Injective function: Difference between revisions
imported>JayBeeEll |
imported>Goodphy →Injections can be undone: Added a proof of a fact that a function with the left inverse of it is injective. |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
''For visual examples, readers are directed to the [[#Gallery|gallery section.]]'' | ''For visual examples, readers are directed to the [[#Gallery|gallery section.]]'' | ||
* For any set <math>X</math> and any subset <math>S \subseteq X,</math> the [[inclusion map]] <math>S \to X</math> (which sends any element <math>s \in S</math> to itself) is injective. In particular, the [[identity function]] <math>X \to X</math> is always injective (and in fact bijective). | * For any set <math>X</math> and any subset <math>S \subseteq X,</math> the [[inclusion map]] <math>S \to X</math> (which sends any element <math>s \in S</math> to itself) is injective. In particular, the [[identity function]] <math>X \to X</math> is always injective (and in fact bijective). | ||
* If the domain of a function is | * If the domain of a function is the [[empty set]], then the function is the [[empty function]], which is injective. | ||
* If the domain of a function has one element (that is, it is a [[singleton set]]), then the function is always injective. | * If the domain of a function has one element (that is, it is a [[singleton set]]), then the function is always injective. | ||
* The function <math>f : \R \to \R</math> defined by <math>f(x) = 2 x + 1</math> is injective. | * The function <math>f : \R \to \R</math> defined by <math>f(x) = 2 x + 1</math> is injective. | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
== Injections can be undone == | == Injections can be undone == | ||
Functions with [[Inverse function#Left and right inverses|left inverses]] are always injections. That is, given <math>f : X \to Y,</math> if there is a function <math>g : Y \to X</math> such that for every <math>x \in X</math>, <math>g(f(x)) = x</math>, then <math>f</math> is injective. In this case, <math>g</math> is called a [[Retract (category theory)|retraction]] of <math>f.</math> Conversely, <math>f</math> is called a [[Retract (category theory)|section]] of <math>g.</math> | Functions with [[Inverse function#Left and right inverses|left inverses]] are always injections. That is, given <math>f : X \to Y,</math> if there is a function <math>g : Y \to X</math> such that for every <math>x \in X</math>, <math>g(f(x)) = x</math>, then <math>f</math> is injective. The proof is that | ||
<math display="block">f(a) = f(b) \rightarrow g(f(a))=g(f(b)) \rightarrow a = b.</math> | |||
In this case, <math>g</math> is called a [[Retract (category theory)|retraction]] of <math>f.</math> Conversely, <math>f</math> is called a [[Retract (category theory)|section]] of <math>g.</math> | |||
Conversely, every injection <math>f</math> with a non-empty domain has a left inverse <math>g</math>. It can be defined by choosing an element <math>a</math> in the domain of <math>f</math> and setting <math>g(y)</math> to the unique element of the pre-image <math>f^{-1}[y]</math> (if it is non-empty) or to <math>a</math> (otherwise).{{refn|Unlike the corresponding statement that every surjective function has a right inverse, this does not require the [[axiom of choice]], as the existence of <math>a</math> is implied by the non-emptiness of the domain. However, this statement may fail in less conventional mathematics such as [[constructive mathematics]]. In constructive mathematics, the inclusion <math>\{ 0, 1 \} \to \R</math> of the two-element set in the reals cannot have a left inverse, as it would violate [[Indecomposability (constructive mathematics)|indecomposability]], by giving a [[Retract (category theory)|retraction]] of the real line to the set {0,1}.}} | Conversely, every injection <math>f</math> with a non-empty domain has a left inverse <math>g</math>. It can be defined by choosing an element <math>a</math> in the domain of <math>f</math> and setting <math>g(y)</math> to the unique element of the pre-image <math>f^{-1}[y]</math> (if it is non-empty) or to <math>a</math> (otherwise).{{refn|Unlike the corresponding statement that every surjective function has a right inverse, this does not require the [[axiom of choice]], as the existence of <math>a</math> is implied by the non-emptiness of the domain. However, this statement may fail in less conventional mathematics such as [[constructive mathematics]]. In constructive mathematics, the inclusion <math>\{ 0, 1 \} \to \R</math> of the two-element set in the reals cannot have a left inverse, as it would violate [[Indecomposability (constructive mathematics)|indecomposability]], by giving a [[Retract (category theory)|retraction]] of the real line to the set {0,1}.}} | ||
The left inverse <math>g</math> is not necessarily an [[Inverse function|inverse]] of <math>f,</math> because the composition in the other order, <math>f \circ g,</math> may differ from the identity on <math>Y.</math> In other words, an injective function can be | The left inverse <math>g</math> is not necessarily an [[Inverse function|inverse]] of <math>f,</math> because the composition in the other order, <math>f \circ g,</math> may differ from the identity on <math>Y.</math> In other words, an injective function can be "reversed" by a left inverse, but is not necessarily [[Inverse function|invertible]], which requires that the function is bijective. | ||
== Injections may be made invertible == | == Injections may be made invertible == | ||
| Line 61: | Line 65: | ||
A proof that a function <math>f</math> is injective depends on how the function is presented and what properties the function holds. | A proof that a function <math>f</math> is injective depends on how the function is presented and what properties the function holds. | ||
For functions that are given by some formula there is a basic idea. | For functions that are given by some formula there is a basic idea. We use the definition of injectivity, namely that if <math>f(x) = f(y),</math> then <math>x = y.</math><ref>{{cite web|last=Williams|first=Peter|title=Proving Functions One-to-One|url=http://www.math.csusb.edu/notes/proofs/bpf/node4.html |date=Aug 21, 1996 |website=Department of Mathematics at CSU San Bernardino Reference Notes Page |archive-date= 4 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170604162511/http://www.math.csusb.edu/notes/proofs/bpf/node4.html}}</ref> | ||
We use the definition of injectivity, namely that if <math>f(x) = f(y),</math> then <math>x = y.</math><ref>{{cite web|last=Williams|first=Peter|title=Proving Functions One-to-One|url=http://www.math.csusb.edu/notes/proofs/bpf/node4.html |date=Aug 21, 1996 |website=Department of Mathematics at CSU San Bernardino Reference Notes Page |archive-date= 4 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170604162511/http://www.math.csusb.edu/notes/proofs/bpf/node4.html}}</ref> | |||
Here is an example: | Here is an example: | ||
Revision as of 10:13, 5 June 2025
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". Template:Functions
In mathematics, an injective function (also known as injection, or one-to-one function[1] ) is a function Template:Math that maps distinct elements of its domain to distinct elements of its codomain; that is, Template:Math implies Template:Math (equivalently by contraposition, Template:Math implies Template:Math). In other words, every element of the function's codomain is the image of Template:Em one element of its domain.[2] The term Template:Em must not be confused with Template:Em that refers to bijective functions, which are functions such that each element in the codomain is an image of exactly one element in the domain.
A homomorphism between algebraic structures is a function that is compatible with the operations of the structures. For all common algebraic structures, and, in particular for vector spaces, an Template:Em is also called a Template:Em. However, in the more general context of category theory, the definition of a monomorphism differs from that of an injective homomorphism.[3] This is thus a theorem that they are equivalent for algebraic structures; see Template:Slink for more details.
A function that is not injective is sometimes called many-to-one.[2]
Definition
Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote". Let be a function whose domain is a set The function is said to be injective provided that for all and in if then ; that is, implies Equivalently, if then in the contrapositive statement.
Symbolically, which is logically equivalent to the contrapositive,[4]An injective function (or, more generally, a monomorphism) is often denoted by using the specialized arrows ↣ or ↪ (for example, or ), although some authors specifically reserve ↪ for an inclusion map.[5]
Examples
For visual examples, readers are directed to the gallery section.
- For any set and any subset the inclusion map (which sends any element to itself) is injective. In particular, the identity function is always injective (and in fact bijective).
- If the domain of a function is the empty set, then the function is the empty function, which is injective.
- If the domain of a function has one element (that is, it is a singleton set), then the function is always injective.
- The function defined by is injective.
- The function defined by is Template:Em injective, because (for example) However, if is redefined so that its domain is the non-negative real numbers [0,+∞), then is injective.
- The exponential function defined by is injective (but not surjective, as no real value maps to a negative number).
- The natural logarithm function defined by is injective.
- The function defined by is not injective, since, for example,
More generally, when and are both the real line then an injective function is one whose graph is never intersected by any horizontal line more than once. This principle is referred to as the Template:Em.[2]
Injections can be undone
Functions with left inverses are always injections. That is, given if there is a function such that for every , , then is injective. The proof is that
In this case, is called a retraction of Conversely, is called a section of
Conversely, every injection with a non-empty domain has a left inverse . It can be defined by choosing an element in the domain of and setting to the unique element of the pre-image (if it is non-empty) or to (otherwise).Template:Refn
The left inverse is not necessarily an inverse of because the composition in the other order, may differ from the identity on In other words, an injective function can be "reversed" by a left inverse, but is not necessarily invertible, which requires that the function is bijective.
Injections may be made invertible
In fact, to turn an injective function into a bijective (hence invertible) function, it suffices to replace its codomain by its actual image That is, let such that for all ; then is bijective. Indeed, can be factored as where is the inclusion function from into
More generally, injective partial functions are called partial bijections.
Other properties
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
- If and are both injective then is injective.
- If is injective, then is injective (but need not be).
- is injective if and only if, given any functions whenever then In other words, injective functions are precisely the monomorphisms in the category Set of sets.
- If is injective and is a subset of then Thus, can be recovered from its image
- If is injective and and are both subsets of then
- Every function can be decomposed as for a suitable injection and surjection This decomposition is unique up to isomorphism, and may be thought of as the inclusion function of the range of as a subset of the codomain of
- If is an injective function, then has at least as many elements as in the sense of cardinal numbers. In particular, if, in addition, there is an injection from to then and have the same cardinal number. (This is known as the Cantor–Bernstein–Schroeder theorem.)
- If both and are finite with the same number of elements, then is injective if and only if is surjective (in which case is bijective).
- An injective function which is a homomorphism between two algebraic structures is an embedding.
- Unlike surjectivity, which is a relation between the graph of a function and its codomain, injectivity is a property of the graph of the function alone; that is, whether a function is injective can be decided by only considering the graph (and not the codomain) of
Proving that functions are injective
A proof that a function is injective depends on how the function is presented and what properties the function holds. For functions that are given by some formula there is a basic idea. We use the definition of injectivity, namely that if then [6]
Here is an example:
Proof: Let Suppose So implies which implies Therefore, it follows from the definition that is injective.
There are multiple other methods of proving that a function is injective. For example, in calculus if is a differentiable function defined on some interval, then it is sufficient to show that the derivative is always positive or always negative on that interval. In linear algebra, if is a linear transformation it is sufficient to show that the kernel of contains only the zero vector. If is a function with finite domain it is sufficient to look through the list of images of each domain element and check that no image occurs twice on the list.
A graphical approach for a real-valued function of a real variable is the horizontal line test. If every horizontal line intersects the curve of in at most one point, then is injective or one-to-one.
Gallery
Script error: No such module "Gallery".
Script error: No such module "Gallery".
See also
Notes
Template:Reflist Template:Reflist
References
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"., p. 17 ff.
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"., p. 38 ff.
External links
Template:Sister project Template:Sister project
- Earliest Uses of Some of the Words of Mathematics: entry on Injection, Surjection and Bijection has the history of Injection and related terms.
- Khan Academy – Surjective (onto) and Injective (one-to-one) functions: Introduction to surjective and injective functions
- ↑ Sometimes one-one function, in Indian mathematical education. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".