Stint: Difference between revisions
imported>Awkwafaba needs sources. Common names don't get taxoboxes, script-assisted date audit and style fixes per MOS:NUM |
imported>CitationCleanerBot m mark free doi |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The [[genus]] ''Calidris'' is not [[monophyletic]] in its traditional delimitations and should be restricted to the stout [[red knot]] and its allies. The genus ''Erolia'' was often used for the stints ever since it was proposed by [[Louis Pierre Vieillot]] in 1816. However, the [[type species]] of ''Erolia'' is the [[curlew sandpiper]], which is not traditionally included among the stints. | The [[genus]] ''Calidris'' is not [[monophyletic]] in its traditional delimitations and should be restricted to the stout [[red knot]] and its allies. The genus ''Erolia'' was often used for the stints ever since it was proposed by [[Louis Pierre Vieillot]] in 1816. However, the [[type species]] of ''Erolia'' is the [[curlew sandpiper]], which is not traditionally included among the stints. | ||
No firm consensus has been reached on the curlew sandpiper's [[phylogenetic]] status (i.e., what its closest relatives are) and hence ''Erolia'' cannot be exactly delimited at present. This notwithstanding, the stints together with a few slightly more distinct calidrids would indeed warrant separation as a distinct genus. The [[sanderling]], sometimes placed in ''Crocethia'', is among these and it may be that this genus name would apply.<ref>{{aut|Thomas, Gavin H.; Wills, Matthew A. & Székely, Tamás}} (2004): A supertree approach to shorebird phylogeny. ''[[BMC journals|BMC Evol. Biol.]]'' '''4''': 28. {{doi|10.1186/1471-2148-4-28}} {{PMID|15329156}} [https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-4-28 PDF fulltext] [https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-4-28#Declarations Supplementary Material]</ref> | No firm consensus has been reached on the curlew sandpiper's [[phylogenetic]] status (i.e., what its closest relatives are) and hence ''Erolia'' cannot be exactly delimited at present. This notwithstanding, the stints together with a few slightly more distinct calidrids would indeed warrant separation as a distinct genus. The [[sanderling]], sometimes placed in ''Crocethia'', is among these and it may be that this genus name would apply.<ref>{{aut|Thomas, Gavin H.; Wills, Matthew A. & Székely, Tamás}} (2004): A supertree approach to shorebird phylogeny. ''[[BMC journals|BMC Evol. Biol.]]'' '''4''': 28. {{doi|10.1186/1471-2148-4-28|doi-access=free}} {{PMID|15329156}} [https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-4-28 PDF fulltext] [https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-4-28#Declarations Supplementary Material]</ref> | ||
[[File:Temminck's Stint AMSM6404 TSTI.jpg|thumb|250 px| Temminck's Stint at [[Jamnagar]], [[India]]]] | [[File:Temminck's Stint AMSM6404 TSTI.jpg|thumb|250 px| Temminck's Stint at [[Jamnagar]], [[India]]]] | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* [[ | * [[Hybridisation in shorebirds#Other hybrid scolopacids|Hybridisation in shorebirds]] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 14:57, 8 June 2025
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "other uses". Template:One source Template:Use dmy dates
A stint is one of several very small waders in the paraphyletic "Calidris" assemblage – often separated in Erolia – which in North America are known as peeps. They are scolopacid waders much similar in ecomorphology to their distant relatives, the charadriid plovers.
Some of these birds are difficult to identify because of the similarity between species, and various breeding, non-breeding, juvenile, and moulting plumages. In addition, some plovers are also similarly patterned, especially in winter. With a few exceptions, stints usually have a fairly stereotypical color pattern, being brownish above and lighter – usually white – on much of the underside. They often have a lighter supercilium above brownish cheeks.
Systematics and taxonomy
The genus Calidris is not monophyletic in its traditional delimitations and should be restricted to the stout red knot and its allies. The genus Erolia was often used for the stints ever since it was proposed by Louis Pierre Vieillot in 1816. However, the type species of Erolia is the curlew sandpiper, which is not traditionally included among the stints.
No firm consensus has been reached on the curlew sandpiper's phylogenetic status (i.e., what its closest relatives are) and hence Erolia cannot be exactly delimited at present. This notwithstanding, the stints together with a few slightly more distinct calidrids would indeed warrant separation as a distinct genus. The sanderling, sometimes placed in Crocethia, is among these and it may be that this genus name would apply.[1]
The species usually considered stints/peeps are:
- Semipalmated sandpiper, Calidris pusilla or Erolia pusilla
- Western sandpiper, Calidris mauri or Erolia mauri
- Red-necked stint, Calidris ruficollis or Erolia ruficollis
- Little stint, Calidris minuta or Erolia minuta
- Temminck's stint, Calidris temminckii or Erolia temminckii
- Long-toed stint, Calidris subminuta or Erolia subminuta
- Least sandpiper, Calidris minutilla or Erolia minutilla
- White-rumped sandpiper, Calidris fuscicollis or Erolia fuscicollis
- Baird's sandpiper, Calidris bairdii or Erolia bairdii
See also
References
- ↑ <templatestyles src="smallcaps/styles.css"/>Thomas, Gavin H.; Wills, Matthew A. & Székely, Tamás (2004): A supertree approach to shorebird phylogeny. BMC Evol. Biol. 4: 28. Script error: No such module "doi". Template:Catalog lookup link PDF fulltext Supplementary Material