Local hidden-variable theory: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>OAbot
m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot.
 
imported>Citation bot
Added bibcode. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Quantum measurement | #UCB_Category 5/84
 
Line 8: Line 8:


=== Single qubit ===
=== Single qubit ===
A [[Bell's theorem|collection of related theorems]], beginning with Bell's proof in 1964, show that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local hidden variables. However, as Bell pointed out, restricted sets of quantum phenomena ''can'' be imitated using local hidden-variable models. Bell provided a local hidden-variable model for quantum measurements upon a spin-1/2 particle, or in the terminology of quantum information theory, a single [[qubit]].<ref name=Bell1964>{{cite journal | last1 = Bell | first1 = J. S. | author-link = John Stewart Bell | year = 1964 | title = On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox | url = https://cds.cern.ch/record/111654/files/vol1p195-200_001.pdf | journal = [[Physics Physique Физика]] | volume = 1 | issue = 3| pages = 195–200 | doi = 10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195 }}</ref> Bell's model was later simplified by [[N. David Mermin]], and a closely related model was presented by [[Simon B. Kochen]] and [[Ernst Specker]].<ref>{{cite journal|first1=S. |last1=Kochen |author-link1=Simon B. Kochen |first2=E. |last2=Specker |author-link2=Ernst Specker |journal=Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics |volume=17 |year=1967 |title=The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics |number=1 |pages=59–87 |jstor=24902153}}</ref><ref name="mermin1993">{{Cite journal|last=Mermin|first=N. David|author-link=David Mermin|date=1993-07-01|title=Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell|journal=[[Reviews of Modern Physics]]|volume=65|issue=3|pages=803–815|doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.65.803|bibcode=1993RvMP...65..803M|arxiv=1802.10119|s2cid=119546199}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Harrigan |first1=Nicholas |last2=Spekkens |first2=Robert W. |date=2010-02-01 |title=Einstein, Incompleteness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0 |journal=Foundations of Physics |language=en |volume=40 |issue=2 |pages=125–157 |arxiv=0706.2661 |doi=10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0 |s2cid=32755624 |issn=1572-9516}}</ref> The existence of these models is related to the fact that [[Gleason's theorem]] does not apply to the case of a single qubit.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Budroni |first1=Costantino |last2=Cabello |first2=Adán |last3=Gühne |first3=Otfried |last4=Kleinmann |first4=Matthias |last5=Larsson |first5=Jan-Åke |date=2022-12-19 |title=Kochen-Specker contextuality |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.045007 |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |language=en |volume=94 |issue=4 |page=045007 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.94.045007 |hdl=11441/144776 |s2cid=251951089 |issn=0034-6861|hdl-access=free |arxiv=2102.13036}}</ref>
A [[Bell's theorem|collection of related theorems]], beginning with Bell's proof in 1964, show that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local hidden variables. However, as Bell pointed out, restricted sets of quantum phenomena ''can'' be imitated using local hidden-variable models. Bell provided a local hidden-variable model for quantum measurements upon a spin-1/2 particle, or in the terminology of quantum information theory, a single [[qubit]].<ref name=Bell1964>{{cite journal | last1 = Bell | first1 = J. S. | author-link = John Stewart Bell | year = 1964 | title = On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox | url = https://cds.cern.ch/record/111654/files/vol1p195-200_001.pdf | journal = [[Physics Physique Физика]] | volume = 1 | issue = 3| pages = 195–200 | doi = 10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195 }}</ref> Bell's model was later simplified by [[N. David Mermin]], and a closely related model was presented by [[Simon B. Kochen]] and [[Ernst Specker]].<ref>{{cite journal|first1=S. |last1=Kochen |author-link1=Simon B. Kochen |first2=E. |last2=Specker |author-link2=Ernst Specker |journal=Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics |volume=17 |year=1967 |title=The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics |number=1 |pages=59–87 |jstor=24902153}}</ref><ref name="mermin1993">{{Cite journal|last=Mermin|first=N. David|author-link=David Mermin|date=1993-07-01|title=Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell|journal=[[Reviews of Modern Physics]]|volume=65|issue=3|pages=803–815|doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.65.803|bibcode=1993RvMP...65..803M|arxiv=1802.10119|s2cid=119546199}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Harrigan |first1=Nicholas |last2=Spekkens |first2=Robert W. |date=2010-02-01 |title=Einstein, Incompleteness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0 |journal=Foundations of Physics |language=en |volume=40 |issue=2 |pages=125–157 |arxiv=0706.2661 |doi=10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0 |bibcode=2010FoPh...40..125H |s2cid=32755624 |issn=1572-9516}}</ref> The existence of these models is related to the fact that [[Gleason's theorem]] does not apply to the case of a single qubit.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Budroni |first1=Costantino |last2=Cabello |first2=Adán |last3=Gühne |first3=Otfried |last4=Kleinmann |first4=Matthias |last5=Larsson |first5=Jan-Åke |date=2022-12-19 |title=Kochen-Specker contextuality |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.045007 |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |language=en |volume=94 |issue=4 |page=045007 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.94.045007 |hdl=11441/144776 |s2cid=251951089 |issn=0034-6861|hdl-access=free |arxiv=2102.13036|bibcode=2022RvMP...94d5007B }}</ref>


=== Bipartite quantum states ===
=== Bipartite quantum states ===
Bell also pointed out that up until then, discussions of [[quantum entanglement]] focused on cases where the results of measurements upon two particles were either perfectly correlated or perfectly anti-correlated. These special cases can also be explained using local hidden variables.<ref name=Bell1964/><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ou |first1=Z. Y. |last2=Pereira |first2=S. F. |last3=Kimble |first3=H. J. |last4=Peng |first4=K. C. |date=1992-06-22 |title=Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for continuous variables |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3663 |journal=Physical Review Letters |language=en |volume=68 |issue=25 |pages=3663–3666 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3663 |pmid=10045765 |issn=0031-9007|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Bartlett |first1=Stephen D. |last2=Rudolph |first2=Terry |last3=Spekkens |first3=Robert W. |date=2012-07-10 |title=Reconstruction of Gaussian quantum mechanics from Liouville mechanics with an epistemic restriction |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.012103 |journal=Physical Review A |language=en |volume=86 |issue=1 |page=012103 |arxiv=1111.5057 |bibcode=2012PhRvA..86a2103B |doi=10.1103/PhysRevA.86.012103 |s2cid=119235025 |issn=1050-2947}}</ref>
Bell also pointed out that up until then, discussions of [[quantum entanglement]] focused on cases where the results of measurements upon two particles were either perfectly correlated or perfectly anti-correlated. These special cases can also be explained using local hidden variables.<ref name=Bell1964/><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ou |first1=Z. Y. |last2=Pereira |first2=S. F. |last3=Kimble |first3=H. J. |last4=Peng |first4=K. C. |date=1992-06-22 |title=Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for continuous variables |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3663 |journal=Physical Review Letters |language=en |volume=68 |issue=25 |pages=3663–3666 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3663 |pmid=10045765 |bibcode=1992PhRvL..68.3663O |issn=0031-9007|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Bartlett |first1=Stephen D. |last2=Rudolph |first2=Terry |last3=Spekkens |first3=Robert W. |date=2012-07-10 |title=Reconstruction of Gaussian quantum mechanics from Liouville mechanics with an epistemic restriction |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.012103 |journal=Physical Review A |language=en |volume=86 |issue=1 |page=012103 |arxiv=1111.5057 |bibcode=2012PhRvA..86a2103B |doi=10.1103/PhysRevA.86.012103 |s2cid=119235025 |issn=1050-2947}}</ref>


For [[separable state]]s of two particles, there is a simple hidden-variable model for any measurements on the two parties. Surprisingly, there are also [[quantum entanglement|entangled states]] for which all [[Measurement in quantum mechanics|von Neumann measurements]] can be described by a hidden-variable model.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=R. F. Werner | title=Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model |journal=[[Physical Review A]]| year=1989 |volume=40 | issue=8 | doi=10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277 | pages=4277–4281 |bibcode=1989PhRvA..40.4277W | pmid=9902666 }}</ref>  Such states are entangled, but do not violate any Bell inequality. The so-called [[Werner state]]s are a single-parameter family of states that are invariant under any transformation of the type <math>U \otimes U,</math> where <math>U</math> is a unitary matrix. For two qubits, they are noisy singlets given as  
For [[separable state]]s of two particles, there is a simple hidden-variable model for any measurements on the two parties. Surprisingly, there are also [[quantum entanglement|entangled states]] for which all [[Measurement in quantum mechanics|von Neumann measurements]] can be described by a hidden-variable model.<ref>{{cite journal |author1=R. F. Werner | title=Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model |journal=[[Physical Review A]]| year=1989 |volume=40 | issue=8 | doi=10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277 | pages=4277–4281 |bibcode=1989PhRvA..40.4277W | pmid=9902666 }}</ref>  Such states are entangled, but do not violate any Bell inequality. The so-called [[Werner state]]s are a single-parameter family of states that are invariant under any transformation of the type <math>U \otimes U,</math> where <math>U</math> is a unitary matrix. For two qubits, they are noisy singlets given as  

Latest revision as of 10:45, 27 June 2025

Template:Short description Template:Quantum In the interpretation of quantum mechanics, a local hidden-variable theory is a hidden-variable theory that satisfies the principle of locality. These models attempt to account for the probabilistic features of quantum mechanics via the mechanism of underlying but inaccessible variables, with the additional requirement that distant events be statistically independent.

The mathematical implications of a local hidden-variable theory with regards to quantum entanglement were explored by physicist John Stewart Bell, who in 1964 proved that broad classes of local hidden-variable theories cannot reproduce the correlations between measurement outcomes that quantum mechanics predicts, a result since confirmed by a range of detailed Bell test experiments.[1]

Models

Single qubit

A collection of related theorems, beginning with Bell's proof in 1964, show that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local hidden variables. However, as Bell pointed out, restricted sets of quantum phenomena can be imitated using local hidden-variable models. Bell provided a local hidden-variable model for quantum measurements upon a spin-1/2 particle, or in the terminology of quantum information theory, a single qubit.[2] Bell's model was later simplified by N. David Mermin, and a closely related model was presented by Simon B. Kochen and Ernst Specker.[3][4][5] The existence of these models is related to the fact that Gleason's theorem does not apply to the case of a single qubit.[6]

Bipartite quantum states

Bell also pointed out that up until then, discussions of quantum entanglement focused on cases where the results of measurements upon two particles were either perfectly correlated or perfectly anti-correlated. These special cases can also be explained using local hidden variables.[2][7][8]

For separable states of two particles, there is a simple hidden-variable model for any measurements on the two parties. Surprisingly, there are also entangled states for which all von Neumann measurements can be described by a hidden-variable model.[9] Such states are entangled, but do not violate any Bell inequality. The so-called Werner states are a single-parameter family of states that are invariant under any transformation of the type UU, where U is a unitary matrix. For two qubits, they are noisy singlets given as ϱ=p|ψψ|+(1p)𝕀4, where the singlet is defined as |ψ=12(|01|10).

Reinhard F. Werner showed that such states allow for a hidden-variable model for p1/2, while they are entangled if p>1/3. The bound for hidden-variable models could be improved until p=2/3.[10] Hidden-variable models have been constructed for Werner states even if positive operator-valued measurements (POVM) are allowed, not only von Neumann measurements.[11] Hidden variable models were also constructed to noisy maximally entangled states, and even extended to arbitrary pure states mixed with white noise.[12] Beside bipartite systems, there are also results for the multipartite case. A hidden-variable model for any von Neumann measurements at the parties has been presented for a three-qubit quantum state.[13]

Time-dependent variables

Previously some new hypotheses were conjectured concerning the role of time in constructing hidden-variables theory. One approach was suggested by K. Hess and W. Philipp and relies upon possible consequences of time dependencies of hidden variables; this hypothesis has been criticized by Richard D. Gill, Template:Ill, Anton Zeilinger and Marek Żukowski, as well as D. M. Appleby.[14][15][16]

See also

References

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".