Insecticide: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>KoA
Restore to previous version before COI WP:SELFCITE. Very primary source and no reason to select that one over the thousands of others looking at that topic.
imported>Citation bot
Added bibcode. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Losipov | Category:Insecticides | #UCB_Category 90/115
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Pesticide used against insects}}
{{short description|Pesticide used against insects}}
{{other uses}}
{{other uses}}
{{For|the Nirvana compilation album|Incesticide}}
[[File:FLIT Spray Can 1.jpg|thumb|[[FLIT]] manual spray pump from 1928]]
[[File:FLIT Spray Can 1.jpg|thumb|[[FLIT]] manual spray pump from 1928]]
[[File:Kente l.jpg|thumb|Farmer spraying a [[cashew]]nut tree in [[Tanzania]]]]
[[File:Kente l.jpg|thumb|Farmer spraying a [[cashew]]nut tree in [[Tanzania]]]]
Line 10: Line 9:


== Sales ==
== Sales ==
In 2016 insecticides were estimated to account for 18% of worldwide pesticide sales.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Delso |first=N. Simon |date=2015 |title=Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites |journal=Environmental Science and Pollution Research |volume=22 |issue=1 |pages=5–34 |bibcode=2015ESPR...22....5S |doi=10.1007/s11356-014-3470-y |pmc=4284386 |pmid=25233913}}</ref> Worldwide sales of insecticides in 2018 were estimated as $ 18.4 billion, of which 25% were neonicotinoids, 17% were pyrethroids, 13% were diamides, and the rest were many other classes which sold for less than 10% each of the market.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last=Sparks |first=Thomas C |date=2024 |title=Insecticide mixtures—uses, benefits and considerations |url=https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7980 |journal=Pest Management Science |doi=10.1002/ps.7980 |pmid=38356314 |via=Wiley|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
In 2016 insecticides were estimated to account for 18% of worldwide pesticide sales.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Delso |first=N. Simon |date=2015 |title=Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites |journal=Environmental Science and Pollution Research |volume=22 |issue=1 |pages=5–34 |bibcode=2015ESPR...22....5S |doi=10.1007/s11356-014-3470-y |pmc=4284386 |pmid=25233913}}</ref> Worldwide sales of insecticides in 2018 were estimated as $ 18.4 billion, of which 25% were neonicotinoids, 17% were pyrethroids, 13% were diamides, and the rest were many other classes which sold for less than 10% each of the market.<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last=Sparks |first=Thomas C |date=2024 |title=Insecticide mixtures—uses, benefits and considerations |url=https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7980 |journal=Pest Management Science |volume=81 |issue=3 |pages=1137–1144 |doi=10.1002/ps.7980 |pmid=38356314 |bibcode=2025PMSci..81.1137S |via=Wiley|url-access=subscription }}</ref>


==Synthetic insecticides==
==Synthetic insecticides==
Line 18: Line 17:


=== Development ===
=== Development ===
{{main|pesticide#Development of new pesticides}}Insecticides with systemic activity against sucking pests, which are safe to [[Pollinator|pollinators]], are sought after,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Sparks |first=Thomas |date=August 2022 |title=Innovation in insecticide discovery: Approaches to the discovery of new classes of insecticides |journal=Pest Management Science |volume=78 |issue=8 |pages=3226–3247 |doi=10.1002/ps.6942 |pmid=35452182 |s2cid=248322585}}</ref><ref name=":02">{{Cite journal |last=Sparks |first=Thomas |date=May 2023 |title=Insecticide discovery–"Chance favors the prepared mind" |journal=Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology |volume=192 |pages=105412 |doi=10.1016/j.pestbp.2023.105412 |pmid=37105622 |bibcode=2023PBioP.19205412S |s2cid=257790593}}</ref><ref name=":15">{{Cite journal |last=Umetsu |first=Noriharu |date=May 2020 |title=Development of novel pesticides in the 21st century |journal=Journal of Pesticide Science |volume=45 |issue=2 |pages=54–74 |doi=10.1584/jpestics.D20-201 |pmc=7581488 |pmid=33132734}}</ref> particularly in view of the partial bans on [[Neonicotinoid|neonicotinoids]]. Revised 2023 guidance by registration authorities describes the bee testing that is required for new insecticides to be approved for commercial use.<ref>{{Cite web |date=11 May 2023 |title=Bees and pesticides: updated guidance for assessing risks |url=https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/news/bees-and-pesticides-updated-guidance-assessing-risks |access-date=26 Nov 2023 |website=European Food Safety Authority}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Adriaanse |first=Pauline |date=11 May 2023 |title=Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees) |journal=EFSA Journal |volume=21 |issue=5 |pages=7989 |doi=10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989 |pmc=10173852 |pmid=37179655}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=28 June 2023 |title=How We Assess Risks to Pollinators |url=https://www.epa.gov/pollinator-protection/how-we-assess-risks-pollinators |website=United States Environmental Protection Agency}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Managing Pesticide Risk to Insect Pollinators; Laws, Policies and Guidance |url=https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-mitigation-pollinators/laws-policies-guidance.htm |access-date=28 Nov 2023 |website=Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development}}</ref>
{{main|pesticide#Development of new pesticides}}Insecticides with systemic activity against sucking pests, which are safe to [[Pollinator|pollinators]], are sought after,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Sparks |first=Thomas |date=August 2022 |title=Innovation in insecticide discovery: Approaches to the discovery of new classes of insecticides |journal=Pest Management Science |volume=78 |issue=8 |pages=3226–3247 |doi=10.1002/ps.6942 |pmid=35452182 |bibcode=2022PMSci..78.3226S |s2cid=248322585}}</ref><ref name=":02">{{Cite journal |last=Sparks |first=Thomas |date=May 2023 |title=Insecticide discovery–"Chance favors the prepared mind" |journal=Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology |volume=192 |article-number=105412 |doi=10.1016/j.pestbp.2023.105412 |pmid=37105622 |bibcode=2023PBioP.19205412S |s2cid=257790593}}</ref><ref name=":15">{{Cite journal |last=Umetsu |first=Noriharu |date=May 2020 |title=Development of novel pesticides in the 21st century |journal=Journal of Pesticide Science |volume=45 |issue=2 |pages=54–74 |doi=10.1584/jpestics.D20-201 |pmc=7581488 |pmid=33132734}}</ref> particularly in view of the partial bans on [[Neonicotinoid|neonicotinoids]]. Revised 2023 guidance by registration authorities describes the bee testing that is required for new insecticides to be approved for commercial use.<ref>{{Cite web |date=11 May 2023 |title=Bees and pesticides: updated guidance for assessing risks |url=https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/news/bees-and-pesticides-updated-guidance-assessing-risks |access-date=26 Nov 2023 |website=European Food Safety Authority}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Adriaanse |first=Pauline |date=11 May 2023 |title=Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees) |journal=EFSA Journal |volume=21 |issue=5 |pages=7989 |doi=10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989 |pmc=10173852 |pmid=37179655}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=28 June 2023 |title=How We Assess Risks to Pollinators |url=https://www.epa.gov/pollinator-protection/how-we-assess-risks-pollinators |website=United States Environmental Protection Agency}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Managing Pesticide Risk to Insect Pollinators; Laws, Policies and Guidance |url=https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-mitigation-pollinators/laws-policies-guidance.htm |access-date=28 Nov 2023 |website=Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development}}</ref>


=== Systemicity and translocation ===
=== Systemicity and translocation ===
Insecticides may be systemic or non-systemic (contact insecticides).<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">{{cite journal |last1=Zhang |first1=Y |last2=Lorsbach |first2=BA |last3=Castetter |first3=S |last4=Lambert |first4=WT |last5=Kister |first5=J |last6=Wang |first6=N |date=2018 |title=Physicochemical property guidelines for modern agrochemicals |journal=Pest Management Science |volume=74 |issue=9 |page=1979-1991 |doi=10.1002/ps.5037 |pmid=29667318 |s2cid=4937939}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{cite journal |last1=Hofstetter |first1=S |date=2018 |title=How To Design for a Tailored Subcellular Distribution of Systemic Agrochemicals in Plant Tissues |url=https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/167227061/Rev_Hofstetter_et_al_intracellular_localization_of_agrochemicals.pdf |journal=J. Agric. Food Chem. |volume=66 |issue=33 |pages=8687–8697 |doi=10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02221 |pmid=30024749 |bibcode=2018JAFC...66.8687H |s2cid=261974999}}</ref> Systemic insecticides penetrate into the plant and move (translocate) inside the plant. Translocation may be upward in the [[xylem]], or downward in the [[phloem]] or both. Systemicity is a prerequisite for the pesticide to be used as a [[Seed treatment|seed-treatment]]. Contact insecticides (non-systemic insecticides) remain on the leaf surface and act through direct contact with the insect.
Insecticides may be systemic or non-systemic (contact insecticides).<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">{{cite journal |last1=Zhang |first1=Y |last2=Lorsbach |first2=BA |last3=Castetter |first3=S |last4=Lambert |first4=WT |last5=Kister |first5=J |last6=Wang |first6=N |date=2018 |title=Physicochemical property guidelines for modern agrochemicals |journal=Pest Management Science |volume=74 |issue=9 |page=1979-1991 |doi=10.1002/ps.5037 |pmid=29667318 |bibcode=2018PMSci..74.1979Z |s2cid=4937939}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{cite journal |last1=Hofstetter |first1=S |date=2018 |title=How To Design for a Tailored Subcellular Distribution of Systemic Agrochemicals in Plant Tissues |url=https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/files/167227061/Rev_Hofstetter_et_al_intracellular_localization_of_agrochemicals.pdf |journal=J. Agric. Food Chem. |volume=66 |issue=33 |pages=8687–8697 |doi=10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02221 |pmid=30024749 |bibcode=2018JAFC...66.8687H |s2cid=261974999}}</ref> Systemic insecticides penetrate into the plant and move (translocate) inside the plant. Translocation may be upward in the [[xylem]], or downward in the [[phloem]] or both. Systemicity is a prerequisite for the pesticide to be used as a [[Seed treatment|seed-treatment]]. Contact insecticides (non-systemic insecticides) remain on the leaf surface and act through direct contact with the insect.


[[Eating behavior in insects|Insects feed]] from various compartments in the plant. Most of the major pests are either chewing insects or sucking insects.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cloyd |first=Raymond A. |date=10 May 2022 |title=Insect and Mite Pests Feeding Behaviors and Plant Damage |url=https://gpnmag.com/article/dr-bugs-insect-and-mite-pests-feeding-behaviors-and-plant-damage |access-date=3 November 2024 |website=Greenhouse Product News}}</ref> Chewing insects, such as caterpillars, eat whole pieces of leaf. Sucking insects use feeding tubes to feed from phloem (e.g. aphids, leafhoppers, scales and whiteflies), or to suck cell contents (e.g. thrips and mites). An insecticide is more effective if it is in the compartment the insect feeds from. The physicochemical properties of the insecticide determine how it is distributed throughout the plant.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":4" />
[[Eating behavior in insects|Insects feed]] from various compartments in the plant. Most of the major pests are either chewing insects or sucking insects.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cloyd |first=Raymond A. |date=10 May 2022 |title=Insect and Mite Pests Feeding Behaviors and Plant Damage |url=https://gpnmag.com/article/dr-bugs-insect-and-mite-pests-feeding-behaviors-and-plant-damage |access-date=3 November 2024 |website=Greenhouse Product News}}</ref> Chewing insects, such as caterpillars, eat whole pieces of leaf. Sucking insects use feeding tubes to feed from phloem (e.g. aphids, leafhoppers, scales and whiteflies), or to suck cell contents (e.g. thrips and mites). An insecticide is more effective if it is in the compartment the insect feeds from. The physicochemical properties of the insecticide determine how it is distributed throughout the plant.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":4" />


=== Organochlorides ===
=== Organochlorides ===
The best known [[organochloride]], [[DDT]], was created by Swiss scientist [[Paul Hermann Müller|Paul Müller]]. For this discovery, he was awarded the 1948 [[Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine]].<ref>{{cite web |editor=Karl Grandin | title=Paul Müller Biography | url=http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1948/muller-bio.html | work=Les Prix Nobel | publisher=The Nobel Foundation | year=1948 | access-date=2008-07-24}}</ref> DDT was introduced in 1944. It functions by opening [[sodium channel]]s in the insect's [[nerve cell]]s.<ref>{{Cite journal |author=Vijverberg |title=Similar mode of action of pyrethroids and DDT on sodium channel gating in myelinated nerves |journal=Nature |volume=295 |issue=5850 |pages=601–603 |year=1982 |display-authors=1 |bibcode=1982Natur.295..601V |last2=Van Den Bercken |first2=Joep |doi=10.1038/295601a0|pmid=6276777 |s2cid=4259608 }}</ref> The contemporaneous rise of the chemical industry facilitated large-scale production of [[chlorinated hydrocarbon]]s including various [[cyclodiene]] and [[hexachlorocyclohexane]] compounds. Although commonly used in the past, many older chemicals have been removed from the market due to their health and environmental effects (''e.g.'' [[DDT]], [[chlordane]], and [[toxaphene]]).<ref>{{Cite web |date=Sep 2002 |title=Public Health Statement for DDT, DDE, and DDD |url=https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp35-c1-b.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080923121618/http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp35-c1-b.pdf |archive-date=2008-09-23 |access-date=Dec 9, 2018 |website=atsdr.cdc.gov |publisher=[[Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry|ATSDR]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=Apr 18, 2012 |title=Medical Management Guidelines (MMGs): Chlordane |url=https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/MMG/MMG.asp?id=349&tid=62 |access-date=Dec 9, 2018 |website=atsdr.cdc.gov |publisher=[[Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry|ATSDR]]}}</ref>
The first and best known [[organochloride]], [[DDT]], was first synthesised by Othmar Zeidler. Swiss scientist [[Paul Hermann Müller|Paul Müller]] found DDTs insecticide properties. For this discovery, he was awarded the 1948 [[Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine]].<ref>{{cite web |editor=Karl Grandin | title=Paul Müller Biography | url=http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1948/muller-bio.html | work=Les Prix Nobel | publisher=The Nobel Foundation | year=1948 | access-date=2008-07-24}}</ref> DDT was introduced in 1944. It functions by opening [[sodium channel]]s in the insect's [[nerve cell]]s.<ref>{{Cite journal |author=Vijverberg |title=Similar mode of action of pyrethroids and DDT on sodium channel gating in myelinated nerves |journal=Nature |volume=295 |issue=5850 |pages=601–603 |year=1982 |display-authors=1 |bibcode=1982Natur.295..601V |last2=Van Den Bercken |first2=Joep |doi=10.1038/295601a0|pmid=6276777 |s2cid=4259608 }}</ref> The contemporaneous rise of the chemical industry facilitated large-scale production of [[chlorinated hydrocarbon]]s including various [[cyclodiene]] and [[hexachlorocyclohexane]] compounds. Although commonly used in the past, many older chemicals have been removed from the market due to their health and environmental effects (''e.g.'' [[DDT]], [[chlordane]], and [[toxaphene]]).<ref>{{Cite web |date=Sep 2002 |title=Public Health Statement for DDT, DDE, and DDD |url=https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp35-c1-b.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080923121618/http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp35-c1-b.pdf |archive-date=2008-09-23 |access-date=Dec 9, 2018 |website=atsdr.cdc.gov |publisher=[[Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry|ATSDR]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=Apr 18, 2012 |title=Medical Management Guidelines (MMGs): Chlordane |url=https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/MMG/MMG.asp?id=349&tid=62 |access-date=Dec 9, 2018 |website=atsdr.cdc.gov |publisher=[[Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry|ATSDR]] |archive-date=December 9, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181209165551/https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/MMG/MMG.asp?id=349&tid=62 |url-status=dead }}</ref>


=== Organophosphates ===
=== Organophosphates ===
[[Organophosphate]]s are another large class of contact insecticides.  These also target the insect's nervous system. Organophosphates interfere with the [[enzyme]]s [[acetylcholinesterase]] and other [[cholinesterase]]s, causing an increase in synaptic [[acetylcholine]] and overstimulation of the [[parasympathetic nervous system]],<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Colović MB, Krstić DZ, Lazarević-Pašti TD, Bondžić AM, Vasić VM |date=May 2013 |title=Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: pharmacology and toxicology |journal=Current Neuropharmacology |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=315–35 |doi=10.2174/1570159X11311030006 |pmc=3648782 |pmid=24179466}}</ref> killing or disabling the insect. Organophosphate insecticides and [[chemical warfare]] [[Nerve agent|nerve agents]] (such as [[sarin]], [[Tabun (nerve agent)|tabun]], [[soman]], and [[VX (nerve agent)|VX]]) have the same mechanism of action. Organophosphates have a cumulative toxic effect to wildlife, so multiple exposures to the chemicals amplifies the toxicity.<ref name="palmerw"/> In the US, organophosphate use declined with the rise of substitutes.<ref name=s730>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1126/science.341.6147.730 | title = Infographic: Pesticide Planet | journal = Science | volume = 341 | issue = 6147 | pages = 730–731 | year = 2013 | pmid =  23950524| bibcode = 2013Sci...341..730. }}</ref> Many of these insecticides, first developed in the mid 20th century, are very poisonous.<ref>{{Cite web |date=Aug 1996 |title=Toxicological Profile for Toxaphene |url=https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/chem_background/exsumpdf/toxaphene_508.pdf |access-date=Dec 9, 2018 |website=ntp.niehs.nih.gov |publisher=[[Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry|ATSDR]] |pages=5}}</ref> Many [[Organophosphate|organophosphates]] do not persist in the environment.
[[Organophosphate]]s are another large class of contact insecticides.  These also target the insect's nervous system. Organophosphates interfere with the [[enzyme]]s [[acetylcholinesterase]] and other [[cholinesterase]]s, causing an increase in synaptic [[acetylcholine]] and overstimulation of the [[parasympathetic nervous system]],<ref>{{cite journal |vauthors=Colović MB, Krstić DZ, Lazarević-Pašti TD, Bondžić AM, Vasić VM |date=May 2013 |title=Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: pharmacology and toxicology |journal=Current Neuropharmacology |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=315–35 |doi=10.2174/1570159X11311030006 |pmc=3648782 |pmid=24179466}}</ref> killing or disabling the insect. Organophosphate insecticides and [[chemical warfare]] [[Nerve agent|nerve agents]] (such as [[sarin]], [[Tabun (nerve agent)|tabun]], [[soman]], and [[VX (nerve agent)|VX]]) have the same mechanism of action. Organophosphates have a cumulative toxic effect to wildlife, so multiple exposures to the chemicals amplifies the toxicity.<ref name="palmerw"/> In the US, organophosphate use declined with the rise of substitutes.<ref name=s730>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1126/science.341.6147.730 | title = Infographic: Pesticide Planet | journal = Science | volume = 341 | issue = 6147 | pages = 730–731 | year = 2013 | pmid =  23950524| bibcode = 2013Sci...341..730. }}</ref> Many of these insecticides, first developed in the mid 20th century, are very poisonous.<ref>{{Cite web |date=Aug 1996 |title=Toxicological Profile for Toxaphene |url=https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/sites/default/files/ntp/htdocs/chem_background/exsumpdf/toxaphene_508.pdf |access-date=Dec 9, 2018 |website=ntp.niehs.nih.gov |publisher=[[Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry|ATSDR]] |pages=5}}</ref> Many [[Organophosphate|organophosphates]] do not persist in the environment.


=== Pyrethroids ===
=== Pyrethroids ===
Line 48: Line 47:


===Market===
===Market===
The global bio-insecticide market was estimated to be less than 10% of the total insecticide market.<ref name=":6">{{Cite journal |last=Marrone |first=Pamela G. |year=2024 |title=Status of the biopesticide market and prospects for new bioherbicides. |url=https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7403 |journal=Pest Management Science |volume=80 |issue=1 |pages=81–86|doi=10.1002/ps.7403 |pmid=36765405 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> The bio-insecticide market is dominated by microbials.<ref name=":10">{{Cite book |last1=Glare |first1=T.R. |title=Microbial Control of Insect and Mite Pests |last2=Jurat-Fuentes |first2=J.-L. |last3=O’Callaghan |first3=M |publisher=Academic Press |year=2017 |isbn=9780128035276 |editor-last=Lacey |editor-first=Lawrence A. |pages=47–67 |chapter=Chapter 4 - Basic and Applied Research: Entomopathogenic Bacteria |doi=10.1016/B978-0-12-803527-6.00004-4 |chapter-url=https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803527-6.00004-4}}</ref> The bio-insecticide market is growing more that 10% yearly, which is a higher growth than the total insecticide market, mainly due to the increase in [[organic farming]] and [[Integrated pest management|IPM]], and also due to benevolent government policies.<ref name=":6" />
The global bio-insecticide market was estimated to be less than 10% of the total insecticide market.<ref name=":6">{{Cite journal |last=Marrone |first=Pamela G. |year=2024 |title=Status of the biopesticide market and prospects for new bioherbicides. |url=https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7403 |journal=Pest Management Science |volume=80 |issue=1 |pages=81–86|doi=10.1002/ps.7403 |pmid=36765405 |bibcode=2024PMSci..80...81M |url-access=subscription }}</ref> The bio-insecticide market is dominated by microbials.<ref name=":10">{{Cite book |last1=Glare |first1=T.R. |title=Microbial Control of Insect and Mite Pests |last2=Jurat-Fuentes |first2=J.-L. |last3=O’Callaghan |first3=M |publisher=Academic Press |year=2017 |isbn=9780128035276 |editor-last=Lacey |editor-first=Lawrence A. |pages=47–67 |chapter=Chapter 4 - Basic and Applied Research: Entomopathogenic Bacteria |doi=10.1016/B978-0-12-803527-6.00004-4 |chapter-url=https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803527-6.00004-4}}</ref> The bio-insecticide market is growing more that 10% yearly, which is a higher growth than the total insecticide market, mainly due to the increase in [[organic farming]] and [[Integrated pest management|IPM]], and also due to benevolent government policies.<ref name=":6" />


Biopesticides are regarded by the US and European authorities as posing fewer risks of environmental and mammalian toxicity.<ref name=":2" /> Biopesticides are more than 10 x (often 100 x) cheaper and 3 x faster to register than synthetic pesticides.<ref name=":6" />
Biopesticides are regarded by the US and European authorities as posing fewer risks of environmental and mammalian toxicity.<ref name=":2" /> Biopesticides are more than 10 x (often 100 x) cheaper and 3 x faster to register than synthetic pesticides.<ref name=":6" />


=== Advantages and disadvantages ===
=== Advantages and disadvantages ===
There is a wide variety of biological insecticides with differing attributes, but in general the following has been described.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Mihăiță |first1=Daraban Gabriel |last2=Hlihor |first2=Raluca-Maria |last3=Suteu |first3=Daniela |year=2023 |title=Pesticides vs. Biopesticides: From Pest Management to Toxicity and Impacts on the Environment and Human Health |journal=Toxics |volume=11 |issue=12 |pages=983|doi=10.3390/toxics11120983 |doi-access=free |pmid=38133384 |pmc=10748064 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=5 September 2024 |title=Advantages and Disadvantages of Biological Control |url=https://isam.education/en/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-biological-control/ |access-date=12 October 2024 |website=INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF AGRI MANAGEMENT S.L}}</ref>
There is a wide variety of biological insecticides with differing attributes, but in general the following has been described.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Mihăiță |first1=Daraban Gabriel |last2=Hlihor |first2=Raluca-Maria |last3=Suteu |first3=Daniela |year=2023 |title=Pesticides vs. Biopesticides: From Pest Management to Toxicity and Impacts on the Environment and Human Health |journal=Toxics |volume=11 |issue=12 |pages=983|doi=10.3390/toxics11120983 |doi-access=free |pmid=38133384 |pmc=10748064 |bibcode=2023Toxic..11..983D }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=5 September 2024 |title=Advantages and Disadvantages of Biological Control |url=https://isam.education/en/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-biological-control/ |access-date=12 October 2024 |website=INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF AGRI MANAGEMENT S.L}}</ref>


They are easier, faster and cheaper to register, usually with lower mammalian toxicity. They are more specific, and thus preserve beneficial insects and biodiversity in general. This makes them compatible with IPM regimes. They degrade rapidly cause less impact on the environment. They have a shorter withholding period.
They are easier, faster and cheaper to register, usually with lower mammalian toxicity. They are more specific, and thus preserve beneficial insects and biodiversity in general. This makes them compatible with IPM regimes. They degrade rapidly cause less impact on the environment. They have a shorter withholding period.{{cn|date=July 2025}}


The spectrum of control is narrow. They are less effective and prone to adverse ambient conditions. They degrade rapidly and are thus less persistent. They are slower to act. They are more expensive, have a shorter shelf-life, and are more difficult to source. They require more specialised knowledge to use.
The spectrum of control is narrow. They are less effective and prone to adverse ambient conditions. They degrade rapidly and are thus less persistent. They are slower to act. They are more expensive, have a shorter shelf-life, and are more difficult to source. They require more specialised knowledge to use.{{cn|date=July 2025}}


===Plant extracts===
===Plant extracts===
Line 69: Line 68:


=== Spider toxins ===
=== Spider toxins ===
[[Spider venoms]] contain many, often hundreds, of insecticidally active [[Spider toxin|toxins]]. Many are [[Protein|proteins]] that attack the nervous system of the insect.<ref name=":9">{{Cite journal |last=King |first=Glenn F |year=2019 |title=Tying pest insects in knots: the deployment of spider-venom-derived knottins as bioinsecticides |url=https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5452 |journal=Pest Manag. Sci. |volume=75 |issue=9 |pages=2437–2445 |doi=10.1002/ps.5452|pmid=31025461 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> Vestaron introduced for agricultural use a spray formulation of GS-omega/kappa-Hxtx-Hv1a (HXTX), derived from the venom of the Australian blue mountain funnel web spider ([[Hadronyche versuta]]).<ref name=":9" /> HXTX acts by allosterically (site II) modifying the [[Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor|nicotinic acetylcholine]] receptor ([[Insecticide Resistance Action Committee#Table of modes of action and classes of insecticide|IRAC]] group 32).<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Windley |first=Monique J. |last2=Vetter |first2=Irina |last3=Lewis |first3=Richard J. |last4=Nicholson |first4=Graham M. |date=2017 |title=Lethal effects of an insecticidal spider venom peptide involve positive allosteric modulation of insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors |url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.04.008 |journal=Neuropharmacology |volume=127 |pages=224-242 |issn=0028-3908}}</ref>
[[Spider venoms]] contain many, often hundreds, of insecticidally active [[Spider toxin|toxins]]. Many are [[Protein|proteins]] that attack the nervous system of the insect.<ref name=":9">{{Cite journal |last=King |first=Glenn F |year=2019 |title=Tying pest insects in knots: the deployment of spider-venom-derived knottins as bioinsecticides |url=https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5452 |journal=Pest Manag. Sci. |volume=75 |issue=9 |pages=2437–2445 |doi=10.1002/ps.5452|pmid=31025461 |url-access=subscription }}</ref> Vestaron introduced for agricultural use a spray formulation of GS-omega/kappa-Hxtx-Hv1a (HXTX), derived from the venom of the Australian blue mountain funnel web spider ([[Hadronyche versuta]]).<ref name=":9" /> HXTX acts by allosterically (site II) modifying the [[Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor|nicotinic acetylcholine]] receptor ([[Insecticide Resistance Action Committee#Table of modes of action and classes of insecticide|IRAC]] group 32).<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Windley |first1=Monique J. |last2=Vetter |first2=Irina |last3=Lewis |first3=Richard J. |last4=Nicholson |first4=Graham M. |date=2017 |title=Lethal effects of an insecticidal spider venom peptide involve positive allosteric modulation of insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors |url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.04.008 |journal=Neuropharmacology |volume=127 |pages=224–242 |doi=10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.04.008 |pmid=28396143 |issn=0028-3908|url-access=subscription }}</ref>


=== Entomopathic bacteria ===
=== Entomopathic bacteria ===
Line 90: Line 89:


=== Runoff and percolation ===
=== Runoff and percolation ===
Solid bait and liquid insecticides, especially if improperly applied in a location, get moved by water flow. Often, this happens through nonpoint sources where runoff carries insecticides in to larger bodies of water. As snow melts and rainfall moves over and through the ground, the water picks applied insecticides and deposits them in to larger bodies of water, rivers, wetlands, underground sources of previously potable water, and percolates in to watersheds.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/ag_runoff_fact_sheet.pdf|title=Protecting Water Quality from Agricultural Runoff|last=Environmental Protection Agency|date=2005|website=EPA.gov|access-date=2019-11-19}}</ref> This runoff and percolation of insecticides can effect the quality of water sources, harming the natural ecology and thus, indirectly effect human populations through  biomagnification and bioaccumulation.
Solid bait and liquid insecticides, especially if improperly applied in a location, get moved by water flow. Often, this happens through nonpoint sources where runoff carries insecticides in to larger bodies of water. As snow melts and rainfall moves over and through the ground, the water picks applied insecticides and deposits them in to larger bodies of water, rivers, wetlands, underground sources of previously potable water, and percolates in to watersheds.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/ag_runoff_fact_sheet.pdf|title=Protecting Water Quality from Agricultural Runoff|last=Environmental Protection Agency|date=2005|website=EPA.gov|access-date=2019-11-19}}</ref> This runoff and percolation of insecticides can effect the quality of water sources, harming the natural ecology and thus, indirectly effect human populations through  biomagnification and bioaccumulation.


=== Insect decline ===
=== Insect decline ===
Line 134: Line 133:
* Example of Insecticide application in the [http://www.zen-garden.org/html/page_control.htm Tsubo-en Zen garden] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120602083834/http://www.zen-garden.org/html/page_control.htm |date=2012-06-02 }} (Japanese dry rock garden) in Lelystad, The Netherlands.
* Example of Insecticide application in the [http://www.zen-garden.org/html/page_control.htm Tsubo-en Zen garden] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120602083834/http://www.zen-garden.org/html/page_control.htm |date=2012-06-02 }} (Japanese dry rock garden) in Lelystad, The Netherlands.
* {{cite web | title=IRAC | website=[[Insecticide Resistance Action Committee]] | date=2021-03-01 | url=http://irac-online.org/ | access-date=2021-04-02}}
* {{cite web | title=IRAC | website=[[Insecticide Resistance Action Committee]] | date=2021-03-01 | url=http://irac-online.org/ | access-date=2021-04-02}}
<!-- spacing -->


{{insecticides|state=open}}
{{insecticides|state=open}}

Latest revision as of 17:52, 26 October 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "other uses".

File:FLIT Spray Can 1.jpg
FLIT manual spray pump from 1928
File:Kente l.jpg
Farmer spraying a cashewnut tree in Tanzania

Insecticides are pesticides used to kill insects.[1] They include ovicides and larvicides used against insect eggs and larvae, respectively. The major use of insecticides is in agriculture, but they are also used in home and garden settings, industrial buildings, for vector control, and control of insect parasites of animals and humans.

Acaricides, which kill mites and ticks, are not strictly insecticides, but are usually classified together with insecticides. Some insecticides (including common bug sprays) are effective against other non-insect arthropods as well, such as scorpions, spiders, etc. Insecticides are distinct from insect repellents, which repel but do not kill.

Sales

In 2016 insecticides were estimated to account for 18% of worldwide pesticide sales.[2] Worldwide sales of insecticides in 2018 were estimated as $ 18.4 billion, of which 25% were neonicotinoids, 17% were pyrethroids, 13% were diamides, and the rest were many other classes which sold for less than 10% each of the market.[3]

Synthetic insecticides

Insecticides are most usefully categorised according to their modes of action. The insecticide resistance action committee (IRAC) lists 30 modes of action plus unknowns. There can be several chemical classes of insecticide with the same mode or action. IRAC lists 56 chemical classes plus unknowns.[4]

The mode of action describes how the insecticide kills or inactivates a pest.

Development

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".Insecticides with systemic activity against sucking pests, which are safe to pollinators, are sought after,[5][6][7] particularly in view of the partial bans on neonicotinoids. Revised 2023 guidance by registration authorities describes the bee testing that is required for new insecticides to be approved for commercial use.[8][9][10][11]

Systemicity and translocation

Insecticides may be systemic or non-systemic (contact insecticides).[2][12][13] Systemic insecticides penetrate into the plant and move (translocate) inside the plant. Translocation may be upward in the xylem, or downward in the phloem or both. Systemicity is a prerequisite for the pesticide to be used as a seed-treatment. Contact insecticides (non-systemic insecticides) remain on the leaf surface and act through direct contact with the insect.

Insects feed from various compartments in the plant. Most of the major pests are either chewing insects or sucking insects.[14] Chewing insects, such as caterpillars, eat whole pieces of leaf. Sucking insects use feeding tubes to feed from phloem (e.g. aphids, leafhoppers, scales and whiteflies), or to suck cell contents (e.g. thrips and mites). An insecticide is more effective if it is in the compartment the insect feeds from. The physicochemical properties of the insecticide determine how it is distributed throughout the plant.[12][13]

Organochlorides

The first and best known organochloride, DDT, was first synthesised by Othmar Zeidler. Swiss scientist Paul Müller found DDTs insecticide properties. For this discovery, he was awarded the 1948 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine.[15] DDT was introduced in 1944. It functions by opening sodium channels in the insect's nerve cells.[16] The contemporaneous rise of the chemical industry facilitated large-scale production of chlorinated hydrocarbons including various cyclodiene and hexachlorocyclohexane compounds. Although commonly used in the past, many older chemicals have been removed from the market due to their health and environmental effects (e.g. DDT, chlordane, and toxaphene).[17][18]

Organophosphates

Organophosphates are another large class of contact insecticides. These also target the insect's nervous system. Organophosphates interfere with the enzymes acetylcholinesterase and other cholinesterases, causing an increase in synaptic acetylcholine and overstimulation of the parasympathetic nervous system,[19] killing or disabling the insect. Organophosphate insecticides and chemical warfare nerve agents (such as sarin, tabun, soman, and VX) have the same mechanism of action. Organophosphates have a cumulative toxic effect to wildlife, so multiple exposures to the chemicals amplifies the toxicity.[20] In the US, organophosphate use declined with the rise of substitutes.[21] Many of these insecticides, first developed in the mid 20th century, are very poisonous.[22] Many organophosphates do not persist in the environment.

Pyrethroids

Pyrethroid insecticides mimic the insecticidal activity of the natural compound pyrethrin, the biopesticide found in Pyrethrum (Now Chrysanthemum and Tanacetum) species. They have been modified to increase their stability in the environment. These compounds are nonpersistent sodium channel modulators and are less toxic than organophosphates and carbamates. Compounds in this group are often applied against household pests.[23] Some synthetic pyrethroids are toxic to the nervous system.[24]

Neonicotinoids

Neonicotinoids are a class of neuro-active insecticides chemically similar to nicotine.(with much lower acute mammalian toxicity and greater field persistence). These chemicals are acetylcholine receptor agonists. They are broad-spectrum systemic insecticides, with rapid action (minutes-hours). They are applied as sprays, drenches, seed and soil treatments. Treated insects exhibit leg tremors, rapid wing motion, stylet withdrawal (aphids), disoriented movement, paralysis and death.[25]Imidacloprid, of the neonicotinoid family, is the most widely used insecticide in the world.[26] In the late 1990s neonicotinoids came under increasing scrutiny over their environmental impact and were linked in a range of studies to adverse ecological effects, including honey-bee colony collapse disorder (CCD) and loss of birds due to a reduction in insect populations. In 2013, the European Union and a few non EU countries restricted the use of certain neonicotinoids.[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] and its potential to increase the susceptibility of rice to planthopper attacks.[35]

Diamides

Diamides selectively activate insect ryanodine receptors (RyR), which are large calcium release channels present in cardiac and skeletal muscle,[36] leading to the loss of calcium crucial for biological processes. This causes insects to act lethargic, stop feeding, and eventually die.[37] The first insecticide from this class to be registered was flubendiamide.[37]

Biological pesticides

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Definition

The EU defines biopesticides as "a form of pesticide based on micro-organisms or natural products".[38] The US EPA defines biopesticides as “certain types of pesticides derived from such natural materials as animals, plants, bacteria, and certain minerals”.[39] Microorganisms that control pests may also be categorised as biological pest control agents together with larger organisms such as parasitic insects, entomopathic nematodes etc. Natural products may also be categorised as chemical insecticides.

The US EPA describes three types of biopesticide.[39] Biochemical pesticides (meaning bio-derived chemicals), which are naturally occurring substances that control pests by non-toxic mechanisms. Microbial pesticides consisting of a microorganism (e.g., a bacterium, fungus, virus or protozoan) as the active ingredient. Plant-Incorporated-Protectants (PIPs) are pesticidal substances that plants produce from genetic material that has been added to the plant (thus producing transgenic crops).

Market

The global bio-insecticide market was estimated to be less than 10% of the total insecticide market.[40] The bio-insecticide market is dominated by microbials.[41] The bio-insecticide market is growing more that 10% yearly, which is a higher growth than the total insecticide market, mainly due to the increase in organic farming and IPM, and also due to benevolent government policies.[40]

Biopesticides are regarded by the US and European authorities as posing fewer risks of environmental and mammalian toxicity.[39] Biopesticides are more than 10 x (often 100 x) cheaper and 3 x faster to register than synthetic pesticides.[40]

Advantages and disadvantages

There is a wide variety of biological insecticides with differing attributes, but in general the following has been described.[42][43]

They are easier, faster and cheaper to register, usually with lower mammalian toxicity. They are more specific, and thus preserve beneficial insects and biodiversity in general. This makes them compatible with IPM regimes. They degrade rapidly cause less impact on the environment. They have a shorter withholding period.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

The spectrum of control is narrow. They are less effective and prone to adverse ambient conditions. They degrade rapidly and are thus less persistent. They are slower to act. They are more expensive, have a shorter shelf-life, and are more difficult to source. They require more specialised knowledge to use.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Plant extracts

Most or all plants produce chemical insecticides to stop insects eating them. Extracts and purified chemicals from thousands of plants have been shown to be insecticidal, however only a few are used in agriculture.[44] In the USA 13 are registered for use, in the EU 6. In Korea, where it is easier to register botanical pesticides, 38 are used. Most used are neem oil, chenopodium, pyrethrins, and azadirachtin.[44] Many botanical insecticides used in past decades (e.g. rotenone, nicotine, ryanodine) have been banned because of their toxicity.[44]

Genetically modified crops

The first transgenic crop, which incorporated an insecticidal PIP, contained a gene for the CRY toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) and was introduced in 1997.[45] For the next ca 25 years the only insecticidal agents used in GMOs were the CRY and VIP toxins from various strains of B.t, which control a wide number of insect types. These are widely used with > 100 million hectares planted with B.t. modified crops in 2019.[45] Since 2020 several novel agents have been engineered into plants and approved.  ipd072Aa from Pseudomonas chlororaphis, ipd079Ea from Ophioglossum pendulum, and mpp75Aa1.1 from Brevibacillus laterosporus code for protein toxins.[45][46] The trait dvsnf7 is an RNAi agent consisting of a double-stranded RNA transcript containing a 240 bp fragment of the WCR Snf7 gene of the western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera).[46][47]

RNA interference

RNA interference (RNAi) uses segments of RNA to fatally silence crucial insect genes.[48] In 2024 two uses of RNAi have been registered by the authorities for use: Genetic modification of a crop to introduce a gene coding for an RNAi fragment, and spraying double stranded RNA fragments onto a field.[47] Monsanto introduced the trait DvSnf7 which expresses a double-stranded RNA transcript containing a 240 bp fragment of the WCR Snf7 gene of the Western Corn Rootworm.[46] GreenLight Biosciences introduced Ledprona, a formulation of double stranded RNA as a spray for potato fields. It targets the essential gene for proteasome subunit beta type-5 (PSMB5) in the Colorado potato beetle.[47]

Spider toxins

Spider venoms contain many, often hundreds, of insecticidally active toxins. Many are proteins that attack the nervous system of the insect.[49] Vestaron introduced for agricultural use a spray formulation of GS-omega/kappa-Hxtx-Hv1a (HXTX), derived from the venom of the Australian blue mountain funnel web spider (Hadronyche versuta).[49] HXTX acts by allosterically (site II) modifying the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (IRAC group 32).[50]

Entomopathic bacteria

Entomopathic bacteria can be mass-produced.[41] The most widely used is Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.), used since decades. There are several strains used with different applications against lepidoptera, coleoptera and diptera. Also used are Lysinibacillus sphaericus, Burkholderia spp, and Wolbachia pipientis. Avermectins and spinosyns are bacterial metabolites, mass-produced by fermentation and used as insecticides. The toxins from B.t. have been incorporated into plants through genetic engineering.[41]

Entomopathic fungi

Entomopathic fungi have been used since 1965 for agricultural use. Hundreds of strains are now in use. They often kill a broad range of insect species. Most strains are from Beauveria, Metarhizium, Cordyceps and Akanthomyces species.[51]

Entomopathic viruses

Of the many types of entomopathic viruses, only baculaviruses are used commercially, and are each specific for their target insect. They have to be grown on insects, so their production is labour-intensive.[52]

Environmental toxicity

Effects on nontarget species

Some insecticides kill or harm other creatures in addition to those they are intended to kill. For example, birds may be poisoned when they eat food that was recently sprayed with insecticides or when they mistake an insecticide granule on the ground for food and eat it.[20] Sprayed insecticide may drift from the area to which it is applied and into wildlife areas, especially when it is sprayed aerially.[20]

Persistence in the environment and accumulation in the food chain

DDT was the first organic insecticide. It was introduced during WW2, and was widely used. One use was vector control and it was sprayed on open water. It degrades slowly in the environment, and it is lipophilic (fat soluble). It became the first global pollutant, and the first pollutant to accumulate[53] and magnify in the food chain.[54][55] During the 1950s and 1960s these very undesirable side effects were recognized, and after some often contentious discussion, DDT was banned in many countries in the 1960s and 1970s. Finally in 2001 DDT and all other persistent insecticides were banned via the Stockholm Convention.[56][57] Since many decades the authorities require new insecticides to degrade in the environment and not to bioaccumulate.[58]

Runoff and percolation

Solid bait and liquid insecticides, especially if improperly applied in a location, get moved by water flow. Often, this happens through nonpoint sources where runoff carries insecticides in to larger bodies of water. As snow melts and rainfall moves over and through the ground, the water picks applied insecticides and deposits them in to larger bodies of water, rivers, wetlands, underground sources of previously potable water, and percolates in to watersheds.[59] This runoff and percolation of insecticides can effect the quality of water sources, harming the natural ecology and thus, indirectly effect human populations through biomagnification and bioaccumulation.

Insect decline

Both number of insects and number of insect species have declined dramatically and continuously over past decades, causing much concern.[60][61][62] Many causes are proposed to contribute to this decline, the most agreed upon are loss of habitat, intensification of farming practices, and insecticide usage. Domestic bees were declining some years ago[63] but population and number of colonies have now risen both in the USA[64] and worldwide.[65] Wild species of bees are still declining.

Bird decline

Besides the effects of direct consumption of insecticides, populations of insectivorous birds decline due to the collapse of their prey populations. Spraying of especially wheat and corn in Europe is believed to have caused an 80 per cent decline in flying insects, which in turn has reduced local bird populations by one to two thirds.[66]

Alternatives

Instead of using chemical insecticides to avoid crop damage caused by insects, there are many alternative options available now that can protect farmers from major economic losses.[67] Some of them are:

  1. Breeding crops resistant, or at least less susceptible, to pest attacks.[68]
  2. Releasing predators, parasitoids, or pathogens to control pest populations as a form of biological control.[69]
  3. Chemical control like releasing pheromones into the field to confuse the insects into not being able to find mates and reproduce.[70]
  4. Integrated Pest Management: using multiple techniques in tandem to achieve optimal results.[71]
  5. Push-pull technique: intercropping with a "push" crop that repels the pest, and planting a "pull" crop on the boundary that attracts and traps it.[72]

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading

  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".

External links

Template:Americana Poster Template:Sister project Template:Sister project

Template:Insecticides Template:Pesticides

Template:Authority control

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  13. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  20. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  28. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  38. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  41. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  43. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  45. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  48. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  49. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  50. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  51. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  52. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  53. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  54. Pesticide Usage in the United States: History, Benefits, Risks, and Trends; Bulletin 1121, November 2000, K.S. Delaplane, Cooperative Extension Service, The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  55. Template:Cite thesis
  56. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  57. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  58. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  59. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  60. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  61. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  62. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  63. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  64. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  65. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  66. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  67. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  68. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  69. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  70. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  71. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  72. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".