Unified Modeling Language: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Previous edit
VisualWikitext
imported>BunnysBot
Fix CW Errors with GenFixes (T1)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Software system design modeling tool}}
{{Short description |Software design modeling notation}}
{{Redirect|UML}}
{{Redirect |UML}}
{{Use American English|date=March 2020}}
{{Use American English|date=March 2020}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2020}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2020}}
Line 9: Line 9:
| website = {{URL|https://www.uml.org/}}
| website = {{URL|https://www.uml.org/}}
}}
}}
The '''Unified Modeling Language''' ('''UML''') is a general-purpose visual [[modeling language]] that is intended to provide a standard way to visualize the design of a system.<ref name="OMG">{{cite book
The '''Unified Modeling Language''' ('''UML''') is a general-purpose, object-oriented, visual [[modeling language]] that provides a way to visualize the architecture and design of a system, like a [[blueprint]].<ref name="OMG">{{cite book
|title=Unified Modeling Language 2.5.1
|title=Unified Modeling Language 2.5.1
|series=[[Object Management Group|OMG]] Document Number formal/2017-12-05
|series=Object Management Group Document Number formal/2017-12-05
|date=December 2017
|date=December 2017
|publisher=[[Object Management Group]] Standards Development Organization (OMG SDO)
|publisher=Object Management Group Standards Development Organization
|url=https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/PDF
|url=https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/PDF
}}</ref>
}}</ref><ref>[1412.2458] Systems, Views and Models of UML. By Ruth Breu Radu Grosu Franz Huber Bernhard Rumpe Wolfgang Schwerin. arXiv arxiv.org</ref> UML defines notation for many types of diagrams which focus on aspects such as behavior, interaction, and structure.


UML provides a standard notation for many types of diagrams which can be roughly divided into three main groups: behavior diagrams, interaction diagrams, and structure diagrams.
UML is both a formal metamodel and a collection of graphical templates. The metamodel defines the elements in an object-oriented model such as classes and properties. It is essentially the same thing as the metamodel in [[object-oriented programming]] (OOP), however for OOP, the metamodel is primarily used at run time to dynamically inspect and modify an application object model. The UML metamodel provides a mathematical, formal foundation for the graphic views used in the modeling language to describe an emerging system.


The creation of UML was originally motivated by the desire to standardize the disparate notational systems and approaches to software design. It was developed at [[Rational Software]] in 1994–1995, with further development led by them through 1996.<ref name=":1" />
UML was created in an attempt to define a standard language for object-oriented programming at the [[OOPSLA]] '95 Conference. Originally, [[Grady Booch]] and [[James Rumbaugh]] merged their models into a unified model. This was followed by Booch's company [[Rational Software]] purchasing Ivar Jacobson's Objectory company and merging their model into the UML. At the time Rational and Objectory were two of the dominant players in the small world of independent vendors of object-oriented tools and methods.<ref>{{cite web|title=From Unified Method to Unified Language|url=http://modelseverywhere.wordpress.com/2010/11/13/from-unified-method-to-unified-language/|work=modelseverywhere.wordpress.com|access-date=19 December 2013|date=November 13, 2010}}</ref> The [[Object Management Group]] (OMG) then took ownership of UML.


In 1997, UML was adopted as a standard by the [[Object Management Group]] (OMG) and has been managed by this organization ever since. In 2005, UML was also published by the [[International Organization for Standardization]] (ISO) and the [[International Electrotechnical Commission]] (IEC) as the '''ISO/IEC 19501''' standard.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=32620 |title=ISO/IEC 19501:2005 - Information technology - Open Distributed Processing - Unified Modeling Language (UML) Version 1.4.3 |publisher=Iso.org |date=2005-04-01 |access-date=2015-05-07}}</ref> Since then the standard has been periodically revised to cover the latest revision of UML.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=32624 |title=ISO/IEC 19505-1:2012 - Information technology - Object Management Group Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML) - Part 1: Infrastructure |publisher=Iso.org |date=2012-04-20 |access-date=2014-04-10}}</ref>
The creation of UML was motivated by the desire to standardize the disparate nature of notational systems and approaches to software design at the time.<ref name=":1" /> In 1997, UML was adopted as a standard by the [[Object Management Group]] (OMG) and has been managed by this organization ever since. In 2005, UML was also published by the [[International Organization for Standardization]] (ISO) and the [[International Electrotechnical Commission]] (IEC) as the '''ISO/IEC 19501''' standard.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=32620 |title=ISO/IEC 19501:2005 - Information technology - Open Distributed Processing - Unified Modeling Language (UML) Version 1.4.3 |publisher=Iso.org |date=2005-04-01 |access-date=2015-05-07}}</ref> Since then the standard has been periodically revised to cover the latest revision of UML.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=32624 |title=ISO/IEC 19505-1:2012 - Information technology - Object Management Group Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML) - Part 1: Infrastructure |publisher=Iso.org |date=2012-04-20 |access-date=2014-04-10}}</ref>


In software engineering, most practitioners do not use UML, but instead produce informal hand drawn diagrams; these diagrams, however, often include elements from UML.<ref>{{cite book
Most developers do not use UML per se, but instead produce more informal diagrams, often hand-drawn. These diagrams, however, often include elements from UML.<ref>{{cite book
|author1=Sebastian Baltes
|author1=Sebastian Baltes
|author2=Stephan Diehl
|author2=Stephan Diehl
Line 38: Line 38:
|s2cid=2436333}}</ref>{{Rp|536}}
|s2cid=2436333}}</ref>{{Rp|536}}


== History ==
==Use==
[[File:OO Modeling languages history.jpg|thumb|320px|History of object-oriented methods and notation]]
UML is primarily used for [[software development]] (in any industry or domain)<ref name="web-apps">{{Cite journal | title=Modeling Web Application Architectures with UML
| date=1999 | doi=10.1145/317665.317677 |url=http://dl.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=317677&type=pdf&CFID=36848136&CFTOKEN=65755783 |format=PDF | last1=Conallen | first1=Jim | journal=Communications of the ACM | volume=42 | issue=10 | pages=63–70 | url-access=subscription }}</ref> but also used outside elsewhere including [[business process]]es, [[Function model|system function]]s, [[database schema]]s, [[workflow]] in the legal systems, [[medical electronics]], [[Health care system]]s, and [[hardware design]].<ref name="BJR-book">{{Cite web | title=Grady Booch, Jacobson and Rumbaugh book}}</ref>


=== Before UML 1.0 ===
UML is designed for use with many object-oriented software development methods; both today and for the methods when it was first developed including [[Object-modeling technique|OMT]], [[Booch method]], [[Objectory]], and especially for [[Rational Unified Process|RUP]] which it was originally intended to be used with when work began at Rational Software.<ref>John Hunt (2000). ''The Unified Process for Practitioners: Object-oriented Design, UML and Java''. Springer, 2000. {{ISBN|1-85233-275-1}}. p.&nbsp;5.door</ref> Although originally intended for object-oriented design documentation, UML has been used effectively in other contexts such as modeling business process.<ref>Satish Mishra (1997). [http://www2.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~hs/Lehre/2004-WS_SWQS/20050107_Ex_UML.ppt "Visual Modeling & Unified Modeling Language (UML): Introduction to UML"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110720091651/http://www2.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~hs/Lehre/2004-WS_SWQS/20050107_Ex_UML.ppt |date=20 July 2011 }}. Rational Software Corporation. Accessed 9 November 2008.</ref><ref name="UML, Success Stories">{{cite web|url=http://www.uml.org/uml_success_stories/index.htm|title=UML, Success Stories|access-date=9 April 2014}}</ref>
UML has evolved since the second half of the 1990s and has its roots in the [[object-oriented programming]] methods developed in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The timeline (see image) shows the highlights of the history of object-oriented modeling methods and notation.


It is originally based on the notations of the [[Booch method]], the [[object-modeling technique]] (OMT), and [[object-oriented software engineering]] (OOSE), which it has integrated into a single language.<ref name=":0" />
As UML is not inherently linked to a particular [[programming language]], it can be used for modeling a system independent of language. Some [[UML tool]]s generate [[source code]] from a UML model.<ref name="importance-UML">{{Cite web | title=Importance of UML
|url=http://www.coderanch.com/t/98273/patterns/importance-UML}}</ref>


[[Rational Software Corporation]] hired [[James Rumbaugh]] from [[General Electric]] in 1994 and after that, the company became the source for two of the most popular object-oriented modeling approaches of the day:<ref>Andreas Zendler (1997) ''Advanced Concepts, Life Cycle Models and Tools for Objeckt-Oriented Software Development''. p.&nbsp;122</ref> Rumbaugh's [[object-modeling technique]] (OMT) and [[Grady Booch]]'s method. They were soon assisted in their efforts by [[Ivar Jacobson]], the creator of the [[object-oriented software engineering]] (OOSE) method, who joined them at Rational in 1995.<ref name=":1">{{cite book
===Elements===
| title = Unified Modeling Language User Guide, The
[[File:Component-based-Software-Engineering-example2.png|class=skin-invert-image|thumb|upright=1.5|Components in a travel reservation system]]
| publisher = Addison-Wesley
| edition = 2
| year = 2005
| page = 496
| url = http://www.informit.com/store/unified-modeling-language-user-guide-9780321267979
| isbn = 0321267974
}}
See the sample content: look for history</ref>


=== UML 1.x ===
UML diagrams support visualizing system aspects like:<ref name=":0">{{cite web |url=http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.1/Superstructure/PDF |title=OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Superstructure. Version 2.4.1 |publisher=Object Management Group |access-date=9 April 2014}}</ref>
Under the technical leadership of those three (Rumbaugh, Jacobson, and Booch), a consortium called the [[UML Partners]] was organized in 1996 to complete the ''Unified Modeling Language (UML)'' specification and propose it to the Object Management Group (OMG) for standardization. The partnership also contained additional interested parties (for example [[Hewlett-Packard|HP]], [[Digital Equipment Corporation|DEC]], [[IBM]], and [[Microsoft]]). The UML Partners' UML 1.0 draft was proposed to the OMG in January 1997 by the consortium. During the same month, the UML Partners formed a group, designed to define the exact meaning of language constructs, chaired by [[Cris Kobryn]] and administered by Ed Eykholt, to finalize the specification and integrate it with other standardization efforts. The result of this work, UML 1.1, was submitted to the OMG in August 1997 and adopted by the OMG in November 1997.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/97-08-11 |title=UML Specification version 1.1 (OMG document ad/97-08-11) |publisher=Omg.org |access-date=2011-09-22}}</ref>
* [[Use case diagram]] for specifying user interactions with systems
* [[Class diagram]] for specifying structures, including data structures
* [[Activity diagram]] for specifying business process workflows
* [[Component diagram]] for specifying how components interface with other components
* [[Deployment diagram]] for specifying how components are deployed and executed on computational nodes


After the first release, a task force was formed<ref name=":1" /> to improve the language, which released several minor revisions, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/ |title=UML |publisher=Omg.org |access-date=2014-04-10}}</ref>
In addition to syntactical (notational) elements with well-defined semantics, UML diagrams also allow for free-form comments (notes) that explain aspects such as usage, constraints, and intents.


The standards it produced (as well as the original standard) have been noted as being ambiguous and inconsistent.<ref>Génova et alia 2004 "Open Issues in Industrial Use Case Modeling"</ref>
===Sharing===
UML models can be exchanged among [[UML tool]]s via the [[XML Metadata Interchange]] (XMI) format.


==== Cardinality notation ====
===Cardinality notation===
As with database Chen, Bachman, and ISO [[ER diagram]]s, class models are specified to use "look-across" [[Cardinality (data modeling)|cardinalities]], even though several authors ([[Merise]],<ref>Hubert Tardieu, Arnold Rochfeld and René Colletti La methode MERISE: Principes et outils (Paperback - 1983)</ref>
As with database Chen, Bachman, and ISO [[ER diagram]]s, class models are specified to use "look-across" [[Cardinality (data modeling)|cardinalities]], even though several authors ([[Merise]],<ref>Hubert Tardieu, Arnold Rochfeld and René Colletti La methode MERISE: Principes et outils (Paperback - 1983)</ref>
Elmasri & Navathe,<ref>Elmasri, Ramez, B. Shamkant, Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, third ed., Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 2000.</ref>
Elmasri & Navathe,<ref>Elmasri, Ramez, B. Shamkant, Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, third ed., Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 2000.</ref>
Line 87: Line 85:
|location=Vienna
|location=Vienna
|degree=Doctor of Technical Sciences
|degree=Doctor of Technical Sciences
|publisher=Technical University of Vienna}}</ref>
|publisher=Technical University of Vienna
|archive-date=29 June 2024
|access-date=25 May 2024
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240629135535/https://publik.tuwien.ac.at/files/pub-inf_4582.pdf
|url-status=dead
}}</ref>
and Dullea et al.<ref>{{cite journal
and Dullea et al.<ref>{{cite journal
|journal=Data & Knowledge Engineering
|journal=Data & Knowledge Engineering
Line 111: Line 114:
investigates this situation and shows how and why different transformations fail.", and: "As we will see on the next few pages, the look-across interpretation introduces several difficulties which prevent the extension of simple mechanisms from binary to ''n''-ary associations."
investigates this situation and shows how and why different transformations fail.", and: "As we will see on the next few pages, the look-across interpretation introduces several difficulties which prevent the extension of simple mechanisms from binary to ''n''-ary associations."


=== UML 2 ===
===Artifacts===
UML 2.0 major revision replaced version 1.5 in 2005, which was developed with an enlarged consortium to improve the language further to reflect new experiences on the usage of its features.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.0/ |title=UML 2.0 |publisher=Omg.org |access-date=2011-09-22}}</ref>
 
Although UML 2.1 was never released as a formal specification, versions 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 appeared in 2007, followed by UML 2.2 in February 2009. UML 2.3 was formally released in May 2010.<ref name="spec">{{cite web|url=http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/ |title=UML |publisher=Omg.org |access-date=2011-09-22}}</ref> UML 2.4.1 was formally released in August 2011.<ref name="spec" /> UML 2.5 was released in October 2012 as an "In progress" version and was officially released in June 2015.<ref name="spec" />
The formal version 2.5.1 was adopted in December 2017.<ref name="OMG" />
 
There are four parts to the UML 2.x specification:
 
* The Superstructure that defines the notation and semantics for diagrams and their model elements
* The Infrastructure that defines the core metamodel on which the Superstructure is based
* The [[Object Constraint Language]] (OCL) for defining rules for model elements
* The UML Diagram Interchange that defines how UML 2 diagram layouts are exchanged
 
Until UML 2.4.1, the latest versions of these standards were:<ref name="Versions2.4.1">{{cite web|author=OMG|title=OMG Formal Specifications (Modeling and Metadata paragraph)|url=http://www.omg.org/spec/#M&M|access-date = 2016-02-12}}</ref>
* UML Superstructure version 2.4.1
* UML Infrastructure version 2.4.1
* OCL version 2.3.1
* UML Diagram Interchange version 1.0.
Since version 2.5, the UML Specification has been simplified (without Superstructure and Infrastructure), and the latest versions of these standards are now:<ref name="LatestVersions">{{cite web|author=OMG|title=about the unified modeling language specification|url=https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/About-UML/|access-date = 2020-02-22}}</ref>
 
* UML Specification 2.5.1
* OCL version 2.4
 
It continues to be updated and improved by the revision task force, who resolve any issues with the language.<ref>{{cite web |title=Issues for UML 2.6 Revision task Force mailing list |url=https://issues.omg.org/issues/lists/uml2-rtf |access-date=2014-04-10 |publisher=Omg.org}}</ref>
 
== Design ==
[[File:Component-based-Software-Engineering-example2.png|class=skin-invert-image|thumb|500px|An example of components in a travel reservation system]]
 
UML offers a way to visualize a system's architectural blueprints in a diagram, including elements such as:<ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.1/Superstructure/PDF |title=OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Superstructure. Version 2.4.1 |publisher=Object Management Group |access-date=9 April 2014}}</ref>
 
* any [[Activity (UML)|activities]] (jobs);
* individual [[Component (UML)|components]] of the system;
** and how they can interact with other [[software component]]s;
* how the system will run;
* how entities interact with others (components and interfaces);
* external [[user interface]].
 
Although originally intended for object-oriented design documentation, UML has been extended to a larger set of design documentation (as listed above),<ref>Satish Mishra (1997). [http://www2.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~hs/Lehre/2004-WS_SWQS/20050107_Ex_UML.ppt "Visual Modeling & Unified Modeling Language (UML): Introduction to UML"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110720091651/http://www2.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~hs/Lehre/2004-WS_SWQS/20050107_Ex_UML.ppt |date=20 July 2011 }}. Rational Software Corporation. Accessed 9 November 2008.</ref> and has been found useful in many contexts.<ref name="UML, Success Stories">{{cite web|url=http://www.uml.org/uml_success_stories/index.htm|title=UML, Success Stories|access-date=9 April 2014}}</ref>
 
=== Software development methods ===
UML is not a development method by itself;<ref>John Hunt (2000). ''The Unified Process for Practitioners: Object-oriented Design, UML and Java''. Springer, 2000. {{ISBN|1-85233-275-1}}. p.&nbsp;5.door</ref> however, it was designed to be compatible with the leading object-oriented software development methods of its time, for example, [[Object-modeling technique|OMT]], [[Booch method]], [[Objectory]], and especially [[Rational Unified Process|RUP]] it was originally intended to be used with when work began at Rational Software.
 
=== Modeling ===
It is important to distinguish between the UML model and the set of diagrams of a system. A diagram is a partial graphic representation of a system's model. The set of diagrams need not completely cover the model and deleting a diagram does not change the model. The model may also contain documentation that drives the model elements and diagrams (such as written use cases).
 
UML diagrams represent two different views of a system model:<ref>Jon Holt Institution of Electrical Engineers (2004). ''UML for Systems Engineering: Watching the Wheels'' IET, 2004, {{ISBN|0-86341-354-4}}. p.&nbsp;58</ref>
 
* Static (or ''structural'') view: emphasizes the static structure of the system using objects, attributes, operations and relationships. It includes [[class diagram]]s and [[composite structure diagram]]s.
* Dynamic (or ''behavioral'') view: emphasizes the dynamic behavior of the system by showing collaborations among objects and changes to the internal states of objects. This view includes [[sequence diagram]]s, [[activity diagram]]s and [[UML state machine|state machine diagrams]].
 
UML models can be exchanged among [[UML tool]]s by using the [[XML Metadata Interchange]] (XMI) format.
 
In UML, one of the key tools for behavior modeling is the use-case model, caused by [[OOSE]]. Use cases are a way of specifying required usages of a system. Typically, they are used to capture the requirements of a system, that is, what a system is supposed to do.<ref>Manuel Almendros-Jiménez, Jesús & Iribarne, Luis. (2007). Describing Use-Case Relationships with Sequence Diagrams. Comput. J.. 50. 116-128. 10.1093/comjnl/bxl053.</ref>
 
== Diagrams ==
{{UML diagram types}}
 
UML 2 has many types of diagrams, which are divided into two categories.<ref name=":0" /> Some types represent ''structural'' information, and the rest represent general types of ''behavior'', including a few that represent different aspects of ''interactions''. These diagrams can be categorized hierarchically as shown in the following class diagram:<ref name=":0" />
 
[[File:UML diagrams overview.svg|class=skin-invert-image|center|600px|Hierarchy of UML 2.2 Diagrams, shown as a [[class diagram]]]]
 
These diagrams may all contain comments or notes explaining usage, constraint, or intent.
 
=== Structure diagrams ===
Structure diagrams represent the static aspects of the system. It emphasizes the things that must be present in the system being modeled. Since structure diagrams represent the structure, they are used extensively in documenting the [[software architecture]] of software systems. For example, the [[component diagram]] describes how a software system is split up into components and shows the dependencies among these components.
 
<gallery class="center skin-invert-image" style="width: initial">
Policy Admin Component Diagram.PNG|[[Component diagram]]
BankAccount1.svg|[[Class diagram]]
</gallery>
 
=== Behavior diagrams ===
Behavior diagrams represent the dynamic aspect of the system. It emphasizes what must happen in the system being modeled. Since behavior diagrams illustrate the behavior of a system, they are used extensively to describe the functionality of software systems. As an example, the [[activity diagram]] describes the business and operational step-by-step activities of the components in a system.
 
<gallery class="center skin-invert-image" style="width: initial">
Activity conducting.svg|[[Activity diagram]]
UML Use Case diagram.svg|[[Use case diagram]]
</gallery>
 
Visual Representation: Staff User → Complaints System: Submit Complaint Complaints System → HR System: Forward Complaint HR System → Department: Assign Complaint Department → Complaints System: Update Resolution Complaints System → Feedback System: Request Feedback Feedback System → Staff User: Provide Feedback Staff User → Feedback System: Submit Feedback. This description can be used to draw a sequence diagram using tools like Lucidchart, Draw.io, or any UML diagram software. The diagram would have actors on the left side, with arrows indicating the sequence of actions and interactions between systems and actors as described. Sequence diagrams should be drawn for each use case to show how different objects interact with each other to achieve the functionality of the use case.
 
== Artifacts ==
[[File:UML Artifact.PNG|thumb|320px|Artifact manifesting components]]
[[File:UML Artifact.PNG|thumb|320px|Artifact manifesting components]]


In UML, an '''artifact'''<ref name="OMG_Artifacts">{{cite book
An artifact
is the "specification of a physical piece of information that is used or produced by a [[software development process]], or by deployment and operation of a system"<ref name="OMG_Artifacts">{{cite book
|chapter=Artifacts
|chapter=Artifacts
|title=Unified Modeling Language 2.5.1
|title=Unified Modeling Language 2.5.1
Line 203: Line 126:
|page=656
|page=656
|url=https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/PDF
|url=https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/PDF
}}</ref>
}}</ref> including models, [[source code]], scripts, [[executable]]s, [[Table (database)|tables]] in [[database systems]], development deliverables, a design [[document]]s, and [[email]] messages.<ref name="OMG_Artifacts" />
is the "specification of a physical piece of information that is used or produced by a [[software development process]], or by deployment and operation of a system."<ref name="OMG_Artifacts" />
 
"Examples of artifacts include model files, [[source code|source]] files, scripts, and [[binary executable]] files, a [[Table (database)|table]] in a [[database system]], a development deliverable, a [[word-processing]] [[document]], or a [[mail]] message."<ref name="OMG_Artifacts" />
 
Artifacts are the physical entities that are deployed on
[[Node (UML)|Nodes]]<ref name="OMG_Artifacts" />
(i.e. Devices and Execution Environments).
Other UML elements such as classes and components are first manifested into artifacts and instances of these artifacts are then deployed. Artifacts can also be composed of other artifacts.


== Metamodeling ==
An artifact is the physical entity that is deployed to a
{{Main|Meta-Object Facility}}
[[Node (UML)|node]].<ref name="OMG_Artifacts" /> Other UML elements such as classes and components are first manifest into artifacts and instances of these artifacts are then deployed. Artifacts can be composed of other artifacts.


===Metamodeling===
[[File:M0-m3.png|thumb|320px|Illustration of the Meta-Object Facility]]
[[File:M0-m3.png|thumb|320px|Illustration of the Meta-Object Facility]]


The [[Object Management Group]] (OMG) has developed a [[metamodeling]] architecture to define the UML, called the [[Meta-Object Facility]].<ref>Iman Poernomo (2006) "[http://calcium.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1259/1/acm-paper.pdf The Meta-Object Facility Typed] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160630002118/http://calcium.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1259/1/acm-paper.pdf |date=30 June 2016 }}" in: ''Proceeding SAC '06 Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing''. pp. 1845–1849</ref> MOF is designed as a four-layered architecture, as shown in the image at right. It provides a meta-meta model at the top, called the M3 layer. This M3-model is the language used by Meta-Object Facility to build metamodels, called M2-models.
The OMG developed a [[metamodeling]] architecture to define UML, called the [[Meta-Object Facility]] (MOF).<ref>Iman Poernomo (2006) "[http://calcium.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1259/1/acm-paper.pdf The Meta-Object Facility Typed] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160630002118/http://calcium.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1259/1/acm-paper.pdf |date=30 June 2016 }}" in: ''Proceeding SAC '06 Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing''. pp. 1845–1849</ref> MOF is designed as a four-layered architecture, as shown in the image at right. It provides a meta-meta model at the top, called the M3 layer. This M3-model is the language used by Meta-Object Facility to build metamodels, called M2-models.


The most prominent example of a Layer 2 Meta-Object Facility model is the UML metamodel, which describes the UML itself. These M2-models describe elements of the M1-layer, and thus M1-models. These would be, for example, models written in UML. The last layer is the M0-layer or data layer. It is used to describe runtime instances of the system.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.1/Infrastructure/PDF/ |title=UML 2.4.1 Infrastructure |publisher=Omg.org |date=2011-08-05 |access-date=2014-04-10}}</ref>
The most prominent example of a Layer 2 Meta-Object Facility model is the UML metamodel, which describes UML itself. These M2-models describe elements of the M1-layer, and thus M1-models. These would be, for example, models written in UML. The last layer is the M0-layer or data layer. It is used to describe runtime instances of the system.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.1/Infrastructure/PDF/ |title=UML 2.4.1 Infrastructure |publisher=Omg.org |date=2011-08-05 |access-date=2014-04-10}}</ref>


The meta-model can be extended using a mechanism called [[stereotype (UML)|stereotyping]]. This has been criticized as being insufficient/untenable by [[Brian Henderson-Sellers]] and Cesar Gonzalez-Perez in "Uses and Abuses of the Stereotype Mechanism in UML 1.x and 2.0".<ref name="UsesAbusesStereotype">{{cite journal
The metamodel can be extended using a mechanism called [[stereotype (UML)|stereotyping]]. This has been criticized as being insufficient/untenable by [[Brian Henderson-Sellers]] and Cesar Gonzalez-Perez in "Uses and Abuses of the Stereotype Mechanism in UML 1.x and 2.0".<ref name="UsesAbusesStereotype">{{cite journal
|author1=[[Brian Henderson-Sellers]]
|author1=[[Brian Henderson-Sellers]]
|author2=Cesar Gonzalez-Perez
|author2=Cesar Gonzalez-Perez
Line 235: Line 151:
|location=[[Berlin]], Germany|isbn=978-3-540-45772-5
|location=[[Berlin]], Germany|isbn=978-3-540-45772-5
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
==Diagrams==
{{UML diagram types}}
UML 2 defines many types of diagrams {{endash}} shown as a [[taxonomy]] in the image.<ref name=":0" /><ref>Jon Holt Institution of Electrical Engineers (2004). ''UML for Systems Engineering: Watching the Wheels'' IET, 2004, {{ISBN|0-86341-354-4}}. p.&nbsp;58</ref>
[[File:UML diagrams overview.svg|class=skin-invert-image|center|600px|Hierarchy of UML 2.2 Diagrams, shown as a [[class diagram]]]]
===Structure diagrams===
Structure diagrams emphasize the structure of the system {{endash}} using objects, classifiers, relationships, attributes and operations. They are used to document [[software architecture]].
* [[Class diagram]] {{endash}} Describes the structure of a class
* [[Component diagram]] {{endash}} Describes how a software system is split into components and dependencies between the components
* [[Composite structure diagram]]
* [[Deployment diagram]]
* [[Object diagram]]
* [[Package diagram]]
* [[Profile diagram]]
===Behavior diagrams===
Behavior diagrams emphasize the behavior of a system by showing collaborations among objects and changes to the internal states of objects. They are used to describe the functionality of a system.
* [[Activity diagram]] {{endash}} Describes the business and operational activities of components
* [[State machine diagram]]
* [[Use case diagram]] {{endash}} Depicts of a user's interaction with a system<ref>Manuel Almendros-Jiménez, Jesús & Iribarne, Luis. (2007). Describing Use-Case Relationships with Sequence Diagrams. Comput. J.. 50. 116-128. 10.1093/comjnl/bxl053.</ref>
===Interaction diagrams===
Interaction diagrams, a subset of behavior diagrams, emphasize the flow of control and data between components of a system.
* [[Communication diagram]] {{endash}} shows communication between components
* [[Interaction overview diagram]]
* [[Sequence diagram]] {{endash}} shows interactions arranged in time sequence; can be drawn via tools such as Lucidchart and Draw.io
* [[Timing diagram (Unified Modeling Language)|Timing diagram]] {{endash}} focuses on timing constraints
===Examples===
<gallery class="center skin-invert-image" style="width: initial">
Policy Admin Component Diagram.PNG |Component diagram
BankAccount1.svg |Class diagram
Activity conducting.svg |Activity diagram
UML Use Case diagram.svg |Use case diagram
Restaurant-UML-UC.png |Use case diagram
UML Diagram Deployment.svg |Deployment diagram
</gallery>


== Adoption ==
== Adoption ==
Line 243: Line 202:
It is considered a large language, with many [[Syntax (programming languages)|constructs]]. Some people (including [[Ivar Jacobson|Jacobson]]) feel that UML's size hinders learning and therefore uptake.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.infoq.com/interviews/Ivar_Jacobson|title = Ivar Jacobson on UML, MDA, and the future of methodologies}}</ref>
It is considered a large language, with many [[Syntax (programming languages)|constructs]]. Some people (including [[Ivar Jacobson|Jacobson]]) feel that UML's size hinders learning and therefore uptake.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.infoq.com/interviews/Ivar_Jacobson|title = Ivar Jacobson on UML, MDA, and the future of methodologies}}</ref>


MS Visual Studio dropped support for UML in 2016 due to lack of usage.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Krill |first=Paul |date=2016-10-18 |title=UML to be ejected from Microsoft Visual Studio |url=https://www.infoworld.com/article/3131600/uml-to-be-ejected-from-microsoft-visual-studio.html |access-date=2023-07-23 |website=InfoWorld |language=en}}</ref>
[[Visual Studio]] dropped support for UML in 2016 due to lack of use.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Krill |first=Paul |date=2016-10-18 |title=UML to be ejected from Microsoft Visual Studio |url=https://www.infoworld.com/article/3131600/uml-to-be-ejected-from-microsoft-visual-studio.html |access-date=2023-07-23 |website=InfoWorld |language=en}}</ref>
 
According to [[Google Trends]], use of the term ''UML'' has declined since 2004 although leveled off in the last 5 years.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Google Trends |url=https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=UML&hl=en |access-date=2023-07-23 |website=Google Trends |language=en-US |archive-date=23 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230723193301/https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=UML&hl=en |url-status=dead }}</ref>
 
==History==
[[File:OO Modeling languages history.svg|thumb|upright=1.5|Timeline and relationships of object-oriented methods and notation]]
UML has evolved since the second half of the 1990s and has its roots in the [[object-oriented programming]] methods developed in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The image shows a timeline of the history of UML and other object-oriented modeling methods and notation.
 
===Origin===
Rational Software hired James Rumbaugh from [[General Electric]] in 1994 and after that, the company became the source for two of the most popular object-oriented modeling approaches of the day:<ref>Andreas Zendler (1997) ''Advanced Concepts, Life Cycle Models and Tools for Objeckt-Oriented Software Development''. p.&nbsp;122</ref> Rumbaugh's [[object-modeling technique]] (OMT) and Grady Booch's method. They were soon assisted in their efforts by [[Ivar Jacobson]], the creator of the [[object-oriented software engineering]] (OOSE) method, who joined them at Rational in 1995.<ref name=":1">{{cite book
| title = Unified Modeling Language User Guide, The
| publisher = Addison-Wesley
| edition = 2
| year = 2005
| page = 496
| url = http://www.informit.com/store/unified-modeling-language-user-guide-9780321267979
| isbn = 0321267974
}}
See the sample content: look for history</ref>


According to [[Google Trends]], UML has been on a steady decline since 2004.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Google Trends |url=https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=UML&hl=en |access-date=2023-07-23 |website=Google Trends |language=en-US |archive-date=23 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230723193301/https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=UML&hl=en |url-status=dead }}</ref>
=== UML 1.x ===
UML is originally based on the notations of the [[Booch method]], the [[object-modeling technique]] (OMT), and [[object-oriented software engineering]] (OOSE), which were integrated into a single language.<ref name=":0" /> UML was developed at Rational Software in 1994–1995, with further development led by them through 1996.<ref name=":1" />
 
Under the technical leadership of Rumbaugh, Jacobson, and Booch, a consortium called the [[UML Partners]] was organized in 1996 to complete the ''Unified Modeling Language (UML)'' specification and propose it to the Object Management Group (OMG) for standardization. The partnership also contained additional interested parties (for example [[Hewlett-Packard|HP]], [[Digital Equipment Corporation|DEC]], [[IBM]], and [[Microsoft]]). The UML Partners' UML 1.0 draft was proposed to the OMG in January 1997 by the consortium. During the same month, the UML Partners formed a group, designed to define the exact meaning of language constructs, chaired by [[Cris Kobryn]] and administered by Ed Eykholt, to finalize the specification and integrate it with other standardization efforts. The result of this work, UML 1.1, was submitted to the OMG in August 1997 and adopted by the OMG in November 1997.<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/97-08-11 |title=UML Specification version 1.1 (OMG document ad/97-08-11) |publisher=Omg.org |access-date=2011-09-22}}</ref>
 
After the first release, a task force was formed<ref name=":1" /> to improve the language, which released several minor revisions, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/ |title=UML |publisher=Omg.org |access-date=2014-04-10}}</ref>
 
The standards it produced (as well as the original standard) have been noted as being ambiguous and inconsistent.<ref>Génova et alia 2004 "Open Issues in Industrial Use Case Modeling"</ref>
 
=== UML 2 ===
UML 2.0 major revision replaced version 1.5 in 2005, which was developed with an enlarged consortium to improve the language further to reflect new experiences on the usage of its features.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.0/ |title=UML 2.0 |publisher=Omg.org |access-date=2011-09-22}}</ref>
 
Although UML 2.1 was never released as a formal specification, versions 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 appeared in 2007, followed by UML 2.2 in February 2009. UML 2.3 was formally released in May 2010.<ref name="spec">{{cite web|url=http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/ |title=UML |publisher=Omg.org |access-date=2011-09-22}}</ref> UML 2.4.1 was formally released in August 2011.<ref name="spec" /> UML 2.5 was released in October 2012 as an "In progress" version and was officially released in June 2015.<ref name="spec" />
The formal version 2.5.1 was adopted in December 2017.<ref name="OMG" />
 
There are four parts to the UML 2.x specification:
 
* The Superstructure that defines the notation and semantics for diagrams and their model elements
* The Infrastructure that defines the core metamodel on which the Superstructure is based
* The [[Object Constraint Language]] (OCL) for defining rules for model elements
* The UML Diagram Interchange that defines how UML 2 diagram layouts are exchanged
 
Until UML 2.4.1, the latest versions of these standards were:<ref name="Versions2.4.1">{{cite web|author=OMG|title=OMG Formal Specifications (Modeling and Metadata paragraph)|url=http://www.omg.org/spec/#M&M|access-date = 2016-02-12}}</ref>
* UML Superstructure version 2.4.1
* UML Infrastructure version 2.4.1
* OCL version 2.3.1
* UML Diagram Interchange version 1.0.
Since version 2.5, the UML Specification has been simplified (without Superstructure and Infrastructure), and the latest versions of these standards are now:<ref name="LatestVersions">{{cite web|author=OMG|title=about the unified modeling language specification|url=https://www.omg.org/spec/UML/About-UML/|access-date = 2020-02-22}}</ref>
 
* UML Specification 2.5.1
* OCL version 2.4
 
It continues to be updated and improved by the revision task force, who resolve any issues with the language.<ref>{{cite web |title=Issues for UML 2.6 Revision task Force mailing list |url=https://issues.omg.org/issues/lists/uml2-rtf |access-date=2014-04-10 |publisher=Omg.org}}</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Applications of UML]]
* {{Annotated link |Business Process Model and Notation}}
* [[Business Process Model and Notation|BPMN (Business Process Model and Notation)]]
* {{Annotated link |C4 model}}
* [[C4 model]]
* {{Annotated link |Department of Defense Architecture Framework}}
* [[Department of Defense Architecture Framework]]
* {{Annotated link |DOT (graph description language)}}
* [[DOT (graph description language)]]
* {{Annotated link |List of Unified Modeling Language tools}}
* [[List of Unified Modeling Language tools]]
* [[Real-Time UML]] – the application of the [[Unified Modelling Language]] (UML)
* [[MODAF]]
* {{Annotated link |MODAF}}
* [[Model-based testing]]
* {{Annotated link |Model-based testing}}
* [[Model-driven engineering]]
* {{Annotated link |Model-driven engineering}}
* [[Object-oriented role analysis and modeling]]
* {{Annotated link |Modeling and Analysis of Real Time and Embedded systems}}
* [[Process Specification Language]]
* {{Annotated link |Object-oriented role analysis and modeling}}
* [[Systems Modeling Language]] (SysML)
* {{Annotated link |Process Specification Language}}
* {{Annotated link |Systems Modeling Language}}


== References ==
== References ==
Line 265: Line 275:


== Further reading ==
== Further reading ==
* Tegarden, David et al. (2025). [https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Systems+Analysis+and+Design%3A+An+Object-Oriented+Approach+with+UML%2C+7th+Edition-p-9781394331727 Systems Analysis and Design: An Object-Oriented Approach with UML] (7th ed.). Wiley. [https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Systems+Analysis+and+Design%3A+An+Object-Oriented+Approach+with+UML%2C+7th+Edition-p-9781394331727 ISBN 978-1-394-33172-7].
* {{cite book
* {{cite book
| first = Scott William
| first = Scott William
Line 322: Line 333:
| title = Business Modelling: UML vs. IDEF
| title = Business Modelling: UML vs. IDEF
| access-date = 2022-11-14
| access-date = 2022-11-14
| archive-date = 18 July 2024
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240718044149/https://www.area-c54.it/public/business%20modelling%20-%20uml%20vs%20idef.pdf
| url-status = dead
}}
}}
* {{cite web
* {{cite web

Latest revision as of 14:54, 18 November 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". Template:Use American English Template:Use dmy dates Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is a general-purpose, object-oriented, visual modeling language that provides a way to visualize the architecture and design of a system, like a blueprint.[1][2] UML defines notation for many types of diagrams which focus on aspects such as behavior, interaction, and structure.

UML is both a formal metamodel and a collection of graphical templates. The metamodel defines the elements in an object-oriented model such as classes and properties. It is essentially the same thing as the metamodel in object-oriented programming (OOP), however for OOP, the metamodel is primarily used at run time to dynamically inspect and modify an application object model. The UML metamodel provides a mathematical, formal foundation for the graphic views used in the modeling language to describe an emerging system.

UML was created in an attempt to define a standard language for object-oriented programming at the OOPSLA '95 Conference. Originally, Grady Booch and James Rumbaugh merged their models into a unified model. This was followed by Booch's company Rational Software purchasing Ivar Jacobson's Objectory company and merging their model into the UML. At the time Rational and Objectory were two of the dominant players in the small world of independent vendors of object-oriented tools and methods.[3] The Object Management Group (OMG) then took ownership of UML.

The creation of UML was motivated by the desire to standardize the disparate nature of notational systems and approaches to software design at the time.[4] In 1997, UML was adopted as a standard by the Object Management Group (OMG) and has been managed by this organization ever since. In 2005, UML was also published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) as the ISO/IEC 19501 standard.[5] Since then the standard has been periodically revised to cover the latest revision of UML.[6]

Most developers do not use UML per se, but instead produce more informal diagrams, often hand-drawn. These diagrams, however, often include elements from UML.[7]Template:Rp

Use

UML is primarily used for software development (in any industry or domain)[8] but also used outside elsewhere including business processes, system functions, database schemas, workflow in the legal systems, medical electronics, Health care systems, and hardware design.[9]

UML is designed for use with many object-oriented software development methods; both today and for the methods when it was first developed including OMT, Booch method, Objectory, and especially for RUP which it was originally intended to be used with when work began at Rational Software.[10] Although originally intended for object-oriented design documentation, UML has been used effectively in other contexts such as modeling business process.[11][12]

As UML is not inherently linked to a particular programming language, it can be used for modeling a system independent of language. Some UML tools generate source code from a UML model.[13]

Elements

File:Component-based-Software-Engineering-example2.png
Components in a travel reservation system

UML diagrams support visualizing system aspects like:[14]

In addition to syntactical (notational) elements with well-defined semantics, UML diagrams also allow for free-form comments (notes) that explain aspects such as usage, constraints, and intents.

Sharing

UML models can be exchanged among UML tools via the XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) format.

Cardinality notation

As with database Chen, Bachman, and ISO ER diagrams, class models are specified to use "look-across" cardinalities, even though several authors (Merise,[15] Elmasri & Navathe,[16] amongst others[17]) prefer same-side or "look-here" for roles and both minimum and maximum cardinalities. Recent researchers (Feinerer[18] and Dullea et al.[19]) have shown that the "look-across" technique used by UML and ER diagrams is less effective and less coherent when applied to n-ary relationships of order strictly greater than 2.

Feinerer says: "Problems arise if we operate under the look-across semantics as used for UML associations. Hartmann[20] investigates this situation and shows how and why different transformations fail.", and: "As we will see on the next few pages, the look-across interpretation introduces several difficulties which prevent the extension of simple mechanisms from binary to n-ary associations."

Artifacts

File:UML Artifact.PNG
Artifact manifesting components

An artifact is the "specification of a physical piece of information that is used or produced by a software development process, or by deployment and operation of a system"[21] including models, source code, scripts, executables, tables in database systems, development deliverables, a design documents, and email messages.[21]

An artifact is the physical entity that is deployed to a node.[21] Other UML elements such as classes and components are first manifest into artifacts and instances of these artifacts are then deployed. Artifacts can be composed of other artifacts.

Metamodeling

File:M0-m3.png
Illustration of the Meta-Object Facility

The OMG developed a metamodeling architecture to define UML, called the Meta-Object Facility (MOF).[22] MOF is designed as a four-layered architecture, as shown in the image at right. It provides a meta-meta model at the top, called the M3 layer. This M3-model is the language used by Meta-Object Facility to build metamodels, called M2-models.

The most prominent example of a Layer 2 Meta-Object Facility model is the UML metamodel, which describes UML itself. These M2-models describe elements of the M1-layer, and thus M1-models. These would be, for example, models written in UML. The last layer is the M0-layer or data layer. It is used to describe runtime instances of the system.[23]

The metamodel can be extended using a mechanism called stereotyping. This has been criticized as being insufficient/untenable by Brian Henderson-Sellers and Cesar Gonzalez-Perez in "Uses and Abuses of the Stereotype Mechanism in UML 1.x and 2.0".[24]

Diagrams

Template:UML diagram types

UML 2 defines many types of diagrams Template:Endash shown as a taxonomy in the image.[14][25]

Hierarchy of UML 2.2 Diagrams, shown as a class diagram
Hierarchy of UML 2.2 Diagrams, shown as a class diagram

Structure diagrams

Structure diagrams emphasize the structure of the system Template:Endash using objects, classifiers, relationships, attributes and operations. They are used to document software architecture.

Behavior diagrams

Behavior diagrams emphasize the behavior of a system by showing collaborations among objects and changes to the internal states of objects. They are used to describe the functionality of a system.

Interaction diagrams

Interaction diagrams, a subset of behavior diagrams, emphasize the flow of control and data between components of a system.

Examples

Adoption

In 2013, UML had been marketed by OMG for many contexts, but aimed primarily at software development with limited success.[12][27]

It has been treated, at times, as a design silver bullet, which leads to problems. UML misuse includes overuse (designing every part of the system with it, which is unnecessary) and assuming that novices can design with it.[28]

It is considered a large language, with many constructs. Some people (including Jacobson) feel that UML's size hinders learning and therefore uptake.[29]

Visual Studio dropped support for UML in 2016 due to lack of use.[30]

According to Google Trends, use of the term UML has declined since 2004 although leveled off in the last 5 years.[31]

History

File:OO Modeling languages history.svg
Timeline and relationships of object-oriented methods and notation

UML has evolved since the second half of the 1990s and has its roots in the object-oriented programming methods developed in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The image shows a timeline of the history of UML and other object-oriented modeling methods and notation.

Origin

Rational Software hired James Rumbaugh from General Electric in 1994 and after that, the company became the source for two of the most popular object-oriented modeling approaches of the day:[32] Rumbaugh's object-modeling technique (OMT) and Grady Booch's method. They were soon assisted in their efforts by Ivar Jacobson, the creator of the object-oriented software engineering (OOSE) method, who joined them at Rational in 1995.[4]

UML 1.x

UML is originally based on the notations of the Booch method, the object-modeling technique (OMT), and object-oriented software engineering (OOSE), which were integrated into a single language.[14] UML was developed at Rational Software in 1994–1995, with further development led by them through 1996.[4]

Under the technical leadership of Rumbaugh, Jacobson, and Booch, a consortium called the UML Partners was organized in 1996 to complete the Unified Modeling Language (UML) specification and propose it to the Object Management Group (OMG) for standardization. The partnership also contained additional interested parties (for example HP, DEC, IBM, and Microsoft). The UML Partners' UML 1.0 draft was proposed to the OMG in January 1997 by the consortium. During the same month, the UML Partners formed a group, designed to define the exact meaning of language constructs, chaired by Cris Kobryn and administered by Ed Eykholt, to finalize the specification and integrate it with other standardization efforts. The result of this work, UML 1.1, was submitted to the OMG in August 1997 and adopted by the OMG in November 1997.[4][33]

After the first release, a task force was formed[4] to improve the language, which released several minor revisions, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5.[34]

The standards it produced (as well as the original standard) have been noted as being ambiguous and inconsistent.[35]

UML 2

UML 2.0 major revision replaced version 1.5 in 2005, which was developed with an enlarged consortium to improve the language further to reflect new experiences on the usage of its features.[36]

Although UML 2.1 was never released as a formal specification, versions 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 appeared in 2007, followed by UML 2.2 in February 2009. UML 2.3 was formally released in May 2010.[37] UML 2.4.1 was formally released in August 2011.[37] UML 2.5 was released in October 2012 as an "In progress" version and was officially released in June 2015.[37] The formal version 2.5.1 was adopted in December 2017.[1]

There are four parts to the UML 2.x specification:

  • The Superstructure that defines the notation and semantics for diagrams and their model elements
  • The Infrastructure that defines the core metamodel on which the Superstructure is based
  • The Object Constraint Language (OCL) for defining rules for model elements
  • The UML Diagram Interchange that defines how UML 2 diagram layouts are exchanged

Until UML 2.4.1, the latest versions of these standards were:[38]

  • UML Superstructure version 2.4.1
  • UML Infrastructure version 2.4.1
  • OCL version 2.3.1
  • UML Diagram Interchange version 1.0.

Since version 2.5, the UML Specification has been simplified (without Superstructure and Infrastructure), and the latest versions of these standards are now:[39]

  • UML Specification 2.5.1
  • OCL version 2.4

It continues to be updated and improved by the revision task force, who resolve any issues with the language.[40]

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Further reading

  • Tegarden, David et al. (2025). Systems Analysis and Design: An Object-Oriented Approach with UML (7th ed.). Wiley. ISBN 978-1-394-33172-7.
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

External links

Template:Sister project Template:Sister project

Template:UML Template:Software engineering Template:ISO standards Template:Authority control

  1. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. ↑ [1412.2458] Systems, Views and Models of UML. By Ruth Breu Radu Grosu Franz Huber Bernhard Rumpe Wolfgang Schwerin. arXiv arxiv.org
  3. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. ↑ a b c d e Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". See the sample content: look for history
  5. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  9. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. ↑ John Hunt (2000). The Unified Process for Practitioners: Object-oriented Design, UML and Java. Springer, 2000. Template:ISBN. p. 5.door
  11. ↑ Satish Mishra (1997). "Visual Modeling & Unified Modeling Language (UML): Introduction to UML" Template:Webarchive. Rational Software Corporation. Accessed 9 November 2008.
  12. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. ↑ Hubert Tardieu, Arnold Rochfeld and René Colletti La methode MERISE: Principes et outils (Paperback - 1983)
  16. ↑ Elmasri, Ramez, B. Shamkant, Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, third ed., Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 2000.
  17. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. ↑ Template:Cite thesis
  19. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  20. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Template:Open access
  21. ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. ↑ Iman Poernomo (2006) "The Meta-Object Facility Typed Template:Webarchive" in: Proceeding SAC '06 Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing. pp. 1845–1849
  23. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  25. ↑ Jon Holt Institution of Electrical Engineers (2004). UML for Systems Engineering: Watching the Wheels IET, 2004, Template:ISBN. p. 58
  26. ↑ Manuel Almendros-Jiménez, Jesús & Iribarne, Luis. (2007). Describing Use-Case Relationships with Sequence Diagrams. Comput. J.. 50. 116-128. 10.1093/comjnl/bxl053.
  27. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". "UML truly is ubiquitous"
  28. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. ↑ Andreas Zendler (1997) Advanced Concepts, Life Cycle Models and Tools for Objeckt-Oriented Software Development. p. 122
  33. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. ↑ Génova et alia 2004 "Open Issues in Industrial Use Case Modeling"
  36. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Retrieved from "http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Unified_Modeling_Language&oldid=3148689"