Panzerfaust
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Template:Title lang Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
The Script error: No such module "Lang". (Script error: No such module "IPA"., Template:Lit. Template:Gloss or Template:Gloss,[1] plural: Script error: No such module "Lang".) was a development family of single-shot man-portable anti-tank systems developed by Nazi Germany during World War II. The weapons were the first single-use light anti-tank weapons based on a pre-loaded disposable launch tube, a weapon configuration which is still used today (a contemporary example being the 84mm AT4).
The Script error: No such module "Lang".-design consisted of a light recoilless launcher tube outfitted with a single pre-loaded high-explosive anti-tank warhead protruding from the muzzle. It was an inexpensive, easy-to-use anti-tank weapon for the common infantry man, being issued as a single unit of ammunition meant to be operated by a single soldier. Firing was done from under the arm at an upward angle as the effective firing range was barely beyond that of hand grenades (Template:Convert max). After use the launcher was discarded.
Development of the Script error: No such module "Lang". started in 1942. The initial design was dubbed Script error: No such module "Lang". (Template:Lit. "fist-cartridge") and was smaller than the later designs. Later dubbed Script error: No such module "Lang". ("tank-fist small"), it entered service in 1943, the larger design being named Script error: No such module "Lang". ("tank-fist big") and entering service in mid to late 1944. All types were used by Germany until the end of the war, with the design remaining in use in other countries for a number of years after the war.[2][3]
Development
Script error: No such module "Lang".
The Script error: No such module "Lang". (Template:Lit. "fist cartridge") was the initial development of what eventually became the Script error: No such module "Lang".-family. The Script error: No such module "Lang".-design was much smaller than the later Script error: No such module "Lang".-designs.
Development of the Script error: No such module "Lang". started in the summer of 1942 at the German company Hugo Schneider AG (HASAG) with the development of a smaller prototype called Script error: No such module "Lang". ("little Greta") by a team headed by Doctor Heinrich Langweiler in Leipzig. The basic concept was that of a recoilless gun; in the Script error: No such module "Lang". and the Script error: No such module "Lang"., a propellent charge pushed the warhead out the front of the tube while the blast also exited the rear of the tube, balancing forces, and therefore there was no recoil force for the operator.
The following weapon, the Script error: No such module "Lang"., 30 m ("fist-cartridge small") weighed Template:Convert and a total length of Template:Convert; its projectile had a length of Template:Convert. The Template:Convert diameter of warhead was a shaped charge of Template:Convert of a 50:50 mix of TNT and tri-hexogen. The propellant was of Template:Convert of black powder, the metal launch tube had a length of Template:Convert and a diameter of Template:Convert (early models reportedly Template:Convert). Fitted to the warhead was a wooden shaft with folded stabilizing fins (made of Template:Convert thick spring metal). These bent blades straightened into position by themselves as soon as they left the launch tube. The warhead was accelerated to a speed of Template:Convert, had a range of about Template:Convert and an armour penetration of up to Template:Convert of plain steel.
Soon a crude aiming device similar to the one used by the Script error: No such module "Lang". was added to the design; it was fixed at a range of Template:Convert. Several designations of this weapon were in use, amongst which Script error: No such module "Lang". 1 or Script error: No such module "Lang". 30 Script error: No such module "Lang".; however, it was common to refer to this weapon simply as the Script error: No such module "Lang".. Of the earlier model, 20,000 were ordered and the first 500 Script error: No such module "Lang". were delivered by the manufacturer, HASAG, Werk Schlieben, in August 1943.
Script error: No such module "Lang".
Development began in 1942 on a larger version of the Script error: No such module "Lang".. The resulting weapon was the Script error: No such module "Lang". 30, also known as Script error: No such module "Lang". (Template:Lit. "tank-fist big") and the like, with a total weight of Template:Convert and total length of Template:Convert. The launch tube was made of low-grade steel Template:Convert in diameter, containing a Template:Convert charge of black powder propellant. Along the side of the tube were a simple folding rear sight and a trigger. The edge of the warhead was used as the front sight. The oversize warhead (Template:Convert in diameter) was fitted into the front of the tube by an attached wooden tail stem with metal stabilizing fins.[7]
The warhead weighed Template:Convert and contained Template:Convert of a 50:50 mixture of TNT and hexogen explosives, and had armour penetration of Template:Convert.[8] The Script error: No such module "Lang". often had warnings written in large red letters on the upper rear end of the tube, the words usually being "Script error: No such module "Lang"." ("Beware. Fire jet."). This was to warn soldiers to avoid the backblast.
After firing, the tube was discarded, making the Script error: No such module "Lang". the first disposable anti-tank weapon. The weapon, when correctly fired from the crook of the arm, could penetrate the armour of any armoured fighting vehicle of the period.[9]
Comparison of models
| Designation | Weight | Propellant weight |
Warhead diameter |
Projectile velocity |
Effective range |
Penetration performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Script error: No such module "Lang". 30 Script error: No such module "Lang". 30m |
Template:Convert | Template:Convert | Template:Convert | Template:Convert | Template:Convert | Template:Convert |
| Script error: No such module "Lang". 30 Script error: No such module "Lang". 30m |
Template:Convert | Template:Convert | 149 mm | 30 m/s | 30 m | 200 mm |
| Script error: No such module "Lang". 60 | 6.8 kg | 120–134 g | 149 mm | 45 m/s | 60 m | 200 mm |
| Script error: No such module "Lang". 100 | Template:Convert | Template:Convert | 149 mm | 60 m/s | Template:Convert | Template:Convert |
| Script error: No such module "Lang". 150 | Template:Convert | Template:Convert | Template:Convert | Template:Convert | Template:Convert | Template:Convert |
Combat use
To use the Script error: No such module "Lang"., the soldier removed the safety, tucked the tube under their arm, and aimed by aligning the target, the sight and the top of the warhead. Unlike the original American M1 60 mm bazooka and the Germans' own heavier 88 mm Script error: No such module "Lang". tube-type rocket launchers based on the American ordnance piece, the Script error: No such module "Lang". did not have the usual trigger. It had a pedal-like lever near the projectile that ignited the propellant when squeezed. Because of the weapon's short range, not only enemy tanks and infantry, but also pieces of the exploding vehicle, posed dangers to its operator. Consequently, the use of a Script error: No such module "Lang". required a degree of personal courage.[10][11] The backblast from firing went back around 2 m behind the operator.
When used against tanks, the Script error: No such module "Lang". had an impressive beyond-armour effect. Compared to the bazooka and the Script error: No such module "Lang"., it made a larger hole and produced massive spalling that killed or injured the crew, due to burns and shrapnel, and destroyed equipment. One informal test found that the Script error: No such module "Lang". made an entry hole Template:Convert in diameter, whereas the Script error: No such module "Lang". made an entry hole at least Template:Convert in diameter. By contrast, the bazooka made an entry hole that was only Template:Convert in diameter).[12] Much of that can be attributed not only to the size of the warhead of the Script error: No such module "Lang"., but also its horn-like shape, as opposed to the traditional cone-shaped warheads of rockets used in the bazooka and Script error: No such module "Lang"..Script error: No such module "Unsubst". The design was later copied in the modern-day AT-4 anti-tank weapon, producing the same effect against modern main battle tanks.
Germany
In the Battle of Normandy, only 6% of British tank losses were from Script error: No such module "Lang". fire, despite the close-range combat in the thick bocage landscape. However, the threat from the Script error: No such module "Lang". forced Allied tank forces to wait for infantry support before advancing. The portion of British tanks taken out of action by Script error: No such module "Lang". later rose to 34%, a rise probably explained by the lack of German anti-tank guns late in the war and the increased numbers of Script error: No such module "Lang". that were available to defending German troops.[13]
During urban combat in eastern Germany later in the war, about 70% of tanks destroyed were hit by Script error: No such module "Lang". or Script error: No such module "Lang".s. Soviet and Western Allied tank crews modified their tanks in the field to provide some protection against Panzerfaust attacks. Defensive measures included the use of logs, sandbags, track links, and concrete and wire mesh, along with bed frames with springs (bedsprings), similar to expanded metal-type German tank sideskirts. In practice, about a meter of air gap was required to substantially reduce the penetrating capability of the warhead, so sideskirts and sandbags, along with other improvised armor, were virtually ineffective against both the Panzerschreck and Panzerfaust. Moreover, the added weight from add-on armor overburdened the vehicle's engine, transmission and suspension.[14]
Later on, each Soviet heavy tank (IS) and assault gun (ISU-152) company was assigned a platoon of infantry in urban battles to protect them from infantry-wielded anti-tank weapons, often supported by flamethrowers. That order remained intact even during 1950s, including during the Hungarian Revolution of 1956.[14][15][16]
During the last stages of the war, due to the lack of available weapons, many poorly-trained conscripts, mainly elderly men and teenage Hitler Youth members, were often given a single Script error: No such module "Lang"., plus any type of obsolete pistol or rifle. Some only had a Panzerfaust. That led several German generals and officers to comment sarcastically that the empty launch-tubes could then be used as clubs in hand-to-hand combat.
Other countries
Many Script error: No such module "Lang". were sold to Finland, which urgently needed them, as Finnish forces did not have enough anti-tank weapons that could penetrate heavily armoured Soviet tanks like the T-34 and IS-2. The Finnish experience with the weapon and its adaptability to Finnish needs was mixed, with only 4,000 of 25,000 Script error: No such module "Lang". delivered expended in combat.[17] The manual that came with the weapon upon delivery to the Finns included depictions of where to aim the weapon on the Soviet T-34 and US Sherman tank (which also saw service with Soviet troops from US Lend-Lease-supplied stocks).Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
The Italian Social Republic (RSI) and the Government of National Unity (Hungary) also used the Script error: No such module "Lang".. Several RSI army units became skilled in anti-tank warfare and the Hungarians themselves used the Script error: No such module "Lang". extensively, especially during the Siege of Budapest. During this brutal siege, an arms factory, the Hungarian Manfred Weiss Steel and Metal Works, located on Csepel Island (within the city) kept up production of various light armaments and ammunition, Script error: No such module "Lang". included, all the way until the very last moment, when attacking Soviet troops seized the factory by the first days of 1945.
The US 82nd Airborne Division captured some Script error: No such module "Lang". in the Allied invasion of Sicily and later during the fighting in Normandy. Finding them more effective than their own bazookas, they held onto them and used them during the later stages of the French Campaign, even dropping with them into the Netherlands during Operation Market Garden. They captured an ammunition dump of Script error: No such module "Lang". near Nijmegen and used them through the Ardennes Offensive toward the end of the war.[18]
The Soviet Red Army only incidentally used captured Script error: No such module "Lang". in 1944, but from the beginning of 1945, many became available and were actively used during the Soviet offensives of 1945, mostly in street fighting against buildings and protective covers.[19] In February 1945, such use of captured Script error: No such module "Lang". was recommended in a directive by Marshal Georgy Zhukov.[19] Similarly, they were used by the Polish People's Army.[19] After the war, some 4,000 Script error: No such module "Lang". were adopted by the Polish Army in 1949, which designated them as PG-49.[19]
Plans and technical materials on the Panzerfaust were supplied to the Empire of Japan to assist with their development of an effective anti-tank weapon. However, the Japanese went with a different design, the Type 4, loosely based upon the American bazooka. Examples of the American weapon were captured by the Japanese at Leyte in 1944.[20]
Variants
- Script error: No such module "Lang". 30 Script error: No such module "Lang". ("small") or Script error: No such module "Lang".
- This was the original version, first delivered in August 1943 with a total weight of Template:Convert and overall length of Template:Convert. The "30" was indicative of the nominal maximum range of Template:Convert. It had a Template:Convert diameter tube containing Template:Convert of black powder propellant launching a Template:Convert warhead carrying Template:Convert of explosive. The projectile traveled at just Template:Convert per second and could penetrate Template:Convert of armour.[7]
- Script error: No such module "Lang". 30
- An improved version also appearing in August 1943. This version had a larger warhead for improved armour penetration, Template:Convert of steel and Template:Convert of armoured steel, but the same range of 30 meters. It has an explosive charge of Template:Convert of explosive material. Its barrel has a caliber of Template:Convert and a length of Template:Convert. It has a weight of Template:Convert and a muzzle velocity of Template:Convert.[21]
- Script error: No such module "Lang". 60
- This was the most common version, and was completed in early 1944. However, it did not reach full production until September 1944, when 400,000 were to be produced each month.[22] It had a much more practical range of Template:Convert, although with a muzzle velocity of only Template:Convert per second it would take 1.3 seconds for the warhead to reach a tank at that range. To achieve the higher velocity, the tube diameter was increased to Template:Convert and Template:Convert of propellant used while being a total length of Template:Convert. It also had an improved flip-up rear sight and trigger mechanism. The weapon now weighed Template:Convert. It could defeat Template:Convert of armour.
- Script error: No such module "Lang". 100
- This was the final version produced in quantity, and was completed in September 1944. However, it did not reach full production until November 1944.[22] It had a nominal maximum range of Template:Convert. Template:Convert of propellant launched the warhead at Template:Convert per second from a Template:Convert diameter tube. The sight had holes for 30, 60, Template:Convert, and had luminous paint in them to make counting up to the correct one easier in the dark. This version weighed Template:Convert and could penetrate Template:Convert of armour.
- Script error: No such module "Lang". 150
- A major redesign of the Script error: No such module "Lang"., the Script error: No such module "Lang". 150 featured a new pointed warhead (with a diameter of 105 mm compared to the 140 mm warhead of the Script error: No such module "Lang". 30/60/100 series) with increased armour penetration and two-stage propellant ignition which gave a higher velocity of Template:Convert per second. A fragmentation sleeve was developed for the Script error: No such module "Lang". 150 to increase its lethality against infantry. The projectile had a delay pellet to the base detonating primer which meant that the projectile exploded after three seconds if it didn't hit its target or a hard surface. This was meant to eliminate duds and also allowed for air bursts to be achieved when combined with the fragmentation sleeve. Production the Script error: No such module "Lang". 150 started in February 1945 and continued until May of that year when the facility in Döbeln, Saxony producing the Script error: No such module "Lang". 150 was captured by the Soviets. Although 100,000 were produced, none were issued to field units beyond limited troop trials. No known examples of the Script error: No such module "Lang". 150 survived the end of the war.[23] A further development of the Panzerfaust 150 was meant to make it a reloadable weapon, capable of firing ten shots before the black powder fouling built up to the point that the weapon needed to be inspected and cleaned. This development was to be completed in May 1945, with production of the improved Script error: No such module "Lang". 150 scheduled to commence in the summer of that year. "The reloadable Pzf 150 might have received a new designation if it had been produced."[24]
- Script error: No such module "Lang". 250
- The last development of the Script error: No such module "Lang". series was the Script error: No such module "Lang". 250. Intended to replace the heavier Script error: No such module "Lang". in German service, this design never left the drawing board. It was to use a reloadable tube and featured a pistol grip. The projectile was to be based on the one used by the Script error: No such module "Lang". 150, but the internal propellant charge was to be larger. Projected muzzle velocity was 120–150 m/s.[25] Serial production was scheduled to begin in September 1945. The Soviet RPG-2 anti-tank weapon took some inspiration from the Script error: No such module "Lang". 250 design (it was also a reloadable, recoilless anti-tank weapon with a trigger grip and electrical firing system). Plans for the Script error: No such module "Lang". 250 had fallen into both American and Soviet hands.[26]
Related development
- PAPI
- Argentine-made antitank weapon, similar to the Script error: No such module "Lang".. The acronym stands for proyectil antitanque para infanteria (Spanish for "infantry anti-tank projectile").Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
- Script error: No such module "Lang". m/45 and Script error: No such module "Lang". m/46
- Swedish-made copies of the Script error: No such module "Lang".. The Royal Swedish Army Materiel Administration ordered a copy of the Script error: No such module "Lang". design from Bofors, examples of which were acquired from Finland and the Danish resistance movement. The resulting weapon, a copy of an early model Script error: No such module "Lang"., was designated Script error: No such module "Lang". m/45 and 10,000 were ordered by the Swedish Armed Forces in late 1945. Albeit judged effective against tanks of the day, the muzzle velocity was low and the effective range was only about 70 meters. Script error: No such module "Lang". m/45 was quickly upgraded by replacing the black powder propellant charge with smokeless powder. The resulting weapon, Script error: No such module "Lang". m/46, had an effective range of about 90 meters.[27]
- Script error: No such module "Lang".
- Polish-made copy of the Panzerfaust 100, manufactured in 1951–1952. Despite large-scale orders, a production encountered technological difficulties and only 5000 combat and 940 training Pc-100 were made in 1952, before the Polish Army switched to more modern Soviet RPG-2.[28] It is erroneously known as PT-100 in foreign publications.[28]
Users
- Panzerfaust
- Template:Flagcountry: Known to be first used in 1943[29]
- Template:Flagcountry[30]
- Template:Flagcountry[30]
- Template:Flagcountry[30][31]
- Template:Flagcountry
- Template:Flagcountry: Polish partisans used captured Script error: No such module "Lang". during the war, and then there was some limited use post-war by the new Soviet-installed communist puppet regime's armed forces into the early 1950s under the designation PG-49).[19]
- Template:Flagcountry: The Czech resistance used captured Script error: No such module "Lang". during the Prague uprising.[32]
- Template:Flagcountry[30]
- Template:Flagcountry: The Red Army used captured Script error: No such module "Lang". in 1944 and 1945.[19]
- Template:Flagcountry: U.S. Army troops used captured examples, from Operation Overlord through VE Day[22]
- Template:Flagicon image Democratic Army of Greece: Used captured Script error: No such module "Lang". during the Greek Civil War.[33]
- Derivatives
- Template:Flagcountry: Argentine-made PAPI and possibly Swedish made Script error: No such module "Lang". m/46[34][35]
- Template:Flagcountry: Polish-made copy Pc-100[28]
- Template:Flagcountry: Manufactured and used copies of the Script error: No such module "Lang". in two variants; Script error: No such module "Lang". m/45 and Script error: No such module "Lang". m/46[27]
See also
- List of common World War II infantry weapons
- List of World War II firearms of Germany
- Rocket-propelled grenade
- Template:Lwc
- Template:Lwc
- Template:Lwc
- Template:Lwc
- Template:Lwc
- Script error: No such module "Lang".
- Script error: No such module "Lang".
- Template:Lwc
- Script error: No such module "Lang". anti-tank rifle grenade
References
Notes
Bibliography
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
External links
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ White, Isaac D. United States vs. German Equipment: As Prepared for the Supreme Commander, Allied Expeditionary Force (1997). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. p. 70. Template:ISBN.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ More Than Courage: Sicily, Naples-Foggia, Anzio, Rhineland, Ardennes-Alsace ..., Phil Nordyke, p. 299
- ↑ a b c d e f Perzyk, Bogusław: Niemieckie granatniki przeciwpancerne Panzerfaust w Wojsku Polskim 1944-1955 cz.I in: Poligon 2/2011, pp. 56–62 (in Polish)
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Weapons of World War II by Alexander Ludeke
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Panzerfaust and Panzerschreck by Rottman, Gordon L. Shumate, Johnny, pp. 23-24.
- ↑ Panzerfaust and Panzerschreck by Rottman, Gordon L. Shumate, Johnny, pp. 23.
- ↑ Panzerfaust and Panzerschreck by Rottman, Gordon L. Shumate, Johnny, pp. 24-25.
- ↑ Panzerfaust and Panzerschreck by Rottman, Gordon L. Shumate, Johnny, p. 75.
- ↑ a b Jansson, Henrik in Slagfjädern nr 2-2018 Årgång 100, p.11
- ↑ a b c Perzyk, Bogusław: Panzerfaust w Wojsku Polskim 1944-1955 cz.II. Projekt PC-100 in: Poligon 4/2011, pp. 68–80 (in Polish)
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Julio S. Guzmán, Las Armas Modernas de Infantería, Abril de 1953
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".