Dicynodontia: Difference between revisions
imported>Dominic3203 Open access status updates in citations with OAbot #oabot |
imported>UtherSRG m Reverted edit by ~2025-31111-21 (talk) to last version by BunnysBot |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| image2 = Placerias.jpg | | image2 = Placerias.jpg | ||
| image2_caption = Skeleton of ''[[Placerias]]'' | | image2_caption = Skeleton of ''[[Placerias]]'' | ||
| fossil_range = [[Middle Permian]] to [[Late Triassic]] {{fossil range|268| | | fossil_range = <br /> [[Middle Permian]] ([[Wordian]]) to [[Late Triassic]] ([[Norian]]) {{fossil range|268|211}} | ||
| display_parents = 2 | | display_parents = 2 | ||
| taxon = Dicynodontia | | taxon = Dicynodontia | ||
| authority = [[Richard Owen|Owen]], 1859 | | authority = [[Richard Owen|Owen]], 1859 | ||
| subdivision_ranks = Clades & genera | | subdivision_ranks = Clades & genera | ||
| subdivision = | | subdivision = See [[#Taxonomy|text]] | ||
| synonyms = Dicynodonta<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Lankester |first=E. Ray |date=1877-10-01 |title=Notes on the embryology and classification of the animal kingdom: Comprising a revision of speculations relative to the origin and significance of the germ-layers. |journal=Journal of Cell Science |volume=s2-17 |issue=68 |pages=399–454 |doi=10.1242/jcs.s2-17.68.399 |issn=0021-9533}}</ref> | |||
}} | }} | ||
'''Dicynodontia''' is an extinct [[clade]] of [[anomodont]]s, an extinct type of non-mammalian [[therapsid]]. Dicynodonts were [[herbivore]]s that typically bore a pair of tusks, hence their name, which means 'two dog tooth'. Members of the group possessed a horny, typically toothless beak, unique amongst all [[synapsid]]s. Dicynodonts first appeared in Southern Pangaea during the [[Guadalupian|mid-Permian]], ca. 270–260 million years ago, and became globally distributed and the dominant herbivorous animals in the [[Permian|Late Permian]], ca. 260–252 Mya. They were devastated by the [[Permian–Triassic extinction event|end-Permian | '''Dicynodontia''' is an extinct [[clade]] of [[anomodont]]s, an extinct type of non-mammalian [[therapsid]]. Dicynodonts were [[herbivore]]s that typically bore a pair of tusks, hence their name, which means 'two dog tooth'. Members of the group possessed a horny, typically toothless beak, unique amongst all [[synapsid]]s. Dicynodonts first appeared in Southern Pangaea during the [[Guadalupian|mid-Permian]], ca. 270–260 million years ago, and became globally distributed and the dominant herbivorous animals in the [[Permian|Late Permian]], ca. 260–252 Mya. They were devastated by the [[Permian–Triassic extinction event|end-Permian mass extinction]] that wiped out most other therapsids ca. 252 Mya. They rebounded at beginning of the following [[Triassic]], but subsequently declined and died out towards the end of that period. They were the most successful and diverse of the non-mammalian therapsids, with over 80-90 [[genus|genera]] known, varying from rat-sized [[Fossorial|burrowers]] to elephant-sized [[Browsing (herbivory)|browsers]]. | ||
==Characteristics== | ==Characteristics== | ||
[[Image:Dinodontosaurus museu2x.jpg|thumb|left|Dicynodont fossils]] | [[Image:Dinodontosaurus museu2x.jpg|thumb|left|Dicynodont fossils]] | ||
[[Image:Diictodon-A72-03.jpg|thumb|right|''[[Diictodon]]'' life-sized model]] | [[Image:Diictodon-A72-03.jpg|thumb|right|''[[Diictodon]]'' life-sized model]] | ||
The dicynodont [[skull]] is highly specialised, light but strong, with the [[synapsida|synapsid]] temporal openings at the rear of the skull greatly enlarged to accommodate larger jaw muscles. The front of the skull and the lower jaw are generally narrow and, in all but a number of primitive forms, toothless. Instead, the front of the mouth is equipped with a horny beak, as in [[turtle]]s and [[ceratopsia]]n [[dinosaur]]s. Food was processed by the retraction of the lower jaw when the mouth closed, producing a powerful shearing action,<ref name=Crompton>{{cite journal |last1=Crompton |first1=A. W. |last2=Hotton |first2=N. |year=1967 |title=Functional morphology of the masticatory apparatus of two dicynodonts (Reptilia, Therapsida) |journal=Postilla |volume=109 |pages=1–51}}</ref> which would have enabled dicynodonts to cope with tough plant material. Dicynodonts typically had a pair of enlarged maxillary caniniform teeth, analogous to the [[tusk]]s present in some living mammals. In the earliest genera, they were merely enlarged teeth, but in later forms they independently evolved into ever-growing teeth like mammal tusks multiple times.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Whitney |first1=M. R. |last2=Angielczyk |first2=K. D. |last3=Peecook |first3=B. R. |last4=Sidor |first4=C. A. |year=2021 |title=The evolution of the synapsid tusk: Insights from dicynodont therapsid tusk histology |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=288 |issue=1961 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2021.1670 |pmc=8548784 |pmid=34702071 |s2cid=239890042}}</ref> In some dicynodonts, the presence of tusks has been suggested to be [[sexually dimorphic]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Angielczyk |first1=Kenneth D. |last2=Benoit |first2=Julien |last3=Rubidge |first3=Bruce S. |date=February 2021 |editor-last=Ruta |editor-first=Marcello |title=A new tusked cistecephalid dicynodont (Therapsida, Anomodontia) from the upper Permian upper Madumabisa Mudstone Formation, Luangwa Basin, Zambia |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/spp2.1285 |journal=Papers in Palaeontology |language=en |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=405–446 |doi=10.1002/spp2.1285 |s2cid=210304700 |issn=2056-2799|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Some dicynodonts such as ''[[Stahleckeria]]'' lacked true tusks and instead bore tusk-like extensions on the side of the beak.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Kammerer |first1=Christian F. |last2=Ordoñez |first2=Maria de los Angeles |date=2021-06-01 |title=Dicynodonts (Therapsida: Anomodontia) of South America |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895981121000183 |journal=Journal of South American Earth Sciences |language=en |volume=108 | | The dicynodont [[skull]] is highly specialised, light but strong, with the [[synapsida|synapsid]] temporal openings at the rear of the skull greatly enlarged to accommodate larger jaw muscles. The front of the skull and the lower jaw are generally narrow and, in all but a number of primitive forms, toothless. Instead, the front of the mouth is equipped with a horny beak, as in [[turtle]]s and [[ceratopsia]]n [[dinosaur]]s. Food was processed by the retraction of the lower jaw when the mouth closed, producing a powerful shearing action,<ref name=Crompton>{{cite journal |last1=Crompton |first1=A. W. |last2=Hotton |first2=N. |year=1967 |title=Functional morphology of the masticatory apparatus of two dicynodonts (Reptilia, Therapsida) |journal=Postilla |volume=109 |pages=1–51}}</ref> which would have enabled dicynodonts to cope with tough plant material. Dicynodonts typically had a pair of enlarged maxillary caniniform teeth, analogous to the [[tusk]]s present in some living mammals. In the earliest genera, they were merely enlarged teeth, but in later forms they independently evolved into ever-growing teeth like mammal tusks multiple times.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Whitney |first1=M. R. |last2=Angielczyk |first2=K. D. |last3=Peecook |first3=B. R. |last4=Sidor |first4=C. A. |year=2021 |title=The evolution of the synapsid tusk: Insights from dicynodont therapsid tusk histology |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=288 |issue=1961 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2021.1670 |pmc=8548784 |pmid=34702071 |s2cid=239890042}}</ref> In some dicynodonts, the presence of tusks has been suggested to be [[sexually dimorphic]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Angielczyk |first1=Kenneth D. |last2=Benoit |first2=Julien |last3=Rubidge |first3=Bruce S. |date=February 2021 |editor-last=Ruta |editor-first=Marcello |title=A new tusked cistecephalid dicynodont (Therapsida, Anomodontia) from the upper Permian upper Madumabisa Mudstone Formation, Luangwa Basin, Zambia |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/spp2.1285 |journal=Papers in Palaeontology |language=en |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=405–446 |doi=10.1002/spp2.1285 |s2cid=210304700 |issn=2056-2799|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Some dicynodonts such as ''[[Stahleckeria]]'' lacked true tusks and instead bore tusk-like extensions on the side of the beak.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Kammerer |first1=Christian F. |last2=Ordoñez |first2=Maria de los Angeles |date=2021-06-01 |title=Dicynodonts (Therapsida: Anomodontia) of South America |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895981121000183 |journal=Journal of South American Earth Sciences |language=en |volume=108 |article-number=103171 |doi=10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103171 |bibcode=2021JSAES.10803171K |s2cid=233565963 |issn=0895-9811|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref name=Colbert>[[Edwin H. Colbert|Colbert, E. H.]], (1969), ''Evolution of the Vertebrates'', John Wiley & Sons Inc (2nd ed.)</ref>{{rp|139}} | ||
The body is short, strong and barrel-shaped, with strong limbs. In large genera (such as ''[[Dinodontosaurus]]'') the hindlimbs were held erect, but the forelimbs bent at the elbow. Both the [[pectoral girdle]] and the [[ilium (bone)|ilium]] are large and strong. The tail is short.{{Citation needed|date=July 2021}} | The body is short, strong and barrel-shaped, with strong limbs. In large genera (such as ''[[Dinodontosaurus]]'') the hindlimbs were held erect, but the forelimbs bent at the elbow. Both the [[pectoral girdle]] and the [[ilium (bone)|ilium]] are large and strong. The tail is short.{{Citation needed|date=July 2021}} | ||
''[[Pentasauropus]]'' dicynodont tracks suggest that dicynodonts had fleshy pads on their feet.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Triassic pentadactyl tracks from the Los Menucos Group (Río Negro province, Patagonia Argentina): possible constraints on the autopodial posture of Gondwanan trackmakers|first1=Paolo|last1=Citton|first2=Ignacio|last2=Díaz-Martínez|first3=Silvina|last3=de Valais|first4=Carlos|last4=Cónsole-Gonella|date=7 August 2018|journal=PeerJ|volume=6| | ''[[Pentasauropus]]'' dicynodont tracks suggest that dicynodonts had fleshy pads on their feet.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Triassic pentadactyl tracks from the Los Menucos Group (Río Negro province, Patagonia Argentina): possible constraints on the autopodial posture of Gondwanan trackmakers|first1=Paolo|last1=Citton|first2=Ignacio|last2=Díaz-Martínez|first3=Silvina|last3=de Valais|first4=Carlos|last4=Cónsole-Gonella|date=7 August 2018|journal=PeerJ|volume=6|article-number=e5358|doi=10.7717/peerj.5358|pmid=30123702|pmc=6086091 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Mummified skin from specimens of ''[[Lystrosaurus]]'' in South Africa have numerous raised bumps.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Smith |first1=Roger M.H. |last2=Botha |first2=Jennifer |last3=Viglietti |first3=Pia A. |date=October 2022 |title=Taphonomy of drought afflicted tetrapods in the Early Triassic Karoo Basin, South Africa |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0031018222003777 |journal=Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology |language=en |volume=604 |article-number=111207 |doi=10.1016/j.palaeo.2022.111207|bibcode=2022PPP...60411207S |s2cid=251781291 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> | ||
===Endothermy and soft tissue anatomy=== | ===Endothermy and soft tissue anatomy=== | ||
Dicynodonts have long been suspected of being [[warm-blooded]] animals. Their bones are highly vascularised and possess [[Haversian canal]]s, and their bodily proportions are conducive to heat preservation.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bakker |first1=Robert T. |title=Dinosaur renaissance |journal=Scientific American |date=April 1975 |volume=232 |issue=4 |pages=58–79 |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0475-58|bibcode=1975SciAm.232d..58B }}</ref> In young specimens, the bones are so highly vascularised that they exhibit higher channel densities than most other therapsids.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Botha-Brink | first1 = Jennifer | last2 = Angielczyk | first2 = Kenneth D. | year = 2010| title = Do extraordinarily high growth rates in Permo-Triassic dicynodonts (Therapsida, Anomodontia) explain their success before and after the end-Permian extinction? | journal = Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society| volume = 160| issue = 2| pages = 341–365| doi = 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00601.x | doi-access = free}}</ref> Yet, studies on [[Late Triassic]] dicynodont [[coprolite]]s paradoxically showcase digestive patterns more typical of animals with slow metabolisms.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bajdek |first1=Piotr |last2=Owocki |first2=Krzysztof |last3=Niedźwiedzki |first3=Grzegorz |title=Putative dicynodont coprolites from the Upper Triassic of Poland |journal=Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology |date=2014 |volume=411 |pages=1–17 |doi=10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.06.013|bibcode=2014PPP...411....1B }}</ref> | Dicynodonts have long been suspected of being [[warm-blooded]] animals. Their bones are highly vascularised and possess [[Haversian canal]]s, and their bodily proportions are conducive to heat preservation.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bakker |first1=Robert T. |title=Dinosaur renaissance |journal=Scientific American |date=April 1975 |volume=232 |issue=4 |pages=58–79 |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0475-58|bibcode=1975SciAm.232d..58B }}</ref> In young specimens, the bones are so highly vascularised that they exhibit higher channel densities than most other therapsids.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Botha-Brink | first1 = Jennifer | last2 = Angielczyk | first2 = Kenneth D. | year = 2010| title = Do extraordinarily high growth rates in Permo-Triassic dicynodonts (Therapsida, Anomodontia) explain their success before and after the end-Permian extinction? | journal = Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society| volume = 160| issue = 2| pages = 341–365| doi = 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00601.x | doi-access = free}}</ref> Yet, studies on [[Late Triassic]] dicynodont [[coprolite]]s paradoxically showcase digestive patterns more typical of animals with slow metabolisms.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bajdek |first1=Piotr |last2=Owocki |first2=Krzysztof |last3=Niedźwiedzki |first3=Grzegorz |title=Putative dicynodont coprolites from the Upper Triassic of Poland |journal=Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology |date=2014 |volume=411 |pages=1–17 |doi=10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.06.013|bibcode=2014PPP...411....1B }}</ref> | ||
More recently, the discovery of [[hair]] remnants in [[Permian]] [[coprolite]]s possibly vindicates the status of dicynodonts as endothermic animals. As these coprolites come from carnivorous species and digested dicynodont bones are abundant, it has been suggested that at least some of these hair remnants come from dicynodont prey.<ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1111/let.12156 | title=Microbiota and food residues including possible evidence of pre-mammalian hair in Upper Permian coprolites from Russia | journal=Lethaia| volume=49 | issue=4 | pages=455–477 | year=2016 | last1=Bajdek | first1=Piotr | last2=Qvarnström | first2=Martin | last3=Owocki | first3=Krzysztof | last4=Sulej | first4=Tomasz | last5=Sennikov | first5=Andrey G. | last6=Golubev | first6=Valeriy K. | last7=Niedźwiedzki | first7=Grzegorz }}</ref> A new study using chemical analysis seemed to suggest that cynodonts and dicynodonts both developed warm blood independently before the Permian extinction.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rey |first1=Kévin |last2=Amiot |first2=Romain |last3=Fourel |first3=François |last4=Abdala |first4=Fernando |last5=Fluteau |first5=Frédéric |last6=Jalil |first6=Nour-Eddine |last7=Liu |first7=Jun |last8=Rubidge |first8=Bruce S. |last9=Smith |first9=Roger MH |last10=Steyer |first10=J. Sébastien |last11=Viglietti |first11=Pia A |last12=Wang |first12=Xu |last13=Lécuyer |first13=Christophe |title=Oxygen isotopes suggest elevated thermometabolism within multiple Permo-Triassic therapsid clades |journal=eLife |date=2017 |volume=6 | | More recently, the discovery of [[hair]] remnants in [[Permian]] [[coprolite]]s possibly vindicates the status of dicynodonts as endothermic animals. As these coprolites come from carnivorous species and digested dicynodont bones are abundant, it has been suggested that at least some of these hair remnants come from dicynodont prey.<ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1111/let.12156 | title=Microbiota and food residues including possible evidence of pre-mammalian hair in Upper Permian coprolites from Russia | journal=Lethaia| volume=49 | issue=4 | pages=455–477 | year=2016 | last1=Bajdek | first1=Piotr | last2=Qvarnström | first2=Martin | last3=Owocki | first3=Krzysztof | last4=Sulej | first4=Tomasz | last5=Sennikov | first5=Andrey G. | last6=Golubev | first6=Valeriy K. | last7=Niedźwiedzki | first7=Grzegorz }}</ref> A new study using chemical analysis seemed to suggest that cynodonts and dicynodonts both developed warm blood independently before the Permian extinction.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Rey |first1=Kévin |last2=Amiot |first2=Romain |last3=Fourel |first3=François |last4=Abdala |first4=Fernando |last5=Fluteau |first5=Frédéric |last6=Jalil |first6=Nour-Eddine |last7=Liu |first7=Jun |last8=Rubidge |first8=Bruce S. |last9=Smith |first9=Roger MH |last10=Steyer |first10=J. Sébastien |last11=Viglietti |first11=Pia A |last12=Wang |first12=Xu |last13=Lécuyer |first13=Christophe |title=Oxygen isotopes suggest elevated thermometabolism within multiple Permo-Triassic therapsid clades |journal=eLife |date=2017 |volume=6 |article-number=e28589 |doi=10.7554/eLife.28589|pmid=28716184 |pmc=5515572 |doi-access=free }}</ref> | ||
== History == | == History of discovery and research == | ||
[[Image:Dicynodon lacerticeps.jpg|thumb|right|''[[Dicynodon lacerticeps]]'' skull illustration, first published in an 1845 description by [[Richard Owen|Sir Richard Owen]]]] | [[Image:Dicynodon lacerticeps.jpg|thumb|right|''[[Dicynodon lacerticeps]]'' skull illustration, first published in an 1845 description by [[Richard Owen|Sir Richard Owen]]]] | ||
A 2024 paper posited that [[rock art]] of a superficially walrus-like imaginary creature with downcurved tusks created by the [[San people]] of [[South Africa]] prior to 1835 may have been partly inspired by fossil dicynodont skulls which erode out of rocks in the area.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Benoit |first=J |year=2024 |title=A possible later stone age painting of a dicynodont (Synapsida) from the South African Karoo |url=https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309908 |journal=PLOS One}}</ref> | A 2024 paper posited that [[rock art]] of a superficially walrus-like imaginary creature with downcurved tusks created by the [[San people]] of [[South Africa]] prior to 1835 may have been partly inspired by fossil dicynodont skulls which erode out of rocks in the area.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Benoit |first=J |year=2024 |title=A possible later stone age painting of a dicynodont (Synapsida) from the South African Karoo |url=https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309908 |journal=PLOS One}}</ref> | ||
| Line 43: | Line 44: | ||
| footer = ''[[Lisowicia]]'', from Late Triassic Poland | | footer = ''[[Lisowicia]]'', from Late Triassic Poland | ||
}} | }} | ||
Dicynodonts first appeared during the [[Guadalupian|Middle Permian]] in the Southern Hemisphere, with South Africa being the centre of their known diversity, and underwent a rapid [[evolutionary radiation]], becoming globally distributed and amongst the most successful and abundant land vertebrates during the [[Lopingian|Late Permian]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kurkin|first=A. A.|date=July 2011|title=Permian anomodonts: Paleobiogeography and distribution of the group|url=http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S0031030111030075|journal=Paleontological Journal|language=en|volume=45|issue=4|pages=432–444|doi=10.1134/S0031030111030075|s2cid=129331000|issn=0031-0301|url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Olroyd|first1=Savannah L.|last2=Sidor|first2=Christian A.|date=August 2017|title=A review of the Guadalupian (middle Permian) global tetrapod fossil record|journal=Earth-Science Reviews|volume=171|pages=583–597|doi=10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.07.001|bibcode=2017ESRv..171..583O|issn=0012-8252|doi-access=free}}</ref> During this time, they included a large variety of ecotypes, including large, medium-sized, and small herbivores and short-limbed mole-like burrowers.<ref>{{cite book|doi=10.1515/9783110341553-005|chapter=5. Non-Mammalian synapsids: The deep roots of the mammalian family tree |title=Mammalian Evolution, Diversity and Systematics |year=2018 |last1=Angielczyk |first1=Kenneth D. |last2=Kammerer |first2=Christian F. |pages=117–198 |isbn= | Dicynodonts first appeared during the [[Guadalupian|Middle Permian]] in the Southern Hemisphere, with South Africa being the centre of their known diversity, and underwent a rapid [[evolutionary radiation]], becoming globally distributed and amongst the most successful and abundant land vertebrates during the [[Lopingian|Late Permian]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kurkin|first=A. A.|date=July 2011|title=Permian anomodonts: Paleobiogeography and distribution of the group|url=http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S0031030111030075|journal=Paleontological Journal|language=en|volume=45|issue=4|pages=432–444|doi=10.1134/S0031030111030075|s2cid=129331000|issn=0031-0301|url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Olroyd|first1=Savannah L.|last2=Sidor|first2=Christian A.|date=August 2017|title=A review of the Guadalupian (middle Permian) global tetrapod fossil record|journal=Earth-Science Reviews|volume=171|pages=583–597|doi=10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.07.001|bibcode=2017ESRv..171..583O|issn=0012-8252|doi-access=free}}</ref> During this time, they included a large variety of ecotypes, including large, medium-sized, and small herbivores and short-limbed mole-like burrowers.<ref>{{cite book|doi=10.1515/9783110341553-005|chapter=5. Non-Mammalian synapsids: The deep roots of the mammalian family tree |title=Mammalian Evolution, Diversity and Systematics |year=2018 |last1=Angielczyk |first1=Kenneth D. |last2=Kammerer |first2=Christian F. |pages=117–198 |isbn=978-3-11-034155-3 |s2cid=92370138 }}</ref> | ||
Only four lineages are known to have survived the [[Permian–Triassic extinction event|Great Dying]]; the first three represented with a single genus each: ''[[Myosaurus]]'', ''[[Kombuisia]]'', and ''[[Lystrosaurus]]'', the latter being the most common and widespread herbivores of the [[Induan]] (earliest [[Triassic]]). None of these survived long into the Triassic. The fourth group was the [[Kannemeyeriiformes]], the only dicynodonts who diversified during the Triassic.<ref>{{cite journal|title=On the validity and phylogenetic position of ''Eubrachiosaurus browni'', a kannemeyeriiform dicynodont (Anomodontia) from Triassic North America |first1=Christian F.|last1=Kammerer|first2=Jörg|last2=Fröbisch|first3=Kenneth D.|last3=Angielczyk|date=31 May 2013|journal=PLOS ONE |volume=8 |issue=5 | | Only four lineages are known to have survived the [[Permian–Triassic extinction event|Great Dying]]; the first three represented with a single genus each: ''[[Myosaurus]]'', ''[[Kombuisia]]'', and ''[[Lystrosaurus]]'', the latter being the most common and widespread herbivores of the [[Induan]] (earliest [[Triassic]]). None of these survived long into the Triassic. The fourth group was the [[Kannemeyeriiformes]], the only dicynodonts who diversified during the Triassic.<ref>{{cite journal|title=On the validity and phylogenetic position of ''Eubrachiosaurus browni'', a kannemeyeriiform dicynodont (Anomodontia) from Triassic North America |first1=Christian F.|last1=Kammerer|first2=Jörg|last2=Fröbisch|first3=Kenneth D.|last3=Angielczyk|date=31 May 2013|journal=PLOS ONE |volume=8 |issue=5 |article-number=e64203 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0064203|pmid=23741307|pmc=3669350|bibcode=2013PLoSO...864203K|doi-access=free}}</ref> These stocky, pig- to ox-sized animals were the most abundant herbivores worldwide from the [[Olenekian]] to the [[Ladinian]] age. By the [[Carnian]] they had been supplanted by [[Traversodontidae|traversodont]] cynodonts and [[rhynchosaur]] reptiles. During the [[Norian]] (middle of the Late Triassic), perhaps due to increasing aridity, they drastically declined, and the role of large herbivores was taken over by [[Sauropodomorpha|sauropodomorph]] dinosaurs.{{Citation needed|date=July 2021}} | ||
Fossils of an [[Asian elephant]]-sized dicynodont ''[[Lisowicia]] bojani'' discovered in [[Poland]] indicate that dicynodonts survived at least until the late Norian or earliest [[Rhaetian]] (latest Triassic); this animal was also the largest known dicynodont species.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Tomasz Sulej |author2=Grzegorz Niedźwiedzki |year=2019 |title=An elephant-sized Late Triassic synapsid with erect limbs |journal=Science |volume=363 |issue= 6422|pages= 78–80|doi=10.1126/science.aal4853 |pmid=30467179 |bibcode=2019Sci...363...78S |doi-access=free |url=https://zenodo.org/record/2532919 }}</ref><ref name="NYT-20190104">{{cite news |last=St. Fleur |first=Nicholas |title=An Elephant-Size Relative of Mammals That Grazed Alongside Dinosaurs |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/04/science/dicynodonts-fossils-poland.html |date=4 January 2019 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=6 January 2019 }}</ref> | Fossils of an [[Asian elephant]]-sized dicynodont ''[[Lisowicia]] bojani'' discovered in [[Poland]] indicate that dicynodonts survived at least until the late Norian or earliest [[Rhaetian]] (latest Triassic, at earliest 211 million years ago,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kowal-Linka |first=Monika |last2=Krzemińska |first2=Ewa |last3=Czupyt |first3=Zbigniew |date=January 2019 |title=The youngest detrital zircons from the Upper Triassic Lipie Śląskie (Lisowice) continental deposits (Poland): Implications for the maximum depositional age of the Lisowice bone-bearing horizon |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0031018218307545 |journal=Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology |language=en |volume=514 |pages=487–501 |doi=10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.11.012|url-access=subscription }}</ref> and probably no later than around 205 million years ago<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Mujal |first=Eudald |last2=Sues |first2=Hans-Dieter |last3=Moreno |first3=Raphael |last4=Schaeffer |first4=Joep |last5=Sobral |first5=Gabriela |last6=Chakravorti |first6=Sanjukta |last7=Spiekman |first7=Stephan N.F. |last8=Schoch |first8=Rainer R. |date=May 2025 |title=Triassic terrestrial tetrapod faunas of the Central European Basin, their stratigraphical distribution, and their palaeoenvironments |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0012825225000467 |journal=Earth-Science Reviews |language=en |volume=264 |article-number=105085 |doi=10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105085}}</ref>); this animal was also the largest known dicynodont species.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Tomasz Sulej |author2=Grzegorz Niedźwiedzki |year=2019 |title=An elephant-sized Late Triassic synapsid with erect limbs |journal=Science |volume=363 |issue= 6422|pages= 78–80|doi=10.1126/science.aal4853 |pmid=30467179 |bibcode=2019Sci...363...78S |doi-access=free |url=https://zenodo.org/record/2532919 }}</ref><ref name="NYT-20190104">{{cite news |last=St. Fleur |first=Nicholas |title=An Elephant-Size Relative of Mammals That Grazed Alongside Dinosaurs |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/04/science/dicynodonts-fossils-poland.html |date=4 January 2019 |work=[[The New York Times]] |access-date=6 January 2019 }}</ref> Six fragments of fossil bone discovered in [[Queensland]], Australia, were interpreted as remains of a skull in 2003. This suggested by some author to indicate that dicynodonts survived into the [[Cretaceous]] in southern [[Gondwana]].<ref name="Thulborn">{{cite journal |last1=Thulborn |first1=T. |last2=Turner |first2=S. |title=The last dicynodont: an Australian Cretaceous relict|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume=270|issue=1518|year=2003|pages=985–993|doi=10.1098/rspb.2002.2296 |jstor=3558635 |pmid=12803915 |pmc=1691326}}</ref> The dicynodont affinity of these specimens was questioned (including a proposal that they belonged to a [[Baurusuchidae|baurusuchian]] crocodyliform by Agnolin et al. in 2010),<ref name="agnolinetal2010">{{cite journal |last=Agnolin |first=F. L. |author2=Ezcurra, M. D. |author3=Pais, D. F. |author4= Salisbury, S. W. |year=2010 |title=A reappraisal of the Cretaceous non-avian dinosaur faunas from Australia and New Zealand: Evidence for their Gondwanan affinities |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=257–300 |doi=10.1080/14772011003594870|s2cid=130568551 |url=https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:206067/UQ206067.pdf }}</ref> and in 2019 Knutsen and Oerlemans considered this fossil to be of [[Pliocene|Plio]]-[[Pleistocene]] age, and reinterpreted it as a fossil of a large mammal, probably a [[Diprotodontidae|diprotodontid]] marsupial.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Espen M. Knutsen |author2=Emma Oerlemans |year=2019 |title=The last dicynodont? Re-assessing the taxonomic and temporal relationships of a contentious Australian fossil |journal=Gondwana Research |volume=77 |pages= 184–203|doi=10.1016/j.gr.2019.07.011 |s2cid=202908716 |doi-access= }}</ref> | ||
Six fragments of fossil bone discovered in [[Queensland]], Australia, were interpreted as remains of a skull in 2003. This suggested to indicate that dicynodonts survived into the [[Cretaceous]] in southern [[Gondwana]].<ref name = "Thulborn">{{cite journal |last1=Thulborn |first1=T. |last2=Turner |first2=S. |title=The last dicynodont: an Australian Cretaceous relict|journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences|volume=270|issue=1518|year=2003|pages=985–993|doi=10.1098/rspb.2002.2296 |jstor=3558635 |pmid=12803915 |pmc=1691326}}</ref> The dicynodont affinity of these specimens was questioned (including a proposal that they belonged to a [[Baurusuchidae|baurusuchian]] crocodyliform by Agnolin et al. in 2010),<ref name=agnolinetal2010>{{cite journal |last=Agnolin |first=F. L. |author2=Ezcurra, M. D. |author3=Pais, D. F. |author4= Salisbury, S. W. |year=2010 |title=A reappraisal of the Cretaceous non-avian dinosaur faunas from Australia and New Zealand: Evidence for their Gondwanan affinities |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |volume=8 |issue=2 |pages=257–300 |doi=10.1080/14772011003594870|s2cid=130568551 |url=https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:206067/UQ206067.pdf }}</ref> and in 2019 Knutsen and Oerlemans considered this fossil to be of [[Pliocene|Plio]]-[[Pleistocene]] age, and reinterpreted it as a fossil of a large mammal, probably a [[Diprotodontidae|diprotodontid]].<ref>{{cite journal |author1=Espen M. Knutsen |author2=Emma Oerlemans |year=2019 |title=The last dicynodont? Re-assessing the taxonomic and temporal relationships of a contentious Australian fossil |journal=Gondwana Research |volume=77 |pages= 184–203|doi=10.1016/j.gr.2019.07.011 |s2cid=202908716 |doi-access= }}</ref> | |||
With the decline and extinction of the kannemeyerids, there were to be no more dominant large synapsid herbivores until the middle [[Paleocene]] epoch (60 Ma) when [[mammal]]s, distant descendants of [[cynodont]]s, began to diversify after the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs. | With the decline and extinction of the kannemeyerids, there were to be no more dominant large synapsid herbivores until the middle [[Paleocene]] epoch (60 Ma) when [[mammal]]s, distant descendants of [[cynodont]]s, began to diversify after the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs. | ||
| Line 58: | Line 57: | ||
Dicynodontia was originally named by the English paleontologist [[Richard Owen]]. It was erected as a family of the order Anomodontia and included the genera ''[[Dicynodon]]'' and ''[[Ptychognathus]]''. Other groups of Anomodontia included [[Gnathodontia]], which included ''[[Rhynchosaurus]]'' (now known to be an [[archosauromorph]]) and [[Cryptodontia]], which included ''[[Oudenodon]]''. Cryptodonts were distinguished from dicynodonts from their absence of tusks. Although it lacks tusks, ''Oudenodon'' is now classified as a dicynodont, and the name Cryptodontia is no longer used. [[Thomas Henry Huxley]] revised Owen's Dicynodontia as an order that included ''Dicynodon'' and ''Oudenodon''.<ref name=OHF04>{{cite journal |last=Osborn |first=H.F. |year=1904 |title=Reclassification of the Reptilia |journal=The American Naturalist |volume=38 |issue=446 |pages=93–115 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EHMWAAAAYAAJ |doi=10.1086/278383|s2cid=84492986 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> Dicynodontia was later ranked as a suborder or infraorder with the larger group Anomodontia, which is classified as an order. The ranking of Dicynodontia has varied in recent studies, with Ivakhnenko (2008) considering it a suborder, Ivanchnenko (2008) considering it an infraorder, and Kurkin (2010) considering it an order.<ref name=KAA10>{{cite journal |last=Kurkin |first=A.A. |year=2010 |title=Late Permian dicynodonts of Eastern Europe |journal=Paleontological Journal |volume=44 |issue=6 |pages=72–80 |doi=10.1134/S0031030110060092|s2cid=131459807 }}</ref> | Dicynodontia was originally named by the English paleontologist [[Richard Owen]]. It was erected as a family of the order Anomodontia and included the genera ''[[Dicynodon]]'' and ''[[Ptychognathus]]''. Other groups of Anomodontia included [[Gnathodontia]], which included ''[[Rhynchosaurus]]'' (now known to be an [[archosauromorph]]) and [[Cryptodontia]], which included ''[[Oudenodon]]''. Cryptodonts were distinguished from dicynodonts from their absence of tusks. Although it lacks tusks, ''Oudenodon'' is now classified as a dicynodont, and the name Cryptodontia is no longer used. [[Thomas Henry Huxley]] revised Owen's Dicynodontia as an order that included ''Dicynodon'' and ''Oudenodon''.<ref name=OHF04>{{cite journal |last=Osborn |first=H.F. |year=1904 |title=Reclassification of the Reptilia |journal=The American Naturalist |volume=38 |issue=446 |pages=93–115 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EHMWAAAAYAAJ |doi=10.1086/278383|s2cid=84492986 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> Dicynodontia was later ranked as a suborder or infraorder with the larger group Anomodontia, which is classified as an order. The ranking of Dicynodontia has varied in recent studies, with Ivakhnenko (2008) considering it a suborder, Ivanchnenko (2008) considering it an infraorder, and Kurkin (2010) considering it an order.<ref name=KAA10>{{cite journal |last=Kurkin |first=A.A. |year=2010 |title=Late Permian dicynodonts of Eastern Europe |journal=Paleontological Journal |volume=44 |issue=6 |pages=72–80 |doi=10.1134/S0031030110060092|s2cid=131459807 }}</ref> | ||
Many higher taxa, including infraorders and families, have been erected as a means of classifying the large number of dicynodont species. Cluver and King (1983) recognised several main groups within Dicynodontia, including | Many higher taxa, including infraorders and families, have been erected as a means of classifying the large number of dicynodont species. Cluver and King (1983) recognised several main groups within Dicynodontia, including Eodicynodontidae (containing only ''[[Eodicynodon]]''), [[Endothiodontia]], Pristerodontia ([[Pristerodontidae]], [[Cryptodontidae]], [[Geikiidae]], [[Dicynodontidae]], [[Lystrosauridae]], and [[Kannemeyeriidae]]), Kingoriamorpha (containing only [[Kingoriidae]]), Diictodontia ([[Pylaecephalidae]], [[Robertiidae]], [[Cistecephalidae]], [[Emydopidae]], and [[Myosauridae]]), and [[Venyukoviamorpha]].<ref name=CK83>{{cite journal |last=Cluver |first=M.A. |author2=King, G.M. |year=1983 |title=A reassessment of the relationships of Permian Dicynodontia (Reptilia, Therapsida) and a new classification of dicynodont |journal=Annals of the South African Museum |volume=91 |pages=195–273}}</ref> Most of these taxa are no longer considered valid. Kammerer and Angielczyk (2009) suggested that the problematic taxonomy and nomenclature of Dicynodontia and other groups results from the large number of conflicting studies and the tendency for invalid names to be mistakenly established.<ref name=KA09/> | ||
{{Multiple image | {{Multiple image | ||
| Line 101: | Line 99: | ||
=== Phylogeny === | === Phylogeny === | ||
Below is a [[cladogram]] modified from Angielczyk et al. (2021):<ref name="Angielczyk2021">{{Cite journal|last1=Angielczyk |first1=K. D. |last2=Liu |first2=J. |last3=Yang |first3=W. |year=2021 |title=A Redescription of ''Kunpania scopulusa'', a Bidentalian Dicynodont (Therapsida, Anomodontia) from the ?Guadalupian of Northwestern China |journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology |volume=41 |issue=1 | | Below is a [[cladogram]] modified from Angielczyk et al. (2021):<ref name="Angielczyk2021">{{Cite journal|last1=Angielczyk |first1=K. D. |last2=Liu |first2=J. |last3=Yang |first3=W. |year=2021 |title=A Redescription of ''Kunpania scopulusa'', a Bidentalian Dicynodont (Therapsida, Anomodontia) from the ?Guadalupian of Northwestern China |journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology |volume=41 |issue=1 |article-number=e1922428 |doi=10.1080/02724634.2021.1922428 |bibcode=2021JVPal..41E2428A |s2cid=236406006 }}</ref> | ||
{{clade | {{clade | ||
|label1='''Dicynodontia''' | |label1='''Dicynodontia''' | ||
| Line 254: | Line 252: | ||
******** ''[[Stahleckeria]]'' | ******** ''[[Stahleckeria]]'' | ||
******** ''[[Ufudocyclops]]'' | ******** ''[[Ufudocyclops]]'' | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Latest revision as of 17:30, 1 December 2025
Template:Short description Template:Automatic taxobox
Dicynodontia is an extinct clade of anomodonts, an extinct type of non-mammalian therapsid. Dicynodonts were herbivores that typically bore a pair of tusks, hence their name, which means 'two dog tooth'. Members of the group possessed a horny, typically toothless beak, unique amongst all synapsids. Dicynodonts first appeared in Southern Pangaea during the mid-Permian, ca. 270–260 million years ago, and became globally distributed and the dominant herbivorous animals in the Late Permian, ca. 260–252 Mya. They were devastated by the end-Permian mass extinction that wiped out most other therapsids ca. 252 Mya. They rebounded at beginning of the following Triassic, but subsequently declined and died out towards the end of that period. They were the most successful and diverse of the non-mammalian therapsids, with over 80-90 genera known, varying from rat-sized burrowers to elephant-sized browsers.
Characteristics
The dicynodont skull is highly specialised, light but strong, with the synapsid temporal openings at the rear of the skull greatly enlarged to accommodate larger jaw muscles. The front of the skull and the lower jaw are generally narrow and, in all but a number of primitive forms, toothless. Instead, the front of the mouth is equipped with a horny beak, as in turtles and ceratopsian dinosaurs. Food was processed by the retraction of the lower jaw when the mouth closed, producing a powerful shearing action,[1] which would have enabled dicynodonts to cope with tough plant material. Dicynodonts typically had a pair of enlarged maxillary caniniform teeth, analogous to the tusks present in some living mammals. In the earliest genera, they were merely enlarged teeth, but in later forms they independently evolved into ever-growing teeth like mammal tusks multiple times.[2] In some dicynodonts, the presence of tusks has been suggested to be sexually dimorphic.[3] Some dicynodonts such as Stahleckeria lacked true tusks and instead bore tusk-like extensions on the side of the beak.[4][5]Template:Rp
The body is short, strong and barrel-shaped, with strong limbs. In large genera (such as Dinodontosaurus) the hindlimbs were held erect, but the forelimbs bent at the elbow. Both the pectoral girdle and the ilium are large and strong. The tail is short.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Pentasauropus dicynodont tracks suggest that dicynodonts had fleshy pads on their feet.[6] Mummified skin from specimens of Lystrosaurus in South Africa have numerous raised bumps.[7]
Endothermy and soft tissue anatomy
Dicynodonts have long been suspected of being warm-blooded animals. Their bones are highly vascularised and possess Haversian canals, and their bodily proportions are conducive to heat preservation.[8] In young specimens, the bones are so highly vascularised that they exhibit higher channel densities than most other therapsids.[9] Yet, studies on Late Triassic dicynodont coprolites paradoxically showcase digestive patterns more typical of animals with slow metabolisms.[10]
More recently, the discovery of hair remnants in Permian coprolites possibly vindicates the status of dicynodonts as endothermic animals. As these coprolites come from carnivorous species and digested dicynodont bones are abundant, it has been suggested that at least some of these hair remnants come from dicynodont prey.[11] A new study using chemical analysis seemed to suggest that cynodonts and dicynodonts both developed warm blood independently before the Permian extinction.[12]
History of discovery and research
A 2024 paper posited that rock art of a superficially walrus-like imaginary creature with downcurved tusks created by the San people of South Africa prior to 1835 may have been partly inspired by fossil dicynodont skulls which erode out of rocks in the area.[13]
Dicynodonts have been known to science since the mid-1800s. The South African geologist Andrew Geddes Bain gave the first description of dicynodonts in 1845. At the time, Bain was a supervisor for the construction of military roads under the Corps of Royal Engineers and had found many reptilian fossils during his surveys of South Africa. Bain described these fossils in an 1845 letter published in Transactions of the Geological Society of London, calling them "bidentals" for their two prominent tusks.[14] In that same year, the English paleontologist Richard Owen named two species of dicynodonts from South Africa: Dicynodon lacerticeps and Dicynodon bainii. Since Bain was preoccupied with the Corps of Royal Engineers, he wanted Owen to describe his fossils more extensively. Owen did not publish a description until 1876 in his Descriptive and Illustrated Catalogue of the Fossil Reptilia of South Africa in the Collection of the British Museum.[15] By this time, many more dicynodonts had been described. In 1859, another important species called Ptychognathus declivis was named from South Africa. In the same year, Owen named the group Dicynodontia.[16] In his Descriptive and Illustrated Catalogue, Owen honored Bain by erecting Bidentalia as a replacement name for his Dicynodontia.[15] The name Bidentalia quickly fell out of use in the following years, replaced by popularity of Owen's Dicynodontia.[17]
Evolutionary history
Script error: No such module "Multiple image". Dicynodonts first appeared during the Middle Permian in the Southern Hemisphere, with South Africa being the centre of their known diversity, and underwent a rapid evolutionary radiation, becoming globally distributed and amongst the most successful and abundant land vertebrates during the Late Permian.[18][19] During this time, they included a large variety of ecotypes, including large, medium-sized, and small herbivores and short-limbed mole-like burrowers.[20]
Only four lineages are known to have survived the Great Dying; the first three represented with a single genus each: Myosaurus, Kombuisia, and Lystrosaurus, the latter being the most common and widespread herbivores of the Induan (earliest Triassic). None of these survived long into the Triassic. The fourth group was the Kannemeyeriiformes, the only dicynodonts who diversified during the Triassic.[21] These stocky, pig- to ox-sized animals were the most abundant herbivores worldwide from the Olenekian to the Ladinian age. By the Carnian they had been supplanted by traversodont cynodonts and rhynchosaur reptiles. During the Norian (middle of the Late Triassic), perhaps due to increasing aridity, they drastically declined, and the role of large herbivores was taken over by sauropodomorph dinosaurs.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Fossils of an Asian elephant-sized dicynodont Lisowicia bojani discovered in Poland indicate that dicynodonts survived at least until the late Norian or earliest Rhaetian (latest Triassic, at earliest 211 million years ago,[22] and probably no later than around 205 million years ago[23]); this animal was also the largest known dicynodont species.[24][25] Six fragments of fossil bone discovered in Queensland, Australia, were interpreted as remains of a skull in 2003. This suggested by some author to indicate that dicynodonts survived into the Cretaceous in southern Gondwana.[26] The dicynodont affinity of these specimens was questioned (including a proposal that they belonged to a baurusuchian crocodyliform by Agnolin et al. in 2010),[27] and in 2019 Knutsen and Oerlemans considered this fossil to be of Plio-Pleistocene age, and reinterpreted it as a fossil of a large mammal, probably a diprotodontid marsupial.[28]
With the decline and extinction of the kannemeyerids, there were to be no more dominant large synapsid herbivores until the middle Paleocene epoch (60 Ma) when mammals, distant descendants of cynodonts, began to diversify after the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs.
Systematics
Taxonomy
Dicynodontia was originally named by the English paleontologist Richard Owen. It was erected as a family of the order Anomodontia and included the genera Dicynodon and Ptychognathus. Other groups of Anomodontia included Gnathodontia, which included Rhynchosaurus (now known to be an archosauromorph) and Cryptodontia, which included Oudenodon. Cryptodonts were distinguished from dicynodonts from their absence of tusks. Although it lacks tusks, Oudenodon is now classified as a dicynodont, and the name Cryptodontia is no longer used. Thomas Henry Huxley revised Owen's Dicynodontia as an order that included Dicynodon and Oudenodon.[29] Dicynodontia was later ranked as a suborder or infraorder with the larger group Anomodontia, which is classified as an order. The ranking of Dicynodontia has varied in recent studies, with Ivakhnenko (2008) considering it a suborder, Ivanchnenko (2008) considering it an infraorder, and Kurkin (2010) considering it an order.[30]
Many higher taxa, including infraorders and families, have been erected as a means of classifying the large number of dicynodont species. Cluver and King (1983) recognised several main groups within Dicynodontia, including Eodicynodontidae (containing only Eodicynodon), Endothiodontia, Pristerodontia (Pristerodontidae, Cryptodontidae, Geikiidae, Dicynodontidae, Lystrosauridae, and Kannemeyeriidae), Kingoriamorpha (containing only Kingoriidae), Diictodontia (Pylaecephalidae, Robertiidae, Cistecephalidae, Emydopidae, and Myosauridae), and Venyukoviamorpha.[31] Most of these taxa are no longer considered valid. Kammerer and Angielczyk (2009) suggested that the problematic taxonomy and nomenclature of Dicynodontia and other groups results from the large number of conflicting studies and the tendency for invalid names to be mistakenly established.[17]
Script error: No such module "Multiple image". Script error: No such module "Multiple image".
Script error: No such module "Multiple image".
Script error: No such module "Multiple image".
Script error: No such module "Multiple image".
Script error: No such module "Multiple image".
Phylogeny
Below is a cladogram modified from Angielczyk et al. (2021):[32] Script error: No such module "Clade".
Current classification
- Dicynodontia
- Brachyprosopus
- Colobodectes
- Eodicynodon
- Lanthanostegus
- Nyaphulia
- Endothiodontia
- Eumantellidae
- Pylaecephalidae
- Therochelonia
- Emydopoidea
- Bidentalia
- Kunpania
- Cryptodontia
- Dicynodontoidea
- Counillonia
- Daptocephalus
- Delectosaurus
- Dicynodon
- Dinanomodon
- Elph
- Gordonia
- Interpresosaurus
- Katumbia
- Peramodon
- Taoheodon
- Turfanodon
- Vivaxosaurus
- Lystrosauridae
- Kannemeyeriiformes
- Angonisaurus
- Dinodontosauridae
- Shansiodontidae
- Kannemeyeriidae
- Stahleckeriidae
- ?Sungeodon
- Woznikella
- Placeriinae
- Stahleckeriinae
See also
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Colbert, E. H., (1969), Evolution of the Vertebrates, John Wiley & Sons Inc (2nd ed.)
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Further reading
- Carroll, R. L. (1988), Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution, WH Freeman & Co.
- Cox, B., Savage, R.J.G., Gardiner, B., Harrison, C. and Palmer, D. (1988) The Marshall illustrated encyclopedia of dinosaurs & prehistoric animals, 2nd Edition, Marshall Publishing
- King, Gillian M., "Anomodontia" Part 17 C, Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology, Gutsav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart and New York, 1988
- King, Gillian M., 1990, The Dicynodonts: A Study in Palaeobiology, Chapman and Hall, London and New York