Ariane 5: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 15:28, 18 November 2025

Template:Short description Template:Use British English Template:Use dmy dates Script error: No such module "infobox".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Ariane 5 is a retired European heavy-lift space launch vehicle operated by Arianespace for the European Space Agency (ESA). It was launched from the Guiana Space Centre (CSG) in French Guiana. It was used to deliver payloads into geostationary transfer orbit (GTO), low Earth orbit (LEO) or further into space. The launch vehicle had a streak of 82 consecutive successful launches between 9 April 2003 and 12 December 2017. In development since 2014,^[1] Ariane 6, a direct successor system was first launched in 2024.^[2]

The system was designed as an expendable launch vehicle by the Centre national d'études spatiales (CNES), the French government's space agency, in cooperation with various European partners. Despite not being a direct derivative of its predecessor launch vehicle program, it was classified as part of the Ariane rocket family. Aérospatiale, and later ArianeGroup, was the prime contractor for the manufacturing of the vehicles, leading a multi-country consortium of other European contractors. Ariane 5 was originally intended to launch the Hermes spacecraft, and thus it was rated for human space launches.

Since its first launch, Ariane 5 was refined in successive versions: "G", "G+", "GS", "ECA", and finally, "ES". The system had a commonly used dual-launch capability, where up to two large geostationary belt communication satellites can be mounted using a SYLDA (Système de Lancement Double Ariane, meaning "Ariane Double-Launch System") carrier system. Up to three, somewhat smaller, main satellites are possible depending on size using a SPELTRA (Structure Porteuse Externe Lancement Triple Ariane, which translates to "Ariane Triple-Launch External Carrier Structure"). Up to eight secondary payloads, usually small experiment packages or minisatellites, could be carried with an ASAP (Ariane Structure for Auxiliary Payloads) platform.

Following the launch of 15 August 2020, Arianespace signed the contracts for the last eight Ariane 5 launches, before it was succeeded by the new Ariane 6 launcher, according to Daniel Neuenschwander, director of space transportation at the ESA.^[3]^[2] Ariane 5 flew its final mission on 5 July 2023.^[4]

Vehicle description

Cryogenic main stage

File:SNECMA Vulcain II.jpg

Vulcain engine

Ariane 5's cryogenic H173 main stage (H158 for Ariane 5G, G+, and GS) was called the EPC (Étage Principal Cryotechnique — Cryotechnic Main Stage). It consisted of a Template:Cvt diameter by Template:Cvt high tank with two compartments, one for liquid oxygen and one for liquid hydrogen, and a Vulcain 2 engine at the base with a vacuum thrust of Template:Cvt. The H173 EPC weighed about Template:Cvt, including Template:Cvt of propellant.^[5] After the main cryogenic stage runs out of fuel, it re-entered the atmosphere for an ocean splashdown.

Solid boosters

Attached to the sides were two P241 (P238 for Ariane 5G and G+) solid rocket boosters (SRBs or EAPs from the French Étages d'Accélération à Poudre — Template:Literal translation), each weighing about Template:Cvt full and delivering a thrust of about Template:Cvt. They were fueled by a mix of ammonium perchlorate (68%) and aluminium fuel (18%) and HTPB (14%). They each burned for 130 seconds before being dropped into the ocean. The SRBs were usually allowed to sink to the bottom of the ocean, but, like the Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters, they could be recovered with parachutes, and this was occasionally done for post-flight analysis. Unlike Space Shuttle SRBs, Ariane 5 boosters were not reused. The most recent attempt was for the first Ariane 5 ECA mission in 2009. One of the two boosters was successfully recovered and returned to the Guiana Space Center for analysis.^[6] Prior to that mission, the last such recovery and testing was done in 2003.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

The French M51 submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) shared a substantial amount of technology with these boosters.^[7]

In February 2000, the suspected nose cone of an Ariane 5 booster washed ashore on the South Texas coast, and was recovered by beachcombers before the government could get to it.^[8]

Second stage

File:Ariane 5 EPS Upper Stage.jpg

EPS Upper Stage used on Ariane 5ES

The second stage was on top of the main stage and below the payload. The original Ariane — Ariane 5G — used the EPS (Étage à Propergols Stockables — Storable Propellant Stage), which was fueled by monomethylhydrazine (MMH) and nitrogen tetroxide, containing Template:Cvt of storable propellant. The EPS was subsequently improved for use on the Ariane 5G+, GS, and ES.

The EPS upper stage was capable of repeated ignition, first demonstrated during flight V26 which was launched on 5 October 2007. This was purely to test the engine, and occurred after the payloads had been deployed. The first operational use of restart capability as part of a mission came on 9 March 2008, when two burns were made to deploy the first Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) into a circular parking orbit, followed by a third burn after ATV deployment to de-orbit the stage. This procedure was repeated for all subsequent ATV flights.

Ariane 5ECA used the ESC (Étage Supérieur Cryotechnique — Cryogenic Upper Stage), which was fueled by liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. The ESC used the HM7B engine previously used in the Ariane 4 third stage. The propellent load of 14.7 tonne allowed the engine to burn for 945 seconds while providing 6.5 tonne of thrust. The ESC provided roll control during powered flight and full attitude control during payload separation using hydrogen gas thrusters. Oxygen gas thrusters allowed longitudinal acceleration after engine cutoff. The flight assembly included the Vehicle Equipment Bay, with flight electronics for the entire rocket, and the payload interface and structural support.^[9]^[10]

Fairing

The payload and all upper stages were covered at launch by a fairing for aerodynamic stability and protection from heating during supersonic flight and acoustic loads. It was jettisoned once sufficient altitude has been reached, typically above Template:Convert. It was made by Ruag Space and since flight VA-238 it was composed of 4 panels.^[11]Template:Clarify

Launch preparations

With the exception of the solid rocket boosters (for safety and cost reasons), the components were assembled in Europe, and then shipped to French Guyana by boat. Once at Kourou, the components were assembled in the Launcher Integration Building (BIL), then transfered into the Final Assembly Building (BAF) for mating the payload and fairing, before the completed rocket was transfered to the Launch Zone (ZL) for fueling and launch. ^[12]

Variants

Variant	Description
G	The original version was dubbed Ariane 5G (Generic) and had a launch mass of Template:Cvt. Its payload capability to geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) was Template:Cvt for a single satellite or Template:Cvt for dual launches. It flew 16 times with one failure and two partial failures.^[13]
G+	The Ariane 5G+ had an improved EPS second stage, with a GTO capacity of Template:Cvt for a single payload or Template:Cvt for two. It flew three times in 2004, with no failures.^[14]
GS	At the time of the failure of the first Ariane 5ECA flight in 2002, all Ariane 5 launchers in production were ECA versions. Some of the ECA cores were modified to use the original Vulcain engine and tank volumes while the failure was investigated; these vehicles were designated Ariane 5GS. The GS used the improved EAP boosters of the ECA variant and the improved EPS of the G+ variant, but the increased mass of the modified ECA core compared to the G and G+ core resulted in slightly reduced payload capacity.^[15] Ariane 5GS could carry a single payload of Template:Cvt or a dual payload of Template:Cvt to GTO. The Ariane 5GS flew 6 times from 2005 to 2009 with no failures.^[16]
ECA	The Ariane 5ECA (Evolution Cryotechnique type A), first flown in 2002 but ending in failure, and first successfully flown in 2005, used an improved Vulcain 2 first-stage engine with a longer, more efficient nozzle with a more efficient flow cycle and denser propellant ratio. The new ratio required length modifications to the first-stage tanks. The EPS second stage was replaced by the ESC-A (Etage Supérieur Cryogénique-A), which had a dry weight of Template:Cvt and was powered by an HM-7B engine burning Template:Cvt of cryogenic propellant. The ESC-A used the liquid oxygen tank and lower structure from the Ariane 4's H10 third stage, mated to a new liquid hydrogen tank. Additionally, the EAP booster casings were lightened with new welds and carry more propellant. The Ariane 5ECA started with a GTO launch capacity of Template:Cvt for dual payloads or Template:Cvt for a single payload.^[17] Later batches: PB+ and PC, increased the max payload to GTO to Template:Cvt.^[18] The Ariane 5 ECA flew 72 times from 2002 to 2019 with one failure and one partial failure.
ECA+	The Ariane 5ECA+ (Evolution Cryotechnique type A+), first successfully flown in 2019, used an improved ESC-D (Etage Supérieur Cryogénique-D).^[19]
ES	The Ariane 5ES (Evolution Storable) had an estimated LEO launch capacity of Template:Cvt. It included all the performance improvements of Ariane 5ECA core and boosters but replaced the ESC-A second stage with the restartable EPS used on Ariane 5GS variants. It was used to launch the Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) into a Template:Cvt circular low Earth orbit inclined at 51.6° and was used 3 times to launch 4 Galileo navigation satellites at a time directly into their operational orbit.^[20] The Ariane 5ES flew 8 times from 2008 to 2018 with no failures.
ME (cancelled)	The Ariane 5ME (Mid-life Evolution) was under development until December 2014 when funding was cut in favour of developing Ariane 6. Last activities for Ariane 5ME were completed at the end of 2015. Vinci upper stage engine, under development for the 5ME, transferred to Ariane 6.

Launch pricing and market competition

Template:Asof, the Ariane 5 commercial launch price for launching a "midsize satellite in the lower position" was approximately €50 million,^[21] competing for commercial launches in an increasingly competitive market.

The heavier satellite was launched in the upper position on a typical dual-satellite Ariane 5 launch and was priced higher than the lower satellite,^[22]Template:Clarify on the order of €90 million Template:Asof.^[23]^[24]

Total launch price of an Ariane 5 – which could transport up to two satellites to space, one in the "upper" and one in the "lower" positions – was around €150 million Template:As of.^[24]

Cancelled plans for future developments

File:Belgian components for the Ariane 5 rocket.jpg

Belgian components produced for the Ariane 5 European heavy-lift launch vehicle explained

Ariane 5 ME

The Ariane 5 ME (Mid-life Evolution) was in development into early 2015, and was seen as a stopgap between Ariane 5ECA/Ariane 5ES and the new Ariane 6. With first flight planned for 2018, it would have become ESA's principal launcher until the arrival of the new Ariane 6 version. ESA halted funding for the development of Ariane 5ME in late 2014 to prioritize development of Ariane 6.^[25]

The Ariane 5ME was to use a new upper stage, with increased propellant volume, powered by the new Vinci engine. Unlike the HM-7B engine, it was to be able to restart several times, allowing for complex orbital maneuvers such as insertion of two satellites into different orbits, direct insertion into geosynchronous orbit, planetary exploration missions, and guaranteed upper stage deorbiting or insertion into graveyard orbit.^[26]^[27] The launcher was also to include a lengthened fairing up to Template:Cvt and a new dual launch system to accommodate larger satellites. Compared to an Ariane 5ECA model, the payload to GTO was to increase by 15% to Template:Cvt and the cost-per-kilogram of each launch was projected to decline by 20%.^[26]

Development

Originally known as the Ariane 5ECB, Ariane 5ME was to have its first flight in 2006. However, the failure of the first ECA flight in 2002, combined with a deteriorating satellite industry, caused ESA to cancel development in 2003.^[28] Development of the Vinci engine continued, though at a lower pace. The ESA Council of Ministers agreed to fund development of the new upper stage in November 2008.^[29]

In 2009, EADS Astrium was awarded a €200 million contract,^[30] and on 10 April 2012 received another €112 million contract to continue development of the Ariane 5ME ^[31] with total development effort expected to cost €1 billion.^[32]

On 21 November 2012, ESA agreed to continue with the Ariane 5ME to meet the challenge of lower priced competitors. It was agreed the Vinci upper stage would also be used as the second stage of a new Ariane 6, and further commonality would be sought.^[27] Ariane 5ME qualification flight was scheduled for mid-2018, followed by gradual introduction into service.^[26]

On 2 December 2014, ESA decided to stop funding the development of Ariane 5ME and instead focus on Ariane 6, which was expected to have a lower cost per launch and allow more flexibility in the payloads (using two or four P120C solid boosters depending on total payload mass).^[25]

Solid propellant stage

Work on the Ariane 5 EAP motors was continued in the Vega programme. The Vega 1st stage engine – the P80 engine – was a shorter derivation of the EAP.^[33] The P80 booster casing was made of filament wound graphite epoxy, much lighter than the current stainless steel casing. A new composite steerable nozzle was developed while new thermal insulation material and a narrower throat improved the expansion ratio and subsequently the overall performance. Additionally, the nozzle had electromechanical actuators which replaced the heavier hydraulic ones used for thrust vector control.

These developments could maybe have made their way back into the Ariane programme, but this was most likely an inference based on early blueprints of the Ariane 6 having a central P80 booster and 2-4 around the main one.^[27]^[34] The incorporation of the ESC-B with the improvements to the solid motor casing and an uprated Vulcain engine would have delivered Template:Cvt to LEO. This would have been developed for any lunar missions but the performance of such a design might not have been possible if the higher Max-Q for the launch of this launch vehicle would have posed a constraint on the mass delivered to orbit.^[35]

Ariane 6

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

The design brief of the next generation launch vehicle Ariane 6 called for a lower-cost and smaller launch vehicle capable of launching a single satellite of up to Template:Cvt to GTO.^[36] However, after several permutations the finalized design was nearly identical in performance to the Ariane 5,^[37] focusing instead on lowering fabrication costs and launch prices. Template:Asof, Ariane 6 was projected to be launched for about €70 million per flight, about half of the Ariane 5 price.^[36]

Initially development of Ariane 6 was projected to cost €3.6 billion.^[38] In 2017, the ESA set 16 July 2020 as the deadline for the first flight.^[39] The Ariane 6 successfully completed its maiden flight on 9 July 2024.

Notable launches

File:Ariane 5 10 2007.ogv

Launch of the 34th Ariane 5 from Guiana Space Centre

Ariane 5's first test flight (Ariane 5 Flight 501) on 4 June 1996 failed, with the rocket self-destructing 37 seconds after launch because of a malfunction in the control software.^[40] A data conversion from 64-bit floating-point value to 16-bit signed integer value to be stored in a variable representing horizontal bias caused a processor trap (operand error)^[41] because the floating-point value was too large to be represented by a 16-bit signed integer. The software had been written for the Ariane 4 where efficiency considerations (the computer running the software had an 80% maximum workload requirement^[41]) led to four variables being protected with a handler while three others, including the horizontal bias variable, were left unprotected because it was thought that they were "physically limited or that there was a large margin of safety".^[41] The software, written in Ada, was included in the Ariane 5 through the reuse of an entire Ariane 4 subsystem despite the fact that the particular software containing the bug, which was just a part of the subsystem, was not required by the Ariane 5 because it has a different preparation sequence than the Ariane 4.^[41]

The second test flight (L502, on 30 October 1997) was a partial failure. The Vulcain nozzle caused a roll problem, leading to premature shutdown of the core stage. The upper stage operated successfully, but it could not reach the intended orbit. A subsequent test flight (L503, on 21 October 1998) proved successful and the first commercial launch (L504) occurred on 10 December 1999 with the launch of the XMM-Newton X-ray observatory satellite.^[42]

Another partial failure occurred on 12 July 2001, with the delivery of two satellites into an incorrect orbit, at only half the height of the intended GTO. The ESA Artemis telecommunications satellite was able to reach its intended orbit on 31 January 2003, through the use of its experimental ion propulsion system.

The next launch did not occur until 1 March 2002, when the Envisat environmental satellite successfully reached an orbit of Template:Cvt above the Earth in the 11th launch. At Template:Cvt, it was the heaviest single payload until the launch of the first ATV on 9 March 2008, at Template:Cvt.

The first launch of the ECA variant on 11 December 2002 ended in failure when a main booster problem caused the rocket to veer off-course, forcing its self-destruction three minutes into the flight. Its payload of two communications satellites (STENTOR and Hot Bird 7), valued at about €630 million, was lost in the Atlantic Ocean. The fault was determined to have been caused by a leak in coolant pipes allowing the nozzle to overheat. After this failure, Arianespace SA delayed the expected January 2003 launch for the Rosetta mission to 26 February 2004, but this was again delayed to early March 2004 due to a minor fault in the foam that protects the cryogenic tanks on the Ariane 5. The failure of the first ECA launch was the last failure of an Ariane 5 until flight 241 in January 2018.

On 27 September 2003, the last Ariane 5G boosted three satellites (including the first European lunar probe, SMART-1), in Flight 162. On 18 July 2004, an Ariane 5G+ boosted what was at the time the heaviest telecommunication satellite ever, Anik F2, weighing almost Template:Cvt.

The first successful launch of the Ariane 5ECA took place on 12 February 2005. The payload consisted of the XTAR-EUR military communications satellite, a 'SLOSHSAT' small scientific satellite and a MaqSat B2 payload simulator. The launch had been scheduled for October 2004, but additional testing and a military launch (of a Helios 2A observation satellite) delayed the attempt.

On 11 August 2005, the first Ariane 5GS (featuring the Ariane 5ECA's improved solid motors) boosted Thaicom 4, the heaviest telecommunications satellite to date at Template:Cvt,^[43] into orbit.

On 16 November 2005, the third Ariane 5ECA launch (the second successful ECA launch) took place. It carried a dual payload consisting of Spaceway F2 for DirecTV and Telkom-2 for PT Telekomunikasi of Indonesia. This was the launch vehicle's heaviest dual payload to date, at more than Template:Cvt.

On 27 May 2006, an Ariane 5ECA launch vehicle set a new commercial payload lifting record of Template:Cvt. The dual-payload consisted of the Thaicom 5 and Satmex 6 satellites.^[44]

On 4 May 2007, the Ariane 5ECA set another new commercial record, lifting into transfer orbit the Astra 1L and Galaxy 17 communication satellites with a combined weight of Template:Cvt, and a total payload weight of Template:Cvt.^[45] This record was again broken by another Ariane 5ECA, launching the Skynet 5B and Star One C1 satellites, on 11 November 2007. The total payload weight for this launch was of Template:Cvt.^[46]

On 9 March 2008, the first Ariane 5ES-ATV was launched to deliver the first ATV called Jules Verne to the International Space Station (ISS). The ATV was the heaviest payload ever launched by a European launch vehicle, providing supplies to the space station with necessary propellant, water, air and dry cargo. This was the first operational Ariane mission which involved an engine restart in the upper stage. The ES-ATV Aestus EPS upper stage was restartable while the ECA HM7-B engine was not.

On 1 July 2009, an Ariane 5ECA launched TerreStar-1 (now EchoStar T1), which was then, at Template:Cvt, the largest and most massive commercial telecommunication satellite ever built at that time^[47] until being overtaken by Telstar 19 Vantage, at Template:Cvt, launched aboard Falcon 9. The satellite was launched into a lower-energy orbit than a usual GTO, with its initial apogee at roughly Template:Cvt.^[48]

On 28 October 2010, an Ariane 5ECA launched Eutelsat's W3B (part of its W Series of satellites) and Broadcasting Satellite System Corporation (B-SAT)'s BSAT-3b satellites into orbit. But the W3B satellite failed to operate shortly after the successful launch and was written off as a total loss due to an oxidizer leak in the satellite's main propulsion system.^[49] The BSAT-3b satellite, however, is operating normally.^[50]

The VA253 launch on 15 August 2020 introduced two small changes that increased lift capacity by about Template:Cvt; these were a lighter avionics and guidance-equipment bay, and modified pressure vents on the payload fairing, which were required for the subsequent launch of the James Webb Space Telescope. It also debuted a location system using Galileo navigation satellites.^[51]

On 25 December 2021, VA256 launched the James Webb Space Telescope towards a Sun–Earth L₂ halo orbit.^[52] The precision of trajectory following launch led to fuel savings credited with potentially doubling the lifetime of the telescope by leaving more hydrazine propellant on board for station-keeping than was expected.^[52]^[53] According to Rudiger Albat, the program manager for Ariane 5, efforts had been made to select components for this flight that had performed especially well during pre-flight testing, including "one of the best Vulcain engines that we've ever built."^[53]

GTO payload weight records

On 22 April 2011, the Ariane 5ECA flight VA-201 broke a commercial record, lifting Yahsat 1A and Intelsat New Dawn with a total payload weight of Template:Cvt to transfer orbit.^[54] This record was later broken again during the launch of Ariane 5ECA flight VA-208 on 2 August 2012, lifting a total of Template:Cvt into the planned geosynchronous transfer orbit,^[55] which was broken again 6 months later on flight VA-212 with Template:Cvt sent towards geosynchronous transfer orbit.^[56] In June 2016, the GTO record was raised to Template:Cvt,^[57] on the first rocket in history that carried a satellite dedicated to financial institutions.^[58] The payload record was pushed a further Template:Cvt, up to Template:Cvt on 24 August 2016 with the launch of Intelsat 33e and Intelsat 36.^[59] On 1 June 2017, the payload record was broken again to Template:Cvt carrying ViaSat-2 and Eutelsat-172B.^[60] In 2021 VA-255 put 11,210 kg into GTO.

VA241 anomaly

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

On 25 January 2018, an Ariane 5ECA launched SES-14 and Al Yah 3 satellites. About 9 minutes and 28 seconds after launch, a telemetry loss occurred between the launch vehicle and the ground controllers. It was later confirmed, about 1 hour and 20 minutes after launch, that both satellites were successfully separated from the upper stage and were in contact with their respective ground controllers,^[61] but that their orbital inclinations were incorrect as the guidance systems might have been compromised. Therefore, both satellites conducted orbital procedures, extending commissioning time.^[62] SES-14 needed about 8 weeks longer than planned commissioning time, meaning that entry into service was reported early September instead of July.^[63] Nevertheless, SES-14 is still expected to be able to meet the designed lifetime. This satellite was originally to be launched with more propellant reserve on a Falcon 9 launch vehicle since the Falcon 9, in this specific case, was intended to deploy this satellite into a high inclination orbit that would require more work from the satellite to reach its final geostationary orbit.^[64] The Al Yah 3 was also confirmed healthy after more than 12 hours without further statement, and like SES-14, Al Yah 3's maneuvering plan was also revised to still fulfill the original mission.^[65] As of 16 February 2018, Al Yah 3 was approaching the intended geostationary orbit, after series of recovery maneuvers had been performed.^[66] The investigation showed that invalid inertial units' azimuth value had sent the vehicle 17° off course but to the intended altitude, they had been programmed for the standard geostationary transfer orbit of 90° when the payloads were intended to be 70° for this supersynchronous transfer orbit mission, 20° off norme.^[67] This mission anomaly ended the 82 consecutive launch success streak from 2003.^[68]

Launch history

Launch statistics

Ariane 5 launch vehicles had accumulated 117 launches, 112 of which were successful, yielding a Script error: No such module "Percentage". success rate. Between April 2003 and December 2017, Ariane 5 flew 83 consecutive missions without failure, but the launch vehicle suffered a partial failure in January 2018.^[69]

Rocket configurations

Script error: No such module "Chart".

Launch outcomes

Script error: No such module "Chart".

List of launches

Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote". All launches are from Guiana Space Centre, ELA-3.

Template:Sticky header

#	Flight no.	Date Time (UTC)	Rocket type Serial no.	Payload	Total payload mass (including launch adapters and SYLDA)	Orbit	Customers	Launch outcome
1	V-88^[70]	4 June 1996 12:34	G 501	Cluster				Template:Failure
1	V-88^[70]
2	V-101	30 October 1997 13:43	G 502	MaqSat-H, TEAMSAT, MaqSat-B, YES				Template:Partial failure^[71]
2	V-101
3	V-112	21 October 1998 16:37	G 503	MaqSat 3, ARD	~6,800 kg	GTO		Template:Success
3	V-112
4	V-119	10 December 1999 14:32	G 504	XMM-Newton	3,800 kg	HEO		Template:Success
4	V-119
5	V-128	21 March 2000 23:28^[72]	G 505	INSAT-3B AsiaStar	~5,800 kg	GTO		Template:Success
5	V-128
6	V-130	14 September 2000 22:54^[72]	G 506	Astra 2B GE-7	~4,700 kg	GTO		Template:Success
6	V-130
7	V-135	16 November 2000 01:07^[72]	G 507	PanAmSat-1R Amsat-P3D STRV 1C STRV 1D	~6,600 kg	GTO		Template:Success
7	V-135
8	V-138	20 December 2000 00:26^[72]	G 508	Astra 2D GE-8 LDREX	~4,700 kg	GTO		Template:Success
8	V-138
9	V-140	8 March 2001 22:51^[72]	G 509	Eurobird-1 BSAT-2a	~5,400 kg	GTO		Template:Success
9	V-140
10	V-142	12 July 2001 21:58^[72]	G 510	Artemis BSAT-2b	~5,400 kg	GTO (planned) MEO (achieved)		Template:Partial failure
10	V-142	Upper stage underperformed, payloads were placed in an unusable orbit. Artemis was raised to its target orbit at the expense of operational fuel; BSAT-2b was not recoverable.
11	V-145	1 March 2002 01:07^[72]	G 511	Envisat	8,111 kg	SSO		Template:Success
11	V-145
12	V-153	5 July 2002 23:22^[72]	G 512	Stellat 5 N-STAR c	~6,700 kg	GTO		Template:Success
12	V-153
13	V-155	28 August 2002 22:45^[72]	G 513	Atlantic Bird 1 MSG-1 MFD	~5,800 kg	GTO		Template:Success
13	V-155
14	V-157	11 December 2002 22:22^[72]	ECA 517	Hot Bird 7 STENTOR MFD-A MFD-B		GTO (planned)		Template:Failure
14	V-157	Maiden flight of Ariane 5ECA, first stage engine failure, rocket destroyed by range safety.
15	V-160	9 April 2003 22:52^[72]	G 514	INSAT-3A Galaxy 12	~5,700 kg	GTO		Template:Success
15	V-160
16	V-161	11 June 2003 22:38^[72]	G 515	Optus C1 BSAT-2c	~7,100 kg	GTO		Template:Success
16	V-161
17	V-162	27 September 2003 23:14^[72]	G 516	INSAT-3E eBird-1 SMART-1	~5,600 kg	GTO		Template:Success
17	V-162	Final flight of Ariane 5G
18	V-158	2 March 2004 07:17^[72]	G+ 518	Rosetta Philae	3,011 kg	Heliocentric		Template:Success
18	V-158	Maiden flight of Ariane 5G+
19	V-163	18 July 2004 00:44^[72]	G+ 519	Anik F2	5,950 kg	GTO		Template:Success
19	V-163
20	V-165	18 December 2004 16:26^[72]	G+ 520	Helios 2A Essaim-1 Essaim-2 Essaim-3 Essaim-4 PARASOL Nanosat 01	4,200 kg	SSO		Template:Success
20	V-165	Final flight of Ariane 5G+
21	V-164	12 February 2005 21:03^[72]	ECA 521	XTAR-EUR Maqsat-B2 Sloshsat-FLEVO	~8,400 kg	GTO		Template:Success
21	V-164
22	V-166	11 August 2005 08:20^[72]	GS 523	Thaicom 4	6,485 kg	GTO		Template:Success
22	V-166	Maiden flight of Ariane 5GS
23	V-168	13 October 2005 22:32^[72]	GS 524	Syracuse 3A Galaxy 15	~6,900 kg	GTO		Template:Success
23	V-168
24	V-167	16 November 2005 23:46^[72]	ECA 522	Spaceway-2 Telkom-2	~9,100 kg	GTO		Template:Success
24	V-167
25	V-169	21 December 2005 23:33^[72]	GS 525	INSAT-4A MSG-2	6,478 kg	GTO		Template:Success
25	V-169
26	V-170	11 March 2006 22:33^[72]	ECA 527	Spainsat Hot Bird 7A	~8,700 kg	GTO		Template:Success
26	V-170
27	V-171	27 May 2006 21:09^[72]	ECA 529	Satmex-6 Thaicom 5	9,172 kg	GTO		Template:Success
27	V-171
28	V-172	11 August 2006 22:15^[72]	ECA 531	JCSAT-10 Syracuse 3B	~8,900 kg	GTO		Template:Success
28	V-172
29	V-173	13 October 2006 20:56^[72]	ECA 533	DirecTV-9S Optus D1 LDREX-2	~9,300 kg	GTO		Template:Success
29	V-173
30	V-174	8 December 2006 22:08^[72]	ECA 534	WildBlue-1 AMC-18	~7,800 kg	GTO		Template:Success
30	V-174
31	V-175	11 March 2007 22:03^[72]	ECA 535	Skynet 5A INSAT-4B	~8,600 kg	GTO		Template:Success
31	V-175
32	V-176	4 May 2007 22:29^[72]	ECA 536	Astra 1L Galaxy 17	9,402 kg	GTO		Template:Success
32	V-176
33	V-177	14 August 2007 23:44^[72]	ECA 537	Spaceway-3 BSAT-3a	8,848 kg	GTO		Template:Success
33	V-177
34	V-178	5 October 2007 22:02^[72]	GS 526	Intelsat 11 Optus D2	5,857 kg	GTO		Template:Success
34	V-178
35	V-179	14 November 2007 22:03^[72]	ECA 538	Skynet 5B Star One C1	9,535 kg	GTO		Template:Success
35	V-179
36	V-180	21 December 2007 21:41^[72]	GS 530	Rascom-QAF1 Horizons-2	~6,500 kg	GTO		Template:Success
36	V-180
37	V-181	9 March 2008 04:03^[72]	ES 528	Jules Verne ATV		LEO (ISS)		Template:Success
37	V-181	Maiden flight of Ariane 5ES
38	V-182	18 April 2008 22:17^[72]	ECA 539	Star One C2 Vinasat-1	7,762 kg	GTO		Template:Success
38	V-182
39	V-183	12 June 2008 22:05	ECA 540	Skynet 5C Türksat 3A	8,541 kg	GTO		Template:Success
39	V-183
40	V-184	7 July 2008 21:47	ECA 541	ProtoStar-1 Badr-6	8,639 kg	GTO		Template:Success
40	V-184
41	V-185	14 August 2008 20:44	ECA 542	Superbird-7 AMC-21	8,068 kg	GTO		Template:Success
41	V-185
42	V-186	20 December 2008 22:35	ECA 543	Hot Bird 9 Eutelsat W2M	9,220 kg	GTO		Template:Success
42	V-186
43	V-187	12 February 2009 22:09	ECA 545	Hot Bird 10 NSS-9 Spirale-A Spirale-B	8,511 kg	GTO		Template:Success
43	V-187
44	V-188	14 May 2009 13:12	ECA 546	Herschel Space Observatory Planck	3,402 kg	Sun–Earth Template:L2		Template:Success
44	V-188
45	V-189	1 July 2009 19:52	ECA 547	TerreStar-1	7,055 kg	GTO		Template:Success
45	V-189
46	V-190	21 August 2009 22:09	ECA 548	JCSAT-12 Optus D3	7,655 kg	GTO		Template:Success
46	V-190
47	V-191	1 October 2009 21:59	ECA 549	Amazonas 2 COMSATBw-1	9,087 kg	GTO		Template:Success
47	V-191
48	V-192	29 October 2009 20:00	ECA 550	NSS-12 Thor-6	9,462 kg	GTO		Template:Success
48	V-192
49	V-193	18 December 2009 16:26	GS 532	Helios 2B	5,954 kg	SSO		Template:Success
49	V-193	Final flight of Ariane 5GS
50	V-194	21 May 2010 22:01	ECA 551	Astra 3B COMSATBw-2	9,116 kg	GTO	SES MilSat Services	Template:Success
50	V-194
51	V-195	26 June 2010 21:41	ECA 552	Arabsat-5A Chollian	8,393 kg	GTO	Arabsat KARI	Template:Success
51	V-195
52	V-196	4 August 2010 20:59	ECA 554	Nilesat 201 RASCOM-QAF 1R	7,085 kg	GTO	Nilesat RASCOM	Template:Success
52	V-196
53	V-197	28 October 2010 21:51	ECA 555	Eutelsat W3B BSAT-3b	8,263 kg	GTO	Eutelsat Broadcasting Satellite System Corporation	Template:Success
53	V-197	Eutelsat W3B suffered a leak in the propulsion system shortly after launch and was declared a total loss.^[73] BSAT-3b is operating normally.
54	V-198	26 November 2010 18:39	ECA 556	Intelsat 17 HYLAS-1	8,867 kg	GTO	Intelsat Avanti Communications	Template:Success
54	V-198
55	V-199	29 December 2010 21:27	ECA 557	Koreasat 6 Hispasat-1E	9,259 kg	GTO	KT Corporation Hispasat	Template:Success
55	V-199
56	V-200	16 February 2011 21:50	ES 544	Johannes Kepler ATV	20,050 kg	LEO (ISS)	ESA	Template:Success
56	V-200
57	VA-201	22 April 2011 21:37	ECA 558	Yahsat 1A New Dawn	10,064 kg	GTO	Al Yah Satellite Communications Intelsat	Template:Success
57	VA-201	Launch was scrubbed from 30 March 2011, aborted in the last seconds before liftoff due to a gimbal malfunction in the Vulcain main engine.^[74]
58	VA-202	20 May 2011 20:38	ECA 559	ST-2 GSAT-8	9,013 kg	GTO	Singapore Telecom ISRO	Template:Success
58	VA-202
59	VA-203	6 August 2011 22:52	ECA 560	Astra 1N BSAT-3c / JCSAT-110R	9,095 kg	GTO	SES Broadcasting Satellite System Corporation	Template:Success
59	VA-203
60	VA-204	21 September 2011 21:38	ECA 561	Arabsat-5C SES-2	8,974 kg	GTO	Arab Satellite Communications Organization SES	Template:Success
60	VA-204
61	VA-205	23 March 2012 04:34	ES 553	Edoardo Amaldi ATV	20,060 kg	LEO (ISS)	ESA	Template:Success
61	VA-205
62	VA-206	15 May 2012 22:13	ECA 562	JCSAT-13 Vinasat-2	8,381 kg	GTO	SKY Perfect JSAT VNPT	Template:Success
62	VA-206
63	VA-207	5 July 2012 21:36	ECA 563	EchoStar XVII MSG-3	9,647 kg	GTO	EchoStar EUMETSAT	Template:Success
63	VA-207
64	VA-208	2 August 2012 20:54	ECA 564	Intelsat 20 HYLAS 2	10,182 kg	GTO	Intelsat Avanti Communications	Template:Success
64	VA-208
65	VA-209	28 September 2012 21:18	ECA 565	Astra 2F GSAT-10	10,211 kg	GTO	SES ISRO	Template:Success
65	VA-209
66	VA-210	10 November 2012 21:05	ECA 566	Eutelsat 21B Star One C3	9,216 kg	GTO	Eutelsat Star One	Template:Success
66	VA-210
67	VA-211	19 December 2012 21:49	ECA 567	Skynet 5D Mexsat-3	8,637 kg	GTO	Astrium Mexican Satellite System	Template:Success
67	VA-211
68	VA-212	7 February 2013 21:36	ECA 568	Amazonas 3 Azerspace-1/Africasat-1a	10,350 kg	GTO	Hispasat Azercosmos^[75]	Template:Success
68	VA-212
69	VA-213	5 June 2013 21:52	ES 592	Albert Einstein ATV	20,252 kg	LEO (ISS)	ESA	Template:Success
69	VA-213
70	VA-214	25 July 2013 19:54	ECA 569	Alphasat I-XL INSAT-3D	9,760 kg	GTO	Inmarsat ISRO	Template:Success
70	VA-214
71	VA-215	29 August 2013 20:30	ECA 570	Eutelsat 25B/Es'hail 1 GSAT-7	9,790 kg	GTO	Eutelsat ISRO	Template:Success
71	VA-215
72	VA-217	6 February 2014 21:30	ECA 572	ABS-2 Athena-Fidus	10,214 kg	GTO	ABS (satellite operator) DIRISI	Template:Success
72	VA-217
73	VA-216	22 March 2014 22:04	ECA 571	Astra 5B Amazonas 4A	9,579 kg	GTO	SES Hispasat	Template:Success
73	VA-216
74	VA-219	29 July 2014 23:47	ES 593	Georges Lemaître ATV	20,293 kg	LEO (ISS)	ESA	Template:Success
74	VA-219
75	VA-218	11 September 2014 22:05	ECA 573	MEASAT-3b Optus 10	10,088 kg	GTO	MEASAT Satellite Systems Optus	Template:Success
75	VA-218
76	VA-220	16 October 2014 21:43	ECA 574	Intelsat 30 ARSAT-1	10,060 kg	GTO	Intelsat ARSAT	Template:Success
76	VA-220
77	VA-221	6 December 2014 20:40	ECA 575	DirecTV-14 GSAT-16	10,210 kg	GTO	DirecTV ISRO	Template:Success
77	VA-221
78	Template:Nobr	26 April 2015 20:00	ECA 576	Thor 7 SICRAL-2	9,852 kg	GTO	British Satellite Broadcasting French Armed Forces	Template:Success
78	Template:Nobr
79	VA-223	27 May 2015 21:16	ECA 577	DirecTV-15 SKY Mexico 1	9,960 kg	GTO	DirecTV Sky México	Template:Success
79	VA-223
80	VA-224	15 July 2015 21:42	ECA 578	Star One C4 MSG-4	8,587 kg	GTO	Star One EUMETSAT	Template:Success
80	VA-224
81	VA-225	20 August 2015 20:34	ECA 579	Eutelsat 8 West B Intelsat 34	9,922 kg	GTO	Eutelsat Intelsat	Template:Success
81	VA-225
82	VA-226	30 September 2015 20:30	ECA 580	NBN Co 1A ARSAT-2	10,203 kg	GTO	National Broadband Network ARSAT	Template:Success
82	VA-226
83	VA-227	10 November 2015 21:34	ECA 581	Arabsat 6B GSAT-15	9,810 kg	GTO	Arabsat ISRO	Template:Success
83	VA-227
84	VA-228	27 January 2016 23:20	ECA 583	Intelsat 29e	6,700 kg	GTO	Intelsat	Template:Success
84	VA-228
85	VA-229	9 March 2016 05:20	ECA 582	Eutelsat 65 West A	6,707 kg	GTO	Eutelsat	Template:Success
85	VA-229
86	VA-230	18 June 2016 21:38	ECA 584	EchoStar 18 BRISat	10,730 kg	GTO	EchoStar Bank Rakyat Indonesia	Template:Success
86	VA-230	This mission carried the first satellite owned by a financial institution.^[76]
87	VA-232	24 August 2016 22:16	ECA 586	Intelsat 33e Intelsat 36	10,735 kg	GTO	Intelsat	Template:Success
87	VA-232	Intelsat 33e's LEROS apogee engine, which supposed to perform orbit raising, failed soon after its successful launch, forcing to use the experimentation of low-thrust reaction control system which extended the commissioning time 3 months longer than expected.^[77] Later, it suffered other thruster problems which cut its operational lifetime by about 3.5 years.^[78]
88	VA-231	5 October 2016 20:30	ECA 585	NBN Co 1B GSAT-18	10,663 kg	GTO	National Broadband Network INSAT	Template:Success
88	VA-231
89	VA-233	17 November 2016 13:06	ES 594	Galileo FOC-M6 (satellites FM-7, 12, 13, 14)	3,290 kg	MEO	ESA	Template:Success
89	VA-233
90	VA-234	21 December 2016 20:30	ECA 587	Star One D1 JCSAT-15	10,722 kg	GTO	Star One SKY Perfect JSAT	Template:Success
90	VA-234
91	VA-235	14 February 2017 21:39	ECA 588	Intelsat 32e / SkyBrasil-1 Telkom-3S	10,485 kg	GTO	Intelsat, DirecTV Latin America Telkom Indonesia	Template:Success
91	VA-235	This mission carried the first Intelsat Epic^NG high-throughput satellite based on the Eurostar E3000 platform, while other Intelsat Epic^NG satellites were based on BSS-702MP platform.^[79]
92	VA-236	4 May 2017 21:50	ECA 589	Koreasat 7 SGDC-1	10,289 kg	GTO	KT Corporation SGDC	Template:Success
92	VA-236	The launch was delayed from March 2017 due to transportation to the launch site being restricted by a blockade erected by striking workers.^[80]
93	VA-237	1 June 2017 23:45	ECA 590	ViaSat-2 Eutelsat 172B	10,865 kg	GTO	ViaSat Eutelsat	Template:Success
93	VA-237	Heaviest and most expensive commercial payload ever put into orbit,^[81] valued at approximately €675 million (~€844 million including the launch vehicle),^[82] until 12 June 2019, when Falcon 9 delivered RADARSAT Constellation with three Canadian satellites, valued almost €844 million (not including the launch vehicle), into orbit.^[83] ViaSat-2 suffered antenna glitch, which cut about 15% of its intended throughput.^[84]
94	VA-238	28 June 2017 21:15	ECA 591	EuropaSat / Hellas Sat 3 GSAT-17	10,177 kg	GTO	Inmarsat / Hellas Sat ISRO	Template:Success
94	VA-238
95	VA-239	29 September 2017 21:56	ECA 5100	Intelsat 37e BSAT-4a	10,838 kg	GTO	Intelsat B-SAT	Template:Success
95	VA-239	Launch was scrubbed from 5 September 2017 due to electrical fault in one of the solid rocket boosters that caused launch abort in the last seconds before liftoff.^[85]
96	VA-240	12 December 2017 18:36	ES 595	Galileo FOC-M7 (satellites FM-19, 20, 21, 22)	3,282 kg	MEO	ESA	Template:Success
96	VA-240
97	VA-241	25 January 2018 22:20	ECA 5101	SES-14 with GOLD Al Yah 3	9,123 kg	GTO	SES, NASA AlYahsat	Template:Partial failure
97	VA-241	Telemetry from the launch vehicle was lost after 9 minutes 30 seconds into the flight, after launch vehicle trajectory went off course due to invalid inertial units' azimuth value.^[67] Satellites later found to have separated from the upper stage and entered an incorrect orbit with large inclination deviations.^[86]^[87] However, they were able to reach the planned orbit with small loss of on board propellant for SES-14 and still expected to meet the designed lifetime,^[88] but with significant loss on Al Yah 3 (up to 50% of its intended operational life).^[89]^[90]
98	VA-242	5 April 2018 21:34	ECA 5102	Superbird-8 / Superbird-B3 HYLAS-4	10,260 kg	GTO	Japanese MoD, SKY Perfect JSAT Avanti Communications	Template:Success
98	VA-242	Return-to-flight mission after VA-241 mishap on 25 January 2018.^[91]
99	VA-244	25 July 2018 11:25	ES 596	Galileo FOC-M8 (satellites FM-23, 24, 25, 26)	3,379 kg	MEO	ESA	Template:Success
99	VA-244	Final flight of Ariane 5ES.
100	VA-243	25 September 2018 22:38	ECA 5103	Horizons-3e Azerspace-2 / Intelsat 38	10,827 kg	GTO	Intelsat, SKY Perfect JSAT Azercosmos	Template:Success
100	VA-243	Hundredth Ariane 5 mission.^[92] Flight VA-243 was delayed from 25 May 2018 due to issues with GSAT-11, which was eventually replaced by Horizons-3e.^[93]
101	VA-245	20 October 2018 01:45	ECA 5105	BepiColombo	4,081 kg	Heliocentric	ESA JAXA	Template:Success
102	VA-246	4 December 2018 20:37	ECA 5104	Template:Plainlist	10,298 kg	GTO	Template:Plainlist	Template:Success
103	VA-247	5 February 2019 21:01	ECA 5106	Template:Plainlist	10,018 kg	GTO	Template:Plainlist	Template:Success
104	VA-248	20 June 2019 21:43	ECA 5107	Template:Plainlist	10,594 kg	GTO	Template:Plainlist	Template:Success
105	VA-249	6 August 2019 19:30	ECA 5108	Template:Plainlist	10,594 kg	GTO	Template:Plainlist	Template:Success
106	VA-250	26 November 2019 21:23^[94]	ECA 5109	Inmarsat-5 F5 (GX 5)^[95]^[96] TIBA-1^[97]	10,495 kg	GTO	Inmarsat Government of Egypt	Template:Success^[98]
107	VA-251	16 January 2020 21:05	ECA 5110	Eutelsat Konnect (African Broadband Satellite)^[99] GSAT-30	7,888 kg	GTO	Eutelsat ISRO	Template:Success
108	VA-252	18 February 2020 22:18	ECA 5111	JCSAT-17 GEO-KOMPSAT 2B	9,236 kg	GTO	SKY Perfect JSAT KARI	Template:Success
109	VA-253	15 August 2020 22:04	ECA 5112	Galaxy 30 MEV-2 BSAT-4b	10,468 kg^[100] including 765 kg of support structures.	GTO	Intelsat Northrop Grumman B-SAT	Template:Success
110	VA-254	30 July 2021 21:00	ECA 5113	Eutelsat Quantum Star One D2	10,515 kg	GTO	Eutelsat Star One	Template:Success
111	VA-255	24 October 2021 02:10	ECA 5115	SES-17 Syracuse 4A	11,210 kg^[101]	GTO	SES DGA	Template:Success
112	VA-256	25 December 2021 12:20	ECA 5114	James Webb Space Telescope	Template:Cvt	Sun–Earth Template:L2	NASA / ESA / CSA / STScI	Template:Success
113	VA-257	22 June 2022 21:50	ECA 5116	MEASAT-3d GSAT-24	9,829 kg	GTO	MEASAT NSIL / Tata Play	Template:Success
114	VA-258	7 September 2022 21:45	ECA 5117	Eutelsat Konnect VHTS	6,400 kg	GTO	Eutelsat	Template:Success
115	VA-259	13 December 2022 20:30	ECA 5118	Galaxy 35 Galaxy 36 MTG-I1	10,972 kg^[102]	GTO	Intelsat EUMETSAT	Template:Success
116	VA-260	14 April 2023 12:14	ECA 5120	Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer (JUICE)	5,963 kg	Heliocentric	ESA	Template:Success
117	VA-261	5 July 2023 22:00	ECA 5119	Syracuse 4B (Comsat-NG 2)^[103] Heinrich Hertz (H2Sat)	7,679.8 kg^[104]	GTO	DGA DLR	Template:Success
117	VA-261	Ariane 5's last mission.

Notes

Template:Reflist

References

↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ ^a ^b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ European Space Agency, "Ariane 5ECA": http://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Transportation/Launch_vehicles/Ariane_5_ECA2 Discussed in context of other launch vehicles in Gérard Maral, Michel Bousquet, and Zhili Sun, Satellite Communications Systems: Systems, Techniques and Technology, sixth edition, London: Wiley, 2020 Template:ISBN
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named final-10
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ ^a ^b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ ^a ^b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ ^a ^b ^c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ ^a ^b ^c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ ^a ^b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Template:Cite magazine
↑ ^a ^b ^c ^d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ ^a ^b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ ^a ^b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Template:Cite tweet
↑ ^a ^b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u ^v ^w ^x ^y ^z ^aa ^ab ^ac ^ad ^ae ^af ^ag ^ah Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Template:Cite tweet
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ third launch of 2020
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

External links

Ariane 5 Overview at Arianespace
Ariane 5 Programme Information at Astrium

Template:Ariane Template:Arianespace launches Template:Expendable launch systems Template:European Space Agency Template:European launch systems

[ars20210622-1] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[mtg-s-2] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[Ariane6-3] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[4] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[a5dsslr-5] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[FranceScience-6] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[7] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[8] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[9] European Space Agency, "Ariane 5ECA": http://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Transportation/Launch_vehicles/Ariane_5_ECA2 Discussed in context of other launch vehicles in Gérard Maral, Michel Bousquet, and Zhili Sun, Satellite Communications Systems: Systems, Techniques and Technology, sixth edition, London: Wiley, 2020 Template:ISBN

[10] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[11] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[12] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[13] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[14] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[15] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[16] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[17] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[final-10-18] Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named final-10

[19] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[ESAA5ES-20] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[aw20140310-21] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[sn20131125-22] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[bbc20131203-23] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[sn20150105-24] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[slr20141203-25] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[AdaptedME-26] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[sfn-20121121-27] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[28] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[29] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[30] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[31] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[parabolicarc-ariane5-cost-32] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[ESPPhandbook-33] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[34] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[ariane_upgrades-35] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[sfn201403327-36] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[37] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[38] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[39] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[40] Template:Cite magazine

[esamultimedia.esa.int-41] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[42] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[43] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[44] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[45] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[46] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[47] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[48] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[49] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[50] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[sfn-20200815-51] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[BBC1-52] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[Ars1-53] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[arianespace1-54] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[ariane_va-208-55] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[ariane_va-212-56] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[57] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[58] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[sf101-20160824-59] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[pr-20170601-60] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[61] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[va241-yahoo-62] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[63] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[64] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[65] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[66] Template:Cite tweet

[arianespace.com-67] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[68] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[69] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[70] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[71] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[EA-A5-72] ↑ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k ^l ^m ⁿ ^o ^p ^q ^r ^s ^t ^u ^v ^w ^x ^y ^z ^aa ^ab ^ac ^ad ^ae ^af ^ag ^ah Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[73] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[74] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[Azercosmos-Arianespace-75] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[76] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[77] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[78] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[79] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[verge-a5cancelled-80] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[81] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[82] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[83] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[84] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[85] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[86] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[87] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[88] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[89] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[90] Template:Cite tweet

[91] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[sfn-20180703-92] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[va243-delay-93] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[94] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[arianespace102717-95] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[inmarsat-5-f5-96] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[97] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[success-va250-98] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[gunter-konnect-99] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[SD-3-2020-100] third launch of 2020

[101] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[102] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[103] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[104] Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

[39]

[40]

[41]

[42]

[43]

[44]

[45]

[46]

[47]

[48]

[49]

[50]

[51]

[52]

[53]

[54]

[55]

[56]

[57]

[58]

[59]

[60]

[61]

[62]

[63]

[64]

[65]

[66]

[67]

[68]

[69]

[70]

[71]

[72]

[73]

[74]

[75]

[76]

[77]

[78]

[79]

[80]

[81]

[82]

[83]

[84]

[85]

[86]

[87]

[88]

[89]

[90]

[91]

[92]

[93]

[94]

[95]

[96]

[97]

[98]

[99]

[100]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 | name           = Ariane 5
 | image          = Ariane 5 with James Webb Space Telescope Prelaunch (51773093465).jpg
-| caption        = Ariane 5 flight [[Ariane flight VA256|VA-256]] on the launch pad with the [[James Webb Space Telescope]] in December 2021
+| caption        = Ariane 5 flight [[Ariane flight VA256|VA-256]] on the launch pad with the [[James Webb Space Telescope]] on December 2021
 | function       = [[Heavy-lift launch vehicle]]
@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 }}
    }}
-| family        = [[Ariane (rocket family)|Ariane]]
+| family         = [[Ariane (rocket family)|Ariane]]
+| derived_from   = [[Ariane 4]]
+| derivatives    = [[Ariane 6]]
 | comparable    = {{flatlist|
 * [[Atlas V]]
@@ Line 43: / Line 45: @@
 * [[H-IIB]]
 * [[Long March 5]]
+* [[LVM3]]
 * [[Proton-M]]
-* [[GSLV Mark III]]
 }}
 |status          = Retired
@@ Line 196: / Line 198: @@
 Since its first launch, Ariane 5 was refined in successive versions: "G", "G+", "GS", "ECA", and finally, "ES". The system had a commonly used dual-launch capability, where up to two large geostationary belt [[communication satellite]]s can be mounted using a '''SYLDA''' (''Système de Lancement Double Ariane'', meaning "Ariane Double-Launch System") carrier system. Up to three, somewhat smaller, main satellites are possible depending on size using a '''SPELTRA''' (''Structure Porteuse Externe Lancement Triple Ariane'', which translates to "Ariane Triple-Launch External Carrier Structure"). Up to eight secondary payloads, usually small experiment packages or [[miniaturized satellite|minisatellites]], could be carried with an '''ASAP''' (Ariane Structure for Auxiliary Payloads) platform.
-Following the launch of 15 August 2020, Arianespace signed the contracts for the last eight Ariane 5 launches, before it was succeeded by the new [[Ariane 6]] launcher, according to Daniel Neuenschwander, director of space transportation at the ESA.<ref name="Ariane6">{{cite web|url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/08/15/debuting-upgrades-ariane-5-rocket-deploys-three-u-s-built-satellites-in-orbit/|title=Debuting upgrades, Ariane 5 rocket deploys three U.S.-built satellites in orbit|publisher=Spaceflight Now|date=15 August 2020|access-date=17 August 2020}}</ref><ref name=mtg-s/> Ariane 5 flew its final mission on 5 July 2023.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Svenson |first=Adam |date=2023-07-06 |title=Last Ariane 5 Mission Leaves Europe Without Launch Capacity |url=https://airspacenews.net/last-ariane-5-mission-leaves-europe-without-launch-capacity/ |access-date=2023-07-23 |website=AIR SPACE News |language=en-US}}</ref>
+Following the launch of 15 August 2020, Arianespace signed the contracts for the last eight Ariane 5 launches, before it was succeeded by the new [[Ariane 6]] launcher, according to Daniel Neuenschwander, director of space transportation at the ESA.<ref name="Ariane6">{{cite web|url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/08/15/debuting-upgrades-ariane-5-rocket-deploys-three-u-s-built-satellites-in-orbit/|title=Debuting upgrades, Ariane 5 rocket deploys three U.S.-built satellites in orbit|publisher=Spaceflight Now|date=15 August 2020|access-date=17 August 2020}}</ref><ref name=mtg-s/> Ariane 5 flew its final mission on 5 July 2023.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Svenson |first=Adam |date=2023-07-06 |title=Last Ariane 5 Mission Leaves Europe Without Launch Capacity |url=https://airspacenews.net/last-ariane-5-mission-leaves-europe-without-launch-capacity/ |access-date=2023-07-23 |website=AIR SPACE News}}</ref>
 == Vehicle description ==
@@ Line 205: / Line 207: @@
 === Solid boosters ===
-Attached to the sides were two P241 (P238 for Ariane 5G and G+) [[solid rocket booster]]s (SRBs or EAPs from the French ''Étages d'Accélération à Poudre''), each weighing about {{cvt|277|t|lb}} full and delivering a thrust of about {{cvt|7080|kN}}. They were fueled by a mix of [[ammonium perchlorate]] (68%) and aluminium fuel (18%) and [[hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene|HTPB]] (14%). They each burned for 130 seconds before being dropped into the ocean. The SRBs were usually allowed to sink to the bottom of the ocean, but, like the [[Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster]]s, they could be recovered with parachutes, and this was occasionally done for post-flight analysis. Unlike Space Shuttle SRBs, Ariane 5 boosters were not reused. The most recent attempt was for the first Ariane 5 ECA mission in 2009. One of the two boosters was successfully recovered and returned to the Guiana Space Center for analysis.<ref name="FranceScience">{{cite web|url=http://www.france-science.org/spip.php?article399#3-ARIANE-5-ECA-BOOSTER-RECOVERED|title=France in Space #387|publisher=Office of Science and Technology Embassy of France in the USA|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090125213207/http://www.france-science.org/spip.php?article399#3-ARIANE-5-ECA-BOOSTER-RECOVERED|archive-date=25 January 2009}}</ref> Prior to that mission, the last such recovery and testing was done in 2003.{{Citation needed|date=January 2022}}
+Attached to the sides were two P241 (P238 for Ariane 5G and G+) [[solid rocket booster]]s (SRBs or EAPs from the French ''Étages d'Accélération à Poudre'' — {{Literal translation|Powder Acceleration Stages}}), each weighing about {{cvt|277|t|lb}} full and delivering a thrust of about {{cvt|7080|kN}}. They were fueled by a mix of [[ammonium perchlorate]] (68%) and aluminium fuel (18%) and [[hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene|HTPB]] (14%). They each burned for 130 seconds before being dropped into the ocean. The SRBs were usually allowed to sink to the bottom of the ocean, but, like the [[Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster]]s, they could be recovered with parachutes, and this was occasionally done for post-flight analysis. Unlike Space Shuttle SRBs, Ariane 5 boosters were not reused. The most recent attempt was for the first Ariane 5 ECA mission in 2009. One of the two boosters was successfully recovered and returned to the Guiana Space Center for analysis.<ref name="FranceScience">{{cite web|url=http://www.france-science.org/spip.php?article399#3-ARIANE-5-ECA-BOOSTER-RECOVERED|title=France in Space #387|publisher=Office of Science and Technology Embassy of France in the USA|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090125213207/http://www.france-science.org/spip.php?article399#3-ARIANE-5-ECA-BOOSTER-RECOVERED|archive-date=25 January 2009}}</ref> Prior to that mission, the last such recovery and testing was done in 2003.{{Citation needed|date=January 2022}}
-The French [[M51 (missile)|M51]] [[Submarine-launched ballistic missile|submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM)]] shared a substantial amount of technology with these boosters.<ref>{{cite news|title=French Navy SSBN 'Le Téméraire' Test Fired M51 SLBM In Operational Conditions|author=Xavier Vavasseur |date=12 Jun 2020|url=https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/06/french-navy-ssbn-le-temeraire-test-fired-m51-slbm-in-operational-conditions/|website=navalnews.com|access-date=March 27, 2023}}</ref>
+The French [[M51 (missile)|M51]] [[Submarine-launched ballistic missile|submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM)]] shared a substantial amount of technology with these boosters.<ref>{{cite news |author=Vavasseur |first=Xavier |date=12 June 2020 |title=French Navy SSBN 'Le Téméraire' Test Fired M51 SLBM In Operational Conditions |url=https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/06/french-navy-ssbn-le-temeraire-test-fired-m51-slbm-in-operational-conditions/ |access-date=March 27, 2023 |website=navalnews.com}}</ref>
-In February 2000, the suspected [[nose cone]] of an Ariane 5 booster washed ashore on the [[South Texas]] coast, and was recovered by [[Beachcombing|beachcombers]] before the government could get to it.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.foxnews.com/etcetera/022900/space.sml |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010224100038/http://www.foxnews.com/etcetera/022900/space.sml |date=29 February 2000 |agency=Associated Press |publisher=Fox News |title=Government Loses Unidentified Floating Object |archive-date=24 February 2001 }}</ref>
+In February 2000, the suspected [[nose cone]] of an Ariane 5 booster washed ashore on the [[South Texas]] coast, and was recovered by [[Beachcombing|beachcombers]] before the government could get to it.<ref>{{cite web |date=29 February 2000 |title=Government Loses Unidentified Floating Object |url=http://www.foxnews.com/etcetera/022900/space.sml |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010224100038/http://www.foxnews.com/etcetera/022900/space.sml |archive-date=24 February 2001 |website=Fox News |agency=Associated Press}}</ref>
 === Second stage ===
@@ Line 218: / Line 220: @@
 The EPS upper stage was capable of repeated ignition, first demonstrated during flight V26 which was launched on 5 October 2007. This was purely to test the engine, and occurred after the payloads had been deployed. The first operational use of restart capability as part of a mission came on 9 March 2008, when two burns were made to deploy the first [[Automated Transfer Vehicle]] (ATV) into a circular parking orbit, followed by a third burn after ATV deployment to de-orbit the stage. This procedure was repeated for all subsequent ATV flights.
-Ariane 5ECA used the ESC (''Étage Supérieur Cryotechnique'' — Cryogenic Upper Stage), which was fueled by liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. The ESC used the [[HM7B]] engine previously used in the Ariane 4 third stage. The propellent load of 14.7 tonne allowed the engine to burn for 945 seconds while providing 6.5 tonne of thrust. The ESC provided roll control during powered flight and full attitude control during payload separation using hydrogen gas thrusters. Oxygen gas thrusters allowed longitudinal acceleration after engine cutoff. The flight assembly included the Vehicle Equipment Bay, with flight electronics for the entire rocket, and the payload interface and structural support.<ref>European Space Agency, "Ariane 5ECA": http://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Transportation/Launch_vehicles/Ariane_5_ECA2 Discussed in context of other launch vehicles in Gérard Maral, Michel Bousquet, and Zhili Sun, ''Satellite Communications Systems: Systems, Techniques and Technology'', sixth edition, London: Wiley, 2020 {{ISBN|9781119382072}}</ref><ref>[https://www.arianespace.com/?popup=ariane-5-4 ESC-A – Cryogenic upper stage], accessed December 27, 2021</ref>
+Ariane 5ECA used the ESC (''Étage Supérieur Cryotechnique'' — Cryogenic Upper Stage), which was fueled by liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. The ESC used the [[HM7B]] engine previously used in the Ariane 4 third stage. The propellent load of 14.7 tonne allowed the engine to burn for 945 seconds while providing 6.5 tonne of thrust. The ESC provided roll control during powered flight and full attitude control during payload separation using hydrogen gas thrusters. Oxygen gas thrusters allowed longitudinal acceleration after engine cutoff. The flight assembly included the Vehicle Equipment Bay, with flight electronics for the entire rocket, and the payload interface and structural support.<ref>European Space Agency, "Ariane 5ECA": http://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Transportation/Launch_vehicles/Ariane_5_ECA2 Discussed in context of other launch vehicles in Gérard Maral, Michel Bousquet, and Zhili Sun, ''Satellite Communications Systems: Systems, Techniques and Technology'', sixth edition, London: Wiley, 2020 {{ISBN|9781119382072}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=ESC-A – Cryogenic upper stage |url=https://www.arianespace.com/?popup=ariane-5-4 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211227172650/https://www.arianespace.com/?popup=ariane-5-4 |archive-date=December 27, 2021 |access-date=December 27, 2021 |website=Arianespace}}</ref>
 === Fairing ===
-The payload and all upper stages were covered at launch by a fairing for aerodynamic stability and protection from heating during supersonic flight and acoustic loads. It was jettisoned once sufficient altitude has been reached, typically above {{cvt|100|km}}. It was made by [[RUAG Space|Ruag Space]] and since flight VA-238 it was composed of 4 panels.<ref>{{cite web|author1=ESA|title=Ariane 5 launch proves reliability and flies new fairing|url=https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Transportation/Ariane_5_launch_proves_reliability_and_flies_new_fairing|access-date=27 February 2020}}</ref>{{clarify|that's fine for explaining what fairings do, generally. But who makes the Ariane fairing? At what cost? What are any of it's design specifications or design characteristics?|date=September 2019}}
+The payload and all upper stages were covered at launch by a fairing for aerodynamic stability and protection from heating during supersonic flight and acoustic loads. It was jettisoned once sufficient altitude has been reached, typically above {{Convert|100|km|mi nmi|abbr=on}}. It was made by [[RUAG Space|Ruag Space]] and since flight VA-238 it was composed of 4 panels.<ref>{{cite web|author1=ESA|title=Ariane 5 launch proves reliability and flies new fairing|url=https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Transportation/Ariane_5_launch_proves_reliability_and_flies_new_fairing|access-date=27 February 2020}}</ref>{{clarify|that's fine for explaining what fairings do, generally. But who makes the Ariane fairing? At what cost? What are any of it's design specifications or design characteristics?|date=September 2019}}
+=== Launch preparations ===
+With the exception of the solid rocket boosters (for safety and cost reasons), the components were assembled in Europe, and then shipped to French Guyana by boat. Once at Kourou, the components were assembled in the Launcher Integration Building (BIL), then transfered into the Final Assembly Building (BAF) for mating the payload and fairing, before the completed rocket was transfered to the Launch Zone (ZL) for fueling and launch. <ref>{{cite web |url=https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2014-1624 |title=Ariane 5 production and integration operations: ten years of continuous efficiency and quality improvement |date=May 2014 |access-date=November 18, 2025}}</ref>
 == Variants ==
@@ Line 241: / Line 246: @@
 |-
 | align="center" | '''ECA'''
-| The Ariane 5ECA (''Evolution Cryotechnique type A''), first successfully flown in 2005, used an improved Vulcain 2 first-stage engine with a longer, more efficient nozzle with a more efficient flow cycle and denser propellant ratio. The new ratio required length modifications to the first-stage tanks. The EPS second stage was replaced by the ESC-A (''Etage Supérieur Cryogénique''-A), which had a dry weight of {{cvt|4540|kg}} and was powered by an [[HM-7B]] engine burning {{cvt|14900|kg}} of cryogenic [[Rocket propellant|propellant]]. The ESC-A used the liquid oxygen tank and lower structure from the Ariane 4's H10 third stage, mated to a new liquid hydrogen tank. Additionally, the EAP booster casings were lightened with new welds and carry more propellant. The Ariane 5ECA started with a GTO launch capacity of {{cvt|9100|kg}} for dual payloads or {{cvt|9600|kg}} for a single payload.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_lau_det/ariane-5eca.htm|title=Ariane-5ECA|publisher=Gunter's Space Page|date=20 February 2020|access-date=23 October 2021}}</ref> Later batches: PB+ and PC, increased the max payload to GTO to {{cvt|11115|kg}}.<ref name=final-10/>
+| The Ariane 5ECA (''Evolution Cryotechnique type A''), first flown in 2002 but ending in failure, and first successfully flown in 2005, used an improved Vulcain 2 first-stage engine with a longer, more efficient nozzle with a more efficient flow cycle and denser propellant ratio. The new ratio required length modifications to the first-stage tanks. The EPS second stage was replaced by the ESC-A (''Etage Supérieur Cryogénique''-A), which had a dry weight of {{cvt|4540|kg}} and was powered by an [[HM-7B]] engine burning {{cvt|14900|kg}} of cryogenic [[Rocket propellant|propellant]]. The ESC-A used the liquid oxygen tank and lower structure from the Ariane 4's H10 third stage, mated to a new liquid hydrogen tank. Additionally, the EAP booster casings were lightened with new welds and carry more propellant. The Ariane 5ECA started with a GTO launch capacity of {{cvt|9100|kg}} for dual payloads or {{cvt|9600|kg}} for a single payload.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_lau_det/ariane-5eca.htm|title=Ariane-5ECA|publisher=Gunter's Space Page|date=20 February 2020|access-date=23 October 2021}}</ref> Later batches: PB+ and PC, increased the max payload to GTO to {{cvt|11115|kg}}.<ref name=final-10/> The Ariane 5 ECA flew 72 times from 2002 to 2019 with one failure and one partial failure.
 |-
 | align="center" | '''ECA+'''
@@ Line 254: / Line 259: @@
 == Launch pricing and market competition ==
-{{asof|2014|11}}, the Ariane 5 commercial launch [[Price#Confusion between prices and costs of production|price]] for launching a "midsize satellite in the lower position" was approximately €50 million,<ref name=aw20140310>{{cite news|last=Svitak|first=Amy|title=SpaceX Says Falcon 9 To Compete For EELV This Year|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/AW_03_10_2014_p48-668592.xml|access-date=4 January 2015|publisher=Aviation Week|date=1 March 2014|quote=''Advertised at US$56.5 million per launch, Falcon 9 missions to GTO cost almost US$15 million less than a ride atop a Chinese Long March 3B and are competitive with the cost to launch a midsize satellite in the lower position on a European Ariane 5ECA''|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140310123118/http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=%2Farticle-xml%2FAW_03_10_2014_p48-668592.xml|archive-date=10 March 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> competing for commercial launches in an increasingly [[Space launch market competition|competitive market]].
+{{asof|2014|11}}, the Ariane 5 commercial launch [[Price#Confusion between prices and costs of production|price]] for launching a "midsize satellite in the lower position" was approximately €50 million,<ref name="aw20140310">{{cite news |last=Svitak |first=Amy |date=1 March 2014 |title=SpaceX Says Falcon 9 To Compete For EELV This Year |url=https://aviationweek.com/space/spacex-says-falcon-9-compete-eelv-year |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250115025231/https://aviationweek.com/space/spacex-says-falcon-9-compete-eelv-year |archive-date=15 January 2025 |access-date=4 January 2015 |publisher=Aviation Week |quote=Advertised at US$56.5 million per launch, Falcon 9 missions to GTO cost almost US$15 million less than a ride atop a Chinese Long March 3B and are competitive with the cost to launch a midsize satellite in the lower position on a European Ariane 5ECA}}</ref> competing for commercial launches in an increasingly [[Space launch market competition|competitive market]].
-The heavier satellite was launched in the upper position on a typical dual-satellite Ariane 5 launch and was priced higher than the lower satellite,<ref name=sn20131125>{{cite news|last=de Selding|first=Peter B. |title=SpaceX Challenge Has Arianespace Rethinking Pricing Policies|url=http://www.spacenews.com/article/launch-report/38331spacex-challenge-has-arianespace-rethinking-pricing-policies|archive-url=https://archive.today/20131127055319/http://www.spacenews.com/article/launch-report/38331spacex-challenge-has-arianespace-rethinking-pricing-policies|url-status=dead|archive-date=27 November 2013|access-date=27 November 2013|publisher=SpaceNews|date=2 November 2013|quote=''The Arianespace commercial launch consortium is telling its customers it is open to reducing the cost of flights for lighter satellites on the Ariane 5 rocket in response to the challenge posed by SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket''}}</ref>{{clarify|date=January 2015}}<!-- still need to find a source for the specifics on this; for now, just qualitatively "higher" --> on the order of €90 million {{asof|2013|lc=y}}.<ref name="bbc20131203">{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-25210742|title=SpaceX launches SES commercial TV satellite for Asia|last=Amos|first=Jonathan|date=3 December 2013|publisher=BBC News|access-date=4 January 2015|quote=''The commercial market for launching telecoms spacecraft is tightly contested, but has become dominated by just a few companies – notably, Europe's Arianespace, which flies the Ariane 5, and International Launch Services (ILS), which markets Russia's Proton vehicle. SpaceX is promising to substantially undercut the existing players on price, and SES, the world's second-largest telecoms satellite operator, believes the incumbents had better take note of the California company's capability. 'The entry of SpaceX into the commercial market is a game-changer''.|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170102045752/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-25210742|archive-date=2 January 2017|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=sn20150105/>
+The heavier satellite was launched in the upper position on a typical dual-satellite Ariane 5 launch and was priced higher than the lower satellite,<ref name="sn20131125">{{cite news |last=de Selding |first=Peter B. |date=2 November 2013 |title=SpaceX Challenge Has Arianespace Rethinking Pricing Policies |url=https://spacenews.com/38331spacex-challenge-has-arianespace-rethinking-pricing-policies/ |url-status= |archive-url= |archive-date= |access-date=27 November 2013 |publisher=SpaceNews |quote=The Arianespace commercial launch consortium is telling its customers it is open to reducing the cost of flights for lighter satellites on the Ariane 5 rocket in response to the challenge posed by SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket...}}</ref>{{clarify|date=January 2015}}<!-- still need to find a source for the specifics on this; for now, just qualitatively "higher" --> on the order of €90 million {{asof|2013|lc=y}}.<ref name="bbc20131203">{{cite news |last=Amos |first=Jonathan |date=3 December 2013 |title=SpaceX launches SES commercial TV satellite for Asia |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-25210742 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170102045752/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-25210742 |archive-date=2 January 2017 |access-date=4 January 2015 |work=BBC News |quote=The commercial market for launching telecoms spacecraft is tightly contested, but has become dominated by just a few companies – notably, Europe's Arianespace, which flies the Ariane 5, and International Launch Services (ILS), which markets Russia's Proton vehicle. SpaceX is promising to substantially undercut the existing players on price, and SES, the world's second-largest telecoms satellite operator, believes the incumbents had better take note of the California company's capability. "The entry of SpaceX into the commercial market is a game-changer...}}</ref><ref name=sn20150105/>
 Total launch price of an Ariane 5 – which could transport up to two satellites to space, one in the "upper" and one in the "lower" positions – was around €150 million {{as of|2015|1|lc=on}}.<ref name=sn20150105>{{cite web|url=http://spacenews.com/with-eye-on-spacex-cnes-begins-work-on-reusable-rocket-stage/|title=With Eye on SpaceX, CNES Begins Work on Reusable Rocket Stage|publisher=SpaceNews|date=5 January 2015|access-date=6 January 2015}}</ref>
@@ Line 280: / Line 285: @@
 Work on the Ariane 5 EAP motors was continued in the [[Vega (launcher)|Vega]] programme. The Vega 1st stage engine – the [[P80 (stage)|P80]] engine – was a shorter derivation of the EAP.<ref name="ESPPhandbook">{{cite book|title=European Space Policy and Programs Handbook|first1=Usa Ibp|last1=Usa|publisher=Int'l Business Publications|year=2010|isbn=9781433015328|page=29}}</ref> The P80 booster casing was made of filament wound graphite epoxy, much lighter than the current stainless steel casing. A new composite steerable nozzle was developed while new thermal insulation material and a narrower throat improved the expansion ratio and subsequently the overall performance. Additionally, the nozzle had electromechanical actuators which replaced the heavier hydraulic ones used for thrust vector control.
-These developments could maybe have made their way back into the Ariane programme, but this was most likely an inference based on early blueprints of the Ariane 6 having a central P80 booster and 2-4 around the main one.<ref name=sfn-20121121>{{cite news|url=http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1211/21ariane/ |title=European ministers decide to stick with Ariane 5, for now|author=Stephen Clark|publisher=Spaceflight Now|date=21 November 2012|access-date=22 November 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121127202631/http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1211/21ariane/|archive-date=27 November 2012|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMTHGD4VUE_Expanding_0.html|title=Successful firing of Vega's first-stage motor in Kourou|date=30 November 2006|publisher=ESA|access-date=30 December 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120305173010/http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMTHGD4VUE_Expanding_0.html|archive-date=5 March 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> The incorporation of the ESC-B with the improvements to the solid motor casing and an uprated Vulcain engine would have delivered {{cvt|27000|kg}} to LEO. This would have been developed for any lunar missions but the performance of such a design might not have been possible if the higher [[Max Q|Max-Q]] for the launch of this launch vehicle would have posed a constraint on the mass delivered to orbit.<ref name="ariane upgrades">{{cite web|url=http://www.astron.nl/p/news/LO/Iranzo_Ariane5_LOFARworkshop.ppt |title=Ariane 5—A European Launcher for Space Exploration |access-date=10 April 2008 |author=David Iranzo-Greus |date=23 March 2005 |publisher=EADS SPACE Transportation |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080911061500/http://www.astron.nl/p/news/LO/Iranzo_Ariane5_LOFARworkshop.ppt |archive-date=11 September 2008}}</ref>
+These developments could maybe have made their way back into the Ariane programme, but this was most likely an inference based on early blueprints of the Ariane 6 having a central P80 booster and 2-4 around the main one.<ref name="sfn-20121121">{{cite news |author=Clark |first=Stephen |date=21 November 2012 |title=European ministers decide to stick with Ariane 5, for now |url=http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1211/21ariane/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121127202631/http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1211/21ariane/ |archive-date=27 November 2012 |access-date=22 November 2012 |publisher=Spaceflight Now}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMTHGD4VUE_Expanding_0.html|title=Successful firing of Vega's first-stage motor in Kourou|date=30 November 2006|publisher=ESA|access-date=30 December 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120305173010/http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMTHGD4VUE_Expanding_0.html|archive-date=5 March 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> The incorporation of the ESC-B with the improvements to the solid motor casing and an uprated Vulcain engine would have delivered {{cvt|27000|kg}} to LEO. This would have been developed for any lunar missions but the performance of such a design might not have been possible if the higher [[Max Q|Max-Q]] for the launch of this launch vehicle would have posed a constraint on the mass delivered to orbit.<ref name="ariane upgrades">{{cite web |author=Iranzo-Greus |first=David |date=23 March 2005 |title=Ariane 5—A European Launcher for Space Exploration |url=http://www.astron.nl/p/news/LO/Iranzo_Ariane5_LOFARworkshop.ppt |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080911061500/http://www.astron.nl/p/news/LO/Iranzo_Ariane5_LOFARworkshop.ppt |archive-date=11 September 2008 |access-date=10 April 2008 |publisher=EADS SPACE Transportation}}</ref>
 == Ariane 6 ==
@@ Line 287: / Line 292: @@
 The design brief of the next generation launch vehicle [[Ariane 6]] called for a lower-cost and smaller launch vehicle capable of launching a single satellite of up to {{cvt|6500|kg}} to GTO.<ref name=sfn201403327>{{cite web|last=Clark|first=Stephen|title=Germany calls for redesign of next-generation Ariane|date=27 March 2014|url=http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1403/27ariane6/#.U2v3InLSW-M |publisher=Spaceflight Now|access-date=8 May 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140512223359/http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1403/27ariane6/#.U2v3InLSW-M|archive-date=12 May 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> However, after several permutations the finalized design was nearly identical in performance to the Ariane 5,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.arianespace.com/ariane-6/|title=Ariane 6 |publisher=Arianespace|access-date=11 December 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181019213706/http://www.arianespace.com/ariane-6/|archive-date=19 October 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> focusing instead on lowering fabrication costs and launch prices. {{asof|2014|03}}, Ariane 6 was projected to be launched for about €70 million per flight, about half of the Ariane 5 price.<ref name=sfn201403327/>
-Initially development of Ariane 6 was projected to cost €3.6 billion.<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.esa.int/For_Media/Press_Releases/Media_backgrounder_for_ESA_Council_at_Ministerial_Level|title=Media backgrounder for ESA Council at Ministerial Level|publisher=ESA|date=27 November 2014|access-date=24 March 2016}}</ref> In 2017, the ESA set 16 July 2020 as the deadline for the first flight.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Amos|first1=Jonathan|date=22 June 2017|title=Full thrust on Europe's new rocket|publisher=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40366736|url-status=live|access-date=2022-01-25|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180322110946/http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40366736|archive-date=22 March 2018}}</ref> The Ariane 6 successfully completed its maiden flight on 9 July 2024.
+Initially development of Ariane 6 was projected to cost €3.6 billion.<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.esa.int/For_Media/Press_Releases/Media_backgrounder_for_ESA_Council_at_Ministerial_Level|title=Media backgrounder for ESA Council at Ministerial Level|publisher=ESA|date=27 November 2014|access-date=24 March 2016}}</ref> In 2017, the ESA set 16 July 2020 as the deadline for the first flight.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Amos |first1=Jonathan |date=22 June 2017 |title=Full thrust on Europe's new rocket |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40366736 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180322110946/http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-40366736 |archive-date=22 March 2018 |access-date=2022-01-25 |work=BBC News}}</ref> The Ariane 6 successfully completed its maiden flight on 9 July 2024.
 == Notable launches ==
 [[File:Ariane 5 10 2007.ogv|thumb|upright=1.0|right|Launch of the 34th Ariane 5 from [[Guiana Space Centre]]]]
-Ariane 5's first test flight ([[Ariane 5 Flight 501]]) on 4 June 1996 failed, with the rocket self-destructing 37 seconds after launch because of a malfunction in the control software.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://www.wired.com/2005/11/historys-worst-software-bugs/|magazine=Wired|title=History's Worst Software Bugs|access-date=3 September 2009|last1=Garfinkel|first1=Simson}}</ref> A data conversion from 64-[[bit]] [[floating-point arithmetic|floating-point]] value to 16-bit [[signedness|signed]] [[integer]] value to be stored in a variable representing horizontal bias caused a processor trap (operand error)<ref name="esamultimedia.esa.int"/> because the floating-point value was too large to be represented by a 16-bit signed integer. The software had been written for the [[Ariane 4]] where efficiency considerations (the computer running the software had an 80% maximum workload requirement<ref name="esamultimedia.esa.int"/>) led to four variables being protected with a [[Exception handling|handler]] while three others, including the horizontal bias variable, were left unprotected because it was thought that they were "physically limited or that there was a large margin of safety".<ref name="esamultimedia.esa.int"/> The software, written in [[Ada (programming language)|Ada]], was included in the Ariane 5 through the reuse of an entire Ariane 4 subsystem despite the fact that the particular software containing the bug, which was just a part of the subsystem, was not required by the Ariane 5 because it has a different preparation sequence than the Ariane 4.<ref name="esamultimedia.esa.int"/>
+Ariane 5's first test flight ([[Ariane flight V88|Ariane 5 Flight 501]]) on 4 June 1996 failed, with the rocket self-destructing 37 seconds after launch because of a malfunction in the control software.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://www.wired.com/2005/11/historys-worst-software-bugs/|magazine=Wired|title=History's Worst Software Bugs|access-date=3 September 2009|last1=Garfinkel|first1=Simson}}</ref> A data conversion from 64-[[bit]] [[floating-point arithmetic|floating-point]] value to 16-bit [[signedness|signed]] [[integer]] value to be stored in a variable representing horizontal bias caused a processor trap (operand error)<ref name="esamultimedia.esa.int"/> because the floating-point value was too large to be represented by a 16-bit signed integer. The software had been written for the [[Ariane 4]] where efficiency considerations (the computer running the software had an 80% maximum workload requirement<ref name="esamultimedia.esa.int"/>) led to four variables being protected with a [[Exception handling|handler]] while three others, including the horizontal bias variable, were left unprotected because it was thought that they were "physically limited or that there was a large margin of safety".<ref name="esamultimedia.esa.int"/> The software, written in [[Ada (programming language)|Ada]], was included in the Ariane 5 through the reuse of an entire Ariane 4 subsystem despite the fact that the particular software containing the bug, which was just a part of the subsystem, was not required by the Ariane 5 because it has a different preparation sequence than the Ariane 4.<ref name="esamultimedia.esa.int"/>
 The second test flight (L502, on 30 October 1997) was a partial failure. The Vulcain nozzle caused a roll problem, leading to premature shutdown of the core stage. The upper stage operated successfully, but it could not reach the intended orbit. A subsequent test flight (L503, on 21 October 1998) proved successful and the first commercial launch (L504) occurred on 10 December 1999 with the launch of the [[XMM-Newton]] X-ray observatory satellite.<ref>{{cite web|title=X-ray Satellite XMM-Newton Celebrates 20 Years in Space|date=December 10, 2019|url=https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2019/x-ray-satellite-xmm-newton-celebrates-20-years-in-space|publisher=NASA|access-date=March 27, 2023}}</ref>
@@ Line 300: / Line 305: @@
 The next launch did not occur until 1 March 2002, when the [[Envisat]] [[environmental satellite]] successfully reached an orbit of {{cvt|800|km}} above the [[Earth]] in the 11th launch. At {{cvt|8111|kg}}, it was the heaviest single payload until the launch of the [[Jules Verne ATV|first ATV]] on 9 March 2008, at {{cvt|19360|kg}}.
-The first launch of the ECA variant on 11 December 2002 ended in failure when a main booster problem caused the rocket to veer off-course, forcing its self-destruction three minutes into the flight. Its payload of two communications satellites ([[STENTOR (satellite)|STENTOR]] and [[Hot Bird 7]]), valued at about €630 million, was lost in the [[Atlantic Ocean]]. The fault was determined to have been caused by a leak in coolant pipes allowing the nozzle to overheat. After this failure, [[Arianespace|Arianespace SA]] delayed the expected January 2003 launch for the [[Rosetta space probe|Rosetta]] mission to 26 February 2004, but this was again delayed to early March 2004 due to a minor fault in the foam that protects the cryogenic tanks on the Ariane 5. The failure of the first ECA launch was the last failure of an Ariane 5 until [[Ariane flight VA241|flight 240]] in January 2018.
+The first launch of the ECA variant on 11 December 2002 ended in failure when a main booster problem caused the rocket to veer off-course, forcing its self-destruction three minutes into the flight. Its payload of two communications satellites ([[STENTOR (satellite)|STENTOR]] and [[Hot Bird 7]]), valued at about €630 million, was lost in the [[Atlantic Ocean]]. The fault was determined to have been caused by a leak in coolant pipes allowing the nozzle to overheat. After this failure, [[Arianespace|Arianespace SA]] delayed the expected January 2003 launch for the [[Rosetta space probe|Rosetta]] mission to 26 February 2004, but this was again delayed to early March 2004 due to a minor fault in the foam that protects the cryogenic tanks on the Ariane 5. The failure of the first ECA launch was the last failure of an Ariane 5 until [[Ariane flight VA241|flight 241]] in January 2018.
 On 27 September 2003, the last Ariane 5G boosted three satellites (including the first European lunar probe, [[SMART-1]]), in Flight 162. On 18 July 2004, an Ariane 5G+ boosted what was at the time the heaviest telecommunication satellite ever, [[Anik (satellite)|Anik F2]], weighing almost {{cvt|6000|kg}}.
@@ Line 328: / Line 333: @@
 === VA241 anomaly ===
-{{main|Ariane 5 flight VA241}}
+{{main|Ariane flight VA241}}
-On 25 January 2018, an Ariane 5ECA launched [[SES-14]] and [[Al Yah Satellite Communications|Al Yah 3]] satellites. About 9 minutes and 28 seconds after launch, a telemetry loss occurred between the launch vehicle and the ground controllers. It was later confirmed, about 1 hour and 20 minutes after launch, that both satellites were successfully separated from the upper stage and were in contact with their respective ground controllers,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/01/25/va-241-mission-status-center/|title=Live coverage: Ariane 5 launches with SES 14 and Al Yah 3 telecom satellites |author=Stephen Clark|publisher=Spaceflight Now|date=2 January 2018|access-date=26 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180126004614/https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/01/25/va-241-mission-status-center/|archive-date=26 January 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> but that their orbital inclinations were incorrect as the guidance systems might have been compromised. Therefore, both satellites conducted orbital procedures, extending commissioning time.<ref name="va241-yahoo">{{cite news|title=Ariane 5 satellites in orbit but not in right location|url=https://sg.news.yahoo.com/ariane-5-satellites-orbit-not-location-031339516.html|access-date=26 January 2018|publisher=Yahoo! News|agency=AFP News|date=26 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180126042057/https://sg.news.yahoo.com/ariane-5-satellites-orbit-not-location-031339516.html|archive-date=26 January 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> SES-14 needed about 8 weeks longer than planned commissioning time, meaning that entry into service was reported early September instead of July.<ref>{{cite web|title=SES-14 Goes Operational to Serve the Americas|url=https://www.ses.com/press-release/ses-14-goes-operational-serve-americas|access-date=26 September 2018 |publisher=SES|date=4 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180904230118/https://www.ses.com/press-release/ses-14-goes-operational-serve-americas|archive-date=4 September 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Nevertheless, SES-14 is still expected to be able to meet the designed lifetime. This satellite was originally to be launched with more propellant reserve on a [[Falcon 9]] launch vehicle since the Falcon 9, in this specific case, was intended to deploy this satellite into a high inclination orbit that would require more work from the satellite to reach its final geostationary orbit.<ref>{{cite news|title=SES Swaps SES-12 and SES-14 Launches|url=https://www.ses.com/press-release/ses-swaps-ses-12-and-ses-14-launches|access-date=17 February 2018|publisher=SES|date=28 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180201030540/https://www.ses.com/press-release/ses-swaps-ses-12-and-ses-14-launches|archive-date=1 February 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> The Al Yah 3 was also confirmed healthy after more than 12 hours without further statement, and like SES-14, Al Yah 3's maneuvering plan was also revised to still fulfill the original mission.<ref>{{cite web|title=Yahsat confirms launch of Al Yah 3 mission Satellite to greatly increase its global coverage|url=http://www.journeyofpride.com/yahsat-confirms-launch-of-al-yah-3-mission-satellite-to-greatly-increase-its-global-coverage/ |website=journeyofpride.com|access-date=26 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180127093940/http://www.journeyofpride.com/yahsat-confirms-launch-of-al-yah-3-mission-satellite-to-greatly-increase-its-global-coverage/|archive-date=27 January 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> As of 16 February 2018, Al Yah 3 was approaching the intended geostationary orbit, after series of recovery maneuvers had been performed.<ref>{{cite news|last1=McDowell|first1=Jonathan|title=The Al Yah 3 satellite put in the wrong orbit by the last Ariane launch is now approaching GEO; current orbit 22.5 hr period, 20828 x 47262 km x 6.2°|url=https://twitter.com/planet4589/status/964284086503247872|access-date=17 February 2018|work=@planet4589|date=16 February 2018}}</ref> The investigation showed that invalid inertial units' azimuth value had sent the vehicle 17° off course but to the intended altitude, they had been programmed for the standard geostationary transfer orbit of 90° when the payloads were intended to be 70° for this supersynchronous transfer orbit mission, 20° off norme.<ref name="arianespace.com">{{cite web|title=Independent Enquiry Commission announces conclusions concerning the launcher trajectory deviation during Flight VA241|url=http://www.arianespace.com/press-release/independent-enquiry-commission-announces-conclusions-concerning-the-launcher-trajectory-deviation-during-flight-va241/|publisher=Arianespace|access-date=23 February 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180223182356/http://www.arianespace.com/press-release/independent-enquiry-commission-announces-conclusions-concerning-the-launcher-trajectory-deviation-during-flight-va241/|archive-date=23 February 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> This mission anomaly ended the 82 consecutive launch success streak from 2003.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Neiberlien |first1=Henry|title=After 16 years, Ariane 5 finally fails|url=http://theavion.com/after-16-years-ariane-5-finally-fails/|access-date=30 January 2018|publisher=The Avion|date=29 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180130204259/http://theavion.com/after-16-years-ariane-5-finally-fails/|archive-date=30 January 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>
+On 25 January 2018, an Ariane 5ECA launched [[SES-14]] and [[Al Yah Satellite Communications|Al Yah 3]] satellites. About 9 minutes and 28 seconds after launch, a telemetry loss occurred between the launch vehicle and the ground controllers. It was later confirmed, about 1 hour and 20 minutes after launch, that both satellites were successfully separated from the upper stage and were in contact with their respective ground controllers,<ref>{{cite web |author=Clark |first=Stephen |date=2 January 2018 |title=Live coverage: Ariane 5 launches with SES 14 and Al Yah 3 telecom satellites |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/01/25/va-241-mission-status-center/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180126004614/https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/01/25/va-241-mission-status-center/ |archive-date=26 January 2018 |access-date=26 January 2018 |publisher=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> but that their orbital inclinations were incorrect as the guidance systems might have been compromised. Therefore, both satellites conducted orbital procedures, extending commissioning time.<ref name="va241-yahoo">{{cite news |date=26 January 2018 |title=Ariane 5 satellites in orbit but not in right location |url=https://sg.news.yahoo.com/ariane-5-satellites-orbit-not-location-031339516.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180126042057/https://sg.news.yahoo.com/ariane-5-satellites-orbit-not-location-031339516.html |archive-date=26 January 2018 |access-date=26 January 2018 |work=Yahoo! News |agency=AFP News}}</ref> SES-14 needed about 8 weeks longer than planned commissioning time, meaning that entry into service was reported early September instead of July.<ref>{{cite web|title=SES-14 Goes Operational to Serve the Americas|url=https://www.ses.com/press-release/ses-14-goes-operational-serve-americas|access-date=26 September 2018 |publisher=SES|date=4 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180904230118/https://www.ses.com/press-release/ses-14-goes-operational-serve-americas|archive-date=4 September 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Nevertheless, SES-14 is still expected to be able to meet the designed lifetime. This satellite was originally to be launched with more propellant reserve on a [[Falcon 9]] launch vehicle since the Falcon 9, in this specific case, was intended to deploy this satellite into a high inclination orbit that would require more work from the satellite to reach its final geostationary orbit.<ref>{{cite news|title=SES Swaps SES-12 and SES-14 Launches|url=https://www.ses.com/press-release/ses-swaps-ses-12-and-ses-14-launches|access-date=17 February 2018|publisher=SES|date=28 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180201030540/https://www.ses.com/press-release/ses-swaps-ses-12-and-ses-14-launches|archive-date=1 February 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> The Al Yah 3 was also confirmed healthy after more than 12 hours without further statement, and like SES-14, Al Yah 3's maneuvering plan was also revised to still fulfill the original mission.<ref>{{cite web|title=Yahsat confirms launch of Al Yah 3 mission Satellite to greatly increase its global coverage|url=http://www.journeyofpride.com/yahsat-confirms-launch-of-al-yah-3-mission-satellite-to-greatly-increase-its-global-coverage/ |website=journeyofpride.com|access-date=26 January 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180127093940/http://www.journeyofpride.com/yahsat-confirms-launch-of-al-yah-3-mission-satellite-to-greatly-increase-its-global-coverage/|archive-date=27 January 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> As of 16 February 2018, Al Yah 3 was approaching the intended geostationary orbit, after series of recovery maneuvers had been performed.<ref>{{cite tweet |number=964284086503247872 |user=planet4589 |title=The Al Yah 3 satellite put in the wrong orbit by the last Ariane launch is now approaching GEO; current orbit 22.5 hr period, 20828 x 47262 km x 6.2° |first1=Jonathan |last=McDowell |date=16 February 2018 |access-date=17 February 2018}}</ref> The investigation showed that invalid inertial units' azimuth value had sent the vehicle 17° off course but to the intended altitude, they had been programmed for the standard geostationary transfer orbit of 90° when the payloads were intended to be 70° for this supersynchronous transfer orbit mission, 20° off norme.<ref name="arianespace.com">{{cite web|title=Independent Enquiry Commission announces conclusions concerning the launcher trajectory deviation during Flight VA241|url=http://www.arianespace.com/press-release/independent-enquiry-commission-announces-conclusions-concerning-the-launcher-trajectory-deviation-during-flight-va241/|publisher=Arianespace|access-date=23 February 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180223182356/http://www.arianespace.com/press-release/independent-enquiry-commission-announces-conclusions-concerning-the-launcher-trajectory-deviation-during-flight-va241/|archive-date=23 February 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> This mission anomaly ended the 82 consecutive launch success streak from 2003.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Neiberlien |first1=Henry |date=29 January 2018 |title=After 16 years, Ariane 5 finally fails |url=http://theavion.com/after-16-years-ariane-5-finally-fails/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180130204259/http://theavion.com/after-16-years-ariane-5-finally-fails/ |archive-date=30 January 2018 |access-date=30 January 2018 |work=The Avion}}</ref>
 == Launch history ==
@@ Line 352: / Line 357: @@
 | group names = G : G+ : GS : ES : ECA
 | units suffix = _flights
-| x legends = 1996 :::: 2000 :::: 2004 :::: 2008 :::: 2012 :::: 2016 :::: 2020 :::
+| x legends = 1996 :::: 2000 :::: 2004 :::: 2008 :::: 2012 :::: 2016 :::: 2020 :::'23
 }}
 {{column}}
@@ Line 367: / Line 372: @@
 | group names = Failure : Partial failure : Success
 | units suffix = _flights
-| x legends = 1996 :::: 2000 :::: 2004 :::: 2008 :::: 2012 :::: 2016 :::: 2020 :::
+| x legends = 1996 :::: 2000 :::: 2004 :::: 2008 :::: 2012 :::: 2016 :::: 2020 :::'23
 }}
@@ Line 377: / Line 382: @@
 All launches are from [[Guiana Space Centre]], [[ELA-3]].
-{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible plainrowheaders" style="width: 100%;"
+{{sticky header}}
+{| class="wikitable  sticky-header sortable mw-collapsible plainrowheaders" style="width: 100%;"
 |-
 ! scope="col" | #
@@ Line 459: / Line 465: @@
 | 14 September 2000<br/>22:54<ref name="EA-A5"/>
 | G<br/>506
-| [[Astra 2B]]<br/>[[GE-7]]
+| [[Astra 2B]]<br/>[[AMC-7|GE-7]]
 | ~4,700&nbsp;kg
 | [[Geostationary transfer orbit|GTO]]
@@ Line 537: / Line 543: @@
 | 5 July 2002<br/>23:22<ref name="EA-A5"/>
 | G<br/>512
-| [[Stellat 5]]<br/>[[N-STAR c]]
+| [[Eutelsat 5 West A|Stellat 5]]<br/>[[N-STAR c]]
 | ~6,700&nbsp;kg
 | [[Geostationary transfer orbit|GTO]]
@@ Line 563: / Line 569: @@
 | 11 December 2002<br/>22:22<ref name="EA-A5"/>
 | ECA<br/>517
-| [[Hot Bird 7]]<br/>[[Stentor (satellite)|Stentor]]<br/>[[Modular Fitting Dummy|MFD-A]]<br/>[[Modular Fitting Dummy|MFD-B]]
+| [[Hot Bird 7]]<br/>[[STENTOR (satellite)|STENTOR]]<br/>[[Modular Fitting Dummy|MFD-A]]<br/>[[Modular Fitting Dummy|MFD-B]]
 |
 | [[Geostationary transfer orbit|GTO]] (planned)
@@ Line 1,862: / Line 1,868: @@
 | 7 September 2022<br/>21:45
 | ECA<br/>5117
-| [[Eutelsat Konnect]] VHTS
+| [[Eutelsat Konnect VHTS]]
 | 6,400&nbsp;kg
 | [[Geostationary transfer orbit|GTO]]
@@ Line 1,873: / Line 1,879: @@
 | 13 December 2022<br/>20:30
 | ECA<br/>5118
-| [[Galaxy (satellite)|Galaxy 35]]<br/>[[Galaxy (satellite)|Galaxy 36]]<br/>[[Meteosat|MTG-I1]]
+| [[Galaxy (satellite)|Galaxy 35]]<br/>[[Galaxy (satellite)|Galaxy 36]]<br/>[[MTG-I1]]
 | 10,972&nbsp;kg<ref>{{Cite web|title=DutchSpace on Twitter|url=https://twitter.com/DutchSpace/status/1603010450765004804|access-date=2022-12-14|website=Twitter|language=en-US}}</ref>
 | [[Geostationary transfer orbit|GTO]]
@@ Line 1,881: / Line 1,887: @@
 |116
-! scope="row" |VA-260
+! scope="row" | [[Ariane flight VA260|VA-260]]
 | 14 April 2023<br/>12:14
 | ECA<br/>5120
@@ Line 1,892: / Line 1,898: @@
 |rowspan=2|117
-! scope="row" rowspan=2 | VA-261
+! scope="row" rowspan=2 | [[Ariane flight VA261|VA-261]]
 | 5 July 2023<br/>22:00
 | ECA<br/>5119
-| [[Syracuse (satellite)|Syracuse 4B]] (Comsat-NG 2)<ref>{{Cite web |last=Foust |first=Jeff |date=10 September 2019 |title=Airbus and Telespazio to sell excess capacity on Syracuse 4 satellites |url=https://spacenews.com/airbus-and-telespazio-to-sell-excess-capacity-on-syracuse-4-satellites/ |access-date=7 September 2022 |website=[[SpaceNews]]}}</ref> <br />Heinrich Hertz (H2Sat)
+| [[Syracuse (satellite)|Syracuse 4B]] (Comsat-NG 2)<ref>{{Cite web |last=Foust |first=Jeff |date=10 September 2019 |title=Airbus and Telespazio to sell excess capacity on Syracuse 4 satellites |url=https://spacenews.com/airbus-and-telespazio-to-sell-excess-capacity-on-syracuse-4-satellites/ |access-date=7 September 2022 |website=[[SpaceNews]]}}</ref> <br />[[Heinrich Hertz (satellite)|Heinrich Hertz]] (H2Sat)
 | 7,679.8&nbsp;kg<ref>{{Cite web|title=DutchSpace on Twitter|url=https://twitter.com/DutchSpace/status/1676707641182101505|access-date=2023-08-06|website=Twitter|language=en-US}}</ref>
 | [[Geostationary transfer orbit|GTO]]
@@ Line 1,918: / Line 1,924: @@
 ==References==
-{{reflist|refs=
+<references>
 <ref name="esamultimedia.esa.int">{{cite web |url=http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/esa-x-1819eng.pdf |title=Ariane 5 Flight 501 Failure, Report by the Inquiry Board |website=esamultimedia.esa.int |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000815230639/http://www.esrin.esa.it/htdocs/tidc/Press/Press96/ariane5rep.html |archive-date=15 August 2000}}</ref>
 <ref name="EA-A5">{{cite encyclopedia |url=http://www.astronautix.com/a/ariane5.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161013130033/http://www.astronautix.com/a/ariane5.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=13 October 2016 |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia Astronautica |title=Ariane 5}}</ref>
-}}
+</references>
 == External links ==

Ariane 5: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 15:28, 18 November 2025

Contents

Vehicle description

Cryogenic main stage

Solid boosters

Second stage

Fairing

Launch preparations

Variants

Launch pricing and market competition

Cancelled plans for future developments

Ariane 5 ME

Development

Solid propellant stage

Ariane 6

Notable launches

GTO payload weight records

VA241 anomaly

Launch history

Launch statistics

Rocket configurations

Launch outcomes

List of launches

See also

Notes

References

External links

Navigation menu

Ariane 5: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 15:28, 18 November 2025

Vehicle description

Cryogenic main stage

Solid boosters

Second stage

Fairing

Launch preparations

Variants

Launch pricing and market competition

Cancelled plans for future developments

Ariane 5 ME

Development

Solid propellant stage

Ariane 6

Notable launches

GTO payload weight records

VA241 anomaly

Launch history

Launch statistics

Rocket configurations

Launch outcomes

List of launches

See also

Notes

References

External links

Navigation menu

Search