Islamization of knowledge: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Citation bot
Altered title. Added s2cid. Removed URL that duplicated identifier. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jovensward | #UCB_webform
 
imported>OAbot
m Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot.
 
Line 11: Line 11:


== Principles and frameworks ==
== Principles and frameworks ==
The Islamization of Knowledge emphasizes the integration of Islamic teachings with modern disciplines by critiquing and re-evaluating contemporary fields through an Islamic perspective.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Stenberg | first=Leif | year=1986 | title=Seyyed Hossein Nasr and Ziauddin Sardar on Islam and Science: marginalization or modernization of a religious tradition | journal=Social Epistemology | volume=10 | issue=10 }}</ref> Ismail al-Faruqi’s 12-step work plan systematically integrates Islamic principles with modern disciplines. It focuses on mastery of modern sciences, understanding Islamic knowledge in various fields, and establishing the relevance of Islamic values to contemporary academic disciplines. Al-Faruqi's approach critiques Western epistemologies and recasts them within an Islamic worldview, harmonizing ethical and intellectual pursuits with the tenets of Islam.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Madani | first=Rehaf A. | year=2016 | title=Islamization of Science | journal=International Journal of Islamic Thought | volume=9 | pages=51–63 | doi=10.24035/ijit.09.2016.006 | s2cid=152202681 }}</ref>
The Islamization of Knowledge emphasizes the integration of Islamic teachings with modern disciplines by critiquing and re-evaluating contemporary fields through an Islamic perspective.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Stenberg | first=Leif | year=1986 | title=Seyyed Hossein Nasr and Ziauddin Sardar on Islam and Science: marginalization or modernization of a religious tradition | journal=Social Epistemology | volume=10 | issue=10 }}</ref> Ismail al-Faruqi’s 12-step work plan systematically integrates Islamic principles with modern disciplines. It focuses on mastery of modern sciences, understanding Islamic knowledge in various fields, and establishing the relevance of Islamic values to contemporary academic disciplines. Al-Faruqi's approach critiques Western epistemologies and recasts them within an Islamic worldview, harmonizing ethical and intellectual pursuits with the tenets of Islam.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Madani | first=Rehaf A. | year=2016 | title=Islamization of Science | journal=International Journal of Islamic Thought | volume=9 | pages=51–63 | doi=10.24035/ijit.09.2016.006 | s2cid=152202681 | doi-access=free }}</ref>


In Southeast Asia, [[Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas]] developed a complementary framework. He emphasized linguistic and philosophical foundations, focusing on the role of ''adab'' (proper conduct) and the metaphysical aspects of knowledge. His contributions shaped the curricula of institutions like ISTAC, which he helped establish.<ref>{{cite book | last=Musa | first=Mohd Faizal | year=2021 | title=Naquib Al-Attas' Islamization of Knowledge: Its Impact on Malay Religious Life, Literature, Language, and Culture | publisher=ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute | location=Singapore }}</ref>
In Southeast Asia, [[Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas]] developed a complementary framework. He emphasized linguistic and philosophical foundations, focusing on the role of ''adab'' (proper conduct) and the metaphysical aspects of knowledge. His contributions shaped the curricula of institutions like ISTAC, which he helped establish.<ref>{{cite book | last=Musa | first=Mohd Faizal | year=2021 | title=Naquib Al-Attas' Islamization of Knowledge: Its Impact on Malay Religious Life, Literature, Language, and Culture | publisher=ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute | location=Singapore }}</ref>
Line 17: Line 17:
Abdullah Berghout, a contemporary scholar, proposed a quality-management system model for Islamization, incorporating Islamic perspectives into modern academic disciplines. His framework emphasizes input, procedure, output, and feedback, focusing on intellectual, psychomotor, and affective domains, with particular emphasis on the affective domain.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Berghout | first=Abdullah | year=2011 | title=Islamisation in Modern Sciences: The Way Forward | journal=Revelation and Science | volume=1 | issue=3 | pages=21–34 }}</ref>
Abdullah Berghout, a contemporary scholar, proposed a quality-management system model for Islamization, incorporating Islamic perspectives into modern academic disciplines. His framework emphasizes input, procedure, output, and feedback, focusing on intellectual, psychomotor, and affective domains, with particular emphasis on the affective domain.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Berghout | first=Abdullah | year=2011 | title=Islamisation in Modern Sciences: The Way Forward | journal=Revelation and Science | volume=1 | issue=3 | pages=21–34 }}</ref>


The implementation of Islamization involves steps such as mastering modern disciplines, analyzing their history and development, mastering Islamic legacy, and critically evaluating modern knowledge from an Islamic perspective. It includes synthesizing Islamic and modern knowledge and reformulating these disciplines within an Islamic framework.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Madani | first=Rehaf A. | year=2016 | title=Islamization of Science | journal=International Journal of Islamic Thought | volume=9 | pages=51–63 | doi=10.24035/ijit.09.2016.006 | s2cid=152202681 }}</ref>
The implementation of Islamization involves steps such as mastering modern disciplines, analyzing their history and development, mastering Islamic legacy, and critically evaluating modern knowledge from an Islamic perspective. It includes synthesizing Islamic and modern knowledge and reformulating these disciplines within an Islamic framework.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Madani | first=Rehaf A. | year=2016 | title=Islamization of Science | journal=International Journal of Islamic Thought | volume=9 | pages=51–63 | doi=10.24035/ijit.09.2016.006 | s2cid=152202681 | doi-access=free }}</ref>


== Reception and critiques ==
== Reception and critiques ==

Latest revision as of 06:11, 9 June 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Template:Islamism sidebar

The Islamization of Knowledge (also abbreviated as IoK) is a conceptual framework originating from Islamic philosophy, advocating for the integration of Islamic teachings with modern academic disciplines, such as the social sciences, management sciences, humanities, sciences, engineering, and technology. This model emphasizes that all knowledge and scientific inquiry should align with the principles of Islam, aiming to foster a holistic understanding of the world through an Islamic worldview.[1] This includes aligning ethical principles and scientific practices with Islamic teachings to address contemporary issues.

Origins

The Islamization of Knowledge traces its roots to the 1977 Makkah conference,[2] an influential event that initiated a dialogue among Islamic intellectuals regarding the role of Islam in shaping knowledge in the modern world.[3] Among these intellectuals, Isma'il Raji al-Faruqi played a pivotal role in formalizing and articulating the concept. Al-Faruqi expressed concerns about the secularization of knowledge in Muslim societies,[4] describing it as "the malaise of the ummah" (Muslim community). He argued that reliance on Western tools and analytical methods often led to breaches of Islamic ethics and a disconnect with the ecological and social realities of Muslim nations.[5]

Al-Faruqi advocated for the revival of methods used in early Muslim philosophy, the restoration of ijtihad (independent reasoning), and the integration of scientific methodologies within the boundaries of Islam. His theoretical framework and work plan for this concept were outlined in his 1982 book, Islamization of Knowledge: General Principles and Work Plan, which remains a foundational reference.[6]

Principles and frameworks

The Islamization of Knowledge emphasizes the integration of Islamic teachings with modern disciplines by critiquing and re-evaluating contemporary fields through an Islamic perspective.[7] Ismail al-Faruqi’s 12-step work plan systematically integrates Islamic principles with modern disciplines. It focuses on mastery of modern sciences, understanding Islamic knowledge in various fields, and establishing the relevance of Islamic values to contemporary academic disciplines. Al-Faruqi's approach critiques Western epistemologies and recasts them within an Islamic worldview, harmonizing ethical and intellectual pursuits with the tenets of Islam.[8]

In Southeast Asia, Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas developed a complementary framework. He emphasized linguistic and philosophical foundations, focusing on the role of adab (proper conduct) and the metaphysical aspects of knowledge. His contributions shaped the curricula of institutions like ISTAC, which he helped establish.[9]

Abdullah Berghout, a contemporary scholar, proposed a quality-management system model for Islamization, incorporating Islamic perspectives into modern academic disciplines. His framework emphasizes input, procedure, output, and feedback, focusing on intellectual, psychomotor, and affective domains, with particular emphasis on the affective domain.[10]

The implementation of Islamization involves steps such as mastering modern disciplines, analyzing their history and development, mastering Islamic legacy, and critically evaluating modern knowledge from an Islamic perspective. It includes synthesizing Islamic and modern knowledge and reformulating these disciplines within an Islamic framework.[11]

Reception and critiques

Supporters argue that the Islamization of Knowledge enables Muslims to maintain their religious identity in a secular world while benefiting from modern advancements.[12][13] Critics, however, highlight potential risks, such as conflating religion with science, restricting academic freedom, and imposing a single interpretation of Islam on diverse Muslim societies.[14][15]

Impact and legacy

The concept has significantly influenced academic institutions such as the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), which advances research on Islamic epistemology and interdisciplinary studies.[16][17] Similarly, institutions like IIUM have implemented integrated curricula combining Islamic values with modern disciplines, serving as models for others globally.

See also

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:Ismail al-Faruqi

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".