Lexical aspect: Difference between revisions
imported>SRamzy No edit summary |
imported>Altenmann No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Update|date=July 2019|1=work since the 2000s}} | {{Update|date=July 2019|1=work since the 2000s}} | ||
In [[linguistics]], the '''lexical aspect''', '''situation type''' or '''Aktionsart''' ({{IPA|de|ʔakˈtsi̯oːnsˌʔaːɐ̯t}}, plural ''Aktionsarten'' {{IPA|[ʔakˈtsi̯oːnsˌʔaːɐ̯tn̩]}}) of an event is part of the way in which that event is structured in relation to [[time]]. For example, the [[English language|English]] verbs ''arrive'' and ''run'' differ in their lexical aspect since the former describes an event which [[Telicity|has a natural endpoint]] while the latter does not. Lexical aspect differs from [[grammatical aspect]] in that it is an inherent [[semantic property]] of a [[Predicate (grammar)|predicate]], while grammatical aspect is a [[Syntax|syntactic]] or [[Morphology (linguistics)|morphological]] property. Although lexical aspect need not be marked morphologically, it has downstream grammatical effects, for instance that ''arrive'' can be modified by "in an hour" while ''believe'' cannot. | In [[linguistics]], the '''lexical aspect''', '''situation type''' or '''Aktionsart''' ({{IPA|de|ʔakˈtsi̯oːnsˌʔaːɐ̯t}}, plural ''Aktionsarten'' {{IPA|[ʔakˈtsi̯oːnsˌʔaːɐ̯tn̩]}}) of an event is part of the way in which that event is structured in relation to [[time]]. For example, the [[English language|English]] verbs ''arrive'' and ''run'' differ in their lexical aspect since the former describes an event which [[Telicity|has a natural endpoint]] while the latter does not. Lexical aspect differs from [[grammatical aspect]] in that it is an inherent [[semantic property]] of a [[Predicate (grammar)|predicate]], while grammatical aspect is a [[Syntax|syntactic]] or [[Morphology (linguistics)|morphological]] property. Although lexical aspect need not be marked morphologically, it has downstream grammatical effects, for instance that ''arrive'' can be modified by "in an hour" while ''believe'' cannot.{{cn|date=December 2025}}{{dubious|date=December 2025|reason=yes, I can believe in an hour, when the evidence arrives}} | ||
==Theories of aspectual class== | ==Theories of aspectual class== | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
|colspan="3" style="background-color:green;"| | |colspan="3" style="background-color:green;"| | ||
|} | |} | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Latest revision as of 04:29, 15 December 2025
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Distinguish". Template:Grammatical categories Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
In linguistics, the lexical aspect, situation type or Aktionsart (Script error: No such module "IPA"., plural Aktionsarten Script error: No such module "IPA".) of an event is part of the way in which that event is structured in relation to time. For example, the English verbs arrive and run differ in their lexical aspect since the former describes an event which has a natural endpoint while the latter does not. Lexical aspect differs from grammatical aspect in that it is an inherent semantic property of a predicate, while grammatical aspect is a syntactic or morphological property. Although lexical aspect need not be marked morphologically, it has downstream grammatical effects, for instance that arrive can be modified by "in an hour" while believe cannot.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Theories of aspectual class
Although all theories of lexical aspect recognize that verbs divide into different classes, the details of the classification differ. An early attempt by Vendler recognized four classes, which has been modified several times.
Vendler's classification
Zeno Vendler classified verbs into four categories on whether they express "activity", "accomplishment", "achievement" or "state". Activities and accomplishments are distinguished from achievements and states in that the first two allow the use of continuous and progressive aspects. Activities and accomplishments are distinguished from each other by boundedness. Activities do not have a terminal point (a point before which the activity has taken place and after which it cannot continue: "John drew a circle"), but accomplishments have one. Of achievements and states, achievements are instantaneous, but states are durative. Achievements and accomplishments are distinguished from one another in that achievements take place immediately (such as in "recognise" or "find"), but accomplishments approach an endpoint incrementally (as in "paint a picture" or "build a house").[1][2]
Comrie's classification
In his discussion of lexical aspect, Bernard Comrie included the category semelfactive or punctual events such as "sneeze". His divisions of the categories were as follows: states, activities, and accomplishments are durative, but semelfactives and achievements are punctual. Of the durative verbs, states are unique as they involve no change, and activities are atelic (that is, have no "terminal point") whereas accomplishments are telic. Of the punctual verbs, semelfactives are atelic, and achievements are telic. The following table shows examples of lexical aspect in English that involve change (an example of a state is 'know').[1][3]
| Punctual | Durative | |
|---|---|---|
| Telic | Achievement (to release) |
Accomplishment (to drown) |
| Atelic | Semelfactive (to knock) |
Activity (to walk) |
| Static | State (to know) |
Moens and Steedman's classification
Another classification is proposed by Moens and Steedman, based on the idea of the event nucleus.[4]
| Event nucleus | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Preparatory
phase |
Culminating
event |
Consequent
phase | |
| Semelfactive | |||
| State | |||
| Activity | |||
| Achievement | |||
| Accomplishment | |||
See also
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Template:Grammatical aspects Template:Formal semantics Template:Authority control