Atherton, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Use American English Template:Use mdy dates Template:Main otherScript error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for clobbered parameters".Template:Main other

Atherton (Template:IPAc-en Template:Respell) is an incorporated town in San Mateo County, California, United States. Its population was 6,823 as of July 2023 estimates. The town's zoning regulations permit only one single-family home per acre in new subdivisions, though smaller lots exist from prior zoning laws.[1]

The town has historically been known for its high concentration of wealth.[2][3] Atherton had the highest per capita income among American towns (populations between 2,500 and 9,999) in both 1990 and 2019.[4][5] It regularly ranks as having the highest cost of living in the United States.[6][7] The town had the highest median home prices in the country throughout 2023, at $7.95 million.[8]

History

File:José Darío Argüello.jpg
Californio politician José Darío Argüello; owner of Rancho de las Pulgas from 1795.
Faxon Dean Atherton
Faxon Dean Atherton

The entire area was originally part of the Rancho de las Pulgas. During the 1860s, Atherton was known as Fair Oaks. In 1923, Menlo Park wanted to incorporate its lands to include Fair Oaks, but the Fair Oaks property owners chose to incorporate separately. The name Fair Oaks was already in use, so the property owners decided to rename the town in honor of Faxon Dean Atherton, a former 19th century landowner on the south peninsula.[9]

Lawsuit against the electrification of Caltrain

The town has been involved in lawsuits to block or delay the introduction of California High-Speed Rail.[10][11] Atherton was an early and vocal opponent of the electrification of the U.S. commuter railroad Caltrain, which serves cities in the San Francisco Peninsula and Silicon Valley. Residents opposed electrification and the proposed high-speed rail route because the overhead electrical lines would require tree removal and the town could potentially be divided by the closing of the two grade crossings at Fair Oaks Lane and Watkins Avenue.[12]

In February 2015, shortly after the project received environmental clearance from the state, Atherton sued Caltrain, alleging the agency's environmental impact review was inadequate and that its collaboration with the CHSRA should be further vetted.[13] In July 2015, the suit proceeded after Caltrain's request to the Surface Transportation Board to exempt it from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines was denied. Atherton reiterated its opposition to electrification on the basis that overhead wires would require removing a significant number of heritage trees, and city representatives asserted that "newer, cleaner, more efficient diesel trains" should supplant plans for "century-old catenary electrical line technology." Atherton mayor Rick De Golia was quoted as saying "Caltrain is locked into an old technology and 20th century thinking."[14] After Caltrain issued infrastructure and rolling stock contracts in July 2016, Atherton representatives did not file a temporary restraining order to halt those contracts, preferring to let the suit proceed to a hearing.[15] In September 2016, Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge Barry Goode sided with Caltrain, ruling that the electrification project did not hinge on the high-speed rail project's success, and was thus independent from the latter.[16][17]

Atherton sued CHSRA again in December 2016, stating that using bond money intended for high-speed rail for CalMod was a material change in usage and therefore was unconstitutional because such a change would require voter approval first.[18] In response, the California Legislature allowed the funding to be redirected by passing Assembly Bill No. 1889, which had been championed by Assembly member Kevin Mullin in 2015.[19] Mullin noted "this entire Caltrain corridor is the epicenter of the innovation economy and it's a job creation and economic engine. This electrification project, I would argue, is monumental with regard to dealing with [increased traffic and environmental impacts] effectively and efficiently."[18]

The Caltrain station closed in 2020.[20][21]

Land use and housing

Atherton is the wealthiest city in the United States.[22][5] According to the San Francisco Chronicle, "the town's ascendance stems largely from its single-family zoning, 1-acre-minimum lot sizes, flat land, streamlined permits and changing buyer demographics — which have translated into soaring house sizes and skyrocketing prices."[23] There is no commercial zoning in the town, thus there are no restaurants, shops or grocery stores.[24] Although city codes specify regulations for sidewalk maintenance,[25] many streets do not have sidewalks.[26]

In 2022, the town blocked a proposal to build 131 multifamily housing units in the town in response to strong criticism.[27] Many of the town's residents, including Golden State Warriors player Steph Curry, strongly opposed proposals to permit more housing construction.[28][29] Advocates for the construction of additional homes have criticized Atherton as being a NIMBY town.[24][27] In the same year, California Governor Gavin Newsom singled out Atherton in a speech for its restrictive housing policies.[30] With the passage of SB 9 in 2021, zoning regulations that limit how many units can be built on a property were nullified,[31] but enforcement actions did not begin until 2023.

In February 2023, responding to state legislative deadlines, the Atherton City Council approved a housing plan with 348 mixed-income housing units. Under California law, the units must be built over the next eight years, and the city must reserve 148 units for occupancy by "very low income" or "low income" individuals, 56 units for "moderate income" individuals, and 144 units for "above moderate income" individuals.[32]

In its 2002 plan, Atherton stated a land-use goal to "preserve the Town's character as a scenic, rural, thickly wooded residential area with abundant open space",[33] but its current general plan as of 2024 does not use this language.[34]

Geography

According to the United States Census Bureau, the town has a total area of Template:Convert, of which Template:Convert is land and Template:Convert, comprising 0.63%, is water.

Atherton lies Template:Convert southeast of Redwood City, and Template:Convert northwest of San Jose. The town is considered to be part of the San Francisco metropolitan area.

Demographics

Template:US Census population

2010

At the 2010 census Atherton had a population of 6,914. The population density was Template:Convert. The racial makeup of Atherton was:

  • 5,565 (80.5%) White
  • 911 (13.2%) Asian
  • 216 (3.1%) from two or more races.
  • 95 (1.4%) from other races
  • 75 (1.1%) African American
  • 45 (0.7%) Pacific Islander
  • 7 (0.1%) Native American

There were 268 residents of Hispanic or Latino origin, or of any race (3.9%).[35]

The census reported that 6,529 people (94.4% of the population) lived in households, 385 (5.6%) lived in non-institutionalized group quarters, and no one was institutionalized.

There were 2,330 households, 787 (33.8%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 1,755 (75.3%) were opposite-sex married couples living together, 109 (4.7%) had a female householder with no husband present, 48 (2.1%) had a male householder with no wife present. There were 34 (1.5%) unmarried opposite-sex partnerships, and 15 (0.6%) same-sex married couples or partnerships. 321 households (13.8%) were one person and 178 (7.6%) had someone living alone who was 65 or older. The average household size was 2.80. There were 1,912 families (82.1% of households); the average family size was 3.03.

The age distribution was 1,543 people (22.3%) under the age of 18, 579 people (8.4%) aged 18 to 24, 966 people (14.0%) aged 25 to 44, 2,264 people (32.7%) aged 45 to 64, and 1,562 people (22.6%) who were 65 or older. The median age was 48.2 years. For every 100 females, there were 96.6 males. For every 100 women age 18 and over, there were 95.3 men.

The median household income was in excess of $250,000, the highest of any place in the United States.[36] The per capita income for the town was $128,816. About 2.9% of families and 5.1% of the population were below the poverty line, including 5.6% of those under age 18 and 5.4% of those age 65 or over.

There were 2,530 housing units at an average density of 501.1 per square mile, of the occupied units 2,116 (90.8%) were owner-occupied and 214 (9.2%) were rented. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.6%; the rental vacancy rate was 3.9%. 5,921 people (85.6% of the population) lived in owner-occupied housing units and 608 people (8.8%) lived in rental housing units.

Forbes ranked Atherton as second on its list of America's Most Expensive ZIP Codes in 2010, listing median house price as over $2,000,000.[37]

2020

At the 2020 census, Atherton had a population of 7,193 and 2,252 households, and the homeowner vacancy rate was 0%. The population density was Template:Convert.

There was an average 2.94 people per household, 89.2% of homes were owner occupied and 10.8% were renter occupied. The racial makeup of Atherton was:

  • 5,403 (75%) White
  • 1,655 (23%) Asian
  • 124 (1.7%) African American
  • 18 (0.3%) Native American
  • 107 (1.5%) Pacific Islander
  • 230 (3.2%) from two or more races.

There were 540 residents of Hispanic or Latino origin, or of any race (7.5%). The median age was 49. For every 100 females there were 100.1 men.

The age distribution was 1,472 people (20.5%) under the age of 18, 862 people (5.6%) aged 18 to 24, 932 people (12.9%) aged 25 to 44, 2,123 (29.5%) aged 45–64 and 1,813 people (25.2%) over the age of 65.

Median income for a household was over $250,000. Males had a median income $102,192 versus $53,882 for females. About 1.1% of families and 2.6% of the population were below the poverty line, including 0.5% of those under the age of 18 and 1.1% of those 65 years or over.[38][39]

Property Shark ranked Atherton first for the fourth year in a row as the most expensive ZIP code in the United States in 2022, with the median home price at $7,900,000.[40][41]

Arts and culture

There are a number of active community organizations: the Atherton Heritage Association, the Atherton Arts Committee, the Atherton Tree Committee, the Friends of the Atherton Community Library, the Holbrook-Palmer Park Foundation, the Atherton Dames, the Police Task Force, and the Atherton Civic Interest League. There are also home owners' associations in various neighborhoods. The Menlo Circus Club is a private club with tennis, swimming, stables and a riding ring located within the town.

There are also several tracts of contemporary Eichler homes, most notably in the Lindenwood neighborhood in the northeast part of the town.[42]

The Holbrook-Palmer Estate, was once an active rural estate and gentleman's farm.[43] The Holbrook-Palmer Estate was donated to the city of Atherton in 1958 and now serves as a Template:Convert and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places for the architecture.[43]

The city is served by the Atherton Public Library of the San Mateo County Libraries, a member of the Peninsula Library System.

Government

In the California State Legislature, Atherton is in Template:Representative, and is split between Template:Representative and Template:Representative.[44] In the United States House of Representatives, Atherton is in Template:Representative.[45]

Politics

According to the California Secretary of State, as of March 11, 2022, Atherton has 5,063 registered voters. Of those, 2,192 (43.2%) are registered Democrats, 1,247 (24.6%) are registered Republicans and 1,317 (26%) have declined to state a political party.[46]

Atherton vote
by party in presidential elections[47]
Year Democratic Republican
align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|2024 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|70.6% 2,741 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|27.0% 1,046
align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|2020 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|71.8% 3,194 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|25.8% 1,148
align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|2016 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|66.6% 2,620 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|26.0% 1,024
align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|2012 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|46.6% 1,904 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|51.5% 2,104
align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|2008 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|57.6% 2,501 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|41.1% 1,787
align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|2004 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|48.3% 2,080 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|50.5% 2,178
align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|2000 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|38.4% 1,595 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|58.1% 2,409
align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|1996 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|34.5% 1,424 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|57.9% 2,389
align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|1992 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|32.3% 1,427 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|49.6% 2,191
align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|1988 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|29.4% 1,332 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|69.8% 3,161
align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|1984 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|26.3% 1,015 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|72.6% 2,803
align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|1980 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|15.5% 603 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|69.8% 2,709
align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|1976 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|20.2% 827 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|77.9% 3,185
align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|1972 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|25.1% 1,065 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|71.8% 3,042
align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|1968 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|26.7% 1,037 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|70.2% 2,725
align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|1964 align="center" style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading"|42.0% 1,587 align="center" style="background-color:Template:Republican Party (US)/meta/shading"|58.0% 2,188

Education

Atherton does not operate its own public school system. Instead, its students attend schools in neighboring districts.[48] Encinal, Las Lomitas, and Laurel are elementary schools; Selby Lane serves both elementary and middle grades. Menlo-Atherton is the local public high school. Selby Lane belongs to the Redwood City School District, Menlo-Atherton to the Sequoia Union High School District, Las Lomitas to the Las Lomitas Elementary School District, and Encinal and Laurel to the Menlo Park City School District.[49]

The town also has the private school Sacred Heart which offers elementary through high school, while Menlo School serves middle and high school. Atherton is also home to Menlo College, a private four-year institution.

Notable people

Template:Div col

Template:Div col end

See also

Template:Portal bar

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:Sister project

Template:US county navigation box Template:SF Bay Area Template:Authority control

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. a b Archive of "1990 CPH-L-126. Median Family Income for Places with a Population of 2,500 to 9,999, Ranked Within the United States: 1989", United States Census Bureau. 1990 CPH-L-126F.html Original page
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  43. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead linkTemplate:Cbignore
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. Template:Cite GovTrack
  46. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/prior-elections/statewide-election-results/
  48. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  51. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  52. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  53. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  54. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  55. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  56. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  57. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  58. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  59. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  60. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  61. Template:Cite magazine
  62. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  63. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  64. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  65. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  66. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  67. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  68. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  69. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  70. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  71. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  72. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".