Substitution splice: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>OAbot
m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot.
 
imported>Citation bot
Removed parameters. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by CorrectionsJackal | Category:Cinematic techniques | #UCB_Category 19/141
 
Line 11: Line 11:
According to the film scholar Jacques Deslandes, it is more likely that Méliès discovered the trick by carefully examining a print of the [[Edison Manufacturing Company]]'s 1895 film ''[[The Execution of Mary Stuart]]'', in which a primitive version of the trick appears. In any case, the substitution splice was both the first special effect Méliès perfected, and the most important in his body of work.<ref name=Williams/>
According to the film scholar Jacques Deslandes, it is more likely that Méliès discovered the trick by carefully examining a print of the [[Edison Manufacturing Company]]'s 1895 film ''[[The Execution of Mary Stuart]]'', in which a primitive version of the trick appears. In any case, the substitution splice was both the first special effect Méliès perfected, and the most important in his body of work.<ref name=Williams/>


Film historians such as [[Richard Abel (cultural historian)|Richard Abel]] and Elizabeth Ezra established that much of the effect was the result of Méliès's careful frame matching during the editing process, creating a seamless [[match cut]] out of two separately staged shots.<ref name=Lim>{{citation|last=Lim|first=Bliss Cua|title=Translating Time: Cinema, the Fantastic, and Temporal Critique|location=Durham|publisher=Duke University Press|year=2009|pages=279–80|isbn=9780822390992 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t0Dhmm50HicC&pg=PA279}}</ref> Indeed, Méliès often used substitution splicing not as an obvious special effect, but as an inconspicuous editing technique, matching and combining short [[take]]s into one apparently seamless longer shot.<ref>{{citation|last=Solomon|first=Matthew|title=Fantastic Voyages of the Cinematic Imagination: Georges Méliès's Trip to the Moon|chapter-url=https://www.sunypress.edu/pdf/62110.pdf|pages=6–7|year=2011|editor-last=Solomon|editor-first=Matthew|chapter=Introduction|publication-place=Albany|publisher=State University of New York Press|chapter-format=[[PDF]]}}</ref> Substitution splicing could become even more seamless when the film was [[Film colorization|colored by hand]], as many of Méliès's films were; the addition of painted color acts as a [[sleight of hand]] technique allowing the cuts to pass by unnoticed.<ref name=Yumibe>{{citation|last=Yumibe|first=Joshua|title=Moving Color: Early Film, Mass Culture, Modernism|location=New Brunswick, NJ|publisher=Rutgers University Press|year=2012|pages=71–2|isbn=9780813552989 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cpvymkXtt1AC&pg=PR71}}</ref>
Film historians such as [[Richard Abel (cultural historian)|Richard Abel]] and Elizabeth Ezra established that much of the effect was the result of Méliès's careful frame matching during the editing process, creating a seamless [[match cut]] out of two separately staged shots.<ref name=Lim>{{citation|last=Lim|first=Bliss Cua|title=Translating Time: Cinema, the Fantastic, and Temporal Critique|location=Durham|publisher=Duke University Press|year=2009|pages=279–80|isbn=9780822390992 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t0Dhmm50HicC&pg=PA279}}</ref> Indeed, Méliès often used substitution splicing not as an obvious special effect, but as an inconspicuous editing technique, matching and combining short [[take]]s into one apparently seamless longer shot.<ref>{{citation|last=Solomon|first=Matthew|title=Fantastic Voyages of the Cinematic Imagination: Georges Méliès's Trip to the Moon|chapter-url=https://www.sunypress.edu/pdf/62110.pdf|pages=6–7|year=2011|editor-last=Solomon|editor-first=Matthew|chapter=Introduction|publication-place=Albany|publisher=State University of New York Press}}</ref> Substitution splicing could become even more seamless when the film was [[Film colorization|colored by hand]], as many of Méliès's films were; the addition of painted color acts as a [[sleight of hand]] technique allowing the cuts to pass by unnoticed.<ref name=Yumibe>{{citation|last=Yumibe|first=Joshua|title=Moving Color: Early Film, Mass Culture, Modernism|location=New Brunswick, NJ|publisher=Rutgers University Press|year=2012|pages=71–2|isbn=9780813552989 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cpvymkXtt1AC&pg=PR71}}</ref>


The substitution splice was the most popular cinematic special effect in [[trick film]]s and early film fantasies, especially those that evolved from the stage tradition of the ''[[féerie]]''.<ref name=Moen/> [[Segundo de Chomón]] is among the other filmmakers who used substitution splicing to create elaborate fantasy effects.<ref name=Moen/> [[D.W. Griffith]]'s 1909 film ''[[The Curtain Pole]]'', starring [[Mack Sennett]], used substitution splices for comedic effect.<ref>{{citation|last=Gunning|first=Tom|title=D.W. Griffith and the Origins of American Narrative Film: The Early Years at Biograph|location=Urbana|publisher=University of Illinois Press|year=1991|page=132|isbn=9780252063664 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Rb0vYtqmLJYC&pg=PA132}}</ref> The transformations made possible by the substitution splice were so central to early fantasy films that, in France, such films were often described simply as ''scènes à transformation''.<ref>{{citation|first=Frank|last=Kessler|chapter=Trick films|page=644|editor-last=Abel|editor-first=Richard|title=Encyclopedia of Early Cinema|location=Abingdon|publisher=Routledge|year=2005|isbn=9780415234405 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hFxwX-dM008C&pg=PA644}}</ref>
The substitution splice was the most popular cinematic special effect in [[trick film]]s and early film fantasies, especially those that evolved from the stage tradition of the ''[[féerie]]''.<ref name=Moen/> [[Segundo de Chomón]] is among the other filmmakers who used substitution splicing to create elaborate fantasy effects.<ref name=Moen/> [[D.W. Griffith]]'s 1909 film ''[[The Curtain Pole]]'', starring [[Mack Sennett]], used substitution splices for comedic effect.<ref>{{citation|last=Gunning|first=Tom|title=D.W. Griffith and the Origins of American Narrative Film: The Early Years at Biograph|location=Urbana|publisher=University of Illinois Press|year=1991|page=132|isbn=9780252063664 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Rb0vYtqmLJYC&pg=PA132}}</ref> The transformations made possible by the substitution splice were so central to early fantasy films that, in France, such films were often described simply as ''scènes à transformation''.<ref>{{citation|first=Frank|last=Kessler|chapter=Trick films|page=644|editor-last=Abel|editor-first=Richard|title=Encyclopedia of Early Cinema|location=Abingdon|publisher=Routledge|year=2005|isbn=9780415234405 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hFxwX-dM008C&pg=PA644}}</ref>

Latest revision as of 03:04, 4 August 2025

Template:Short description

File:The Execution of Mary Stuart, 1895.ogv
The earliest known use of the effect, in the 1895 film The Execution of Mary Queen of Scots
Complete 30 second Mutoscope reel of Sherlock Holmes Baffled. Sherlock Holmes enters a parlour to find it being burgled. When confronted, the villain disappears. Holmes attempts to ignore the event by lighting a cigar, but upon the thief's reappearance tries to reclaim the sack of stolen goods, using a pistol stored in his dressing gown pocket. After Holmes collects his property, the bag vanishes from his hand into the grasp of the thief, who promptly disappears through a window. At this point the film ends abruptly with Holmes looking "baffled".
Sherlock Holmes Baffled, an early silent film employing the effect for comic purposes

The substitution splice[1][2] or stop trick[3] is a cinematic special effect in which filmmakers achieve an appearance, disappearance, or transformation[2] by altering one or more selected aspects of the mise-en-scène between two shots while maintaining the same framing and other aspects of the scene in both shots. The effect is usually polished by careful editing to establish a seamless cut and optimal moment of change.[4] It has also been referred to as stop motion substitution or stop-action.

The pioneering French filmmaker Georges Méliès claimed to have accidentally developed the stop trick, as he wrote in Les Vues Cinématographiques in 1907[5][6] (translated from French):

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

An obstruction of the apparatus that I used in the beginning (a rudimentary apparatus in which the film would often tear or get stuck and refuse to advance) produced an unexpected effect, one day when I was prosaically filming the Place de L'Opéra; I had to stop for a minute to free the film and to get the machine going again. During this time passersby, omnibuses, cars, had all changed places, of course. When I later projected the film, reattached at the point of the rupture, I suddenly saw the Madeleine-Bastille bus changed into a hearse, and men changed into women. The trick-by-substitution, called the stop trick, had been invented and two days later I performed the first metamorphosis of men into women and the first sudden disappearances that had, at the beginning, such a great success.

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

According to the film scholar Jacques Deslandes, it is more likely that Méliès discovered the trick by carefully examining a print of the Edison Manufacturing Company's 1895 film The Execution of Mary Stuart, in which a primitive version of the trick appears. In any case, the substitution splice was both the first special effect Méliès perfected, and the most important in his body of work.[2]

Film historians such as Richard Abel and Elizabeth Ezra established that much of the effect was the result of Méliès's careful frame matching during the editing process, creating a seamless match cut out of two separately staged shots.[4] Indeed, Méliès often used substitution splicing not as an obvious special effect, but as an inconspicuous editing technique, matching and combining short takes into one apparently seamless longer shot.[7] Substitution splicing could become even more seamless when the film was colored by hand, as many of Méliès's films were; the addition of painted color acts as a sleight of hand technique allowing the cuts to pass by unnoticed.[8]

The substitution splice was the most popular cinematic special effect in trick films and early film fantasies, especially those that evolved from the stage tradition of the féerie.[1] Segundo de Chomón is among the other filmmakers who used substitution splicing to create elaborate fantasy effects.[1] D.W. Griffith's 1909 film The Curtain Pole, starring Mack Sennett, used substitution splices for comedic effect.[9] The transformations made possible by the substitution splice were so central to early fantasy films that, in France, such films were often described simply as scènes à transformation.[10]

This technique is different from the stop motion technique, in which the entire shot is created frame by frame.[11]

References

Template:Reflist

  1. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".