Board of Longitude: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hughbe98
No edit summary
 
imported>WikiCleanerBot
m v2.05b - Bot T12 CW#548 - Fix errors for CW project (Punctuation in link)
 
Line 11: Line 11:
| membership_year = 1714
| membership_year = 1714
}}
}}
{{Infobox UK legislation
 
| short_title          = Discovery of Longitude at Sea Act 1713
| type                  = Act
| parliament            = Parliament of Great Britain
| long_title            =
| year                  = 1713
| citation              = [[13 Ann.]] c. 14 (Ruffhead c. 15)
| introduced_commons    =
| introduced_lords      =
| territorial_extent    =
| royal_assent          = 9 July 1714
| commencement          =
| expiry_date          =
| repeal_date          =
| amends                =
| replaces              =
| amendments            =
| repealing_legislation =
| related_legislation  =
| status                =
| legislation_history  =
| theyworkforyou        =
| millbankhansard      =
| original_text        =
| revised_text          =
| use_new_UK-LEG        =
| UK-LEG_title          =
| collapsed            = yes
}}
The '''Commissioners for the Discovery of the Longitude at Sea''', or more popularly '''Board of Longitude''', was a British government body formed in 1714 to administer a scheme of prizes intended to encourage innovators to solve the problem of finding [[longitude]] at sea.
The '''Commissioners for the Discovery of the Longitude at Sea''', or more popularly '''Board of Longitude''', was a British government body formed in 1714 to administer a scheme of prizes intended to encourage innovators to solve the problem of finding [[longitude]] at sea.


==Origins==
==Origins==
Navigators and scientists had been working on the problem of not knowing a ship's longitude. The establishment of the Board of Longitude was motivated by this problem and by the [[1707 Scilly naval disaster|1707 grounding of four ships]] of Vice-Admiral [[Cloudesley Shovell|Sir Cloudesley Shovell]]'s fleet off the [[Isles of Scilly]], resulting in heavy loss of life. Established by [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Queen Anne]] the [[Longitude Act 1714]] named 24 Commissioners of Longitude, key figures from politics, the Navy, astronomy and mathematics.<ref>{{cite web|title=Acts of Parliament and awards|url=http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/MS-RGO-00014-00001/19|publisher=Cambridge Digital Library|access-date=22 July 2013}}</ref> However, the Board did not meet until at least 1737<ref>{{cite web|title=Commissioners of Longitude|url=http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/ES-LON-00004|publisher=Cambridge Digital Library|access-date=22 July 2013}}</ref> when interest grew in [[John Harrison]]'s marine timekeeper.
Navigators and scientists had been working on the problem of not knowing a ship's longitude. The establishment of the Board of Longitude was motivated by this problem and by the [[1707 Scilly naval disaster|1707 grounding of four ships]] of Vice-Admiral [[Cloudesley Shovell|Sir Cloudesley Shovell]]'s fleet off the [[Isles of Scilly]], resulting in heavy loss of life. Established by [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Queen Anne]] the '''[[Longitude Act|Longitude Act 1714]]''' ([[13 Ann.]] c. 14){{efn|This is the citation in ''[[The Statutes of the Realm]]''.}} named 24 Commissioners of Longitude, key figures from politics, the Navy, astronomy and mathematics.<ref>{{cite web|title=Acts of Parliament and awards|url=http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/MS-RGO-00014-00001/19|publisher=Cambridge Digital Library|access-date=22 July 2013}}</ref> However, the Board did not meet until at least 1737<ref>{{cite web|title=Commissioners of Longitude|url=http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/ES-LON-00004|publisher=Cambridge Digital Library|access-date=22 July 2013}}</ref> when interest grew in [[John Harrison]]'s marine timekeeper.


The Board administered prizes for those who could demonstrate a working device or method. The main [[longitude prize]]s were:
The Board administered prizes for those who could demonstrate a working device or method. The main [[longitude prize]]s were:
*£10,000 for a method that could determine longitude within {{convert|60|nmi}} (£{{Inflation|UK|10,000|1714|fmt=c|r=-5}} as of {{inflation-year|UK}})
*£10,000 for a method that could determine longitude within 1 longitude [[Degree of arc|degree]], equivalent to 60 [[Nautical mile|nautical miles]] (110 km; 69 mi) at the equator (about £{{Inflation|UK|10,000|1714|fmt=c|r=-5}} as of {{inflation-year|UK}});
*£15,000 for a method that could determine longitude within {{convert|40|nmi}} (£{{Inflation|UK|15,000|1714|fmt=c|r=-5}} as of {{inflation-year|UK}})
*£15,000 for a method that could determine longitude within 40 longitudinal [[Minutes of arc|minutes]], equivalent to {{convert|40|nmi}} at the equator (about £{{Inflation|UK|15,000|1714|fmt=c|r=-5}} as of {{inflation-year|UK}})
*£20,000 for a method that could determine longitude within {{convert|30|nmi}} (£{{Inflation|UK|20,000|1714|fmt=c|r=-5}} as of {{inflation-year|UK}}).
*£20,000 for a method that could determine longitude within 30 longitudinal [[Minutes of arc|minutes]], equivalent to {{convert|30|nmi}} at the equator (about £{{Inflation|UK|20,000|1714|fmt=c|r=-5}} as of {{inflation-year|UK}}).


In addition, the Board had the discretion to make awards to persons who were making significant contributions to the effort or to provide financial support to those who were working towards a solution.  The Board could also make advances of up to £2,000 for experimental work deemed promising.<ref name="egrtaylor">Taylor, E.G.R., ''The Haven-finding Art: A History of Navigation from Odysseus to Captain Cook'', Hollis &amp; Carter, London 1971, {{ISBN|0-370-01347-6}}</ref> Under this heading, the Board  made many lesser awards, including some awards in total £5,000 made to [[John Harrison]] before he received his main prize, an award of £3,000 to the widow of [[Tobias Mayer]], whose lunar tables were the basis of the lunar data in the early decades of ''[[The Nautical Almanac]]'', £300 to [[Leonhard Euler]] for his (assumed) contribution to the work of Mayer, £50 each to [[Richard Dunthorne]] and [[Israel Lyons]] for contributing methods to shorten the calculations connected with lunar distances, and awards made to the designers of improvements in chronometers.
In addition, the Board had the discretion to make awards to persons who were making significant contributions to the effort or to provide financial support to those who were working towards a solution.  The Board could also make advances of up to £2,000 for experimental work deemed promising.<ref name="egrtaylor">Taylor, E.G.R., ''The Haven-finding Art: A History of Navigation from Odysseus to Captain Cook'', Hollis &amp; Carter, London 1971, {{ISBN|0-370-01347-6}}</ref> Under this heading, the Board  made many lesser awards, including some awards in total £5,000 made to [[John Harrison]] before he received his main prize, an award of £3,000 to the widow of [[Tobias Mayer]], whose lunar tables were the basis of the lunar data in the early decades of ''[[The Nautical Almanac]]'', £300 to [[Leonhard Euler]] for his (assumed) contribution to the work of Mayer, £50 each to [[Richard Dunthorne]] and [[Israel Lyons]] for contributing methods to shorten the calculations connected with lunar distances, and awards made to the designers of improvements in chronometers.
Line 64: Line 36:
{{Portal|Geography}}
{{Portal|Geography}}
* [[Longitude (book)|''Longitude'' (book)]]
* [[Longitude (book)|''Longitude'' (book)]]
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}


==References==
==References==
Line 73: Line 48:


{{Admiralty Department|state=collapsed}}
{{Admiralty Department|state=collapsed}}
{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Board Of Longitude}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Board Of Longitude}}
Line 78: Line 54:
[[Category:History of navigation]]
[[Category:History of navigation]]
[[Category:1714 establishments in Great Britain]]
[[Category:1714 establishments in Great Britain]]
[[Category:1828 disestablishments]]
[[Category:1828 disestablishments in the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Meridians (geography)]]
[[Category:Meridians (geography)]]
[[Category:Navigation organizations]]
[[Category:Navigation organizations]]

Latest revision as of 07:09, 15 September 2025

Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Template:Main other

The Commissioners for the Discovery of the Longitude at Sea, or more popularly Board of Longitude, was a British government body formed in 1714 to administer a scheme of prizes intended to encourage innovators to solve the problem of finding longitude at sea.

Origins

Navigators and scientists had been working on the problem of not knowing a ship's longitude. The establishment of the Board of Longitude was motivated by this problem and by the 1707 grounding of four ships of Vice-Admiral Sir Cloudesley Shovell's fleet off the Isles of Scilly, resulting in heavy loss of life. Established by Queen Anne the Longitude Act 1714 (13 Ann. c. 14)Template:Efn named 24 Commissioners of Longitude, key figures from politics, the Navy, astronomy and mathematics.[1] However, the Board did not meet until at least 1737[2] when interest grew in John Harrison's marine timekeeper.

The Board administered prizes for those who could demonstrate a working device or method. The main longitude prizes were:

In addition, the Board had the discretion to make awards to persons who were making significant contributions to the effort or to provide financial support to those who were working towards a solution. The Board could also make advances of up to £2,000 for experimental work deemed promising.[3] Under this heading, the Board made many lesser awards, including some awards in total £5,000 made to John Harrison before he received his main prize, an award of £3,000 to the widow of Tobias Mayer, whose lunar tables were the basis of the lunar data in the early decades of The Nautical Almanac, £300 to Leonhard Euler for his (assumed) contribution to the work of Mayer, £50 each to Richard Dunthorne and Israel Lyons for contributing methods to shorten the calculations connected with lunar distances, and awards made to the designers of improvements in chronometers.

Even though many tried their hand at winning the main prize, for decades none was able to come up with a practical solution to the problem. The Board recognised that any serious attempt would be based on the recognition that the earth rotates through 15° of longitude every hour. The comparison of local time between a reference place (e.g., Greenwich) and the local time of the place in question would determine the longitude of that place. Since local apparent time could be determined with some ease, the problem centred on finding a means of determining (or in the case of chronometers, keeping) the time of the reference place when one is far away from it.

For details of the efforts towards determining the longitude, see History of longitude.

End of the board's mandate

For many decades a sufficiently accurate chronometer was prohibitively expensive. The lunar distance method was used by mariners either in conjunction with or instead of the marine chronometer. However, with the expectation that accurate clocks would eventually become commonplace, John Harrison showed that his method was the way of the future. However, the board never awarded the prize to Harrison, nor anyone else.

With the significant problems considered as solved, the Board of Longitude was abolished by Act of Parliament in 1828 and replaced by a Resident Committee for Scientific Advice for the Admiralty consisting of three scientific advisors: Thomas Young, Michael Faraday and Edward Sabine.[4]

See also

Script error: No such module "Portal".

Notes

Template:Notelist

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:Admiralty Department Template:Authority control

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Taylor, E.G.R., The Haven-finding Art: A History of Navigation from Odysseus to Captain Cook, Hollis & Carter, London 1971, Template:ISBN
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".