Three-domain system: Difference between revisions
imported>TooManyFingers I'm not qualified to properly remove the weasel words themselves, BUT we had weasel words being used to support a boldly-worded and poorly-sourced statement. I turned the over-bold statement into an appropriately timid one. |
imported>Citation bot Added bibcode. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_toolbar |
||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
==Alternatives== | ==Alternatives== | ||
[[File:3 domains.png|thumb|330px|Alternative versions of the three domains of life's phylogeny]] | [[File:3 domains.png|thumb|330px|Alternative versions of the three domains of life's phylogeny]] | ||
Parts of the three-domain theory have been challenged by scientists including [[Ernst Mayr]], [[Thomas Cavalier-Smith]], and [[Radhey S. Gupta]].<ref name=Gupta1998>{{cite journal | last1=Gupta | first1=Radhey S. | year=1998 | title=Life's Third Domain (''Archaea''): An Established Fact or an Endangered Paradigm?: A New Proposal for Classification of Organisms Based on Protein Sequences and Cell Structure.| journal=Theoretical Population Biology | volume=54 | issue=2| pages=91–104 | doi=10.1006/tpbi.1998.1376 | pmid=9733652| bibcode=1998TPBio..54...91G }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Mayr | first1=E. | year=1998 | title=Two empires or three? | journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA | volume=95 | issue=17| pages=9720–9723 | doi=10.1073/pnas.95.17.9720 | pmid=9707542 | pmc=33883| bibcode=1998PNAS...95.9720M | doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Cavalier-Smith | first1=Thomas |author-link=Thomas Cavalier-Smith | year=2002 | title=The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification | pmid=11837318| journal=Int J Syst Evol Microbiol | volume=52 | issue=1| pages=7–76 | doi=10.1099/00207713-52-1-7| doi-access=free }}</ref> | Parts of the three-domain theory have been challenged by scientists including [[Ernst Mayr]], [[Thomas Cavalier-Smith]], and [[Radhey S. Gupta]].<ref name=Gupta1998>{{cite journal | last1=Gupta | first1=Radhey S. | year=1998 | title=Life's Third Domain (''Archaea''): An Established Fact or an Endangered Paradigm?: A New Proposal for Classification of Organisms Based on Protein Sequences and Cell Structure.| journal=Theoretical Population Biology | volume=54 | issue=2| pages=91–104 | doi=10.1006/tpbi.1998.1376 | pmid=9733652| bibcode=1998TPBio..54...91G }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Mayr | first1=E. | year=1998 | title=Two empires or three? | journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA | volume=95 | issue=17| pages=9720–9723 | doi=10.1073/pnas.95.17.9720 | pmid=9707542 | pmc=33883| bibcode=1998PNAS...95.9720M | doi-access=free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Cavalier-Smith | first1=Thomas |author-link=Thomas Cavalier-Smith | year=2002 | title=The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification | pmid=11837318| journal=Int J Syst Evol Microbiol | volume=52 | issue=1| pages=7–76 | doi=10.1099/00207713-52-1-7| bibcode=2002IJSEM..52....7C | doi-access=free }}</ref> | ||
Recent work has proposed that Eukaryota may have actually branched off from the domain Archaea. According to Spang ''et al.'', [[Lokiarchaeota]] forms a monophyletic group with eukaryotes in phylogenomic analyses. The associated genomes also encode an expanded repertoire of eukaryotic signature proteins that are suggestive of sophisticated membrane remodelling capabilities.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Spang | first1=Anja | year=2015 | title=Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes | journal=Nature | volume=521 | issue=7551 | pages=173–179 | doi=10.1038/nature14447 | pmid=25945739 | pmc=4444528| bibcode=2015Natur.521..173S }}</ref> This work suggests a [[two-domain system]] as opposed to the three-domain system.<ref name=":02" /><ref name=":3" /><ref name="Gabaldón">{{cite journal |last1=Gabaldón |first1=Toni |title=Origin and Early Evolution of the Eukaryotic Cell |journal=Annual Review of Microbiology |date=8 October 2021 |volume=75 |issue=1 |pages=631–647 |doi=10.1146/annurev-micro-090817-062213 |pmid=34343017 |s2cid=236916203 |url=https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-090817-062213 |access-date=11 August 2022 |language=en |issn=0066-4227 |quote="A rooted version of this three-domain tree placed Archaea and Eukarya as sister clades, suggesting that eukaryotes were very distantly related to archaea and not more related to any specific group. More recently, phylogenetic analyses using more sophisticated models and expanded gene data sets have provided increasing support for an alternative tree topology in which the eukaryotic clade branches within Archaea, rather than next to it." |url-access=subscription }}</ref> Exactly how and when Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya developed and how they are related continues to be debated.<ref name="Callier">{{cite journal |last1=Callier |first1=Viviane |title=Mitochondria and the origin of eukaryotes |journal=Knowable Magazine |date=8 June 2022 |doi=10.1146/knowable-060822-2 |doi-access=free |url=https://knowablemagazine.org/article/living-world/2022/mitochondria-origin-eukaryotes |access-date=18 August 2022|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref name="Gabaldón"/><ref name="McCutcheon">{{cite journal |last1=McCutcheon |first1=John P. |title=The Genomics and Cell Biology of Host-Beneficial Intracellular Infections |journal=Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology |date=6 October 2021 |volume=37 |issue=1 |pages=115–142 |doi=10.1146/annurev-cellbio-120219-024122 |pmid=34242059 |s2cid=235786110 |language=en |issn=1081-0706|doi-access=free }}</ref> | Recent work has proposed that Eukaryota may have actually branched off from the domain Archaea. According to Spang ''et al.'', [[Lokiarchaeota]] forms a monophyletic group with eukaryotes in phylogenomic analyses. The associated genomes also encode an expanded repertoire of eukaryotic signature proteins that are suggestive of sophisticated membrane remodelling capabilities.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Spang | first1=Anja | year=2015 | title=Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes | journal=Nature | volume=521 | issue=7551 | pages=173–179 | doi=10.1038/nature14447 | pmid=25945739 | pmc=4444528| bibcode=2015Natur.521..173S }}</ref> This work suggests a [[two-domain system]] as opposed to the three-domain system.<ref name=":02" /><ref name=":3" /><ref name="Gabaldón">{{cite journal |last1=Gabaldón |first1=Toni |title=Origin and Early Evolution of the Eukaryotic Cell |journal=Annual Review of Microbiology |date=8 October 2021 |volume=75 |issue=1 |pages=631–647 |doi=10.1146/annurev-micro-090817-062213 |pmid=34343017 |s2cid=236916203 |url=https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-090817-062213 |access-date=11 August 2022 |language=en |issn=0066-4227 |quote="A rooted version of this three-domain tree placed Archaea and Eukarya as sister clades, suggesting that eukaryotes were very distantly related to archaea and not more related to any specific group. More recently, phylogenetic analyses using more sophisticated models and expanded gene data sets have provided increasing support for an alternative tree topology in which the eukaryotic clade branches within Archaea, rather than next to it." |url-access=subscription }}</ref> Exactly how and when Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya developed and how they are related continues to be debated.<ref name="Callier">{{cite journal |last1=Callier |first1=Viviane |title=Mitochondria and the origin of eukaryotes |journal=Knowable Magazine |date=8 June 2022 |doi=10.1146/knowable-060822-2 |doi-access=free |url=https://knowablemagazine.org/article/living-world/2022/mitochondria-origin-eukaryotes |access-date=18 August 2022|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref name="Gabaldón"/><ref name="McCutcheon">{{cite journal |last1=McCutcheon |first1=John P. |title=The Genomics and Cell Biology of Host-Beneficial Intracellular Infections |journal=Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology |date=6 October 2021 |volume=37 |issue=1 |pages=115–142 |doi=10.1146/annurev-cellbio-120219-024122 |pmid=34242059 |s2cid=235786110 |language=en |issn=1081-0706|doi-access=free }}</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 09:44, 17 December 2025
The three-domain system is a taxonomic classification system that groups all cellular life into three domains, namely Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya, introduced by Carl Woese, Otto Kandler and Mark Wheelis in 1990.[1] The key difference from earlier classifications such as the two-empire system and the five-kingdom classification is the splitting of Archaea (previously named "archaebacteria") from Bacteria as completely different organisms.
The three domain hypothesis is considered obsolete by some who believe that eukaryotes do not form a separate domain of life, but arose from a fusion between an Archaea species and a Bacteria species.[2][3][4] (see Two-domain system)
Background
Woese argued, on the basis of differences in 16S rRNA genes, that bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes each arose separately from an ancestor with poorly developed genetic machinery, often called a progenote. To reflect these primary lines of descent, he treated each as a domain, divided into several different kingdoms. Originally his split of the prokaryotes was into Eubacteria (now Bacteria) and Archaebacteria (now Archaea).[5] Woese initially used the term "kingdom" to refer to the three primary phylogenic groupings, and this nomenclature was widely used until the term "domain" was adopted in 1990.[1]
Acceptance of the validity of Woese's phylogenetically valid classification was a slow process. Prominent biologists including Salvador Luria and Ernst Mayr objected to his division of the prokaryotes.[6][7] Not all criticism of him was restricted to the scientific level. A decade of labor-intensive oligonucleotide cataloging left him with a reputation as "a crank", and Woese would go on to be dubbed "Microbiology's Scarred Revolutionary" by a news article printed in the journal Science in 1997.[8] The growing amount of supporting data led the scientific community to accept the Archaea by the mid-1980s.[9] Today, very few scientists still accept the concept of a unified Prokarya.[10]
Classification
Template:Multiple images The three-domain system adds a level of classification (the domains) "above" the kingdoms present in the previously used five- or six-kingdom systems. This classification system recognizes the fundamental divide between the two prokaryotic groups, insofar as Archaea appear to be more closely related to eukaryotes than they are to other prokaryotes – bacteria-like organisms with no cell nucleus. The three-domain system sorts the previously known kingdoms into these three domains: Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya.[2]
Domain Archaea
The Archaea are prokaryotic, with no nuclear membrane, but with biochemistry and RNA markers that are distinct from bacteria. The archaeans possess unique, ancient evolutionary history for which they are considered some of the oldest species of organisms on Earth, most notably their diverse, exotic metabolisms.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Some examples of archaeal organisms are:Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
- methanogens – which produce the gas methane
- halophiles – which live in very salty water
- thermoacidophiles – which thrive in acidic high-temperature water
Domain Bacteria
The Bacteria are also prokaryotic; their domain consists of cells with bacterial rRNA, no nuclear membrane, and whose membranes possess primarily diacyl glycerol diester lipids. Traditionally classified as bacteria, many thrive in the same environments favored by humans, and were the first prokaryotes discovered; they were briefly called the Eubacteria or "true" bacteria when the Archaea were first recognized as a distinct clade.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Most known pathogenic prokaryotic organisms belong to bacteria (see[11] for exceptions). For that reason, and because the Archaea are typically difficult to grow in laboratories, Bacteria are currently studied more extensively than Archaea.
Some examples of bacteria include:Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
- "Cyanobacteria" – photosynthesizing bacteria that are related to the chloroplasts of eukaryotic plants and algae
- Spirochaetota – Gram-negative bacteria that include those causing syphilis and Lyme disease
- Actinomycetota – Gram-positive bacteria including Bifidobacterium animalis which is present in the human large intestine
Domain Eukarya
Eukaryota are organisms whose cells contain a membrane-bound nucleus. They include many large single-celled organisms and all known non-microscopic organisms. The domain contains, for example:
- Holomycota – mushrooms and allies
- Viridiplantae – green plants
- Holozoa – animals and allies
- Stramenopiles – includes brown algae
- Amoebozoa – solitary and social amoebae
- Discoba – includes euglenoids
Niches
Each of the three cell types tends to fit into recurring specialities or roles. Bacteria tend to be the most prolific reproducers, at least in moderate environments. Archaeans tend to adapt quickly to extreme environments, such as high temperatures, high acids, high sulfur, etc. This includes adapting to use a wide variety of food sources. Eukaryotes are the most flexible with regard to forming cooperative colonies, such as in multi-cellular organisms, including humans. In fact, the structure of a eukaryote is likely to have derived from a joining of different cell types, forming organelles.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Parakaryon myojinensis (incertae sedis) is a single-celled organism known to be a unique example. "This organism appears to be a life form distinct from prokaryotes and eukaryotes",[12] with features of both.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Alternatives
Parts of the three-domain theory have been challenged by scientists including Ernst Mayr, Thomas Cavalier-Smith, and Radhey S. Gupta.[13][14][15]
Recent work has proposed that Eukaryota may have actually branched off from the domain Archaea. According to Spang et al., Lokiarchaeota forms a monophyletic group with eukaryotes in phylogenomic analyses. The associated genomes also encode an expanded repertoire of eukaryotic signature proteins that are suggestive of sophisticated membrane remodelling capabilities.[16] This work suggests a two-domain system as opposed to the three-domain system.[3][4][2] Exactly how and when Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya developed and how they are related continues to be debated.[17][2][18]
See also
<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".