Urease: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Amklose
Removed a stray sentence fragment.
imported>Monkbot
 
Line 24: Line 24:


== Importance ==
== Importance ==
Urease is important because of its role in the [[Nitrogen cycle#:~:text=The nitrogen cycle is the,both biological and physical processes.|Nitrogen cycle]] as a key catalyst in the reaction converting urea to ammonium and CO<sub>2</sub>. Urease occurs as a [[soil enzyme]], likely because soil microorganisms benefit from the nitrogen made available by urea degradation in the form of ammonium.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Demoling |first=Fredrik |last2=Figueroa |first2=Daniela |last3=Bååth |first3=Erland |date=2007-10-01 |title=Comparison of factors limiting bacterial growth in different soils |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0038071707001939 |journal=Soil Biology and Biochemistry |volume=39 |issue=10 |pages=2485–2495 |doi=10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.05.002 |issn=0038-0717|url-access=subscription }}</ref>  
Urease is important because of its role in the [[Nitrogen cycle#:~:text=The nitrogen cycle is the,both biological and physical processes.|nitrogen cycle]] as a key catalyst in the reaction converting urea to ammonium and CO<sub>2</sub>. Urease occurs as a [[soil enzyme]], likely because soil microorganisms benefit from the nitrogen made available by urea degradation in the form of ammonium.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Demoling |first1=Fredrik |last2=Figueroa |first2=Daniela |last3=Bååth |first3=Erland |date=2007-10-01 |title=Comparison of factors limiting bacterial growth in different soils |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0038071707001939 |journal=Soil Biology and Biochemistry |volume=39 |issue=10 |pages=2485–2495 |doi=10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.05.002 |bibcode=2007SBiBi..39.2485D |issn=0038-0717|url-access=subscription }}</ref>


==Structure==
==Structure==
Line 30: Line 30:
A 1984 study focusing on urease from [[jack bean]] found that the [[active site]] contains a pair of [[nickel]] centers.<ref>{{cite journal | pmid = 6398286 | title=Nickel--an essential element | year=1984 | journal=IARC Sci. Publ. | pages=339–65 | vauthors=Anke M, Groppel B, Kronemann H, Grün M | issue=53}}</ref> [[In vitro]] activation also has been achieved with [[manganese]] and [[cobalt]] in place of nickel.<ref name="pmid20046957">{{cite journal | vauthors = Carter EL, Flugga N, Boer JL, Mulrooney SB, Hausinger RP | title = Interplay of metal ions and urease | journal = Metallomics | volume = 1 | issue = 3 | pages = 207–21 | date = 1 January 2009 | pmid = 20046957 | pmc = 2745169 | doi = 10.1039/b903311d }}</ref>  Lead salts are [[Enzyme inhibitor|inhibiting]].
A 1984 study focusing on urease from [[jack bean]] found that the [[active site]] contains a pair of [[nickel]] centers.<ref>{{cite journal | pmid = 6398286 | title=Nickel--an essential element | year=1984 | journal=IARC Sci. Publ. | pages=339–65 | vauthors=Anke M, Groppel B, Kronemann H, Grün M | issue=53}}</ref> [[In vitro]] activation also has been achieved with [[manganese]] and [[cobalt]] in place of nickel.<ref name="pmid20046957">{{cite journal | vauthors = Carter EL, Flugga N, Boer JL, Mulrooney SB, Hausinger RP | title = Interplay of metal ions and urease | journal = Metallomics | volume = 1 | issue = 3 | pages = 207–21 | date = 1 January 2009 | pmid = 20046957 | pmc = 2745169 | doi = 10.1039/b903311d }}</ref>  Lead salts are [[Enzyme inhibitor|inhibiting]].


The [[molecular weight]] is either 480 [[Atomic mass unit|kDa]] or 545 [[Atomic mass unit|kDa]] for jack-bean urease (calculated mass from the amino acid sequence). 840 amino acids per molecule, of which 90 are cysteine residues.<ref name="Molecular Catalysis B 2009">{{cite journal| vauthors = Krajewska B |title=Ureases I. Functional, catalytic and kinetic properties: A review|journal=Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic|date=30 June 2009|volume=59|issue=1–3|pages=9–21|doi=10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.01.003}}</ref>
The [[molecular weight]] is either 480 [[Atomic mass unit|kDa]] or 545 [[Atomic mass unit|kDa]] for jack-bean urease (calculated mass from the amino acid sequence). 840 amino acids per molecule, of which 90 are cysteine residues.<ref name="Molecular Catalysis B 2009">{{cite journal| vauthors = Krajewska B |title=Ureases I. Functional, catalytic and kinetic properties: A review|journal=Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic|date=30 June 2009|volume=59|issue=1–3|pages=9–21|doi=10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.01.003|url=https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/78616 }}</ref>


The optimum [[pH]] is 7.4 and optimum temperature is 60&nbsp;°C.  Substrates include urea and [[hydroxyurea]].
The optimum [[pH]] is 7.4 and optimum temperature is 60&nbsp;°C.  Substrates include urea and [[hydroxyurea]].
Line 76: Line 76:
====Ciurli/Mangani====
====Ciurli/Mangani====


The mechanism proposed by Ciurli and Mangani<ref name="pmid21542631">{{cite journal | vauthors = Zambelli B, Musiani F, Benini S, Ciurli S | title = Chemistry of Ni2+ in Urease: Sensing, Trafficking, and Catalysis | journal = Accounts of Chemical Research | volume = 44 | issue = 7 | pages = 520–530 | date = 19 July 2011 | pmid = 21542631 | doi = 10.1021/ar200041k }}</ref> is one of the more recent and currently accepted views of the mechanism of urease and is based primarily on the different roles of the two [[nickel]] ions in the active site.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999" /> One of which binds and activates urea, the other nickel ion binds and activates the nucleophilic water molecule.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/>  With regards to this proposal, urea enters the active site cavity when the mobile ‘flap’ (which allows for the entrance of urea into the active site) is open. Stability of the binding of urea to the active site is achieved via a [[hydrogen-bonding]] network, orienting the substrate into the catalytic cavity.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/>  Urea binds to the five-coordinated nickel (Ni1) with the carbonyl [[oxygen]] atom. It approaches the six-coordinated nickel (Ni2) with one of its amino groups and subsequently bridges the two nickel centers.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/>  The binding of the urea carbonyl oxygen atom to Ni1 is stabilized through the protonation state of His<sup>α222</sup> Nԑ. Additionally, the conformational change from the open to closed state of the mobile flap generates a rearrangement of Ala<sup>α222</sup> carbonyl group in such a way that its oxygen atom points to Ni2.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/>  The Ala<sup>α170</sup> and Ala<sup>α366</sup> are now oriented in a way that their carbonyl groups act as hydrogen-bond acceptors towards NH<sub>2</sub> group of urea, thus aiding its binding to Ni2.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/>  Urea is a very poor [[chelating ligand]] due to low [[Lewis base]] character of its NH<sub>2</sub> groups. However the carbonyl oxygens of Ala<sup>α170</sup> and Ala<sup>α366</sup> enhance the basicity of the NH<sub>2</sub> groups and allow for binding to Ni2.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/> Therefore, in this proposed mechanism, the positioning of urea in the active site is induced by the structural features of the active site residues which are positioned to act as hydrogen-bond donors in the vicinity of Ni1 and as acceptors in the vicinity of Ni2.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/>  The main structural difference between the Ciurli/Mangani mechanism and the other two is that it incorporates a [[nitrogen]], oxygen bridging urea that is attacked by a bridging [[hydroxide]].<ref name=Zimmer />
The mechanism proposed by Ciurli and Mangani<ref name="pmid21542631">{{cite journal | vauthors = Zambelli B, Musiani F, Benini S, Ciurli S | title = Chemistry of Ni2+ in Urease: Sensing, Trafficking, and Catalysis | journal = Accounts of Chemical Research | volume = 44 | issue = 7 | pages = 520–530 | date = 19 July 2011 | pmid = 21542631 | doi = 10.1021/ar200041k }}</ref> is one of the more recent and currently accepted views of the mechanism of urease and is based primarily on the different roles of the two [[nickel]] ions in the active site.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999" /> One of which binds and activates urea, the other nickel ion binds and activates the nucleophilic water molecule.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/>  With regards to this proposal, urea enters the active site cavity when the mobile 'flap' (which allows for the entrance of urea into the active site) is open. Stability of the binding of urea to the active site is achieved via a [[hydrogen-bonding]] network, orienting the substrate into the catalytic cavity.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/>  Urea binds to the five-coordinated nickel (Ni1) with the carbonyl [[oxygen]] atom. It approaches the six-coordinated nickel (Ni2) with one of its amino groups and subsequently bridges the two nickel centers.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/>  The binding of the urea carbonyl oxygen atom to Ni1 is stabilized through the protonation state of His<sup>α222</sup> Nԑ. Additionally, the conformational change from the open to closed state of the mobile flap generates a rearrangement of Ala<sup>α222</sup> carbonyl group in such a way that its oxygen atom points to Ni2.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/>  The Ala<sup>α170</sup> and Ala<sup>α366</sup> are now oriented in a way that their carbonyl groups act as hydrogen-bond acceptors towards NH<sub>2</sub> group of urea, thus aiding its binding to Ni2.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/>  Urea is a very poor [[chelating ligand]] due to low [[Lewis base]] character of its NH<sub>2</sub> groups. However the carbonyl oxygens of Ala<sup>α170</sup> and Ala<sup>α366</sup> enhance the basicity of the NH<sub>2</sub> groups and allow for binding to Ni2.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/> Therefore, in this proposed mechanism, the positioning of urea in the active site is induced by the structural features of the active site residues which are positioned to act as hydrogen-bond donors in the vicinity of Ni1 and as acceptors in the vicinity of Ni2.<ref name="Benini, S. 1999"/>  The main structural difference between the Ciurli/Mangani mechanism and the other two is that it incorporates a [[nitrogen]], oxygen bridging urea that is attacked by a bridging [[hydroxide]].<ref name=Zimmer />


===Action in pathogenesis===
===Action in pathogenesis===
Line 95: Line 95:


==Occurrence and applications in agriculture==
==Occurrence and applications in agriculture==
Urea is found naturally in the environment and is also artificially introduced, comprising more than half of all synthetic nitrogen fertilizers used globally.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Glibert P, Harrison J, Heil C, Seitzinger S | year = 2006 | title = Escalating worldwide use of urea – a global change contributing to coastal eutrophication | journal = Biogeochemistry | volume = 77 | issue = 3| pages = 441–463 | doi=10.1007/s10533-005-3070-5| s2cid = 2209850 }}</ref>  Heavy use of urea is thought to promote [[eutrophication]], despite the observation that urea is rapidly transformed by microbial ureases, and thus usually does not persist.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Daigh AL, Savin MC, Brye K, Norman R, Miller D | year = 2014 | title = Urea persistence in floodwater and soil used for flooded rice production | journal = Soil Use and Management | volume = 30 | issue = 4| pages = 463–470 | doi = 10.1111/sum.12142 | s2cid = 97961385 }}</ref>  Environmental urease activity is often measured as an indicator of the health of microbial communities.  In the absence of plants, urease activity in soil is generally attributed to heterotrophic microorganisms, although it has been demonstrated that some chemoautotrophic ammonium oxidizing bacteria are capable of growth on urea as a sole source of carbon, nitrogen, and energy.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Marsh KL, Sims GK, Mulvaney RL | title = Availability of urea to autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria as related to the fate of 14 C-and 15 N-labeled urea added to soil. | journal = Biology and Fertility of Soils. | date = November 2005 | volume = 42 | issue = 2 | pages = 137–145 | doi = 10.1007/s00374-005-0004-2 | s2cid = 6245255 }}</ref>
Urea is found naturally in the environment and is also artificially introduced, comprising more than half of all synthetic nitrogen fertilizers used globally.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Glibert P, Harrison J, Heil C, Seitzinger S | year = 2006 | title = Escalating worldwide use of urea – a global change contributing to coastal eutrophication | journal = Biogeochemistry | volume = 77 | issue = 3| pages = 441–463 | doi=10.1007/s10533-005-3070-5| bibcode = 2006Biogc..77..441G | s2cid = 2209850 }}</ref>  Heavy use of urea is thought to promote [[eutrophication]], despite the observation that urea is rapidly transformed by microbial ureases, and thus usually does not persist.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Daigh AL, Savin MC, Brye K, Norman R, Miller D | year = 2014 | title = Urea persistence in floodwater and soil used for flooded rice production | journal = Soil Use and Management | volume = 30 | issue = 4| pages = 463–470 | doi = 10.1111/sum.12142 | bibcode = 2014SUMan..30..463D | s2cid = 97961385 }}</ref>  Environmental urease activity is often measured as an indicator of the health of microbial communities.  In the absence of plants, urease activity in soil is generally attributed to heterotrophic microorganisms, although it has been demonstrated that some chemoautotrophic ammonium oxidizing bacteria are capable of growth on urea as a sole source of carbon, nitrogen, and energy.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Marsh KL, Sims GK, Mulvaney RL | title = Availability of urea to autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria as related to the fate of 14 C-and 15 N-labeled urea added to soil. | journal = Biology and Fertility of Soils. | date = November 2005 | volume = 42 | issue = 2 | pages = 137–145 | doi = 10.1007/s00374-005-0004-2 | s2cid = 6245255 }}</ref>


=== Inhibition in fertilizers ===
=== Inhibition in fertilizers ===
{{Further|Controlled release fertilizer|Ammonia volatilization from urea}}
{{Further|Controlled release fertilizer|Ammonia volatilization from urea}}
The inhibition of urease is a significant goal in agriculture because the rapid breakdown of urea-based fertilizers is wasteful and environmentally damaging.<ref name=Pan>{{cite journal | vauthors = Pan B, Lam SK, Mosier A, Luo Y, Chen D |title=Ammonia Volatilization from Synthetic Fertilizers and its Mitigation Strategies: A Global Synthesis|year=2016 |journal=Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment|volume=232|pages=283–289 |doi=10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.019 }}</ref>  [[Phenyl phosphorodiamidate]] and [[N-(n-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide|''N''-(''n''-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide]] are two such inhibitors.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Gholivand K, Pooyan M, Mohammadpanah F, Pirastefar F, Junk PC, Wang J, Ebrahimi Valmoozi AA, Mani-Varnosfaderani A | display-authors = 6 | title = Synthesis, crystal structure and biological evaluation of new phosphoramide derivatives as urease inhibitors using docking, QSAR and kinetic studies | journal = Bioorganic Chemistry | volume = 86 | pages = 482–493 | date = May 2019 | pmid = 30772649 | doi = 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.01.064 | s2cid = 73460771 }}</ref>
The inhibition of urease is a significant goal in agriculture because the rapid breakdown of urea-based fertilizers is wasteful and environmentally damaging.<ref name=Pan>{{cite journal | vauthors = Pan B, Lam SK, Mosier A, Luo Y, Chen D |title=Ammonia Volatilization from Synthetic Fertilizers and its Mitigation Strategies: A Global Synthesis|year=2016 |journal=Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment|volume=232|pages=283–289 |doi=10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.019 |bibcode=2016AgEE..232..283P }}</ref>  [[Phenyl phosphorodiamidate]] and [[N-(n-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide|''N''-(''n''-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide]] are two such inhibitors.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Gholivand K, Pooyan M, Mohammadpanah F, Pirastefar F, Junk PC, Wang J, Ebrahimi Valmoozi AA, Mani-Varnosfaderani A | display-authors = 6 | title = Synthesis, crystal structure and biological evaluation of new phosphoramide derivatives as urease inhibitors using docking, QSAR and kinetic studies | journal = Bioorganic Chemistry | volume = 86 | pages = 482–493 | date = May 2019 | pmid = 30772649 | doi = 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.01.064 | s2cid = 73460771 }}</ref>


===Biomineralization===
===Biomineralization===
By promoting the formation of [[calcium carbonate]], ureases are potentially useful for [[biomineralization]]-inspired processes.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Anbu P, Kang CH, Shin YJ, So JS | title = Formations of calcium carbonate minerals by bacteria and its multiple applications | journal = SpringerPlus | volume = 5 | pages = 250 | date = 1 March 2016 | pmid = 27026942 | pmc = 4771655 | doi = 10.1186/s40064-016-1869-2 | doi-access = free }}</ref> Notably, microbiologically induced formation of calcium carbonate can be used in making [[bioconcrete]].<ref>{{cite web| vauthors = Moneo S |title=Dutch scientist invents self-healing concrete with bacteria|url=https://canada.constructconnect.com/joc/news/Infrastructure/2015/9/Dutch-scientist-invents-self-healing-concrete-with-bacteria-1010047W|website=Journal Of Commerce|access-date=23 March 2018|date=11 September 2015}}</ref>
By promoting the formation of [[calcium carbonate]], ureases are potentially useful for [[biomineralization]]-inspired processes.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Anbu P, Kang CH, Shin YJ, So JS | title = Formations of calcium carbonate minerals by bacteria and its multiple applications | journal = SpringerPlus | volume = 5 | article-number = 250 | date = 1 March 2016 | pmid = 27026942 | pmc = 4771655 | doi = 10.1186/s40064-016-1869-2 | doi-access = free }}</ref> Notably, microbiologically induced formation of calcium carbonate can be used in making [[bioconcrete]].<ref>{{cite web| vauthors = Moneo S |title=Dutch scientist invents self-healing concrete with bacteria|url=https://canada.constructconnect.com/joc/news/Infrastructure/2015/9/Dutch-scientist-invents-self-healing-concrete-with-bacteria-1010047W|website=Journal Of Commerce|access-date=23 March 2018|date=11 September 2015}}</ref>


== Non-enzymatic action ==
== Non-enzymatic action ==
Line 110: Line 110:


== As diagnostic test ==
== As diagnostic test ==
{{Main|Rapid urease test}}
{{See also|Rapid urease test}}
Many gastrointestinal or urinary tract pathogens produce urease, enabling the detection of urease to be used as a diagnostic to detect presence of pathogens.
Many gastrointestinal or urinary tract pathogens produce urease, enabling the detection of urease to be used as a diagnostic to detect presence of pathogens.


Line 123: Line 123:
*''[[Brucella]]''
*''[[Brucella]]''
* ''[[Staphylococcus saprophyticus]]''
* ''[[Staphylococcus saprophyticus]]''
* ''[[Staphylococcus aureus]]''<ref name="pmid30608981">{{cite journal | vauthors = Zhou C, Bhinderwala F, Lehman MK, Thomas VC, Chaudhari SS, Yamada KJ, Foster KW, Powers R, Kielian T, Fey PD | display-authors = 6 | title = Urease is an essential component of the acid response network of Staphylococcus aureus and is required for a persistent murine kidney infection | journal = PLOS Pathogens | volume = 15 | issue = 1 | pages = e1007538 | date = January 2019 | pmid = 30608981 | pmc = 6343930 | doi = 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007538 | doi-access = free }}</ref>
* ''[[Staphylococcus aureus]]''<ref name="pmid30608981">{{cite journal | vauthors = Zhou C, Bhinderwala F, Lehman MK, Thomas VC, Chaudhari SS, Yamada KJ, Foster KW, Powers R, Kielian T, Fey PD | display-authors = 6 | title = Urease is an essential component of the acid response network of Staphylococcus aureus and is required for a persistent murine kidney infection | journal = PLOS Pathogens | volume = 15 | issue = 1 | article-number = e1007538 | date = January 2019 | pmid = 30608981 | pmc = 6343930 | doi = 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007538 | doi-access = free }}</ref>


== Ligands ==
== Ligands ==
Line 137: Line 137:
==Extraction==
==Extraction==
{{missing information|applications of urease|date=May 2022}}
{{missing information|applications of urease|date=May 2022}}
First isolated as a crystal in 1926 by Sumner, using acetone solvation and centrifuging.<ref>{{cite journal| vauthors = Gorin G, Butler MF, Katyal JM, Buckley JE |title=Isolation of crystalline urease |journal=Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science |date=1959 |volume=40 |pages=62–70 |url=http://digital.library.okstate.edu/oas/oas_pdf/v40/p62_70.pdf|access-date=Dec 7, 2014}}</ref> Modern biochemistry has increased its demand for urease. [[jack bean|Jack bean meal]],<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Sung HY, Lee WM, Chiou MJ, Chang CT | title = A procedure for purifying jack bean urease for clinical use | journal = Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China. Part B, Life Sciences | volume = 13 | issue = 4 | pages = 250–7 | date = October 1989 | pmid = 2517764 }}</ref> [[Watermelon|watermelon seeds]],<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Prakash O, Bhushan G |title=Isolation, purification and partial characterisation of urease from seeds of water melon (''Citrullus vulgaris'')|journal=Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology|date= January 1997|volume=6|pages=45–47|doi=10.1007/BF03263009|s2cid=41143649 }}</ref> and [[pea|pea seeds]]<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = El-Hefnawy ME, Sakran M, Ismail AI, Aboelfetoh EF | title = Extraction, purification, kinetic and thermodynamic properties of urease from germinating ''Pisum sativum'' L. seeds | journal = BMC Biochemistry | volume = 15 | issue = 1 | pages = 15 | date = July 2014 | pmid = 25065975 | pmc = 4121304 | doi = 10.1186/1471-2091-15-15  | doi-access = free }}</ref> have all proven useful sources of urease.
First isolated as a crystal in 1926 by Sumner, using acetone solvation and centrifuging.<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Gorin G, Butler MF, Katyal JM, Buckley JE |title=Isolation of crystalline urease |journal=Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science |date=1959 |volume=40 |pages=62–70 |url=http://digital.library.okstate.edu/oas/oas_pdf/v40/p62_70.pdf |access-date=Dec 7, 2014 |archive-date=March 4, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304001458/http://digital.library.okstate.edu/oas/oas_pdf/v40/p62_70.pdf }}</ref> Modern biochemistry has increased its demand for urease. [[jack bean|Jack bean meal]],<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Sung HY, Lee WM, Chiou MJ, Chang CT | title = A procedure for purifying jack bean urease for clinical use | journal = Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China. Part B, Life Sciences | volume = 13 | issue = 4 | pages = 250–7 | date = October 1989 | pmid = 2517764 }}</ref> [[Watermelon|watermelon seeds]],<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Prakash O, Bhushan G |title=Isolation, purification and partial characterisation of urease from seeds of water melon (''Citrullus vulgaris'')|journal=Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology|date= January 1997|volume=6|issue=1 |pages=45–47|doi=10.1007/BF03263009|bibcode=1997JPBB....6...45P |s2cid=41143649 }}</ref> and [[pea|pea seeds]]<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = El-Hefnawy ME, Sakran M, Ismail AI, Aboelfetoh EF | title = Extraction, purification, kinetic and thermodynamic properties of urease from germinating ''Pisum sativum'' L. seeds | journal = BMC Biochemistry | volume = 15 | issue = 1 | page = 15 | date = July 2014 | pmid = 25065975 | pmc = 4121304 | doi = 10.1186/1471-2091-15-15  | doi-access = free }}</ref> have all proven useful sources of urease.


== See also ==
== See also ==
*[[Urea carboxylase]]
*[[Urea carboxylase]]
*[[Allophanate hydrolase]]
*[[Allophanate hydrolase]]
*[[Rapid urease test|Urease test]]


== References ==
== References ==

Latest revision as of 13:30, 4 October 2025

Template:Short description Template:Infobox enzyme Ureases (EC 3.5.1.5), functionally, belong to the superfamily of amidohydrolases and phosphotriesterases.[1] Ureases are found in numerous Bacteria, Archaea, fungi, algae, plants, and some invertebrates. Ureases are nickel-containing metalloenzymes of high molecular weight.[2] Ureases are important in degrading avian faecal matter, which is rich in uric acid, the breakdown product of which is urea, which is then degraded by urease as described here.

These enzymes catalyze the hydrolysis of urea into carbon dioxide and ammonia:

(NH2)2CO + H2O Template:Overset CO2 + 2NH3

The hydrolysis of urea occurs in two stages. In the first stage, ammonia and carbamic acid are produced. The carbamate spontaneously and rapidly hydrolyzes to ammonia and carbonic acid. Urease activity increases the pH of its environment as ammonia is produced, which is basic.

History

Urease activity was first identified in 1876 by Frédéric Alphonse Musculus as a soluble ferment.[3] In 1926, James B. Sumner, showed that urease is a protein by examining its crystallized form.[4] Sumner's work was the first demonstration that a protein can function as an enzyme and led eventually to the recognition that most enzymes are in fact proteins. Urease was the first enzyme crystallized. For this work, Sumner was awarded the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1946.[5] The crystal structure of urease was first solved by P. A. Karplus in 1995.[4]

Importance

Urease is important because of its role in the nitrogen cycle as a key catalyst in the reaction converting urea to ammonium and CO2. Urease occurs as a soil enzyme, likely because soil microorganisms benefit from the nitrogen made available by urea degradation in the form of ammonium.[6]

Structure

A 1984 study focusing on urease from jack bean found that the active site contains a pair of nickel centers.[7] In vitro activation also has been achieved with manganese and cobalt in place of nickel.[8] Lead salts are inhibiting.

The molecular weight is either 480 kDa or 545 kDa for jack-bean urease (calculated mass from the amino acid sequence). 840 amino acids per molecule, of which 90 are cysteine residues.[9]

The optimum pH is 7.4 and optimum temperature is 60 °C. Substrates include urea and hydroxyurea.

Bacterial ureases are composed of three distinct subunits, one large catalytic (α 60–76kDa) and two small (β 8–21 kDa, γ 6–14 kDa) commonly forming (αβγ)3 trimers stoichiometry with a 2-fold symmetric structure (note that the image above gives the structure of the asymmetric unit, one-third of the true biological assembly), they are cysteine-rich enzymes, resulting in the enzyme molar masses between 190 and 300kDa.[9]

An exceptional urease is obtained from Helicobacter sp.. These are composed of two subunits, α(26–31 kDa)-β(61–66 kDa). These subunits form a supramolecular (αβ)12 dodecameric complex.[10] of repeating α-β subunits, each coupled pair of subunits has an active site, for a total of 12 active sites.[10] It plays an essential function for survival, neutralizing gastric acid by allowing urea to enter into periplasm via a proton-gated urea channel.[11] The presence of urease is used in the diagnosis of Helicobacter species.

All bacterial ureases are solely cytoplasmic, except for those in Helicobacter pylori, which along with its cytoplasmic activity, has external activity with host cells. In contrast, all plant ureases are cytoplasmic.[9]

Fungal and plant ureases are made up of identical subunits (~90 kDa each), most commonly assembled as trimers and hexamers. For example, jack bean urease has two structural and one catalytic subunit. The α subunit contains the active site, it is composed of 840 amino acids per molecule (90 cysteines), its molecular mass without Ni(II) ions amounting to 90.77 kDa. The mass of the hexamer with the 12 nickel ions is 545.34 kDa. Other examples of homohexameric structures of plant ureases are those of soybean, pigeon pea and cotton seeds enzymes.[9]

It is important to note, that although composed of different types of subunits, ureases from different sources extending from bacteria to plants and fungi exhibit high homology of amino acid sequences. The single plant urease chain is equivalent to a fused γ-β-α organization. The Helicobacter "α" is equivalent to a fusion of the normal bacterial γ-β subunits, while its "β" subunit is equivalent to the normal bacterial α.[9] The three-chain organization is likely ancestral.[12]

Activity

The kcat/Km of urease in the processing of urea is 1014 times greater than the rate of the uncatalyzed elimination reaction of urea.[4] There are many reasons for this observation in nature. The proximity of urea to active groups in the active site along with the correct orientation of urea allow hydrolysis to occur rapidly. Urea alone is very stable due to the resonance forms it can adopt. The stability of urea is understood to be due to its resonance energy, which has been estimated at 30–40 kcal/mol.[4] This is because the zwitterionic resonance forms all donate electrons to the carbonyl carbon making it less of an electrophile making it less reactive to nucleophilic attack.[4]

Active site

The active site of ureases is located in the α (alpha) subunits. It is a bis-μ-hydroxo dimeric nickel center, with an interatomic distance of ~3.5 Å.[4] > The Ni(II) pair are weakly antiferromagnetically coupled.[13] X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) studies of Canavalia ensiformis (jack bean), Klebsiella aerogenes and Sporosarcina pasteurii (formerly known as Bacillus pasteurii)[14] confirm 5–6 coordinate nickel ions with exclusively O/N ligation, including two imidazole ligands per nickel.[8] Urea substrate is proposed to displace aquo ligands.

Water molecules located towards the opening of the active site form a tetrahedral cluster that fills the cavity site through hydrogen bonds. Some amino acid residues are proposed to form mobile flap of the site, which gate for the substrate.[2] Cysteine residues are common in the flap region of the enzymes, which have been determined not to be essential in catalysis, although involved in positioning other key residues in the active site appropriately.[15] In Sporosarcina pasteurii urease, the flap was found in the open conformation, while its closed conformation is apparently needed for the reaction.[14]

When compared, the α subunits of Helicobacter pylori urease and other bacterial ureases align with the jack bean ureases.[15]

The binding of urea to the active site of urease has not been observed.[9]

Proposed mechanisms

Blakeley/Zerner

One mechanism for the catalysis of this reaction by urease was proposed by Blakely and Zerner.[16] It begins with a nucleophilic attack by the carbonyl oxygen of the urea molecule onto the 5-coordinate Ni (Ni-1). A weakly coordinated water ligand is displaced in its place. A lone pair of electrons from one of the nitrogen atoms on the Urea molecule creates a double bond with the central carbon, and the resulting NH2 of the coordinated substrate interacts with a nearby positively charged group. Blakeley and Zerner proposed this nearby group to be a Carboxylate ion, although deprotonated carboxylates are negatively charged.

A hydroxide ligand on the six coordinate Ni is deprotonated by a base. The carbonyl carbon is subsequently attacked by the electronegative oxygen. A pair of electrons from the nitrogen-carbon double bond returns to the nitrogen and neutralizes the charge on it, while the now 4-coordinate carbon assumes an intermediate tetrahedral orientation.

The breakdown of this intermediate is then helped by a sulfhydryl group of a cysteine located near the active site. A hydrogen bonds to one of the nitrogen atoms, breaking its bond with carbon, and releasing an Template:Chem2 molecule. Simultaneously, the bond between the oxygen and the 6-coordinate nickel is broken. This leaves a carbamate ion coordinated to the 5-coordinate Ni, which is then displaced by a water molecule, regenerating the enzyme.

The carbamate produced then spontaneously degrades to produce another ammonia and carbonic acid.[17]

Hausinger/Karplus

The mechanism proposed by Hausinger and Karplus attempts to revise some of the issues apparent in the Blakely and Zerner pathway, and focuses on the positions of the side chains making up the urea-binding pocket.[4] From the crystal structures from K. aerogenes urease, it was argued that the general base used in the Blakely mechanism, His320, was too far away from the Ni2-bound water to deprotonate in order to form the attacking hydroxide moiety. In addition, the general acidic ligand required to protonate the urea nitrogen was not identified.[18] Hausinger and Karplus suggests a reverse protonation scheme, where a protonated form of the His320 ligand plays the role of the general acid and the Ni2-bound water is already in the deprotonated state.[4] The mechanism follows the same path, with the general base omitted (as there is no more need for it) and His320 donating its proton to form the ammonia molecule, which is then released from the enzyme. While the majority of the His320 ligands and bound water will not be in their active forms (protonated and deprotonated, respectively,) it was calculated that approximately 0.3% of total urease enzyme would be active at any one time.[4] While logically, this would imply that the enzyme is not very efficient, contrary to established knowledge, usage of the reverse protonation scheme provides an advantage in increased reactivity for the active form, balancing out the disadvantage.[4] Placing the His320 ligand as an essential component in the mechanism also takes into account the mobile flap region of the enzyme. As this histidine ligand is part of the mobile flap, binding of the urea substrate for catalysis closes this flap over the active site and with the addition of the hydrogen bonding pattern to urea from other ligands in the pocket, speaks to the selectivity of the urease enzyme for urea.[4]

Ciurli/Mangani

The mechanism proposed by Ciurli and Mangani[19] is one of the more recent and currently accepted views of the mechanism of urease and is based primarily on the different roles of the two nickel ions in the active site.[14] One of which binds and activates urea, the other nickel ion binds and activates the nucleophilic water molecule.[14] With regards to this proposal, urea enters the active site cavity when the mobile 'flap' (which allows for the entrance of urea into the active site) is open. Stability of the binding of urea to the active site is achieved via a hydrogen-bonding network, orienting the substrate into the catalytic cavity.[14] Urea binds to the five-coordinated nickel (Ni1) with the carbonyl oxygen atom. It approaches the six-coordinated nickel (Ni2) with one of its amino groups and subsequently bridges the two nickel centers.[14] The binding of the urea carbonyl oxygen atom to Ni1 is stabilized through the protonation state of Hisα222 Nԑ. Additionally, the conformational change from the open to closed state of the mobile flap generates a rearrangement of Alaα222 carbonyl group in such a way that its oxygen atom points to Ni2.[14] The Alaα170 and Alaα366 are now oriented in a way that their carbonyl groups act as hydrogen-bond acceptors towards NH2 group of urea, thus aiding its binding to Ni2.[14] Urea is a very poor chelating ligand due to low Lewis base character of its NH2 groups. However the carbonyl oxygens of Alaα170 and Alaα366 enhance the basicity of the NH2 groups and allow for binding to Ni2.[14] Therefore, in this proposed mechanism, the positioning of urea in the active site is induced by the structural features of the active site residues which are positioned to act as hydrogen-bond donors in the vicinity of Ni1 and as acceptors in the vicinity of Ni2.[14] The main structural difference between the Ciurli/Mangani mechanism and the other two is that it incorporates a nitrogen, oxygen bridging urea that is attacked by a bridging hydroxide.[17]

Action in pathogenesis

Bacterial ureases are often the mode of pathogenesis for many medical conditions. They are associated with hepatic encephalopathy / Hepatic coma, infection stones, and peptic ulceration.[20]

Infection stones

Infection induced urinary stones are a mixture of struvite (MgNH4PO4•6H2O) and carbonate apatite [Ca10(PO4)6•CO3].[20] These polyvalent ions are soluble but become insoluble when ammonia is produced from microbial urease during urea hydrolysis, as this increases the surrounding environments pH from roughly 6.5 to 9.[20] The resultant alkalinization results in stone crystallization.[20] In humans the microbial urease, Proteus mirabilis, is the most common in infection induced urinary stones.[21]

Urease in hepatic encephalopathy / hepatic coma

Studies have shown that Helicobacter pylori along with cirrhosis of the liver cause hepatic encephalopathy and hepatic coma.[22] Helicobacter pylori release microbial ureases into the stomach. The urease hydrolyzes urea to produce ammonia and carbonic acid. As the bacteria are localized to the stomach ammonia produced is readily taken up by the circulatory system from the gastric lumen.[22] This results in elevated ammonia levels in the blood, a condition known as hyperammonemia; eradication of Helicobacter pylori show marked decreases in ammonia levels.[22]

Urease in peptic ulcers

Helicobacter pylori is also the cause of peptic ulcers with its manifestation in 55–68% reported cases.[23] This was confirmed by decreased ulcer bleeding and ulcer reoccurrence after eradication of the pathogen.[23] In the stomach there is an increase in pH of the mucosal lining as a result of urea hydrolysis, which prevents movement of hydrogen ions between gastric glands and gastric lumen.[20] In addition, the high ammonia concentrations have an effect on intercellular tight junctions increasing permeability and also disrupting the gastric mucous membrane of the stomach.[20][24]

Occurrence and applications in agriculture

Urea is found naturally in the environment and is also artificially introduced, comprising more than half of all synthetic nitrogen fertilizers used globally.[25] Heavy use of urea is thought to promote eutrophication, despite the observation that urea is rapidly transformed by microbial ureases, and thus usually does not persist.[26] Environmental urease activity is often measured as an indicator of the health of microbial communities. In the absence of plants, urease activity in soil is generally attributed to heterotrophic microorganisms, although it has been demonstrated that some chemoautotrophic ammonium oxidizing bacteria are capable of growth on urea as a sole source of carbon, nitrogen, and energy.[27]

Inhibition in fertilizers

Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote". The inhibition of urease is a significant goal in agriculture because the rapid breakdown of urea-based fertilizers is wasteful and environmentally damaging.[28] Phenyl phosphorodiamidate and N-(n-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide are two such inhibitors.[29]

Biomineralization

By promoting the formation of calcium carbonate, ureases are potentially useful for biomineralization-inspired processes.[30] Notably, microbiologically induced formation of calcium carbonate can be used in making bioconcrete.[31]

Non-enzymatic action

In addition to acting as an enzyme, some ureases (especially plant ones) have additional effects that persist even when the catalytic function is disabled. These include entomotoxicity, inhibition of fungi, neurotoxicity in mammals, promotion of endocytosis and inflammatory eicosanoid production in mammals, and induction of chemotaxis in bacteria. These activities may be part of a defense mechanism.[12]

Urease insect-toxicity was originally noted in canatoxin, an orthologous isoform of jack bean urease. Digestion of the peptide identified a 10-kDa portion most responsible for this effect, termed jaburetox. An analogous portion from the soybean urease is named soyuretox. Studies on insects show that the entire protein is toxic without needing any digestion, however. Nevertheless, the "uretox" peptides, being more concentrated in toxicity, show promise as biopesticides.[12]

As diagnostic test

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Many gastrointestinal or urinary tract pathogens produce urease, enabling the detection of urease to be used as a diagnostic to detect presence of pathogens.

Urease-positive pathogens include:

Ligands

Inhibitors

A wide range of urease inhibitors of different structural families are known. Inhibition of urease is not only of interest to agriculture, but also to medicine as pathogens like H. pylori produce urease as a survival mechanism. Known structural classes of inhibitors include:[33][34]

  • Analogues of urea, the strongest being thioureas like 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-palmitoylthiourea.
  • Phosphoramidates, the most commonly used in agriculture (see above).
  • Hydroquinone and quinones. In medicine, the most interesting are quinolones, already a class of widely used antibiotics.
  • Some plant metabolites are also urease inhibitors, an example being allicin. These have potential both as environmentally-friendly fertilizer additives[35] and natural drugs.

Extraction

Template:Missing information First isolated as a crystal in 1926 by Sumner, using acetone solvation and centrifuging.[36] Modern biochemistry has increased its demand for urease. Jack bean meal,[37] watermelon seeds,[38] and pea seeds[39] have all proven useful sources of urease.

See also

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  2. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  3. Musculus, « Sur le ferment de l'urée », Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences, vol. 82, 1876, pp. 333-336, reachable in Gallica
  4. a b c d e f g h i j k Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  5. The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1946
  6. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  8. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  9. a b c d e f Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  10. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  14. a b c d e f g h i j Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  17. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  20. a b c d e f Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  22. a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  23. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  28. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  38. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  39. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

External links

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Navbox". Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:Clinical microbiology techniques Template:Portal bar Template:Authority control