Babson task

Template:Short description A Babson Task (or simply Babson) is a Template:Chessprobgloss chess problem with the following properties:

1. White has only one Template:Chessprobgloss, or first move, that forces checkmate in the stipulated number of moves.
2. Black's defences include the promotion of a certain pawn to a queen, rook, bishop, or knight. (Black may have other defences as well.)
3. If Black promotes, then the only way for White towards a forced checkmate in the stipulated number of moves is to promote a pawn to the same piece to which Black promoted.

Template:Ill (1852–1929), the task's eponym, first conceived of the task in 1884, but never solved it. To devise a satisfying Babson task is regarded as one of the greatest challenges in chess composing. For almost a century, it was unknown whether such a task could exist.

The Babson task is a special form of Allumwandlung, a chess problem in which the solution contains promotions to each of the four possible pieces. Such problems were already known when Babson formulated his task. Template:Algebraic notation

Forerunners of the Babson task

This 1912 problem by Wolfgang Pauly is, as it were, a three-quarter Babson task: three of Black's promotions are matched by White.

The key is 1.b3, after which there are the following lines:

This is not a full Babson, however, because 1...a1=B 2.f8=B does not work; White must instead play 2.f8=Q, with similar play to above.

Selfmate Babsons

The earliest Babson tasks are all in the form of a selfmate, in which White, moving first, must force Black to deliver checkmate against Black's will within a specified number of moves. In 1914, Babson himself published such a problem, in which three different white pawns shared the promotions.

Henry Wald Bettmann composed the first problem in which one black pawn and one white pawn were involved in all promotions, winning 1st prize in the Babson Task Tourney 1925–26.

The key in Bettmann's problem is 1.a8=B, after which play is as follows:

Various other composers later composed similar problems.

Directmate Babsons

Composing a Babson task in directmate form (where White moves first and must checkmate Black against any defence within a stipulated number of moves) was thought so difficult that very little effort was put into it until the 1960s, when Pierre Drumare began his work on the problem, which occupied him for the next twenty years or so. He managed to compose a Babson task in which the knight is replaced with the nightrider (a fairy chess piece which moves by making any number of knight moves in the same direction on unblocked squares) but found it hard to devise one using normal pieces: because of the knight's limited range, it is difficult to justify a knight promotion by White in response to a knight promotion by Black on the other side of the board.

When Drumare eventually succeeded using conventional pieces in 1980, the result was regarded as highly unsatisfactory, even by Drumare himself. It is a mate in five (first published Memorial Seneca, 1980). The key is 1.Rf2, after which captures by Black on b1 are answered by captures by White on g8.

Efficiency in chess problems is considered a great boon, but Drumare's attempt is very inefficient: no fewer than 30 pieces are on the board. It also has six promoted pieces in the initial position (even a single promoted piece is considered something of a "cheat" in chess problems), which is in any case illegal: one of the white f-pawns must have made a capture, and the white and black b- and c-pawns must have made two captures between them, making three in total, yet only two units are missing from the board. Despite all these flaws, it is the first complete Babson task.

In 1982, two years after composing this problem, Drumare gave up, saying that the Babson task would never be satisfactorily solved.

The following year, Leonid Yarosh, a football coach from Kazan who was virtually unknown as a problem composer until that point, came up with a much better Babson task than Drumare's: the position is legal, it is much simpler than Drumare's problem, and there are no promoted pieces on board. First published in March 1983 in the famous Russian chess magazine Shakhmaty v SSSR, this is generally thought of as the first satisfactory solution of the Babson task. Drumare himself had high praise for the problem.

The key is 1.Rxh4, and the main lines are:

Template:Unordered list However, Yarosh's problem has a small flaw: the key is a capture, something which is generally frowned upon in problems. Also, when first presented, the black piece at h4 was a pawn, but a computer discovered an additional solution by 1.axb8=N hxg3+ 2.Kh3 Bxb8 3.Qxc2 and mate next move. Yarosh then substituted a knight on that square; now 1.axb8=N fails to 1...Nf3+ 2.Bxf3 Bxb8 3.Qxc2 Bxg3+ and White is too late. Nevertheless, when Dutch author Tim Krabbé saw this version in the Soviet publication 64, he records that the realisation that somebody had at last solved the Babson task had the effect upon him as if he had "... opened a newspaper and seen the headline 'Purpose Of Life Discovered'."

Yarosh continued to work on the problem, and in August 1983, he created an improved version with a non-capturing key, which appeared in Shakhmaty v SSSR. Many chess problemists, including Tim Krabbé, consider the problem one of the greatest ever composed. Again, it is a mate in four moves.

The key here is non-capturing and also thematic (that is, it is logically related to the rest of the solution): 1.a7!. The variations are largely the same as in the original:

There is another defence for black that is non-thematic and also leads to mate in four: 1...Qxd8+ 2.Kg7 axb1=Q 3.Rxf4+ Qe4 4. Rxe4#. However, this is not considered a flaw according to the rules of the Babson task.

Yarosh composed a completely different Babson task later in 1983 and another in 1986. Several other Babsons were later composed by other authors, including one by Drumare in 1985. The solution of this Babson is 1.fxg8=Q dxe2 2.Nxe3 e1=Q/R/B/N 3.gxf8=Q/R/B/N and now mate in two in all variations.

The cyclic Babson

In a cyclic Babson, rather than Black’s promotions being matched by White, they are related in cyclic form: for example, Black promoting to a queen means White must promote to a bishop, Black promoting to a bishop means White must promote to a rook, Black promoting to a rook means White must promote to a knight, and Black promoting to a knight means White must promote to a queen.

The August 2003 issue of the German problem magazine Die Schwalbe contained the problem to the right, a mate in four by Peter Hoffmann. Hoffmann had previously published a number of conventional directmate Babsons, but this one is significant because it is the first cyclic Babson. However, as with Drumare's original Babson task, the problem uses promoted pieces and has a capturing key.

The key is 1.Nxe6, threatening 2.hxg8=Q and 3.Qf7#. The thematic defences are:

• 1...d1=Q 2.hxg8=B (2.hxg8=Q? Qd7+ 3.Bxd7 stalemate; 2.hxg8=N+? Kxe6 and no mate), threatening 3.c4+ Q-moves 4.BxQ#
  • 2...Qd7+ 3.Bxd7 Kxg6 4.Rxh6#
  • 2...Qxc1 3.Rxg5 (threat: 4.Rf5#) hxg5 4.Qh8#
• 1...d1=B 2.hxg8=R (2.hxg8=Q? stalemate; 2.hxg8=N+? Kxe6 and no mate) Kxe6 3.Rd8 3.Kf6 Rd6#
• 1...d1=R 2.hxg8=N (2.hxg8=Q? Rd4+ 3.c4 stalemate) Kxe6 3.Qxe2+ K-moves 4.Qe5#
• 1...d1=N 2.hxg8=Q (2.hxg8=N+? Kxe6 3.Qxe2+ Ne3! and no mate) Nxb2+ 3.Kb5(Bxb2) and 4.Qf7#

There are also a number of sidelines.

In the September 2005 issue of Template:Ill, the first cyclic Babson without promoted pieces in the initial position was published. Again, the composer was Peter Hoffmann.

The key is 1.Nxb6. The thematic defences are:

• 1...d1=Q 2.exf8=B (2.exf8=Q? Qd4+ 3.Bxd4 stalemate; 2.exf8=N+? Kd6 3.Be5+ Kc5 and no mate)
  • 2...Qd4+ 3.exd4 Kxf6 4.d5#
• 1...d1=B 2.exf8=R (2.exf8=Q? stalemate; 2.exf8=N+? Kd6 3.Be5+ Kc5 and no mate)
  • 2...Kd6 3.Qd2+ with mate after any move by black
• 1...d1=R 2.exf8=N+ (2.exf8=Q? Rd4+ 3.Bxd4 stalemate; 2.exf8=B? Rd7 3.c8=Q(B) stalemate)
  • 2...Kd6 3.Be5+ Kc5 4.Qxc2#
• 1...d1=N 2.exf8=Q (2.exf8=N+? Kd6 3.Be5+ Kc5 and no mate)
  • 2...Nxc3+ 3.Kxa5 Ne4 4.c8=Q#

Babson Task in an endgame study

Achieving a Babson task in an endgame study was long considered impossible because of the enormous complexity required to make every promotion the only winning move, avoid duals, and keep the position legal. Some partial Babsons have been shown in the form of studies, but at a maximum only three quarters of the theme was achieved (usually missing the rook variation).

In October 2024, the Israeli-American chess composer Gady Costeff published on EG an attempt of a complete Babson Task in an endgame study.

Solution:

1... d1=Q 2. fxe8=Q! [White wins]

1... d1=R 2. fxe8=R! [White wins] [Thematic Try 2. fxe8=Q? Nc5+ 3. Nxc5 Rxd4+! 4. Nc4 Rb4+! 5. axb4 Stalemate]

1... d1=B 2. fxe8=B! [White wins]

1... d1=N 2. fxe8=N+! [White wins] [2. fxe8=Q? Nxb2#! Checkmate]

Although the solution to Costeff's study is correct from a purely analytical perspective, the position is technically illegal: only the h-pawn could have promoted into one of the three white Knights, which would require an illegal move (such as jumping over h7) or an excessive number of white captures. While some modifications—such as removing the black pawn on a7—might seem to resolve the issue, even minor changes result in unintended side effects, including dual solutions, positional instability, or unsolvability. The study's construction also involves a high piece density, and some candidate black defenses (e.g. 1...Ke7, 1...Nd6, 1...Nc7) have been shown to require extended computer-assisted analysis to be conclusively refuted. Despite the illegality of the setting, the study marked the first demonstration of a complete Babson Task within the endgame study genre. A historical precedent exists in the direct-mate genre, where Pierre Drumare achieved the theme for the first time in 1980, also in an illegal setting.

In January 2025, again on EG, the Italian chess composer Daniele Guglielmo Gatti showed a complete Babson Task in an endgame study. The composer claimed to have worked on it for only forty-five days, after having seen Costeff's failed attempt. Gatti composed a significantly different position, but retained some core elements and ideas of Costeff's one. He managed to make the position legal, absent of promoted pieces, and improved the economy of the problem. This made him the first composer to correctly achieve the Babson task in an endgame study, 141 years after the theme was proposed.

The solution of the study is as follows:

— 1…f1=Q 2.hxg8=Q! Ne5+ 3.dxe5 Qf4+ 4.Ne4! avoids stalemate and wins,

— 1…f1=R 2.hxg8=R!/i Rxg1/ii 3.Nd6/iii exd6 4.Ne4+ Kh7 5.Nf6 mate,

— 1…f1=B 2.hxg8=B!/iv Kg7 (Qxe1; Nf3+! wins) 3.c6 Qxe1 4.c7 Qb1 5.Nxe6+ Kxg8 6.c8=Q+ Kh7 7.Ng5+ Kg7 8.Qf5 Qxa2+ 9.Kc5 e1=Q 10.Ne6+ Qxe6 11.Qxe6 wins,

— 1…f1=N 2.hxg8=N+!/v Kg7 3.Nxe6+ Kxg8 4.Rxe2 Nxe3+ 5.Rxe3 Qd2 6.Ree1 Qxa2+ 7.Kb4 Qb3+ 8.Ka5 wins.

i) Thematic try: 2.hxg8=Q? Ne5+! 3.dxe5 Rf4+! 4.Ne4 Qc3+ (or Qxb5+) 5. Kxc3 stalemate.

ii) Rxe1 3.Rxe1 with: Qxe1 4.Nf3+ wins, or g1=Q 4.Nxe6+ (Rxg1? Bd5! mate;) Kh7 5.Rg7+ Kh8 6.Rxg1 wins.

iii) Threatens 4.Nf7 mate. Prematurely 3.Ne4+? Kh7! wins as there is no mate on f6.

iv) Thematic try: 2.hxg8=N+? Kg7 3.c6 Qxe1 4.c7 Qb1 5.Nxe6+ Kh7 The point: no promotion with check 6.c8=Q Qxa2+ 7.Kb4 Qb3+ 8.Ka5 (Kc5? Qc2+ skewer) e1=Q+ 9.Kb6 Qxe3 another point 10.Nf6+ Kh6 11.g5+ Qxg5 12.Ng8+ Kh5 and draw.

v) Other promotions all fail to Nxe3 mate.

Following its publication, Gatti's study was featured on various national and international platforms. In Italy, it appeared on UnoScacchista, the official Facebook page of the Italian Chess Federation, the podcast L’Infilata, the chess magazine Torre & Cavallo – Scacco!, and issue no. 115 of Best Problems.. Internationally, it was covered on the ARVES website, known for its focus on endgame studies, and on SuperProblem.ru, within the “Tasks & Records” section. It also appeared in issue no. 173 of the Swedish magazine Springaren and in issues no. 2 and no. 3 (2025) of the Hungarian magazine Magyar Sakkvilág.

Several chess composers and critics publicly commented on the study. Ukrainian composer and former WCCI champion Serhiy Didukh referred to it as a “chess miracle” in his blog Chess Study Art. He later included the study in his digital book 100 Memorable Studies, published on the same site. The study was also praised by Harold van der Heijden and World Champion of endgame study composition Steffen Slumstrup Nielsen in the editorial of EG no. 239. Heijden referred to the composer as "a hero" for achieving a long-standing challenge in chess composition. German grandmaster and endgame study composer Jan Michael Sprenger contributed a comment on Didukh’s blog, calling the setting “sound and completely legal”, and describing it as “a rather elegant position given the complexity of the task.” He remarked on the surprising speed of its realization.

Outside the composition community, the study was analyzed by Austrian grandmaster and national champion Felix Blohberger in an instructional YouTube video.

Some discussion was raised regarding the initial stipulation of the study. While the Babson Task traditionally begins with White to move, the study in question starts with Black to move. This choice, while uncommon, is legally permissible in endgame studies. In EG no. 239, van der Heijden notes: “The composer also indicated that it is a pity that the study starts with BTM. When you put the wK on c3, the only move is 1.Kc4. Steffen advised that BTM is a lesser problem than wK in check in the initial position, and I fully agree.”

References

Bibliography

Further reading

• Jeremy Morse, Chess Problems Tasks and Records (Faber and Faber, 1995, revised edition 2001) – contains a chapter on the Babson task

External links

• (a detailed analysis of Yarosh's second Babson)
• (lists Babsons published later)
• (mentions two forerunners of the Babson task)