Ayodhya: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Editking100
Moved railway station image from sister city section to rail section and added airport image
imported>Toddy1
revert nonsense added by Vasantuike
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|City in Uttar Pradesh, India}}
{{short description|City in Uttar Pradesh, India}}
{{Redirect|Ayodhya Dham|other uses|Ayodhya (disambiguation)}}
{{Redirect|Ayodhya Dham|other uses|Ayodhya (disambiguation)}}
{{for|the legendary city mentioned in ancient Sanskrit texts|Ayodhya (Ramayana)}}
{{for|the legendary city in Hindu mythology|Ayodhya (Ramayana)}}
{{pp|reason=Persistent [[WP:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]; [[WP:RFPP]] request, long term issue|small=yes}}
 
{{protection padlock|reason=Persistent [[WP:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]; [[WP:RFPP]] request, long term issue|small=yes}}
{{Use Indian English|date=January 2025}}
{{Use Indian English|date=January 2025}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2025}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2025}}
Line 17: Line 18:
  |caption1          = [[Ram Mandir]]
  |caption1          = [[Ram Mandir]]
  |image2            = Ruhi.jpg
  |image2            = Ruhi.jpg
  |caption2          = [[Ram ki Paidi|Ram ki Paidi Ghat]] on [[Ghaghara|Saryu River]]
  |caption2          = [[Ram ki Paidi|Ram ki Paidi Ghat]] on [[Ghaghara|Sarayu River]]
  |image3            = Hanuman Garhi Temple, a major religious site in Ayodhya utter pradesh.jpg
  |image3            = Hanuman Garhi Temple, a major religious site in Ayodhya utter pradesh.jpg
  |caption3          = [[Hanuman Garhi Temple]]
  |caption3          = [[Hanuman Garhi Temple]]
Line 25: Line 26:
  |caption5          = Vijayraghav Mandir
  |caption5          = Vijayraghav Mandir
  |image6 = River Saryu, Guptar Ghat.jpg
  |image6 = River Saryu, Guptar Ghat.jpg
  |caption6 = Guptar Ghat on [[Ghaghara|Saryu River]]
  |caption6 = Guptar Ghat on [[Ghaghara|Sarayu River]]
  |image7            = Paintings in Ayodhya Airport.jpg
  |image7            = Paintings in Ayodhya Airport.jpg
  |caption7          = Ramayana art at [[Ayodhya Airport]]
  |caption7          = [[Ayodhya Airport]]
  }}
  }}
| image_alt          =  
| image_alt          =  
Line 33: Line 34:
| image_seal        =  
| image_seal        =  
| seal_size          =  
| seal_size          =  
| nickname           = ''Ram Nagri'',<ref>{{cite news |last1=राय |first1=विवेक |date=7 October 2024 |title=अयोध्या में दीपोत्सव तैयारियां हुई शुरू, 25 लाख दीपों से जगमग होगी राम नगरी |url=https://www.abplive.com/states/up-uk/ayodhya-deepotsav-ram-nagri-illuminated-with-light-of-25-lakh-lamps-ann-2798878 |work=ABP News |language=hi |access-date=2 December 2024}}</ref>''The Temple Town''<ref>{{Cite web |date=November 2021 |title=Ayodhya decked up for 'Vikas Deepotsav'; over 9 lakh earthen lamps to illuminate temple town |url=https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/india/ayodhya-vikas-deepotsav-earthen-lamps-diwali-ram-mandir-shree-ram-janmabhoomi-743176 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211103105420/https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/india/ayodhya-vikas-deepotsav-earthen-lamps-diwali-ram-mandir-shree-ram-janmabhoomi-743176 |archive-date=3 November 2021 |access-date=3 November 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Frenzied spiral grips Ayodhya, temple town turns festive burlesque ahead of Ram Mandir consecration |url=https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/frenzied-spiral-grips-ayodhya-temple-town-turns-festive-burlesque-ahead-of-ram-temple-consecretion/cid/1995201 |work=The Telegraph |date=21 January 2024 |access-date=21 January 2024 |archive-date=21 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240121013351/https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/frenzied-spiral-grips-ayodhya-temple-town-turns-festive-burlesque-ahead-of-ram-temple-consecretion/cid/1995201 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=The Voices Of Ayodhya – Watch NDTV Special Episode From Temple Town |url=https://www.ndtv.com/video/news/ndtv-special-ndtv-24x7/the-voices-of-ayodhya-watch-ndtv-special-episode-from-temple-town-755073 |work=NDTV |date=20 January 2024 |access-date=21 January 2024 |archive-date=22 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240122002546/https://www.ndtv.com/video/news/ndtv-special-ndtv-24x7/the-voices-of-ayodhya-watch-ndtv-special-episode-from-temple-town-755073 |url-status=live}}</ref>
| nicknames           = ''Ram Nagri'',<ref>{{cite news |last1=राय |first1=विवेक |date=7 October 2024 |title=अयोध्या में दीपोत्सव तैयारियां हुई शुरू, 25 लाख दीपों से जगमग होगी राम नगरी |url=https://www.abplive.com/states/up-uk/ayodhya-deepotsav-ram-nagri-illuminated-with-light-of-25-lakh-lamps-ann-2798878 |work=ABP News |language=hi |access-date=2 December 2024}}</ref> ''The Temple Town''<ref>{{Cite web |date=November 2021 |title=Ayodhya decked up for 'Vikas Deepotsav'; over 9 lakh earthen lamps to illuminate temple town |url=https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/india/ayodhya-vikas-deepotsav-earthen-lamps-diwali-ram-mandir-shree-ram-janmabhoomi-743176 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211103105420/https://www.indiatvnews.com/news/india/ayodhya-vikas-deepotsav-earthen-lamps-diwali-ram-mandir-shree-ram-janmabhoomi-743176 |archive-date=3 November 2021 |access-date=3 November 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Frenzied spiral grips Ayodhya, temple town turns festive burlesque ahead of Ram Mandir consecration |url=https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/frenzied-spiral-grips-ayodhya-temple-town-turns-festive-burlesque-ahead-of-ram-temple-consecretion/cid/1995201 |work=The Telegraph |date=21 January 2024 |access-date=21 January 2024 |archive-date=21 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240121013351/https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/frenzied-spiral-grips-ayodhya-temple-town-turns-festive-burlesque-ahead-of-ram-temple-consecretion/cid/1995201 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=The Voices Of Ayodhya – Watch NDTV Special Episode From Temple Town |url=https://www.ndtv.com/video/news/ndtv-special-ndtv-24x7/the-voices-of-ayodhya-watch-ndtv-special-episode-from-temple-town-755073 |work=NDTV |date=20 January 2024 |access-date=21 January 2024 |archive-date=22 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240122002546/https://www.ndtv.com/video/news/ndtv-special-ndtv-24x7/the-voices-of-ayodhya-watch-ndtv-special-episode-from-temple-town-755073 |url-status=live}}</ref>
| map_alt            =  
| map_alt            =  
| map_caption        =  
| map_caption        =  
| pushpin_map        = India Uttar Pradesh#India
| pushpin_map        = India Uttar Pradesh#India3
| pushpin_label_position = left
| pushpin_label_position = left
| pushpin_map_alt    =  
| pushpin_map_alt    =  
| pushpin_map_caption =  
| pushpin_map_caption = location in India and Uttar Pradesh
| coordinates        = {{Coord|26|47|57|N|82|12|16|E|display=inline,title}}
| coordinates        = {{Coord|26|47|57|N|82|12|16|E|display=inline,title}}
| subdivision_type  = Country
| subdivision_type  = Country
Line 95: Line 96:
'''Ayodhya''' ({{Indic Transl|hi|Ayodhyā|ɐˈjoːdʱjɐː|Ayodhya.ogg}}) is a city situated on the banks of the [[Ghaghara|Sarayu river]]<ref>{{Cite news |title=Uttar Pradesh: Water level of Saryu river in Ayodhya rises |url=https://www.aninews.in/news/national/general-news/uttar-pradesh-water-level-of-saryu-river-in-ayodhya-rises20240915150403/ |work=ANI News |date=15 September 2024 |access-date=3 January 2025}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=Alert sounded as Saryu river crosses red mark in Ayodhya |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/saryu-river-crosses-danger-mark-in-ayodhya/articleshow/111618933.cms |work=The Times of India |issn=0971-8257 |date=10 July 2024 |access-date=3 January 2025}}</ref> in the [[States and union territories of India|Indian state]] of [[Uttar Pradesh]]. It is the administrative headquarters of the [[Ayodhya district]] as well as the [[Ayodhya division]] of [[Uttar Pradesh]], India.<ref name="district ayodhya">{{Cite web |title=District Ayodhya – Government of Uttar Pradesh {{!}} City Of Lord Rama {{!}} India |url=https://ayodhya.nic.in/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108190706/https://ayodhya.nic.in/ |archive-date=8 November 2020 |access-date=10 August 2021 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=About District |url=https://ayodhya.nic.in/about-district/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109061219/https://ayodhya.nic.in/about-district/ |archive-date=9 November 2019 |access-date=9 November 2019 |website=District Ayodhya – Government of Uttar Pradesh}}</ref> Ayodhya became the top [[tourist destination]] of Uttar Pradesh with 110 million visitors in the first half of 2024, surpassing [[Varanasi]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Ayodhya top tourist destination in U.P. with 11 crore visitors |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/lucknow-news/ayodhya-top-tourist-destination-in-u-p-with-11-crore-visitors-101726340702232.html |work=Hindustan Times |date=15 September 2024 |access-date=17 September 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Ayodhya emerges as the top destination in Uttar Pradesh with over 11 crore visitors |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/travel/travel-news/ayodhya-emerges-as-the-top-destination-in-uttar-pradesh-with-over-11-crore-visitors/articleshow/113388767.cms |work=The Times of India |date=16 September 2024 |access-date=17 September 2024}}</ref>
'''Ayodhya''' ({{Indic Transl|hi|Ayodhyā|ɐˈjoːdʱjɐː|Ayodhya.ogg}}) is a city situated on the banks of the [[Ghaghara|Sarayu river]]<ref>{{Cite news |title=Uttar Pradesh: Water level of Saryu river in Ayodhya rises |url=https://www.aninews.in/news/national/general-news/uttar-pradesh-water-level-of-saryu-river-in-ayodhya-rises20240915150403/ |work=ANI News |date=15 September 2024 |access-date=3 January 2025}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=Alert sounded as Saryu river crosses red mark in Ayodhya |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/saryu-river-crosses-danger-mark-in-ayodhya/articleshow/111618933.cms |work=The Times of India |issn=0971-8257 |date=10 July 2024 |access-date=3 January 2025}}</ref> in the [[States and union territories of India|Indian state]] of [[Uttar Pradesh]]. It is the administrative headquarters of the [[Ayodhya district]] as well as the [[Ayodhya division]] of [[Uttar Pradesh]], India.<ref name="district ayodhya">{{Cite web |title=District Ayodhya – Government of Uttar Pradesh {{!}} City Of Lord Rama {{!}} India |url=https://ayodhya.nic.in/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108190706/https://ayodhya.nic.in/ |archive-date=8 November 2020 |access-date=10 August 2021 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=About District |url=https://ayodhya.nic.in/about-district/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109061219/https://ayodhya.nic.in/about-district/ |archive-date=9 November 2019 |access-date=9 November 2019 |website=District Ayodhya – Government of Uttar Pradesh}}</ref> Ayodhya became the top [[tourist destination]] of Uttar Pradesh with 110 million visitors in the first half of 2024, surpassing [[Varanasi]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Ayodhya top tourist destination in U.P. with 11 crore visitors |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/lucknow-news/ayodhya-top-tourist-destination-in-u-p-with-11-crore-visitors-101726340702232.html |work=Hindustan Times |date=15 September 2024 |access-date=17 September 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Ayodhya emerges as the top destination in Uttar Pradesh with over 11 crore visitors |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/travel/travel-news/ayodhya-emerges-as-the-top-destination-in-uttar-pradesh-with-over-11-crore-visitors/articleshow/113388767.cms |work=The Times of India |date=16 September 2024 |access-date=17 September 2024}}</ref>


Ayodhya was historically known as [[Sāketa|Saketa]] until renamed Ayodhya, by [[Skandagupta]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lal |first=Vinay |title=The History of History: Politics and Scholarship in Modern India |date=2003 |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=978-0-19-566465-2 |pages=151}}</ref> The early Buddhist and Jain canonical texts mention that the religious leaders [[Gautama Buddha]] and [[Mahavira]] visited and lived in the city. The Jain texts also describe it as the birthplace of five [[tirthankara]]s namely, [[Rishabhanatha]], [[Ajitanatha]], [[Abhinandananatha]], [[Sumatinatha]] and [[Anantanatha]], and associate it with the legendary [[Bharata Chakravarti]]. From the [[Gupta Empire|Gupta]] period onwards, several sources mention Ayodhya and Saketa as the name of the same city.
The settlement was historically known as '''Sāketa''' until it was renamed to Ayodhya during the [[Gupta Empire|Gupta period]].{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|pp=28-30|ps=: From Chinese sources we know that king Vikramaditya, i.e. Skandagupta, had the royal court installed in Ayodhya (according to Paramartha) ... The possibility remains open that the royal court had already moved from Pataliputra to Saketa/Ayodhya during the reign of Kumaragupta.}} The early Buddhist and Jain canonical texts mention that the religious leaders [[Gautama Buddha]] and [[Mahavira]] visited and lived in the city. The Jain texts also describe it as the birthplace of five [[tirthankara]]s namely, [[Rishabhanatha]], [[Ajitanatha]], [[Abhinandananatha]], [[Sumatinatha]] and [[Anantanatha]], and associate it with the legendary [[Bharata Chakravarti]]. From the [[Gupta Empire|Gupta]] period onwards, several sources mention Ayodhya and Saketa as the name of the same city.


The [[Ayodhya (Ramayana)|legendary city of Ayodhya]], popularly identified as the present-day Ayodhya, is identified in the epic ''[[Ramayana]]'' and [[Versions of the Ramayana|its many versions]] as the birthplace of the Hindu deity [[Rama]] of [[Kosala]] and is hence regarded as the first of the [[Sapta Puri|seven most important pilgrimage sites]] for Hindus.<ref name="district ayodhya" /><ref>{{cite news |title=How holy triangle has led to a mega surge in UP's tourist footfall – Times of India |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/how-holy-triangle-has-led-to-a-mega-surge-in-ups-tourist-footfall/articleshow/107006369.cms |work=The Times of India |date=20 January 2024 |access-date=21 January 2024 |archive-date=21 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240121162619/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/how-holy-triangle-has-led-to-a-mega-surge-in-ups-tourist-footfall/articleshow/107006369.cms |url-status=live }}</ref>  The [[Ayodhya dispute]] was centred on the [[Babri Masjid|Babri mosque]], built 1528–29 under the [[Mughal Empire|Mughal]] emperor [[Babur]] and said to have been built on top of a Hindu temple that stood at the [[Ram Janmabhoomi|birth spot of Rama]].<ref>{{Citation |last=Jain |first=Meenakshi |title=The Battle for Rama – Case of the Temple at Ayodhya |year=2017 |publisher=Aryan Books International |isbn=978-8-173-05579-9}}{{page needed|date=December 2021}}</ref> In 1992 a Hindu mob [[demolition of the Babri Masjid|demolished the mosque]], provoking riots throughout the country.<ref>{{Cite news |date=9 November 2019 |title=Ayodhya verdict: No place for fear, negativity in 'New India', says PM |language=en |work=[[Business Standard]] |url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/ayodhya-verdict-live-updates-sc-ruling-in-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-ayodhya-land-dispute-case-today-hindus-muslim-119110900133_1.html |url-status=live |access-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109184525/https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/ayodhya-verdict-live-updates-sc-ruling-in-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-ayodhya-land-dispute-case-today-hindus-muslim-119110900133_1.html |archive-date=9 November 2019}}</ref> In 2019, the [[Supreme Court of India]] announced the [[2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute|final verdict]] that the land belonged to the government based on tax records;<ref>{{Cite news |date=9 November 2019 |title=Ayodhya verdict: Supreme Court dismisses Shia Waqf Board's appeal, says land belongs to govt |work=[[India Today]] |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/ayodhya-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-verdict-supreme-court-dismisses-shia-waqf-board-s-appeal-says-land-belongs-to-govt-1617279-2019-11-09 |url-status=live |access-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109105049/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/ayodhya-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-verdict-supreme-court-dismisses-shia-waqf-board-s-appeal-says-land-belongs-to-govt-1617279-2019-11-09 |archive-date=9 November 2019}}</ref> It further ordered the land to be handed over to [[Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra|a trust]] to build the [[Ram Mandir]]; which was [[consecration of the Ram Mandir|consecrated in January 2024]]. It also ordered the government to give an alternate five acre tract of land to the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board to build the [[Ayodhya Mosque, Dhannipur|mosque]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=9 November 2019 |title=Ram Mandir verdict: Supreme Court verdict on Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case |work=[[The Times of India]] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-babri-masjid-ram-mandir-case-verdict-highlights-supreme-court-declared-verdict-on-ram-janmabhoomi-case/articleshow/71978918.cms |url-status=live |access-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109143026/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-babri-masjid-ram-mandir-case-verdict-highlights-supreme-court-declared-verdict-on-ram-janmabhoomi-case/articleshow/71978918.cms |archive-date=9 November 2019}}</ref>
The [[Ayodhya (Ramayana)|legendary city of Ayodhya]], popularly identified as the present-day Ayodhya, is identified in the epic ''[[Ramayana]]'' and [[Versions of the Ramayana|its many versions]] as the birthplace of the Hindu deity [[Rama]] of [[Kosala]] and is hence regarded as the first of the [[Sapta Puri|seven most important pilgrimage sites]] for Hindus.<ref name="district ayodhya" /><ref>{{cite news |title=How holy triangle has led to a mega surge in UP's tourist footfall – Times of India |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/how-holy-triangle-has-led-to-a-mega-surge-in-ups-tourist-footfall/articleshow/107006369.cms |work=The Times of India |date=20 January 2024 |access-date=21 January 2024 |archive-date=21 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240121162619/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/how-holy-triangle-has-led-to-a-mega-surge-in-ups-tourist-footfall/articleshow/107006369.cms |url-status=live }}</ref>  The [[Ayodhya dispute]] was centred on the [[Babri Masjid|Babri mosque]], built 1528–29 under the [[Mughal Empire|Mughal]] emperor [[Babur]] and said to have been built on top of a Hindu temple that stood at the [[Ram Janmabhoomi|birth spot of Rama]].<ref>{{Citation |last=Jain |first=Meenakshi |title=The Battle for Rama – Case of the Temple at Ayodhya |year=2017 |publisher=Aryan Books International |isbn=978-8-173-05579-9}}{{page needed|date=December 2021}}</ref> In 1992 a Hindu mob [[demolition of the Babri Masjid|demolished the mosque]], provoking riots throughout the country.<ref>{{Cite news |date=9 November 2019 |title=Ayodhya verdict: No place for fear, negativity in 'New India', says PM |language=en |work=[[Business Standard]] |url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/ayodhya-verdict-live-updates-sc-ruling-in-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-ayodhya-land-dispute-case-today-hindus-muslim-119110900133_1.html |url-status=live |access-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109184525/https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/ayodhya-verdict-live-updates-sc-ruling-in-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-ayodhya-land-dispute-case-today-hindus-muslim-119110900133_1.html |archive-date=9 November 2019}}</ref> In 2019, the [[Supreme Court of India]] announced the [[2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute|final verdict]] that the land belonged to the government based on tax records;<ref>{{Cite news |date=9 November 2019 |title=Ayodhya verdict: Supreme Court dismisses Shia Waqf Board's appeal, says land belongs to govt |work=[[India Today]] |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/ayodhya-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-verdict-supreme-court-dismisses-shia-waqf-board-s-appeal-says-land-belongs-to-govt-1617279-2019-11-09 |url-status=live |access-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109105049/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/ayodhya-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-verdict-supreme-court-dismisses-shia-waqf-board-s-appeal-says-land-belongs-to-govt-1617279-2019-11-09 |archive-date=9 November 2019}}</ref> It further ordered the land to be handed over to [[Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra|a trust]] to build the [[Ram Mandir]]; which was [[consecration of the Ram Mandir|consecrated in January 2024]]. It also ordered the government to give an alternate five acre tract of land to the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board to build the [[Ayodhya Mosque, Dhannipur|mosque]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=9 November 2019 |title=Ram Mandir verdict: Supreme Court verdict on Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case |work=[[The Times of India]] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-babri-masjid-ram-mandir-case-verdict-highlights-supreme-court-declared-verdict-on-ram-janmabhoomi-case/articleshow/71978918.cms |url-status=live |access-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109143026/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-babri-masjid-ram-mandir-case-verdict-highlights-supreme-court-declared-verdict-on-ram-janmabhoomi-case/articleshow/71978918.cms |archive-date=9 November 2019}}</ref>


== Etymology and names ==
== Etymology ==
The word "Ayodhya" is a regularly formed derivation of the [[Sanskrit]] verb ''yudh'', "to fight, or wage war".<ref>{{Cite web |title=yudh – KST (Online Sanskrit Dictionary) |url=https://kosha.sanskrit.today/word/en/yudh?q=yudh |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405025128/https://kosha.sanskrit.today/word/en/yudh?q=yudh |archive-date=5 April 2023 |access-date=11 June 2022 |website=kosha.sanskrit.today}}</ref> ''Yodhya'' is the future passive participle, meaning "to be fought"; the initial ''a'' is the negative prefix; the whole, therefore, means "not to be fought" or, more idiomatically in English, "invincible".{{sfn|Kunal, Ayodhya Revisited|2016|p=2}} This meaning is attested by the ''[[Atharvaveda]]'', which uses it to refer to the unconquerable city of gods.{{sfn|Bakker, The rise of Ayodhya as a place of pilgrimage|1982|p=103}} The ninth century [[Jain]] poem ''[[Adi Purana]]'' also states that Ayodhya "does not exist by name alone but by the merit" of being unconquerable by enemies. ''Satyopakhyana'' interprets the word differently, stating that it means "that which cannot be conquered by sins" (instead of enemies).{{sfn|Kunal, Ayodhya Revisited|2016|p=4}}
The word "Ayodhya" is a regularly formed derivation of the [[Sanskrit]] verb ''yudh'', "to fight, or wage war".<ref>{{Cite web |title=yudh – KST (Online Sanskrit Dictionary) |url=https://kosha.sanskrit.today/word/en/yudh?q=yudh |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230405025128/https://kosha.sanskrit.today/word/en/yudh?q=yudh |archive-date=5 April 2023 |access-date=11 June 2022 |website=kosha.sanskrit.today}}</ref> ''Yodhya'' is the future passive participle, meaning "to be fought"; the initial ''a'' is the negative prefix; the whole, therefore, means "not to be fought" or, more idiomatically in English, "invincible".{{sfn|Kunal, Ayodhya Revisited|2016|p=2}} This meaning is attested by the ''[[Atharvaveda]]'', which uses it to refer to the unconquerable city of gods.{{sfn|Bakker, The rise of Ayodhya as a place of pilgrimage|1982|p=103}} The ninth century [[Jain]] poem ''[[Adi Purana]]'' also states that Ayodhya "does not exist by name alone but by the merit" of being unconquerable by enemies. ''Satyopakhyana'' interprets the word differently, stating that it means "that which cannot be conquered by sins" (instead of enemies).{{sfn|Kunal, Ayodhya Revisited|2016|p=4}}


Line 124: Line 125:


=== As Saketa ===
=== As Saketa ===
Archaeological and literary evidence suggests that the site of present-day Ayodhya had developed into an urban settlement by the fifth or sixth-century BC.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=2}} The site is identified as the location of the ancient [[Sāketa|Saketa city]], which probably emerged as a marketplace located at the junction of the two important roads, the [[Shravasti]]-[[Pratishthana]] north–south road, and the [[Rajagriha]]-[[Varanasi]]-Shravasti-[[Taxila]] east–west road.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=13}} Ancient Buddhist texts, such as ''[[Samyutta Nikaya]]'', state that Saketa was located in the [[Kosala]] kingdom ruled by [[Prasenajit]] (or Pasenadi; c. sixth–5th century BC), whose capital was located at Shravasti.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=5, 13}} The later Buddhist commentary ''Dhammapada-[[atthakatha]]'' states that the Saketa town was established by merchant Dhananjaya (the father of [[Visakha]]), on the suggestion of king Prasenajit.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=5}} The ''[[Digha Nikaya]]'' describes it as one of the six large cities of India.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=5}} The early Buddhist canonical texts mention [[Shravasti]] as the capital of Kosala, but the later texts, such as the Jain texts ''Nayadhammakahao'' and ''Pannavana Suttam'', and the Buddhist [[Jataka]]s, mention Saketa as the capital of Kosala.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=2,5–6}}
Archaeological and literary evidence suggests that the site of present-day Ayodhya had developed into an urban settlement by the fifth or sixth-century BC.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=2}} The site is identified as the location of the ancient Sāketa city, which probably emerged as a marketplace located at the junction of the two important roads, the [[Shravasti]]-[[Pratishthana]] north–south road, and the [[Rajagriha]]-[[Varanasi]]-Shravasti-[[Taxila]] east–west road.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=13}} Ancient Buddhist texts, such as ''[[Samyutta Nikaya]]'', state that Saketa was located in the [[Kosala]] kingdom ruled by [[Prasenajit]] (or Pasenadi; c. sixth–5th century BC), whose capital was located at Shravasti.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=5, 13}} The later Buddhist commentary ''Dhammapada-[[atthakatha]]'' states that the Saketa town was established by merchant Dhananjaya (the father of [[Visakha]]), on the suggestion of king Prasenajit.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=5}} The ''[[Digha Nikaya]]'' describes it as one of the six large cities of India.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=5}} The early Buddhist canonical texts mention [[Shravasti]] as the capital of Kosala, but the later texts, such as the Jain texts ''Nayadhammakahao'' and ''Pannavana Suttam'', and the Buddhist [[Jataka]]s, mention Saketa as the capital of Kosala.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=2,5–6}}


As a busy town frequented by travellers, it appears to have become important for preachers such as [[Gautama Buddha]] and [[Mahavira]].{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=13}} The ''Samyutta Nikaya'' and ''[[Anguttara Nikaya]]'' mention that Buddha resided at Saketa at times.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=5}} The early Jain canonical texts (such as ''Antagada-dasao'', ''Anuttarovavaiya-dasao'', and ''Vivagasuya'') state that Mahavira visited Saketa; ''Nayadhammakahao'' states that [[Parshvanatha]] also visited Saketa.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=6}} The Jain texts, both canonical and post-canonical, describe Ayodhya as the location of various shrines, such as those of snake, [[yaksha]] Pasamiya, Muni Suvratasvamin, and Surappia.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=6}}
As a busy town frequented by travellers, it appears to have become important for preachers such as [[Gautama Buddha]] and [[Mahavira]].{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=13}} The ''Samyutta Nikaya'' and ''[[Anguttara Nikaya]]'' mention that Buddha resided at Saketa at times.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=5}} The early Jain canonical texts (such as ''Antagada-dasao'', ''Anuttarovavaiya-dasao'', and ''Vivagasuya'') state that Mahavira visited Saketa; ''Nayadhammakahao'' states that [[Parshvanatha]] also visited Saketa.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=6}} The Jain texts, both canonical and post-canonical, describe Ayodhya as the location of various shrines, such as those of snake, [[yaksha]] Pasamiya, Muni Suvratasvamin, and Surappia.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=6}}
Line 142: Line 143:
=== Gupta period ===
=== Gupta period ===


Around the fourth century, the region came under the control of the [[Gupta Empire|Guptas]], who revived [[Brahmanism]].{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=26}} The ''[[Vayu Purana]]'' and the ''[[Brahmanda Purana]]'' attest that the early Gupta kings ruled Saketa.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=7}} No Gupta-era archaeological layers have been discovered in present-day Ayodhya, although a large number of Gupta coins have been discovered here. It is possible that during the Gupta period, the habitations in the city were located in the areas that have not yet been excavated.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=27}} The Buddhist sites that had suffered destruction during the Khotanese-Kushan invasion appear to have remained deserted.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|pp=25–26}} The fifth-century Chinese traveller [[Faxian]] states that the ruins of Buddhist buildings existed at "Sha-chi" during his time.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=17}} One theory identifies Sha-chi with Saketa, although this identification is not undisputed.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=J. C. Aggarwal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=V3JuAAAAMAAJ |title=Ram Janmabhoomi through the ages: Babri Masjid controversy |last2=N. K. Chowdhry |publisher=S. Chand |year=1991 |isbn=978-0-8364-2745-5 |page=7 |access-date=13 July 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230907214041/https://books.google.com/books?id=V3JuAAAAMAAJ |archive-date=7 September 2023 |url-status=live}}</ref> If Sha-chi is indeed Saketa, it appears that by the fifth century, the town no longer had a flourshing Buddhist community or any important Buddhist building that was still in use.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=18}}
Around the fourth century, the region came under the control of the [[Gupta Empire|Guptas]], who revived [[Brahmanism]].{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=26}} The ''[[Vayu Purana]]'' and the ''[[Brahmanda Purana]]'' attest that the early Gupta kings ruled Saketa.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=7}} No Gupta-era archaeological layers have been discovered in present-day Ayodhya, although a large number of Gupta coins have been discovered here. It is possible that during the Gupta period, the habitations in the city were located in the areas that have not yet been excavated.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=27}} The Buddhist sites that had suffered destruction during the Khotanese-Kushan invasion appear to have remained deserted.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|pp=25–26}} The fifth-century Chinese traveller [[Faxian]] states that the ruins of Buddhist buildings existed at "Sha-chi" during his time.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=17}} One theory identifies Sha-chi with Saketa, although this identification is not undisputed.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=J. C. Aggarwal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=V3JuAAAAMAAJ |title=Ram Janmabhoomi through the ages: Babri Masjid controversy |last2=N. K. Chowdhry |publisher=S. Chand |year=1991 |isbn=978-0-8364-2745-5 |page=7 |access-date=13 July 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230907214041/https://books.google.com/books?id=V3JuAAAAMAAJ |archive-date=7 September 2023 |url-status=live}}</ref> If Sha-chi is indeed Saketa, it appears that by the fifth century, the town no longer had a flourishing Buddhist community or any important Buddhist building that was still in use.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=18}}


An important development during the Gupta time was the recognition of Saketa as the [[Ayodhya (legendary city)|legendary city of Ayodhya]], the capital of the [[Ikshvaku dynasty]].{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=26}} The 436 AD Karamdanda (Karmdand) inscription, issued during the reign of [[Kumaragupta I]], names Ayodhya as the capital of the Kosala province, and records commander Prithvisena's offerings to Brahmins from Ayodhya.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=28}} Later, the capital of the [[Gupta Empire]] was moved from Pataliputra to Ayodhya. [[Paramartha]] states that king Vikramaditya moved the royal court to Ayodhya; Xuanzang also corroborates this, stating that this king moved the court to the "country of Shravasti", that is, Kosala.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=29}} A local oral tradition of Ayodhya, first recorded in writing by [[Robert Montgomery Martin]] in 1838,{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=30}} mentions that the city was deserted after the death of Rama's descendant [[Brihadbala]]. The city remain deserted until King Vikrama of [[Ujjain]] came searching for it, and re-established it. He cut down the forests that had covered the ancient ruins, erected the Ramgar fort, and built 360 temples.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=30}}
An important development during the Gupta time was the recognition of Saketa as the [[Ayodhya (legendary city)|legendary city of Ayodhya]], the capital of the [[Ikshvaku dynasty]].{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=26}} The 436 AD Karamdanda (Karmdand) inscription, issued during the reign of [[Kumaragupta I]], names Ayodhya as the capital of the Kosala province, and records commander Prithvisena's offerings to Brahmins from Ayodhya.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=28}} Later, the capital of the [[Gupta Empire]] was moved from Pataliputra to Ayodhya. [[Paramartha (Chinese monk)|Paramartha]] states that king Vikramaditya moved the royal court to Ayodhya; Xuanzang also corroborates this, stating that this king moved the court to the "country of Shravasti", that is, Kosala.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=29}} A local oral tradition of Ayodhya, first recorded in writing by [[Robert Montgomery Martin]] in 1838,{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=30}} mentions that the city was deserted after the death of Rama's descendant [[Brihadbala]]. The city remain deserted until King Vikrama of [[Ujjain]] came searching for it, and re-established it. He cut down the forests that had covered the ancient ruins, erected the Ramgar fort, and built 360 temples.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=30}}


Vikramditya was a title of multiple Gupta kings, and the king who moved the capital to Ayodhya is identified as Skandagupta.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=29}} Bakker theorises that the move to Ayodhya may have been prompted by a flooding of the river Ganges at Pataliputra, the need to check the [[Huna people|Huna]] advance from the west, and Skandagupta's desire to compare himself with Rama (whose Ikshvaku dynasty is associated with the legendary Ayodhya).{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=30}} According to Paramaratha's ''Life of Vasubandhu'', Vikramaditya was a patron of scholars, and awarded 300,000 pieces of gold to [[Vasubandhu]].{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=31}} The text states that Vasubandhu was a native of Saketa ("Sha-ki-ta"), and describes Vikramaditya as the king of Ayodhya ("A-yu-ja").{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=8}} This wealth was used to build three monasteries in the country of A-yu-ja (Ayodhya).{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=31}} Paramartha further states that the later king Baladitya (identified with [[Narasimhagupta]]) and his mother also awarded large sums of gold to Vasubandhu, and these funds were used to build another Buddhist temple at Ayodhya.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=32}} These structures may have been seen by the seventh century Chinese traveller [[Xuanzang]], who describes a [[stupa]] and a [[monastery]] at Ayodhya ("O-yu-t-o").{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=18, 31}}
Vikramditya was a title of multiple Gupta kings, and the king who moved the capital to Ayodhya is identified as Skandagupta.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=29}} Bakker theorises that the move to Ayodhya may have been prompted by a flooding of the river Ganges at Pataliputra, the need to check the [[Huna people|Huna]] advance from the west, and Skandagupta's desire to compare himself with Rama (whose Ikshvaku dynasty is associated with the legendary Ayodhya).{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=30}} According to Paramaratha's ''Life of Vasubandhu'', Vikramaditya was a patron of scholars, and awarded 300,000 pieces of gold to [[Vasubandhu]].{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=31}} The text states that Vasubandhu was a native of Saketa ("Sha-ki-ta"), and describes Vikramaditya as the king of Ayodhya ("A-yu-ja").{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=8}} This wealth was used to build three monasteries in the country of A-yu-ja (Ayodhya).{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=31}} Paramartha further states that the later king Baladitya (identified with [[Narasimhagupta]]) and his mother also awarded large sums of gold to Vasubandhu, and these funds were used to build another Buddhist temple at Ayodhya.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=32}} These structures may have been seen by the seventh century Chinese traveller [[Xuanzang]], who describes a [[stupa]] and a [[monastery]] at Ayodhya ("O-yu-t-o").{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya, Part 1|1984|p=18, 31}}
Line 163: Line 164:
[[File:Ayodhya seen from the river Ghaghara, Uttar Pradesh. Coloure Wellcome V0050436.jpg|thumb|right|Ayodhya in 1785 as seen from river [[Ghaghara]]; painting by [[William Hodges]]. It depicts the Svargadvar Ghat. A mosque of Aurangzeb period in the background.<ref>{{harvnb|Kunal, Ayodhya Revisited|2016|pp=439–440}}: "It is remarkable to note that William Hodges, R.A., who visited Fyzabad and Ayodhya in 1783, made the well known painting of the bank with Svargadvāri mosque."</ref>]]
[[File:Ayodhya seen from the river Ghaghara, Uttar Pradesh. Coloure Wellcome V0050436.jpg|thumb|right|Ayodhya in 1785 as seen from river [[Ghaghara]]; painting by [[William Hodges]]. It depicts the Svargadvar Ghat. A mosque of Aurangzeb period in the background.<ref>{{harvnb|Kunal, Ayodhya Revisited|2016|pp=439–440}}: "It is remarkable to note that William Hodges, R.A., who visited Fyzabad and Ayodhya in 1783, made the well known painting of the bank with Svargadvāri mosque."</ref>]]


Under [[Mughal Empire|Mughal]] rule, the [[Babri mosque]] was constructed in Ayodhya. The city was the capital of the province of [[Awadh]] (mispronounced as "Oudh" by the British), which is also believed to be a variant of the name "Ayodhya".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Service |first=Tribune News |title=Awadh Archives in Ayodhya |url=https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/features/awadh-archives-in-ayodhya-140592 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210831075415/https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/features/awadh-archives-in-ayodhya-140592 |archive-date=31 August 2021 |access-date=31 August 2021 |website=Tribuneindia News Service |language=en}}</ref>
Under [[Mughal Empire|Mughal]] rule, the [[Babri mosque]] was constructed in Ayodhya. The city was the capital of the province of [[Awadh]] (pronounced as "Oudh" by the British), which is also believed to be a variant of the name "Ayodhya".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Service |first=Tribune News |title=Awadh Archives in Ayodhya |url=https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/features/awadh-archives-in-ayodhya-140592 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210831075415/https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/features/awadh-archives-in-ayodhya-140592 |archive-date=31 August 2021 |access-date=31 August 2021 |website=Tribuneindia News Service |language=en}}</ref>


After the death of Aurangzeb in 1707 AD, the central Muslim rule weakened, and Awadh became virtually independent, with Ayodhya as its capital. However, the rulers became increasingly dependent on the local Hindu nobles, and control over the temples and pilgrimage centres was relaxed.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya: A Hindu Jerusalem|1991}}{{better source needed|date=August 2020}}
After the death of Aurangzeb in 1707 AD, the central Muslim rule weakened, and Awadh became virtually independent, with Ayodhya as its capital. However, the rulers became increasingly dependent on the local Hindu nobles, and control over the temples and pilgrimage centres was relaxed.{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya: A Hindu Jerusalem|1991}}{{better source needed|date=August 2020}}
Line 169: Line 170:
[[File:United Provinces 1903.gif|thumb|right|[[United Provinces of Agra and Oudh]], showing 'Ajodhia', 1903 map]]
[[File:United Provinces 1903.gif|thumb|right|[[United Provinces of Agra and Oudh]], showing 'Ajodhia', 1903 map]]


=== British period ===
===British period===
In the 1850s, a group of Hindus attacked the Babri mosque, on the grounds that it was built over [[Ram Janmabhoomi|the birthplace]] of the Hindu deity [[Rama]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Christophe Jaffrelot |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iVsfVOTUnYEC&pg=PA92 |title=The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics: 1925 to the 1990s: Strategies of Identity-building, Implantation and Mobilisation (with Special Reference to Central India) |publisher=Penguin Books India |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-14-024602-5 |page=92 |access-date=20 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230907214041/https://books.google.com/books?id=iVsfVOTUnYEC&pg=PA92 |archive-date=7 September 2023 |url-status=live}}</ref> To prevent further disputes, the British administrators divided the mosque premises between Hindus and Muslims.<ref>P. Carnegy: ''A Historical Sketch of Tehsil Fyzabad'', Lucknow 1870, cited by Harsh Narain, ''The Ayodhya Temple Mosque Dispute: Focus on Muslim Sources'', 1993, New Delhi, Penman Publications. {{ISBN|81-85504-16-4}} p.8-9, and by Peter Van der Veer ''Religious Nationalism'', p.153</ref>


Ayodhya was annexed in 1856 by the British rulers. The rulers of Awadh were [[Shia]], and the [[Sunni]] groups had already protested against the permissive attitude of the former government. The British intervened and crushed the Sunni resistance. In 1857, the British annexed Oudh (Awadh) and subsequently reorganised it into the [[United Provinces of Agra and Oudh]].{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya: A Hindu Jerusalem|1991}}
In the 1850s, a group of Hindus attacked the Babri mosque, on the grounds that it was built over [[Ram Janmabhoomi|the birthplace]] of the Hindu deity [[Rama]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Christophe Jaffrelot |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iVsfVOTUnYEC&pg=PA92 |title=The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics: 1925 to the 1990s: Strategies of Identity-building, Implantation and Mobilisation (with Special Reference to Central India) |publisher=Penguin Books India |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-14-024602-5 |page=92 |access-date=20 June 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230907214041/https://books.google.com/books?id=iVsfVOTUnYEC&pg=PA92 |archive-date=7 September 2023 |url-status=live}}</ref> To prevent further disputes, British colonial authorities divided the mosque premises between Hindus and Muslims.<ref>P. Carnegy: ''A Historical Sketch of Tehsil Fyzabad'', Lucknow 1870, cited by Harsh Narain, ''The Ayodhya Temple Mosque Dispute: Focus on Muslim Sources'', 1993, New Delhi, Penman Publications. {{ISBN|81-85504-16-4}} p.8-9, and by Peter Van der Veer ''Religious Nationalism'', p.153</ref> Ayodhya was annexed in 1856 by the British [[East India Company]] (EIC). The rulers of Awadh were [[Shia]], and the [[Sunni]] groups had already protested against the permissive attitude of the former government. The EIC intervened and managed to suppress the Sunni agitation. In 1857, the British annexed Oudh (Awadh) and subsequently reorganised it into the [[United Provinces of Agra and Oudh]].{{sfn|Bakker, Ayodhya: A Hindu Jerusalem|1991}}


{{clear left}}
{{clear left}}
Line 183: Line 183:
A movement was launched in 1984 by the [[Vishva Hindu Parishad]] party to reclaim the Babri mosque site for a Rama temple. In 1992, a right wing [[Hindu nationalist]] rally turned into a riot, leading to the [[demolition of the Babri Masjid|demolition of the Babri mosque]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Amy Chua |url=https://archive.org/details/dayofempirehowhy00chua_0 |title=Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance – And Why They Fall |publisher=Doubleday |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-385-51284-8 |page=[https://archive.org/details/dayofempirehowhy00chua_0/page/182 182] |url-access=registration}}</ref> A makeshift temple at [[Ram Janmabhoomi]] for ''[[Ram Lalla Temple|Ram Lalla]]'', infant Rama was constructed.<ref>{{Cite news |date=19 January 2002 |title=Ram Lalla deity to be taken to Ayodhya |work=[[The Hindu]] |url=http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2002/01/19/stories/2002011901441000.htm |url-status=dead |access-date=30 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040623012141/http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2002/01/19/stories/2002011901441000.htm |archive-date=23 June 2004}}</ref> Under the Indian government orders, no one was permitted near the site within 200 yards, and the gate was locked to the outside. Hindu pilgrims, however, began entering through a side door to offer worship.{{citation needed|date=August 2020}}
A movement was launched in 1984 by the [[Vishva Hindu Parishad]] party to reclaim the Babri mosque site for a Rama temple. In 1992, a right wing [[Hindu nationalist]] rally turned into a riot, leading to the [[demolition of the Babri Masjid|demolition of the Babri mosque]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Amy Chua |url=https://archive.org/details/dayofempirehowhy00chua_0 |title=Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance – And Why They Fall |publisher=Doubleday |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-385-51284-8 |page=[https://archive.org/details/dayofempirehowhy00chua_0/page/182 182] |url-access=registration}}</ref> A makeshift temple at [[Ram Janmabhoomi]] for ''[[Ram Lalla Temple|Ram Lalla]]'', infant Rama was constructed.<ref>{{Cite news |date=19 January 2002 |title=Ram Lalla deity to be taken to Ayodhya |work=[[The Hindu]] |url=http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2002/01/19/stories/2002011901441000.htm |url-status=dead |access-date=30 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040623012141/http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2002/01/19/stories/2002011901441000.htm |archive-date=23 June 2004}}</ref> Under the Indian government orders, no one was permitted near the site within 200 yards, and the gate was locked to the outside. Hindu pilgrims, however, began entering through a side door to offer worship.{{citation needed|date=August 2020}}


In 2003, the [[Archaeological Survey of India]] (ASI) carried out an excavation at the mosque site to determine if it was built over the ruins of a temple. The excavation uncovered pillar bases indicating a temple had been in existence under the mosque.<ref>{{Cite news |date=25 August 2003 |title=Proof of temple found at Ayodhya: ASI report |work=[[Rediff.com]] |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/aug/25ayo1.htm |url-status=live |access-date=30 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100926043755/http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/aug/25ayo1.htm |archive-date=26 September 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=25 August 2003 |title=Evidence of temple found: ASI |work=[[The Tribune (Chandigarh)]] |url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2003/20030826/main6.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030906030401/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2003/20030826/main6.htm |archive-date=6 September 2003}}</ref> Besides Hindus, the Buddhist and Jain representatives claimed that their temples existed at the excavated site.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Chishti |first=Seema |date=14 March 2003 |title=Can Ayodhya dig settle the dispute? |work=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2848393.stm |url-status=live |access-date=11 June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140325192812/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2848393.stm |archive-date=25 March 2014}}</ref>
In 2003, the [[Archaeological Survey of India]] (ASI) carried out an excavation at the mosque site to determine if it was built over the ruins of a temple. The excavation uncovered pillar bases indicating a temple had been in existence under the mosque.<ref>{{Cite news |date=25 August 2003 |title=Proof of temple found at Ayodhya: ASI report |work=[[Rediff.com]] |url=https://www.rediff.com/news/2003/aug/25ayo1.htm |url-status=live |access-date=30 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100926043755/http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/aug/25ayo1.htm |archive-date=26 September 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=25 August 2003 |title=Evidence of temple found: ASI |work=[[The Tribune (Chandigarh)]] |url=http://www.tribuneindia.com/2003/20030826/main6.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030906030401/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2003/20030826/main6.htm |archive-date=6 September 2003}}</ref> Besides Hindus, the Buddhist and Jain representatives claimed that their temples existed at the excavated site.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Chishti |first=Seema |date=14 March 2003 |title=Can Ayodhya dig settle the dispute? |work=BBC News |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2848393.stm |url-status=live |access-date=11 June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140325192812/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2848393.stm |archive-date=25 March 2014}}</ref>


On 5 July 2005, [[2005 Ram Janmabhoomi attack|five terrorists]] attacked the site of the makeshift Ramlalla temple in Ayodhya. All five were killed in the ensuing gunfight with security forces, and one civilian died in the bomb blast triggered as they attempted to breach the cordon wall.
On 5 July 2005, [[2005 Ram Janmabhoomi attack|five terrorists]] attacked the site of the makeshift Ramlalla temple in Ayodhya. All five were killed in the ensuing gunfight with security forces, and one civilian died in the bomb blast triggered as they attempted to breach the cordon wall.


On 30 September 2010, the [[Lucknow]] bench of the [[Allahabad High Court]] ruled that one-third of the disputed land should be given to the [[Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board]], one-third to the [[Nirmohi Akhara]] and one-third to the [[Hindu]] party for the shrine of "Ram Lalla" (infant Rama). The court further ruled that the area where the idols of Ram are present be given to Hindus in the final decree, while the rest of the land shall be divided equally by metes and bounds among the three parties.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Ayodhya verdict: Allahabad High Court says divide land in 3 ways |work=[[NDTV]] |url=http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/ayodhya-verdict-allahabad-high-court-says-divide-land-in-3-ways-56063 |url-status=live |access-date=30 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101002110425/http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/ayodhya-verdict-allahabad-high-court-says-divide-land-in-3-ways-56063 |archive-date=2 October 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=High Court of Allahabad, Ram Janmbhoomi Babri Masjid Judgement, Decision of Hon'ble Special Full Bench Hearing Ayodhya Matters |url=http://rjbm.nic.in/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101002000743/http://rjbm.nic.in/ |archive-date=2 October 2010 |access-date=30 September 2010 |publisher=Rjbm.nic.in}}</ref> The judgement, along with evidences provided by the Archaeological Survey of India, upheld that the Babri Masjid was built after demolishing the Hindu temple, which is the birthplace of Rama, and that the mosque was not constructed according to the principles of Islam. The final verdict by the Supreme Court on the case ruled the disputed land in the favour of Hindus for the construction of Ram Mandir and ordered an alternative piece of land be given to the Muslim community for the construction of a mosque.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Gupta |first=Pathikrit Sen |date=10 November 2019 |title=Ayodhya Verdict: Entire Disputed Site Goes to Hindus for Ram Mandir, Muslims to Get 5 Acres of Alternate Land |work=[[News18]] |url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/ayodhya-case-verdict-live-updates-ram-janmabhoomi-babri-masjid-ayodhya-mandir-news-samachar-supreme-court-uttar-pradesh-2379563.html |url-status=live |access-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109055244/https://www.news18.com/news/india/ayodhya-case-verdict-live-updates-ram-janmabhoomi-babri-masjid-ayodhya-mandir-news-samachar-supreme-court-uttar-pradesh-2379563.html |archive-date=9 November 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=10 November 2019 |title=Ayodhya Verdict Live Updates: Disputed Land To Be Given For Temple Construction, Muslims To Get 5-Acre Plot In Ayodhya, Says Top Court |work=[[NDTV]] |editor-last=Nair |editor-first=Arun |url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/ayodhya-verdict-live-updates-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-land-dispute-case-supreme-court-verdict-at-10-3-2129704 |url-status=live |access-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109060357/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/ayodhya-verdict-live-updates-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-land-dispute-case-supreme-court-verdict-at-10-3-2129704 |archive-date=9 November 2019 |editor2-first=Vaibhav |editor2-last=Tiwari}}</ref>
On 30 September 2010, the [[Lucknow]] bench of the [[Allahabad High Court]] ruled that one-third of the disputed land should be given to the [[Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board]], one-third to the [[Nirmohi Akhara]] and one-third to the [[Hindu]] party for the shrine of "Ram Lalla" (infant Rama). The court further ruled that the area where the idols of Ram are present be given to Hindus in the final decree, while the rest of the land shall be divided equally by metes and bounds among the three parties.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Ayodhya verdict: Allahabad High Court says divide land in 3 ways |work=[[NDTV]] |url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/ayodhya-verdict-allahabad-high-court-says-divide-land-in-3-ways-433808 |url-status=live |access-date=30 September 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101002110425/http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/ayodhya-verdict-allahabad-high-court-says-divide-land-in-3-ways-56063 |archive-date=2 October 2010}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=High Court of Allahabad, Ram Janmbhoomi Babri Masjid Judgement, Decision of Hon'ble Special Full Bench Hearing Ayodhya Matters |url=http://rjbm.nic.in/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101002000743/http://rjbm.nic.in/ |archive-date=2 October 2010 |access-date=30 September 2010 |publisher=Rjbm.nic.in}}</ref> The judgement, along with evidences provided by the Archaeological Survey of India, upheld that the Babri Masjid was built after demolishing the Hindu temple, which is the birthplace of Rama, and that the mosque was not constructed according to the principles of Islam. The final verdict by the Supreme Court on the case ruled the disputed land in the favour of Hindus for the construction of Ram Mandir and ordered an alternative piece of land be given to the Muslim community for the construction of a mosque.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Gupta |first=Pathikrit Sen |date=10 November 2019 |title=Ayodhya Verdict: Entire Disputed Site Goes to Hindus for Ram Mandir, Muslims to Get 5 Acres of Alternate Land |work=[[News18]] |url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/ayodhya-case-verdict-live-updates-ram-janmabhoomi-babri-masjid-ayodhya-mandir-news-samachar-supreme-court-uttar-pradesh-2379563.html |url-status=live |access-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109055244/https://www.news18.com/news/india/ayodhya-case-verdict-live-updates-ram-janmabhoomi-babri-masjid-ayodhya-mandir-news-samachar-supreme-court-uttar-pradesh-2379563.html |archive-date=9 November 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=10 November 2019 |title=Ayodhya Verdict Live Updates: Disputed Land To Be Given For Temple Construction, Muslims To Get 5-Acre Plot In Ayodhya, Says Top Court |work=[[NDTV]] |editor-last=Nair |editor-first=Arun |url=https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/ayodhya-verdict-live-updates-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-land-dispute-case-supreme-court-verdict-at-10-3-2129704 |url-status=live |access-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191109060357/https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/ayodhya-verdict-live-updates-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-land-dispute-case-supreme-court-verdict-at-10-3-2129704 |archive-date=9 November 2019 |editor2-first=Vaibhav |editor2-last=Tiwari}}</ref>


In a judgement pronounced by a 5 judge bench of the Supreme Court of India on 9 November 2019, the land was handed over to the government to form a trust for the construction of a temple. The court instructed the government to also allot a plot of {{convert|5|acres|ha|order=flip}} in Ayodhya to the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board to construct a mosque/Masjid.<ref>{{Cite news |date=10 November 2019 |title=Ayodhya verdict live: Country's unity strengthened after verdict, say religious leaders |work=[[The Times of India]] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-verdict-live-updates-supreme-court-verdict-on-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-dispute/liveblog/71978224.cms |url-status=live |access-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191110001744/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-verdict-live-updates-supreme-court-verdict-on-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-dispute/liveblog/71978224.cms |archive-date=10 November 2019}}</ref>
In a judgement pronounced by a 5 judge bench of the Supreme Court of India on 9 November 2019, the land was handed over to the government to form a trust for the construction of a temple. The court instructed the government to also allot a plot of {{convert|5|acres|ha|order=flip}} in Ayodhya to the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board to construct a mosque/Masjid.<ref>{{Cite news |date=10 November 2019 |title=Ayodhya verdict live: Country's unity strengthened after verdict, say religious leaders |work=[[The Times of India]] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-verdict-live-updates-supreme-court-verdict-on-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-dispute/liveblog/71978224.cms |url-status=live |access-date=9 November 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191110001744/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ayodhya-verdict-live-updates-supreme-court-verdict-on-ram-mandir-babri-masjid-dispute/liveblog/71978224.cms |archive-date=10 November 2019}}</ref>


Some South Koreans have identified the "Ayuta" mentioned in their ancient [[Samgungnyusa]] legend with Ayodhya. According to this legend, the ancient Korean princess [[Heo Hwang-ok]] came from Ayuta. In the 2000s, the local government of Ayodhya and South Korea acknowledged the connection and held a ceremony to raise a statue of the princess.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Manjul |first=Tarannum |date=21 January 2010 |title=Korean relative of Kings of Ayodhya goes on evidence hunting |work=[[The Indian Express]] |url=http://www.indianexpress.com/news/korean-relative-of-kings-of-ayodhya-goes-on/569976/ |url-status=live |access-date=12 November 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110305120500/http://www.indianexpress.com/news/korean-relative-of-kings-of-ayodhya-goes-on/569976/ |archive-date=5 March 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Arora |first=V N |date=12 September 2004 |title=South Korea's Ayodhya connection |work=[[The Times of India]] |url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2004-09-12/india/27159136_1_saryu-monument-connection |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110811122813/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2004-09-12/india/27159136_1_saryu-monument-connection |archive-date=11 August 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Ahn |first=San Whan |date=12 May 2000 |title=Festivities organized to honor Indian princess |work=[[India Abroad]] |url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-79276360.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105030814/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-79276360.html |archive-date=5 November 2012 |via=[[HighBeam Research]]}}</ref>
Some South Koreans have identified the "Ayuta" mentioned in their ancient [[Samgungnyusa]] legend with Ayodhya. According to this legend, the ancient Korean princess [[Heo Hwang-ok]] came from Ayuta. In the 2000s, the local government of Ayodhya and South Korea acknowledged the connection and held a ceremony to raise a statue of the princess.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Manjul |first=Tarannum |date=21 January 2010 |title=Korean relative of Kings of Ayodhya goes on evidence hunting |work=[[The Indian Express]] |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/lucknow/korean-relative-of-kings-of-ayodhya-goes-on-evidence-hunting/ |url-status=live |access-date=12 November 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110305120500/http://www.indianexpress.com/news/korean-relative-of-kings-of-ayodhya-goes-on/569976/ |archive-date=5 March 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Arora |first=V N |date=12 September 2004 |title=South Korea's Ayodhya connection |work=[[The Times of India]] |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/South-Koreas-Ayodhya-connection/articleshow/847880.cms |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110811122813/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2004-09-12/india/27159136_1_saryu-monument-connection |archive-date=11 August 2011}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Ahn |first=San Whan |date=12 May 2000 |title=Festivities organized to honor Indian princess |work=[[India Abroad]] |url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-79276360.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105030814/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-79276360.html |archive-date=5 November 2012 |via=[[HighBeam Research]]}}</ref>


==== Ram temple ====
==== Ram temple ====
{{Main|Ram Mandir}}
{{Main|Ram Mandir}}
On 5 August 2020, the prime minister of India, [[Narendra Modi]], laid the ceremonial foundation stone for a new temple at [[Ram Janmabhoomi|what is believed to be the birthplace of the god, Ram]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mishra |first=Avaneesh |date=5 August 2020 |title=Ram temple bhoomi pujan: Ceremony starts at 12.30 pm, PM to offer prayers to idol, address gathering |language=en |work=[[The Indian Express]] |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ram-temple-bhoomi-pujan-ceremony-starts-at-12-30-pm-pm-to-offer-prayers-to-idol-address-gathering-6539814/ |url-status=live |access-date=31 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210831075417/https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ram-temple-bhoomi-pujan-ceremony-starts-at-12-30-pm-pm-to-offer-prayers-to-idol-address-gathering-6539814/ |archive-date=31 August 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=5 August 2020 |title=Golden chapter, says PM Modi after laying foundation stone for Ram temple |work=[[Hindustan Times]] |editor-last=Tikku |editor-first=Aloke |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/pm-modi-lays-foundation-stone-for-ram-temple-in-ayodhya/story-6PtybMaVg4pvL92ufuBBbO.html |url-status=live |access-date=27 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211127132120/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/pm-modi-lays-foundation-stone-for-ram-temple-in-ayodhya/story-6PtybMaVg4pvL92ufuBBbO.html |archive-date=27 November 2021}}</ref> It was planned to build a new township, Navya Ayodhya, on a {{convert|500|acre|ha|adj=on|order=flip}} site next to the [[Faizabad]]-[[Gorakhpur]] highway, which will have luxury hotels and apartment complexes.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Sinha |first=Rakesh |date=5 August 2020 |title=Ayodhya breaks ground today |work=[[The Indian Express]] |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ayodhya-ram-temple-bhoomi-pujan-6539817/ |url-status=live |access-date=27 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211127132120/https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ayodhya-ram-temple-bhoomi-pujan-6539817/ |archive-date=27 November 2021}}</ref>
On 5 August 2020, the prime minister of India, [[Narendra Modi]], laid the ceremonial foundation stone for a new temple at [[Ram Janmabhoomi|what is believed to be the birthplace of the god, Ram]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mishra |first=Avaneesh |date=5 August 2020 |title=Ram temple bhoomi pujan: Ceremony starts at 12.30 pm, PM to offer prayers to idol, address gathering |language=en |work=[[The Indian Express]] |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ram-temple-bhoomi-pujan-ceremony-starts-at-12-30-pm-pm-to-offer-prayers-to-idol-address-gathering-6539814/ |url-status=live |access-date=31 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210831075417/https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ram-temple-bhoomi-pujan-ceremony-starts-at-12-30-pm-pm-to-offer-prayers-to-idol-address-gathering-6539814/ |archive-date=31 August 2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=5 August 2020 |title=Golden chapter, says PM Modi after laying foundation stone for Ram temple |work=[[Hindustan Times]] |editor-last=Tikku |editor-first=Aloke |url=https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/pm-modi-lays-foundation-stone-for-ram-temple-in-ayodhya/story-6PtybMaVg4pvL92ufuBBbO.html |url-status=live |access-date=27 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211127132120/https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/pm-modi-lays-foundation-stone-for-ram-temple-in-ayodhya/story-6PtybMaVg4pvL92ufuBBbO.html |archive-date=27 November 2021}}</ref> It was planned to build a new township, Navya Ayodhya, on a {{convert|500|acre|ha|adj=on|order=flip}} site next to the [[Faizabad]]-[[Gorakhpur]] highway, which will have luxury hotels and apartment complexes.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Sinha |first=Rakesh |date=5 August 2020 |title=Ayodhya breaks ground today |work=[[The Indian Express]] |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ayodhya-ram-temple-bhoomi-pujan-6539817/ |url-status=live |access-date=27 November 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211127132120/https://indianexpress.com/article/india/ayodhya-ram-temple-bhoomi-pujan-6539817/ |archive-date=27 November 2021}}</ref>


Line 269: Line 270:
=== Nageshwarnath Temple ===
=== Nageshwarnath Temple ===
The temple of Nageshwarnath was established by [[Kusha (Ramayana)|Kush]], son of Rama. Legend has it that Kush lost his armlet while bathing in the [[Sarayu River (Ayodhya)|Sarayu]], and it was retrieved by a Nag-Kanya who fell in love with him. As she was a devotee of Shiva, Kush built her this temple. It was the only temple to survive when Ayodhya was abandoned until the time of [[Vikramaditya]]. While the rest of city was in ruin and covered by dense forest, this temple allowed Vikramaditya to recognise the city. The festival of [[Shivratri]] is celebrated here with great splendor.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Pandey |first=Dharmendra |date=13 February 2018 |title=रामनगरी अयोध्या में आज महाशिवरात्रि पर भोले की बम-बम |language=hi |work=[[Dainik Jagran]] |url=https://www.jagran.com/uttar-pradesh/faizabad-maha-shivratri-huge-number-of-devotees-in-temples-of-ayodhya-17509578.html |url-status=live |access-date=31 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210831075415/https://www.jagran.com/uttar-pradesh/faizabad-maha-shivratri-huge-number-of-devotees-in-temples-of-ayodhya-17509578.html |archive-date=31 August 2021}}</ref>
The temple of Nageshwarnath was established by [[Kusha (Ramayana)|Kush]], son of Rama. Legend has it that Kush lost his armlet while bathing in the [[Sarayu River (Ayodhya)|Sarayu]], and it was retrieved by a Nag-Kanya who fell in love with him. As she was a devotee of Shiva, Kush built her this temple. It was the only temple to survive when Ayodhya was abandoned until the time of [[Vikramaditya]]. While the rest of city was in ruin and covered by dense forest, this temple allowed Vikramaditya to recognise the city. The festival of [[Shivratri]] is celebrated here with great splendor.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Pandey |first=Dharmendra |date=13 February 2018 |title=रामनगरी अयोध्या में आज महाशिवरात्रि पर भोले की बम-बम |language=hi |work=[[Dainik Jagran]] |url=https://www.jagran.com/uttar-pradesh/faizabad-maha-shivratri-huge-number-of-devotees-in-temples-of-ayodhya-17509578.html |url-status=live |access-date=31 August 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210831075415/https://www.jagran.com/uttar-pradesh/faizabad-maha-shivratri-huge-number-of-devotees-in-temples-of-ayodhya-17509578.html |archive-date=31 August 2021}}</ref>
===Shri Valmiki Ramayana Bhawan===
[[File:Main entrance of shri Valmiki Ramayana bhawan, ayodhya.jpg|thumb|Shri Valmiki Ramayana Bhawan]]
Shri Valmiki Ramayan Bhawan (श्री वाल्मीकि रामायण भवन) is a prominent religious and cultural site located in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India. The Bhawan is dedicated to Maharishi Valmiki, the Adi Kavi (first poet) and author of the Ramayana. The complex serves as a center for the recitation, study, and promotion of the Ramayana. Devotees and scholars gather here regularly to read and listen to the epic, keeping alive the spiritual and cultural heritage of Lord Rama’s life and teachings. The architecture of the building reflects traditional North Indian temple style with marble structures and decorative domes.


=== Other places of interest ===
=== Other places of interest ===
Line 281: Line 286:
File:Vijayraghav Mandir, Ayodhya.jpg|Vijayraghav Mandir, Ayodhya
File:Vijayraghav Mandir, Ayodhya.jpg|Vijayraghav Mandir, Ayodhya
File:Saryu River Bank, Ayodhya, Faizabad, (U.P.), India..JPG|Steps on the bank of the Ghaghara
File:Saryu River Bank, Ayodhya, Faizabad, (U.P.), India..JPG|Steps on the bank of the Ghaghara
File:Naya ghat, Saryu river, ayodhya.jpg|Tons of boats in the naya ghat located in Saryu river(ghagra) in ayodhya, uttar pradesh
File:Illuminated gateway inside Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Mandir complex, Ayodhya.png|A beautifully lit stone gateway within the Shri [[Ram mandir|Ram Janmabhoomi Mandir]] premises in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India. The intricate carvings and latticework are highlighted with warm lighting, while devotees walk towards the sanctum area.
</gallery>
</gallery>


Line 288: Line 295:
== Sister cities ==
== Sister cities ==
* {{flagicon|South Korea}} [[Gimhae]], South Korea
* {{flagicon|South Korea}} [[Gimhae]], South Korea
** The mayors of Ayodhya and Gimhae signed a sister city bond in March 2001, based on Ayodhya's identification as the birthplace of the legendary queen [[Heo Hwang-ok]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Arora |first=V N |date=12 September 2004 |title=South Korea's Ayodhya connection |work=The Times of India |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/South-Koreas-Ayodhya-connection/articleshow/847880.cms |url-status=live |access-date=23 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170322144105/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/South-Koreas-Ayodhya-connection/articleshow/847880.cms |archive-date=22 March 2017}}</ref>
** The mayors of Ayodhya and Gimhae signed a sister city bond in March 2001, based on Ayodhya's identification as the birthplace of the legendary queen [[Heo Hwang-ok]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Arora |first=V N |date=12 September 2004 |title=South Korea's Ayodhya connection |work=The Times of India |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/South-Koreas-Ayodhya-connection/articleshow/847880.cms |url-status=live |access-date=23 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170322144105/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/South-Koreas-Ayodhya-connection/articleshow/847880.cms |archive-date=22 March 2017}}</ref>
* {{flagicon|Nepal}} [[Janakpur]], Nepal.<ref>{{Cite web |title=MoU on Twinning arrangements between Kathmandu-Varanasi, Janakpur-Ayodhya and Lumbini-Bodh Gaya as sister cities |url=https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=112053 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200823152314/https://pib.gov.in/ErrorPage.html?aspxerrorpath=%2Fnewsite%2FPrintRelease.aspx |archive-date=23 August 2020 |access-date=8 March 2020 |website=pib.gov.in}}</ref>
* {{flagicon|Nepal}} [[Janakpur]], Nepal.<ref>{{Cite web |title=MoU on Twinning arrangements between Kathmandu-Varanasi, Janakpur-Ayodhya and Lumbini-Bodh Gaya as sister cities |url=https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=112053 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200823152314/https://pib.gov.in/ErrorPage.html?aspxerrorpath=%2Fnewsite%2FPrintRelease.aspx |archive-date=23 August 2020 |access-date=8 March 2020 |website=pib.gov.in}}</ref>
** Ayodhya and Janakpur became sister cities in November 2014.<ref>{{Cite news |date=26 November 2014 |title=PM Narendra Modi signs 10 agreements with Nepal, inaugurates bus service |work=The Times of India |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/PM-Narendra-Modi-signs-10-agreements-with-Nepal-inaugurates-bus-service/articleshow/45278008.cms |url-status=live |access-date=23 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170920152250/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/PM-Narendra-Modi-signs-10-agreements-with-Nepal-inaugurates-bus-service/articleshow/45278008.cms |archive-date=20 September 2017}}</ref> Ayodhya is the birthplace of [[Rama]] and Janakpur is the birthplace of his consort, [[Sita]].
** Ayodhya and Janakpur became sister cities in November 2014.<ref>{{Cite news |date=26 November 2014 |title=PM Narendra Modi signs 10 agreements with Nepal, inaugurates bus service |work=The Times of India |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/PM-Narendra-Modi-signs-10-agreements-with-Nepal-inaugurates-bus-service/articleshow/45278008.cms |url-status=live |access-date=23 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170920152250/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/PM-Narendra-Modi-signs-10-agreements-with-Nepal-inaugurates-bus-service/articleshow/45278008.cms |archive-date=20 September 2017}}</ref> Ayodhya is the birthplace of [[Rama]] and Janakpur is the birthplace of his consort, [[Sita]].


== Transportation ==
== Transportation ==
Line 306: Line 313:
=== Flight ===
=== Flight ===
The nearest airports are [[Maharishi Valmiki International Airport Ayodhya Dham|Maharishi Valmiki International Airport, Ayodhyadham]], {{cvt|5|km}} away, [[Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport]] in Lucknow, {{cvt|134|km}} away, and [[Prayagraj Airport]], {{cvt|166|km}} away.
The nearest airports are [[Maharishi Valmiki International Airport Ayodhya Dham|Maharishi Valmiki International Airport, Ayodhyadham]], {{cvt|5|km}} away, [[Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport]] in Lucknow, {{cvt|134|km}} away, and [[Prayagraj Airport]], {{cvt|166|km}} away.
[[File:Ayodhya International Airport.jpg|thumb|[[Ayodhya Airport|Maharishi Valmiki International Airport, Ayodhyadham]]]]
[[File:Ayodhya International Airport.jpg|thumb|[[Ayodhya Airport|Maharishi Valmiki International Airport, Ayodhyadham]]]]


==Gallery==
<gallery>
File:Tea seller at Ayodhya, uttar pradesh.png|a local tea seller at Ayodhya making tea
</gallery>


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 327: Line 338:
* {{Cite book |last=Kunal |first=Kishore |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gKKaDAAAQBAJ |title=Ayodhya Revisited |publisher=Ocean |year=2016 |isbn=978-81-8430-357-5 |ref={{sfnref|Kunal, Ayodhya Revisited|2016}} |author-link=Kishore Kunal}}
* {{Cite book |last=Kunal |first=Kishore |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gKKaDAAAQBAJ |title=Ayodhya Revisited |publisher=Ocean |year=2016 |isbn=978-81-8430-357-5 |ref={{sfnref|Kunal, Ayodhya Revisited|2016}} |author-link=Kishore Kunal}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Lutgendorf |first=Philip |year=1997 |title=Imagining Ayodhya: Utopia and its Shadows in a Hindu Landscape |url=https://documents.pub/document/imagining-ayodhya-utopia-and-its-shadows-in-a-hindu-landscape.html |url-status=live |journal=International Journal of Hindu Studies |volume=1 |pages=19–54 |doi=10.1007/s11407-997-0011-z |jstor=20106448 |s2cid=144225912 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230125013736/https://documents.pub/document/imagining-ayodhya-utopia-and-its-shadows-in-a-hindu-landscape.html |archive-date=25 January 2023 |access-date=25 January 2023 |ref={{sfnref|Lutgendorf, Imagining Ayodhya|1997}} |number=1|url-access=subscription }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Lutgendorf |first=Philip |year=1997 |title=Imagining Ayodhya: Utopia and its Shadows in a Hindu Landscape |url=https://documents.pub/document/imagining-ayodhya-utopia-and-its-shadows-in-a-hindu-landscape.html |url-status=live |journal=International Journal of Hindu Studies |volume=1 |pages=19–54 |doi=10.1007/s11407-997-0011-z |jstor=20106448 |s2cid=144225912 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230125013736/https://documents.pub/document/imagining-ayodhya-utopia-and-its-shadows-in-a-hindu-landscape.html |archive-date=25 January 2023 |access-date=25 January 2023 |ref={{sfnref|Lutgendorf, Imagining Ayodhya|1997}} |number=1|url-access=subscription }}
* {{Cite book |last=Pandey |first=Gyanendra |url=https://archive.org/details/routineviolencen0000pand |title=Routine Violence: Nations, Fragments, Histories |publisher=Stanford University Press |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-8047-5264-0 |page=[https://archive.org/details/routineviolencen0000pand/page/97 97] |ref={{sfnref|Gyanendra Pandey|2006}} |author-link=Gyanendra Pandey |url-access=registration}}
* {{Cite book |last=Pandey |first=Gyanendra |url=https://archive.org/details/routineviolencen0000pand |title=Routine Violence: Nations, Fragments, Histories |publisher=Stanford University Press |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-8047-5264-0 |page=[https://archive.org/details/routineviolencen0000pand/page/97 97] |ref={{sfnref|Gyanendra Pandey|2006}} |author-link=Gyanendra Pandey (historian) |url-access=registration}}
* {{Cite book |last=Paul |first=Herman |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AP3qBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA114 |title=Key Issues in Historical Theory |publisher=Routledge |year=2015 |isbn=978-1-317-51946-1 |ref={{sfnref|Herman Paul|2015}}}}
* {{Cite book |last=Paul |first=Herman |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AP3qBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA114 |title=Key Issues in Historical Theory |publisher=Routledge |year=2015 |isbn=978-1-317-51946-1 |ref={{sfnref|Herman Paul|2015}}}}
* {{Citation |last=Narain |first=Harsh |title=The Ayodhya Temple Mosque Dispute: Focus on Muslim Sources |year=1993 |place=Delhi |publisher=Penman Publishers}}
* {{Citation |last=Narain |first=Harsh |title=The Ayodhya Temple Mosque Dispute: Focus on Muslim Sources |year=1993 |place=Delhi |publisher=Penman Publishers}}
Line 360: Line 371:
[[Category:Populated places along the Silk Road]]
[[Category:Populated places along the Silk Road]]
[[Category:Former capital cities in India]]
[[Category:Former capital cities in India]]
[[Category:Capitals of Ancient Kingdoms in Uttar Pradesh]]
[[Category:Jain pilgrimage sites]]
[[Category:Jain pilgrimage sites]]
[[Category:Hindu pilgrimage sites in India]]
[[Category:Hindu pilgrimage sites in India]]
[[Category:Rama]]
[[Category:Rama]]
[[Category:Rama temples]]
[[Category:Rama temples]]

Latest revision as of 06:20, 17 November 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". Script error: No such module "For".

Template:Protection padlock Template:Use Indian English Template:Use dmy dates Template:Main otherScript error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for clobbered parameters".Template:Main other Template:Contains special characters

Ayodhya (Template:Indic Transl) is a city situated on the banks of the Sarayu river[1][2] in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. It is the administrative headquarters of the Ayodhya district as well as the Ayodhya division of Uttar Pradesh, India.[3][4] Ayodhya became the top tourist destination of Uttar Pradesh with 110 million visitors in the first half of 2024, surpassing Varanasi.[5][6]

The settlement was historically known as Sāketa until it was renamed to Ayodhya during the Gupta period.Template:Sfn The early Buddhist and Jain canonical texts mention that the religious leaders Gautama Buddha and Mahavira visited and lived in the city. The Jain texts also describe it as the birthplace of five tirthankaras namely, Rishabhanatha, Ajitanatha, Abhinandananatha, Sumatinatha and Anantanatha, and associate it with the legendary Bharata Chakravarti. From the Gupta period onwards, several sources mention Ayodhya and Saketa as the name of the same city.

The legendary city of Ayodhya, popularly identified as the present-day Ayodhya, is identified in the epic Ramayana and its many versions as the birthplace of the Hindu deity Rama of Kosala and is hence regarded as the first of the seven most important pilgrimage sites for Hindus.[3][7] The Ayodhya dispute was centred on the Babri mosque, built 1528–29 under the Mughal emperor Babur and said to have been built on top of a Hindu temple that stood at the birth spot of Rama.[8] In 1992 a Hindu mob demolished the mosque, provoking riots throughout the country.[9] In 2019, the Supreme Court of India announced the final verdict that the land belonged to the government based on tax records;[10] It further ordered the land to be handed over to a trust to build the Ram Mandir; which was consecrated in January 2024. It also ordered the government to give an alternate five acre tract of land to the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board to build the mosque.[11]

Etymology

The word "Ayodhya" is a regularly formed derivation of the Sanskrit verb yudh, "to fight, or wage war".[12] Yodhya is the future passive participle, meaning "to be fought"; the initial a is the negative prefix; the whole, therefore, means "not to be fought" or, more idiomatically in English, "invincible".Template:Sfn This meaning is attested by the Atharvaveda, which uses it to refer to the unconquerable city of gods.Template:Sfn The ninth century Jain poem Adi Purana also states that Ayodhya "does not exist by name alone but by the merit" of being unconquerable by enemies. Satyopakhyana interprets the word differently, stating that it means "that which cannot be conquered by sins" (instead of enemies).Template:Sfn

"Saketa" is the older name for the city, attested in Sanskrit, Jain, Buddhist, Greek and Chinese sources.Template:Sfn According to Vaman Shivram Apte, the word "Saketa" is derived from the Sanskrit words Saha (with) and Aketen (houses or buildings). The Adi Purana states that Ayodhya is called Saketa "because of its magnificent buildings which had significant banners as their arms".Template:Sfn According to Hans T. Bakker, the word may be derived from the roots sa and ketu ("with banner"); the variant name saketu is attested in the Vishnu Purana.Template:Sfn

The older name in English was "Oudh" or "Oude", and the princely state it was the capital of until 1856 is still known as Oudh State.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Ayodhya was stated to be the capital of the ancient Kosala kingdom in the Ramayana. Hence it was also referred to as "Kosala". The Adi Purana states that Ayodhya is famous as su-kośala "because of its prosperity and good skill".Template:Sfn

The cities of Ayutthaya (Thailand), and Yogyakarta (Indonesia), are named after Ayodhya.[13][14]

History

File:Ayodhya-jain-teracotta.jpg
Terracotta image of Jain Tirthankar dated fourth century BCE excavated from Ayodhya
File:Ayodhya Nagri.jpg
Gold carving depiction of the legendary Ayodhya at the Ajmer Jain temple

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Ancient Indian Sanskrit-language epics, such as the Ramayana and the Mahabharata mention a legendary city called Ayodhya, which was the capital of the legendary Ikshvaku kings of Kosala, including Rama.Template:Sfn Neither these texts, nor the earlier Sanskrit texts such as the Vedas, mention a city called Saketa. Non-religious, non-legendary ancient Sanskrit texts, such as Panini's Ashtadhyayi and Patanjali's commentary on it, do mention Saketa.Template:Sfn The later Buddhist text Mahavastu describes Saketa as the seat of the Ikshvaku king Sujata, whose descendants established the Shakya capital Kapilavastu.Template:Sfn

The earliest of the Buddhist Pali-language texts and the Jain Prakrit-language texts mention a city called Saketa (Sageya or Saeya in Prakrit) as an important city of the Kosala mahajanapada.Template:Sfn Topographical indications in both Buddhist and Jain texts suggest that Saketa is the same as the present-day Ayodhya.Template:Sfn For example, according to the Samyutta Nikaya and the Vinaya Pitaka, Saketa was located at a distance of six yojanas from Shravasti. The Vinaya Pitaka mentions that a big river was located between the two cities, and the Sutta Nipata mentions Saketa as the first halting place on the southward road from Shravasti to Pratishthana.Template:Sfn

Fourth century onwards, multiple texts, including Kalidasa's Raghuvamsha, mention Ayodhya as another name for Saketa.Template:Sfn The later Jain canonical text Jambudvipa-Pannati describes a city called Viniya (or Vinita) as the birthplace of Lord Rishabhanatha, and associates this city with Bharata Chakravartin; the Kalpa-Sutra describes Ikkhagabhumi as the birthplace of Rishabhadev. The index on the Jain text Paumachariya clarifies that Aojjha (Aodhya), Kosala-puri ("Kosala city"), Viniya, and Saeya (Saketa) are synonyms. The post-Canonical Jain texts also mention "Aojjha"; for example, the Avassagacurni describes it as the principal city of Kosala, while the Avassaganijjutti names it as the capital of Sagara Chakravartin.Template:Sfn The Avassaganijjutti implies that Viniya ("Vinia"), Kosalapuri ("Kosalapura"), and Ikkhagabhumi were distinct cities, naming them as the capitals of Abhinamdana, Sumai, and Usabha respectively. Abhayadeva's commentary on the Thana Sutta, another post-canonical text, identifies Saketa, Ayodhya, and Vinita as one city.Template:Sfn

According to one theory, the legendary Ayodhya city is the same as the historical city of Saketa and the present-day Ayodhya. According to another theory, the legendary Ayodhya is a mythical city,Template:Sfn and the name "Ayodhya" came to be used for the Saketa (present-day Ayodhya) only around the fourth century, when a Gupta emperor (probably Skandagupta) moved his capital to Saketa, and renamed it to Ayodhya after the legendary city.Template:Sfn[15] Alternative, but less likely, theories state that Saketa and Ayodhya were two adjoining cities, or that Ayodhya was a locality within the Saketa city.Template:Sfn

As Saketa

Archaeological and literary evidence suggests that the site of present-day Ayodhya had developed into an urban settlement by the fifth or sixth-century BC.Template:Sfn The site is identified as the location of the ancient Sāketa city, which probably emerged as a marketplace located at the junction of the two important roads, the Shravasti-Pratishthana north–south road, and the Rajagriha-Varanasi-Shravasti-Taxila east–west road.Template:Sfn Ancient Buddhist texts, such as Samyutta Nikaya, state that Saketa was located in the Kosala kingdom ruled by Prasenajit (or Pasenadi; c. sixth–5th century BC), whose capital was located at Shravasti.Template:Sfn The later Buddhist commentary Dhammapada-atthakatha states that the Saketa town was established by merchant Dhananjaya (the father of Visakha), on the suggestion of king Prasenajit.Template:Sfn The Digha Nikaya describes it as one of the six large cities of India.Template:Sfn The early Buddhist canonical texts mention Shravasti as the capital of Kosala, but the later texts, such as the Jain texts Nayadhammakahao and Pannavana Suttam, and the Buddhist Jatakas, mention Saketa as the capital of Kosala.Template:Sfn

As a busy town frequented by travellers, it appears to have become important for preachers such as Gautama Buddha and Mahavira.Template:Sfn The Samyutta Nikaya and Anguttara Nikaya mention that Buddha resided at Saketa at times.Template:Sfn The early Jain canonical texts (such as Antagada-dasao, Anuttarovavaiya-dasao, and Vivagasuya) state that Mahavira visited Saketa; Nayadhammakahao states that Parshvanatha also visited Saketa.Template:Sfn The Jain texts, both canonical and post-canonical, describe Ayodhya as the location of various shrines, such as those of snake, yaksha Pasamiya, Muni Suvratasvamin, and Surappia.Template:Sfn

It is not clear what happened to Saketa after Kosala was conquered by the Magadha emperor Ajatashatru around fifth century BC. There is lack of historical sources about the city's situation for the next few centuries: it is possible that the city remained a commercial centre of secondary importance, but did not grow into a political centre of Magadha, whose capital was located at Pataliputra.Template:Sfn Several Buddhist buildings may have been constructed in the town during the rule of the Maurya emperor Ashoka in the third century BC: these buildings were probably located on the present-day human-made mounds in Ayodhya.Template:Sfn Excavations at Ayodhya have resulted in the discovery of a large brick wall, identified as a fortification wall by archaeologist B. B. Lal.Template:Sfn This wall probably erected in the last quarter of the third-century BC.Template:Sfn

File:Dhanadeva Ayodhya inscription.jpg
The Dhanadeva-Ayodhya inscription, first-century BC
File:Muladeva coin Kosala.jpg
Coin of ruler Muladeva, of the Deva dynasty minted in Ayodhya, Kosala. Obv: Muladevasa, elephant to left facing symbol. Rev: Wreath, above symbol, below snake.

After the decline of the Maurya empire, Saketa appears to have come under the rule of Pushyamitra Shunga. The first century BC inscription of Dhanadeva suggests that he appointed a governor there.Template:Sfn The Yuga Purana mentions Saketa as the residence of a governor, and describes it as being attacked by a combined force of Greeks, Mathuras, and Panchalas.Template:Sfn Patanjali's commentary on Panini also refers to the Greek siege of Saketa.Template:Sfn

Later, Saketa appears to have become part of a small, independent kingdom.Template:Sfn The Yuga Purana states that Saketa was ruled by seven powerful kings after the retreat of the Greeks.Template:Sfn The Vayu Purana and the Brahmanda Purana also state that seven powerful kings ruled in the capital of Kosala. The historicity of these kings is attested by the discovery of the coins of the Deva dynasty kings, including Dhanadeva, whose inscription describes him as the king of Kosala (Kosaladhipati).Template:Sfn As the capital of Kosala, Saketa probably eclipsed Shravasti in importance during this period. The east–west route connecting Pataliputra to Taxila, which earlier passed through Saketa and Shravasti, appears to have shifted southwards during this period, now passing through Saketa, Ahichhatra and Kanyakubja.Template:Sfn

After the Deva kings, Saketa appears to have been ruled by the Datta, Kushan, and Mitra kings, although the chronological order of their rule is uncertain. Bakker theorises that the Dattas succeeded the Deva kings in the mid-1st century AD, and their kingdom was annexed to the Kushan Empire by Kanishka.Template:Sfn The Tibetan text Annals of Li Country (c. 11th century) mentions that an alliance of king Vijayakirti of Khotan, king Kanika, the king of Gu-zan, and the king of Li, marched to India and captured the So-ked city. During this invasion, Vijayakirti took several Buddhist relics from Saketa, and placed them in the stupa of Phru-no. If Kanika is identified as Kanishka, and So-ked as Saketa, it appears that the invasion of Kushans and their allies led to the destruction of the Buddhist sites at Saketa.Template:Sfn

Nevertheless, Saketa appears to have remained a prosperous town during the Kushan rule.Template:Sfn The second century geographer Ptolemy mentions a metropolis "Sageda" or "Sagoda", which has been identified with Saketa.Template:Sfn The earliest inscription that mentions Saketa as a place name is dated to the late Kushan period: it was found on the pedestal of a Buddha image in Shravasti, and records the gift of the image by Sihadeva of Saketa.Template:Sfn Before or after the Kushans, Saketa appears to have been ruled by a dynasty of kings whose names end in "-mitra", and whose coins have been found at Ayodhya. They may have been members of a local dynasty that was distinct from the Mitra dynasty of Mathura. These kings are attested only by their coinage: Sangha-mitra, Vijaya-mitra, Satya-mitra, Deva-mitra, and Arya-mitra; coins of Kumuda-sena and Aja-varman have also been discovered.Template:Sfn

Gupta period

Around the fourth century, the region came under the control of the Guptas, who revived Brahmanism.Template:Sfn The Vayu Purana and the Brahmanda Purana attest that the early Gupta kings ruled Saketa.Template:Sfn No Gupta-era archaeological layers have been discovered in present-day Ayodhya, although a large number of Gupta coins have been discovered here. It is possible that during the Gupta period, the habitations in the city were located in the areas that have not yet been excavated.Template:Sfn The Buddhist sites that had suffered destruction during the Khotanese-Kushan invasion appear to have remained deserted.Template:Sfn The fifth-century Chinese traveller Faxian states that the ruins of Buddhist buildings existed at "Sha-chi" during his time.Template:Sfn One theory identifies Sha-chi with Saketa, although this identification is not undisputed.[16] If Sha-chi is indeed Saketa, it appears that by the fifth century, the town no longer had a flourishing Buddhist community or any important Buddhist building that was still in use.Template:Sfn

An important development during the Gupta time was the recognition of Saketa as the legendary city of Ayodhya, the capital of the Ikshvaku dynasty.Template:Sfn The 436 AD Karamdanda (Karmdand) inscription, issued during the reign of Kumaragupta I, names Ayodhya as the capital of the Kosala province, and records commander Prithvisena's offerings to Brahmins from Ayodhya.Template:Sfn Later, the capital of the Gupta Empire was moved from Pataliputra to Ayodhya. Paramartha states that king Vikramaditya moved the royal court to Ayodhya; Xuanzang also corroborates this, stating that this king moved the court to the "country of Shravasti", that is, Kosala.Template:Sfn A local oral tradition of Ayodhya, first recorded in writing by Robert Montgomery Martin in 1838,Template:Sfn mentions that the city was deserted after the death of Rama's descendant Brihadbala. The city remain deserted until King Vikrama of Ujjain came searching for it, and re-established it. He cut down the forests that had covered the ancient ruins, erected the Ramgar fort, and built 360 temples.Template:Sfn

Vikramditya was a title of multiple Gupta kings, and the king who moved the capital to Ayodhya is identified as Skandagupta.Template:Sfn Bakker theorises that the move to Ayodhya may have been prompted by a flooding of the river Ganges at Pataliputra, the need to check the Huna advance from the west, and Skandagupta's desire to compare himself with Rama (whose Ikshvaku dynasty is associated with the legendary Ayodhya).Template:Sfn According to Paramaratha's Life of Vasubandhu, Vikramaditya was a patron of scholars, and awarded 300,000 pieces of gold to Vasubandhu.Template:Sfn The text states that Vasubandhu was a native of Saketa ("Sha-ki-ta"), and describes Vikramaditya as the king of Ayodhya ("A-yu-ja").Template:Sfn This wealth was used to build three monasteries in the country of A-yu-ja (Ayodhya).Template:Sfn Paramartha further states that the later king Baladitya (identified with Narasimhagupta) and his mother also awarded large sums of gold to Vasubandhu, and these funds were used to build another Buddhist temple at Ayodhya.Template:Sfn These structures may have been seen by the seventh century Chinese traveller Xuanzang, who describes a stupa and a monastery at Ayodhya ("O-yu-t-o").Template:Sfn

Decline as a political centre

Ayodhya probably suffered when the Hunas led by Mihirakula invaded the Gupta empire in the sixth century. After the fall of the Guptas, it may have been ruled by the Maukhari dynasty, whose coins have been found in the nearby areas. It was not devastated, as Xuanzang describes it as a flourishing town and a Buddhist centre.Template:Sfn However, it had lost its position as an important political centre to Kanyakubja (Kannauj).Template:Sfn At the time of Xuanzang's visit, it was a part of Harsha's empire, and was probably the seat of a vassal or an administrative officer. Xuanzang states that the city measured about 0.6 km (20 li) in circumference. Another seventh-century source, Kāśikāvṛttī, mentions that the town was surrounded by a moat similar to that around Pataliputra.Template:Sfn

After the fall of Harsha's empire, Ayodhya appears to have been variously controlled by local kings and the rulers of Kannauj, including Yashovarman and the Gurjara-Pratiharas. The town is not mentioned in any surviving texts or inscriptions composed during 650–1050 AD, although it may be identified with the "city of Harishchandra" mentioned in the eighth-century poem Gaudavaho. Archaeological evidence (including images to Vishnu, Jain tirthankaras, Ganesha, the seven Matrikas, and a Buddhist stupa) suggests that the religious activity in the area continued during this period.Template:Sfn

Early medieval period

According to Indologist Hans T. Bakker, the only religious significance of Ayodhya in the first millennium AD was related to the Gopratara tirtha (now called Guptar Ghat), where Rama and his followers are said to have ascended to heaven by entering the waters of Sarayu.Template:Sfn[17]Template:Sfn

In the 11th century, the Gahadavala dynasty came to power in the region, and promoted Vaishnavism. They built several Vishnu temples in Ayodhya, five of which survived till the end of Aurangzeb's reign. Hans Bakker concludes that there might have been a temple at the supposed birth spot of Rama built by the Gahadavalas (see Vishnu Hari inscription). In subsequent years, the cult of Rama developed within Vaishnavism, with Rama being regarded as the foremost avatar of Vishnu. Between the 13th and 18th century, Ayodhya's importance as a pilgrimage centre grew.[17]

In 1226 AD, Ayodhya became the capital of the province of Awadh (or "Oudh") within the Delhi sultanate. Muslim historians state that the area was little more than wilderness prior to this. Pilgrimage was tolerated, but the tax on pilgrims ensured that the temples did not receive much income.Template:Sfn

Mughal period

File:Ayodhya seen from the river Ghaghara, Uttar Pradesh. Coloure Wellcome V0050436.jpg
Ayodhya in 1785 as seen from river Ghaghara; painting by William Hodges. It depicts the Svargadvar Ghat. A mosque of Aurangzeb period in the background.[18]

Under Mughal rule, the Babri mosque was constructed in Ayodhya. The city was the capital of the province of Awadh (pronounced as "Oudh" by the British), which is also believed to be a variant of the name "Ayodhya".[19]

After the death of Aurangzeb in 1707 AD, the central Muslim rule weakened, and Awadh became virtually independent, with Ayodhya as its capital. However, the rulers became increasingly dependent on the local Hindu nobles, and control over the temples and pilgrimage centres was relaxed.Template:SfnTemplate:Better source needed

File:United Provinces 1903.gif
United Provinces of Agra and Oudh, showing 'Ajodhia', 1903 map

British period

In the 1850s, a group of Hindus attacked the Babri mosque, on the grounds that it was built over the birthplace of the Hindu deity Rama.[20] To prevent further disputes, British colonial authorities divided the mosque premises between Hindus and Muslims.[21] Ayodhya was annexed in 1856 by the British East India Company (EIC). The rulers of Awadh were Shia, and the Sunni groups had already protested against the permissive attitude of the former government. The EIC intervened and managed to suppress the Sunni agitation. In 1857, the British annexed Oudh (Awadh) and subsequently reorganised it into the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh.Template:Sfn

Independent India

Template:Ayodhya debate

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

A movement was launched in 1984 by the Vishva Hindu Parishad party to reclaim the Babri mosque site for a Rama temple. In 1992, a right wing Hindu nationalist rally turned into a riot, leading to the demolition of the Babri mosque.[22] A makeshift temple at Ram Janmabhoomi for Ram Lalla, infant Rama was constructed.[23] Under the Indian government orders, no one was permitted near the site within 200 yards, and the gate was locked to the outside. Hindu pilgrims, however, began entering through a side door to offer worship.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

In 2003, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) carried out an excavation at the mosque site to determine if it was built over the ruins of a temple. The excavation uncovered pillar bases indicating a temple had been in existence under the mosque.[24][25] Besides Hindus, the Buddhist and Jain representatives claimed that their temples existed at the excavated site.[26]

On 5 July 2005, five terrorists attacked the site of the makeshift Ramlalla temple in Ayodhya. All five were killed in the ensuing gunfight with security forces, and one civilian died in the bomb blast triggered as they attempted to breach the cordon wall.

On 30 September 2010, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court ruled that one-third of the disputed land should be given to the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board, one-third to the Nirmohi Akhara and one-third to the Hindu party for the shrine of "Ram Lalla" (infant Rama). The court further ruled that the area where the idols of Ram are present be given to Hindus in the final decree, while the rest of the land shall be divided equally by metes and bounds among the three parties.[27][28] The judgement, along with evidences provided by the Archaeological Survey of India, upheld that the Babri Masjid was built after demolishing the Hindu temple, which is the birthplace of Rama, and that the mosque was not constructed according to the principles of Islam. The final verdict by the Supreme Court on the case ruled the disputed land in the favour of Hindus for the construction of Ram Mandir and ordered an alternative piece of land be given to the Muslim community for the construction of a mosque.[29][30]

In a judgement pronounced by a 5 judge bench of the Supreme Court of India on 9 November 2019, the land was handed over to the government to form a trust for the construction of a temple. The court instructed the government to also allot a plot of Template:Convert in Ayodhya to the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board to construct a mosque/Masjid.[31]

Some South Koreans have identified the "Ayuta" mentioned in their ancient Samgungnyusa legend with Ayodhya. According to this legend, the ancient Korean princess Heo Hwang-ok came from Ayuta. In the 2000s, the local government of Ayodhya and South Korea acknowledged the connection and held a ceremony to raise a statue of the princess.[32][33][34]

Ram temple

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

On 5 August 2020, the prime minister of India, Narendra Modi, laid the ceremonial foundation stone for a new temple at what is believed to be the birthplace of the god, Ram.[35][36] It was planned to build a new township, Navya Ayodhya, on a Template:Convert site next to the Faizabad-Gorakhpur highway, which will have luxury hotels and apartment complexes.[37]

The Ram Mandir (Template:Literal translation) is a Hindu temple complex in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India.[38][39] Many Hindus believe that it is located at the site of Ram Janmabhoomi, the mythical birthplace of Rama, a principal deity of Hinduism.[40][41][42] The temple was inaugurated[39] on 22 January 2024 after a prana pratishtha (consecration) ceremony.[38][42]

Demographics

Template:Pie chart Script error: No such module "Unsubst".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". As of the 2011 Census of India, Ayodhya had a population of 55,890. Males constituted 56.7% of the population and females 43.3%. Ayodhya had an average literacy rate of 78.1%.[43] As per the religion data of 2011 Census, the majority population is of Hindu religion with 93.23%, and Muslims comes the second with 6.19%.[44]

Geography and climate

File:Ayodhya Diwali 2021 09.jpg
Deepawali being celebrated at Ram ki Paidi ghat on the banks of Saryu river in Ayodhya

Ayodhya has a humid subtropical climate, typical of central India. Summers are long, dry and hot, lasting from late March to mid-June, with average daily temperatures near Template:Cvt.[45] They are followed by the monsoon season which lasts till October, with annual precipitation of approximately Template:Cvt and average temperatures around Template:Cvt. Winter starts in early November and lasts till the end of January, followed by a short spring in February and early March. Average temperatures are mild, near Template:Cvt, but nights can be colder.[45]

Template:Weather box

Places of interest

File:Ayodhya Diwali 2021 12.jpg
Panoramic view of Ram ki Paidi ghat

Ayodhya is an important place of pilgrimage for the Hindus. A verse in the Brahmanda Purana names Ayodhya among "the most sacred and foremost cities", the others being Mathura, Haridvara, Kashi, Kanchi and Avantika. This verse is also found in the other Puranas with slight variations.Template:Sfn In Garuda Purana, Ayodhya is said to be one of seven holiest places for Hindus in India, with Varanasi being the most sacrosanct.[46] In 2023, a Diwali celebration in Ayodhya, broke the Guinness World Record of its previous world record of 1,576,944 for the largest display of oil lamp with 2,223,676 displayed on the eve of Diwali.[47]

Ram Mandir

File:Ram Janmbhoomi Mandir, Ayodhya Dham.jpg
Ram Mandir in Ayodhya is believed to be the birthplace of Rama

Ram Mandir, also known as the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Mandir, is a Hindu temple complex under construction in Ayodhya.[48] The site is significant to Hindus as it is believed to be the birthplace of their revered deity Rama. Balak Ram or the Infant form of Rama is the presiding deity of the temple consecrated on 22 January 2024.[49][50]

Hanuman Garhi Fort

File:Hanuman Garhi Temple, a major religious site in Ayodhya utter pradesh.jpg
Hanuman Garhi Temple

Hanuman Garhi, a massive four-sided fort with circular bastions at each corner and a temple of Hanuman inside, is the most popular shrine in Ayodhya. Situated in the centre of town, it is approachable by a flight of 76 steps. Its legend is that Hanuman lived here in a cave and guarded the Janambhoomi, or Ramkot. The main temple contains the statue of Maa Anjani with Bal Hanuman seated on her lap. The faithful believe wishes are granted with a visit to the shrine. Kanak Bhawan is a temple said to have been given to Sita and Rama by Rama's stepmother Kaikeyi as a wedding gift, and only contains statues of Sita with her husband.[51]

Ramkot

Ramkot is the main place of worship in Ayodhya, and the site of the ancient citadel of its namesake, standing on elevated ground in the western city. Although visited by pilgrims throughout the year, it attracts devotees from all over the world on "Ram Navami", the day of the birth of Rama. Ram Navami is celebrated with great pomp in the Hindu month of Chaitra, which falls between March and April. Swarg Dwar is believed to be the site of cremation of Rama. Mani Parbat and Sugriv Parbat are ancient earth mounds, the first identified by a stupa built by the emperor Ashoka, and the second is an ancient monastery. Treta ke Thakur is a temple standing at the site of the Ashvamedha Yajnya of Rama. Three centuries prior, the Raja of Kulu built a new temple here, which was improved by Ahilyabai Holkar of Indore in 1784, the same time the adjacent Ghats were built. The initial idols in black sandstone were recovered from Sarayu and placed in the new temple, which was known as Kaleram-ka-Mandir. Chhoti Devkali Mandir is the temple of goddess Ishani, or Durga, Kuldevi of Sita.[52]

Nageshwarnath Temple

The temple of Nageshwarnath was established by Kush, son of Rama. Legend has it that Kush lost his armlet while bathing in the Sarayu, and it was retrieved by a Nag-Kanya who fell in love with him. As she was a devotee of Shiva, Kush built her this temple. It was the only temple to survive when Ayodhya was abandoned until the time of Vikramaditya. While the rest of city was in ruin and covered by dense forest, this temple allowed Vikramaditya to recognise the city. The festival of Shivratri is celebrated here with great splendor.[53]

Shri Valmiki Ramayana Bhawan

File:Main entrance of shri Valmiki Ramayana bhawan, ayodhya.jpg
Shri Valmiki Ramayana Bhawan

Shri Valmiki Ramayan Bhawan (श्री वाल्मीकि रामायण भवन) is a prominent religious and cultural site located in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India. The Bhawan is dedicated to Maharishi Valmiki, the Adi Kavi (first poet) and author of the Ramayana. The complex serves as a center for the recitation, study, and promotion of the Ramayana. Devotees and scholars gather here regularly to read and listen to the epic, keeping alive the spiritual and cultural heritage of Lord Rama’s life and teachings. The architecture of the building reflects traditional North Indian temple style with marble structures and decorative domes.

Other places of interest

Memorial of Heo Hwang-ok

The legendary princess Heo Hwang-ok, who married king Suro of Geumgwan Gaya of Korea, is believed by some to be a native of Ayodhya.[54] In 2001, a Memorial of Heo Hwang-ok was inaugurated by a Korean delegation, which included over a hundred historians and government representatives.[55] In 2016, a Korean delegation proposed to develop the memorial. The proposal was accepted by the Uttar Pradesh chief minister Akhilesh Yadav.[56]

Sister cities

Transportation

Road

Ayodhya is connected by road to several major cities and towns, including Lucknow (Template:Cvt), Gorakhpur (Template:Cvt), Prayagraj (Template:Cvt), Varanasi (Template:Cvt) and Delhi (Template:Cvt).[60]

A direct bus service has been started between Ayodhya and Janakpur (birthplace of Sita), in Nepal as a part of Ramayana circuit.[61]

Rail

The city is on the broad gauge Northern Railway line on Pandit Din Dayal Upadhyay Junction and Lucknow main route with Ayodhya Junction and Ayodhya Cantt railway stations.

Ramayana Circuit Train : Special Train that runs from Delhi to main sites of the Ramayana Circuit[62]

File:Ayodhya Junction railway station, Ayodhya.jpg
Ayodhya Dham Junction railway station

Flight

The nearest airports are Maharishi Valmiki International Airport, Ayodhyadham, Template:Cvt away, Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport in Lucknow, Template:Cvt away, and Prayagraj Airport, Template:Cvt away.

File:Ayodhya International Airport.jpg
Maharishi Valmiki International Airport, Ayodhyadham

Gallery

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Sources

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

Further reading

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

External links

Script error: No such module "Sister project links".Template:Main otherTemplate:Sister project

Script error: No such module "Navbox". Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:Faizabad district Template:Authority control

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "It is remarkable to note that William Hodges, R.A., who visited Fyzabad and Ayodhya in 1783, made the well known painting of the bank with Svargadvāri mosque."
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. P. Carnegy: A Historical Sketch of Tehsil Fyzabad, Lucknow 1870, cited by Harsh Narain, The Ayodhya Temple Mosque Dispute: Focus on Muslim Sources, 1993, New Delhi, Penman Publications. Template:ISBN p.8-9, and by Peter Van der Veer Religious Nationalism, p.153
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  43. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named citypopulationde
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  48. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  51. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  52. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  53. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  54. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  55. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  56. UP CM announces grand memorial of Queen Huh Wang-Ock Template:Webarchive, 1 March 2016, WebIndia123
  57. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  58. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  59. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  60. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  61. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  62. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".