement policy, which includes the provisions of Measure B and also cites the California Supreme Court Ruling narrowly defining "caregiver" in the state's medical marijuana law.[49]

In 2004, Measure H was passed in Mendocino County with a 56% majority, making it the first county in the United States to ban the production and cultivation of genetically modified organisms.[50]

On November 4, 2008, Mendocino County voted 63.1% against Proposition 8 which amended the California Constitution to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman.[51]

Crime

The following table includes the number of incidents reported and the rate per 1,000 persons for each type of offense.

Cities by population and crime rates

A coroner's jury ruled that the 2018 Hart family crash in Mendocino County was deliberate.[55]

Media

Mendocino County is considered part of the San Francisco Bay Area television market, and primarily receives the major Bay Area TV stations.

The county is also served by local and regional newspapers as well as a community radio stations. Community radio stations include KZYX, operating out of Philo, and KLLG, operating out of the Little Lake Grange in Willits. The Humboldt County-based KMUD is also receivable in large parts of the county. Local independent newspapers include the online news service The Mendocino Voice,[56] and The Laytonville Observer, the Anderson Valley Advertiser,[57] the Willits Weekly[58] and the Independent Coast Observer. Four formerly independent newspapers are now owned by the national conglomerate media company Digital First Media; they are: The Ukiah Daily Journal, The Mendocino Beacon, the Willits News, and The Fort Bragg Advocate. These four papers have seen a precipitous decline in the size of editorial staff and in coverage over the past several years, in keeping with the nationwide tactics of DFM.[59] The Sonoma County-based Press Democrat also covers the area.

Education

Community colleges

Universities

K-12 education

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". School districts include:[60]

Unified:

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

Secondary:

Elementary:

Transportation

File:US 101 Mendocino County.jpg
US 101 in Mendocino County

Major highways

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

Public transportation

Bus

The Mendocino Transit Authority provides local and intercity bus service within Mendocino County. Limited service also connects with transit in Sonoma County. Greyhound Bus Lines currently serves Ukiah.

Amtrak Thruway operates connecting bus service to Ukiah, Willits and Laytonville.[61]

The historic Skunk Train is a heritage railway (that formerly connected Fort Bragg, California with Willits) using steam locomotives.

Airports

For commercial service, passengers in Mendocino County need to go to Eureka, one county to the north in Humboldt County, or to Sonoma County Airport in Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, one county to the south. More comprehensive service is available from Sacramento to the east or San Francisco, well to the south.

Emergency services for the largely unincorporated county are coordinated through Howard Forest Station, a local Cal Fire station just south of Willits.

Communities

File:Ecological Staircase trail.jpg
Ecological staircase trail in Jug Handle State Nature Reserve
File:Islands off mendocino.jpg
Islands off the Mendocino coast
File:Mendocino Grove.jpg
Mendocino Grove

Cities

Census-designated places

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

Unincorporated communities

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Indian reservations

Mendocino County has nine Indian reservations lying within its borders, the fourth-most of any county in the United States (after San Diego County, California; Sandoval County, New Mexico; and Riverside County, California).

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

Population ranking

Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

The population ranking of the following table is based on the 2010 Census and 2020 Census data for Mendocino County.[62][63][64]

county seat

Rank City/Town/etc. Municipal type Population (2010 Census) Population (2020 Census)
1 Ukiah City 16,075 16,607
2 Fort Bragg City 7,273 6,983
3 Willits City 4,888 4,988
4 Brooktrails CDP 3,235 3,632
5 Redwood Valley CDP 1,729 1,843
6 Covelo CDP 1,255 1,394
7 Laytonville CDP 1,227 1,152
9 Talmage CDP 1,130 986
8 Boonville CDP 1,035 1,018
10 Mendocino CDP 894 932
13 Hopland CDP 756 661
11 Calpella CDP 679 799
12 Potter Valley CDP 646 665
14 Cleone CDP 618 622
15 Caspar CDP 509 500
17 Point Arena City 449 460
18 Round Valley Reservation[65] (partially in Trinity County) AIAN 401 456
19 Philo CDP 349 319
16 Anchor Bay CDP 340 473
21 Redwood Valley Rancheria[66] AIAN 238 238
25 Laytonville Rancheria[67] AIAN 212 155
22 Manchester-Point Arena Rancheria[68] AIAN 212 188
24 Manchester CDP 195 159
26 Albion CDP 168 153
29 Sherwood Valley Rancheria[69] AIAN 168 119
23 Comptche CDP 159 167
28 Coyote Valley Reservation[70] AIAN 144 127
27 Pinoleville Rancheria[71] AIAN 129 142
31 Leggett CDP 122 77
30 Little River CDP 117 94
32 Guidiville Rancheria[72] AIAN 52 50
20 Hopland Rancheria (Pomo Indians)[73] AIAN 38 253

In popular culture

"Mendocino" by the Sir Douglas Quintet was released in December 1968 and reached number 27 in the U.S. Billboard Hot 100 by early 1969, spending 15 weeks on the chart.

Kate McGarrigle's song "(Talk to Me of) Mendocino" is one of the songs on the McGarrigles' 1975 debut album; it has been covered by Linda Ronstadt on her 1982 album Get Closer, by English singer-songwriter John Howard on his 2007 EP, and by Bette Midler on her 2014 album It's the Girls.

A song written by Matt Serletic and Bernie Taupin, "Mendocino County Line", which was released in 2002, is about a love that could not last and cites the Mendocino County Line in the chorus.

Many films and movies have been filmed in and around Mendocino County, including Dying Young, The Russians Are Coming, Overboard, The Dunwich Horror, The Karate Kid Part III, Dead & Buried, Forever Young, Same Time Next Year, Racing with the Moon, Pontiac Moon, and The Majestic.

See also

Script error: No such module "Portal".

Notes

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. a b Percentage of registered voters with respect to total population. Percentages of party members with respect to registered voters follow.

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Template:Cite video
  6. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. a b https://archive.org/stream/bub_gb_m8FQAQAAIAAJ/bub_gb_m8FQAQAAIAAJ_djvu.txt Cape Mendocino was named in honor of Antonio de Mendoza, the first Viceroy of New Spain. He was appointed by the emperor, and, arriving in the city of Mexico in 1535, ordered a survey of the coast of California, wherein the cape was discovered. The county was named after the cape. History of Northern California, p. 138.
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Template:If all, [Script error: No such module "If empty". 151 Template:Delink 279], archived from the original on January 11, 2024.Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. included in the Asian category in the 1980 Census
  27. included in the Asian category in the 1990 Census
  28. not an option in the 1980 Census
  29. not an option in the 1990 Census
  30. Template:USCensus2010CA
  31. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  36. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. a b c U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Table B02001. U.S. Census website. Retrieved October 26, 2013.
  39. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p California Secretary of State. February 10, 2025 – Report of Registration, Template:Webarchive. Retrieved October 31, 2013.
  40. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. Template:Cite GovTrack
  42. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  43. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  48. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  51. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  52. a b c d e f g h i j Office of the Attorney General, Department of Justice, State of California. Table 11: Crimes – 2009 Template:Webarchive. Retrieved November 14, 2013.
  53. Only larceny-theft cases involving property over $400 in value are reported as property crimes.
  54. a b c United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Crime in the United States, 2012, Table 8 (California). Retrieved November 14, 2013.
  55. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  56. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  57. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  58. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  59. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  60. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". - Text list
  61. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  62. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  63. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  64. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  65. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  66. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  67. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  68. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  69. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  70. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  71. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  72. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  73. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Further reading

External links

Template:Sister project Template:Wikivoyage

  • Script error: No such module "Official website".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Template:Geographic Location Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:California North Coast Script error: No such module "navbox". Template:Authority control