Cognition: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Citation bot
Alter: title, url, issue, pages, journal, last2, first3, first4. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: issue, volume, pages, chapter-url, bibcode, pmid, authors 1-1. Removed or converted URL. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Neko-chan | #UCB_toolbar
imported>Phlsph7
Undid revision 1321541895 by P.D.Dharmasiri (talk) unencyclopedic
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Act or process of knowing}}
{{Short description|Mental activity dealing with knowledge}}
{{about|the mental process|the journal|Cognition (journal){{!}}''Cognition'' (journal)|the company|Cognition AI}}
{{about|the mental process|the journal|Cognition (journal){{!}}''Cognition'' (journal)|the company|Cognition AI}}
{{redirect-distinguish|Human cognition|Animal cognition}}
{{redirect|Cognitive}}
{{redirect|Cognitive}}
{{Use American English|date=July 2023}}
{{Use American English|date=July 2023}}


[[File:RobertFuddBewusstsein17Jh.png|alt=A cognitive model illustrated by Robert Fludd|thumb|A [[cognitive model]], as illustrated by [[Robert Fludd]] (1619)<ref>[[Robert Fludd|Fludd, Robert]]. "De tripl. animae in corp. vision". {{Abbr|Tract.|''Tractatus'' ('treatise')}} I, {{Abbr|sect.|section}} I, {{Abbr|lib.|''libre'' ('book')}} X in {{Langx|la|Utriusque cosmi maioris scilicet et minoris metaphysica, physica atqve technica historia|label=none}}, vol. II.  p. [[iarchive:utriusquecosmima02flud/page/216/mode/2up|217]].</ref>]]
[[File:Cognitive capacities.svg|thumb|alt=Diagram of a head with symbols for different cognitive capacities inside it|Cognition encompasses psychological activities like perception, thinking, language processing, and memory.]]
'''Cognition''' refers to the broad set of mental processes that relate to acquiring [[knowledge]] and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses. <ref>{{Cite web|title=Cognition|url=https://www.lexico.com/definition/cognition |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200715113427/https://www.lexico.com/definition/cognition |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 15, 2020 |website=Lexico|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] and [[Dictionary.com]]|access-date=6 May 2020}}</ref> It encompasses all aspects of [[intellect]]ual functions and processes such as: [[perception]], [[attention]], [[thought]], [[imagination]], [[intelligence]], the formation of [[knowledge]], [[memory]] and [[working memory]], [[Value judgment|judgment]] and [[evaluation]], [[reason]]ing and [[computation]], [[problem solving|problem-solving]] and [[decision making|decision-making]], [[comprehension (logic)|comprehension]] and production of [[language]]. Cognitive processes use existing knowledge to discover new knowledge.


Cognitive processes are analyzed from very different perspectives within different contexts, notably in the fields of [[linguistics]], [[musicology]], [[anesthesia]], [[neuroscience]], [[psychiatry]], [[psychology]], [[education]], [[philosophy]], [[anthropology]], [[biology]], [[systemics]], [[logic]], and [[computer science]].<ref>{{cite book|last=Von Eckardt|first=Barbara | name-list-style = vanc |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=E8l48-DZln0C&q=what+is+cognition&pg=PA13|title=What is cognitive science?|publisher=MIT Press|year=1996|isbn=9780262720236|location=Princeton, MA|pages=45–72}}</ref> These and other approaches to the analysis of cognition (such as [[embodied cognition]]) are synthesized in the developing field of [[cognitive science]], a progressively autonomous [[Discipline (academia)|academic discipline]].
'''Cognitions''' are mental activities that deal with [[knowledge]]. They encompass [[Psychology|psychological]] processes that acquire, store, retrieve, transform, or otherwise use information. Cognitions are a pervasive part of mental life, helping individuals understand and interact with the world.


== Etymology ==
Cognitive processes are typically categorized by their function. [[Perception]] organizes [[Sense data|sensory information]] about the world, interpreting physical stimuli, such as light and sound, to construct a coherent [[experience]] of objects and events. [[Attention]] prioritizes specific aspects while filtering out irrelevant information. [[Memory]] is the ability to retain, store, and retrieve information, including [[working memory]] and [[long-term memory]]. [[Thinking]] encompasses psychological activities in which [[concepts]], ideas, and mental representations are considered and manipulated. It includes [[Logical reasoning|reasoning]], [[concept formation]], [[problem-solving]], and [[decision-making]]. Many cognitive activities deal with [[language]], including [[language acquisition]], [[language comprehension|comprehension]], and [[language production|production]]. [[Metacognition]] involves knowledge about knowledge or mental processes that monitor and regulate other mental processes. Classifications also distinguish between [[Consciousness|conscious]] and [[Unconscious mind|unconscious]] processes and between [[Automatic and controlled processes|controlled and automatic]] ones.
The word ''cognition'' dates back to the 15th century, where it meant "[[thought|thinking]] and awareness".<ref name=":0">{{cite book | last=Revlin | first=Russell | title=Cognition: Theory and Practice | publisher=Macmillan | date=2012-02-24 | isbn=978-0-7167-5667-5}}</ref> The term comes from the [[Latin]] noun {{Langx|la|{{wikt-lang|en|i=no|cognitio}}|label=none}} ('examination', 'learning', or 'knowledge'), derived from the verb {{Langx|la|{{wikt-lang|en|i=no|cognosco}}|label=none}}, a [[Compound (linguistics)|compound]] of {{Langx|la|{{wikt-lang|en|i=no|con}}|label=none}} ('with') and {{Langx|la|{{wikt-lang|en|i=no|gnosco|gnōscō}}|label=none}} ('know'). The latter half, {{Lang|la|gnōscō}}, itself is a [[cognate]] of a [[Ancient Greek|Greek]] verb, ''{{Langx|grc|gi(g)nósko|label=none|italic=yes}}'' ({{Langx|grc|γι(γ)νώσκω|label=none|lit=I know,' or 'perceive}}).<ref>{{cite web | vauthors = Liddell HG, Scott R | author-link1 = Henry Liddell | author-link2 = Robert Scott (philologist) | date = 1940 | url = https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057:entry=gignw/skw | title = γιγνώσκω | work = [[A Greek–English Lexicon|A Greek-English Lexicon]] | veditors = Jones HS, McKenzie R | editor-link1 = Henry Stuart Jones | location = Oxford | publisher = [[Oxford University Press|Clarendon Press]] | via = [[Perseus Project]] }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | vauthors = Franchi S, Bianchini F | author-link2 = Francesco Bianchini | date = 2011 | chapter = On The Historical Dynamics Of Cognitive Science: A View From The Periphery. | title = The Search for a Theory of Cognition: Early Mechanisms and New Ideas | location = Amsterdam | publisher = [[Rodopi (publisher)|Rodopi]] | page =  XIV }}</ref>


== Early studies ==
Researchers discuss diverse theories of the nature of cognition. Classical [[computationalism]] argues that cognitive processes manipulate [[symbols]] according to mechanical rules, similar to how computers execute [[algorithms]]. [[Connectionism]] models the [[mind]] as a [[Neural network|complex network of nodes]] where information flows as nodes communicate with each other. Representationalism and anti-representationalism disagree about whether cognitive processes operate on [[Mental representation|internal representations]] of the world.
Despite the word ''cognitive'' itself dating back to the 15th century,<ref name=":0" /> attention to ''cognitive processes'' came about more than eighteen centuries earlier, beginning with [[Aristotle]] (384–322 BCE) and his interest in the inner workings of the mind and how they affect the human experience. Aristotle focused on cognitive areas pertaining to memory, perception, and mental imagery. He placed great importance on ensuring that his studies were based on empirical evidence, that is, scientific information that is gathered through observation and conscientious experimentation.<ref>{{cite book|last=Matlin|first=Margaret | name-list-style = vanc |title=Cognition|publisher=John Wiley & Sons, Inc.|year=2009|location=Hoboken, NJ|page=4}}</ref> Two millennia later, the groundwork for modern concepts of cognition was laid during the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] by thinkers such as [[John Locke]] and [[Dugald Stewart]] who sought to develop a model of the mind in which ideas were acquired, remembered and manipulated.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Eddy|first1=Matthew Daniel | name-list-style = vanc |title=The Cognitive Unity of Calvinist Pedagogy in Enlightenment Scotland|url=https://www.academia.edu/28249746|journal=Ábrahám Kovács (Ed.), Reformed Churches Working Unity in Diversity: Global Historical, Theological and Ethical Perspectives (Budapest: l'Harmattan, 2016)|pages=46–60}}</ref>


During the very early nineteenth century cognitive models were developed both in [[philosophy]]—particularly by authors writing about the [[philosophy of mind]]—and in [[medicine]], especially by physicians seeking to understand how to cure madness. In [[England|Britain]], these models were studied in the academy by scholars such as [[James Sully]] at [[University College London]], and they were even used by politicians when considering the national [[Elementary Education Act 1870]] ([[33 & 34 Vict.]] c. 75).<ref>{{cite journal | last=Eddy | first=Matthew Daniel | title=The politics of cognition: liberalism and the evolutionary origins of Victorian education | journal=British Journal for the History of Science | volume=50 | issue=4 | date=2017 | issn=1474-001X | pmid=29019300 | doi=10.1017/S0007087417000863 | doi-access=free | pages=677–699 | url=https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/preview/1353882/22231.pdf }}</ref>
Many disciplines explore cognition, including psychology, [[neuroscience]], and [[cognitive science]]. They examine different levels of abstraction and employ distinct [[Methodology|methods of inquiry]]. Some scientists study [[cognitive development]], investigating how mental abilities grow from infancy through adulthood. While cognitive research mostly focuses on humans, it also explores how [[Animal cognition|animals acquire knowledge]] and how [[Artificial intelligence|artificial systems]] can emulate cognitive processes.


As [[psychology]] emerged as a burgeoning field of study in [[Europe]], whilst also gaining a following in [[United States|America]], scientists such as [[Wilhelm Wundt]], [[Hermann Ebbinghaus|Herman Ebbinghaus]], [[Mary Whiton Calkins]], and [[William James]] would offer their contributions to the study of human cognition.{{citation needed|date=August 2024}}
== Definition ==
Cognitions are [[Mental state|mental processes]] that deal with [[knowledge]], involving the acquisition, transformation, storage, retrieval, and use of [[information]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Revlin|2013|pp=2–7}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=2–4}} | {{harvnb|Strickland|2001|pp=131–132}} }}</ref> For example, these processes occur when reading an article, as sensory information about the text is acquired and preexisting linguistic knowledge is retrieved to interpret the meaning. This information is then transformed as different ideas are linked, resulting in the storage of information as memories and beliefs are formed.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=2–4}} | {{harvnb|Revlin|2013|pp=2–7}} | {{harvnb|Best|1995|pp=4–5}} }}</ref>


=== Early theorists ===
Cognitions are a pervasive part of [[Mind|mental]] life, and many cognitive processes happen simultaneously. They are essential for understanding and interacting with the world by making individuals aware of their environment and helping them plan and execute appropriate responses.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=2–4}} | {{harvnb|Revlin|2013|pp=2–7}} | {{harvnb|Strickland|2001|pp=131–132}} | {{harvnb|Best|1995|p=1}}}}</ref> [[Thought]] is a paradigmatic form of cognition. It considers [[ideas]], analyzes information, draws [[inferences]], [[Problem-solving|solves problems]], and forms beliefs. However, cognition is not limited to abstract [[reasoning]] and encompasses diverse psychological processes, including [[perception]], [[attention]], [[memory]], [[language]], and [[decision-making]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/cognition § Cognition]}} | {{harvnb|Anastasi|2008|loc=Lead section}} | {{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 1.2 Cognition}} | {{harvnb|Strickland|2001|pp=131–132}} }}</ref> It is debated whether or under what conditions [[feelings]], [[emotions]], and other [[Affect (psychology)|affects]] qualify as cognitions.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/cognition § Cognition]}} | {{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 1.2 Cognition}} }}</ref> Some controversial views associated with [[Cognitivism (psychology)|cognitivism]] argue that all mental phenomena are cognitions.<ref>{{harvnb|Dreyfus|1991|pp=1–2}}</ref>
[[Wilhelm Wundt]] (1832–1920) emphasized the notion of what he called ''[[introspection]]'': examining the inner feelings of an individual. With introspection, the subject had to be careful with describing their feelings in the most objective manner possible in order for Wundt to find the information scientific.<ref name="Fuchs">{{cite book| vauthors = Fuchs AH, Milar KJ |chapter=Psychology as a science|title=Handbook of Psychology|year=2003|volume=1|pages=1–26|doi=10.1002/0471264385.wei0101|isbn=9780471176695}}</ref><ref>{{cite book| vauthors = Zangwill OL |title=The Oxford companion to the mind|year=2004|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|pages=951–952| isbn=978-0-19-866224-2}}</ref> Though Wundt's contributions are by no means minimal, modern psychologists find his methods to be too subjective and choose to rely on more objective procedures of experimentation to make conclusions about the human cognitive process.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Cowan |first1=Nelson |last2=Rachev |first2=Nikolay R. |date=2018-08-01 |title=Merging with the path not taken: Wilhelm Wundt's work as a precursor to the embedded-processes approach to memory, attention, and consciousness |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810017306086 |journal=Consciousness and Cognition |volume=63 |pages=228–238 |doi=10.1016/j.concog.2018.06.001 |pmid=29880413 |issn=1053-8100}}</ref>


[[Hermann Ebbinghaus]] (1850–1909) conducted cognitive studies that mainly examined the function and capacity of human memory. Ebbinghaus developed his own experiment in which he constructed over 2,000 syllables made out of nonexistent words (for instance, 'EAS'). He then examined his own personal ability to learn these non-words. He purposely chose non-words as opposed to real words to control for the influence of pre-existing experience on what the words might symbolize, thus enabling easier recollection of them.<ref name="Fuchs" /><ref name="Zangwill">{{cite book| vauthors = Zangwill OL |title=The Oxford companion to the mind|year=2004|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|page=276| isbn=978-0-19-866224-2}}</ref> Ebbinghaus observed and hypothesized a number of variables that may have affected his ability to learn and recall the non-words he created. One of the reasons, he concluded, was the amount of time between the presentation of the list of stimuli and the recitation or recall of the same. Ebbinghaus was the first to record and plot a "[[learning curve]]" and a "[[forgetting curve]]".<ref>{{cite book | vauthors = Brink TL | date = 2008 | chapter = "Memory." Unit 7 | title = Psychology: A Student Friendly Approach | page = 126 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335128923}}</ref>
Cognitive activities can happen consciously, like when a person deliberately analyzes a problem step by step. They can also take place unconsciously, such as automatic mechanisms responsible for [[language processing]] and [[Face perception|facial recognition]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 1.2 Cognition}} | {{harvnb|Robbins|2017|loc=§ 1. What Is a Mental Module?}} | {{harvnb|Bermúdez|2014|p=289}} }}</ref>  [[Rationalism|Rationalists]] typically emphasize the role of basic principles and inferences in the generation of knowledge. [[Empiricism|Empiricists]], by contrast, highlight sensory processes as the ultimate source of all knowledge of the world, arguing that all cognitive processes deal with sensory input.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Revlin|2013|pp=2–3}} | {{harvnb|Balota|2000|pp=131–132}} | {{harvnb|Coren|Ward|1989|pp=2–3}}}}</ref> Many fields of inquiry study cognition, including [[psychology]], [[cognitive science]], [[neurology]], and [[philosophy]]. While research focuses primarily on the human mind, cognition is not limited to humans and encompasses [[animal cognition|animal]] and artificial cognition.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Balota|2000|pp=131–132}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=iv, 3–4, 21–22}} | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/animal-cognition § Animal Cognition]}} | {{harvnb|Fioretti|2024}} }}</ref>


[[Mary Whiton Calkins]] (1863–1930) was an influential American pioneer in the realm of psychology. Her work also focused on human memory capacity. A common theory, called the [[recency effect]], can be attributed to the studies that she conducted.<ref>{{cite journal| vauthors = Madigan S, O'Hara R |title=Short-term memory at the turn of the century: Mary Whiton Calkin's memory research|journal=American Psychologist|year=1992|volume=47|pages=170–174|doi=10.1037/0003-066X.47.2.170|issue=2}}</ref> The recency effect, also discussed in the subsequent experiment section, is the tendency for individuals to be able to accurately recollect the final items presented in a sequence of stimuli. Calkin's theory is closely related to the aforementioned study and conclusion of the memory experiments conducted by Hermann Ebbinghaus.<ref name="Matlin">{{cite book | last=Matlin | first=Margaret W. | title=Cognition | date=2007 | isbn=978-0-470-14664-4|publisher=John Wiley & Sons, Inc.|location=Hoboken, NJ|page=5}}</ref>
The term ''cognition'' originates from the [[Indo-European]] root {{lang|ine|gnō-}}, meaning {{gloss|to know}}. This root is present in the [[Latin]] term {{lang|la|gnōscere}}, also meaning {{gloss|to know}}, which led to the formation of the verb {{lang|la|cognōscere}}, meaning {{gloss|to learn, to investigate}}. Through its [[past participle]] {{lang|la|cognitus}}, the Latin verb entered [[Middle English]] as {{lang|enm|cognicioun}}. The earliest documented use occurred in 1447, eventually evolving into the modern English word ''cognition''.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|HarperCollins|2022}} | {{harvnb|HarperCollins|2022a}} | {{harvnb|Hoad|1993|p=83}} }}</ref>


[[William James]] (1842–1910) is another pivotal figure in the history of cognitive science. James was quite discontent with Wundt's emphasis on introspection and Ebbinghaus' use of nonsense stimuli. He instead chose to focus on the human learning experience in everyday life and its importance to the study of cognition. James' most significant contribution to the study and theory of cognition was his textbook ''Principles of Psychology'' which preliminarily examines aspects of cognition such as perception, memory, reasoning, and attention.<ref name="Matlin" />
== Types of cognitive processes ==
Cognitive processes encompass various types, each managing different information and performing distinct functions within the human mind. They are sometimes divided into basic processes, like [[perception]] and [[memory]], and higher-order processes, like [[Thought|thinking]]. This distinction is based on the idea that higher-order processes rely on basic processes and could not occur without them.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=22–23}} | {{harvnb|Best|1995|p=367}} }}</ref>


[[René Descartes]] (1596–1650) was a seventeenth-century philosopher who came up with the phrase "Cogito, ergo sum", which means "I think, therefore I am." He took a philosophical approach to the study of cognition and the mind, with his Meditations he wanted people to meditate along with him to come to the same conclusions as he did but in their own free cognition.<ref>{{cite web |title=René Descartes |url=https://www.iep.utm.edu/descarte/#H3 |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=2 April 2020}}</ref>
=== Perception and attention ===
{{main|Perception|Attention}}
[[File:Simplified model of perception and memory.svg|thumb|upright=1.5|alt=Diagram of perception and memory|Simplified model of cognitive processes associated with perception and memory<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Galotti|2015|pp=15–16}} | {{harvnb|Reed|2007|p=3}} }}</ref>]]
Perception is the organization and interpretation of sensory information about the world. It is a complex mental activity that involves the interplay of diverse cognitive processes, many of which occur automatically and unconsciously. It starts with physical [[Stimulus (physiology)|stimuli]], such as light or sound, which are detected by [[Sensory receptor|receptors]] and transmitted to the brain as electrical signals. These signals are processed in various [[brain regions]] to construct a coherent [[experience]] of distinct objects and events while situating them in a [[space-time|spatial-temporal framework]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=34–36}} | {{harvnb|Pomerantz|2006|pp=1, 6–7}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=34–35}} }}</ref>


== Psychology ==
Certain cognitive processes are responsible for [[Feature detection (nervous system)|detecting basic features]] in the sensory data, such as edges, colors, and [[Pitch (music)|pitches]], while others process spatial location. [[Object recognition (cognitive science)|Object recognition]] is another function that compares this information with stored representations in search of known patterns, such as recognizing a familiar landmark or identifying a specific melody. Some cognitive faculties are specialized for tasks only relevant to particular perceptual contents, such as [[Face perception|face recognition]] and language processing.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=22–23, 35–36}} | {{harvnb|Pomerantz|2006|pp=4–5, 7–8}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=34–35, 40–41}} | {{harvnb|Reisberg|2010|pp=59–61, 94–95}} }}</ref>
[[File:Generalization process using trees.svg|thumb|alt=Diagram|When the mind makes a generalization such as the [[concept]] of ''tree'', it extracts similarities from numerous examples; the simplification enables higher-level thinking (abstract thinking).]]{{See also|Cognitivism (psychology)}}
In [[psychology]], the term "cognition" is usually used in an [[Information processing (psychology)|information processing]] view of an individual's psychological [[functionalism (philosophy of mind)|functions]],<ref name="Sternberg2009">{{cite book | vauthors = Sternberg RJ, Sternberg K | date = 2009 | title = Cognitive Psychology | edition = 6th | location = Belmont, CA | publisher = [[Cengage|Wadsworth Cengage]] Learning | isbn=978-0-495-50632-4}}</ref> and such is the same in [[cognitive engineering]].<ref name="Blomberg">{{cite journal| vauthors = Blomberg O |year = 2011|title = Concepts of cognition for cognitive engineering|journal = [[International Journal of Aviation Psychology]]|volume = 21|issue = 1|pages = 85–104|doi = 10.1080/10508414.2011.537561|s2cid = 144876967}}</ref> In the study of [[social cognition]], a branch of [[social psychology]], the term is used to explain [[Attitude (psychology)|attitudes]], [[Attribution (psychology)|attribution]], and [[group dynamics]];<ref name="Sternberg2009" /> however, psychological research in the field of cognitive science has also suggested an embodied approach to understanding cognition. Contrary to the traditional computationalist approach, [[embodied cognition]] emphasizes the body's significant role in the acquisition and development of cognitive capabilities.<ref name="calvo_gomila_2008">{{Cite book |title=Handbook of cognitive science: an embodied approach |publisher=Elsevier Science |editor=Paco Calvo |editor2=Antoni Gomila |date=2008 |isbn=978-0-08-091487-9 |location=Amsterdam |oclc=318353781}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Lakoff |first=George |date=2012 |title=Explaining Embodied Cognition Results |journal=Topics in Cognitive Science |volume=4 |issue=4 |pages=773–785 |doi=10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x |pmid=22961950 |s2cid=18978114 |issn=1756-8757|doi-access=free }}</ref>


Human cognition is conscious and [[Unconscious cognition|unconscious]], [[Tangibility|concrete]] or [[Abstraction|abstract]], as well as [[Intuition|intuitive]] (like knowledge of a language) and [[Conceptualism|conceptual]] (like a model of a language). It encompasses processes such as [[memory]], [[Association of Ideas|association]], [[concept formation]], [[pattern recognition]], [[language]], [[attention]], [[perception]], [[action (philosophy)|action]], [[problem solving]], and [[mental image]]ry.<ref>{{cite book |authorlink1=Stanley Coren|last1=Coren |first1=Stanley |authorlink2=Lawrence M. Ward |first2=Lawrence M. |last2=Ward |first3=James T. |last3=Enns |year=1999 |title=Sensation and Perception |edition=5th |publisher=[[Harcourt (publisher)|Harcourt Brace]] |isbn=978-0-470-00226-1 |page=9}}</ref><ref>{{cite book | last=Best | first=John B. | date = 1999 | title = Cognitive Psychology | edition = 5th | pages = 15–17| isbn=978-0-470-00232-2}}</ref> Traditionally, [[emotion]] was not thought of as a cognitive process, but now much research is being undertaken to examine the [[cognitive psychology]] of emotion; research is also focused on one's awareness of one's own strategies and methods of cognition, which is called [[metacognition]]. The concept of cognition has gone through several revisions through the development of disciplines within psychology.{{citation needed|date=August 2024}}
Cognitive processes responsible for perception rely on various [[heuristics]] to simplify problems and reduce cognitive labor. For example, visual perception often assumes that the size, shape, and color of objects [[Subjective constancy|remain constant]] to ensure a consistent view despite changes in perspective or lighting. Heuristics sometimes lead to inaccurate or [[Illusion|illusory perceptions]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Pomerantz|2006|pp=4, 8–9}} | {{harvnb|Bernstein|Nash|2006|pp=117–118}} }}</ref>


Psychologists initially understood cognition governing human action as information processing. This was a movement known as cognitivism in the 1950s, emerging after the Behaviorist movement viewed cognition as a form of behavior.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Pyszczynski |first1=Tom |last2=Greenberg |first2=Jeff |last3=Koole |first3=Sander |last4=Solomon |first4=Sheldon |article=Experimental Existential Psychology: Coping With the Facts of Life |year=2010|title=Handbook of Social Psychology |pages=socpsy001020 |editor-last=Fiske |editor-first=Susan T. |editor2-last=Gilbert |editor2-first=Daniel T. |editor3-last=Lindzey |editor3-first=Gardner |location=Hoboken, NJ |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |language=en |doi=10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001020 |isbn=978-0-470-56111-9}}</ref> Cognitivism approached cognition as a form of computation, viewing the mind as a machine and consciousness as an executive function.<ref name="calvo_gomila_2008" /> However; post cognitivism began to emerge in the 1990s as the development of cognitive science presented theories that highlighted the necessity of cognitive action as embodied, extended, and producing dynamic processes in the mind.<ref>{{Cite book |date=2007 |editor-last=Zelazo |editor-first=Philip David |editor2-last=Moscovitch |editor2-first=Morris |editor3-last=Thompson |editor3-first=Evan |title=The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness |doi=10.1017/cbo9780511816789|isbn=9780511816789 }}</ref> The development of Cognitive psychology arose as psychology from different theories, and so began exploring these dynamics concerning mind and environment, starting a movement from these prior dualist paradigms that prioritized cognition as systematic computation or exclusively behavior.<ref  name="calvo_gomila_2008" />
Different forms of perception are associated with distinct types of stimuli and receptors. [[Visual perception]], based on the detection of light, is a primary source of knowledge about the external environment. Other forms of perception include [[hearing]], [[touch]], [[Sense of smell|smell]], and [[taste]]. Data from these different modalities is integrated by higher-order cognitive processes to form a unified and coherent experience of the world.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Bernstein|Nash|2006|pp=85–88, 130–131}} | {{harvnb|Biggs|Matthen|Stokes|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=KKM-BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 1–5]}} }}</ref> Although sensory data is a central factor of perceptual experience, it is not the only factor, and various other forms of information influence the underlying cognitive operations. For instance, memories from earlier experiences determine which objects are experienced as familiar. Other factors include the expectations, goals, background knowledge, and belief system of the individual.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=27–28}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=46–47}} | {{harvnb|Reisberg|2010|pp=59–61, 94–95}} }}</ref>


=== Piaget's theory of cognitive development ===
Attention is a central aspect of mental processes that focuses cognitive resources on certain stimuli or features. It involves the selection or prioritization of specific aspects while filtering out irrelevant information. For example, attention is responsible for the [[cocktail party effect]], in which the brain concentrates on a single conversation while relegating the surrounding party noise to the background. The selection process is crucial since the total amount of information is typically too vast for the brain to process all at once. It ensures that the most important features are prioritized. Attention is not limited to perception but is also present in other cognitive processes, such as remembering and thinking.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Gopher|Iani|2006|pp=1–2}} | {{harvnb|Best|1995|pp=35–36}} | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/attention § Attention]}} | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=13, 28–29}} | {{harvnb|Pomerantz|2006|p=3}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|p=71}} }}</ref>
{{Main|Piaget's theory of cognitive development}}
For years, [[List of sociologists|sociologists]] and [[psychologist]]s have conducted studies on [[cognitive development]], i.e. the construction of human thought or mental processes.{{citation needed|date=August 2024}}


[[Jean Piaget]] was one of the most important and influential people in the field of [[developmental psychology]]. He believed that humans are unique in comparison to animals because we have the capacity to do "abstract symbolic reasoning". His work can be compared to [[Lev Vygotsky]], [[Sigmund Freud]], and [[Erik Erikson]] who were also great contributors in the field of developmental psychology. Piaget is known for studying the cognitive development in children, having studied his own three children and their intellectual development, from which he would come to a [[Piaget's theory of cognitive development|theory of cognitive development]] that describes the developmental stages of childhood.<ref>{{cite web|last=Cherry|first=Kendra|name-list-style=vanc|title=Jean Piaget Biography|url=http://psychology.about.com/od/profilesofmajorthinkers/p/piaget.htm|publisher=The New York Times Company|access-date=18 September 2012|archive-date=19 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160419045331/http://psychology.about.com/od/profilesofmajorthinkers/p/piaget.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref>
=== Memory and learning ===
{{main|Memory|Learning}}
Memory is the ability to retain, store, and retrieve information. It includes the capacity to consciously recall past experiences and is central to many other cognitive activities that rely on stored data to process information and coordinate behavior. Memory processes have three stages: an input phase where new information is acquired, a storage phase preserving the information for future access, and an output phase retrieving the information and making it available to other cognitive operations. Different types of memory are distinguished by the function they perform and the type of information they operate on.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|p=23}} | {{harvnb|Reisberg|2010|pp=132–135, 141}} | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=59–60}} }}</ref>


{| class="wikitable"
[[Working memory]] stores information temporarily, making it available to other cognitive processes while allowing manipulation of the stored information. During [[mental arithmetic]], for example, the working memory holds and updates intermediate results while calculations are performed.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=98–100, 108–109, 127}} | {{harvnb|Reisberg|2010|pp=140–141}} }}</ref> The term is sometimes used interchangeably with the term ''[[short-term memory]]'', which is defined by brief retention without the emphasis on dynamic manipulation. [[Long-term memory]], by contrast, retains information for long periods, in some cases indefinitely. During storage, the information is not actively considered. However, it remains available for retrieval, like when recalling a childhood memory.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=99–100, 126–128}} | {{harvnb|Reisberg|2010|pp=135–136, 165}} | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=60–63}} }}</ref> Passive exposure to information is usually not sufficient for the effective formation and retrieval of long-term memories. Relevant factors include the level and type of engagement with the content, like attention, emotion, mood, and the context in which the information is processed.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=142, 151}} | {{harvnb|Reisberg|2010|pp=132, 196}} }}</ref>
|-
! Stage !! Age or Period !! Description<ref>{{cite book | last1=Gauvain | first1=Mary | last2=Parke | first2=Ross D  | date = 2009 | title = Child Psychology: A Contemporary Viewpoint | edition = 7th | location = Boston | publisher = [[McGraw-Hill Education|McGraw-Hill]]  |isbn=978-0-07-338268-5}}</ref>
|-
| Sensorimotor stage ||[[Infant|Infancy]] (0–2 years) || Intelligence is present; motor activity but no symbols; knowledge is developing yet limited; knowledge is based on experiences/ interactions; mobility allows the child to learn new things; some language skills are developed at the end of this stage. The goal is to develop [[object permanence]], achieving a basic understanding of [[causality]], time, and space.
|-
| Preoperational stage ||[[Toddler]] and [[Early childhood|Early Childhood]] (2–7 years) || Symbols or language skills are present; memory and imagination are developed; non-reversible and non-logical thinking; shows intuitive [[problem solving]]; begins to perceive relationships; grasps the concept of conservation of numbers; predominantly [[Egocentrism|egocentric]] thinking.
|-
| Concrete operational stage || Elementary and Early [[Adolescence]] (7–12 years) || Logical and systematic form of intelligence; manipulation of symbols related to [[Physical object|concrete objects]]; thinking is now characterized by reversibility and the ability to take the role of another; grasps concepts of the [[conservation of mass]], length, weight, and volume; predominantly operational thinking; nonreversible and egocentric thinking
|-
| Formal operational stage || Adolescence and [[Adult]]hood (12 years and on) || Logical use of symbols related to abstract concepts; Acquires flexibility in thinking as well as the capacities for abstract thinking and mental hypothesis testing; can consider possible alternatives in complex reasoning and problem-solving.
|}


=== Beginning of cognition ===
Long-term memory is typically divided into [[Episodic memory|episodic]], [[Semantic memory|semantic]], and [[procedural memory]] based on the type of information involved.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|p=127}} | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA184 184]}} }}</ref> Episodic memory deals with information about past personal experiences and events. New memories are stored as a person undergoes experiences and can be accessed later, either by accessing factual information about the events or by reliving them. For example, remembering one's last holiday trip involves episodic memory.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=127, 250}} | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA184 184]}} }}</ref> Semantic memory deals with [[general knowledge]] about facts and concepts not linked to specific experiences. For instance, the information that water freezes at 0&nbsp;°C is stored in semantic memory.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=23, 127, 248–250}} | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA184 184]}} }}</ref> Procedural memory handles [[practical knowledge]] of how to do things. It encompasses learned skills that can be executed, like the abilities to ride a bicycle and type on a keyboard.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/procedural-memory § Procedural Memory]}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|p=127}} }}</ref>
Studies on cognitive development have also been conducted in children beginning from the embryonal period to understand when cognition appears and what environmental attributes stimulate the construction of human thought or mental processes. Research shows the intentional engagement of fetuses with the environment, demonstrating cognitive achievements.<ref name="ValDanilov_SI_Modulation 2023">{{Cite journal |last=Val Danilov |first=Igor |date= 2023|title=Shared Intentionality Modulation at the Cell Level: Low-Frequency Oscillations for Temporal Coordination in Bioengineering Systems |url=https://www.lidsen.com/journals/neurobiology/neurobiology-07-04-185 |journal=OBM Neurobiology |language=en |volume=7 |issue=4 |pages=1–17 |doi=10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2304185|s2cid=263722179 |doi-access=free }}</ref> However, organisms with simple reflexes cannot cognize the environment alone because the environment is the cacophony of stimuli (electromagnetic waves, chemical interactions, and pressure fluctuations).<ref>{{cite book | chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-10467-1_19 | doi=10.1007/978-3-031-10467-1_19 | chapter=Smartphone in Detecting Developmental Disability in Infancy: A Theoretical Approach to Shared Intentionality for Assessment Tool of Cognitive Decline and e-Learning | title=Intelligent Computing | series=Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems | date=2022 | last1=Val Danilov | first1=Igor | volume=508 | pages=305–315 | isbn=978-3-031-10466-4 }}</ref> Their sensation is too limited by the noise to solve the cue problem–the relevant stimulus cannot overcome the noise magnitude if it passes through the senses (see the [[binding problem]]). Fetuses need external help to stimulate their nervous system in choosing the relevant sensory stimulus for grasping the perception of objects.<ref name="ValDanilov_Perspective 2022">{{Cite journal |last1=Val Danilov |first1=Igor |last2=Mihailova |first2=Sandra |date= 2022|title=A New Perspective on Assessing Cognition in Children through Estimating Shared Intentionality |journal=Journal of Intelligence |language=en |volume=10 |issue=2 |page=21 |doi=10.3390/jintelligence10020021 |issn=2079-3200 |pmc=9036231 |pmid=35466234 |doi-access=free }}</ref> The [[Shared intentionality]] approach proposes a plausible explanation of perception development in this earlier stage. Initially, Michael Tomasello introduced the [[psychological construct]] of [[Shared intentionality]], highlighting its contribution to cognitive development from birth.<ref>{{cite book|last=Tomasello|first=Michael|title=Becoming Human: A Theory of Ontogeny|location=Cambridge, Massachusetts|publisher=[[Harvard University Press]]|year=2019|isbn=9780674988651}}{{page needed|date=August 2024}}</ref> This primary interaction provides unaware collaboration in mother-child dyads for environmental learning. Later, Igor Val Danilov developed this notion, expanding it to the intrauterine period and clarifying the [[Neurophysiology|neurophysiological]] processes underlying [[Shared intentionality]].<ref name="ValDanilov_Theoretical 2023">{{Cite journal |last=Danilov |first=Igor Val |date=2023-02-17 |title=Theoretical Grounds of Shared Intentionality for Neuroscience in Developing Bioengineering Systems |url=https://www.lidsen.com/journals/neurobiology/neurobiology-07-01-156/obm.neurobiol.2301156.pdf |journal=OBM Neurobiology |volume=07 |issue=1 |pages=1–14 |doi=10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2301156 |doi-access=free}}</ref> According to the [[Shared intentionality]] approach, the mother shares the essential sensory stimulus of the actual cognitive problem with the child.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Danilov |first1=Igor Val |last2=Mihailova |first2=Sandra |date=2021-10-02 |title=Neuronal Coherence Agent for Shared Intentionality: A Hypothesis of Neurobiological Processes Occurring during Social Interaction |url=https://www.lidsen.com/journals/neurobiology/neurobiology-05-04-113/obm.neurobiol.2104113.pdf |journal=OBM Neurobiology |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=1 |doi=10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2104113 |doi-access=free}}</ref> By sharing this stimulus, the mother provides a template for developing the young organism's nervous system.<ref name="ValDanilov_LF 2023">{{Cite journal |last=Val Danilov |first=Igor |date= 2023|title=Low-Frequency Oscillations for Nonlocal Neuronal Coupling in Shared Intentionality Before and After Birth: Toward the Origin of Perception |url=https://www.lidsen.com/journals/neurobiology/neurobiology-07-04-192 |journal=OBM Neurobiology |language=en |volume=7 |issue=4 |pages=1–17 |doi=10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2304192|s2cid=265002516 |doi-access=free }}</ref>


Recent findings in research on child cognitive development <ref name="ValDanilov_Perspective 2022" /><ref name="ValDanilov_Theoretical 2023" /><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Castiello |first1=Umberto |last2=Becchio |first2=Cristina |last3=Zoia |first3=Stefania |last4=Nelini |first4=Cristian |last5=Sartori |first5=Luisa |last6=Blason |first6=Laura |last7=D'Ottavio |first7=Giuseppina |last8=Bulgheroni |first8=Maria |last9=Gallese |first9=Vittorio |date=2010-10-07 |title=Wired to Be Social: The Ontogeny of Human Interaction |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=5 |issue=10 |page=e13199 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0013199 |issn=1932-6203 |pmc=2951360 |pmid=20949058 |doi-access=free|bibcode=2010PLoSO...513199C }}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Kisilevsky |first=Barbara S. |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-22023-9_8 |title=Fetal Development: Research on Brain and Behavior, Environmental Influences, and Emerging Technologies |date=2016 |publisher=Springer International Publishing |isbn=978-3-319-22022-2 |publication-place=Cham |pages=133–152 |chapter=Fetal Auditory Processing: Implications for Language Development? |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-22023-9_8}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lee |first1=Grace Y. |last2=Kisilevsky |first2=Barbara S. |date=2014 |title=Fetuses respond to father's voice but prefer mother's voice after birth |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dev.21084 |journal=Developmental Psychobiology |volume=56 |issue=1 |pages=1–11 |doi=10.1002/dev.21084 |pmid=23817883 |issn=0012-1630}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hepper |first1=P. G. |last2=Scott |first2=D. |last3=Shahidullah |first3=S. |date=1993 |title=Newborn and fetal response to maternal voice |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02646839308403210 |journal=Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=147–153 |doi=10.1080/02646839308403210 |issn=0264-6838}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lecanuet |first1=J.-P. |last2=Granier-Deferre |first2=C. |last3=Jacquet |first3=A.-Y. |last4=Capponi |first4=I. |last5=Ledru |first5=L. |year=1993 |title=Prenatal discrimination of a male and a female voice uttering the same sentence |url=https://www.academia.edu/download/104352542/edp.243002040520230718-1-d9iwqc.pdf |journal=Early Development and Parenting |publisher=Wiley |volume=2 |issue=4 |pages=217–228 |doi=10.1002/edp.2430020405 |issn=1057-3593}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hepper |first=Peter |date=2015 |title=Behavior During the Prenatal Period: Adaptive for Development and Survival |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdep.12104 |journal=Child Development Perspectives |volume=9 |issue=1 |pages=38–43 |doi=10.1111/cdep.12104}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Jardri |first1=Renaud |last2=Houfflin-Debarge |first2=Véronique |last3=Delion |first3=Pierre |last4=Pruvo |first4=Jean-Pierre |last5=Thomas |first5=Pierre |last6=Pins |first6=Delphine |date=2012 |title=Assessing fetal response to maternal speech using a noninvasive functional brain imaging technique |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.11.002 |journal=International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience |volume=30 |issue=2 |pages=159–161 |doi=10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.11.002 |pmid=22123457 |issn=0736-5748}}</ref>{{excessive citations inline|date=March 2025}} and advances in inter-brain neuroscience experiments<ref name="pmid37563301">{{cite journal | vauthors = Liu J, Zhang R, Xie E, Lin Y, Chen D, Liu Y, Li K, Chen M, Li Y, Wang G, Li X | display-authors = 6 | title = Shared intentionality modulates interpersonal neural synchronization at the establishment of communication system | journal = Communications Biology | volume = 6 | issue = 1 | page = 832 | date = August 2023 | pmid = 37563301 | pmc = 10415255 | doi = 10.1038/s42003-023-05197-z }}</ref><ref name="pmid34188170">{{cite journal | vauthors = Painter DR, Kim JJ, Renton AI, Mattingley JB | title = Joint control of visually guided actions involves concordant increases in behavioural and neural coupling | journal = Communications Biology | volume = 4 | issue = 1 | page = 816 | date = June 2021 | pmid = 34188170 | pmc = 8242020 | doi = 10.1038/s42003-021-02319-3 }}</ref><ref name="pmid29292232">{{cite journal | vauthors = Hu Y, Pan Y, Shi X, Cai Q, Li X, Cheng X | title = Inter-brain synchrony and cooperation context in interactive decision making | journal = Biological Psychology | volume = 133 | issue =  | pages = 54–62 | date = March 2018 | pmid = 29292232 | doi = 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.12.005 | s2cid = 46859640 }}</ref><ref name="pmid30060130">{{cite journal | vauthors = Fishburn FA, Murty VP, Hlutkowsky CO, MacGillivray CE, Bemis LM, Murphy ME, Huppert TJ, Perlman SB | display-authors = 6 | title = Putting our heads together: interpersonal neural synchronization as a biological mechanism for shared intentionality | journal = Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience | volume = 13 | issue = 8 | pages = 841–849 | date = September 2018 | pmid = 30060130 | pmc = 6123517 | doi = 10.1093/scan/nsy060 }}</ref><ref name="pmid28284802">{{cite journal | vauthors = Szymanski C, Pesquita A, Brennan AA, Perdikis D, Enns JT, Brick TR, Müller V, Lindenberger U | display-authors = 6 | title = Teams on the same wavelength perform better: Inter-brain phase synchronization constitutes a neural substrate for social facilitation | journal = NeuroImage | volume = 152 | issue =  | pages = 425–436 | date = May 2017 | pmid = 28284802 | doi = 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.013 | hdl = 11858/00-001M-0000-002D-059A-1 | s2cid = 3807834 | hdl-access = free }}</ref> have made the above proposition plausible. Based on them, the [[shared intentionality|shared intentionality hypothesis]] introduced the notion of pre-perceptual communication in the mother-fetus communication model due to nonlocal neuronal coupling.<ref name="ValDanilov_SI_Modulation 2023" /><ref name="ValDanilov_Theoretical 2023" /><ref name="ValDanilov_LF 2023" /> This nonlocal coupling model refers to communication between two organisms through the copying of the adequate ecological dynamics by biological systems indwelling one environmental context, where a naive actor (Fetus) replicates information from an experienced actor (Mother) due to intrinsic processes of these [[Dynamical systems theory|dynamic systems]] ([[Embodied cognition|embodied information]]) but without interacting through sensory signals.<ref name="ValDanilov_SI_Modulation 2023" /><ref name="ValDanilov_Theoretical 2023" /><ref name="ValDanilov_LF 2023" /> The Mother's heartbeats (a low-frequency oscillator) modulate relevant local neuronal networks in specific subsystems of both her and the nervous system of the fetus due to the effect of the [[Wave interference|interference]] of the low-frequency oscillator (Mother heartbeats) and already exhibited gamma activity in these neuronal networks (interference in physics is the combination of two or more electromagnetic waveforms to form a resultant wave).<ref name="ValDanilov_SI_Modulation 2023" /><ref name="ValDanilov_Theoretical 2023" /><ref name="ValDanilov_LF 2023" /> Therefore, the subliminal perception in a fetus emerges due to [[Shared intentionality]] with the mother that stimulates cognition in this organism even before birth.<ref name="ValDanilov_SI_Modulation 2023" /><ref name="ValDanilov_Theoretical 2023" /><ref name="ValDanilov_LF 2023" />
As a form of know-how, procedural memory is distinct from the capacity to verbally describe the exact procedure involved in the execution, like explaining how to maintain balance on a bicycle.<ref>{{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/procedural-memory § Procedural Memory]}}</ref> For this reason, procedural memory is categorized as non-declarative or [[implicit memory]], which operates automatically and cannot be consciously accessed.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/nondeclarative-memory § Nondeclarative Memory], [https://dictionary.apa.org/implicit-memory § Implicit Memory]}} | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA184 184]}} }}</ref> Episodic and semantic memory, by contrast, belong to declarative or [[explicit memory]], which encompasses information that can be consciously recalled and described.<ref>{{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/declarative-memory § Declarative Memory], [https://dictionary.apa.org/explicit-memory § Explicit Memory]}}</ref>


Further, cognition and emotions develop with the association of affective cues with stimuli responsible for triggering the neuronal pathways of simple reflexes.<ref name="Reflexes Cognition">{{cite journal |last1=Danilov |first1=Igor Val |last2=Mihailova |first2=Sandra |title=Reflexes and Shared Intentionality in the Origins of Emotions Development: A Scoping Review of Studies on Blinking in Infants |journal=OBM Neurobiology |date=January 2025 |volume=9 |issue=1 |pages=1–21 |doi=10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2501263 |url=https://www.lidsen.com/journals/neurobiology/neurobiology-09-01-263 |language=en |issn=2573-4407|doi-access=free }}{{Creative Commons text attribution notice|cc=by4|from this source=yes}}</ref> This pre-perceptual multimodal integration can succeed owing to neuronal coherence in mother-child dyads beginning from pregnancy.<ref name="Reflexes Cognition" /> According to the pre-perceptual multimodal integration hypothesis based on empirical evidence, these cognitive-reflex and emotion-reflex stimuli conjunctions further form simple innate neuronal assemblies, shaping the cognitive and emotional neuronal patterns in statistical learning that are continuously connected with the neuronal pathways of reflexes.<ref name="Reflexes Cognition" />
The different forms of memory play a central role in learning, which involves the acquisition of novel information, skills, or habits, as well as changes to existing structures. Learning occurs through experience and enables individuals to adapt to their environment. It happens either [[intention]]ally, such as studying or practicing, or unintentionally as an unconscious side effect while engaging in other tasks. A central aspect of effective learning is the formation of memory connections, which link different pieces of information and facilitate their retrieval.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/learning § Learning]}} | {{harvnb|Reisberg|2010|pp=132, 155–156}} | {{harvnb|Hager|2012|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=6mYgGsQKtDUC&pg=PA208 208]}} }}</ref>


Another crucial question in understanding the beginning of cognition is memory storage about the relevant ecological dynamics by the naive nervous system (i.e., memorizing the ecological condition of relevant sensory stimulus) at the molecular level – an [[Engram (neuropsychology)|engram]]. Evidence derived using [[optical imaging]], [[Molecular genetics|molecular-genetic]] and [[Optogenetics|optogenetic]] techniques in conjunction with appropriate behavioural analyses continues to offer support for the idea that changing the strength of connections between neurons is one of the major mechanisms by which engrams are stored in the brain.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Takeuchi |first1=Tomonori |last2=Duszkiewicz |first2=Adrian J. |last3=Morris |first3=Richard G. M. |date=2014-01-05 |title=The synaptic plasticity and memory hypothesis: encoding, storage and persistence |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences |volume=369 |issue=1633 |page=20130288 |doi=10.1098/rstb.2013.0288 |issn=1471-2970 |pmc=3843897 |pmid=24298167 |doi-access=free}}</ref>
=== Thinking ===
{{main|Thought}}
Thinking is a mental activity in which [[concepts]], ideas, and mental representations are considered and manipulated. Many cognitive processes fall into this category, including [[Logical reasoning|reasoning]], [[concept formation]], [[problem solving]], and [[decision-making]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/thinking § Thinking]}} | {{harvnb|Berlyne|Vinacke|Sternberg|2025|loc=Lead section, § Types of Thinking}} }}</ref>


Two (or more) possible mechanisms of cognition can involve both quantum effects<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Kerskens |first1=Christian Matthias |last2=López Pérez |first2=David |date=2022-10-01 |title=Experimental indications of non-classical brain functions |journal=Journal of Physics Communications |volume=6 |issue=10 |page=105001 |doi=10.1088/2399-6528/ac94be |issn=2399-6528 |doi-access=free|bibcode=2022JPhCo...6j5001K }}</ref> and synchronization of brain structures due to electromagnetic interference.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hanslmayr |first1=Simon |last2=Axmacher |first2=Nikolai |last3=Inman |first3=Cory S. |date=2019 |title=Modulating Human Memory via Entrainment of Brain Oscillations |url=https://birmingham.elsevierpure.com/files/68319704/Hanslmayr_et_al_Modulating_human_Memory_Trends_in_Neurosciences_2019.pdf |journal=Trends in Neurosciences |volume=42 |issue=7 |pages=485–499 |doi=10.1016/j.tins.2019.04.004 |doi-access=free|pmid=31178076 }}</ref><ref name="ValDanilov_SI_Modulation 2023" /><ref name="ValDanilov_Theoretical 2023" /><ref name="ValDanilov_LF 2023" />
Logical reasoning deals with information in the form of [[Proposition|statements]] by inferring a conclusion from a set of [[premise]]s. It proceeds in a rigorous and norm-governed manner to ensure that the conclusion is rationally convincing and supported by the premises.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Nunes|2011|pp=2066–2069|loc=Logical Reasoning and Learning}} | {{harvnb|Dowden|2020|pp=5, 24}} }}</ref> Logical reasoning encompasses [[Deductive reasoning|deductive]] and non-deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning follows strict [[rules of inference]], providing the strongest support: the conclusion of a deductive inference cannot be false if all the premises are true. An example is the inference from the premises "all men are mortal" and "Socrates is a man" to the conclusion "Socrates is mortal". Non-deductive reasoning makes a conclusion rationally convincing but does not guarantee its truth. For instance, [[inductive reasoning]] infers a general law from many individual observations, like concluding that all ravens are black based on observations of numerous black ravens. [[Abductive reasoning]], another type of non-deductive reasoning, seeks the best explanation of a phenomenon. For example, a doctor uses abductive reasoning when they infer that a child has [[chickenpox]] as an explanation of the child's [[skin rash]] and [[fever]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Reichertz|2013|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=R-6GAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA123 123–126]}} | {{harvnb|Berlyne|Vinacke|Sternberg|2025|loc=§ Reasoning}} | {{harvnb|Nunes|2011|pp=2066–2069|loc=Logical Reasoning and Learning}} | {{harvnb|Dowden|2020|pp=1, 5, 24, 346–347, 432, 470}} }}</ref>


=== Common types of tests on human cognition ===
[[File:Generalization process using trees.svg|thumb|alt=Diagram of several trees with arrows to one more tree|Through concept formation, the mind learns to identify common patterns among diverse instances.<ref name="auto5">{{multiref | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA223 223]}} | {{harvnb|Best|1995|pp=392–393, 400–401}} | {{harvnb|Berlyne|Vinacke|Sternberg|2025|loc=§ Concept Attainment}} }}</ref>]]
====Serial position====
The ''[[Serial-position effect]]'' is meant to test a theory of memory that states that when information is given in a serial manner, we tend to remember information at the beginning of the sequence, called the ''primacy effect'', and information at the end of the sequence, called the ''recency effect''. Consequently, information given in the middle of the sequence is typically forgotten, or not recalled as easily. This study predicts that the recency effect is stronger than the primacy effect, because the information that is most recently learned is still in working memory when asked to be recalled. Information that is learned first still has to go through a retrieval process. This experiment focuses on human memory processes.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Surprenant | first=Aimée M. | title=Distinctiveness and serial position effects in tonal sequences | journal=Perception & Psychophysics | volume=63 | issue=4 | date=2001 | issn=0031-5117 | doi=10.3758/BF03194434 | doi-access=free | pages=737–745 | pmid=11436742 | url=https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/BF03194434.pdf }}</ref>


====Word superiority====
Problem-solving is a goal-directed activity that aims to overcome obstacles and arrive at a pre-defined objective. This happens, for instance, when determining the best route for an upcoming trip. Problem-solving starts with comprehending the problem, which typically involves an understanding of the initial state, the goal state, and the obstacles or constraints that hinder progress. Some problems are well-structured and have precise solution paths. For ill-structured problems, by contrast, it is not possible to determine which exact steps are successful. To find solutions, [[creativity]] in the form of [[divergent thinking]] generates many possible approaches. [[Convergent thinking]] evaluates the different options and eliminates unfeasible ones. Thought often relies on heuristics or general rules to find and compare possible solutions. Common heuristics are to divide a problem into several simpler subproblems and to adapt strategies that were successful for similar problems encountered earlier.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Berlyne|Vinacke|Sternberg|2025|loc=§ Problem-solving}} | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA218 218]}} | {{harvnb|Reisberg|2010|pp=444–445, 476–477}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=370–371, 380, 386}} }}</ref>
The ''[[word superiority effect]] experiment'' presents a subject with a word, or a letter by itself, for a brief period of time, i.e. 40&nbsp;ms, and they are then asked to recall the letter that was in a particular location in the word. In theory, the subject should be better able to correctly recall the letter when it was presented in a word than when it was presented in isolation. This experiment focuses on human speech and language.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Krueger | first=Lester E. | title=The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding | journal=Memory & Cognition | volume=20 | issue=6 | date=1992 | issn=0090-502X | doi=10.3758/BF03202718 | doi-access=free | pages=685–694 | pmid=1435271 | url=https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/BF03202718.pdf }}</ref>


====Brown–Peterson====
Closely related to problem-solving, decision-making is the cognitive process of choosing between courses of [[Action (philosophy)|action]]. To determine the best alternative, it weighs the different options by assessing their advantages and disadvantages, for example, by considering their positive and negative consequences. According to [[expected utility theory]], a decision is [[Rationality|rational]] if it selects the option with the highest expected utility, which is determined by the [[probability]] and the value of each consequence. To assess the probability of an outcome, people use various heuristics in everyday situations, such as the [[representativeness heuristic]], the [[availability heuristic]], and [[Anchoring effect|anchoring]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=419–420}} | {{harvnb|Revlin|2013|pp=435–440}} | {{harvnb|Mellers|2006|pp=1–2}} | {{harvnb|Nairne|2011|pp=301–302}} }}</ref>
In the ''[[Brown–Peterson cohomology]] experiment'', participants are briefly presented with a [[trigram]] and in one particular version of the experiment, they are then given a distractor task, asking them to identify whether a sequence of words is in fact words, or non-words (due to being misspelled, etc.). After the distractor task, they are asked to recall the trigram from before the distractor task. In theory, the longer the distractor task, the harder it will be for participants to correctly recall the trigram. This experiment focuses on human [[short-term memory]].<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Nairne | first1=James S. | last2=Whiteman | first2=Howard L. | last3=Kelley | first3=Matthew R. |title=Short-term forgetting of order under conditions of reduced interference |journal=Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A |year=1999 |volume=52 |pages=241–251 |doi=10.1080/713755806 |s2cid=15713857 |url=http://www1.psych.purdue.edu/~nairne/pdfs/32.pdf |access-date=2018-01-09 |archive-date=2022-07-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220730173204/http://www1.psych.purdue.edu/~nairne/pdfs/32.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>


====Memory span====
Different forms of thinking rely on concepts, which are general ideas or mental representations to sort objects into classes, like the concepts ''animal'' and ''table''. Concept formation is the process of acquiring a new concept by learning to identify its instances and grasping its relation to other concepts. This process helps individuals organize information and make sense of the world. Psychologists distinguish between logical and natural concepts. Logical concepts have precise definitions and rules of application, like the concept ''triangle''. Natural concepts, by contrast, are based on resemblance but lack exact definitions or clear-cut boundaries, like the concept ''table''.<ref name="auto5"/>
During the ''[[memory span]] experiment'', each subject is presented with a sequence of [[Stimulus (physiology)|stimuli]] of the same kind; words depicting objects, numbers, letters that sound similar, and letters that sound dissimilar. After being presented with the stimuli, the subject is asked to recall the sequence of stimuli that they were given in the exact order in which it was given. In one particular version of the experiment, if the subject recalled a list correctly, the list length was increased by one for that type of material, and vice versa if it was recalled incorrectly. The theory is that people have a memory span of about seven items for numbers, the same for letters that sound dissimilar and short words. The memory span is projected to be shorter with letters that sound similar and with longer words.<ref>{{cite journal | last1=May | first1=Cynthia P. | last2=Hasher | first2=Lynn | last3=Kane | first3=Michael J. | title=The role of interference in memory span | journal=Memory & Cognition | volume=27 | issue=5 | date=1999 | issn=0090-502X | doi=10.3758/BF03198529 | doi-access=free | pages=759–767 | pmid=10540805 | url=https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/BF03198529.pdf }}</ref>


====Visual search====
=== Language ===
In one version of the ''[[visual search]] experiment'', a participant is presented with a window that displays circles and squares scattered across it. The participant is to identify whether there is a green circle on the window. In the ''featured'' search, the subject is presented with several trial windows that have blue squares or circles and one green circle or no green circle in it at all. In the ''[[Conjunctive tasks|conjunctive]]'' search, the subject is presented with trial windows that have blue circles or green squares and a present or absent green circle whose presence the participant is asked to identify. What is expected is that in the feature searches, reaction time, that is the time it takes for a participant to identify whether a green circle is present or not, should not change as the number of distractors increases. Conjunctive searches where the target is absent should have a longer reaction time than the conjunctive searches where the target is present. The theory is that in feature searches, it is easy to spot the target, or if it is absent, because of the difference in color between the target and the distractors. In conjunctive searches where the target is absent, reaction time increases because the subject has to look at each shape to determine whether it is the target or not because some of the distractors if not all of them, are the same color as the target stimuli. Conjunctive searches where the target is present take less time because if the target is found, the search between each shape stops.<ref>{{cite journal| vauthors = Wolfe J, Cave K, Franzel S |title=Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search|journal=Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance|year=1989|volume=15|pages=419–433|doi=10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.419 |issue=3 |pmid=2527952|citeseerx=10.1.1.551.1667 }}</ref>
{{main|Language}}
A language is a structured communication system based on symbols and rules to share information and coordinate action, such as [[English language|English]], [[Spanish language|Spanish]], and [[Japanese language|Japanese]]. Language plays a central role in everyday life, and some theorists argue that language affects numerous cognitive processes to some extent. For example, the [[Whorfian hypothesis]] and the thesis of linguistic relativity propose that language influences thought patterns and that speakers of distinct languages think differently.{{efn|There is no academic consensus on the nature and extent of this influence.<ref>{{harvnb|Eysenck|Keane|2015|loc=§ Part III: Language, § Whorfian Hypothesis}}</ref>}} Many cognitive processes are involved in the [[Language acquisition|acquisition]], [[Language comprehension|comprehension]], and [[Language production|production]] of linguistic expressions.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=145–146}} | {{harvnb|Eysenck|Keane|2015|loc=§ Part III: Language, § Whorfian Hypothesis}} | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA204 204]}} | {{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 5. Language}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=296–297, 336}} }}</ref>


====Knowledge representation====
Language acquisition happens naturally in childhood through exposure to a linguistic environment. It is a complex process since the system of spoken language is made up of several layers.<ref>{{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA268 268–269]}}</ref> At the fundamental level are [[Phone (phonetics)|basic sounds]] or [[Phoneme|sound units]]. They do not have linguistic meaning themselves but are combined into [[words]], which refer to diverse things and ideas.{{efn|The smallest linguistic units to carry meaning are [[morphemes]]. Some morphemes can function independently as words, while others only occur as modifications, such as [[prefixes]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|p=133}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=298–299}} }}</ref>}} Words are combined into [[sentences]] by following the rules of [[grammar]]. This system makes it possible to form and comprehend an infinite number of sentences based on a finite knowledge of a limited number of words and rules. The exact meaning of sentences usually depends also on the [[context]] in which they are used.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=131–134}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=297–299}} }}</ref> Although distinct languages can differ significantly in their general structure, there are some universal cognitive patterns that underlie all human languages.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=134–135}} | {{harvnb|Eysenck|Keane|2015|loc=§ Part III: Language, § Is language innate?}} | {{harvnb|Ardila|2018|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=17E_DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA3 3–4]}} }}</ref>
The [[semantic network]] of [[Knowledge representation and reasoning|knowledge representation]] systems have been studied in various paradigms. One of the oldest paradigms is the [[leveling and sharpening]] of stories as they are repeated from memory studied by [[Frederic Bartlett|Bartlett]]. The [[semantic differential]] used [[factor analysis]] to determine the main meanings of words, finding that the [[ethical value]] of words is the first factor. More controlled experiments examine the categorical relationships of words in [[free recall]]. The hierarchical structure of words has been explicitly mapped in [[George Armitage Miller|George Miller]]'s [[WordNet]]. More dynamic models of semantic networks have been created and tested with computational systems such as [[neural network (machine learning)|neural networks]], [[latent semantic analysis]] (LSA), [[Bayesian analysis]], and multidimensional factor analysis. The meanings of words are studied by all the disciplines of [[cognitive science]].<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Pinker S, Bloom P | title = Natural language and natural selection. |date=December 1990 |journal=Behavioral and Brain Sciences |volume=13 |issue=4 |pages=707–727 |doi=10.1017/S0140525X00081061 | s2cid = 6167614 }}</ref>


== Metacognition ==
Language comprehension is the process of understanding [[Spoken language|spoken]], [[Written language|written]], and [[Sign language|signed language]]. It involves the coordination of various cognitive skills to recognize words, consult memory to access their meanings, analyze sentence structures, and use contextual information to interpret their implications. Additional difficulties come from lexical and structural [[ambiguities]], in which a word or a sentence can be associated with multiple meanings. To resolve ambiguities, individuals rely on background knowledge about the overall topic and the speaker to discern the intended meaning. As a result, language comprehension depends not only on [[Bottom-up and top-down design|bottom-up processes]], which start with sensory information, but also on top-down processes, which integrate general knowledge and expectations. For example, expectations cause longer processing times if a familiar word occurs in a context where the reader did not expect it.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=135–141, 144–145}} | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA207 207–209, 212]}} }}</ref>
{{Excerpt|Metacognition}}


== Improving cognition ==
While language comprehension seeks to uncover the meaning of pre-existing linguistic messages, language production involves the inverse process of generating linguistic expressions to convey thoughts. It starts with the formulation of a general idea one wants to express and a rough sentence pattern of how to communicate it. Speakers then cognitively search for words that match the concepts they wish to convey. This activity, known as [[lexicalization]], is divided into two stages: the identification of an [[Lemma (psycholinguistics)|abstract semantic representation of the intended concept]], followed by the retrieval of the phonological form needed to pronounce the word.{{efn|For example, this two-stage model analyzes [[tip of the tongue]] phenomena as a success of the first stage and a failure of the second stage, having identified the meaning but being unable to retrieve the phonological form from memory.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|p=138}} | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA210 210–211]}} }}</ref>}} As speakers string together words to generate a sentence, they consider the [[grammatical category]] of each word, like the contrast between [[nouns]] and [[adjectives]], to align with the intended overall sentence structure. Additionally, the context of the conversation and the assumed background knowledge of the audience influence the selection of words and sentence structure.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=138, 142–144}} | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA209 209–211]}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=336–344, 348–349}} }}</ref>
{{main|Nootropic}}


===Physical exercise===
=== Others ===
Aerobic and [[anaerobic exercise]] have been studied concerning cognitive improvement.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Sanders LM, Hortobágyi T, la Bastide-van Gemert S, van der Zee EA, van Heuvelen MJ | title = Dose-response relationship between exercise and cognitive function in older adults with and without cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis | journal = PLOS ONE | volume = 14 | issue = 1 | pages = e0210036 | date = 2019-01-10 | pmid = 30629631 | pmc = 6328108 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0210036 | bibcode = 2019PLoSO..1410036S | veditors = Regnaux JP | doi-access = free }}</ref> There appear to be short-term increases in attention span, verbal and visual memory in some studies. However, the effects are transient and diminish over time, after cessation of the physical activity.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Young J, Angevaren M, Rusted J, Tabet N | title = Aerobic exercise to improve cognitive function in older people without known cognitive impairment | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | issue = 4 | pages = CD005381 | date = April 2015 | volume = 2015 | pmid = 25900537 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD005381.pub4 | collaboration = Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group | pmc = 10554155 }}</ref> People with Parkinson's disease have also seen improved cognition while cycling, while pairing it with other cognitive tasks.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Hazamy |first1=Audrey A. |last2=Altmann |first2=Lori J.P. |last3=Stegemöller |first3=Elizabeth |last4=Bowers |first4=Dawn |last5=Lee |first5=Hyo Keun |last6=Wilson |first6=Jonathan |last7=Okun |first7=Michael S. |last8=Hass |first8=Chris J. |date=April 2017 |title=Improved cognition while cycling in Parkinson's disease patients and healthy adults |journal=Brain and Cognition |language=en |volume=113 |pages=23–31 |doi=10.1016/j.bandc.2017.01.002 |pmc=5346468 |pmid=28088064}}</ref> Exercise, even at light intensity, significantly improves general cognition across all populations, with the largest cognitive gains seen from shorter interventions (1–3 months), light to moderate intensity activity.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Singh |first1=Ben |last2=Bennett |first2=Hunter |last3=Miatke |first3=Aaron |last4=Dumuid |first4=Dorothea |last5=Curtis |first5=Rachel |last6=Ferguson |first6=Ty |last7=Brinsley |first7=Jacinta |last8=Szeto |first8=Kimberley |last9=Petersen |first9=Jasmine M. |last10=Gough |first10=Claire |last11=Eglitis |first11=Emily |last12=Simpson |first12=Catherine EM |last13=Ekegren |first13=Christina L. |last14=Smith |first14=Ashleigh E. |last15=Erickson |first15=Kirk I. |date=2025-03-06 |title=Effectiveness of exercise for improving cognition, memory and executive function: a systematic umbrella review and meta-meta-analysis |url=https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2025/03/06/bjsports-2024-108589 |journal=British Journal of Sports Medicine |volume=59 |issue=12 |pages=866–876 |language=en |doi=10.1136/bjsports-2024-108589 |issn=0306-3674 |pmid=40049759|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Cognitive processes can be [[Consciousness|conscious]] or [[Unconscious mind|unconscious]]. Conscious processes, such as attentively solving a math problem step by step or recalling a vivid memory, involve active awareness. Unconscious processes, such as low-level processes underlying face recognition and language processing, operate automatically in the background without the individual's awareness. Phenomenal consciousness involves a qualitative experience of mental phenomena, whereas access consciousness is an awareness of information that is available for use but not actively experienced at the moment.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Eysenck|Keane|2015|loc=§ 16. Consciousness}} | {{harvnb|Davies|2001|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=-wt1aZrGXLYC&pg=PA191 191–192]}} | {{harvnb|Gennaro|loc=§ 1. Terminological Matters: Various Concepts of Consciousness}} }}</ref> Various theories of the cognitive function of consciousness have been proposed. They include the idea that consciousness integrates diverse forms of data and makes information globally available to various subsystems. Other theories argue that consciousness improves social interaction by fostering [[self-awareness]] in social contexts and that it allows for increased flexibility and control, particularly in novel situations.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Van Gulick|2025|loc=§ 6. The Functional Question: Why Does Consciousness Exist?}} | {{harvnb|Eysenck|Keane|2015|loc=§ 16. Consciousness}} }}</ref>


===Dietary supplements===
A related distinction is between [[Automatic and controlled processes|controlled and automatic processes]]. Controlled processes are actively guided by the individual's intentions, like when a person deliberately shifts attention from one object of perception to another. These processes are flexible and adaptable to new situations but require more cognitive resources. Automatic processes, by contrast, happen unconsciously, are effortless, and require fewer cognitive resources. By becoming familiar with a task, a cognitive process that was initially controlled can become automatic, thereby freeing up cognitive resources for other tasks. For example, as a novice driver becomes experienced, they can automatically handle the car and adapt to road and traffic conditions while gaining the ability to engage in a conversation at the same time.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|p=10}} | {{harvnb|Fabio|Caprì|Romano|2019|pp=773–774}} }}</ref>
Studies evaluating [[phytoestrogen]], blueberry supplementation and antioxidants showed minor increases in cognitive function after supplementation but no significant effects compared to [[placebo]].<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Barfoot KL, May G, Lamport DJ, Ricketts J, Riddell PM, Williams CM | title = The effects of acute wild blueberry supplementation on the cognition of 7–10-year-old schoolchildren | journal = European Journal of Nutrition | volume = 58 | issue = 7 | pages = 2911–2920 | date = October 2019 | pmid = 30327868 | pmc = 6768899 | doi = 10.1007/s00394-018-1843-6 | url = }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Thaung Zaw JJ, Howe PR, Wong RH | title = Does phytoestrogen supplementation improve cognition in humans? A systematic review | journal = Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | volume = 1403 | issue = 1 | pages = 150–163 | date = September 2017 | pmid = 28945939 | doi = 10.1111/nyas.13459 | bibcode = 2017NYASA1403..150T | s2cid = 25280760 | url = http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/nyas.13459 | url-access = subscription }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Sokolov AN, Pavlova MA, Klosterhalfen S, Enck P | title = Chocolate and the brain: neurobiological impact of cocoa flavanols on cognition and behavior | journal = Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews | volume = 37 | issue = 10 Pt 2 | pages = 2445–2453 | date = December 2013 | pmid = 23810791 | doi = 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.013 | s2cid = 17371625 }}</ref> Another study on the effects of herbal and dietary supplements on cognition in menopause show that soy and Ginkgo biloba supplementation could improve women's cognition.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Clement |first1=Yuri N. |last2=Onakpoya |first2=Igho |last3=Hung |first3=Shao K. |last4=Ernst |first4=Edzard |date=March 2011 |title=Effects of herbal and dietary supplements on cognition in menopause: A systematic review |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378512210004536 |journal=Maturitas |language=en |volume=68 |issue=3 |pages=256–263 |doi=10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.12.005|pmid=21237589 |url-access=subscription }}</ref>


===Pleasurable social stimulation===
[[File:Metacognition2.svg|thumb|alt=Diagram of a brain thinking about a brain|Metacognitive processes deal with information about other cognitive processes.<ref name="auto3">{{multiref | {{harvnb|Moses|Baird|2001|pp=533–535}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=188–189, 203–204}} }}</ref>]]
Exposing individuals with cognitive impairment (i.e. [[dementia]]) to daily activities designed to stimulate thinking and memory in a social setting, seems to improve cognition. Although study materials are small, and larger studies need to confirm the results, the effect of social cognitive stimulation seems to be larger than the effects of some drug treatments.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Woods B, Aguirre E, Spector AE, Orrell M | title = Cognitive stimulation to improve cognitive functioning in people with dementia | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | issue = 2 | pages = CD005562 | date = February 2012 | pmid = 22336813 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD005562.pub2  | s2cid = 7086782 | collaboration = Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group }}</ref>


===Other methods===
Consciousness is closely related to [[metacognition]], which encompasses any knowledge or cognitive process that deals with information about cognition. Some forms of metacognition only manage or store information about other aspects of cognition, like [[Metamemory|knowing that one can recall a specific memory]]. Others play an active role in monitoring and regulating ongoing processes, like changing a problem-solving strategy upon realizing that the previous one was ineffective. Metacognitive skills tend to improve the performance of other cognitive skills, particularly when dealing with complex tasks.<ref name="auto3"/>
[[Transcranial magnetic stimulation]] (TMS) has been shown to improve cognition in individuals without dementia 1 month after treatment session compared to before treatment. The effect was not significantly larger compared to placebo.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Trung J, Hanganu A, Jobert S, Degroot C, Mejia-Constain B, Kibreab M, Bruneau MA, Lafontaine AL, Strafella A, Monchi O | display-authors = 6 | title = Transcranial magnetic stimulation improves cognition over time in Parkinson's disease | journal = Parkinsonism & Related Disorders | volume = 66 | pages = 3–8 | date = September 2019 | pmid = 31300260 | doi = 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.07.006 | s2cid = 196350357 | url = https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1353802019302962 | url-access = subscription }}</ref> Computerized cognitive training, utilizing a computer based training regime for different cognitive functions has been examined in a clinical setting but no lasting effects has been shown.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Gates NJ, Rutjes AW, Di Nisio M, Karim S, Chong LY, March E, Martínez G, Vernooij RW | display-authors = 6 | title = Computerised cognitive training for 12 or more weeks for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life | journal = The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | volume = 2020 | pages = CD012277 | date = February 2020 | issue = 2 | pmid = 32104914 | pmc = 7045394 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD012277.pub3 | url = | collaboration = Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group }}</ref>
 
[[Social cognition]]s are mental activities through which individuals make sense of social phenomena. They include diverse types, such as the recognition of faces and facial expressions, the interpretation of intentions and behavior, and the evaluation of social cues and dynamics. A central topic in this field is [[theory of mind]]{{em dash}}the ability to understand others as mental beings with emotions, desires, and beliefs different from one's own. This ability allows individuals to think about and respond to the mental states of others.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Friedenberg|Silverman|Spivey|2022|pp=319–320, 329–330}} | {{harvnb|Frith|2008|pp=2033–2034}} | {{harvnb|Gilbert|2001|pp=777–778}} }}</ref> [[Morality|Moral]] cognitions are a type of social cognition that make individuals aware of the moral significance of situations. They occur when people recognize and appreciate [[altruistic]] behavior or disapprove of malicious and harmful actions.<ref>{{harvnb|Haas|2020|pp=[https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5_4 59–60]}}</ref> [[Cognitive psychology|Cognitive psychologists]] also study the relation between cognition and [[emotion]], for example, how emotions influence mental operations like attention and decision-making.<ref>{{harvnb|Eysenck|Keane|2015|loc=§ 15. Cognition and Emotion: Introduction}}</ref>
 
Cognitive processes do not always function as they should and can lead to inaccuracies, either because of natural errors associated with [[cognitive biases]] or as a result of pathological impairments from [[cognitive disorders]]. Cognitive biases are systematic ways in which human thinking deviates from ideal norms of [[rationality]]. They are common patterns that affect most people, leading to misinterpretations of reality and suboptimal decisions. Cognitive biases are often caused by heuristics or mental shortcuts, which the brain uses to increase speed and reduce cognitive load. For instance, people typically [[availability heuristic|rely on information that easily comes to mind]] when assessing a situation while disregarding more relevant information that is harder to retrieve.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Eysenck|Keane|2015|loc=§ Glossary: Heuristics}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=419–420, 427–428}} | {{harvnb|Litvak|Lerner|2009|pp=89–90}} | {{harvnb|Eldridge|2025}} }}</ref>
 
Cognitive disorders involve a more pronounced deviation from typical mental functioning. High-level cognitive abilities usually require the interaction of many low-level processes. Impairments affecting a specific subprocess often result in a partial malfunction of the high-level process while leaving its other functions intact.<ref>{{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=11–12, 52–53, 56–57}}</ref> For example, [[prosopagnosia]] is a perceptual disorder in which individuals lack the ability to recognize faces without impacting other visual abilities.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=52–53}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|p=55}} }}</ref> Similarly, [[anterograde amnesia]] is an impaired ability to form and recall new memories but leaves long-term memory intact. Disorders can affect a wide range of mental functions, including thought and language.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=99–100, 118, 147}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|p=146}} }}</ref> Some disorders involve a general cognitive decline that is not limited to one specific function. For instance, [[Alzheimer's disease]] is associated with a global, gradual impairment of memory, reasoning, and language.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=83–85}} | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/alzheimers-disease § Alzheimer's Disease]}} }}</ref>
 
== Theories ==
Various theories of the nature of cognition have been proposed. They provide conceptualizations and [[Cognitive model|models]] to represent cognitive processes, explain [[empirical data]], and predict [[experimental]] outcomes. Some theories propose interpretations of the overall [[cognitive architecture]] of the [[mind]], seeking to explain cognition as a whole. Others suggest more limited models intended only for specific mental activities, such as theories of visual attention.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=159–160, 176}} | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 4. Theoretical Approaches}} }}</ref>
 
=== Classical computationalism ===
[[Computational theory of mind|Computationalism]] interprets cognition as a form of [[computation]], highlighting the similarities between minds and computers. Classical computationalism understands cognitions as [[symbol]] manipulations and asserts that the brain represents information through symbols or strings of symbols. In this view, computations operate on strings to create new strings according to a set of mechanical rules. These rules only depend on the syntactic structure of the strings, meaning that cognitive processes have no understanding of what the symbols represent. For example, a simple calculator transforms the string "3 + 7" into the result "10" according to the mechanical rules of [[arithmetic]] without grasping the meaning of these numerals.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 2.1 Introduction, § 2.2 Classical Computationalism}} | {{harvnb|Buckner|Garson|2025|loc=§ 5. The Shape of the Controversy between Connectionists and Classicists}} | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=162–163, 176}} | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 4.3 Concepts}} }}</ref> To handle complex data dealing with many entities and their interrelations, theorists often introduce more sophisticated symbol-based devices of [[knowledge representation]], such as [[semantic nets]], [[Schema (psychology)|schemata]], and [[Frame (artificial intelligence)|frames]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=162–163, 176}} | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 4.3 Concepts}} }}</ref>
 
According to classical computationalism, any cognitive activity is at its fundamental level a formal symbol manipulation, including perception, reasoning, planning, and language processing. This perspective helps researchers analyze and distinguish cognitive processes by examining the types of representations involved and the mechanical rules followed.<ref>{{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 2.2 Classical Computationalism}}</ref> The [[tri-level hypothesis]] divides this study into three levels of abstraction. The highest level analyzes the goal or purpose of a process, identifying the information it receives, the problem it aims to solve, and the result it produces. The intermediary level involves the decomposition of the process into individual steps, analyzing how the computation is performed or which [[algorithm]] is used. The most concrete level explores how the algorithm is implemented on a material level through neurological systems.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=161–162}} | {{harvnb|Friedenberg|Silverman|Spivey|2022|pp=8–9}} | {{harvnb|Bermúdez|2014|pp=122–123}} | {{harvnb|Rescorla|2025|loc=Lead section}} | {{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 2.2 Classical Computationalism}} }}</ref>
 
Classical computationalism is closely related to the [[Information processing theory|information-processing approach]], which assumes that most cognitive activities are complex processes arising from the interaction of several subprocesses. Each process is characterized by the function it performs, which is connected to the input information it obtains, how it transforms this information, and the output it generates. Interaction happens when the output of one subprocess acts as the input for another. This approach is associated with serial models in which complex computations are divided into sequences of calculations where intermediary results are computed and transmitted until a final output is produced. It typically divides the mind into a small number of high-level systems responsible for different tasks, such as perception, memory, and reasoning. Information-processing models often rely on a hierarchical cognitive architecture where a central system integrates information from other units and formulates overall goals.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Best|1995|pp=20–25}} | {{harvnb|Galotti|2015|pp=15–16}} }}</ref>
 
The [[language of thought hypothesis]] is a version of classical computationalism arguing that thought happens through the medium of an internal [[Language|linguistic system]] similar to natural languages, termed ''mentalese''. It suggests that mental states like beliefs and desires are realized through mentalese sentences and that cognitive operations transform these sentences according to specific rules.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 2.1 Introduction}} | {{harvnb|Rescorla|2024|loc=Lead section}} }}</ref>
 
Some symbol-based approaches use [[formal logic]] as a model of cognition. According to this view, representations have the form of [[Proposition|statements]], similar to declarative sentences. Computational processes are conceptualized as [[rules of inference]], which take one or more sentences as input and produce a new sentence as output. For example, ''[[modus ponens]]'' is a rule of inference that, when applied to the [[premise]]s "if it rains, then the ground is wet" and "it rains", results in the conclusion "the ground is wet".<ref>{{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 4.1 Formal Logic}}</ref>
 
Certain rule-based approaches interpret cognition as the application of if-then rules to generate new representations. According to this outlook, a cognitive system is made up of many rules, each defined by one or more conditions together with an output procedure. If information stored in the working memory satisfies all the conditions of a rule then its output procedure is triggered and transfers a new representation to the working memory. This change may, in turn, prompt the execution of another rule, leading to a dynamic sequence of operations that can solve complex computational tasks. The cognitive architecture [[Soar (cognitive architecture)|Soar]] is an example of this approach.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 4.2 Rules}} | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=163, 165–166}} | {{harvnb|Vernon|Hofsten|Fadiga|2011|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=F0jAvNeFPaQC&pg=PA160 160]}} }}</ref>
 
=== Connectionism ===
{{main|Connectionism}}
[[File:Artificial neural network colored.svg|thumb|alt=Diagram of a neural network consisting of several layers|Connectionism analyzes cognition through complex neural networks consisting of several layers of nodes.<ref name="auto">{{multiref | {{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 2.4 Connectionism}} | {{harvnb|Buckner|Garson|2025|loc=Lead section, § 1. A Description of Neural Networks}} }}</ref>]]
Classical computationalism is typically contrasted with connectionism. As another form of computationalism, connectionism agrees that cognitions are computations but proposes a different cognitive architecture based on a [[Neural network|complex network of nodes]]. The nodes are locally linked with each other, and the activity of each node depends on the inputs it receives from connected nodes.<ref name="auto6">{{multiref | {{harvnb|Best|1995|pp=25–26}} | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 4.6 Connectionism, § 4.7 Theoretical Neuroscience}} | {{harvnb|Buckner|Garson|2025|loc=Lead section, § 1. A Description of Neural Networks}} | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=167–168, 174–175}} | {{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ Connectionism}} }}</ref> The nodes are typically arranged in [[Layer (deep learning)|layers]] where information flows in one direction from earlier to later layers. The initial input layer of nodes receives information, such as sensory data, and passes it on to [[Hidden layer|intermediary layers]], where the main computation takes place. At the end of the process stands an output layer, which transmits the result to other systems. The behavior of each individual node is usually relatively simple: the node's activation value is determined by its weighted inputs and broadcast to nodes in the subsequent layer. Complex computations emerge as numerous nodes operate in parallel and interact across layers.<ref name="auto"/>
 
Connectionism is closely related to [[computational neuroscience]], and some researchers directly integrate neurological data about electrochemical activities of [[neurons]] into their theories. However, the more common approach is to use abstract, idealized models to avoid complexities introduced by neurophysiological mechanisms. Connectionism also shares various interests with the field of [[artificial intelligence]], and the networks and [[learning algorithms]] proposed in one field often have similar applications in the other.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 4.9 Deep Learning}} | {{harvnb|Buckner|Garson|2025|loc=§ 11. Deep Learning: Connectionism’s New Wave}} | {{harvnb|Waskan|loc=Lead section}} }}</ref>
 
Connectionists typically reject the serial and hierarchical models common in classical computationalism. Instead, they argue that cognition happens in [[Parallel computing|parallel]] as countless neurons work simultaneously without a central control system guiding the process.<ref name="auto6"/>
 
Although connectionism is often presented as an alternative to computationalism, the two views do not necessarily exclude each other. For example, implementation connectionists argue that non-symbolic processes at the fundamental neural level implement symbolic processes at a more abstract level. According to this view, the cognitive system functions as a neural network at the fundamental level and as a symbol-processor when viewed from a more abstract perspective. This position contrasts with radical connectionism, which asserts that symbol-based approaches are fundamentally flawed since they misconstrue the nature of cognition.<ref>{{harvnb|Buckner|Garson|2025|loc=§ 5. The Shape of the Controversy between Connectionists and Classicists}}</ref>
 
=== Representationalism and anti-representationalism ===
Both classical computationalism and common forms of connectionism{{efn|It is debated whether all forms of connectionism involve representations.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chemero|1999|pp=39–42}} | {{harvnb|Fodor|Pylyshyn|1997|p=313}} }}</ref>}} accept representationalism, which holds that information is stored in [[Mental representation|representations]] that depict the state of the world. Representations can take various forms, such as symbols, images, and concepts, as well as subsymbolic patterns used to model higher-level structures. Representationalists examine how cognitive systems encode, manipulate, and decode representations to construct [[Mental model|internal models]] of the environment and predict changes.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=160–161}} | {{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 2.1 Introduction}} | {{harvnb|Waskan|loc=§ 7. Anti-Represenationalism: Dynamical Stystems Theory, A-Life and Embodied Cognition}} | {{harvnb|Fodor|Pylyshyn|1997|p=313}} }}</ref>
 
Anti-representationalists reject the idea that cognition is about representing the world through internal models. They assert that [[intelligence]] arises from the interaction between an organism and its environment rather than from internal processes alone. For example, approaches in [[behaviorism]] and [[situated robotics]] suggest an immediate link between perception and action: environmental stimuli are directly processed and translated into behavior following [[stimulus-response]] patterns. This outlook suggests that intelligent behavior emerges if an entity has stimulus-response patterns that match the external situation, even if the cognitive system responsible for these patterns has no representations of what the environment is like.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=160–161}} | {{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 2.6 Alternative Approaches to the Study of Cognition, § 7. Evaluating Anti-representationalism.}} | {{harvnb|Chemero|1999|pp=39–40}} }}</ref>
 
Anti-representationalism is closely related to [[4E cognition]], a family of views critical of the prioritization of internal representations. 4E cognition examines the relation between mind, body, and environment, including [[Embodied cognition|embodied]], [[Embodied embedded cognition|embedded]], [[Extended mind thesis|extended]], and [[Enactivism|enactive cognition]]. Embodied cognition is the idea that cognitive processes are grounded in bodily experience and cannot be understood in isolation from the organism's sensorimotor capacities. Embedded cognition asserts that cognitive effort and efficiency depend on physical and social environments. Extended cognition claims that the environment not only influences cognition but forms part of it, meaning that cognitive processes extend beyond internal neural activity to include external events. Enactive cognition asserts that cognition arises from the active interaction between organism and environment.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Shapiro|Spaulding|2025|loc=Lead section, § 2. Embodied Cognition: Themes and Close Relations}} | {{harvnb|Alexander|2025|loc=§ Abstract, § Introduction, § 4. Paradigmatic examples of 4E cognitive science}} | {{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 2.8 The Extended Mind}} }}</ref>
 
=== Others ===
The [[modularity of mind]] is an approach that analyzes the cognitive system in terms of independent mental modules. Each module is an inborn mechanism that deals only with a specific type of information while being mostly unaware of the activities of other modules. Mental modules are primarily used to explain low-level cognitive processes, such as edge detection in visual perception.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Robbins|2017|loc=§ 1. What Is a Mental Module?}} | {{harvnb|Hufendiek|Wild|2015|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=78C6BwAAQBAJ&pg=PA265 265–268]}} | {{harvnb|Bermúdez|2014|pp=288–290}} }}</ref> The massive modularity hypothesis, by contrast, asserts that the mind is entirely composed of modules. According to this view, mental modules are also responsible for high-level cognitive processes by linking and integrating the outputs of low-level cognitive processes.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Hufendiek|Wild|2015|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=78C6BwAAQBAJ&pg=PA267 267–268]}} | {{harvnb|Robbins|2017|loc=§ 3.1. The Case for Massive Modularity}} | {{harvnb|Bermúdez|2014|p=277}} }}</ref>
 
[[Bayesian epistemology|Bayesianism]] applies [[probability theory]] to model cognitive processes such as learning, vision, and motor control. Its central idea is that representations of the environment can be more or less reliable and that the laws of probability theory describe how to integrate information and manage uncertainty.<ref>{{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 4.8 Bayesian}}</ref> Bayesianism is sometimes combined with [[Predictive coding|predictive models]]. According to them, the brain creates and adjusts its internal representation of the environment by predicting what is going to happen, comparing the predictions to reality, and updating the internal representation accordingly.<ref>{{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 4.10 Predictive Processing and Active Inference}}</ref>
 
[[Dual process theory (moral psychology)|Dual process theory]] relies on the distinction between [[automatic and controlled processes]] to analyze cognitive phenomena. It conceptualizes them as two systems and proposes different models of their interaction. According to the default-interventionist model, the automatic system generates impressions while the controlled system monitors them and intervenes if it detects problems. The parallel-competitive model, by contrast, suggests that each system generates its own type of knowledge and that the outputs of the different systems compete with each other.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Neys|2018|pp=1–2}} | {{harvnb|Stets|2016|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=nQ3NCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA351 351]}} }}</ref>
 
== Development ==
{{main|Cognitive development}}
Cognitive development is the progressive growth of mental abilities from [[infancy]] through [[adulthood]] as individuals acquire improved [[cognitive skills]] and learn from experience. Some changes occur continuously as gradual improvements over extended periods. Others involve discontinuous transitions in the form of abrupt reorganizations resulting in qualitative changes. They are typically conceptualized as stages through which the individual passes.<ref name="auto4">{{multiref | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA235 235–238]}} | {{harvnb|Newcombe|2006}} | {{harvnb|Gelman|Baird|2001|pp=128–129}} | {{harvnb|Mareschal|2006}} }}</ref>
 
The [[nature versus nurture]] debate addresses the causes of cognitive development, contrasting the influences of inborn dispositions with the effects of environment and experience. [[Empiricism|Empiricists]] identify environment and experience as the main factors. This view is inspired by [[John Locke]]'s idea that the mind of an infant is a [[tabula rasa|blank slate]] that initially knows nothing of the world. According to this outlook, children learn through sense data by associating and generalizing impressions. [[Psychological nativism|Nativists]], by contrast, argue that the mind has [[Innatism|innate knowledge]] of abstract patterns. They suggest that this inborn framework organizes sensory information and guides learning.<ref name="auto4"/>
 
[[File:Jean Piaget in Ann Arbor (cropped).png|thumb|alt=Photo of a man with white hair and glasses, wearing a suit|[[Jean Piaget]] divided the cognitive development of children into four stages.<ref name="auto1">{{harvnb|Matlin|2013|p=9}}</ref>]]
 
Various theories of the general mechanisms and stages of cognitive development have been proposed. [[Jean Piaget]]'s [[Piaget's theory of cognitive development|theory]] divides cognitive development into four stages, each marked by an increasing capacity for abstraction and systematic understanding. In the initial sensory-motor stage, from birth to about two years, children explore sensory impressions and motor capacities, learning that things continue to exist when not observed. During the pre-operational stage, up to about age seven, children begin to understand and use symbols intuitively. In the following stages of concrete and formal operation, children first apply [[logical reasoning]] to concrete physical objects and then, from around age twelve, also to abstract ideas.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Bernstein|Nash|2006|pp=349–350}} | {{harvnb|Gross|2020|pp=566–572}} | {{harvnb|Khatoon|2012|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ha1KBZm9CXQC&pg=PA308 308–311]}} }}</ref>
 
In contrast to Piaget's approach, [[Lev Vygotsky]]'s theory sees social interaction as the primary driver of cognitive development without clearly demarcated stages. It holds that children learn new skills by engaging in tasks under the guidance of knowledgeable others. This view emphasizes the role of language acquisition, suggesting that children internalize language and use it in [[private speech]] as a tool for planning, self-regulation, and problem solving.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA264 264–265]}} | {{harvnb|Berk|Harris|2006}} }}</ref> Other approaches examine the role of different types of representation in cognitive development. For example, [[Annette Karmiloff-Smith]] proposes that cognitive developments involve a shift from [[Implicit cognition|implicit]] to [[Explicit knowledge|explicit]] representations, making knowledge more complex and easier to access. A further theory, proposed by [[Robert S. Siegler]], asserts that children use multiple [[cognitive strategies]] to solve problems and become more adept at selecting effective strategies as they develop.<ref>{{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA260 260–264]}}</ref>
 
Cognitive development is most rapid during childhood. Some influences occur even before birth, due to factors like nutrition, [[Prenatal stress|maternal stress]], and harmful substances like [[Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder|alcohol during pregnancy]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Coall|Callan|Dickins|Chisholm|2015|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Fg3QBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA57 57–58]}} | {{harvnb|Bernstein|Nash|2006|pp=342–348, 384}} | {{harvnb|Abel|2003|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=j77OEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA231 231–232]}} }}</ref> Developments in childhood affect all major cognitive faculties, including perception, memory, thinking, and language. Cognitive changes also happen during adulthood but are less pronounced. In [[old age]], overall cognition declines, affecting reasoning, comprehension, novel problem solving, and memory.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Bernstein|Nash|2006|pp=382–385}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=453–455}} }}</ref>
 
== Non-human ==
=== Animal ===
{{main|Animal cognition}}
[[File:BonoboFishing04.jpeg|thumb|alt=Photo of a bonobo using a stick to fish for termites|The ability to [[Tool use by non-humans|employ tools]] is an example of [[animal cognition]], such as a [[bonobo]] fishing [[termites]] with a stick.<ref>{{harvnb|De Waal|Lanting|2023|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=zVDhEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA36 36–37]}}</ref>]]
Animal cognition refers to mechanisms through which animals acquire knowledge and transform information to engage in flexible, goal-oriented behavior. Animals use cognitive abilities for many daily tasks, for example, to find and recognize food, navigate territory, seek shelter, hunt prey, avoid predators, interact socially, communicate, learn new habits, and form long-term memories. Researchers examine cognition across diverse species, including [[mammals]], [[birds]], [[fish]], and [[insects]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Andrews|Monsó|2021|loc=Lead section, § 1. What is Animal Cognition?}} | {{harvnb|Howard|Barron|2024|pp=R294–R295}} | {{harvnb|Stevens|Stevens|2012}} | {{harvnb|Kuhlmeier|Boysen|2006}} }}</ref> Animal cognition is typically specialized and domain-specific, meaning that a species may excel at particular tasks and contexts while performing poorly in others.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Bräuer|Hanus|Pika|Gray|2020|loc=Abstract, § 2. Performing Competently–Performing Poorly: Cognitive Skills Are Not Necessarily Linked Together}} | {{harvnb|Santos|Caramazza|2005|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=qvF5AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA6 6]}} }}</ref>
 
Researchers examine various areas of animal cognition. They are interested in whether animals can form [[abstract concepts]], expressed in the ability to understand a category and apply it to novel instances. For instance, [[chimpanzees]] can learn concepts of different numbers. As a result, they acquire various number-related abilities, like identifying collections containing a specific number of items. Another often-studied capacity is the power to form and remember a spatial map of the environment. This enables animals, such as [[jays]], to navigate efficiently and choose the shortest route to a shelter or a feeding site. Research also addresses [[imitation]], in which an animal copies the behavior of another animal. This facilitates the spread of useful skills, including [[Tool use by non-humans|tool-use]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Kuhlmeier|Boysen|2006}} | {{harvnb|Hauser|2001|pp=666–667}} }}</ref> Beyond animal cognition, some researchers also examine [[plant cognition]], such as [[plant communication]]. For instance, [[maple trees]] release [[Volatile organic compound|airborne chemicals]] to warn nearby trees of a [[herbivore]] attack, helping them prepare defensive responses.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Segundo-Ortin|Calvo|2022|loc=§ 1. Introduction, § 2.1 Communication}} | {{harvnb|Arimura|Pearse|2017|pp=4–5}} | {{harvnb|Schenk|Seabloom|2010|p=1}} }}</ref>
 
[[Comparative cognition]] is the study of the similarities and differences in cognitive abilities across species. It is an interdisciplinary field of inquiry that also considers evolutionary factors. For example, researchers investigate which cognitive traits are required to solve particular socioecological problems and how these traits evolved in different species. A traditionally dominant approach divides animal cognition into higher and lower psychological processes based on features like flexibility and complexity. However, it is controversial to what extent this contrast captures meaningful functional distinctions, and researchers risk [[Anthropomorphism|anthropomorphic bias]] by interpreting animal cognition in terms of human traits.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Howard|Barron|2024|pp=R294–R295}} | {{harvnb|Halina|2023|loc=Lead section, § 1. Evolution, Development, and Culture, § 3.1 Anthropomorphism}} }}</ref>
 
=== Artificial ===
Artificial cognition uses computational systems to emulate and model cognitive processes, like perception and reasoning, with central applications in [[artificial intelligence]] and [[robotics]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Siemens|Marmolejo-Ramos|Gabriel|Medeiros|2022|loc=§ Introduction}} | {{harvnb|Taylor|Taylor|2021|pp=454–456}} }}</ref> Artificial and human cognition have different strengths and weaknesses. For example, artificial cognition excels at rapidly processing vast datasets according to predefined [[algorithms]]. Human cognition, by contrast, is typically better suited to assess emotional significance and to find and evaluate solutions that require novel and [[Creativity|creative]] thinking. These differences affect how the two forms of cognition are integrated with each other. For some applications, artificial cognition is used to assist human cognition. In [[aviation]], for example, it helps monitor diverse metrics, allowing human pilots to focus on decision-making rather than data analysis. However, there are also cases where artificial cognition replaces human cognition, such as [[Vehicular automation|autonomous vehicle navigation]].<ref>{{harvnb|Siemens|Marmolejo-Ramos|Gabriel|Medeiros|2022|loc=§ Introduction, § 2. Human and Artificial Cognition, § 3.1.2. Computer vision, § 5. Human and Artificial Cognition in Practice}}</ref>
 
The field of artificial cognitive systems explores the possibility of [[Autonomous robot|autonomous machines]] with human-like cognition. This encompasses not only artificial intelligence at the level of individual tasks, such as object detection or language translation, but also the integration of diverse cognitive processes. The aim is an embodied system that can autonomously interact with its environment in real time. An artificial cognitive system can navigate its surroundings, set goals, devise means to achieve them, anticipate outcomes, adapt to circumstances, execute action plans, and learn from experience.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Vernon|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=zzMqBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 1–8]}} | {{harvnb|Crowder|Carbone|Friess|2013|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=1RO4BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 1–3]}} }}</ref> [[Artificial general intelligence]], a closely related concept, refers to hypothetical systems that possess or surpass the full range of human mental abilities. It is controversial whether such a system can be fully realized since it would include not only computational capacities associated with logical reasoning but also emotion and phenomenal consciousness.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Chen|2023|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=C8vAEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA1141 1141]}} | {{harvnb|Bringsjord|Govindarajulu|2024|loc=§ 8. Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence}} | {{harvnb|Butz|2021|pp=91–92}} }}</ref>
 
== In various fields ==
Many fields of inquiry study cognition, including [[psychology]], [[neuroscience]], and [[cognitive science]]. They examine different aspects of cognition, ranging from high-level computational processes to low-level neural mechanisms, and employ distinct [[Methodology|methods]] to reach their conclusions. There is substantial overlap among these disciplines, and researchers from one field often rely on conceptual models or empirical findings from another.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Eysenck|Keane|2015|loc=§ 1. Approaches to Human Cognition}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=1–21}} }}</ref>
 
=== Psychology ===
{{main|Cognitive psychology}}
Cognitive psychology examines mental activities responsible for cognitive phenomena and intelligent behavior. It uses the [[scientific method]] to study cognitive processes like perception, memory, reasoning, and language. Although mental activities mediate between [[Stimulus–response model|stimuli and responses]], they are [[Unobservable|not directly observable]], which poses a methodological challenge for researchers. It typically forces them to rely on indirect methods for [[empirical validation]], usually in the form of models or theories that have testable predictions. For example, if a theory predicts a specific behavior in a particular situation, then empirical observations can determine if outcomes align with those predictions.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Balota|Cortese|2000|pp=153–154}} | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/cognitive-psychology § Cognitive Psychology]}} | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA11 11–12]}} }}</ref>
 
Cognitive psychologists use diverse methods to gather data for empirical validation. [[Experimental]] methods create controlled situations in which certain factors, called [[Dependent and independent variables|independent variables]], can be changed. The main interest is in how these factors influence individuals in the situation. By measuring the effects, called dependent variables, researchers aim to identify [[Causality|causal relations]] between independent and dependent variables. [[Correlation]]al methods, by contrast, measure the degree of association between two variables without proving that one causes the other. Cognitive psychologists also integrate methods from other disciplines, including neuroimaging techniques and computational simulations. Early cognitive psychologists made extensive use of [[introspection]], in which researchers examine and reflect on their own experiences to understand mental processes. The choice of method depends a lot on the studied cognitive process, such as the differences between research on perception and memory.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Balota|Watson|2000|pp=158–162}} | {{harvnb|Hood|2013|pp=1314–1315}} | {{harvnb|Dumont|2008|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=MP5X2SK2DCgC&pg=PA17 17, 27–28, 48]}} | {{harvnb|Howitt|Cramer|2011|pp=11–12, 16–17, 220–221, 232–233, 383–384}} }}</ref>
 
=== Neuroscience===
{{main|Cognitive neuroscience}}
[[File:1206 FMRI.jpg|thumb|alt=fMRI image showing the brain from a top view with active areas colored in orange|upright=0.7|[[Functional magnetic resonance imaging|fMRI]] is a neuroimaging technique that can measure regional brain activity corresponding to specific cognitive tasks.<ref>{{harvnb|Scharff|2008|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=mqcvrd7rKc0C&pg=PA270 270–271]}}</ref>]]
Cognitive neuroscience investigates how the [[nervous system]] gives rise to cognition. It is particularly interested in the [[brain]], covering both micro-scale studies of individual [[neurons]] and [[synapses]] as well as the macro-scale analyses of interactions between [[brain regions]]. For example, cognitive neuroscientists study the brain areas responsible for processes like memory and decision-making, exploring how they represent and transform information and communicate with each other on a biological level. They also examine how these processes are influenced by [[neurotransmitters]]{{em dash}}[[Cell signaling|signalling molecules]] that affect information exchange between neurons.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Banich|Compton|2023|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=adPQEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA3 3, 17–18]}} | {{harvnb|Eysenck|Keane|2015|loc=§ Cognitive Neuroscience: the Brain in Action}} | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/cognitive-neuroscience § Cognitive Neuroscience]}} }}</ref>
 
Cognitive neuroscientists employ [[neuroimaging]] techniques to study brain activity, including [[electroencephalography]] (EEG), [[positron emission tomography]] (PET), and [[functional magnetic resonance imaging]] (fMRI). These techniques visualize neural processes by measuring phenomena such as electrical or magnetic changes and blood flow across different brain areas, indicating local activity levels. Researchers compare the activation patterns associated with specific mental tasks to learn how regional brain activity correlates with cognitive demands. Another method examines patients with [[brain damage]]. It seeks to understand the role of a brain area indirectly by studying how cognition changes if the area is impaired.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Revlin|2013|pp=33–42}} | {{harvnb|Friedenberg|Silverman|Spivey|2022|pp=17–18}} | {{harvnb|Engelmann|Mulckhuyse|Ting|2019|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=uC2jDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA159 159]}} | {{harvnb|Scharff|2008|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=mqcvrd7rKc0C&pg=PA270 270–271]}} | {{harvnb|Hellier|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=FOTNEAAAQBAJ&pg=PR31 31–32]}} }}</ref>
 
A different approach, common in [[Computational neuroscience|computational or theoretical neuroscience]], is to design computational or mathematical models of cognitive systems. This approach explores possible explanations of observed mental phenomena and neural activities by modeling and simulating underlying brain mechanisms.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Arbib|2016|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=6-51DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 1]}} | {{harvnb|Vaina|2006}} }}</ref>
 
=== Cognitive science ===
{{main|Cognitive science}}
Cognitive science is an interdisciplinary field informed by psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, linguistics, and artificial intelligence. It seeks to integrate the insights of these disciplines and provide a unified perspective. To this end, it adopts a common conceptualization of minds as information processors, understanding cognition as the manipulation of internal representations.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=21–22}} | {{harvnb|Friedenberg|Silverman|Spivey|2022|pp=2–3}} | {{harvnb|Bermúdez|2014|pp=3, 85}} | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=Lead section, § 3. Representation and Computation}} }}</ref>
 
To bridge disciplinary and methodological divides, it identifies distinct levels of analysis corresponding to different degrees of abstraction. For example, neuroscientific analysis of the electrochemical activity of brain areas belongs to a concrete level that deals with the biological mechanisms performing computations. By contrast, the psychological study of the roles of and interactions between high-level processes, such as perception, memory, and reasoning, adopts an abstract perspective. Cognitive scientists seek to coordinate empirical experiments with theoretical models to produce testable theories that link the different levels.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=21–22}} | {{harvnb|Groome|2005|pp=161–162}} | {{harvnb|Friedenberg|Silverman|Spivey|2022|pp=8–9}} | {{harvnb|Bermúdez|2014|pp=122–123}} }}</ref>
 
=== Other fields ===
Many fields of inquiry have subareas dedicated to cognitive phenomena. For example, [[cognitive linguistics]] is a subarea of [[linguistics]] that investigates the relation between language and cognition. It studies the cognitive processes responsible for [[grammar]], [[conceptualization]], [[language comprehension]], and [[language production]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Fauconnier|2006}} | {{harvnb|Van Hoek|2001|pp=134–135}} }}</ref> Similarly, [[cognitive anthropology]] examines the connection between [[culture]] and cognition, conceptualizing culture as a system of knowledge, beliefs, and values. It analyzes and compares cultures from this perspective to identify distinctive features of particular societies and the universal patterns shared by all.<ref>{{harvnb|Casson|2001|pp=120–122}}</ref> [[Cognitive sociology]], a related field, explores how sociocultural factors shape cognitive activity.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Cerulo|2005|loc=Cognitive Sociology}} | {{harvnb|Raphael|2017}} }}</ref> Other fields include [[cognitive archaeology]], [[cognitive architecture]], and [[cognitive biology]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Mithen|2001|pp=122–124}} | {{harvnb|Sloman|2001|pp=124–126}} | {{harvnb|Slijepcevic|2024}} }}</ref>
 
Various branches of [[philosophy]] address cognition, including [[philosophy of mind]] and [[epistemology]]. Philosophers of mind examine the nature of cognition and related concepts, such as [[mind]], [[Mental representation|representation]], and [[consciousness]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Lowe|2000|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=mH12kYm1RKAC&pg=PA1 1–2]}} | {{harvnb|Crumley II|2006|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Yf4eAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA2 2–4]}} }}</ref> They are particularly interested in the [[Mind–body problem|relation between mind and matter]]<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Kim|2005|p=608}} | {{harvnb|Jaworski|2011|pp=11–12}} | {{harvnb|Searle|2004|pp=3–4}} }}</ref> and the [[Hard problem of consciousness|problem of how physical states can give rise to conscious experience]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Weisberg|loc=Lead Section, § 1. Stating the Problem}} | {{harvnb|Blackmore|2013|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=WycuAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA33 33–35]}} | {{harvnb|Searle|2004|pp=39–40}} }}</ref> Epistemologists seek to understand the nature and limits of [[knowledge]]. They further ask under what conditions cognitive processes, like perception and reasoning, lead to knowledge.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Truncellito|loc=Lead section}} | {{harvnb|Blaauw|Pritchard|2005|pp=49–50}} | {{harvnb|Crumley II|2009|p=16}} }}</ref> Philosophers also reflect on the fields of inquiry studying cognition. They explore how [[Philosophy of psychology|psychologists]], [[Neurophilosophy|neuroscientists]], and cognitive scientists conduct research and ask about the fundamental concepts and background assumptions underlying these fields.<ref>{{harvnb|Cain|2016|loc=§ 1. Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Cognitive Science, § 6. The Brain and Cognition}}</ref>
 
[[Education studies]] is the field of inquiry examining the nature, purposes, practices, and outcomes of [[education]]. It investigates the [[cognitive development]] of children and studies how knowledge is transmitted, acquired, and organized.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Bartlett|Burton|2003|pp=1–3}} | {{harvnb|Ranney|Shimoda|2001|pp=261–262}} }}</ref> This discipline overlaps with cognitive psychology and cognitive science because of its interest in [[learning]], covering diverse cognitive processes and skills, such as [[conceptual change]], [[metacognition]], [[mental models]], logical reasoning, and problem solving.<ref>{{harvnb|Ranney|Shimoda|2001|pp=261–262}}</ref> Cognitive learning theories conceptualize learning in terms of information processing. They analyze how information is encoded, retrieved, and transformed, often with the goal of devising educational practices that optimize learning. For example, [[cognitive load theory]] identifies limitations of working memory as a bottleneck that impedes learning and proposes educational practices to avoid cognitive overload.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Pear|2014|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=e5F7AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA7 7]}} | {{harvnb|Sweller|2011|loc=§ Abstract, § Introduciton}} | {{harvnb|Mayer|2006}} | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/cognitive-load § Cognitive Load], [https://dictionary.apa.org/cognitive-overload § Cognitive Overload]}} }}</ref>
 
[[Psychometrics]] examines how mental attributes can be measured. It includes the discussion of [[cognitive tests]], which are methods designed to assess cognitive abilities. For example, [[IQ tests]] include tasks involving logical reasoning, verbal comprehension, spatial thinking, and working memory to estimate overall cognitive performance.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Nairne|2011|pp=313, 322–323}} | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/psychometrics § Psychometrics]}} }}</ref> The [[Montreal Cognitive Assessment]] and the [[mini–mental state examination]] are tests to detect cognitive impairment, such as deficits in memory, attention, and language.<ref>{{harvnb|Kabátová|Puteková|Martinková|Súkenníková|2016|pp=62–64}}</ref>
 
[[Cognitive enhancement]] encompasses diverse ways to improve mental performance, including biochemical, behavioral, and physical factors. Biochemical approaches include balanced [[nutrition]] and [[nootropics|psychoactive substances]] like [[caffeine]] and [[amphetamine]]. Behavioral enhancements cover [[physical exercise]], sufficient sleep, [[meditation]], and cognitive strategies, such as [[mnemonics]]. Physical enhancements encompass invasive and non-invasive [[Electrical brain stimulation|brain stimulation]] as well as [[neurofeedback]] and wearable devices.<ref>{{harvnb|Dresler|Sandberg|Bublitz|Ohla|2019|loc=§ 1. Introduction, § 2. Mode of Action}}</ref>
 
[[Cognitive behavior therapy]] is a [[psychotherapy]] that analyzes psychological problems in terms of cognitive processes. It argues that maladaptive automatic thoughts, [[cognitive distortions]], and unhealthy [[core beliefs]] lead to inaccurate interpretations of events and emotional [[Mental distress|distress]]. For example, if a person has an unconscious core belief that they are [[Inferiority complex|fundamentally inadequate]], they may misinterpret a neutral interaction as a rejection. Cognitive behavior therapists seek to restructure problematic attitudes by helping clients recognize and modify dysfunctional thought patterns.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|American Psychological Association|2018|loc=[https://dictionary.apa.org/cognitive-behavior-therapy § Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT)], [https://dictionary.apa.org/cognitive-restructuring § Cognitive Restructuring]}} | {{harvnb|Chand|Kuckel|Huecker|2025|loc=§ Issues of Concern, § Clinical Significance}} }}</ref>
 
Many topics in [[computer science]] are relevant to cognition, particularly for approaches that understand cognition in terms of [[computation]] and information processing. [[Theory of computation|Theories of computation]] examine the nature of computation and explore [[Computability|which problems can be solved computationally]]. [[Computer architecture]] has parallels with [[cognitive architecture]], providing models of how different components interact to form a functional system. Another overlap concerns the field of [[knowledge representation]], in which computer scientists explore formal data structures that make knowledge accessible to computational processes. [[Artificial intelligence]] is the capacity of certain computer systems to perform tasks requiring intelligence, such as reasoning and problem-solving. It includes the field of [[machine learning]], through which computer systems can acquire new abilities not explicitly coded by programmers. The field of [[cognitive robotics]] integrates insights from these subfields to create intelligent [[robots]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Belford|Tucker|2025|loc=Lead section, § Algorithms and Complexity, § Information Management, § Intelligent Systems}} | {{harvnb|Katiyar|Katiyar|2021|pp=19–20}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=17–21}} }}</ref>
 
=== History ===
[[File:John Locke.jpg|thumb|alt=Oil painting of a man with gray hair wearing a brown attire|[[John Locke]] argued that humans have no inborn knowledge and need to learn everything from experience.<ref name="auto2">{{multiref | {{harvnb|Solso|MacLin|2000|pp=150–151}} | {{harvnb|Davey|Sterling|Field|2014|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA235 235–236]}} | {{harvnb|Laurence|Margolis|2015|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ka6rCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA117 117]}} }}</ref>]]
Cognitive research has its roots in [[ancient philosophy]]. Early work took the form of [[Epistemology|reflections on the nature and sources of knowledge]], proposed [[Faculty psychology|divisions of the mind into separate faculties]], and analyzed specific cognitive processes, like perception and deductive reasoning.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Solso|MacLin|2000|pp=150–151}} | {{harvnb|Leahey|2017|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=-mBQDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 1–2, 66–67, 71]}} }}</ref> [[Plato]] ({{circa|428–347 BCE}}) examined how knowledge of abstract principles is possible.<ref>{{harvnb|Leahey|2017|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=-mBQDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA60 60–61, 71, 87–88, 100–102]}}</ref> His student [[Aristotle]] (384–322 BCE) explored the nature of perception, studying how the mind integrates sensory data with memory and imagination. He also devised a [[Aristotelian logic|formal logical system]] to describe logical reasoning.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|p=4}} | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 1. History}} | {{harvnb|Leahey|2017|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=-mBQDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA66 66–68, 71]}} }}</ref> Inspired by Aristotle, [[Avicenna]] (980–1037 CE) and [[Thomas Aquinas]] (1224–1274 CE) developed faculty psychologies that organized the mind into distinct faculties and analyzed their functions and interactions.<ref>{{harvnb|Leahey|2017|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=-mBQDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA87 87–88, 100–102]}}</ref> In [[early modern philosophy]], [[Rationalism|rationalists]] like [[René Descartes]] (1596–1650) and [[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]] (1646–1716) argued that the mind has innate knowledge of the world. This view was opposed by [[Empiricism|empiricists]], like [[John Locke]] (1632–1704), who saw the mind as a [[Tabula rasa|blank slate]] that learns everything from experience.<ref name="auto2"/> [[Immanuel Kant]] (1724–1804) introduced the idea of [[Category (Kant)|innate categories]] that organize all experience and understanding.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Reisberg|2010|p=12}} | {{harvnb|Leahey|2017|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=-mBQDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA168 168–170]}} }}</ref>
 
Experimental research into cognitive processes began in the late 19th century with [[Wilhelm Wundt]] (1832–1920) and his student [[Edward Bradford Titchener]] (1867–1927). They laid the foundations of scientific psychology by introducing controlled laboratory experiments, such as [[Mental chronometry|measuring responses and reaction times to stimuli]], combined with a rigorous [[Introspection|introspective]] method.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Reisberg|2010|pp=7–8}} | {{harvnb|Solso|MacLin|2000|p=151}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=4–5}} | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 1. History}} }}</ref> [[Hermann Ebbinghaus]] (1850–1909) and [[Mary Whiton Calkins]] (1863–1930) pioneered experimental studies of memory.<ref>{{harvnb|Matlin|2013|p=5}}</ref> [[William James]] (1842–1910) approached psychological research from a [[Pragmatism|pragmatist perspective]], studying everyday experience.<ref>{{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=5–6}}</ref> In the early 20th century, [[Max Wertheimer]] (1880–1943), [[Kurt Koffka]] (1886–1941), and [[Wolfgang Köhler]] (1887–1967) formulated [[Gestalt psychology]]. In contrast to earlier experimental approaches that analyzed individual elements, they focused on larger patterns that emerge as the mind actively organizes information into coherent wholes.<ref>{{harvnb|Matlin|2013|p=7}}</ref> [[Frederic Bartlett]] (1886–1969) was also interested in how the mind actively transforms information, examining how this process introduces systematic errors into memory.<ref>{{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=7–8}}</ref>
 
Difficulties in measuring internal cognitive events led to the rise of [[behaviorism]], which sought to explain observable conduct through stimulus–response patterns without reference to unobservable mental states. Initially developed by [[John B. Watson]] (1878–1958), it dominated psychological research in the first half of the 20th century.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Reisberg|2010|pp=9–10}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=6–7}} | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 1. History}} }}</ref> Challenges in explaining complex human behavior prompted a paradigm shift in the 1950s{{em dash}}the [[cognitive revolution]]. Instead of studying stimulus–response patterns, researchers examined how the mind receives, stores, and transforms information, placing cognition at the center of psychological research and resulting in the emergence of cognitive subfields across disciplines.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Reisberg|2010|pp=11–12}} | {{harvnb|Matlin|2013|pp=8–9}} | {{harvnb|Solso|MacLin|2000|pp=151–152}} | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=Lead section, § 1. History}} }}</ref>
 
[[Jean Piaget]] (1896–1980) applied these ideas to [[developmental psychology]] and proposed a series of cognitive stages through which children pass as they gradually acquire the capacity for abstract thinking.<ref name="auto1"/> [[Donald Broadbent]] (1926–1993) integrated ideas from the [[Shannon–Weaver model|information theory of communication]], developed by [[Claude Shannon]] (1916–2001) and [[Warren Weaver]] (1894–1978), to analyze how perception transmits and filters information.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Solso|MacLin|2000|p=152}} | {{harvnb|Smith|2001|pp=2140–2141}} }}</ref> [[Allen Newell]] (1927–1992) and [[Herbert A. Simon]] (1916–2001) helped establish the field of artificial intelligence while demonstrating how computers can model and simulate human problem-solving.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Solso|MacLin|2000|p=152}} | {{harvnb|Smith|2001|pp=2140–2141}} | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 1. History}} }}</ref> In linguistics, [[Noam Chomsky]] (1928–present) examined how the brain processes language, identifying [[Universal grammar|universal patterns of language mechanisms]].<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Solso|MacLin|2000|pp=152–153}} | {{harvnb|Smith|2001|pp=2140–2141}} | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=§ 1. History}} }}</ref>
 
These developments across several fields of inquiry led to the formation of [[cognitive science]] in the 1970s.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Thagard|2023|loc=Lead section, § 1. History}} | {{harvnb|Bermúdez|2014|pp=5–6}} }}</ref> [[David Marr (neuroscientist)|David Marr]] (1945–1980) helped unify this interdisciplinary field with the tri-level hypothesis, proposing that the distinct disciplines work on different levels of abstraction but are fundamentally concerned with the same phenomena.<ref>{{harvnb|Bermúdez|2014|pp=46–48}}</ref> The advent of [[neuroimaging]] techniques such as [[fMRI]] and [[Positron emission tomography|PET]] revolutionized the neuroscientific study of cognition, enabling the examination of regional, task-specific brain activity.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|Solso|MacLin|2000|p=153}} | {{harvnb|Bermúdez|2014|pp=3, 59–60}} }}</ref> Concurrently, advances in computational power and artificial intelligence made possible the design of increasingly complex simulations of cognition and intelligent systems that rival and surpass human cognition in specific tasks.<ref>{{multiref | {{harvnb|van Rooij|Guest|Adolfi|de Haan|2024|loc=§ Abstract, § Introduction}} | {{harvnb|Fokas|2023|loc=§ Introduction}} }}</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==
{{Portal|Philosophy|Psychology}}
{{Portal|Philosophy|Psychology}}
* [[Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument]]
* [[Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument]]
* [[Cognitive biology]]
* [[Cognitive computing]]
* [[Cognitive computing]]
* [[Cognitive holding power]]
* [[Cognitive holding power]]
* [[Cognitive liberty]]
* [[Cognitive liberty]]
* [[Cognitive musicology]]
* [[Cognitive musicology]]
* [[Cognitive psychology]]
* [[Cognitive shuffle]]
* [[Cognitive science]]
* [[Cognitivism (psychology)|Cognitivism]]
* [[Cognitivism (psychology)|Cognitivism]]
* [[Comparative cognition]]
* [[Outline of human intelligence]]
* [[Embodied cognition]]
* [[Outline of thought]]
* [[Cognitive shuffle]]
* [[Information processing technology and aging]]
* [[Mental chronometry]] – i.e., the measuring of cognitive processing speed
* [[Nootropic]]
* [[Outline of human intelligence]] – a list of traits, capacities, models, and research fields of human intelligence, and more.
* [[Outline of thought]] – a list that identifies many types of thoughts, types of thinking, aspects of thought, related fields, and more.
* [[Shared intentionality]]
* [[Sex differences in cognition]]
* [[Sex differences in cognition]]


== References ==
== References ==
{{reflist}}
=== Notes ===
{{notelist|30em}}
 
=== Citations ===
{{reflist|30em}}


== Further reading ==
=== Sources ===
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite book | author-link1 = Alfredo Ardila | vauthors = Ardila A |title=Historical Development of Human Cognition. A Cultural-Historical Neuropsychological Perspective |publisher=Springer |year=2018 |isbn= 978-9811068867}}
* {{cite book |last1=Abel |first1=Ernest L. |editor1-last=Blocker |editor1-first=Jack S. |editor2-last=Fahey |editor2-first=David M. |editor3-last=Tyrrell |editor3-first=Ian R. |title=Alcohol and Temperance in Modern History: An International Encyclopedia |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-1-57607-834-1 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j77OEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA231 |language=en |chapter=Fetal Alcohol Syndrome |date=2003 |pages=231–232}}
* {{cite book | vauthors = Coren S, Ward LM, Enns JT |title=Sensation and Perception |publisher=Harcourt Brace |year=1999 |page=9 |isbn= 978-0-470-00226-1}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Alexander |first1=Cameron |title=What is 4E cognitive science? |journal=Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences |doi=10.1007/s11097-025-10055-w |date=2025 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite book | veditors = Lycan WG | date = 1999 | title = Mind and Cognition: An Anthology | edition = 2nd | location = Malden, MA | publisher = [[Wiley-Blackwell|Blackwell Publishing]] }}
* {{cite web |author1=American Psychological Association |url=https://dictionary.apa.org |title=APA Dictionary of Psychology |language=en |date=2018 |publisher=American Psychological Association}}
* {{Cite book |title=What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought |last=Stanovich |first=Keith |year=2009 |publisher=Yale University Press |location=New Haven (CT) |isbn=978-0-300-12385-2 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/whatintelligence00stan }}
* {{cite book |last1=Anastasi |first1=Jeffrey S. |editor1-last=Darity |editor1-first=William A. |title=International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences |publisher=Macmillan Reference USA |isbn=978-0-02-865965-7 |edition=2nd |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/science-and-technology/computers-and-electrical-engineering/computers-and-computing/cognition |chapter=Cognition |date=2008 }}
* {{cite web |last1=Andrews |first1=Kristin |author2-link=Susana Monsó |last2=Monsó |first2=Susana |title=Animal Cognition |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognition-animal/ |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=15 August 2025  |date=2021 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Arbib |first1=Michael A. |editor1-last=Arbib |editor1-first=Michael A. |editor2-last=Bonaiuto |editor2-first=James J. |title=From Neuron to Cognition via Computational Neuroscience |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-33527-0 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6-51DQAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 |language=en |chapter=1. From Neuron to Cognition: An Opening Perspective |date=2016 |pages=1–72}}
* {{cite book |last1=Ardila |first1=Alfredo |title=Historical Development of Human Cognition: A Cultural-Historical Neuropsychological Perspective |publisher=Springer Nature Singapore |isbn=978-981-10-6887-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=17E_DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA3 |language=en |date=2018 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Arimura |first1=G. |last2=Pearse |first2=I. S. |chapter=From the Lab Bench to the Forest: Ecology and Defence Mechanisms of Volatile-Mediated 'Talking Trees' |editor-last1=Becard |editor-first1=Guillaume |title=How Plants Communicate With Their Biotic Environment |date=17 March 2017 |publisher=Academic Press |isbn=978-0-12-801620-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XPEbDQAAQBAJ |language=en |access-date=26 December 2022 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Balota |first1=David A. |editor1-last=Kazdin |editor1-first=Alan E. |title=Encyclopedia of Psychology |chapter=Cognition |pages=131–132 |date=2000 |publisher=American Psychological Association |isbn=978-1-55798-187-5}}
* {{cite book |last1=Balota |first1=David A. |last2=Cortese |first2=Michael J. |editor1-last=Kazdin |editor1-first=Alan E. |title=Encyclopedia of Psychology |volume=2 |publisher=American Psychological Association |isbn=978-1-55798-187-5 |chapter=Cognitive Psychology: Theories |date=2000 |pages=153–158}}
* {{cite book |last1=Balota |first1=David A. |last2=Watson |first2=Jason M. |editor1-last=Kazdin |editor1-first=Alan E. |title=Encyclopedia of Psychology |volume=2 |publisher=American Psychological Association |isbn=978-1-55798-187-5 |chapter=Cognitive Psychology: Research Methods |date=2000 |pages=158–162}}
* {{cite book |last1=Banich |first1=Marie T. |last2=Compton |first2=Rebecca J. |title=Cognitive Neuroscience |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-83114-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=adPQEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA3 |language=en |date=2023 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Bartlett |first1=Steve |last2=Burton |first2=Diana |editor-last1=Bartlett |editor-first1=Steve |editor-last2=Burton |editor-first2=Diana |title=Education Studies |date=2003 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-0-7619-4049-4 |chapter=1. The Study of Education |pages=1–13}}
* {{cite web |last1=Belford |first1=Geneva G. |last2=Tucker |first2=Allen |title=Computer Science |url=https://www.britannica.com/science/computer-science |website=Encyclopædia Britannica |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. |access-date=18 August 2025 |language=en  |date=2025 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Berk |first1=Laura E. |last2=Harris |first2=Sara |chapter=Vygotsky, Lev |editor-last1=Nadel |editor-first1=Lynn |title=Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-470-01619-0 |doi=10.1002/0470018860 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}
* {{cite web |last1=Berlyne |first1=D. E. |last2=Vinacke |first2=W. Edgar |last3=Sternberg |first3=Robert J. |title=Thought |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/thought |website=Encyclopædia Britannica |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. |access-date=31 July 2025 |language=en  |date=2025 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Bermúdez |first1=José Luis |title=Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Science of the Mind |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-05162-1 |edition=2nd |date=2014}}
* {{cite book |last1=Bernstein |first1=Douglas |last2=Nash |first2=Peggy W. |title=Essentials of Psychology |publisher=Houghton Mifflin Harcourt |isbn=978-0-618-71312-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4Do-bFrt9tUC |language=en |date=2006}}
* {{cite book |last1=Best |first1=John B. |title=Cognitive Psychology |edition=4th |publisher=West Publishing Company |date=1995 |isbn=978-0-314-04445-7}}
* {{cite book |last1=Biggs |first1=Stephen |last2=Matthen |first2=Mohan |last3=Stokes |first3=Dustin |editor1-last=Stokes |editor1-first=Dustin |editor2-last=Matthen |editor2-first=Mohan |editor3-last=Biggs |editor3-first=Stephen |title=Perception and Its Modalities |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-938161-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KKM-BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 |language=en |chapter=Sorting the Senses |date=2014 |pages=1–20}}
* {{cite book |last1=Blaauw |first1=Martijn |last2=Pritchard |first2=Duncan |author2-link=Duncan Pritchard |title=Epistemology A–Z |publisher=Edinburgh University Press |isbn=978-0-7486-2213-9 |date=2005 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Blackmore |first1=Susan |title=Consciousness: An Introduction |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-4441-2827-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WycuAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA33 |language=en |date=2013}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Bräuer |first1=Juliane |last2=Hanus |first2=Daniel |last3=Pika |first3=Simone |last4=Gray |first4=Russell |last5=Uomini |first5=Natalie |title=Old and New Approaches to Animal Cognition: There Is Not "One Cognition" |journal=Journal of Intelligence |volume=8 |issue=3 |doi=10.3390/jintelligence8030028 |date=2020 |page=28 |pmid=32630788 |pmc=7555673 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite web |last1=Bringsjord |first1=Selmer |last2=Govindarajulu |first2=Naveen Sundar |title=Artificial Intelligence |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/artificial-intelligence/ |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=6 May 2024 |date=2024 |archive-date=13 May 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240513103532/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/artificial-intelligence/ |url-status=live}}
* {{cite web |last1=Buckner |first1=Cameron |last2=Garson |first2=James |title=Connectionism |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/connectionism/ |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=7 August 2025  |date=2025 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Butz |first1=Martin V. |title=Towards Strong AI |journal=KI - Künstliche Intelligenz |volume=35 |issue=1 |doi=10.1007/s13218-021-00705-x |date=2021 |pages=91–101 |doi-access=free}}
* {{cite book |last1=Cain |first1=M. J. |title=The Philosophy of Cognitive Science |publisher=Polity Press |date=2016 |isbn=978-1-5095-0205-9}}
* {{cite book |last1=Casson |first1=Ronald W. |chapter=Cognitive Anthropology |pages=120–122 |editor1-last=Wilson |editor1-first=Robert A. |editor2-last=Keil |editor2-first=Frank C. |title=The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS) |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-73144-7 |language=en |date=2001}}
* {{cite book |last1=Cerulo |first1=Karen A. |title=Encyclopedia of Social Theory |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-0-7619-2611-5 |doi=10.4135/9781412952552.n46 |chapter=Cognitive Sociology |date=2005 }}
* {{cite web |last1=Chand |first1=Suma P. |last2=Kuckel |first2=Daniel P. |last3=Huecker |first3=Martin R. |title=Cognitive Behavior Therapy |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470241/ |website=StatPearls |publisher=StatPearls Publishing |access-date=17 August 2025  |date=2025 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Chemero |first1=Anthony |editor1-last=Riegler |editor1-first=Alexander |editor2-last=Peschl |editor2-first=Markus |editor3-last=Stein |editor3-first=Astrid |title=Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-0-306-46286-3 |doi=10.1007/978-0-585-29605-0_5 |language=en |chapter=Empirical and Metaphysical Anti-Representationalism |date=1999 |pages=39–47 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Chen |first1=Zhaoman |editor1-last=Hung |editor1-first=Jason C. |editor2-last=Yen |editor2-first=Neil Y. |editor3-last=Chang |editor3-first=Jia-Wei |title=Frontier Computing: Theory, Technologies and Applications (FC 2022) |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-981-99-1428-9 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C8vAEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA1141 |language=en |chapter=Exploration of Youth Social Work Model Driven by Artificial Intelligence |date=2023 |pages=1138–1146}}
* {{cite book |last1=Coall |first1=David A. |last2=Callan |first2=Anna C. |last3=Dickins |first3=Thomas E. |last4=Chisholm |first4=James S. |editor-last1=Lamb |editor-first1=Michael E. |title=Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, Socioemotional Processes |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-95387-7 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Fg3QBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA57 |language=en |chapter=Evolution and Prenatal Development: An Evolutionary Perspective |date=2015 |pages=57–105}}
* {{cite book |last1=Coren |first1=Stanley |last2=Ward |first2=Lawrence M. |title=Sensation & Perception |edition=3rd |publisher=Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers |date=1989 |isbn=978-0-15-579647-8}}
* {{cite book |last1=Crowder |first1=James |last2=Carbone |first2=John N. |last3=Friess |first3=Shelli |title=Artificial Cognition Architectures |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-1-4614-8072-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1RO4BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 |language=en |date=2013 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Crumley II |first1=Jack S. |title=A Brief Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind |date=2006 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers |isbn=978-0-7425-7212-6 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Yf4eAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA2 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Crumley II |first1=Jack S. |title=An Introduction to Epistemology |edition=2 |publisher=Broadview Press |isbn=978-1-77048-156-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=62gYgpeVT28C |language=en |date=2009 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Davey |first1=Graham |last2=Sterling |first2=Christopher |last3=Field |first3=Andy |title=Complete Psychology |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-4441-4530-4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DJWbBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA184 |language=en |date=2014 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Davies |first1=Martin |editor1-last=Wilson |editor1-first=Robert A. |editor2-last=Keil |editor2-first=Frank C. |title=The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS) |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-73144-7 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-wt1aZrGXLYC&pg=PA191 |language=en |chapter=Consciousness |date=2001 |pages=190–193}}
* {{cite book |last1=De Waal |first1=Frans |last2=Lanting |first2=Frans |title=Bonobo: The Forgotten Ape |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-35128-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zVDhEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA36 |language=en |date=2023 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Dowden |first1=Bradley H. |title=Logical Reasoning |date=2020 |url=https://www.csus.edu/indiv/d/dowdenb/4/logical-reasoning-archives/Logical-Reasoning-2020-05-15.pdf }} (for an earlier version, see: {{cite book |last1=Dowden |first1=Bradley Harris |title=Logical Reasoning |date=1993 |publisher=Wadsworth Publishing Company |isbn=978-0-534-17688-4 |language=en |ref=none }})
* {{cite journal |last1=Dresler |first1=Martin |last2=Sandberg |first2=Anders |last3=Bublitz |first3=Christoph |last4=Ohla |first4=Kathrin |last5=Trenado |first5=Carlos |last6=Mroczko-Wąsowicz |first6=Aleksandra |last7=Kühn |first7=Simone |last8=Repantis |first8=Dimitris |title=Hacking the Brain: Dimensions of Cognitive Enhancement |journal=ACS Chemical Neuroscience |volume=10 |issue=3 |doi=10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00571 |date=2019 |pp=1137–1148|hdl=2066/202660 |hdl-access=free }}
* {{cite book |last1=Dreyfus |first1=Hubert L. |date=1991 |chapter=Socratic And Platonic Sources Of Cognitivism |pages=1–17 |editor1-last=Smith |editor1-first=J-C. |publisher=Springer Dordrecht |isbn=978-94-009-2161-0 |title=Historical Foundations Of Cognitive Science |doi=10.1007/978-94-009-2161-0_1 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-2161-0_1}}
* {{cite book |last1=Dumont |first1=K. |editor1-last=Nicholas |editor1-first=Lionel |title=Introduction to Psychology |publisher=University of Capetown Press |isbn=978-1-919895-02-4 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MP5X2SK2DCgC&pg=PA48 |language=en |chapter=2. Research Methods and Statistics |date=2008 |pages=9–48}}
* {{cite web |last1=Eldridge |first1=Stephen |title=Cognitive Bias |url=https://www.britannica.com/science/cognitive-bias |website=Encyclopædia Britannica |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. |access-date=25 August 2025 |language=en  |date=2025 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Engelmann |first1=Jan B. |last2=Mulckhuyse |first2=Manon |last3=Ting |first3=Chih-Chung |editor1-last=Schram |editor1-first=Arthur |editor2-last=Ule |editor2-first=Aljaž |title=Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Experimental Economics |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |isbn=978-1-78811-056-3 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uC2jDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA159 |language=en |chapter=Brain Measurement and Manipulation Methods; |date=2019 |pages=142–172}}
* {{cite book |last1=Eysenck |first1=Michael W. |last2=Keane |first2=Mark T. |title=Cognitive Psychology |edition=7th |date=2015 |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-1-84872-415-0}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Fabio |first1=Rosa Angela |last2=Caprì |first2=Tindara |last3=Romano |first3=Martina |title=From Controlled to Automatic Processes and Back Again: The Role of Contextual Features |journal=Europe's Journal of Psychology |volume=15 |issue=4 |doi=10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1746 |date=2019 |pages=773–788 |pmid=33680159 |pmc=7909205 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Fauconnier |first1=Gilles |chapter=Cognitive Linguistics |editor-last1=Nadel |editor-first1=Lynn |title=Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-470-01619-0 |doi=10.1002/0470018860 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}
* {{cite book |last1=Fioretti |first1=Guido |editor1-last=Wall |editor1-first=Friederike |editor2-last=Chen |editor2-first=Shu-Heng |editor3-last=Leitner |editor3-first=Stephan |title=The Oxford Handbook of Agent-based Computational Management Science |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-766812-2 |url=https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197668122.013.3 |date=2024 |chapter=Artificial Cognition |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197668122.013.3 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Fodor |first1=Jerry A. |last2=Pylyshyn |first2=Zenon W. |editor-last=Haugeland |editor-first=John |title=Mind Design: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence |publisher=MIT Press |date=1997 |isbn=978-0-262-58153-0 |chapter=Connectionism And Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Fokas |first1=Athanassios S. |title=Can Artificial Intelligence Reach Human Thought? |journal=PNAS Nexus |volume=2 |issue=12 |doi=10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad409  |doi-access=free|date=2023 |pmc=11004553 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Friedenberg |first1=Jay |last2=Silverman |first2=Gordon |last3=Spivey |first3=Michael |title=Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Study of Mind |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-5443-8015-5 |edition=4 |date=2022}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Frith |first1=Chris D |title=Social Cognition |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=363 |issue=1499 |doi=10.1098/rstb.2008.0005 |date=2008 |pages=2033–2039 |pmid=18292063 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Galotti |first1=Kathleen M. |title=Cognitive Psychology In and Out of the Laboratory |publisher=SAGE |year=2015 |edition=5 |isbn=978-1-4522-3032-0}}
* {{cite book |last1=Gelman |first1=Rochel |last2=Baird |first2=Jodie A. |chapter=Cognitive Development |editor1-last=Wilson |editor1-first=Robert A. |editor2-last=Keil |editor2-first=Frank C. |title=The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS) |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-73144-7 |language=en |date=2001 |pages=128–129}}
* {{cite web |last1=Gennaro |first1=Rocco J. |title=Consciousness |url=https://iep.utm.edu/consciousness/ |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=19 April 2024 |archive-date=6 April 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240406132436/https://iep.utm.edu/consciousness/ |url-status=live}}
* {{cite book |last1=Gilbert |first1=Daniel |chapter=Social Cognition |pages=777–778 |editor1-last=Wilson |editor1-first=Robert A. |editor2-last=Keil |editor2-first=Frank C. |title=The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS) |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-73144-7 |language=en |date=2001 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Gopher |first1=Daniel |last2=Iani |first2=Cristina |chapter=Attention |editor-last1=Nadel |editor-first1=Lynn |title=Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-470-01619-0 |doi=10.1002/0470018860 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}
* {{cite book |last1=Groome |first1=David |title=An Introduction to Cognitive Psychology: Processes and Disorders |publisher=Psychology Press |date=2005 |isbn=978-0-203-97798-9}}
* {{cite book |last1=Gross |first1=Richard |title=Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour |publisher=Hodder Education |isbn=978-1-5104-6846-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Z7TsDwAAQBAJ |language=en |date=2020 |edition=8}}
* {{cite book |last1=Haas |first1=Julia |editor1-last=Holtzman |editor1-first=Geoffrey S. |editor2-last=Hildt |editor2-first=Elisabeth |title=Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications? |publisher=Springer International Publishing |isbn=978-3-030-56134-5 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5_4 |language=en |chapter=Two Theories of Moral Cognition |series=The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology |date=2020 |volume=22 |pages=59–79 |doi=10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5_4 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Hager |first1=Paul |editor1-last=Jarvis |editor1-first=Peter |editor2-last=Watts |editor2-first=Mary H. |title=The Routledge International Handbook of Learning |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-57130-2 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6mYgGsQKtDUC&pg=PA208 |pages=207–215 |language=en |chapter=Informal Learning: Everyday Living |date=2012 }}
* {{cite web |last1=Halina |first1=Marta |title=Methods in Comparative Cognition |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/comparative-cognition/ |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=15 August 2025  |date=2023 }}
* {{cite web |author1=HarperCollins |title=Cognition |url=https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=cognition |website=The American Heritage Dictionary |publisher=HarperCollins Publishers |access-date=25 July 2025  |date=2022 }}
* {{cite web |author1=HarperCollins |title=Indo-European Roots Appendix |url=https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/indoeurop.html |website=The American Heritage Dictionary |publisher=HarperCollins Publishers |access-date=25 July 2025  |date=2022a |at=§ gnō-}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hauser |first1=Marc D. |editor1-last=Wilson |editor1-first=Robert A. |editor2-last=Keil |editor2-first=Frank C. |title=The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS) |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-73144-7 |chapter=Primate Cognition |date=2001 |pages=666–667 |language=en}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hellier |first1=Jennifer L. |editor-last1=Hellier |editor-first1=Jennifer L. |title=The Brain, the Nervous System, and Their Diseases |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing |isbn=978-1-61069-338-7 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FOTNEAAAQBAJ&pg=PR31 |language=en |date=2014 |chapter=Introduction: Neuroscience Overview |pages=xxxi–xxxvi}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hoad |first1=T. F. |title=The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology |date=1993 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-283098-2 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Hood |first1=Ralph W. |editor-last1=Runehov |editor-first1=Anne L. C. |editor-last2=Oviedo |editor-first2=Lluis |title=Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-4020-8265-8 |chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_695 |language=en |chapter=Methodology in Psychology |date=2013 |pages=1314–1322 |doi=10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_695 |archive-date=13 May 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240513103913/https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_695 |url-status=live}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Howard |first1=Scarlett R. |last2=Barron |first2=Andrew B. |title=Understanding the limits to animal cognition |journal=Current Biology |volume=34 |issue=7 |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2024.02.043 |date=2024 |pages=R294–R300 |pmid=38593777 |bibcode=2024CBio...34.R294H }}
* {{cite book |last1=Howitt |first1=Dennis |last2=Cramer |first2=Duncan |title=Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology |publisher=Pearson Education |isbn=978-0-273-73499-4 |edition=3 |date=2011}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hufendiek |first1=Rebekka |last2=Wild |first2=Markus |editor-last1=Perler |editor-first1=Dominik |chapter=6. Faculties and Modularity |title=The Faculties: A History |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-993527-7 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=78C6BwAAQBAJ&pg=PA3 |language=en |date=2015 |pages=254–298}}
* {{cite book |last1=Jaworski |first1=William |title=Philosophy of Mind: A Comprehensive Introduction |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |isbn=978-1-4443-3367-1 |edition=1 |date=2011}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Kabátová |first1=O. |last2=Puteková |first2=S. |last3=Martinková |first3=J. |last4=Súkenníková |first4=M. |title=Analysis of Psychometric Features of the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Methods |journal=Clinical Social Work and Health Intervention |volume=7 |issue=2 |doi=10.22359/cswhi_7_2_08 |date=2016 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Katiyar |first1=Sarthak |last2=Katiyar |first2=Kalpana |title=Recent Trends Towards Cognitive Science: From Robots to Humanoids |journal=Cognitive Computing for Human-Robot Interaction |doi=10.1016/B978-0-323-85769-7.00012-4 |date=2021 |pages=19–49}}
* {{cite book |editor1-last=Khatoon |editor1-first=Naima |title=General Psychology |publisher=Pearson Education India |isbn=978-81-317-5999-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ha1KBZm9CXQC&pg=PA308 |language=en |date=2012}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kim |first1=Jaegwon |editor-last1=Honderich |editor-first1=Ted |title=The Oxford Companion to Philosophy |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-926479-7 |chapter-url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199264797.001.0001/acref-9780199264797-e-1610 |language=en |chapter=Mind, Problems of the Philosophy of |date=2005 |archive-date=11 April 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240411165434/https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780199264797.001.0001/acref-9780199264797-e-1608?rskey=jqUtkA&result=1601 |url-status=live |pages=607–612}}
* {{cite book |last1=Kuhlmeier |first1=Valerie A. |last2=Boysen |first2=Sarah T. |chapter=Animal Cognition |editor-last1=Nadel |editor-first1=Lynn |title=Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-470-01619-0 |doi=10.1002/0470018860 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}
* {{cite book |last1=Laurence |first1=Stephen |last2=Margolis |first2=Eric |editor1-last=Margolis |editor1-first=Eric |editor2-last=Laurence |editor2-first=Stephen |title=The Conceptual Mind: New Directions in the Study of Concepts |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-02863-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ka6rCQAAQBAJ&pg=PA117 |language=en |chapter=5. Concept Nativism and Neural Plasticity |date=2015 |pages=117–148}}
* {{cite book |last1=Leahey |first1=Thomas Hardy |title=A History of Psychology: From Antiquity to Modernity |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-22849-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-mBQDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 |language=en |date=2017 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Litvak |first1=P. |last2=Lerner |first2=J. S. |chapter=Cognitive Bias |date=2009 |editor1-last=Sander |editor1-first=David |editor2-last=Scherer |editor2-first=Klaus |title=Oxford Companion to Emotion and the Affective Sciences |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-871219-0 |pages=89–90}}
* {{cite book |last1=Lowe |first1=E. Jonathan |title=An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind |date=2000 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-65428-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mH12kYm1RKAC&pg=PA1 |access-date=19 July 2023 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Mareschal |first1=Denis |chapter=Cognitive Development, Computational Models of |editor-last1=Nadel |editor-first1=Lynn |title=Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-470-01619-0 |doi=10.1002/0470018860 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}
* {{cite book |last1=Matlin |first1=Margaret W. |title=Cognition |edition=8th |date=2013 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-118-14896-9}}
* {{cite book |last1=Mayer |first1=Richard E. |chapter=Instruction and Cognition |editor-last1=Nadel |editor-first1=Lynn |title=Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-470-01619-0 |doi=10.1002/0470018860 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}
* {{cite book |last1=Mellers |first1=Barbara A. |chapter=Decision-Making |editor-last1=Nadel |editor-first1=Lynn |title=Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-470-01619-0 |doi=10.1002/0470018860 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}
* {{cite book |last1=Mithen |first1=Steven J.|chapter=Cognitive Archaeology |pages=122–124 |editor1-last=Wilson |editor1-first=Robert A. |editor2-last=Keil |editor2-first=Frank C. |title=The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS) |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-73144-7 |language=en |date=2001}}
* {{cite book |last1=Moses |first1=Louis J. |last2=Baird |first2=Jodie A. |chapter=Metacognition |editor1-last=Wilson |editor1-first=Robert A. |editor2-last=Keil |editor2-first=Frank C. |title=The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS) |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-73144-7 |language=en |date=2001 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Nairne |first1=James S. |title=Psychology |publisher=Cengage Learning |isbn=978-0-8400-3310-9 |edition=5 |date=2011}}
* {{cite book |last1=Newcombe |first1=Nora S. |chapter=Development |editor-last1=Nadel |editor-first1=Lynn |title=Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-470-01619-0 |doi=10.1002/0470018860 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}
* {{cite book |last1=Neys |first1=Wim De |editor1-last=De Neys |editor1-first=Wim |title=Dual Process Theory 2.0 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-138-70064-2 |chapter=Dual Process Theory 2.0: An Introduction |date=2018 |pages=1–4}}
* {{cite book |last1=Nunes |first1=Terezinha |editor1-last=Seel |editor1-first=Norbert M. |title=Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning |date=5 October 2011 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-1-4419-1427-9 |language=en |pages=2066–2069 |chapter=Logical Reasoning and Learning }}
* {{cite book |last1=Pear |first1=Joseph J. |title=The Science of Learning |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-1-317-76279-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=e5F7AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA7 |language=en |date=2014 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Pomerantz |first1=James R. |chapter=Perception: Overview |editor-last1=Nadel |editor-first1=Lynn |title=Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-470-01619-0 |doi=10.1002/0470018860 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}
* {{cite book |last1=Ranney |first1=Michael |last2=Shimoda |first2=Todd |chapter=Education |editor1-last=Wilson |editor1-first=Robert A. |editor2-last=Keil |editor2-first=Frank C. |title=The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS) |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-73144-7 |language=en |date=2001 |pages=261–262}}
* {{cite web |last1=Raphael |first1=Michael W. |title=Cognitive Sociology |url=https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199756384/obo-9780199756384-0187.xml |website=Oxford Bibliographies |access-date=18 August 2025 |language=en |doi=10.1093/obo/9780199756384-0187  |date=2017 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Reed |first1=Stephen K. |title=Cognition: Theory And Applications |edition=7th |date=2007 |publisher=Thomson Wadsworth |isbn=978-0-495-09156-1}}
* {{cite book |last1=Reichertz |first1=Jo |chapter=Induction, Deduction, Abduction |pages=123–135 |editor-last1=Flick |editor-first1=Uwe |title=The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis |date=2013 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-4462-9669-1 |language=en }}
* {{cite book |last1=Reisberg |first1=Daniel |title=Cognition: Exploring the Science of the Mind |publisher=W. W. Norton & Company |date=2010 |edition=4th |isbn=978-0-393-93048-1}}
* {{cite web |last1=Rescorla |first1=Michael |title=The Language of Thought Hypothesis |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/language-thought/ |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=9 August 2025  |date=2024 }}
* {{cite web |last1=Rescorla |first1=Michael |title=The Computational Theory of Mind |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computational-mind/ |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=8 August 2025  |date=2025 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Revlin |first1=Russell |title=Cognition: Theory and Practice |publisher=Worth Publishers |date=2013 |isbn=978-0-7167-5667-5}}
* {{cite web |last1=Robbins |first1=Philip |title=Modularity of Mind |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/modularity-mind/ |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=16 April 2024 |date=2017 |archive-date=12 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210212012915/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/modularity-mind/ |url-status=live}}
* {{cite book |last1=Santos |first1=L. R. |last2=Caramazza |first2=A. |editor1-last=Forde |editor1-first=Emer |editor2-last=Humphreys |editor2-first=Glyn |title=Category Specificity in Brain and Mind |publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-1-135-42625-5 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qvF5AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA6 |language=en |chapter=The Domain-Specific Hypothesis: A Developmental and Comparative Perspective on Category-Specific Deficists |date=2005 |pages=1–24 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Scharff |first1=Lauren Fruh VanSickle |editor1-last=Davis |editor1-first=Stephen F. |title=Handbook of Research Methods in Experimental Psychology |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-0-470-75672-0 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mqcvrd7rKc0C&pg=PA270 |language=en |chapter=Sensation and Perception Research Methods |date=2008 |pages=263–284}}
* {{cite book |last1=Schenk |first1=H. Jochen |last2=Seabloom |first2=Eric W. |chapter=Evolutionary Ecology of Plant Signals and Toxins: A Conceptual Framework |editor-last1=Baluška |editor-first1=František |editor-last2=Ninkovic |editor-first2=Velemir |title=Plant Communication From an Ecological Perspective |date=5 August 2010 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-3-642-12162-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9hUpvAoY_HAC&pg=PA1 |language=en |access-date=20 December 2022 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Searle |first1=John R. |title=Mind: A Brief Introduction |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-515733-8 |date=2004}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Segundo-Ortin |first1=Miguel |last2=Calvo |first2=Paco |title=Consciousness and cognition in plants |journal=WIREs Cognitive Science |volume=13 |issue=2 |doi=10.1002/wcs.1578 |date=2022 |article-number=e1578 |pmid=34558231 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite web |last1=Shapiro |first1=Lawrence |last2=Spaulding |first2=Shannon |title=Embodied Cognition |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/embodied-cognition/ |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=7 August 2025  |date=2025 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Siemens |first1=George |last2=Marmolejo-Ramos |first2=Fernando |last3=Gabriel |first3=Florence |last4=Medeiros |first4=Kelsey |last5=Marrone |first5=Rebecca |last6=Joksimovic |first6=Srecko |last7=de Laat |first7=Maarten |title=Human and artificial cognition |journal=Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence |volume=3 |doi=10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100107 |date=2022 |article-number=100107 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Slijepcevic |first1=Predrag |title=Principles of cognitive biology and the concept of biocivilisations |journal=BioSystems |volume=235 |doi=10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.105109 |date=2024 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Sloman |first1=Steven |chapter=Cognitive Architecture |pages=124–126 |editor1-last=Wilson |editor1-first=Robert A. |editor2-last=Keil |editor2-first=Frank C. |title=The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS) |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-73144-7 |language=en |date=2001}}
* {{cite encyclopedia |last1=Smith |first1=E. E. |editor1-last=Smelser |editor1-first=Neil J. |editor2-last=Baltes |editor2-first=Paul B. |encyclopedia=International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences |date=2001 |publisher=Elsevier |isbn=978-0-08-043076-8 |language=en |pages=2140–2147 |title=Cognitive Psychology: History}}
* {{cite book |last1=Solso |first1=Robert L. |last2=MacLin |first2=Otto H. |editor1-last=Kazdin |editor1-first=Alan E. |title=Encyclopedia of Psychology |volume=2 |publisher=American Psychological Association |isbn=978-1-55798-187-5 |chapter=Cognitive Psychology: History of the Field |date=2000 |pages=150–153}}
* {{cite book |last1=Stets |first1=Jan E. |editor1-last=Brand |editor1-first=Cordula |title=Dual-Process Theories in Moral Psychology: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Theoretical, Empirical and Practical Considerations |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-3-658-12053-5 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nQ3NCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA351 |language=en |chapter=Rationalist vs. Intuitionist Views on Morality. A Sociological Perspective |date=2016 |pages=345–366}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Stevens |first1=Alison N. P. |last2=Stevens |first2=Jeffrey R. |date=2012 |title=Animal Cognition |journal=Nature Education Knowledge |volume=3 |issue=11 |url=https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/animal-cognition-96639212/}}
* {{cite book |editor-last1=Strickland |editor-first1=Bonnie Ruth |title=The Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology |edition=2nd |publisher=Gale Group |date=2001 |isbn=978-0-7876-4786-5}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Sweller |first1=John |title=Cognitive Load Theory |journal=Psychology of Learning and Motivation |volume=55 |doi=10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8 |date=2011 |pages=37–76}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Taylor |first1=J. Eric T. |last2=Taylor |first2=Graham W. |title=Artificial Cognition: How Experimental Psychology Can Help Generate Explainable Artificial Intelligence |journal=Psychonomic Bulletin & Review |volume=28 |issue=2 |doi=10.3758/s13423-020-01825-5 |date=2021 |pages=454–475 |pmid=33159244 |doi-access=free }}
* {{cite web |last1=Thagard |first1=Paul |title=Cognitive Science |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-science/ |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=22 July 2025  |date=2023 }}
* {{cite web |last1=Truncellito |first1=David A. |title=Epistemology |url=https://iep.utm.edu/epistemo/ |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=12 July 2024 |archive-date=13 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220113223803/https://iep.utm.edu/epistemo/ |url-status=live }}
* {{cite book |last1=Vaina |first1=Lucia M. |chapter=Marr, David |editor-last1=Nadel |editor-first1=Lynn |title=Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science |date=2006 |isbn=978-0-470-01619-0 |doi=10.1002/0470018860 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons}}
* {{cite web |last1=Van Gulick |first1=Robert |title=Consciousness |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consciousness/ |website=The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University |access-date=2 August 2025  |date=2025 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Van Hoek |first1=Karen |chapter=Cognitive Linguistics |pages=134–135 |editor1-last=Wilson |editor1-first=Robert A. |editor2-last=Keil |editor2-first=Frank C. |title=The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (MITECS) |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-73144-7 |language=en |date=2001}}
* {{cite journal |last1=van Rooij |first1=Iris |last2=Guest |first2=Olivia |last3=Adolfi |first3=Federico |last4=de Haan |first4=Ronald |last5=Kolokolova |first5=Antonina |last6=Rich |first6=Patricia |title=Reclaiming AI as a Theoretical Tool for Cognitive Science |journal=Computational Brain & Behavior |volume=7 |issue=4 |doi=10.1007/s42113-024-00217-5 |date=2024 |pages=616–636}}
* {{cite book |last1=Vernon |first1=David |title=Artificial Cognitive Systems: A Primer |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-02838-7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zzMqBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA1 |language=en |date=2014 }}
* {{cite book |last1=Vernon |first1=David |last2=Hofsten |first2=Claes von |last3=Fadiga |first3=Luciano |title=A Roadmap for Cognitive Development in Humanoid Robots |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-3-642-16904-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=F0jAvNeFPaQC&pg=PA160 |language=en |date=2011 }}
* {{cite web |last1=Waskan |first1=Jonathan |title=Connectionism |url=https://iep.utm.edu/connectionism-cognition/ |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=9 August 2025}}
* {{cite web |last1=Weisberg |first1=Josh |title=Hard Problem of Consciousness |url=https://iep.utm.edu/hard-problem-of-conciousness/ |website=Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy |access-date=22 April 2024 |archive-date=19 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230719172212/https://iep.utm.edu/hard-problem-of-conciousness/ |url-status=live}}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}
* [[Gary Stix|Stix, Gary]], "Thinking without Words: Cognition doesn't require language, it turns out" (interview with [[Evelina Fedorenko]], a [[cognitive neuroscientist]] at the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]]), ''[[Scientific American]]'', vol. 332, no. 3 (March 2025), pp.&nbsp;86–88. "[I]n the tradition of [[linguist]] [[Noam Chomsky]]... we use [[language]] for [[thinking]]: to think is why language evolved in our species. [However, evidence that thought and language are separate systems is found, for example, by] looking at deficits in different abilities – for instance, in people with brain damage... who have impairments in language – some form of [[aphasia]] [ – yet are clearly able to think]." (p.&nbsp;87.) Conversely, "[[large language models]] such as [[GPT-2]]... do language very well [but t]hey're not so good at thinking, which... nicely align[s] with the idea that the language system by itself is not what makes you think." (p.&nbsp;88.)


== External links ==
== External links ==
Line 144: Line 369:
{{wikibooks|Cognitive psychology}}
{{wikibooks|Cognitive psychology}}
{{wiktionary}}
{{wiktionary}}
* ''[https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/cognition Cognition]'' An international journal publishing theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind.
* [http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160522150143/http%3A//cf.hum.uva.nl/mmm/ Information on music cognition, University of Amsterdam]
* [http://www.cognitie.nl/ Cognitie.NL] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111019035923/http://www.cognitie.nl/ |date=2011-10-19 }} Information on cognition research, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) and [[University of Amsterdam]] (UvA)
* Emotional and Decision Making Lab, Carnegie Mellon, [https://web.archive.org/web/20050405203028/http://computing.hss.cmu.edu/lernerlab/home.php EDM Lab]
* [http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-Limits-of-Human-Cognition-37388.shtml The Limits of Human Cognition] – an article describing the evolution of mammals' cognitive abilities
* [https://medicalxpress.com/news/2010-05-half-heard-conversations-cognitive.html Half-heard phone conversations reduce cognitive performance]
* [https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-limits-of-intelligence/ The limits of intelligence] Douglas Fox, ''[[Scientific American]]'', 14 June 14, 2011.


{{Mental processes}}
{{Mental processes}}
Line 158: Line 376:


[[Category:Cognition| ]]
[[Category:Cognition| ]]
[[Category:Cognitive psychology|*]]
[[Category:Cognitive science|*]]
[[Category:Thought]]

Latest revision as of 10:05, 11 November 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". Template:Use American English

Diagram of a head with symbols for different cognitive capacities inside it
Cognition encompasses psychological activities like perception, thinking, language processing, and memory.

Cognitions are mental activities that deal with knowledge. They encompass psychological processes that acquire, store, retrieve, transform, or otherwise use information. Cognitions are a pervasive part of mental life, helping individuals understand and interact with the world.

Cognitive processes are typically categorized by their function. Perception organizes sensory information about the world, interpreting physical stimuli, such as light and sound, to construct a coherent experience of objects and events. Attention prioritizes specific aspects while filtering out irrelevant information. Memory is the ability to retain, store, and retrieve information, including working memory and long-term memory. Thinking encompasses psychological activities in which concepts, ideas, and mental representations are considered and manipulated. It includes reasoning, concept formation, problem-solving, and decision-making. Many cognitive activities deal with language, including language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Metacognition involves knowledge about knowledge or mental processes that monitor and regulate other mental processes. Classifications also distinguish between conscious and unconscious processes and between controlled and automatic ones.

Researchers discuss diverse theories of the nature of cognition. Classical computationalism argues that cognitive processes manipulate symbols according to mechanical rules, similar to how computers execute algorithms. Connectionism models the mind as a complex network of nodes where information flows as nodes communicate with each other. Representationalism and anti-representationalism disagree about whether cognitive processes operate on internal representations of the world.

Many disciplines explore cognition, including psychology, neuroscience, and cognitive science. They examine different levels of abstraction and employ distinct methods of inquiry. Some scientists study cognitive development, investigating how mental abilities grow from infancy through adulthood. While cognitive research mostly focuses on humans, it also explores how animals acquire knowledge and how artificial systems can emulate cognitive processes.

Definition

Cognitions are mental processes that deal with knowledge, involving the acquisition, transformation, storage, retrieval, and use of information.[1] For example, these processes occur when reading an article, as sensory information about the text is acquired and preexisting linguistic knowledge is retrieved to interpret the meaning. This information is then transformed as different ideas are linked, resulting in the storage of information as memories and beliefs are formed.[2]

Cognitions are a pervasive part of mental life, and many cognitive processes happen simultaneously. They are essential for understanding and interacting with the world by making individuals aware of their environment and helping them plan and execute appropriate responses.[3] Thought is a paradigmatic form of cognition. It considers ideas, analyzes information, draws inferences, solves problems, and forms beliefs. However, cognition is not limited to abstract reasoning and encompasses diverse psychological processes, including perception, attention, memory, language, and decision-making.[4] It is debated whether or under what conditions feelings, emotions, and other affects qualify as cognitions.[5] Some controversial views associated with cognitivism argue that all mental phenomena are cognitions.[6]

Cognitive activities can happen consciously, like when a person deliberately analyzes a problem step by step. They can also take place unconsciously, such as automatic mechanisms responsible for language processing and facial recognition.[7] Rationalists typically emphasize the role of basic principles and inferences in the generation of knowledge. Empiricists, by contrast, highlight sensory processes as the ultimate source of all knowledge of the world, arguing that all cognitive processes deal with sensory input.[8] Many fields of inquiry study cognition, including psychology, cognitive science, neurology, and philosophy. While research focuses primarily on the human mind, cognition is not limited to humans and encompasses animal and artificial cognition.[9]

The term cognition originates from the Indo-European root Script error: No such module "Lang"., meaning Template:Gloss. This root is present in the Latin term Script error: No such module "Lang"., also meaning Template:Gloss, which led to the formation of the verb Script error: No such module "Lang"., meaning Template:Gloss. Through its past participle Script error: No such module "Lang"., the Latin verb entered Middle English as Script error: No such module "Lang".. The earliest documented use occurred in 1447, eventually evolving into the modern English word cognition.[10]

Types of cognitive processes

Cognitive processes encompass various types, each managing different information and performing distinct functions within the human mind. They are sometimes divided into basic processes, like perception and memory, and higher-order processes, like thinking. This distinction is based on the idea that higher-order processes rely on basic processes and could not occur without them.[11]

Perception and attention

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Diagram of perception and memory
Simplified model of cognitive processes associated with perception and memory[12]

Perception is the organization and interpretation of sensory information about the world. It is a complex mental activity that involves the interplay of diverse cognitive processes, many of which occur automatically and unconsciously. It starts with physical stimuli, such as light or sound, which are detected by receptors and transmitted to the brain as electrical signals. These signals are processed in various brain regions to construct a coherent experience of distinct objects and events while situating them in a spatial-temporal framework.[13]

Certain cognitive processes are responsible for detecting basic features in the sensory data, such as edges, colors, and pitches, while others process spatial location. Object recognition is another function that compares this information with stored representations in search of known patterns, such as recognizing a familiar landmark or identifying a specific melody. Some cognitive faculties are specialized for tasks only relevant to particular perceptual contents, such as face recognition and language processing.[14]

Cognitive processes responsible for perception rely on various heuristics to simplify problems and reduce cognitive labor. For example, visual perception often assumes that the size, shape, and color of objects remain constant to ensure a consistent view despite changes in perspective or lighting. Heuristics sometimes lead to inaccurate or illusory perceptions.[15]

Different forms of perception are associated with distinct types of stimuli and receptors. Visual perception, based on the detection of light, is a primary source of knowledge about the external environment. Other forms of perception include hearing, touch, smell, and taste. Data from these different modalities is integrated by higher-order cognitive processes to form a unified and coherent experience of the world.[16] Although sensory data is a central factor of perceptual experience, it is not the only factor, and various other forms of information influence the underlying cognitive operations. For instance, memories from earlier experiences determine which objects are experienced as familiar. Other factors include the expectations, goals, background knowledge, and belief system of the individual.[17]

Attention is a central aspect of mental processes that focuses cognitive resources on certain stimuli or features. It involves the selection or prioritization of specific aspects while filtering out irrelevant information. For example, attention is responsible for the cocktail party effect, in which the brain concentrates on a single conversation while relegating the surrounding party noise to the background. The selection process is crucial since the total amount of information is typically too vast for the brain to process all at once. It ensures that the most important features are prioritized. Attention is not limited to perception but is also present in other cognitive processes, such as remembering and thinking.[18]

Memory and learning

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Memory is the ability to retain, store, and retrieve information. It includes the capacity to consciously recall past experiences and is central to many other cognitive activities that rely on stored data to process information and coordinate behavior. Memory processes have three stages: an input phase where new information is acquired, a storage phase preserving the information for future access, and an output phase retrieving the information and making it available to other cognitive operations. Different types of memory are distinguished by the function they perform and the type of information they operate on.[19]

Working memory stores information temporarily, making it available to other cognitive processes while allowing manipulation of the stored information. During mental arithmetic, for example, the working memory holds and updates intermediate results while calculations are performed.[20] The term is sometimes used interchangeably with the term short-term memory, which is defined by brief retention without the emphasis on dynamic manipulation. Long-term memory, by contrast, retains information for long periods, in some cases indefinitely. During storage, the information is not actively considered. However, it remains available for retrieval, like when recalling a childhood memory.[21] Passive exposure to information is usually not sufficient for the effective formation and retrieval of long-term memories. Relevant factors include the level and type of engagement with the content, like attention, emotion, mood, and the context in which the information is processed.[22]

Long-term memory is typically divided into episodic, semantic, and procedural memory based on the type of information involved.[23] Episodic memory deals with information about past personal experiences and events. New memories are stored as a person undergoes experiences and can be accessed later, either by accessing factual information about the events or by reliving them. For example, remembering one's last holiday trip involves episodic memory.[24] Semantic memory deals with general knowledge about facts and concepts not linked to specific experiences. For instance, the information that water freezes at 0 °C is stored in semantic memory.[25] Procedural memory handles practical knowledge of how to do things. It encompasses learned skills that can be executed, like the abilities to ride a bicycle and type on a keyboard.[26]

As a form of know-how, procedural memory is distinct from the capacity to verbally describe the exact procedure involved in the execution, like explaining how to maintain balance on a bicycle.[27] For this reason, procedural memory is categorized as non-declarative or implicit memory, which operates automatically and cannot be consciously accessed.[28] Episodic and semantic memory, by contrast, belong to declarative or explicit memory, which encompasses information that can be consciously recalled and described.[29]

The different forms of memory play a central role in learning, which involves the acquisition of novel information, skills, or habits, as well as changes to existing structures. Learning occurs through experience and enables individuals to adapt to their environment. It happens either intentionally, such as studying or practicing, or unintentionally as an unconscious side effect while engaging in other tasks. A central aspect of effective learning is the formation of memory connections, which link different pieces of information and facilitate their retrieval.[30]

Thinking

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Thinking is a mental activity in which concepts, ideas, and mental representations are considered and manipulated. Many cognitive processes fall into this category, including reasoning, concept formation, problem solving, and decision-making.[31]

Logical reasoning deals with information in the form of statements by inferring a conclusion from a set of premises. It proceeds in a rigorous and norm-governed manner to ensure that the conclusion is rationally convincing and supported by the premises.[32] Logical reasoning encompasses deductive and non-deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning follows strict rules of inference, providing the strongest support: the conclusion of a deductive inference cannot be false if all the premises are true. An example is the inference from the premises "all men are mortal" and "Socrates is a man" to the conclusion "Socrates is mortal". Non-deductive reasoning makes a conclusion rationally convincing but does not guarantee its truth. For instance, inductive reasoning infers a general law from many individual observations, like concluding that all ravens are black based on observations of numerous black ravens. Abductive reasoning, another type of non-deductive reasoning, seeks the best explanation of a phenomenon. For example, a doctor uses abductive reasoning when they infer that a child has chickenpox as an explanation of the child's skin rash and fever.[33]

Diagram of several trees with arrows to one more tree
Through concept formation, the mind learns to identify common patterns among diverse instances.[34]

Problem-solving is a goal-directed activity that aims to overcome obstacles and arrive at a pre-defined objective. This happens, for instance, when determining the best route for an upcoming trip. Problem-solving starts with comprehending the problem, which typically involves an understanding of the initial state, the goal state, and the obstacles or constraints that hinder progress. Some problems are well-structured and have precise solution paths. For ill-structured problems, by contrast, it is not possible to determine which exact steps are successful. To find solutions, creativity in the form of divergent thinking generates many possible approaches. Convergent thinking evaluates the different options and eliminates unfeasible ones. Thought often relies on heuristics or general rules to find and compare possible solutions. Common heuristics are to divide a problem into several simpler subproblems and to adapt strategies that were successful for similar problems encountered earlier.[35]

Closely related to problem-solving, decision-making is the cognitive process of choosing between courses of action. To determine the best alternative, it weighs the different options by assessing their advantages and disadvantages, for example, by considering their positive and negative consequences. According to expected utility theory, a decision is rational if it selects the option with the highest expected utility, which is determined by the probability and the value of each consequence. To assess the probability of an outcome, people use various heuristics in everyday situations, such as the representativeness heuristic, the availability heuristic, and anchoring.[36]

Different forms of thinking rely on concepts, which are general ideas or mental representations to sort objects into classes, like the concepts animal and table. Concept formation is the process of acquiring a new concept by learning to identify its instances and grasping its relation to other concepts. This process helps individuals organize information and make sense of the world. Psychologists distinguish between logical and natural concepts. Logical concepts have precise definitions and rules of application, like the concept triangle. Natural concepts, by contrast, are based on resemblance but lack exact definitions or clear-cut boundaries, like the concept table.[34]

Language

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". A language is a structured communication system based on symbols and rules to share information and coordinate action, such as English, Spanish, and Japanese. Language plays a central role in everyday life, and some theorists argue that language affects numerous cognitive processes to some extent. For example, the Whorfian hypothesis and the thesis of linguistic relativity propose that language influences thought patterns and that speakers of distinct languages think differently.Template:Efn Many cognitive processes are involved in the acquisition, comprehension, and production of linguistic expressions.[37]

Language acquisition happens naturally in childhood through exposure to a linguistic environment. It is a complex process since the system of spoken language is made up of several layers.[38] At the fundamental level are basic sounds or sound units. They do not have linguistic meaning themselves but are combined into words, which refer to diverse things and ideas.Template:Efn Words are combined into sentences by following the rules of grammar. This system makes it possible to form and comprehend an infinite number of sentences based on a finite knowledge of a limited number of words and rules. The exact meaning of sentences usually depends also on the context in which they are used.[39] Although distinct languages can differ significantly in their general structure, there are some universal cognitive patterns that underlie all human languages.[40]

Language comprehension is the process of understanding spoken, written, and signed language. It involves the coordination of various cognitive skills to recognize words, consult memory to access their meanings, analyze sentence structures, and use contextual information to interpret their implications. Additional difficulties come from lexical and structural ambiguities, in which a word or a sentence can be associated with multiple meanings. To resolve ambiguities, individuals rely on background knowledge about the overall topic and the speaker to discern the intended meaning. As a result, language comprehension depends not only on bottom-up processes, which start with sensory information, but also on top-down processes, which integrate general knowledge and expectations. For example, expectations cause longer processing times if a familiar word occurs in a context where the reader did not expect it.[41]

While language comprehension seeks to uncover the meaning of pre-existing linguistic messages, language production involves the inverse process of generating linguistic expressions to convey thoughts. It starts with the formulation of a general idea one wants to express and a rough sentence pattern of how to communicate it. Speakers then cognitively search for words that match the concepts they wish to convey. This activity, known as lexicalization, is divided into two stages: the identification of an abstract semantic representation of the intended concept, followed by the retrieval of the phonological form needed to pronounce the word.Template:Efn As speakers string together words to generate a sentence, they consider the grammatical category of each word, like the contrast between nouns and adjectives, to align with the intended overall sentence structure. Additionally, the context of the conversation and the assumed background knowledge of the audience influence the selection of words and sentence structure.[42]

Others

Cognitive processes can be conscious or unconscious. Conscious processes, such as attentively solving a math problem step by step or recalling a vivid memory, involve active awareness. Unconscious processes, such as low-level processes underlying face recognition and language processing, operate automatically in the background without the individual's awareness. Phenomenal consciousness involves a qualitative experience of mental phenomena, whereas access consciousness is an awareness of information that is available for use but not actively experienced at the moment.[43] Various theories of the cognitive function of consciousness have been proposed. They include the idea that consciousness integrates diverse forms of data and makes information globally available to various subsystems. Other theories argue that consciousness improves social interaction by fostering self-awareness in social contexts and that it allows for increased flexibility and control, particularly in novel situations.[44]

A related distinction is between controlled and automatic processes. Controlled processes are actively guided by the individual's intentions, like when a person deliberately shifts attention from one object of perception to another. These processes are flexible and adaptable to new situations but require more cognitive resources. Automatic processes, by contrast, happen unconsciously, are effortless, and require fewer cognitive resources. By becoming familiar with a task, a cognitive process that was initially controlled can become automatic, thereby freeing up cognitive resources for other tasks. For example, as a novice driver becomes experienced, they can automatically handle the car and adapt to road and traffic conditions while gaining the ability to engage in a conversation at the same time.[45]

Diagram of a brain thinking about a brain
Metacognitive processes deal with information about other cognitive processes.[46]

Consciousness is closely related to metacognition, which encompasses any knowledge or cognitive process that deals with information about cognition. Some forms of metacognition only manage or store information about other aspects of cognition, like knowing that one can recall a specific memory. Others play an active role in monitoring and regulating ongoing processes, like changing a problem-solving strategy upon realizing that the previous one was ineffective. Metacognitive skills tend to improve the performance of other cognitive skills, particularly when dealing with complex tasks.[46]

Social cognitions are mental activities through which individuals make sense of social phenomena. They include diverse types, such as the recognition of faces and facial expressions, the interpretation of intentions and behavior, and the evaluation of social cues and dynamics. A central topic in this field is theory of mind—the ability to understand others as mental beings with emotions, desires, and beliefs different from one's own. This ability allows individuals to think about and respond to the mental states of others.[47] Moral cognitions are a type of social cognition that make individuals aware of the moral significance of situations. They occur when people recognize and appreciate altruistic behavior or disapprove of malicious and harmful actions.[48] Cognitive psychologists also study the relation between cognition and emotion, for example, how emotions influence mental operations like attention and decision-making.[49]

Cognitive processes do not always function as they should and can lead to inaccuracies, either because of natural errors associated with cognitive biases or as a result of pathological impairments from cognitive disorders. Cognitive biases are systematic ways in which human thinking deviates from ideal norms of rationality. They are common patterns that affect most people, leading to misinterpretations of reality and suboptimal decisions. Cognitive biases are often caused by heuristics or mental shortcuts, which the brain uses to increase speed and reduce cognitive load. For instance, people typically rely on information that easily comes to mind when assessing a situation while disregarding more relevant information that is harder to retrieve.[50]

Cognitive disorders involve a more pronounced deviation from typical mental functioning. High-level cognitive abilities usually require the interaction of many low-level processes. Impairments affecting a specific subprocess often result in a partial malfunction of the high-level process while leaving its other functions intact.[51] For example, prosopagnosia is a perceptual disorder in which individuals lack the ability to recognize faces without impacting other visual abilities.[52] Similarly, anterograde amnesia is an impaired ability to form and recall new memories but leaves long-term memory intact. Disorders can affect a wide range of mental functions, including thought and language.[53] Some disorders involve a general cognitive decline that is not limited to one specific function. For instance, Alzheimer's disease is associated with a global, gradual impairment of memory, reasoning, and language.[54]

Theories

Various theories of the nature of cognition have been proposed. They provide conceptualizations and models to represent cognitive processes, explain empirical data, and predict experimental outcomes. Some theories propose interpretations of the overall cognitive architecture of the mind, seeking to explain cognition as a whole. Others suggest more limited models intended only for specific mental activities, such as theories of visual attention.[55]

Classical computationalism

Computationalism interprets cognition as a form of computation, highlighting the similarities between minds and computers. Classical computationalism understands cognitions as symbol manipulations and asserts that the brain represents information through symbols or strings of symbols. In this view, computations operate on strings to create new strings according to a set of mechanical rules. These rules only depend on the syntactic structure of the strings, meaning that cognitive processes have no understanding of what the symbols represent. For example, a simple calculator transforms the string "3 + 7" into the result "10" according to the mechanical rules of arithmetic without grasping the meaning of these numerals.[56] To handle complex data dealing with many entities and their interrelations, theorists often introduce more sophisticated symbol-based devices of knowledge representation, such as semantic nets, schemata, and frames.[57]

According to classical computationalism, any cognitive activity is at its fundamental level a formal symbol manipulation, including perception, reasoning, planning, and language processing. This perspective helps researchers analyze and distinguish cognitive processes by examining the types of representations involved and the mechanical rules followed.[58] The tri-level hypothesis divides this study into three levels of abstraction. The highest level analyzes the goal or purpose of a process, identifying the information it receives, the problem it aims to solve, and the result it produces. The intermediary level involves the decomposition of the process into individual steps, analyzing how the computation is performed or which algorithm is used. The most concrete level explores how the algorithm is implemented on a material level through neurological systems.[59]

Classical computationalism is closely related to the information-processing approach, which assumes that most cognitive activities are complex processes arising from the interaction of several subprocesses. Each process is characterized by the function it performs, which is connected to the input information it obtains, how it transforms this information, and the output it generates. Interaction happens when the output of one subprocess acts as the input for another. This approach is associated with serial models in which complex computations are divided into sequences of calculations where intermediary results are computed and transmitted until a final output is produced. It typically divides the mind into a small number of high-level systems responsible for different tasks, such as perception, memory, and reasoning. Information-processing models often rely on a hierarchical cognitive architecture where a central system integrates information from other units and formulates overall goals.[60]

The language of thought hypothesis is a version of classical computationalism arguing that thought happens through the medium of an internal linguistic system similar to natural languages, termed mentalese. It suggests that mental states like beliefs and desires are realized through mentalese sentences and that cognitive operations transform these sentences according to specific rules.[61]

Some symbol-based approaches use formal logic as a model of cognition. According to this view, representations have the form of statements, similar to declarative sentences. Computational processes are conceptualized as rules of inference, which take one or more sentences as input and produce a new sentence as output. For example, modus ponens is a rule of inference that, when applied to the premises "if it rains, then the ground is wet" and "it rains", results in the conclusion "the ground is wet".[62]

Certain rule-based approaches interpret cognition as the application of if-then rules to generate new representations. According to this outlook, a cognitive system is made up of many rules, each defined by one or more conditions together with an output procedure. If information stored in the working memory satisfies all the conditions of a rule then its output procedure is triggered and transfers a new representation to the working memory. This change may, in turn, prompt the execution of another rule, leading to a dynamic sequence of operations that can solve complex computational tasks. The cognitive architecture Soar is an example of this approach.[63]

Connectionism

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Diagram of a neural network consisting of several layers
Connectionism analyzes cognition through complex neural networks consisting of several layers of nodes.[64]

Classical computationalism is typically contrasted with connectionism. As another form of computationalism, connectionism agrees that cognitions are computations but proposes a different cognitive architecture based on a complex network of nodes. The nodes are locally linked with each other, and the activity of each node depends on the inputs it receives from connected nodes.[65] The nodes are typically arranged in layers where information flows in one direction from earlier to later layers. The initial input layer of nodes receives information, such as sensory data, and passes it on to intermediary layers, where the main computation takes place. At the end of the process stands an output layer, which transmits the result to other systems. The behavior of each individual node is usually relatively simple: the node's activation value is determined by its weighted inputs and broadcast to nodes in the subsequent layer. Complex computations emerge as numerous nodes operate in parallel and interact across layers.[64]

Connectionism is closely related to computational neuroscience, and some researchers directly integrate neurological data about electrochemical activities of neurons into their theories. However, the more common approach is to use abstract, idealized models to avoid complexities introduced by neurophysiological mechanisms. Connectionism also shares various interests with the field of artificial intelligence, and the networks and learning algorithms proposed in one field often have similar applications in the other.[66]

Connectionists typically reject the serial and hierarchical models common in classical computationalism. Instead, they argue that cognition happens in parallel as countless neurons work simultaneously without a central control system guiding the process.[65]

Although connectionism is often presented as an alternative to computationalism, the two views do not necessarily exclude each other. For example, implementation connectionists argue that non-symbolic processes at the fundamental neural level implement symbolic processes at a more abstract level. According to this view, the cognitive system functions as a neural network at the fundamental level and as a symbol-processor when viewed from a more abstract perspective. This position contrasts with radical connectionism, which asserts that symbol-based approaches are fundamentally flawed since they misconstrue the nature of cognition.[67]

Representationalism and anti-representationalism

Both classical computationalism and common forms of connectionismTemplate:Efn accept representationalism, which holds that information is stored in representations that depict the state of the world. Representations can take various forms, such as symbols, images, and concepts, as well as subsymbolic patterns used to model higher-level structures. Representationalists examine how cognitive systems encode, manipulate, and decode representations to construct internal models of the environment and predict changes.[68]

Anti-representationalists reject the idea that cognition is about representing the world through internal models. They assert that intelligence arises from the interaction between an organism and its environment rather than from internal processes alone. For example, approaches in behaviorism and situated robotics suggest an immediate link between perception and action: environmental stimuli are directly processed and translated into behavior following stimulus-response patterns. This outlook suggests that intelligent behavior emerges if an entity has stimulus-response patterns that match the external situation, even if the cognitive system responsible for these patterns has no representations of what the environment is like.[69]

Anti-representationalism is closely related to 4E cognition, a family of views critical of the prioritization of internal representations. 4E cognition examines the relation between mind, body, and environment, including embodied, embedded, extended, and enactive cognition. Embodied cognition is the idea that cognitive processes are grounded in bodily experience and cannot be understood in isolation from the organism's sensorimotor capacities. Embedded cognition asserts that cognitive effort and efficiency depend on physical and social environments. Extended cognition claims that the environment not only influences cognition but forms part of it, meaning that cognitive processes extend beyond internal neural activity to include external events. Enactive cognition asserts that cognition arises from the active interaction between organism and environment.[70]

Others

The modularity of mind is an approach that analyzes the cognitive system in terms of independent mental modules. Each module is an inborn mechanism that deals only with a specific type of information while being mostly unaware of the activities of other modules. Mental modules are primarily used to explain low-level cognitive processes, such as edge detection in visual perception.[71] The massive modularity hypothesis, by contrast, asserts that the mind is entirely composed of modules. According to this view, mental modules are also responsible for high-level cognitive processes by linking and integrating the outputs of low-level cognitive processes.[72]

Bayesianism applies probability theory to model cognitive processes such as learning, vision, and motor control. Its central idea is that representations of the environment can be more or less reliable and that the laws of probability theory describe how to integrate information and manage uncertainty.[73] Bayesianism is sometimes combined with predictive models. According to them, the brain creates and adjusts its internal representation of the environment by predicting what is going to happen, comparing the predictions to reality, and updating the internal representation accordingly.[74]

Dual process theory relies on the distinction between automatic and controlled processes to analyze cognitive phenomena. It conceptualizes them as two systems and proposes different models of their interaction. According to the default-interventionist model, the automatic system generates impressions while the controlled system monitors them and intervenes if it detects problems. The parallel-competitive model, by contrast, suggests that each system generates its own type of knowledge and that the outputs of the different systems compete with each other.[75]

Development

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Cognitive development is the progressive growth of mental abilities from infancy through adulthood as individuals acquire improved cognitive skills and learn from experience. Some changes occur continuously as gradual improvements over extended periods. Others involve discontinuous transitions in the form of abrupt reorganizations resulting in qualitative changes. They are typically conceptualized as stages through which the individual passes.[76]

The nature versus nurture debate addresses the causes of cognitive development, contrasting the influences of inborn dispositions with the effects of environment and experience. Empiricists identify environment and experience as the main factors. This view is inspired by John Locke's idea that the mind of an infant is a blank slate that initially knows nothing of the world. According to this outlook, children learn through sense data by associating and generalizing impressions. Nativists, by contrast, argue that the mind has innate knowledge of abstract patterns. They suggest that this inborn framework organizes sensory information and guides learning.[76]

Photo of a man with white hair and glasses, wearing a suit
Jean Piaget divided the cognitive development of children into four stages.[77]

Various theories of the general mechanisms and stages of cognitive development have been proposed. Jean Piaget's theory divides cognitive development into four stages, each marked by an increasing capacity for abstraction and systematic understanding. In the initial sensory-motor stage, from birth to about two years, children explore sensory impressions and motor capacities, learning that things continue to exist when not observed. During the pre-operational stage, up to about age seven, children begin to understand and use symbols intuitively. In the following stages of concrete and formal operation, children first apply logical reasoning to concrete physical objects and then, from around age twelve, also to abstract ideas.[78]

In contrast to Piaget's approach, Lev Vygotsky's theory sees social interaction as the primary driver of cognitive development without clearly demarcated stages. It holds that children learn new skills by engaging in tasks under the guidance of knowledgeable others. This view emphasizes the role of language acquisition, suggesting that children internalize language and use it in private speech as a tool for planning, self-regulation, and problem solving.[79] Other approaches examine the role of different types of representation in cognitive development. For example, Annette Karmiloff-Smith proposes that cognitive developments involve a shift from implicit to explicit representations, making knowledge more complex and easier to access. A further theory, proposed by Robert S. Siegler, asserts that children use multiple cognitive strategies to solve problems and become more adept at selecting effective strategies as they develop.[80]

Cognitive development is most rapid during childhood. Some influences occur even before birth, due to factors like nutrition, maternal stress, and harmful substances like alcohol during pregnancy.[81] Developments in childhood affect all major cognitive faculties, including perception, memory, thinking, and language. Cognitive changes also happen during adulthood but are less pronounced. In old age, overall cognition declines, affecting reasoning, comprehension, novel problem solving, and memory.[82]

Non-human

Animal

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Photo of a bonobo using a stick to fish for termites
The ability to employ tools is an example of animal cognition, such as a bonobo fishing termites with a stick.[83]

Animal cognition refers to mechanisms through which animals acquire knowledge and transform information to engage in flexible, goal-oriented behavior. Animals use cognitive abilities for many daily tasks, for example, to find and recognize food, navigate territory, seek shelter, hunt prey, avoid predators, interact socially, communicate, learn new habits, and form long-term memories. Researchers examine cognition across diverse species, including mammals, birds, fish, and insects.[84] Animal cognition is typically specialized and domain-specific, meaning that a species may excel at particular tasks and contexts while performing poorly in others.[85]

Researchers examine various areas of animal cognition. They are interested in whether animals can form abstract concepts, expressed in the ability to understand a category and apply it to novel instances. For instance, chimpanzees can learn concepts of different numbers. As a result, they acquire various number-related abilities, like identifying collections containing a specific number of items. Another often-studied capacity is the power to form and remember a spatial map of the environment. This enables animals, such as jays, to navigate efficiently and choose the shortest route to a shelter or a feeding site. Research also addresses imitation, in which an animal copies the behavior of another animal. This facilitates the spread of useful skills, including tool-use.[86] Beyond animal cognition, some researchers also examine plant cognition, such as plant communication. For instance, maple trees release airborne chemicals to warn nearby trees of a herbivore attack, helping them prepare defensive responses.[87]

Comparative cognition is the study of the similarities and differences in cognitive abilities across species. It is an interdisciplinary field of inquiry that also considers evolutionary factors. For example, researchers investigate which cognitive traits are required to solve particular socioecological problems and how these traits evolved in different species. A traditionally dominant approach divides animal cognition into higher and lower psychological processes based on features like flexibility and complexity. However, it is controversial to what extent this contrast captures meaningful functional distinctions, and researchers risk anthropomorphic bias by interpreting animal cognition in terms of human traits.[88]

Artificial

Artificial cognition uses computational systems to emulate and model cognitive processes, like perception and reasoning, with central applications in artificial intelligence and robotics.[89] Artificial and human cognition have different strengths and weaknesses. For example, artificial cognition excels at rapidly processing vast datasets according to predefined algorithms. Human cognition, by contrast, is typically better suited to assess emotional significance and to find and evaluate solutions that require novel and creative thinking. These differences affect how the two forms of cognition are integrated with each other. For some applications, artificial cognition is used to assist human cognition. In aviation, for example, it helps monitor diverse metrics, allowing human pilots to focus on decision-making rather than data analysis. However, there are also cases where artificial cognition replaces human cognition, such as autonomous vehicle navigation.[90]

The field of artificial cognitive systems explores the possibility of autonomous machines with human-like cognition. This encompasses not only artificial intelligence at the level of individual tasks, such as object detection or language translation, but also the integration of diverse cognitive processes. The aim is an embodied system that can autonomously interact with its environment in real time. An artificial cognitive system can navigate its surroundings, set goals, devise means to achieve them, anticipate outcomes, adapt to circumstances, execute action plans, and learn from experience.[91] Artificial general intelligence, a closely related concept, refers to hypothetical systems that possess or surpass the full range of human mental abilities. It is controversial whether such a system can be fully realized since it would include not only computational capacities associated with logical reasoning but also emotion and phenomenal consciousness.[92]

In various fields

Many fields of inquiry study cognition, including psychology, neuroscience, and cognitive science. They examine different aspects of cognition, ranging from high-level computational processes to low-level neural mechanisms, and employ distinct methods to reach their conclusions. There is substantial overlap among these disciplines, and researchers from one field often rely on conceptual models or empirical findings from another.[93]

Psychology

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Cognitive psychology examines mental activities responsible for cognitive phenomena and intelligent behavior. It uses the scientific method to study cognitive processes like perception, memory, reasoning, and language. Although mental activities mediate between stimuli and responses, they are not directly observable, which poses a methodological challenge for researchers. It typically forces them to rely on indirect methods for empirical validation, usually in the form of models or theories that have testable predictions. For example, if a theory predicts a specific behavior in a particular situation, then empirical observations can determine if outcomes align with those predictions.[94]

Cognitive psychologists use diverse methods to gather data for empirical validation. Experimental methods create controlled situations in which certain factors, called independent variables, can be changed. The main interest is in how these factors influence individuals in the situation. By measuring the effects, called dependent variables, researchers aim to identify causal relations between independent and dependent variables. Correlational methods, by contrast, measure the degree of association between two variables without proving that one causes the other. Cognitive psychologists also integrate methods from other disciplines, including neuroimaging techniques and computational simulations. Early cognitive psychologists made extensive use of introspection, in which researchers examine and reflect on their own experiences to understand mental processes. The choice of method depends a lot on the studied cognitive process, such as the differences between research on perception and memory.[95]

Neuroscience

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

fMRI image showing the brain from a top view with active areas colored in orange
fMRI is a neuroimaging technique that can measure regional brain activity corresponding to specific cognitive tasks.[96]

Cognitive neuroscience investigates how the nervous system gives rise to cognition. It is particularly interested in the brain, covering both micro-scale studies of individual neurons and synapses as well as the macro-scale analyses of interactions between brain regions. For example, cognitive neuroscientists study the brain areas responsible for processes like memory and decision-making, exploring how they represent and transform information and communicate with each other on a biological level. They also examine how these processes are influenced by neurotransmitterssignalling molecules that affect information exchange between neurons.[97]

Cognitive neuroscientists employ neuroimaging techniques to study brain activity, including electroencephalography (EEG), positron emission tomography (PET), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). These techniques visualize neural processes by measuring phenomena such as electrical or magnetic changes and blood flow across different brain areas, indicating local activity levels. Researchers compare the activation patterns associated with specific mental tasks to learn how regional brain activity correlates with cognitive demands. Another method examines patients with brain damage. It seeks to understand the role of a brain area indirectly by studying how cognition changes if the area is impaired.[98]

A different approach, common in computational or theoretical neuroscience, is to design computational or mathematical models of cognitive systems. This approach explores possible explanations of observed mental phenomena and neural activities by modeling and simulating underlying brain mechanisms.[99]

Cognitive science

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Cognitive science is an interdisciplinary field informed by psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, linguistics, and artificial intelligence. It seeks to integrate the insights of these disciplines and provide a unified perspective. To this end, it adopts a common conceptualization of minds as information processors, understanding cognition as the manipulation of internal representations.[100]

To bridge disciplinary and methodological divides, it identifies distinct levels of analysis corresponding to different degrees of abstraction. For example, neuroscientific analysis of the electrochemical activity of brain areas belongs to a concrete level that deals with the biological mechanisms performing computations. By contrast, the psychological study of the roles of and interactions between high-level processes, such as perception, memory, and reasoning, adopts an abstract perspective. Cognitive scientists seek to coordinate empirical experiments with theoretical models to produce testable theories that link the different levels.[101]

Other fields

Many fields of inquiry have subareas dedicated to cognitive phenomena. For example, cognitive linguistics is a subarea of linguistics that investigates the relation between language and cognition. It studies the cognitive processes responsible for grammar, conceptualization, language comprehension, and language production.[102] Similarly, cognitive anthropology examines the connection between culture and cognition, conceptualizing culture as a system of knowledge, beliefs, and values. It analyzes and compares cultures from this perspective to identify distinctive features of particular societies and the universal patterns shared by all.[103] Cognitive sociology, a related field, explores how sociocultural factors shape cognitive activity.[104] Other fields include cognitive archaeology, cognitive architecture, and cognitive biology.[105]

Various branches of philosophy address cognition, including philosophy of mind and epistemology. Philosophers of mind examine the nature of cognition and related concepts, such as mind, representation, and consciousness.[106] They are particularly interested in the relation between mind and matter[107] and the problem of how physical states can give rise to conscious experience.[108] Epistemologists seek to understand the nature and limits of knowledge. They further ask under what conditions cognitive processes, like perception and reasoning, lead to knowledge.[109] Philosophers also reflect on the fields of inquiry studying cognition. They explore how psychologists, neuroscientists, and cognitive scientists conduct research and ask about the fundamental concepts and background assumptions underlying these fields.[110]

Education studies is the field of inquiry examining the nature, purposes, practices, and outcomes of education. It investigates the cognitive development of children and studies how knowledge is transmitted, acquired, and organized.[111] This discipline overlaps with cognitive psychology and cognitive science because of its interest in learning, covering diverse cognitive processes and skills, such as conceptual change, metacognition, mental models, logical reasoning, and problem solving.[112] Cognitive learning theories conceptualize learning in terms of information processing. They analyze how information is encoded, retrieved, and transformed, often with the goal of devising educational practices that optimize learning. For example, cognitive load theory identifies limitations of working memory as a bottleneck that impedes learning and proposes educational practices to avoid cognitive overload.[113]

Psychometrics examines how mental attributes can be measured. It includes the discussion of cognitive tests, which are methods designed to assess cognitive abilities. For example, IQ tests include tasks involving logical reasoning, verbal comprehension, spatial thinking, and working memory to estimate overall cognitive performance.[114] The Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the mini–mental state examination are tests to detect cognitive impairment, such as deficits in memory, attention, and language.[115]

Cognitive enhancement encompasses diverse ways to improve mental performance, including biochemical, behavioral, and physical factors. Biochemical approaches include balanced nutrition and psychoactive substances like caffeine and amphetamine. Behavioral enhancements cover physical exercise, sufficient sleep, meditation, and cognitive strategies, such as mnemonics. Physical enhancements encompass invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation as well as neurofeedback and wearable devices.[116]

Cognitive behavior therapy is a psychotherapy that analyzes psychological problems in terms of cognitive processes. It argues that maladaptive automatic thoughts, cognitive distortions, and unhealthy core beliefs lead to inaccurate interpretations of events and emotional distress. For example, if a person has an unconscious core belief that they are fundamentally inadequate, they may misinterpret a neutral interaction as a rejection. Cognitive behavior therapists seek to restructure problematic attitudes by helping clients recognize and modify dysfunctional thought patterns.[117]

Many topics in computer science are relevant to cognition, particularly for approaches that understand cognition in terms of computation and information processing. Theories of computation examine the nature of computation and explore which problems can be solved computationally. Computer architecture has parallels with cognitive architecture, providing models of how different components interact to form a functional system. Another overlap concerns the field of knowledge representation, in which computer scientists explore formal data structures that make knowledge accessible to computational processes. Artificial intelligence is the capacity of certain computer systems to perform tasks requiring intelligence, such as reasoning and problem-solving. It includes the field of machine learning, through which computer systems can acquire new abilities not explicitly coded by programmers. The field of cognitive robotics integrates insights from these subfields to create intelligent robots.[118]

History

Oil painting of a man with gray hair wearing a brown attire
John Locke argued that humans have no inborn knowledge and need to learn everything from experience.[119]

Cognitive research has its roots in ancient philosophy. Early work took the form of reflections on the nature and sources of knowledge, proposed divisions of the mind into separate faculties, and analyzed specific cognitive processes, like perception and deductive reasoning.[120] Plato (Template:Circa) examined how knowledge of abstract principles is possible.[121] His student Aristotle (384–322 BCE) explored the nature of perception, studying how the mind integrates sensory data with memory and imagination. He also devised a formal logical system to describe logical reasoning.[122] Inspired by Aristotle, Avicenna (980–1037 CE) and Thomas Aquinas (1224–1274 CE) developed faculty psychologies that organized the mind into distinct faculties and analyzed their functions and interactions.[123] In early modern philosophy, rationalists like René Descartes (1596–1650) and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) argued that the mind has innate knowledge of the world. This view was opposed by empiricists, like John Locke (1632–1704), who saw the mind as a blank slate that learns everything from experience.[119] Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) introduced the idea of innate categories that organize all experience and understanding.[124]

Experimental research into cognitive processes began in the late 19th century with Wilhelm Wundt (1832–1920) and his student Edward Bradford Titchener (1867–1927). They laid the foundations of scientific psychology by introducing controlled laboratory experiments, such as measuring responses and reaction times to stimuli, combined with a rigorous introspective method.[125] Hermann Ebbinghaus (1850–1909) and Mary Whiton Calkins (1863–1930) pioneered experimental studies of memory.[126] William James (1842–1910) approached psychological research from a pragmatist perspective, studying everyday experience.[127] In the early 20th century, Max Wertheimer (1880–1943), Kurt Koffka (1886–1941), and Wolfgang Köhler (1887–1967) formulated Gestalt psychology. In contrast to earlier experimental approaches that analyzed individual elements, they focused on larger patterns that emerge as the mind actively organizes information into coherent wholes.[128] Frederic Bartlett (1886–1969) was also interested in how the mind actively transforms information, examining how this process introduces systematic errors into memory.[129]

Difficulties in measuring internal cognitive events led to the rise of behaviorism, which sought to explain observable conduct through stimulus–response patterns without reference to unobservable mental states. Initially developed by John B. Watson (1878–1958), it dominated psychological research in the first half of the 20th century.[130] Challenges in explaining complex human behavior prompted a paradigm shift in the 1950s—the cognitive revolution. Instead of studying stimulus–response patterns, researchers examined how the mind receives, stores, and transforms information, placing cognition at the center of psychological research and resulting in the emergence of cognitive subfields across disciplines.[131]

Jean Piaget (1896–1980) applied these ideas to developmental psychology and proposed a series of cognitive stages through which children pass as they gradually acquire the capacity for abstract thinking.[77] Donald Broadbent (1926–1993) integrated ideas from the information theory of communication, developed by Claude Shannon (1916–2001) and Warren Weaver (1894–1978), to analyze how perception transmits and filters information.[132] Allen Newell (1927–1992) and Herbert A. Simon (1916–2001) helped establish the field of artificial intelligence while demonstrating how computers can model and simulate human problem-solving.[133] In linguistics, Noam Chomsky (1928–present) examined how the brain processes language, identifying universal patterns of language mechanisms.[134]

These developments across several fields of inquiry led to the formation of cognitive science in the 1970s.[135] David Marr (1945–1980) helped unify this interdisciplinary field with the tri-level hypothesis, proposing that the distinct disciplines work on different levels of abstraction but are fundamentally concerned with the same phenomena.[136] The advent of neuroimaging techniques such as fMRI and PET revolutionized the neuroscientific study of cognition, enabling the examination of regional, task-specific brain activity.[137] Concurrently, advances in computational power and artificial intelligence made possible the design of increasingly complex simulations of cognition and intelligent systems that rival and surpass human cognition in specific tasks.[138]

See also

Script error: No such module "Portal".

References

Notes

Template:Notelist

Citations

Template:Reflist

Sources

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". (for an earlier version, see: Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".)
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

External links

Template:Sister project Template:Sister project Template:Sister project

Template:Mental processes Template:Human intelligence topics

Template:Authority control

  1. Template:Multiref
  2. Template:Multiref
  3. Template:Multiref
  4. Template:Multiref
  5. Template:Multiref
  6. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  7. Template:Multiref
  8. Template:Multiref
  9. Template:Multiref
  10. Template:Multiref
  11. Template:Multiref
  12. Template:Multiref
  13. Template:Multiref
  14. Template:Multiref
  15. Template:Multiref
  16. Template:Multiref
  17. Template:Multiref
  18. Template:Multiref
  19. Template:Multiref
  20. Template:Multiref
  21. Template:Multiref
  22. Template:Multiref
  23. Template:Multiref
  24. Template:Multiref
  25. Template:Multiref
  26. Template:Multiref
  27. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  28. Template:Multiref
  29. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  30. Template:Multiref
  31. Template:Multiref
  32. Template:Multiref
  33. Template:Multiref
  34. a b Template:Multiref
  35. Template:Multiref
  36. Template:Multiref
  37. Template:Multiref
  38. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  39. Template:Multiref
  40. Template:Multiref
  41. Template:Multiref
  42. Template:Multiref
  43. Template:Multiref
  44. Template:Multiref
  45. Template:Multiref
  46. a b Template:Multiref
  47. Template:Multiref
  48. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  49. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  50. Template:Multiref
  51. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  52. Template:Multiref
  53. Template:Multiref
  54. Template:Multiref
  55. Template:Multiref
  56. Template:Multiref
  57. Template:Multiref
  58. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  59. Template:Multiref
  60. Template:Multiref
  61. Template:Multiref
  62. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  63. Template:Multiref
  64. a b Template:Multiref
  65. a b Template:Multiref
  66. Template:Multiref
  67. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  68. Template:Multiref
  69. Template:Multiref
  70. Template:Multiref
  71. Template:Multiref
  72. Template:Multiref
  73. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  74. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  75. Template:Multiref
  76. a b Template:Multiref
  77. a b Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  78. Template:Multiref
  79. Template:Multiref
  80. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  81. Template:Multiref
  82. Template:Multiref
  83. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  84. Template:Multiref
  85. Template:Multiref
  86. Template:Multiref
  87. Template:Multiref
  88. Template:Multiref
  89. Template:Multiref
  90. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  91. Template:Multiref
  92. Template:Multiref
  93. Template:Multiref
  94. Template:Multiref
  95. Template:Multiref
  96. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  97. Template:Multiref
  98. Template:Multiref
  99. Template:Multiref
  100. Template:Multiref
  101. Template:Multiref
  102. Template:Multiref
  103. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  104. Template:Multiref
  105. Template:Multiref
  106. Template:Multiref
  107. Template:Multiref
  108. Template:Multiref
  109. Template:Multiref
  110. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  111. Template:Multiref
  112. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  113. Template:Multiref
  114. Template:Multiref
  115. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  116. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  117. Template:Multiref
  118. Template:Multiref
  119. a b Template:Multiref
  120. Template:Multiref
  121. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  122. Template:Multiref
  123. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  124. Template:Multiref
  125. Template:Multiref
  126. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  127. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  128. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  129. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  130. Template:Multiref
  131. Template:Multiref
  132. Template:Multiref
  133. Template:Multiref
  134. Template:Multiref
  135. Template:Multiref
  136. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  137. Template:Multiref
  138. Template:Multiref