Age of Enlightenment: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>DoebLoggs
m Reverted edit by 2405:6E00:453:6470:59E6:E2B1:5044:CF9B (talk) to last version by Helping2248
imported>Citation bot
Alter: last, journal, title. Add: issue, volume, pages, isbn, publisher, doi, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | Category:CS1 maint: extra punctuation | #UCB_Category 25/33
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|17th- to 18th-century European cultural movement}}
{{Short description|European cultural movement}}
{{Redirect2|Age of Reason|Lumières|the book by Thomas Paine|The Age of Reason|the French filmmakers|Auguste and Louis Lumière}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2025}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2025}}
 
{{Infobox historical era
[[File:Les salons au XVIIIe siècle - Histoire Image.jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|''[[In the Salon of Madame Geoffrin in 1755]]''. Reading of [[Voltaire]]'s tragedy, ''[[L'Orphelin de la Chine|The Orphan of China]],'' in the [[Salon (gathering)|salon]] of [[Marie Thérèse Geoffrin|Marie Thérèse Rodet Geoffrin]], by [[Anicet Charles Gabriel Lemonnier]], {{Circa|1812}}{{efn|Back row, left to right: [[Jean-Baptiste-Louis Gresset]], [[Pierre de Marivaux]], [[Jean-François Marmontel]], [[Joseph-Marie Vien]], [[Antoine Léonard Thomas]], [[Charles Marie de La Condamine]], [[Guillaume Thomas François Raynal]], [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]], [[Jean-Philippe Rameau]], [[La Clairon]], [[Charles-Jean-François Hénault]], [[Étienne François]], [[duc de Choiseul]], a bust of [[Voltaire]], [[Charles-Augustin de Ferriol d'Argental]], [[Jean François de Saint-Lambert]], [[Edmé Bouchardon]], [[Jacques-Germain Soufflot]], [[Jean-Baptiste Bourguignon d'Anville]], [[Anne Claude de Caylus]], [[Fortunato Felice]], [[François Quesnay]], [[Denis Diderot]], [[Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot, Baron de Laune]], [[Chrétien Guillaume de Lamoignon de Malesherbes]], [[Armand de Vignerot du Plessis]], [[Pierre Louis Maupertuis]], [[Jean-Jacques Dortous de Mairan]], [[Henri François d'Aguesseau]], [[Alexis Clairaut]].<br>
| name      = Age of Enlightenment
Front row, right to left: [[Montesquieu]], [[Sophie d'Houdetot]], [[Claude Joseph Vernet]], [[Bernard Le Bouyer de Fontenelle]], [[Marie-Thérèse Rodet Geoffrin]], [[Louis François, Prince of Conti]], [[Marie Louise Nicole Élisabeth de La Rochefoucauld, Duchesse d'Anville]], [[Philippe Jules François Mancini]], [[François-Joachim de Pierre de Bernis]], [[Claude Prosper Jolyot de Crébillon]], [[Alexis Piron]], [[Charles Pinot Duclos]], [[Claude-Adrien Helvétius]], [[Charles-André van Loo]], [[Jean le Rond d'Alembert]], [[Lekain]] at the desk reading aloud, [[Jeanne Julie Éléonore de Lespinasse]], [[Anne-Marie du Boccage]], [[René Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur]], [[Françoise de Graffigny]], [[Étienne Bonnot de Condillac]], [[Bernard de Jussieu]], [[Louis-Jean-Marie Daubenton]], [[Georges-Louis Leclerc]], [[Comte de Buffon]].}}]]
| location  = [[Early modern Europe]]
| start    = 1687
| end      = 1789
| image    = [[File:Les salons au XVIIIe siècle - Histoire Image.jpg|frameless|upright=1.3]]
| alt      =
| caption  =''[[In the Salon of Madame Geoffrin in 1755]]''. Reading of [[Voltaire]]'s tragedy, ''[[L'Orphelin de la Chine|The Orphan of China]],'' in the [[Salon (gathering)|salon]] of [[Marie Thérèse Geoffrin|Marie Thérèse Rodet Geoffrin]], by [[Anicet Charles Gabriel Lemonnier]], {{Circa|1812}}{{efn|Back row, left to right: [[Jean-Baptiste-Louis Gresset]], [[Pierre de Marivaux]], [[Jean-François Marmontel]], [[Joseph-Marie Vien]], [[Antoine Léonard Thomas]], [[Charles Marie de La Condamine]], [[Guillaume Thomas François Raynal]], [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]], [[Jean-Philippe Rameau]], [[La Clairon]], [[Charles-Jean-François Hénault]], [[Étienne François]], [[duc de Choiseul]], a bust of [[Voltaire]], [[Charles-Augustin de Ferriol d'Argental]], [[Jean François de Saint-Lambert]], [[Edmé Bouchardon]], [[Jacques-Germain Soufflot]], [[Jean-Baptiste Bourguignon d'Anville]], [[Anne Claude de Caylus]], [[Fortunato Felice]], [[François Quesnay]], [[Denis Diderot]], [[Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot, Baron de Laune]], [[Chrétien Guillaume de Lamoignon de Malesherbes]], [[Armand de Vignerot du Plessis]], [[Pierre Louis Maupertuis]], [[Jean-Jacques Dortous de Mairan]], [[Henri François d'Aguesseau]], [[Alexis Clairaut]].<br/>
Front row, right to left: [[Montesquieu]], [[Sophie d'Houdetot]], [[Claude Joseph Vernet]], [[Bernard Le Bouyer de Fontenelle]], [[Marie-Thérèse Rodet Geoffrin]], [[Louis François, Prince of Conti]], [[Marie Louise Nicole Élisabeth de La Rochefoucauld, Duchesse d'Anville]], [[Philippe Jules François Mancini]], [[François-Joachim de Pierre de Bernis]], [[Claude Prosper Jolyot de Crébillon]], [[Alexis Piron]], [[Charles Pinot Duclos]], [[Claude-Adrien Helvétius]], [[Charles-André van Loo]], [[Jean le Rond d'Alembert]], [[Lekain]] at the desk reading aloud, [[Jeanne Julie Éléonore de Lespinasse]], [[Anne-Marie du Boccage]], [[René Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur]], [[Françoise de Graffigny]], [[Étienne Bonnot de Condillac]], [[Bernard de Jussieu]], [[Louis-Jean-Marie Daubenton]], [[Georges-Louis Leclerc]], [[Comte de Buffon]].}}
| before    = [[Scientific Revolution]]
| including =
| after    =[[Romanticism]]
| monarch  = {{hlist|[[Louis XIV]]
|[[Louis XV]]
|[[Louis XVI]]
|[[Frederick the Great]]
|[[Catherine the Great]]
|[[Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor|Joseph II]]
|[[George III]]
}}
| leaders  = {{hlist|[[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]]
|[[Voltaire]]
|[[Immanuel Kant]]
|[[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]]
|[[David Hume]]
|[[Adam Smith]]
|[[Benjamin Franklin]]
}}
| presidents =
| primeministers =
| key_events =
* [[American Revolution]] (1765–1783)
* [[French Revolution]] (1789–1799)
}}
{{Classicism|state=Collapsed}}
{{Classicism|state=Collapsed}}
{{Capitalism sidebar}}{{Liberalism sidebar}}
{{Capitalism sidebar}}{{Liberalism sidebar}}


The '''Age of Enlightenment''' (also the '''Age of Reason''' and '''the Enlightenment''') was a [[Europe|European]] [[Intellect|intellectual]] and [[Philosophy|philosophical]] movement active from the late 17th to early 19th century.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Age of Enlightenment: A History From Beginning to End: Chapter 3 |website=publishinghau5.com |url=http://publishinghau5.com/The-Age-of-Enlightenment--A-History-From-Beginning-to-End-page-3.php |access-date=3 April 2017 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170303123359/http://publishinghau5.com/The-Age-of-Enlightenment--A-History-From-Beginning-to-End-page-3.php |archive-date=3 March 2017}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite journal |last=Conrad |first=Sebastian |date=1 October 2012 |title=Enlightenment in Global History: A Historiographical Critique |url=https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article/117/4/999/33183 |journal=The American Historical Review |volume=117 |issue=4 |pages=999–1027 |doi=10.1093/ahr/117.4.999 |issn=0002-8762 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Chiefly valuing knowledge gained through [[rationalism]] and [[empiricism]], the Enlightenment was concerned with a wide range of social and [[Politics|political]] ideals such as [[natural law]], [[liberty]], and [[progress]], [[toleration]] and [[fraternity (philosophy)|fraternity]], [[constitutional government]], and the formal [[separation of church and state]].<ref>{{cite book |last=Outram |first=Dorinda |title=Panorama of the Enlightenment |publisher=J. Paul Getty Museum |year=2006 |page=29 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=A84nA7Ae3t0C&q=%22Panorama%20of%20the%20Enlightenment%22&pg=PA29 |isbn=978-0-89236-861-7}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |first=Milan |last=Zafirovski |title=The Enlightenment and Its Effects on Modern Society |year=2010 |page=144}}</ref><ref>Jacob, Margaret C. ''The Secular Enlightenment.'' Princeton: Princeton University Press 2019 1</ref>
The '''Age of Enlightenment''' (also the '''Age of Reason''') was a period in the [[history of Europe]] and [[History of Western civilization|Western civilization]]<ref>{{harvnb|Padgett|2003|p=49}}: "the Enlightenment was a Western phenomenon"</ref> during which '''the Enlightenment''',{{efn|Also called the '''European Enlightenment''',{{sfn |Kates |2022}} the '''Euro-American Enlightenment''',{{sfn |Schüssler Fiorenza |1989 |p=5}} or the '''Western Enlightenment'''.{{sfn |Lee |Ackerman |2018 |p=3}}<br/>In other European languages: {{bulleted list|{{langx|nl|de Verlichting}}|{{langx|fr|les Lumières|lit=the Lights}} (i.e. "the lights of reason"){{sfn |Forsyth |1987 |p=22}}|{{langx|de|die Aufklärung}}|{{langx|it|l'Illuminismo}}|{{langx|pl|Oświecenie}}|{{langx|pt|o Iluminismo}}|{{langx|ru|Просвещение}}|{{langx|es|la Ilustración}}|{{langx|sv|Upplysningen}}}}}} an [[intellectual movement|intellectual]]<ref name="McGrath 2024 p. 107; Kendrick & Nagel 2025 p. 330">{{harvnb|McGrath|2024|p=107}}: "The Enlightenment was a period of European intellectual and cultural development that began in the late seventeenth century and lasted through the eighteenth century."; {{harvnb|Kendrick|Nagel|2025|p=330}}: "On the heels of the 17th century's Scientific Revolution, the Enlightenment marked an intellectual and cultural shift in the 18th century."</ref> and [[cultural movement|cultural]]<ref name="McGrath 2024 p. 107; Kendrick & Nagel 2025 p. 330"/> movement, flourished, emerging in the late 17th century<ref name="McGrath 2024 p. 107; Kendrick & Nagel 2025 p. 330"/> in [[Western Europe]]<ref name="Mokyr 2011 p. 99">{{harvnb|Mokyr|2011|p=99}}: "The Enlightenment was a Western European phenomenon, and after 1750 it reached into Central and Eastern Europe as well, even if it left the Ottoman world and much of southern Europe unaffected."</ref> and reaching its peak in the 18th century, as its ideas spread more widely across [[Europe]]<ref name="Mokyr 2011 p. 99"/> and into the [[European colonies]], in the [[Americas]] and [[Oceania]].<ref>{{harvnb|Liulevicius|2010|p=47}}: "The Enlightenment was a shared international movement throughout Europe and the Americas"</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Israel|2023|p=1}}: "The Enlightenment was a broad international movement"</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite journal |last=Conrad |first=Sebastian |date=1 October 2012 |title=Enlightenment in Global History: A Historiographical Critique |url=https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article/117/4/999/33183 |journal=The American Historical Review |volume=117 |issue=4 |pages=999–1027 |doi=10.1093/ahr/117.4.999 |issn=0002-8762 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Characterized by an emphasis on [[reason]], [[empirical evidence]], and [[scientific method]], the Enlightenment promoted ideals of [[individual liberty]], [[religious tolerance]], [[progress]], and [[Natural law|natural rights]]. Its thinkers advocated for [[constitutional government]], the [[separation of church and state]], and the application of rational principles to social and political reform.{{Sfn |Outram |2006 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=A84nA7Ae3t0C&q=%22Panorama%20of%20the%20Enlightenment%22&pg=PA29 29]}}<ref>{{cite book |last=Zafirovski |first=Milan |title=The Enlightenment and Its Effects on Modern Society |date=2010 |page=144}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Jacob |first=Margaret C. |author-link=Margaret Jacob |title=The Secular Enlightenment |location=Princeton |publisher=Princeton University Press |date=2019 |page=1}}</ref>


The Enlightenment was preceded by and overlapped the [[Scientific Revolution]], which included the work of [[Johannes Kepler]], [[Galileo Galilei]], [[Francis Bacon]], [[Pierre Gassendi]], [[Christiaan Huygens]] and [[Isaac Newton]], among others, as well as the philosophy of [[Descartes]], [[Hobbes]], [[Spinoza]], [[Leibniz]], and [[John Locke]]. The dating of the period of the beginning of the Enlightenment can be attributed to the publication of [[René Descartes]]' ''[[Discourse on the Method]]'' in 1637, with his method of systematically disbelieving everything unless there was a well-founded reason for accepting it, and featuring his famous dictum, ''[[Cogito, ergo sum]]'' ("I think, therefore I am"). Others cite the publication of Isaac Newton's ''[[Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica|Principia Mathematica]]'' (1687) as the culmination of the Scientific Revolution and the beginning of the Enlightenment.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Western-philosophy/The-Enlightenment |title=The Enlightenment |author=<!--Not stated--> |date= |website= |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=16 November 2023 |quote=}}</ref><ref name="Bristow 2023">{{cite encyclopedia |last=Bristow |first=William |editor1-last=Zalta |editor1-first=Edward N. |editor2-last=Nodelman |editor2-first=Uri |title=Enlightenment |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |date=20 August 2010 |edition=Fall 2023 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/enlightenment/ |access-date=15 April 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Casini |first1=Paolo |date=January 1988 |title=Newton's Principia and the Philosophers of the Enlightenment |url= |journal=Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London |volume=42 |issue=1 |pages=35–52 |doi=10.1098/rsnr.1988.0006 |s2cid=145282986 |access-date= |issn=0035-9149}}</ref> European historians traditionally dated its beginning with the death of [[Louis XIV]] of [[France]] in 1715 and its end with the outbreak of the [[French Revolution]] in 1789. Many historians now date the end of the Enlightenment as the start of the 19th century, with the latest proposed year being the death of [[Immanuel Kant]] in 1804.<ref>{{cite web |title=British Library- The Enlightenment |url=https://www.bl.uk/restoration-18th-century-literature/articles/the-enlightenment |access-date=21 June 2018 |archive-date=24 August 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230824220906/https://www.bl.uk/restoration-18th-century-literature/articles/the-enlightenment |url-status=dead}}</ref>
The Enlightenment emerged from and built upon the [[Scientific Revolution]] of the 16th and 17th centuries, which had established new methods of empirical inquiry through the work of figures such as [[Galileo Galilei]], [[Johannes Kepler]], [[Francis Bacon]], [[Pierre Gassendi]], [[Christiaan Huygens]] and [[Isaac Newton]]. Philosophical foundations were laid by thinkers including [[René Descartes]], [[Thomas Hobbes]], [[Baruch Spinoza]], and [[John Locke]], whose ideas about reason, natural rights, and empirical knowledge became central to Enlightenment thought. The dating of the period of the beginning of the Enlightenment can be attributed to the publication of Descartes' ''[[Discourse on the Method]]'' in 1637, with his method of systematically disbelieving everything unless there was a well-founded reason for accepting it, and featuring his dictum, {{lang|la|[[Cogito, ergo sum]]}} ('I think, therefore I am'). Others cite the publication of Newton's {{lang|la|[[Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica|Principia Mathematica]]}} (1687) as the culmination of the Scientific Revolution and the beginning of the Enlightenment.<ref>{{cite web |author=<!--Not stated--> |title=The Enlightenment |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Western-philosophy/The-Enlightenment |access-date=16 November 2023 |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica}}</ref><ref name="Bristow 2023">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Enlightenment |encyclopedia=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/enlightenment |access-date=15 April 2025 |last=Bristow |first=William |date=20 August 2010 |editor1-last=Zalta |editor1-first=Edward N. |edition=Fall 2023 |editor2-last=Nodelman |editor2-first=Uri}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Casini |first=Paolo |date=January 1988 |title=Newton's Principia and the Philosophers of the Enlightenment |journal=Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London |volume=42 |issue=1 |pages=35–52 |doi=10.1098/rsnr.1988.0006 |issn=0035-9149 |s2cid=145282986}}</ref> European historians traditionally dated its beginning with the death of [[Louis XIV]] of France in 1715 and its end with the outbreak of the [[French Revolution]] in 1789. Many historians now date the end of the Enlightenment as the start of the 19th century, with the latest proposed year being the death of [[Immanuel Kant]] in 1804.<ref>{{cite web |title=British Library- The Enlightenment |url=https://www.bl.uk/restoration-18th-century-literature/articles/the-enlightenment |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230824220906/https://www.bl.uk/restoration-18th-century-literature/articles/the-enlightenment |archive-date=24 August 2023 |access-date=21 June 2018}}</ref>


Philosophers and scientists of the period widely circulated their ideas through meetings at [[Academy|scientific academies]], [[Masonic lodge]]s, [[salon (gathering)|literary salons]], [[coffeehouse]]s and in [[book|printed books]], [[academic journal|journals]], and [[pamphlet]]s. The ideas of the Enlightenment undermined the authority of the [[monarchy]] and religious officials and paved the way for the political [[Revolution|revolutions]] of the 18th and 19th centuries. A variety of 19th-century movements, including [[liberalism]], [[socialism]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Smaldone |first=William |title=European socialism: a concise history with documents |date=2014 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc |isbn=978-1-4422-0909-1 |location=Lanham |pages=3–4}}</ref> and [[neoclassicism]], trace their intellectual heritage to the Enlightenment.<ref>Eugen Weber, ''Movements, Currents, Trends: Aspects of European Thought in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries'' (1992).</ref> [[Scientific racism]] also has a background in this period.
The movement was characterized by the widespread circulation of ideas through new institutions: [[Academy|scientific academies]], [[Salon (gathering)|literary salons]], [[coffeehouse]]s, [[Masonic lodge]]s, and an expanding [[print culture]] of [[book]]s, [[Academic journal|journals]], and [[pamphlet]]s. The ideas of the Enlightenment undermined the authority of the [[monarchy]] and religious officials and paved the way for the political [[revolution]]s of the 18th and 19th centuries. A variety of 19th-century movements, including [[liberalism]], [[socialism]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Smaldone |first=William |title=European socialism: a concise history with documents |date=2014 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc |isbn=978-1-4422-0909-1 |location=Lanham |pages=3–4}}</ref> and [[neoclassicism]], trace their intellectual heritage to the Enlightenment.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Eugen |last=Weber |author-link=Eugen Weber |title=Movements, Currents, Trends: Aspects of European Thought in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries |date=1992}}</ref> The Enlightenment was marked by an increasing awareness of the relationship between the [[mind]] and the everyday media of the world,<ref name="Eddy2022">{{cite book |last=Eddy |first=Matthew Daniel |url=https://www.academia.edu/3769533 |title=Media and the Mind: Art, Science and Notebooks as Paper Machines, 1700–1830 |date=2022 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago}}</ref> and by an emphasis on the [[scientific method]] and [[reductionism]], along with increased questioning of religious [[dogma]]—an attitude captured by Kant's essay ''[[Answering the Question: What Is Enlightenment?]],'' where the phrase {{Lang|la|[[sapere aude]]}} ('dare to know') can be found.<ref>{{cite book |last=Gay |first=Peter |url=https://archive.org/details/enlightenmentint02gayp |title=The Enlightenment: An Interpretation |publisher=W.W. Norton & Company |date=1996 |isbn=978-0-393-00870-8 |url-access=registration}}</ref>


The Enlightenment was marked by an increasing awareness of the relationship between the [[mind]] and the everyday media of the world,<ref name="Eddy2022">{{cite book |last1=Eddy |first1=Matthew Daniel |title=Media and the Mind: Art, Science and Notebooks as Paper Machines, 1700–1830 |date=2022 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago |url=https://www.academia.edu/3769533}}</ref> and by an emphasis on the [[scientific method]] and [[reductionism]], along with increased questioning of religious [[dogma]] — an attitude captured by Kant's essay ''[[Answering the Question: What Is Enlightenment?]],'' where the phrase {{Lang|la|[[sapere aude]]}} ('dare to know') can be found.<ref>{{cite book |last=Gay |first=Peter |title=The Enlightenment: An Interpretation |publisher=W.W. Norton & Company |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-393-00870-8 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/enlightenmentint02gayp}}</ref>
The central doctrines of the Enlightenment were [[civil liberties|individual liberty]], representative government, the [[rule of law]], and [[religious freedom]], in contrast to an [[absolute monarchy]] or [[single party state]] and the [[religious persecution]] of faiths other than those formally [[state religion|established]] and often [[Caesaropapism|controlled outright]] by the [[State (polity)|State]]. By contrast, other intellectual currents included arguments in favour of [[Anti-Christian sentiment|anti-Christianity]], [[Deism]] and [[Atheism]], accompanied by demands for [[secular state]]s, bans on [[religious education]], [[suppression of monasteries]], the [[suppression of the Jesuits]], and the expulsion of [[religious order]]s. The Enlightenment also faced contemporary criticism, later termed the "[[Counter-Enlightenment]]" by [[Isaiah Berlin|Sir Isaiah Berlin]], which defended traditional religious and political authorities against rationalist critique.
 
The central doctrines of the Enlightenment were [[civil liberties|individual liberty]], representative government, the [[rule of law]], and [[religious freedom]], in contrast to an [[absolute monarchy]] or [[single party state]] and the [[religious persecution]] of faiths other than those formally [[State religion|established]] and often [[Caesaropapism|controlled outright]] by the [[State (polity)|State]]. By contrast, other intellectual currents included arguments in favour of [[anti-Christianity]], [[Deism]], and even [[Atheism]], accompanied by demands for [[secular state]]s, bans on [[religious education]], [[suppression of monasteries]], the [[suppression of the Jesuits]], and the expulsion of [[religious order]]s. Contemporary criticism, particularly of these [[Antireligion|anti-religious]] concepts, has since been dubbed the [[Counter-Enlightenment]] by [[Isaiah Berlin|Sir Isaiah Berlin]].


==Influential intellectuals==
==Influential intellectuals==
{{Main list|List of intellectuals of the Enlightenment}}
{{Main list|List of intellectuals of the Enlightenment}}


The Age of Enlightenment was preceded by and closely associated with the [[Scientific Revolution]].<ref>I. Bernard Cohen, "Scientific Revolution and Creativity in the Enlightenment." ''Eighteenth-Century Life'' 7.2 (1982): 41–54.</ref> Earlier philosophers whose work influenced the Enlightenment included [[Francis Bacon]], [[Pierre Gassendi]], [[René Descartes]], [[Thomas Hobbes]], [[Baruch Spinoza]], [[John Locke]], [[Pierre Bayle]], and [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]].<ref>Israel, Jonathan I. ''Democratic Enlightenment.'' Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011,9</ref><ref>Sootin, Harry. ''Isaac Newton.'' New York: Messner (1955)</ref> Some of the figures of the Enlightenment included [[Cesare Beccaria]], [[George Berkeley]], [[Denis Diderot]], [[David Hume]], [[Immanuel Kant]], [[Lord Monboddo]], [[Montesquieu]], [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]], [[Adam Smith]], [[Hugo Grotius]], and [[Voltaire]].<ref name="Black">Jeremy Black, "Ancien Regime and Enlightenment. Some Recent Writing on Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century Europe," ''European History Quarterly'' 22.2 (1992): 247–55.</ref>
The Age of Enlightenment was preceded by and closely associated with the [[Scientific Revolution]].<ref>{{Cite journal |first=I. Bernard |last=Cohen |author-link=I. Bernard Cohen |title=Scientific Revolution and Creativity in the Enlightenment |journal=Eighteenth-Century Life |volume=7 |issue=2 |date=1982 |pages=41–54}}</ref> Earlier philosophers whose work influenced the Enlightenment included [[Francis Bacon]], [[Pierre Gassendi]], [[René Descartes]], [[Thomas Hobbes]], [[Baruch Spinoza]], [[John Locke]], [[Pierre Bayle]], and [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]].{{Sfn|Israel|2011|p=9}}<ref>Sootin, Harry. ''Isaac Newton.'' New York: Messner (1955)</ref> Some of the figures of the Enlightenment included [[Cesare Beccaria]], [[George Berkeley]], [[Denis Diderot]], [[David Hume]], [[Immanuel Kant]], [[Lord Monboddo]], [[Montesquieu]], [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]], [[Adam Smith]], [[Hugo Grotius]], and [[Voltaire]].<ref name="Black">{{Cite journal |first=Jeremy |last=Black |title=Ancien Regime and Enlightenment. Some Recent Writing on Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century Europe |journal=European History Quarterly |volume=22 |issue=2 |date=1992 |pages=247–255 |doi=10.1177/026569149202200204 }}</ref>


One of the most influential Enlightenment publications was the ''{{lang|fr|[[Encyclopédie]]}}'' (''Encyclopedia''). Published between 1751 and 1772 in 35 volumes, it was compiled by Diderot, [[Jean le Rond d'Alembert]], and a team of 150 others. The ''Encyclopédie'' helped spread the ideas of the Enlightenment across Europe and beyond.<ref>Robert Darnton, ''The Business of Enlightenment: a publishing history of the Encyclopédie, 1775–1800'' (2009).</ref> Other publications of the Enlightenment included Berkeley's ''[[A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge]]'' (1710), Voltaire's ''[[Letters on the English]]'' (1733) and ''[[Philosophical Dictionary]]'' (1764); Hume's ''[[A Treatise of Human Nature]]'' (1740); Montesquieu's ''[[The Spirit of Law|The Spirit of the Laws]]'' (1748); Rousseau's ''[[Discourse on Inequality]]'' (1754) and ''[[The Social Contract]]'' (1762); Cesare Beccaria's ''[[On Crimes and Punishments]]'' (1764); Adam Smith's ''[[The Theory of Moral Sentiments]]'' (1759) and ''[[The Wealth of Nations]]'' (1776); and Kant's ''[[Critique of Pure Reason]]'' (1781).{{citation needed|date=April 2024}}
One of the most influential Enlightenment publications was the ''{{lang|fr|[[Encyclopédie]]}}'' (''Encyclopedia''). Published between 1751 and 1772 in 35 volumes, it was compiled by Diderot, [[Jean le Rond d'Alembert]], and a team of 150 others. The ''Encyclopédie'' helped spread the ideas of the Enlightenment across Europe and beyond.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Robert |last=Darnton |author-link=Robert Darnton |title=The Business of Enlightenment: a publishing history of the Encyclopédie, 1775–1800 |date=1979}}</ref>
 
Other publications of the Enlightenment included Locke's ''[[A Letter Concerning Toleration]]'' (1689) and ''[[Two Treatises of Government]]'' (1689); Berkeley's ''[[A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge]]'' (1710), Voltaire's ''[[Letters on the English]]'' (1733) and ''[[Philosophical Dictionary]]'' (1764); Hume's ''[[A Treatise of Human Nature]]'' (1740); Montesquieu's ''[[The Spirit of Law|The Spirit of the Laws]]'' (1748); Rousseau's ''[[Discourse on Inequality]]'' (1754) and ''[[The Social Contract]]'' (1762); Cesare Beccaria's ''[[On Crimes and Punishments]]'' (1764); Adam Smith's ''[[The Theory of Moral Sentiments]]'' (1759) and ''[[The Wealth of Nations]]'' (1776); and Kant's ''[[Critique of Pure Reason]]'' (1781).{{citation needed|date=April 2024}}


==Topics==
==Topics==
===Philosophy===
===Philosophy===
{{main|Enlightenment philosophy}}
[[File:Somer Francis Bacon.jpg|thumb|left|upright|English philosopher [[Francis Bacon]]'s work is considered foundational to the age of enlightenment]]
[[File:Frans Hals - Portret van René Descartes.jpg|thumb|left|upright|[[René Descartes]], widely considered a seminal figure in the emergence of [[modern philosophy]] and science]]
[[File:Frans Hals - Portret van René Descartes.jpg|thumb|left|upright|[[René Descartes]], widely considered a seminal figure in the emergence of [[modern philosophy]] and science]]
Bacon's [[empiricism]] and Descartes' [[Rationalism|rationalist]] philosophy laid the foundation for enlightenment thinking.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iCyZCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT4 |isbn=978-1-63149-208-2 |title=The Dream of Enlightenment: The Rise of Modern Philosophy |date=2016 |publisher=W. W. Norton & Company}}</ref> Descartes' attempt to construct the sciences on a secure [[metaphysics|metaphysical]] foundation was not as successful as his [[Cartesian doubt|method of doubt]] applied to philosophy, which led to a [[Mind–body dualism|dualistic doctrine]] of mind and matter. His [[skepticism]] was refined by Locke's ''[[An Essay Concerning Human Understanding|Essay Concerning Human Understanding]]'' (1690) and Hume's writings in the 1740s. Descartes' dualism was challenged by Spinoza's uncompromising assertion of the unity of matter in his [[Tractatus Theologico-Politicus|''Tractatus'']] (1670) and ''[[Ethics (Spinoza book)|Ethics]]'' (1677).<ref>{{Cite book |last=Rahman |first=Shoaib |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hoDkEAAAQBAJ |title=The Roots of Enlightenment: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE AGE OF REASON IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY EUROPE |date=2023 |edition=Hardcover |publisher=Fadew, Inc. |isbn=979-8-8681-1641-4 |language=en}}</ref>
Bacon's [[empiricism]] and Descartes' [[Rationalism|rationalist]] philosophy laid the foundation for enlightenment thinking.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iCyZCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT4 |title=The Dream of Enlightenment: The Rise of Modern Philosophy |date=2016 |publisher=W. W. Norton & Company |isbn=978-1-63149-208-2}}</ref> Descartes' attempt to construct the sciences on a secure [[metaphysics|metaphysical]] foundation was not as successful as his [[Cartesian doubt|method of doubt]] applied to philosophy, which led to a [[Mind–body dualism|dualistic doctrine]] of mind and matter. His [[skepticism]] was refined by Locke's ''[[An Essay Concerning Human Understanding|Essay Concerning Human Understanding]]'' (1690) and Hume's writings in the 1740s. Descartes' dualism was challenged by Spinoza's uncompromising assertion of the unity of matter in his [[Tractatus Theologico-Politicus|''Tractatus'']] (1670) and ''[[Ethics (Spinoza book)|Ethics]]'' (1677).<ref>{{Cite book |last=Rahman |first=Shoaib |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hoDkEAAAQBAJ |title=The Roots of Enlightenment: A HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE AGE OF REASON IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY EUROPE |date=2023 |publisher=Fadew, Inc. |isbn=979-8-8681-1641-4 |edition=Hardcover |language=en}}</ref>


According to [[Jonathan Israel]], these laid down two distinct lines of Enlightenment thought: first, the moderate variety, following Descartes, Locke, and [[Christian Wolff (philosopher)|Christian Wolff]], which sought accommodation between reform and the traditional systems of power and faith, and, second, the Radical Enlightenment, inspired by the philosophy of Spinoza, advocating democracy, individual liberty, freedom of expression, and eradication of religious authority.{{sfn|Israel|2006|p=15}}{{sfn|Israel|2010|pp=vii–viii, 19}} The moderate variety tended to be [[Deism|deistic]] whereas the radical tendency separated the basis of morality entirely from theology. Both lines of thought were eventually opposed by a conservative [[Counter-Enlightenment]] which sought a return to faith.{{sfn|Israel|2010|p=11}}
According to [[Jonathan Israel]], these laid down two distinct lines of Enlightenment thought: first, the moderate variety, following Descartes, Locke, and [[Christian Wolff (philosopher)|Christian Wolff]], which sought accommodation between reform and the traditional systems of power and faith, and, second, the Radical Enlightenment, inspired by the philosophy of Spinoza, advocating democracy, individual liberty, freedom of expression, and eradication of religious authority.{{sfn |Israel |2006 |p=15}}{{sfn |Israel |2010 |pp=vii–viii, 19}} The moderate variety tended to be [[Deism|deistic]] whereas the radical tendency separated the basis of morality entirely from theology. Both lines of thought were eventually opposed by a conservative [[Counter-Enlightenment]] which sought a return to faith.{{sfn |Israel |2010 |p=11}}


In the mid-18th century, Paris became the center of philosophic and scientific activity challenging traditional doctrines and dogmas. After the [[Edict of Fontainebleau]] in 1685, the relationship between church and the absolutist government was very strong. The early enlightenment emerged in protest to these circumstances, gaining ground under the support of [[Madame de Pompadour]], the mistress of [[Louis XV]].{{sfn|Haakonssen|2008|p=33}} Called the ''Siècle des Lumières,'' the philosophical movement of the Enlightenment had already started by the early 18th century, when [[Pierre Bayle]] launched the popular and scholarly Enlightenment critique of religion. As a [[skeptic]] Bayle only partially accepted the philosophy and principles of rationality. He did draw a strict boundary between morality and religion. The rigor of his ''[[Dictionnaire Historique et Critique]]'' influenced many of the Enlightenment ''[[Encyclopédistes]].''{{Sfn|Haakonssen|2008|p=34}} By the mid-18th century the French Enlightenment had found a focus in the project of the ''[[Encyclopédie]].''{{Sfn|Haakonssen|2008|p=33}} The philosophical movement was led by Voltaire and Rousseau, who argued for a society based upon reason rather than faith and Catholic doctrine, for a new civil order based on [[natural law]], and for science based on experiments and observation. The political philosopher Montesquieu introduced the idea of a [[separation of powers]] in a government, a concept which was enthusiastically adopted by the authors of the [[Constitution of the United States|United States Constitution]]. While the ''[[philosophes]]'' of the French Enlightenment were not revolutionaries and many were members of the nobility, their ideas played an important part in undermining the legitimacy of the [[Ancien Régime|Old Regime]] and shaping the [[French Revolution]].{{Sfn|Petitfils|2005|pages=99–105}}
In the mid-18th century, Paris became the center of philosophic and scientific activity challenging traditional doctrines and dogmas. After the [[Edict of Fontainebleau]] in 1685, the relationship between church and the absolutist government was very strong. The early enlightenment emerged in protest to these circumstances, gaining ground under the support of [[Madame de Pompadour]], the mistress of [[Louis XV]].{{sfn |Haakonssen |2008 |p=33}} Called the ''Siècle des Lumières,'' the philosophical movement of the Enlightenment had already started by the early 18th century, when [[Pierre Bayle]] launched the popular and scholarly Enlightenment critique of religion. As a [[skeptic]] Bayle only partially accepted the philosophy and principles of rationality. He did draw a strict boundary between morality and religion. The rigor of his ''[[Dictionnaire Historique et Critique]]'' influenced many of the Enlightenment ''[[Encyclopédistes]].''{{Sfn |Haakonssen |2008 |p=34}} By the mid-18th century the French Enlightenment had found a focus in the project of the ''[[Encyclopédie]].''{{Sfn |Haakonssen |2008 |p=33}} The philosophical movement was led by Voltaire and Rousseau, who argued for a society based upon reason rather than faith and Catholic doctrine, for a new civil order based on [[natural law]], and for science based on experiments and observation. The political philosopher Montesquieu introduced the idea of a [[separation of powers]] in a government, a concept which was enthusiastically adopted by the authors of the [[Constitution of the United States|United States Constitution]]. While the ''[[philosophes]]'' of the French Enlightenment were not revolutionaries and many were members of the nobility, their ideas played an important part in undermining the legitimacy of the [[Ancien Régime|Old Regime]] and shaping the [[French Revolution]].{{Sfn |Petitfils |2005 |pages=99–105}}


[[Francis Hutcheson (philosopher)|Francis Hutcheson]], a moral philosopher and founding figure of the [[Scottish Enlightenment]], described the [[utilitarianism|utilitarian]] and [[consequentialism|consequentialist]] principle that virtue is that which provides, in his words, "the greatest happiness for the greatest numbers." Much of what is incorporated in the [[scientific method]] (the nature of knowledge, evidence, experience, and causation) and some modern attitudes towards the relationship between science and religion were developed by Hutcheson's protégés in [[Edinburgh]]: David Hume and Adam Smith.<ref name="Denby">{{cite magazine |title=Northern Lights: How modern life emerged from eighteenth-century Edinburgh |last=Denby |first=David |magazine=The New Yorker |date=11 October 2004 |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2004/10/11/northern-lights-3 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606141619/http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2004/10/11/041011crat_atlarge |archive-date=6 June 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Scottish enlightenment and the challenges for Europe in the 21st century; climate change and energy |last=Barroso |first=José Manuel |authorlink=José Manuel Barroso |date=28 November 2006 |url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_06_756}}</ref> Hume became a major figure in the [[philosophical skepticism|skeptical philosophical]] and empiricist traditions of philosophy.
[[Francis Hutcheson (philosopher)|Francis Hutcheson]], a moral philosopher and founding figure of the [[Scottish Enlightenment]], described the [[utilitarianism|utilitarian]] and [[consequentialism|consequentialist]] principle that virtue is that which provides, in his words, "the greatest happiness for the greatest numbers." Much of what is incorporated in the [[scientific method]] (the nature of knowledge, evidence, experience, and causation) and some modern attitudes towards the relationship between science and religion were developed by Hutcheson's protégés in [[Edinburgh]]: David Hume and Adam Smith.<ref name="Denby">{{cite magazine |last=Denby |first=David |date=11 October 2004 |title=Northern Lights: How modern life emerged from eighteenth-century Edinburgh |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2004/10/11/northern-lights-3 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606141619/http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2004/10/11/041011crat_atlarge |archive-date=6 June 2011 |magazine=The New Yorker}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Barroso |first=José Manuel |authorlink=José Manuel Barroso |date=28 November 2006 |title=The Scottish enlightenment and the challenges for Europe in the 21st century; climate change and energy |url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_06_756}}</ref> Hume became a major figure in the [[philosophical skepticism|skeptical philosophical]] and empiricist traditions of philosophy.


[[File:Immanuel Kant portrait c1790.jpg|thumb|upright|German philosopher [[Immanuel Kant]], one of the most influential figures of Enlightenment and modern philosophy]]
[[File:Immanuel Kant portrait c1790.jpg|thumb|upright|German philosopher [[Immanuel Kant]], one of the most influential figures of Enlightenment and modern philosophy]]
Kant tried to reconcile rationalism and religious belief, [[Individualism|individual freedom]] and political authority, as well as map out a view of the public sphere through private and public reason.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/web%20publishing/KantOnElightenment.htm |title=Kant's essay What is Enlightenment? |work=mnstate.edu |access-date=4 November 2015 |archive-date=17 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200217062357/http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/web%20publishing/KantOnElightenment.htm |url-status=dead}}</ref> Kant's work continued to shape German thought and indeed all of European philosophy, well into the 20th century.<ref>Manfred Kuehn, ''Kant: A Biography'' (2001).</ref>
Kant tried to reconcile rationalism and religious belief, [[Individualism|individual freedom]] and political authority, as well as map out a view of the public sphere through private and public reason.<ref>{{cite web |title=Kant's essay What is Enlightenment? |url=http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/web%20publishing/KantOnElightenment.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200217062357/http://web.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/web%20publishing/KantOnElightenment.htm |archive-date=17 February 2020 |access-date=4 November 2015 |work=mnstate.edu}}</ref> Kant's work continued to influence German intellectual life and European philosophy more broadly well into the 20th century.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Manfred |last=Kuehn |title=Kant: A Biography |date=2001}}</ref>


[[Mary Wollstonecraft]] was one of England's earliest [[Feminism|feminist]] philosophers.<ref>{{cite web |last=Kreis |first=Steven |url=http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/wollstonecraft.html |title=Mary Wollstonecraft, 1759–1797 |publisher=Historyguide.org |date=13 April 2012 |access-date=14 January 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140111055540/http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/wollstonecraft.html |archive-date=11 January 2014}}</ref> She argued for a society based on reason and that women as well as men should be treated as rational beings. She is best known for her work ''[[A Vindication of the Rights of Woman]]'' (1792).<ref>Mary Wollstonecraft, ''A Vindication of the Rights of Woman'' (Renascence Editions, 2000) [https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/785/vindication.pdf?sequence=1 online]</ref>
[[Mary Wollstonecraft]] was one of England's earliest [[Feminism|feminist]] philosophers.<ref>{{cite web |last=Kreis |first=Steven |date=13 April 2012 |title=Mary Wollstonecraft, 1759–1797 |url=http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/wollstonecraft.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140111055540/http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/wollstonecraft.html |archive-date=11 January 2014 |access-date=14 January 2014 |publisher=Historyguide.org}}</ref> She argued for a society based on reason and that women as well as men should be treated as rational beings. She is best known for her 1792 work, ''[[A Vindication of the Rights of Woman]]''.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Mary |last=Wollstonecraft |author-link=Mary Wollstonecraft |title=[[A Vindication of the Rights of Woman]] |date=2000}}</ref>


===Science===
===Science===
{{Main|Science in the Age of Enlightenment}}
{{Main|Science in the Age of Enlightenment}}
Science played an important role in Enlightenment discourse and thought. Many Enlightenment writers and thinkers had backgrounds in the sciences and associated scientific advancement with the overthrow of religion and traditional authority in favour of the development of free speech and thought.<ref>Bruce P. Lenman, ''Integration and Enlightenment: Scotland, 1746–1832'' (1993) [https://www.amazon.com/dp/0748603859 excerpt and text search]</ref> There were immediate practical results. The experiments of [[Antoine Lavoisier]] were used to create the first modern chemical plants in Paris, and the experiments of the [[Montgolfier brothers]] enabled them to launch the first manned flight in a [[hot air balloon]] in 1783.<ref>Sarmant, Thierry, ''Histoire de Paris,'' p. 120.</ref>
Science played an important role in Enlightenment discourse and thought. Many Enlightenment writers and thinkers had backgrounds in the sciences and associated scientific advancement with the overthrow of religion and traditional authority in favour of the development of free speech and thought.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lenman |first=Bruce P. |title=Integration and Enlightenment: Scotland, 1746–1832 |date=1993}}</ref> There were immediate practical results. The experiments of [[Antoine Lavoisier]] were used to create the first modern chemical plants in Paris, and the experiments of the [[Montgolfier brothers]] enabled them to launch the first manned flight in a [[hot air balloon]] in 1783.<ref>{{cite book |last=Sarmant |first=Thierry |title=Histoire de Paris: Politique, urbanisme, civilisation |publisher=Editions Jean-Paul Gisserot |date=2012 |isbn=978-2-7558-0330-3 |page=120 |lang=fr}}</ref>


Broadly speaking, Enlightenment science greatly valued empiricism and rational thought and was embedded with the Enlightenment ideal of advancement and progress. The study of science, under the heading of [[natural philosophy]], was divided into [[physics]] and a conglomerate grouping of [[chemistry]] and [[natural history]], which included [[anatomy]], [[biology]], geology, [[mineralogy]], and [[zoology]].<ref>Porter (2003), 79–80.</ref> As with most Enlightenment views, the benefits of science were not seen universally: Rousseau criticized the sciences for distancing man from nature and not operating to make people happier.<ref>Burns (2003), entry: 7,103.</ref>
Broadly speaking, Enlightenment science greatly valued empiricism and rational thought and was embedded with the Enlightenment ideal of advancement and progress. The study of science, under the heading of [[natural philosophy]], was divided into [[physics]] and a conglomerate grouping of [[chemistry]] and [[natural history]], which included [[anatomy]], [[biology]], geology, [[mineralogy]], and [[zoology]].{{Sfn|Lindberg|Numbers|Porter|2003|pp=79–80}} As with most Enlightenment views, the benefits of science were not seen universally: Rousseau criticized the sciences for distancing man from nature and not operating to make people happier.{{Sfn|Burns|2003|loc=entry: 7,103}}


Science during the Enlightenment was dominated by scientific societies and [[academy|academies]], which had largely replaced universities as centres of scientific research and development. Societies and academies were also the backbone of the maturation of the scientific profession. Scientific academies and societies grew out of the Scientific Revolution as the creators of scientific knowledge, in contrast to the scholasticism of the university.<ref>Gillispie, (1980), p. xix.</ref> Some societies created or retained links to universities, but contemporary sources distinguished universities from scientific societies by claiming that the university's utility was in the transmission of knowledge while societies functioned to create knowledge.<ref>James E. McClellan III, "Learned Societies," in ''Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment,'' ed. Alan Charles Kors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003) {{cite web |url=http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/HistoryWorld/Modern/?view=usa&ci=9780195104301 |title=Oxford University Press: Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment: Alan Charles Kors |access-date=16 October 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120330082517/http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/HistoryWorld/Modern/?view=usa&ci=9780195104301 |archive-date=30 March 2012}} (accessed on 8 June 2008).</ref> As the role of universities in institutionalized science began to diminish, learned societies became the cornerstone of organized science. Official scientific societies were chartered by the state to provide technical expertise.<ref>Porter, (2003), p. 91.</ref>
Science during the Enlightenment was dominated by scientific societies and [[academy|academies]], which had largely replaced universities as centres of scientific research and development. Societies and academies were also the backbone of the maturation of the scientific profession. Scientific academies and societies grew out of the Scientific Revolution as the creators of scientific knowledge, in contrast to the scholasticism of the university.{{Sfn |Gillispie |1980 |p=xix}} Some societies created or retained links to universities, but contemporary sources distinguished universities from scientific societies by claiming that the university's utility was in the transmission of knowledge while societies functioned to create knowledge.<ref>{{Cite book |last=McClellan |first=James E. III |url=http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/HistoryWorld/Modern/?view=usa&ci=9780195104301 |title=Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment |date=2003 |publisher=Oxford University Press |editor-last=Kors |editor-first=Alan Charles |location=Oxford |chapter=Learned Societies |access-date=16 October 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120330082517/http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/HistoryWorld/Modern/?view=usa&ci=9780195104301 |archive-date=30 March 2012}}</ref> As the role of universities in institutionalized science began to diminish, learned societies became the cornerstone of organized science. Official scientific societies were chartered by the state to provide technical expertise.{{Sfn|Lindberg|Numbers|Porter|2003|p=91}}


Most societies were granted permission to oversee their own publications, control the election of new members and the administration of the society.<ref>See Gillispie, (1980), "Conclusion."</ref> In the 18th century, a very large number of official academies and societies were founded in Europe; by 1789 there were over 70 official scientific societies. In reference to this growth, [[Bernard Le Bovier de Fontenelle|Bernard de Fontenelle]] coined the term "the Age of Academies" to describe the 18th century.<ref>Porter, (2003), p. 90.</ref>
Most societies were granted permission to oversee their own publications, control the election of new members and the administration of the society.{{Sfn |Gillispie |1980 |loc=Conclusion}} In the 18th century, a very large number of official academies and societies were founded in Europe; by 1789 there were over 70 official scientific societies. In reference to this growth, [[Bernard Le Bovier de Fontenelle|Bernard de Fontenelle]] coined the term "the Age of Academies" to describe the 18th century.{{Sfn|Lindberg|Numbers|Porter|2003|p=90}}


Another important development was the [[popular culture|popularization]] of science among an increasingly literate population. ''Philosophes'' introduced the public to many scientific theories, most notably through the ''Encyclopédie'' and the popularization of [[Newtonianism]] by Voltaire and [[Émilie du Châtelet]]. Some historians have marked the 18th century as a drab period in the history of science.<ref>see Hall (1954), iii; Mason (1956), 223.</ref> The century saw significant advancements in the practice of medicine, mathematics, and physics; the development of biological [[taxonomy (biology)|taxonomy]]; a new understanding of [[magnetism]] and electricity; and the maturation of chemistry as a discipline, which established the foundations of modern chemistry.{{citation needed|date=April 2024}}
Another important development was the [[popular culture|popularization]] of science among an increasingly literate population. ''Philosophes'' introduced the public to many scientific theories, most notably through the ''Encyclopédie'' and the popularization of [[Newtonianism]] by Voltaire and [[Émilie du Châtelet]]. Some historians have marked the 18th century as a drab period in the history of science.<ref>see Hall (1954), iii{{Full citation needed|date=November 2025}}; {{Harvnb|Mason|1962|p=223}}.</ref> The century saw significant advancements in the practice of medicine, mathematics, and physics; the development of biological [[taxonomy (biology)|taxonomy]]; a new understanding of [[magnetism]] and electricity; and the maturation of chemistry as a discipline, which established the foundations of modern chemistry.{{citation needed|date=April 2024}}


The influence of science began appearing more commonly in poetry and literature. Some poetry became infused with scientific metaphor and imagery, while other poems were written directly about scientific topics. [[Richard Blackmore]] committed the Newtonian system to verse in ''Creation, a Philosophical Poem in Seven Books'' (1712). After Newton's death in 1727, poems were composed in his honour for decades.<ref name="Burns, 2003, entry: 158">Burns, (2003), entry: 158.</ref> [[James Thomson (poet, born 1700)|James Thomson]] penned his "Poem to the Memory of Newton," which mourned the loss of Newton and praised his science and legacy.<ref>Thomson, (1786), p. 203.</ref>
The influence of science began appearing more commonly in poetry and literature. While some societies were established with ties to universities or maintained existing ones contemporary sources often distinguished between the two, asserting that universities primarily served to transmit knowledge, whereas scientific societies were oriented toward the creation of new knowledge.{{Sfn|Burns|2003|loc=entry: 158}} [[James Thomson (poet, born 1700)|James Thomson]] penned his "A Poem to the Memory of Sir Isaac Newton," which mourned the loss of Newton and praised his science and legacy.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Thomson |first=James |author-link= James Thomson (poet, born 1700) |title=A Poem to the Memory of Sir Isaac Newton |orig-date=1727 |publisher=J. Millan |location=London |date=1730 |url=https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_the-seasons-a-hymn-a-p_thomson-james_1730_0 |page=290 |via=[[Archive.org]]}}</ref>


===Sociology, economics, and law===
===Sociology, economics, and law===
[[File:Cesare Beccaria.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Cesare Beccaria]], father of classical criminal theory]]
[[File:Cesare Beccaria.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Cesare Beccaria]], father of classical criminal theory]]


Hume and other [[Scottish Enlightenment]] thinkers developed a "[[A Treatise of Human Nature|science of man]],"<ref name="Magnusson">{{cite magazine |last=Magnusson |first=Magnus |title=Review of James Buchan, ''Capital of the Mind: how Edinburgh Changed the World'' |magazine=New Statesman |date=10 November 2003 |url=http://www.newstatesman.com/200311100040 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606015918/http://www.newstatesman.com/200311100040 |url-status=dead |archive-date=6 June 2011 |access-date=27 April 2014}}</ref> which was expressed historically in works by authors including [[James Burnett, Lord Monboddo|James Burnett]], [[Adam Ferguson]], [[John Millar (philosopher)|John Millar]], and [[William Robertson (historian)|William Robertson]], all of whom merged a scientific study of how humans behaved in ancient and primitive cultures with a strong awareness of the determining forces of [[modernity]]. Modern sociology largely originated from this movement,<ref>{{cite journal |jstor=588406 |title=Origins of Sociology: The Case of the Scottish Enlightenment |journal=The British Journal of Sociology |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=164–180 |last1=Swingewood |first1=Alan |year=1970 |doi=10.2307/588406}}</ref> and Hume's philosophical concepts that directly influenced [[James Madison]] (and thus the U.S. Constitution), and as popularised by [[Dugald Stewart]] was the basis of [[classical liberalism]].<ref>D. Daiches, P. Jones and J. Jones, ''A Hotbed of Genius: The Scottish Enlightenment, 1730–1790'' (1986).</ref>
Hume and other [[Scottish Enlightenment]] thinkers developed a "[[A Treatise of Human Nature|science of man]],"<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Magnusson |first=Magnus |date=10 November 2003 |title=Review of James Buchan, ''Capital of the Mind: how Edinburgh Changed the World'' |url=http://www.newstatesman.com/200311100040 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606015918/http://www.newstatesman.com/200311100040 |archive-date=6 June 2011 |access-date=27 April 2014 |magazine=New Statesman}}</ref> which was expressed historically in works by authors including [[James Burnett, Lord Monboddo|James Burnett]], [[Adam Ferguson]], [[John Millar (philosopher)|John Millar]], and [[William Robertson (historian)|William Robertson]], all of whom merged a scientific study of how humans behaved in ancient and primitive cultures with a strong awareness of the determining forces of [[modernity]]. Modern sociology largely originated from this movement,<ref>{{cite journal |last=Swingewood |first=Alan |date=1970 |title=Origins of Sociology: The Case of the Scottish Enlightenment |journal=The British Journal of Sociology |volume=21 |issue=2 |pages=164–180 |doi=10.2307/588406 |jstor=588406}}</ref> and Hume's philosophical concepts that directly influenced [[James Madison]] (and thus the U.S. Constitution), and as popularised by [[Dugald Stewart]] was the basis of [[classical liberalism]].<ref>{{Cite book |title=A Hotbed of Genius: The Scottish Enlightenment, 1730–1790 |date=1986 |publisher=[[Saltire Society]] |isbn=978-0854110698 |editor-last=Daiches |editor-first=David |editor-link=David Daiches |ol=8286026M |editor-last2=Jones |editor-first2=Peter Howard |editor-last3=Jones |editor-first3=Jean}}</ref>


In 1776, Adam Smith published ''[[The Wealth of Nations]],'' often considered the first work on modern economics as it had an immediate impact on British economic policy that continues into the 21st century.<ref name="Fry">M. Fry, ''Adam Smith's Legacy: His Place in the Development of Modern Economics'' (Routledge, 1992).</ref> It was immediately preceded and influenced by [[Anne Robert Jacques Turgot]]'s drafts of ''[[Reflections on the Formation and Distribution of Wealth]]'' (1766). Smith acknowledged indebtedness and possibly was the original English translator.<ref>The Illusion of Free Markets, Bernard E. Harcourt, p. 260, notes 11–14.</ref>
In 1776, Adam Smith published ''[[The Wealth of Nations]],'' often considered the first work on modern economics as it had an immediate impact on British economic policy that continues into the 21st century.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Adam Smith's Legacy: His Place in the Development of Modern Economics |date=1992 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=9780415061643 |editor-last=Fry |editor-first=Michael |ol=1546417M}}</ref> It was immediately preceded and influenced by [[Anne Robert Jacques Turgot]]'s drafts of ''[[Reflections on the Formation and Distribution of Wealth]]'' (1766). Smith acknowledged indebtedness and possibly was the original English translator.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Harcourt |first=Bernard E. |author-link=Bernard Harcourt |title=The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order |date=2011 |isbn=9780674057265 |page=260, notes 11–14 |ol=24438583M}}</ref>


Beccaria, a jurist, criminologist, philosopher, and politician and one of the great Enlightenment writers, became famous for his masterpiece ''Dei delitti e delle pene'' (Of Crimes and Punishments, 1764). His treatise, translated into 22 languages,<ref name="history-world.org">{{cite web |url=http://history-world.org/enlightenment_throughout_europe.htm |title=The Enlightenment throughout Europe |publisher=History-world.org |access-date=25 March 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130123082708/http://history-world.org/enlightenment_throughout_europe.htm |archive-date=23 January 2013 |url-status=usurped}}</ref> condemned torture and the death penalty and was a founding work in the field of [[penology]] and the [[classical school (criminology)|classical school of criminology]] by promoting [[criminal justice]]. [[Francesco Mario Pagano]] wrote important studies such as ''Saggi politici'' (Political Essays, 1783); and ''Considerazioni sul processo criminale'' (Considerations on the Criminal Trial, 1787), which established him as an international authority on criminal law.<ref>Roland Sarti, ''Italy: A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present,'' Infobase Publishing, 2009, p. 457</ref>
Beccaria, a jurist, criminologist, philosopher, and politician and one of the great Enlightenment writers, became famous for his masterpiece ''Dei delitti e delle pene'' (Of Crimes and Punishments, 1764). His treatise, translated into 22 languages,<ref name="history-world.org">{{cite web |title=The Enlightenment throughout Europe |url=http://history-world.org/enlightenment_throughout_europe.htm |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130123082708/http://history-world.org/enlightenment_throughout_europe.htm |archive-date=23 January 2013 |access-date=25 March 2013 |publisher=History-world.org}}</ref> condemned torture and the death penalty and was a founding work in the field of [[penology]] and the [[classical school (criminology)|classical school of criminology]] by promoting [[criminal justice]]. [[Francesco Mario Pagano]] wrote studies such as ''Saggi politici'' (Political Essays, 1783); and ''Considerazioni sul processo criminale'' (Considerations on the Criminal Trial, 1787), which established him as an international authority on criminal law.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Roland |last=Sarti |title=Italy: A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present |publisher=Infobase |date=2009 |page=457}}</ref>


===Politics===
===Politics===
The Enlightenment has long been seen as the foundation of modern Western political and intellectual culture.<ref>Daniel Brewer, ''The Enlightenment Past: reconstructing eighteenth-century French thought'' (2008), p. 1</ref> The Enlightenment brought [[political modernization]] to the West, in terms of introducing democratic values and institutions and the creation of modern, liberal democracies. This thesis has been widely accepted by scholars and has been reinforced by the large-scale studies by [[Robert Darnton]], [[Roy Porter]], and, most recently, by Jonathan Israel.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=De Dijn |first1=Annelien |author-link=Annelien de Dijn |year=2012 |title=The Politics of Enlightenment: From Peter Gay to Jonathan Israel |journal=Historical Journal |volume=55 |issue=3 |pages=785–805 |doi=10.1017/s0018246x12000301 |s2cid=145439970}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=von Guttner |first=Darius |title=The French Revolution |url=https://www.academia.edu/9869783 |year=2015 |publisher=Nelson Cengage |pages=34–35}}{{Dead link|date=January 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> Enlightenment thought was deeply influential in the political realm. European rulers such as [[Catherine the Great|Catherine II of Russia]], [[Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor|Joseph II of Austria]], and [[Frederick the Great|Frederick II of Prussia]] tried to apply Enlightenment thought on religious and political tolerance, which became known as [[enlightened absolutism]].<ref name="Black" /> Many of the major political and intellectual figures behind the [[American Revolution]] associated themselves closely with the Enlightenment: [[Benjamin Franklin]] visited Europe repeatedly and contributed actively to the scientific and political debates there and brought the newest ideas back to Philadelphia; [[Thomas Jefferson]] closely followed European ideas and later incorporated some of the ideals of the Enlightenment into the [[United States Declaration of Independence|Declaration of Independence]]; and Madison incorporated these ideals into the U.S. Constitution during its framing in 1787.<ref>Robert A. Ferguson, ''The American Enlightenment, 1750–1820'' (1994).</ref>
The Enlightenment has long been seen as the foundation of modern Western political and intellectual culture.<ref>{{cite book |last=Brewer |first=Daniel |title=The Enlightenment Past: Reconstructing 18th-Century French Thought |date=2008 |page=1}}</ref> The Enlightenment brought [[political modernization]] to the West, in terms of introducing democratic values and institutions and the creation of modern, liberal democracies. This thesis has been widely accepted by scholars and has been reinforced by the large-scale studies by [[Robert Darnton]], [[Roy Porter]], and, most recently, by Jonathan Israel.<ref>{{cite journal |last=De Dijn |first=Annelien |author-link=Annelien de Dijn |date=2012 |title=The Politics of Enlightenment: From Peter Gay to Jonathan Israel |journal=Historical Journal |volume=55 |issue=3 |pages=785–805 |doi=10.1017/s0018246x12000301 |s2cid=145439970}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=von Guttner |first=Darius |url=https://www.academia.edu/9869783 |title=The French Revolution |publisher=Nelson Cengage |date=2015 |pages=34–35 |access-date=30 October 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230403233248/https://www.academia.edu/9869783 |archive-date=3 April 2023 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Enlightenment thought was deeply influential in the political realm. European rulers such as [[Catherine the Great|Catherine II of Russia]], [[Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor|Joseph II of Austria]], and [[Frederick the Great|Frederick II of Prussia]] tried to apply Enlightenment thought on religious and political tolerance, which became known as [[enlightened absolutism]].<ref name="Black"/> Many of the major political and intellectual figures behind the [[American Revolution]] associated themselves closely with the Enlightenment: [[Benjamin Franklin]] visited Europe repeatedly and contributed actively to the scientific and political debates there and brought the newest ideas back to Philadelphia; [[Thomas Jefferson]] closely followed European ideas and later incorporated some of the ideals of the Enlightenment into the [[United States Declaration of Independence|Declaration of Independence]]; and Madison incorporated these ideals into the U.S. Constitution during its framing in 1787.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Robert A. |last=Ferguson |title=The American Enlightenment, 1750–1820 |date=1994}}</ref>


====Theories of government====
====Theories of government====
[[File:John_Locke.jpg|thumb|upright=.8|Philosopher [[John Locke]] argued that the authority of government stems from a [[social contract]] based on [[Natural rights and legal rights|natural rights]]. According to Locke, the authority of government [[limited government|was limited]] and required the [[consent of the governed]].]]
[[File:John_Locke.jpg|thumb|upright=.8|Philosopher [[John Locke]] argued that the authority of government stems from a [[social contract]] based on [[Natural rights and legal rights|natural rights]]. According to Locke, the authority of government [[limited government|was limited]] and required the [[consent of the governed]].]]
Locke, one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/influence.html |title=John Locke > The Influence of John Locke's Works (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) |publisher=Plato.stanford.edu |access-date=14 January 2014}}</ref> based his governance philosophy in [[social contract]] theory, a subject that permeated Enlightenment political thought. English philosopher [[Thomas Hobbes]] ushered in this new debate with his work ''[[Leviathan (Hobbes book)|Leviathan]]'' in 1651. Hobbes also developed some of the fundamentals of European liberal thought: the right of the individual, the natural equality of all men, the artificial character of the political order (which led to the later distinction between [[civil society]] and the state), the view that all legitimate political power must be "[[Representative democracy|representative]]" and based on the consent of the people, and a liberal interpretation of law which leaves people free to do whatever the law does not explicitly forbid.<ref>Pierre Manent, ''An Intellectual History of Liberalism'' (1994) pp. 20–38</ref>
Locke, one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers,<ref>{{cite web |title=John Locke > The Influence of John Locke's Works (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/influence.html |access-date=14 January 2014 |publisher=Plato.stanford.edu}}</ref> based his governance philosophy on [[social contract]] theory, a subject that permeated Enlightenment political thought. English philosopher [[Thomas Hobbes]] ushered in this new debate with his work ''[[Leviathan (Hobbes book)|Leviathan]]'' in 1651. Hobbes also developed some of the fundamentals of European liberal thought: the right of the individual, the natural equality of all men, the artificial character of the political order (which led to the later distinction between [[civil society]] and the state), the view that all legitimate political power must be "[[Representative democracy|representative]]" and based on the consent of the people, and a liberal interpretation of law which leaves people free to do whatever the law does not explicitly forbid.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Pierre |last=Manent |title=An Intellectual History of Liberalism |date=1994 |pages=20–38}}</ref>


Both Locke and Rousseau developed social contract theories in ''[[Two Treatises of Government]]'' and ''[[Discourse on Inequality]],'' respectively. While quite different works, Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau agreed that a social contract, in which the government's authority lies in the [[consent of the governed]],<ref>Lessnoff, Michael H. ''Social Contract Theory.'' New York: NYU, 1990. Print.{{page needed|date=February 2020}}</ref> is necessary for man to live in civil society. Locke defines the [[state of nature]] as a condition in which humans are rational and follow natural law, in which all men are born equal and with the [[right to life]], liberty, and property. However, when one citizen breaks the law of nature both the transgressor and the victim enter into a state of war, from which it is virtually impossible to break free. Therefore, Locke said that individuals enter into civil society to protect their natural rights via an "unbiased judge" or common authority, such as courts. In contrast, Rousseau's conception relies on the supposition that "civil man" is corrupted, while "natural man" has no want he cannot fulfill himself. Natural man is only taken out of the state of nature when the inequality associated with [[private property]] is established.<ref>Discourse on the Origin of Inequality</ref> Rousseau said that people join into civil society via the social contract to achieve unity while preserving individual freedom. This is embodied in the sovereignty of the [[general will]], the moral and collective legislative body constituted by citizens.{{citation needed|date=April 2024}}
Both Locke and Rousseau developed social contract theories in ''[[Two Treatises of Government]]'' and ''[[Discourse on Inequality]],'' respectively. While quite different works, Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau agreed that a social contract, in which the government's authority lies in the [[consent of the governed]],<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lessnoff |first=Michael H. |title=Social Contract Theory |location=New York |publisher=New York University |date=1990}}{{page needed|date=February 2020}}</ref> is necessary for man to live in civil society. Locke defines the [[state of nature]] as a condition in which humans are rational and follow natural law, in which all men are born equal and with the [[right to life]], liberty, and property. However, when one citizen breaks the law of nature both the transgressor and the victim enter into a state of war, from which it is virtually impossible to break free. Therefore, Locke said that individuals enter into civil society to protect their natural rights via an "unbiased judge" or common authority, such as courts. In contrast, Rousseau's conception relies on the supposition that "civil man" is corrupted, while "natural man" has no want he cannot fulfill himself. Natural man is only taken out of the state of nature when the inequality associated with [[private property]] is established.<ref>{{Cite book |title=[[Discourse on Inequality |Discours sur l'origine et les fondements de l'inégalité parmi les hommes]] |trans-title=Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men |lang=fr |date=1754 |orig-date=1755 |publisher=Marc-Michel Rey |author-link=Jean-Jacques Rousseau |first=Jean-Jacques |last=Rousseau}}</ref> Rousseau said that people join into civil society via the social contract to achieve unity while preserving individual freedom. This is embodied in the sovereignty of the [[general will]], the moral and collective legislative body constituted by citizens.{{citation needed|date=April 2024}}


Locke is known for his statement that individuals have a right to "Life, Liberty, and Property," and his belief that the natural right to property is derived from labor. Tutored by Locke, [[Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury]], wrote in 1706: "There is a mighty Light which spreads its self over the world especially in those two free Nations of England and Holland; on whom the Affairs of Europe now turn."<ref>{{cite book |first=B. |last=Rand |title=The Life, Unpublished Letters and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury |year=1900 |page=353}} Quoted in: {{block indent|em=3|{{cite book |first=Roy |last=Porter |title=Enlightenment, Britain and the Creation of the Modern World |publisher=Allen Lane, The Penguin Press |year=2000 |page=3}} }}</ref> Locke's theory of natural rights has influenced many political documents, including the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the French National Constituent Assembly's [[Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen]].
Locke is known for his statement that individuals have a right to "Life, Liberty, and Property," and his belief that the natural right to property is derived from labor. Tutored by Locke, [[Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury]], wrote in 1706: "There is a mighty Light which spreads its self over the world especially in those two free Nations of England and Holland; on whom the Affairs of Europe now turn."<ref>{{cite book |editor-last=Rand |editor-first=Benjamin |author-link=Benjamin Rand |title=The Life, Unpublished Letters, and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury |date=1900 |location=London |publisher=Swan, Sonnenschein & Co. |page=[https://archive.org/details/thelifeunpublish00shafuoft/page/352 353]}} Quoted in {{Harvnb|Porter|2000|p=3}}.</ref> Locke's theory of natural rights has influenced many political documents, including the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the French National Constituent Assembly's [[Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen]].


Some ''philosophes'' argued that the establishment of a contractual basis of rights would lead to the [[market mechanism]] and [[capitalism]], the scientific method, religious [[toleration|tolerance]], and the organization of states into self-governing republics through democratic means. In this view, the tendency of the ''philosophes<!-- "philosophes" is correct -->'' in particular to apply [[rationality]] to every problem is considered the essential change.<ref>Lorraine Y. Landry, ''Marx and the postmodernism debates: an agenda for critical theory'' (2000) p. 7</ref>
Some ''philosophes'' argued that the establishment of a contractual basis of rights would lead to the [[market mechanism]] and [[capitalism]], the scientific method, religious [[toleration|tolerance]], and the organization of states into self-governing republics through democratic means. In this view, the tendency of the ''philosophes<!-- "philosophes" is correct -->'' in particular to apply [[rationality]] to every problem is considered the essential change.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Lorraine Y. |last=Landry |title=Marx and the postmodernism debates: an agenda for critical theory |date=2000 |page=7}}</ref>


Although much of Enlightenment political thought was dominated by social contract theorists, Hume and Ferguson criticized this camp. Hume's essay ''Of the Original Contract'' argues that governments derived from consent are rarely seen and civil government is grounded in a ruler's habitual authority and force. It is precisely because of the ruler's authority over-and-against the subject that the subject tacitly consents, and Hume says that the subjects would "never imagine that their consent made him sovereign," rather the authority did so.<ref>''Of the Original Contract''</ref> Similarly, Ferguson did not believe citizens built the state, rather polities grew out of social development. In his 1767 ''[[An Essay on the History of Civil Society]],'' Ferguson uses the four stages of progress, a theory that was popular in Scotland at the time, to explain how humans advance from a [[Hunter-gatherer|hunting and gathering]] society to a commercial and civil society without agreeing to a social contract.
Although much of Enlightenment political thought was dominated by social contract theorists, Hume and Ferguson criticized this camp. Hume's essay ''Of the Original Contract'' argues that governments derived from consent are rarely seen and civil government is grounded in a ruler's habitual authority and force. It is precisely because of the ruler's authority over-and-against the subject that the subject tacitly consents, and Hume says that the subjects would "never imagine that their consent made him sovereign," rather the authority did so.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Hume |first=David |author-link=David Hume |date=1742 |title= Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, Part II, Essay XII, Of The Original Contract}}</ref> Similarly, Ferguson did not believe citizens built the state, rather polities grew out of social development. In his 1767 ''[[An Essay on the History of Civil Society]],'' Ferguson uses the four stages of progress, a theory that was popular in Scotland at the time, to explain how humans advance from a [[Hunter-gatherer|hunting and gathering]] society to a commercial and civil society without agreeing to a social contract.


Both Rousseau's and Locke's social contract theories rest on the presupposition of [[Natural rights and legal rights|natural rights]], which are not a result of law or custom but are things that all men have in pre-political societies and are therefore universal and inalienable. The most famous natural right formulation comes from Locke's ''Second Treatise,'' when he introduces the state of nature. For Locke, the law of nature is grounded on mutual security or the idea that one cannot infringe on another's natural rights, as every man is equal and has the same inalienable rights. These natural rights include perfect equality and freedom, as well as the right to preserve life and property.
Both Rousseau's and Locke's social contract theories rest on the presupposition of [[Natural rights and legal rights|natural rights]], which are not a result of law or custom but are things that all men have in pre-political societies and are therefore universal and inalienable. The most famous natural right formulation comes from Locke's ''Second Treatise,'' when he introduces the state of nature. For Locke, the law of nature is grounded on mutual security or the idea that one cannot infringe on another's natural rights, as every man is equal and has the same inalienable rights. These natural rights include perfect equality and freedom, as well as the right to preserve life and property.
Line 86: Line 120:
[[File:SebastiãoJoseph.png|thumb|left|upright=.8|The [[Sebastião José de Carvalho e Melo, 1st Marquis of Pombal|Marquis of Pombal]], as the head of the government of Portugal, implemented sweeping socio-economic reforms.]]
[[File:SebastiãoJoseph.png|thumb|left|upright=.8|The [[Sebastião José de Carvalho e Melo, 1st Marquis of Pombal|Marquis of Pombal]], as the head of the government of Portugal, implemented sweeping socio-economic reforms.]]


The leaders of the Enlightenment were not especially democratic, as they more often look to absolute monarchs as the key to imposing reforms designed by the intellectuals. Voltaire despised democracy and said the absolute monarch must be enlightened and must act as dictated by reason and justice—in other words, be a "[[Philosopher king|philosopher-king]]."<ref>{{cite book |editor=David Williams |title=Voltaire: Political Writings |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LV7GZhQEULEC&pg=PR14 |year=1994 |pages=xiv–xv |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-43727-1}}</ref>
The leaders of the Enlightenment were not especially democratic, as they more often look to absolute monarchs as the key to imposing reforms designed by the intellectuals. Voltaire despised democracy and said the absolute monarch must be enlightened and must act as dictated by reason and justice—in other words, be a "[[Philosopher king|philosopher-king]]."<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LV7GZhQEULEC&pg=PR14 |title=Voltaire: Political Writings |date=1994 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-43727-1 |editor-last=Williams |editor-first=David |pages=xiv–xv}}</ref>


In several nations, rulers welcomed leaders of the Enlightenment at court and asked them to help design laws and programs to reform the system, typically to build stronger states. These rulers are called "enlightened despots" by historians.<ref>Stephen J. Lee, ''Aspects of European history, 1494–1789'' (1990) pp.&nbsp;258–266</ref> They included Frederick the Great of Prussia, Catherine the Great of Russia, [[Leopold II, Holy Roman Emperor|Leopold II]] of [[Grand Duchy of Tuscany|Tuscany]] and Joseph II of Austria. Joseph was over-enthusiastic, announcing many reforms that had little support so that revolts broke out and his regime became a comedy of errors, and nearly all his programs were reversed.<ref>Nicholas Henderson, "Joseph II," ''History Today'' (March 1991) 41:21–27</ref> Senior ministers [[Sebastião José de Carvalho e Melo, 1st Marquis of Pombal|Pombal in Portugal]] and [[Johann Friedrich Struensee]] in Denmark also governed according to Enlightenment ideals. In Poland, the model [[Constitution of 3 May 1791|constitution of 1791]] expressed Enlightenment ideals, but was in effect for only one year before [[Second Partition of Poland|the nation was partitioned]] among its neighbors. More enduring were the cultural achievements, which created a nationalist spirit in Poland.<ref>John Stanley, "Towards A New Nation: The Enlightenment and National Revival in Poland," ''Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism,'' 1983, Vol. 10 Issue 2, pp.&nbsp;83–110</ref>
In several nations, rulers welcomed leaders of the Enlightenment at court and asked them to help design laws and programs to reform the system, typically to build stronger states. These rulers are called "enlightened despots" by historians.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lee |first=Stephen J. |title=Aspects of European history, 1494–1789 |date=1990 |pages=258–266}}</ref> They included Frederick the Great of Prussia, Catherine the Great of Russia, [[Leopold II, Holy Roman Emperor|Leopold II]] of [[Grand Duchy of Tuscany|Tuscany]] and Joseph II of Austria. Joseph was over-enthusiastic, announcing many reforms that had little support so that revolts broke out and his regime became a comedy of errors, and nearly all his programs were reversed.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Henderson |first=Nicholas |date=March 1991 |title=Joseph II |journal=History Today |volume=41 |pages=21–27}}</ref> Senior ministers [[Sebastião José de Carvalho e Melo, 1st Marquis of Pombal|Pombal in Portugal]] and [[Johann Friedrich Struensee]] in Denmark also governed according to Enlightenment ideals. In Poland, the model [[Constitution of 3 May 1791|constitution of 1791]] expressed Enlightenment ideals, but was in effect for only one year before [[Second Partition of Poland|the nation was partitioned]] among its neighbors. More enduring were the cultural achievements, which created a nationalist spirit in Poland.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Stanley |first=John |date=1983 |title=Towards A New Nation: The Enlightenment and National Revival in Poland |journal=Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=83–110}}</ref>
[[File:Struensee - miniature portrait.jpg|thumb|upright=.8|Denmark's minister [[Johann Friedrich Struensee|Johann Struensee]], a social reformer, was publicly executed in 1772 for usurping royal authority.]]
[[File:Struensee - miniature portrait.jpg|thumb|upright=.8|Denmark's minister [[Johann Friedrich Struensee|Johann Struensee]], a social reformer, was publicly executed in 1772 for usurping royal authority.]]


Frederick the Great, the king of Prussia from 1740 to 1786, saw himself as a leader of the Enlightenment and patronized philosophers and scientists at his court in Berlin. Voltaire, who had been imprisoned and maltreated by the French government, was eager to accept Frederick's invitation to live at his palace. Frederick explained: "My principal occupation is to combat ignorance and prejudice... to enlighten minds, cultivate morality, and to make people as happy as it suits human nature, and as the means at my disposal permit."<ref>Giles MacDonogh, ''Frederick the Great: A Life in Deed and Letters'' (2001) p. 341</ref>
Frederick the Great, the king of Prussia from 1740 to 1786, saw himself as a leader of the Enlightenment and patronized philosophers and scientists at his court in Berlin. Voltaire, who had been imprisoned and maltreated by the French government, was eager to accept Frederick's invitation to live at his palace. Frederick explained: "My principal occupation is to combat ignorance and prejudice... to enlighten minds, cultivate morality, and to make people as happy as it suits human nature, and as the means at my disposal permit."<ref>{{Cite book |last=MacDonogh |first=Giles |title=Frederick the Great: A Life in Deed and Letters |date=2001 |page=341}}</ref>


====American Revolution and French Revolution====
====American Revolution and French Revolution====
The Enlightenment has been frequently linked to the [[American Revolution]] of 1776<ref>"Enlightenment ideals of rationalism and intellectual and religious freedom pervaded the American colonial religious landscape, and these values were instrumental in the American Revolution and the creation of a nation without an established religion." [https://pluralism.org/enlightenment-and-revolution Enlightenment and Revolution], Pluralism Project, [[Harvard University]].</ref> and the [[French Revolution]] of 1789—both had some intellectual influence from Thomas Jefferson.<ref>{{cite book |first=Gregory |last=Fremont-Barnes |title=Encyclopedia of the Age of Political Revolutions and New Ideologies, 1760–1815 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6_2wkP4j-EsC&pg=PA190 |year=2007 |publisher=Greenwood |page=190 |isbn=978-0-313-04951-4}}</ref><ref>"Recognized in Europe as the author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson quickly became a focal point or lightning rod for revolutionaries in Europe and the Americas. As United States minister to France when revolutionary fervor was rising toward the storming of the Bastille in 1789, Jefferson became an ardent supporter of the French Revolution, even allowing his residence to be used as a meeting place for the rebels led by Lafayette." [https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/jefferson/jeffworld.html Thomas Jefferson. A Revolutionary World.] [[Library of Congress]].</ref> One view of the political changes that occurred during the Enlightenment is that the "[[consent of the governed]]" philosophy as delineated by Locke in ''Two Treatises of Government'' (1689) represented a paradigm shift from the old governance paradigm under [[feudalism]] known as the "[[divine right of kings]]." In this view, the revolutions were caused by the fact that this governance paradigm shift often could not be resolved peacefully and therefore violent revolution was the result. A governance philosophy where the king was never wrong would be in direct conflict with one whereby citizens by natural law had to consent to the acts and rulings of their government.
The Enlightenment has been frequently linked to the [[American Revolution]] of 1776<ref>{{Cite web |quote=Enlightenment ideals of rationalism and intellectual and religious freedom pervaded the American colonial religious landscape, and these values were instrumental in the American Revolution and the creation of a nation without an established religion. |url=https://pluralism.org/enlightenment-and-revolution |title=Enlightenment and Revolution], Pluralism Project | website =Harvard University}}</ref> and the [[French Revolution]] of 1789—both had some intellectual influence from Thomas Jefferson.<ref>{{cite book |last=Fremont-Barnes |first=Gregory |title=Encyclopedia of the Age of Political Revolutions and New Ideologies, 1760–1815 |publisher=Greenwood |date=2007 |isbn=978-0-313-04951-4 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=6_2wkP4j-EsC&pg=PA190 190]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |quote=Recognized in Europe as the author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson quickly became a focal point or lightning rod for revolutionaries in Europe and the Americas. As United States minister to France when revolutionary fervor was rising toward the storming of the Bastille in 1789, Jefferson became an ardent supporter of the French Revolution, even allowing his residence to be used as a meeting place for the rebels led by Lafayette. |url=https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/jefferson/jeffworld.html |first=Thomas |last=Jefferson |author-link=Thomas Jefferson |title=A Revolutionary World |website=Library of Congress}}</ref> A key aspect of this era was a profound shift from the [[Absolute monarchy|absolute monarchies]] of Europe, which asserted the "[[Divine right of kings|divine right]]" to rule. John Locke rejected this view in his writings on the [[Two Treatises of Government]] (1689). He asserted that citizens were seen to possess natural rights, including life, liberty, and property. Therefore governments exist to protect these rights through the "[[consent of the governed]]." The clash between these competing ethos often resulted in violent upheaval in differing ways. In France, [[Ancien régime]], with its rigid social hierarchy and absolute monarchical power, was systematically dismantled during the French Revolution. While the American Revolution focused more on breaking free from a government - represented by [[George III|King George III]] and Parliament - that colonists felt did not adequately represent their interests.


[[Alexis de Tocqueville]] proposed the French Revolution as the inevitable result of the radical opposition created in the 18th century between the monarchy and the men of letters of the Enlightenment. These men of letters constituted a sort of "substitute aristocracy that was both all-powerful and without real power." This illusory power came from the rise of "public opinion," born when absolutist centralization removed the nobility and the [[bourgeoisie]] from the political sphere. The "literary politics" that resulted promoted a discourse of equality and was hence in fundamental opposition to the monarchical regime.<ref>Chartier, 8. See also Alexis de Tocqueville, ''L'Ancien Régime et la Révolution,'' 1850, Book Three, Chapter One.</ref> De Tocqueville "clearly designates... the cultural effects of transformation in the forms of the exercise of power."<ref>Chartier, 13.</ref>
[[Alexis de Tocqueville]] proposed the French Revolution as the inevitable result of the radical opposition created in the 18th century between the monarchy and the men of letters of the Enlightenment. These men of letters constituted a sort of "substitute aristocracy that was both all-powerful and without real power." This illusory power came from the rise of "public opinion," born when absolutist centralization removed the nobility and the [[bourgeoisie]] from the political sphere. The "literary politics" that resulted promoted a discourse of equality and was hence in fundamental opposition to the monarchical regime.{{Sfn |Chartier |1991 |p=8}}<ref>See also {{Cite book |first= Alexis |last=de Tocqueville |author-link=Alexis de Tocqueville |title=[[L'Ancien Régime et la Révolution]] |date=1850 |trans-title=The Old Regime and the Revolution |lang=fr |at=Book Three, Chapter One}}</ref> De Tocqueville "clearly designates... the cultural effects of transformation in the forms of the exercise of power."{{Sfn |Chartier |1991 |p=13}}


===Religion===
===Religion===
Line 103: Line 137:
|width=75%
|width=75%
|quote=It does not require great art or magnificently trained eloquence, to prove that Christians should tolerate each other. I, however, am going further: I say that we should regard all men as our brothers. What? The Turk my brother? The Chinaman my brother? The Jew? The Siam? Yes, without doubt; are we not all children of the same father and creatures of the same God?
|quote=It does not require great art or magnificently trained eloquence, to prove that Christians should tolerate each other. I, however, am going further: I say that we should regard all men as our brothers. What? The Turk my brother? The Chinaman my brother? The Jew? The Siam? Yes, without doubt; are we not all children of the same father and creatures of the same God?
|source=Voltaire (1763)<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20060107013835/http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~wldciv/world_civ_reader/world_civ_reader_2/voltaire.html ''A Treatise on Toleration'']</ref>
|source=Voltaire (1763)<ref>{{Cite web |title=Voltaire: A Treatise on Toleration |url=http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~wldciv/world_civ_reader/world_civ_reader_2/voltaire.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060107013835/http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~wldciv/world_civ_reader/world_civ_reader_2/voltaire.html |archive-date=7 January 2006 |access-date=31 March 2020 |website=www.wsu.edu}}</ref>
|}}
|}}
[[File:Voltaire-lisant.jpg|thumb|left|French philosopher [[Voltaire]] argued for [[religious tolerance]].]]
[[File:Voltaire-lisant.jpg|thumb|French philosopher [[Voltaire]] argued for [[religious tolerance]].]]


Enlightenment era religious commentary was a response to the preceding century of religious conflict in Europe, especially the [[Thirty Years' War]].<ref>Margaret C. Jacob, ed. ''The Enlightenment: Brief History with Documents,'' Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2001, Introduction, pp.&nbsp;1–72.</ref> Theologians of the Enlightenment wanted to reform their faith to its generally non-confrontational roots and to limit the capacity for religious controversy to spill over into politics and warfare while still maintaining a true faith in God. For moderate Christians, this meant a return to simple Scripture. Locke abandoned the corpus of theological commentary in favor of an "unprejudiced examination" of the [[Sola scriptura|Word of God alone]]. He determined the essence of Christianity to be a belief in Christ the redeemer and recommended avoiding more detailed debate.<ref>{{cite book |first=John |last=Locke |title=Reasonableness of Christianity |volume="Preface" The Reasonableness of Christianity, as delivered in the Scriptures |year=1695}}</ref> [[Anthony Collins (philosopher)|Anthony Collins]], one of the English [[Freethought|freethinkers]], published his "Essay concerning the Use of Reason in Propositions the Evidence whereof depends on Human Testimony" (1707), in which he rejects the distinction between "above reason" and "contrary to reason," and demands that revelation should conform to man's natural ideas of God. In the ''[[Jefferson Bible]],'' Thomas Jefferson went further and dropped any passages dealing with miracles, visitations of angels, and the [[resurrection of Jesus]] after [[Crucifixion of Jesus|his death]], as he tried to extract the practical Christian moral code of the [[New Testament]].<ref>{{cite book |first={{nowrap|R. B.}} |last=Bernstein |title=Thomas Jefferson |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4vrD1WKLicwC&pg=PA179 |year=2003 |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=179 |isbn=978-0-19-975844-9}}</ref>
Enlightenment era religious commentary was a response to the preceding century of religious conflict in Europe, especially the [[Thirty Years' War]].<ref>{{Cite book |editor-first=Margaret C. |editor-last=Jacob |title=Enlightenment: Brief History with Documents |location=Boston |publisher=Bedford/St. Martin's |date=2001 |chapter=Introduction |pages=1–72}}</ref> Theologians of the Enlightenment wanted to reform their faith to its generally non-confrontational roots and to limit the capacity for religious controversy to spill over into politics and warfare while still maintaining a true faith in God. For moderate Christians, this meant a return to simple Scripture. Locke abandoned the corpus of theological commentary in favor of an "unprejudiced examination" of the [[Sola scriptura|Word of God alone]]. He determined the essence of Christianity to be a belief in Christ the redeemer and recommended avoiding more detailed debate.<ref>{{cite book |last=Locke |first=John |author-link=John Locke |title=Reasonableness of Christianity |date=1695 |volume="Preface" The Reasonableness of Christianity, as delivered in the Scriptures}}</ref> [[Anthony Collins (philosopher)|Anthony Collins]], one of the English [[Freethought|freethinkers]], published his "Essay concerning the Use of Reason in Propositions the Evidence whereof depends on Human Testimony" (1707), in which he rejects the distinction between "above reason" and "contrary to reason," and demands that revelation should conform to man's natural ideas of God. In the ''[[Jefferson Bible]],'' Thomas Jefferson went further and dropped any passages dealing with miracles, visitations of angels, and the [[resurrection of Jesus]] after [[Crucifixion of Jesus|his death]], as he tried to extract the practical Christian moral code of the [[New Testament]].<ref>{{cite book |last=Bernstein |first=R. B. |title=Thomas Jefferson |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2003 |isbn=978-0-19-975844-9 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=4vrD1WKLicwC&pg=PA179 179]}}</ref>


Enlightenment scholars sought to curtail the political power of [[organized religion]] and thereby prevent another age of intolerant religious war.<ref>{{cite book |first1=Ole Peter |last1=Grell |last2=Porter |first2=Roy |title=Toleration in Enlightenment Europe |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JPTdIQBIvS0C |year=2000 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |pages=1–68 |isbn=978-0-521-65196-7}}</ref> Spinoza determined to remove politics from contemporary and historical theology (e.g., disregarding [[Halakha|Judaic law]]).<ref>[[Baruch Spinoza]], ''Theologico-Political Treatise,'' "Preface," 1677, [http://www.gutenburg.com gutenberg.com]</ref> [[Moses Mendelssohn]] advised affording no political weight to any organized religion but instead recommended that each person follow what they found most convincing.<ref>{{cite web |first=Moses |last=Mendelssohn |title=Jerusalem: Or on Religious Power and Judaism |year=1783 |url=http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/mendelssohn1782.pdf}}</ref> They believed a good religion based in instinctive [[morality|morals]] and a belief in God should not theoretically need force to maintain order in its believers, and both Mendelssohn and Spinoza judged religion on its moral fruits, not the logic of its theology.<ref>{{cite book |last=Goetschel |first=Willi |title=Spinoza's Modernity: Mendelssohn, Lessing, and Heine |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CYcOfkrduWYC&pg=PA126 |year=2004 |publisher=Univ of Wisconsin Press |page=126 |isbn=978-0-299-19083-5}}</ref>
Enlightenment scholars sought to curtail the political power of [[organized religion]] and thereby prevent another age of intolerant religious war.<ref>{{cite book |editor-last=Grell |editor-first=Ole Peter |title=Toleration in Enlightenment Europe |editor-last2=Porter |editor-first2=Roy |editor-link2=Roy Porter |publisher=Cambridge University Press |date=2000 |isbn=978-0-521-65196-7 |pages=1–68}}</ref> Spinoza determined to remove politics from contemporary and historical theology (e.g., disregarding [[Halakha|Judaic law]]).<ref>{{Cite book |first=Baruch |last=Spinoza |author-link=Baruch Spinoza |title=Tractatus Theologico-Politicus |chapter=Preface |date=1677 |url=https://archive.org/details/bim_eighteenth-century_a-treatise-partly-theolo_spinoza-benedictus-de_1737 |pages=7–24}}</ref> [[Moses Mendelssohn]] advised affording no political weight to any organized religion but instead recommended that each person follow what they found most convincing.<ref>{{cite web |last=Mendelssohn |first=Moses |author-link=Moses Mendelssohn |date=1783 |title=Jerusalem: Or on Religious Power and Judaism |url=http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/mendelssohn1782.pdf}}</ref> They believed a good religion based in instinctive [[morality|morals]] and a belief in God should not theoretically need force to maintain order in its believers, and both Mendelssohn and Spinoza judged religion on its moral fruits, not the logic of its theology.<ref>{{cite book |last=Goetschel |first=Willi |title=Spinoza's Modernity: Mendelssohn, Lessing, and Heine |publisher=Univ of Wisconsin Press |date=2004 |isbn=978-0-299-19083-5 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=CYcOfkrduWYC&pg=PA126 126]}}</ref>


Several novel ideas about religion developed with the Enlightenment, including [[deism]] and talk of [[atheism]]. According to [[Thomas Paine]], deism is the simple belief in [[Creator deity|God the Creator]] with no reference to the Bible or any other miraculous source. Instead, the deist relies solely on personal reason to guide his [[creed]],<ref>Thomas Paine, ''Of the Religion of Deism Compared with the Christian Religion,'' 1804, Internet History Sourcebook</ref> which was eminently agreeable to many thinkers of the time.<ref>{{cite book |first1=Ellen Judy |last1=Wilson |first2=Peter Hanns |last2=Reill |title=Encyclopedia Of The Enlightenment |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t1pQ4YG-TDIC&pg=PA148 |year=2004 |publisher=Infobase Publishing |page=148 |isbn=978-1-4381-1021-9}}</ref> Atheism was much discussed, but there were few proponents. Wilson and Reill note: "In fact, very few enlightened intellectuals, even when they were vocal critics of Christianity, were true atheists. Rather, they were critics of [[Orthodoxy|orthodox]] belief, wedded rather to skepticism, deism, vitalism, or perhaps pantheism."{{sfn|Wilson|Reill|2004|p=26}} Some followed [[Pierre Bayle]] and argued that atheists could indeed be moral men.<ref>{{cite book |last=Pagden |first=Anthony |title=The Enlightenment: And Why it Still Matters |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GnURng7tsWIC&pg=PA100 |year=2013 |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=100 |isbn=978-0-19-966093-3}}</ref> Many others like Voltaire held that without belief in a God who punishes evil, the moral order of society was undermined; that is, since atheists gave themselves to no supreme authority and no law and had no fear of eternal consequences, they were far more likely to disrupt society.<ref>{{cite book |last=Brown |first=Stuart |title=British Philosophy and the Age of Enlightenment: Routledge History of Philosophy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EoIafbj8pFgC&pg=PA256 |year=2003 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |page=256 |isbn=978-0-415-30877-9}}</ref> Bayle observed that, in his day, "prudent persons will always maintain an appearance of [religion]," and he believed that even atheists could hold concepts of honor and go beyond their own self-interest to create and interact in society.<ref>{{cite book |last=Bayle |first=Pierre |title=A general dictionary: historical and critical: in which a new and accurate translation of that of the celebrated Mr. Bayle, with the corrections and observations printed in the late edition at Paris, is included; and interspersed with several thousand lives never before published. The whole containing the history of the most illustrious persons of all ages and nations particularly those of Great Britain and Ireland, distinguished by their rank, actions, learning and other accomplishments. With reflections on such passages of Bayle, as seem to favor scepticism and the Manichee system |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qmNZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA778 |year=1741 |page=778}}</ref> Locke said that if there were no God and no divine law, the result would be moral anarchy: every individual "could have no law but his own will, no end but himself. He would be a god to himself, and the satisfaction of his own will the sole measure and end of all his actions."<ref name="Nuovo 2003">{{cite web |last1=Nuovo |first1=Victor |title=God, Locke and Equality: Christian Foundations of Locke's Political Thought |url=https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/god-locke-and-equality-christian-foundations-of-locke-s-political-thought/ |website=Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews |publisher=University of Notre Dame |access-date=15 April 2025 |date=4 May 2003 |type=book review}}</ref>
Several novel ideas about religion developed with the Enlightenment, including [[deism]] and talk of [[atheism]]. According to [[Thomas Paine]], deism is the simple belief in [[Creator deity|God the Creator]] with no reference to the Bible or any other miraculous source. Instead, the deist relies solely on personal reason to guide his [[creed]],<ref>{{Cite book |author-link=Thomas Paine |last=Paine |first=Thomas |title=Of the Religion of Deism Compared with the Christian Religion |date=1804 |publisher=Internet History Sourcebook}}</ref> which was eminently agreeable to many thinkers of the time.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wilson |first1=Ellen Judy |title=Encyclopedia Of The Enlightenment |last2=Reill |first2=Peter Hanns |publisher=Infobase Publishing |date=2004 |isbn=978-1-4381-1021-9 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=t1pQ4YG-TDIC&pg=PA148 148]}}</ref> Atheism was much discussed, but there were few proponents. Wilson and Reill note: "In fact, very few enlightened intellectuals, even when they were vocal critics of Christianity, were true atheists. Rather, they were critics of [[Orthodoxy|orthodox]] belief, wedded rather to skepticism, deism, vitalism, or perhaps pantheism."{{sfn |Wilson |Reill |2004 |p=26}} Some followed [[Pierre Bayle]] and argued that atheists could indeed be moral men.<ref>{{cite book |last=Pagden |first=Anthony |title=The Enlightenment: And Why it Still Matters |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2013 |isbn=978-0-19-966093-3 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=GnURng7tsWIC&pg=PA100 100]}}</ref> Many others like Voltaire held that without belief in a God who punishes evil, the moral order of society was undermined; that is, since atheists gave themselves to no supreme authority and no law and had no fear of eternal consequences, they were far more likely to disrupt society.<ref>{{cite book |last=Brown |first=Stuart |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EoIafbj8pFgC&pg=PA256 |title=British Philosophy and the Age of Enlightenment: Routledge History of Philosophy |publisher=Taylor & Francis |date=2003 |isbn=978-0-415-30877-9 |page=256}}</ref> Bayle observed that, in his day, "prudent persons will always maintain an appearance of [religion]," and he believed that even atheists could hold concepts of honor and go beyond their own self-interest to create and interact in society.<ref>{{cite book |last=Bayle |first=Pierre |author-link=Pierre Bayle |title=[[Dictionnaire Historique et Critique]] |trans-title=A Historical and Critical Dictionary |volume=10 |date=1741 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=qmNZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA778 778]}}</ref> Locke said that if there were no God and no divine law, the result would be moral anarchy: every individual "could have no law but his own will, no end but himself. He would be a god to himself, and the satisfaction of his own will the sole measure and end of all his actions."<ref>{{cite web |last=Nuovo |first=Victor |date=4 May 2003 |title=God, Locke and Equality: Christian Foundations of Locke's Political Thought |url=https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/god-locke-and-equality-christian-foundations-of-locke-s-political-thought |access-date=15 April 2025 |website=Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews |publisher=University of Notre Dame |type=book review}}</ref>


====Separation of church and state====
====Separation of church and state====
{{Main|Separation of church and state|Separation of church and state in the United States}}
{{Main|Separation of church and state|Separation of church and state in the United States}}
The "Radical Enlightenment"{{sfn|Israel|2011|pp=11}}{{sfn|Israel|2010|p=19}} promoted the concept of separating church and state,{{sfn|Israel|2010|pp=vii–viii}} an idea that is often credited to Locke.<ref name=AFP>Feldman, Noah (2005). ''Divided by God.'' Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, p. 29 ("It took [[John Locke]] to translate the demand for liberty of conscience into a systematic argument for distinguishing the realm of government from the realm of religion.")</ref> According to his principle of the social contract, Locke said that the government lacked authority in the realm of individual conscience, as this was something rational people could not cede to the government for it or others to control. For Locke, this created a natural right in the liberty of conscience, which he said must therefore remain protected from any government authority.
The "Radical Enlightenment"{{sfn |Israel |2011 |pp=11}}{{sfn |Israel |2010 |p=19}} promoted the concept of separating church and state,{{sfn |Israel |2010 |pp=vii–viii}} an idea that is often credited to Locke.<ref name="AFP">{{Cite book |last=Feldman |first=Noah |date=2005 |title=Divided by God |publisher=Farrar, Straus, and Giroux |page=29 |quote=It took [[John Locke]] to translate the demand for liberty of conscience into a systematic argument for distinguishing the realm of government from the realm of religion.}}</ref> According to his principle of the social contract, Locke said that the government lacked authority in the realm of individual conscience, as this was something rational people could not cede to the government for it or others to control. For Locke, this created a natural right in the liberty of conscience, which he said must therefore remain protected from any government authority.


These views on religious tolerance and the importance of individual conscience, along with the social contract, became particularly influential in the [[Thirteen Colonies|American colonies]] and the drafting of the United States Constitution.<ref>Feldman, Noah (2005). ''Divided by God.'' Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, p. 29</ref> In a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut, Thomas Jefferson calls for a "wall of separation between church and state" at the federal level. He previously had supported successful efforts to disestablish the [[Church of England]] in Virginia<ref>[[#Ferling2000|Ferling, 2000]], p. 158</ref> and authored the [[Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom]].<ref>[[#Mayer|Mayer, 1994]] p. 76</ref> Jefferson's political ideals were greatly influenced by the writings of Locke, Bacon, and Newton,<ref>[[#Kayes|Hayes, 2008]], p. 10</ref> whom he considered the three greatest men that ever lived.<ref>[[#Cogliano|Cogliano, 2003]], p. 14</ref>
These views on religious tolerance and the importance of individual conscience, along with the social contract, became particularly influential in the [[Thirteen Colonies|American colonies]] and the drafting of the United States Constitution.{{Sfn|Feldman|2005|p=29}} In a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut, Thomas Jefferson calls for a "wall of separation between church and state" at the federal level. He previously had supported successful efforts to disestablish the [[Church of England]] in Virginia<ref>[[#Ferling|Ferling]] (2000) p. 158{{Full citation needed|date=November 2025}}</ref> and authored the [[Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom]].<ref>[[#Mayer|Mayer]] (1994) p.76{{Full citation needed|date=November 2025}}</ref> Jefferson's political ideals were greatly influenced by the writings of Locke, Bacon, and Newton,<ref>[[#Hayes|Hayes]] (2008) p. 10{{Full citation needed|date=November 2025}}</ref> whom he considered the three greatest men that ever lived.<ref>[[#Cogliano|Cogliano]] (2003) p.14{{Full citation needed|date=November 2025}}</ref>


==National variations==
==National variations==
[[File:Europe, 1700 - 1714.png|thumb|upright=1.5|Europe at the beginning of the [[War of the Spanish Succession]], 1700]]
[[File:Europe, 1700 - 1714.png|thumb|upright=1.5|Europe at the beginning of the [[War of the Spanish Succession]], 1700]]


The Enlightenment took hold in most European countries and influenced nations globally, often with a specific local emphasis. For example, in France it became associated with anti-government and anti-Church radicalism, while in Germany it reached deep into the middle classes, where it expressed a spiritualistic and nationalistic tone without threatening governments or established churches.<ref>David N. Livingstone and Charles W.J. Withers, ''Geography and Enlightenment'' (1999)</ref> Government responses varied widely. In France, the government was hostile, and the ''philosophes'' fought against its censorship, sometimes being imprisoned or hounded into exile. The British government, for the most part, ignored the Enlightenment's leaders in England and Scotland, although it did give Newton a knighthood and a very lucrative government office.
The Enlightenment took hold in most European countries and influenced nations globally, often with a specific local emphasis. For example, in France it became associated with anti-government and anti-Church radicalism, while in Germany it reached deep into the middle classes, where it expressed a spiritualistic and nationalistic tone without threatening governments or established churches.<ref>{{Cite book |first1=David N. |last1=Livingstone |first2=Charles W. J. |last2=Withers |title=Geography and Enlightenment |date=1999}}</ref> Government responses varied widely. In France, the government was hostile, and the ''philosophes'' fought against its censorship, sometimes being imprisoned or hounded into exile. The British government, for the most part, ignored the Enlightenment's leaders in England and Scotland, although it did give Newton a knighthood and a very lucrative government office.


A common theme among most countries which derived Enlightenment ideas from Europe was the intentional non-inclusion of Enlightenment philosophies pertaining to slavery. Originally during the French Revolution, a revolution deeply inspired by Enlightenment philosophy, "France's revolutionary government had denounced slavery, but the property-holding 'revolutionaries' then remembered their bank accounts."<ref name="ReferenceD">''A History of Modern Latin America: 1800 to the Present,'' Second Edition, by [[Teresa A. Meade]]</ref> Slavery frequently showed the limitations of the Enlightenment ideology as it pertained to European colonialism, since many colonies of Europe operated on a [[plantation economy]] fueled by slave labor. In 1791, the [[Haitian Revolution]], a [[slave rebellion]] by emancipated slaves against [[French colonial empire|French colonial rule]] in the colony of [[Saint-Domingue]], broke out. European nations and the United States, despite the strong support for Enlightenment ideals, refused to "[give support] to Saint-Domingue's anti-colonial struggle."<ref name="ReferenceD" />
A common theme among most countries which derived Enlightenment ideas from Europe was the intentional non-inclusion of Enlightenment philosophies pertaining to slavery. Originally during the French Revolution, a revolution deeply inspired by Enlightenment philosophy, "France's revolutionary government had denounced slavery, but the property-holding 'revolutionaries' then remembered their bank accounts."<ref name="Meade">{{Cite book |title=A History of Modern Latin America: 1800 to the Present |edition=2nd |first=Teresa A. |last=Meade |author-link=Teresa A. Meade}}</ref> Slavery frequently showed the limitations of the Enlightenment ideology as it pertained to European colonialism, since many colonies of Europe operated on a [[plantation economy]] fueled by slave labor. In 1791, the [[Haitian Revolution]], a [[slave rebellion]] by emancipated slaves against [[French colonial empire|French colonial rule]] in the colony of [[Saint-Domingue]], broke out. European nations and the United States, despite the strong support for Enlightenment ideals, refused to "[give support] to Saint-Domingue's anti-colonial struggle."<ref name="Meade"/>


===Great Britain===
===Great Britain===
Line 130: Line 164:
{{Further|Georgian era#English Enlightenment}}
{{Further|Georgian era#English Enlightenment}}


The very existence of an English Enlightenment has been hotly debated by scholars. The majority of textbooks on British history make little or no mention of an English Enlightenment. Some surveys of the entire Enlightenment include England and others ignore it, although they do include coverage of such major intellectuals as [[Joseph Addison]], [[Edward Gibbon]], John Locke, Isaac Newton, [[Alexander Pope]], [[Joshua Reynolds]], and [[Jonathan Swift]].<ref>Peter Gay, ed. ''The Enlightenment: A comprehensive anthology'' (1973) p. 14</ref> [[Freethought#United Kingdom|Freethinking]], a term describing those who stood in opposition to the institution of the Church, and the literal belief in the Bible, can be said to have begun in England no later than 1713, when [[Anthony Collins (philosopher)|Anthony Collins]] wrote his "Discourse of Free-thinking," which gained substantial popularity. This essay attacked the clergy of all churches and was a plea for deism.
The very existence of an English Enlightenment has been hotly debated by scholars. The majority of textbooks on British history make little or no mention of an English Enlightenment. Some surveys of the entire Enlightenment include England and others ignore it, although they do include coverage of such major intellectuals as [[Joseph Addison]], [[Edward Gibbon]], John Locke, Isaac Newton, [[Alexander Pope]], [[Joshua Reynolds]], and [[Jonathan Swift]].{{Sfn|Gay|1973|p=14}} [[Freethought#United Kingdom|Freethinking]], a term describing those who stood in opposition to the institution of the Church, and the literal belief in the Bible, can be said to have begun in England no later than 1713, when [[Anthony Collins (philosopher)|Anthony Collins]] wrote his "Discourse of Free-thinking," which gained substantial popularity. This essay attacked the clergy of all churches and was a plea for deism.


[[Roy Porter]] argues that the reasons for this neglect were the assumptions that the movement was primarily French-inspired, that it was largely a-religious or anti-clerical, and that it stood in outspoken defiance to the established order.<ref>Roy Porter, "England" in Alan Charles Kors, ed., ''Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment'' (2003) 1:409–15.</ref> Porter admits that after the 1720s England could claim thinkers to equal [[Denis Diderot|Diderot]], Voltaire, or Rousseau. However, its leading intellectuals such as Gibbon,<ref>Karen O'Brien, "English Enlightenment Histories, 1750–c.1815" in {{cite book |editor=José Rabasa |title=The Oxford History of Historical Writing: Volume 3: 1400–1800 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HcVZeiGg4awC&pg=PA518 |year=2012 |location=Oxford, England |publisher=OUP |pages=518–535 |isbn=978-0-19-921917-9}}</ref> [[Edmund Burke]] and [[Samuel Johnson]] were all quite conservative and supportive of the standing order. Porter says the reason was that Enlightenment had come early to England and had succeeded such that the culture had accepted political liberalism, philosophical empiricism, and religious toleration, positions which intellectuals on the continent had to fight against powerful odds. Furthermore, England rejected the collectivism of the continent and emphasized the improvement of individuals as the main goal of enlightenment.<ref>Roy Porter, ''The creation of the modern world: the untold story of the British Enlightenment'' (2000), pp. 1–12, 482–484.</ref>
[[Roy Porter]] argues that the reasons for this neglect were the assumptions that the movement was primarily French-inspired, that it was largely a-religious or anti-clerical, and that it stood in outspoken defiance to the established order.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Roy |last=Porter |author-link=Roy Porter |chapter=England |editor-first=Alan Charles |editor-last=Kors |title=Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment |date=2003 |volume=1 |pages=409–415}}</ref> Porter admits that after the 1720s England could claim thinkers to equal [[Denis Diderot|Diderot]], Voltaire, or Rousseau. However, its leading intellectuals such as Gibbon,<ref>{{Cite book |first=Karen |last=O'Brien |chapter=English Enlightenment Histories, 1750–c.1815 |title=The Oxford History of Historical Writing: Volume 3: 1400–1800 |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2012 |isbn=978-0-19-921917-9 |editor-first=José |editor-last=Rabasa |location=Oxford, England |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=HcVZeiGg4awC&pg=PA518 518–535]}}</ref> [[Edmund Burke]] and [[Samuel Johnson]] were all quite conservative and supportive of the standing order. Porter says the reason was that Enlightenment had come early to England and had succeeded such that the culture had accepted political liberalism, philosophical empiricism, and religious toleration, positions which intellectuals on the continent had to fight against powerful odds. Furthermore, England rejected the collectivism of the continent and emphasized the improvement of individuals as the main goal of enlightenment.{{Sfn|Porter|2000|pp=1–12, 482–484.}}


According to [[Derek Hirst]], the 1640s and 1650s saw a revived economy characterised by growth in manufacturing, the elaboration of financial and credit instruments, and the commercialisation of communication. The gentry found time for leisure activities, such as horse racing and bowling. In the high culture important innovations included the development of a mass market for music, increased scientific research, and an expansion of publishing. All the trends were discussed in depth at the newly established [[English coffeehouses in the 17th and 18th centuries|coffee houses]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hirst |first=Derek |date=1996 |title=Locating the 1650s in England's Seventeenth Century |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/24423269 |journal=History |volume=81 |issue=263 |pages=359–383 |doi=10.1111/1468-229X.00016 |jstor=24423269 |issn=0018-2648|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=The Enlightenment (1650–1800): The English Enlightenment |url=https://www.sparknotes.com/history/european/enlightenment/section2/ |access-date=18 December 2023 |website=SparkNotes |language=en}}</ref>
According to [[Derek Hirst]], the 1640s and 1650s saw a revived economy characterised by growth in manufacturing, the elaboration of financial and credit instruments, and the commercialisation of communication. The gentry found time for leisure activities, such as horse racing and bowling. In the high culture important innovations included the development of a mass market for music, increased scientific research, and an expansion of publishing. All the trends were discussed in depth at the newly established [[English coffeehouses in the 17th and 18th centuries|coffee houses]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hirst |first=Derek |date=1996 |title=Locating the 1650s in England's Seventeenth Century |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/24423269 |journal=History |volume=81 |issue=263 |pages=359–383 |doi=10.1111/1468-229X.00016 |issn=0018-2648 |jstor=24423269 |url-access=subscription}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=The Enlightenment (1650–1800): The English Enlightenment |url=https://www.sparknotes.com/history/european/enlightenment/section2 |access-date=18 December 2023 |website=SparkNotes |language=en}}</ref>


[[File:AdamSmith.jpg|thumb|left|upright|One leader of the Scottish Enlightenment was [[Adam Smith]], the father of modern economic science.]]
[[File:AdamSmith.jpg|thumb|left|upright|One leader of the Scottish Enlightenment was [[Adam Smith]], the father of modern economic science.]]


====Scotland====
====Scotland====
In the [[Scottish Enlightenment]], the principles of sociability, equality, and utility were disseminated in schools and universities, many of which used sophisticated teaching methods which blended philosophy with daily life.<ref name="Eddy2022" /> Scotland's major cities created an intellectual infrastructure of mutually supporting institutions such as schools, universities, reading societies, libraries, periodicals, museums, and masonic lodges.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Towsey |first1=Mark |title=Reading the Scottish Enlightenment Books and Their Readers in Provincial Scotland, 1750–1820 |date=2010 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-19351-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_uB5DwAAQBAJ}}</ref> The Scottish network was "predominantly liberal [[Calvinism|Calvinist]], Newtonian, and 'design' oriented in character which played a major role in the further development of the transatlantic Enlightenment."<ref name="HermanTwo">A. Herman, ''How the Scots Invented the Modern World'' (Crown Publishing Group, 2001).</ref> In France, Voltaire said "we look to Scotland for all our ideas of civilization."<ref>{{cite book |last=Harrison |first=Lawrence E. |title=Jews, Confucians, and Protestants: Cultural Capital and the End of Multiculturalism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Rbqn4RfUMioC&pg=PA92 |year=2012 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |page=92 |isbn=978-1-4422-1964-9}}</ref> The focus of the Scottish Enlightenment ranged from intellectual and economic matters to the specifically scientific as in the work of [[William Cullen]], physician and chemist; [[James Anderson of Hermiston|James Anderson]], [[agronomist]]; [[Joseph Black]], physicist and chemist; and James Hutton, the first modern geologist.<ref name="Denby"/><ref name="Repcheck">J. Repcheck, ''The Man Who Found Time: James Hutton and the Discovery of the Earth's Antiquity'' (Basic Books, 2003), pp. 117–143.</ref>
In the [[Scottish Enlightenment]], the principles of sociability, equality, and utility were disseminated in schools and universities, many of which used sophisticated teaching methods which blended philosophy with daily life.<ref name="Eddy2022"/> Scotland's major cities created an intellectual infrastructure of mutually supporting institutions such as schools, universities, reading societies, libraries, periodicals, museums, and masonic lodges.<ref>{{cite book |last=Towsey |first=Mark |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_uB5DwAAQBAJ |title=Reading the Scottish Enlightenment Books and Their Readers in Provincial Scotland, 1750–1820 |date=2010 |publisher=Brill |isbn=978-90-04-19351-2}}</ref> The Scottish network was "predominantly liberal [[Calvinism|Calvinist]], Newtonian, and 'design' oriented in character which played a major role in the further development of the transatlantic Enlightenment."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Herman |first=A. |title=How the Scots Invented the Modern World |date=2001 |publisher=Crown Publishing}}</ref> In France, Voltaire said "we look to Scotland for all our ideas of civilization."<ref>{{cite book |last=Harrison |first=Lawrence E. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Rbqn4RfUMioC&pg=PA92 |title=Jews, Confucians, and Protestants: Cultural Capital and the End of Multiculturalism |date=2012 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |isbn=978-1-4422-1964-9 |page=92}}</ref> The focus of the Scottish Enlightenment ranged from intellectual and economic matters to the specifically scientific as in the work of [[William Cullen]], physician and chemist; [[James Anderson of Hermiston|James Anderson]], [[agronomist]]; [[Joseph Black]], physicist and chemist; and James Hutton, the first modern geologist.<ref name="Denby"/><ref>{{Cite book |last=Repcheck |first=J. |title=The Man Who Found Time: James Hutton and the Discovery of the Earth's Antiquity |date=2003 |publisher=Basic Books |pages=117–143}}</ref>


====Anglo-American colonies====
====Anglo-American colonies====
Line 146: Line 180:
[[File:Declaration of Independence (1819), by John Trumbull.jpg|thumb|[[John Trumbull]]'s ''[[Declaration of Independence (Trumbull)|Declaration of Independence]]'' imagines the drafting committee presenting its work to the Congress.]]
[[File:Declaration of Independence (1819), by John Trumbull.jpg|thumb|[[John Trumbull]]'s ''[[Declaration of Independence (Trumbull)|Declaration of Independence]]'' imagines the drafting committee presenting its work to the Congress.]]


Several Americans, especially Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, played a major role in bringing Enlightenment ideas to the New World and in influencing British and French thinkers.<ref>Henry F. May, ''The Enlightenment in America'' (1978)</ref> Franklin was influential for his political activism and for his advances in physics.<ref>Michael Atiyah, "Benjamin Franklin and the Edinburgh Enlightenment," ''Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society'' (Dec 2006) 150#4 pp.&nbsp;591–606.</ref><ref>Jack Fruchtman, Jr., ''Atlantic Cousins: Benjamin Franklin and His Visionary Friends'' (2007)</ref> The cultural exchange during the Age of Enlightenment ran in both directions across the Atlantic. Thinkers such as Paine, Locke, and Rousseau all take Native American cultural practices as examples of natural freedom.<ref>Charles C. Mann, ''1491'' (2005)</ref> The Americans closely followed English and Scottish political ideas, as well as some French thinkers such as Montesquieu.<ref>Paul M. Spurlin, ''Montesquieu in America, 1760–1801'' (1941)</ref> As deists, they were influenced by ideas of [[John Toland]] and [[Matthew Tindal]]. There was a great emphasis upon [[liberalism in the United States|liberty]], [[republicanism in the United States|republicanism]], and [[freedom of religion in the United States|religious tolerance]]. There was no respect for monarchy or inherited political power. Deists reconciled science and religion by rejecting prophecies, miracles, and biblical theology. Leading deists included Thomas Paine in ''[[The Age of Reason]]'' and Thomas Jefferson in his short ''Jefferson Bible,'' from which he removed all supernatural aspects.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1272214/The-Founding-Fathers-Deism-and-Christianity |title=The Founding Fathers, Deism, and Christianity |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica}}</ref>
Several Americans, especially [[Benjamin Franklin]] and [[Thomas Jefferson]], played a major role in bringing Enlightenment ideas to the New World and in influencing British and French thinkers.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Henry F. |last=May |title=The Enlightenment in America |date=1978}}</ref> Franklin was influential for his political activism and for his advances in physics.<ref>{{Cite journal |first=Michael |last=Atiyah |title=Benjamin Franklin and the Edinburgh Enlightenment |journal=Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society |date=December 2006 |volume=150 |issue=4 |pages=591–606}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |first=Jack Jr. |last= Fruchtman |title=Atlantic Cousins: Benjamin Franklin and His Visionary Friends |date=2007}}</ref> The cultural exchange during the Age of Enlightenment ran in both directions across the Atlantic. Thinkers such as Paine, Locke, and Rousseau all take Native American cultural practices as examples of natural freedom.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Charles C. |last=Mann |title=1491 |date=2005}}</ref> The Americans closely followed English and Scottish political ideas, as well as some French thinkers such as Montesquieu.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Paul M. |last=Spurlin |title=Montesquieu in America, 1760–1801 |date=1941}}</ref> As deists, they were influenced by ideas of [[John Toland]] and [[Matthew Tindal]]. There was a great emphasis upon [[liberalism in the United States|liberty]], [[republicanism in the United States|republicanism]], and [[freedom of religion in the United States|religious tolerance]]. There was no respect for monarchy or inherited political power. Deists reconciled science and religion by rejecting prophecies, miracles, and biblical theology. Leading deists included Thomas Paine in ''[[The Age of Reason]]'' and Thomas Jefferson in his short ''[[Jefferson Bible]],'' from which he removed all supernatural aspects.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |title=The Founding Fathers, Deism, and Christianity |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1272214/The-Founding-Fathers-Deism-and-Christianity}}</ref>
 
===Netherlands===
The Dutch Enlightenment began in 1640.{{sfn |Deijl |2025 |p=11}} During the Early Dutch Enlightenment (1640–1720), many books were translated from Latin, French or English to Dutch, often at the risk of their translators and publishers.{{sfn |Deijl |2025 |p=11}} By the 1720s, the Dutch Republic had also become a major center for printing and exporting banned books to France.<ref>{{cite book |last=McLeod |first=Hugh |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ljosAQAAMAAJ |title=Religion and the People of Western Europe, 1789–1970 |date=1981 |page=9 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-289101-3 }}</ref> The most famous figure of the Dutch Enlightenment was [[Baruch Spinoza]].
 
===France===
{{main|French Enlightenment}}
The French Enlightenment was influenced by England{{sfn |Wade |1977 |p=120}} and in turn influenced other national enlightenments. As worded by Sharon A. Stanley, "the French Enlightenment stands out from other national enlightenments for its unrelenting assault on church leadership and theology."{{sfn |Stanley |2012 |p=27}}


===German states===
===German states===
{{Further|History of Germany#Enlightenment|Hymnody of continental Europe#Rationalism}}
{{main|German Enlightenment}}
{{see also|Hymnody of continental Europe#Rationalism}}


Prussia took the lead among the German states in sponsoring the political reforms that Enlightenment thinkers urged absolute rulers to adopt. There were important movements as well in the smaller states of Bavaria, Saxony, Hanover, and the Palatinate. In each case, Enlightenment values became accepted and led to significant political and administrative reforms that laid the groundwork for the creation of modern states.<ref>Charles W. Ingrao, "A Pre-Revolutionary Sonderweg." ''German History'' 20#3 (2002), pp. 279–286.</ref> The princes of Saxony, for example, carried out an impressive series of fundamental fiscal, administrative, judicial, educational, cultural, and general economic reforms. The reforms were aided by the country's strong urban structure and influential commercial groups and modernized pre-1789 Saxony along the lines of classic Enlightenment principles.<ref>Katrin Keller, "Saxony: Rétablissement and Enlightened Absolutism." ''German History'' 20.3 (2002): 309–331.</ref><ref>"The German Enlightenment," ''German History'' (Dec 2017) 35#4 pp. 588–602, round table discussion of historiography.</ref>
Prussia took the lead among the German states in sponsoring the political reforms that Enlightenment thinkers urged absolute rulers to adopt. There were important movements as well in the smaller states of Bavaria, Saxony, Hanover, and the Palatinate. In each case, Enlightenment values became accepted and led to significant political and administrative reforms that laid the groundwork for the creation of modern states.<ref>Charles W. Ingrao, "A Pre-Revolutionary Sonderweg." ''German History'' 20#3 (2002), pp. 279–286.</ref> The princes of Saxony, for example, carried out an impressive series of fundamental fiscal, administrative, judicial, educational, cultural, and general economic reforms. The reforms were aided by the country's strong urban structure and influential commercial groups and modernized pre-1789 Saxony along the lines of classic Enlightenment principles.<ref>Katrin Keller, "Saxony: Rétablissement and Enlightened Absolutism." ''German History'' 20.3 (2002): 309–331.</ref><ref>"The German Enlightenment," ''German History'' (Dec 2017) 35#4 pp. 588–602, round table discussion of historiography.</ref>
Line 155: Line 197:
[[File:Oer-Weimarer Musenhof.jpg|thumb|left|''Weimar's Courtyard of the Muses'' by [[Theobald von Oer]], a tribute to The Enlightenment and the [[Weimar Classicism]] depicting German poets [[Friedrich Schiller|Schiller]], [[Christoph Martin Wieland|Wieland]], [[Johann Gottfried Herder|Herder]], and [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe|Goethe]]]]
[[File:Oer-Weimarer Musenhof.jpg|thumb|left|''Weimar's Courtyard of the Muses'' by [[Theobald von Oer]], a tribute to The Enlightenment and the [[Weimar Classicism]] depicting German poets [[Friedrich Schiller|Schiller]], [[Christoph Martin Wieland|Wieland]], [[Johann Gottfried Herder|Herder]], and [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe|Goethe]]]]


Before 1750, the German upper classes looked to France for intellectual, cultural, and architectural leadership, as French was the language of high society. By the mid-18th century, the ''Aufklärung'' (The Enlightenment) had transformed German high culture in music, philosophy, science, and literature. Christian Wolff was the pioneer as a writer who expounded the Enlightenment to German readers and legitimized German as a philosophic language.<ref>{{cite book |first=John G. |last=Gagliardo |title=Germany under the Old Regime, 1600–1790 |year=1991 |pages=217–234, 375–395}}</ref>
Before 1750, the German upper classes looked to France for intellectual, cultural, and architectural leadership, as French was the language of high society. By the mid-18th century, the ''Aufklärung'' (The Enlightenment) had transformed German high culture in music, philosophy, science, and literature. Christian Wolff was the pioneer as a writer who expounded the Enlightenment to German readers and legitimized German as a philosophic language.<ref>{{cite book |last=Gagliardo |first=John G. |title=Germany under the Old Regime, 1600–1790 |date=1991 |pages=217–234, 375–395}}</ref>


[[Johann Gottfried Herder|Johann Gottfried von Herder]] broke new ground in philosophy and poetry, as a leader of the [[Sturm und Drang]] movement of proto-Romanticism. [[Weimar Classicism]] (''Weimarer Klassik'') was a cultural and literary movement based in Weimar that sought to establish a new humanism by synthesizing Romantic, classical, and Enlightenment ideas. The movement (from 1772 until 1805) involved Herder as well as polymath [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]] and [[Friedrich Schiller]], a poet and historian. The theatre principal [[Abel Seyler]] greatly influenced the development of German theatre and promoted serious [[German opera]], new works and experimental productions, and the concept of a national theatre.<ref>[[Wilhelm Kosch]], "Seyler, Abel", in ''[[Dictionary of German Biography]]'', eds. [[Walther Killy]] and [[Rudolf Vierhaus]], Vol. 9, [[Walter de Gruyter]], 2005, {{ISBN|978-3-11-096629-9}}, p. 308</ref> Herder argued that every group of people had its own particular identity, which was expressed in its language and culture. This legitimized the promotion of German language and culture and helped shape the development of German nationalism. Schiller's plays expressed the restless spirit of his generation, depicting the hero's struggle against social pressures and the force of destiny.<ref>{{citation |editor-first=Simon J. |editor-last=Richter |title=The Literature of Weimar Classicism |year=2005}}</ref>
[[Johann Gottfried Herder|Johann Gottfried von Herder]] broke new ground in philosophy and poetry, as a leader of the [[Sturm und Drang]] movement of proto-Romanticism. [[Weimar Classicism]] (''Weimarer Klassik'') was a cultural and literary movement based in Weimar that sought to establish a new humanism by synthesizing Romantic, classical, and Enlightenment ideas. The movement (from 1772 until 1805) involved Herder as well as polymath [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]] and [[Friedrich Schiller]], a poet and historian. The theatre principal [[Abel Seyler]] greatly influenced the development of German theatre and promoted serious [[German opera]], new works and experimental productions, and the concept of a national theatre.<ref>[[Wilhelm Kosch]], "Seyler, Abel", in ''[[Dictionary of German Biography]]'', eds. [[Walther Killy]] and [[Rudolf Vierhaus]], Vol. 9, [[Walter de Gruyter]], 2005, {{ISBN|978-3-11-096629-9}}, p. 308</ref> Herder argued that every group of people had its own particular identity, which was expressed in its language and culture. This legitimized the promotion of German language and culture and helped shape the development of German nationalism. Schiller's plays expressed the restless spirit of his generation, depicting the hero's struggle against social pressures and the force of destiny.<ref>{{citation |title=The Literature of Weimar Classicism |date=2005 |editor-last=Richter |editor-first=Simon J.}}</ref>


German music, sponsored by the upper classes, came of age under composers [[Johann Sebastian Bach]], [[Joseph Haydn]], and [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart]].<ref>{{cite book |editor-first=Samantha |editor-last=Owens |editor2-last=Reul |editor2-first=Barbara M. |editor3-last=Stockigt |editor3-first=Janice B. |title=Music at German Courts, 1715–1760: Changing Artistic Priorities |year=2011}}</ref>
German music, sponsored by the upper classes, came of age under composers [[Johann Sebastian Bach]], [[Joseph Haydn]], and [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Music at German Courts, 1715–1760: Changing Artistic Priorities |date=2011 |editor-last=Owens |editor-first=Samantha |editor2-last=Reul |editor2-first=Barbara M. |editor3-last=Stockigt |editor3-first=Janice B.}}</ref>


In remote [[Königsberg]], Kant tried to reconcile rationalism and religious belief, individual freedom, and political authority. Kant's work contained basic tensions that would continue to shape German thought—and indeed all of European philosophy—well into the 20th century.<ref>{{cite book |first=Manfred |last=Kuehn |title=Kant: A Biography |year=2001}}</ref> German Enlightenment won the support of princes, aristocrats, and the middle classes, and it permanently reshaped the culture.<ref>{{cite book |editor-first=Richard |editor-last=Van Dulmen |editor2-first=Anthony |editor2-last=Williams |title=The Society of the Enlightenment: The Rise of the Middle Class and Enlightenment Culture in Germany |year=1992}}</ref> However, there was a conservatism among the elites that warned against going too far.<ref>[[Thomas P. Saine]], ''The Problem of Being Modern, or the German Pursuit of Enlightenment from Leibniz to the French Revolution'' (1997)</ref>
In remote [[Königsberg]], Kant tried to reconcile rationalism and religious belief, individual freedom, and political authority. Kant's work contained basic tensions that would continue to shape German thought—and indeed all of European philosophy—well into the 20th century.{{Sfn|Kuehn|2001}} German Enlightenment won the support of princes, aristocrats, and the middle classes, and it permanently reshaped the culture.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Society of the Enlightenment: The Rise of the Middle Class and Enlightenment Culture in Germany |date=1992 |editor-last=Van Dulmen |editor-first=Richard |editor2-last=Williams |editor2-first=Anthony}}</ref> However, there was a conservatism among the elites that warned against going too far.<ref>[[Thomas P. Saine]], ''The Problem of Being Modern, or the German Pursuit of Enlightenment from Leibniz to the French Revolution'' (1997)</ref>


In 1788, Prussia issued an "Edict on Religion" that forbade preaching any sermon that undermined popular belief in the Holy Trinity or the Bible. The goal was to avoid theological disputes that might impinge on domestic tranquility. Men who doubted the value of Enlightenment favoured the measure, but so too did many supporters. German universities had created a closed elite that could debate controversial issues among themselves, but spreading them to the public was seen as too risky. This intellectual elite was favoured by the state, but that might be reversed if the process of the Enlightenment proved politically or socially destabilizing.<ref>Michael J. Sauter, "The Enlightenment on trial: state service and social discipline in eighteenth-century Germany's public sphere." ''Modern Intellectual History'' 5.2 (2008): 195–223.</ref>
In 1788, Prussia issued an "Edict on Religion" that forbade preaching any sermon that undermined popular belief in the Holy Trinity or the Bible. The goal was to avoid theological disputes that might impinge on domestic tranquility. Men who doubted the value of Enlightenment favoured the measure, but so too did many supporters. German universities had created a closed elite that could debate controversial issues among themselves, but spreading them to the public was seen as too risky. This intellectual elite was favoured by the state, but that might be reversed if the process of the Enlightenment proved politically or socially destabilizing.<ref>Michael J. Sauter, "The Enlightenment on trial: state service and social discipline in eighteenth-century Germany's public sphere." ''Modern Intellectual History'' 5.2 (2008): 195–223.</ref>


===Habsburg monarchy===
===Austria===
The reign of [[Maria Theresa]], the first [[Habsburg monarchy|Habsburg monarch]] to be considered influenced by the Enlightenment in some areas, was marked by a mix of enlightenment and conservatism. Her son [[Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor|Joseph II]]'s brief reign was marked by this conflict, with his ideology of [[Josephinism]] facing opposition. Joseph II carried out numerous reforms in the spirit of the Enlightenment, which affected, for example, the school system, monasteries and the legal system. Emperor [[Leopold II, Holy Roman Emperor|Leopold II]], who was an early opponent of capital punishment, had a brief and contentious rule that was mostly marked by relations with France. Similarly, Emperor [[Francis II, Holy Roman Emperor|Francis II]]'s rule was primarily marked by relations with France.
{{main|Austrian Enlightenment}}
During the 18th century, Austria was under [[Habsburg rule]]. The reign of [[Maria Theresa]], the first [[Habsburg monarchy|Habsburg monarch]] to be considered influenced by the Enlightenment in some areas, was marked by a mix of enlightenment and conservatism. Her son [[Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor|Joseph II]]'s brief reign was marked by this conflict, with his ideology of [[Josephinism]] facing opposition. Joseph II carried out numerous reforms in the spirit of the Enlightenment, which affected, for example, the school system, monasteries and the legal system. Emperor [[Leopold II, Holy Roman Emperor|Leopold II]], who was an early opponent of capital punishment, had a brief and contentious rule that was mostly marked by relations with France. Similarly, Emperor [[Francis II, Holy Roman Emperor|Francis II]]'s rule was primarily marked by relations with France.


The ideas of the Enlightenment also appeared in literature and theater works. [[Joseph von Sonnenfels]] was an important representative. In music, [[Austria]]n musicians such as [[Joseph Haydn]] and [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart]] were associated with the Enlightenment.
The ideas of the Enlightenment also appeared in literature and theater works. [[Joseph von Sonnenfels]] was an important representative. In music, [[Austria]]n musicians such as [[Joseph Haydn]] and [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart]] were associated with the Enlightenment.
===Hungary===
The Hungarian Enlightenment<ref name="Hungarian Authors">{{cite book |last1=Tezla |first1=Albert |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aOK0vb9WwaIC |title=Hungarian Authors |date=1970 |page=91 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-42650-4 }}</ref> emerged during the 18th century, while Hungary was part of the [[Habsburg Empire]]. The Hungarian Enlightenment is usually said to have begun in 1772 and was greatly influenced by French Enlightenment (through Vienna).<ref name="Hungarian Authors"/>
===Romania===
The Romanian Enlightenment<ref>{{cite book |last=Hitchins |first=Keith |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LUR3qXStHvAC |title=The Romanians, 1774–1866 |date=1996 |page=129 |publisher=Clarendon Press |isbn=978-0-19-820591-3 }}</ref> emerged during the 18th century across the three major historical regions inhabited by Romanians: [[Transylvania]], [[Wallachia]], and [[Moldavia]]. At that time, [[Transylvania]] was in the [[Habsburg Empire]] while [[Wallachia]] and [[Moldavia]] were vassals of the [[Ottoman Empire]].
The Transylvanian Enlightenment was represented by the [[Transylvanian School]], a group of thinkers who promoted a cultural revival and rights for Romanians (who were marginalized by the Habsburgs).
The Wallachian Enlightenment was represented by such figures as [[Dinicu Golescu]] (1777–1830), while the Moldavian Englightenment was headed by prince [[Dimitrie Cantemir]] (1673-1723).
===Switzerland===
{{Main|Swiss Enlightenment}}
The Enlightenment arrived relatively late in Switzerland, spreading from England, the Netherlands, and France toward the end of the 17th century. The movement initially took hold in Protestant regions, where it gradually replaced orthodox religious thinking. The 1712 victory of the reformed cantons of Zurich and Bern over the five Catholic cantons of central Switzerland in the [[Toggenburg War|Second War of Villmergen]] marked both a Protestant triumph and a victory for Enlightenment ideas in the economically more developed regions.<ref name="hls">{{cite web |last1=Im Hof |first1=Ulrich |last2=Marti |first2=Hanspeter |date=4 December 2012 |title=Lumières |url=https://hls-dhs-dss.ch/fr/articles/017433/2012-12-04 |access-date=22 July 2025 |website=Dictionnaire historique de la Suisse |language=fr |translator=Laurent Droz}}</ref>
In Switzerland, which lacked a central court or academy, the Enlightenment spread through the intellectual elite of reformed cities, particularly pastors educated in academies and colleges with strong humanist traditions. The theological "Helvetic [[triumvirate]]" of [[Jean-Alphonse Turrettini]] (Geneva), [[Jean-Frédéric Ostervald]] (Neuchâtel), and [[Samuel Werenfels]] (Basel) led their churches toward a humanistic Christianity beginning in 1697, creating what Paul Wernle termed "reasoned orthodoxy" that balanced rational thought with Christian ethics.<ref name="hls"/>
Swiss Enlightenment thinkers made significant contributions across multiple fields. The Romand school developed influential theories of [[natural law]], with scholars like [[Jean Barbeyrac]] (Lausanne), [[Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui]] (Geneva), and [[Emer de Vattel]] (Neuchâtel) promoting concepts of inalienable rights and justified resistance to tyranny that influenced the American independence movement. In literature, [[Johann Jakob Bodmer]] and [[Johann Jakob Breitinger]] made Zurich a center of German literary innovation, while [[Albert von Haller]]'s poetry represented the peak of Swiss Enlightenment literature. [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]], considering himself both a Genevan and Swiss citizen, developed democratic republican theories that extended Genevan models to broader European federalist principles.<ref name="hls"/>
The movement was characterized by what scholars term "[[Helvetism]]" – specifically Swiss aspects including a Christian conception of natural law, patriotic ethics, and philosophical approaches grounded in practical pedagogy and economics. Most distinctively, Swiss Enlightenment thought celebrated Alpine nature, viewing Switzerland as the "land of shepherds" whose republican and federalist traditions were shaped by its mountain environment. The movement organized through numerous societies and publications, including the ''Encyclopédie d'Yverdon'' (1770-1780), which offered a moderate alternative to the French ''Encyclopédie''. Swiss intellectuals gained international prominence, with many serving in foreign academies, particularly in Berlin under Frederick II and in St. Petersburg under Catherine II.<ref name="hls"/>


===Italy===
===Italy===
{{Main|Italian Enlightenment}}
{{Main|Italian Enlightenment}}
[[File:Pompeo Marchesi (1783.1858) Monumento a Cesare Beccaria, 1837, Milano.jpg|thumb|upright=.8|Statue of [[Cesare Beccaria]], considered one of the greatest thinkers of the Enlightenment]]
[[File:Pompeo Marchesi (1783.1858) Monumento a Cesare Beccaria, 1837, Milano.jpg|thumb|upright=.8|Statue of [[Cesare Beccaria]], considered one of the greatest thinkers of the Enlightenment]]
In Italy the main centers of diffusion of the Enlightenment were [[Naples]] and [[Milan]]:<ref>{{cite book |last=Mori |first=Massimo |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RGqODAAAQBAJ |title=Storia della filosofia moderna |date=2015 |publisher=Gius.Laterza & Figli Spa |isbn=978-88-581-1845-0 |language=it}}</ref> in both cities the intellectuals took public office and collaborated with the Bourbon and Habsburg administrations. In Naples, [[Antonio Genovesi]], [[Ferdinando Galiani]], and [[Gaetano Filangieri]] were active under the tolerant King Charles of Bourbon. However, the Neapolitan Enlightenment, like Vico's philosophy, remained almost always in the theoretical field.<ref>{{cite book |last=D'Onofrio |first=Federico |title=On the caoncept of 'felicitas publica' in Eighteenth-Century political economy, in History of economic thought |year=2015}}</ref> Only later, many Enlighteners animated the unfortunate experience of the [[Parthenopean Republic]]. In Milan, however, the movement strove to find concrete solutions to problems. The center of discussions was the magazine ''[[Il Caffè]]'' (1762–1766), founded by brothers [[Pietro Verri|Pietro]] and [[Alessandro Verri]] (famous philosophers and writers, as well as their brother Giovanni), who also gave life to the Accademia dei Pugni, founded in 1761. Minor centers were [[Tuscany]], Veneto, and [[Piedmont]], where among others, Pompeo Neri worked.
In Italy the main centers of diffusion of the Enlightenment were [[Naples]] and [[Milan]]:<ref>{{cite book |last=Mori |first=Massimo |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RGqODAAAQBAJ |title=Storia della filosofia moderna |date=2015 |publisher=Gius.Laterza & Figli Spa |isbn=978-88-581-1845-0 |language=it}}</ref> in both cities the intellectuals took public office and collaborated with the Bourbon and Habsburg administrations. In Naples, [[Antonio Genovesi]], [[Ferdinando Galiani]], and [[Gaetano Filangieri]] were active under the tolerant King Charles of Bourbon. However, the Neapolitan Enlightenment, like Vico's philosophy, remained almost always in the theoretical field.<ref>{{cite book |last=D'Onofrio |first=Federico |title=On the caoncept of 'felicitas publica' in Eighteenth-Century political economy, in History of economic thought |date=2015}}</ref> Only later, many Enlighteners animated the unfortunate experience of the [[Parthenopean Republic]]. In Milan, however, the movement strove to find concrete solutions to problems. The center of discussions was the magazine ''[[Il Caffè]]'' (1762–1766), founded by brothers [[Pietro Verri|Pietro]] and [[Alessandro Verri]] (famous philosophers and writers, as well as their brother Giovanni), who also gave life to the Accademia dei Pugni, founded in 1761. Minor centers were [[Tuscany]], Veneto, and [[Piedmont]], where among others, Pompeo Neri worked.


From Naples, Genovesi influenced a generation of southern Italian intellectuals and university students. His textbook ''Della diceosina, o sia della Filosofia del Giusto e dell'Onesto'' (1766) was a controversial attempt to mediate between the history of moral philosophy on the one hand and the specific problems encountered by 18th-century commercial society on the other. It contained the greater part of Genovesi's political, philosophical, and economic thought, which became a guidebook for Neapolitan economic and social development.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Antonio Genovesi's Diceosina: Source of the Neapolitan enlightenment|last=Guasti|first=Niccolò|journal=History of European Ideas|issue=4|year=2006|volume=32|pages=385–405|doi=10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2006.08.003}}</ref>
From Naples, Genovesi influenced a generation of southern Italian intellectuals and university students. His textbook ''Della diceosina, o sia della Filosofia del Giusto e dell'Onesto'' (1766) was a controversial attempt to mediate between the history of moral philosophy on the one hand and the specific problems encountered by 18th-century commercial society on the other. It contained the greater part of Genovesi's political, philosophical, and economic thought, which became a guidebook for Neapolitan economic and social development.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Guasti |first=Niccolò |date=2006 |title=Antonio Genovesi's Diceosina: Source of the Neapolitan enlightenment |journal=History of European Ideas |volume=32 |issue=4 |pages=385–405 |doi=10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2006.08.003 |hdl=11380/1248261 |hdl-access=free}}</ref>


Science flourished as [[Alessandro Volta]] and [[Luigi Galvani]] made break-through discoveries in electricity. Pietro Verri was a leading economist in Lombardy. Historian [[Joseph Schumpeter]] states he was "the most important pre-Smithian authority on Cheapness-and-Plenty."<ref>Pier Luigi Porta, "Lombard enlightenment and classical political economy." ''The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought'' 18.4 (2011): 521–50.</ref> The most influential scholar on the Italian Enlightenment has been [[Franco Venturi]].<ref>Franco Venturi, ''Italy and the Enlightenment: studies in a cosmopolitan century'' (1972) [https://archive.org/details/italyenlightenme00vent online]</ref><ref>Anna Maria Rao, "Enlightenment and reform: an overview of culture and politics in Enlightenment Italy." ''Journal of Modern Italian Studies'' 10.2 (2005): 142–67.</ref> Italy also produced some of the Enlightenment's greatest legal theorists, including [[Cesare Beccaria]], [[Giambattista Vico]], and [[Francesco Mario Pagano]].
Science flourished as [[Alessandro Volta]] and [[Luigi Galvani]] made break-through discoveries in electricity. Pietro Verri was a leading economist in Lombardy. Historian [[Joseph Schumpeter]] states he was "the most important pre-Smithian authority on Cheapness-and-Plenty."<ref>{{Cite journal |first=Pier Luigi |last=Porta |title=Lombard enlightenment and classical political economy |journal=The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought |volume=18 |issue=4 |date=2011 |pages=521–550 |doi=10.1080/09672567.2010.487285 }}</ref> The most influential scholar on the Italian Enlightenment has been [[Franco Venturi]].<ref>{{cite book |last=Venturi |first=Franco |url=https://archive.org/details/italyenlightenme00vent |title=Italy and the Enlightenment: studies in a cosmopolitan century |location=New York |publisher=New York University Press |date=1972}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |first=Anna Maria |last=Rao |title=Enlightenment and reform: an overview of culture and politics in Enlightenment Italy |journal=Journal of Modern Italian Studies |volume=10 |issue=2 |date=2005 |pages=142–167 |doi=10.1080/13545710500111280 }}</ref> Italy also produced some of the Enlightenment's greatest legal theorists, including [[Cesare Beccaria]], [[Giambattista Vico]], and [[Francesco Mario Pagano]].


===Bourbon Spain and Spanish America===
===Bourbon Spain and Spanish America===
{{Main|Enlightenment in Spain|Spanish American Enlightenment}}
{{Main|Spanish Enlightenment|Spanish American Enlightenment}}
[[File:Constitucion Cadiz 1812.png|thumb|[[Spanish Constitution of 1812]]]]
[[File:Constitucion Cadiz 1812.png|thumb|[[Spanish Constitution of 1812]]]]
When [[Charles II of Spain|Charles II]], the last Spanish Habsburg monarch, died his successor was from the French [[House of Bourbon]], initiating a period of French Enlightenment influence in Spain and the Spanish Empire.<ref>Aldridge, Alfred Owen. ''The Ibero-American Enlightenment.'' Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1971.</ref><ref>De Vos, Paula S. "Research, Development, and Empire: State Support of Science in Spain and Spanish America, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries," ''Colonial Latin America Review'' 15, no. 1 (June 2006) 55–79.</ref>
When [[Charles II of Spain|Charles II]], the last Spanish Habsburg monarch, died his successor was from the French [[House of Bourbon]], initiating a period of French Enlightenment influence in Spain and the Spanish Empire.<ref>Aldridge, Alfred Owen. ''The Ibero-American Enlightenment.'' Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1971.</ref><ref>De Vos, Paula S. "Research, Development, and Empire: State Support of Science in Spain and Spanish America, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries," ''Colonial Latin America Review'' 15, no. 1 (June 2006) 55–79.</ref>
Line 194: Line 257:


===Portugal and Brazil===
===Portugal and Brazil===
{{Main|History of Portugal (1640–1777)}}
{{See also|History of Portugal (1640–1777)}}
The Enlightenment in Portugal (''Iluminismo'') was heavily marked by the rule of Prime Minister [[Sebastião José de Carvalho e Melo, 1st Marquis of Pombal|Marquis of Pombal]] under King [[Joseph I of Portugal|Joseph I]] from 1756 to 1777. Following the [[1755 Lisbon earthquake]] which destroyed a large part of Lisbon, the Marquis of Pombal implemented important economic policies to regulate commercial activity (in particular with Brazil and England), and to standardise quality throughout the country (for example by introducing the first integrated industries in Portugal). His reconstruction of [[Lisbon]]'s riverside district in straight and perpendicular streets (the [[Lisbon Baixa]]), methodically organized to facilitate commerce and exchange (for example by assigning to each street a different product or service), can be seen as a direct application of the Enlightenment ideas to governance and urbanism. His urbanistic ideas, also being the first large-scale example of [[earthquake engineering]], became collectively known as [[Pombaline style]], and were implemented throughout the kingdom during his stay in office. His governance was as enlightened as ruthless, see for example the [[Távora affair]].
The Portuguese Enlightenment was heavily marked by the rule of Prime Minister [[Sebastião José de Carvalho e Melo, 1st Marquis of Pombal|Marquis of Pombal]] under King [[Joseph I of Portugal|Joseph I]] from 1756 to 1777. Following the [[1755 Lisbon earthquake]] which destroyed a large part of Lisbon, the Marquis of Pombal implemented important economic policies to regulate commercial activity (in particular with Brazil and England), and to standardise quality throughout the country (for example by introducing the first integrated industries in Portugal). His reconstruction of [[Lisbon]]'s riverside district in straight and perpendicular streets (the [[Lisbon Baixa]]), methodically organized to facilitate commerce and exchange (for example by assigning to each street a different product or service), can be seen as a direct application of the Enlightenment ideas to governance and urbanism. His urbanistic ideas, also being the first large-scale example of [[earthquake engineering]], became collectively known as [[Pombaline style]], and were implemented throughout the kingdom during his stay in office. His governance was as enlightened as ruthless, see for example the [[Távora affair]].


In literature, the first Enlightenment ideas in Portugal can be traced back to the diplomat, philosopher, and writer [[António Vieira]]<ref>{{cite journal |last=Cohen |first=Thomas M. |date=15 November 2018 |title=Six Sermons, written by António Vieira |journal=Journal of Jesuit Studies |language=en |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=692–695 |doi=10.1163/22141332-00504010-11 |issn=2214-1324 |doi-access=free}}</ref> who spent a considerable amount of his life in [[colonial Brazil]] denouncing discriminations against [[New Christian]]s and the [[indigenous peoples in Brazil]]. During the 18th century, enlightened literary movements such as the [[Arcádia Lusitana]] (lasting from 1756 until 1776, then replaced by the [[Nova Arcádia]] in 1790 until 1794) surfaced in the academic medium, in particular involving former students of the [[University of Coimbra]]. A distinct member of this group was the poet [[Manuel Maria Barbosa du Bocage]]. The physician [[António Nunes Ribeiro Sanches]] was also an important Enlightenment figure, contributing to the ''Encyclopédie'' and being part of the [[Anna of Russia|Russian court]]. The ideas of the Enlightenment influenced various economists and anti-colonial intellectuals throughout the [[Portuguese Empire]], such as [[José Joaquim da Cunha Azeredo Coutinho|José de Azeredo Coutinho]], [[José da Silva Lisboa, Viscount of Cairu|José da Silva Lisboa]], [[Cláudio Manuel da Costa|Cláudio Manoel da Costa]], and [[Tomás António Gonzaga|Tomás Antônio Gonzaga]].
In literature, the first Enlightenment ideas in Portugal can be traced back to the diplomat, philosopher, and writer [[António Vieira]]<ref>{{cite journal |last=Cohen |first=Thomas M. |date=15 November 2018 |title=Six Sermons, written by António Vieira |journal=Journal of Jesuit Studies |language=en |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=692–695 |doi=10.1163/22141332-00504010-11 |issn=2214-1324 |doi-access=free}}</ref> who spent a considerable amount of his life in [[colonial Brazil]] denouncing discriminations against [[New Christian]]s and the [[indigenous peoples in Brazil]]. During the 18th century, enlightened literary movements such as the [[Arcádia Lusitana]] (lasting from 1756 until 1776, then replaced by the [[Nova Arcádia]] in 1790 until 1794) surfaced in the academic medium, in particular involving former students of the [[University of Coimbra]]. A distinct member of this group was the poet [[Manuel Maria Barbosa du Bocage]]. The physician [[António Nunes Ribeiro Sanches]] was also an important Enlightenment figure, contributing to the ''Encyclopédie'' and being part of the [[Anna of Russia|Russian court]]. The ideas of the Enlightenment influenced various economists and anti-colonial intellectuals throughout the [[Portuguese Empire]], such as [[José Joaquim da Cunha Azeredo Coutinho|José de Azeredo Coutinho]], [[José da Silva Lisboa, Viscount of Cairu|José da Silva Lisboa]], [[Cláudio Manuel da Costa|Cláudio Manoel da Costa]], and [[Tomás António Gonzaga|Tomás Antônio Gonzaga]].


The Napoleonic [[invasion of Portugal (1807)|invasion of Portugal]] had consequences for the Portuguese monarchy. With the aid of the British navy, the Portuguese royal family was [[transfer of the Portuguese court to Brazil|evacuated to Brazil]], its most important colony. Even though Napoleon had been defeated, the royal court remained in Brazil. The [[Liberal Revolution of 1820]] forced the return of the royal family to Portugal. The terms by which the restored king was to rule was a constitutional monarchy under the Constitution of Portugal. Brazil declared its independence of Portugal in 1822 and became a monarchy.
The Napoleonic [[invasion of Portugal (1807)|invasion of Portugal]] had consequences for the Portuguese monarchy. With the aid of the British navy, the Portuguese royal family was [[transfer of the Portuguese court to Brazil|evacuated to Brazil]], its most important colony. Even though Napoleon had been defeated, the royal court remained in Brazil. The [[Liberal Revolution of 1820]] forced the return of the royal family to Portugal. The terms by which the restored king was to rule was a constitutional monarchy under the Constitution of Portugal. Brazil declared [[Independence of Brazil|its independence]] from Portugal in 1822 and became a monarchy.
 
===Sweden===
The existence of a Swedish Enlightenment has been debated by scholars. According to [[Tore Frängsmyr]], the Swedish Enlightenment "never formed a truly coherent current of ideas or became a unified movement."{{sfn |Frängsmyr |1981}} As worded by Max Skjönsberg, {{blockquote|Frängsmyr's main arguments against a Swedish Enlightenment were that religious criticism in Sweden was reserved for foreign Catholicism rather than [[Church of Sweden|the domestic Lutheran Church]] and that the debate about freedom in the 1750s and 1760s focused on political economy and freedom to trade rather than freedom to 'philosophize'. The fact that political economy is now a much more important aspect of Enlightenment historiography, to a great degree thanks to research on the Scottish Enlightenment, is a clear example of why Frängsmyr's case is in need of revision.{{sfn |Skjönsberg |2023 |p=5}}}}
 
Between 1718 and 1772, the Swedish Enlightenment overlapped with the period of parliamentary rule known in Swedish history as the [[Age of Liberty]].


===Russia===
===Russia===
{{main|Russian Enlightenment}}
[[File:Elizabeth of Russia visiting Lomonosov's mosaic workshop by A.V.Makovskiy (priv.coll.).jpg|thumb|[[Elizabeth of Russia|Empress Elizabeth]] visits Russian scientist [[Mikhail Lomonosov]].]]
[[File:Elizabeth of Russia visiting Lomonosov's mosaic workshop by A.V.Makovskiy (priv.coll.).jpg|thumb|[[Elizabeth of Russia|Empress Elizabeth]] visits Russian scientist [[Mikhail Lomonosov]].]]
In Russia, the government began to actively encourage the proliferation of arts and sciences in the mid-18th century. This era produced the first Russian university, library, theatre, public museum, and independent press. Like other enlightened despots, Catherine the Great played a key role in fostering the arts, sciences and education. She used her own interpretation of Enlightenment ideals, assisted by notable international experts such as Voltaire (by correspondence) and in residence world class scientists such as [[Leonhard Euler]] and [[Peter Simon Pallas]]. The national Enlightenment differed from its Western European counterpart in that it promoted further modernization of all aspects of Russian life and was concerned with attacking the institution of [[serfdom in Russia]]. The [[Russian Enlightenment]] centered on the individual instead of societal enlightenment and encouraged the living of an enlightened life.<ref>Elise Kimerling Wirtschafter, "Thoughts on the Enlightenment and Enlightenment in Russia," ''Modern Russian History & Historiography,'' 2009, Vol. 2 Issue 2, pp.&nbsp;1–26</ref>{{sfn|Israel|2011|pp=609–32}} A powerful element was ''prosveshchenie'' which combined religious piety, erudition, and commitment to the spread of learning. However, it lacked the skeptical and critical spirit of the Western European Enlightenment.<ref>Colum Leckey, "What is Prosveshchenie? Nikolai Novikov's Historical Dictionary of Russian Writers Revisited." ''Russian History'' 37.4 (2010): 360–77.</ref>
In Russia, the government began to actively encourage the proliferation of arts and sciences in the mid-18th century. This era produced the first Russian university, library, theatre, public museum, and independent press. Like other enlightened despots, Catherine the Great played a key role in fostering the arts, sciences and education. She used her own interpretation of Enlightenment ideals, assisted by notable international experts such as Voltaire (by correspondence) and in residence world class scientists such as [[Leonhard Euler]] and [[Peter Simon Pallas]]. The national Enlightenment differed from its Western European counterpart in that it promoted further modernization of all aspects of Russian life and was concerned with attacking the institution of [[serfdom in Russia]]. The Russian Enlightenment centered on the individual instead of societal enlightenment and encouraged the living of an enlightened life.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wirtschafter |first=Elise Kimerling |date=2009 |title=Thoughts on the Enlightenment and Enlightenment in Russia |journal=Modern Russian History & Historiography |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=1–26}}</ref>{{Sfn |Israel |2011 |pp=609–632}} A powerful element was ''prosveshchenie'' which combined religious piety, erudition, and commitment to the spread of learning. However, it lacked the skeptical and critical spirit of the Western European Enlightenment.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Leckey |first=Colum |date=2010 |title=What is Prosveshchenie? Nikolai Novikov's Historical Dictionary of Russian Writers Revisited |journal=Russian History |volume=37 |issue=4 |pages=360–377 |doi=10.1163/187633110X528663 }}</ref>


===Poland and Lithuania===
===Poland and Lithuania===
Line 210: Line 279:
Enlightenment ideas (''oświecenie'') emerged late in [[history of Poland|Poland]], as the Polish middle class was weaker and [[szlachta]] (nobility) culture ([[Sarmatism]]) together with the [[Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]] political system ([[Golden Liberty]]) were in deep crisis. The political system was built on aristocratic [[republicanism]], but was unable to defend itself against powerful neighbors Russia, Prussia, and Austria as they repeatedly sliced off regions until nothing was left of independent Poland. The Polish Enlightenment began in the 1730s–40s and especially in theatre and the arts peaked in the reign of King [[Stanisław August Poniatowski]] (second half of the 18th century).
Enlightenment ideas (''oświecenie'') emerged late in [[history of Poland|Poland]], as the Polish middle class was weaker and [[szlachta]] (nobility) culture ([[Sarmatism]]) together with the [[Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]] political system ([[Golden Liberty]]) were in deep crisis. The political system was built on aristocratic [[republicanism]], but was unable to defend itself against powerful neighbors Russia, Prussia, and Austria as they repeatedly sliced off regions until nothing was left of independent Poland. The Polish Enlightenment began in the 1730s–40s and especially in theatre and the arts peaked in the reign of King [[Stanisław August Poniatowski]] (second half of the 18th century).


Warsaw was a main centre after 1750, with an expansion of schools and educational institutions and the arts patronage held at the Royal Castle.<ref>Maciej Janowski, "Warsaw and Its Intelligentsia: Urban Space and Social Change, 1750–1831." ''Acta Poloniae Historica'' 100 (2009): 57–77. {{ISSN|0001-6829}}</ref> Leaders promoted tolerance and more education. They included King [[Stanisław August Poniatowski|Stanislaw II August]] and reformers Piotr Switkowski, [[Antoni Popławski|Antoni Poplawski]], Josef Niemcewicz, and Jósef Pawlinkowski, as well as Baudouin de Cortenay, a Polonized dramatist. Opponents included Florian Jaroszewicz, [[Gracjan Piotrkowski|Gracjan Piotrowski]], Karol Wyrwicz, and Wojciech Skarszewski.<ref>Richard Butterwick, "What is Enlightenment (oświecenie)? Some Polish Answers, 1765–1820." Central Europe 3.1 (2005): 19–37. [https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/31577077/Butterwick_What_is_Enlightenment_CE_05.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1505874099&Signature=UBisNjAzY5RdyAEsKG%2BbHWrJHJw%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DWhat_is_Enlightenment_Oswiecenie_Some_Po.pdf online]{{dead link|date=November 2017}}</ref> The movement went into decline with the [[Third Partition of Poland]] (1795) – a national tragedy inspiring a short period of sentimental writing – and ended in 1822, replaced by [[Romanticism in Poland|Romanticism]].<ref name="JS">Jerzy Snopek, [http://f.poland.pl/files/86/0/234/Literature_of_Enlightenment.pdf "The Polish Literature of the Enlightenment."] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111005232247/http://f.poland.pl/files/86/0/234/Literature_of_Enlightenment.pdf |date=5 October 2011}} (PDF 122 KB) ''Poland.pl.'' {{nowrap|Retrieved 7 October 2011.}}</ref>
Warsaw was a main centre after 1750, with an expansion of schools and educational institutions and the arts patronage held at the Royal Castle.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Janowski |first=Maciej |date=2009 |title=Warsaw and Its Intelligentsia: Urban Space and Social Change, 1750–1831 |journal=Acta Poloniae Historica |volume=100 |doi=10.3726/978-3-653-04952-7 |issn=0001-6829 |pages=57–77 |isbn=978-3-653-99944-0 }}</ref> Leaders promoted tolerance and more education. They included King [[Stanisław August Poniatowski|Stanislaw II August]] and reformers Piotr Switkowski, [[Antoni Popławski|Antoni Poplawski]], Josef Niemcewicz, and Jósef Pawlinkowski, as well as Baudouin de Cortenay, a Polonized dramatist. Opponents included Florian Jaroszewicz, [[Gracjan Piotrkowski|Gracjan Piotrowski]], Karol Wyrwicz, and Wojciech Skarszewski.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Butterwick |first=Richard |date=2005 |title=What is Enlightenment (oświecenie)? Some Polish Answers, 1765–1820 |journal=Central Europe |volume=3 |issue=1 |doi=10.1179/147909605x44218 |pages=19–37}}</ref> The movement went into decline with the [[Third Partition of Poland]] (1795) – a national tragedy inspiring a short period of sentimental writing – and ended in 1822, replaced by [[Romanticism in Poland|Romanticism]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Snopek |first=Jerzy |url=http://f.poland.pl/files/86/0/234/Literature_of_Enlightenment.pdf |title=The Polish Literature of the Enlightenment |access-date=7 October 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111005232247/http://f.poland.pl/files/86/0/234/Literature_of_Enlightenment.pdf |archive-date=5 October 2011 |via=Poland.pl}}</ref>


===China===
===China===
[[File:Matteo Ricci 2.jpg|thumb|Italian [[Society of Jesus|Jesuit]] priest [[Matteo Ricci]] worked with several Chinese elites, such as [[Xu Guangqi]], in translating ''[[Euclid's Elements]]'' into Chinese.]]
[[File:Matteo Ricci 2.jpg|thumb|Italian [[Society of Jesus|Jesuit]] priest [[Matteo Ricci]] worked with several Chinese elites, such as [[Xu Guangqi]], in translating ''[[Euclid's Elements]]'' into Chinese.]]
Eighteenth-century China experienced "a trend towards seeing fewer dragons and miracles, not unlike the disenchantment that began to spread across the Europe of the Enlightenment."<ref name=":0"/> Furthermore, "some of the developments that we associate with Europe's Enlightenment resemble events in China remarkably."<ref name=":0"/> During this time, ideals of Chinese society were reflected in "the reign of the [[Qing dynasty|Qing]] emperors [[Kangxi Emperor|Kangxi]] and [[Qianlong Emperor|Qianlong]]; China was posited as the incarnation of an enlightened and [[meritocracy|meritocratic]] society—and [[instrumentalism|instrumentalized]] for criticisms of [[absolute monarchy|absolutist]] rule in Europe."<ref name=":0" />
Eighteenth-century China experienced "a trend towards seeing fewer dragons and miracles, not unlike the disenchantment that began to spread across the Europe of the Enlightenment."<ref name=":0"/> Furthermore, "some of the developments that we associate with Europe's Enlightenment resemble events in China remarkably."<ref name=":0"/> During this time, ideals of Chinese society were reflected in "the reign of the [[Qing dynasty|Qing]] emperors [[Kangxi Emperor|Kangxi]] and [[Qianlong Emperor|Qianlong]]; China was posited as the incarnation of an enlightened and [[meritocracy|meritocratic]] society—and [[instrumentalism|instrumentalized]] for criticisms of [[absolute monarchy|absolutist]] rule in Europe."<ref name=":0"/>


===Japan===
===Japan===
From 1641 to 1853, the [[Tokugawa shogunate]] of Japan enforced a policy called ''[[Sakoku|kaikin]].'' The policy prohibited foreign contact with most outside countries.<ref>Ronald P. Toby, ''State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of the Tokugawa Bakufu,'' Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, (1984) 1991.</ref> [[Robert N. Bellah|Robert Bellah]] found "origins of modern Japan in certain strands of [[Confucianism|Confucian]] thinking, a 'functional analogue to the [[Protestant work ethic|Protestant Ethic]]' that [[Max Weber]] singled out as the driving force behind Western capitalism."<ref name=":0" /> Japanese Confucian and Enlightenment ideas were brought together, for example, in the work of the Japanese reformer [[Tsuda Mamichi]] in the 1870s, who said, "Whenever we open our mouths...it is to speak of 'enlightenment.{{'"}}<ref name=":0" />
From 1641 to 1853, the [[Tokugawa shogunate]] of Japan enforced a policy called ''[[Sakoku|kaikin]].'' The policy prohibited foreign contact with most outside countries.<ref>Ronald P. Toby, ''State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of the Tokugawa Bakufu,'' Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, (1984) 1991.</ref> [[Robert N. Bellah|Robert Bellah]] found "origins of modern Japan in certain strands of [[Confucianism|Confucian]] thinking, a 'functional analogue to the [[Protestant work ethic|Protestant Ethic]]' that [[Max Weber]] singled out as the driving force behind Western capitalism."<ref name=":0"/> Japanese Confucian and Enlightenment ideas were brought together, for example, in the work of the Japanese reformer [[Tsuda Mamichi]] in the 1870s, who said, "Whenever we open our mouths...it is to speak of 'enlightenment.{{'"}}<ref name=":0"/>


In Japan and much of East Asia, Confucian ideas were not replaced but "ideas associated with the Enlightenment were instead fused with the existing cosmology—which in turn was refashioned under conditions of [[globalization|global]] interaction."<ref name=":0" /> In Japan in particular, the term ''ri,'' which is the Confucian idea of "order and harmony on human society" also came to represent "the idea of [[laissez-faire]] and the rationality of [[market (economics)|market]] exchange."<ref name=":0" /> By the 1880s, the slogan "Civilization and Enlightenment" became potent throughout Japan, China, and Korea and was employed to address challenges of [[globalization]].<ref name=":0" />
In Japan and much of East Asia, Confucian ideas were not replaced but "ideas associated with the Enlightenment were instead fused with the existing cosmology—which in turn was refashioned under conditions of [[globalization|global]] interaction."<ref name=":0"/> In Japan in particular, the term ''ri,'' which is the Confucian idea of "order and harmony on human society" also came to represent "the idea of [[laissez-faire]] and the rationality of [[market (economics)|market]] exchange."<ref name=":0"/> By the 1880s, the slogan "Civilization and Enlightenment" became potent throughout Japan, China, and Korea and was employed to address challenges of [[globalization]].<ref name=":0"/>


===Korea===
===Korea===
During this time, Korea "aimed at isolation" and was known as the "[[hermit kingdom]]" but became awakened to Enlightenment ideas by the 1890s such as with the activities of the [[Independence Club]].<ref name=":0"/> Korea was influenced by China and Japan but also found its own Enlightenment path with the Korean intellectual [[Yu Kil-chun|Yu Kilchun]] who popularized the term Enlightenment throughout Korea.<ref name=":0" /> The use of Enlightenment ideas was a "response to a specific situation in Korea in the 1890s, and not a belated answer to Voltaire."<ref name=":0" />
During this time, Korea "aimed at isolation" and was known as the "[[hermit kingdom]]" but became awakened to Enlightenment ideas by the 1890s such as with the activities of the [[Independence Club]].<ref name=":0"/> Korea was influenced by China and Japan but also found its own Enlightenment path with the Korean intellectual [[Yu Kil-chun|Yu Kilchun]] who popularized the term Enlightenment throughout Korea.<ref name=":0"/> The use of Enlightenment ideas was a "response to a specific situation in Korea in the 1890s, and not a belated answer to Voltaire."<ref name=":0"/>


===India===
===India===
In 18th-century India, [[Tipu Sultan]] was an enlightened monarch, who "was one of the founding members of the (French) [[Jacobin]] Club in [[Srirangapatna|Seringapatam]], had planted a [[Liberty Tree|liberty tree]], and asked to be addressed as 'Tipu Citoyen,{{'"}} which means Citizen Tipu.<ref name=":0"/> In parts of India, an important movement called the "[[Bengali Renaissance|Bengal Renaissance]]" led to Enlightenment reforms beginning in the 1820s.<ref name=":0" /> [[Ram Mohan Roy]] was a reformer who "fused different traditions in his project of social reform that made him a proponent of a 'religion of reason.{{'"}}<ref name=":0" />
In 18th-century India, [[Tipu Sultan]] was an enlightened monarch, who "was one of the founding members of the (French) [[Jacobin]] Club in [[Srirangapatna|Seringapatam]], had planted a [[Liberty Tree|liberty tree]], and asked to be addressed as 'Tipu Citoyen,{{'"}} which means Citizen Tipu.<ref name=":0"/> In parts of India, an important movement called the "[[Bengali Renaissance|Bengal Renaissance]]" led to Enlightenment reforms beginning in the 1820s.<ref name=":0"/> [[Ram Mohan Roy]] was a reformer who "fused different traditions in his project of social reform that made him a proponent of a 'religion of reason.{{'"}}<ref name=":0"/>


===Egypt===
===Egypt===
[[File:Leon Cogniet - Jean-Francois Champollion.jpg|thumb|[[Jean-François Champollion]], the founder of [[Egyptology]]]]
[[File:Leon Cogniet - Jean-Francois Champollion.jpg|thumb|[[Jean-François Champollion]], the founder of [[Egyptology]]]]
Eighteenth-century Egypt had "a form of 'cultural revival' in the making—specifically Islamic origins of modernization long before Napoleon's Egyptian campaign."<ref name=":0"/> [[French campaign in Egypt and Syria|Napoleon's expedition into Egypt]] further encouraged "social transformations that harkened back to debates about inner-Islamic reform, but now were also legitimized by referring to the authority of the Enlightenment."<ref name=":0"/> A major intellectual influence on [[Islamic modernism]] and expanding the Enlightenment in Egypt, [[Rifa'a at-Tahtawi|Rifa al-Tahtawi]] "oversaw the publication of hundreds of European works in the Arabic language."<ref name=":0" />
Eighteenth-century Egypt had "a form of 'cultural revival' in the making—specifically Islamic origins of modernization long before Napoleon's Egyptian campaign."<ref name=":0"/> [[French campaign in Egypt and Syria|Napoleon's expedition into Egypt]] further encouraged "social transformations that harkened back to debates about inner-Islamic reform, but now were also legitimized by referring to the authority of the Enlightenment."<ref name=":0"/> A major intellectual influence on [[Islamic modernism]] and expanding the Enlightenment in Egypt, [[Rifa'a at-Tahtawi|Rifa al-Tahtawi]] "oversaw the publication of hundreds of European works in the Arabic language."<ref name=":0"/>


===Ottoman Empire===
===Ottoman Empire===
Line 240: Line 309:
The idea of the Enlightenment has always been contested territory. According to [[Keith Thomas (historian)|Keith Thomas]], its supporters "hail it as the source of everything that is progressive about the modern world. For them, it stands for freedom of thought, rational inquiry, critical thinking, religious tolerance, political liberty, scientific achievement, the pursuit of happiness, and hope for the future."<ref>Keith Thomas, "The Great Fight Over the Enlightenment," [http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/apr/03/great-fight-over-enlightenment/ ''The New York Review'' April 3, 2014]</ref> Thomas adds that its detractors accuse it of shallow rationalism, naïve optimism, unrealistic universalism, and moral darkness. From the start, conservative and clerical defenders of traditional religion attacked materialism and skepticism as evil forces that encouraged immorality. By 1794, they pointed to the [[Reign of Terror]] during the French Revolution as confirmation of their predictions.
The idea of the Enlightenment has always been contested territory. According to [[Keith Thomas (historian)|Keith Thomas]], its supporters "hail it as the source of everything that is progressive about the modern world. For them, it stands for freedom of thought, rational inquiry, critical thinking, religious tolerance, political liberty, scientific achievement, the pursuit of happiness, and hope for the future."<ref>Keith Thomas, "The Great Fight Over the Enlightenment," [http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/apr/03/great-fight-over-enlightenment/ ''The New York Review'' April 3, 2014]</ref> Thomas adds that its detractors accuse it of shallow rationalism, naïve optimism, unrealistic universalism, and moral darkness. From the start, conservative and clerical defenders of traditional religion attacked materialism and skepticism as evil forces that encouraged immorality. By 1794, they pointed to the [[Reign of Terror]] during the French Revolution as confirmation of their predictions.


Romantic philosophers argued that the Enlightenment's excessive dependence on reason was a mistake that it perpetuated, disregarding the bonds of history, myth, faith, and tradition that were necessary to hold society together.<ref name="Thomas, 2014">Thomas, 2014</ref> [[Ritchie Robertson]] portrays it as a grand intellectual and political program, offering a "science" of society modeled on the powerful physical laws of Newton. "Social science" was seen as the instrument of human improvement. It would expose truth and expand human happiness.<ref>
Romantic philosophers argued that the Enlightenment's excessive dependence on reason was a mistake that it perpetuated, disregarding the bonds of history, myth, faith, and tradition that were necessary to hold society together.<ref name="Thomas, 2014">Thomas, 2014</ref> [[Ritchie Robertson]] portrays it as a grand intellectual and political program, offering a "science" of society modeled on the powerful physical laws of Newton. "Social science" was seen as the instrument of human improvement. It would expose truth and expand human happiness.<ref>{{cite book |last=Robertson |first=Ritchie |title=The Enlightenment: The Pursuit of Happiness 1680-1790 |publisher=Penguin Books Ltd |date=2022 |isbn=9780141979403 |at=ch. 1}}</ref>
Ritchie Robertson, "The Enlightenment: The Pursuit of Happiness, 1680–1790." (2020) ch. 1.</ref>


The rights of women and nonwhite people were generally overlooked in Enlightenment philosophy, which is often explicitly [[Eurocentric]].<ref name="Bristow 2023"/> [[Scientific racism]] first emerged at this time, bringing together traditional racism and new research methods.<ref name="Boyle p74">{{Cite book |last=Boyle |first=Jen E. |title=Anamorphosis in Early Modern Literature |date=2010 |publisher=Ashgate Publishing |location=Farnham, Surrey |isbn=978-1-409-40069-1 |page=74 |doi=10.4324/9781315262598}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=11 December 2024 |title=Scientific racism {{!}} Categorization, Craniometry, Anthropometry, Louis Agassiz, Charles Darwin, Gregor Mendel, & Franz Boas {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/scientific-racism |access-date=22 January 2025 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref>  During the Enlightenment, concepts of [[monogenism]] and [[polygenism]] became popular, though they would only be systematized epistemologically during the 19th century. Monogenism contends that all races have a single origin, while polygenism is the idea that each race has a separate origin. Until the 18th century, the words "race" and "species" were interchangeable.<ref name="Boyle p74"/> The classification of non-European peoples as sub-human and irrational served to justify European dominance.{{Efn|{{ill|Michèle Duchet|fr|Michèle Duchet}} was a pioneer in highlighting the darker aspects of the Enlightenment. She focussed on refuting the myth of anti-colonialism in Enlightenment thought, stating that the criticisms sought to preserve European [[neo-colonial]] rule, rather than having been based on humanistic ideals.}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Vartija |first=Devin J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VaE3EAAAQBAJ&dq=enlightenment+race&pg=PA1 |title=The Color of Equality: Race and Common Humanity in Enlightenment Thought |date=2021 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |isbn=978-0-8122-5319-1 |language=en}}</ref>{{Rp|page=|pages=4, 10}}
The rights of women and nonwhite people were generally overlooked in Enlightenment philosophy, which is often explicitly [[Eurocentric]].<ref name="Bristow 2023"/> [[Scientific racism]] first emerged at this time, bringing together traditional racism and new research methods.<ref name="Boyle p74">{{Cite book |last=Boyle |first=Jen E. |title=Anamorphosis in Early Modern Literature |date=2010 |publisher=Ashgate Publishing |isbn=978-1-409-40069-1 |location=Farnham, Surrey |page=74 |doi=10.4324/9781315262598}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=11 December 2024 |title=Scientific racism {{!}} Categorization, Craniometry, Anthropometry, Louis Agassiz, Charles Darwin, Gregor Mendel, & Franz Boas {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/scientific-racism |access-date=22 January 2025 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref>  During the Enlightenment, concepts of [[monogenism]] and [[polygenism]] became popular, though they would only be systematized epistemologically during the 19th century. Monogenism contends that all races have a single origin, while polygenism is the idea that each race has a separate origin. Until the 18th century, the words "race" and "species" were interchangeable.<ref name="Boyle p74"/> The classification of non-European peoples as sub-human and irrational served to justify European dominance.{{Efn|{{ill|Michèle Duchet|fr|Michèle Duchet}} was a pioneer in highlighting the darker aspects of the Enlightenment. She focussed on refuting the myth of anti-colonialism in Enlightenment thought, stating that the criticisms sought to preserve European [[neo-colonial]] rule, rather than having been based on humanistic ideals.}}<ref>{{Cite book |last=Vartija |first=Devin J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VaE3EAAAQBAJ&dq=enlightenment+race&pg=PA1 |title=The Color of Equality: Race and Common Humanity in Enlightenment Thought |date=2021 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |isbn=978-0-8122-5319-1 |language=en}}</ref>{{Rp|page=|pages=4, 10}}


===Definition===
===Definition===
The term "Enlightenment" emerged in English in the latter part of the 19th century,<ref>''Oxford English Dictionary,'' 3rd Edn (revised)</ref> with particular reference to French philosophy, as the equivalent of the French term ''[[Lumières]]'' (used first by [[Jean-Baptiste Dubos]] in 1733 and already well established by 1751). From Kant's 1784 essay "Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?" ("Answering the Question: [[What Is Enlightenment?|What is Enlightenment?]]"), the German term became ''Aufklärun''g (''aufklären''=to illuminate; ''sich aufklären''=to clear up). However, scholars have never agreed on a definition of the Enlightenment or on its chronological or geographical extent. Terms like ''les Lumières'' (French), ''illuminism''o (Italian), ''ilustración'' (Spanish) and ''Aufklärung'' (German) referred to partly overlapping movements. Not until the late 19th century did English scholars agree they were talking about "the Enlightenment."<ref name="Thomas, 2014"/><ref>{{cite journal |first=John |last=Lough |title=Reflections on Enlightenment and Lumieres |year=1985 |volume=8#1 |pages=1–15 |doi=10.1111/j.1754-0208.1985.tb00093.x |journal=Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies |issue=1}}</ref>
The term "Enlightenment" emerged in English in the latter part of the 19th century,<ref>''Oxford English Dictionary,'' 3rd Edn (revised)</ref> with particular reference to French philosophy, as the equivalent of the French term ''[[Lumières]]'' (used first by [[Jean-Baptiste Dubos]] in 1733 and already well established by 1751). From Kant's 1784 essay "Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?" ("Answering the Question: [[What Is Enlightenment?|What is Enlightenment?]]"), the German term became ''Aufklärun''g (''aufklären''=to illuminate; ''sich aufklären''=to clear up). However, scholars have never agreed on a definition of the Enlightenment or on its chronological or geographical extent. Terms like ''les Lumières'' (French), ''illuminism''o (Italian), ''ilustración'' (Spanish) and ''Aufklärung'' (German) referred to partly overlapping movements. Not until the late 19th century did English scholars agree they were talking about "the Enlightenment."<ref name="Thomas, 2014"/><ref>{{cite journal |last=Lough |first=John |date=1985 |title=Reflections on Enlightenment and Lumieres |journal=Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies |volume=8#1 |issue=1 |pages=1–15 |doi=10.1111/j.1754-0208.1985.tb00093.x}}</ref>


[[File:Encyclopedie frontispice full.jpg|thumb|upright|If there is something you know, communicate it. If there is something you don't know, search for it.<div style="text-align:right;">— An engraving from the 1772 edition of the ''[[Encyclopédie]]''; [[Truth]], in the top center, is surrounded by light and unveiled by the figures to the right, Philosophy and [[Reason]]</div>]]
[[File:Encyclopedie frontispice full.jpg|thumb|upright|If there is something you know, communicate it. If there is something you don't know, search for it.<div style="text-align:right;">— An engraving from the 1772 edition of the ''[[Encyclopédie]]''; [[Truth]], in the top center, is surrounded by light and unveiled by the figures to the right, Philosophy and [[Reason]]</div>]]


Enlightenment historiography began in the period itself, from what Enlightenment figures said about their work. A dominant element was the intellectual angle they took. [[Jean le Rond d'Alembert]]'s ''Preliminary Discourse'' of ''l'Encyclopédie'' provides a history of the Enlightenment which comprises a chronological list of developments in the realm of knowledge—of which the ''Encyclopédie'' forms the pinnacle.<ref>Jean le Rond d'Alembert, ''Discours préliminaire de l'Encyclopédie''</ref> In 1783, Mendelssohn referred to Enlightenment as a process by which man was educated in the use of reason.<ref>Outram, 1. The past tense is used deliberately as whether man would educate himself or be educated by certain exemplary figures was a common issue at the time. D'Alembert's introduction to l'Encyclopédie, for example, along with Immanuel Kant's essay response (the "independent thinkers"), both support the later model.</ref> Kant called Enlightenment "man's release from his self-incurred tutelage," tutelage being "man's inability to make use of his understanding without direction from another."<ref>Immanuel Kant, "What is Enlightenment?", 1.</ref> "For Kant, Enlightenment was mankind's final coming of age, the emancipation of the human consciousness from an immature state of ignorance."<ref>{{harvnb|Porter|2001|p=1}}</ref> The German scholar [[Ernst Cassirer]] called the Enlightenment "a part and a special phase of that whole intellectual development through which modern philosophic thought gained its characteristic self-confidence and self-consciousness."<ref>Ernst Cassirer, ''The Philosophy of the Enlightenment,'' (1951), p. vi</ref> According to historian [[Roy Porter]], the liberation of the human mind from a dogmatic state of ignorance, is the epitome of what the Age of Enlightenment was trying to capture.<ref>{{harvnb|Porter|2001|p=70}}</ref>
Enlightenment historiography began in the period itself, from what Enlightenment figures said about their work. A dominant element was the intellectual angle they took. [[Jean le Rond d'Alembert]]'s ''Preliminary Discourse'' of ''l'Encyclopédie'' provides a history of the Enlightenment which comprises a chronological list of developments in the realm of knowledge—of which the ''Encyclopédie'' forms the pinnacle.<ref>Jean le Rond d'Alembert, ''Discours préliminaire de l'Encyclopédie''</ref> In 1783, Mendelssohn referred to Enlightenment as a process by which man was educated in the use of reason.{{Sfn |Outram |1995 |p=1}}{{Efn|The past tense is used deliberately as whether man would educate himself or be educated by certain exemplary figures was a common issue at the time. D'Alembert's introduction to l'Encyclopédie, for example, along with Immanuel Kant's essay response (the "independent thinkers"), both support the later model.}} Kant called Enlightenment "man's release from his self-incurred tutelage," tutelage being "man's inability to make use of his understanding without direction from another."<ref>Immanuel Kant, "What is Enlightenment?", 1.</ref> "For Kant, Enlightenment was mankind's final coming of age, the emancipation of the human consciousness from an immature state of ignorance."{{Sfn|Porter|2001|p=1}} The German scholar [[Ernst Cassirer]] called the Enlightenment "a part and a special phase of that whole intellectual development through which modern philosophic thought gained its characteristic self-confidence and self-consciousness."<ref>Ernst Cassirer, ''The Philosophy of the Enlightenment,'' (1951), p. vi</ref> According to historian [[Roy Porter]], the liberation of the human mind from a dogmatic state of ignorance, is the epitome of what the Age of Enlightenment was trying to capture.{{Sfn|Porter|2001|p=1}}


[[Bertrand Russell]] saw the Enlightenment as a phase in a progressive development which began in antiquity and that reason and challenges to the established order were constant ideals throughout that time.<ref name="Russell, Bertrand p492-494">Russell, Bertrand. ''A History of Western Philosophy.'' pp.&nbsp;492–494</ref> Russell said that the Enlightenment was ultimately born out of the Protestant reaction against the Catholic [[Counter-Reformation]] and that philosophical views such as affinity for democracy against monarchy originated among 16th-century Protestants to justify their desire to break away from the Catholic Church. Although many of these philosophical ideals were picked up by Catholics, Russell argues that by the 18th century the Enlightenment was the principal manifestation of the [[Reformation|schism]] that began with [[Martin Luther]].<ref name="Russell, Bertrand p492-494"/>
[[Bertrand Russell]] saw the Enlightenment as a phase in a progressive development which began in antiquity and that reason and challenges to the established order were constant ideals throughout that time.<ref name="Russell, Bertrand p492-494">Russell, Bertrand. ''A History of Western Philosophy.'' pp.&nbsp;492–494</ref> Russell said that the Enlightenment was ultimately born out of the Protestant reaction against the Catholic [[Counter-Reformation]] and that philosophical views such as affinity for democracy against monarchy originated among 16th-century Protestants to justify their desire to break away from the Catholic Church. Although many of these philosophical ideals were picked up by Catholics, Russell argues that by the 18th century the Enlightenment was the principal manifestation of the [[Reformation|schism]] that began with [[Martin Luther]].<ref name="Russell, Bertrand p492-494"/>


Jonathan Israel rejects the attempts of postmodern and [[Marxism|Marxian]] historians to understand the revolutionary ideas of the period purely as by-products of social and economic transformations.{{sfn|Israel|2010|pp=49–50}} He instead focuses on the history of ideas in the period from 1650 to the end of the 18th century and claims that it was the ideas themselves that caused the change that eventually led to the revolutions of the latter half of the 18th century and the early 19th century.{{sfn|Israel|2006|pp=v–viii}} Israel argues that until the 1650s Western civilization "was based on a largely shared core of faith, tradition, and authority."{{Sfn|Israel|2001|pp=3}}
Jonathan Israel rejects the attempts of postmodern and [[Marxism|Marxian]] historians to understand the revolutionary ideas of the period purely as by-products of social and economic transformations.{{sfn |Israel |2010 |pp=49–50}} He instead focuses on the history of ideas in the period from 1650 to the end of the 18th century and claims that it was the ideas themselves that caused the change that eventually led to the revolutions of the latter half of the 18th century and the early 19th century.{{sfn |Israel |2006 |pp=v–viii}} Israel argues that until the 1650s Western civilization "was based on a largely shared core of faith, tradition, and authority."{{Sfn |Israel |2001 |pp=3}}


===Time span===
===Time span===
There is little consensus on the precise beginning of the Age of Enlightenment, though several historians and philosophers argue that it was marked by Descartes' 1637 philosophy of ''[[Cogito, ergo sum]]'' ("I think, therefore I am"), which shifted the [[epistemology|epistemological]] basis from external authority to internal certainty.<ref name="Heidegger1938emancipated">Martin Heidegger [1938] (2002) ''The Age of the World Picture'' quotation:{{blockquote|For up to Descartes ... a particular ''sub-iectum'' ... lies at the foundation of its own fixed qualities and changing circumstances. The superiority of a ''sub-iectum'' ... arises out of the claim of man to a ... self-supported, unshakeable foundation of truth, in the sense of certainty. Why and how does this claim acquire its decisive authority? The claim originates in that emancipation of man in which he frees himself from obligation to Christian revelational truth and Church doctrine to a legislating for himself that takes its stand upon itself.}}</ref><ref name="Ingraffia95p126">Ingraffia, Brian D. (1995) [https://books.google.com/books?id=LHjZYbOLG8cC&pg=PA126 ''Postmodern theory and biblical theology: vanquishing God's shadow''] p. 126</ref><ref>Norman K. Swazo (2002) [https://books.google.com/books?id=INP_cy6Mu7EC&pg=PA97 ''Crisis theory and world order: Heideggerian reflections''] pp.&nbsp;97–99</ref> In France, many cited the publication of Newton's ''[[Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica|Principia Mathematica]]'' (1687),<ref>Shank, J. B. ''The Newton Wars and the Beginning of the French Enlightenment'' (2008), "Introduction"{{Page needed|date=July 2020}}</ref> which built upon the work of earlier scientists and formulated the [[Newton's laws of motion|laws of motion]] and [[Newton's law of universal gravitation|universal gravitation]].<ref>{{cite web |title=PHYS 200 – Lecture 3 – Newton's Laws of Motion – Open Yale Courses |url=http://oyc.yale.edu/physics/phys-200/lecture-3 |website=oyc.yale.edu}}</ref> French historians usually place the ''Siècle des Lumières'' ("Century of Enlightenments") between 1715 and 1789: from the beginning of the reign of [[Louis XV]] until the French Revolution.<ref>[[Matthew Smith Anderson|Anderson, M. S.]] ''Historians and eighteenth-century Europe, 1715–1789'' (Oxford UP, 1979); Jean de Viguerie, ''Histoire et dictionnaire du temps des Lumières (1715–1789)'' (Paris: Robert Laffont, 1995).</ref> Most scholars use the last years of the century, often choosing the French Revolution or the beginning of the [[Napoleonic Wars]] (1804) as a convenient point in time with which to date the end of the Enlightenment.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/enlightenment_age.html |title=The age of Enlightenment |last=Frost |first=Martin |year=2008 |access-date=18 January 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071010041056/http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/enlightenment_age.html |archive-date=10 October 2007}}</ref>
There is little consensus on the precise beginning of the Age of Enlightenment, though several historians and philosophers argue that it was marked by Descartes' 1637 philosophy of ''[[Cogito, ergo sum]]'' ("I think, therefore I am"), which shifted the [[epistemology|epistemological]] basis from external authority to internal certainty.<ref name="Heidegger1938emancipated">{{Cite book |first=Martin |last=Heidegger |author-link=Martin Heidegger |orig-date=1938 |date=2002 |title=The Age of the World Picture}}: {{blockquote|For up to Descartes ... a particular ''sub-iectum'' ... lies at the foundation of its own fixed qualities and changing circumstances. The superiority of a ''sub-iectum'' ... arises out of the claim of man to a ... self-supported, unshakeable foundation of truth, in the sense of certainty. Why and how does this claim acquire its decisive authority? The claim originates in that emancipation of man in which he frees himself from obligation to Christian revelational truth and Church doctrine to a legislating for himself that takes its stand upon itself.}}</ref><ref name="Ingraffia95p126">Ingraffia, Brian D. (1995) [https://www.google.com/books/edition/_/LHjZYbOLG8cC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA126 ''Postmodern theory and biblical theology: vanquishing God's shadow''] p. 126</ref><ref>Norman K. Swazo (2002) [https://books.google.com/books?id=INP_cy6Mu7EC&pg=PA97 ''Crisis theory and world order: Heideggerian reflections''] pp.&nbsp;97–99</ref> In France, many cited the publication of Newton's ''[[Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica|Principia Mathematica]]'' (1687),<ref>Shank, J. B. ''The Newton Wars and the Beginning of the French Enlightenment'' (2008), "Introduction"{{Page needed|date=July 2020}}</ref> which built upon the work of earlier scientists and formulated the [[Newton's laws of motion|laws of motion]] and [[Newton's law of universal gravitation|universal gravitation]].<ref>{{cite web |title=PHYS 200 – Lecture 3 – Newton's Laws of Motion – Open Yale Courses |url=http://oyc.yale.edu/physics/phys-200/lecture-3 |website=oyc.yale.edu}}</ref> French historians usually place the ''Siècle des Lumières'' ("Century of Enlightenments") between 1715 and 1789: from the beginning of the reign of [[Louis XV]] until the French Revolution.<ref>[[Matthew Smith Anderson|Anderson, M. S.]] ''Historians and eighteenth-century Europe, 1715–1789'' (Oxford UP, 1979); Jean de Viguerie, ''Histoire et dictionnaire du temps des Lumières (1715–1789)'' (Paris: Robert Laffont, 1995).</ref> Most scholars use the last years of the century, often choosing the French Revolution or the beginning of the [[Napoleonic Wars]] (1804) as a convenient point in time with which to date the end of the Enlightenment.<ref>{{cite web |last=Frost |first=Martin |date=2008 |title=The age of Enlightenment |url=http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/enlightenment_age.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071010041056/http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/enlightenment_age.html |archive-date=10 October 2007 |access-date=18 January 2008}}</ref>


In recent years, scholars have expanded the time span and global perspective of the Enlightenment by examining: (1) how European intellectuals did not work alone and other people helped spread and adapt Enlightenment ideas, (2) how Enlightenment ideas were "a response to cross-border interaction and [[globalization|global integration]]," and (3) how the Enlightenment "continued throughout the nineteenth century and beyond."<ref name=":0"/> The Enlightenment "was not merely a history of [[diffusion of innovations|diffusion]]" and "was the work of historical actors around the world... who invoked the term... for their own specific purposes."<ref name=":0"/>
In recent years, scholars have expanded the time span and global perspective of the Enlightenment by examining: (1) how European intellectuals did not work alone and other people helped spread and adapt Enlightenment ideas, (2) how Enlightenment ideas were "a response to cross-border interaction and [[globalization|global integration]]," and (3) how the Enlightenment "continued throughout the nineteenth century and beyond."<ref name=":0"/> The Enlightenment "was not merely a history of [[diffusion of innovations|diffusion]]" and "was the work of historical actors around the world... who invoked the term... for their own specific purposes."<ref name=":0"/>
Line 264: Line 332:
In their 1947 book ''[[Dialectic of Enlightenment]],'' [[Frankfurt School]] philosophers [[Max Horkheimer]] and [[Theodor W. Adorno]], both wartime exiles from Nazi Germany, critiqued the supposed rational basis of the modern world:
In their 1947 book ''[[Dialectic of Enlightenment]],'' [[Frankfurt School]] philosophers [[Max Horkheimer]] and [[Theodor W. Adorno]], both wartime exiles from Nazi Germany, critiqued the supposed rational basis of the modern world:


{{blockquote|Enlightenment, understood in the widest sense as the advance of thought, has always aimed at liberating human beings from fear and installing them as masters. Yet the wholly enlightened earth radiates under the sign of disaster triumphant.<ref name="Zuidervaart p185">{{cite book |last1=Zuidervaart |first1=Lambert |title=Social Philosophy after Adorno |date=2007 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-46453-6 |page=185 |doi=10.1017/CBO9780511618970.009 |chapter=Appendix: Adorno's Social Philosophy}}</ref>}}
{{blockquote|Enlightenment, understood in the widest sense as the advance of thought, has always aimed at liberating human beings from fear and installing them as masters. Yet the wholly enlightened earth radiates under the sign of disaster triumphant.<ref name="Zuidervaart p185">{{cite book |last=Zuidervaart |first=Lambert |title=Social Philosophy after Adorno |date=2007 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-139-46453-6 |page=185 |chapter=Appendix: Adorno's Social Philosophy |doi=10.1017/CBO9780511618970.009}}</ref>}}


Extending Horkheimer and Adorno's argument, intellectual historian [[Jason Josephson Storm]] argues that any idea of the Age of Enlightenment as a clearly defined period that is separate from the earlier [[Renaissance]] and later [[Romanticism]] or [[Counter-Enlightenment]] constitutes a myth. Storm points out that there are vastly different and mutually contradictory periodizations of the Enlightenment depending on nation, field of study, and school of thought; that the term and category of "Enlightenment" referring to the Scientific Revolution was actually applied after the fact; that the Enlightenment did not see an increase in [[disenchantment]] or the dominance of the [[mechanism (philosophy)|mechanistic worldview]]; and that a blur in the early modern ideas of the [[humanities]] and natural sciences makes it hard to circumscribe a Scientific Revolution.<ref>{{cite book |last=Josephson-Storm |first=Jason |title=The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences |location=Chicago |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=2017 |pages=58–61 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xZ5yDgAAQBAJ |isbn=978-0-226-40336-6}}</ref> Storm defends his categorization of the Enlightenment as "myth" by noting the regulative role ideas of a period of Enlightenment and disenchantment play in modern Western culture, such that belief in magic, spiritualism, and even religion appears somewhat taboo in intellectual strata.<ref>{{cite book |last=Josephson-Storm |first=Jason |title=The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences |location=Chicago |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=2017 |pages=61–62 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xZ5yDgAAQBAJ |isbn=978-0-226-40336-6}}</ref>
Extending Horkheimer and Adorno's argument, intellectual historian [[Jason Josephson Storm]] argues that any idea of the Age of Enlightenment as a clearly defined period that is separate from the earlier [[Renaissance]] and later [[Romanticism]] or [[Counter-Enlightenment]] constitutes a myth. Storm points out that there are vastly different and mutually contradictory periodizations of the Enlightenment depending on nation, field of study, and school of thought; that the term and category of "Enlightenment" referring to the Scientific Revolution was actually applied after the fact; that the Enlightenment did not see an increase in [[disenchantment]] or the dominance of the [[mechanism (philosophy)|mechanistic worldview]]; and that a blur in the early modern ideas of the [[humanities]] and natural sciences makes it hard to circumscribe a Scientific Revolution.<ref>{{cite book |last=Josephson-Storm |first=Jason |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xZ5yDgAAQBAJ |title=The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences |publisher=University of Chicago Press |date=2017 |isbn=978-0-226-40336-6 |location=Chicago |pages=58–61}}</ref> Storm defends his categorization of the Enlightenment as "myth" by noting the regulative role ideas of a period of Enlightenment and disenchantment play in modern Western culture, such that belief in magic, spiritualism, and even religion appears somewhat taboo in intellectual strata.<ref>{{cite book |last=Josephson-Storm |first=Jason |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xZ5yDgAAQBAJ |title=The Myth of Disenchantment: Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences |publisher=University of Chicago Press |date=2017 |isbn=978-0-226-40336-6 |location=Chicago |pages=61–62}}</ref>


In the 1970s, study of the Enlightenment expanded to include the ways Enlightenment ideas spread to European colonies and how they interacted with indigenous cultures and how the Enlightenment took place in formerly unstudied areas such as Italy, Greece, the Balkans, Poland, Hungary, and Russia.<ref>Outram, 6. See also, A. Owen Alridge (ed.), ''The Ibero-American Enlightenment'' (1971)., Franco Venturi, ''The End of the Old Regime in Europe 1768–1776: The First Crisis.''</ref> Intellectuals such as [[Robert Darnton]] and [[Jürgen Habermas]] have focused on the social conditions of the Enlightenment. Habermas described the creation of the "bourgeois public sphere" in 18th-century Europe, containing the new venues and modes of communication allowing for rational exchange. Habermas said that the public sphere was bourgeois, egalitarian, rational, and independent from the state, making it the ideal venue for intellectuals to critically examine contemporary politics and society, away from the interference of established authority. While the public sphere is generally an integral component of the social study of the Enlightenment, other historians{{efn|e.g. Robert Darnton, Roger Chartier, Brian Cowan, Donna T. Andrew.}} have questioned whether the public sphere had these characteristics.
In the 1970s, study of the Enlightenment expanded to include the ways Enlightenment ideas spread to European colonies and how they interacted with indigenous cultures and how the Enlightenment took place in formerly unstudied areas such as Italy, Greece, the Balkans, Poland, Hungary, and Russia.{{Sfn |Outram |1995 |page=6}}<ref>See also, A. Owen Alridge (ed.), ''The Ibero-American Enlightenment'' (1971)., Franco Venturi, ''The End of the Old Regime in Europe 1768–1776: The First Crisis.''</ref> Intellectuals such as [[Robert Darnton]] and [[Jürgen Habermas]] have focused on the social conditions of the Enlightenment. Habermas described the creation of the "bourgeois public sphere" in 18th-century Europe, containing the new venues and modes of communication allowing for rational exchange. Habermas said that the public sphere was bourgeois, egalitarian, rational, and independent from the state, making it the ideal venue for intellectuals to critically examine contemporary politics and society, away from the interference of established authority. While the public sphere is generally an integral component of the social study of the Enlightenment, other historians{{efn|e.g. Robert Darnton, Roger Chartier, Brian Cowan, Donna T. Andrew.}} have questioned whether the public sphere had these characteristics.


==Society and culture==
==Society and culture==
Line 275: Line 343:
In contrast to the intellectual historiographical approach of the Enlightenment, which examines the various currents or discourses of intellectual thought within the European context during the 17th and 18th centuries, the cultural (or social) approach examines the changes that occurred in European society and culture. This approach studies the process of changing sociabilities and cultural practices during the Enlightenment.
In contrast to the intellectual historiographical approach of the Enlightenment, which examines the various currents or discourses of intellectual thought within the European context during the 17th and 18th centuries, the cultural (or social) approach examines the changes that occurred in European society and culture. This approach studies the process of changing sociabilities and cultural practices during the Enlightenment.


One of the primary elements of the culture of the Enlightenment was the rise of the [[public sphere]], a "realm of communication marked by new arenas of debate, more open and accessible forms of urban public space and sociability, and an explosion of print culture," in the late 17th century and 18th century.<ref>James Van Horn Melton, ''The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe'' (2001), p. 4.</ref> Elements of the public sphere included that it was egalitarian, that it discussed the domain of "common concern," and that argument was founded on reason.<ref>Jürgen Habermas, ''The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere,'' (1989), pp. 36, 37.</ref> Habermas uses the term "common concern" to describe those areas of political/social knowledge and discussion that were previously the exclusive territory of the state and religious authorities, now open to critical examination by the public sphere. The values of this bourgeois public sphere included holding reason to be supreme, considering everything to be open to criticism (the public sphere is [[Critical thinking|critical]]), and the opposition of secrecy of all sorts.<ref>Melton, 8.</ref>
One of the primary elements of the culture of the Enlightenment was the rise of the [[public sphere]], a "realm of communication marked by new arenas of debate, more open and accessible forms of urban public space and sociability, and an explosion of print culture," in the late 17th century and 18th century.{{Sfn|Melton|2001|p=4}} Elements of the public sphere included that it was [[Egalitarianism|egalitarian]], that it discussed the domain of "common concern," and that argument was founded on reason.{{Sfn|Habermas|1989|pp=36–37}} Habermas uses the term "common concern" to describe those areas of political/social knowledge and discussion that were previously the exclusive territory of the state and religious authorities, now open to critical examination by the public sphere. The values of this bourgeois public sphere included holding reason to be supreme, considering everything to be open to criticism (the public sphere is [[Critical thinking|critical]]), and the opposition of secrecy of all sorts.{{Sfn|Melton|2001|p=8}}


[[File:Alexandre humboldt.jpg|thumb|upright|left|German explorer [[Alexander von Humboldt]] showed his disgust for slavery and often criticized the colonial policies—he always acted out of a deeply humanistic conviction, borne by the ideas of the Enlightenment.<ref>Nicolaas A. Rupke (2008). "''[https://books.google.com/books?id=_fXXRzidVKMC Alexander Von Humboldt: A Metabiography].''" University of Chicago Press. p. 138 {{ISBN|978-0-226-73149-0}}</ref>]]
[[File:Alexander von Humboldt by Friedrich Georg Weitsch.jpg|thumb|upright|left|German explorer [[Alexander von Humboldt]] showed his disgust for slavery and often criticized the colonial policies—he always acted out of a deeply humanistic conviction, borne by the ideas of the Enlightenment.<ref>Nicolaas A. Rupke (2008). "''[https://books.google.com/books?id=_fXXRzidVKMC Alexander Von Humboldt: A Metabiography].''" University of Chicago Press. p. 138 {{ISBN|978-0-226-73149-0}}</ref>]]
The creation of the public sphere has been associated with two long-term historical trends: the rise of the modern nation state and the rise of [[capitalism]]. The modern nation state in its consolidation of public power created by counterpoint a private realm of society independent of the state, which allowed for the public sphere. Capitalism also increased society's [[autonomy]] and [[self-awareness]], as well as an increasing need for the exchange of information. As the nascent public sphere expanded, it embraced a large variety of institutions, and the most commonly cited were coffee houses and cafés, salons and the literary public sphere, figuratively localized in the [[Republic of Letters]].<ref>Melton, 4, 5. Habermas, 14–26.</ref> In France, the creation of the public sphere was helped by the aristocracy's move from the king's palace at Versailles to Paris in about 1720, since their rich spending stimulated the trade in luxuries and artistic creations, especially fine paintings.<ref>{{cite book |editor=Daniel Brewer |title=The Cambridge Companion to the French Enlightenment |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mry1BAAAQBAJ&pg=PT91 |year=2014 |publisher=Cambridge UP |pages=91ff |isbn=978-1-316-19432-4}}</ref>
The creation of the public sphere has been associated with two long-term historical trends: the rise of the modern nation state and the rise of [[capitalism]]. The modern nation state in its consolidation of public power created by counterpoint a private realm of society independent of the state, which allowed for the public sphere. Capitalism also increased society's [[autonomy]] and [[self-awareness]], as well as an increasing need for the exchange of information. As the nascent public sphere expanded, it embraced a large variety of institutions, and the most commonly cited were coffee houses and cafés, salons and the literary public sphere, figuratively localized in the [[Republic of Letters]].{{Sfn|Melton|2001|pp=4, 5}}{{Sfn|Habermas|1989|pp=14–26}} In France, the creation of the public sphere was helped by the aristocracy's move from the king's palace at Versailles to Paris in about 1720, since their rich spending stimulated the trade in luxuries and artistic creations, especially fine paintings.<ref>{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mry1BAAAQBAJ&pg=PT91 |title=The Cambridge Companion to the French Enlightenment |publisher=Cambridge UP |date=2014 |isbn=978-1-316-19432-4 |editor=Daniel Brewer |pages=91ff}}</ref>


The context for the rise of the public sphere was the economic and social change commonly associated with the [[Industrial Revolution]]: "Economic expansion, increasing urbanization, rising population and improving communications in comparison to the stagnation of the previous century."<ref>Outram, Dorinda. ''The Enlightenment'' (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 12.</ref> Rising efficiency in production techniques and communication lowered the prices of consumer goods and increased the amount and variety of goods available to consumers (including the literature essential to the public sphere). Meanwhile, the colonial experience (most European states had colonial empires in the 18th century) began to expose European society to extremely heterogeneous cultures, leading to the breaking down of "barriers between cultural systems, religious divides, gender differences and geographical areas."<ref>Outram 2005, p. 13.</ref>
The context for the rise of the public sphere was the economic and social change commonly associated with the [[Industrial Revolution]]: "Economic expansion, increasing urbanization, rising population and improving communications in comparison to the stagnation of the previous century."{{Sfn |Outram |1995 |page=12}} Rising efficiency in production techniques and communication lowered the prices of consumer goods and increased the amount and variety of goods available to consumers (including the literature essential to the public sphere). Meanwhile, the colonial experience (most European states had colonial empires in the 18th century) began to expose European society to extremely heterogeneous cultures, leading to the breaking down of "barriers between cultural systems, religious divides, gender differences and geographical areas."{{Sfn |Outram |1995 |page=13}}


The word "public" implies the highest level of inclusivity—the public sphere by definition should be open to all. However, this sphere was only public to relative degrees. Enlightenment thinkers frequently contrasted their conception of the "public" with that of the people: [[Marquis de Condorcet|Condorcet]] contrasted "opinion" with populace, [[Jean-François Marmontel|Marmontel]] "the opinion of men of letters" with "the opinion of the multitude" and [[Jean le Rond d'Alembert|d'Alembert]] the "truly enlightened public" with "the blind and noisy multitude."<ref>Chartier, 27.</ref> Additionally, most institutions of the public sphere excluded both women and the lower classes.<ref>Mona Ozouf, {{"'}}Public Opinion' at the End of the Old Regime"</ref> Cross-class influences occurred through noble and lower class participation in areas such as the coffeehouses and the Masonic lodges.
The word "public" implies the highest level of inclusivity—the public sphere by definition should be open to all. However, this sphere was only public to relative degrees. Enlightenment thinkers frequently contrasted their conception of the "public" with that of the people: [[Marquis de Condorcet|Condorcet]] contrasted "opinion" with populace, [[Jean-François Marmontel|Marmontel]] "the opinion of men of letters" with "the opinion of the multitude" and [[Jean le Rond d'Alembert|d'Alembert]] the "truly enlightened public" with "the blind and noisy multitude."{{Sfn |Chartier |1991 |p=27}} Additionally, most institutions of the public sphere excluded both women and the lower classes.<ref>Mona Ozouf, {{"'}}Public Opinion' at the End of the Old Regime"</ref> Cross-class influences occurred through noble and lower class participation in areas such as the coffeehouses and the Masonic lodges.


===Implications in the arts===
===Implications in the arts===
Line 300: Line 368:


===Republic of Letters===
===Republic of Letters===
The term "[[Republic of Letters]]" was coined in 1664 by Pierre Bayle in his journal ''Nouvelles de la Republique des Lettres.'' Towards the end of the 18th century, the editor of ''Histoire de la République des Lettres en France,'' a literary survey, described the Republic of Letters as being: {{blockquote|In the midst of all the governments that decide the fate of men; in the bosom of so many states, the majority of them despotic&nbsp;... there exists a certain realm which holds sway only over the mind&nbsp;... that we honor with the name Republic, because it preserves a measure of independence, and because it is almost its essence to be free. It is the realm of talent and of thought.<ref name="Outram, 21"/>}}
The term "[[Republic of Letters]]" was coined in 1664 by Pierre Bayle in his journal ''Nouvelles de la Republique des Lettres.'' Towards the end of the 18th century, the editor of ''Histoire de la République des Lettres en France,'' a literary survey, described the Republic of Letters as being: {{blockquote|In the midst of all the governments that decide the fate of men; in the bosom of so many states, the majority of them despotic&nbsp;... there exists a certain realm which holds sway only over the mind&nbsp;... that we honor with the name Republic, because it preserves a measure of independence, and because it is almost its essence to be free. It is the realm of talent and of thought.{{Sfn |Outram |1995 |page=21}}}}


The Republic of Letters was the sum of a number of Enlightenment ideals: an egalitarian realm governed by knowledge that could act across political boundaries and rival state power.<ref name="Outram, 21"/> It was a forum that supported "free public examination of questions regarding religion or legislation."<ref>Chartier, 26.</ref> Kant considered written communication essential to his conception of the public sphere; once everyone was a part of the "reading public," then society could be said to be enlightened.<ref>Chartier, 26, 26. Kant, "What is Enlightenment?"</ref> The people who participated in the Republic of Letters, such as Diderot and Voltaire, are frequently known today as important Enlightenment figures. Indeed, the men who wrote Diderot's ''Encyclopédie'' arguably formed a microcosm of the larger "republic."<ref>Outram, 23.</ref>
The Republic of Letters was the sum of a number of Enlightenment ideals: an egalitarian realm governed by knowledge that could act across political boundaries and rival state power.{{Sfn |Outram |1995 |page=21}} It was a forum that supported "free public examination of questions regarding religion or legislation."{{Sfn |Chartier |1991 |p=26}} Kant considered written communication essential to his conception of the public sphere; once everyone was a part of the "reading public," then society could be said to be enlightened.{{Sfn |Chartier |1991 |p=26}}<ref>Kant, "What is Enlightenment?"</ref> The people who participated in the Republic of Letters, such as Diderot and Voltaire, are frequently known today as important Enlightenment figures. Indeed, the men who wrote Diderot's ''Encyclopédie'' arguably formed a microcosm of the larger "republic."{{Sfn |Outram |1995 |page=23}}


[[File:Gentleman's Magazine 1731.JPG|thumb|Front page of ''[[The Gentleman's Magazine]],'' January 1731]]
[[File:Gentleman's Magazine 1731.JPG|thumb|Front page of ''[[The Gentleman's Magazine]],'' January 1731]]
Many women played an essential part in the French Enlightenment because of the role they played as ''salonnières'' in Parisian salons, as the contrast to the male ''philosophes<!-- "philosophes" is correct -->.'' The salon was the principal social institution of the republic<ref>Goodman, 3.</ref> and "became the civil working spaces of the project of Enlightenment." Women, as salonnières, were "the legitimate governors of [the] potentially unruly discourse" that took place within.<ref>Dena Goodman, ''The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment'' (1994), 53.</ref> While women were marginalized in the public culture of the Old Regime, the French Revolution destroyed the old cultural and economic restraints of patronage and corporatism (guilds), opening French society to female participation, particularly in the literary sphere.<ref>Carla Hesse, ''The Other Enlightenment: How French Women Became Modern'' (2001), 42.</ref>
Many women played an essential part in the French Enlightenment because of the role they played as ''salonnières'' in Parisian salons, as the contrast to the male ''philosophes<!-- "philosophes" is correct -->.'' The salon was the principal social institution of the republic<ref>Goodman, 3.</ref> and "became the civil working spaces of the project of Enlightenment." Women, as salonnières, were "the legitimate governors of [the] potentially unruly discourse" that took place within.<ref>Dena Goodman, ''The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment'' (1994), 53.</ref> While women were marginalized in the public culture of the Old Regime, the French Revolution destroyed the old cultural and economic restraints of patronage and corporatism (guilds), opening French society to female participation, particularly in the literary sphere.<ref>Carla Hesse, ''The Other Enlightenment: How French Women Became Modern'' (2001), 42.</ref>


In France, the established men of letters (''gens de lettres'') had fused with the elites (''les grands'') of French society by the mid-18th century. This led to the creation of an oppositional literary sphere, [[Grub Street]], the domain of a "multitude of versifiers and would-be authors."<ref>Crébillon fils, quoted from Darnton, ''The Literary Underground,'' 17.</ref> These men came to London to become authors only to discover that the literary market could not support large numbers of writers, who in any case were very poorly remunerated by the publishing-bookselling [[guild]]s.<ref>Darnton, ''The Literary Underground,'' 19, 20.</ref>
In France, the established men of letters (''gens de lettres'') had fused with the elites (''les grands'') of French society by the mid-18th century. This led to the creation of an oppositional literary sphere, [[Grub Street]], the domain of a "multitude of versifiers and would-be authors."<ref>Crébillon fils, quoted from {{Harvnb|Darnton|1982|p=17}}</ref> These men came to London to become authors only to discover that the literary market could not support large numbers of writers, who in any case were very poorly remunerated by the publishing-bookselling [[guild]]s.{{Sfn|Darnton|1982|pp=19, 20}}


The writers of Grub Street, the Grub Street Hacks, were left feeling bitter about the relative success of the men of letters<ref>Darnton, "The Literary Underground," 21, 23.</ref> and found an outlet for their literature which was typified by the ''[[Libelle (literary genre)|libelle]].'' Written mostly in the form of pamphlets, the ''libelles'' "slandered the court, the Church, the aristocracy, the academies, the salons, everything elevated and respectable, including the monarchy itself."<ref>Darnton, ''The Literary Underground,'' 29</ref> ''Le Gazetier cuirassé'' by [[Charles Théveneau de Morande]] was a prototype of the genre. It was Grub Street literature that was most read by the public during the Enlightenment.<ref>Outram, 22.</ref> According to Darnton, more importantly the Grub Street hacks inherited the "revolutionary spirit" once displayed by the ''philosophes<!-- "philosophes" is correct -->'' and paved the way for the French Revolution by desacralizing figures of political, moral, and religious authority in France.<ref>Darnton, ''The Literary Underground,'' 35–40.</ref>
The writers of Grub Street, the Grub Street Hacks, were left feeling bitter about the relative success of the men of letters{{Sfn|Darnton|1982|pp=21, 23}} and found an outlet for their literature which was typified by the ''[[Libelle (literary genre)|libelle]].'' Written mostly in the form of pamphlets, the ''libelles'' "slandered the court, the Church, the aristocracy, the academies, the salons, everything elevated and respectable, including the monarchy itself."{{Sfn|Darnton|1982|p=29}} ''Le Gazetier cuirassé'' by [[Charles Théveneau de Morande]] was a prototype of the genre. It was Grub Street literature that was most read by the public during the Enlightenment.{{Sfn |Outram |1995 |page=22}} According to Darnton, more importantly the Grub Street hacks inherited the "revolutionary spirit" once displayed by the ''philosophes<!-- "philosophes" is correct -->'' and paved the way for the French Revolution by desacralizing figures of political, moral, and religious authority in France.{{Sfn|Darnton|1982|pp=35–40}}


===Book industry===
===Book industry===
[[File:1477-1799 ESTC titles per decade, statistics.png|thumb|[[English Short Title Catalogue|ESTC]] data 1477–1799 by decade given with a regional differentiation]]
[[File:1477-1799 ESTC titles per decade, statistics.png|thumb|[[English Short Title Catalogue|ESTC]] data 1477–1799 by decade given with a regional differentiation]]


The increased consumption of reading materials of all sorts was one of the key features of the "social" Enlightenment. Developments in the Industrial Revolution allowed consumer goods to be produced in greater quantities at lower prices, encouraging the spread of books, pamphlets, newspapers, and journals – "media of the transmission of ideas and attitudes." Commercial development likewise increased the demand for information, along with rising populations and increased urbanisation.<ref>Outram, 17, 20.</ref> However, demand for reading material extended outside of the realm of the commercial and outside the realm of the upper and middle classes, as evidenced by the [[bibliothèque bleue]]. Literacy rates are difficult to gauge, but in France the rates doubled over the course of the 18th century.<ref>Darnton, "The Literary Underground," 16.</ref> Reflecting the decreasing influence of religion, the number of books about science and art published in Paris doubled from 1720 to 1780, while the number of books about religion dropped to just one-tenth of the total.{{sfn|Petitfils|2005|pages=99–105}}
The increased consumption of reading materials of all sorts was one of the key features of the "social" Enlightenment. Developments in the Industrial Revolution allowed consumer goods to be produced in greater quantities at lower prices, encouraging the spread of books, pamphlets, newspapers, and journals – "media of the transmission of ideas and attitudes." Commercial development likewise increased the demand for information, along with rising populations and increased urbanisation.{{Sfn |Outram |1995 |pages=17, 20}} However, demand for reading material extended outside of the realm of the commercial and outside the realm of the upper and middle classes, as evidenced by the [[bibliothèque bleue]]. Literacy rates are difficult to gauge, but in France the rates doubled over the course of the 18th century.{{Sfn|Darnton|1982|p=16}} Reflecting the decreasing influence of religion, the number of books about science and art published in Paris doubled from 1720 to 1780, while the number of books about religion dropped to just one-tenth of the total.{{sfn |Petitfils |2005 |pages=99–105}}


Reading underwent serious changes in the 18th century. In particular, Rolf Engelsing has argued for the existence of a ''reading revolution.'' Until 1750, reading was done intensively: people tended to own a small number of books and read them repeatedly, often to small audience. After 1750, people began to read "extensively," finding as many books as they could, increasingly reading them alone.<ref>from Outram, 19. See Rolf Engelsing, "Die Perioden der Lesergeschichte in der Neuzeit. Das statische Ausmass und die soziokulturelle Bedeutung der Lektüre," Archiv für Geschichte des Buchwesens, 10 (1969), cols. 944–1002 and Der Bürger als Leser: Lesergeschichte in Deutschland, 1500–1800 (Stuttgart, 1974).</ref> This is supported by increasing literacy rates, particularly among women.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/482597/history-of-publishing/28681/Developments-in-the-18th-century |title=history of publishing :: Developments in the 18th century |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |date=5 October 2023}}</ref>
Reading underwent serious changes in the 18th century. In particular, Rolf Engelsing has argued for the existence of a ''reading revolution.'' Until 1750, reading was done intensively: people tended to own a small number of books and read them repeatedly, often to small audience. After 1750, people began to read "extensively," finding as many books as they could, increasingly reading them alone.{{Sfn |Outram |1995 |page=19}}<ref>See Rolf Engelsing, "Die Perioden der Lesergeschichte in der Neuzeit. Das statische Ausmass und die soziokulturelle Bedeutung der Lektüre," Archiv für Geschichte des Buchwesens, 10 (1969), cols. 944–1002 and Der Bürger als Leser: Lesergeschichte in Deutschland, 1500–1800 (Stuttgart, 1974).</ref> This is supported by increasing literacy rates, particularly among women.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |title=history of publishing :: Developments in the 18th century |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/482597/history-of-publishing/28681/Developments-in-the-18th-century |date=5 October 2023}}</ref>


The vast majority of the reading public could not afford to own a private library, and while most of the state-run "universal libraries" set up in the 17th and 18th centuries were open to the public, they were not the only sources of reading material. On one end of the spectrum was the ''bibliothèque bleue,'' a collection of cheaply produced books published in Troyes, France. Intended for a largely rural and semi-literate audience these books included almanacs, retellings of medieval romances and condensed versions of popular novels, among other things. While some historians have argued against the Enlightenment's penetration into the lower classes, the ''bibliothèque bleue'' represents at least a desire to participate in Enlightenment sociability.<ref>Outram, 27–29</ref> Moving up the classes, a variety of institutions offered readers access to material without needing to buy anything. Libraries that lent out their material for a small price started to appear, and occasionally bookstores would offer a small lending library to their patrons. Coffee houses commonly offered books, journals, and sometimes even popular novels to their customers. ''[[Tatler (1709 journal)|Tatler]]'' and ''[[The Spectator]],'' two influential periodicals sold from 1709 to 1714, were closely associated with coffee house culture in London, being both read and produced in various establishments in the city.<ref>Erin Mackie, ''The Commerce of Everyday Life: Selections from The Tatler and The Spectator'' (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 1998), 16.</ref> This is an example of the triple or even quadruple function of the coffee house: reading material was often obtained, read, discussed, and even produced on the premises.<ref>See Mackie, Darnton, ''An Early Information Society''</ref>
The vast majority of the reading public could not afford to own a private library, and while most of the state-run "universal libraries" set up in the 17th and 18th centuries were open to the public, they were not the only sources of reading material. On one end of the spectrum was the ''bibliothèque bleue,'' a collection of cheaply produced books published in Troyes, France. Intended for a largely rural and semi-literate audience these books included almanacs, retellings of medieval romances and condensed versions of popular novels, among other things. While some historians have argued against the Enlightenment's penetration into the lower classes, the ''bibliothèque bleue'' represents at least a desire to participate in Enlightenment sociability.{{Sfn |Outram |1995 |pp=27–29}} Moving up the classes, a variety of institutions offered readers access to material without needing to buy anything. Libraries that lent out their material for a small price started to appear, and occasionally bookstores would offer a small lending library to their patrons. Coffee houses commonly offered books, journals, and sometimes even popular novels to their customers. ''[[Tatler (1709 journal)|Tatler]]'' and ''[[The Spectator]],'' two influential periodicals sold from 1709 to 1714, were closely associated with coffee house culture in London, being both read and produced in various establishments in the city.<ref>Erin Mackie, ''The Commerce of Everyday Life: Selections from The Tatler and The Spectator'' (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 1998), 16.</ref> This is an example of the triple or even quadruple function of the coffee house: reading material was often obtained, read, discussed, and even produced on the premises.<ref>See Mackie, Darnton, ''An Early Information Society''</ref>


[[File:Denis Diderot 111.PNG|thumb|upright|[[Denis Diderot]] is best known as the editor of the ''[[Encyclopédie]].'']]
[[File:Denis Diderot 111.PNG|thumb|upright|[[Denis Diderot]] is best known as the editor of the ''[[Encyclopédie]].'']]
It is difficult to determine what people actually read during the Enlightenment. For example, examining the catalogs of private libraries gives an image skewed in favor of the classes wealthy enough to afford libraries and also ignores censored works unlikely to be publicly acknowledged. For this reason, a study of publishing would be much more fruitful for discerning reading habits.<ref>In particular, see Chapter 6, "Reading, Writing and Publishing"</ref> Across continental Europe, but in France especially, booksellers and publishers had to negotiate censorship laws of varying strictness. For example, the ''Encyclopédie'' narrowly escaped seizure and had to be saved by [[Guillaume-Chrétien de Lamoignon de Malesherbes|Malesherbes]], the man in charge of the French censor. Indeed, many publishing companies were conveniently located outside France so as to avoid overzealous French censors. They would smuggle their merchandise across the border, where it would then be transported to clandestine booksellers or small-time peddlers.<ref>See Darnton, ''The Literary Underground,'' 184.</ref> The records of clandestine booksellers may give a better representation of what literate Frenchmen might have truly read, since their clandestine nature provided a less restrictive product choice.<ref name="autogenerated1">Darnton, ''The Literary Underground,'' 135–47.</ref> In one case, political books were the most popular category, primarily libels and pamphlets. Readers were more interested in sensationalist stories about criminals and political corruption than they were in political theory itself. The second most popular category, "general works" (those books "that did not have a dominant motif and that contained something to offend almost everyone in authority"), demonstrated a high demand for generally low-brow subversive literature. However, these works never became part of literary canon and are largely forgotten today as a result.<ref name="autogenerated1" />
It is difficult to determine what people actually read during the Enlightenment. For example, examining the catalogs of private libraries gives an image skewed in favor of the classes wealthy enough to afford libraries and also ignores censored works unlikely to be publicly acknowledged. For this reason, a study of publishing would be much more fruitful for discerning reading habits.<ref>In particular, see Chapter 6, "Reading, Writing and Publishing"</ref> Across continental Europe, but in France especially, booksellers and publishers had to negotiate censorship laws of varying strictness. For example, the ''Encyclopédie'' narrowly escaped seizure and had to be saved by [[Guillaume-Chrétien de Lamoignon de Malesherbes|Malesherbes]], the man in charge of the French censor. Indeed, many publishing companies were conveniently located outside France so as to avoid overzealous French censors. They would smuggle their merchandise across the border, where it would then be transported to clandestine booksellers or small-time peddlers.<ref>See {{Harvnb|Darnton|1982|p=184}}</ref> The records of clandestine booksellers may give a better representation of what literate Frenchmen might have truly read, since their clandestine nature provided a less restrictive product choice.{{Sfn|Darnton|1982|pp=135–147}} In one case, political books were the most popular category, primarily libels and pamphlets. Readers were more interested in sensationalist stories about criminals and political corruption than they were in political theory itself. The second most popular category, "general works" (those books "that did not have a dominant motif and that contained something to offend almost everyone in authority"), demonstrated a high demand for generally low-brow subversive literature. However, these works never became part of literary canon and are largely forgotten today as a result.{{Sfn|Darnton|1982|pp=135–147}}


A healthy, legal publishing industry existed throughout Europe, although established publishers and book sellers occasionally ran afoul of the law. For example, the ''Encyclopédie'', condemned by both the King and [[Pope Clement XII|Clement XII]], nevertheless found its way into print with the help of the aforementioned Malesherbes and creative use of French censorship law.<ref>Darnton, ''The Business of Enlightenment,'' 12, 13. For a more detailed description of French censorship laws, see Darnton, ''The Literary Underground''</ref> However, many works were sold without running into any legal trouble at all. Borrowing records from libraries in England, Germany, and North America indicate that more than 70% of books borrowed were novels. Less than 1% of the books were of a religious nature, indicating the general trend of declining religiosity.<ref name="Outram, 21">Outram, 21.</ref>
A healthy, legal publishing industry existed throughout Europe, although established publishers and book sellers occasionally ran afoul of the law. For example, the ''Encyclopédie'', condemned by both the King and [[Pope Clement XII|Clement XII]], nevertheless found its way into print with the help of the aforementioned Malesherbes and creative use of French censorship law.<ref>{{Harvnb|Darnton|1979|pp=12, 13}}. For a more detailed description of French censorship laws, see {{Harvnb|Darnton|1982}}.</ref> However, many works were sold without running into any legal trouble at all. Borrowing records from libraries in England, Germany, and North America indicate that more than 70% of books borrowed were novels. Less than 1% of the books were of a religious nature, indicating the general trend of declining religiosity.{{Sfn |Outram |1995 |page=21}}


===Natural history===
===Natural history===
[[File:Buffon 1707-1788.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon|Georges Buffon]] is best remembered for his {{lang|fr|Histoire naturelle}}, a 44 volume encyclopedia describing everything known about the natural world.]]
[[File:Buffon 1707-1788.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon|Georges Buffon]] is best remembered for his {{lang|fr|Histoire naturelle}}, a 44 volume encyclopedia describing everything known about the natural world.]]
A genre that greatly rose in importance was that of scientific literature. Natural history in particular became increasingly popular among the upper classes. Works of natural history include [[René Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur|René-Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur]]'s ''Histoire naturelle des insectes'' and [[Jacques Fabien Gautier d'Agoty|Jacques Gautier d'Agoty]]'s ''La Myologie complète, ou description de tous les muscles du corps humain'' (1746). Outside [[Ancien Régime]] France, natural history was an important part of medicine and industry, encompassing the fields of botany, zoology, meteorology, hydrology, and mineralogy. Students in Enlightenment universities and academies were taught these subjects to prepare them for careers as diverse as medicine and theology. As shown by Matthew Daniel Eddy, natural history in this context was a very middle class pursuit and operated as a fertile trading zone for the interdisciplinary exchange of diverse scientific ideas.<ref name="Eddy2008">{{cite book |last=Eddy |first=Matthew Daniel |title=The Language of Mineralogy: John Walker, Chemistry and the Edinburgh Medical School, 1750–1800 |year=2008 |publisher=Ashgate |location=Aldershot |url=https://www.academia.edu/1112014}}</ref>
A genre that greatly rose in importance was that of scientific literature. Natural history in particular became increasingly popular among the upper classes. Works of natural history include [[René Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur|René-Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur]]'s ''Histoire naturelle des insectes'' and [[Jacques Fabien Gautier d'Agoty|Jacques Gautier d'Agoty]]'s ''La Myologie complète, ou description de tous les muscles du corps humain'' (1746). Outside [[Ancien Régime]] France, natural history was an important part of medicine and industry, encompassing the fields of botany, zoology, meteorology, hydrology, and mineralogy. Students in Enlightenment universities and academies were taught these subjects to prepare them for careers as diverse as medicine and theology. As shown by Matthew Daniel Eddy, natural history in this context was a very middle class pursuit and operated as a fertile trading zone for the interdisciplinary exchange of diverse scientific ideas.<ref name="Eddy2008">{{cite book |last=Eddy |first=Matthew Daniel |url=https://www.academia.edu/1112014 |title=The Language of Mineralogy: John Walker, Chemistry and the Edinburgh Medical School, 1750–1800 |publisher=Ashgate |date=2008 |location=Aldershot}}</ref>


The target audience of natural history was French upper class, evidenced more by the specific discourse of the genre than by the generally high prices of its works. Naturalists catered to upper class desire for erudition: many texts had an explicit instructive purpose. However, natural history was often a political affair. As Emma Spary writes, the classifications used by naturalists "slipped between the natural world and the social&nbsp;... to establish not only the expertise of the naturalists over the natural, but also the dominance of the natural over the social."<ref>Emma Spary, "The 'Nature' of Enlightenment" in ''The Sciences in Enlightened Europe,'' William Clark, Jan Golinski, and Steven Schaffer, eds. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), 281–82.</ref> The idea of taste (''le goût'') was a social indicator: to truly be able to categorize nature, one had to have the proper taste, an ability of discretion shared by all members of the upper class. In this way, natural history spread many of the scientific developments of the time but also provided a new source of legitimacy for the dominant class.<ref>Spary, 289–93.</ref> From this basis, naturalists could then develop their own social ideals based on their scientific works.<ref>See Thomas Laqueur, ''Making sex: body and gender from the Greeks to Freud'' (1990).</ref>
The target audience of natural history was French upper class, evidenced more by the specific discourse of the genre than by the generally high prices of its works. Naturalists catered to upper class desire for erudition: many texts had an explicit instructive purpose. However, natural history was often a political affair. As Emma Spary writes, the classifications used by naturalists "slipped between the natural world and the social&nbsp;... to establish not only the expertise of the naturalists over the natural, but also the dominance of the natural over the social."<ref>Emma Spary, "The 'Nature' of Enlightenment" in ''The Sciences in Enlightened Europe,'' William Clark, Jan Golinski, and Steven Schaffer, eds. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), 281–82.</ref> The idea of taste (''le goût'') was a social indicator: to truly be able to categorize nature, one had to have the proper taste, an ability of discretion shared by all members of the upper class. In this way, natural history spread many of the scientific developments of the time but also provided a new source of legitimacy for the dominant class.<ref>Spary, 289–93.</ref> From this basis, naturalists could then develop their own social ideals based on their scientific works.<ref>See Thomas Laqueur, ''Making sex: body and gender from the Greeks to Freud'' (1990).</ref>
Line 333: Line 401:
===Scientific and literary journals===
===Scientific and literary journals===
[[File:1665 journal des scavans title.jpg|thumb|upright|{{Lang|fr|[[Journal des sçavans]]}} was the earliest academic journal published in Europe.]]
[[File:1665 journal des scavans title.jpg|thumb|upright|{{Lang|fr|[[Journal des sçavans]]}} was the earliest academic journal published in Europe.]]
The first scientific and literary journals were established during the Enlightenment. The first journal, the Parisian {{Lang|fr|[[Journal des sçavans]]}}, appeared in 1665. However, it was not until 1682 that periodicals began to be more widely produced. French and Latin were the dominant languages of publication, but there was also a steady demand for material in German and Dutch. There was generally low demand for English publications on the continent, which was echoed by England's similar lack of desire for French works. Languages commanding less of an international market—such as Danish, Spanish, and Portuguese—found journal success more difficult, and a more international language was used instead. French slowly took over Latin's status as the ''[[lingua franca]]'' of learned circles. This in turn gave precedence to the publishing industry in Holland, where the vast majority of these French language periodicals were produced.{{sfn|Israel|2001|pp=143–44}}
The first scientific and literary journals were established during the Enlightenment. The first journal, the Parisian {{Lang|fr|[[Journal des sçavans]]}}, appeared in 1665. However, it was not until 1682 that periodicals began to be more widely produced. French and Latin were the dominant languages of publication, but there was also a steady demand for material in German and Dutch. There was generally low demand for English publications on the continent, which was echoed by England's similar lack of desire for French works. Languages commanding less of an international market—such as Danish, Spanish, and Portuguese—found journal success more difficult, and a more international language was used instead. French slowly took over Latin's status as the ''[[lingua franca]]'' of learned circles. This in turn gave precedence to the publishing industry in Holland, where the vast majority of these French language periodicals were produced.{{sfn |Israel |2001 |pp=143–44}}


Jonathan Israel called the journals the most influential cultural innovation of European intellectual culture.{{sfn|Israel|2001|pp=142}} They shifted the attention of the "cultivated public" away from established authorities to novelty and innovation, and instead promoted the Enlightened ideals of toleration and intellectual objectivity. Being a source of knowledge derived from science and reason, they were an implicit critique of existing notions of universal truth monopolized by monarchies, parliaments, and religious authorities. They also advanced Christian Enlightenment that upheld "the legitimacy of God-ordained authority"—the Bible—in which there had to be agreement between the biblical and natural theories.{{sfn|Israel|2001|pp=150–51}}
Jonathan Israel called the journals the most influential cultural innovation of European intellectual culture.{{sfn |Israel |2001 |pp=142}} They shifted the attention of the "cultivated public" away from established authorities to novelty and innovation, and instead promoted the Enlightened ideals of toleration and intellectual objectivity. Being a source of knowledge derived from science and reason, they were an implicit critique of existing notions of universal truth monopolized by monarchies, parliaments, and religious authorities. They also advanced Christian Enlightenment that upheld "the legitimacy of God-ordained authority"—the Bible—in which there had to be agreement between the biblical and natural theories.{{sfn |Israel |2001 |pp=150–51}}


===Encyclopedias and dictionaries===
===Encyclopedias and dictionaries===
[[File:Encyclopedie de D'Alembert et Diderot - Premiere Page - ENC 1-NA5.jpg|thumb|upright|First page of the ''[[Encyclopédie]],'' published between 1751 and 1766]]
[[File:Encyclopedie de D'Alembert et Diderot - Premiere Page - ENC 1-NA5.jpg|thumb|upright|First page of the ''[[Encyclopédie]],'' published between 1751 and 1766]]
Although the existence of dictionaries and encyclopedias spanned into ancient times, the texts changed from defining words in a long running list to far more detailed discussions of those words in 18th-century [[encyclopedic dictionary|encyclopedic dictionaries]].<ref name="Headrick 2000 144">Headrick, (2000), p. 144.</ref> The works were part of an Enlightenment movement to systematize knowledge and provide education to a wider audience than the elite. As the 18th century progressed, the content of encyclopedias also changed according to readers' tastes. Volumes tended to focus more strongly on secular affairs, particularly science and technology, rather than matters of theology.
Although the existence of dictionaries and encyclopedias spanned into ancient times, the texts changed from defining words in a long running list to far more detailed discussions of those words in 18th-century [[encyclopedic dictionary|encyclopedic dictionaries]].{{Sfn|Headrick|2000|p=144}} The works were part of an Enlightenment movement to systematize knowledge and provide education to a wider audience than the elite. As the 18th century progressed, the content of encyclopedias also changed according to readers' tastes. Volumes tended to focus more strongly on secular affairs, particularly science and technology, rather than matters of theology.


Along with secular matters, readers also favoured an alphabetical ordering scheme over cumbersome works arranged along thematic lines.<ref name="Headrick 2000 172">Headrick, (2000), p. 172.</ref> Commenting on alphabetization, the historian [[Charles Porset]] has said that "as the zero degree of taxonomy, alphabetical order authorizes all reading strategies; in this respect it could be considered an emblem of the Enlightenment." For Porset, the avoidance of thematic and [[Hierarchical organization|hierarchical]] systems thus allows free interpretation of the works and becomes an example of [[egalitarianism]].<ref>Porter, (2003), pp.&nbsp;249–250.</ref> Encyclopedias and dictionaries also became more popular during the Age of Enlightenment as the number of educated consumers who could afford such texts began to multiply.<ref name="Headrick 2000 144"/> In the latter half of the 18th century, the number of dictionaries and encyclopedias published by decade increased from 63 between 1760 and 1769 to approximately 148 in the decade proceeding the French Revolution.<ref>Headrick, (2000), p. 168.</ref> Along with growth in numbers, dictionaries and encyclopedias also grew in length, often having multiple print runs that sometimes included in supplemented editions.<ref name="Headrick 2000 172"/>
Along with secular matters, readers also favoured an alphabetical ordering scheme over cumbersome works arranged along thematic lines.{{Sfn|Headrick|2000|p=172}} Commenting on alphabetization, the historian [[Charles Porset]] has said that "as the zero degree of taxonomy, alphabetical order authorizes all reading strategies; in this respect it could be considered an emblem of the Enlightenment." For Porset, the avoidance of thematic and [[Hierarchical organization|hierarchical]] systems thus allows free interpretation of the works and becomes an example of [[egalitarianism]].{{Sfn|Lindberg|Numbers|Porter|2003|pp=249–250}} Encyclopedias and dictionaries also became more popular during the Age of Enlightenment as the number of educated consumers who could afford such texts began to multiply.{{Sfn|Headrick|2000|p=144}} In the latter half of the 18th century, the number of dictionaries and encyclopedias published by decade increased from 63 between 1760 and 1769 to approximately 148 in the decade proceeding the French Revolution.{{Sfn|Headrick|2000|p=168}} Along with growth in numbers, dictionaries and encyclopedias also grew in length, often having multiple print runs that sometimes included in supplemented editions.{{Sfn|Headrick|2000|p=172}}


The first technical dictionary was drafted by [[John Harris (writer)|John Harris]] and entitled ''[[Lexicon Technicum]]: Or, An Universal English Dictionary of Arts and Sciences.'' Harris' book avoids theological and biographical entries and instead concentrates on science and technology. Published in 1704, the ''Lexicon Technicum'' was the first book to be written in English that took a methodical approach to describing mathematics and commercial [[arithmetic]] along with the physical sciences and [[navigation]]. Other technical dictionaries followed Harris' model, including [[Ephraim Chambers]]' ''[[Cyclopædia, or an Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences|Cyclopaedia]]'' (1728), which included five editions and is a substantially larger work than Harris'. The [[Bookbinding|folio]] edition of the work even included foldout engravings. The ''Cyclopaedia'' emphasized Newtonian theories, Lockean philosophy and contained thorough examinations of technologies, such as [[engraving]], brewing, and [[dyeing]].
The first technical dictionary was drafted by [[John Harris (writer)|John Harris]] and entitled ''[[Lexicon Technicum]]: Or, An Universal English Dictionary of Arts and Sciences.'' Harris' book avoids theological and biographical entries and instead concentrates on science and technology. Published in 1704, the ''Lexicon Technicum'' was the first book to be written in English that took a methodical approach to describing mathematics and commercial [[arithmetic]] along with the physical sciences and [[navigation]]. Other technical dictionaries followed Harris' model, including [[Ephraim Chambers]]' ''[[Cyclopædia, or an Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences|Cyclopaedia]]'' (1728), which included five editions and is a substantially larger work than Harris'. The [[Bookbinding|folio]] edition of the work even included foldout engravings. The ''Cyclopaedia'' emphasized Newtonian theories, Lockean philosophy and contained thorough examinations of technologies, such as [[engraving]], brewing, and [[dyeing]].


[[File:ENC SYSTEME FIGURE.jpeg|upright|thumb|left|"[[Figurative system of human knowledge]]," the structure that the ''Encyclopédie'' organised knowledge into – it had three main branches: memory, reason, and imagination.]] In Germany, practical reference works intended for the uneducated majority became popular in the 18th century. The ''Marperger Curieuses Natur-, Kunst-, Berg-, Gewerk- und Handlungs-Lexicon'' (1712) explained terms that usefully described the trades and scientific and commercial education. ''Jablonksi Allgemeines Lexicon'' (1721) was better known than the ''Handlungs-Lexicon'' and underscored technical subjects rather than scientific theory. For example, over five columns of text were dedicated to wine while geometry and [[logic]] were allocated only twenty-two and seventeen lines, respectively. The first edition of the ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'' (1771) was modelled along the same lines as the German lexicons.<ref>Headrick, (2000), pp.&nbsp;150–152.</ref>
[[File:ENC SYSTEME FIGURE.jpeg|upright|thumb|left|"[[Figurative system of human knowledge]]," the structure that the ''Encyclopédie'' organised knowledge into – it had three main branches: memory, reason, and imagination.]] In Germany, practical reference works intended for the uneducated majority became popular in the 18th century. The ''Marperger Curieuses Natur-, Kunst-, Berg-, Gewerk- und Handlungs-Lexicon'' (1712) explained terms that usefully described the trades and scientific and commercial education. ''Jablonksi Allgemeines Lexicon'' (1721) was better known than the ''Handlungs-Lexicon'' and underscored technical subjects rather than scientific theory. For example, over five columns of text were dedicated to wine while geometry and [[logic]] were allocated only twenty-two and seventeen lines, respectively. The first edition of the ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'' (1771) was modelled along the same lines as the German lexicons.{{Sfn|Headrick|2000|pp=150–152}}


However, the prime example of reference works that systematized scientific knowledge in the Age of Enlightenment were [[universal encyclopedia]]s rather than technical dictionaries. It was the goal of universal encyclopedias to record all human knowledge in a comprehensive reference work.<ref>Headrick, (2000), p. 153.</ref> The most well-known of these works is Diderot and d'Alembert's ''Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers.'' The work, which began publication in 1751, was composed of 35 volumes and over 71,000 separate entries. A great number of the entries were dedicated to describing the sciences and crafts in detail and provided intellectuals across Europe with a high-quality survey of human knowledge. In d'Alembert's ''Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot,'' the work's goal to record the extent of human knowledge in the arts and sciences is outlined:
However, the prime example of reference works that systematized scientific knowledge in the Age of Enlightenment were [[universal encyclopedia]]s rather than technical dictionaries. It was the goal of universal encyclopedias to record all human knowledge in a comprehensive reference work.{{Sfn|Headrick|2000|p=153}} The most well-known of these works is Diderot and d'Alembert's ''Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers.'' The work, which began publication in 1751, was composed of 35 volumes and over 71,000 separate entries. A great number of the entries were dedicated to describing the sciences and crafts in detail and provided intellectuals across Europe with a high-quality survey of human knowledge. In d'Alembert's ''Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot,'' the work's goal to record the extent of human knowledge in the arts and sciences is outlined:


{{blockquote|As an Encyclopédie, it is to set forth as well as possible the order and connection of the parts of human knowledge. As a Reasoned Dictionary of the Sciences, Arts, and Trades, it is to contain the general principles that form the basis of each science and each art, liberal or mechanical, and the most essential facts that make up the body and substance of each.<ref>d'Alembert, p. 4.</ref>}}
{{blockquote|As an Encyclopédie, it is to set forth as well as possible the order and connection of the parts of human knowledge. As a Reasoned Dictionary of the Sciences, Arts, and Trades, it is to contain the general principles that form the basis of each science and each art, liberal or mechanical, and the most essential facts that make up the body and substance of each.<ref>d'Alembert, p. 4.</ref>}}


The massive work was arranged according to a "tree of knowledge." The tree reflected the marked division between the arts and sciences, which was largely a result of the rise of empiricism. Both areas of knowledge were united by philosophy, or the trunk of the tree of knowledge. The Enlightenment's desacrilization of religion was pronounced in the tree's design, particularly where theology accounted for a peripheral branch, with black magic as a close neighbour.<ref>Darnton, (1979), p. 7.</ref> As the ''Encyclopédie'' gained popularity, it was published in [[book binding|quarto]] and octavo editions after 1777. The quarto and octavo editions were much less expensive than previous editions, making the ''Encyclopédie'' more accessible to the non-elite. Robert Darnton estimates that there were approximately 25,000 copies of the ''Encyclopédie'' in circulation throughout France and Europe before the French Revolution.<ref>Darnton, (1979), p. 37.</ref> The extensive yet affordable encyclopedia came to represent the transmission of Enlightenment and scientific education to an expanding audience.<ref>Darnton, (1979), p. 6.</ref>
The massive work was arranged according to a "tree of knowledge." The tree reflected the marked division between the arts and sciences, which was largely a result of the rise of empiricism. Both areas of knowledge were united by philosophy, or the trunk of the tree of knowledge. The Enlightenment's desacrilization of religion was pronounced in the tree's design, particularly where theology accounted for a peripheral branch, with black magic as a close neighbour.{{Sfn|Darnton|1979|p=7}} As the ''Encyclopédie'' gained popularity, it was published in [[book binding|quarto]] and octavo editions after 1777. The quarto and octavo editions were much less expensive than previous editions, making the ''Encyclopédie'' more accessible to the non-elite. Robert Darnton estimates that there were approximately 25,000 copies of the ''Encyclopédie'' in circulation throughout France and Europe before the French Revolution.{{Sfn|Darnton|1979|p=37}} The extensive yet affordable encyclopedia came to represent the transmission of Enlightenment and scientific education to an expanding audience.{{Sfn|Darnton|1979|p=6}}


===Popularization of science===
===Popularization of science===
One of the most important developments that the Enlightenment era brought to the discipline of science was its popularization. An increasingly literate population seeking knowledge and education in both the arts and the sciences drove the expansion of print culture and the dissemination of scientific learning. The new literate population was precipitated by a high rise in the availability of food; this enabled many people to rise out of poverty, and instead of paying more for food, they had money for education.<ref>Jacob, (1988), p. 191; Melton, (2001), pp.&nbsp;82–83</ref> Popularization was generally part of an overarching Enlightenment ideal that endeavoured "to make information available to the greatest number of people."<ref>Headrick, (2000), p. 15</ref> As public interest in natural philosophy grew during the 18th century, public lecture courses and the publication of popular texts opened up new roads to money and fame for amateurs and scientists who remained on the periphery of universities and academies.<ref>Headrick, (2000), p. 19.</ref> More formal works included explanations of scientific theories for individuals lacking the educational background to comprehend the original scientific text. Newton's celebrated ''Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica'' was published in Latin and remained inaccessible to readers without education in the classics until Enlightenment writers began to translate and analyze the text in the vernacular.
One of the most important developments that the Enlightenment era brought to the discipline of science was its popularization. An increasingly literate population seeking knowledge and education in both the arts and the sciences drove the expansion of print culture and the dissemination of scientific learning. The new literate population was precipitated by a high rise in the availability of food; this enabled many people to rise out of poverty, and instead of paying more for food, they had money for education.<ref>Jacob, (1988), p. 191; Melton, (2001), pp.&nbsp;82–83</ref> Popularization was generally part of an overarching Enlightenment ideal that endeavoured "to make information available to the greatest number of people."{{Sfn|Headrick|2000|p=15}} As public interest in natural philosophy grew during the 18th century, public lecture courses and the publication of popular texts opened up new roads to money and fame for amateurs and scientists who remained on the periphery of universities and academies.{{Sfn|Headrick|2000|p=19}} More formal works included explanations of scientific theories for individuals lacking the educational background to comprehend the original scientific text. Newton's celebrated ''Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica'' was published in Latin and remained inaccessible to readers without education in the classics until Enlightenment writers began to translate and analyze the text in the vernacular.


[[File:Fontenelle.jpg|thumb|left|A portrait of [[Bernard de Fontenelle]]]]
[[File:Fontenelle.jpg|thumb|left|A portrait of [[Bernard de Fontenelle]]]]
The first significant work that expressed scientific theory and knowledge expressly for the laity, in the vernacular and with the entertainment of readers in mind, was [[Bernard Le Bovier de Fontenelle|Bernard de Fontenelle]]'s ''[[Conversations on the Plurality of Worlds]]'' (1686). The book was produced specifically for women with an interest in scientific writing and inspired a variety of similar works.<ref>Phillips, (1991), pp. 85, 90</ref> These popular works were written in a discursive style, which was laid out much more clearly for the reader than the complicated articles, treatises, and books published by the academies and scientists. Charles Leadbetter's ''Astronomy'' (1727) was advertised as "a Work entirely New" that would include "short and easie {{sic}} Rules and Astronomical Tables."<ref>Phillips, (1991), p. 90.</ref>
The first significant work that expressed scientific theory and knowledge expressly for the laity, in the vernacular and with the entertainment of readers in mind, was [[Bernard Le Bovier de Fontenelle|Bernard de Fontenelle]]'s ''[[Conversations on the Plurality of Worlds]]'' (1686). The book was produced specifically for women with an interest in scientific writing and inspired a variety of similar works.{{Sfn|Phillips|1991|pp=85, 90}} These popular works were written in a discursive style, which was laid out much more clearly for the reader than the complicated articles, treatises, and books published by the academies and scientists. Charles Leadbetter's ''Astronomy'' (1727) was advertised as "a Work entirely New" that would include "short and easie {{sic}} Rules and Astronomical Tables."{{Sfn|Phillips|1991|p=90}}


The first French introduction to Newtonianism and the ''Principia'' was ''Eléments de la philosophie de Newton,'' published by Voltaire in 1738.<ref>Porter, (2003), p. 300.</ref> [[Émilie du Châtelet]]'s translation of the ''Principia,'' published after her death in 1756, also helped to spread Newton's theories beyond scientific academies and the university.<ref>Porter, (2003), p. 101.</ref> Writing for a growing female audience, [[Francesco Algarotti]] published ''Il Newtonianism per le dame,'' which was a tremendously popular work and was translated from Italian into English by [[Elizabeth Carter]]. A similar introduction to Newtonianism for women was produced by [[Henry Pemberton]]. His ''A View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy'' was published by subscription. Extant records of subscribers show that women from a wide range of social standings purchased the book, indicating the growing number of scientifically inclined female readers among the middling class.<ref>Phillips, (1991), p. 92.</ref> During the Enlightenment, women also began producing popular scientific works. [[Sarah Trimmer]] wrote a successful natural history textbook for children titled ''The Easy Introduction to the Knowledge of Nature'' (1782), which was published for many years in eleven editions.<ref>Phillips, (1991), p. 107.</ref>
The first French introduction to Newtonianism and the ''Principia'' was ''Eléments de la philosophie de Newton,'' published by Voltaire in 1738.{{Sfn|Lindberg|Numbers|Porter|2003|p=300}} [[Émilie du Châtelet]]'s translation of the ''Principia,'' published after her death in 1756, also helped to spread Newton's theories beyond scientific academies and the university.{{Sfn|Lindberg|Numbers|Porter|2003|p=101}} Writing for a growing female audience, [[Francesco Algarotti]] published ''Il Newtonianism per le dame,'' which was a tremendously popular work and was translated from Italian into English by [[Elizabeth Carter]]. A similar introduction to Newtonianism for women was produced by [[Henry Pemberton]]. His ''A View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy'' was published by subscription. Extant records of subscribers show that women from a wide range of social standings purchased the book, indicating the growing number of scientifically inclined female readers among the middling class.{{Sfn|Phillips|1991|p=92}} During the Enlightenment, women also began producing popular scientific works. [[Sarah Trimmer]] wrote a successful natural history textbook for children titled ''The Easy Introduction to the Knowledge of Nature'' (1782), which was published for many years in eleven editions.{{Sfn|Phillips|1991|p=107}}


===Schools and universities===
===Schools and universities===
Line 365: Line 433:
Most work on the Enlightenment emphasizes the ideals discussed by intellectuals, rather than the actual state of education at the time. Leading educational theorists like England's John Locke and Switzerland's Jean Jacques Rousseau both emphasized the importance of shaping young minds early. By the late Enlightenment, there was a rising demand for a more universal approach to education, particularly after the American Revolution and the French Revolution.
Most work on the Enlightenment emphasizes the ideals discussed by intellectuals, rather than the actual state of education at the time. Leading educational theorists like England's John Locke and Switzerland's Jean Jacques Rousseau both emphasized the importance of shaping young minds early. By the late Enlightenment, there was a rising demand for a more universal approach to education, particularly after the American Revolution and the French Revolution.


The predominant educational psychology from the 1750s onward, especially in northern European countries, was [[associationism]]: the notion that the mind associates or dissociates ideas through repeated routines. In addition to being conducive to Enlightenment ideologies of liberty, self-determination, and personal responsibility, it offered a practical theory of the mind that allowed teachers to transform longstanding forms of print and manuscript culture into effective graphic tools of learning for the lower and middle orders of society.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Eddy |first=Matthew Daniel |title=The Shape of Knowledge: Children and the Visual Culture of Literacy and Numeracy |journal=Science in Context |year=2013 |volume=26 |issue=2 |pages=215–245 |url=https://www.academia.edu/1817033 |doi=10.1017/s0269889713000045 |s2cid=147123263 }}{{Dead link|date=May 2025 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> Children were taught to memorize facts through oral and graphic methods that originated during the Renaissance.<ref>{{cite book |last=Hotson |first=Howard |title=Commonplace Learning: Ramism and Its German Ramifications 1543–1630 |year=2007 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford}}</ref>
The predominant educational psychology from the 1750s onward, especially in northern European countries, was [[associationism]]: the notion that the mind associates or dissociates ideas through repeated routines. In addition to being conducive to Enlightenment ideologies of liberty, self-determination, and personal responsibility, it offered a practical theory of the mind that allowed teachers to transform longstanding forms of print and manuscript culture into effective graphic tools of learning for the lower and middle orders of society.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Eddy |first=Matthew Daniel |date=2013 |title=The Shape of Knowledge: Children and the Visual Culture of Literacy and Numeracy |url=https://www.academia.edu/1817033 |journal=Science in Context |volume=26 |issue=2 |pages=215–245 |doi=10.1017/s0269889713000045 |s2cid=147123263}}{{Dead link|date=May 2025 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> Children were taught to memorize facts through oral and graphic methods that originated during the Renaissance.<ref>{{cite book |last=Hotson |first=Howard |title=Commonplace Learning: Ramism and Its German Ramifications 1543–1630 |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=2007 |location=Oxford}}</ref>


Many of the leading universities associated with Enlightenment progressive principles were located in northern Europe, with the most renowned being the universities of Leiden, Göttingen, Halle, Montpellier, Uppsala, and Edinburgh. These universities, especially Edinburgh, produced professors whose ideas had a significant impact on Britain's North American colonies and later the American Republic. Within the natural sciences, Edinburgh's medical school also led the way in chemistry, anatomy, and pharmacology.<ref name="Eddy2008" /> In other parts of Europe, the universities and schools of France and most of Europe were bastions of traditionalism and were not hospitable to the Enlightenment. In France, the major exception was the medical university at Montpellier.<ref>Elizabeth Williams, ''A Cultural History of Medical Vitalism in Enlightenment Montpellier'' (2003) p. 50</ref>
Many of the leading universities associated with Enlightenment progressive principles were located in northern Europe, with the most renowned being the universities of Leiden, Göttingen, Halle, Montpellier, Uppsala, and Edinburgh. These universities, especially Edinburgh, produced professors whose ideas had a significant impact on Britain's North American colonies and later the American Republic. Within the natural sciences, Edinburgh's medical school also led the way in chemistry, anatomy, and pharmacology.<ref name="Eddy2008"/> In other parts of Europe, the universities and schools of France and most of Europe were bastions of traditionalism and were not hospitable to the Enlightenment. In France, the major exception was the medical university at Montpellier.<ref>Elizabeth Williams, ''A Cultural History of Medical Vitalism in Enlightenment Montpellier'' (2003) p. 50</ref>


===Learned academies===
===Learned academies===
[[File:Sébastien Leclerc I, Louis XIV Visiting the Royal Academy of Sciences, 1671.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Louis XIV]] visiting the {{lang|fr|[[French Academy of Sciences|Académie des sciences]]}} in 1671: "It is widely accepted that 'modern science' arose in the Europe of the 17th century, introducing a new understanding of the natural world"—Peter Barrett<ref>Peter Barrett (2004), ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=fwxViwX6KuMC&pg=PA14 Science and Theology Since Copernicus: The Search for Understanding],'' p. 14, [[Continuum International Publishing Group]], {{ISBN|978-0-567-08969-4}}</ref>]] [[File:Zoom lunette ardente.jpg|thumb|[[Antoine Lavoisier]] conducting an experiment related to combustion generated by amplified sun light]]
[[File:Sébastien Leclerc I, Louis XIV Visiting the Royal Academy of Sciences, 1671.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Louis XIV]] visiting the {{lang|fr|[[French Academy of Sciences|Académie des sciences]]}} in 1671: "It is widely accepted that 'modern science' arose in the Europe of the 17th century, introducing a new understanding of the natural world"—Peter Barrett<ref>Peter Barrett (2004), ''[https://www.google.com/books/edition/_/fwxViwX6KuMC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA14 Science and Theology Since Copernicus: The Search for Understanding],'' p. 14, [[Continuum International Publishing Group]], {{ISBN|978-0-567-08969-4}}</ref>]] [[File:Zoom lunette ardente.jpg|thumb|[[Antoine Lavoisier]] conducting an experiment related to combustion generated by amplified sun light]]
The history of Academies in France during the Enlightenment begins with the [[French Academy of Sciences|Academy of Science]], founded in 1666 in Paris. It was closely tied to the French state, acting as an extension of a government seriously lacking in scientists. It helped promote and organize new disciplines and it trained new scientists. It also contributed to the enhancement of scientists' social status, considering them to be the "most useful of all citizens." Academies demonstrate the rising interest in science along with its increasing secularization, as evidenced by the small number of clerics who were members (13%).<ref>Daniel Roche,'' France in the Enlightenment,'' (1998), 420.</ref> The presence of the French academies in the public sphere cannot be attributed to their membership, as although the majority of their members were bourgeois, the exclusive institution was only open to elite Parisian scholars. They perceived themselves as "interpreters of the sciences for the people." For example, it was with this in mind that academicians took it upon themselves to disprove the popular pseudo-science of [[Animal magnetism|mesmerism]].<ref>Roche, 515–16.</ref>
The history of Academies in France during the Enlightenment begins with the [[French Academy of Sciences|Academy of Science]], founded in 1666 in Paris. It was closely tied to the French state, acting as an extension of a government seriously lacking in scientists. It helped promote and organize new disciplines and it trained new scientists. It also contributed to the enhancement of scientists' social status, considering them to be the "most useful of all citizens." Academies demonstrate the rising interest in science along with its increasing secularization, as evidenced by the small number of clerics who were members (13%).{{Sfn|Roche|1998|p=420}} The presence of the French academies in the public sphere cannot be attributed to their membership, as although the majority of their members were bourgeois, the exclusive institution was only open to elite Parisian scholars. They perceived themselves as "interpreters of the sciences for the people." For example, it was with this in mind that academicians took it upon themselves to disprove the popular pseudo-science of [[Animal magnetism|mesmerism]].{{Sfn|Roche|1998|pp=515–516}}


The strongest contribution of the French Academies to the public sphere comes from the ''concours académiques'' (roughly translated as "academic contests") they sponsored throughout France. These academic contests were perhaps the most public of any institution during the Enlightenment.<ref>Caradonna JL. ''Annales,'' "Prendre part au siècle des Lumières: Le concours académique et la culture intellectuelle au XVIIIe siècle"</ref> The practice of contests dated back to the [[Middle Ages]] and was revived in the mid-17th century. The subject matter had previously been generally religious and/or monarchical, featuring essays, poetry, and painting. However, by roughly 1725 this subject matter had radically expanded and diversified, including "royal propaganda, philosophical battles, and critical ruminations on the social and political institutions of the Old Regime." Topics of public controversy were also discussed such as the theories of Newton and Descartes, the slave trade, women's education, and justice in France.<ref>Jeremy L. Caradonna, "Prendre part au siècle des Lumières: Le concours académique et la culture intellectuelle au XVIIIe siècle," ''Annales. Histoire, Sciences sociales,'' vol. 64 (mai-juin 2009), n. 3, 633–62.</ref> More importantly, the contests were open to all, and the enforced anonymity of each submission guaranteed that neither gender nor social rank would determine the judging. Indeed, although the "vast majority" of participants belonged to the wealthier strata of society ("the liberal arts, the clergy, the judiciary and the medical profession"), there were some cases of the popular classes submitting essays and even winning.<ref>Caradonna, 634–36.</ref> Similarly, a significant number of women participated—and won—the competitions. Of a total of 2,300 prize competitions offered in France, women won 49—perhaps a small number by modern standards but very significant in an age in which very few women had any academic training. Indeed, the majority of the winning entries were for poetry competitions, a genre commonly stressed in women's education.<ref>Caradonna, 653–54.</ref>
The strongest contribution of the French Academies to the public sphere comes from the ''concours académiques'' (roughly translated as "academic contests") they sponsored throughout France. These academic contests were perhaps the most public of any institution during the Enlightenment.<ref>{{Cite journal |first=Jeremy L. |last=Caradonna |title=Prendre part au siècle des Lumières: Le concours académique et la culture intellectuelle au XVIIIe siècle |journal=Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales |lang=fr |volume=64 |date=May–June 2009 |issue=3 |pages=631–662 |doi=10.1017/S0395264900026615 }}</ref> The practice of contests dated back to the [[Middle Ages]] and was revived in the mid-17th century. The subject matter had previously been generally religious and/or monarchical, featuring essays, poetry, and painting. However, by roughly 1725 this subject matter had radically expanded and diversified, including "royal propaganda, philosophical battles, and critical ruminations on the social and political institutions of the Old Regime." Topics of public controversy were also discussed such as the theories of Newton and Descartes, the slave trade, women's education, and justice in France.{{Sfn|Caradonna|2009|pp=633–662}} More importantly, the contests were open to all, and the enforced anonymity of each submission guaranteed that neither gender nor social rank would determine the judging. Indeed, although the "vast majority" of participants belonged to the wealthier strata of society ("the liberal arts, the clergy, the judiciary and the medical profession"), there were some cases of the popular classes submitting essays and even winning.{{Sfn|Caradonna|2009|pp=634–636}} Similarly, a significant number of women participated—and won—the competitions. Of a total of 2,300 prize competitions offered in France, women won 49—perhaps a small number by modern standards but very significant in an age in which very few women had any academic training. Indeed, the majority of the winning entries were for poetry competitions, a genre commonly stressed in women's education.{{Sfn|Caradonna|2009|pp=653–654}}


In England, the [[Royal Society]] of London played a significant role in the public sphere and the spread of Enlightenment ideas. It was founded by a group of independent scientists and given a royal charter in 1662.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://royalsociety.org/about-us/history/royal-charters/ |title=Royal Charters |work=royalsociety.org}}</ref> The society played a large role in spreading [[Robert Boyle]]'s [[experimental philosophy]] around Europe and acted as a clearinghouse for intellectual correspondence and exchange.<ref>Steven Shapin, ''A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England,'' Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 1994.</ref> Boyle was "a founder of the experimental world in which scientists now live and operate" and his method based knowledge on experimentation, which had to be witnessed to provide proper empirical legitimacy. This is where the Royal Society came into play: witnessing had to be a "collective act" and the Royal Society's assembly rooms were ideal locations for relatively public demonstrations.<ref>Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer, ''Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life'' (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985), 5, 56, 57. This same desire for multiple witnesses led to attempts at replication in other locations and a complex iconography and literary technology developed to provide visual and written proof of experimentation. See pp. 59–65.</ref> However, not just any witness was considered to be credible: "Oxford professors were accounted more reliable witnesses than Oxfordshire peasants." Two factors were taken into account: a witness's knowledge in the area and a witness's "moral constitution." In other words, only civil society were considered for Boyle's public.<ref>Shapin and Schaffer, 58, 59.</ref>
In England, the [[Royal Society]] of London played a significant role in the public sphere and the spread of Enlightenment ideas. It was founded by a group of independent scientists and given a royal charter in 1662.<ref>{{cite web |title=Royal Charters |url=https://royalsociety.org/about-us/history/royal-charters |work=royalsociety.org}}</ref> The society played a large role in spreading [[Robert Boyle]]'s [[experimental philosophy]] around Europe and acted as a clearinghouse for intellectual correspondence and exchange.<ref>Steven Shapin, ''A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England,'' Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 1994.</ref> Boyle was "a founder of the experimental world in which scientists now live and operate" and his method based knowledge on experimentation, which had to be witnessed to provide proper empirical legitimacy. This is where the Royal Society came into play: witnessing had to be a "collective act" and the Royal Society's assembly rooms were ideal locations for relatively public demonstrations.<ref>Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer, ''Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life'' (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985), 5, 56, 57. This same desire for multiple witnesses led to attempts at replication in other locations and a complex iconography and literary technology developed to provide visual and written proof of experimentation. See pp. 59–65.</ref> However, not just any witness was considered to be credible: "Oxford professors were accounted more reliable witnesses than Oxfordshire peasants." Two factors were taken into account: a witness's knowledge in the area and a witness's "moral constitution." In other words, only civil society were considered for Boyle's public.<ref>Shapin and Schaffer, 58, 59.</ref>


===Salons===
===Salons===
Line 384: Line 452:
{{Main|English coffeehouses in the 17th and 18th centuries}}
{{Main|English coffeehouses in the 17th and 18th centuries}}


[[Coffeehouse]]s were especially important to the spread of knowledge during the Enlightenment because they created a unique environment in which people from many different walks of life gathered and shared ideas. They were frequently criticized by nobles who feared the possibility of an environment in which class and its accompanying titles and privileges were disregarded. Such an environment was especially intimidating to monarchs who derived much of their power from the disparity between classes of people. If the different classes joined together under the influence of Enlightenment thinking, they might recognize the all-encompassing oppression and abuses of their monarchs and because of the numbers of their members might be able to successfully revolt. Monarchs also resented the idea of their subjects convening as one to discuss political matters, especially matters of foreign affairs. Rulers thought political affairs were their business only, a result of their divine right to rule.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Coffeehouse Civility, 1660–1714: An Aspect of Post-Courtly Culture in England |first=Lawrence E. |journal=Huntington Library Quarterly |last=Klein |date=1 January 1996 |volume=59 |issue=1 |pages=31–51 |doi=10.2307/3817904 |jstor=3817904}}</ref>
[[Coffeehouse]]s were especially important to the spread of knowledge during the Enlightenment because they created a unique environment in which people from many different walks of life gathered and shared ideas. They were frequently criticized by nobles who feared the possibility of an environment in which class and its accompanying titles and privileges were disregarded. Such an environment was especially intimidating to monarchs who derived much of their power from the disparity between classes of people. If the different classes joined together under the influence of Enlightenment thinking, they might recognize the all-encompassing oppression and abuses of their monarchs and because of the numbers of their members might be able to successfully revolt. Monarchs also resented the idea of their subjects convening as one to discuss political matters, especially matters of foreign affairs. Rulers thought political affairs were their business only, a result of their divine right to rule.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Klein |first=Lawrence E. |date=1 January 1996 |title=Coffeehouse Civility, 1660–1714: An Aspect of Post-Courtly Culture in England |journal=Huntington Library Quarterly |volume=59 |issue=1 |pages=31–51 |doi=10.2307/3817904 |jstor=3817904}}</ref>


Coffeeshops became homes away from home for many who sought to engage in discourse with their neighbors and discuss intriguing and thought-provoking matters, from philosophy to politics. Coffeehouses were essential to the Enlightenment, for they were centers of free-thinking and self-discovery. Although many coffeehouse patrons were scholars, many were not. Coffeehouses attracted a diverse set of people, including the educated wealthy and bourgeois as well as the lower classes. Patrons, being doctors, lawyers, merchants, represented almost all classes, so the coffeeshop environment sparked fear in those who wanted to preserve class distinction. One of the most popular critiques of the coffeehouse said that it "allowed promiscuous association among people from different rungs of the social ladder, from the artisan to the aristocrat" and was therefore compared to [[Noah's Ark]], receiving all types of animals, clean and unclean.<ref>Klein, 35.</ref> This unique culture served as a catalyst for journalism, when [[Joseph Addison]] and [[Richard Steele]] recognized its potential as an audience. Together, Steele and Addison published ''[[The Spectator (1711)]],'' a daily publication which aimed, through fictional narrator Mr. Spectator, to both entertain and provoke discussion on serious philosophical matters.
Coffeeshops became homes away from home for many who sought to engage in discourse with their neighbors and discuss intriguing and thought-provoking matters, from philosophy to politics. Coffeehouses were essential to the Enlightenment, for they were centers of free-thinking and self-discovery. Although many coffeehouse patrons were scholars, many were not. Coffeehouses attracted a diverse set of people, including the educated wealthy and bourgeois as well as the lower classes. Patrons, being doctors, lawyers, merchants, represented almost all classes, so the coffeeshop environment sparked fear in those who wanted to preserve class distinction. One of the most popular critiques of the coffeehouse said that it "allowed promiscuous association among people from different rungs of the social ladder, from the artisan to the aristocrat" and was therefore compared to [[Noah's Ark]], receiving all types of animals, clean and unclean.<ref>Klein, 35.</ref> This unique culture served as a catalyst for journalism, when [[Joseph Addison]] and [[Richard Steele]] recognized its potential as an audience. Together, Steele and Addison published ''[[The Spectator (1711)]],'' a daily publication which aimed, through fictional narrator Mr. Spectator, to both entertain and provoke discussion on serious philosophical matters.
Line 390: Line 458:
The first English coffeehouse opened in Oxford in 1650. Brian Cowan said that Oxford coffeehouses developed into "penny universities," offering a locus of learning that was less formal than at structured institutions. These penny universities occupied a significant position in Oxford academic life, as they were frequented by those consequently referred to as the ''virtuosi,'' who conducted their research on some of the premises. According to Cowan, "the coffeehouse was a place for like-minded scholars to congregate, to read, as well as learn from and to debate with each other, but was emphatically not a university institution, and the discourse there was of a far different order than any university tutorial."<ref>Cowan, 90, 91.</ref>
The first English coffeehouse opened in Oxford in 1650. Brian Cowan said that Oxford coffeehouses developed into "penny universities," offering a locus of learning that was less formal than at structured institutions. These penny universities occupied a significant position in Oxford academic life, as they were frequented by those consequently referred to as the ''virtuosi,'' who conducted their research on some of the premises. According to Cowan, "the coffeehouse was a place for like-minded scholars to congregate, to read, as well as learn from and to debate with each other, but was emphatically not a university institution, and the discourse there was of a far different order than any university tutorial."<ref>Cowan, 90, 91.</ref>


The [[Café Procope]] was established in Paris in 1686, and by the 1720s there were around 400 cafés in the city. The Café Procope in particular became a center of Enlightenment, welcoming such celebrities as Voltaire and Rousseau. The Café Procope was where Diderot and D'Alembert decided to create the ''Encyclopédie''.<ref>Colin Jones, ''Paris: Biography of a City'' (New York: Viking, 2004), 188, 189.</ref> The cafés were one of the various "nerve centers" for ''bruits publics,'' public noise or rumour. These ''bruits'' were allegedly a much better source of information than were the actual newspapers available at the time.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Robert |last=Darnton |title=An Early Information Society: News and the Media in Eighteenth-Century Paris |journal=The American Historical Review |year=2000 |volume=105#1 |issue=1 |pages=1–35 |jstor=2652433 |doi=10.2307/2652433}}</ref>
The [[Café Procope]] was established in Paris in 1686, and by the 1720s there were around 400 cafés in the city. The Café Procope in particular became a center of Enlightenment, welcoming such celebrities as Voltaire and Rousseau. The Café Procope was where Diderot and D'Alembert decided to create the ''Encyclopédie''.<ref>Colin Jones, ''Paris: Biography of a City'' (New York: Viking, 2004), 188, 189.</ref> The cafés were one of the various "nerve centers" for ''bruits publics,'' public noise or rumour. These ''bruits'' were allegedly a much better source of information than were the actual newspapers available at the time.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Darnton |first=Robert |date=2000 |title=An Early Information Society: News and the Media in Eighteenth-Century Paris |journal=The American Historical Review |volume=105#1 |issue=1 |pages=1–35 |doi=10.2307/2652433 |jstor=2652433}}</ref>


===Debating societies===
===Debating societies===
{{Main|London Debating Societies}}
{{Main|London Debating Societies}}
The debating societies are an example of the public sphere during the Enlightenment.<ref>Donna T. Andrew, "Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780," ''This Historical Journal,'' Vol. 39, No. 2. (June 1996), pp. 405–423.</ref> Their origins include:
The debating societies are an example of the public sphere during the Enlightenment.{{Sfn |Andrew |1996 |pp=405–423}} Their origins include:
* Clubs of fifty or more men who, at the beginning of the 18th century, met in pubs to discuss religious issues and affairs of state.
* Clubs of fifty or more men who, at the beginning of the 18th century, met in pubs to discuss religious issues and affairs of state.
* Mooting clubs, set up by law students to practice rhetoric.
* Mooting clubs, set up by law students to practice rhetoric.
* Spouting clubs, established to help actors train for theatrical roles.
* Spouting clubs, established to help actors train for theatrical roles.
* [[John Henley (preacher)|John Henley]]'s Oratory, which mixed outrageous sermons with even more absurd questions, like "Whether Scotland be anywhere in the world?"<ref>Andrew, 406. Andrew gives the name as "William Henley," which must be a lapse of writing.</ref>
* [[John Henley (preacher)|John Henley]]'s Oratory, which mixed outrageous sermons with even more absurd questions, like "Whether Scotland be anywhere in the world?"{{Sfn |Andrew |1996 |p=406 |loc=(Andrew gives the name as "William Henley," which must be a lapse of writing)}}


In the late 1770s, popular debating societies began to move into more "genteel" rooms, a change which helped establish a new standard of sociability.<ref>Andrew, 408.</ref> The backdrop to these developments was "an explosion of interest in the theory and practice of public elocution." The debating societies were commercial enterprises that responded to this demand, sometimes very successfully. Some societies welcomed from 800 to 1,200 spectators per night.<ref>Andrew, 406–08, 411.</ref>
In the late 1770s, popular debating societies began to move into more "genteel" rooms, a change which helped establish a new standard of sociability.{{Sfn |Andrew |1996 |p=408}} The backdrop to these developments was "an explosion of interest in the theory and practice of public elocution." The debating societies were commercial enterprises that responded to this demand, sometimes very successfully. Some societies welcomed from 800 to 1,200 spectators per night.{{Sfn |Andrew |1996 |pp=406–408, 411}}


The debating societies discussed an extremely wide range of topics. Before the Enlightenment, most intellectual debates revolved around "confessional"—that is, Catholic, [[Lutheranism|Lutheran]], Reformed (Calvinist) or [[Anglicanism|Anglican]] issues, debated primarily to establish which bloc of faith ought to have the "monopoly of truth and a God-given title to authority."{{Sfn|Israel|2001|p=4}} After Enlightenment, everything that previously had been rooted in tradition was questioned, and often replaced by new concepts. After the second half of the 17th century and during the 18th century, a "general process of rationalization and secularization set in" and confessional disputes were reduced to a secondary status in favor of the "escalating contest between faith and incredulity."{{Sfn|Israel|2001|p=4}}
The debating societies discussed an extremely wide range of topics. Before the Enlightenment, most intellectual debates revolved around "confessional"—that is, Catholic, [[Lutheranism|Lutheran]], Reformed (Calvinist) or [[Anglicanism|Anglican]] issues, debated primarily to establish which bloc of faith ought to have the "monopoly of truth and a God-given title to authority."{{Sfn |Israel |2001 |p=4}} After Enlightenment, everything that previously had been rooted in tradition was questioned, and often replaced by new concepts. After the second half of the 17th century and during the 18th century, a "general process of rationalization and secularization set in" and confessional disputes were reduced to a secondary status in favor of the "escalating contest between faith and incredulity."{{Sfn |Israel |2001 |p=4}}


In addition to debates on religion, societies discussed issues such as politics and the role of women. However, the critical subject matter of these debates did not necessarily translate into opposition to the government; the results of the debate quite frequently upheld the ''status quo''.<ref>Andrew, 412–15.</ref> From a historical standpoint, one of the most important features of the debating society was their openness to the public, as women attended and even participated in almost every debating society, which were likewise open to all classes providing they could pay the entrance fee. Once inside, spectators were able to participate in a largely egalitarian form of sociability that helped spread Enlightenment ideas.<ref>Andrew, 422.</ref>
In addition to debates on religion, societies discussed issues such as politics and the role of women. However, the critical subject matter of these debates did not necessarily translate into opposition to the government; the results of the debate quite frequently upheld the ''status quo''.{{Sfn |Andrew |1996 |pp=412–415}} From a historical standpoint, one of the most important features of the debating society was their openness to the public, as women attended and even participated in almost every debating society, which were likewise open to all classes providing they could pay the entrance fee. Once inside, spectators were able to participate in a largely egalitarian form of sociability that helped spread Enlightenment ideas.{{Sfn |Andrew |1996 |p=422}}


===Masonic lodges===
===Masonic lodges===
[[File:Freimaurer Initiation.jpg|thumb|Masonic initiation ceremony]]
[[File:Freimaurer Initiation.jpg|thumb|Masonic initiation ceremony]]


Historians have debated the extent to which the secret network of [[Freemasonry]] was a main factor in the Enlightenment.<ref>{{cite book |author1-last=Crow |author1-first=Matthew |author2-last=Jacob |author2-first=Margaret |author2-link=Margaret Jacob |year=2014 |chapter=Freemasonry and the Enlightenment |editor1-last=Bodgan |editor1-first=Henrik |editor2-last=Snoek |editor2-first=Jan A. M. |title=Handbook of Freemasonry |location=[[Leiden]] |publisher=[[Brill Publishers]] |series=Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion |volume=8 |doi=10.1163/9789004273122_008 |pages=100–116 |isbn=978-90-04-21833-8 |issn=1874-6691}}</ref> Leaders of the Enlightenment included Freemasons such as Diderot, Montesquieu, Voltaire, [[Gotthold Ephraim Lessing|Lessing]], Pope,<ref>Maynard Mack, ''Alexander Pope: A Life,'' Yale University Press, 1985 p. 437–440. Pope, a Catholic, was a Freemason in 1730, eight years before membership was prohibited by the Catholic Church (1738). Pope's name is on the membership list of the Goat Tavern Lodge (p. 439). Pope's name appears on a 1723 list and a 1730 list.</ref> Horace Walpole, Sir Robert Walpole, Mozart, Goethe, Frederick the Great, Benjamin Franklin<ref>{{cite book |first={{nowrap|J. A.}} Leo |last=Lemay |title=The Life of Benjamin Franklin, Volume 2: Printer and Publisher, 1730–1747 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KOhKqgMD10cC&pg=PA83 |year=2013 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |pages=83–92 |isbn=978-0-8122-0929-7}}</ref> and George Washington.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bullock |first1=Steven C. |year=1996 |title=Initiating the Enlightenment?: Recent Scholarship on European Freemasonry |journal=Eighteenth-Century Life |volume=20 |issue=1 |page=81}}</ref> Norman Davies said Freemasonry was a powerful force on behalf of liberalism in Europe from about 1700 to the twentieth century. It expanded during the Enlightenment, reaching practically every country in Europe. It was especially attractive to powerful aristocrats and politicians as well as intellectuals, artists, and political activists.<ref>Norman Davies, ''Europe: A History'' (1996) pp. 634–635</ref>
Historians have debated the extent to which the secret network of [[Freemasonry]] was a main factor in the Enlightenment.<ref>{{cite book |author-last=Crow |author-first=Matthew |title=Handbook of Freemasonry |author2-last=Jacob |author-first2=Margaret |author2-link=Margaret Jacob |date=2014 |publisher=[[Brill Publishers]] |isbn=978-90-04-21833-8 |editor-last=Bodgan |editor-first=Henrik |series=Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion |volume=8 |location=[[Leiden]] |pages=100–116 |chapter=Freemasonry and the Enlightenment |doi=10.1163/9789004273122_008 |issn=1874-6691 |editor2-last=Snoek |editor-first2=Jan A. M.}}</ref> Leaders of the Enlightenment included Freemasons such as Diderot, Montesquieu, Voltaire, [[Gotthold Ephraim Lessing|Lessing]], Pope,<ref>Maynard Mack, ''Alexander Pope: A Life,'' Yale University Press, 1985 p. 437–440. Pope, a Catholic, was a Freemason in 1730, eight years before membership was prohibited by the Catholic Church (1738). Pope's name is on the membership list of the Goat Tavern Lodge (p. 439). Pope's name appears on a 1723 list and a 1730 list.</ref> Horace Walpole, Robert Walpole, Mozart, Goethe, Frederick the Great, Benjamin Franklin<ref>{{cite book |last=Lemay |first={{nowrap|J. A.}} Leo |title=The Life of Benjamin Franklin, Volume 2: Printer and Publisher, 1730–1747 |date=2013 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |isbn=978-0-8122-0929-7 |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=KOhKqgMD10cC&pg=PA83 83–92]}}</ref> and George Washington.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Bullock |first=Steven C. |date=1996 |title=Initiating the Enlightenment?: Recent Scholarship on European Freemasonry |journal=Eighteenth-Century Life |volume=20 |issue=1 |page=81}}</ref> Norman Davies said Freemasonry was a powerful force on behalf of liberalism in Europe from about 1700 to the twentieth century. It expanded during the Enlightenment, reaching practically every country in Europe. It was especially attractive to powerful aristocrats and politicians as well as intellectuals, artists, and political activists.<ref>Norman Davies, ''Europe: A History'' (1996) pp. 634–635</ref>


During the Enlightenment, Freemasons comprised an international network of like-minded men, often meeting in secret in ritualistic programs at their lodges. They promoted the ideals of the Enlightenment and helped diffuse these values across Britain, France, and other places. Freemasonry as a systematic creed with its own myths, values, and rituals originated in Scotland {{circa|1600}} and spread to England and then across the Continent in the 18th century. They fostered new codes of conduct—including a communal understanding of liberty and equality inherited from guild sociability—"liberty, fraternity, and equality."<ref>Margaret C. Jacob's seminal work on Enlightenment freemasonry, Margaret C. Jacob, ''Living the Enlightenment: Free masonry and Politics in Eighteenth-Century Europe'' (Oxford University Press, 1991) p. 49.</ref> Scottish soldiers and Jacobite Scots brought to the Continent ideals of fraternity, which reflected not the local system of Scottish customs, but the institutions and ideals originating in the English Revolution against royal absolutism.<ref>Margaret C. Jacob, "Polite worlds of Enlightenment," in Martin Fitzpatrick and Peter Jones, eds. ''The Enlightenment World'' (Routledge, 2004) pp. 272–287.</ref> Freemasonry was particularly prevalent in France—by 1789, there were perhaps as many as 100,000 French Masons, making Freemasonry the most popular of all Enlightenment associations.<ref>Roche, 436.</ref> The Freemasons displayed a passion for secrecy and created new degrees and ceremonies. Similar societies, partially imitating Freemasonry, emerged in France, Germany, Sweden, and Russia. One example was the [[Illuminati]], founded in Bavaria in 1776, which was copied after the Freemasons, but was never part of the movement. The name itself translates to "[[wikt:illuminato#Italian|enlightened]]," chosen to reflect their [[Illuminati#Origins|original intent]] to promote the values of the movement. The Illuminati was an overtly political group, which most Masonic lodges decidedly were not.<ref>Fitzpatrick and Jones, eds. ''The Enlightenment World'' p. 281</ref>
During the Enlightenment, Freemasons comprised an international network of like-minded men, often meeting in secret in ritualistic programs at their lodges. They promoted the ideals of the Enlightenment and helped diffuse these values across Britain, France, and other places. Freemasonry as a systematic creed with its own myths, values, and rituals originated in Scotland {{circa|1600}} and spread to England and then across the Continent in the 18th century. They fostered new codes of conduct—including a communal understanding of liberty and equality inherited from guild sociability—"liberty, fraternity, and equality."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Jacob |first=Margaret C. |author-link=Margaret Jacob |title=Living the Enlightenment: Free masonry and Politics in Eighteenth-Century Europe |date=1991 |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=49}}</ref> Scottish soldiers and Jacobite Scots brought to the Continent ideals of fraternity, which reflected not the local system of Scottish customs, but the institutions and ideals originating in the English Revolution against royal absolutism.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Jacob |first=Margaret C. |author-link=Margaret Jacob |title=Polite worlds of Enlightenment |pages=272–287}} in {{Harvnb|Fitzpatrick|Jones|2004}}.</ref> Freemasonry was particularly prevalent in France—by 1789, there were perhaps as many as 100,000 French Masons, making Freemasonry the most popular of all Enlightenment associations.{{Sfn|Roche|1998|p=436}} The Freemasons displayed a passion for secrecy and created new degrees and ceremonies. Similar societies, partially imitating Freemasonry, emerged in France, Germany, Sweden, and Russia. One example was the [[Illuminati]], founded in Bavaria in 1776, which was copied after the Freemasons, but was never part of the movement. The name itself translates to "[[wikt:illuminato#Italian|enlightened]]," chosen to reflect their [[Illuminati#Origins|original intent]] to promote the values of the movement. The Illuminati was an overtly political group, which most Masonic lodges decidedly were not.<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Enlightenment World |date=2004 |publisher=Routledge |editor-last=Fitzpatrick |editor-first=Martin |page=281 |editor-last2=Jones |editor-first2=Peter}}</ref>


Masonic lodges created a private model for public affairs. They "reconstituted the polity and established a constitutional form of self-government, complete with constitutions and laws, elections, and representatives." In other words, the micro-society set up within the lodges constituted a normative model for society as a whole. This was especially true on the continent: when the first lodges began to appear in the 1730s, their embodiment of British values was often seen as threatening by state authorities. For example, the Parisian lodge that met in the mid 1720s was composed of English [[Jacobitism|Jacobite]] exiles.<ref>Jacob, pp. 20, 73, 89.</ref> Furthermore, freemasons across Europe explicitly linked themselves to the Enlightenment as a whole. For example, in French lodges the line "As the means to be enlightened I search for the enlightened" was a part of their initiation rites. British lodges assigned themselves the duty to "initiate the unenlightened." This did not necessarily link lodges to the irreligious, but neither did this exclude them from the occasional heresy. In fact, many lodges praised the Grand Architect, the masonic terminology for the deistic divine being who created a scientifically ordered universe.<ref>Jacob, 145–47.</ref>
Masonic lodges created a private model for public affairs. They "reconstituted the polity and established a constitutional form of self-government, complete with constitutions and laws, elections, and representatives." In other words, the micro-society set up within the lodges constituted a normative model for society as a whole. This was especially true on the continent: when the first lodges began to appear in the 1730s, their embodiment of British values was often seen as threatening by state authorities. For example, the Parisian lodge that met in the mid 1720s was composed of English [[Jacobitism|Jacobite]] exiles.<ref>Jacob, pp. 20, 73, 89.</ref> Furthermore, freemasons across Europe explicitly linked themselves to the Enlightenment as a whole. For example, in French lodges the line "As the means to be enlightened I search for the enlightened" was a part of their initiation rites. British lodges assigned themselves the duty to "initiate the unenlightened." This did not necessarily link lodges to the irreligious, but neither did this exclude them from the occasional heresy. In fact, many lodges praised the Grand Architect, the masonic terminology for the deistic divine being who created a scientifically ordered universe.<ref>Jacob, 145–147.</ref>


German historian Reinhart Koselleck claimed: "On the Continent there were two social structures that left a decisive imprint on the Age of Enlightenment: the Republic of Letters and the Masonic lodges."<ref>Reinhart Koselleck, ''[[Critique and Crisis]],'' p. 62, (The MIT Press, 1988)</ref> Scottish professor Thomas Munck argues that "although the Masons did promote international and cross-social contacts which were essentially non-religious and broadly in agreement with enlightened values, they can hardly be described as a major radical or reformist network in their own right."<ref>Thomas Munck, 1994, p. 70.</ref> Many of the Masons values seemed to greatly appeal to Enlightenment values and thinkers. Diderot discusses the link between Freemason ideals and the enlightenment in D'Alembert's Dream, exploring masonry as a way of spreading enlightenment beliefs.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.stmarys-ca.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/files/Dalemberts_Dream.pdf |last=Diderot |first=Denis |title=D'Alembert's Dream |year=1769 |access-date=17 November 2014 |archive-date=29 November 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141129024943/https://www.stmarys-ca.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/files/Dalemberts_Dream.pdf |url-status=dead}}</ref> Historian Margaret Jacob stresses the importance of the Masons in indirectly inspiring enlightened political thought.<ref>Margaret C. Jacob, ''Living the Enlightenment: Freemasonry and politics in eighteenth-century Europe'' (Oxford University Press, 1991.)</ref> On the negative side, [[Daniel Roche (historian)|Daniel Roche]] contests claims that Masonry promoted egalitarianism and he argues the lodges only attracted men of similar social backgrounds.<ref>Roche, 437.</ref> The presence of noble women in the French "lodges of adoption" that formed in the 1780s was largely due to the close ties shared between these lodges and aristocratic society.<ref>Jacob, 139. See also Janet M. Burke, "Freemasonry, Friendship and Noblewomen: The Role of the Secret Society in Bringing Enlightenment Thought to Pre-Revolutionary Women Elites," ''History of European Ideas'' 10 no. 3 (1989): 283–94.</ref>
German historian Reinhart Koselleck claimed: "On the Continent there were two social structures that left a decisive imprint on the Age of Enlightenment: the Republic of Letters and the Masonic lodges."<ref>Reinhart Koselleck, ''[[Critique and Crisis]],'' p. 62, (The MIT Press, 1988)</ref> Scottish professor Thomas Munck argues that "although the Masons did promote international and cross-social contacts which were essentially non-religious and broadly in agreement with enlightened values, they can hardly be described as a major radical or reformist network in their own right."<ref>Thomas Munck, 1994, p. 70.</ref> Many of the Masons values seemed to greatly appeal to Enlightenment values and thinkers. Diderot discusses the link between Freemason ideals and the enlightenment in D'Alembert's Dream, exploring masonry as a way of spreading enlightenment beliefs.<ref>{{cite web |last=Diderot |first=Denis |date=1769 |title=D'Alembert's Dream |url=https://www.stmarys-ca.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/files/Dalemberts_Dream.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141129024943/https://www.stmarys-ca.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/files/Dalemberts_Dream.pdf |archive-date=29 November 2014 |access-date=17 November 2014}}</ref> Historian [[Margaret Jacob]] stresses the importance of the Masons in indirectly inspiring enlightened political thought.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Jacob |first=Margaret C. |author-link=Margaret Jacob |title=Living the Enlightenment: Freemasonry and politics in eighteenth-century Europe |date=1991 |publisher=Oxford University Press}}</ref> On the negative side, [[Daniel Roche (historian)|Daniel Roche]] contests claims that Masonry promoted egalitarianism and he argues the lodges only attracted men of similar social backgrounds.{{Sfn|Roche|1998|p=437}} The presence of noble women in the French "lodges of adoption" that formed in the 1780s was largely due to the close ties shared between these lodges and aristocratic society.<ref>Jacob, 139. See also Janet M. Burke, "Freemasonry, Friendship and Noblewomen: The Role of the Secret Society in Bringing Enlightenment Thought to Pre-Revolutionary Women Elites," ''History of European Ideas'' 10 no. 3 (1989): 283–94.</ref>


The major opponent of Freemasonry was the Catholic Church so in countries with a large Catholic element, such as France, Italy, Spain, and Mexico, much of the ferocity of the political battles involve the confrontation between what Davies calls the reactionary Church and enlightened Freemasonry.<ref>Davies, ''Europe: A History'' (1996) pp. 634–635</ref><ref>Richard Weisberger et al., eds., ''Freemasonry on both sides of the Atlantic: essays concerning the craft in the British Isles, Europe, the United States, and Mexico'' (2002)</ref> Even in France, Masons did not act as a group.<ref>Robert R. Palmer, ''The Age of the Democratic Revolution: The Struggle'' (1970) p. 53</ref> American historians, while noting that Benjamin Franklin and [[George Washington]] were indeed active Masons, have downplayed the importance of Freemasonry in causing the American Revolution because the Masonic order was non-political and included both Patriots and their enemy the Loyalists.<ref>Neil L. York, "Freemasons and the American Revolution," ''The Historian'' Volume: 55. Issue: 2. 1993, pp. 315+.</ref>
The major opponent of Freemasonry was the Catholic Church so in countries with a large Catholic element, such as France, Italy, Spain, and Mexico, much of the ferocity of the political battles involve the confrontation between what Davies calls the reactionary Church and enlightened Freemasonry.<ref>Davies, ''Europe: A History'' (1996) pp. 634–635</ref><ref>Richard Weisberger et al., eds., ''Freemasonry on both sides of the Atlantic: essays concerning the craft in the British Isles, Europe, the United States, and Mexico'' (2002)</ref> Even in France, Masons did not act as a group.<ref>Robert R. Palmer, ''The Age of the Democratic Revolution: The Struggle'' (1970) p. 53</ref> American historians, while noting that Benjamin Franklin and [[George Washington]] were indeed active Masons, have downplayed the importance of Freemasonry in causing the American Revolution because the Masonic order was non-political and included both Patriots and their enemy the Loyalists.<ref>Neil L. York, "Freemasons and the American Revolution," ''The Historian'' Volume: 55. Issue: 2. 1993, pp. 315+.</ref>


===Art===
===Art===
The art produced during the Enlightenment focused on a search for morality that was absent from the art in previous eras.{{Citation needed|date=May 2022}} At the same time, the [[Classical art]] of Greece and Rome became interesting to people again, since archaeological teams discovered [[Pompeii]] and [[Herculaneum]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Janson |first1=H. W. |last2=Janson |first2=Anthony |title=A Basic History of Art |url=https://archive.org/details/basichistoryofar0006jans |url-access=registration |year=2003 |publisher=Harry N. Abrams, Inc. |location=New York |pages=[https://archive.org/details/basichistoryofar0006jans/page/458 458–474]}}</ref> People took inspiration from it and revived classical art into [[neoclassicism|neo-classical art]]. This can especially be seen in early American art and architecture, which featured arches, goddesses, and other classical architectural designs.{{clarify|this may be true of American art, but I find the idea slightly startling given that rococo going on in France and Italy, that this is would be *especially* true od American art. If I have the timeline wrong or something feel free to remove the tag; if nor please a somewhat better summary here|date=October 2023}}
At the same time, the [[Classical art]] of Greece and Rome became interesting to people again, since archaeological teams discovered [[Pompeii]] and [[Herculaneum]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Janson |first1=H. W. |url=https://archive.org/details/basichistoryofar0006jans |title=A Basic History of Art |last2=Janson |first2=Anthony |publisher=Harry N. Abrams, Inc. |date=2003 |location=New York |pages=[https://archive.org/details/basichistoryofar0006jans/page/458 458–474] |url-access=registration}}</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 434: Line 502:
* [[Renaissance philosophy]]
* [[Renaissance philosophy]]
* [[Witch trials in the early modern period]]
* [[Witch trials in the early modern period]]
* [[Counter-Enlightenment|Counter Enlightenment]]


==Notes==
==Notes==
Line 444: Line 513:


===Sources===
===Sources===
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin|indent=yes|30em}}
* Andrew, Donna T. "Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780." ''The Historical Journal'', Vol. 39, No. 2. (June 1996), pp.&nbsp;405–423. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2640187 in JSTOR]
* {{Cite journal |last=Andrew |first=Donna T. |date=June 1996 |title=Popular Culture and Public Debate: London 1780 |journal=The Historical Journal |volume=39 |issue=2 |pages=405–423 |doi=10.1017/S0018246X00020306 |jstor=2640187}}
* Burns, William. ''Science in the Enlightenment: An Encyclopædia'' (2003)<!-- 353pp -->
* {{Cite book |last=Burns |first=William |title=Science in the Enlightenment: An Encyclopædia |date=2003}}
* Cowan, Brian, ''The Social Life of Coffee: The Emergence of the British Coffeehouse''. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005
* Cowan, Brian, ''The Social Life of Coffee: The Emergence of the British Coffeehouse''. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.
* [[Robert Darnton|Darnton, Robert]]. ''The Literary Underground of the Old Regime''. (1982).
* {{cite book |last=Chartier |first=Roger |title=The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution |date=1991 |publisher=Duke University Press |translator-last=Cochrane |translator-first=Lydia G.}}
* {{Cite book |last=Darnton |first=Robert |author-link=Robert Darnton |title=The Literary Underground of the Old Regime |date=1982}}
* {{cite book |last=Deijl |first=Lucas van der |title=Translating the New Philosophy in the Dutch Early Enlightenment (1640–1720) |date=2025 |chapter=Introduction |pages=11–42 |publisher=Amsterdam University Press |doi=10.2307/jj.33326009.5 |jstor=jj.33326009.5 |isbn=978-90-485-6375-3 }}
* {{cite book |last=Forsyth |first=Murray |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C0IUAQAAIAAJ |title=Reason and Revolution: The Political Thought of the Abbé Sieyes |date=1987 |publisher=Leicester University Press |isbn=978-0-7185-1222-4 |authorlink=Murray Forsyth}}
* {{cite book |last=Frängsmyr |first=Tore |title=The Enlightenment in National Context |date=1981 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |editor-last=Porter |editor-first=Roy S. |editor-link=Roy Porter |location=Cambridge |chapter=The Enlightenment in Sweden |doi=10.1017/CBO9780511561283.012 |editor-last2=Teich |editor-first2=Mikuláš |author-link=Tore Frängsmyr |pages=164–175 |isbn=978-0-521-23757-4 }}
* {{Cite book |title=The Enlightenment: A Comprehensive Anthology |publisher=Simon and Schuster |date=1973 |isbn=978-0-671-21707-5 |editor-last=Gay |editor-first=Peter |editor-link=Peter Gay}}
* {{Cite book |last=Gillispie |first=Charles Coulston |title=Science and Polity in France at the End of the Old Regime |date=1980}}
* {{cite book |last=Haakonssen |first=Knud |title=The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy |date=2008 |publisher=Cambridge University Press}}
* {{cite book |last=Haakonssen |first=Knud |title=The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy |date=2008 |publisher=Cambridge University Press}}
* {{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan I. |title=Radical Enlightenment; Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750 |year=2001 |publisher=Oxford University Press}}
* {{Cite book |last=Habermas |first=Jürgen |title=The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere |date=1989}}
* {{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan I. |title=Enlightenment Contested |year=2006 |publisher=Oxford University Press}}
* {{Cite book |last=Headrick |first=Daniel R. |title=When Information Came of Age: Technologies of Knowledge in the Age of Reason and Revolution, 1700–1850 |date=2000 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford}}
* {{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan I. |title=A Revolution of the Mind: Radical Enlightenment and the Intellectual Origins of Modern Democracy |year=2010 |publisher=Princeton}}
* {{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan I. |title=Radical Enlightenment; Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750 |date=2001 |publisher=Oxford University Press |authorlink=Jonathan Israel}}
* {{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan I. |title=Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights 1750–1790 |year=2011 |publisher=Oxford University Press}}
*: {{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan I. |author-mask=2 |title=Enlightenment Contested |date=2006 |publisher=Oxford University Press}}
* Melton, James Van Horn. ''The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe''. (2001).
*: {{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan I. |author-mask=2 |title=A Revolution of the Mind: Radical Enlightenment and the Intellectual Origins of Modern Democracy |date=2010 |publisher=Princeton}}
* {{cite book |last=Petitfils |first=Jean-Christian |title=Louis XVI |year=2005 |publisher=Perrin |isbn=978-2-7441-9130-5}}
*: {{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan I. |author-mask=2 |title=Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights 1750–1790 |date=2011 |publisher=Oxford University Press}}
* [[Ritchie Robertson|Robertson, Ritchie]]. ''The Enlightenment: The Pursuit of Happiness, 1680–1790''. London: Allen Lane, 2020; New York: HarperCollins, 2021
*: {{cite book |last=Israel |first=Jonathan I. |author-mask=2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NmeoEAAAQBAJ |title=Historical Dictionary of the Enlightenment |date=2023 |isbn=978-1-5381-2314-0 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |edition=2nd}}
* {{cite book |last=Porter |first=Roy |title=The Enlightenment |edition=2nd |year=2001 |publisher=Macmillan Education UK |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z6C9zlVo7cAC |isbn=978-0-333-94505-6}}
* {{cite book |last=Kates |first=Gary |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=grh-EAAAQBAJ |title=The Books that Made the European Enlightenment |date=2022 |publisher=Bloomsbury |isbn=978-1-350-27767-0 }}
* [[Daniel Roche (historian)|Roche, Daniel]]. ''France in the Enlightenment''. (1998).
* {{cite book |last1=Kendrick |first1=Sam |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3kpzEQAAQBAJ |title=Research Handbook on the Sociology of Knowledge |last2=Nagel |first2=Joane |date=2025 |chapter=Gender, climate change, and the production of scientific knowledge |publisher=Edward Elgar |isbn=978-1-80037-664-9 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Lee |first1=Raymond L. M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=k1-1DwAAQBAJ |title=The Challenge of Religion After Modernity |last2=Ackerman |first2=Susan E. |date=2018 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-351-73484-4 }}
* {{Cite book |title=The Cambridge History of Science |date=2003 |isbn=9780521572439 |editor-last=Lindberg |editor-first=David C. |volume=4, Eighteenth-Century Science |editor-last2=Numbers |editor-first2=Ronald L. |editor-last3=Porter |editor-first3=Roy |editor-link3=Roy Porter}}
* {{cite book |last=Liulevicius |first=Vejas G. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P2mF419R0-kC |title=The German Myth of the East: 1800 to the Present |date=2010 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-960516-3 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Mason |first=Stephen F. |title=A History of the Sciences |date=1962 |publisher=Collier |location=New York}}
* {{cite book |last=McGrath |first=John |title=The Modernization of the Western World |date=2024 |chapter=The Enlightenment |pages=107–113 |doi=10.4324/9781003467328-10 |isbn=978-1-003-46732-8 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Melton |first=James Van Horn |title=The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe |date=2001}}
* {{cite book |last=Mokyr |first=Joel |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_LSlrytZxE0C |title=The Enlightened Economy |date=2011 |publisher=Penguin |isbn=978-0-14-196910-7 |authorlink=Joel Mokyr}}
* {{cite book |last=Outram |first=Dorinda |title=The Enlightenment |date=1995}}
*: {{cite book |last=Outram |first=Dorinda |author-mask=2 |title=Panorama of the Enlightenment |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-89236-861-7}}
* {{cite book |last=Padgett |first=Alan G. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ix5mKB8d0NoC |title=Science and the Study of God |date=2003 |publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans |isbn=978-0-8028-3941-1 }}
* {{cite book |last=Petitfils |first=Jean-Christian |title=Louis XVI |date=2005 |publisher=Perrin |isbn=978-2-7441-9130-5}}
* {{Cite book |last=Phillips |first=Patricia |title=The Scientific Lady : A Social History of Women's Scientific Interests, 1520–1918 |date=1991 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |location=New York}}
* {{cite book |last=Porter |first=Roy S. |author-link=Roy Porter |title=The Creation of the Modern World: The Untold Story of the British Enlightenment |date=2000 |isbn=9780713991529}}
* {{cite book |last=Porter |first=Roy S. |author-mask=2 |author-link=Roy Porter |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z6C9zlVo7cAC |title=The Enlightenment |date=2001 |publisher=Macmillan Education UK |isbn=978-0-333-94505-6 |edition=2nd}}
* {{Cite book |last=Roche |first=Daniel |author-link=Daniel Roche (historian) |title=France in the Enlightenment |date=1998}}
* {{cite journal |last=Schüssler Fiorenza |first=Elisabeth |date=1989 |title=Commitment and Critical Inquiry |journal=The Harvard Theological Review |publisher=Cambridge University Press |volume=82 |issue=1 |pages=1–11 |doi=10.1017/S0017816000015996 |jstor=1509509 |authorlink=Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza}}
* {{cite journal |last=Skjönsberg |first=Max |date=2023 |title=A Theory of the Enlightenment in Late Eighteenth-Century Sweden: Nils von Rosenstein and Scotland's Science of Man and Politics |journal=Scandinavian Journal of History |volume=48 |issue=4 |pages=427–456 |doi=10.1080/03468755.2023.2187879}}
* {{cite book |last=Stanley |first=Sharon A. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Vn0hAwAAQBAJ |title=The French Enlightenment and the Emergence of Modern Cynicism |date=2012 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-37903-9 }}
* {{cite book |last=Wade |first=Ira O. |title=The Structure and Form of the French Enlightenment |date=1977 |publisher=Princeton University Press |volume=1 |jstor=j.ctt13x11rw}}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}


Line 464: Line 558:
===Reference and surveys===
===Reference and surveys===
{{Refbegin}}
{{Refbegin}}
* [[Carl L. Becker|Becker, Carl L.]] ''The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-Century Philosophers.'' (1932), a famous short classic
* {{cite book |last=Becker |first=Carl L. |title=The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-Century Philosophers |date=1932}}
* Chisick, Harvey. ''Historical Dictionary of the Enlightenment'' (2005)
* {{cite book |last=Chisick |first=Harvey |title=Historical Dictionary of the Enlightenment |date=2005}}
* Delon, Michel. ''Encyclopædia of the Enlightenment'' (2001) 1480 pp.
* {{cite book |last=Delon |first=Michel |title=Encyclopædia of the Enlightenment |date=2001}}
* [[Louis Dupré (philosopher)|Dupré, Louis]]. ''The Enlightenment and the Intellectual Foundations of Modern Culture'' (2004)
* {{cite book |last=Dupré |first=Louis |title=The Enlightenment and the Intellectual Foundations of Modern Culture |date=2004}}
* [[Peter Gay|Gay, Peter]]. ''The Enlightenment: The Rise of Modern Paganism'' (1966, 2nd ed. 1995), 592 pp. [https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393313026 excerpt and text search vol 1].
* {{cite book |last=Gay |first=Peter |title=The Enlightenment: The Rise of Modern Paganism |date=1995 |edition=2nd |orig-date=1966}}
* Gay, Peter. ''The Enlightenment: The Science of Freedom'' (1969, 2nd ed. 1995), a highly influential study [https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393313662 excerpt and text search vol 2];
* {{cite book |last=Gay |first=Peter |title=The Enlightenment: The Science of Freedom |date=1995 |edition=2nd |orig-date=1969}}
* Greensides F., Hyland P., Gomez O. (ed.). ''The Enlightenment'' (2002)
* {{cite book |title=The Enlightenment |date=2002 |editor1-last=Greensides |editor1-first=F. |editor2-last=Hyland |editor2-first=P. |editor3-last=Gomez |editor3-first=O.}}
* {{cite book |last=Ferrone |first=Vincenzo |title=The Enlightenment: History of an Idea |year=2017 |publisher=Princeton University Press}}
* {{cite book |last=Ferrone |first=Vincenzo |title=The Enlightenment: History of an Idea |publisher=Princeton University Press |date=2017 |location=Princeton}}
* Fitzpatrick, Martin et al., eds. ''The Enlightenment World'' (2004). 714 pp.&nbsp;39 essays by scholars
* {{cite book |title=The Enlightenment World |date=2004 |editor1-last=Fitzpatrick |editor1-first=Martin}}
* Hampson, Norman. ''The Enlightenment'' (1981) [https://archive.org/details/enlightenment00hamp online]
* {{cite book |last=Hampson |first=Norman |url=https://archive.org/details/enlightenment00hamp |title=The Enlightenment |date=1981 |isbn=978-0-14-021004-0}}
* Hazard, Paul. ''European Thought in the 18th Century: From Montesquieu to Lessing'' (1965)
* {{cite book |last=Hazard |first=Paul |title=European Thought in the 18th Century: From Montesquieu to Lessing |date=1965}}
* Hesmyr, Atle. ''From Enlightenment to Romanticism in 18th Century Europe'' (2018)
* {{cite book |last=Hesmyr |first=Atle |title=From Enlightenment to Romanticism in 18th Century Europe |date=2018}}
* [[Gertrude Himmelfarb|Himmelfarb, Gertrude]]. ''The Roads to Modernity: The British, French, and American Enlightenments'' (2004) [https://www.amazon.com/Roads-Modernity-British-American-Enlightenments/dp/1400077222/ excerpt and text search]
* {{cite book |last=Himmelfarb |first=Gertrude |title=The Roads to Modernity: The British, French, and American Enlightenments |date=2004}}
* Jacob, Margaret. ''Enlightenment: A Brief History with Documents'' 2000
* {{cite book |last=Jacob |first=Margaret |title=Enlightenment: A Brief History with Documents |date=2000}}
* [[Alan Charles Kors|Kors, Alan Charles]]. ''Encyclopædia of the Enlightenment'' (4 vol. 1990; 2nd ed. 2003), 1984 pp. [https://www.amazon.com/dp/0195104307 excerpt and text search]
* {{Cite book |last=Kadane |first=Matthew |title=The Enlightenment and Original Sin |publisher=University of Chicago Press |date=2024 |isbn=9780226832890 |location=Chicago, IL}}
* [[Ulrich L. Lehner|Lehner, Ulrich L.]] ''The Catholic Enlightenment'' (2016)
* {{cite book |last=Kors |first=Alan Charles |title=Encyclopædia of the Enlightenment |date=2003 |edition=2nd |volume=4 |orig-date=1990}}
* Lehner, Ulrich L. ''Women, Catholicism and Enlightenment'' (2017)
* {{cite book |last=Lehner |first=Ulrich L. |title=The Catholic Enlightenment |date=2016}}
* Munck, Thomas. ''Enlightenment: A Comparative Social History, 1721–1794'' (1994)
* {{cite book |last=Lehner |first=Ulrich L. |title=Women, Catholicism and Enlightenment |date=2017}}
* Outram, Dorinda. ''The Enlightenment'' (1995) 157 pp. [https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521425344 excerpt and text search]; also [https://archive.org/details/enlightenment00outr online]
* {{cite book |last=Love |first=Ronald S. |title=The Enlightenment |publisher=Greenwood |date=2008 |location=Westport, CT}}
* Outram, Dorinda. ''Panorama of the Enlightenment'' (2006), emphasis on Germany; heavily illustrated
* {{cite book |last=Munck |first=Thomas |title=Enlightenment: A Comparative Social History, 1721–1794 |date=1994}}
* {{cite book |last=Pinker |first=Steven |title=Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress |year=2018 |publisher=Penguin Books}}
* {{cite book |last=Pinker |first=Steven |title=Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress |publisher=Penguin Books |date=2018}}
* Reill, Peter Hanns, and Wilson, Ellen Judy. ''Encyclopædia of the Enlightenment.'' (2nd ed. 2004). 670 pp.
* {{cite encyclopedia |date=2015 |title=Enlightenment |encyclopedia=International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition) |publisher=Elsevier |last=Ricuperati |first=Giuseppe |editor-last=Wright |editor-first=James D. |pages=656–663 |doi=10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.62004-4 |isbn=978-0-08-097087-5}}
* Robertson, Ritchie. ''The Enlightenment: The Pursuit of Happiness, 1680–1790.'' (2021).
* {{cite book |last=Statman |first=Alexander |title=A Global Enlightenment: Western Progress and Chinese Science |date=2023 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-82576-2}}
* {{cite book |last=Sarmant |first=Thierry |title=Histoire de Paris: Politique, urbanisme, civilisation |year=2012 |publisher=Editions Jean-Paul Gisserot |isbn=978-2-7558-0330-3}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |date=2015 |title=Enlightenment: Impact on the Social Sciences |encyclopedia=International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition) |publisher=Elsevier |last=Torpey |first=John C. |editor-last=Wright |editor-first=James D. |pages=664–668 |doi=10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03203-7 |isbn=978-0-08-097087-5}}
* {{cite book |last1=Statman |first1=Alexander |title=A Global Enlightenment: Western Progress and Chinese Science |date=2023 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0-226-82576-2}}
* {{cite book |last=Warman |first=Caroline |url=http://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/418/tolerance--the-beacon-of-the-enlightenment |title=Tolerance: The Beacon of the Enlightenment |publisher=Open Book Publishers |date=2016 |isbn=978-1-78374-203-5 |editor1-last=Warman |editor1-first=Caroline |series=Open Book Classics |volume=3 |doi=10.11647/OBP.0088 |ref=none |display-authors=etal |doi-access=free}}
* {{cite book |last=Warman |first=Caroline |title=Tolerance: The Beacon of the Enlightenment |series=Open Book Classics |year=2016 |volume=3 |publisher=Open Book Publishers |url=http://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/418/tolerance--the-beacon-of-the-enlightenment |isbn=978-1-78374-203-5 |display-authors=etal |doi=10.11647/OBP.0088 |editor1-last=Warman |editor1-first=Caroline |ref=none |doi-access=free}}
* {{cite book |title=The Blackwell Companion to the Enlightenment |date=1992 |editor1-last=Yolton |editor1-first=John W.}}
* Yolton, John W. et al. ''The Blackwell Companion to the Enlightenment.'' (1992). 581 pp.
{{Refend}}
{{Refend}}


===Specialty studies===
===Specialty studies===
{{Refbegin}}
{{Refbegin}}
* Aldridge, A. Owen (ed.). ''The Ibero-American Enlightenment'' (1971).
* {{cite book |title=The Ibero-American Enlightenment |date=1971 |editor-last=Aldridge |editor-first=A. Owen}}
* Artz, Frederick B. ''The Enlightenment in France'' (1998) [https://archive.org/details/isbn_0873380320 online]
* {{cite book |last=Artz |first=Frederick B. |url=https://archive.org/details/isbn_0873380320 |title=The Enlightenment in France |date=1998 |isbn=978-0-87338-032-4}}
* Brewer, Daniel. ''The Enlightenment Past: Reconstructing 18th-Century French Thought'' (2008)
* {{cite book |last=Broadie |first=Alexander |title=The Scottish Enlightenment: The Historical Age of the Historical Nation |date=2007}}
* Broadie, Alexander. ''The Scottish Enlightenment: The Historical Age of the Historical Nation'' (2007)
* {{cite book |last=Broadie |first=Alexander |title=The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment |date=2003}}
* Broadie, Alexander. ''The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment'' (2003) [https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521003237 excerpt and text search]
* {{cite journal |last=Bronner |first=Stephen |date=1995 |title=The Great Divide: The Enlightenment and its Critics |journal=New Politics |volume=5 |pages=65–86}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Bronner |first1=Stephen |year=1995 |title=The Great Divide: The Enlightenment and its Critics |journal=New Politics |volume=5 |pages=65–86}}
* {{cite book |last=Buchan |first=James |title=Crowded with Genius: The Scottish Enlightenment: Edinburgh's Moment of the Mind |date=2004}}
* Brown, Stuart, ed. ''British Philosophy in the Age of Enlightenment'' (2002)
* {{cite journal |last=Burrows |first=Simon |date=2013 |title=In Search of Enlightenment: From Mapping Books to Cultural History |journal=Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies |volume=13 |issue=4 |pages=3–28 |doi=10.1353/jem.2013.0042}}
* Buchan, James. ''Crowded with Genius: The Scottish Enlightenment: Edinburgh's Moment of the Mind'' (2004) [https://www.amazon.com/dp/006055889X excerpt and text search]
* {{cite book |title=The Origins and Nature of the Scottish Enlightenment |date=1982 |editor1-last=Campbell |editor1-first=R.S. |location=Edinburgh |editor2-last=Skinner |editor2-first=A.S.}}
* Burrows, Simon. (2013) "In Search of Enlightenment: From Mapping Books to Cultural History." ''Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies'' 13, no. 4: 3–28.
* {{cite book |last=Cassirer |first=Ernst |title=The Philosophy of the Enlightenment |date=1955}}
* Campbell, R.S. and Skinner, A.S., (eds.) ''The Origins and Nature of the Scottish Enlightenment'', Edinburgh, 1982
* {{cite book |url=http://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15324coll10/id/59328/rec/1 |title=Europe in the age of enlightenment and revolution |publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art |date=1989 |isbn=978-0-87099-451-7 |location=New York}}
* Cassirer, Ernst. ''The Philosophy of the Enlightenment.'' 1955. a highly influential study by a neoKantian philosopher [https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691019630 excerpt and text search]
* {{cite book |last=Edelstein |first=Dan |title=The Enlightenment: A Genealogy |publisher=University of Chicago Press |date=2010}}
* [[Roger Chartier|Chartier, Roger]]. ''The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution''. Translated by Lydia G. Cochrane. Duke University Press, 1991.
* {{cite journal |last=Golinski |first=Jan |date=2011 |title=Science in the Enlightenment, Revisited |journal=History of Science |volume=49 |issue=2 |pages=217–231 |bibcode=2011HisSc..49..217G |doi=10.1177/007327531104900204 |s2cid=142886527}}
* {{cite book |url=http://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/compoundobject/collection/p15324coll10/id/59328/rec/1 |title=Europe in the age of enlightenment and revolution |location=New York |publisher=The Metropolitan Museum of Art |year=1989 |isbn=978-0-87099-451-7}}
* {{cite book |last=Goodman |first=Dena |title=The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment |date=1994}}
* Edelstein, Dan. ''The Enlightenment: A Genealogy'' (University of Chicago Press; 2010) 209 pp.
* {{cite book |last=Hesse |first=Carla |title=The Other Enlightenment: How French Women Became Modern |publisher=Princeton University Press |date=2001 |location=Princeton}}
* {{cite journal |last=Golinski |first=Jan |year=2011 |title=Science in the Enlightenment, Revisited |journal=History of Science |volume=49 |issue=2 |pages=217–231 |bibcode=2011HisSc..49..217G |doi=10.1177/007327531104900204 |s2cid=142886527}}
* {{cite book |last=Hankins |first=Thomas L. |title=Science and the Enlightenment |date=1985}}
* Goodman, Dena. ''The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment''. (1994).
* {{cite book |last=May |first=Henry F. |title=The Enlightenment in America |date=1976}}
* Hesse, Carla. ''The Other Enlightenment: How French Women Became Modern''. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.
* {{cite book |last=Redkop |first=Benjamin |title=The Enlightenment and Community |date=1999}}
* Hankins, Thomas L. ''Science and the Enlightenment'' (1985).
* {{cite book |last=Reid-Maroney |first=Nina |title=Philadelphia's Enlightenment, 1740–1800: Kingdom of Christ, Empire of Reason |date=2001}}
* May, Henry F. ''The Enlightenment in America.'' 1976. 419 pp.
* {{cite journal |last=Schmidt |first=James |date=2003 |title=Inventing the Enlightenment: Anti-Jacobins, British Hegelians, and the 'Oxford English Dictionary' |journal=Journal of the History of Ideas |volume=64 |issue=3 |pages=421–443 |doi=10.2307/3654234 |hdl=2144/2409 |jstor=3654234 |hdl-access=free}}
* Porter, Roy. ''The Creation of the Modern World: The Untold Story of the British Enlightenment.'' 2000. 608 pp. [https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393322688 excerpt and text search]
* {{cite book |last=Sorkin |first=David |title=The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna |date=2008}}
* Redkop, Benjamin. ''The Enlightenment and Community'', 1999
* {{cite book |last=Staloff |first=Darren |title=Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson: The Politics of Enlightenment and the American Founding |date=2005}}
* Reid-Maroney, Nina. ''Philadelphia's Enlightenment, 1740–1800: Kingdom of Christ, Empire of Reason.'' 2001. 199 pp.
* {{cite book |last=Suitner |first=Riccarda |title=The Dialogues of the Dead of the Early German Enlightenment |publisher=Brill |date=2022 |location=Leiden-Boston}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Schmidt |first1=James |year=2003 |title=Inventing the Enlightenment: Anti-Jacobins, British Hegelians, and the 'Oxford English Dictionary' |journal=Journal of the History of Ideas |volume=64 |issue=3 |pages=421–443 |doi=10.2307/3654234 |jstor=3654234 |hdl=2144/2409 |hdl-access=free}}
* {{cite book |last=Till |first=Nicholas |title=Mozart and the Enlightenment: Truth, Virtue, and Beauty in Mozart's Operas |date=1993}}
* Sorkin, David. ''The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna'' (2008)
* {{cite book |last=Tunstall |first=Kate E. |title=Blindness and Enlightenment. An Essay. With a new translation of Diderot's Letter on the Blind |publisher=Continuum |date=2011}}
* Staloff, Darren. ''Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson: The Politics of Enlightenment and the American Founding.'' 2005. 419 pp. [https://www.amazon.com/dp/080905356X excerpt and text search]
* {{cite book |last=Venturi |first=Franco |title=Utopia and Reform in the Enlightenment |date=1971 |series=George Macaulay Trevelyan Lecture}}
* Suitner, Riccarda. ''The Dialogues of the Dead of the Early German Enlightenment'' (Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2022)
* {{cite book |last=Wills |first=Garry |url=https://archive.org/details/cincinnatusgeorg00will |title=Cincinnatus: George Washington and the Enlightenment |date=1984 |isbn=978-0-385-17562-3}}
* Till, Nicholas. ''Mozart and the Enlightenment: Truth, Virtue, and Beauty in Mozart's Operas.'' 1993. 384 pp.
* {{cite book |last=Winterer |first=Caroline |title=American Enlightenments: Pursuing Happiness in the Age of Reason |publisher=Yale University Press |date=2016 |location=New Haven}}
* Tunstall, Kate E. ''Blindness and Enlightenment. An Essay. With a new translation of Diderot's Letter on the Blind'' (Continuum, 2011)
* {{cite book |last=Navarro i Soriano |first=Ferran |title=Harca, harca, harca! Músiques per a la recreació històrica de la Guerra de Successió (1794–1715) |publisher=Editorial DENES |date=2019 |isbn=978-84-16473-45-8}}
* [[Franco Venturi|Venturi, Franco]]. ''Utopia and Reform in the Enlightenment''. George Macaulay Trevelyan Lecture, (1971)
* [[Franco Venturi|Venturi, Franco]]. ''Italy and the Enlightenment: studies in a cosmopolitan century'' (1972) [https://archive.org/details/italyenlightenme00vent online]
* [[Garry Wills|Wills, Garry]]. ''Cincinnatus: George Washington and the Enlightenment'' (1984) [https://archive.org/details/cincinnatusgeorg00will online]
* Winterer, Caroline. ''American Enlightenments: Pursuing Happiness in the Age of Reason'' (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016)
* Navarro i Soriano, Ferran (2019). Harca, harca, harca! Músiques per a la recreació històrica de la Guerra de Successió (1794–1715). Editorial DENES. {{ISBN|978-84-16473-45-8}}.
{{Refend}}
{{Refend}}


===Primary sources===
===Primary sources===
{{Refbegin}}
{{Refbegin}}
* Broadie, Alexander, ed. ''The Scottish Enlightenment: An Anthology'' (2001) [https://www.amazon.com/dp/0862417384 excerpt and text search]
* {{cite book |title=The Scottish Enlightenment: An Anthology |date=2001 |editor-last=Broadie |editor-first=Alexander}}
* Diderot, Denis. ''Rameau's Nephew and other Works'' (2008) excerpt and text search.
* {{cite book |last=Diderot |first=Denis |title=Rameau's Nephew and other Works |date=2008}}
* Diderot, Denis. "Letter on the Blind" in Tunstall, Kate E. ''Blindness and Enlightenment. An Essay. With a new translation of Diderot's Letter on the Blind'' (Continuum, 2011)
* {{cite book |last=Diderot |first=Denis |title=Blindness and Enlightenment. An Essay. With a new translation of Diderot's Letter on the Blind |publisher=Continuum |date=2011 |editor-last=Tunstall |editor-first=Kate E. |chapter=Letter on the Blind}}
* Diderot, Denis. ''The Encyclopédie of Diderot and D'Alembert: Selected Articles'' (1969) excerpt and text search Collaborative Translation Project of the University of Michigan
* {{cite book |last1=Diderot |first1=Denis |title=The Encyclopédie of Diderot and D'Alembert: Selected Articles |last2=D'Alembert |first2=Jean le Rond |others=Collaborative Translation Project of the University of Michigan |date=1969}}
* {{cite book |editor-last=Gay |editor-first=Peter |editor-link=Peter Gay |title=The Enlightenment: A Comprehensive Anthology |year=1973 |publisher=Simon and Schuster |isbn=978-0-671-21707-5}}
* {{cite book |title=The Enlightenment: A Sourcebook and Reader |date=2001 |editor1-last=Gomez |editor1-first=Olga}}
* Gomez, Olga, et al. eds. ''The Enlightenment: A Sourcebook and Reader'' (2001) [https://www.amazon.com/dp/0415204496 excerpt and text search]
* {{cite book |title=The Portable Enlightenment Reader |date=1995 |editor-last=Kramnick |editor-first=Isaac}}
* Kramnick, Issac, ed. ''The Portable Enlightenment Reader'' (1995) [https://www.amazon.com/dp/0140245669 excerpt and text search]
* {{cite book |title=The Enlightenment |date=1965 |editor-last=Manuel |editor-first=Frank Edward}}
* [[Frank E. Manuel|Manuel, Frank Edward]], ed. ''The Enlightenment'' (1965) online, excerpts
* {{cite book |title=What is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions |date=1996 |editor-last=Schmidt |editor-first=James}}
* Schmidt, James, ed. ''What is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions'' (1996) [https://www.amazon.com/dp/0520202260 excerpt and text search]
{{Refend}}
{{Refend}}


Line 553: Line 642:
{{Early Modern Europe}}
{{Early Modern Europe}}
{{History of Europe}}
{{History of Europe}}
{{Western culture}}{{Historiography}}{{History of the Catholic Church}}
{{Western culture}}
{{Historiography}}
{{History of the Catholic Church}}


{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}
Line 567: Line 658:
[[Category:Learning]]
[[Category:Learning]]
[[Category:Libertarianism]]
[[Category:Libertarianism]]
[[Category:Philosophical schools and traditions|Enlightenment]]
[[Category:Philosophical schools and traditions]]
[[Category:Progress]]
[[Category:Progress]]
[[Category:Reasoning]]
[[Category:Reasoning]]
Line 574: Line 665:
[[Category:Truth]]
[[Category:Truth]]
[[Category:Virtue]]
[[Category:Virtue]]
[[Category:Western culture|Enlightenment]]
[[Category:Western culture]]

Latest revision as of 04:34, 20 November 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Redirect hatnote". Template:Use dmy dates Template:Infobox historical era Script error: No such module "Sidebar". Template:Capitalism sidebarTemplate:Sidebar with collapsible lists

The Age of Enlightenment (also the Age of Reason) was a period in the history of Europe and Western civilization[1] during which the Enlightenment,Template:Efn an intellectual[2] and cultural[2] movement, flourished, emerging in the late 17th century[2] in Western Europe[3] and reaching its peak in the 18th century, as its ideas spread more widely across Europe[3] and into the European colonies, in the Americas and Oceania.[4][5][6] Characterized by an emphasis on reason, empirical evidence, and scientific method, the Enlightenment promoted ideals of individual liberty, religious tolerance, progress, and natural rights. Its thinkers advocated for constitutional government, the separation of church and state, and the application of rational principles to social and political reform.Template:Sfn[7][8]

The Enlightenment emerged from and built upon the Scientific Revolution of the 16th and 17th centuries, which had established new methods of empirical inquiry through the work of figures such as Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, Francis Bacon, Pierre Gassendi, Christiaan Huygens and Isaac Newton. Philosophical foundations were laid by thinkers including René Descartes, Thomas Hobbes, Baruch Spinoza, and John Locke, whose ideas about reason, natural rights, and empirical knowledge became central to Enlightenment thought. The dating of the period of the beginning of the Enlightenment can be attributed to the publication of Descartes' Discourse on the Method in 1637, with his method of systematically disbelieving everything unless there was a well-founded reason for accepting it, and featuring his dictum, Script error: No such module "Lang". ('I think, therefore I am'). Others cite the publication of Newton's Script error: No such module "Lang". (1687) as the culmination of the Scientific Revolution and the beginning of the Enlightenment.[9][10][11] European historians traditionally dated its beginning with the death of Louis XIV of France in 1715 and its end with the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789. Many historians now date the end of the Enlightenment as the start of the 19th century, with the latest proposed year being the death of Immanuel Kant in 1804.[12]

The movement was characterized by the widespread circulation of ideas through new institutions: scientific academies, literary salons, coffeehouses, Masonic lodges, and an expanding print culture of books, journals, and pamphlets. The ideas of the Enlightenment undermined the authority of the monarchy and religious officials and paved the way for the political revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries. A variety of 19th-century movements, including liberalism, socialism,[13] and neoclassicism, trace their intellectual heritage to the Enlightenment.[14] The Enlightenment was marked by an increasing awareness of the relationship between the mind and the everyday media of the world,[15] and by an emphasis on the scientific method and reductionism, along with increased questioning of religious dogma—an attitude captured by Kant's essay Answering the Question: What Is Enlightenment?, where the phrase Script error: No such module "Lang". ('dare to know') can be found.[16]

The central doctrines of the Enlightenment were individual liberty, representative government, the rule of law, and religious freedom, in contrast to an absolute monarchy or single party state and the religious persecution of faiths other than those formally established and often controlled outright by the State. By contrast, other intellectual currents included arguments in favour of anti-Christianity, Deism and Atheism, accompanied by demands for secular states, bans on religious education, suppression of monasteries, the suppression of the Jesuits, and the expulsion of religious orders. The Enlightenment also faced contemporary criticism, later termed the "Counter-Enlightenment" by Sir Isaiah Berlin, which defended traditional religious and political authorities against rationalist critique.

Influential intellectuals

Script error: No such module "Main list".

The Age of Enlightenment was preceded by and closely associated with the Scientific Revolution.[17] Earlier philosophers whose work influenced the Enlightenment included Francis Bacon, Pierre Gassendi, René Descartes, Thomas Hobbes, Baruch Spinoza, John Locke, Pierre Bayle, and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.Template:Sfn[18] Some of the figures of the Enlightenment included Cesare Beccaria, George Berkeley, Denis Diderot, David Hume, Immanuel Kant, Lord Monboddo, Montesquieu, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith, Hugo Grotius, and Voltaire.[19]

One of the most influential Enlightenment publications was the Script error: No such module "Lang". (Encyclopedia). Published between 1751 and 1772 in 35 volumes, it was compiled by Diderot, Jean le Rond d'Alembert, and a team of 150 others. The Encyclopédie helped spread the ideas of the Enlightenment across Europe and beyond.[20]

Other publications of the Enlightenment included Locke's A Letter Concerning Toleration (1689) and Two Treatises of Government (1689); Berkeley's A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (1710), Voltaire's Letters on the English (1733) and Philosophical Dictionary (1764); Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature (1740); Montesquieu's The Spirit of the Laws (1748); Rousseau's Discourse on Inequality (1754) and The Social Contract (1762); Cesare Beccaria's On Crimes and Punishments (1764); Adam Smith's The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) and The Wealth of Nations (1776); and Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1781).Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Topics

Philosophy

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:Somer Francis Bacon.jpg
English philosopher Francis Bacon's work is considered foundational to the age of enlightenment
File:Frans Hals - Portret van René Descartes.jpg
René Descartes, widely considered a seminal figure in the emergence of modern philosophy and science

Bacon's empiricism and Descartes' rationalist philosophy laid the foundation for enlightenment thinking.[21] Descartes' attempt to construct the sciences on a secure metaphysical foundation was not as successful as his method of doubt applied to philosophy, which led to a dualistic doctrine of mind and matter. His skepticism was refined by Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690) and Hume's writings in the 1740s. Descartes' dualism was challenged by Spinoza's uncompromising assertion of the unity of matter in his Tractatus (1670) and Ethics (1677).[22]

According to Jonathan Israel, these laid down two distinct lines of Enlightenment thought: first, the moderate variety, following Descartes, Locke, and Christian Wolff, which sought accommodation between reform and the traditional systems of power and faith, and, second, the Radical Enlightenment, inspired by the philosophy of Spinoza, advocating democracy, individual liberty, freedom of expression, and eradication of religious authority.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The moderate variety tended to be deistic whereas the radical tendency separated the basis of morality entirely from theology. Both lines of thought were eventually opposed by a conservative Counter-Enlightenment which sought a return to faith.Template:Sfn

In the mid-18th century, Paris became the center of philosophic and scientific activity challenging traditional doctrines and dogmas. After the Edict of Fontainebleau in 1685, the relationship between church and the absolutist government was very strong. The early enlightenment emerged in protest to these circumstances, gaining ground under the support of Madame de Pompadour, the mistress of Louis XV.Template:Sfn Called the Siècle des Lumières, the philosophical movement of the Enlightenment had already started by the early 18th century, when Pierre Bayle launched the popular and scholarly Enlightenment critique of religion. As a skeptic Bayle only partially accepted the philosophy and principles of rationality. He did draw a strict boundary between morality and religion. The rigor of his Dictionnaire Historique et Critique influenced many of the Enlightenment Encyclopédistes.Template:Sfn By the mid-18th century the French Enlightenment had found a focus in the project of the Encyclopédie.Template:Sfn The philosophical movement was led by Voltaire and Rousseau, who argued for a society based upon reason rather than faith and Catholic doctrine, for a new civil order based on natural law, and for science based on experiments and observation. The political philosopher Montesquieu introduced the idea of a separation of powers in a government, a concept which was enthusiastically adopted by the authors of the United States Constitution. While the philosophes of the French Enlightenment were not revolutionaries and many were members of the nobility, their ideas played an important part in undermining the legitimacy of the Old Regime and shaping the French Revolution.Template:Sfn

Francis Hutcheson, a moral philosopher and founding figure of the Scottish Enlightenment, described the utilitarian and consequentialist principle that virtue is that which provides, in his words, "the greatest happiness for the greatest numbers." Much of what is incorporated in the scientific method (the nature of knowledge, evidence, experience, and causation) and some modern attitudes towards the relationship between science and religion were developed by Hutcheson's protégés in Edinburgh: David Hume and Adam Smith.[23][24] Hume became a major figure in the skeptical philosophical and empiricist traditions of philosophy.

File:Immanuel Kant portrait c1790.jpg
German philosopher Immanuel Kant, one of the most influential figures of Enlightenment and modern philosophy

Kant tried to reconcile rationalism and religious belief, individual freedom and political authority, as well as map out a view of the public sphere through private and public reason.[25] Kant's work continued to influence German intellectual life and European philosophy more broadly well into the 20th century.[26]

Mary Wollstonecraft was one of England's earliest feminist philosophers.[27] She argued for a society based on reason and that women as well as men should be treated as rational beings. She is best known for her 1792 work, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.[28]

Science

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Science played an important role in Enlightenment discourse and thought. Many Enlightenment writers and thinkers had backgrounds in the sciences and associated scientific advancement with the overthrow of religion and traditional authority in favour of the development of free speech and thought.[29] There were immediate practical results. The experiments of Antoine Lavoisier were used to create the first modern chemical plants in Paris, and the experiments of the Montgolfier brothers enabled them to launch the first manned flight in a hot air balloon in 1783.[30]

Broadly speaking, Enlightenment science greatly valued empiricism and rational thought and was embedded with the Enlightenment ideal of advancement and progress. The study of science, under the heading of natural philosophy, was divided into physics and a conglomerate grouping of chemistry and natural history, which included anatomy, biology, geology, mineralogy, and zoology.Template:Sfn As with most Enlightenment views, the benefits of science were not seen universally: Rousseau criticized the sciences for distancing man from nature and not operating to make people happier.Template:Sfn

Science during the Enlightenment was dominated by scientific societies and academies, which had largely replaced universities as centres of scientific research and development. Societies and academies were also the backbone of the maturation of the scientific profession. Scientific academies and societies grew out of the Scientific Revolution as the creators of scientific knowledge, in contrast to the scholasticism of the university.Template:Sfn Some societies created or retained links to universities, but contemporary sources distinguished universities from scientific societies by claiming that the university's utility was in the transmission of knowledge while societies functioned to create knowledge.[31] As the role of universities in institutionalized science began to diminish, learned societies became the cornerstone of organized science. Official scientific societies were chartered by the state to provide technical expertise.Template:Sfn

Most societies were granted permission to oversee their own publications, control the election of new members and the administration of the society.Template:Sfn In the 18th century, a very large number of official academies and societies were founded in Europe; by 1789 there were over 70 official scientific societies. In reference to this growth, Bernard de Fontenelle coined the term "the Age of Academies" to describe the 18th century.Template:Sfn

Another important development was the popularization of science among an increasingly literate population. Philosophes introduced the public to many scientific theories, most notably through the Encyclopédie and the popularization of Newtonianism by Voltaire and Émilie du Châtelet. Some historians have marked the 18th century as a drab period in the history of science.[32] The century saw significant advancements in the practice of medicine, mathematics, and physics; the development of biological taxonomy; a new understanding of magnetism and electricity; and the maturation of chemistry as a discipline, which established the foundations of modern chemistry.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

The influence of science began appearing more commonly in poetry and literature. While some societies were established with ties to universities or maintained existing ones contemporary sources often distinguished between the two, asserting that universities primarily served to transmit knowledge, whereas scientific societies were oriented toward the creation of new knowledge.Template:Sfn James Thomson penned his "A Poem to the Memory of Sir Isaac Newton," which mourned the loss of Newton and praised his science and legacy.[33]

Sociology, economics, and law

File:Cesare Beccaria.jpg
Cesare Beccaria, father of classical criminal theory

Hume and other Scottish Enlightenment thinkers developed a "science of man,"[34] which was expressed historically in works by authors including James Burnett, Adam Ferguson, John Millar, and William Robertson, all of whom merged a scientific study of how humans behaved in ancient and primitive cultures with a strong awareness of the determining forces of modernity. Modern sociology largely originated from this movement,[35] and Hume's philosophical concepts that directly influenced James Madison (and thus the U.S. Constitution), and as popularised by Dugald Stewart was the basis of classical liberalism.[36]

In 1776, Adam Smith published The Wealth of Nations, often considered the first work on modern economics as it had an immediate impact on British economic policy that continues into the 21st century.[37] It was immediately preceded and influenced by Anne Robert Jacques Turgot's drafts of Reflections on the Formation and Distribution of Wealth (1766). Smith acknowledged indebtedness and possibly was the original English translator.[38]

Beccaria, a jurist, criminologist, philosopher, and politician and one of the great Enlightenment writers, became famous for his masterpiece Dei delitti e delle pene (Of Crimes and Punishments, 1764). His treatise, translated into 22 languages,[39] condemned torture and the death penalty and was a founding work in the field of penology and the classical school of criminology by promoting criminal justice. Francesco Mario Pagano wrote studies such as Saggi politici (Political Essays, 1783); and Considerazioni sul processo criminale (Considerations on the Criminal Trial, 1787), which established him as an international authority on criminal law.[40]

Politics

The Enlightenment has long been seen as the foundation of modern Western political and intellectual culture.[41] The Enlightenment brought political modernization to the West, in terms of introducing democratic values and institutions and the creation of modern, liberal democracies. This thesis has been widely accepted by scholars and has been reinforced by the large-scale studies by Robert Darnton, Roy Porter, and, most recently, by Jonathan Israel.[42][43] Enlightenment thought was deeply influential in the political realm. European rulers such as Catherine II of Russia, Joseph II of Austria, and Frederick II of Prussia tried to apply Enlightenment thought on religious and political tolerance, which became known as enlightened absolutism.[19] Many of the major political and intellectual figures behind the American Revolution associated themselves closely with the Enlightenment: Benjamin Franklin visited Europe repeatedly and contributed actively to the scientific and political debates there and brought the newest ideas back to Philadelphia; Thomas Jefferson closely followed European ideas and later incorporated some of the ideals of the Enlightenment into the Declaration of Independence; and Madison incorporated these ideals into the U.S. Constitution during its framing in 1787.[44]

Theories of government

File:John Locke.jpg
Philosopher John Locke argued that the authority of government stems from a social contract based on natural rights. According to Locke, the authority of government was limited and required the consent of the governed.

Locke, one of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers,[45] based his governance philosophy on social contract theory, a subject that permeated Enlightenment political thought. English philosopher Thomas Hobbes ushered in this new debate with his work Leviathan in 1651. Hobbes also developed some of the fundamentals of European liberal thought: the right of the individual, the natural equality of all men, the artificial character of the political order (which led to the later distinction between civil society and the state), the view that all legitimate political power must be "representative" and based on the consent of the people, and a liberal interpretation of law which leaves people free to do whatever the law does not explicitly forbid.[46]

Both Locke and Rousseau developed social contract theories in Two Treatises of Government and Discourse on Inequality, respectively. While quite different works, Locke, Hobbes, and Rousseau agreed that a social contract, in which the government's authority lies in the consent of the governed,[47] is necessary for man to live in civil society. Locke defines the state of nature as a condition in which humans are rational and follow natural law, in which all men are born equal and with the right to life, liberty, and property. However, when one citizen breaks the law of nature both the transgressor and the victim enter into a state of war, from which it is virtually impossible to break free. Therefore, Locke said that individuals enter into civil society to protect their natural rights via an "unbiased judge" or common authority, such as courts. In contrast, Rousseau's conception relies on the supposition that "civil man" is corrupted, while "natural man" has no want he cannot fulfill himself. Natural man is only taken out of the state of nature when the inequality associated with private property is established.[48] Rousseau said that people join into civil society via the social contract to achieve unity while preserving individual freedom. This is embodied in the sovereignty of the general will, the moral and collective legislative body constituted by citizens.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Locke is known for his statement that individuals have a right to "Life, Liberty, and Property," and his belief that the natural right to property is derived from labor. Tutored by Locke, Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 3rd Earl of Shaftesbury, wrote in 1706: "There is a mighty Light which spreads its self over the world especially in those two free Nations of England and Holland; on whom the Affairs of Europe now turn."[49] Locke's theory of natural rights has influenced many political documents, including the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the French National Constituent Assembly's Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen.

Some philosophes argued that the establishment of a contractual basis of rights would lead to the market mechanism and capitalism, the scientific method, religious tolerance, and the organization of states into self-governing republics through democratic means. In this view, the tendency of the philosophes in particular to apply rationality to every problem is considered the essential change.[50]

Although much of Enlightenment political thought was dominated by social contract theorists, Hume and Ferguson criticized this camp. Hume's essay Of the Original Contract argues that governments derived from consent are rarely seen and civil government is grounded in a ruler's habitual authority and force. It is precisely because of the ruler's authority over-and-against the subject that the subject tacitly consents, and Hume says that the subjects would "never imagine that their consent made him sovereign," rather the authority did so.[51] Similarly, Ferguson did not believe citizens built the state, rather polities grew out of social development. In his 1767 An Essay on the History of Civil Society, Ferguson uses the four stages of progress, a theory that was popular in Scotland at the time, to explain how humans advance from a hunting and gathering society to a commercial and civil society without agreeing to a social contract.

Both Rousseau's and Locke's social contract theories rest on the presupposition of natural rights, which are not a result of law or custom but are things that all men have in pre-political societies and are therefore universal and inalienable. The most famous natural right formulation comes from Locke's Second Treatise, when he introduces the state of nature. For Locke, the law of nature is grounded on mutual security or the idea that one cannot infringe on another's natural rights, as every man is equal and has the same inalienable rights. These natural rights include perfect equality and freedom, as well as the right to preserve life and property.

Locke argues against indentured servitude on the basis that enslaving oneself goes against the law of nature because a person cannot surrender their own rights: freedom is absolute, and no one can take it away. Locke argues that one person cannot enslave another because it is morally reprehensible, although he introduces a caveat by saying that enslavement of a lawful captive in time of war would not go against one's natural rights.

Enlightened absolutism

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:SebastiãoJoseph.png
The Marquis of Pombal, as the head of the government of Portugal, implemented sweeping socio-economic reforms.

The leaders of the Enlightenment were not especially democratic, as they more often look to absolute monarchs as the key to imposing reforms designed by the intellectuals. Voltaire despised democracy and said the absolute monarch must be enlightened and must act as dictated by reason and justice—in other words, be a "philosopher-king."[52]

In several nations, rulers welcomed leaders of the Enlightenment at court and asked them to help design laws and programs to reform the system, typically to build stronger states. These rulers are called "enlightened despots" by historians.[53] They included Frederick the Great of Prussia, Catherine the Great of Russia, Leopold II of Tuscany and Joseph II of Austria. Joseph was over-enthusiastic, announcing many reforms that had little support so that revolts broke out and his regime became a comedy of errors, and nearly all his programs were reversed.[54] Senior ministers Pombal in Portugal and Johann Friedrich Struensee in Denmark also governed according to Enlightenment ideals. In Poland, the model constitution of 1791 expressed Enlightenment ideals, but was in effect for only one year before the nation was partitioned among its neighbors. More enduring were the cultural achievements, which created a nationalist spirit in Poland.[55]

File:Struensee - miniature portrait.jpg
Denmark's minister Johann Struensee, a social reformer, was publicly executed in 1772 for usurping royal authority.

Frederick the Great, the king of Prussia from 1740 to 1786, saw himself as a leader of the Enlightenment and patronized philosophers and scientists at his court in Berlin. Voltaire, who had been imprisoned and maltreated by the French government, was eager to accept Frederick's invitation to live at his palace. Frederick explained: "My principal occupation is to combat ignorance and prejudice... to enlighten minds, cultivate morality, and to make people as happy as it suits human nature, and as the means at my disposal permit."[56]

American Revolution and French Revolution

The Enlightenment has been frequently linked to the American Revolution of 1776[57] and the French Revolution of 1789—both had some intellectual influence from Thomas Jefferson.[58][59] A key aspect of this era was a profound shift from the absolute monarchies of Europe, which asserted the "divine right" to rule. John Locke rejected this view in his writings on the Two Treatises of Government (1689). He asserted that citizens were seen to possess natural rights, including life, liberty, and property. Therefore governments exist to protect these rights through the "consent of the governed." The clash between these competing ethos often resulted in violent upheaval in differing ways. In France, Ancien régime, with its rigid social hierarchy and absolute monarchical power, was systematically dismantled during the French Revolution. While the American Revolution focused more on breaking free from a government - represented by King George III and Parliament - that colonists felt did not adequately represent their interests.

Alexis de Tocqueville proposed the French Revolution as the inevitable result of the radical opposition created in the 18th century between the monarchy and the men of letters of the Enlightenment. These men of letters constituted a sort of "substitute aristocracy that was both all-powerful and without real power." This illusory power came from the rise of "public opinion," born when absolutist centralization removed the nobility and the bourgeoisie from the political sphere. The "literary politics" that resulted promoted a discourse of equality and was hence in fundamental opposition to the monarchical regime.Template:Sfn[60] De Tocqueville "clearly designates... the cultural effects of transformation in the forms of the exercise of power."Template:Sfn

Religion

<templatestyles src="Template:Quote_box/styles.css" />

It does not require great art or magnificently trained eloquence, to prove that Christians should tolerate each other. I, however, am going further: I say that we should regard all men as our brothers. What? The Turk my brother? The Chinaman my brother? The Jew? The Siam? Yes, without doubt; are we not all children of the same father and creatures of the same God?

Voltaire (1763)[61]

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

File:Voltaire-lisant.jpg
French philosopher Voltaire argued for religious tolerance.

Enlightenment era religious commentary was a response to the preceding century of religious conflict in Europe, especially the Thirty Years' War.[62] Theologians of the Enlightenment wanted to reform their faith to its generally non-confrontational roots and to limit the capacity for religious controversy to spill over into politics and warfare while still maintaining a true faith in God. For moderate Christians, this meant a return to simple Scripture. Locke abandoned the corpus of theological commentary in favor of an "unprejudiced examination" of the Word of God alone. He determined the essence of Christianity to be a belief in Christ the redeemer and recommended avoiding more detailed debate.[63] Anthony Collins, one of the English freethinkers, published his "Essay concerning the Use of Reason in Propositions the Evidence whereof depends on Human Testimony" (1707), in which he rejects the distinction between "above reason" and "contrary to reason," and demands that revelation should conform to man's natural ideas of God. In the Jefferson Bible, Thomas Jefferson went further and dropped any passages dealing with miracles, visitations of angels, and the resurrection of Jesus after his death, as he tried to extract the practical Christian moral code of the New Testament.[64]

Enlightenment scholars sought to curtail the political power of organized religion and thereby prevent another age of intolerant religious war.[65] Spinoza determined to remove politics from contemporary and historical theology (e.g., disregarding Judaic law).[66] Moses Mendelssohn advised affording no political weight to any organized religion but instead recommended that each person follow what they found most convincing.[67] They believed a good religion based in instinctive morals and a belief in God should not theoretically need force to maintain order in its believers, and both Mendelssohn and Spinoza judged religion on its moral fruits, not the logic of its theology.[68]

Several novel ideas about religion developed with the Enlightenment, including deism and talk of atheism. According to Thomas Paine, deism is the simple belief in God the Creator with no reference to the Bible or any other miraculous source. Instead, the deist relies solely on personal reason to guide his creed,[69] which was eminently agreeable to many thinkers of the time.[70] Atheism was much discussed, but there were few proponents. Wilson and Reill note: "In fact, very few enlightened intellectuals, even when they were vocal critics of Christianity, were true atheists. Rather, they were critics of orthodox belief, wedded rather to skepticism, deism, vitalism, or perhaps pantheism."Template:Sfn Some followed Pierre Bayle and argued that atheists could indeed be moral men.[71] Many others like Voltaire held that without belief in a God who punishes evil, the moral order of society was undermined; that is, since atheists gave themselves to no supreme authority and no law and had no fear of eternal consequences, they were far more likely to disrupt society.[72] Bayle observed that, in his day, "prudent persons will always maintain an appearance of [religion]," and he believed that even atheists could hold concepts of honor and go beyond their own self-interest to create and interact in society.[73] Locke said that if there were no God and no divine law, the result would be moral anarchy: every individual "could have no law but his own will, no end but himself. He would be a god to himself, and the satisfaction of his own will the sole measure and end of all his actions."[74]

Separation of church and state

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The "Radical Enlightenment"Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn promoted the concept of separating church and state,Template:Sfn an idea that is often credited to Locke.[75] According to his principle of the social contract, Locke said that the government lacked authority in the realm of individual conscience, as this was something rational people could not cede to the government for it or others to control. For Locke, this created a natural right in the liberty of conscience, which he said must therefore remain protected from any government authority.

These views on religious tolerance and the importance of individual conscience, along with the social contract, became particularly influential in the American colonies and the drafting of the United States Constitution.Template:Sfn In a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in Connecticut, Thomas Jefferson calls for a "wall of separation between church and state" at the federal level. He previously had supported successful efforts to disestablish the Church of England in Virginia[76] and authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom.[77] Jefferson's political ideals were greatly influenced by the writings of Locke, Bacon, and Newton,[78] whom he considered the three greatest men that ever lived.[79]

National variations

File:Europe, 1700 - 1714.png
Europe at the beginning of the War of the Spanish Succession, 1700

The Enlightenment took hold in most European countries and influenced nations globally, often with a specific local emphasis. For example, in France it became associated with anti-government and anti-Church radicalism, while in Germany it reached deep into the middle classes, where it expressed a spiritualistic and nationalistic tone without threatening governments or established churches.[80] Government responses varied widely. In France, the government was hostile, and the philosophes fought against its censorship, sometimes being imprisoned or hounded into exile. The British government, for the most part, ignored the Enlightenment's leaders in England and Scotland, although it did give Newton a knighthood and a very lucrative government office.

A common theme among most countries which derived Enlightenment ideas from Europe was the intentional non-inclusion of Enlightenment philosophies pertaining to slavery. Originally during the French Revolution, a revolution deeply inspired by Enlightenment philosophy, "France's revolutionary government had denounced slavery, but the property-holding 'revolutionaries' then remembered their bank accounts."[81] Slavery frequently showed the limitations of the Enlightenment ideology as it pertained to European colonialism, since many colonies of Europe operated on a plantation economy fueled by slave labor. In 1791, the Haitian Revolution, a slave rebellion by emancipated slaves against French colonial rule in the colony of Saint-Domingue, broke out. European nations and the United States, despite the strong support for Enlightenment ideals, refused to "[give support] to Saint-Domingue's anti-colonial struggle."[81]

Great Britain

England

Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote".

The very existence of an English Enlightenment has been hotly debated by scholars. The majority of textbooks on British history make little or no mention of an English Enlightenment. Some surveys of the entire Enlightenment include England and others ignore it, although they do include coverage of such major intellectuals as Joseph Addison, Edward Gibbon, John Locke, Isaac Newton, Alexander Pope, Joshua Reynolds, and Jonathan Swift.Template:Sfn Freethinking, a term describing those who stood in opposition to the institution of the Church, and the literal belief in the Bible, can be said to have begun in England no later than 1713, when Anthony Collins wrote his "Discourse of Free-thinking," which gained substantial popularity. This essay attacked the clergy of all churches and was a plea for deism.

Roy Porter argues that the reasons for this neglect were the assumptions that the movement was primarily French-inspired, that it was largely a-religious or anti-clerical, and that it stood in outspoken defiance to the established order.[82] Porter admits that after the 1720s England could claim thinkers to equal Diderot, Voltaire, or Rousseau. However, its leading intellectuals such as Gibbon,[83] Edmund Burke and Samuel Johnson were all quite conservative and supportive of the standing order. Porter says the reason was that Enlightenment had come early to England and had succeeded such that the culture had accepted political liberalism, philosophical empiricism, and religious toleration, positions which intellectuals on the continent had to fight against powerful odds. Furthermore, England rejected the collectivism of the continent and emphasized the improvement of individuals as the main goal of enlightenment.Template:Sfn

According to Derek Hirst, the 1640s and 1650s saw a revived economy characterised by growth in manufacturing, the elaboration of financial and credit instruments, and the commercialisation of communication. The gentry found time for leisure activities, such as horse racing and bowling. In the high culture important innovations included the development of a mass market for music, increased scientific research, and an expansion of publishing. All the trends were discussed in depth at the newly established coffee houses.[84][85]

File:AdamSmith.jpg
One leader of the Scottish Enlightenment was Adam Smith, the father of modern economic science.

Scotland

In the Scottish Enlightenment, the principles of sociability, equality, and utility were disseminated in schools and universities, many of which used sophisticated teaching methods which blended philosophy with daily life.[15] Scotland's major cities created an intellectual infrastructure of mutually supporting institutions such as schools, universities, reading societies, libraries, periodicals, museums, and masonic lodges.[86] The Scottish network was "predominantly liberal Calvinist, Newtonian, and 'design' oriented in character which played a major role in the further development of the transatlantic Enlightenment."[87] In France, Voltaire said "we look to Scotland for all our ideas of civilization."[88] The focus of the Scottish Enlightenment ranged from intellectual and economic matters to the specifically scientific as in the work of William Cullen, physician and chemist; James Anderson, agronomist; Joseph Black, physicist and chemist; and James Hutton, the first modern geologist.[23][89]

Anglo-American colonies

Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote".

File:Declaration of Independence (1819), by John Trumbull.jpg
John Trumbull's Declaration of Independence imagines the drafting committee presenting its work to the Congress.

Several Americans, especially Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, played a major role in bringing Enlightenment ideas to the New World and in influencing British and French thinkers.[90] Franklin was influential for his political activism and for his advances in physics.[91][92] The cultural exchange during the Age of Enlightenment ran in both directions across the Atlantic. Thinkers such as Paine, Locke, and Rousseau all take Native American cultural practices as examples of natural freedom.[93] The Americans closely followed English and Scottish political ideas, as well as some French thinkers such as Montesquieu.[94] As deists, they were influenced by ideas of John Toland and Matthew Tindal. There was a great emphasis upon liberty, republicanism, and religious tolerance. There was no respect for monarchy or inherited political power. Deists reconciled science and religion by rejecting prophecies, miracles, and biblical theology. Leading deists included Thomas Paine in The Age of Reason and Thomas Jefferson in his short Jefferson Bible, from which he removed all supernatural aspects.[95]

Netherlands

The Dutch Enlightenment began in 1640.Template:Sfn During the Early Dutch Enlightenment (1640–1720), many books were translated from Latin, French or English to Dutch, often at the risk of their translators and publishers.Template:Sfn By the 1720s, the Dutch Republic had also become a major center for printing and exporting banned books to France.[96] The most famous figure of the Dutch Enlightenment was Baruch Spinoza.

France

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The French Enlightenment was influenced by EnglandTemplate:Sfn and in turn influenced other national enlightenments. As worded by Sharon A. Stanley, "the French Enlightenment stands out from other national enlightenments for its unrelenting assault on church leadership and theology."Template:Sfn

German states

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Prussia took the lead among the German states in sponsoring the political reforms that Enlightenment thinkers urged absolute rulers to adopt. There were important movements as well in the smaller states of Bavaria, Saxony, Hanover, and the Palatinate. In each case, Enlightenment values became accepted and led to significant political and administrative reforms that laid the groundwork for the creation of modern states.[97] The princes of Saxony, for example, carried out an impressive series of fundamental fiscal, administrative, judicial, educational, cultural, and general economic reforms. The reforms were aided by the country's strong urban structure and influential commercial groups and modernized pre-1789 Saxony along the lines of classic Enlightenment principles.[98][99]

File:Oer-Weimarer Musenhof.jpg
Weimar's Courtyard of the Muses by Theobald von Oer, a tribute to The Enlightenment and the Weimar Classicism depicting German poets Schiller, Wieland, Herder, and Goethe

Before 1750, the German upper classes looked to France for intellectual, cultural, and architectural leadership, as French was the language of high society. By the mid-18th century, the Aufklärung (The Enlightenment) had transformed German high culture in music, philosophy, science, and literature. Christian Wolff was the pioneer as a writer who expounded the Enlightenment to German readers and legitimized German as a philosophic language.[100]

Johann Gottfried von Herder broke new ground in philosophy and poetry, as a leader of the Sturm und Drang movement of proto-Romanticism. Weimar Classicism (Weimarer Klassik) was a cultural and literary movement based in Weimar that sought to establish a new humanism by synthesizing Romantic, classical, and Enlightenment ideas. The movement (from 1772 until 1805) involved Herder as well as polymath Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and Friedrich Schiller, a poet and historian. The theatre principal Abel Seyler greatly influenced the development of German theatre and promoted serious German opera, new works and experimental productions, and the concept of a national theatre.[101] Herder argued that every group of people had its own particular identity, which was expressed in its language and culture. This legitimized the promotion of German language and culture and helped shape the development of German nationalism. Schiller's plays expressed the restless spirit of his generation, depicting the hero's struggle against social pressures and the force of destiny.[102]

German music, sponsored by the upper classes, came of age under composers Johann Sebastian Bach, Joseph Haydn, and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.[103]

In remote Königsberg, Kant tried to reconcile rationalism and religious belief, individual freedom, and political authority. Kant's work contained basic tensions that would continue to shape German thought—and indeed all of European philosophy—well into the 20th century.Template:Sfn German Enlightenment won the support of princes, aristocrats, and the middle classes, and it permanently reshaped the culture.[104] However, there was a conservatism among the elites that warned against going too far.[105]

In 1788, Prussia issued an "Edict on Religion" that forbade preaching any sermon that undermined popular belief in the Holy Trinity or the Bible. The goal was to avoid theological disputes that might impinge on domestic tranquility. Men who doubted the value of Enlightenment favoured the measure, but so too did many supporters. German universities had created a closed elite that could debate controversial issues among themselves, but spreading them to the public was seen as too risky. This intellectual elite was favoured by the state, but that might be reversed if the process of the Enlightenment proved politically or socially destabilizing.[106]

Austria

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". During the 18th century, Austria was under Habsburg rule. The reign of Maria Theresa, the first Habsburg monarch to be considered influenced by the Enlightenment in some areas, was marked by a mix of enlightenment and conservatism. Her son Joseph II's brief reign was marked by this conflict, with his ideology of Josephinism facing opposition. Joseph II carried out numerous reforms in the spirit of the Enlightenment, which affected, for example, the school system, monasteries and the legal system. Emperor Leopold II, who was an early opponent of capital punishment, had a brief and contentious rule that was mostly marked by relations with France. Similarly, Emperor Francis II's rule was primarily marked by relations with France.

The ideas of the Enlightenment also appeared in literature and theater works. Joseph von Sonnenfels was an important representative. In music, Austrian musicians such as Joseph Haydn and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart were associated with the Enlightenment.

Hungary

The Hungarian Enlightenment[107] emerged during the 18th century, while Hungary was part of the Habsburg Empire. The Hungarian Enlightenment is usually said to have begun in 1772 and was greatly influenced by French Enlightenment (through Vienna).[107]

Romania

The Romanian Enlightenment[108] emerged during the 18th century across the three major historical regions inhabited by Romanians: Transylvania, Wallachia, and Moldavia. At that time, Transylvania was in the Habsburg Empire while Wallachia and Moldavia were vassals of the Ottoman Empire.

The Transylvanian Enlightenment was represented by the Transylvanian School, a group of thinkers who promoted a cultural revival and rights for Romanians (who were marginalized by the Habsburgs).

The Wallachian Enlightenment was represented by such figures as Dinicu Golescu (1777–1830), while the Moldavian Englightenment was headed by prince Dimitrie Cantemir (1673-1723).

Switzerland

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The Enlightenment arrived relatively late in Switzerland, spreading from England, the Netherlands, and France toward the end of the 17th century. The movement initially took hold in Protestant regions, where it gradually replaced orthodox religious thinking. The 1712 victory of the reformed cantons of Zurich and Bern over the five Catholic cantons of central Switzerland in the Second War of Villmergen marked both a Protestant triumph and a victory for Enlightenment ideas in the economically more developed regions.[109]

In Switzerland, which lacked a central court or academy, the Enlightenment spread through the intellectual elite of reformed cities, particularly pastors educated in academies and colleges with strong humanist traditions. The theological "Helvetic triumvirate" of Jean-Alphonse Turrettini (Geneva), Jean-Frédéric Ostervald (Neuchâtel), and Samuel Werenfels (Basel) led their churches toward a humanistic Christianity beginning in 1697, creating what Paul Wernle termed "reasoned orthodoxy" that balanced rational thought with Christian ethics.[109]

Swiss Enlightenment thinkers made significant contributions across multiple fields. The Romand school developed influential theories of natural law, with scholars like Jean Barbeyrac (Lausanne), Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui (Geneva), and Emer de Vattel (Neuchâtel) promoting concepts of inalienable rights and justified resistance to tyranny that influenced the American independence movement. In literature, Johann Jakob Bodmer and Johann Jakob Breitinger made Zurich a center of German literary innovation, while Albert von Haller's poetry represented the peak of Swiss Enlightenment literature. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, considering himself both a Genevan and Swiss citizen, developed democratic republican theories that extended Genevan models to broader European federalist principles.[109]

The movement was characterized by what scholars term "Helvetism" – specifically Swiss aspects including a Christian conception of natural law, patriotic ethics, and philosophical approaches grounded in practical pedagogy and economics. Most distinctively, Swiss Enlightenment thought celebrated Alpine nature, viewing Switzerland as the "land of shepherds" whose republican and federalist traditions were shaped by its mountain environment. The movement organized through numerous societies and publications, including the Encyclopédie d'Yverdon (1770-1780), which offered a moderate alternative to the French Encyclopédie. Swiss intellectuals gained international prominence, with many serving in foreign academies, particularly in Berlin under Frederick II and in St. Petersburg under Catherine II.[109]

Italy

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:Pompeo Marchesi (1783.1858) Monumento a Cesare Beccaria, 1837, Milano.jpg
Statue of Cesare Beccaria, considered one of the greatest thinkers of the Enlightenment

In Italy the main centers of diffusion of the Enlightenment were Naples and Milan:[110] in both cities the intellectuals took public office and collaborated with the Bourbon and Habsburg administrations. In Naples, Antonio Genovesi, Ferdinando Galiani, and Gaetano Filangieri were active under the tolerant King Charles of Bourbon. However, the Neapolitan Enlightenment, like Vico's philosophy, remained almost always in the theoretical field.[111] Only later, many Enlighteners animated the unfortunate experience of the Parthenopean Republic. In Milan, however, the movement strove to find concrete solutions to problems. The center of discussions was the magazine Il Caffè (1762–1766), founded by brothers Pietro and Alessandro Verri (famous philosophers and writers, as well as their brother Giovanni), who also gave life to the Accademia dei Pugni, founded in 1761. Minor centers were Tuscany, Veneto, and Piedmont, where among others, Pompeo Neri worked.

From Naples, Genovesi influenced a generation of southern Italian intellectuals and university students. His textbook Della diceosina, o sia della Filosofia del Giusto e dell'Onesto (1766) was a controversial attempt to mediate between the history of moral philosophy on the one hand and the specific problems encountered by 18th-century commercial society on the other. It contained the greater part of Genovesi's political, philosophical, and economic thought, which became a guidebook for Neapolitan economic and social development.[112]

Science flourished as Alessandro Volta and Luigi Galvani made break-through discoveries in electricity. Pietro Verri was a leading economist in Lombardy. Historian Joseph Schumpeter states he was "the most important pre-Smithian authority on Cheapness-and-Plenty."[113] The most influential scholar on the Italian Enlightenment has been Franco Venturi.[114][115] Italy also produced some of the Enlightenment's greatest legal theorists, including Cesare Beccaria, Giambattista Vico, and Francesco Mario Pagano.

Bourbon Spain and Spanish America

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:Constitucion Cadiz 1812.png
Spanish Constitution of 1812

When Charles II, the last Spanish Habsburg monarch, died his successor was from the French House of Bourbon, initiating a period of French Enlightenment influence in Spain and the Spanish Empire.[116][117]

In the 18th Century, the Spanish continued to expand their empire in the Americas with the Spanish missions in California and established missions deeper inland in South America. Under Charles III, the crown began to implement serious structural changes. The monarchy curtailed the power of the Catholic Church, and established a standing military in Spanish America. Freer trade was promoted under comercio libre in which regions could trade with companies sailing from any other Spanish port, rather than the restrictive mercantile system. The crown sent out scientific expeditions to assert Spanish sovereignty over territories it claimed but did not control, but also importantly to discover the economic potential of its far-flung empire. Botanical expeditions sought plants that could be of use to the empire.[118] Charles IV gave Prussian scientist Alexander von Humboldt free rein to travel in Spanish America, usually closed to foreigners, and more importantly, access to crown officials to aid the success of his scientific expedition.[119]

When Napoleon invaded Spain in 1808, Ferdinand VII abdicated and Napoleon placed his brother Joseph Bonaparte on the throne. To add legitimacy to this move, the Bayonne Constitution was promulgated, which included representation from Spain's overseas components, but most Spaniards rejected the whole Napoleonic project. A war of national resistance erupted. The Cortes de Cádiz (parliament) was convened to rule Spain in the absence of the legitimate monarch, Ferdinand. It created a new governing document, the Constitution of 1812, which laid out three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial; put limits on the king by creating a constitutional monarchy; defined citizens as those in the Spanish Empire without African ancestry; established universal manhood suffrage; and established public education starting with primary school through university as well as freedom of expression. The constitution was in effect from 1812 until 1814, when Napoleon was defeated and Ferdinand was restored to the throne of Spain. Upon his return, Ferdinand repudiated the constitution and reestablished absolutist rule.[120]

Haiti

The Haitian Revolution began in 1791 and ended in 1804 and shows how Enlightenment ideas "were part of complex transcultural flows."[6] Radical ideas in Paris during and after the French Revolution were mobilized in Haiti, such as by Toussaint Louverture.[6] Toussaint had read the critique of European colonialism in Guillaume Thomas François Raynal's book Histoire des deux Indes and "was particularly impressed by Raynal's prediction of the coming of a 'Black Spartacus.Template:'"[6]

The revolution combined Enlightenment ideas with the experiences of the slaves in Haiti, two-thirds of whom had been born in Africa and could "draw on specific notions of kingdom and just government from West and Central Africa, and to employ religious practices such as voodoo for the formation of revolutionary communities."[6] The revolution also affected France and "forced the French National Convention to abolish slavery in 1794."[6]

Portugal and Brazil

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The Portuguese Enlightenment was heavily marked by the rule of Prime Minister Marquis of Pombal under King Joseph I from 1756 to 1777. Following the 1755 Lisbon earthquake which destroyed a large part of Lisbon, the Marquis of Pombal implemented important economic policies to regulate commercial activity (in particular with Brazil and England), and to standardise quality throughout the country (for example by introducing the first integrated industries in Portugal). His reconstruction of Lisbon's riverside district in straight and perpendicular streets (the Lisbon Baixa), methodically organized to facilitate commerce and exchange (for example by assigning to each street a different product or service), can be seen as a direct application of the Enlightenment ideas to governance and urbanism. His urbanistic ideas, also being the first large-scale example of earthquake engineering, became collectively known as Pombaline style, and were implemented throughout the kingdom during his stay in office. His governance was as enlightened as ruthless, see for example the Távora affair.

In literature, the first Enlightenment ideas in Portugal can be traced back to the diplomat, philosopher, and writer António Vieira[121] who spent a considerable amount of his life in colonial Brazil denouncing discriminations against New Christians and the indigenous peoples in Brazil. During the 18th century, enlightened literary movements such as the Arcádia Lusitana (lasting from 1756 until 1776, then replaced by the Nova Arcádia in 1790 until 1794) surfaced in the academic medium, in particular involving former students of the University of Coimbra. A distinct member of this group was the poet Manuel Maria Barbosa du Bocage. The physician António Nunes Ribeiro Sanches was also an important Enlightenment figure, contributing to the Encyclopédie and being part of the Russian court. The ideas of the Enlightenment influenced various economists and anti-colonial intellectuals throughout the Portuguese Empire, such as José de Azeredo Coutinho, José da Silva Lisboa, Cláudio Manoel da Costa, and Tomás Antônio Gonzaga.

The Napoleonic invasion of Portugal had consequences for the Portuguese monarchy. With the aid of the British navy, the Portuguese royal family was evacuated to Brazil, its most important colony. Even though Napoleon had been defeated, the royal court remained in Brazil. The Liberal Revolution of 1820 forced the return of the royal family to Portugal. The terms by which the restored king was to rule was a constitutional monarchy under the Constitution of Portugal. Brazil declared its independence from Portugal in 1822 and became a monarchy.

Sweden

The existence of a Swedish Enlightenment has been debated by scholars. According to Tore Frängsmyr, the Swedish Enlightenment "never formed a truly coherent current of ideas or became a unified movement."Template:Sfn As worded by Max Skjönsberg, <templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Frängsmyr's main arguments against a Swedish Enlightenment were that religious criticism in Sweden was reserved for foreign Catholicism rather than the domestic Lutheran Church and that the debate about freedom in the 1750s and 1760s focused on political economy and freedom to trade rather than freedom to 'philosophize'. The fact that political economy is now a much more important aspect of Enlightenment historiography, to a great degree thanks to research on the Scottish Enlightenment, is a clear example of why Frängsmyr's case is in need of revision.Template:Sfn

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Between 1718 and 1772, the Swedish Enlightenment overlapped with the period of parliamentary rule known in Swedish history as the Age of Liberty.

Russia

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:Elizabeth of Russia visiting Lomonosov's mosaic workshop by A.V.Makovskiy (priv.coll.).jpg
Empress Elizabeth visits Russian scientist Mikhail Lomonosov.

In Russia, the government began to actively encourage the proliferation of arts and sciences in the mid-18th century. This era produced the first Russian university, library, theatre, public museum, and independent press. Like other enlightened despots, Catherine the Great played a key role in fostering the arts, sciences and education. She used her own interpretation of Enlightenment ideals, assisted by notable international experts such as Voltaire (by correspondence) and in residence world class scientists such as Leonhard Euler and Peter Simon Pallas. The national Enlightenment differed from its Western European counterpart in that it promoted further modernization of all aspects of Russian life and was concerned with attacking the institution of serfdom in Russia. The Russian Enlightenment centered on the individual instead of societal enlightenment and encouraged the living of an enlightened life.[122]Template:Sfn A powerful element was prosveshchenie which combined religious piety, erudition, and commitment to the spread of learning. However, it lacked the skeptical and critical spirit of the Western European Enlightenment.[123]

Poland and Lithuania

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:Manuscript of the Constitution of the 3rd May 1791.PNG
Polish–Lithuanian Constitution of 1791, Europe's first modern constitution

Enlightenment ideas (oświecenie) emerged late in Poland, as the Polish middle class was weaker and szlachta (nobility) culture (Sarmatism) together with the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth political system (Golden Liberty) were in deep crisis. The political system was built on aristocratic republicanism, but was unable to defend itself against powerful neighbors Russia, Prussia, and Austria as they repeatedly sliced off regions until nothing was left of independent Poland. The Polish Enlightenment began in the 1730s–40s and especially in theatre and the arts peaked in the reign of King Stanisław August Poniatowski (second half of the 18th century).

Warsaw was a main centre after 1750, with an expansion of schools and educational institutions and the arts patronage held at the Royal Castle.[124] Leaders promoted tolerance and more education. They included King Stanislaw II August and reformers Piotr Switkowski, Antoni Poplawski, Josef Niemcewicz, and Jósef Pawlinkowski, as well as Baudouin de Cortenay, a Polonized dramatist. Opponents included Florian Jaroszewicz, Gracjan Piotrowski, Karol Wyrwicz, and Wojciech Skarszewski.[125] The movement went into decline with the Third Partition of Poland (1795) – a national tragedy inspiring a short period of sentimental writing – and ended in 1822, replaced by Romanticism.[126]

China

File:Matteo Ricci 2.jpg
Italian Jesuit priest Matteo Ricci worked with several Chinese elites, such as Xu Guangqi, in translating Euclid's Elements into Chinese.

Eighteenth-century China experienced "a trend towards seeing fewer dragons and miracles, not unlike the disenchantment that began to spread across the Europe of the Enlightenment."[6] Furthermore, "some of the developments that we associate with Europe's Enlightenment resemble events in China remarkably."[6] During this time, ideals of Chinese society were reflected in "the reign of the Qing emperors Kangxi and Qianlong; China was posited as the incarnation of an enlightened and meritocratic society—and instrumentalized for criticisms of absolutist rule in Europe."[6]

Japan

From 1641 to 1853, the Tokugawa shogunate of Japan enforced a policy called kaikin. The policy prohibited foreign contact with most outside countries.[127] Robert Bellah found "origins of modern Japan in certain strands of Confucian thinking, a 'functional analogue to the Protestant Ethic' that Max Weber singled out as the driving force behind Western capitalism."[6] Japanese Confucian and Enlightenment ideas were brought together, for example, in the work of the Japanese reformer Tsuda Mamichi in the 1870s, who said, "Whenever we open our mouths...it is to speak of 'enlightenment.Template:'"[6]

In Japan and much of East Asia, Confucian ideas were not replaced but "ideas associated with the Enlightenment were instead fused with the existing cosmology—which in turn was refashioned under conditions of global interaction."[6] In Japan in particular, the term ri, which is the Confucian idea of "order and harmony on human society" also came to represent "the idea of laissez-faire and the rationality of market exchange."[6] By the 1880s, the slogan "Civilization and Enlightenment" became potent throughout Japan, China, and Korea and was employed to address challenges of globalization.[6]

Korea

During this time, Korea "aimed at isolation" and was known as the "hermit kingdom" but became awakened to Enlightenment ideas by the 1890s such as with the activities of the Independence Club.[6] Korea was influenced by China and Japan but also found its own Enlightenment path with the Korean intellectual Yu Kilchun who popularized the term Enlightenment throughout Korea.[6] The use of Enlightenment ideas was a "response to a specific situation in Korea in the 1890s, and not a belated answer to Voltaire."[6]

India

In 18th-century India, Tipu Sultan was an enlightened monarch, who "was one of the founding members of the (French) Jacobin Club in Seringapatam, had planted a liberty tree, and asked to be addressed as 'Tipu Citoyen,Template:'" which means Citizen Tipu.[6] In parts of India, an important movement called the "Bengal Renaissance" led to Enlightenment reforms beginning in the 1820s.[6] Ram Mohan Roy was a reformer who "fused different traditions in his project of social reform that made him a proponent of a 'religion of reason.Template:'"[6]

Egypt

File:Leon Cogniet - Jean-Francois Champollion.jpg
Jean-François Champollion, the founder of Egyptology

Eighteenth-century Egypt had "a form of 'cultural revival' in the making—specifically Islamic origins of modernization long before Napoleon's Egyptian campaign."[6] Napoleon's expedition into Egypt further encouraged "social transformations that harkened back to debates about inner-Islamic reform, but now were also legitimized by referring to the authority of the Enlightenment."[6] A major intellectual influence on Islamic modernism and expanding the Enlightenment in Egypt, Rifa al-Tahtawi "oversaw the publication of hundreds of European works in the Arabic language."[6]

Ottoman Empire

The Enlightenment began to influence the Ottoman Empire in the 1830s and continued into the late 19th century.[6] The Tanzimat was a period of reform in the Ottoman Empire that began with the Gülhane Hatt-ı Şerif in 1839 and ended with the First Constitutional Era in 1876.

Namik Kemal, a political activist and member of the Young Ottomans, drew on major Enlightenment thinkers and "a variety of intellectual resources in his quest for social and political reform."[6] In 1893, Kemal responded to Ernest Renan, who had indicted the Islamic religion, with his own version of the Enlightenment, which "was not a poor copy of French debates in the eighteenth century, but an original position responding to the exigencies of Ottoman society in the late nineteenth century."[6]

Historiography

The idea of the Enlightenment has always been contested territory. According to Keith Thomas, its supporters "hail it as the source of everything that is progressive about the modern world. For them, it stands for freedom of thought, rational inquiry, critical thinking, religious tolerance, political liberty, scientific achievement, the pursuit of happiness, and hope for the future."[128] Thomas adds that its detractors accuse it of shallow rationalism, naïve optimism, unrealistic universalism, and moral darkness. From the start, conservative and clerical defenders of traditional religion attacked materialism and skepticism as evil forces that encouraged immorality. By 1794, they pointed to the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution as confirmation of their predictions.

Romantic philosophers argued that the Enlightenment's excessive dependence on reason was a mistake that it perpetuated, disregarding the bonds of history, myth, faith, and tradition that were necessary to hold society together.[129] Ritchie Robertson portrays it as a grand intellectual and political program, offering a "science" of society modeled on the powerful physical laws of Newton. "Social science" was seen as the instrument of human improvement. It would expose truth and expand human happiness.[130]

The rights of women and nonwhite people were generally overlooked in Enlightenment philosophy, which is often explicitly Eurocentric.[10] Scientific racism first emerged at this time, bringing together traditional racism and new research methods.[131][132] During the Enlightenment, concepts of monogenism and polygenism became popular, though they would only be systematized epistemologically during the 19th century. Monogenism contends that all races have a single origin, while polygenism is the idea that each race has a separate origin. Until the 18th century, the words "race" and "species" were interchangeable.[131] The classification of non-European peoples as sub-human and irrational served to justify European dominance.Template:Efn[133]Template:Rp

Definition

The term "Enlightenment" emerged in English in the latter part of the 19th century,[134] with particular reference to French philosophy, as the equivalent of the French term Lumières (used first by Jean-Baptiste Dubos in 1733 and already well established by 1751). From Kant's 1784 essay "Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?" ("Answering the Question: What is Enlightenment?"), the German term became Aufklärung (aufklären=to illuminate; sich aufklären=to clear up). However, scholars have never agreed on a definition of the Enlightenment or on its chronological or geographical extent. Terms like les Lumières (French), illuminismo (Italian), ilustración (Spanish) and Aufklärung (German) referred to partly overlapping movements. Not until the late 19th century did English scholars agree they were talking about "the Enlightenment."[129][135]

File:Encyclopedie frontispice full.jpg
If there is something you know, communicate it. If there is something you don't know, search for it.
— An engraving from the 1772 edition of the Encyclopédie; Truth, in the top center, is surrounded by light and unveiled by the figures to the right, Philosophy and Reason

Enlightenment historiography began in the period itself, from what Enlightenment figures said about their work. A dominant element was the intellectual angle they took. Jean le Rond d'Alembert's Preliminary Discourse of l'Encyclopédie provides a history of the Enlightenment which comprises a chronological list of developments in the realm of knowledge—of which the Encyclopédie forms the pinnacle.[136] In 1783, Mendelssohn referred to Enlightenment as a process by which man was educated in the use of reason.Template:SfnTemplate:Efn Kant called Enlightenment "man's release from his self-incurred tutelage," tutelage being "man's inability to make use of his understanding without direction from another."[137] "For Kant, Enlightenment was mankind's final coming of age, the emancipation of the human consciousness from an immature state of ignorance."Template:Sfn The German scholar Ernst Cassirer called the Enlightenment "a part and a special phase of that whole intellectual development through which modern philosophic thought gained its characteristic self-confidence and self-consciousness."[138] According to historian Roy Porter, the liberation of the human mind from a dogmatic state of ignorance, is the epitome of what the Age of Enlightenment was trying to capture.Template:Sfn

Bertrand Russell saw the Enlightenment as a phase in a progressive development which began in antiquity and that reason and challenges to the established order were constant ideals throughout that time.[139] Russell said that the Enlightenment was ultimately born out of the Protestant reaction against the Catholic Counter-Reformation and that philosophical views such as affinity for democracy against monarchy originated among 16th-century Protestants to justify their desire to break away from the Catholic Church. Although many of these philosophical ideals were picked up by Catholics, Russell argues that by the 18th century the Enlightenment was the principal manifestation of the schism that began with Martin Luther.[139]

Jonathan Israel rejects the attempts of postmodern and Marxian historians to understand the revolutionary ideas of the period purely as by-products of social and economic transformations.Template:Sfn He instead focuses on the history of ideas in the period from 1650 to the end of the 18th century and claims that it was the ideas themselves that caused the change that eventually led to the revolutions of the latter half of the 18th century and the early 19th century.Template:Sfn Israel argues that until the 1650s Western civilization "was based on a largely shared core of faith, tradition, and authority."Template:Sfn

Time span

There is little consensus on the precise beginning of the Age of Enlightenment, though several historians and philosophers argue that it was marked by Descartes' 1637 philosophy of Cogito, ergo sum ("I think, therefore I am"), which shifted the epistemological basis from external authority to internal certainty.[140][141][142] In France, many cited the publication of Newton's Principia Mathematica (1687),[143] which built upon the work of earlier scientists and formulated the laws of motion and universal gravitation.[144] French historians usually place the Siècle des Lumières ("Century of Enlightenments") between 1715 and 1789: from the beginning of the reign of Louis XV until the French Revolution.[145] Most scholars use the last years of the century, often choosing the French Revolution or the beginning of the Napoleonic Wars (1804) as a convenient point in time with which to date the end of the Enlightenment.[146]

In recent years, scholars have expanded the time span and global perspective of the Enlightenment by examining: (1) how European intellectuals did not work alone and other people helped spread and adapt Enlightenment ideas, (2) how Enlightenment ideas were "a response to cross-border interaction and global integration," and (3) how the Enlightenment "continued throughout the nineteenth century and beyond."[6] The Enlightenment "was not merely a history of diffusion" and "was the work of historical actors around the world... who invoked the term... for their own specific purposes."[6]

Modern study

In their 1947 book Dialectic of Enlightenment, Frankfurt School philosophers Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, both wartime exiles from Nazi Germany, critiqued the supposed rational basis of the modern world:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Enlightenment, understood in the widest sense as the advance of thought, has always aimed at liberating human beings from fear and installing them as masters. Yet the wholly enlightened earth radiates under the sign of disaster triumphant.[147]

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Extending Horkheimer and Adorno's argument, intellectual historian Jason Josephson Storm argues that any idea of the Age of Enlightenment as a clearly defined period that is separate from the earlier Renaissance and later Romanticism or Counter-Enlightenment constitutes a myth. Storm points out that there are vastly different and mutually contradictory periodizations of the Enlightenment depending on nation, field of study, and school of thought; that the term and category of "Enlightenment" referring to the Scientific Revolution was actually applied after the fact; that the Enlightenment did not see an increase in disenchantment or the dominance of the mechanistic worldview; and that a blur in the early modern ideas of the humanities and natural sciences makes it hard to circumscribe a Scientific Revolution.[148] Storm defends his categorization of the Enlightenment as "myth" by noting the regulative role ideas of a period of Enlightenment and disenchantment play in modern Western culture, such that belief in magic, spiritualism, and even religion appears somewhat taboo in intellectual strata.[149]

In the 1970s, study of the Enlightenment expanded to include the ways Enlightenment ideas spread to European colonies and how they interacted with indigenous cultures and how the Enlightenment took place in formerly unstudied areas such as Italy, Greece, the Balkans, Poland, Hungary, and Russia.Template:Sfn[150] Intellectuals such as Robert Darnton and Jürgen Habermas have focused on the social conditions of the Enlightenment. Habermas described the creation of the "bourgeois public sphere" in 18th-century Europe, containing the new venues and modes of communication allowing for rational exchange. Habermas said that the public sphere was bourgeois, egalitarian, rational, and independent from the state, making it the ideal venue for intellectuals to critically examine contemporary politics and society, away from the interference of established authority. While the public sphere is generally an integral component of the social study of the Enlightenment, other historiansTemplate:Efn have questioned whether the public sphere had these characteristics.

Society and culture

File:Josef II medal.jpg
A medal minted during the reign of Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor, commemorating his grant of religious liberty to Jews and Protestants in Hungary—another important reform of Joseph II was the abolition of serfdom.

In contrast to the intellectual historiographical approach of the Enlightenment, which examines the various currents or discourses of intellectual thought within the European context during the 17th and 18th centuries, the cultural (or social) approach examines the changes that occurred in European society and culture. This approach studies the process of changing sociabilities and cultural practices during the Enlightenment.

One of the primary elements of the culture of the Enlightenment was the rise of the public sphere, a "realm of communication marked by new arenas of debate, more open and accessible forms of urban public space and sociability, and an explosion of print culture," in the late 17th century and 18th century.Template:Sfn Elements of the public sphere included that it was egalitarian, that it discussed the domain of "common concern," and that argument was founded on reason.Template:Sfn Habermas uses the term "common concern" to describe those areas of political/social knowledge and discussion that were previously the exclusive territory of the state and religious authorities, now open to critical examination by the public sphere. The values of this bourgeois public sphere included holding reason to be supreme, considering everything to be open to criticism (the public sphere is critical), and the opposition of secrecy of all sorts.Template:Sfn

File:Alexander von Humboldt by Friedrich Georg Weitsch.jpg
German explorer Alexander von Humboldt showed his disgust for slavery and often criticized the colonial policies—he always acted out of a deeply humanistic conviction, borne by the ideas of the Enlightenment.[151]

The creation of the public sphere has been associated with two long-term historical trends: the rise of the modern nation state and the rise of capitalism. The modern nation state in its consolidation of public power created by counterpoint a private realm of society independent of the state, which allowed for the public sphere. Capitalism also increased society's autonomy and self-awareness, as well as an increasing need for the exchange of information. As the nascent public sphere expanded, it embraced a large variety of institutions, and the most commonly cited were coffee houses and cafés, salons and the literary public sphere, figuratively localized in the Republic of Letters.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn In France, the creation of the public sphere was helped by the aristocracy's move from the king's palace at Versailles to Paris in about 1720, since their rich spending stimulated the trade in luxuries and artistic creations, especially fine paintings.[152]

The context for the rise of the public sphere was the economic and social change commonly associated with the Industrial Revolution: "Economic expansion, increasing urbanization, rising population and improving communications in comparison to the stagnation of the previous century."Template:Sfn Rising efficiency in production techniques and communication lowered the prices of consumer goods and increased the amount and variety of goods available to consumers (including the literature essential to the public sphere). Meanwhile, the colonial experience (most European states had colonial empires in the 18th century) began to expose European society to extremely heterogeneous cultures, leading to the breaking down of "barriers between cultural systems, religious divides, gender differences and geographical areas."Template:Sfn

The word "public" implies the highest level of inclusivity—the public sphere by definition should be open to all. However, this sphere was only public to relative degrees. Enlightenment thinkers frequently contrasted their conception of the "public" with that of the people: Condorcet contrasted "opinion" with populace, Marmontel "the opinion of men of letters" with "the opinion of the multitude" and d'Alembert the "truly enlightened public" with "the blind and noisy multitude."Template:Sfn Additionally, most institutions of the public sphere excluded both women and the lower classes.[153] Cross-class influences occurred through noble and lower class participation in areas such as the coffeehouses and the Masonic lodges.

Implications in the arts

Because of the focus on reason over superstition, the Enlightenment cultivated the arts.[154] Emphasis on learning, art, and music became more widespread, especially with the growing middle class. Areas of study such as literature, philosophy, science, and the fine arts increasingly explored subject matter to which the general public, in addition to the previously more segregated professionals and patrons, could relate.[155]

File:George Frideric Handel by Balthasar Denner.jpg
George Frideric Handel

As musicians depended more on public support, public concerts became increasingly popular and helped supplement performers' and composers' incomes. The concerts also helped them to reach a wider audience. Handel, for example, epitomized this with his highly public musical activities in London. He gained considerable fame there with performances of his operas and oratorios. The music of Haydn and Mozart, with their Viennese Classical styles, are usually regarded as being the most in line with the Enlightenment ideals.[156]

The desire to explore, record, and systematize knowledge had a meaningful impact on music publications. Rousseau's Dictionnaire de musique (published 1767 in Geneva and 1768 in Paris) was a leading text in the late 18th century.[156] This widely available dictionary gave short definitions of words like genius and taste and was clearly influenced by the Enlightenment movement. Another text influenced by Enlightenment values was Charles Burney's A General History of Music: From the Earliest Ages to the Present Period (1776), which was a historical survey and an attempt to rationalize elements in music systematically over time.[157] Recently, musicologists have shown renewed interest in the ideas and consequences of the Enlightenment. For example, Rose Rosengard Subotnik's Deconstructive Variations (subtitled Music and Reason in Western Society) compares Mozart's Die Zauberflöte (1791) using the Enlightenment and Romantic perspectives and concludes that the work is "an ideal musical representation of the Enlightenment."[157]

As the economy and the middle class expanded, there was an increasing number of amateur musicians. One manifestation of this involved women, who became more involved with music on a social level. Women were already engaged in professional roles as singers and increased their presence in the amateur performers' scene, especially with keyboard music.[158] Music publishers began to print music that amateurs could understand and play. The majority of the works that were published were for keyboard, voice and keyboard, and chamber ensemble.[158] After these initial genres were popularized, from the mid-century on, amateur groups sang choral music, which then became a new trend for publishers to capitalize on. The increasing study of the fine arts, as well as access to amateur-friendly published works, led to more people becoming interested in reading and discussing music. Music magazines, reviews, and critical works which suited amateurs as well as connoisseurs began to surface.[158]

Dissemination of ideas

The philosophes spent a great deal of energy disseminating their ideas among educated men and women in cosmopolitan cities. They used many venues, some of them quite new.

File:Pierre Bayle by Louis Ferdinand Elle.jpg
French philosopher Pierre Bayle

Republic of Letters

The term "Republic of Letters" was coined in 1664 by Pierre Bayle in his journal Nouvelles de la Republique des Lettres. Towards the end of the 18th century, the editor of Histoire de la République des Lettres en France, a literary survey, described the Republic of Letters as being: <templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

In the midst of all the governments that decide the fate of men; in the bosom of so many states, the majority of them despotic ... there exists a certain realm which holds sway only over the mind ... that we honor with the name Republic, because it preserves a measure of independence, and because it is almost its essence to be free. It is the realm of talent and of thought.Template:Sfn

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

The Republic of Letters was the sum of a number of Enlightenment ideals: an egalitarian realm governed by knowledge that could act across political boundaries and rival state power.Template:Sfn It was a forum that supported "free public examination of questions regarding religion or legislation."Template:Sfn Kant considered written communication essential to his conception of the public sphere; once everyone was a part of the "reading public," then society could be said to be enlightened.Template:Sfn[159] The people who participated in the Republic of Letters, such as Diderot and Voltaire, are frequently known today as important Enlightenment figures. Indeed, the men who wrote Diderot's Encyclopédie arguably formed a microcosm of the larger "republic."Template:Sfn

File:Gentleman's Magazine 1731.JPG
Front page of The Gentleman's Magazine, January 1731

Many women played an essential part in the French Enlightenment because of the role they played as salonnières in Parisian salons, as the contrast to the male philosophes. The salon was the principal social institution of the republic[160] and "became the civil working spaces of the project of Enlightenment." Women, as salonnières, were "the legitimate governors of [the] potentially unruly discourse" that took place within.[161] While women were marginalized in the public culture of the Old Regime, the French Revolution destroyed the old cultural and economic restraints of patronage and corporatism (guilds), opening French society to female participation, particularly in the literary sphere.[162]

In France, the established men of letters (gens de lettres) had fused with the elites (les grands) of French society by the mid-18th century. This led to the creation of an oppositional literary sphere, Grub Street, the domain of a "multitude of versifiers and would-be authors."[163] These men came to London to become authors only to discover that the literary market could not support large numbers of writers, who in any case were very poorly remunerated by the publishing-bookselling guilds.Template:Sfn

The writers of Grub Street, the Grub Street Hacks, were left feeling bitter about the relative success of the men of lettersTemplate:Sfn and found an outlet for their literature which was typified by the libelle. Written mostly in the form of pamphlets, the libelles "slandered the court, the Church, the aristocracy, the academies, the salons, everything elevated and respectable, including the monarchy itself."Template:Sfn Le Gazetier cuirassé by Charles Théveneau de Morande was a prototype of the genre. It was Grub Street literature that was most read by the public during the Enlightenment.Template:Sfn According to Darnton, more importantly the Grub Street hacks inherited the "revolutionary spirit" once displayed by the philosophes and paved the way for the French Revolution by desacralizing figures of political, moral, and religious authority in France.Template:Sfn

Book industry

File:1477-1799 ESTC titles per decade, statistics.png
ESTC data 1477–1799 by decade given with a regional differentiation

The increased consumption of reading materials of all sorts was one of the key features of the "social" Enlightenment. Developments in the Industrial Revolution allowed consumer goods to be produced in greater quantities at lower prices, encouraging the spread of books, pamphlets, newspapers, and journals – "media of the transmission of ideas and attitudes." Commercial development likewise increased the demand for information, along with rising populations and increased urbanisation.Template:Sfn However, demand for reading material extended outside of the realm of the commercial and outside the realm of the upper and middle classes, as evidenced by the bibliothèque bleue. Literacy rates are difficult to gauge, but in France the rates doubled over the course of the 18th century.Template:Sfn Reflecting the decreasing influence of religion, the number of books about science and art published in Paris doubled from 1720 to 1780, while the number of books about religion dropped to just one-tenth of the total.Template:Sfn

Reading underwent serious changes in the 18th century. In particular, Rolf Engelsing has argued for the existence of a reading revolution. Until 1750, reading was done intensively: people tended to own a small number of books and read them repeatedly, often to small audience. After 1750, people began to read "extensively," finding as many books as they could, increasingly reading them alone.Template:Sfn[164] This is supported by increasing literacy rates, particularly among women.[165]

The vast majority of the reading public could not afford to own a private library, and while most of the state-run "universal libraries" set up in the 17th and 18th centuries were open to the public, they were not the only sources of reading material. On one end of the spectrum was the bibliothèque bleue, a collection of cheaply produced books published in Troyes, France. Intended for a largely rural and semi-literate audience these books included almanacs, retellings of medieval romances and condensed versions of popular novels, among other things. While some historians have argued against the Enlightenment's penetration into the lower classes, the bibliothèque bleue represents at least a desire to participate in Enlightenment sociability.Template:Sfn Moving up the classes, a variety of institutions offered readers access to material without needing to buy anything. Libraries that lent out their material for a small price started to appear, and occasionally bookstores would offer a small lending library to their patrons. Coffee houses commonly offered books, journals, and sometimes even popular novels to their customers. Tatler and The Spectator, two influential periodicals sold from 1709 to 1714, were closely associated with coffee house culture in London, being both read and produced in various establishments in the city.[166] This is an example of the triple or even quadruple function of the coffee house: reading material was often obtained, read, discussed, and even produced on the premises.[167]

File:Denis Diderot 111.PNG
Denis Diderot is best known as the editor of the Encyclopédie.

It is difficult to determine what people actually read during the Enlightenment. For example, examining the catalogs of private libraries gives an image skewed in favor of the classes wealthy enough to afford libraries and also ignores censored works unlikely to be publicly acknowledged. For this reason, a study of publishing would be much more fruitful for discerning reading habits.[168] Across continental Europe, but in France especially, booksellers and publishers had to negotiate censorship laws of varying strictness. For example, the Encyclopédie narrowly escaped seizure and had to be saved by Malesherbes, the man in charge of the French censor. Indeed, many publishing companies were conveniently located outside France so as to avoid overzealous French censors. They would smuggle their merchandise across the border, where it would then be transported to clandestine booksellers or small-time peddlers.[169] The records of clandestine booksellers may give a better representation of what literate Frenchmen might have truly read, since their clandestine nature provided a less restrictive product choice.Template:Sfn In one case, political books were the most popular category, primarily libels and pamphlets. Readers were more interested in sensationalist stories about criminals and political corruption than they were in political theory itself. The second most popular category, "general works" (those books "that did not have a dominant motif and that contained something to offend almost everyone in authority"), demonstrated a high demand for generally low-brow subversive literature. However, these works never became part of literary canon and are largely forgotten today as a result.Template:Sfn

A healthy, legal publishing industry existed throughout Europe, although established publishers and book sellers occasionally ran afoul of the law. For example, the Encyclopédie, condemned by both the King and Clement XII, nevertheless found its way into print with the help of the aforementioned Malesherbes and creative use of French censorship law.[170] However, many works were sold without running into any legal trouble at all. Borrowing records from libraries in England, Germany, and North America indicate that more than 70% of books borrowed were novels. Less than 1% of the books were of a religious nature, indicating the general trend of declining religiosity.Template:Sfn

Natural history

File:Buffon 1707-1788.jpg
Georges Buffon is best remembered for his Script error: No such module "Lang"., a 44 volume encyclopedia describing everything known about the natural world.

A genre that greatly rose in importance was that of scientific literature. Natural history in particular became increasingly popular among the upper classes. Works of natural history include René-Antoine Ferchault de Réaumur's Histoire naturelle des insectes and Jacques Gautier d'Agoty's La Myologie complète, ou description de tous les muscles du corps humain (1746). Outside Ancien Régime France, natural history was an important part of medicine and industry, encompassing the fields of botany, zoology, meteorology, hydrology, and mineralogy. Students in Enlightenment universities and academies were taught these subjects to prepare them for careers as diverse as medicine and theology. As shown by Matthew Daniel Eddy, natural history in this context was a very middle class pursuit and operated as a fertile trading zone for the interdisciplinary exchange of diverse scientific ideas.[171]

The target audience of natural history was French upper class, evidenced more by the specific discourse of the genre than by the generally high prices of its works. Naturalists catered to upper class desire for erudition: many texts had an explicit instructive purpose. However, natural history was often a political affair. As Emma Spary writes, the classifications used by naturalists "slipped between the natural world and the social ... to establish not only the expertise of the naturalists over the natural, but also the dominance of the natural over the social."[172] The idea of taste (le goût) was a social indicator: to truly be able to categorize nature, one had to have the proper taste, an ability of discretion shared by all members of the upper class. In this way, natural history spread many of the scientific developments of the time but also provided a new source of legitimacy for the dominant class.[173] From this basis, naturalists could then develop their own social ideals based on their scientific works.[174]

Scientific and literary journals

File:1665 journal des scavans title.jpg
Script error: No such module "Lang". was the earliest academic journal published in Europe.

The first scientific and literary journals were established during the Enlightenment. The first journal, the Parisian Script error: No such module "Lang"., appeared in 1665. However, it was not until 1682 that periodicals began to be more widely produced. French and Latin were the dominant languages of publication, but there was also a steady demand for material in German and Dutch. There was generally low demand for English publications on the continent, which was echoed by England's similar lack of desire for French works. Languages commanding less of an international market—such as Danish, Spanish, and Portuguese—found journal success more difficult, and a more international language was used instead. French slowly took over Latin's status as the lingua franca of learned circles. This in turn gave precedence to the publishing industry in Holland, where the vast majority of these French language periodicals were produced.Template:Sfn

Jonathan Israel called the journals the most influential cultural innovation of European intellectual culture.Template:Sfn They shifted the attention of the "cultivated public" away from established authorities to novelty and innovation, and instead promoted the Enlightened ideals of toleration and intellectual objectivity. Being a source of knowledge derived from science and reason, they were an implicit critique of existing notions of universal truth monopolized by monarchies, parliaments, and religious authorities. They also advanced Christian Enlightenment that upheld "the legitimacy of God-ordained authority"—the Bible—in which there had to be agreement between the biblical and natural theories.Template:Sfn

Encyclopedias and dictionaries

File:Encyclopedie de D'Alembert et Diderot - Premiere Page - ENC 1-NA5.jpg
First page of the Encyclopédie, published between 1751 and 1766

Although the existence of dictionaries and encyclopedias spanned into ancient times, the texts changed from defining words in a long running list to far more detailed discussions of those words in 18th-century encyclopedic dictionaries.Template:Sfn The works were part of an Enlightenment movement to systematize knowledge and provide education to a wider audience than the elite. As the 18th century progressed, the content of encyclopedias also changed according to readers' tastes. Volumes tended to focus more strongly on secular affairs, particularly science and technology, rather than matters of theology.

Along with secular matters, readers also favoured an alphabetical ordering scheme over cumbersome works arranged along thematic lines.Template:Sfn Commenting on alphabetization, the historian Charles Porset has said that "as the zero degree of taxonomy, alphabetical order authorizes all reading strategies; in this respect it could be considered an emblem of the Enlightenment." For Porset, the avoidance of thematic and hierarchical systems thus allows free interpretation of the works and becomes an example of egalitarianism.Template:Sfn Encyclopedias and dictionaries also became more popular during the Age of Enlightenment as the number of educated consumers who could afford such texts began to multiply.Template:Sfn In the latter half of the 18th century, the number of dictionaries and encyclopedias published by decade increased from 63 between 1760 and 1769 to approximately 148 in the decade proceeding the French Revolution.Template:Sfn Along with growth in numbers, dictionaries and encyclopedias also grew in length, often having multiple print runs that sometimes included in supplemented editions.Template:Sfn

The first technical dictionary was drafted by John Harris and entitled Lexicon Technicum: Or, An Universal English Dictionary of Arts and Sciences. Harris' book avoids theological and biographical entries and instead concentrates on science and technology. Published in 1704, the Lexicon Technicum was the first book to be written in English that took a methodical approach to describing mathematics and commercial arithmetic along with the physical sciences and navigation. Other technical dictionaries followed Harris' model, including Ephraim Chambers' Cyclopaedia (1728), which included five editions and is a substantially larger work than Harris'. The folio edition of the work even included foldout engravings. The Cyclopaedia emphasized Newtonian theories, Lockean philosophy and contained thorough examinations of technologies, such as engraving, brewing, and dyeing.

File:ENC SYSTEME FIGURE.jpeg
"Figurative system of human knowledge," the structure that the Encyclopédie organised knowledge into – it had three main branches: memory, reason, and imagination.

In Germany, practical reference works intended for the uneducated majority became popular in the 18th century. The Marperger Curieuses Natur-, Kunst-, Berg-, Gewerk- und Handlungs-Lexicon (1712) explained terms that usefully described the trades and scientific and commercial education. Jablonksi Allgemeines Lexicon (1721) was better known than the Handlungs-Lexicon and underscored technical subjects rather than scientific theory. For example, over five columns of text were dedicated to wine while geometry and logic were allocated only twenty-two and seventeen lines, respectively. The first edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica (1771) was modelled along the same lines as the German lexicons.Template:Sfn

However, the prime example of reference works that systematized scientific knowledge in the Age of Enlightenment were universal encyclopedias rather than technical dictionaries. It was the goal of universal encyclopedias to record all human knowledge in a comprehensive reference work.Template:Sfn The most well-known of these works is Diderot and d'Alembert's Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers. The work, which began publication in 1751, was composed of 35 volumes and over 71,000 separate entries. A great number of the entries were dedicated to describing the sciences and crafts in detail and provided intellectuals across Europe with a high-quality survey of human knowledge. In d'Alembert's Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot, the work's goal to record the extent of human knowledge in the arts and sciences is outlined:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

As an Encyclopédie, it is to set forth as well as possible the order and connection of the parts of human knowledge. As a Reasoned Dictionary of the Sciences, Arts, and Trades, it is to contain the general principles that form the basis of each science and each art, liberal or mechanical, and the most essential facts that make up the body and substance of each.[175]

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

The massive work was arranged according to a "tree of knowledge." The tree reflected the marked division between the arts and sciences, which was largely a result of the rise of empiricism. Both areas of knowledge were united by philosophy, or the trunk of the tree of knowledge. The Enlightenment's desacrilization of religion was pronounced in the tree's design, particularly where theology accounted for a peripheral branch, with black magic as a close neighbour.Template:Sfn As the Encyclopédie gained popularity, it was published in quarto and octavo editions after 1777. The quarto and octavo editions were much less expensive than previous editions, making the Encyclopédie more accessible to the non-elite. Robert Darnton estimates that there were approximately 25,000 copies of the Encyclopédie in circulation throughout France and Europe before the French Revolution.Template:Sfn The extensive yet affordable encyclopedia came to represent the transmission of Enlightenment and scientific education to an expanding audience.Template:Sfn

Popularization of science

One of the most important developments that the Enlightenment era brought to the discipline of science was its popularization. An increasingly literate population seeking knowledge and education in both the arts and the sciences drove the expansion of print culture and the dissemination of scientific learning. The new literate population was precipitated by a high rise in the availability of food; this enabled many people to rise out of poverty, and instead of paying more for food, they had money for education.[176] Popularization was generally part of an overarching Enlightenment ideal that endeavoured "to make information available to the greatest number of people."Template:Sfn As public interest in natural philosophy grew during the 18th century, public lecture courses and the publication of popular texts opened up new roads to money and fame for amateurs and scientists who remained on the periphery of universities and academies.Template:Sfn More formal works included explanations of scientific theories for individuals lacking the educational background to comprehend the original scientific text. Newton's celebrated Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica was published in Latin and remained inaccessible to readers without education in the classics until Enlightenment writers began to translate and analyze the text in the vernacular.

File:Fontenelle.jpg
A portrait of Bernard de Fontenelle

The first significant work that expressed scientific theory and knowledge expressly for the laity, in the vernacular and with the entertainment of readers in mind, was Bernard de Fontenelle's Conversations on the Plurality of Worlds (1686). The book was produced specifically for women with an interest in scientific writing and inspired a variety of similar works.Template:Sfn These popular works were written in a discursive style, which was laid out much more clearly for the reader than the complicated articles, treatises, and books published by the academies and scientists. Charles Leadbetter's Astronomy (1727) was advertised as "a Work entirely New" that would include "short and easie [sic] Rules and Astronomical Tables."Template:Sfn

The first French introduction to Newtonianism and the Principia was Eléments de la philosophie de Newton, published by Voltaire in 1738.Template:Sfn Émilie du Châtelet's translation of the Principia, published after her death in 1756, also helped to spread Newton's theories beyond scientific academies and the university.Template:Sfn Writing for a growing female audience, Francesco Algarotti published Il Newtonianism per le dame, which was a tremendously popular work and was translated from Italian into English by Elizabeth Carter. A similar introduction to Newtonianism for women was produced by Henry Pemberton. His A View of Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy was published by subscription. Extant records of subscribers show that women from a wide range of social standings purchased the book, indicating the growing number of scientifically inclined female readers among the middling class.Template:Sfn During the Enlightenment, women also began producing popular scientific works. Sarah Trimmer wrote a successful natural history textbook for children titled The Easy Introduction to the Knowledge of Nature (1782), which was published for many years in eleven editions.Template:Sfn

Schools and universities

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Most work on the Enlightenment emphasizes the ideals discussed by intellectuals, rather than the actual state of education at the time. Leading educational theorists like England's John Locke and Switzerland's Jean Jacques Rousseau both emphasized the importance of shaping young minds early. By the late Enlightenment, there was a rising demand for a more universal approach to education, particularly after the American Revolution and the French Revolution.

The predominant educational psychology from the 1750s onward, especially in northern European countries, was associationism: the notion that the mind associates or dissociates ideas through repeated routines. In addition to being conducive to Enlightenment ideologies of liberty, self-determination, and personal responsibility, it offered a practical theory of the mind that allowed teachers to transform longstanding forms of print and manuscript culture into effective graphic tools of learning for the lower and middle orders of society.[177] Children were taught to memorize facts through oral and graphic methods that originated during the Renaissance.[178]

Many of the leading universities associated with Enlightenment progressive principles were located in northern Europe, with the most renowned being the universities of Leiden, Göttingen, Halle, Montpellier, Uppsala, and Edinburgh. These universities, especially Edinburgh, produced professors whose ideas had a significant impact on Britain's North American colonies and later the American Republic. Within the natural sciences, Edinburgh's medical school also led the way in chemistry, anatomy, and pharmacology.[171] In other parts of Europe, the universities and schools of France and most of Europe were bastions of traditionalism and were not hospitable to the Enlightenment. In France, the major exception was the medical university at Montpellier.[179]

Learned academies

File:Sébastien Leclerc I, Louis XIV Visiting the Royal Academy of Sciences, 1671.jpg
Louis XIV visiting the Script error: No such module "Lang". in 1671: "It is widely accepted that 'modern science' arose in the Europe of the 17th century, introducing a new understanding of the natural world"—Peter Barrett[180]
File:Zoom lunette ardente.jpg
Antoine Lavoisier conducting an experiment related to combustion generated by amplified sun light

The history of Academies in France during the Enlightenment begins with the Academy of Science, founded in 1666 in Paris. It was closely tied to the French state, acting as an extension of a government seriously lacking in scientists. It helped promote and organize new disciplines and it trained new scientists. It also contributed to the enhancement of scientists' social status, considering them to be the "most useful of all citizens." Academies demonstrate the rising interest in science along with its increasing secularization, as evidenced by the small number of clerics who were members (13%).Template:Sfn The presence of the French academies in the public sphere cannot be attributed to their membership, as although the majority of their members were bourgeois, the exclusive institution was only open to elite Parisian scholars. They perceived themselves as "interpreters of the sciences for the people." For example, it was with this in mind that academicians took it upon themselves to disprove the popular pseudo-science of mesmerism.Template:Sfn

The strongest contribution of the French Academies to the public sphere comes from the concours académiques (roughly translated as "academic contests") they sponsored throughout France. These academic contests were perhaps the most public of any institution during the Enlightenment.[181] The practice of contests dated back to the Middle Ages and was revived in the mid-17th century. The subject matter had previously been generally religious and/or monarchical, featuring essays, poetry, and painting. However, by roughly 1725 this subject matter had radically expanded and diversified, including "royal propaganda, philosophical battles, and critical ruminations on the social and political institutions of the Old Regime." Topics of public controversy were also discussed such as the theories of Newton and Descartes, the slave trade, women's education, and justice in France.Template:Sfn More importantly, the contests were open to all, and the enforced anonymity of each submission guaranteed that neither gender nor social rank would determine the judging. Indeed, although the "vast majority" of participants belonged to the wealthier strata of society ("the liberal arts, the clergy, the judiciary and the medical profession"), there were some cases of the popular classes submitting essays and even winning.Template:Sfn Similarly, a significant number of women participated—and won—the competitions. Of a total of 2,300 prize competitions offered in France, women won 49—perhaps a small number by modern standards but very significant in an age in which very few women had any academic training. Indeed, the majority of the winning entries were for poetry competitions, a genre commonly stressed in women's education.Template:Sfn

In England, the Royal Society of London played a significant role in the public sphere and the spread of Enlightenment ideas. It was founded by a group of independent scientists and given a royal charter in 1662.[182] The society played a large role in spreading Robert Boyle's experimental philosophy around Europe and acted as a clearinghouse for intellectual correspondence and exchange.[183] Boyle was "a founder of the experimental world in which scientists now live and operate" and his method based knowledge on experimentation, which had to be witnessed to provide proper empirical legitimacy. This is where the Royal Society came into play: witnessing had to be a "collective act" and the Royal Society's assembly rooms were ideal locations for relatively public demonstrations.[184] However, not just any witness was considered to be credible: "Oxford professors were accounted more reliable witnesses than Oxfordshire peasants." Two factors were taken into account: a witness's knowledge in the area and a witness's "moral constitution." In other words, only civil society were considered for Boyle's public.[185]

Salons

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Salons were places where philosophes were reunited and discussed old, actual, or new ideas. This led to salons being the birthplace of intellectual and enlightened ideas.

Coffeehouses

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Coffeehouses were especially important to the spread of knowledge during the Enlightenment because they created a unique environment in which people from many different walks of life gathered and shared ideas. They were frequently criticized by nobles who feared the possibility of an environment in which class and its accompanying titles and privileges were disregarded. Such an environment was especially intimidating to monarchs who derived much of their power from the disparity between classes of people. If the different classes joined together under the influence of Enlightenment thinking, they might recognize the all-encompassing oppression and abuses of their monarchs and because of the numbers of their members might be able to successfully revolt. Monarchs also resented the idea of their subjects convening as one to discuss political matters, especially matters of foreign affairs. Rulers thought political affairs were their business only, a result of their divine right to rule.[186]

Coffeeshops became homes away from home for many who sought to engage in discourse with their neighbors and discuss intriguing and thought-provoking matters, from philosophy to politics. Coffeehouses were essential to the Enlightenment, for they were centers of free-thinking and self-discovery. Although many coffeehouse patrons were scholars, many were not. Coffeehouses attracted a diverse set of people, including the educated wealthy and bourgeois as well as the lower classes. Patrons, being doctors, lawyers, merchants, represented almost all classes, so the coffeeshop environment sparked fear in those who wanted to preserve class distinction. One of the most popular critiques of the coffeehouse said that it "allowed promiscuous association among people from different rungs of the social ladder, from the artisan to the aristocrat" and was therefore compared to Noah's Ark, receiving all types of animals, clean and unclean.[187] This unique culture served as a catalyst for journalism, when Joseph Addison and Richard Steele recognized its potential as an audience. Together, Steele and Addison published The Spectator (1711), a daily publication which aimed, through fictional narrator Mr. Spectator, to both entertain and provoke discussion on serious philosophical matters.

The first English coffeehouse opened in Oxford in 1650. Brian Cowan said that Oxford coffeehouses developed into "penny universities," offering a locus of learning that was less formal than at structured institutions. These penny universities occupied a significant position in Oxford academic life, as they were frequented by those consequently referred to as the virtuosi, who conducted their research on some of the premises. According to Cowan, "the coffeehouse was a place for like-minded scholars to congregate, to read, as well as learn from and to debate with each other, but was emphatically not a university institution, and the discourse there was of a far different order than any university tutorial."[188]

The Café Procope was established in Paris in 1686, and by the 1720s there were around 400 cafés in the city. The Café Procope in particular became a center of Enlightenment, welcoming such celebrities as Voltaire and Rousseau. The Café Procope was where Diderot and D'Alembert decided to create the Encyclopédie.[189] The cafés were one of the various "nerve centers" for bruits publics, public noise or rumour. These bruits were allegedly a much better source of information than were the actual newspapers available at the time.[190]

Debating societies

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The debating societies are an example of the public sphere during the Enlightenment.Template:Sfn Their origins include:

  • Clubs of fifty or more men who, at the beginning of the 18th century, met in pubs to discuss religious issues and affairs of state.
  • Mooting clubs, set up by law students to practice rhetoric.
  • Spouting clubs, established to help actors train for theatrical roles.
  • John Henley's Oratory, which mixed outrageous sermons with even more absurd questions, like "Whether Scotland be anywhere in the world?"Template:Sfn

In the late 1770s, popular debating societies began to move into more "genteel" rooms, a change which helped establish a new standard of sociability.Template:Sfn The backdrop to these developments was "an explosion of interest in the theory and practice of public elocution." The debating societies were commercial enterprises that responded to this demand, sometimes very successfully. Some societies welcomed from 800 to 1,200 spectators per night.Template:Sfn

The debating societies discussed an extremely wide range of topics. Before the Enlightenment, most intellectual debates revolved around "confessional"—that is, Catholic, Lutheran, Reformed (Calvinist) or Anglican issues, debated primarily to establish which bloc of faith ought to have the "monopoly of truth and a God-given title to authority."Template:Sfn After Enlightenment, everything that previously had been rooted in tradition was questioned, and often replaced by new concepts. After the second half of the 17th century and during the 18th century, a "general process of rationalization and secularization set in" and confessional disputes were reduced to a secondary status in favor of the "escalating contest between faith and incredulity."Template:Sfn

In addition to debates on religion, societies discussed issues such as politics and the role of women. However, the critical subject matter of these debates did not necessarily translate into opposition to the government; the results of the debate quite frequently upheld the status quo.Template:Sfn From a historical standpoint, one of the most important features of the debating society was their openness to the public, as women attended and even participated in almost every debating society, which were likewise open to all classes providing they could pay the entrance fee. Once inside, spectators were able to participate in a largely egalitarian form of sociability that helped spread Enlightenment ideas.Template:Sfn

Masonic lodges

File:Freimaurer Initiation.jpg
Masonic initiation ceremony

Historians have debated the extent to which the secret network of Freemasonry was a main factor in the Enlightenment.[191] Leaders of the Enlightenment included Freemasons such as Diderot, Montesquieu, Voltaire, Lessing, Pope,[192] Horace Walpole, Robert Walpole, Mozart, Goethe, Frederick the Great, Benjamin Franklin[193] and George Washington.[194] Norman Davies said Freemasonry was a powerful force on behalf of liberalism in Europe from about 1700 to the twentieth century. It expanded during the Enlightenment, reaching practically every country in Europe. It was especially attractive to powerful aristocrats and politicians as well as intellectuals, artists, and political activists.[195]

During the Enlightenment, Freemasons comprised an international network of like-minded men, often meeting in secret in ritualistic programs at their lodges. They promoted the ideals of the Enlightenment and helped diffuse these values across Britain, France, and other places. Freemasonry as a systematic creed with its own myths, values, and rituals originated in Scotland Template:Circa and spread to England and then across the Continent in the 18th century. They fostered new codes of conduct—including a communal understanding of liberty and equality inherited from guild sociability—"liberty, fraternity, and equality."[196] Scottish soldiers and Jacobite Scots brought to the Continent ideals of fraternity, which reflected not the local system of Scottish customs, but the institutions and ideals originating in the English Revolution against royal absolutism.[197] Freemasonry was particularly prevalent in France—by 1789, there were perhaps as many as 100,000 French Masons, making Freemasonry the most popular of all Enlightenment associations.Template:Sfn The Freemasons displayed a passion for secrecy and created new degrees and ceremonies. Similar societies, partially imitating Freemasonry, emerged in France, Germany, Sweden, and Russia. One example was the Illuminati, founded in Bavaria in 1776, which was copied after the Freemasons, but was never part of the movement. The name itself translates to "enlightened," chosen to reflect their original intent to promote the values of the movement. The Illuminati was an overtly political group, which most Masonic lodges decidedly were not.[198]

Masonic lodges created a private model for public affairs. They "reconstituted the polity and established a constitutional form of self-government, complete with constitutions and laws, elections, and representatives." In other words, the micro-society set up within the lodges constituted a normative model for society as a whole. This was especially true on the continent: when the first lodges began to appear in the 1730s, their embodiment of British values was often seen as threatening by state authorities. For example, the Parisian lodge that met in the mid 1720s was composed of English Jacobite exiles.[199] Furthermore, freemasons across Europe explicitly linked themselves to the Enlightenment as a whole. For example, in French lodges the line "As the means to be enlightened I search for the enlightened" was a part of their initiation rites. British lodges assigned themselves the duty to "initiate the unenlightened." This did not necessarily link lodges to the irreligious, but neither did this exclude them from the occasional heresy. In fact, many lodges praised the Grand Architect, the masonic terminology for the deistic divine being who created a scientifically ordered universe.[200]

German historian Reinhart Koselleck claimed: "On the Continent there were two social structures that left a decisive imprint on the Age of Enlightenment: the Republic of Letters and the Masonic lodges."[201] Scottish professor Thomas Munck argues that "although the Masons did promote international and cross-social contacts which were essentially non-religious and broadly in agreement with enlightened values, they can hardly be described as a major radical or reformist network in their own right."[202] Many of the Masons values seemed to greatly appeal to Enlightenment values and thinkers. Diderot discusses the link between Freemason ideals and the enlightenment in D'Alembert's Dream, exploring masonry as a way of spreading enlightenment beliefs.[203] Historian Margaret Jacob stresses the importance of the Masons in indirectly inspiring enlightened political thought.[204] On the negative side, Daniel Roche contests claims that Masonry promoted egalitarianism and he argues the lodges only attracted men of similar social backgrounds.Template:Sfn The presence of noble women in the French "lodges of adoption" that formed in the 1780s was largely due to the close ties shared between these lodges and aristocratic society.[205]

The major opponent of Freemasonry was the Catholic Church so in countries with a large Catholic element, such as France, Italy, Spain, and Mexico, much of the ferocity of the political battles involve the confrontation between what Davies calls the reactionary Church and enlightened Freemasonry.[206][207] Even in France, Masons did not act as a group.[208] American historians, while noting that Benjamin Franklin and George Washington were indeed active Masons, have downplayed the importance of Freemasonry in causing the American Revolution because the Masonic order was non-political and included both Patriots and their enemy the Loyalists.[209]

Art

At the same time, the Classical art of Greece and Rome became interesting to people again, since archaeological teams discovered Pompeii and Herculaneum.[210]

See also

Notes

Template:NoteFoot Template:Notelist

References

Citations

Template:Reflist

Sources

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Cowan, Brian, The Social Life of Coffee: The Emergence of the British Coffeehouse. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
    Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
    Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
    Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
    Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
    Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

Further reading

Reference and surveys

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

Specialty studies

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

Primary sources

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

External links

Script error: No such module "Sister project links".Template:Main other

Template:Age of Enlightenment Template:Early Modern Europe Template:History of Europe Template:Western culture Template:Historiography Template:History of the Catholic Church

Template:Authority control

  1. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "the Enlightenment was a Western phenomenon"
  2. a b c Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "The Enlightenment was a period of European intellectual and cultural development that began in the late seventeenth century and lasted through the eighteenth century."; Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "On the heels of the 17th century's Scientific Revolution, the Enlightenment marked an intellectual and cultural shift in the 18th century."
  3. a b Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "The Enlightenment was a Western European phenomenon, and after 1750 it reached into Central and Eastern Europe as well, even if it left the Ottoman world and much of southern Europe unaffected."
  4. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "The Enlightenment was a shared international movement throughout Europe and the Americas"
  5. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "The Enlightenment was a broad international movement"
  6. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  18. Sootin, Harry. Isaac Newton. New York: Messner (1955)
  19. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. a b Template:Cite magazine
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. see Hall (1954), iiiTemplate:Full citation needed; Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  33. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Template:Cite magazine
  35. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  43. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  48. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Quoted in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  50. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  51. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  52. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  53. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  54. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  55. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  56. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  57. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  58. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  59. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  60. See also Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  61. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  62. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  63. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  64. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  65. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  66. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  67. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  68. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  69. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  70. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  71. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  72. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  73. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  74. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  75. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  76. Ferling (2000) p. 158Template:Full citation needed
  77. Mayer (1994) p.76Template:Full citation needed
  78. Hayes (2008) p. 10Template:Full citation needed
  79. Cogliano (2003) p.14Template:Full citation needed
  80. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  81. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  82. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  83. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  84. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  85. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  86. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  87. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  88. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  89. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  90. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  91. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  92. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  93. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  94. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  95. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  96. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  97. Charles W. Ingrao, "A Pre-Revolutionary Sonderweg." German History 20#3 (2002), pp. 279–286.
  98. Katrin Keller, "Saxony: Rétablissement and Enlightened Absolutism." German History 20.3 (2002): 309–331.
  99. "The German Enlightenment," German History (Dec 2017) 35#4 pp. 588–602, round table discussion of historiography.
  100. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  101. Wilhelm Kosch, "Seyler, Abel", in Dictionary of German Biography, eds. Walther Killy and Rudolf Vierhaus, Vol. 9, Walter de Gruyter, 2005, Template:ISBN, p. 308
  102. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  103. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  104. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  105. Thomas P. Saine, The Problem of Being Modern, or the German Pursuit of Enlightenment from Leibniz to the French Revolution (1997)
  106. Michael J. Sauter, "The Enlightenment on trial: state service and social discipline in eighteenth-century Germany's public sphere." Modern Intellectual History 5.2 (2008): 195–223.
  107. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  108. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  109. a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  110. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  111. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  112. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  113. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  114. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  115. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  116. Aldridge, Alfred Owen. The Ibero-American Enlightenment. Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1971.
  117. De Vos, Paula S. "Research, Development, and Empire: State Support of Science in Spain and Spanish America, Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries," Colonial Latin America Review 15, no. 1 (June 2006) 55–79.
  118. Bleichmar, Daniela. Visible Empire: Botanical Expeditions & Visual Culture in the Hispanic Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2012.
  119. Brading, D. A. The First America: The Spanish Monarchy, Creole Patriots, and the Liberal State, 1492–1867 Chapter 23, "Scientific Traveller." New York: Cambridge University Press 1991 Template:ISBN
  120. Thiessen, Heather. "Spain: Constitution of 1812." Encyclopedia of Latin American History and Culture, vol. 5, p. 165. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons 1996.
  121. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  122. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  123. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  124. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  125. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  126. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  127. Ronald P. Toby, State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of the Tokugawa Bakufu, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, (1984) 1991.
  128. Keith Thomas, "The Great Fight Over the Enlightenment," The New York Review April 3, 2014
  129. a b Thomas, 2014
  130. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  131. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  132. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  133. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  134. Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd Edn (revised)
  135. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  136. Jean le Rond d'Alembert, Discours préliminaire de l'Encyclopédie
  137. Immanuel Kant, "What is Enlightenment?", 1.
  138. Ernst Cassirer, The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, (1951), p. vi
  139. a b Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy. pp. 492–494
  140. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".: <templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

    For up to Descartes ... a particular sub-iectum ... lies at the foundation of its own fixed qualities and changing circumstances. The superiority of a sub-iectum ... arises out of the claim of man to a ... self-supported, unshakeable foundation of truth, in the sense of certainty. Why and how does this claim acquire its decisive authority? The claim originates in that emancipation of man in which he frees himself from obligation to Christian revelational truth and Church doctrine to a legislating for himself that takes its stand upon itself.

    Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
  141. Ingraffia, Brian D. (1995) Postmodern theory and biblical theology: vanquishing God's shadow p. 126
  142. Norman K. Swazo (2002) Crisis theory and world order: Heideggerian reflections pp. 97–99
  143. Shank, J. B. The Newton Wars and the Beginning of the French Enlightenment (2008), "Introduction"Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  144. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  145. Anderson, M. S. Historians and eighteenth-century Europe, 1715–1789 (Oxford UP, 1979); Jean de Viguerie, Histoire et dictionnaire du temps des Lumières (1715–1789) (Paris: Robert Laffont, 1995).
  146. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  147. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  148. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  149. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  150. See also, A. Owen Alridge (ed.), The Ibero-American Enlightenment (1971)., Franco Venturi, The End of the Old Regime in Europe 1768–1776: The First Crisis.
  151. Nicolaas A. Rupke (2008). "Alexander Von Humboldt: A Metabiography." University of Chicago Press. p. 138 Template:ISBN
  152. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  153. Mona Ozouf, Template:"'Public Opinion' at the End of the Old Regime"
  154. David Beard and Kenneth Gloag, Musicology, The Key Concepts (New York: Routledge, 2005), 58.
  155. J. Peter Burkholder, Donald J. Grout, and Claude V. Palisca, A History of Western Music, Seventh Edition, (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2006), 475.
  156. a b Beard and Gloag, Musicology, 59.
  157. a b Beard and Gloag, Musicology, 60.
  158. a b c Burkholder, Grout, and Palisca, A History of Western Music, 475.
  159. Kant, "What is Enlightenment?"
  160. Goodman, 3.
  161. Dena Goodman, The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment (1994), 53.
  162. Carla Hesse, The Other Enlightenment: How French Women Became Modern (2001), 42.
  163. Crébillon fils, quoted from Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  164. See Rolf Engelsing, "Die Perioden der Lesergeschichte in der Neuzeit. Das statische Ausmass und die soziokulturelle Bedeutung der Lektüre," Archiv für Geschichte des Buchwesens, 10 (1969), cols. 944–1002 and Der Bürger als Leser: Lesergeschichte in Deutschland, 1500–1800 (Stuttgart, 1974).
  165. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  166. Erin Mackie, The Commerce of Everyday Life: Selections from The Tatler and The Spectator (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 1998), 16.
  167. See Mackie, Darnton, An Early Information Society
  168. In particular, see Chapter 6, "Reading, Writing and Publishing"
  169. See Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  170. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".. For a more detailed description of French censorship laws, see Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  171. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  172. Emma Spary, "The 'Nature' of Enlightenment" in The Sciences in Enlightened Europe, William Clark, Jan Golinski, and Steven Schaffer, eds. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), 281–82.
  173. Spary, 289–93.
  174. See Thomas Laqueur, Making sex: body and gender from the Greeks to Freud (1990).
  175. d'Alembert, p. 4.
  176. Jacob, (1988), p. 191; Melton, (2001), pp. 82–83
  177. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".Template:Dead link
  178. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  179. Elizabeth Williams, A Cultural History of Medical Vitalism in Enlightenment Montpellier (2003) p. 50
  180. Peter Barrett (2004), Science and Theology Since Copernicus: The Search for Understanding, p. 14, Continuum International Publishing Group, Template:ISBN
  181. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  182. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  183. Steven Shapin, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  184. Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985), 5, 56, 57. This same desire for multiple witnesses led to attempts at replication in other locations and a complex iconography and literary technology developed to provide visual and written proof of experimentation. See pp. 59–65.
  185. Shapin and Schaffer, 58, 59.
  186. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  187. Klein, 35.
  188. Cowan, 90, 91.
  189. Colin Jones, Paris: Biography of a City (New York: Viking, 2004), 188, 189.
  190. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  191. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  192. Maynard Mack, Alexander Pope: A Life, Yale University Press, 1985 p. 437–440. Pope, a Catholic, was a Freemason in 1730, eight years before membership was prohibited by the Catholic Church (1738). Pope's name is on the membership list of the Goat Tavern Lodge (p. 439). Pope's name appears on a 1723 list and a 1730 list.
  193. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  194. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  195. Norman Davies, Europe: A History (1996) pp. 634–635
  196. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  197. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". in Script error: No such module "Footnotes"..
  198. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  199. Jacob, pp. 20, 73, 89.
  200. Jacob, 145–147.
  201. Reinhart Koselleck, Critique and Crisis, p. 62, (The MIT Press, 1988)
  202. Thomas Munck, 1994, p. 70.
  203. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  204. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  205. Jacob, 139. See also Janet M. Burke, "Freemasonry, Friendship and Noblewomen: The Role of the Secret Society in Bringing Enlightenment Thought to Pre-Revolutionary Women Elites," History of European Ideas 10 no. 3 (1989): 283–94.
  206. Davies, Europe: A History (1996) pp. 634–635
  207. Richard Weisberger et al., eds., Freemasonry on both sides of the Atlantic: essays concerning the craft in the British Isles, Europe, the United States, and Mexico (2002)
  208. Robert R. Palmer, The Age of the Democratic Revolution: The Struggle (1970) p. 53
  209. Neil L. York, "Freemasons and the American Revolution," The Historian Volume: 55. Issue: 2. 1993, pp. 315+.
  210. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".