Pfizer: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>InternetArchiveBot
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5
fix header
Line 46: Line 46:
'''Pfizer Inc.''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|f|aɪ|z|ər}} {{Respell|FY|zər}})<ref>{{Citation |last=Wells |first=John C. |title=Longman Pronunciation Dictionary |year=2008 |edition=3rd |publisher=[[Longman]] |isbn=9781405881180}}</ref> is an American [[Multinational corporation|multinational]] [[Pharmaceutical industry|pharmaceutical]] and [[biotechnology]] corporation headquartered at [[The Spiral (New York City)|The Spiral]] in [[Manhattan]], New York City. Founded in 1849 in New York by German entrepreneurs [[Charles Pfizer]] (1824–1906) and [[Charles F. Erhart]] (1821–1891), Pfizer is one of the oldest pharmaceutical companies in [[North America]].
'''Pfizer Inc.''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|f|aɪ|z|ər}} {{Respell|FY|zər}})<ref>{{Citation |last=Wells |first=John C. |title=Longman Pronunciation Dictionary |year=2008 |edition=3rd |publisher=[[Longman]] |isbn=9781405881180}}</ref> is an American [[Multinational corporation|multinational]] [[Pharmaceutical industry|pharmaceutical]] and [[biotechnology]] corporation headquartered at [[The Spiral (New York City)|The Spiral]] in [[Manhattan]], New York City. Founded in 1849 in New York by German entrepreneurs [[Charles Pfizer]] (1824–1906) and [[Charles F. Erhart]] (1821–1891), Pfizer is one of the oldest pharmaceutical companies in [[North America]].


Pfizer develops and produces [[medicine]]s and [[vaccine]]s for [[immunology]], [[oncology]], [[cardiology]], [[endocrinology]], and [[neurology]]. The company's largest products by sales are the [[Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine]] ($11 billion in 2023 revenues), [[apixaban]] ($6 billion in 2023 revenues), a [[pneumococcal conjugate vaccine]] ($6 billion in 2023 revenues), [[palbociclib]] ($4 billion in 2023 revenues), and [[tafamidis]] ($3 billion in 2023 revenues).<ref name=10K/> In 2023, 46% of the company's revenues came from the United States, 6% came from Japan, and 48% came from other countries.<ref name=10K>{{cite web |url=https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/78003/000007800324000039/pfe-20231231.htm |title=Pfizer Inc. 2023 Form 10-K Annual Report |publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]] |date=February 22, 2024}}</ref>
Pfizer develops and produces [[medicine]]s and [[vaccine]]s for [[immunology]], [[oncology]], [[cardiology]], [[endocrinology]], and [[neurology]]. The company's largest products by sales are Eliquis ([[apixaban]]) ($7.3 billion in 2024 revenues, 11% of total revenues), Prevnar (a [[pneumococcal conjugate vaccine]]) ($6.4 billion in 2024 revenues, 10% of total revenues), Paxlovid ([[Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir]]) ($5.7 billion in 2024 revenues, 9% of total revenues), Vyndaqel ([[tafamidis]]) ($5.4 billion in 2024 revenues, 8% of total revenues), Comirnaty (the [[Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine]]) ($5.3 billion in 2023 revenues, 8% of total revenues), and Ibrance ([[palbociclib]]) ($4.3 billion in 2024 revenues, 6% of total revenues).<ref name=10K/> In 2024, 61% of the company's revenues came from the United States, 4% came from China, and 35% came from other countries.<ref name=10K>{{cite web |url=https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/78003/000007800324000039/pfe-20231231.htm |title=Pfizer Inc. 2023 Form 10-K Annual Report |publisher=[[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]] |date=February 22, 2024}}</ref>


Pfizer has been a publicly traded company for nearly a century, making its debut on the [[New York Stock Exchange]] in 1942 under the ticker symbol PFE. Since then, its stock has seen ups and downs, influenced by new drug launches, regulatory shifts, and changing market demand for its medicines and vaccines. As a key player in the healthcare industry, Pfizer is part of major stock indices like the [[S&P 100]] and [[S&P 500]], with major institutional investors such as [[The Vanguard Group|Vanguard]] and [[State Street Corporation|State Street]] holding significant stakes.<ref>{{cite web |title=Pfizer, Inc. |url=https://www.home.saxo/products/stocks/popular/pfizer |website=Saxo |access-date=7 April 2025}}</ref><ref name="finance.yahoo.com">{{cite web |title=Pfizer Inc. (PFE) |url=https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/PFE/profile |website=finance.yahoo.com |access-date=10 February 2025}}</ref>
The company is ranked fifth on the [[list of largest biomedical companies by revenue]]. It is ranked the 69th on the [[Fortune 500|''Fortune'' 500]] list.<ref>{{cite web |title=Fortune 500: Pfizer |url=https://fortune.com/company/pfizer/fortune500/ |publisher=[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]}}</ref>
 
Pfizer is one of the top pharmaceutical companies in the United States, with a [[market capitalization]] of $150.35 billion as of December 31, 2024. It ranks fifth among U.S. pharma companies. As of 2024, the company holds the 69th position on the [[Fortune 500|''Fortune'' 500]] list.<ref>{{cite web |title=Fortune 500: Pfizer |url=https://fortune.com/company/pfizer/fortune500/ |publisher=[[Fortune (magazine)|Fortune]]}}</ref><ref name="globaldata.com">{{cite web |title=Top 10 Pharma Companies in the US by Market Capitalization |url=https://www.globaldata.com/companies/top-companies-by-sector/healthcare/us-companies-by-market-cap/#:~:text=Showing%2010%20out%20of%2025,of%20Mar%2031%2C%202023) |website=globaldata.com |access-date=10 February 2025}}</ref>


==History==
==History==
Line 150: Line 148:


Over the following month and a half, regulators in various countries approved Pfizer's vaccine for emergency use.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Roberts |first=Michelle |date=2 December 2020 |title=Covid-19: Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine judged safe for use in UK |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55145696 |access-date=2 December 2020 |website=[[BBC News]]}}</ref><ref name="Bahrain Approves Covid-19 Vaccine (Al Jazeera)">{{Cite news |date=4 December 2020 |title=Bahrain becomes second country to approve Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine |publisher=Al Jazeera |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/12/4/bahrain-becomes-second-country-to-approve-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine |access-date=11 December 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Austen |first=Ian |date=9 December 2020 |title=Canada Approves Vaccine and Could Start Shots Next Week |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/world/americas/canada-vaccine-approve.html |url-access=subscription |access-date=11 December 2020 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201211000426/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/world/americas/canada-vaccine-approve.html |archive-date=11 December 2020 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=11 December 2020 |title=Saudi Arabia approves Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine as Bahrain plans to give the public free shots |work=KTLA |url=https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/saudi-arabia-approves-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-as-bahrain-plans-to-give-the-public-free-shots/ |access-date=11 December 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Steenhuysen |first=Manas Mishra, Julie |date=11 December 2020 |title=U.S. FDA advisers overwhelmingly back authorizing Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine/us-fda-advisers-wrestle-with-ethical-issues-linked-to-authorizing-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-idUSKBN28K1O5 |access-date=11 December 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Thomas |first1=Katie |last2=LaFraniere |first2=Sharon |last3=Weiland |first3=Noah |last4=Goodnough |first4=Abby |last5=Haberman |first5=Maggie |date=2020-12-12 |title=F.D.A. Clears Pfizer Vaccine, and Millions of Doses Will Be Shipped Right Away |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/11/health/pfizer-vaccine-authorized.html |access-date=2020-12-12 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Abdullah |first=Zhaki |title=Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine approved by Singapore, first shipment expected by end-December |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-approves-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-phase-3-13769570 |date=December 14, 2020 |website=CNA |access-date=January 20, 2021 |archive-date=February 4, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210204082015/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-approves-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-phase-3-13769570 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-recommends-first-covid-19-vaccine-authorisation-eu |title=EMA recommends first COVID-19 vaccine for authorisation in the EU |website=[[Europa (web portal)|Europa]] |date=December 21, 2020}}</ref>
Over the following month and a half, regulators in various countries approved Pfizer's vaccine for emergency use.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Roberts |first=Michelle |date=2 December 2020 |title=Covid-19: Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine judged safe for use in UK |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55145696 |access-date=2 December 2020 |website=[[BBC News]]}}</ref><ref name="Bahrain Approves Covid-19 Vaccine (Al Jazeera)">{{Cite news |date=4 December 2020 |title=Bahrain becomes second country to approve Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine |publisher=Al Jazeera |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/12/4/bahrain-becomes-second-country-to-approve-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine |access-date=11 December 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Austen |first=Ian |date=9 December 2020 |title=Canada Approves Vaccine and Could Start Shots Next Week |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/world/americas/canada-vaccine-approve.html |url-access=subscription |access-date=11 December 2020 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201211000426/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/world/americas/canada-vaccine-approve.html |archive-date=11 December 2020 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=11 December 2020 |title=Saudi Arabia approves Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine as Bahrain plans to give the public free shots |work=KTLA |url=https://ktla.com/news/nationworld/saudi-arabia-approves-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-as-bahrain-plans-to-give-the-public-free-shots/ |access-date=11 December 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Steenhuysen |first=Manas Mishra, Julie |date=11 December 2020 |title=U.S. FDA advisers overwhelmingly back authorizing Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine/us-fda-advisers-wrestle-with-ethical-issues-linked-to-authorizing-pfizers-covid-19-vaccine-idUSKBN28K1O5 |access-date=11 December 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Thomas |first1=Katie |last2=LaFraniere |first2=Sharon |last3=Weiland |first3=Noah |last4=Goodnough |first4=Abby |last5=Haberman |first5=Maggie |date=2020-12-12 |title=F.D.A. Clears Pfizer Vaccine, and Millions of Doses Will Be Shipped Right Away |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/11/health/pfizer-vaccine-authorized.html |access-date=2020-12-12 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Abdullah |first=Zhaki |title=Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine approved by Singapore, first shipment expected by end-December |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-approves-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-phase-3-13769570 |date=December 14, 2020 |website=CNA |access-date=January 20, 2021 |archive-date=February 4, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210204082015/https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/singapore-approves-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-phase-3-13769570 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-recommends-first-covid-19-vaccine-authorisation-eu |title=EMA recommends first COVID-19 vaccine for authorisation in the EU |website=[[Europa (web portal)|Europa]] |date=December 21, 2020}}</ref>
==== Controversy ====
In February 2021, after a year long investigation relying on unnamed officials, Pfizer was accused by [[The Bureau of Investigative Journalism]] (TBIJ) of employing "high-level bullying" against at least two [[Latin America]]n countries during negotiations to acquire COVID-19 vaccines, including requesting that the countries put sovereign assets as [[Collateral (finance)|collateral]] for payments.<ref name="bullied">{{Cite news |title=Investigation: Drugmaker 'bullied' Latin American nations |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/11/investigation-pfizer-bullied-latin-american-nations |website=[[Al Jazeera English]] |date=March 11, 2021}}</ref> According to TBIJ, these negotiation tactics resulted in a months long delay in Pfizer reaching a vaccine agreement with one country and a complete failure to reach agreements with two other countries, including [[Argentina]] and Brazil.<ref name="bullied"/>
In November 2021, TBMJ published an article after obtaining information from a [[whistleblower]] from the Ventavia Research Group. Ventavia was hired by Pfizer as a research subcontractor. A regional director (whistleblower) who was employed at Ventavia Research Group has told ''The BMJ'' that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in [[Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine#Clinical trials|Pfizer's pivotal phase III trial]]. The regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Thacker |first1=Paul |title=Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer's vaccine trial |url=https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635 |access-date=2 November 2021 |publisher=thebmj}}</ref> The [[European Medicines Agency]] (EMA) stated in a response to the [[European Parliament]], that "the deficiencies identified do not jeopardize the quality and integrity of the data from the main Comirnaty trial and have no impact on the benefit-risk assessment or on the conclusions on the safety, effectiveness and quality of the vaccine".<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/ema-reply-letter-members-european-parliament-ms-m-rivasi-mr-p-pedicini-ms-t-metz-concerning-covid-19_en.pdf |title=Reply letter on the Integrity of clinical data, additional clinical trials and studies, pharmacovigilance and mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safety |author=[[European Medicines Agency]] |date=3 December 2021 |access-date=2 February 2022}}</ref> ''[[Science-Based Medicine]]'' emphasized that Ventavia oversaw just three of the 153 clinical sites involved with Pfizer's trial and "a small fraction (~1,000 by the time the whistleblower was fired) of the trial's over ~44,000 subjects."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Gorski |first=David |author-link=David Gorski |date=November 8, 2021 |title=What the heck happened to The BMJ? |work=Science-Based Medicine |url=https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/what-the-heck-happened-to-the-bmj/ |access-date=May 16, 2023}}</ref>
On 10 October 2022, during a session of the [[European Parliament]]'s Special Committee on the COVID-19 Pandemic, Pfizer executive Janine Small testified that the company had not evaluated their [[Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine|COVID-19 vaccine]] for its ability to reduce transmission of the [[SARS-CoV-2]] virus prior to its release to the general public.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-10-10 |title=Special Committee on COVID-19 pandemic |url=https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/special-committee-on-covid-19-pandemic_20221010-1430-COMMITTEE-COVI |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221014010053/https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/special-committee-on-covid-19-pandemic_20221010-1430-COMMITTEE-COVI |archive-date=2022-10-14 |access-date=2022-10-14 |website=[[European Parliament]] Multimedia Centre }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=TN World Desk |date=2022-10-13 |title=Pfizer admits it did not know whether its Covid vaccine prevented transmission of virus when rollout began |url=https://www.timesnownews.com/world/pfizer-admits-it-did-not-know-its-covid-vaccine-prevented-transmission-of-virus-when-rollout-began-article-94836651 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20221013205522/https://www.timesnownews.com/world/pfizer-admits-it-did-not-know-its-covid-vaccine-prevented-transmission-of-virus-when-rollout-began-article-94836651 |archive-date=2022-10-13 |access-date=2022-10-14 |website=[[TimesNow]] }}</ref> Dutch MEP [[Rob Roos]] described the admission as "scandalous".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Chung |first=Frank |date=2022-10-13 |title=Pfizer did not know whether Covid vaccine stopped transmission before rollout, executive admits |url=https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/pfizer-did-not-know-whether-covid-vaccine-stopped-transmission-before-rollout-executive-admits/news-story/f307f28f794e173ac017a62784fec414 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221014110736/https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/pfizer-did-not-know-whether-covid-vaccine-stopped-transmission-before-rollout-executive-admits/news-story/f307f28f794e173ac017a62784fec414 |archive-date=2022-10-14 |access-date=2022-10-14 |website=[[News.com.au]]}}</ref> CEO [[Albert Bourla]] was slated to attend, but withdrew.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bauer-Babef |first=Clara |date=2022-10-12 |title=Pfizer remains discreet about COVID vaccine purchase contracts |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/coronavirus/news/pfizer-remains-discreet-about-covid-vaccine-purchase-contracts/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221013183554/https://www.euractiv.com/section/coronavirus/news/pfizer-remains-discreet-about-covid-vaccine-purchase-contracts/ |archive-date=2022-10-13 |access-date=2022-10-14 |website=[[Euractiv]] -GB}}</ref> Roos' statements in turn have been described as "misleading".<ref>{{Cite web |date=October 18, 2022 |first=Flora |last=Teoh |title=Scientific studies show that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reduces transmission; claim by Rob Roos is misleading |url=https://science.feedback.org/review/scientific-studies-show-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-reduces-transmission-claim-rob-roos-misleading/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240916075734/https://science.feedback.org/review/scientific-studies-show-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-reduces-transmission-claim-rob-roos-misleading/ |archive-date=September 16, 2024 |access-date=September 16, 2024 |website=Science Feedback |publisher=Health Feedback -GB}}</ref>


==== Development of oral antivirals ====
==== Development of oral antivirals ====
Line 173: Line 164:


On Sept 30, 2024, Pfizer announced its intentions to sell 540 million Haleon shares whose worth is about  £2.1 billion ($2.8 billion)  according to Bloomberg calculations.<ref>{{Cite web |date=October 1, 2024 |title=Pfizer to further reduce stake in Haleon, offers to sell 540 million share |url=https://www.business-standard.com/world-news/pfizer-to-further-reduce-stake-in-haleon-offers-to-sell-540-million-share-124100101515_1.html}}</ref>
On Sept 30, 2024, Pfizer announced its intentions to sell 540 million Haleon shares whose worth is about  £2.1 billion ($2.8 billion)  according to Bloomberg calculations.<ref>{{Cite web |date=October 1, 2024 |title=Pfizer to further reduce stake in Haleon, offers to sell 540 million share |url=https://www.business-standard.com/world-news/pfizer-to-further-reduce-stake-in-haleon-offers-to-sell-540-million-share-124100101515_1.html}}</ref>
In the third quarter of 2024, Pfizer reported $17.7 billion in revenue, a 32% year-over-year increase, driven by [[Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir|Paxlovid]] ($2.7 billion) and [[Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine|Comirnaty]] ($1.4 billion). Excluding COVID-19 products, core revenue grew 14% to $13.6 billion, led by [[Tafamidis|Vyndaqel]] sales (up 63%) and $854 million from legacy Seagen products. The company raised its 2024 revenue guidance to $61.0–$64.0 billion and adjusted diluted earnings per share to $2.75–$2.95. Pfizer remains on track for $5.5 billion in cost savings, with $4 billion expected by 2024 and $1.5 billion by 2027. Reported diluted earnings per share was $0.78, and adjusted diluted earnings per share was $1.06. The company ranks 69th on the [[Fortune 500|''Fortune'' 500]] of the same year.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-10-29 |title=Pfizer Delivers Strong Third-Quarter 2024 Financial Results and Raises 2024 Guidance |url=https://insights.pfizer.com/q324earnings/ |access-date=2025-04-02 |website=Pfizer Investor Insights |language=en-US}}</ref>


=== Partnership with Flagship Pioneering ===  
=== Partnership with Flagship Pioneering ===  
In July 2024, Pfizer and Flagship Pioneering announced an "Innovation Supply Chain" partnership to co-develop 10 drug candidates. Each party committed $50 million upfront, leveraging Flagship’s ecosystem of over 40 startups to align with Pfizer’s priorities. Pfizer will fund the selected programs and has the option to license or acquire assets, with potential success milestones and royalties reaching up to $700 million per commercialized drug. Two programs, focused on [[obesity]] and [[Cardiovascular disease|cardiovascular diseases]], have already been initiated.<ref name=FBT>{{cite web |url=https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/pfizer-flagship-return-obesity-part-latest-additions-multibillion-dollar-collaboration |title=Pfizer, Flagship return to obesity as part of latest additions to multibillion-dollar collaboration |author=James Waldron |website=Fierce Biotech |date=20 November 2024 |accessdate=16 March 2025}}</ref>
In July 2024, Pfizer and Flagship Pioneering announced an "Innovation Supply Chain" partnership to co-develop 10 drug candidates. Each party committed $50 million upfront, leveraging Flagship’s ecosystem of over 40 startups to align with Pfizer’s priorities. Pfizer will fund the selected programs and has the option to license or acquire assets, with potential success milestones and royalties reaching up to $700 million per commercialized drug. Two programs, focused on [[obesity]] and [[Cardiovascular disease|cardiovascular diseases]], have already been initiated.<ref name=FBT>{{cite web |url=https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/pfizer-flagship-return-obesity-part-latest-additions-multibillion-dollar-collaboration |title=Pfizer, Flagship return to obesity as part of latest additions to multibillion-dollar collaboration |author=James Waldron |website=Fierce Biotech |date=20 November 2024 |accessdate=16 March 2025}}</ref>


Line 183: Line 171:


=== Collaboration with Ignition AI Accelerator ===  
=== Collaboration with Ignition AI Accelerator ===  
In October 2024, Pfizer announced a partnership with the Ignition AI Accelerator, a collaborative initiative by [[Nvidia|NVIDIA]], Tribe, and Digital Industry Singapore (DISG). The collaboration aims using [[artificial intelligence]] to expedite [[drug discovery]] and development processes, improve operational efficiency, and streamline stakeholder engagement. The initiative also focuses on optimizing manufacturing processes, including improving yields and reducing cycle times.<ref>{{cite web |title=Pfizer partners with Ignition AI to enhance drug discovery |url=https://itbrief.asia/story/pfizer-partners-with-ignition-ai-to-enhance-drug-discovery|author=Kaleah Salmon|date=14 October 2024 |website=IT Brief |access-date=5 April 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Singapore's Ignition AI Accelerator partners Pfizer to advance biopharma sector with AI |url=https://technode.global/2024/10/09/singapores-ignition-ai-accelerator-partners-pfizer-to-advance-biopharma-sector-with-ai/ |website=TNGlobal |date=9 October 2024 |access-date=5 April 2025}}</ref>
In October 2024, Pfizer announced a partnership with the Ignition AI Accelerator, a collaborative initiative by [[Nvidia|NVIDIA]], Tribe, and Digital Industry Singapore (DISG). The collaboration aims using [[artificial intelligence]] to expedite [[drug discovery]] and development processes, improve operational efficiency, and streamline stakeholder engagement. The initiative also focuses on optimizing manufacturing processes, including improving yields and reducing cycle times.<ref>{{cite web |title=Pfizer partners with Ignition AI to enhance drug discovery |url=https://itbrief.asia/story/pfizer-partners-with-ignition-ai-to-enhance-drug-discovery|author=Kaleah Salmon|date=14 October 2024 |website=IT Brief |access-date=5 April 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Singapore's Ignition AI Accelerator partners Pfizer to advance biopharma sector with AI |url=https://technode.global/2024/10/09/singapores-ignition-ai-accelerator-partners-pfizer-to-advance-biopharma-sector-with-ai/ |website=TNGlobal |date=9 October 2024 |access-date=5 April 2025}}</ref>


=== Expanding AI Collaboration for Clinical Trials with Saama ===  
=== Expanding AI Collaboration for Clinical Trials with Saama ===  
Saama and Pfizer reached an expanded multi-year agreement to integrate AI-driven solutions across Pfizer's R&D portfolio, building on their 2020 partnership. Initially the partnership focused on automating data review processes with the Smart Data Quality (SDQ) platform — developed during Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trials — the partnership as of 2024 scales to streamline data review and accelerate regulatory submissions across global studies. The expanded collaboration introduces Saama’s Biometrics Research and Analysis Information Network, enabling faster statistical programming, biostatistics workflows, and submission-ready outputs.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Saama and Pfizer Expand Agreement to Integrate AI-Driven Data Solutions Across R&D Portfolio |url=https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240212789592/en/Saama-and-Pfizer-Expand-Agreement-to-Integrate-AI-Driven-Data-Solutions-Across-RD-Portfolio |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241024202742/https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240212789592/en/Saama-and-Pfizer-Expand-Agreement-to-Integrate-AI-Driven-Data-Solutions-Across-RD-Portfolio |archive-date=October 24, 2024 |access-date=2025-04-07 |date=2024-02-12 |url-status=live }}</ref>
Saama and Pfizer reached an expanded multi-year agreement to integrate AI-driven solutions across Pfizer's R&D portfolio, building on their 2020 partnership. Initially the partnership focused on automating data review processes with the Smart Data Quality (SDQ) platform — developed during Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trials — the partnership as of 2024 scales to streamline data review and accelerate regulatory submissions across global studies. The expanded collaboration introduces Saama’s Biometrics Research and Analysis Information Network, enabling faster statistical programming, biostatistics workflows, and submission-ready outputs.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Saama and Pfizer Expand Agreement to Integrate AI-Driven Data Solutions Across R&D Portfolio |url=https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240212789592/en/Saama-and-Pfizer-Expand-Agreement-to-Integrate-AI-Driven-Data-Solutions-Across-RD-Portfolio |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241024202742/https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240212789592/en/Saama-and-Pfizer-Expand-Agreement-to-Integrate-AI-Driven-Data-Solutions-Across-RD-Portfolio |archive-date=October 24, 2024 |access-date=2025-04-07 |date=2024-02-12 |url-status=live }}</ref>


Line 270: Line 256:
{{hidden end}}
{{hidden end}}


== Areas of focus ==  
==Areas of focus==
 
Pfizer focuses on addressing critical health challenges through innovation in various therapeutic areas. In the field of rare diseases, the company develops treatments for conditions such as [[Duchenne muscular dystrophy]], [[Haemophilia|hemophilia]], [[sickle cell disease]], and [[Gaucher's disease|Gaucher disease]], with an inclination on [[gene therapy]] and improving diagnostic resources for patients with unmet medical needs.<ref>{{cite web |title=Pfizer gene therapy research delayed by trial changes, safety questions |author=Ned Pagliarulo|url=https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/pfizer-gene-therapy-delay-dmd-hemophilia/609390/ |date=3 November 2021|website=BioPharma Dive |access-date=26 March 2025}}</ref>
Pfizer focuses on addressing critical health challenges through innovation in various therapeutic areas. In the field of rare diseases, the company develops treatments for conditions such as [[Duchenne muscular dystrophy]], [[Haemophilia|hemophilia]], [[sickle cell disease]], and [[Gaucher's disease|Gaucher disease]], with an inclination on [[gene therapy]] and improving diagnostic resources for patients with unmet medical needs.<ref>{{cite web |title=Pfizer gene therapy research delayed by trial changes, safety questions |author=Ned Pagliarulo|url=https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/pfizer-gene-therapy-delay-dmd-hemophilia/609390/ |date=3 November 2021|website=BioPharma Dive |access-date=26 March 2025}}</ref>


=== Internal medicine ===
===Internal medicine===
 
Pfizer has a longstanding history in vaccines, contributing to breakthroughs in diseases like polio and smallpox. Currently, the company focuses on vaccines for pneumococcal and meningococcal diseases, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), [[Lyme disease]], and [[Clostridioides difficile]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Pfizer reports durable second-season efficacy for RSV vaccine |author=Lisa Schnirring|date=29 February 2024|url=https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/respiratory-syncytial-virus-rsv/pfizer-reports-durable-second-season-efficacy-rsv-vaccine |website=[[Center for Infectious Disease Research & Policy]] |access-date=27 March 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Lyme Disease Vaccine Reaches Completion of the Primary Series
Pfizer has a longstanding history in vaccines, contributing to breakthroughs in diseases like polio and smallpox. Currently, the company focuses on vaccines for pneumococcal and meningococcal diseases, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), [[Lyme disease]], and [[Clostridioides difficile]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Pfizer reports durable second-season efficacy for RSV vaccine |author=Lisa Schnirring|date=29 February 2024|url=https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/respiratory-syncytial-virus-rsv/pfizer-reports-durable-second-season-efficacy-rsv-vaccine |website=[[Center for Infectious Disease Research & Policy]] |access-date=27 March 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Lyme Disease Vaccine Reaches Completion of the Primary Series
|url=https://www.contagionlive.com/view/lyme-disease-vaccine-reaches-completion-of-the-primary-series |author=John Parkinson|date=19 July 2024|website=Contagion |access-date=27 March 2025}}</ref> It also invests in maternal and neonatal vaccines, [[cancer prevention]], and efforts to mitigate [[Hospital-acquired infection|hospital-acquired infections]]. It also works in advancing therapies for issues related to metabolic and cardiovascular health, including obesity, [[type 2 diabetes]], [[insulin resistance]], and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).<ref>{{cite web |title=CDC Endorses Pfizer's Maternal RSV Vaccine to Shield Newborns |url=https://respiratory-therapy.com/products-treatment/pharmaceuticals/us-pharmaceuticals/cdc-endorses-pfizers-maternal-rsv-vaccine-shield-newborns/ |website=Respiratory Therapy|date=26 September 2023|access-date=27 March 2025}}</ref>
|url=https://www.contagionlive.com/view/lyme-disease-vaccine-reaches-completion-of-the-primary-series |author=John Parkinson|date=19 July 2024|website=Contagion |access-date=27 March 2025}}</ref> It also invests in maternal and neonatal vaccines, [[cancer prevention]], and efforts to mitigate [[Hospital-acquired infection|hospital-acquired infections]]. It also works in advancing therapies for issues related to metabolic and cardiovascular health, including obesity, [[type 2 diabetes]], [[insulin resistance]], and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).<ref>{{cite web |title=CDC Endorses Pfizer's Maternal RSV Vaccine to Shield Newborns |url=https://respiratory-therapy.com/products-treatment/pharmaceuticals/us-pharmaceuticals/cdc-endorses-pfizers-maternal-rsv-vaccine-shield-newborns/ |website=Respiratory Therapy|date=26 September 2023|access-date=27 March 2025}}</ref>


=== Obesity Treatment Developments ===  
===Obesity Treatment Developments===  
 
Pfizer has advanced its obesity treatment research through the development of [[danuglipron]], an oral [[glucagon-like peptide-1]] (GLP-1) receptor agonist:<ref name="techtarget">{{cite web |title=Pfizer advances daily oral GLP-1 research |url=https://www.techtarget.com/pharmalifesciences/news/366606009/Pfizer-advances-daily-oral-GLP-1-research|author=Veronica Salib |website=TechTarget |date=12 July 2024|access-date=29 March 2025}}</ref>
Pfizer has advanced its obesity treatment research through the development of [[danuglipron]], an oral [[glucagon-like peptide-1]] (GLP-1) receptor agonist:<ref name="techtarget">{{cite web |title=Pfizer advances daily oral GLP-1 research |url=https://www.techtarget.com/pharmalifesciences/news/366606009/Pfizer-advances-daily-oral-GLP-1-research|author=Veronica Salib |website=TechTarget |date=12 July 2024|access-date=29 March 2025}}</ref>


Line 289: Line 272:
Dose optimization trials are planned for late 2024 to support large-scale registration studies.<ref name="techtarget"/>
Dose optimization trials are planned for late 2024 to support large-scale registration studies.<ref name="techtarget"/>


=== Oncology ===  
===Oncology===  
 
Pfizer develops targeted therapies to treat multiple cancer types, including bladder, breast, cervical, lung, and colorectal cancers, as well as hematological malignancies. The company conducts research on [[Personalized medicine|precision medicine]] and [[immunotherapy]], aiming to improve survival rates and quality of life for cancer patients. Specially, the acquisition of Seagen has supported further development of oncology treatments, including mRNA cancer vaccines.<ref name="Driving equitable">{{cite web |title=Elif Aral: Driving equitable healthcare in the region |url=https://www.arabianbusiness.com/resources/elif-aral-driving-equitable-healthcare-in-the-region |date=22 October 2024|website=[[Arabian Business]] |access-date=30 March 2025}}</ref>
Pfizer develops targeted therapies to treat multiple cancer types, including bladder, breast, cervical, lung, and colorectal cancers, as well as hematological malignancies. The company conducts research on [[Personalized medicine|precision medicine]] and [[immunotherapy]], aiming to improve survival rates and quality of life for cancer patients. Specially, the acquisition of Seagen has supported further development of oncology treatments, including mRNA cancer vaccines.<ref name="Driving equitable">{{cite web |title=Elif Aral: Driving equitable healthcare in the region |url=https://www.arabianbusiness.com/resources/elif-aral-driving-equitable-healthcare-in-the-region |date=22 October 2024|website=[[Arabian Business]] |access-date=30 March 2025}}</ref>


* '''Prostate Cancer''': The EMBARK trial showed improved metastasis-free survival in high-risk, non-metastatic prostate cancer patients, leading to the FDA approval of a combination therapy in 2023.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Improved Outcomes with Enzalutamide in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer |author=Stephen J. Freedland, M.D., Murilo de Almeida Luz, M.D., Ugo De Giorgi, M.D., Ph.D., Martin Gleave, M.D., Geoffrey T. Gotto, M.D., M.P.H., Christopher M. Pieczonka, M.D., Gabriel P. Haas, M.D., Choung-Soo Kim, M.D., Miguel Ramirez-Backhaus, M.D., Antti Rannikko, M.D., Ph.D., Jamal Tarazi, M.D., M.P.A., Swetha Sridharan, M.B., B.S., Jennifer Sugg, M.S., Yiyun Tang, Ph.D., Ronald F. Tutrone, Jr., M.D., Balaji Venugopal, M.B., B.S., M.D., Arnauld Villers, M.D., Ph.D., Henry H. Woo, M.B., B.S., D.Med.Sc., Fabian Zohren, M.D., Ph.D., and Neal D. Shore, M.D. |url=https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2303974 |journal=[[The New England Journal of Medicine]] |date=2023-10-18 |volume=389 |issue=16 |pages=1453–1465 |access-date=2025-03-30 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa2303974|pmid=37851874 }}</ref>
* '''Prostate Cancer''': The EMBARK trial showed improved metastasis-free survival in high-risk, non-metastatic prostate cancer patients, leading to the FDA approval of a combination therapy in 2023.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Improved Outcomes with Enzalutamide in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer |author=Stephen J. Freedland, M.D., Murilo de Almeida Luz, M.D., Ugo De Giorgi, M.D., Ph.D., Martin Gleave, M.D., Geoffrey T. Gotto, M.D., M.P.H., Christopher M. Pieczonka, M.D., Gabriel P. Haas, M.D., Choung-Soo Kim, M.D., Miguel Ramirez-Backhaus, M.D., Antti Rannikko, M.D., Ph.D., Jamal Tarazi, M.D., M.P.A., Swetha Sridharan, M.B., B.S., Jennifer Sugg, M.S., Yiyun Tang, Ph.D., Ronald F. Tutrone, Jr., M.D., Balaji Venugopal, M.B., B.S., M.D., Arnauld Villers, M.D., Ph.D., Henry H. Woo, M.B., B.S., D.Med.Sc., Fabian Zohren, M.D., Ph.D., and Neal D. Shore, M.D. |url=https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2303974 |journal=[[The New England Journal of Medicine]] |date=2023-10-18 |volume=389 |issue=16 |pages=1453–1465 |access-date=2025-03-30 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa2303974|pmid=37851874 |url-access=subscription }}</ref>


* '''The TALAPRO-2''' study explored treatments for metastatic prostate cancer with homologous recombination repair mutations, which are found in 25% of cases.<ref>{{cite web |title=Clinical Trials + Font Resize - Pfizer announces positive results from phase 3 TALAPRO-2 trial of Talzenna in combination with Xtandi in patients with mCRPC |url=https://www.pharmabiz.com/NewsDetails.aspx?aid=172947&sid=2 |website=Pharmabiz.com |date=11 October 2024|access-date=30 March 2025}}</ref>
* '''The TALAPRO-2''' study explored treatments for metastatic prostate cancer with homologous recombination repair mutations, which are found in 25% of cases.<ref>{{cite web |title=Clinical Trials + Font Resize - Pfizer announces positive results from phase 3 TALAPRO-2 trial of Talzenna in combination with Xtandi in patients with mCRPC |url=https://www.pharmabiz.com/NewsDetails.aspx?aid=172947&sid=2 |website=Pharmabiz.com |date=11 October 2024|access-date=30 March 2025}}</ref>
Line 300: Line 282:


===Advances in AI, Gene Therapy, and Breakthrough Treatments===  
===Advances in AI, Gene Therapy, and Breakthrough Treatments===  
Pfizer has also started initiatives which aim to address healthcare challenges across various regions and therapeutic areas in advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), gene therapy, obesity treatments, and oncology research. In 2023, Pfizer’s affordability and access programs reached 45 million patients in the MERA region, supported by the IUdo app, which was launched in [[Egypt]], [[Qatar]], and [[Lebanon]] to facilitate patient access to care. In 2024, Pfizer focuses on integrating AI and gene therapy in the [[Middle East]], [[Russia]], and [[Africa]] (MERA) region, with its headquarters in [[Dubai]].<ref name="Driving equitable"/> Key initiatives include:
Pfizer has also started initiatives which aim to address healthcare challenges across various regions and therapeutic areas in advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), gene therapy, obesity treatments, and oncology research. In 2023, Pfizer’s affordability and access programs reached 45 million patients in the MERA region, supported by the IUdo app, which was launched in [[Egypt]], [[Qatar]], and [[Lebanon]] to facilitate patient access to care. In 2024, Pfizer focuses on integrating AI and gene therapy in the [[Middle East]], [[Russia]], and [[Africa]] (MERA) region, with its headquarters in [[Dubai]].<ref name="Driving equitable"/> Key initiatives include:
* '''Personalized Healthcare''': Omnichannel strategies are being used to provide tailored healthcare solutions for patients and professionals.<ref>{{cite web |title=Omnichannel Engagement in Pharma: Process and Challenges |url=https://medicaldigitals.com/blogs/pharmaceutical-marketing/omnichannel-engagement-pharma/ |date=24 January 2024|website=Medical Digitals |access-date=6 April 2025}}</ref>
* '''Personalized Healthcare''': Omnichannel strategies are being used to provide tailored healthcare solutions for patients and professionals.<ref>{{cite web |title=Omnichannel Engagement in Pharma: Process and Challenges |url=https://medicaldigitals.com/blogs/pharmaceutical-marketing/omnichannel-engagement-pharma/ |date=24 January 2024|website=Medical Digitals |access-date=6 April 2025}}</ref>
Line 311: Line 292:
Pfizer has been accused of aggressive [[pharmaceutical marketing]].<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://nymag.com/nymetro/health/features/3122/ |title=Inside the Happiness Business |last=Kirkpatrick |first=David D. |work=[[New York (magazine)|New York]] |date=May 15, 2000}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Oldani |first=Michael |date=2002 |title=Tales from the Script |url=https://digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/anthpubs/ucb/text/kas087-006.pdf |journal=Kroeber Society Papers |volume=87 |pages=147–176 |via=University of California Berkeley}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Oldani |first=Michael J. |date=2004 |title=Thick Prescriptions: Toward an Interpretation of Pharmaceutical Sales Practices |journal=Medical Anthropology Quarterly |volume=18 |issue=3 |pages=325–356 |doi=10.1525/maq.2004.18.3.325 |issn=1548-1387 |pmid=15484967}}</ref>
Pfizer has been accused of aggressive [[pharmaceutical marketing]].<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://nymag.com/nymetro/health/features/3122/ |title=Inside the Happiness Business |last=Kirkpatrick |first=David D. |work=[[New York (magazine)|New York]] |date=May 15, 2000}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Oldani |first=Michael |date=2002 |title=Tales from the Script |url=https://digitalassets.lib.berkeley.edu/anthpubs/ucb/text/kas087-006.pdf |journal=Kroeber Society Papers |volume=87 |pages=147–176 |via=University of California Berkeley}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Oldani |first=Michael J. |date=2004 |title=Thick Prescriptions: Toward an Interpretation of Pharmaceutical Sales Practices |journal=Medical Anthropology Quarterly |volume=18 |issue=3 |pages=325–356 |doi=10.1525/maq.2004.18.3.325 |issn=1548-1387 |pmid=15484967}}</ref>


====2004 Illegal marketing of gabapentin for off-label uses settlement====
====Illegal marketing of gabapentin for off-label uses settlement (2004)====
In 1993, the [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) approved [[gabapentin]] only for treatment of [[seizures]]. [[Warner–Lambert]], which merged with Pfizer in 2000, used [[continuing medical education]] and [[medical research]], sponsored articles about the drug for the medical literature, and alleged suppression of unfavorable study results, to promote gabapentin. Within five years, the drug was being widely used for [[off-label use]]s such as treatment of pain and psychiatric conditions. Warner–Lambert admitted to violating FDA regulations by promoting the drug for pain, psychiatric conditions, migraine, and other unapproved uses.<ref>{{Cite journal |vauthors=Steinman MA, Bero LA, Chren MM, Landefeld CS |date=August 2006 |title=Narrative review: the promotion of gabapentin: an analysis of internal industry documents |journal=[[Annals of Internal Medicine]] |volume=145 |issue=4 |pages=284–93 |doi=10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00008 |pmid=16908919 |doi-access=free}}</ref> In 2004, the company paid $430{{nbsp}}million in one of the largest settlements to resolve criminal and civil health care liability charges. It was the first off-label promotion case successfully brought under the [[False Claims Act]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Henney JE |date=August 2006 |title=Safeguarding patient welfare: who's in charge? |journal=[[Annals of Internal Medicine]] |volume=145 |issue=4 |pages=305–7 |doi=10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00013 |pmid=16908923 |s2cid=39262014}}</ref> A Cochrane review concluded that gabapentin is ineffective in migraine prophylaxis.<ref>{{Cite journal |vauthors=Mulleners WM, McCrory DC, Linde M |date=August 2014 |title=Antiepileptics in migraine prophylaxis: An updated Cochrane review |journal=Cephalalgia |volume=35 |issue=1 |pages=51–62 |doi=10.1177/0333102414534325 |pmid=25115844 |s2cid=43079346|doi-access=free }}</ref> The [[American Academy of Neurology]] rates it as having unproven efficacy, while the [[Canadian Headache Society]] and the [[European Federation of Neurological Societies]] rate its use as being supported by moderate and low-quality evidence.<ref>{{Cite journal |vauthors=Loder E, Burch R, Rizzoli P |date=June 2012 |title=The 2012 AHS/AAN guidelines for prevention of episodic migraine: a summary and comparison with other recent clinical practice guidelines |journal=Headache |volume=52 |issue=6 |pages=930–45 |doi=10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02185.x |pmid=22671714 |doi-access=free |s2cid=540800}}</ref>
In 1993, the [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) approved [[gabapentin]] only for treatment of [[seizures]]. [[Warner–Lambert]], which merged with Pfizer in 2000, used [[continuing medical education]] and [[medical research]], sponsored articles about the drug for the medical literature, and alleged suppression of unfavorable study results, to promote gabapentin. Within five years, the drug was being widely used for [[off-label use]]s such as treatment of pain and psychiatric conditions. Warner–Lambert admitted to violating FDA regulations by promoting the drug for pain, psychiatric conditions, migraine, and other unapproved uses.<ref>{{Cite journal |vauthors=Steinman MA, Bero LA, Chren MM, Landefeld CS |date=August 2006 |title=Narrative review: the promotion of gabapentin: an analysis of internal industry documents |journal=[[Annals of Internal Medicine]] |volume=145 |issue=4 |pages=284–93 |doi=10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00008 |pmid=16908919 |doi-access=free}}</ref> In 2004, the company paid $430{{nbsp}}million in one of the largest settlements to resolve criminal and civil health care liability charges. It was the first off-label promotion case successfully brought under the [[False Claims Act]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Henney JE |date=August 2006 |title=Safeguarding patient welfare: who's in charge? |journal=[[Annals of Internal Medicine]] |volume=145 |issue=4 |pages=305–7 |doi=10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00013 |pmid=16908923 |s2cid=39262014}}</ref> A Cochrane review concluded that gabapentin is ineffective in migraine prophylaxis.<ref>{{Cite journal |vauthors=Mulleners WM, McCrory DC, Linde M |date=August 2014 |title=Antiepileptics in migraine prophylaxis: An updated Cochrane review |journal=Cephalalgia |volume=35 |issue=1 |pages=51–62 |doi=10.1177/0333102414534325 |pmid=25115844 |s2cid=43079346|doi-access=free }}</ref> The [[American Academy of Neurology]] rates it as having unproven efficacy, while the [[Canadian Headache Society]] and the [[European Federation of Neurological Societies]] rate its use as being supported by moderate and low-quality evidence.<ref>{{Cite journal |vauthors=Loder E, Burch R, Rizzoli P |date=June 2012 |title=The 2012 AHS/AAN guidelines for prevention of episodic migraine: a summary and comparison with other recent clinical practice guidelines |journal=Headache |volume=52 |issue=6 |pages=930–45 |doi=10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02185.x |pmid=22671714 |doi-access=free |s2cid=540800}}</ref>


====2009 Illegal marketing of Bextra settlement====
====Illegal marketing of Bextra settlement (2009)====
In September 2009, Pfizer pleaded guilty to the illegal marketing of [[arthritis]] drug [[valdecoxib]] (Bextra) and agreed to a $2.3{{nbsp}}billion settlement, the largest [[health care fraud]] settlement at that time.<ref>{{cite web |title=Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History |url=https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history |publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]] |access-date=2022-05-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220512181155/https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history |archive-date=May 12, 2022 |date=2009-09-09 |quote=American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. (hereinafter together "Pfizer") have agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products, the Justice Department announced today.}}</ref> Pfizer promoted the sale of the drug for several uses and dosages that the [[Food and Drug Administration]] specifically declined to approve due to safety concerns. The drug was pulled from the market in 2005.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/03/business/03health.html |title=Pfizer pays $2.3 billion to settle marketing case |first=Gardiner |last=Harris |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=September 2, 2009 |url-access=limited}}</ref> It was Pfizer's fourth such settlement in a decade.<ref name=Settle/><ref name=Improper>{{Cite news |last=Johnson |first=Carrie |date=September 3, 2009 |title=In Settlement, A Warning To Drugmakers: Pfizer to Pay Record Penalty In Improper-Marketing Case |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/02/AR2009090201449_pf.html}}</ref><ref name=fine/> The payment included $1.195{{nbsp}}billion in criminal penalties for felony violations of the [[Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act]], and $1.0{{nbsp}}billion to settle allegations it had illegally promoted the drugs for uses that were not approved by the [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) leading to violations under the [[False Claims Act]] as reimbursements were requested from Federal and State programs. The criminal fine was the largest ever assessed in the United States to date.<ref name=Settle>{{Cite news |last=Harris |first=Gardiner |title=Pfizer Pays $2.3 billion to Settle Marketing Case |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/03/business/03health.html |date=September 3, 2009}}</ref><ref name=Improper/><ref name=fine>{{Cite news |title=Pfizer agrees record fraud fine |work=[[BBC News]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8234533.stm |date=September 2, 2009}}</ref> Pfizer entered a [[corporate integrity agreement]] with the [[Office of Inspector General (United States)|Office of Inspector General]] that required it to make substantial structural reforms within the company, and publish to its website its post approval commitments and a searchable database of all payments to physicians made by the company.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Corporate Integrity Agreement between the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services and Pfizer Inc. |url=https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/cia/agreements/pfizer_inc.pdf |website=[[Office of Inspector General (United States)|Office of Inspector General]] |date=August 31, 2009 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110715112330/http://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/cia/agreements/pfizer_inc.pdf |archive-date=July 15, 2011}}</ref>
In September 2009, Pfizer pleaded guilty to the illegal marketing of [[arthritis]] drug [[valdecoxib]] (Bextra) and agreed to a $2.3{{nbsp}}billion settlement, the largest [[health care fraud]] settlement at that time.<ref>{{cite web |title=Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in Its History |url=https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history |publisher=[[United States Department of Justice]] |access-date=2022-05-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220512181155/https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history |archive-date=May 12, 2022 |date=2009-09-09 |quote=American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. (hereinafter together "Pfizer") have agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products, the Justice Department announced today.}}</ref> Pfizer promoted the sale of the drug for several uses and dosages that the [[Food and Drug Administration]] specifically declined to approve due to safety concerns. The drug was pulled from the market in 2005.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/03/business/03health.html |title=Pfizer pays $2.3 billion to settle marketing case |first=Gardiner |last=Harris |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=September 2, 2009 |url-access=limited}}</ref> It was Pfizer's fourth such settlement in a decade.<ref name=Settle/><ref name=Improper>{{Cite news |last=Johnson |first=Carrie |date=September 3, 2009 |title=In Settlement, A Warning To Drugmakers: Pfizer to Pay Record Penalty In Improper-Marketing Case |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/02/AR2009090201449_pf.html}}</ref><ref name=fine/> The payment included $1.195{{nbsp}}billion in criminal penalties for felony violations of the [[Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act]], and $1.0{{nbsp}}billion to settle allegations it had illegally promoted the drugs for uses that were not approved by the [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA) leading to violations under the [[False Claims Act]] as reimbursements were requested from Federal and State programs. The criminal fine was the largest ever assessed in the United States to date.<ref name=Settle>{{Cite news |last=Harris |first=Gardiner |title=Pfizer Pays $2.3 billion to Settle Marketing Case |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/03/business/03health.html |date=September 3, 2009}}</ref><ref name=Improper/><ref name=fine>{{Cite news |title=Pfizer agrees record fraud fine |work=[[BBC News]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8234533.stm |date=September 2, 2009}}</ref> Pfizer entered a [[corporate integrity agreement]] with the [[Office of Inspector General (United States)|Office of Inspector General]] that required it to make substantial structural reforms within the company, and publish to its website its post approval commitments and a searchable database of all payments to physicians made by the company.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Corporate Integrity Agreement between the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services and Pfizer Inc. |url=https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/cia/agreements/pfizer_inc.pdf |website=[[Office of Inspector General (United States)|Office of Inspector General]] |date=August 31, 2009 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110715112330/http://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/cia/agreements/pfizer_inc.pdf |archive-date=July 15, 2011}}</ref>


====Termination of Peter Rost====
====Termination of Peter Rost (2005)====
[[Peter Rost (doctor)|Peter Rost]] was vice president in charge of the [[endocrinology]] division at [[Pharmacia]] before its acquisition by Pfizer. During that time he raised concerns internally about [[kickback (bribery)|kickbacks]] and off-label marketing of Genotropin, Pharmacia's [[human growth hormone]] drug. Pfizer reported the Pharmacia marketing practices to the FDA and Department of Justice; Rost was unaware of this and filed an FCA lawsuit against Pfizer. Pfizer kept him employed, but isolated him until the FCA suit was unsealed in 2005. The Justice Department declined to intervene, and Pfizer fired him, and he filed a wrongful termination suit against Pfizer. Pfizer won a summary dismissal of the case, with the court ruling that the evidence showed Pfizer had decided to fire Rost prior to learning of his whistleblower activities.<ref>{{Cite web |title=ROST v. PFIZER, INC. |publisher=Casetext |url=https://casetext.com/case/rost-v-pfizer-2 |access-date=November 26, 2015 |archive-date=August 6, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806081254/https://casetext.com/case/rost-v-pfizer-2 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/business/at-pfizer-the-isolation-increases-for-a-whistleblower.html |title=At Pfizer, the Isolation Increases for a Whistle-Blower |first=Alex |last=Berenson |authorlink=Alex Berenson |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=June 8, 2005 |url-access=limited}}</ref>
[[Peter Rost (doctor)|Peter Rost]] was vice president in charge of the [[endocrinology]] division at [[Pharmacia]] before its acquisition by Pfizer. During that time he raised concerns internally about [[kickback (bribery)|kickbacks]] and off-label marketing of Genotropin, Pharmacia's [[human growth hormone]] drug. Pfizer reported the Pharmacia marketing practices to the FDA and Department of Justice; Rost was unaware of this and filed an FCA lawsuit against Pfizer. Pfizer kept him employed, but isolated him until the FCA suit was unsealed in 2005. The Justice Department declined to intervene, and Pfizer fired him, and he filed a wrongful termination suit against Pfizer. Pfizer won a summary dismissal of the case, with the court ruling that the evidence showed Pfizer had decided to fire Rost prior to learning of his whistleblower activities.<ref>{{Cite web |title=ROST v. PFIZER, INC. |publisher=Casetext |url=https://casetext.com/case/rost-v-pfizer-2 |access-date=November 26, 2015 |archive-date=August 6, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806081254/https://casetext.com/case/rost-v-pfizer-2 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/08/business/at-pfizer-the-isolation-increases-for-a-whistleblower.html |title=At Pfizer, the Isolation Increases for a Whistle-Blower |first=Alex |last=Berenson |authorlink=Alex Berenson |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=June 8, 2005 |url-access=limited}}</ref>


====2014 Illegal marketing of Rapamune settlement====
====Illegal marketing of Rapamune settlement (2014)====
A "whistleblower suit" was filed in 2005 against [[Wyeth]], which was acquired by Pfizer in 2009, alleging that the company illegally marketed [[sirolimus]] (Rapamune) for [[off-label use]]s, targeted specific doctors and medical facilities to increase sales of Rapamune, tried to get transplant patients to change from their transplant drugs to Rapamune, and specifically targeted [[African-Americans]]. According to the whistleblowers, Wyeth also provided doctors and hospitals that prescribed the drug with kickbacks such as grants, donations, and other money.<ref>{{Cite magazine |url=https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/congress-joins-probe-into-wyeth-s-rapamune-marketing |title=Congress joins probe into Wyeth's Rapamune marketing |first=Tracy |last=Staton |magazine=Fierce Pharma |date=June 14, 2010}}</ref> In 2013, the company pleaded guilty to criminal mis-branding violations under the [[Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act]]. By August 2014, it had paid $491{{nbsp}}million in civil and criminal penalties related to Rapamune.<ref>{{Cite magazine |url=https://www.fiercepharma.com/regulatory/pfizer-settles-more-off-label-marketing-cases-tied-to-rapamune |title=Pfizer settles more off-label marketing cases tied to Rapamune |first=Eric |last=Palmer |magazine=Fierce Pharma |date=June 14, 2010}}</ref>
A "whistleblower suit" was filed in 2005 against [[Wyeth]], which was acquired by Pfizer in 2009, alleging that the company illegally marketed [[sirolimus]] (Rapamune) for [[off-label use]]s, targeted specific doctors and medical facilities to increase sales of Rapamune, tried to get transplant patients to change from their transplant drugs to Rapamune, and specifically targeted [[African-Americans]]. According to the whistleblowers, Wyeth also provided doctors and hospitals that prescribed the drug with kickbacks such as grants, donations, and other money.<ref>{{Cite magazine |url=https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/congress-joins-probe-into-wyeth-s-rapamune-marketing |title=Congress joins probe into Wyeth's Rapamune marketing |first=Tracy |last=Staton |magazine=Fierce Pharma |date=June 14, 2010}}</ref> In 2013, the company pleaded guilty to criminal mis-branding violations under the [[Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act]]. By August 2014, it had paid $491{{nbsp}}million in civil and criminal penalties related to Rapamune.<ref>{{Cite magazine |url=https://www.fiercepharma.com/regulatory/pfizer-settles-more-off-label-marketing-cases-tied-to-rapamune |title=Pfizer settles more off-label marketing cases tied to Rapamune |first=Eric |last=Palmer |magazine=Fierce Pharma |date=June 14, 2010}}</ref>


====2014 Illegal marketing settlement====
====Illegal marketing settlement (2014)====
In June 2010, health insurance network [[Blue Cross Blue Shield]] (BCBS) filed a lawsuit against Pfizer for allegedly illegally marketing drugs Bextra, Geodon and Lyrica. BCBS alleged that Pfizer used kickbacks and wrongly persuaded doctors to prescribe the drugs.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Blue Cross Names and Shames Pfizer Execs Linked to Massages-for-Prescriptions Push |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/blue-cross-names-and-shames-pfizer-execs-linked-to-massages-for-prescriptions-push/ |first=Jim |last=Edwards |work=[[CBS News]] |date=June 10, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2010/06/07/daily52.html |title=Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas sues Pfizer |last=Bounds |first=Jeff |work=[[American City Business Journals]] |date=June 10, 2010}}</ref> According to the lawsuit, Pfizer handed out 'misleading' materials on [[off-label use]]s, sent over 5,000 doctors on trips to the [[Caribbean]] or around the United States, and paid them $2,000 honoraria in return for listening to lectures about Bextra.<ref>{{Cite magazine |url=https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/bcbs-names-pfizer-managers-kickback-suit |title=BCBS names Pfizer managers in kickback suit |magazine=Fierce Pharma |first=Tracy |last=Staton |date=June 11, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.dallasnews.com/business/2010/06/11/blue-cross-blue-shield-of-texas-sues-pfizer-over-drug-marketing/ |title=Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas sues Pfizer over drug marketing |work=[[The Dallas Morning News]] |date=June 11, 2010 |url-access=subscription}}</ref> Despite Pfizer's claims that "the company's intent was pure" in fostering a legal exchange of information among doctors, an internal marketing plan revealed that Pfizer intended to train physicians "to serve as public relations spokespeople."<ref name=toobig/> The case was settled in 2014 for $325{{nbsp}}million.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Pfizer Agrees to $325 Million Neurontin Marketing Accord |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-06-02/pfizer-agrees-to-325-million-settlment-over-neurontin.html |first=Christie |last=Smythe |work=[[Bloomberg News]] |date=June 2, 2014 |url-access=subscription}}</ref> Fearing that Pfizer is "[[too big to fail]]" and that prosecuting the company would result in disruptions to [[Medicare (United States)|Medicare]] and [[Medicaid]], federal prosecutors instead charged a subsidiary of a subsidiary of a subsidiary of Pfizer, which is "nothing more than a shell company whose only function is to plead guilty."<ref name=toobig>{{cite news |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/04/02/pfizer.bextra/index.html |title=Feds found Pfizer too big to nail |last1=Griffin |first1=Drew |last2=Segal |first2=Andy |work=[[CNN]] |date=April 2, 2010}}</ref>
In June 2010, health insurance network [[Blue Cross Blue Shield]] (BCBS) filed a lawsuit against Pfizer for allegedly illegally marketing drugs Bextra, Geodon and Lyrica. BCBS alleged that Pfizer used kickbacks and wrongly persuaded doctors to prescribe the drugs.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Blue Cross Names and Shames Pfizer Execs Linked to Massages-for-Prescriptions Push |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/blue-cross-names-and-shames-pfizer-execs-linked-to-massages-for-prescriptions-push/ |first=Jim |last=Edwards |work=[[CBS News]] |date=June 10, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/stories/2010/06/07/daily52.html |title=Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas sues Pfizer |last=Bounds |first=Jeff |work=[[American City Business Journals]] |date=June 10, 2010}}</ref> According to the lawsuit, Pfizer handed out 'misleading' materials on [[off-label use]]s, sent over 5,000 doctors on trips to the [[Caribbean]] or around the United States, and paid them $2,000 honoraria in return for listening to lectures about Bextra.<ref>{{Cite magazine |url=https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/bcbs-names-pfizer-managers-kickback-suit |title=BCBS names Pfizer managers in kickback suit |magazine=Fierce Pharma |first=Tracy |last=Staton |date=June 11, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.dallasnews.com/business/2010/06/11/blue-cross-blue-shield-of-texas-sues-pfizer-over-drug-marketing/ |title=Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas sues Pfizer over drug marketing |work=[[The Dallas Morning News]] |date=June 11, 2010 |url-access=subscription}}</ref> Despite Pfizer's claims that "the company's intent was pure" in fostering a legal exchange of information among doctors, an internal marketing plan revealed that Pfizer intended to train physicians "to serve as public relations spokespeople."<ref name=toobig/> The case was settled in 2014 for $325{{nbsp}}million.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Pfizer Agrees to $325 Million Neurontin Marketing Accord |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-06-02/pfizer-agrees-to-325-million-settlment-over-neurontin.html |first=Christie |last=Smythe |work=[[Bloomberg News]] |date=June 2, 2014 |url-access=subscription}}</ref> Fearing that Pfizer is "[[too big to fail]]" and that prosecuting the company would result in disruptions to [[Medicare (United States)|Medicare]] and [[Medicaid]], federal prosecutors instead charged a subsidiary of a subsidiary of a subsidiary of Pfizer, which is "nothing more than a shell company whose only function is to plead guilty."<ref name=toobig>{{cite news |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/04/02/pfizer.bextra/index.html |title=Feds found Pfizer too big to nail |last1=Griffin |first1=Drew |last2=Segal |first2=Andy |work=[[CNN]] |date=April 2, 2010}}</ref>


===2013 Quigley Company asbestos settlement===
===Quigley Company asbestos settlement (2013)===
The Quigley Company, which sold [[asbestos]]-containing insulation products until the early 1970s, was acquired by Pfizer in 1968. In June 2013, asbestos victims and Pfizer negotiated a settlement that required Pfizer to pay a total of $964{{nbsp}}million: $430{{nbsp}}million to 80% of existing plaintiffs and place an additional $535{{nbsp}}million into a settlement trust that will compensate future plaintiffs as well as the remaining 20% of plaintiffs with claims against Pfizer and Quigley. Of that $535{{nbsp}}million, $405{{nbsp}}million is in a 40-year note from Pfizer, while $100{{nbsp}}million is from insurance policies.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.theday.com/article/20130627/BIZ03/306279581 |title=Pfizer to pay $958M to end asbestos litigation |first=Tiffany |last=Kary |agency=[[Bloomberg News]] |date=June 27, 2013 }}{{Dead link|date=May 2025 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
The Quigley Company, which sold [[asbestos]]-containing insulation products until the early 1970s, was acquired by Pfizer in 1968. In June 2013, asbestos victims and Pfizer negotiated a settlement that required Pfizer to pay a total of $964{{nbsp}}million: $430{{nbsp}}million to 80% of existing plaintiffs and place an additional $535{{nbsp}}million into a settlement trust that will compensate future plaintiffs as well as the remaining 20% of plaintiffs with claims against Pfizer and Quigley. Of that $535{{nbsp}}million, $405{{nbsp}}million is in a 40-year note from Pfizer, while $100{{nbsp}}million is from insurance policies.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.theday.com/article/20130627/BIZ03/306279581 |title=Pfizer to pay $958M to end asbestos litigation |first=Tiffany |last=Kary |agency=[[Bloomberg News]] |date=June 27, 2013 }}{{Dead link|date=May 2025 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>


===1994 Shiley defective heart valves settlement===
===Shiley defective heart valves settlement (1994)===
Pfizer purchased Shiley in 1979, at the onset of its Convexo-Concave valve ordeal, involving the [[Bjork–Shiley valve]]. Approximately 500 people died when defective [[heart valve]]s fractured and, in 1994, Pfizer agreed to pay $10.75{{nbsp}}million to settle claims by the [[United States Department of Justice]] that the company lied to get approval for the valves.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/07/02/business/pfizer-unit-to-settle-charges-of-lying-about-heart-valve.html |title=Pfizer Unit to Settle Charges Of Lying About Heart Valve |first=Barry |last=Meier |work=The New York Times |authorlink=Barry Meier |date=July 2, 1994 |url-access=limited}}</ref>
Pfizer purchased Shiley in 1979, at the onset of its Convexo-Concave valve ordeal, involving the [[Bjork–Shiley valve]]. Approximately 500 people died when defective [[heart valve]]s fractured and, in 1994, Pfizer agreed to pay $10.75{{nbsp}}million to settle claims by the [[United States Department of Justice]] that the company lied to get approval for the valves.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/07/02/business/pfizer-unit-to-settle-charges-of-lying-about-heart-valve.html |title=Pfizer Unit to Settle Charges Of Lying About Heart Valve |first=Barry |last=Meier |work=The New York Times |authorlink=Barry Meier |date=July 2, 1994 |url-access=limited}}</ref>


===2010 Firing of employee that filed suit===
===Firing of employee that filed suit (2010)===
A federal lawsuit was filed by a scientist claiming she got an infection by a genetically modified [[lentivirus]] while working for Pfizer, resulting in intermittent [[paralysis]].<ref>{{Cite news |title=Ex-Pfizer Worker Cites Genetically Engineered Virus In Lawsuit Over Firing |url=https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-xpm-2010-03-14-hc-pfizer-virus-lawsuit-0314-artmar14-story.html |work=[[Hartford Courant]] |date=March 14, 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120728144301/http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-pfizer-virus-lawsuit-0314.artmar14,0,5614508,print.story |archive-date=July 28, 2012}}</ref> A judge dismissed the case citing a lack of evidence that the illness was caused by the virus but the jury ruled that by firing the employee, Pfizer violated laws protecting [[freedom of speech]] and [[whistleblower]]s and awarded her $1.37{{nbsp}}million.<ref>{{Cite news |title=A Pfizer Whistle-Blower Is Awarded $1.4 Million |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/03/business/03pfizer.html |first1=Andrew |last1=Pollack |first2=Duff |last2=Wilson |authorlink2=Duff Wilson |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=April 2, 2010 |url-access=limited}}</ref>
A federal lawsuit was filed by a scientist claiming she got an infection by a genetically modified [[lentivirus]] while working for Pfizer, resulting in intermittent [[paralysis]].<ref>{{Cite news |title=Ex-Pfizer Worker Cites Genetically Engineered Virus In Lawsuit Over Firing |url=https://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-xpm-2010-03-14-hc-pfizer-virus-lawsuit-0314-artmar14-story.html |work=[[Hartford Courant]] |date=March 14, 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120728144301/http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-pfizer-virus-lawsuit-0314.artmar14,0,5614508,print.story |archive-date=July 28, 2012}}</ref> A judge dismissed the case citing a lack of evidence that the illness was caused by the virus but the jury ruled that by firing the employee, Pfizer violated laws protecting [[freedom of speech]] and [[whistleblower]]s and awarded her $1.37{{nbsp}}million.<ref>{{Cite news |title=A Pfizer Whistle-Blower Is Awarded $1.4 Million |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/03/business/03pfizer.html |first1=Andrew |last1=Pollack |first2=Duff |last2=Wilson |authorlink2=Duff Wilson |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=April 2, 2010 |url-access=limited}}</ref>


===2012 Celebrex intellectual property settlement===
===Celebrex intellectual property settlement (2012)===
[[Brigham Young University]] (BYU) said a professor of chemistry, Dr. [[Daniel L. Simmons]], discovered an enzyme in the 1990s that led towards development of [[Celebrex]]. BYU was originally seeking a 15% royalty on sales, equating to $9.7{{nbsp}}billion. A research agreement had been made between BYU and [[Monsanto]], whose pharmaceutical business was later acquired by Pfizer, to develop a better [[aspirin]]. The enzyme Dr. Simmons claims to have discovered would induce pain and inflammation while causing gastrointestinal problems and Celebrex is used to reduce those issues. A six-year battle ensued because BYU claimed that Pfizer did not give Dr. Simmons credit or compensation, while Pfizer claimed that it had met all obligations regarding the Monsanto agreement. In May 2012, Pfizer settled the allegations, agreeing to pay $450{{nbsp}}million.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/02/health/pfizer-settles-byu-lawsuit-over-development-of-celebrex.html |title=Pfizer Settles B.Y.U. Lawsuit Over Development of Celebrex |agency=[[Associated Press]] |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=May 1, 2012 |url-access=limited}}</ref>
[[Brigham Young University]] (BYU) said a professor of chemistry, Dr. [[Daniel L. Simmons]], discovered an enzyme in the 1990s that led towards development of [[Celebrex]]. BYU was originally seeking a 15% royalty on sales, equating to $9.7{{nbsp}}billion. A research agreement had been made between BYU and [[Monsanto]], whose pharmaceutical business was later acquired by Pfizer, to develop a better [[aspirin]]. The enzyme Dr. Simmons claims to have discovered would induce pain and inflammation while causing gastrointestinal problems and Celebrex is used to reduce those issues. A six-year battle ensued because BYU claimed that Pfizer did not give Dr. Simmons credit or compensation, while Pfizer claimed that it had met all obligations regarding the Monsanto agreement. In May 2012, Pfizer settled the allegations, agreeing to pay $450{{nbsp}}million.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/02/health/pfizer-settles-byu-lawsuit-over-development-of-celebrex.html |title=Pfizer Settles B.Y.U. Lawsuit Over Development of Celebrex |agency=[[Associated Press]] |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=May 1, 2012 |url-access=limited}}</ref>


===2011 Nigeria Trovafloxacin lawsuit settlement===
===Nigeria Trovafloxacin lawsuit settlement (2011)===
{{main|Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc.}}
{{main|Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc.}}
In 1996, an outbreak of measles, cholera, and bacterial meningitis occurred in Nigeria. Pfizer representatives and personnel from a contract research organization (CRO) traveled to [[Kano (city)|Kano]] to set up a clinical trial and administer an experimental [[antibiotic]], [[trovafloxacin]], to approximately 200 children.<ref>{{Citation |last=Oldani |first=Michael |title=The SAGE Encyclopedia of Pharmacology and Society |date=2016 |pages=1444–1447 |chapter=Trovafloxacin (Trovan) Controversy |chapter-url=http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-encyclopedia-of-pharmacology-and-society/i11727.xml |publisher=SAGE Publications Inc. |doi=10.4135/9781483349985.n409 |isbn=9781483350004 |access-date=2019-01-21}}</ref> Tests in animals showed that Trovan had life-threatening side effects, including joint disease, abnormal cartilage growth, liver damage, and a degenerative bone condition. Pfizer’s representatives did not alert the parents or patients about the serious risks involved, or tell them about an effective conventional treatment that Doctors without Borders was providing at the same site.<ref>{{cite web |title=Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc.- clinical trial |url=https://www.academia.edu/39569927 |access-date=30 January 2025 |website=academia.edu|date=January 2019 }}</ref> Local Kano officials reported that more than fifty children died in the experiment, while many others developed mental and physical deformities such as blindness, deafness, paralysis, and brain damage.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6768799.stm |last=Murray |first=Senan |title=Anger at deadly Nigerian drug trials |work=[[BBC News]] |date=June 20, 2007}}</ref> The nature and frequency of both fatalities and other adverse outcomes were similar to those historically found among pediatric patients treated for meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa.<ref>{{Cite journal |vauthors=Ramakrishnan M, Ulland AJ, Steinhardt LC, Moïsi JC, Were F, Levine OS |year=2009 |title=Sequelae due to bacterial meningitis among African children: a systematic literature review |journal=[[BMC Medicine]] |volume=7 |page=47 |doi=10.1186/1741-7015-7-47 |pmc=2759956 |pmid=19751516 |doi-access=free }}</ref> In 2001, families of the children, as well as the governments of Kano and Nigeria, filed lawsuits regarding the treatment.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1517171.stm |title=Nigerians sue Pfizer over test deaths |work=[[BBC News]] |date=August 30, 2001}}</ref> According to ''[[Democracy Now!]]'', "[r]esearchers did not obtain signed consent forms, and medical personnel said Pfizer did not tell parents their children were getting the experimental drug."<ref name="DN">{{Cite news |url=https://www.democracynow.org/2010/12/17/wikileaks_cables_pfizer_targeted_nigerian_attorney |title=WikiLeaks Cables: Pfizer Targeted Nigerian Attorney General to Undermine Suit over Fatal Drug Tests |work=[[Democracy Now!]] |date=December 17, 2010}}</ref> The lawsuits also accused Pfizer of using the outbreak to perform unapproved human testing, as well as allegedly under-dosing a control group being treated with traditional antibiotics in order to skew the results of the trial in favor of Trovan. Nigerian medical personnel as well as at least one Pfizer physician said the trial was conducted without regulatory approval.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/06/AR2006050601338.html |title=Panel Faults Pfizer in '96 Clinical Trial In Nigeria |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=May 7, 2006}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pfizer-bribed-nigerian-officials-in-fatal-drug-trial-ex-employee-claims/ |title=Pfizer Bribed Nigerian Officials in Fatal Drug Trial, Ex-Employee Claims |first=Jim |last=Edwards |work=[[CBS News]] |date=February 10, 2011}}</ref>
In 1996, an outbreak of measles, cholera, and bacterial meningitis occurred in Nigeria. Pfizer representatives and personnel from a contract research organization (CRO) traveled to [[Kano (city)|Kano]] to set up a clinical trial and administer an experimental [[antibiotic]], [[trovafloxacin]], to approximately 200 children.<ref>{{Citation |last=Oldani |first=Michael |title=The SAGE Encyclopedia of Pharmacology and Society |date=2016 |pages=1444–1447 |chapter=Trovafloxacin (Trovan) Controversy |chapter-url=http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-encyclopedia-of-pharmacology-and-society/i11727.xml |publisher=SAGE Publications Inc. |doi=10.4135/9781483349985.n409 |isbn=9781483350004 |access-date=2019-01-21}}</ref> Tests in animals showed that Trovan had life-threatening side effects, including joint disease, abnormal cartilage growth, liver damage, and a degenerative bone condition. Pfizer’s representatives did not alert the parents or patients about the serious risks involved, or tell them about an effective conventional treatment that Doctors without Borders was providing at the same site.<ref>{{cite web |title=Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc.- clinical trial |url=https://www.academia.edu/39569927 |access-date=30 January 2025 |website=academia.edu|date=January 2019 }}</ref> Local Kano officials reported that more than fifty children died in the experiment, while many others developed mental and physical deformities such as blindness, deafness, paralysis, and brain damage.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6768799.stm |last=Murray |first=Senan |title=Anger at deadly Nigerian drug trials |work=[[BBC News]] |date=June 20, 2007}}</ref> The nature and frequency of both fatalities and other adverse outcomes were similar to those historically found among pediatric patients treated for meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa.<ref>{{Cite journal |vauthors=Ramakrishnan M, Ulland AJ, Steinhardt LC, Moïsi JC, Were F, Levine OS |year=2009 |title=Sequelae due to bacterial meningitis among African children: a systematic literature review |journal=[[BMC Medicine]] |volume=7 |page=47 |doi=10.1186/1741-7015-7-47 |pmc=2759956 |pmid=19751516 |doi-access=free }}</ref> In 2001, families of the children, as well as the governments of Kano and Nigeria, filed lawsuits regarding the treatment.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1517171.stm |title=Nigerians sue Pfizer over test deaths |work=[[BBC News]] |date=August 30, 2001}}</ref> According to ''[[Democracy Now!]]'', "[r]esearchers did not obtain signed consent forms, and medical personnel said Pfizer did not tell parents their children were getting the experimental drug."<ref name="DN">{{Cite news |url=https://www.democracynow.org/2010/12/17/wikileaks_cables_pfizer_targeted_nigerian_attorney |title=WikiLeaks Cables: Pfizer Targeted Nigerian Attorney General to Undermine Suit over Fatal Drug Tests |work=[[Democracy Now!]] |date=December 17, 2010}}</ref> The lawsuits also accused Pfizer of using the outbreak to perform unapproved human testing, as well as allegedly under-dosing a control group being treated with traditional antibiotics in order to skew the results of the trial in favor of Trovan. Nigerian medical personnel as well as at least one Pfizer physician said the trial was conducted without regulatory approval.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/06/AR2006050601338.html |title=Panel Faults Pfizer in '96 Clinical Trial In Nigeria |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |date=May 7, 2006}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pfizer-bribed-nigerian-officials-in-fatal-drug-trial-ex-employee-claims/ |title=Pfizer Bribed Nigerian Officials in Fatal Drug Trial, Ex-Employee Claims |first=Jim |last=Edwards |work=[[CBS News]] |date=February 10, 2011}}</ref>
Line 350: Line 331:
The lawsuits were eventually settled out of court. Pfizer committed to paying {{US$|35 million}} "to compensate the families of children in the study", another $30 million to "support healthcare initiatives in Kano", and $10 million to cover legal costs. Payouts began in 2011.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lenzer |first1=J. |title=Pfizer settles with victims of Nigerian drug trial |journal=BMJ |date=16 August 2011 |volume=343 |issue=aug16 3 |pages=d5268 |doi=10.1136/bmj.d5268 |pmid=21846712 |s2cid=8758603}}</ref>
The lawsuits were eventually settled out of court. Pfizer committed to paying {{US$|35 million}} "to compensate the families of children in the study", another $30 million to "support healthcare initiatives in Kano", and $10 million to cover legal costs. Payouts began in 2011.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lenzer |first1=J. |title=Pfizer settles with victims of Nigerian drug trial |journal=BMJ |date=16 August 2011 |volume=343 |issue=aug16 3 |pages=d5268 |doi=10.1136/bmj.d5268 |pmid=21846712 |s2cid=8758603}}</ref>


===2022 Inflating Prices fine===
===Inflating prices fine (2022)===
In July 2022, UK antitrust authorities fined Pfizer £63 million for unfairly high priced drug that aids in controlling epileptic seizures. The Competition and Markets Authority stated that the company took advantage of loopholes by de-branding epilepsy drug Epanutin, by doing so the price of Epanutin's price was not regulated to the same standards the company are used to and therefore the price of the drug was raised. It was stated that over a four-year period, Pfizer had billed Epanutin for around 780% and 1,600% higher than its standard price.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-21/pfizer-flynn-fined-70-million-for-unfair-epilepsy-drug-prices#xj4y7vzkg|title=Pfizer, Flynn Fined £70 Million for Epilepsy Drug Prices|last=Browning|first=Jonny|date=21 July 2022|website=bloomberg.com|publisher=Bloomberg|access-date=27 July 2022}}</ref>
In July 2022, UK antitrust authorities fined Pfizer £63 million for unfairly high priced drug that aids in controlling epileptic seizures. The Competition and Markets Authority stated that the company took advantage of loopholes by de-branding epilepsy drug Epanutin, by doing so the price of Epanutin's price was not regulated to the same standards the company are used to and therefore the price of the drug was raised. It was stated that over a four-year period, Pfizer had billed Epanutin for around 780% and 1,600% higher than its standard price.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-21/pfizer-flynn-fined-70-million-for-unfair-epilepsy-drug-prices#xj4y7vzkg|title=Pfizer, Flynn Fined £70 Million for Epilepsy Drug Prices|last=Browning|first=Jonny|date=21 July 2022|website=bloomberg.com|publisher=Bloomberg|access-date=27 July 2022}}</ref>


===2022 Allegations of patent infringement on mRNA technology===
===Allegations of patent infringement on mRNA technology (2022)===
In August 2022, [[Moderna]] announced that it will sue Pfizer and its partner [[BioNTech]] for [[Patent infringement|infringing their patent]] on the mRNA technology.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Reed |first1=Jim |title=Moderna suing Pfizer over Covid vaccine technology |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/health-62691102 |access-date=2022-08-27 |work=[[BBC News]] |date=2022-08-26}}</ref> In May 2024, the [[European Patent Office]] upheld the validity of Moderna's EP949 patent, one of the two patents asserted against Pfizer and BioNTech.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Moderna wins Covid jab patent dispute over Pfizer and BioNTech |url=https://www.ft.com/content/50c5078c-c9f0-4b35-b916-3475b641c773 |access-date=2024-05-18 |website=www.ft.com|date=May 17, 2024 |last1=Johnston |first1=Ian |last2=Barnes |first2=Oliver }}</ref>
 
===COVID-19 vaccine controversy ===
In February 2021, after a year long investigation relying on unnamed officials, Pfizer was accused by [[The Bureau of Investigative Journalism]] (TBIJ) of employing "high-level bullying" against at least two [[Latin America]]n countries during negotiations to acquire COVID-19 vaccines, including requesting that the countries put sovereign assets as [[Collateral (finance)|collateral]] for payments.<ref name="bullied">{{Cite news |title=Investigation: Drugmaker 'bullied' Latin American nations |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/11/investigation-pfizer-bullied-latin-american-nations |website=[[Al Jazeera English]] |date=March 11, 2021}}</ref> According to TBIJ, these negotiation tactics resulted in a months long delay in Pfizer reaching a vaccine agreement with one country and a complete failure to reach agreements with two other countries, including [[Argentina]] and Brazil.<ref name="bullied"/>
 
In November 2021, TBMJ published an article after obtaining information from a [[whistleblower]] from the Ventavia Research Group. Ventavia was hired by Pfizer as a research subcontractor. A regional director (whistleblower) who was employed at Ventavia Research Group has told ''The BMJ'' that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in [[Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine#Clinical trials|Pfizer's pivotal phase III trial]]. The regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US [[Food and Drug Administration]] (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Thacker |first1=Paul |title=Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer's vaccine trial |url=https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635 |access-date=2 November 2021 |publisher=thebmj}}</ref> The [[European Medicines Agency]] (EMA) stated in a response to the [[European Parliament]], that "the deficiencies identified do not jeopardize the quality and integrity of the data from the main Comirnaty trial and have no impact on the benefit-risk assessment or on the conclusions on the safety, effectiveness and quality of the vaccine".<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/ema-reply-letter-members-european-parliament-ms-m-rivasi-mr-p-pedicini-ms-t-metz-concerning-covid-19_en.pdf |title=Reply letter on the Integrity of clinical data, additional clinical trials and studies, pharmacovigilance and mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safety |author=[[European Medicines Agency]] |date=3 December 2021 |access-date=2 February 2022}}</ref> ''[[Science-Based Medicine]]'' emphasized that Ventavia oversaw just three of the 153 clinical sites involved with Pfizer's trial and "a small fraction (~1,000 by the time the whistleblower was fired) of the trial's over ~44,000 subjects."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Gorski |first=David |author-link=David Gorski |date=November 8, 2021 |title=What the heck happened to The BMJ? |work=Science-Based Medicine |url=https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/what-the-heck-happened-to-the-bmj/ |access-date=May 16, 2023}}</ref>


In August 2022, [[Moderna]] announced that it will sue Pfizer and its partner [[BioNTech]] for [[Patent infringement|infringing their patent]] on the mRNA technology.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Reed |first1=Jim |title=Moderna suing Pfizer over Covid vaccine technology |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/health-62691102 |access-date=2022-08-27 |work=[[BBC News]] |date=2022-08-26}}</ref> In May 2024, the [[European Patent Office]] upheld the validity of Moderna's EP949 patent, one of the two patents asserted against Pfizer and BioNTech.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Moderna wins Covid jab patent dispute over Pfizer and BioNTech |url=https://www.ft.com/content/50c5078c-c9f0-4b35-b916-3475b641c773 |access-date=2024-05-18 |website=www.ft.com|date=May 17, 2024 |last1=Johnston |first1=Ian |last2=Barnes |first2=Oliver }}</ref>
On 10 October 2022, during a session of the [[European Parliament]]'s Special Committee on the COVID-19 Pandemic, Pfizer executive Janine Small testified that the company had not evaluated their [[Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine|COVID-19 vaccine]] for its ability to reduce transmission of the [[SARS-CoV-2]] virus prior to its release to the general public.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-10-10 |title=Special Committee on COVID-19 pandemic |url=https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/special-committee-on-covid-19-pandemic_20221010-1430-COMMITTEE-COVI |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221014010053/https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/special-committee-on-covid-19-pandemic_20221010-1430-COMMITTEE-COVI |archive-date=2022-10-14 |access-date=2022-10-14 |website=[[European Parliament]] Multimedia Centre }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=TN World Desk |date=2022-10-13 |title=Pfizer admits it did not know whether its Covid vaccine prevented transmission of virus when rollout began |url=https://www.timesnownews.com/world/pfizer-admits-it-did-not-know-its-covid-vaccine-prevented-transmission-of-virus-when-rollout-began-article-94836651 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20221013205522/https://www.timesnownews.com/world/pfizer-admits-it-did-not-know-its-covid-vaccine-prevented-transmission-of-virus-when-rollout-began-article-94836651 |archive-date=2022-10-13 |access-date=2022-10-14 |website=[[TimesNow]] }}</ref> Dutch MEP [[Rob Roos]] described the admission as "scandalous".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Chung |first=Frank |date=2022-10-13 |title=Pfizer did not know whether Covid vaccine stopped transmission before rollout, executive admits |url=https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/pfizer-did-not-know-whether-covid-vaccine-stopped-transmission-before-rollout-executive-admits/news-story/f307f28f794e173ac017a62784fec414 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221014110736/https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/pfizer-did-not-know-whether-covid-vaccine-stopped-transmission-before-rollout-executive-admits/news-story/f307f28f794e173ac017a62784fec414 |archive-date=2022-10-14 |access-date=2022-10-14 |website=[[News.com.au]]}}</ref> CEO [[Albert Bourla]] was slated to attend, but withdrew.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bauer-Babef |first=Clara |date=2022-10-12 |title=Pfizer remains discreet about COVID vaccine purchase contracts |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/coronavirus/news/pfizer-remains-discreet-about-covid-vaccine-purchase-contracts/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221013183554/https://www.euractiv.com/section/coronavirus/news/pfizer-remains-discreet-about-covid-vaccine-purchase-contracts/ |archive-date=2022-10-13 |access-date=2022-10-14 |website=[[Euractiv]] -GB}}</ref> Roos' statements in turn have been described as "misleading".<ref>{{Cite web |date=October 18, 2022 |first=Flora |last=Teoh |title=Scientific studies show that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reduces transmission; claim by Rob Roos is misleading |url=https://science.feedback.org/review/scientific-studies-show-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-reduces-transmission-claim-rob-roos-misleading/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240916075734/https://science.feedback.org/review/scientific-studies-show-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-reduces-transmission-claim-rob-roos-misleading/ |archive-date=September 16, 2024 |access-date=September 16, 2024 |website=Science Feedback |publisher=Health Feedback -GB}}</ref>


==Impact of US Administration-Imposed Tariffs on Pfizer==
==Impact of US Administration-Imposed Tariffs on Pfizer==
Line 550: Line 537:
* [[James C. Smith (businessman)|James C. Smith]], former CEO of [[Thomson Reuters]]
* [[James C. Smith (businessman)|James C. Smith]], former CEO of [[Thomson Reuters]]
* Cyrus Taraporevala, former President and CEO of [[State Street Global Advisors|State Street Global Advisor]]
* Cyrus Taraporevala, former President and CEO of [[State Street Global Advisors|State Street Global Advisor]]
== Ownership ==
{{As of|2024|11|30|df=US}}, the largest shareholders of Pfizer were:<ref>{{Cite web |title=Top Institutional Holders |url=https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/PFE/holders/ |website=Yahoo!Finance}}</ref>
* [[The Vanguard Group]] (9.11%)
* [[BlackRock]] (7.69%)
* [[State Street Corporation|State Street]] (5.13%)
* [[Wellington Management Group]] (2.89%)
* [[Charles Schwab Corporation]] (2.30%)
* [[Geode Capital Management]] (2.08%)
* [[Norges Bank]] (1.48%)
* [[Morgan Stanley]] (1.38%)
* [[Massachusetts Financial Services]] (1.26%)
* [[State Farm]] (0.96%)


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 03:38, 26 June 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Template:Use American English Template:Use mdy dates Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherTemplate:Main otherScript error: No such module "Check for clobbered parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Template:Multiple image

File:Shinjuku Bunka Quint Building.jpg
The headquarters of Pfizer in Tokyo, Japan

Pfizer Inc. (Template:IPAc-en Template:Respell)[1] is an American multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology corporation headquartered at The Spiral in Manhattan, New York City. Founded in 1849 in New York by German entrepreneurs Charles Pfizer (1824–1906) and Charles F. Erhart (1821–1891), Pfizer is one of the oldest pharmaceutical companies in North America.

Pfizer develops and produces medicines and vaccines for immunology, oncology, cardiology, endocrinology, and neurology. The company's largest products by sales are Eliquis (apixaban) ($7.3 billion in 2024 revenues, 11% of total revenues), Prevnar (a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) ($6.4 billion in 2024 revenues, 10% of total revenues), Paxlovid (Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) ($5.7 billion in 2024 revenues, 9% of total revenues), Vyndaqel (tafamidis) ($5.4 billion in 2024 revenues, 8% of total revenues), Comirnaty (the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine) ($5.3 billion in 2023 revenues, 8% of total revenues), and Ibrance (palbociclib) ($4.3 billion in 2024 revenues, 6% of total revenues).[2] In 2024, 61% of the company's revenues came from the United States, 4% came from China, and 35% came from other countries.[2]

The company is ranked fifth on the list of largest biomedical companies by revenue. It is ranked the 69th on the Fortune 500 list.[3]

History

File:Charlespfizer.jpg
Charles Pfizer (1824–1906)

1849–1950: Early history

Pfizer was founded in 1849 as "Charles Pfizer & Company" by Charles Pfizer and Charles F. Erhart,[4] two cousins who had immigrated to the United States from Ludwigsburg, Germany. The business produced chemical compounds, and was headquartered on Bartlett Street[5] in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, where they produced an antiparasitic called santonin. This was an immediate success, although it was production of citric acid that led to Pfizer's growth in the 1880s. Pfizer continued to buy property in the area (by now the Williamsburg district of the city of Brooklyn, New York and beginning in 1898, the City of Greater New York) to expand its lab and factory, retaining offices on Flushing Avenue until the 1960s; the Brooklyn plant ultimately closed in 2009.[6] Following their success with citric acid, Pfizer (at the now-demolished 295 Washington Avenue) and Erhart (at 280 Washington Avenue) established their main residences in the nearby Clinton Hill district, known for its concentration of Gilded Age wealth.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

In 1881, Pfizer moved its administrative headquarters to 81 Maiden Lane in Manhattan, presaging the company's expansion to Chicago, Illinois, a year later.[5][7] By 1906 sales exceeded $3Template:Nbspmillion.[8]

World War I caused a shortage of calcium citrate. Pfizer imported the compound from Italy for the manufacture of citric acid, and due to the disruption in supply, the company began a search for an alternative.[9] They found this in the form of a fungus capable of fermenting sugar to citric acid. By 1919, the company was able to commercialize production of citric acid from this source.[9] The company developed expertise in fermentation technology as a result. These skills were applied to the deep-submergence mass production of penicillin, an antibiotic, during World War II in response to the need to treat injured Allied soldiers.[10] The company also embarked on a global soil collection program related to improving production yields of penicillin which ultimately resulted in 135,000 samples.[11]

On June 2, 1942, the company incorporated under the Delaware General Corporation Law.[2]

1950–1980: Pivot to pharmaceutical research and global expansion

Due to price declines for penicillin, Pfizer searched for new antibiotics with greater profit potential. Pfizer discovered oxytetracycline in 1950, and this changed the company from a manufacturer of fine chemicals to a research-based pharmaceutical company. Pfizer developed a drug discovery program focused on in vitro synthesis to augment its research in fermentation technology. In 1959, the company established an animal health division with a Template:Cvt farm and research facility in Terre Haute, Indiana.[10]

By the 1950s, Pfizer had established offices in Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Cuba, Mexico, Panama, Puerto Rico, and the United Kingdom. In 1960, the company moved its medical research laboratory operations out of New York City to a new facility in Groton, Connecticut. In 1980, Pfizer launched Feldene (piroxicam), a prescription anti-inflammatory medication that became Pfizer's first product to reach $1Template:Nbspbillion in revenue.[8]

In 1965, John Powers, Jr. became chief executive officer of the company, succeeding John McKeen.[8]

As the area surrounding its Brooklyn, NY plant fell into decline in the 1970s and 1980s, the company formed a public-private partnership with New York City that encompassed the construction of low- and middle-income housing, the refurbishment of apartment buildings for the homeless and the establishment of a charter school.[7]

In 1972, Edmund T. Pratt Jr. became chief executive officer of the company, succeeding John Powers, Jr.[8]

1980–2000: Development of Viagra, Zoloft, and Lipitor

In 1981, the company received approval for Diflucan (fluconazole), the first oral treatment for severe fungal infections including candidiasis, blastomycosis, coccidiodomycosis, cryptococcosis, histoplasmosis, dermatophytosis, and pityriasis versicolor.[12]

In 1986, Pfizer acquired the worldwide rights to Zithromax (azithromycin), a macrolide antibiotic that is recommended by the Infectious Disease Society of America as a first line treatment for certain cases of community-acquired pneumonia, from Pliva.[13][14]

In 1989, Pfizer scientists Peter Dunn and Albert Wood created Viagra (sildenafil) for treating high blood pressure and angina, a chest pain associated with coronary artery disease. In 1991, it was patented in the United Kingdom as a heart medication. Early trials for the medication showed that it did not work for the treatment of heart disease, but volunteers in the clinical trials had increased erections several days after taking the drug. It was patented in the United States in 1996 and received approval by the Food and Drug Administration in March 1998. In December 1998, Pfizer hired Bob Dole as a spokesperson for the drug.[15] The patents for Viagra expired in 2020.[16]

In 1991, William C. Steere, Jr. became chief executive officers of the company, succeeding Edmund T. Pratt Jr.[17]

In 1991 Pfizer also began marketing Zoloft (sertraline), an antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class developed nine years earlier by Pfizer chemists Kenneth Koe and Willard Welch. Sertraline is primarily prescribed for major depressive disorder in adult outpatients as well as obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and social anxiety disorder in both adults and children. In 2005, the year before it became a generic drug, sales were over $3Template:Nbspbillion and over 100Template:Nbspmillion people had been treated with the drug.[18] The patent for Zoloft expired in the summer of 2006.[19]

In 1996, Eisai, in partnership with Pfizer, received approval from the Food and Drug Administration for donepezil under the brand Aricept for treatment of Alzheimer's disease;[20] Pfizer also received approval for Norvasc (amlodipine), an antihypertensive drug of the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker class.[21]

File:Zoloft bottles.jpg
Bottles of Zoloft (sertraline), an antidepressant

In 1997, the company entered into a co-marketing agreement with Warner–Lambert for Lipitor (atorvastatin), a statin for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Although atorvastatin was the fifth statin to be developed, clinical trials showed that atorvastatin caused a more dramatic reduction in low-density lipoprotein pattern C (LDL-C) than the other statin drugs. Upon its patent expiration in 2011, Lipitor was the best-selling drug ever, with approximately $125Template:Nbspbillion in sales over 14.5 years.[22]

2000–2010: Further expansion

In 2001, Henry McKinnell became chief executive officer of the company, replacing William C. Steere, Jr.[23]

In 2002, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation purchased stock in Pfizer.[24]

In 2004, the company received approval for Lyrica (pregabalin), an anticonvulsant and anxiolytic medication used to treat epilepsy, neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, restless leg syndrome, and generalized anxiety disorder.[25][26][27] The United States patent on Lyrica was challenged by generic manufacturers and was upheld in 2014, extending the expiration date to 2018.[28]

In July 2006, Jeff Kindler was named chief executive officer of the company, replacing Henry McKinnell.[23][29]

On December 3, 2006, Pfizer ceased development of torcetrapib, a drug that increases production of HDL, which reduces LDL thought to be correlated to heart disease. During a Phase III clinical trial involving 15,000 patients, more deaths than expected occurred in the group that took the medicine, and the mortality rate of patients taking the combination of torcetrapib and Lipitor (82 deaths during the study) was 60% higher than those taking Lipitor alone (52 deaths during the study). Lipitor alone was not implicated in the results, but Pfizer lost nearly $1Template:Nbspbillion developing the failed drug and its stock price dropped 11% on the day of the announcement.[30][31][32][33]

Between 2007 and 2010, Pfizer spent $3.3Template:Nbspmillion on investigations and legal fees and recovered about $5.1Template:Nbspmillion, and had another $5Template:Nbspmillion of pending recoveries from civil lawsuits against makers of counterfeit prescription drugs. Pfizer has hired customs and narcotics experts worldwide to track down fakes and assemble evidence that can be used to pursue civil suits for trademark infringement.[34]

In July 2008, Pfizer announced 275 job cuts at its manufacturing facility in Portage, Michigan. Portage was previously the world headquarters of Upjohn Company, which had been acquired as part of Pharmacia.[35][36]

Acquisitions and mergers

In June 2000, Pfizer acquired Warner-Lambert outright for $116Template:Nbspbillion. To satisfy conditions imposed by antitrust regulators at the Federal Trade Commission, Pfizer sold off or transferred stakes in several minor products, including RID (a shampoo for treatment of head lice, sold to Bayer) and Warner-Lambert's antidepressant Celexa (which competes with Zoloft).[37] The acquisition created what was, at the time, the second-largest pharmaceutical company worldwide.[38]

In 2003, Pfizer merged with Pharmacia, and in the process acquired Searle and SUGEN. Searle had developed Flagyl (metronidazole), a nitroimidazole antibiotic medication used particularly for anaerobic bacteria and protozoa.[36][39] Searle also developed celecoxib (Celebrex) a COX-2 inhibitor and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used to treat the pain and inflammation in osteoarthritis, acute pain in adults, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, painful menstruation, and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.[40] SUGEN, a company focused on protein kinase inhibitors, had pioneered the use of ATP-mimetic small molecules to block signal transduction. The SUGEN facility was shut down in 2003 by Pfizer, with the loss of more than 300 jobs, and several programs were transferred to Pfizer. These included sunitinib (Sutent), a cancer medication which was approved for human use by the FDA in January 2006.[41][42] A related compound, SU11654 (Toceranib), was also approved for cancer in dogs, and the ALK inhibitor Crizotinib also grew out of a SUGEN program.[43][44]

In October 2006, the company announced it would acquire PowerMed.[45]

On October 15, 2009, Pfizer acquired Wyeth for $68Template:Nbspbillion in cash and stock, including the assumption of debt, making Pfizer the largest pharmaceutical company in the world.[46][47][48][49][50] The acquisition of Wyeth provided Pfizer with a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, trademarked Prevnar 13; this is used for the prevention of invasive pneumococcal infections. The introduction of the original, 7-valent version of the vaccine, developed by Wyeth in February 2000, led to a 75% reduction in the incidence of invasive pneumococcal infections among children under ageTemplate:Nbsp5 in the United States. Pfizer introduced an improved version of the vaccine in 2010, for which it was granted a patent in India in 2017. Prevnar 13 provides coverage of 13 bacterial variants, expanding beyond the original 7-valent version.[50] By 2012, the rate of invasive infections among children under ageScript error: No such module "String".5 had been reduced by an additional 50%.[51][52]

2010–2020: Further discoveries and acquisitions

File:235 E42 St 2025 jeh.jpg
Former headquarters on 42nd Street
File:Pfizer World Headquarters (51921996957).jpg
Entrance to former Pfizer World Headquarters building (1961–2023)

In 2010, Ian Read was named chief executive officer of the company.[53]

In February 2011, Pfizer announced the closure of its UK research and development facility (formerly also a manufacturing plant) in Sandwich, Kent, which at the time employed 2,400 people.[54] In March 2011, Pfizer acquired King Pharmaceuticals for $3.6Template:Nbspbillion in cash. King produced emergency injectables such as the EpiPen.[55]

On September 4, 2012, the FDA approved bosutinib (Bosulif) for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), a rare type of leukemia and a blood and bone marrow disease that affects primarily older adults.[56] In November 2012, Pfizer received approval from the Food and Drug Administration for Xeljanz, a tofacitinib, for rheumatoid arthritis and ulcerative colitis.[57] The drug had sales of $1.77Template:Nbspbillion in 2018, and in January 2019, it was the top drug in the United States for direct-to-consumer advertising, passing adalimumab (Humira).[58] In 2023, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) identified Xeljanz (tofacitinib) as one of five high-expenditure drugs that experienced significant net price increases without new clinical evidence to justify the hikes. Specifically, Xeljanz's wholesale acquisition cost rose by 6%, leading to an additional $72 million in costs to U.S. payers.[59]

On February 1, 2013, Zoetis, the Agriculture Division of Pfizer and later Pfizer Animal Health, became a public company via an initial public offering, raising $2.2Template:Nbspbillion.[60][61][62][63] Later in 2013, Pfizer completed the corporate spin-off of its remaining stake in Zoetis.[64][65]

In September 2014, the company acquired Innopharma for $225Template:Nbspmillion, plus up to $135Template:Nbspmillion in milestone payments, in a deal that expanded Pfizer's range of generic and injectable drugs.[66][67]

On January 5, 2015, the company announced it would acquire a controlling interest in Redvax, expanding its vaccine portfolio targeting human cytomegalovirus.[68] In February 2015, the company received approval from the Food and Drug Administration for palbociclib (Ibrance) for treatment of certain types of breast cancer.[69][70] In March 2015, the company announced it would restart its collaboration with Eli Lilly and Company surrounding the Phase III trial of Tanezumab.[71] In May 2015, Pfizer and a Bar-Ilan University laboratory announced a partnership based on the development of medical DNA nanotechnology.[72] In June 2015, the company acquired Nimenrix and Mencevax, meningococcal vaccines, from GlaxoSmithKline for around $130Template:Nbspmillion.[73] In September 2015, Pfizer acquired Hospira for $17Template:Nbspbillion, including the assumption of debt.[74][75][76][77][78][79] Hospira was the largest producer of generic injectable pharmaceuticals in the world.[80] On November 23, 2015, Pfizer and Allergan announced a planned $160Template:Nbspbillion merger, in the largest pharmaceutical deal ever and the third largest corporate merger in history. The proposed transaction contemplated that the merged company maintain Allergan's Republic of Ireland domicile, resulting in the new company being subject to corporation tax at the relatively low rate of 12.5%.[81] The deal was to constitute a reverse merger, whereby Allergan acquired Pfizer, with the new company then changing its name to "Pfizer, plc".[82][83][84] On April 6, 2016, Pfizer and Allergan terminated the merger agreement after the Obama administration and the United States Department of the Treasury introduced new laws intended to limit corporate inversions (the extent to which companies could move their headquarters overseas in order to reduce the amount of taxes they pay).[85][86]

In June 2016, the company acquired Anacor Pharmaceuticals for $5.2Template:Nbspbillion, expanding its portfolio in both inflammation and immunology drugs areas.[87][88] In August 2016, the company made a $40Template:Nbspmillion bid for the assets of BIND Therapeutics, which was in bankruptcy.[89] The same month, the company acquired Bamboo Therapeutics for $645Template:Nbspmillion, expanding its gene therapy offerings.[90] In September 2016, the company acquired cancer drug-maker Medivation for $14Template:Nbspbillion.[91][92][93] In October 2016, the company licensed the anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibody, ONC-392, from OncoImmune.[94][95] In November 2016, Pfizer funded a $3,435,600 study with the CDC Foundation to research "screen-and-treat" strategies for cryptococcal disease in Botswana.[96] In December 2016, Pfizer acquired AstraZeneca's small-molecule antibiotics business for $1.575 billion.[97][98][99]

In January 2018, Pfizer announced that it would end its work on research into treatments for Alzheimer's disease and Parkinsonism (a symptom of Parkinson's disease and other conditions). The company said about 300 researchers would lose their jobs.[100] In July 2018, the Food and Drug Administration approved enzalutamide, developed by Pfizer and Astellas Pharma for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.[101] In August 2018, Pfizer signed an agreement with BioNTech to conduct joint research and development activities regarding mRNA-based influenza vaccines.[102] In October 2018, effective January 1, 2019, Albert Bourla was promoted to chief executive officer, succeeding Ian Read, his mentor.[103][104][105][106] In July 2019, the company acquired Therachon for up to $810Template:Nbspmillion, expanding its rare disease portfolio through Therachon's recombinant human fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 compound, aimed at treating conditions such as achondroplasia.[107] Also in July, Pfizer acquired Array Biopharma for $10.6Template:Nbspbillion, boosting its oncology pipeline.[108] In August 2019, Pfizer merged its consumer health business with that of GlaxoSmithKline, into a joint venture owned 68% by GlaxoSmithKline and 32% by Pfizer, with plans to make it a public company. The transaction built on a 2018 transaction where GlaxoSmithKline acquired Novartis' stake in the GSK-Novartis consumer healthcare joint business.[109] The transaction followed negotiations with other companies including Reckitt Benckiser,[110] Sanofi, Johnson & Johnson,[111] and Procter & Gamble.[112] In September 2019, Pfizer initiated a study with the CDC Foundation to investigate the tracking of healthcare-associated infections, scheduled to run through to June 2023.[96] In December 2019, Pfizer awarded the CDC Foundation a further $1,948,482 to continue its cryptococcal disease screening and treatment research in nine African countries.[96]

2020-onwards: pandemic, corporate development, and Trump tariffs

COVID-19 and vaccine development

In March 2020, Pfizer joined the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator funding vehicle to expedite development of treatments against COVID-19.[113][114] The $125 million initiative was launched by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in partnership with Mastercard and Wellcome Trust, with additional funding announced shortly after from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and Madonna.[115][116]

The following month, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health announced the Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) public-private partnership to develop a coordinated research strategy for prioritizing and speeding up development of COVID-19 vaccines and pharmaceutical products.[117] Pfizer joined the partnership as an industry "leadership organization", and participated as a collaborator in ACTIV-led clinical trials.[118][119] CEO Albert Bourla attended the GAVI COVAX AMC 2021 Investment Opportunity Launch Event, otherwise named One World Protected, on April 15, 2021.[120]

In Canada, Pfizer endorsed the use of a vaccine passport mobile app developed by CANImmunize in order to record and track status of COVID-19 vaccination.[121]

As the scale of the COVID-19 pandemic became apparent, Pfizer partnered with BioNTech to study and develop COVID-19 mRNA vaccine candidates. Unlike many of its competitors, Pfizer took no initial research funds from the United States' Operation Warp Speed vaccine development program, instead choosing to invest roughly $2 billion of its own funds. Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla has said that he declined money from Operation Warp Speed to avoid government intervention, stating later that "when you get money from someone that always comes with strings. They want to see how we are going to progress, what type of moves you are going to do. They want reports. And also, I wanted to keep Pfizer out of politics, by the way."[122]

In May 2020, Pfizer began testing four different COVID-19 vaccine variations using lipid nanoparticle technology provided by Canadian biotechnology company Acuitas Therapeutics.[123] Vaccines were injected into the first human participants in the U.S. in early May. In July 2020, Pfizer and BioNTech announced that two of the partners' four mRNA vaccine candidates had won fast track designation from the FDA.[124] The company began PhaseScript error: No such module "String".II-III testing on 30,000 people in the last week of July 2020 and was slated to be paid $1.95Script error: No such module "String".billion for 100Template:Nbspmillion doses of the vaccine by the US government.[125] In September 2020, Pfizer and BioNTech announced that they had completed talks with the European Commission to provide an initial 200Template:Nbspmillion vaccine doses to the EU, with the option to supply another 100Template:Nbspmillion doses at a later date.[126]

On November 9, 2020, Pfizer announced that BioNTech's COVID-19 vaccine, tested on 43,500 people, was found to be 90% effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19.[127] The efficacy was updated to 95% a week later.[128] Akiko Iwasaki, an immunologist interviewed by The New York Times, described the efficacy figure as "really a spectacular number."[129] The announcement made Pfizer and BioNTech the first companies to develop and test a working vaccine for COVID-19.[128]

Over the following month and a half, regulators in various countries approved Pfizer's vaccine for emergency use.[130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137]

Development of oral antivirals

In November 2021, Pfizer launched a new COVID-19 oral antivirus treatment known as Paxlovid. In January 2022, the Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla confirmed that the trial results of a fourth dose were pending until March 2022. He said that the firm was setting up a collaboration to develop an anti-COVID pill treatment along with a French company, Novasep. He also said the COVID vaccine was "safe and efficient" for children.[138][139] In May 2022, reports emerged of patients experiencing "rebound" symptoms after completing a five-day course of Paxlovid.[140] The FDA responded by announcing they had performed additional analyses of the drug's clinical trial data, and decided against changing its recommendations.[141] U.S. President Joe Biden and Dr. Anthony Fauci were both reported to experience this rebound syndrome in the months that followed, while continuing to recommend the drug for those who may benefit from it.[142]

Corporate developments and acquisitions

In September 2020, the company acquired a 9.9% stake in CStone Pharmaceuticals for $200Template:Nbspmillion (HK$1.55Template:Nbspbillion), helping to commercialise its anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, CS1001.[143] In October 2020, the company acquired Arixa Pharmaceuticals.[144] In November 2020, using a Reverse Morris Trust structure, Pfizer merged its off-patent branded and generic drug business, known as Upjohn, with Mylan to form Viatris, owned 57% by Pfizer shareholders.[145][146]

On January 5, 2021, Pfizer introduced a new logo.[147] In April 2021, Pfizer acquired Amplyx Pharmaceuticals and its anti-fungal compound fosmanogepix (APX001).[148][149] In August, the company announced it would acquire Trillium Therapeutics Inc and its immuno-oncology portfolio for $2.3 billion.[150][151]

In March 2022, the company acquired Arena Pharmaceuticals for $6.7 billion in cash.[152][153][154] In June 2022, the company acquired ReViral Ltd, for up to $525 million, gaining access to experimental drugs used to combat respiratory syncytial virus infections.[155][156] In October 2022, the company acquired Biohaven Pharma and its calcitonin gene-related peptide programs for $11.6 billion.[157][158][159] It also acquired Global Blood Therapeutics for $5.4 billion, boosting Pfizer's rare disease business.[160][161][162]

In April 2023, Pfizer moved its world headquarters from 42nd Street in Midtown Manhattan to the Spiral at Hudson Yards.[163][164]

In December 2023, the company acquired Seagen, a pioneer of antibody–drug conjugates for the treatment of cancer, for $43Template:Nbspbillion.[165][166]

On Sept 30, 2024, Pfizer announced its intentions to sell 540 million Haleon shares whose worth is about  £2.1 billion ($2.8 billion)  according to Bloomberg calculations.[167]

Partnership with Flagship Pioneering

In July 2024, Pfizer and Flagship Pioneering announced an "Innovation Supply Chain" partnership to co-develop 10 drug candidates. Each party committed $50 million upfront, leveraging Flagship’s ecosystem of over 40 startups to align with Pfizer’s priorities. Pfizer will fund the selected programs and has the option to license or acquire assets, with potential success milestones and royalties reaching up to $700 million per commercialized drug. Two programs, focused on obesity and cardiovascular diseases, have already been initiated.[168]

The partnership represents a new model in pharmaceutical R&D, focusing on early collaboration with startups to streamline drug development. For startups, the model provides an opportunity for early engagement with pharmaceutical companies, offering potential funding and reduced uncertainty in development programs.[168]

Collaboration with Ignition AI Accelerator

In October 2024, Pfizer announced a partnership with the Ignition AI Accelerator, a collaborative initiative by NVIDIA, Tribe, and Digital Industry Singapore (DISG). The collaboration aims using artificial intelligence to expedite drug discovery and development processes, improve operational efficiency, and streamline stakeholder engagement. The initiative also focuses on optimizing manufacturing processes, including improving yields and reducing cycle times.[169][170]

Expanding AI Collaboration for Clinical Trials with Saama

Saama and Pfizer reached an expanded multi-year agreement to integrate AI-driven solutions across Pfizer's R&D portfolio, building on their 2020 partnership. Initially the partnership focused on automating data review processes with the Smart Data Quality (SDQ) platform — developed during Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trials — the partnership as of 2024 scales to streamline data review and accelerate regulatory submissions across global studies. The expanded collaboration introduces Saama’s Biometrics Research and Analysis Information Network, enabling faster statistical programming, biostatistics workflows, and submission-ready outputs.[171]

Acquisition history

<templatestyles src="Template:Hidden begin/styles.css"/>

Pfizer acquisitions

Template:Tree list

  • Pfizer (Founded 1849 as Charles Pfizer & Company)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Warner–Lambert (Acq 2000)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • William R. Warner (Founded 1856, merged 1955)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Lambert Pharmacal Company (Merged 1955)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Parke-Davis (Founded 1860, Acq 1976)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Wilkinson Sword (Acq 1993, divested 2003)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Agouron (Acq 1999)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Pharmacia (Acq 2002)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Pharmacia & Upjohn (Merged 2000)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
        • Pharmacia (Merged 1995)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
          • Farmitalia Carlo Erba
          • Kabi Pharmacia
          • Pharmacia Aktiebolaget
        • The Upjohn Company (Merged 1995)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
        • Monsanto (Merged 2000, divested 2002)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
        • Searle (Merged 2000)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Esperion Therapeutics (Acq 2003, divested 2008)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Meridica (Acq 2004)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Vicuron Pharmaceuticals (Acq 2005)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Idun (Acq 2005)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Angiosyn (Acq 2005)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Powermed (Acq 2006)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Rinat (Acq 2006)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Coley Pharmaceutical Group (Acq 2007)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • CovX (Acq 2007)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc (Acq 2008)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Wyeth (Acq 2009)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Chef Boyardee (Acq 1946, divested 1996 with food div)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • S.M.A. Corporation
      • Ayerst Laboratories (Acq 1943)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Fort Dodge Serum Company (Acq 1945)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Bristol-Myers (Animal Health div)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Parke-Davis (Animal Health div)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • A.H. Robins
      • Sherwood Medical (Acq 1982)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Genetics Institute, Inc. (Acq 1992)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • American Cyanamid (Acq 1994)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Lederle Laboratories
      • Solvay (Acq 1995, Animal Health div)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • King Pharmaceuticals (Acq 2010)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Monarch Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
      • King Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, Inc.
      • Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc.
      • Parkedale Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
      • King Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.
      • Monarch Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited
    • Synbiotics Corporation (Acq 2011)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Icagen (Acq 2011)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Ferrosan (Consumer Health div, Acq 2011)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Excaliard Pharmaceuticals (Acq 2011)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Alacer Corp (Acq 2012)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • NextWave Pharmaceuticals, Inc (Acq 2012)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Innopharma (Acq 2014)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Redvax GmbH (Acq 2014)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Hospira (Spun off from Abbott Laboratories 2004, Acq 2015)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Mayne Pharma Ltd (Acq 2007)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Pliva-Croatia
      • Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Generics & Injectables div, Acq 2009)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Acq 2010)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • TheraDoc (Acq 2010)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Arixa Pharmaceuticals (Acq 2020)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Anacor Pharmaceuticals(Acq 2016)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Bamboo Therapeutics (Acq 2016)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Medivation (Acq 2016)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • AstraZeneca (Small molecule antibiotic div, Acq 2016)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Array BioPharma (Acq 2019)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Amplyx Pharmaceuticals (Acq 2021)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Trillium Therapeutics (Acq 2021)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Arena Pharmaceuticals (Acq 2022)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • ReViral Ltd (Acq 2022)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Biohaven Pharma (Acq 2022)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Kleo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Acq 2021)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
    • Seagen (Acq 2023)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
      • Cascadian Therapeutics (Acq 2018)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Template:Tree list/end

Areas of focus

Pfizer focuses on addressing critical health challenges through innovation in various therapeutic areas. In the field of rare diseases, the company develops treatments for conditions such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, hemophilia, sickle cell disease, and Gaucher disease, with an inclination on gene therapy and improving diagnostic resources for patients with unmet medical needs.[172]

Internal medicine

Pfizer has a longstanding history in vaccines, contributing to breakthroughs in diseases like polio and smallpox. Currently, the company focuses on vaccines for pneumococcal and meningococcal diseases, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), Lyme disease, and Clostridioides difficile.[173][174] It also invests in maternal and neonatal vaccines, cancer prevention, and efforts to mitigate hospital-acquired infections. It also works in advancing therapies for issues related to metabolic and cardiovascular health, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).[175]

Obesity Treatment Developments

Pfizer has advanced its obesity treatment research through the development of danuglipron, an oral glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist:[176]

  • Danuglipron Development: Initial trials of the twice-daily formulation showed potential for weight loss and blood sugar management.
  • New Formulation: A once-daily modified-release version has been identified for further study, showing a suitable pharmacokinetic profile and no significant safety issues in trials involving 1,400 participants.

Dose optimization trials are planned for late 2024 to support large-scale registration studies.[176]

Oncology

Pfizer develops targeted therapies to treat multiple cancer types, including bladder, breast, cervical, lung, and colorectal cancers, as well as hematological malignancies. The company conducts research on precision medicine and immunotherapy, aiming to improve survival rates and quality of life for cancer patients. Specially, the acquisition of Seagen has supported further development of oncology treatments, including mRNA cancer vaccines.[177]

  • Prostate Cancer: The EMBARK trial showed improved metastasis-free survival in high-risk, non-metastatic prostate cancer patients, leading to the FDA approval of a combination therapy in 2023.[178]
  • The TALAPRO-2 study explored treatments for metastatic prostate cancer with homologous recombination repair mutations, which are found in 25% of cases.[179]
  • Bladder Cancer: The EV-302 study investigated new treatments for advanced urothelial cancer, focusing on improving care for hard-to-treat patient groups.[180]

Advances in AI, Gene Therapy, and Breakthrough Treatments

Pfizer has also started initiatives which aim to address healthcare challenges across various regions and therapeutic areas in advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), gene therapy, obesity treatments, and oncology research. In 2023, Pfizer’s affordability and access programs reached 45 million patients in the MERA region, supported by the IUdo app, which was launched in Egypt, Qatar, and Lebanon to facilitate patient access to care. In 2024, Pfizer focuses on integrating AI and gene therapy in the Middle East, Russia, and Africa (MERA) region, with its headquarters in Dubai.[177] Key initiatives include:

  • Personalized Healthcare: Omnichannel strategies are being used to provide tailored healthcare solutions for patients and professionals.[181]
  • AI-Powered Education Programs: AI-driven atrial fibrillation programs localized educational materials into multiple languages, increasing accessibility.
  • Rare Disease Research: Collaboration with the Abu Dhabi Department of Health to analyze real-world data on Sickle Cell Disease using AI.[182]

Legal issues

Aggressive pharmaceutical marketing

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Pfizer has been accused of aggressive pharmaceutical marketing.[183][184][185]

Illegal marketing of gabapentin for off-label uses settlement (2004)

In 1993, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved gabapentin only for treatment of seizures. Warner–Lambert, which merged with Pfizer in 2000, used continuing medical education and medical research, sponsored articles about the drug for the medical literature, and alleged suppression of unfavorable study results, to promote gabapentin. Within five years, the drug was being widely used for off-label uses such as treatment of pain and psychiatric conditions. Warner–Lambert admitted to violating FDA regulations by promoting the drug for pain, psychiatric conditions, migraine, and other unapproved uses.[186] In 2004, the company paid $430Template:Nbspmillion in one of the largest settlements to resolve criminal and civil health care liability charges. It was the first off-label promotion case successfully brought under the False Claims Act.[187] A Cochrane review concluded that gabapentin is ineffective in migraine prophylaxis.[188] The American Academy of Neurology rates it as having unproven efficacy, while the Canadian Headache Society and the European Federation of Neurological Societies rate its use as being supported by moderate and low-quality evidence.[189]

Illegal marketing of Bextra settlement (2009)

In September 2009, Pfizer pleaded guilty to the illegal marketing of arthritis drug valdecoxib (Bextra) and agreed to a $2.3Template:Nbspbillion settlement, the largest health care fraud settlement at that time.[190] Pfizer promoted the sale of the drug for several uses and dosages that the Food and Drug Administration specifically declined to approve due to safety concerns. The drug was pulled from the market in 2005.[191] It was Pfizer's fourth such settlement in a decade.[192][193][194] The payment included $1.195Template:Nbspbillion in criminal penalties for felony violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and $1.0Template:Nbspbillion to settle allegations it had illegally promoted the drugs for uses that were not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) leading to violations under the False Claims Act as reimbursements were requested from Federal and State programs. The criminal fine was the largest ever assessed in the United States to date.[192][193][194] Pfizer entered a corporate integrity agreement with the Office of Inspector General that required it to make substantial structural reforms within the company, and publish to its website its post approval commitments and a searchable database of all payments to physicians made by the company.[195]

Termination of Peter Rost (2005)

Peter Rost was vice president in charge of the endocrinology division at Pharmacia before its acquisition by Pfizer. During that time he raised concerns internally about kickbacks and off-label marketing of Genotropin, Pharmacia's human growth hormone drug. Pfizer reported the Pharmacia marketing practices to the FDA and Department of Justice; Rost was unaware of this and filed an FCA lawsuit against Pfizer. Pfizer kept him employed, but isolated him until the FCA suit was unsealed in 2005. The Justice Department declined to intervene, and Pfizer fired him, and he filed a wrongful termination suit against Pfizer. Pfizer won a summary dismissal of the case, with the court ruling that the evidence showed Pfizer had decided to fire Rost prior to learning of his whistleblower activities.[196][197]

Illegal marketing of Rapamune settlement (2014)

A "whistleblower suit" was filed in 2005 against Wyeth, which was acquired by Pfizer in 2009, alleging that the company illegally marketed sirolimus (Rapamune) for off-label uses, targeted specific doctors and medical facilities to increase sales of Rapamune, tried to get transplant patients to change from their transplant drugs to Rapamune, and specifically targeted African-Americans. According to the whistleblowers, Wyeth also provided doctors and hospitals that prescribed the drug with kickbacks such as grants, donations, and other money.[198] In 2013, the company pleaded guilty to criminal mis-branding violations under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. By August 2014, it had paid $491Template:Nbspmillion in civil and criminal penalties related to Rapamune.[199]

Illegal marketing settlement (2014)

In June 2010, health insurance network Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) filed a lawsuit against Pfizer for allegedly illegally marketing drugs Bextra, Geodon and Lyrica. BCBS alleged that Pfizer used kickbacks and wrongly persuaded doctors to prescribe the drugs.[200][201] According to the lawsuit, Pfizer handed out 'misleading' materials on off-label uses, sent over 5,000 doctors on trips to the Caribbean or around the United States, and paid them $2,000 honoraria in return for listening to lectures about Bextra.[202][203] Despite Pfizer's claims that "the company's intent was pure" in fostering a legal exchange of information among doctors, an internal marketing plan revealed that Pfizer intended to train physicians "to serve as public relations spokespeople."[204] The case was settled in 2014 for $325Template:Nbspmillion.[205] Fearing that Pfizer is "too big to fail" and that prosecuting the company would result in disruptions to Medicare and Medicaid, federal prosecutors instead charged a subsidiary of a subsidiary of a subsidiary of Pfizer, which is "nothing more than a shell company whose only function is to plead guilty."[204]

Quigley Company asbestos settlement (2013)

The Quigley Company, which sold asbestos-containing insulation products until the early 1970s, was acquired by Pfizer in 1968. In June 2013, asbestos victims and Pfizer negotiated a settlement that required Pfizer to pay a total of $964Template:Nbspmillion: $430Template:Nbspmillion to 80% of existing plaintiffs and place an additional $535Template:Nbspmillion into a settlement trust that will compensate future plaintiffs as well as the remaining 20% of plaintiffs with claims against Pfizer and Quigley. Of that $535Template:Nbspmillion, $405Template:Nbspmillion is in a 40-year note from Pfizer, while $100Template:Nbspmillion is from insurance policies.[206]

Shiley defective heart valves settlement (1994)

Pfizer purchased Shiley in 1979, at the onset of its Convexo-Concave valve ordeal, involving the Bjork–Shiley valve. Approximately 500 people died when defective heart valves fractured and, in 1994, Pfizer agreed to pay $10.75Template:Nbspmillion to settle claims by the United States Department of Justice that the company lied to get approval for the valves.[207]

Firing of employee that filed suit (2010)

A federal lawsuit was filed by a scientist claiming she got an infection by a genetically modified lentivirus while working for Pfizer, resulting in intermittent paralysis.[208] A judge dismissed the case citing a lack of evidence that the illness was caused by the virus but the jury ruled that by firing the employee, Pfizer violated laws protecting freedom of speech and whistleblowers and awarded her $1.37Template:Nbspmillion.[209]

Celebrex intellectual property settlement (2012)

Brigham Young University (BYU) said a professor of chemistry, Dr. Daniel L. Simmons, discovered an enzyme in the 1990s that led towards development of Celebrex. BYU was originally seeking a 15% royalty on sales, equating to $9.7Template:Nbspbillion. A research agreement had been made between BYU and Monsanto, whose pharmaceutical business was later acquired by Pfizer, to develop a better aspirin. The enzyme Dr. Simmons claims to have discovered would induce pain and inflammation while causing gastrointestinal problems and Celebrex is used to reduce those issues. A six-year battle ensued because BYU claimed that Pfizer did not give Dr. Simmons credit or compensation, while Pfizer claimed that it had met all obligations regarding the Monsanto agreement. In May 2012, Pfizer settled the allegations, agreeing to pay $450Template:Nbspmillion.[210]

Nigeria Trovafloxacin lawsuit settlement (2011)

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". In 1996, an outbreak of measles, cholera, and bacterial meningitis occurred in Nigeria. Pfizer representatives and personnel from a contract research organization (CRO) traveled to Kano to set up a clinical trial and administer an experimental antibiotic, trovafloxacin, to approximately 200 children.[211] Tests in animals showed that Trovan had life-threatening side effects, including joint disease, abnormal cartilage growth, liver damage, and a degenerative bone condition. Pfizer’s representatives did not alert the parents or patients about the serious risks involved, or tell them about an effective conventional treatment that Doctors without Borders was providing at the same site.[212] Local Kano officials reported that more than fifty children died in the experiment, while many others developed mental and physical deformities such as blindness, deafness, paralysis, and brain damage.[213] The nature and frequency of both fatalities and other adverse outcomes were similar to those historically found among pediatric patients treated for meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa.[214] In 2001, families of the children, as well as the governments of Kano and Nigeria, filed lawsuits regarding the treatment.[215] According to Democracy Now!, "[r]esearchers did not obtain signed consent forms, and medical personnel said Pfizer did not tell parents their children were getting the experimental drug."[216] The lawsuits also accused Pfizer of using the outbreak to perform unapproved human testing, as well as allegedly under-dosing a control group being treated with traditional antibiotics in order to skew the results of the trial in favor of Trovan. Nigerian medical personnel as well as at least one Pfizer physician said the trial was conducted without regulatory approval.[217][218]

In 2007, Pfizer published a Statement of Defense letter, stating that the drug's oral form was safer and easier to administer. Trovan had been used safely in more than five thousand Americans prior to the Nigerian trial, and mortality in the patients treated by Pfizer was lower than that observed historically in African meningitis epidemics. No unusual side effects, unrelated to meningitis, were observed after four weeks.[219]

In June 2010, the US Supreme Court rejected Pfizer's appeal against a ruling allowing lawsuits by the Nigerian families to proceed.[220]

In December 2010, the United States diplomatic cables leak indicated that Pfizer hired investigators to find evidence of corruption against Nigerian attorney general Michael Aondoakaa to persuade him to drop legal action.[221] The Washington Post reporter Joe Stephens, who helped break the story in 2000, called these actions "dangerously close to blackmail".[216] In response, the company released a press statement describing the allegations as "preposterous" and saying that it acted in good faith.[222] Aondoakka, who had allegedly demanded bribes from Pfizer in return for a settlement of the case,[223] was declared unfit for office and had his U.S. visa revoked in association with corruption charges in 2010.[224][225]

The lawsuits were eventually settled out of court. Pfizer committed to paying Template:US$ "to compensate the families of children in the study", another $30 million to "support healthcare initiatives in Kano", and $10 million to cover legal costs. Payouts began in 2011.[226]

Inflating prices fine (2022)

In July 2022, UK antitrust authorities fined Pfizer £63 million for unfairly high priced drug that aids in controlling epileptic seizures. The Competition and Markets Authority stated that the company took advantage of loopholes by de-branding epilepsy drug Epanutin, by doing so the price of Epanutin's price was not regulated to the same standards the company are used to and therefore the price of the drug was raised. It was stated that over a four-year period, Pfizer had billed Epanutin for around 780% and 1,600% higher than its standard price.[227]

Allegations of patent infringement on mRNA technology (2022)

In August 2022, Moderna announced that it will sue Pfizer and its partner BioNTech for infringing their patent on the mRNA technology.[228] In May 2024, the European Patent Office upheld the validity of Moderna's EP949 patent, one of the two patents asserted against Pfizer and BioNTech.[229]

COVID-19 vaccine controversy

In February 2021, after a year long investigation relying on unnamed officials, Pfizer was accused by The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ) of employing "high-level bullying" against at least two Latin American countries during negotiations to acquire COVID-19 vaccines, including requesting that the countries put sovereign assets as collateral for payments.[230] According to TBIJ, these negotiation tactics resulted in a months long delay in Pfizer reaching a vaccine agreement with one country and a complete failure to reach agreements with two other countries, including Argentina and Brazil.[230]

In November 2021, TBMJ published an article after obtaining information from a whistleblower from the Ventavia Research Group. Ventavia was hired by Pfizer as a research subcontractor. A regional director (whistleblower) who was employed at Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer's pivotal phase III trial. The regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day.[231] The European Medicines Agency (EMA) stated in a response to the European Parliament, that "the deficiencies identified do not jeopardize the quality and integrity of the data from the main Comirnaty trial and have no impact on the benefit-risk assessment or on the conclusions on the safety, effectiveness and quality of the vaccine".[232] Science-Based Medicine emphasized that Ventavia oversaw just three of the 153 clinical sites involved with Pfizer's trial and "a small fraction (~1,000 by the time the whistleblower was fired) of the trial's over ~44,000 subjects."[233]

On 10 October 2022, during a session of the European Parliament's Special Committee on the COVID-19 Pandemic, Pfizer executive Janine Small testified that the company had not evaluated their COVID-19 vaccine for its ability to reduce transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus prior to its release to the general public.[234][235] Dutch MEP Rob Roos described the admission as "scandalous".[236] CEO Albert Bourla was slated to attend, but withdrew.[237] Roos' statements in turn have been described as "misleading".[238]

Impact of US Administration-Imposed Tariffs on Pfizer

Per Yahoo Finance, Pfizer maintains a wide economic moat supported by steady cash flows and a diversified portfolio of patent-protected drugs, along with scale advantages in research and development.[239]

As several media outlets note, Pfizer's role in global healthcare provides it with some insulation from international tariff disputes, as pharmaceutical products are generally exempt from tariffs under international trade agreements and governmental trade policies.[240][241][242] Per The Wall Street Journal, Health Care Industry and Consumer staples are among the least impacted.[243] In February 2025, Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla emphasized the company’s ability to mitigate potential future tariffs by shifting manufacturing to its 13 U.S. facilities, including large-scale sites dedicated to sterile injectables and antibody production.[244]

Donald Trump said in February 2025 that he was considering four exemptions to reciprocal tariffs, including pharmaceutical industries.[245]

Environmental record

Since 2000, the company has implemented more than 4,000 greenhouse gas reduction projects.[246]

Pfizer has inherited Wyeth's liabilities in the American Cyanamid site in Bridgewater Township, New Jersey, a highly toxic EPA Superfund site. Pfizer has since attempted to remediate this land in order to clean and develop it for future profits and potential public uses.[247] The Sierra Club and the Edison Wetlands Association have opposed the cleanup plan, arguing that the area is subject to flooding, which could cause pollutants to leach. The EPA considers the plan the most reasonable from considerations of safety and cost-effectiveness, arguing that an alternative plan involving trucking contaminated soil off site could expose cleanup workers. The EPA's position is backed by the environmental watchdog group CRISIS.[248]

In June 2002, a chemical explosion at the Groton plant injured 7 people and caused the evacuation of more than 100 homes in the surrounding area.[249]

Public-private engagement

Pfizer engages with the public and private sectors in a variety of settings including to promote research and development, academic funding, event sponsorship, philanthropy, and political lobbying.

Academia

Activism

Conferences and summits

  • Women in Medicine Summit – Sponsor.[260]
  • World Neuroscience Innovation Forum – Strategic partner.[261]

Media

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Pfizer engaged many forms of media to promote their COVID-19 vaccine, including a commissioned National Geographic documentary.[262] Pfizer is also a donor to the National Geographic Society.[263]

Pfizer was a prominent sponsor of the 2022 Oscars ceremony alongside BioNTech.[264]

Pfizer has been a major donor to the National Press Foundation.[265][266] Pfizer sponsored a program for the NPF called "Cancer Issues 2010" to train journalists to "understand the latest research" on various cancers, including the role of pharmaceutical products and vaccines. MicroRNA (miRNA) was also a listed topic.[267][268]

Pfizer sponsors 19 to Zero, a "coalition of academics, public health experts, behavioural economists, and creative professionals" that develops media and educational materials to influence public perception surrounding COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines.[269]

Medical societies

Political lobbying

Pfizer is affiliated with a variety of industry organizations engaging in political lobbying, and has made substantial direct donations to government and regulatory agencies:

Scott Gottlieb, who resigned as FDA commissioner in April 2019, joined the Pfizer board of directors three months later, in July 2019.[313]

Pfizer lobbied various officials in the Government of British Columbia between April and November 2012, including then-premier Christy Clark, future premier John Horgan, future health minister Adrian Dix, and future deputy premier, minister of public safety and solicitor general Mike Farnworth. The disclosed purpose was to "provide health policy and pharmaceutical information and communications on behalf of Pfizer Canada," and "learn and understand the budgetary, policy and strategic directions of the Government."[314]

Professional associations

Public health

Pfizer has engaged in a number of public health and global health initiatives worldwide, and provides funding for health care facilities of various specialties in Canada and the United States:

Pfizer sponsored a presentation in January 2020 delivered by Julie Bettinger through British Columbia's Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA) titled "Vaccine hesitancy: It doesn't matter if the vaccine works if nobody gets it."[273][346]

In 2020, Pfizer provided funding in the range of $100,000.00 – $250,000.00 to Ronald McDonald House Charities “to provide resources that directly improve the health and well-being of children and their families.”[347]

Research and development

Pfizer has partnered with and sponsored many medical research networks and professional associations in the United States, Canada and globally:

The Pfizer Award

The Pfizer Award, established in 1958 by Pfizer, Inc., recognizes exceptional books on the history of science. The prize includes a medal and $2,500. Eligible books must be published in English within the three years preceding the competition year (e.g., for 2024, books from 2021–2023). Edited volumes and books with more than two authors are excluded, though multi-volume works by one or two authors may qualify once all volumes are published. While books with themes in medicine or technology may be considered, the award prioritizes works focused on the history of science. The prize is not divided between multiple books.[369]

The Royal Society Pfizer Award/The Royal Society Africa Prize

The Royal Society Pfizer Award, established in 2006 with support from Pfizer Inc., recognized African research scientists contributing innovatively to biological and basic medical sciences, with a focus on capacity building in Africa. Recipients received a bronze medal, £1,000, and an £11,000 research grant for a project affiliated with an African scientific institution, such as a university or research center. The award was last presented in 2016 and has since been replaced by the Royal Society Africa Prize.[370]

Philanthropy

The Pfizer Foundation

The Pfizer Foundation, established in 1953, is a charitable organization dedicated to building healthier communities worldwide. It operates independently of Pfizer Inc., with its mission centered on addressing global health challenges, supporting urgent health needs, and empowering Pfizer employees to create meaningful impacts in their communities.[371][372]

The foundation also supports specific initiatives such as improving breast cancer care in Rwanda, empowering women and driving progress through Integrated Health Services in Benin, addressing vaccine access for zero-dose children in Nigeria, and collaborating with organizations like Direct Relief to strengthen healthcare providers in the United States.[373]

Pfizer's Global Recognitions

Pfizer has received numerous accolades and recognitions worldwide for its efforts in fostering an inclusive and equitable work environment beside the pharmaceutical activities.

In the United States, Pfizer earned a 100% score from the Human Rights Campaign (2025) on the Corporate Equality Index for LGBTQ workplace equality [374] and ranked highly in the Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility (2024) Corporate Inclusion Index. Pfizer was named a “Best Place to Work for Disability Inclusion” in the Disability Equality Index (2024) and received awards such as Top Diverse Employer, Top Hispanic Employer, and Top Disability-Friendly Company by DiversityComm, Inc. (2024). Other recognitions include being named one of "America's Greatest Workplaces" by Newsweek (2023),[375] Clinical Trials Arena Excellence Awards 2023, inclusion in the top 10 of the “World’s Most Admired Companies” by Fortune (2023), and being listed as a Top Employer for Diversity and Best Employer for Women by Forbes (2022). Pfizer was also recognized as a “Best Place to Work” by Glassdoor (2021) and a Top Employer by Science (2021) for its practices during the pandemic.[376]

Pfizer For All

Pfizer has introduced PfizerForAll, a digital platform designed to streamline access to healthcare and wellness resources in the United States. The platform supports individuals with common conditions like the flu, COVID-19, and migraines, as well as those seeking adult vaccinations.[377] It integrates services such as same-day access to healthcare professionals, home delivery of prescriptions and diagnostic tests, appointment scheduling, and financial assistance for Pfizer medications. Partnering with organizations like UpScriptHealth, Alto Pharmacy, and Instacart, PfizerForAll aims to simplify tasks like prescription fulfillment and accessing savings programs. Pfizer plans to expand the platform to address a wider range of healthcare needs and enhance user experience.[378][379]

Corporate affairs

Board of directors

Template:As of, the company's board consisted of the following directors:[380]

See also

Script error: No such module "Portal".

References

Template:Reflist


External links

Template:Commons category-inline

Template:Finance links Template:Coord Template:Pharmaceutical companies of the United States Template:Authority control

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. a b Kenneth T. Jackson. The Encyclopedia of New York City. The New York Historical Society; Yale University Press; September 1995. P. 895. Template:ISBN
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead linkTemplate:Cbignore
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  28. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  36. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  43. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  48. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  51. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  52. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  53. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  54. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  55. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  56. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  57. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  58. Template:Cite magazine
  59. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  60. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  61. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  62. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  63. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  64. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  65. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  66. Template:Cite magazine
  67. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  68. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  69. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  70. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead linkTemplate:Cbignore
  71. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  72. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  73. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  74. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  75. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  76. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  77. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  78. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  79. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  80. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  81. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  82. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  83. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  84. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  85. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  86. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  87. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  88. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  89. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  90. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  91. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  92. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  93. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  94. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  95. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  96. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  97. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  98. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  99. Template:Cite magazine
  100. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  101. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead linkTemplate:Cbignore
  102. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  103. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  104. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  105. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  106. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  107. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  108. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  109. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  110. Template:Cite magazine
  111. Template:Cite magazine
  112. Template:Cite magazine
  113. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  114. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  115. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  116. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  117. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  118. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  119. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  120. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  121. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  122. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  123. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  124. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  125. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  126. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  127. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  128. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  129. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  130. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  131. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  132. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  133. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  134. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  135. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  136. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  137. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  138. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  139. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  140. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  141. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  142. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  143. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  144. Template:Cite magazine
  145. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  146. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  147. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  148. Template:Cite magazine
  149. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  150. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  151. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  152. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  153. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  154. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  155. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  156. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  157. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  158. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  159. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  160. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  161. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  162. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  163. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  164. Template:Cite magazine
  165. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  166. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  167. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  168. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  169. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  170. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  171. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  172. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  173. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  174. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  175. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  176. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  177. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  178. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  179. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  180. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  181. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  182. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  183. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  184. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  185. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  186. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  187. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  188. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  189. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  190. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  191. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  192. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  193. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  194. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  195. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  196. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  197. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  198. Template:Cite magazine
  199. Template:Cite magazine
  200. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  201. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  202. Template:Cite magazine
  203. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  204. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  205. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  206. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead link
  207. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  208. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  209. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  210. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  211. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  212. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  213. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  214. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  215. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  216. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  217. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  218. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  219. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  220. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  221. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  222. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  223. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  224. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  225. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  226. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  227. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  228. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  229. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  230. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  231. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  232. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  233. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  234. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  235. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  236. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  237. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  238. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  239. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  240. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  241. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  242. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  243. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  244. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  245. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  246. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  247. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  248. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  249. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  250. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  251. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  252. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  253. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  254. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  255. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  256. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  257. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  258. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  259. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  260. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  261. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  262. Template:Cite magazine
  263. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  264. Template:Cite magazine
  265. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  266. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  267. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  268. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  269. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  270. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  271. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  272. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  273. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  274. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  275. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  276. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  277. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  278. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  279. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  280. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  281. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  282. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  283. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  284. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  285. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  286. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  287. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  288. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  289. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  290. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  291. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  292. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  293. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  294. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  295. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  296. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  297. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  298. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  299. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  300. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  301. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  302. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  303. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  304. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  305. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  306. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  307. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  308. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  309. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  310. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  311. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  312. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  313. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  314. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  315. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  316. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  317. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  318. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  319. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  320. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  321. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  322. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  323. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  324. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  325. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  326. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  327. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  328. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  329. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  330. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  331. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  332. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  333. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  334. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  335. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  336. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  337. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  338. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  339. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  340. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  341. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  342. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  343. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  344. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  345. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  346. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  347. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  348. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  349. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  350. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  351. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  352. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  353. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  354. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  355. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  356. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  357. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  358. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  359. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  360. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  361. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  362. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  363. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  364. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  365. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  366. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  367. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  368. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  369. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  370. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  371. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  372. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  373. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  374. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  375. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  376. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  377. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  378. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  379. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  380. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".