Uniting for Consensus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Revision as of 19:51, 28 May 2025 by imported>Izno (top: clean ref)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Pp-sock Script error: No such module "Unsubst". Template:Unreliable sources Template:Use dmy dates

File:Uniting for Consensus core.png
Uniting for Consensus core members

Uniting for Consensus (UfC), nicknamed the Coffee Club, is a movement that developed in the 1990s in opposition to the possible expansion of permanent seats in the United Nations Security Council. Under the leadership of Italy,[1][2] it aims to counter the bids for permanent seats proposed by G4 nations (Brazil, Germany, India, and Japan) and is calling for a consensus before any decision is reached on the form and size of the United Nations Security Council.

History

Italy, through the ambassador Francesco Paolo Fulci, along with Pakistan, Mexico and Egypt, founded the "Coffee Club" in 1995 .[3] The four countries were united by a rejection of the proposal to increase the number of permanent members of the Security Council, instead desiring to encourage the expansion of non-permanent seats. The founders of the group were soon joined by other countries, including Spain, Argentina, Turkey, and Canada, and in a short time the group came to include about 50 countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America.[3] The thesis of the Uniting for Consensus group is that the increase of permanent seats would further accentuate the disparity between the member countries and result in the extension of a series of privileges with a cascade effect. The new permanent members would in fact benefit from the method of electing, which is particularly advantageous in a number of specific organs of the United Nations System.[4]

During the 59th session of the United Nations General Assembly in 2005, the UfC group — led by the representatives of Canada, Italy, and Pakistan — made a proposal[5] that centred on an enlargement of the number of non-permanent members from ten to twenty. The non-permanent members would be elected by the General Assembly for a two-year term and would be eligible for immediate re-election, subject to the decision of their respective geographical groups.[6] The other members and co-sponsors of the text, entitled "Reform of the Security Council", were listed as Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Malta, Mexico, San Marino, Spain and Turkey.[7] Although the proposal was not accepted, the initiative found broad consensus among member states, including permanent member China.[8]

On 20 April 2009, Italy, acting as representatives of the UfC group, provided a new model of reform,[9] which was presented as a concrete attempt to reach a deal. The document proposed creating a new category of seats, still non-permanent, but elected for an extended duration (3 to 5 years terms) without the possibility of immediate re-election. This new kind of seat would not be allocated to single national countries but rather to regional groups on a rotational basis. As far as traditional categories of seats are concerned, the UfC proposal does not imply any change, but only the introduction of small and medium size states among groups eligible for regular seats. This proposal includes even the question of veto, giving a range of options that goes from abolition to limitation of the application of the veto only to Chapter VII matters.

During the last round, Italy firmly rejected the G4 proposal as well as the African Union one and even denounced the unfair behaviour of G4 countries. According to Italy, the G4 is attempting to exclude the UfC proposal from the floor, “on the basis of a presumed level of support”.[10] Moreover, Italy believes that it has shown flexibility by putting forward a new proposal in April 2009, while the G4 remained tied to its 2005 document.[11] Italy's active role in current discussions started in February 2009 before the beginning of intergovernmental negotiations, when Minister of Foreign Affairs Franco Frattini hosted more than 75 countries to develop a shared path towards a reform of the Security Council.[12] In May 2011, the members states which have participated in the group meeting held in Rome rose to 120.[13][14]

Member States Data

As of 27 March 2023, core members of the Uniting for Consensus group were:[15]

Country UN budget International Trade
(Millions of USD)
2023
GDP (nominal)
(Millions of USD)
2023
GDP (PPP)
(Millions of USD)
2023
Defense budget
(Millions of USD)
Active military Population G8 G20 OECD DAC MIKTA
Script error: No such module "flag". 4.999% 1,150,100 2,198,730 1,846,950 34,500 293,202 60,849,247 Green tickY Green tickY Green tickY Green tickY Red XN
Script error: No such module "flag". 3.207% 1,045,200 1,736,869 1,396,131 34,000 68,250 38,953,100 Green tickY Green tickY Green tickY Green tickY Red XN
Script error: No such module "flag". 3.177% 1,025,200 1,493,513 1,413,468 33,984 128,013 46,163,116 Red XN Red XN Green tickY Green tickY Red XN
Script error: No such module "flag". 2.356% 1,031,200 1,154,784 1,661,640 31,859 267,506 112,336,538 Red XN Green tickY Green tickY Red XN Green tickY
Script error: No such module "flag". 3.160% 1,001,000 1,116,247 1,554,149 30,800 600,000 50,004,441 Red XN Green tickY Green tickY Green tickY Green tickY
Script error: No such module "flag". 0.617% 1,000,800 778,089 1,573,565 32,687 866,576 84,724,269 Red XN Green tickY Green tickY Red XN Green tickY
Script error: No such module "flag". 0.287% 136,300 447,644 716,419 3,179 73,100 46,117,096 Red XN Green tickY Red XN Red XN Red XN
Script error: No such module "flag". 0.144% 92,760 327,626 471,890 10,290 285,220 46,748,000 Red XN Red XN Red XN Red XN Red XN
Script error: No such module "flag". 0.082% 58,000 210,566 488,580 5,160 617,000 180,991,000 Red XN Red XN Red XN Red XN Red XN
Script error: No such module "flag". 0.034% 24,460 40,947 55,020 6,125 155,020 4,301,712 Red XN Red XN Red XN Red XN Red XN
Script error: No such module "flag". 0.017% 9,200 8,896 10,757 58 1,954 417,617 Red XN Red XN Red XN Red XN Red XN
Script error: No such module "flag". 0.003% 6,201 2,048 1,136 10 900 32,404 Red XN Red XN Red XN Red XN Red XN

See also

References

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

External links

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Navbox with collapsible groups