User:Revived
| Template:Ns0
Template:Userbox-level Template:Userbox-level Template:Userbox-level Template:User wikipedia/AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD Template:User wikipedia/RC Patrol Template:User wikipedia/Counter Vandalism Unit Template:User wikipedia/No personal attacks Script error: No such module "userbox".Template:Template other User:Mkdw/OSX Script error: No such module "userbox".Template:Template other User:Menasim/Userboxes/User Google User:The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User Metric User:UBX/Religion Script error: No such module "userbox".Template:Template other Script error: No such module "userbox".Template:Template other Script error: No such module "userbox".Template:Template other User:Feureau/UserBox/ubx-5 |
Hello, and welcome to my user page! I'm a student in Software Engineering at the University of Waterloo in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. In the past, I contributed some content, but these days, I spend most of my time countering vandalism.
I'm fairly interested in mathematics (specifically combinatorial enumeration); however, as my program would suggest, my primary interest is in the application of engineering design principles to the implementation of computer software. (I should mention that I am by no means an expert in either of these fields: I'm just an undergraduate who has many interests!)
Articles I have successfully started
Articles I have worked a fair bit on
Associations
- Harmonious Editing Club
- Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgements About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are In Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They are Deletionist
My philosopy
Perhaps this sums it up: work together! I think that revert and edit warring is counterproductive. You're never going to get Wikipedia to read the way you want, and neither should you. Instead, get things hammered out to something that tells the story accurately.
If you think I've made a mistake, by all means, please tell me! By all means, I'll take a look at it. Just leave a note on my talk page.
Other stuff I stuck here
| This user is a member of the Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia. |