Destroyer: Difference between revisions
imported>Augmented Seventh →Destroyers in preservation: section heading punctuation |
imported>InternetArchiveBot Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5 |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{other uses}} | {{other uses}} | ||
{{EngvarB|date=November 2022}} | {{EngvarB|date=November 2022}} | ||
{{Infobox machine | |||
| image = File:HMAS Hobart (DDG 39) participating in the International Fleet Review 2022.jpg | |||
| caption = [[HMAS Hobart (DDG 39)|HMAS ''Hobart'']], the lead ship of the [[Royal Australian Navy|RAN]]'s [[Hobart-class destroyer|''Hobart'' class destroyer]]. | |||
| classification = [[Watercraft]] | |||
| industry = [[Arms industry|Arms]] | |||
| application = [[Naval warfare]] | |||
| inventor = [[Fernando Villaamil]] | |||
| invented = {{start date and age|1887|df=y|p=y}} | |||
}} | |||
[[File:USS AllenMSumner DD692 Hawaii 1967.jpg|thumb|[[USS Allen M. Sumner]], the lead ship of the [[US Navy]]'s [[Allen M. Sumner-class destroyer]], sailing off the coast of Hawaii.]] | |||
[[File:USS_Zumwalt_is_on_the_final_leg_of_its_three-month_journey_to_its_new_homeport_in_San_Diego._(31620613005).jpg|thumb|[[USS Zumwalt]], the lead ship of the [[US Navy]]'s {{sclass|Zumwalt|destroyer|4}}, sailing in formation with [[USS Independence (LCS-2)|USS Independence]] (rear).]] | |||
[[File:PLANS Nanchang (DDG-101) 20210427.jpg|thumb|[[Type 055 destroyer|Type 055 class destroyer]] {{ship|Chinese destroyer|Nanchang|101|2}} of the [[China|Chinese]] [[People's Liberation Army Navy]] (PLAN)]] | [[File:PLANS Nanchang (DDG-101) 20210427.jpg|thumb|[[Type 055 destroyer|Type 055 class destroyer]] {{ship|Chinese destroyer|Nanchang|101|2}} of the [[China|Chinese]] [[People's Liberation Army Navy]] (PLAN)]] | ||
[[File:ROKS Sejong the Great (DDG-991), broadside view in July 2010.jpg|thumb|{{ROKS|Sejong the Great}}, the lead ship of her class of {{sclass|Sejong the Great|destroyer|1}} of the [[Republic of Korea Navy]]]] | [[File:ROKS Sejong the Great (DDG-991), broadside view in July 2010.jpg|thumb|{{ROKS|Sejong the Great}}, the lead ship of her class of {{sclass|Sejong the Great|destroyer|1}} of the [[Republic of Korea Navy]]]] | ||
[[File:Caio Duilio D554.jpg|thumb|The Italian {{ship|Italian destroyer|Caio Duilio||2}}, which belongs to the {{sclass2|Horizon|frigate|4}} of Franco-Italian designed first-rate frigates]] | [[File:Caio Duilio D554.jpg|thumb|The Italian {{ship|Italian destroyer|Caio Duilio||2}}, which belongs to the {{sclass2|Horizon|frigate|4}} of Franco-Italian designed first-rate frigates]] | ||
In [[navy|naval]] terminology, a '''destroyer''' is a fast, maneuverable, long-endurance [[warship]] intended to escort | In [[navy|naval]] terminology, a '''destroyer''' is a fast, maneuverable, long-endurance [[warship]] intended to escort | ||
larger vessels in a [[Naval fleet|fleet]], [[convoy]], or [[carrier battle group]] and defend them against a wide range of general threats. They were conceived in | larger vessels in a [[Naval fleet|fleet]], [[convoy]], or [[carrier battle group]] and defend them against a wide range of general threats. They were conceived in the late 19th century as a defense against [[torpedo boat]]s, and by the time of the [[Russo-Japanese War]] in 1904, these "torpedo boat destroyers" (TBDs) were "large, swift, and powerfully armed [[torpedo boats]] designed to destroy other torpedo boats".<ref>Gove p. 2412</ref> Although the term "destroyer" had been used interchangeably with "TBD" and "torpedo boat destroyer" by navies since 1892, the term "torpedo boat destroyer" had been generally shortened to simply "destroyer" by nearly all navies by the [[First World War]].<ref>Lyon pp. 8, 9</ref> | ||
Before [[World War II]], destroyers were light vessels with little endurance for unattended ocean operations;{{Citation needed|date=September 2024}} typically, a number of destroyers and a single [[destroyer tender]] operated together.{{Citation needed|date=September 2024}} After the war, destroyers grew in size. The American {{sclass|Allen M. Sumner|destroyer|1}}s had a displacement of 2,200 tons, while the {{sclass|Arleigh Burke|destroyer|4}} has a displacement of up to 9,600 tons, a difference of nearly 340%. Moreover, the advent of guided missiles allowed destroyers to take on the surface-combatant roles previously filled by [[battleship]]s and [[cruiser]]s. This resulted in larger and more powerful [[guided missile destroyer]]s more capable of independent operation. | Before [[World War II]], destroyers were light vessels with little endurance for unattended ocean operations;{{Citation needed|date=September 2024}} typically, a number of destroyers and a single [[destroyer tender]] operated together.{{Citation needed|date=September 2024}} After the war, destroyers grew in size. The American {{sclass|Allen M. Sumner|destroyer|1}}s had a displacement of 2,200 tons, while the {{sclass|Arleigh Burke|destroyer|4}} has a displacement of up to 9,600 tons, a difference of nearly 340%. Moreover, the advent of guided missiles allowed destroyers to take on the surface-combatant roles previously filled by [[battleship]]s and [[cruiser]]s. This resulted in larger and more powerful [[guided missile destroyer]]s more capable of independent operation.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
At the start of the 21st century, destroyers are the global standard for [[surface combatant|surface-combatant]] ships, with only two nations (the [[United States Navy|United States]] and [[Russian Navy|Russia]]) officially operating the heavier cruisers, with no battleships or true [[battlecruiser]]s remaining.{{NoteTag|Although the Russian {{sclass|Kirov|battlecruiser|4}} are sometimes classified as battlecruisers due to their displacement, they are described by Russia as large missile cruisers.}} Modern guided-missile destroyers are equivalent in [[tonnage]] but vastly superior in firepower to cruisers of the World War II era, and are capable of carrying [[nuclear missile|nuclear-tipped]] [[cruise missile]]s. At {{convert|510|ft|m}} long, a displacement of 9,200 tons, and with an armament of more than 90 missiles,<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20120301123441/http://www.armybase.us/2010/04/northrop-grumman-christened-its-28th-aegis-guided-missile-destroyer-william-p-lawrence-ddg-110/ Northrop Grumman christened its 28th Aegis guided missile destroyer, William P. Lawrence (DDG 110)] April 19, 2010. Retrieved August 29, 2014.</ref> guided-missile destroyers such as the ''Arleigh Burke'' class are actually larger and more heavily armed than most previous ships classified as guided-missile cruisers. The Chinese [[Type 055 destroyer]] has been described as a cruiser in some US Navy reports due to its size and armament.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2017_China_Military_Power_Report.PDF |title=Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2017 |publisher=Office of the Secretary of Defense |access-date=1 July 2021 |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170828190843/https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2017_China_Military_Power_Report.PDF |archive-date=2017-08-28 }}</ref> | At the start of the 21st century, destroyers are the global standard for [[surface combatant|surface-combatant]] ships, with only two nations (the [[United States Navy|United States]] and [[Russian Navy|Russia]]) officially operating the heavier cruisers, with no battleships or true [[battlecruiser]]s remaining.{{NoteTag|Although the Russian {{sclass|Kirov|battlecruiser|4}} are sometimes classified as battlecruisers due to their displacement, they are described by Russia as large missile cruisers.}} Modern guided-missile destroyers are equivalent in [[tonnage]] but vastly superior in firepower to cruisers of the World War II era, and are capable of carrying [[nuclear missile|nuclear-tipped]] [[cruise missile]]s. At {{convert|510|ft|m}} long, a displacement of 9,200 tons, and with an armament of more than 90 missiles,<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20120301123441/http://www.armybase.us/2010/04/northrop-grumman-christened-its-28th-aegis-guided-missile-destroyer-william-p-lawrence-ddg-110/ Northrop Grumman christened its 28th Aegis guided missile destroyer, William P. Lawrence (DDG 110)] April 19, 2010. Retrieved August 29, 2014.</ref> guided-missile destroyers such as the ''Arleigh Burke'' class are actually larger and more heavily armed than most previous ships classified as guided-missile cruisers. The Chinese [[Type 055 destroyer]] has been described as a cruiser in some US Navy reports due to its size and armament.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2017_China_Military_Power_Report.PDF |title=Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2017 |publisher=Office of the Secretary of Defense |access-date=1 July 2021 |url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170828190843/https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2017_China_Military_Power_Report.PDF |archive-date=2017-08-28 }}</ref> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 27: | ||
==Origins== | ==Origins== | ||
[[File:Fernando Villaamil (ca 1897).jpg|thumb|[[Fernando Villaamil]], credited as the inventor of the destroyer concept, who died in action during the [[Battle of Santiago de Cuba]] in 1898.]] | [[File:Fernando Villaamil (ca 1897).jpg|thumb|[[Fernando Villaamil]], credited as the inventor of the destroyer concept, who died in action during the [[Battle of Santiago de Cuba]] in 1898.]] | ||
The emergence and development of the destroyer was related to the invention of the [[self-propelled torpedo]] in the 1860s. A navy now had the potential to destroy a superior enemy battle fleet using steam [[launch (boat)|launches]] to fire torpedoes. Cheap, fast boats armed with torpedoes called [[torpedo boat]]s were built and became a threat to large capital ships near enemy coasts. The first seagoing vessel designed to launch the self-propelled [[Whitehead torpedo]] was the 33-ton {{HMS|Lightning|1876|6}} in 1876.<ref name=ast>{{cite journal |last=Toby |first=A. Steven |year=1985 |title=The "Can-Do" Tin Can |journal=Proceedings |volume=111 |issue=10 |pages=108–113 |publisher=[[United States Naval Institute]] }}</ref> She was armed with two drop collars to launch these weapons; these were replaced in 1879 by a single [[torpedo tube]] in the bow. By the 1880s, the type had evolved into small ships of 50–100 tons, fast enough to evade enemy picket boats. | The emergence and development of the destroyer was related to the invention of the [[self-propelled torpedo]] in the 1860s. A navy now had the potential to destroy a superior enemy battle fleet using steam [[launch (boat)|launches]] to fire torpedoes. Cheap, fast boats armed with torpedoes, called [[torpedo boat]]s, were built and became a threat to large capital ships near enemy coasts. The first seagoing vessel designed to launch the self-propelled [[Whitehead torpedo]] was the 33-ton {{HMS|Lightning|1876|6}} in 1876.<ref name=ast>{{cite journal |last=Toby |first=A. Steven |year=1985 |title=The "Can-Do" Tin Can |journal=Proceedings |volume=111 |issue=10 |pages=108–113 |publisher=[[United States Naval Institute]] }}</ref> She was armed with two drop collars to launch these weapons; these were replaced in 1879 by a single [[torpedo tube]] in the bow. By the 1880s, the type had evolved into small ships of 50–100 tons, fast enough to evade enemy picket boats.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
At first, the threat of a torpedo-boat attack to a battle fleet was considered to exist only when at anchor, but as faster and longer-range torpedo boats and torpedoes were developed, the threat extended to cruising at sea. In response to this new threat, more heavily gunned picket boats called "catchers" were built, which were used to escort the battle fleet at sea. They needed significant seaworthiness and endurance to operate with the battle fleet, and as they inherently became larger, they became officially designated "torpedo-boat destroyers", and by the First World War were largely known as "destroyers" in English. The antitorpedo boat origin of this type of ship is retained in its name in other languages, including [[French language|French]] ({{lang|fr|contre-torpilleur}}), [[Italian language|Italian]] ({{lang|it|cacciatorpediniere}}), [[Portuguese language|Portuguese]] ({{lang|pt|contratorpedeiro}}), [[Czech language|Czech]] ({{lang|cs|torpédoborec}}), [[Greek language|Greek]] ({{transliteration|el|antitorpiliko}}, {{lang|el|αντιτορπιλικό}}), [[Dutch language|Dutch]] ({{lang|nl|torpedobootjager}}) and, up until the Second World War, [[Polish language|Polish]] ({{lang|pl|kontrtorpedowiec}}, now obsolete).<ref>Lyon p. 8</ref> | At first, the threat of a torpedo-boat attack to a battle fleet was considered to exist only when at anchor, but as faster and longer-range torpedo boats and torpedoes were developed, the threat extended to cruising at sea. In response to this new threat, more heavily gunned picket boats called "catchers" were built, which were used to escort the battle fleet at sea. They needed significant seaworthiness and endurance to operate with the battle fleet, and as they inherently became larger, they became officially designated "torpedo-boat destroyers", and by the First World War were largely known as "destroyers" in English. The antitorpedo boat origin of this type of ship is retained in its name in other languages, including [[French language|French]] ({{lang|fr|contre-torpilleur}}), [[Italian language|Italian]] ({{lang|it|cacciatorpediniere}}), [[Portuguese language|Portuguese]] ({{lang|pt|contratorpedeiro}}), [[Czech language|Czech]] ({{lang|cs|torpédoborec}}), [[Greek language|Greek]] ({{transliteration|el|antitorpiliko}}, {{lang|el|αντιτορπιλικό}}), [[Dutch language|Dutch]] ({{lang|nl|torpedobootjager}}) and, up until the Second World War, [[Polish language|Polish]] ({{lang|pl|kontrtorpedowiec}}, now obsolete).<ref>Lyon p. 8</ref> | ||
Once destroyers became more than just catchers guarding an anchorage, they were recognized to be also ideal to take over the offensive role of torpedo boats themselves, so they were also fitted with torpedo tubes in addition to their antitorpedo-boat guns. At that time, and even into World War I, the only function of destroyers was to protect their own battle fleet from enemy torpedo attacks and to make such attacks on the battleships of the enemy. The task of escorting merchant convoys was still in the future. | Once destroyers became more than just catchers guarding an anchorage, they were recognized to be also ideal to take over the offensive role of torpedo boats themselves, so they were also fitted with torpedo tubes in addition to their antitorpedo-boat guns. At that time, and even into World War I, the only function of destroyers was to protect their own battle fleet from enemy torpedo attacks and to make such attacks on the battleships of the enemy. The task of escorting merchant convoys was still in the future.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
===Early designs=== | ===Early designs=== | ||
[[File:Kotaka.jpg|thumb|The [[Imperial Japanese Navy]]'s ''Kotaka'' (1887)]] | [[File:Kotaka.jpg|thumb|The [[Imperial Japanese Navy]]'s ''Kotaka'' (1887)]] | ||
An important development came with the construction of [[HMS TB 81 (1885)|HMS ''Swift'']] in 1884, later redesignated TB 81.<ref>{{cite web |url= | An important development came with the construction of [[HMS TB 81 (1885)|HMS ''Swift'']] in 1884, later redesignated TB 81.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.battleships-cruisers.co.uk/torpedo_boats.htm |title=Torpedo Boats |publisher=Battleships-Cruisers.co.uk}}</ref> This was a large (137 ton) torpedo boat with four [[QF 3-pounder Hotchkiss|47 mm quick-firing guns]] and three torpedo tubes. At {{convert|23.75|kn|lk=in}}, while still not fast enough to engage enemy torpedo boats reliably, the ship at least had the armament to deal with them.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
Another forerunner of the torpedo-boat destroyer (TBD) was the Japanese torpedo boat<ref>Jentschura p. 126</ref> {{ship|Japanese warship|Kotaka||2}} (''Falcon''), built in 1885.<ref>{{cite book |last=Evans and Peattie |first=David C. and Mark R. |title=''Kaigun: Strategy, Tactics, and Technology in the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1887–1941'' |year=1997 |publisher=[[Naval Institute Press]] |location=Annapolis, Maryland |isbn=978-0-87021-192-8}}</ref> Designed to Japanese specifications and ordered from the Isle of Dogs, London [[Yarrow shipyards|Yarrow shipyard]] in 1885, she was transported in parts to Japan, where she was assembled and launched in 1887. The {{convert|165|ft|m|adj=on}} long vessel was armed with four 1-pounder (37 mm) quick-firing guns and six [[torpedo]] tubes, reached {{convert|19|knot|km/h}}, and at 203 tons, was the largest torpedo boat built to date. In her trials in 1889, ''Kotaka'' demonstrated that she could exceed the role of coastal defense, and was capable of accompanying larger [[warship]]s on the high seas. The Yarrow shipyards, builder of the parts for ''Kotaka'', "considered Japan to have effectively invented the destroyer".<ref>{{cite book |last=Howe |first=Christopher |title=''The Origins of Japanese Trade Supremacy: Development and Technology in Asia from 1540 to the Pacific War'' |year=1996 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago, Illinois |isbn=978-0-226-35485-9}}</ref> | Another forerunner of the torpedo-boat destroyer (TBD) was the Japanese torpedo boat<ref>Jentschura p. 126</ref> {{ship|Japanese warship|Kotaka||2}} (''Falcon''), built in 1885.<ref>{{cite book |last=Evans and Peattie |first=David C. and Mark R. |title=''Kaigun: Strategy, Tactics, and Technology in the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1887–1941'' |year=1997 |publisher=[[Naval Institute Press]] |location=Annapolis, Maryland |isbn=978-0-87021-192-8}}</ref> Designed to Japanese specifications and ordered from the Isle of Dogs, London [[Yarrow shipyards|Yarrow shipyard]] in 1885, she was transported in parts to Japan, where she was assembled and launched in 1887. The {{convert|165|ft|m|adj=on}} long vessel was armed with four 1-pounder (37 mm) quick-firing guns and six [[torpedo]] tubes, reached {{convert|19|knot|km/h}}, and at 203 tons, was the largest torpedo boat built to date. In her trials in 1889, ''Kotaka'' demonstrated that she could exceed the role of coastal defense, and was capable of accompanying larger [[warship]]s on the high seas. The Yarrow shipyards, builder of the parts for ''Kotaka'', "considered Japan to have effectively invented the destroyer".<ref>{{cite book |last=Howe |first=Christopher |title=''The Origins of Japanese Trade Supremacy: Development and Technology in Asia from 1540 to the Pacific War'' |year=1996 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |location=Chicago, Illinois |isbn=978-0-226-35485-9}}</ref> | ||
| Line 34: | Line 44: | ||
{{Main|Torpedo gunboat}} | {{Main|Torpedo gunboat}} | ||
[[File:HMS Spider.png|thumb|HMS ''Spider'', an early model of torpedo gunboat]] | [[File:HMS Spider.png|thumb|HMS ''Spider'', an early model of torpedo gunboat]] | ||
The first vessel designed for the explicit purpose of hunting and destroying torpedo boats was the [[torpedo gunboat]]. Essentially very small cruisers, torpedo gunboats were equipped with torpedo tubes and an adequate gun armament, intended for hunting down smaller enemy boats. By the end of the 1890s, torpedo gunboats were made obsolete by their more successful contemporaries, the TBDs, which were much faster. | The first vessel designed for the explicit purpose of hunting and destroying torpedo boats was the [[torpedo gunboat]]. Essentially very small cruisers, torpedo gunboats were equipped with torpedo tubes and an adequate gun armament, intended for hunting down smaller enemy boats. By the end of the 1890s, torpedo gunboats were made obsolete by their more successful contemporaries, the TBDs, which were much faster.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
The first example of this was {{HMS|Rattlesnake|1886|6}}, designed by [[Nathaniel Barnaby]] in 1885, and commissioned in response to the [[Panjdeh Incident|Russian War scare]].<ref name="L&W">{{cite book |last=Lyon & Winfield |title=The Sail and Steam Navy List|chapter=10|pages=82–3}}</ref> The gunboat was armed with torpedoes and designed for hunting and destroying smaller [[torpedo boat]]s. Exactly {{convert|200|ft|m}} long and {{convert|23|ft|m}} in beam, she displaced 550 tons. Built of steel, ''Rattlesnake'' was unarmoured with the exception of a {{fraction|3|4}}-inch protective deck. She was armed with a single [[BL 4 inch naval gun Mk I – VI|4-inch/25-pounder breech-loading gun]], six [[QF 3 pounder Hotchkiss|3-pounder QF guns]] and four {{convert|14|in|mm|adj=on}} torpedo tubes, arranged with two fixed tubes at the bow and a set of torpedo-dropping carriages on either side. Four torpedo reloads were carried.<ref name="L&W" /> | The first example of this was {{HMS|Rattlesnake|1886|6}}, designed by [[Nathaniel Barnaby]] in 1885, and commissioned in response to the [[Panjdeh Incident|Russian War scare]].<ref name="L&W">{{cite book |last=Lyon & Winfield |title=The Sail and Steam Navy List|chapter=10|pages=82–3}}</ref> The gunboat was armed with torpedoes and designed for hunting and destroying smaller [[torpedo boat]]s. Exactly {{convert|200|ft|m}} long and {{convert|23|ft|m}} in beam, she displaced 550 tons. Built of steel, ''Rattlesnake'' was unarmoured with the exception of a {{fraction|3|4}}-inch protective deck. She was armed with a single [[BL 4 inch naval gun Mk I – VI|4-inch/25-pounder breech-loading gun]], six [[QF 3 pounder Hotchkiss|3-pounder QF guns]] and four {{convert|14|in|mm|adj=on}} torpedo tubes, arranged with two fixed tubes at the bow and a set of torpedo-dropping carriages on either side. Four torpedo reloads were carried.<ref name="L&W" /> | ||
A number of torpedo gunboat classes followed, including the ''Grasshopper'' class, the {{sclass|Sharpshooter|torpedo gunboat|4}}, the {{sclass|Alarm |torpedo gunboat|4}}, and the {{sclass|Dryad|torpedo gunboat|4}} – all built for the Royal Navy during the 1880s and the 1890s. In the 1880s, the [[Chilean Navy]] ordered the construction of two {{sclass|Almirante Lynch|torpedo gunboat|4}} torpedo gunboats from the British shipyard Laird Brothers, which specialized in the construction of this type of vessel. The novelty is that one of these ''Almirante Lynch''-class torpedo boats managed to sink the ironclad {{ship|Chilean ironclad|Blanco Encalada||2}} with self-propelled torpedoes in the [[Battle of Caldera Bay]] in 1891, thus surpassing its main function of hunting torpedo boats. | A number of torpedo gunboat classes followed, including the ''Grasshopper'' class, the {{sclass|Sharpshooter|torpedo gunboat|4}}, the {{sclass|Alarm |torpedo gunboat|4}}, and the {{sclass|Dryad|torpedo gunboat|4}} – all built for the Royal Navy during the 1880s and the 1890s. In the 1880s, the [[Chilean Navy]] ordered the construction of two {{sclass|Almirante Lynch|torpedo gunboat|4}} torpedo gunboats from the British shipyard Laird Brothers, which specialized in the construction of this type of vessel. The novelty is that one of these ''Almirante Lynch''-class torpedo boats managed to sink the ironclad {{ship|Chilean ironclad|Blanco Encalada||2}} with self-propelled torpedoes in the [[Battle of Caldera Bay]] in 1891, thus surpassing its main function of hunting torpedo boats.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
[[Fernando Villaamil]], second officer of the Ministry of the [[Spanish Navy|Navy of Spain]], designed his own torpedo gunboat to combat the threat from the torpedo boat.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.spanamwar.com/Vilamil.htm|title=Capitan de Navio Fernando Villaamil, 1898|website=www.spanamwar.com|accessdate=18 December 2022}}</ref> He asked several British shipyards to submit proposals capable of fulfilling these specifications. In 1885, the Spanish Navy chose the design submitted by the shipyard of James and [[George Thomson (shipbuilder)|George Thomson]] of [[Clydebank]]. {{ship|Spanish warship|Destructor|1886|2}} (''Destroyer'' in Spanish) was laid down at the end of the year, launched in 1886, and commissioned in 1887. Some authors considered her as the first destroyer ever built.<ref>"Under the influence of Fernando Villamil (1845–1898), Spain in 1886 produced the first torpedo boat destroyer." Kern, Robert & Dodge, Meredith: ''Historical dictionary of modern Spain, 1700–1988.'' Greenwood Press, 1990, page 361. {{ISBN|0-313-25971-2}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last1=Polmar|first1=Norman|title=Navy's Most Wanted™: The Top 10 Book of Admirable Admirals, Sleek Submarines, and Other Naval Oddities|last2=Cavas|first2=Christopher|publisher=Potomac Books|year=2009|isbn=978-1597976558|pages=44}}</ref> | [[Fernando Villaamil]], second officer of the Ministry of the [[Spanish Navy|Navy of Spain]], designed his own torpedo gunboat to combat the threat from the torpedo boat.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.spanamwar.com/Vilamil.htm|title=Capitan de Navio Fernando Villaamil, 1898|website=www.spanamwar.com|accessdate=18 December 2022}}</ref> He asked several British shipyards to submit proposals capable of fulfilling these specifications. In 1885, the Spanish Navy chose the design submitted by the shipyard of James and [[George Thomson (shipbuilder)|George Thomson]] of [[Clydebank]]. {{ship|Spanish warship|Destructor|1886|2}} (''Destroyer'' in Spanish) was laid down at the end of the year, launched in 1886, and commissioned in 1887. Some authors considered her as the first destroyer ever built.<ref>"Under the influence of Fernando Villamil (1845–1898), Spain in 1886 produced the first torpedo boat destroyer." Kern, Robert & Dodge, Meredith: ''Historical dictionary of modern Spain, 1700–1988.'' Greenwood Press, 1990, page 361. {{ISBN|0-313-25971-2}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last1=Polmar|first1=Norman|title=Navy's Most Wanted™: The Top 10 Book of Admirable Admirals, Sleek Submarines, and Other Naval Oddities|last2=Cavas|first2=Christopher|publisher=Potomac Books|year=2009|isbn=978-1597976558|pages=44}}</ref> | ||
[[File:Contratorpedero Destructor (en 1890).svg|thumb|Spanish warship [[Spanish warship Destructor|''Destructor'']] | [[File:Contratorpedero Destructor (en 1890).svg|thumb|Spanish warship [[Spanish warship Destructor|''Destructor'']] (''Destroyer''), 1890]] | ||
She displaced 348 tons, and was the first warship<ref>{{Cite book|title=The illustrated history of ships|last=Cornwell|first=Edward Lewis|publisher=Crescent Books|year=1979|isbn=0517287951|pages=150}}</ref> equipped with twin [[triple-expansion engine]]s generating {{convert|3784|ihp|0|abbr=on}}, for a maximum speed of {{convert|22.6|kn|km/h}},<ref name=dest>{{Cite web|url=https://accounts.google.com/v3/signin/identifier?dsh=S-200562420%3A1671362468167974&continue=https%3A%2F%2Fsites.google.com%2Fsite%2Fsites%2Fsystem%2Ferrors%2FWebspaceNotFound%3Fpath%3D%2Frlmbuquesdeguerra%2Fcontratorpedero-destructor&followup=https%3A%2F%2Fsites.google.com%2Fsite%2Fsites%2Fsystem%2Ferrors%2FWebspaceNotFound%3Fpath%3D%2Frlmbuquesdeguerra%2Fcontratorpedero-destructor&passive=1209600&service=jotspot&flowName=WebLiteSignIn&flowEntry=ServiceLogin&ifkv=AeAAQh4ygN8Myw04e4GrFy_UtXYT1uUliIutQB9C-gLkpfx-kFM_8r6fQa48u2dDzkqfuZMdxSVh|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100226031523/http://sites.google.com/site/rlmbuquesdeguerra/contratorpedero-destructor#prof|url-status=dead|title=Google Sites: Sign-in|archivedate=26 February 2010|website=accounts.google.com|accessdate=18 December 2022}}</ref> which made her one of the faster ships in the world in 1888.<ref>Illustrated Naval and Military Magazine: A monthly journal devoted to all subjects connected with Her Majesty's land and sea forces, 1888, v 9, page 280</ref> She was armed with one {{convert|90|mm|in|adj=on|abbr=on}} Spanish-designed [[Hontoria]] [[Breech-loading weapon|breech-loading]] gun,<ref name="Bernie2">Fitzsimmons, Bernard: ''The Illustrated encyclopedia of 20th century weapons and warfare.'' Columbia House, 1978, v. 8, page 835</ref> four {{convert|57|mm|in|adj=on|abbr=on}} ([[QF 6 pounder Nordenfelt|6-pounder]]) [[Thorsten Nordenfelt|Nordenfelt]] guns, two {{convert|37|mm|in|adj=on|abbr=on}} (3-pdr) [[Hotchkiss et Cie|Hotchkiss]] cannons and two {{convert|15|in|cm|adj=on}} [[Schwartzkopff torpedo]] tubes.<ref name=dest /> The ship carried three torpedoes per tube.<ref name="Bernie2"/> She carried a crew of 60.<ref name=dest /> | She displaced 348 tons, and was the first warship<ref>{{Cite book|title=The illustrated history of ships|last=Cornwell|first=Edward Lewis|publisher=Crescent Books|year=1979|isbn=0517287951|pages=150}}</ref> equipped with twin [[triple-expansion engine]]s generating {{convert|3784|ihp|0|abbr=on}}, for a maximum speed of {{convert|22.6|kn|km/h}},<ref name=dest>{{Cite web|url=https://accounts.google.com/v3/signin/identifier?dsh=S-200562420%3A1671362468167974&continue=https%3A%2F%2Fsites.google.com%2Fsite%2Fsites%2Fsystem%2Ferrors%2FWebspaceNotFound%3Fpath%3D%2Frlmbuquesdeguerra%2Fcontratorpedero-destructor&followup=https%3A%2F%2Fsites.google.com%2Fsite%2Fsites%2Fsystem%2Ferrors%2FWebspaceNotFound%3Fpath%3D%2Frlmbuquesdeguerra%2Fcontratorpedero-destructor&passive=1209600&service=jotspot&flowName=WebLiteSignIn&flowEntry=ServiceLogin&ifkv=AeAAQh4ygN8Myw04e4GrFy_UtXYT1uUliIutQB9C-gLkpfx-kFM_8r6fQa48u2dDzkqfuZMdxSVh|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100226031523/http://sites.google.com/site/rlmbuquesdeguerra/contratorpedero-destructor#prof|url-status=dead|title=Google Sites: Sign-in|archivedate=26 February 2010|website=accounts.google.com|accessdate=18 December 2022}}</ref> which made her one of the faster ships in the world in 1888.<ref>Illustrated Naval and Military Magazine: A monthly journal devoted to all subjects connected with Her Majesty's land and sea forces, 1888, v 9, page 280</ref> She was armed with one {{convert|90|mm|in|adj=on|abbr=on}} Spanish-designed [[Hontoria]] [[Breech-loading weapon|breech-loading]] gun,<ref name="Bernie2">Fitzsimmons, Bernard: ''The Illustrated encyclopedia of 20th century weapons and warfare.'' Columbia House, 1978, v. 8, page 835</ref> four {{convert|57|mm|in|adj=on|abbr=on}} ([[QF 6 pounder Nordenfelt|6-pounder]]) [[Thorsten Nordenfelt|Nordenfelt]] guns, two {{convert|37|mm|in|adj=on|abbr=on}} (3-pdr) [[Hotchkiss et Cie|Hotchkiss]] cannons and two {{convert|15|in|cm|adj=on}} [[Schwartzkopff torpedo]] tubes.<ref name=dest /> The ship carried three torpedoes per tube.<ref name="Bernie2"/> She carried a crew of 60.<ref name=dest /> | ||
In terms of gunnery, | In terms of gunnery, dimensions, the specialised design and speed to chase torpedo boats, and her high-seas capabilities, ''Destructor'' was a highly influential precursor to the TBD.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.quarterdeck.org/100th/DDs.htm#prof|title=The Destructor -100 Years|website=www.quarterdeck.org|access-date=2019-04-28|archive-date=2021-02-26|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210226160934/http://www.quarterdeck.org/100th/DDs.htm#prof|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="Bernie2"/> | ||
==Development of | ==Development of the destroyer class== | ||
[[File:HMS Havock (1893).jpg|thumb|{{HMS|Havock|1893|6}}, the first | [[File:HMS Havock (1893).jpg|thumb|{{HMS|Havock|1893|6}}, the first ship formally designated as destroyer class, 1894]] | ||
The first classes of ships to bear the formal designation TBD were the {{sclass|Daring|destroyer|4||1893}} of two ships and {{sclass|Havock|destroyer|4}} of two ships of the Royal Navy. | The first classes of ships to bear the formal designation TBD were the {{sclass|Daring|destroyer|4||1893}} of two ships and {{sclass|Havock|destroyer|4}} of two ships of the Royal Navy.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
Early torpedo gunboat designs lacked the range and speed to keep up with the fleet they were supposed to protect. In 1892, the [[Third Sea Lord]], [[Rear Admiral]] [[John Fisher, 1st Baron Fisher|John "Jacky" Fisher]] ordered the development of a new type of ships equipped with the then-novel [[water-tube boiler]]s and [[British ordnance terms#QF|quick-firing]] small-calibre guns. Six ships to the specifications circulated by the admiralty were ordered initially, comprising three different designs each produced by a different shipbuilder: {{HMS|Daring|1893|6}} and {{HMS|Decoy|1894|6}} from [[John I. Thornycroft & Company]], {{HMS|Havock|1893|6}} and {{HMS|Hornet|1893|6}} from [[Yarrow Shipbuilders|Yarrows]], and {{HMS|Ferret|1893|6}} and {{HMS|Lynx|1894|6}} from [[Cammell Laird|Laird, Son & Company]].<ref>{{cite book|title=The British Destroyer|author=Captain T.D. Manning|publisher=Putnam and Co|year=1961}}</ref> | Early torpedo gunboat designs lacked the range and speed to keep up with the fleet they were supposed to protect. In 1892, the [[Third Sea Lord]], [[Rear Admiral]] [[John Fisher, 1st Baron Fisher|John "Jacky" Fisher]] ordered the development of a new type of ships equipped with the then-novel [[water-tube boiler]]s and [[British ordnance terms#QF|quick-firing]] small-calibre guns. Six ships to the specifications circulated by the admiralty were ordered initially, comprising three different designs each produced by a different shipbuilder: {{HMS|Daring|1893|6}} and {{HMS|Decoy|1894|6}} from [[John I. Thornycroft & Company]], {{HMS|Havock|1893|6}} and {{HMS|Hornet|1893|6}} from [[Yarrow Shipbuilders|Yarrows]], and {{HMS|Ferret|1893|6}} and {{HMS|Lynx|1894|6}} from [[Cammell Laird|Laird, Son & Company]].<ref>{{cite book|title=The British Destroyer|author=Captain T.D. Manning|publisher=Putnam and Co|year=1961}}</ref> | ||
| Line 62: | Line 72: | ||
Torpedo boat destroyer designs continued to evolve around the turn of the 20th century in several key ways. The first was the introduction of the [[steam turbine]]. The spectacular unauthorized demonstration of the turbine-powered {{ship||Turbinia}} at the 1897 Spithead Navy Review, which, significantly, was of torpedo-boat size, prompted the Royal Navy to order a prototype turbine-powered destroyer, {{HMS|Viper|1899|6}} of 1899. This was the first turbine warship of any kind, and achieved a remarkable {{convert|34|kn}} on sea trials. By 1910, the turbine had been widely adopted by all navies for their faster ships.<ref name=ast/> | Torpedo boat destroyer designs continued to evolve around the turn of the 20th century in several key ways. The first was the introduction of the [[steam turbine]]. The spectacular unauthorized demonstration of the turbine-powered {{ship||Turbinia}} at the 1897 Spithead Navy Review, which, significantly, was of torpedo-boat size, prompted the Royal Navy to order a prototype turbine-powered destroyer, {{HMS|Viper|1899|6}} of 1899. This was the first turbine warship of any kind, and achieved a remarkable {{convert|34|kn}} on sea trials. By 1910, the turbine had been widely adopted by all navies for their faster ships.<ref name=ast/> | ||
The second development was the replacement of the torpedo boat-style turtleback foredeck by a raised forecastle for the new {{sclass2|River|destroyer|2||1903}}s built in 1903, which provided better sea-keeping and more space below deck. | The second development was the replacement of the torpedo boat-style turtleback foredeck by a raised forecastle for the new {{sclass2|River|destroyer|2||1903}}s built in 1903, which provided better sea-keeping and more space below deck.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
The first warship to use only [[fuel oil]] propulsion was the Royal Navy's TBD {{HMS|Spiteful|1899|6}}, after experiments in 1904, although the obsolescence of coal as a fuel in British warships was delayed by oil's availability.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Anon. |title=The British Admiralty ... |journal=Scientific American |volume=91 |issue=2 |year=1904 |url=https://archive.org/stream/scientific-american-1904-07-09/scientific-american-v91-n02-1904-07-09#page/n0/mode/2up |issn=0036-8733}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Dahl |first=E.J. |title=Naval innovation: From coal to oil |journal=Joint Force Quarterly |issue=Winter 2000–01 |year=2001 |url=http://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a524799.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161022194856/http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a524799.pdf |archive-date=22 October 2016 |pages=50–6|url-status=live |access-date=14 February 2017}}</ref> Other navies also adopted oil, for instance the USN with the {{sclass|Paulding|destroyer|4}} of 1909. | The first warship to use only [[fuel oil]] propulsion was the Royal Navy's TBD {{HMS|Spiteful|1899|6}}, after experiments in 1904, although the obsolescence of coal as a fuel in British warships was delayed by oil's availability.<ref>{{cite journal|author=Anon. |title=The British Admiralty ... |journal=Scientific American |volume=91 |issue=2 |year=1904 |url=https://archive.org/stream/scientific-american-1904-07-09/scientific-american-v91-n02-1904-07-09#page/n0/mode/2up |issn=0036-8733}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Dahl |first=E.J. |title=Naval innovation: From coal to oil |journal=Joint Force Quarterly |issue=Winter 2000–01 |year=2001 |url=http://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a524799.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161022194856/http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a524799.pdf |archive-date=22 October 2016 |pages=50–6|url-status=live |access-date=14 February 2017}}</ref> Other navies also adopted oil, for instance the USN with the {{sclass|Paulding|destroyer|4}} of 1909. | ||
In spite of all this variety, destroyers adopted a largely similar pattern. The hull was long and narrow, with a relatively shallow draft. The bow was either raised in a forecastle or covered under a turtleback; underneath this were the crew spaces, extending {{fraction|1|4}} to {{fraction|1|3}} the way along the hull. Aft of the crew spaces was as much engine space as the technology of the time would allow - several boilers and engines or turbines. Above deck, one or more quick-firing guns were mounted in the bows, in front of the bridge; several more were mounted amidships and astern. Two tube mountings (later on, multiple mountings) were generally found amidships. | In spite of all this variety, destroyers adopted a largely similar pattern. The hull was long and narrow, with a relatively shallow draft. The bow was either raised in a forecastle or covered under a turtleback; underneath this were the crew spaces, extending {{fraction|1|4}} to {{fraction|1|3}} the way along the hull. Aft of the crew spaces was as much engine space as the technology of the time would allow - several boilers and engines or turbines. Above deck, one or more quick-firing guns were mounted in the bows, in front of the bridge; several more were mounted amidships and astern. Two tube mountings (later on, multiple mountings) were generally found amidships.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
Between 1892 and 1914, destroyers became markedly larger; initially 275 tons with a length of {{convert|165|ft|m}} for the Royal Navy's first {{sclass|Havock|destroyer|4}} of TBDs,<ref>Lyon p. 53</ref> up to the First World War with {{convert|300|ft|m|adj=on}} long destroyers displacing 1,000 tons was not unusual. Construction remained focused on putting the biggest possible engines into a small hull, though, resulting in a somewhat flimsy construction. Often, hulls were built of [[high-tensile steel]]<ref name=ast/> only {{cvt|1/8|in}} thick. | Between 1892 and 1914, destroyers became markedly larger; initially 275 tons with a length of {{convert|165|ft|m}} for the Royal Navy's first {{sclass|Havock|destroyer|4}} of TBDs,<ref>Lyon p. 53</ref> up to the First World War with {{convert|300|ft|m|adj=on}} long destroyers displacing 1,000 tons was not unusual. Construction remained focused on putting the biggest possible engines into a small hull, though, resulting in a somewhat flimsy construction. Often, hulls were built of [[high-tensile steel]]<ref name=ast/> only {{cvt|1/8|in}} thick.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
By 1910, the steam-driven displacement (that is, not [[Planing (sailing)|hydroplaning]]) torpedo boat had become redundant as a separate type. Germany, nevertheless, continued to build such boats until the end of World War I, although these were effectively small coastal destroyers. In fact, Germany never distinguished between the two types, giving them pennant numbers in the same series and never giving names to destroyers. Ultimately, the term "torpedo boat" came to be attached to a quite different vessel – the very fast-hydroplaning, motor-driven [[motor torpedo boat]]. | By 1910, the steam-driven displacement (that is, not [[Planing (sailing)|hydroplaning]]) torpedo boat had become redundant as a separate type. Germany, nevertheless, continued to build such boats until the end of World War I, although these were effectively small coastal destroyers. In fact, Germany never distinguished between the two types, giving them pennant numbers in the same series and never giving names to destroyers. Ultimately, the term "torpedo boat" came to be attached to a quite different vessel – the very fast-hydroplaning, motor-driven [[motor torpedo boat]].{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
==Early use and World War I== | ==Early use and World War I== | ||
| Line 86: | Line 96: | ||
===Early combat=== | ===Early combat=== | ||
[[File:HMS Loyal (1913) IWM SP 001136.jpg|thumb|{{HMS|Loyal|1913|6}}, of the {{sclass|Laforey|destroyer (1913)|4}}]] | [[File:HMS Loyal (1913) IWM SP 001136.jpg|thumb|{{HMS|Loyal|1913|6}}, of the {{sclass|Laforey|destroyer (1913)|4}}]] | ||
The TBD's first major use in combat came during the [[Battle of Port Arthur|Japanese surprise attack on the Russian fleet]] anchored in [[Lüshunkou District|Port Arthur]] at the opening of the [[Russo-Japanese War]] on 8 February 1904. | The TBD's first major use in combat came during the [[Battle of Port Arthur|Japanese surprise attack on the Russian fleet]] anchored in [[Lüshunkou District|Port Arthur]] at the opening of the [[Russo-Japanese War]] on 8 February 1904.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
Three destroyer divisions attacked the Russian fleet in port, firing a total of 18 torpedoes, but only two Russian battleships, {{ship|Russian battleship|Tsesarevich||2}} and {{ship|Russian battleship|Retvizan||2}}, and a [[protected cruiser]], {{ship|Russian cruiser|Pallada|1899|2}}, were seriously damaged due to the proper deployment of [[torpedo net]]s. ''Tsesarevich'', the Russian flagship, had her nets deployed, with at least four enemy torpedoes "hung up" in them,<ref>Grant p. 42</ref> and other warships were similarly saved from further damage by their nets.<ref>Grant p. 33, 34, 40</ref> | Three destroyer divisions attacked the Russian fleet in port, firing a total of 18 torpedoes, but only two Russian battleships, {{ship|Russian battleship|Tsesarevich||2}} and {{ship|Russian battleship|Retvizan||2}}, and a [[protected cruiser]], {{ship|Russian cruiser|Pallada|1899|2}}, were seriously damaged due to the proper deployment of [[torpedo net]]s. ''Tsesarevich'', the Russian flagship, had her nets deployed, with at least four enemy torpedoes "hung up" in them,<ref>Grant p. 42</ref> and other warships were similarly saved from further damage by their nets.<ref>Grant p. 33, 34, 40</ref> | ||
| Line 95: | Line 105: | ||
[[File:Wickes dd75.jpg|thumb|left|{{USS|Wickes|DD-75|6}}, a {{sclass|Wickes|destroyer|2}}]] | [[File:Wickes dd75.jpg|thumb|left|{{USS|Wickes|DD-75|6}}, a {{sclass|Wickes|destroyer|2}}]] | ||
The threat evolved by World War I with the development of the [[submarine]], or [[U-boat]]. The submarine had the potential to hide from gunfire and close underwater to fire torpedoes. Early-war destroyers had the speed and armament to intercept submarines before they submerged, either by gunfire or by ramming. Destroyers also had a shallow enough draft that they were difficult to hit with torpedoes. | The threat evolved by World War I with the development of the [[submarine]], or [[U-boat]]. The submarine had the potential to hide from gunfire and close underwater to fire torpedoes. Early-war destroyers had the speed and armament to intercept submarines before they submerged, either by gunfire or by ramming. Destroyers also had a shallow enough draft that they were difficult to hit with torpedoes.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
[[File:HMS Badger (1911).jpg|thumb|{{HMS|Badger|1911|6}} was the first destroyer to successfully ram a submarine.]] | [[File:HMS Badger (1911).jpg|thumb|{{HMS|Badger|1911|6}} was the first destroyer to successfully ram a submarine.]] | ||
The desire to attack submarines under water led to rapid destroyer evolution during the war. They were quickly equipped with strengthened bows for ramming, and [[depth charge]]s and [[hydrophone]]s for identifying submarine targets. The first submarine casualty credited to a destroyer was the German {{SMU|U-19|Germany|2}}, rammed by {{HMS|Badger|1911|6}} on 29 October 1914. While ''U-19'' was only damaged, the next month, {{HMS|Garry}} successfully sank {{SMU|U-18|Germany|2}}. The first depth-charge sinking was on 4 December 1916, when {{SMU|UC-19|3=2}}<ref>{{cite book|publisher = Naval Institute Press |title = U-boats Destroyed: German Submarine Losses in the World Wars|first= Paul|last = Kemp |date =1997|isbn = 9781557508591}}</ref> was sunk by HMS ''Llewellyn''. | The desire to attack submarines under water led to rapid destroyer evolution during the war. They were quickly equipped with strengthened bows for ramming, and [[depth charge]]s and [[hydrophone]]s for identifying submarine targets. The first submarine casualty credited to a destroyer was the German {{SMU|U-19|Germany|2}}, rammed by {{HMS|Badger|1911|6}} on 29 October 1914. While ''U-19'' was only damaged, the next month, {{HMS|Garry}} successfully sank {{SMU|U-18|Germany|2}}. The first depth-charge sinking was on 4 December 1916, when {{SMU|UC-19|3=2}}<ref>{{cite book|publisher = Naval Institute Press |title = U-boats Destroyed: German Submarine Losses in the World Wars|first= Paul|last = Kemp |date =1997|isbn = 9781557508591}}</ref> was sunk by HMS ''Llewellyn''.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
The submarine threat meant that many destroyers spent their time on antisubmarine patrol. Once Germany adopted [[unrestricted submarine warfare]] in January 1917, destroyers were called on to escort merchant [[convoy]]s. US Navy destroyers were among the first American units to be dispatched upon the American entry to the war, and a squadron of Japanese destroyers even joined Allied patrols in the Mediterranean. Patrol duty was far from safe; of the 67 British destroyers lost in the war, collisions accounted for 18, while 12 were wrecked. | The submarine threat meant that many destroyers spent their time on antisubmarine patrol. Once Germany adopted [[unrestricted submarine warfare]] in January 1917, destroyers were called on to escort merchant [[convoy]]s. US Navy destroyers were among the first American units to be dispatched upon the American entry to the war, and a squadron of Japanese destroyers even joined Allied patrols in the Mediterranean. Patrol duty was far from safe; of the 67 British destroyers lost in the war, collisions accounted for 18, while 12 were wrecked.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
At the end of the war, the state-of-the-art was represented by the British [[V and W-class destroyer|W class]]. | At the end of the war, the state-of-the-art was represented by the British [[V and W-class destroyer|W class]].{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
==1918–1945== | ==1918–1945== | ||
| Line 109: | Line 119: | ||
[[File:Velox.jpg|right|thumb|V-class destroyer, {{HMS|Velox|D34|6}}]] | [[File:Velox.jpg|right|thumb|V-class destroyer, {{HMS|Velox|D34|6}}]] | ||
The trend during World War I had been towards larger destroyers with heavier armaments. A number of opportunities to fire at capital ships had been missed during the war, because destroyers had expended all their torpedoes in an initial salvo. The British [[V and W-class destroyer|V and W classes]] of the late war had sought to address this by mounting six torpedo tubes in two triple mounts, instead of the four or two on earlier models. The V and W classes set the standard of destroyer building well into the 1920s. | The trend during World War I had been towards larger destroyers with heavier armaments. A number of opportunities to fire at capital ships had been missed during the war, because destroyers had expended all their torpedoes in an initial salvo. The British [[V and W-class destroyer|V and W classes]] of the late war had sought to address this by mounting six torpedo tubes in two triple mounts, instead of the four or two on earlier models. The V and W classes set the standard of destroyer building well into the 1920s.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
Two Romanian destroyers {{ship|NMS|Mărăști||2}} and {{ship|NMS|Mărășești||2}}, though, had the greatest firepower of all destroyers in the world throughout the first half of the 1920s. This was largely because, between their commissioning in 1920 and 1926, they retained the armament that they had while serving in the Italian Navy as [[scout cruiser]]s (''[[esploratori]]''). When initially ordered by Romania in 1913, the Romanian specifications envisioned three 120 mm guns, a caliber which would eventually be adopted as the standard for future Italian destroyers. Armed with three 152 mm and four 76 mm guns after being completed as scout cruisers, the two warships were officially re-rated as destroyers by the [[Romanian Navy]]. The two Romanian warships were thus the destroyers with the greatest firepower in the world throughout much of the interwar period. As of 1939, when the Second World War started, their artillery, although changed, was still close to cruiser standards, amounting to nine heavy naval guns (five of 120 mm and four of 76 mm). In addition, they retained their two twin 457 mm torpedo tubes and two machine guns, plus the capacity to carry up to 50 mines.<ref>''Brassey's Annual: The Armed Forces Year-book'', Praeger Publishers, 1939, p. 276</ref> | Two Romanian destroyers {{ship|NMS|Mărăști||2}} and {{ship|NMS|Mărășești||2}}, though, had the greatest firepower of all destroyers in the world throughout the first half of the 1920s. This was largely because, between their commissioning in 1920 and 1926, they retained the armament that they had while serving in the Italian Navy as [[scout cruiser]]s (''[[esploratori]]''). When initially ordered by Romania in 1913, the Romanian specifications envisioned three 120 mm guns, a caliber which would eventually be adopted as the standard for future Italian destroyers. Armed with three 152 mm and four 76 mm guns after being completed as scout cruisers, the two warships were officially re-rated as destroyers by the [[Romanian Navy]]. The two Romanian warships were thus the destroyers with the greatest firepower in the world throughout much of the interwar period. As of 1939, when the Second World War started, their artillery, although changed, was still close to cruiser standards, amounting to nine heavy naval guns (five of 120 mm and four of 76 mm). In addition, they retained their two twin 457 mm torpedo tubes and two machine guns, plus the capacity to carry up to 50 mines.<ref>''Brassey's Annual: The Armed Forces Year-book'', Praeger Publishers, 1939, p. 276</ref> | ||
[[File:Uranami II.jpg|left|thumb|''Fubuki''-class destroyer, {{ship|Japanese destroyer|Uranami|1928|2}}]]The next major innovation came with the Japanese {{sclass|Fubuki|destroyer|4}} or "special type", designed in 1923 and delivered in 1928. The design was initially noted for its powerful armament of six 5-inch (127 mm) guns and three triple torpedo mounts. The second batch of the class gave the guns high-angle turrets for antiaircraft warfare, and the {{convert|24|in|cm|adj=on}}, oxygen-fueled Long Lance [[Type 93 torpedo]]. The later {{sclass|Hatsuharu|destroyer|4}} of 1931 further improved the torpedo armament by storing its reload torpedoes close at hand in the superstructure, allowing reloading within 15 minutes. | [[File:Uranami II.jpg|left|thumb|''Fubuki''-class destroyer, {{ship|Japanese destroyer|Uranami|1928|2}}]]The next major innovation came with the Japanese {{sclass|Fubuki|destroyer|4}} or "special type", designed in 1923 and delivered in 1928. The design was initially noted for its powerful armament of six 5-inch (127 mm) guns and three triple torpedo mounts. The second batch of the class gave the guns high-angle turrets for antiaircraft warfare, and the {{convert|24|in|cm|adj=on}}, oxygen-fueled Long Lance [[Type 93 torpedo]]. The later {{sclass|Hatsuharu|destroyer|4}} of 1931 further improved the torpedo armament by storing its reload torpedoes close at hand in the superstructure, allowing reloading within 15 minutes.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
Most other nations replied with similar larger ships. The US {{sclass|Porter|destroyer|4}} adopted twin 5-inch (127 mm) guns, and the subsequent {{sclass|Mahan|destroyer|4}} and {{sclass|Gridley|destroyer|4}}es (the latter of 1934) increased the number of torpedo tubes to 12 and 16, respectively. | Most other nations replied with similar larger ships. The US {{sclass|Porter|destroyer|4}} adopted twin 5-inch (127 mm) guns, and the subsequent {{sclass|Mahan|destroyer|4}} and {{sclass|Gridley|destroyer|4}}es (the latter of 1934) increased the number of torpedo tubes to 12 and 16, respectively.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
[[File:Fantasque.jpg|thumb|France's {{sclass|Le Fantasque|destroyer|4}} is the fastest destroyer class ever built.]] | [[File:Fantasque.jpg|thumb|France's {{sclass|Le Fantasque|destroyer|4}} is the fastest destroyer class ever built.]] | ||
| Line 124: | Line 134: | ||
Once German and Japanese rearmament became clear, the British and American navies consciously focused on building destroyers that were smaller, but more numerous than those used by other nations. The British built a series of destroyers (the {{sclass2|A|destroyer|4||1929}} to {{sclass2|I|destroyer|4}}), which were about 1,400 tons standard displacement, and had four {{convert|4.7|in|mm|0|adj=on}} guns and eight torpedo tubes; the American {{sclass|Benson|destroyer|4}} of 1938 was similar in size, but carried five {{convert|5|in|mm|0|adj=on}} guns and ten torpedo tubes. Realizing the need for heavier gun armament, the British built the {{sclass2|Tribal|destroyer (1936)|4}} of 1936 (sometimes called ''Afridi'' after one of two lead ships). These ships displaced 1,850 tons and were armed with eight {{convert|4.7|in|mm|0|adj=on}} guns in four twin turrets and four torpedo tubes. These were followed by the [[J-, K- and N-class destroyer|J-class]] and L-class destroyers, with six {{convert|4.7|in|mm|0|adj=on}} guns in twin turrets and eight torpedo tubes. | Once German and Japanese rearmament became clear, the British and American navies consciously focused on building destroyers that were smaller, but more numerous than those used by other nations. The British built a series of destroyers (the {{sclass2|A|destroyer|4||1929}} to {{sclass2|I|destroyer|4}}), which were about 1,400 tons standard displacement, and had four {{convert|4.7|in|mm|0|adj=on}} guns and eight torpedo tubes; the American {{sclass|Benson|destroyer|4}} of 1938 was similar in size, but carried five {{convert|5|in|mm|0|adj=on}} guns and ten torpedo tubes. Realizing the need for heavier gun armament, the British built the {{sclass2|Tribal|destroyer (1936)|4}} of 1936 (sometimes called ''Afridi'' after one of two lead ships). These ships displaced 1,850 tons and were armed with eight {{convert|4.7|in|mm|0|adj=on}} guns in four twin turrets and four torpedo tubes. These were followed by the [[J-, K- and N-class destroyer|J-class]] and L-class destroyers, with six {{convert|4.7|in|mm|0|adj=on}} guns in twin turrets and eight torpedo tubes. | ||
Antisubmarine sensors included [[sonar]] (or ASDIC), although training in their use was indifferent. Antisubmarine weapons changed little, and ahead-throwing weapons, a need recognized in World War I, had made no progress. | Antisubmarine sensors included [[sonar]] (or ASDIC), although training in their use was indifferent. Antisubmarine weapons changed little, and ahead-throwing weapons, a need recognized in World War I, had made no progress.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
===Later combat=== | ===Later combat=== | ||
| Line 130: | Line 140: | ||
{{further|American World War II destroyers|British World War II destroyers|French World War II destroyers|German World War II destroyers|Italian World War II destroyers|Japanese World War II destroyers|Soviet World War II destroyers|Romanian World War II destroyers}} | {{further|American World War II destroyers|British World War II destroyers|French World War II destroyers|German World War II destroyers|Italian World War II destroyers|Japanese World War II destroyers|Soviet World War II destroyers|Romanian World War II destroyers}} | ||
[[File:USS McGowan (DD-678) at sea, circa in 1945.jpg|thumb|left|{{USS|McGowan|DD-678|6}}, a {{sclass|Fletcher|destroyer|2}} during World War II]] | [[File:USS McGowan (DD-678) at sea, circa in 1945.jpg|thumb|left|{{USS|McGowan|DD-678|6}}, a {{sclass|Fletcher|destroyer|2}} during World War II]] | ||
During the 1920s and 1930s, destroyers were often deployed to areas of diplomatic tension or humanitarian disaster. British and American destroyers were common on the Chinese coast and rivers, even supplying landing parties to protect colonial interests. By World War II, the threat had evolved once again. Submarines were more effective, and [[aircraft]] had become important weapons of naval warfare; once again the early-war fleet destroyers were ill-equipped for combating these new targets. They were fitted with new light [[antiaircraft]] guns, [[radar]], and [[Hedgehog (weapon)|forward-launched ASW]] weapons, in addition to their existing [[dual-purpose gun]]s, [[depth charge]]s, and torpedoes. Increasing size allowed improved internal arrangement of propulsion machinery with [[compartmentation]], so ships were less likely to be sunk by a single hit.<ref name=ast/> In most cases torpedo and/or dual-purpose gun armament was reduced to accommodate new [[anti-air warfare|anti-air]] and [[anti-submarine warfare|anti-submarine]] weapons. By this time the destroyers had become large, multi-purpose vessels, expensive targets in their own right. As a result, casualties on destroyers were among the highest. In the US Navy, particularly in World War II, destroyers became known as | During the 1920s and 1930s, destroyers were often deployed to areas of diplomatic tension or humanitarian disaster. British and American destroyers were common on the Chinese coast and rivers, even supplying landing parties to protect colonial interests. By World War II, the threat had evolved once again. Submarines were more effective, and [[aircraft]] had become important weapons of naval warfare; once again the early-war fleet destroyers were ill-equipped for combating these new targets. They were fitted with new light [[antiaircraft]] guns, [[radar]], and [[Hedgehog (weapon)|forward-launched ASW]] weapons, in addition to their existing [[dual-purpose gun]]s, [[depth charge]]s, and torpedoes. Increasing size allowed improved internal arrangement of propulsion machinery with [[compartmentation]], so ships were less likely to be sunk by a single hit.<ref name=ast/> In most cases torpedo and/or dual-purpose gun armament was reduced to accommodate new [[anti-air warfare|anti-air]] and [[anti-submarine warfare|anti-submarine]] weapons. By this time the destroyers had become large, multi-purpose vessels, expensive targets in their own right. As a result, casualties on destroyers were among the highest. In the US Navy, particularly in World War II, destroyers became known as tin cans due to their light armor compared to battleships and cruisers.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
The need for large numbers of antisubmarine ships led to the introduction of smaller and cheaper specialized antisubmarine warships called [[corvette]]s and [[frigate]]s by the Royal Navy and [[destroyer escort]]s by the USN. A similar programme was belatedly started by the Japanese (see {{sclass|Matsu|destroyer|2}}). These ships had the size and displacement of the original TBDs from which the contemporary destroyer had evolved. | The need for large numbers of antisubmarine ships led to the introduction of smaller and cheaper specialized antisubmarine warships called [[corvette]]s and [[frigate]]s by the Royal Navy and [[destroyer escort]]s by the USN. A similar programme was belatedly started by the Japanese (see {{sclass|Matsu|destroyer|2}}). These ships had the size and displacement of the original TBDs from which the contemporary destroyer had evolved.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
==Post-World War II== | ==Post-World War II== | ||
[[File:ORP_Błyskawica_w_nowym_kamuflażu_-_02-01-2012.jpg|thumb|The [[Polish Navy|Polish]] destroyer {{ORP|Błyskawica}} is preserved as a [[museum ship]] in [[Gdynia]].]] | [[File:ORP_Błyskawica_w_nowym_kamuflażu_-_02-01-2012.jpg|thumb|The [[Polish Navy|Polish]] destroyer {{ORP|Błyskawica}} is preserved as a [[museum ship]] in [[Gdynia]].]] | ||
Some conventional destroyers completed in the late 1940s and 1950s were built on wartime experience. These vessels were significantly larger than wartime ships and had fully automatic main guns, unit machinery, radar, sonar, and antisubmarine weapons, such as the [[Squid (weapon)|squid mortar]]. Examples include the British {{sclass|Daring|destroyer (1949)|0}}, US {{sclass|Forrest Sherman|destroyer|0}}, and the Soviet {{sclass|Kotlin|destroyer|2}}s. | Some conventional destroyers completed in the late 1940s and 1950s were built on wartime experience. These vessels were significantly larger than wartime ships and had fully automatic main guns, unit machinery, radar, sonar, and antisubmarine weapons, such as the [[Squid (weapon)|squid mortar]]. Examples include the British {{sclass|Daring|destroyer (1949)|0}}, US {{sclass|Forrest Sherman|destroyer|0}}, and the Soviet {{sclass|Kotlin|destroyer|2}}s.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
Some World War II–vintage ships were modernized for antisubmarine warfare, and to extend their service lives, to avoid having to build (expensive) brand-new ships. Examples include the US [[FRAM I]] programme and the British [[Type 15 frigate]]s converted from fleet destroyers. | Some World War II–vintage ships were modernized for antisubmarine warfare, and to extend their service lives, to avoid having to build (expensive) brand-new ships. Examples include the US [[FRAM I]] programme and the British [[Type 15 frigate]]s converted from fleet destroyers.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
The advent of [[surface-to-air missile]]s and [[surface-to-surface missile]]s, such as the [[Exocet]], in the early 1960s changed naval warfare. [[Guided missile destroyer]]s (DDG in the US Navy) were developed to carry these weapons and protect the fleet from air, submarine, and surface threats. Examples include the Soviet {{sclass|Kashin|destroyer|4}}, the British {{sclass2|County|destroyer|4}}, and the US {{sclass|Charles F. Adams|destroyer|4}}. | The advent of [[surface-to-air missile]]s and [[surface-to-surface missile]]s, such as the [[Exocet]], in the early 1960s changed naval warfare. [[Guided missile destroyer]]s (DDG in the US Navy) were developed to carry these weapons and protect the fleet from air, submarine, and surface threats. Examples include the Soviet {{sclass|Kashin|destroyer|4}}, the British {{sclass2|County|destroyer|4}}, and the US {{sclass|Charles F. Adams|destroyer|4}}.{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
The 21st century destroyers tend to display features such as large, slab sides without complicated corners and crevices to keep the [[radar cross-section]] small, [[vertical launch system]]s to carry a large number of missiles at high readiness to fire, and [[helicopter]] flight decks and [[hangars]]. | The 21st century destroyers tend to display features such as large, slab sides without complicated corners and crevices to keep the [[radar cross-section]] small, [[vertical launch system]]s to carry a large number of missiles at high readiness to fire, and [[helicopter]] flight decks and [[hangars]].{{Citation needed|date=October 2025}} | ||
==Operators== | ==Operators== | ||
| Line 150: | Line 160: | ||
[[File:PLANS Taiyuan (DDG-131) 20190729.jpg|thumb|right|A [[People's Liberation Army Navy|Chinese Navy]] [[Type 052D destroyer|Luyang III-class (Type 052D)]] destroyer]] | [[File:PLANS Taiyuan (DDG-131) 20190729.jpg|thumb|right|A [[People's Liberation Army Navy|Chinese Navy]] [[Type 052D destroyer|Luyang III-class (Type 052D)]] destroyer]] | ||
* {{navy|China}} operates the [[Type 055 destroyer]],<ref>{{Cite web |last= Johnson|first=Jesse|date=2020-01-12|title=China's navy commissions biggest and 'most powerful' surface warship |url= https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/01/12/asia-pacific/china-navy-commissions-biggest-most-powerful-warship/ |access-date= 2020-11-17|website=The Japan Times|language=en-US}}</ref> two [[Type 052B destroyer|Luyang I-class]] destroyers, six [[Type 052C destroyer|Luyang II-class]] destroyers, 24<ref>{{Cite web |title=China Commissions Two New Type 052D Destroyers |url=https://www.defenseworld.net/news/31547/China_Commissions_Two_New_Type_052D_Destroyers#.YjRNxnpBy3A |access-date=2022-03-18 |website=www.defenseworld.net|date=10 March 2022 }}</ref> [[Type 052D destroyer]] and two [[Type 051C destroyer|Luzhou]]-class destroyers. China also operates two [[Type 052 destroyer]]s, one [[Type 051B destroyer]] and four {{sclass|Sovremenny|destroyer|5}}-class destroyers that are of older models. The Type 055 is considered to be a [[cruiser]] by [[NATO]] and the [[United States Department of Defense|U.S. Department of Defense]] for its tonnage and capability matching that of the {{sclass|Ticonderoga|cruiser|1}}.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2017|url=https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2017_China_Military_Power_Report.PDF |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180824200942/https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2017_China_Military_Power_Report.PDF |archive-date=2018-08-24 |url-status=dead|website=dod.defense.gov |date = 15 May 2017 }}</ref> | * {{navy|China}} operates the [[Type 055 destroyer]],<ref>{{Cite web |last= Johnson|first=Jesse|date=2020-01-12|title=China's navy commissions biggest and 'most powerful' surface warship |url= https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/01/12/asia-pacific/china-navy-commissions-biggest-most-powerful-warship/ |access-date= 2020-11-17|website=The Japan Times|language=en-US}}</ref> two [[Type 052B destroyer|Luyang I-class]] destroyers, six [[Type 052C destroyer|Luyang II-class]] destroyers, 24<ref>{{Cite web |title=China Commissions Two New Type 052D Destroyers |url=https://www.defenseworld.net/news/31547/China_Commissions_Two_New_Type_052D_Destroyers#.YjRNxnpBy3A |access-date=2022-03-18 |website=www.defenseworld.net |date=10 March 2022 |archive-date=2022-03-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220313095159/https://www.defenseworld.net/news/31547/China_Commissions_Two_New_Type_052D_Destroyers#.YjRNxnpBy3A |url-status=dead }}</ref> [[Type 052D destroyer]] and two [[Type 051C destroyer|Luzhou]]-class destroyers. China also operates two [[Type 052 destroyer]]s, one [[Type 051B destroyer]] and four {{sclass|Sovremenny|destroyer|5}}-class destroyers that are of older models. The Type 055 is considered to be a [[cruiser]] by [[NATO]] and the [[United States Department of Defense|U.S. Department of Defense]] for its tonnage and capability matching that of the {{sclass|Ticonderoga|cruiser|1}}.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic of China 2017|url=https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2017_China_Military_Power_Report.PDF |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180824200942/https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2017_China_Military_Power_Report.PDF |archive-date=2018-08-24 |url-status=dead|website=dod.defense.gov |date = 15 May 2017 }}</ref> | ||
* {{naval|Taiwan}} (Taiwan) operates four {{sclass|Kidd|destroyer|2}}s, purchased from the United States. | * {{naval|Taiwan}} (Taiwan) operates four {{sclass|Kidd|destroyer|2}}s, purchased from the United States. | ||
| Line 172: | Line 182: | ||
* {{navy|Russia}} The Russian Navy operates two {{sclass|Sovremenny|destroyer|0}} and eight {{sclass|Udaloy|destroyer|0}} destroyers. | * {{navy|Russia}} The Russian Navy operates two {{sclass|Sovremenny|destroyer|0}} and eight {{sclass|Udaloy|destroyer|0}} destroyers. | ||
* {{navy|United Kingdom}} operates six [[Type 45 destroyer|Type 45]] or ''Daring''-class destroyers. | * {{navy|United Kingdom}} operates six [[Type 45 destroyer|Type 45]] or ''Daring''-class destroyers. | ||
[[File: | [[File:130920-N-NX070-025 - USS Arleigh Burke (DDG-51).jpg|thumb|{{USS|Arleigh Burke}}, the lead ship of her class of [[guided-missile destroyer]]s]] | ||
*{{naval|United States}} operates 73 active {{sclass|Arleigh Burke|destroyer|0}} [[guided missile]] destroyers (DDGs) of a planned class of 92, and also has two active {{sclass|Zumwalt|destroyer|0}} destroyer of a planned class of three, all {{as of|lc=y|December 2022}}. | *{{naval|United States}} operates 73 active {{sclass|Arleigh Burke|destroyer|0}} [[guided missile]] destroyers (DDGs) of a planned class of 92, and also has two active {{sclass|Zumwalt|destroyer|0}} destroyer of a planned class of three, all {{as of|lc=y|December 2022}}. | ||
| Line 188: | Line 196: | ||
* {{navy|Egypt}} operates the [[ENS Tahya Misr|ENS ''Tahya Misr'']]. This is one of the ''Aquitaine''-class variants of the FREMM Multipurpose frigates purchased from France, which is classified as a destroyer by France. | * {{navy|Egypt}} operates the [[ENS Tahya Misr|ENS ''Tahya Misr'']]. This is one of the ''Aquitaine''-class variants of the FREMM Multipurpose frigates purchased from France, which is classified as a destroyer by France. | ||
* {{navy|Germany}} operates three {{sclass|Sachsen|frigate|2}}s and four {{sclass|Baden-Württemberg|frigate|2}}s. These ships are officially classified as frigates by Germany, but regarded as destroyers internationally due to size and capability. | * {{navy|Germany}} operates three {{sclass|Sachsen|frigate|2}}s and four {{sclass|Baden-Württemberg|frigate|2}}s. These ships are officially classified as frigates by Germany, but regarded as destroyers internationally due to size and capability. | ||
* {{navy|Morocco}} operates the [[Moroccan frigate Mohammed VI|''Mohammed VI'']]. This is one of the ''Aquitaine''-class variants of the FREMM Multipurpose frigates purchased from France, which is classified as a destroyer by France. | * {{navy|Morocco}} operates the [[Moroccan frigate Mohammed VI|''Mohammed VI'']]. This is one of the ''Aquitaine''-class variants of the FREMM Multipurpose frigates purchased from France, which is classified as a destroyer by France. | ||
* {{naval|Netherlands}} operates four {{sclass|De Zeven Provinciën|frigate|2}}s. These ships are classified as frigates by the Netherlands, but regarded as destroyers internationally due to size and capability.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://weaponsystems.net/system/424-De+Zeven+Provinci%C3%ABn+class|title=De Zeven Provinciën class |last= |first= |date= |website=weaponsystems.net |publisher= |access-date=9 November 2024 |quote=}}</ref> | * {{naval|Netherlands}} operates four {{sclass|De Zeven Provinciën|frigate|2}}s. These ships are classified as frigates by the Netherlands, but regarded as destroyers internationally due to size and capability.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://weaponsystems.net/system/424-De+Zeven+Provinci%C3%ABn+class|title=De Zeven Provinciën class |last= |first= |date= |website=weaponsystems.net |publisher= |access-date=9 November 2024 |quote=}}</ref> | ||
| Line 199: | Line 206: | ||
* {{navy|Austria-Hungary}} lost its entire navy upon the Empire's collapse following World War I. | * {{navy|Austria-Hungary}} lost its entire navy upon the Empire's collapse following World War I. | ||
* {{navy|Ukrainian People's Republic}} lost its entire navy upon its [[Ukrainian–Soviet War|conquest]] by the [[Bolsheviks]] in 1921. | * {{navy|Ukrainian People's Republic}} lost its entire navy upon its [[Ukrainian–Soviet War|conquest]] by the [[Bolsheviks]] in 1921. | ||
* {{navy|Estonia}} sold its two {{sclass|Orfey|destroyer|2}} and {{sclass|Izyaslav|destroyer|2}}s to Peru in 1933 | * {{navy|Estonia}} sold its two {{sclass|Orfey|destroyer|2}} and {{sclass|Izyaslav|destroyer|2}}s to Peru in 1933. | ||
* {{navy|Manchukuo}} transferred its only {{sclass|Momo|destroyer|2}} back to Japan in 1942. | * {{navy|Manchukuo}} transferred its only {{sclass|Momo|destroyer|2}} back to Japan in 1942. | ||
* {{navy|Bulgaria}} decommissioned its only {{sclass|Ognevoy|destroyer|2}} in 1963. | * {{navy|Bulgaria}} decommissioned its only {{sclass|Ognevoy|destroyer|2}} in 1963. | ||
| Line 227: | Line 234: | ||
* {{naval|Philippines}} decommissioned its last {{sclass|Cannon|destroyer escort|2}} in 2018. | * {{naval|Philippines}} decommissioned its last {{sclass|Cannon|destroyer escort|2}} in 2018. | ||
* {{navy|Pakistan}} decommissioned its last {{sclass|Tariq|destroyer|2}} in 2023. | * {{navy|Pakistan}} decommissioned its last {{sclass|Tariq|destroyer|2}} in 2023. | ||
* {{navy|Thailand}} decommissioned its last {{sclass|Cannon|destroyer escort|2}} in 2025. | |||
==Future development== | ==Future development== | ||
*{{naval|Brazil}} plans to build 7,000-ton destroyers after the delivery of the new frigates, and TKMS presented to the Navy its most modern 7,200-ton MEKO A-400 air defense destroyer, an updated version of the German [[Baden-Württemberg-class frigate|F-125]]-class frigates. The similarities between the projects and the high rate of commonality between requirements were also crucial for the consortium's victory.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.defesanet.com.br/cct/noticia/31694/CCT-%E2%80%93-thyssenkrupp-Marine-Systems---Dr-Rolf-Wirtz--O-nosso-diferencial-e-a-Qualidade-do-Produto/|title=CCT – thyssenkrupp Marine Systems - Dr Rolf Wirtz: O nosso diferencial é a Qualidade do Produto|date=9 January 2019|website=Defesa Net|language=pt|access-date=16 May 2021|archive-date=25 November 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221125184529/https://www.defesanet.com.br/cct/noticia/31694/CCT-%E2%80%93-thyssenkrupp-Marine-Systems---Dr-Rolf-Wirtz--O-nosso-diferencial-e-a-Qualidade-do-Produto/|url-status=dead}}</ref> | *{{naval|Brazil}} plans to build 7,000-ton destroyers after the delivery of the new frigates, and TKMS presented to the Navy its most modern 7,200-ton MEKO A-400 air defense destroyer, an updated version of the German [[Baden-Württemberg-class frigate|F-125]]-class frigates. The similarities between the projects and the high rate of commonality between requirements were also crucial for the consortium's victory.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.defesanet.com.br/cct/noticia/31694/CCT-%E2%80%93-thyssenkrupp-Marine-Systems---Dr-Rolf-Wirtz--O-nosso-diferencial-e-a-Qualidade-do-Produto/|title=CCT – thyssenkrupp Marine Systems - Dr Rolf Wirtz: O nosso diferencial é a Qualidade do Produto|date=9 January 2019|website=Defesa Net|language=pt|access-date=16 May 2021|archive-date=25 November 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221125184529/https://www.defesanet.com.br/cct/noticia/31694/CCT-%E2%80%93-thyssenkrupp-Marine-Systems---Dr-Rolf-Wirtz--O-nosso-diferencial-e-a-Qualidade-do-Produto/|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
*{{navy|Canada}} is building up to 15 {{sclass2|River|destroyer|2||2030s}}s based on the Royal Navy's [[Type 26 | *{{navy|Canada}} is building up to 15 {{sclass2|River|destroyer|2||2030s}}s based on the Royal Navy's [[Type 26 Global Combat Ship]]. They will be more powerful than the Type 26, being fitted with the [[Aegis Combat System]] and long range surface-to-air and surface-to-surface missiles. | ||
*{{navy|China}} is adding six more [[Type 052D destroyer]] and sixteen more [[Type 055 destroyer]] class ships to its navy. | *{{navy|China}} is adding six more [[Type 052D destroyer]] and sixteen more [[Type 055 destroyer]] class ships to its navy. | ||
*{{navy|France}} is building five new [[Frégate de défense et d'intervention|''Amiral Ronarc'h''-class destroyers]] (classed as "first rank frigates" in the French Navy).<ref name="frenchnavy"/> | *{{navy|France}} is building five new [[Frégate de défense et d'intervention|''Amiral Ronarc'h''-class destroyers]] (classed as "first rank frigates" in the French Navy).<ref name="frenchnavy"/> | ||
*{{navy|Germany}}: Six multi-mission [[F126 frigate]]s which will have destroyer-size and corresponding capabilities (Length: 163 m, displacement: 10,550 tons)<ref>{{cite web|url= | *{{navy|Germany}}: Six multi-mission [[F126 frigate]]s which will have destroyer-size and corresponding capabilities (Length: 163 m, displacement: 10,550 tons)<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bundeswehr-journal.de/2017/zwei-weitere-mks-180-fuer-die-deutsche-marine/|title=Zwei weitere MKS 180 für die deutsche Marine – bundeswehr-journal|date=14 February 2017}}</ref> | ||
* {{navy|Greece}} has ordered three [[Frégate de défense et d'intervention]] (with an option on a fourth) from France. | * {{navy|Greece}} has ordered three [[Frégate de défense et d'intervention]] (with an option on a fourth) from France. | ||
*{{navy|India}} India has begun development of its [[Project 18-class destroyer|Project-18 Next Generation Destroyer]]s.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.mod.gov.in/sites/default/files/tpcr.pdf|title=Technology perspective}}</ref> | *{{navy|India}} India has begun development of its [[Project 18-class destroyer|Project-18 Next Generation Destroyer]]s.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.mod.gov.in/sites/default/files/tpcr.pdf|title=Technology perspective}}</ref> | ||
| Line 258: | Line 265: | ||
* {{USS|Stewart|DE-238}} in [[Galveston, Texas]], USA | * {{USS|Stewart|DE-238}} in [[Galveston, Texas]], USA | ||
* {{HMS|Cavalier|R73}} in [[Chatham, Kent]], UK | * {{HMS|Cavalier|R73}} in [[Chatham, Kent]], UK | ||
* [[HMCS Haida|HMCS '' | * [[HMCS Haida|HMCS ''Haida'']] in [[Hamilton, Ontario]], Canada | ||
* {{HMAS|Vampire|D11}} in [[Sydney, New South Wales]], Australia | * {{HMAS|Vampire|D11}} in [[Sydney, New South Wales]], Australia | ||
* [[French destroyer Maillé-Brézé (D627)|FS ''Maillé-Brézé'']] in [[Nantes]], [[Pays de la Loire]], France | * [[French destroyer Maillé-Brézé (D627)|FS ''Maillé-Brézé'']] in [[Nantes]], [[Pays de la Loire]], France | ||
| Line 284: | Line 291: | ||
* [[Chinese destroyer Zhuhai (1990)|CNS ''Zhuhai'']] in [[Chongqing]], China | * [[Chinese destroyer Zhuhai (1990)|CNS ''Zhuhai'']] in [[Chongqing]], China | ||
* [[USS McAnn|BNS ''Comandante Bauru'']] in [[Rio de Janeiro]], Brazil | * [[USS McAnn|BNS ''Comandante Bauru'']] in [[Rio de Janeiro]], Brazil | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Latest revision as of 13:54, 11 November 2025
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "other uses". Template:EngvarB Template:Infobox machine
In naval terminology, a destroyer is a fast, maneuverable, long-endurance warship intended to escort larger vessels in a fleet, convoy, or carrier battle group and defend them against a wide range of general threats. They were conceived in the late 19th century as a defense against torpedo boats, and by the time of the Russo-Japanese War in 1904, these "torpedo boat destroyers" (TBDs) were "large, swift, and powerfully armed torpedo boats designed to destroy other torpedo boats".[1] Although the term "destroyer" had been used interchangeably with "TBD" and "torpedo boat destroyer" by navies since 1892, the term "torpedo boat destroyer" had been generally shortened to simply "destroyer" by nearly all navies by the First World War.[2]
Before World War II, destroyers were light vessels with little endurance for unattended ocean operations;Script error: No such module "Unsubst". typically, a number of destroyers and a single destroyer tender operated together.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". After the war, destroyers grew in size. The American Template:Sclasss had a displacement of 2,200 tons, while the Template:Sclass has a displacement of up to 9,600 tons, a difference of nearly 340%. Moreover, the advent of guided missiles allowed destroyers to take on the surface-combatant roles previously filled by battleships and cruisers. This resulted in larger and more powerful guided missile destroyers more capable of independent operation.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
At the start of the 21st century, destroyers are the global standard for surface-combatant ships, with only two nations (the United States and Russia) officially operating the heavier cruisers, with no battleships or true battlecruisers remaining.Template:NoteTag Modern guided-missile destroyers are equivalent in tonnage but vastly superior in firepower to cruisers of the World War II era, and are capable of carrying nuclear-tipped cruise missiles. At Template:Convert long, a displacement of 9,200 tons, and with an armament of more than 90 missiles,[3] guided-missile destroyers such as the Arleigh Burke class are actually larger and more heavily armed than most previous ships classified as guided-missile cruisers. The Chinese Type 055 destroyer has been described as a cruiser in some US Navy reports due to its size and armament.[4]
Many NATO navies, such as the French, Spanish, Dutch, Danish, and German, use the term "frigate" for their destroyers, which leads to some confusion.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Origins
The emergence and development of the destroyer was related to the invention of the self-propelled torpedo in the 1860s. A navy now had the potential to destroy a superior enemy battle fleet using steam launches to fire torpedoes. Cheap, fast boats armed with torpedoes, called torpedo boats, were built and became a threat to large capital ships near enemy coasts. The first seagoing vessel designed to launch the self-propelled Whitehead torpedo was the 33-ton Template:HMS in 1876.[5] She was armed with two drop collars to launch these weapons; these were replaced in 1879 by a single torpedo tube in the bow. By the 1880s, the type had evolved into small ships of 50–100 tons, fast enough to evade enemy picket boats.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
At first, the threat of a torpedo-boat attack to a battle fleet was considered to exist only when at anchor, but as faster and longer-range torpedo boats and torpedoes were developed, the threat extended to cruising at sea. In response to this new threat, more heavily gunned picket boats called "catchers" were built, which were used to escort the battle fleet at sea. They needed significant seaworthiness and endurance to operate with the battle fleet, and as they inherently became larger, they became officially designated "torpedo-boat destroyers", and by the First World War were largely known as "destroyers" in English. The antitorpedo boat origin of this type of ship is retained in its name in other languages, including French (Script error: No such module "Lang".), Italian (Script error: No such module "Lang".), Portuguese (Script error: No such module "Lang".), Czech (Script error: No such module "Lang".), Greek (Template:Transliteration, Script error: No such module "Lang".), Dutch (Script error: No such module "Lang".) and, up until the Second World War, Polish (Script error: No such module "Lang"., now obsolete).[6]
Once destroyers became more than just catchers guarding an anchorage, they were recognized to be also ideal to take over the offensive role of torpedo boats themselves, so they were also fitted with torpedo tubes in addition to their antitorpedo-boat guns. At that time, and even into World War I, the only function of destroyers was to protect their own battle fleet from enemy torpedo attacks and to make such attacks on the battleships of the enemy. The task of escorting merchant convoys was still in the future.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Early designs
An important development came with the construction of HMS Swift in 1884, later redesignated TB 81.[7] This was a large (137 ton) torpedo boat with four 47 mm quick-firing guns and three torpedo tubes. At Template:Convert, while still not fast enough to engage enemy torpedo boats reliably, the ship at least had the armament to deal with them.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Another forerunner of the torpedo-boat destroyer (TBD) was the Japanese torpedo boat[8] Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". (Falcon), built in 1885.[9] Designed to Japanese specifications and ordered from the Isle of Dogs, London Yarrow shipyard in 1885, she was transported in parts to Japan, where she was assembled and launched in 1887. The Template:Convert long vessel was armed with four 1-pounder (37 mm) quick-firing guns and six torpedo tubes, reached Template:Convert, and at 203 tons, was the largest torpedo boat built to date. In her trials in 1889, Kotaka demonstrated that she could exceed the role of coastal defense, and was capable of accompanying larger warships on the high seas. The Yarrow shipyards, builder of the parts for Kotaka, "considered Japan to have effectively invented the destroyer".[10]
The German aviso Template:SMS, launched in 1886, was designed as a "Torpedojäger" (torpedo hunter), intended to screen the fleet against attacks by torpedo boats. The ship was significantly larger than torpedo boats of the period, displacing some Template:Cvt, with an armament of Template:Cvt guns and Template:Cvt Hotchkiss revolver cannon.[11]
Torpedo gunboat
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
The first vessel designed for the explicit purpose of hunting and destroying torpedo boats was the torpedo gunboat. Essentially very small cruisers, torpedo gunboats were equipped with torpedo tubes and an adequate gun armament, intended for hunting down smaller enemy boats. By the end of the 1890s, torpedo gunboats were made obsolete by their more successful contemporaries, the TBDs, which were much faster.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
The first example of this was Template:HMS, designed by Nathaniel Barnaby in 1885, and commissioned in response to the Russian War scare.[12] The gunboat was armed with torpedoes and designed for hunting and destroying smaller torpedo boats. Exactly Template:Convert long and Template:Convert in beam, she displaced 550 tons. Built of steel, Rattlesnake was unarmoured with the exception of a <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />3⁄4-inch protective deck. She was armed with a single 4-inch/25-pounder breech-loading gun, six 3-pounder QF guns and four Template:Convert torpedo tubes, arranged with two fixed tubes at the bow and a set of torpedo-dropping carriages on either side. Four torpedo reloads were carried.[12]
A number of torpedo gunboat classes followed, including the Grasshopper class, the Template:Sclass, the Template:Sclass, and the Template:Sclass – all built for the Royal Navy during the 1880s and the 1890s. In the 1880s, the Chilean Navy ordered the construction of two Template:Sclass torpedo gunboats from the British shipyard Laird Brothers, which specialized in the construction of this type of vessel. The novelty is that one of these Almirante Lynch-class torpedo boats managed to sink the ironclad Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". with self-propelled torpedoes in the Battle of Caldera Bay in 1891, thus surpassing its main function of hunting torpedo boats.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Fernando Villaamil, second officer of the Ministry of the Navy of Spain, designed his own torpedo gunboat to combat the threat from the torpedo boat.[13] He asked several British shipyards to submit proposals capable of fulfilling these specifications. In 1885, the Spanish Navy chose the design submitted by the shipyard of James and George Thomson of Clydebank. Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". (Destroyer in Spanish) was laid down at the end of the year, launched in 1886, and commissioned in 1887. Some authors considered her as the first destroyer ever built.[14][15]
She displaced 348 tons, and was the first warship[16] equipped with twin triple-expansion engines generating Template:Convert, for a maximum speed of Template:Convert,[17] which made her one of the faster ships in the world in 1888.[18] She was armed with one Template:Convert Spanish-designed Hontoria breech-loading gun,[19] four Template:Convert (6-pounder) Nordenfelt guns, two Template:Convert (3-pdr) Hotchkiss cannons and two Template:Convert Schwartzkopff torpedo tubes.[17] The ship carried three torpedoes per tube.[19] She carried a crew of 60.[17]
In terms of gunnery, dimensions, the specialised design and speed to chase torpedo boats, and her high-seas capabilities, Destructor was a highly influential precursor to the TBD.[20][19]
Development of the destroyer class
The first classes of ships to bear the formal designation TBD were the Template:Sclass of two ships and Template:Sclass of two ships of the Royal Navy.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Early torpedo gunboat designs lacked the range and speed to keep up with the fleet they were supposed to protect. In 1892, the Third Sea Lord, Rear Admiral John "Jacky" Fisher ordered the development of a new type of ships equipped with the then-novel water-tube boilers and quick-firing small-calibre guns. Six ships to the specifications circulated by the admiralty were ordered initially, comprising three different designs each produced by a different shipbuilder: Template:HMS and Template:HMS from John I. Thornycroft & Company, Template:HMS and Template:HMS from Yarrows, and Template:HMS and Template:HMS from Laird, Son & Company.[21]
These ships all featured a turtleback (i.e. rounded) forecastle that was characteristic of early British TBDs. Template:HMS and Template:HMS were both built by Thornycroft, displaced 260 tons (287.8 tons full load), and were 185 feet in length. They were armed with one 12-pounder gun and three 6-pounder guns, with one fixed 18-in torpedo tube in the bow plus two more torpedo tubes on a revolving mount abaft the two funnels. Later, the bow torpedo tube was removed and two more 6-pounder guns added, instead. They produced 4,200 hp from a pair of Thornycroft water-tube boilers, giving them a top speed of 27 knots, giving the range and speed to travel effectively with a battle fleet. In common with subsequent early Thornycroft boats, they had sloping sterns and double rudders.[22]
The French navy, an extensive user of torpedo boats, built its first TBD in 1899, with the Template:Sclass torpilleur d'escadre. The United States commissioned its first TBD, Template:USS, Destroyer No. 1, in 1902, and by 1906, 16 destroyers were in service with the US Navy.[23]
Subsequent improvements
Torpedo boat destroyer designs continued to evolve around the turn of the 20th century in several key ways. The first was the introduction of the steam turbine. The spectacular unauthorized demonstration of the turbine-powered Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". at the 1897 Spithead Navy Review, which, significantly, was of torpedo-boat size, prompted the Royal Navy to order a prototype turbine-powered destroyer, Template:HMS of 1899. This was the first turbine warship of any kind, and achieved a remarkable Template:Convert on sea trials. By 1910, the turbine had been widely adopted by all navies for their faster ships.[5]
The second development was the replacement of the torpedo boat-style turtleback foredeck by a raised forecastle for the new Template:Sclass2s built in 1903, which provided better sea-keeping and more space below deck.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
The first warship to use only fuel oil propulsion was the Royal Navy's TBD Template:HMS, after experiments in 1904, although the obsolescence of coal as a fuel in British warships was delayed by oil's availability.[24][25] Other navies also adopted oil, for instance the USN with the Template:Sclass of 1909. In spite of all this variety, destroyers adopted a largely similar pattern. The hull was long and narrow, with a relatively shallow draft. The bow was either raised in a forecastle or covered under a turtleback; underneath this were the crew spaces, extending <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄4 to <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄3 the way along the hull. Aft of the crew spaces was as much engine space as the technology of the time would allow - several boilers and engines or turbines. Above deck, one or more quick-firing guns were mounted in the bows, in front of the bridge; several more were mounted amidships and astern. Two tube mountings (later on, multiple mountings) were generally found amidships.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Between 1892 and 1914, destroyers became markedly larger; initially 275 tons with a length of Template:Convert for the Royal Navy's first Template:Sclass of TBDs,[26] up to the First World War with Template:Convert long destroyers displacing 1,000 tons was not unusual. Construction remained focused on putting the biggest possible engines into a small hull, though, resulting in a somewhat flimsy construction. Often, hulls were built of high-tensile steel[5] only Template:Cvt thick.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
By 1910, the steam-driven displacement (that is, not hydroplaning) torpedo boat had become redundant as a separate type. Germany, nevertheless, continued to build such boats until the end of World War I, although these were effectively small coastal destroyers. In fact, Germany never distinguished between the two types, giving them pennant numbers in the same series and never giving names to destroyers. Ultimately, the term "torpedo boat" came to be attached to a quite different vessel – the very fast-hydroplaning, motor-driven motor torpedo boat.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Early use and World War I
Navies originally built TBDrs to protect against torpedo boats, but admirals soon appreciated the flexibility of the fast, multipurpose vessels that resulted. Vice-Admiral Sir Baldwin Walker laid down destroyer duties for the Royal Navy:[27]
- Screening the advance of a fleet when hostile torpedo craft are about
- Searching a hostile coast along which a fleet might pass
- Watching an enemy's port for the purpose of harassing his torpedo craft and preventing their return
- Attacking an enemy fleet
Early destroyers were extremely cramped places to live, being "without a doubt magnificent fighting vessels... but unable to stand bad weather".[28] During the Russo-Japanese War in 1904, the commander of the Imperial Japanese Navy TBD Akatsuki[29][30][31] described "being in command of a destroyer for a long period, especially in wartime... is not very good for the health". Stating that he had originally been strong and healthy, he continued, "life on a destroyer in winter, with bad food, no comforts, would sap the powers of the strongest men in the long run. A destroyer is always more uncomfortable than the others, and rain, snow, and sea-water combine to make them damp; in fact, in bad weather, there is not a dry spot where one can rest for a moment."[32]
The Japanese destroyer-commander finished with, "Yesterday, I looked at myself in a mirror for a long time; I was disagreeably surprised to see my face thin, full of wrinkles, and as old as though I were 50. My clothes (uniform) cover nothing but a skeleton, and my bones are full of rheumatism."[32]
In 1898, the US Navy officially classified Template:USS, a Template:Convert long all steel vessel displacing 165 tons, as a torpedo boat, but her commander, LT. John C. Fremont, described her as "...a compact mass of machinery not meant to keep the sea nor to live in... as five-sevenths of the ship are taken up by machinery and fuel, whilst the remaining two-sevenths, fore and aft, are the crew's quarters; officers forward and the men placed aft. And even in those spaces are placed anchor engines, steering engines, steam pipes, etc. rendering them unbearably hot in tropical regions."[33]
Early combat
The TBD's first major use in combat came during the Japanese surprise attack on the Russian fleet anchored in Port Arthur at the opening of the Russo-Japanese War on 8 February 1904.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Three destroyer divisions attacked the Russian fleet in port, firing a total of 18 torpedoes, but only two Russian battleships, Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., and a protected cruiser, Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., were seriously damaged due to the proper deployment of torpedo nets. Tsesarevich, the Russian flagship, had her nets deployed, with at least four enemy torpedoes "hung up" in them,[34] and other warships were similarly saved from further damage by their nets.[35]
While capital-ship engagements were scarce in World War I, destroyer units engaged almost continually in raiding and patrol actions. The first shot of the war at sea was fired on 5 August 1914 by Template:HMS, one of the 3rd Destroyer Flotilla, in an engagement with the German auxiliary minelayer Template:SS.[36]
Destroyers were involved in the skirmishes that prompted the Battle of Heligoland Bight, and filled a range of roles in the Battle of Gallipoli, acting as troop transports and as fire-support vessels, as well as their fleet-screening role. Over 80 British destroyers and 60 German torpedo boats took part in the Battle of Jutland, which involved pitched small-boat actions between the main fleets, and several foolhardy attacks by unsupported destroyers on capital ships. Jutland also concluded with a messy night action between the German High Seas Fleet and part of the British destroyer screen.
The threat evolved by World War I with the development of the submarine, or U-boat. The submarine had the potential to hide from gunfire and close underwater to fire torpedoes. Early-war destroyers had the speed and armament to intercept submarines before they submerged, either by gunfire or by ramming. Destroyers also had a shallow enough draft that they were difficult to hit with torpedoes.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
The desire to attack submarines under water led to rapid destroyer evolution during the war. They were quickly equipped with strengthened bows for ramming, and depth charges and hydrophones for identifying submarine targets. The first submarine casualty credited to a destroyer was the German Template:SMU, rammed by Template:HMS on 29 October 1914. While U-19 was only damaged, the next month, Template:HMS successfully sank Template:SMU. The first depth-charge sinking was on 4 December 1916, when Template:SMU[37] was sunk by HMS Llewellyn.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
The submarine threat meant that many destroyers spent their time on antisubmarine patrol. Once Germany adopted unrestricted submarine warfare in January 1917, destroyers were called on to escort merchant convoys. US Navy destroyers were among the first American units to be dispatched upon the American entry to the war, and a squadron of Japanese destroyers even joined Allied patrols in the Mediterranean. Patrol duty was far from safe; of the 67 British destroyers lost in the war, collisions accounted for 18, while 12 were wrecked.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
At the end of the war, the state-of-the-art was represented by the British W class.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
1918–1945
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
The trend during World War I had been towards larger destroyers with heavier armaments. A number of opportunities to fire at capital ships had been missed during the war, because destroyers had expended all their torpedoes in an initial salvo. The British V and W classes of the late war had sought to address this by mounting six torpedo tubes in two triple mounts, instead of the four or two on earlier models. The V and W classes set the standard of destroyer building well into the 1920s.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Two Romanian destroyers Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters"., though, had the greatest firepower of all destroyers in the world throughout the first half of the 1920s. This was largely because, between their commissioning in 1920 and 1926, they retained the armament that they had while serving in the Italian Navy as scout cruisers (esploratori). When initially ordered by Romania in 1913, the Romanian specifications envisioned three 120 mm guns, a caliber which would eventually be adopted as the standard for future Italian destroyers. Armed with three 152 mm and four 76 mm guns after being completed as scout cruisers, the two warships were officially re-rated as destroyers by the Romanian Navy. The two Romanian warships were thus the destroyers with the greatest firepower in the world throughout much of the interwar period. As of 1939, when the Second World War started, their artillery, although changed, was still close to cruiser standards, amounting to nine heavy naval guns (five of 120 mm and four of 76 mm). In addition, they retained their two twin 457 mm torpedo tubes and two machine guns, plus the capacity to carry up to 50 mines.[38]
The next major innovation came with the Japanese Template:Sclass or "special type", designed in 1923 and delivered in 1928. The design was initially noted for its powerful armament of six 5-inch (127 mm) guns and three triple torpedo mounts. The second batch of the class gave the guns high-angle turrets for antiaircraft warfare, and the Template:Convert, oxygen-fueled Long Lance Type 93 torpedo. The later Template:Sclass of 1931 further improved the torpedo armament by storing its reload torpedoes close at hand in the superstructure, allowing reloading within 15 minutes.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Most other nations replied with similar larger ships. The US Template:Sclass adopted twin 5-inch (127 mm) guns, and the subsequent Template:Sclass and Template:Sclasses (the latter of 1934) increased the number of torpedo tubes to 12 and 16, respectively.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
In the Mediterranean, the Italian Navy's building of very fast light cruisers of the Template:Sclass prompted the French to produce exceptional destroyer designs. The French had long been keen on large destroyers, with their Template:Sclass of 1922 displacing over 2,000 tons and carrying 130 mm guns; a further three similar classes were produced around 1930. The Template:Sclass of 1935 carried five Template:Convert guns and nine torpedo tubes, but could achieve speeds of Template:Convert, which remains the record speed for a steamship and for any destroyer.[39] The Italians' own destroyers were almost as swift; most Italian designs of the 1930s were rated at over Template:Convert, while carrying torpedoes and either four or six 120 mm guns.
Germany started to build destroyers again during the 1930s as part of Hitler's rearmament program. The Germans were also fond of large destroyers, but while the initial Type 1934 displaced over 3,000 tons, their armament was equal to smaller vessels. This changed from the Type 1936 onwards, which mounted heavy Template:Convert guns. German destroyers also used innovative high-pressure steam machinery; while this should have helped their efficiency, it more often resulted in mechanical problems.
Once German and Japanese rearmament became clear, the British and American navies consciously focused on building destroyers that were smaller, but more numerous than those used by other nations. The British built a series of destroyers (the Template:Sclass2 to Template:Sclass2), which were about 1,400 tons standard displacement, and had four Template:Convert guns and eight torpedo tubes; the American Template:Sclass of 1938 was similar in size, but carried five Template:Convert guns and ten torpedo tubes. Realizing the need for heavier gun armament, the British built the Template:Sclass2 of 1936 (sometimes called Afridi after one of two lead ships). These ships displaced 1,850 tons and were armed with eight Template:Convert guns in four twin turrets and four torpedo tubes. These were followed by the J-class and L-class destroyers, with six Template:Convert guns in twin turrets and eight torpedo tubes.
Antisubmarine sensors included sonar (or ASDIC), although training in their use was indifferent. Antisubmarine weapons changed little, and ahead-throwing weapons, a need recognized in World War I, had made no progress.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Later combat
Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote".
During the 1920s and 1930s, destroyers were often deployed to areas of diplomatic tension or humanitarian disaster. British and American destroyers were common on the Chinese coast and rivers, even supplying landing parties to protect colonial interests. By World War II, the threat had evolved once again. Submarines were more effective, and aircraft had become important weapons of naval warfare; once again the early-war fleet destroyers were ill-equipped for combating these new targets. They were fitted with new light antiaircraft guns, radar, and forward-launched ASW weapons, in addition to their existing dual-purpose guns, depth charges, and torpedoes. Increasing size allowed improved internal arrangement of propulsion machinery with compartmentation, so ships were less likely to be sunk by a single hit.[5] In most cases torpedo and/or dual-purpose gun armament was reduced to accommodate new anti-air and anti-submarine weapons. By this time the destroyers had become large, multi-purpose vessels, expensive targets in their own right. As a result, casualties on destroyers were among the highest. In the US Navy, particularly in World War II, destroyers became known as tin cans due to their light armor compared to battleships and cruisers.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
The need for large numbers of antisubmarine ships led to the introduction of smaller and cheaper specialized antisubmarine warships called corvettes and frigates by the Royal Navy and destroyer escorts by the USN. A similar programme was belatedly started by the Japanese (see Template:Sclass). These ships had the size and displacement of the original TBDs from which the contemporary destroyer had evolved.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Post-World War II
Some conventional destroyers completed in the late 1940s and 1950s were built on wartime experience. These vessels were significantly larger than wartime ships and had fully automatic main guns, unit machinery, radar, sonar, and antisubmarine weapons, such as the squid mortar. Examples include the British Template:Sclass, US Template:Sclass, and the Soviet Template:Sclasss.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Some World War II–vintage ships were modernized for antisubmarine warfare, and to extend their service lives, to avoid having to build (expensive) brand-new ships. Examples include the US FRAM I programme and the British Type 15 frigates converted from fleet destroyers.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
The advent of surface-to-air missiles and surface-to-surface missiles, such as the Exocet, in the early 1960s changed naval warfare. Guided missile destroyers (DDG in the US Navy) were developed to carry these weapons and protect the fleet from air, submarine, and surface threats. Examples include the Soviet Template:Sclass, the British Template:Sclass2, and the US Template:Sclass.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
The 21st century destroyers tend to display features such as large, slab sides without complicated corners and crevices to keep the radar cross-section small, vertical launch systems to carry a large number of missiles at high readiness to fire, and helicopter flight decks and hangars.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Operators
- Template:Country data Australia operates three Template:Sclasss.
- Template:Country data China operates the Type 055 destroyer,[40] two Luyang I-class destroyers, six Luyang II-class destroyers, 24[41] Type 052D destroyer and two Luzhou-class destroyers. China also operates two Type 052 destroyers, one Type 051B destroyer and four Template:Sclass-class destroyers that are of older models. The Type 055 is considered to be a cruiser by NATO and the U.S. Department of Defense for its tonnage and capability matching that of the Template:Sclass.[42]
- Template:Naval (Taiwan) operates four Template:Sclasss, purchased from the United States.
- Template:Country data France operates two Template:Sclass2s and eight FREMM Multipurpose frigates of the Aquitaine-class variant. The French Navy does not use the term "destroyer" but rather "first-rate frigate" for these ship types, but they are marked with the NATO "D" hull code which places them in the destroyer type, as opposed to "F" for frigate.[43]
- Template:Country data Greece has HS Velos, a Template:Sclass, remains ceremonially in commission due to her historical significance.
- Template:Country data India operates four Template:Sclasss, three Template:Sclasss, three Template:Sclass, and three Template:Sclass destroyers.
- Template:Country data Italy operates two Template:Sclasss and two Orizzonte-class destroyers.
- Template:Country data Japan operates two Template:Sclass, two Template:Sclass, four Template:Sclass, two Template:Sclass, four Template:Sclass, five Template:Sclass, nine Template:Sclass, eight Template:Sclass, and two Template:Sclasss, along with six Template:Sclasss. Japan also operates two Template:Sclass and two Template:Sclass helicopter destroyers, internationally regarded as helicopter carriers.
- Template:Country data South Korea operates three Template:Sclass, six Template:Sclass and three Template:Sclass destroyers.
- Template:Country data North Korea operates a single Template:Sclass.[44]
- Template:Country data Poland has the Template:Sclass Template:ORP which remains ceremonially in commission due to her historical significance.
- Template:Country data Russia The Russian Navy operates two Template:Sclass and eight Template:Sclass destroyers.
- Template:Country data United Kingdom operates six Type 45 or Daring-class destroyers.
- Template:Naval operates 73 active Template:Sclass guided missile destroyers (DDGs) of a planned class of 92, and also has two active Template:Sclass destroyer of a planned class of three, all Template:As of.
Ships of equivalent to frigates
- Template:Country data Argentina operates three Template:Sclasss. This class's hull is MEKO 360H2 frigate.
- Template:Naval operates five Template:Sclasss. These ships are classified as destroyers by Iran, but internationally regarded as light frigates.
Ships of note classed as frigates
- Template:Country data Egypt operates the ENS Tahya Misr. This is one of the Aquitaine-class variants of the FREMM Multipurpose frigates purchased from France, which is classified as a destroyer by France.
- Template:Country data Germany operates three Template:Sclasss and four Template:Sclasss. These ships are officially classified as frigates by Germany, but regarded as destroyers internationally due to size and capability.
- Template:Country data Morocco operates the Mohammed VI. This is one of the Aquitaine-class variants of the FREMM Multipurpose frigates purchased from France, which is classified as a destroyer by France.
- Template:Naval operates four Template:Sclasss. These ships are classified as frigates by the Netherlands, but regarded as destroyers internationally due to size and capability.[45]
- Template:Naval operates four Template:Sclasss. These ships are subclasses of Spain's Alvaro de Bazan-class, and classified as frigates, but are regarded as destroyers due to their size and armament.[46]
- Template:Naval operates Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. This ship was classified as a destroyer from 1990 to 2001, when she was reclassified as a frigate. No official reason was given for this and there was no change in armament or capability, thus remaining in the destroyer type.
- Template:Country data Spain operates five Template:Sclasss. These ships are officially classified as a frigates by Spain, but due to their size and capabilities are regarded internationally as destroyers. They also served as the basis for Australia's Hobart-class destroyers.
Former operators
- Template:Country data Austria-Hungary lost its entire navy upon the Empire's collapse following World War I.
- Template:Country data Ukrainian People's Republic lost its entire navy upon its conquest by the Bolsheviks in 1921.
- Template:Country data Estonia sold its two Template:Sclass and Template:Sclasss to Peru in 1933.
- Template:Country data Manchukuo transferred its only Template:Sclass back to Japan in 1942.
- Template:Country data Bulgaria decommissioned its only Template:Sclass in 1963.
- Template:Country data Denmark decommissioned its last Template:Sclass2 in 1965.
- Template:Naval decommissioned its last Template:Sclass in 1967.
- Template:Country data Israel decommissioned its last Z-class destroyer in 1972.
- Template:Country data Dominican Republic decommissioned its H-class destroyer in 1972.
- Template:Naval transferred its remaining Template:Sclass to The Philippines in 1975 following the Fall of Saigon.
- Template:Country data South Africa decommissioned its last W-class destroyer in 1976.
- Template:Country data Yugoslavia decommissioned its only destroyer, Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". in 1980.
- Template:Naval decommissioned both its Template:Sclass and four Template:Sclasss in 1982 following defense reviews.
- Template:Naval decommissioned both its Template:Sclasss and its lone Template:Sclass in 1986.
- Template:Country data Uruguay decommissioned its last Template:Sclass in 1991.
- Template:Country data Tunisia lone Template:Sclass was destroyed by a fire in 1992.
- Template:Country data Ecuador decommissioned its lone Template:Sclass in 1994.
- Template:Country data Vietnam decommissioned its lone Template:Sclass in 1997.
- Template:Naval decommissioned its last Template:Sclass in 2000.
- Template:Country data Poland decommissioned its lone Template:Sclass2 in 2003.
- Template:Country data Greece decommissioned its last Template:Sclass in 2004.
- Template:Naval decommissioned its last Template:Sclasss in 2005.
- Template:Country data Chile decommissioned its last Template:Sclass2 in 2006.
- Template:Country data Peru decommissioned its last Template:Sclass in 2007.
- Template:Naval decommissioned its last Garcia-class destroyer escort in 2008.
- Template:Country data Venezuela decommissioned its last Template:Sclass in 2011.
- Template:Naval decommissioned its last Template:Sclass in 2015.
- Template:Country data Canada decommissioned its last Template:Sclass in 2017.
- Template:Naval decommissioned its last Template:Sclass in 2018.
- Template:Country data Pakistan decommissioned its last Template:Sclass in 2023.
- Template:Country data Thailand decommissioned its last Template:Sclass in 2025.
Future development
- Template:Naval plans to build 7,000-ton destroyers after the delivery of the new frigates, and TKMS presented to the Navy its most modern 7,200-ton MEKO A-400 air defense destroyer, an updated version of the German F-125-class frigates. The similarities between the projects and the high rate of commonality between requirements were also crucial for the consortium's victory.[47]
- Template:Country data Canada is building up to 15 Template:Sclass2s based on the Royal Navy's Type 26 Global Combat Ship. They will be more powerful than the Type 26, being fitted with the Aegis Combat System and long range surface-to-air and surface-to-surface missiles.
- Template:Country data China is adding six more Type 052D destroyer and sixteen more Type 055 destroyer class ships to its navy.
- Template:Country data France is building five new Amiral Ronarc'h-class destroyers (classed as "first rank frigates" in the French Navy).[43]
- Template:Country data Germany: Six multi-mission F126 frigates which will have destroyer-size and corresponding capabilities (Length: 163 m, displacement: 10,550 tons)[48]
- Template:Country data Greece has ordered three Frégate de défense et d'intervention (with an option on a fourth) from France.
- Template:Country data India India has begun development of its Project-18 Next Generation Destroyers.[49]
- Template:Naval is building 1-2 Template:Sclasss.
- Template:Country data Italy is researching development into their new DDX project to replace their Durand da le Penne-class destroyers.[50]
- Template:Country data Japan Is developing plans for its DDR Destroyer Revolution Project.
- Template:Country data South Korea has begun development of its KDX-IIA destroyers. These ships are to be a subclass of South Korea's Template:Sclasss. The first unit is expected to enter service in 2019. Additionally, Template:Sclasss are being built.
- Template:Country data Russia has begun development of its Template:Sclass2. Design work was ongoing as of 2020.
- Template:Naval is currently developing its TF2000-class destroyer as the largest part of the MILGEM project. A total of seven ships will be constructed and will specialise in anti-air warfare.
- Template:Country data United Kingdom is in the early stages of developing a Type 83 destroyer design after the unveiling of these plans in the 2021 defence white paper. The class is projected to replace the Type 45 destroyer fleet beginning in the latter 2030s.[51]
- Template:Naval has 19 additional Arleigh Burke destroyers planned or under construction. The new ships will be the upgraded "flight III" version.[52] The United States has also started development of its DDG(X) next-generation destroyer project.[53] Construction of the first ship is expected to start in 2028.
Destroyers in preservation
Many historic destroyers are preserved as museum ships
- Template:USS in Buffalo, New York, USA
- Template:USS in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
- Template:USS in Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Template:USS in Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Template:USS in Bay City, Michigan, USA
- Template:USS in Bremerton, Washington, USA
- Template:USS in Albany, New York, USA
- Template:USS in Galveston, Texas, USA
- Template:HMS in Chatham, Kent, UK
- HMCS Haida in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Template:HMAS in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- FS Maillé-Brézé in Nantes, Pays de la Loire, France
- FGS Mölders in Wilhelmshaven, Lower Saxony, Germany
- ORP Błyskawica in Gdynia, Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland
- HSwMS Småland in Gothenburg, Västergötland, Sweden
- HS Velos in Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia, Greece
- TCG Gayret in Izmit, Kocaeli Province, Turkey
- RFS Bespokoyny in Kronshtadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- RFS Smetlivy in Sevastopol, Crimea, occupied region of Ukraine.
- ROKS Jeong Ju in Dangjin, South Chungcheong Province, South Korea
- ROCS Te Yang in Tainan City, Tainan County, Taiwan
- CNS Anshan in Qingdao, Shandong, China
- CNS Changchun in Rushan, Shandong, China
- CNS Taiyuan in Zhongshan, Dalian, China
- CNS Chongqing in Tianjin, China
- CNS Dalian in Liugong Island, Shandong, China
- CNS Jinan in Qingdao, Shandong, China
- CNS Nanchang in Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- CNS Nanjing in Shipu, Xiangshan County, Zhejiang, China
- CNS Nanning in Fangchenggang, Guangxi, China
- CNS Xi'an in Wuhan, Hubei, China
- CNS Xining in Taizhou, Jiangsu, China
- CNS Yinchuan in Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
- CNS Zhuhai in Chongqing, China
- BNS Comandante Bauru in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
See also
- List of destroyer classes
- United States Navy 1975 ship reclassification
- Bombardment of Cherbourg
- List of destroyers of the Second World War
Notes
References
Further reading
- Evans, David C. Kaigun: Strategy, Tactics, and Technology in the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1887–1941, Mark R. Peattie. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, Maryland Template:ISBN
- Gardiner, Robert (Editor). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships (1860–1905): Naval Institute Press, 1985.
- Gove, Philip Babock (Editor in Chief). Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged. (2002) Merriam-Webster Inc., Publishers, Massachusetts, US.
- Grant, R. Captain. Before Port Arthur in a Destroyer; The Personal Diary of a Japanese Naval Officer. London, John Murray; first and second editions published in 1907.
- Howe, Christopher. Origins of Japanese Trade Supremacy: Development and Technology in Asia from 1540 to the Pacific War, The University of Chicago Press, Template:ISBN
- Jentschura, Hansgeorg. Warships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1869–1945. United States Naval Institute, Annapolis, Maryland, 1977. Template:ISBN.
- Lyon, David, The First Destroyers. Chatham Publishing, 1 & 2 Faulkner's Alley, Cowcross St. London, Great Britain; 1996. Template:ISBN.
- Sanders, Michael S. (2001) The Yard: Building a Destroyer at the Bath Iron Works, HarperCollins, Template:ISBN
- Simpson, Richard V. Building The Mosquito Fleet, The US Navy's First Torpedo Boats. Arcadia Publishing, (2001); Charleston, South Carolina, US. Template:ISBN.
- Preston, Antony. Destroyers, Bison Books (London) 1977. Template:ISBN
- Van der Vat, Dan. The Atlantic Campaign.
- Navy Designates Next-Generation Zumwalt Destroyer
External links
Template:Sister project Template:Commons category-inline
Template:Warship types of the 19th & 20th centuries Template:Authority control
- ↑ Gove p. 2412
- ↑ Lyon pp. 8, 9
- ↑ Northrop Grumman christened its 28th Aegis guided missile destroyer, William P. Lawrence (DDG 110) April 19, 2010. Retrieved August 29, 2014.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Lyon p. 8
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Jentschura p. 126
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ "Under the influence of Fernando Villamil (1845–1898), Spain in 1886 produced the first torpedo boat destroyer." Kern, Robert & Dodge, Meredith: Historical dictionary of modern Spain, 1700–1988. Greenwood Press, 1990, page 361. Template:ISBN
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Illustrated Naval and Military Magazine: A monthly journal devoted to all subjects connected with Her Majesty's land and sea forces, 1888, v 9, page 280
- ↑ a b c Fitzsimmons, Bernard: The Illustrated encyclopedia of 20th century weapons and warfare. Columbia House, 1978, v. 8, page 835
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Simpson p. 151
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Lyon p. 53
- ↑ Brett, Bernard: "History of World Sea Power", Deans International (London) 1985. Template:ISBN
- ↑ Grant p. 136
- ↑ Grant, image, frontispiece
- ↑ Lyon p. 58
- ↑ Jentschura p. 132
- ↑ a b Grant p. 102, 103
- ↑ Simpson p. 100
- ↑ Grant p. 42
- ↑ Grant p. 33, 34, 40
- ↑ The Königin Luise was abandoned and scuttled by her crew, but the British patrol later passed through the area she had mined and a cruiser was damaged and abandoned.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Brassey's Annual: The Armed Forces Year-book, Praeger Publishers, 1939, p. 276
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".