Line (unit)
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "For". Template:Use dmy dates The line (abbreviated L or l or ‴ or lin.) was a small English unit of length, variously reckoned as <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄10, <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄12, <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄16, or <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄40 of an inch.Template:Efn It was not included among the units authorized as the British Imperial system in 1824.
Size
The line was not recognized by any statute of the English Parliament but was usually understood as <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄4 of a barleycorn,[1] (which itself was recognized by statute as <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄3 of an inch[2]) making it <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄12 of an inch, and <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄144 of a foot. The line was eventually decimalized as <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄10 of an inch, without recourse to barleycorns.Template:Refn
The US button trade uses the same or a similar term but defined as one-fortieth of the US-customary inch (making a button-maker's line equal to Script error: No such module "convert".).[3][4]
In use
Botanists formerly used the units (usually as <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄12 inch) to measure the size of plant parts. Linnaeus's Philosophia botanica (1751) includes the Linea in its summary of units of measurements, defining it as Script error: No such module "Lang". [[[:Template:Lit]]]; Stearns gives its length as Script error: No such module "convert".. Even after metrication, British botanists continued to employ tools with gradations marked as linea (lines); the British line is approximately Script error: No such module "convert". and the Paris line approximately Script error: No such module "convert"..[5]
Entomologists in the UK and other European countries in the 1800s used lines as a unit of measurement for insects, at least for the relatively large mantids and phasmids. Examples include Westwood,[6][7] in the UK, and de Haan[8] in the Netherlands.
Gunsmiths and armament companies also employed the <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄10-inch line (the "decimal line"), in part owing to the importance of the German and Russian arms industries.Template:Sfnp These are now given in terms of millimeters, but the seemingly arbitrary 7.62 mm (0.30 in) caliber was originally understood as a 3-line caliber (as with the 1891 Mosin–Nagant rifle). The Script error: No such module "convert". caliber used by the M2 Browning machine gun was similarly a 5-line caliber.Template:Sfnp
Foreign units
Other similar small units called lines include:
- The Russian Script error: No such module "Lang". (ли́ния), <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄10 of the diuym which had been set precisely equal to an English inch by Peter the GreatTemplate:Sfnp
- The French Script error: No such module "Lang". or "Paris line", <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄12 of the French inch (Template:Langx), 2.256 mm and about 1.06 L.
- The Portuguese Script error: No such module "Lang"., <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄12 of the Portuguese inch or 12 "points" (Script error: No such module "Lang".) or 2.29 mm
- The German Script error: No such module "Lang". was usually <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄12 of the German inch but sometimes also <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄10 German inch
- The Vienna line, <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄12 of a Vienna inch.[9][10]
See also
- English units used prior to 1824
- Imperial units defined by the British Weights and Measures Act 1824
- List of unusual units of measurement
Notes
References
Citations
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Albert Johannsen. "Manual of petrographic methods". p. 623.
- ↑ Karl Wilhelm Naegeli; Simon Schwendener. "The Microscope in Theory and Practice". p. 294.
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Bibliography
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..