Semiconductor device fabrication: Difference between revisions
imported>CommunityNotesContributor m post move cleanup: Changed link from RCA to RCA Corporation using MovePlus |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Semiconductor manufacturing processes}} | {{Semiconductor manufacturing processes}} | ||
'''Semiconductor device fabrication''' is the process used to manufacture [[semiconductor devices]], typically [[integrated circuit]]s (ICs) such as [[microprocessor]]s, [[microcontroller]]s, and memories (such as [[Random-access memory|RAM]] and [[flash memory]]). It is a multiple-step [[Photolithography|photolithographic]] and physico-chemical process (with steps such as [[thermal oxidation]], thin-film deposition, ion | '''Semiconductor device fabrication''' is the process used to manufacture [[semiconductor devices]], typically [[integrated circuit]]s (ICs) such as [[microprocessor]]s, [[microcontroller]]s, and memories (such as [[Random-access memory|RAM]] and [[flash memory]]). It is a multiple-step [[Photolithography|photolithographic]] and physico-chemical process (with steps such as [[thermal oxidation]], thin-film deposition, [[ion implantation]], etching) during which [[electronic circuits]] are gradually created on a [[wafer (electronics)|wafer]], typically made of pure single-crystal [[semiconducting]] material. [[Silicon]] is almost always used, but various [[compound semiconductor]]s are used for specialized applications. Steps such as etching and photolithography can be used to manufacture other devices, such as LCD and OLED displays.<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jjRjDwAAQBAJ | title=Flat Panel Display Manufacturing | isbn=978-1-119-16134-9 | last1=Souk | first1=Jun | last2=Morozumi | first2=Shinji | last3=Luo | first3=Fang-Chen | last4=Bita | first4=Ion | date=24 September 2018 | publisher=John Wiley & Sons }}</ref> | ||
The fabrication process is performed in highly specialized [[semiconductor fabrication plant]]s, also called foundries or "fabs",<ref name="berlin-regression-methods" /> with the central part being the "[[clean room]]". In more advanced semiconductor devices, such as modern [[14 nanometer|14]]/[[10 nanometer|10]]/[[7 nanometer|7 nm]] nodes, fabrication can take up to 15 weeks, with 11–13 weeks being the industry average.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.chinawaterrisk.org/resources/analysis-reviews/8-things-you-should-know-about-water-and-semiconductors/|title=8 Things You Should Know About Water & Semiconductors|date=11 July 2013|website=China Water Risk|language=en-US|access-date=2023-01-21}}</ref> Production in advanced fabrication facilities is completely automated, with automated material handling systems taking care of the transport of wafers from machine to machine.<ref name="auto4">{{cite book|last=Yoshio|first=Nishi|year=2017|title=Handbook of Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology|publisher=CRC Press}}</ref> | The fabrication process is performed in highly specialized [[semiconductor fabrication plant]]s, also called foundries or "fabs",<ref name="berlin-regression-methods" /> with the central part being the "[[clean room]]". In more advanced semiconductor devices, such as modern [[14 nanometer|14]]/[[10 nanometer|10]]/[[7 nanometer|7 nm]] nodes, fabrication can take up to 15 weeks, with 11–13 weeks being the industry average.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.chinawaterrisk.org/resources/analysis-reviews/8-things-you-should-know-about-water-and-semiconductors/|title=8 Things You Should Know About Water & Semiconductors|date=11 July 2013|website=China Water Risk|language=en-US|access-date=2023-01-21}}</ref> Production in advanced fabrication facilities is completely automated, with automated material handling systems taking care of the transport of wafers from machine to machine.<ref name="auto4">{{cite book|last=Yoshio|first=Nishi|year=2017|title=Handbook of Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology|publisher=CRC Press}}</ref> | ||
A wafer often has several integrated circuits which are called [[Die (integrated circuit)|dies]] as they are pieces diced from a single | A wafer often has several integrated circuits, which are called [[Die (integrated circuit)|dies]] as they are pieces diced from a single wafer. Individual dies are separated from a finished wafer in a process called [[die singulation]], also called wafer dicing. The dies can then undergo further assembly and packaging.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Lei |first1=Wei-Sheng |last2=Kumar |first2=Ajay |last3=Yalamanchili |first3=Rao |date=2012-04-06 |title=Die singulation technologies for advanced packaging: A critical review |url=https://doi.org/10.1116/1.3700230 |journal=Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena |volume=30 |issue=4 |page=040801 |doi=10.1116/1.3700230 |bibcode=2012JVSTB..30d0801L |issn=2166-2746|url-access=subscription }}</ref> | ||
Within fabrication plants, the wafers are transported inside special sealed plastic boxes called [[FOUP]]s.<ref name="auto4"/> FOUPs in many fabs contain an internal nitrogen atmosphere<ref name="auto">{{Cite conference | Within fabrication plants, the wafers are transported inside special sealed plastic boxes called [[FOUP]]s.<ref name="auto4"/> FOUPs in many fabs contain an internal nitrogen atmosphere<ref name="auto">{{Cite conference|conference=25th Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC 2014)|doi=10.1109/ASMC.2014.6846999 |s2cid=2482339 |title=Advanced FOUP purge using diffusers for FOUP door-off application |date=2014 |last1=Wang |first1=H. P. |last2=Kim |first2=S. C. |last3=Liu |first3=B. |pages=120–124 |isbn=978-1-4799-3944-2 }}</ref><ref name="auto3">{{Cite conference|url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7328897|title=450mm FOUP/LPU system in advanced semiconductor manufacturing processes: A study on the minimization of oxygen content inside FOUP when the door is opened |conference=2015 Joint e-Manufacturing and Design Collaboration Symposium (eMDC) & 2015 International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing (ISSM)}}</ref> which helps prevent copper from oxidizing on the wafers. Copper is used in modern semiconductors for wiring.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Moisture Prevention in a Pre-Purged Front-Opening Unified Pod (FOUP) During Door Opening in a Mini-Environment |doi=10.1109/TSM.2018.2791985 |s2cid=25469704 |date=2018 |last1=Lin |first1=Tee |last2=Fu |first2=Ben-Ran |last3=Hu |first3=Shih-Cheng |last4=Tang |first4=Yi-Han |journal=IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing |volume=31 |issue=1 |pages=108–115 |bibcode=2018ITSM...31..108L }}</ref> The insides of the processing equipment and FOUPs is kept cleaner than the surrounding air in the cleanroom. This internal atmosphere is known as a mini-environment and helps improve yield, which is the number of working devices on a wafer. This mini environment is within an EFEM (equipment front end module)<ref name="auto6">{{cite journal |last1=Kure |first1=Tokuo |last2=Hanaoka |first2=Hideo |last3=Sugiura |first3=Takumi |last4=Nakagawa |first4=Shinya |title=Clean-room Technologies for the Mini-environment Age |journal=Hitachi Review |date=2007 |volume=56 |issue=3 |pages=70–74 |url=https://www.hitachi.com/rev/pdf/2007/r2007_03_109.pdf |citeseerx=10.1.1.493.1460 |s2cid=30883737 |access-date=2021-11-01 |archive-date=2021-11-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211101165519/https://www.hitachi.com/rev/pdf/2007/r2007_03_109.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> which allows a machine to receive FOUPs, and introduces wafers from the FOUPs into the machine. Additionally, many machines also handle wafers in clean nitrogen or vacuum environments to reduce contamination and improve process control.<ref name="auto4"/> Fabrication plants need large amounts of liquid nitrogen to maintain the atmosphere inside production machinery and FOUPs, which are constantly purged with nitrogen.<ref name="auto"/><ref name="auto3"/> There can also be an air curtain or a mesh<ref>{{cite conference | conference=2016 27th Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC) | doi=10.1109/ASMC.2016.7491075 | s2cid=3240442 | title=FOUP purge performance improvement using EFEM flow converter | date=2016 | last1=Kim | first1=Seong Chan | last2=Schelske | first2=Greg | pages=6–11 | isbn=978-1-5090-0270-2 }}</ref> between the FOUP and the EFEM which helps reduce the amount of humidity that enters the FOUP and improves yield.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=A Numerical Study on the Effects of Purge and Air Curtain Flow Rates on Humidity Invasion Into a Front Opening Unified Pod (FOUP) |doi=10.1109/TSM.2022.3209221 |s2cid=252555815 |date=2022 |last1=Benalcazar |first1=David |last2=Lin |first2=Tee |last3=Hu |first3=Ming-Hsuan |last4=Ali Zargar |first4=Omid |last5=Lin |first5=Shao-Yu |last6=Shih |first6=Yang-Cheng |last7=Leggett |first7=Graham |journal=IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing |volume=35 |issue=4 |pages=670–679 |bibcode=2022ITSM...35..670B }}</ref><ref name="auto5">{{Cite journal|title=Performance of Different Front-Opening Unified Pod (FOUP) Moisture Removal Techniques With Local Exhaust Ventilation System |doi=10.1109/TSM.2020.2977122 |s2cid=213026336 |date=2020 |last1=Lin |first1=Tee |last2=Ali Zargar |first2=Omid |last3=Juina |first3=Oscar |last4=Lee |first4=Tzu-Chieh |last5=Sabusap |first5=Dexter Lyndon |last6=Hu |first6=Shih-Cheng |last7=Leggett |first7=Graham |journal=IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing |volume=33 |issue=2 |pages=310–315 |bibcode=2020ITSM...33..310L }}</ref> | ||
Some of the companies that manufacture machines used in the industrial semiconductor fabrication process include [[ASML Holding|ASML]], [[Applied Materials]], [[Tokyo Electron]], and [[Lam Research]]. | |||
==Feature size== | ==Feature size== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{anchor|Process size}} | {{anchor|Process size}} | ||
Feature size is determined by the width of the smallest lines that can be patterned in a semiconductor fabrication process | Feature size (or process size) is determined by the width of the smallest lines that can be patterned in a semiconductor fabrication process; this measurement is known as the linewidth.<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PsVVKz_hjBgC&dq=feature+size+semiconductor&pg=SA21-PA48 | title=Handbook of Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology | isbn=978-1-4200-1766-3 | last1=Nishi | first1=Yoshio | last2=Doering | first2=Robert | date=19 December 2017 | publisher=CRC Press }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nHm4e7rFNfgC&dq=feature+size+semiconductor&pg=PA8 | title=Fundamental Principles of Optical Lithography: The Science of Microfabrication | isbn=978-0-470-72386-9 | last1=Mack | first1=Chris | date=11 March 2008 | publisher=John Wiley & Sons }}</ref> Patterning often refers to photolithography which allows a device design or pattern to be defined on the device during fabrication.<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NEkPEAAAQBAJ&dq=photolithography+patterning&pg=PA121 | title=Extending Moore's Law through Advanced Semiconductor Design and Processing Techniques | isbn=978-1-351-24866-2 | last1=Lambrechts | first1=Wynand | last2=Sinha | first2=Saurabh | last3=Abdallah | first3=Jassem Ahmed | last4=Prinsloo | first4=Jaco | date=13 September 2018 | publisher=CRC Press }}</ref> F<sup>2</sup> is used as a measurement of area for different parts of a semiconductor device, based on the feature size of a semiconductor manufacturing process. Many semiconductor devices are designed in sections called cells, and each cell represents a small part of the device, such as a memory cell to store data. Thus F<sup>2</sup> is used to measure the area taken up by these cells or sections.<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FPBjEAAAQBAJ&dq=f2+cell+size&pg=PP22 | title=Semiconductor Memory Devices and Circuits | isbn=978-1-000-56761-8 | last1=Yu | first1=Shimeng | date=19 April 2022 | publisher=CRC Press }}</ref> | ||
A specific '''semiconductor process''' has specific rules on the minimum size (width or CD/Critical Dimension) and spacing for features on each layer of the chip.<ref name="shirriff_die_shrink" /> | A specific '''semiconductor process''' has specific rules on the minimum size (width or CD/Critical Dimension) and spacing for features on each layer of the chip.<ref name="shirriff_die_shrink" /> | ||
Normally a new semiconductor process has smaller minimum sizes and tighter spacing. In some cases, this allows a simple [[die shrink]] of a currently produced chip design to reduce costs, improve performance,<ref name="shirriff_die_shrink">{{cite web|first=Ken|last=Shirriff|url=https://www.righto.com/2020/06/die-shrink-how-intel-scaled-down-8086.html|title=Die shrink: How Intel scaled-down the 8086 processor|date=June 2020|access-date=22 May 2022}}</ref> and increase transistor density (number of transistors per unit area) without the expense of a new design. | Normally, a new semiconductor process has smaller minimum sizes and tighter spacing. In some cases, this allows a simple [[die shrink]] of a currently produced chip design to reduce costs, improve performance,<ref name="shirriff_die_shrink">{{cite web|first=Ken|last=Shirriff|url=https://www.righto.com/2020/06/die-shrink-how-intel-scaled-down-8086.html|title=Die shrink: How Intel scaled-down the 8086 processor|date=June 2020|access-date=22 May 2022}}</ref> and increase transistor density (number of transistors per unit area) without the expense of a new design. | ||
Early semiconductor processes had arbitrary names for generations (viz., [[HMOS]] I/II/III/IV and [[CHMOS]] III/III-E/IV/V). Later each new generation process became known as a '''technology node'''<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.semiconductors.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/2003Overall-Roadmap-Technology-Characteristics.pdf|title=Overall Roadmap Technology Characteristics|publisher=[[Semiconductor Industry Association]]}}</ref> or '''process node''',<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.design-reuse.com/articles/43316/a-brief-history-of-process-node-evolution.html|title=A Brief History of Process Node Evolution|first=Priyank|last=Shukla|website=Design And Reuse}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/technology_node#:~:text=The%20technology%20node%20(also%20process,process%20and%20its%20design%20rules.&text=Generally%2C%20the%20smaller%20the%20technology,faster%20and%20more%20power-efficient.|title=Technology Node - WikiChip|access-date=2020-10-20|archive-date=2020-11-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112024930/https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/technology_node#:~:text=The%20technology%20node%20(also%20process,process%20and%20its%20design%20rules.&text=Generally%2C%20the%20smaller%20the%20technology,faster%20and%20more%20power-efficient.|url-status=live}}</ref> designated by the process' '''minimum feature size''' in [[nanometers]] (or historically [[Micrometre|micrometers]]) of the process's [[Gate (transistor)|transistor gate]] length, such as the "[[90 nm process]]". However, this has not been the case since 1994,<ref name="Moore">{{Cite web|url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/a-better-way-to-measure-progress-in-semiconductors|title=A Better Way To Measure Progress in Semiconductors|first=Samuel K.|last=Moore|website=IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News|date=21 July 2020|access-date=22 May 2022}}</ref> and the number of nanometers used to name process nodes (see the [[International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors]]) has become more of a marketing term that has no standardized relation with functional feature sizes or with transistor density (number of transistors per unit area).<ref name="ridley" >{{Cite web|url=https://www.pcgamer.com/chipmaking-process-node-naming-lmc-paper/|title=Intel 10nm isn't bigger than AMD 7nm, you're just measuring wrong|first=Jacob|last=Ridley|website=PC Gamer|date=April 29, 2020|access-date=October 21, 2020|archive-date=October 28, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201028014834/https://www.pcgamer.com/chipmaking-process-node-naming-lmc-paper/|url-status=live}}</ref> | Early semiconductor processes had arbitrary names for generations (viz., [[HMOS]] I/II/III/IV and [[CHMOS]] III/III-E/IV/V). Later each new generation process became known as a '''technology node'''<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.semiconductors.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/2003Overall-Roadmap-Technology-Characteristics.pdf|title=Overall Roadmap Technology Characteristics|publisher=[[Semiconductor Industry Association]]}}</ref> or '''process node''',<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.design-reuse.com/articles/43316/a-brief-history-of-process-node-evolution.html|title=A Brief History of Process Node Evolution|first=Priyank|last=Shukla|website=Design And Reuse}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/technology_node#:~:text=The%20technology%20node%20(also%20process,process%20and%20its%20design%20rules.&text=Generally%2C%20the%20smaller%20the%20technology,faster%20and%20more%20power-efficient.|title=Technology Node - WikiChip|access-date=2020-10-20|archive-date=2020-11-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112024930/https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/technology_node#:~:text=The%20technology%20node%20(also%20process,process%20and%20its%20design%20rules.&text=Generally%2C%20the%20smaller%20the%20technology,faster%20and%20more%20power-efficient.|url-status=live}}</ref> designated by the process' '''minimum feature size''' in [[nanometers]] (or historically [[Micrometre|micrometers]]) of the process's [[Gate (transistor)|transistor gate]] length, such as the "[[90 nm process]]". However, this has not been the case since 1994,<ref name="Moore">{{Cite web|url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/a-better-way-to-measure-progress-in-semiconductors|title=A Better Way To Measure Progress in Semiconductors|first=Samuel K.|last=Moore|website=IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News|date=21 July 2020|access-date=22 May 2022}}</ref> and the number of nanometers used to name process nodes (see the [[International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors]]) has become more of a marketing term that has no standardized relation with functional feature sizes or with transistor density (number of transistors per unit area).<ref name="ridley" >{{Cite web|url=https://www.pcgamer.com/chipmaking-process-node-naming-lmc-paper/|title=Intel 10nm isn't bigger than AMD 7nm, you're just measuring wrong|first=Jacob|last=Ridley|website=PC Gamer|date=April 29, 2020|access-date=October 21, 2020|archive-date=October 28, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201028014834/https://www.pcgamer.com/chipmaking-process-node-naming-lmc-paper/|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
Initially transistor gate length was smaller than that suggested by the process node name (e.g. 350 nm node); however this trend reversed in 2009.<ref name="Moore"/> Feature sizes can have no connection to the nanometers (nm) used in marketing. | Initially transistor gate length was smaller than that suggested by the process node name (e.g. 350 nm node); however, this trend reversed in 2009.<ref name="Moore"/> Feature sizes can have no connection to the nanometers (nm) used in marketing. | ||
For example, Intel's former [[10 nm process]] actually has features (the tips of [[FinFET]] fins) with a width of 7 nm, so the Intel 10 nm process is similar in transistor density to [[TSMC]]'s [[7 nm process]]. As another example, GlobalFoundries' 12 and 14 nm processes have similar feature sizes.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/13405/intel-10nm-cannon-lake-and-core-i3-8121u-deep-dive-review/3|title=Intel's 10nm Cannon Lake and Core i3-8121U Deep Dive Review|first=Ian|last=Cutress|website=[[AnandTech]]|access-date=2020-11-07|archive-date=2020-11-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112015437/https://www.anandtech.com/show/13405/intel-10nm-cannon-lake-and-core-i3-8121u-deep-dive-review/3|url-status= | For example, Intel's former [[10 nm process]] actually has features (the tips of [[FinFET]] fins) with a width of 7 nm, so the Intel 10 nm process is similar in transistor density to [[TSMC]]'s [[7 nm process]]. As another example, GlobalFoundries' 12 and 14 nm processes have similar feature sizes.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/13405/intel-10nm-cannon-lake-and-core-i3-8121u-deep-dive-review/3|title=Intel's 10nm Cannon Lake and Core i3-8121U Deep Dive Review|first=Ian|last=Cutress|website=[[AnandTech]]|access-date=2020-11-07|archive-date=2020-11-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112015437/https://www.anandtech.com/show/13405/intel-10nm-cannon-lake-and-core-i3-8121u-deep-dive-review/3|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url = https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/1497/vlsi-2018-globalfoundries-12nm-leading-performance-12lp/|title = VLSI 2018: GlobalFoundries 12nm Leading-Performance, 12LP|date = 22 July 2018|access-date = 20 October 2020|archive-date = 7 April 2019|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190407104112/https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/1497/vlsi-2018-globalfoundries-12nm-leading-performance-12lp/|url-status = live}}</ref><ref name="ridley" /> | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
===20th century=== | ===20th century=== | ||
[[File:1957(Figure 9)-Gate oxide transistor by Frosch and Derrick.png|thumb|245x245px|A diagram of the semiconductor oxide transistors made by Frosch and Derick in 1957<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Frosch |first1=C. J. |last2=Derick |first2=L |date=1957 |title=Surface Protection and Selective Masking during Diffusion in Silicon |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/1.2428650 |journal=Journal of the Electrochemical Society |language=en |volume=104 |issue=9 |pages=547 |doi=10.1149/1.2428650|url-access=subscription }}</ref>]] | |||
In 1955, [[Carl Frosch]] and Lincoln Derick, working at [[Bell Telephone Laboratories]], accidentally grew a layer of silicon dioxide over the silicon wafer, for which they observed surface passivation effects.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Huff |first1=Howard |last2=Riordan |first2=Michael |date=2007-09-01 |title=Frosch and Derick: Fifty Years Later (Foreword) |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/2.F02073IF |journal=The Electrochemical Society Interface |volume=16 |issue=3 |pages=29 |doi=10.1149/2.F02073IF |issn=1064-8208|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{Cite patent|number=US2802760A|title=Oxidation of semiconductive surfaces for controlled diffusion|gdate=1957-08-13|invent1=Lincoln|invent2=Frosch|inventor1-first=Derick|inventor2-first=Carl J.|url=https://patents.google.com/patent/US2802760A}}</ref> By 1957 Frosch and Derick, using masking and predeposition, were able to manufacture silicon dioxide transistors; the first planar field effect transistors, in which drain and source were adjacent at the same surface.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Frosch |first1=C. J. |last2=Derick |first2=L |date=1957 |title=Surface Protection and Selective Masking during Diffusion in Silicon |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/1.2428650 |journal=Journal of the Electrochemical Society |language=en |volume=104 |issue=9 |pages=547 |doi=10.1149/1.2428650|url-access=subscription }}</ref> At Bell Labs, the importance of their discoveries was immediately realized. Memos describing the results of their work circulated at Bell Labs before being formally published in 1957. At [[Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory|Shockley Semiconductor]], Shockley had circulated the preprint of their article in December 1956 to all his senior staff, including [[Jean Hoerni]],<ref name="Moskowitz">{{cite book |last1=Moskowitz |first1=Sanford L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2STRDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA168 |title=Advanced Materials Innovation: Managing Global Technology in the 21st century |date=2016 |publisher=[[John Wiley & Sons]] |isbn=978-0-470-50892-3 |page=168}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author1=Christophe Lécuyer |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LaZpUpkG70QC&pg=PA62 |title=Makers of the Microchip: A Documentary History of Fairchild Semiconductor |author2=David C. Brook |author3=Jay Last |date=2010 |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-01424-3 |pages=62–63}}</ref><ref>{{cite conference |last=Huff |first=Howard R. |editor-last1=Claeys |editor-first1=Cor L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bu22JNYbE5MC&pg=PA27 |title=From The Lab to The Fab: Transistors to Integrated Circuits |book-title=ULSI Process Integration III: Proceedings of the International Symposium |date=2003 |publisher=[[The Electrochemical Society]] |isbn=978-1-56677-376-8 |pages=27–30}}</ref><ref name="Lojek120">{{cite book |last1=Lojek |first1=Bo |title=History of Semiconductor Engineering |date=2007 |publisher=[[Springer Science & Business Media]] |isbn=9783540342588 |page=120}}</ref> who would later invent the [[planar process]] in 1959 while at [[Fairchild Semiconductor]].<ref>{{patent|US|3025589|Hoerni, J. A.: "Method of Manufacturing Semiconductor Devices” filed May 1, 1959}}</ref><ref>{{patent|US|3064167|Hoerni, J. A.: "Semiconductor device" filed May 15, 1960}}</ref> | |||
In 1948, | In 1948, Bardeen patented an insulated-gate transistor (IGFET) with an inversion layer; Bardeen's concept forms the basis of [[MOSFET]] technology today.<ref>{{cite conference |author=Howard R. Duff |book-title=AIP Conference Proceedings |date=2001 |volume=550 |pages=3–32 |title=John Bardeen and transistor physics |doi=10.1063/1.1354371 |doi-access=free}}</ref> An improved type of MOSFET technology, [[CMOS]], was developed by [[Chih-Tang Sah]] and [[Frank Wanlass]] at [[Fairchild Semiconductor]] in 1963.<ref name="computerhistory1963">{{cite web |title=1963: Complementary MOS Circuit Configuration is Invented |url=https://www.computerhistory.org/siliconengine/complementary-mos-circuit-configuration-is-invented/ |website=[[Computer History Museum]] |access-date=6 July 2019 |archive-date=23 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190723142758/https://www.computerhistory.org/siliconengine/complementary-mos-circuit-configuration-is-invented/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite conference |last1=Sah |first1=Chih-Tang |author1-link=Chih-Tang Sah |last2=Wanlass |first2=Frank |book-title=1963 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers |title=Nanowatt logic using field-effect metal-oxide semiconductor triodes |author2-link=Frank Wanlass |date=February 1963 |volume=VI |pages=32–33 |doi=10.1109/ISSCC.1963.1157450}}</ref> CMOS was commercialised by [[RCA Corporation|RCA]] in the late 1960s.<ref name="computerhistory1963" /> RCA commercially used CMOS for its [[4000-series integrated circuits]] in 1968, starting with a 20{{nbsp}}μm process before gradually scaling to a [[10 μm process]] over the next several years.<ref name="Lojek330">{{cite book |last1=Lojek |first1=Bo |title=History of Semiconductor Engineering |date=2007 |publisher=[[Springer Science & Business Media]] |isbn=9783540342588 |page=330 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2cu1Oh_COv8C&pg=PA330 |access-date=2019-07-21 |archive-date=2020-08-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806021239/https://books.google.com/books?id=2cu1Oh_COv8C&pg=PA330 |url-status=live }}</ref> Many early semiconductor device manufacturers developed and built their own equipment such as ion implanters.<ref name="ion-implantation-in-silicon-technology">{{cite journal |url=https://www.axcelis.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Ion_Implantation_in_Silicon_Technology.pdf |title=Ion Implantation in Silicon Technology |first1=Leonard |last1=Rubin |first2=John |last2=Poate |journal=The Industrial Physicist |volume=9 |issue=3 |date=June–July 2003 |publisher=[[American Institute of Physics]] |pages=12–15}}</ref> | ||
In 1963, [[Harold M. Manasevit]] was the first to document epitaxial growth of [[silicon on sapphire]] while working at the [[Autonetics]] division of [[North American Aviation]] (now [[Boeing]]). In 1964, he published his findings with colleague William Simpson in the ''Journal of Applied Physics''.<ref name="Manasevit_1964">{{cite journal |last1=Manasevit |first1=H. M. |last2=Simpson |first2=W. J. |title=Single-Crystal Silicon on a Sapphire Substrate |journal=[[Journal of Applied Physics]] |year=1964 |volume=35 |issue=4 |pages=1349–51 |doi=10.1063/1.1713618|bibcode=1964JAP....35.1349M }}</ref> In 1965, C.W. Mueller and P.H. Robinson fabricated a MOSFET (metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor) using the silicon-on-sapphire process at [[RCA Laboratories]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mueller |first1=C. W. |last2=Robinson |first2=P. H. |title=Grown-film silicon transistors on sapphire |journal=[[Proceedings of the IEEE]] |date=December 1964 |volume=52 |issue=12 |pages=1487–90 |doi=10.1109/PROC.1964.3436}}</ref> | In 1963, [[Harold M. Manasevit]] was the first to document epitaxial growth of [[silicon on sapphire]] while working at the [[Autonetics]] division of [[North American Aviation]] (now [[Boeing]]). In 1964, he published his findings with colleague William Simpson in the ''Journal of Applied Physics''.<ref name="Manasevit_1964">{{cite journal |last1=Manasevit |first1=H. M. |last2=Simpson |first2=W. J. |title=Single-Crystal Silicon on a Sapphire Substrate |journal=[[Journal of Applied Physics]] |year=1964 |volume=35 |issue=4 |pages=1349–51 |doi=10.1063/1.1713618|bibcode=1964JAP....35.1349M }}</ref> In 1965, C.W. Mueller and P.H. Robinson fabricated a MOSFET (metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor) using the silicon-on-sapphire process at [[RCA Laboratories]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mueller |first1=C. W. |last2=Robinson |first2=P. H. |title=Grown-film silicon transistors on sapphire |journal=[[Proceedings of the IEEE]] |date=December 1964 |volume=52 |issue=12 |pages=1487–90 |doi=10.1109/PROC.1964.3436}}</ref> | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
Wafer size has grown over time, from 25 mm (1 inch) in 1960, to 50 mm (2 inches) in 1969, 100 mm (4 inches) in 1976, 125 mm (5 inches) in 1981, 150 mm (6 inches) in 1983 and 200 mm in 1992.<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NEkPEAAAQBAJ&dq=wafer+size+increase+over+time&pg=PA35 | isbn=978-1-351-24866-2 | title=Extending Moore's Law through Advanced Semiconductor Design and Processing Techniques | date=13 September 2018 | publisher=CRC Press }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://f450c.org/infographic/ | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222155518/http://www.f450c.org/infographic/ | url-status=usurped | archive-date=December 22, 2015 | title=Evolution of the Silicon Wafer Infographic }}</ref> | Wafer size has grown over time, from 25 mm (1 inch) in 1960, to 50 mm (2 inches) in 1969, 100 mm (4 inches) in 1976, 125 mm (5 inches) in 1981, 150 mm (6 inches) in 1983 and 200 mm in 1992.<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NEkPEAAAQBAJ&dq=wafer+size+increase+over+time&pg=PA35 | isbn=978-1-351-24866-2 | title=Extending Moore's Law through Advanced Semiconductor Design and Processing Techniques | date=13 September 2018 | publisher=CRC Press }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://f450c.org/infographic/ | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222155518/http://www.f450c.org/infographic/ | url-status=usurped | archive-date=December 22, 2015 | title=Evolution of the Silicon Wafer Infographic }}</ref> | ||
In the era of 2-inch wafers, these were handled manually using tweezers and held manually for the time required for a given process. Tweezers were replaced by vacuum wands as they generate fewer particles<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iWTxDwAAQBAJ&dq=wafer+vacuum+wand&pg=PA148 | isbn=978-3-030-40021-7 | title=How Transistor Area Shrank by 1 Million Fold | date=15 July 2020 | publisher=Springer }}</ref> which can contaminate the wafers. Wafer carriers or cassettes, which can hold several wafers at once, were developed to carry several wafers between process steps, but wafers had to be individually removed from the carrier, processed and returned to the carrier, so acid-resistant carriers were developed to eliminate this time consuming process, so the entire cassette with wafers was dipped into wet etching and wet cleaning tanks. When wafer sizes increased to 100 mm, the entire cassette would often not be dipped as uniformly, and the quality of the results across the wafer became hard to control. By the time 150 mm wafers arrived, the cassettes were not dipped and were only used as wafer carriers and holders to store wafers, and robotics became prevalent for handling wafers. With 200 mm wafers manual handling of wafer cassettes becomes risky as they are heavier.<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Md1-mZ69qMQC&dq=Wafer+box+cassette&pg=PA144 | isbn=978-0-7923-9619-2 | title=Wafer Fabrication: Factory Performance and Analysis | date=30 November 1995 | publisher=Springer }}</ref> | In the era of 2-inch wafers, these were handled manually using tweezers and held manually for the time required for a given process. Tweezers were replaced by vacuum wands as they generate fewer particles<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iWTxDwAAQBAJ&dq=wafer+vacuum+wand&pg=PA148 | isbn=978-3-030-40021-7 | title=How Transistor Area Shrank by 1 Million Fold | date=15 July 2020 | publisher=Springer }}</ref> which can contaminate the wafers. Wafer carriers or cassettes, which can hold several wafers at once, were developed to carry several wafers between process steps, but wafers had to be individually removed from the carrier, processed, and returned to the carrier, so acid-resistant carriers were developed to eliminate this time consuming process, so the entire cassette with wafers was dipped into wet etching and wet cleaning tanks. When wafer sizes increased to 100 mm, the entire cassette would often not be dipped as uniformly, and the quality of the results across the wafer became hard to control. By the time 150 mm wafers arrived, the cassettes were not dipped and were only used as wafer carriers and holders to store wafers, and robotics became prevalent for handling wafers. With 200 mm wafers, manual handling of wafer cassettes becomes risky as they are heavier.<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Md1-mZ69qMQC&dq=Wafer+box+cassette&pg=PA144 | isbn=978-0-7923-9619-2 | title=Wafer Fabrication: Factory Performance and Analysis | date=30 November 1995 | publisher=Springer }}</ref> | ||
In the 1970s and 1980s, several companies migrated their semiconductor manufacturing technology from [[bipolar junction transistor|bipolar]] to MOSFET technology. Semiconductor manufacturing equipment has been considered costly since 1978.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/724-semiconductor-equipment-too-expensive-circa-1978 | title=Wafer fab costs skyrocketing out of control }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | chapter-url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10569131 | doi=10.1002/9781394297610.ch6 | chapter=The MOSFET Transistor | title=Silicon, from Sand to Chips 1 | date=2024 | pages=175–206 | publisher=Wiley | isbn=978-1-78630-921-1 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.electronicdesign.com/technologies/power/article/21801160/igbts-or-mosfets-which-is-better-for-your-design | title=IGBTs or MOSFETs: Which is Better for Your Design? | date=4 October 1999 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-future-of-transistors | title=The Future of the Transistor is Our Future - IEEE Spectrum }}</ref> | In the 1970s and 1980s, several companies migrated their semiconductor manufacturing technology from [[bipolar junction transistor|bipolar]] to MOSFET technology. Semiconductor manufacturing equipment has been considered costly since 1978.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/724-semiconductor-equipment-too-expensive-circa-1978 | title=Wafer fab costs skyrocketing out of control }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | chapter-url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10569131 | doi=10.1002/9781394297610.ch6 | chapter=The MOSFET Transistor | title=Silicon, from Sand to Chips 1 | date=2024 | pages=175–206 | publisher=Wiley | isbn=978-1-78630-921-1 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.electronicdesign.com/technologies/power/article/21801160/igbts-or-mosfets-which-is-better-for-your-design | title=IGBTs or MOSFETs: Which is Better for Your Design? | date=4 October 1999 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-future-of-transistors | title=The Future of the Transistor is Our Future - IEEE Spectrum }}</ref> | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
In 1984, [[KLA Corporation|KLA]] developed the first automatic reticle and photomask inspection tool.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/682-kla-200-series-reticle-inspection-systems | title=Kla 200 Series }}</ref> In 1985, KLA developed an automatic inspection tool for silicon wafers, which replaced manual microscope inspection.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/235-kla-tencor-kla-2020 | title=KLA 2020 - the tool that sparked the yield management revolution }}</ref> | In 1984, [[KLA Corporation|KLA]] developed the first automatic reticle and photomask inspection tool.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/682-kla-200-series-reticle-inspection-systems | title=Kla 200 Series }}</ref> In 1985, KLA developed an automatic inspection tool for silicon wafers, which replaced manual microscope inspection.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/235-kla-tencor-kla-2020 | title=KLA 2020 - the tool that sparked the yield management revolution }}</ref> | ||
In 1985, SGS (now [[STmicroelectronics]]) invented BCD, also called [[BCDMOS]], a semiconductor manufacturing process using bipolar, CMOS and [[DMOS]] devices.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/three-chips-in-one-the-history-of-the-bcd-integrated-circuit|title=Three Chips in One: The History of the BCD Integrated Circuit - IEEE Spectrum|website=[[IEEE]]}}</ref> [[Applied Materials]] developed the first practical multi chamber, or cluster wafer processing tool, the Precision 5000.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/141-applied-materials-precision-5000-cvd | title=Applied Materials Precision 5000 CVD System }}</ref> | In 1985, SGS (now [[STmicroelectronics]]) invented BCD, also called [[BCDMOS]], a semiconductor manufacturing process using bipolar, CMOS and [[DMOS]] devices.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/three-chips-in-one-the-history-of-the-bcd-integrated-circuit|title=Three Chips in One: The History of the BCD Integrated Circuit - IEEE Spectrum|website=[[IEEE]]}}</ref> [[Applied Materials]] developed the first practical multi-chamber, or cluster wafer processing tool, the Precision 5000.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/141-applied-materials-precision-5000-cvd | title=Applied Materials Precision 5000 CVD System }}</ref> | ||
Until the 1980s, physical vapor deposition was the primary technique used for depositing materials onto wafers, until the advent of chemical vapor deposition.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/110-mrc-series-900-in-line-sputtering-system | title=Series 900 In-Line Sputtering System by MRC }}</ref> Equipment with diffusion pumps was replaced with those using turbomolecular | Until the 1980s, physical vapor deposition was the primary technique used for depositing materials onto wafers, until the advent of chemical vapor deposition.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/110-mrc-series-900-in-line-sputtering-system | title=Series 900 In-Line Sputtering System by MRC }}</ref> Equipment with diffusion pumps was replaced with those using [[turbomolecular pump]]s, as the latter do not use oil, which often contaminates wafers during processing in vacuum.<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i_brZUv8JEYC&dq=turbomolecular+pump+replaced+diffusion+pump&pg=PA72 | isbn=978-1-4377-7868-7 | title=Vacuum Deposition onto Webs, Films and Foils | date=21 June 2011 | publisher=William Andrew }}</ref> | ||
200 mm diameter wafers were first used in 1990 and became the standard until the introduction of 300 mm diameter wafers in 2000.<ref>{{Cite conference | 200 mm diameter wafers were first used in 1990 and became the standard until the introduction of 300 mm diameter wafers in 2000.<ref>{{Cite conference|title=The world's first 300 mm fab at Infineon - challenges and success |book-title=Proceedings of ISSM2000. Ninth International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37130) |doi=10.1109/ISSM.2000.993612 |s2cid=109383925 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.edn.com/the-300mm-era-begins/ | title=The 300mm Era Begins | date=10 July 2000 }}</ref> Bridge tools were used in the transition from 150 mm wafers to 200 mm wafers<ref name="auto12">{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/711-applied-materials-introduces-producer-wafer-fab-system | title=Applied Materials Producer }}</ref> and in the transition from 200 mm to 300 mm wafers.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.chiphistory.org/878-300mm-semiconductor-wafers-get-a-reprieve|title=300mm Semiconductor Wafers get a reprieve|website=Chip History}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.eetimes.com/novellus-offers-300-mm-cvd-tool-thats-smaller-than-200-mm-lower-costs/ | title=Novellus offers 300-mm CVD tool that's smaller than 200-mm, lower costs | date=10 July 2000 }}</ref> The semiconductor industry has adopted larger wafers to cope with the increased demand for chips as larger wafers provide more surface area per wafer.<ref>{{cite conference|url=https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/449/1/97/975569/Model-based-silicon-wafer-criteria-for-optimal|title=Model-based silicon wafer criteria for optimal integrated circuit performance|first1=Howard R. |last1=Huff |first2=Randal K. |last2=Goodall |first3=W. Murray |last3=Bullis |first4=James A. |last4=Moreland |first5=Fritz G. |last5=Kirscht |first6=Syd R. |last6=Wilson |author7=The NTRS Starting Materials Team |book-title=AIP Conference Proceedings |volume=449 |issue=1 |pages=97–112 |date=24 November 1998 |doi=10.1063/1.56795|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Over time, the industry shifted to 300 mm wafers which brought along the adoption of FOUPs,<ref name="auto11">{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3S-GDwAAQBAJ&dq=before+smif+wafers&pg=PT40 | title=Wafer Fabrication: Automatic Material Handling System | isbn=978-3-11-048723-7 | last1=Zhang | first1=Jie | date=24 September 2018 | publisher=Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG }}</ref> but many products that are not advanced are still produced in 200 mm wafers such as analog ICs, RF chips, power ICs, BCDMOS and [[MEMS]] devices.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://semiengineering.com/200mm-fab-crunch/|title=200mm Fab Crunch|first=Mark|last=LaPedus|date=May 21, 2018|website=Semiconductor Engineering}}</ref> | ||
Some processes such as cleaning,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.eetimes.com/the-future-of-batch-and-single-wafer-processing-in-wafer-cleaning/ |title=The future of batch and single-wafer processing in wafer cleaning |first=Scott |last=Becker |date=24 March 2003 |website=[[EE Times]]}}</ref> ion implantation,<ref>{{cite conference | Some processes such as cleaning,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.eetimes.com/the-future-of-batch-and-single-wafer-processing-in-wafer-cleaning/ |title=The future of batch and single-wafer processing in wafer cleaning |first=Scott |last=Becker |date=24 March 2003 |website=[[EE Times]]}}</ref> ion implantation,<ref>{{cite conference | title=Manufacturing advantages of single wafer high current ion implantation |book-title=Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Ion Implantation Technology | doi=10.1109/IIT.1996.586424 | s2cid=70599233 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | url=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2005.05.016 | doi=10.1016/j.nimb.2005.05.016 | title=Approaches to single wafer high current ion implantation | date=2005 | last1=Renau | first1=A. | journal=Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms | volume=237 | issue=1–2 | pages=284–289 | bibcode=2005NIMPB.237..284R | url-access=subscription }}</ref> etching,<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xQ3yBwAAQBAJ&dq=batch+plasma+etching&pg=PA199 | isbn=978-1-4899-2566-4 | title=Dry Etching for VLSI | date=29 June 2013 | publisher=Springer }}</ref> annealing<ref>{{cite journal | url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1557/PROC-470-201 | doi=10.1557/PROC-470-201 | title=Understanding the Impact of Batch vs. Single Wafer in Thermal Processing Using Cost of Ownership Analysis | date=1997 | last1=Hossain-Pas | first1=S. | last2=Pas | first2=M. F. | journal=MRS Proceedings | volume=470 | article-number=201 | url-access=subscription }}</ref> and oxidation<ref>{{cite journal | title=Contrasting single-wafer and batch processing for memory devices |journal=IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing | date=2003 |volume=16 |issue=2 | doi=10.1109/TSM.2003.810939 | last1=Weimer | first1=R.A. | last2=Eppich | first2=D.M. | last3=Beaman | first3=K.L. | last4=Powell | first4=D.C. | last5=Gonzalez | first5=F. | pages=138–146 |bibcode=2003ITSM...16..138W }}</ref> started to adopt single wafer processing instead of batch wafer processing to improve the reproducibility of results.<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TzL5aUslKDUC&dq=batch+single+wafer+etching&pg=PA309 | isbn=978-0-470-02056-2 | title=Introduction to Microfabrication | date=28 January 2005 | publisher=John Wiley & Sons }}</ref><ref>{{cite conference | title=Trends in single-wafer processing |book-title=1992 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers | doi=10.1109/VLSIT.1992.200629 | s2cid=110840307 }}</ref> A similar trend existed in MEMS manufacturing.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.cmmmagazine.com/mems/single-wafer-vs-batch-wafer-processing-in-mems-manufacturing/ | title=Single Wafer vs Batch Wafer Processing in MEMS Manufacturing | date=2 August 2016 | access-date=18 February 2024 | archive-date=18 February 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240218221103/https://www.cmmmagazine.com/mems/single-wafer-vs-batch-wafer-processing-in-mems-manufacturing/ | url-status=dead }}</ref> In 1998, Applied Materials introduced the Producer, a cluster tool that had chambers grouped in pairs for processing wafers, which shared common vacuum and supply lines but were otherwise isolated, which was revolutionary at the time as it offered higher productivity than other cluster tools without sacrificing quality, due to the isolated chamber design.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.chiphistory.org/712-applied-materials-producer-a-new-revolution-is-upon-us|title=Applied Materials Producer - a new revolution is upon us|website=Chip History}}</ref><ref name="auto12"/> | ||
===21st century=== | ===21st century=== | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
[[File:Semiconductor photomask.jpg|thumb|Semiconductor photomask or reticle]] | [[File:Semiconductor photomask.jpg|thumb|Semiconductor photomask or reticle]] | ||
Since 2009, "node" has become a commercial name for marketing purposes that indicates new generations of process technologies, without any relation to gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.design-reuse.com/articles/43316/a-brief-history-of-process-node-evolution.html|title=A Brief History of Process Node Evolution|last=Shukla|first=Priyank|website=design-reuse.com|access-date=2019-07-09|archive-date=2019-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190709064439/https://www.design-reuse.com/articles/43316/a-brief-history-of-process-node-evolution.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.extremetech.com/computing/184946-14nm-7nm-5nm-how-low-can-cmos-go-it-depends-if-you-ask-the-engineers-or-the-economists|title=14nm, 7nm, 5nm: How low can CMOS go? It depends if you ask the engineers or the economists…|last=Hruska|first=Joel|website=[[ExtremeTech]]|date=23 June 2014 |access-date=2019-07-09|archive-date=2019-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190709064438/https://www.extremetech.com/computing/184946-14nm-7nm-5nm-how-low-can-cmos-go-it-depends-if-you-ask-the-engineers-or-the-economists|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://wccftech.com/intel-losing-process-lead-analysis-7nm-2022/|title=Exclusive: Is Intel Really Starting To Lose Its Process Lead? 7nm Node Slated For Release in 2022|website=wccftech.com|date=2016-09-10|access-date=2019-07-09|archive-date=2019-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190709064438/https://wccftech.com/intel-losing-process-lead-analysis-7nm-2022/|url-status=live}}</ref> For example, [[GlobalFoundries]]' [[7 nm]] process was similar to Intel's [[10 nm process]], thus the conventional notion of a process node has become blurred.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.eejournal.com/article/life-at-10nm-or-is-it-7nm-and-3nm/|title=Life at 10nm. (Or is it 7nm?) And 3nm - Views on Advanced Silicon Platforms|website=eejournal.com|date=2018-03-12|access-date=2019-07-09|archive-date=2019-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190709064439/https://www.eejournal.com/article/life-at-10nm-or-is-it-7nm-and-3nm/|url-status=live}}</ref> Additionally, TSMC and Samsung's 10 nm processes are only slightly denser than Intel's 14 nm in transistor density. They are actually much closer to Intel's 14 nm process than they are to Intel's 10 nm process (e.g. Samsung's 10 nm processes' fin pitch is the | Since 2009, "node" has become a commercial name for marketing purposes that indicates new generations of process technologies, without any relation to gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.design-reuse.com/articles/43316/a-brief-history-of-process-node-evolution.html|title=A Brief History of Process Node Evolution|last=Shukla|first=Priyank|website=design-reuse.com|access-date=2019-07-09|archive-date=2019-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190709064439/https://www.design-reuse.com/articles/43316/a-brief-history-of-process-node-evolution.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.extremetech.com/computing/184946-14nm-7nm-5nm-how-low-can-cmos-go-it-depends-if-you-ask-the-engineers-or-the-economists|title=14nm, 7nm, 5nm: How low can CMOS go? It depends if you ask the engineers or the economists…|last=Hruska|first=Joel|website=[[ExtremeTech]]|date=23 June 2014 |access-date=2019-07-09|archive-date=2019-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190709064438/https://www.extremetech.com/computing/184946-14nm-7nm-5nm-how-low-can-cmos-go-it-depends-if-you-ask-the-engineers-or-the-economists|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://wccftech.com/intel-losing-process-lead-analysis-7nm-2022/|title=Exclusive: Is Intel Really Starting To Lose Its Process Lead? 7nm Node Slated For Release in 2022|website=wccftech.com|date=2016-09-10|access-date=2019-07-09|archive-date=2019-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190709064438/https://wccftech.com/intel-losing-process-lead-analysis-7nm-2022/|url-status=live}}</ref> For example, [[GlobalFoundries]]' [[7 nm]] process was similar to Intel's [[10 nm process]], thus the conventional notion of a process node has become blurred.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.eejournal.com/article/life-at-10nm-or-is-it-7nm-and-3nm/|title=Life at 10nm. (Or is it 7nm?) And 3nm - Views on Advanced Silicon Platforms|website=eejournal.com|date=2018-03-12|access-date=2019-07-09|archive-date=2019-07-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190709064439/https://www.eejournal.com/article/life-at-10nm-or-is-it-7nm-and-3nm/|url-status=live}}</ref> Additionally, TSMC and Samsung's 10 nm processes are only slightly denser than Intel's 14 nm in transistor density. They are actually much closer to Intel's 14 nm process than they are to Intel's 10 nm process (e.g. Samsung's 10 nm processes' fin pitch is the same as that of Intel's 14 nm process: 42 nm).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/10_nm_lithography_process#Industry|title=10 nm lithography process - WikiChip|website=en.wikichip.org|access-date=2019-08-17|archive-date=2019-07-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190701083338/https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/10_nm_lithography_process#Industry|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/14_nm_lithography_process#Industry|title=14 nm lithography process - WikiChip|website=en.wikichip.org|access-date=2019-08-17|archive-date=2019-07-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190701083339/https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/14_nm_lithography_process#Industry|url-status=live}}</ref> Intel has changed the name of its 10 nm process to position it as a 7 nm process.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/16823/intel-accelerated-offensive-process-roadmap-updates-to-10nm-7nm-4nm-3nm-20a-18a-packaging-foundry-emib-foveros | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210726210347/https://www.anandtech.com/show/16823/intel-accelerated-offensive-process-roadmap-updates-to-10nm-7nm-4nm-3nm-20a-18a-packaging-foundry-emib-foveros | url-status=dead | archive-date=July 26, 2021 | title=Intel's Process Roadmap to 2025: With 4nm, 3nm, 20A and 18A?! | last=Cutress | first=Ian | website=[[AnandTech]]}}</ref> As transistors become smaller, new effects start to influence design decisions, such as self-heating of the transistors, and other effects, such as electromigration, have become more evident since the 16nm node.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://semiengineering.com/chip-aging-becomes-design-problem/|title=Chip Aging Becomes Design Problem|first=Brian|last=Bailey|date=August 9, 2018|website=Semiconductor Engineering}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://semiengineering.com/will-self-heating-stop-finfets/|title=Will Self-Heating Stop FinFETs|first=Katherine|last=Derbyshire|date=April 20, 2017|website=Semiconductor Engineering}}</ref> | ||
In 2011, [[Intel]] demonstrated [[Fin field-effect transistor]]s (FinFETs), where the gate surrounds the channel on three sides, allowing for increased energy efficiency and lower gate delay—and thus greater performance—over planar transistors at the 22nm node, because planar transistors which only have one surface acting as a channel, started to suffer from short channel effects.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://semiengineering.com/knowledge_centers/integrated-circuit/transistors/3d/finfet-3/ | title=FinFET }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/foundries-rush-3d-transistors | title=Foundries Rush 3-D Transistors - IEEE Spectrum }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://download.intel.com/newsroom/kits/22nm/pdfs/22nm-Details_Presentation.pdf|title=Intel's Revolutionary 22 nm Transistor Technology|last1=Bohr|first1=Mark|last2=Mistry|first2=Kaizad|date=May 2011|website=intel.com|access-date=April 18, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.techradar.com/news/computing-components/processors/intel-s-tri-gate-transistors-everything-you-need-to-know-952572|title=Intel's Tri-Gate transistors: everything you need to know|last=Grabham|first=Dan|date=May 6, 2011|work=TechRadar|access-date=April 19, 2018}}</ref><ref> | In 2011, [[Intel]] demonstrated [[Fin field-effect transistor]]s (FinFETs), where the gate surrounds the channel on three sides, allowing for increased energy efficiency and lower gate delay—and thus greater performance—over planar transistors at the 22nm node, because planar transistors which only have one surface acting as a channel, started to suffer from short channel effects.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://semiengineering.com/knowledge_centers/integrated-circuit/transistors/3d/finfet-3/ | title=FinFET }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/foundries-rush-3d-transistors | title=Foundries Rush 3-D Transistors - IEEE Spectrum }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://download.intel.com/newsroom/kits/22nm/pdfs/22nm-Details_Presentation.pdf|title=Intel's Revolutionary 22 nm Transistor Technology|last1=Bohr|first1=Mark|last2=Mistry|first2=Kaizad|date=May 2011|website=intel.com|access-date=April 18, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.techradar.com/news/computing-components/processors/intel-s-tri-gate-transistors-everything-you-need-to-know-952572|title=Intel's Tri-Gate transistors: everything you need to know|last=Grabham|first=Dan|date=May 6, 2011|work=TechRadar|access-date=April 19, 2018}}</ref><ref> | ||
{{cite journal |doi=10.1109/MM.2017.4241347|title=CMOS Scaling Trends and Beyond|journal=IEEE Micro|volume=37|issue=6|pages=20–29|year=2017|last1=Bohr|first1=Mark T.|last2=Young|first2=Ian A. | {{cite journal |doi=10.1109/MM.2017.4241347|title=CMOS Scaling Trends and Beyond|journal=IEEE Micro|volume=37|issue=6|pages=20–29|year=2017|last1=Bohr|first1=Mark T.|last2=Young|first2=Ian A. | ||
|s2cid=6700881|quote=The next major transistor innovation was the introduction of FinFET (tri-gate) transistors on Intel's 22-nm technology in 2011.}} | |bibcode=2017IMicr..37f..20B |s2cid=6700881|quote=The next major transistor innovation was the introduction of FinFET (tri-gate) transistors on Intel's 22-nm technology in 2011.}} | ||
</ref> A startup called SuVolta created a technology called Deeply Depleted Channel (DDC) to compete with FinFET transistors | </ref> A startup called SuVolta created a technology called Deeply Depleted Channel (DDC) to compete with FinFET transistors; it uses very lightly doped planar transistors at the 65 nm node.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/startup-seeks-new-life-for-planar-transistors | title=Start-up Seeks New Life for Planar Transistors - IEEE Spectrum }}</ref> | ||
By 2018, a number of transistor architectures had been proposed for the eventual replacement of [[FinFET]], most of which were based on the concept of [[GAAFET]]:<ref>{{cite web | url=https://semiengineering.com/the-increasingly-uneven-race-to-3nm-2nm/ | title=The Increasingly Uneven Race to 3nm/2nm | date=24 May 2021 }}</ref> horizontal and vertical nanowires, horizontal nanosheet transistors<ref>{{cite web | url=https://semiengineering.com/whats-different-about-next-gen-transistors/ | title=What's Different About Next-Gen Transistors | date=20 October 2022 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/amp/intels-stacked-nanosheet-transistors-could-be-the-next-step-in-moores-law-2652903505 | title=Intel's Stacked Nanosheet Transistors Could be the Next Step in Moore's Law }}</ref> (Samsung MBCFET, Intel Nanoribbon), vertical FET (VFET) and other vertical transistors,<ref>{{cite web | url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/amp/nanowire-transistors-could-keep-moores-law-alive-2650269271 | title=Nanowire Transistors Could Keep Moore's Law Alive }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://physicsworld.com/a/nanowires-give-vertical-transistors-a-boost/ | title=Nanowires give vertical transistors a boost | date=2 August 2012 }}</ref> complementary FET (CFET), stacked FET, vertical TFETs, FinFETs with III-V semiconductor materials (III-V FinFET),<ref>{{cite web | url=https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/07/itrs-roadmap-2021-moores-law/?amp=1 | title=Transistors will stop shrinking in 2021, but Moore's law will live on | date=25 July 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.extremetech.com/science/162376-7nm-5nm-3nm-the-new-materials-and-transistors-that-will-take-us-to-the-limits-of-moores-law|title=7nm, 5nm, 3nm: The new materials and transistors that will take us to the limits of Moore's law | Extremetech|date=26 July 2013 }}</ref> several kinds of horizontal gate-all-around transistors such as nano-ring, hexagonal wire, square wire, and round wire gate-all-around transistors<ref>{{cite web | url=https://semiengineering.com/whats-after-finfets/ | title=What's After FinFETs? | date=24 July 2017 }}</ref> and negative-capacitance FET (NC-FET) which uses drastically different materials.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://semiengineering.com/transistor-options-beyond-3nm/ | title=Transistor Options Beyond 3nm | date=15 February 2018 }}</ref> FD-SOI was seen as a potential low cost alternative to FinFETs.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.eetimes.com/samsung-gf-ramp-fd-soi/ | title=Samsung, GF Ramp FD-SOI | date=27 April 2018 }}</ref> | By 2018, a number of transistor architectures had been proposed for the eventual replacement of [[FinFET]], most of which were based on the concept of [[GAAFET]]:<ref>{{cite web | url=https://semiengineering.com/the-increasingly-uneven-race-to-3nm-2nm/ | title=The Increasingly Uneven Race to 3nm/2nm | date=24 May 2021 }}</ref> horizontal and vertical nanowires, horizontal nanosheet transistors<ref>{{cite web | url=https://semiengineering.com/whats-different-about-next-gen-transistors/ | title=What's Different About Next-Gen Transistors | date=20 October 2022 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/amp/intels-stacked-nanosheet-transistors-could-be-the-next-step-in-moores-law-2652903505 | title=Intel's Stacked Nanosheet Transistors Could be the Next Step in Moore's Law }}</ref> (Samsung MBCFET, Intel Nanoribbon), vertical FET (VFET) and other vertical transistors,<ref>{{cite web | url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/amp/nanowire-transistors-could-keep-moores-law-alive-2650269271 | title=Nanowire Transistors Could Keep Moore's Law Alive }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://physicsworld.com/a/nanowires-give-vertical-transistors-a-boost/ | title=Nanowires give vertical transistors a boost | date=2 August 2012 }}</ref> complementary FET (CFET), stacked FET, vertical TFETs, FinFETs with III-V semiconductor materials (III-V FinFET),<ref>{{cite web | url=https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/07/itrs-roadmap-2021-moores-law/?amp=1 | title=Transistors will stop shrinking in 2021, but Moore's law will live on | date=25 July 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.extremetech.com/science/162376-7nm-5nm-3nm-the-new-materials-and-transistors-that-will-take-us-to-the-limits-of-moores-law|title=7nm, 5nm, 3nm: The new materials and transistors that will take us to the limits of Moore's law | Extremetech|date=26 July 2013 }}</ref> several kinds of horizontal gate-all-around transistors such as nano-ring, hexagonal wire, square wire, and round wire gate-all-around transistors<ref>{{cite web | url=https://semiengineering.com/whats-after-finfets/ | title=What's After FinFETs? | date=24 July 2017 }}</ref> and negative-capacitance FET (NC-FET) which uses drastically different materials.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://semiengineering.com/transistor-options-beyond-3nm/ | title=Transistor Options Beyond 3nm | date=15 February 2018 }}</ref> FD-SOI was seen as a potential low cost alternative to FinFETs.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.eetimes.com/samsung-gf-ramp-fd-soi/ | title=Samsung, GF Ramp FD-SOI | date=27 April 2018 }}</ref> | ||
As of 2019, [[14 nanometer]] and [[10 nanometer]] chips are in mass production by Intel, [[United Microelectronics Corporation|UMC]], TSMC, Samsung, [[Micron Technology|Micron]], [[SK Hynix]], [[Toshiba Memory]] and GlobalFoundries, with [[7 nanometer]] process chips in mass production by TSMC and Samsung, although their 7 nanometer node definition is similar to Intel's 10 nanometer process. The [[5 nanometer]] process began being produced by Samsung in 2018.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/14231/samsung-completes-development-of-5-nm-euv-process-technology|title=Samsung Completes Development of 5nm EUV Process Technology|last=Shilov|first=Anton|website=[[AnandTech]]|access-date=2019-05-31|archive-date=2019-04-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190420144452/https://www.anandtech.com/show/14231/samsung-completes-development-of-5-nm-euv-process-technology|url-status= | As of 2019, [[14 nanometer]] and [[10 nanometer]] chips are in mass production by Intel, [[United Microelectronics Corporation|UMC]], TSMC, Samsung, [[Micron Technology|Micron]], [[SK Hynix]], [[Toshiba Memory]] and GlobalFoundries, with [[7 nanometer]] process chips in mass production by TSMC and Samsung, although their 7 nanometer node definition is similar to Intel's 10 nanometer process. The [[5 nanometer]] process began being produced by Samsung in 2018.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/14231/samsung-completes-development-of-5-nm-euv-process-technology|title=Samsung Completes Development of 5nm EUV Process Technology|last=Shilov|first=Anton|website=[[AnandTech]]|access-date=2019-05-31|archive-date=2019-04-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190420144452/https://www.anandtech.com/show/14231/samsung-completes-development-of-5-nm-euv-process-technology|url-status=dead}}</ref> As of 2019, the node with the highest [[transistor density]] is TSMC's 5{{nbsp}}nanometer N5 node,<ref>{{cite web |last1=Cheng |first1=Godfrey |title=Moore's Law is not Dead |url=https://www.tsmc.com/english/news-events/blog-article-20190814 |website=TSMC Blog |publisher=[[TSMC]] |date=14 August 2019 |access-date=25 September 2023}}</ref> with a density of 171.3{{nbsp}}million transistors per square millimeter.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/2207/tsmc-starts-5-nanometer-risk-production/|title=TSMC Starts 5-Nanometer Risk Production|last=Schor|first=David|date=2019-04-06|website=WikiChip Fuse|language=en-US|access-date=2019-04-07|archive-date=2020-05-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200505020415/https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/2207/tsmc-starts-5-nanometer-risk-production/|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2019, Samsung and TSMC announced plans to produce [[3 nanometer]] nodes. GlobalFoundries has decided to stop the development of new nodes beyond 12 nanometers to save resources, as it has determined that setting up a new fab to handle sub-12 nm orders would be beyond the company's financial abilities.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/13277/globalfoundries-stops-all-7nm-development|title=GlobalFoundries Stops All 7nm Development: Opts To Focus on Specialized Processes|first1=Anton|last1=Shilov|first2=Ian|last2=Cutress|website=[[AnandTech]]|access-date=2019-10-12|archive-date=2019-10-12|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191012175428/https://www.anandtech.com/show/13277/globalfoundries-stops-all-7nm-development|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
From 2020 to 2023, there was a [[Global chip shortage (2020–2023)|global chip shortage]]. During this shortage caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, many semiconductor manufacturers banned employees from leaving company grounds.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2021/06/25/taiwan-chipmakers-keep-workers-imprisoned-factories-keep-global/ | title=Taiwan chipmakers keep workers 'imprisoned' in factories to keep up with global pandemic demand | newspaper=The Telegraph | date=July 2021 | last1=Smith | first1=Nicola | last2=Liu | first2=John }}</ref> Many countries granted subsidies to semiconductor companies for building new fabrication plants or fabs. Many companies were affected by counterfeit chips.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/06/chip-shortages-lead-to-more-counterfeit-chips-and-devices/?amp=1 | title=Chip shortages lead to more counterfeit chips and devices | date=14 June 2021 }}</ref> Semiconductors have become vital to the world economy and the national security of some countries.<ref>{{cite interview|url=https://www.weforum.org/podcasts/radio-davos/episodes/silicon-chips-semiconductors-chris-miller/|title=What are semiconductors, and why are they vital to the global economy?|first=Chris|last=Miller|website=[[World Economic Forum]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/06/14/global-subsidies-semiconductors-shortage/|title=Countries lavish subsidies and perks on semiconductor manufacturers as a global chip war heats up|first=Jeanne|last=Whalen|date=June 14, 2021|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-launching-semiconductor-supply-chain-review-boost-national-security-2023-12-21/|title=China import concerns spur US to launch semiconductor supply chain review|first=David|last=Shepardson|date=December 21, 2023|website=Reuters}}</ref> The US has asked TSMC to not produce semiconductors for Huawei, a Chinese company.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.ft.com/content/6ab43e94-fca8-11e9-a354-36acbbb0d9b6 | title=US urges Taiwan to curb chip exports to China | newspaper=Financial Times | date=3 November 2019 | last1=Hille | first1=Kathrin }}</ref> CFET transistors were explored, which stacks NMOS and PMOS transistors on top of each other. Two approaches were evaluated for constructing these transistors: a monolithic approach which built both types of transistors in one process, and a sequential approach which built the two types of transistors separately and then stacked them.<ref name="auto10">{{cite web | url=https://semiwiki.com/events/300552-vlsi-technology-forum-short-course-logic-devices/ | title=VLSI Symposium - TSMC and Imec on Advanced Process and Devices Technology Toward 2nm | date=25 February 2024 }}</ref> | From 2020 to 2023, there was a [[Global chip shortage (2020–2023)|global chip shortage]]. During this shortage caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, many semiconductor manufacturers banned employees from leaving company grounds.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2021/06/25/taiwan-chipmakers-keep-workers-imprisoned-factories-keep-global/ | title=Taiwan chipmakers keep workers 'imprisoned' in factories to keep up with global pandemic demand | newspaper=The Telegraph | date=July 2021 | last1=Smith | first1=Nicola | last2=Liu | first2=John }}</ref> Many countries granted subsidies to semiconductor companies for building new fabrication plants or fabs. Many companies were affected by counterfeit chips.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/06/chip-shortages-lead-to-more-counterfeit-chips-and-devices/?amp=1 | title=Chip shortages lead to more counterfeit chips and devices | date=14 June 2021 }}</ref> Semiconductors have become vital to the world economy and the national security of some countries.<ref>{{cite interview|url=https://www.weforum.org/podcasts/radio-davos/episodes/silicon-chips-semiconductors-chris-miller/|title=What are semiconductors, and why are they vital to the global economy?|first=Chris|last=Miller|website=[[World Economic Forum]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/06/14/global-subsidies-semiconductors-shortage/|title=Countries lavish subsidies and perks on semiconductor manufacturers as a global chip war heats up|first=Jeanne|last=Whalen|date=June 14, 2021|newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-launching-semiconductor-supply-chain-review-boost-national-security-2023-12-21/|title=China import concerns spur US to launch semiconductor supply chain review|first=David|last=Shepardson|date=December 21, 2023|website=Reuters}}</ref> The US has asked TSMC to not produce semiconductors for Huawei, a Chinese company.<ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.ft.com/content/6ab43e94-fca8-11e9-a354-36acbbb0d9b6 | title=US urges Taiwan to curb chip exports to China | newspaper=Financial Times | date=3 November 2019 | last1=Hille | first1=Kathrin }}</ref> CFET transistors were explored, which stacks NMOS and PMOS transistors on top of each other. Two approaches were evaluated for constructing these transistors: a monolithic approach which built both types of transistors in one process, and a sequential approach which built the two types of transistors separately and then stacked them.<ref name="auto10">{{cite web | url=https://semiwiki.com/events/300552-vlsi-technology-forum-short-course-logic-devices/ | title=VLSI Symposium - TSMC and Imec on Advanced Process and Devices Technology Toward 2nm | date=25 February 2024 }}</ref> | ||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
*** Photoresist coating (often as a liquid, on the entire wafer) | *** Photoresist coating (often as a liquid, on the entire wafer) | ||
*** Photoresist baking (solidification in an oven) | *** Photoresist baking (solidification in an oven) | ||
*** Edge bead removal<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FgDmEAAAQBAJ&dq=photoresist+edge+bead+removal&pg=PA1439 | isbn=978-981-99-2836-1 | title=Handbook of Integrated Circuit Industry | date=27 November 2023 | publisher=Springer }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | *** Edge bead removal<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FgDmEAAAQBAJ&dq=photoresist+edge+bead+removal&pg=PA1439 | isbn=978-981-99-2836-1 | title=Handbook of Integrated Circuit Industry | date=27 November 2023 | publisher=Springer }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|title=An Investigation of Edge Bead Removal Width Variability, Effects and Process Control in Photolithographic Manufacturing |journal=IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing |volume=35 |issue=1 |date=February 2022 |doi=10.1109/TSM.2021.3129770 |s2cid=244560651 |last1=Reiter |first1=Tamas |last2=McCann |first2=Michael |last3=Connolly |first3=James |last4=Haughey |first4=Sean |pages=60–66 |bibcode=2022ITSM...35...60R }}</ref> | ||
*** Exposure (in a photolithography [[stepper]], scanner or [[Aligner (semiconductor)|mask aligner]]) | *** Exposure (in a photolithography [[stepper]], scanner or [[Aligner (semiconductor)|mask aligner]]) | ||
*** Post Exposure Baking (PEB) improves the durability of the photoresist | *** Post-Exposure Baking (PEB) improves the durability of the photoresist | ||
*** Development (removal of parts of the resist by application of a liquid developer, leaving only parts of the wafer exposed for ion implantation, layer deposition, etching, etc) | *** Development (removal of parts of the resist by application of a liquid developer, leaving only parts of the wafer exposed for ion implantation, layer deposition, etching, etc) | ||
** [[Hardmask]] creation | ** [[Hardmask]] creation | ||
** [[Ion implantation]] (in which [[dopant]]s are embedded in the wafer creating regions of increased or decreased conductivity) | ** [[Ion implantation]] (in which [[dopant]]s are embedded in the wafer, creating regions of increased or decreased conductivity) | ||
**[[Etching (microfabrication)]] | **[[Etching (microfabrication)]] | ||
*** [[Dry etching]] ([[plasma etching]]) | *** [[Dry etching]] ([[plasma etching]]) | ||
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
*** [[Molecular beam epitaxy]] (MBE)<ref name=UTP_1>{{cite web| title=Unlocking the Potential of Molecular Beam Epitaxy| author=Pelé, A-F.| url=https://www.eetimes.eu/unlocking-the-potential-of-molecular-beam-epitaxy| publisher=AspenCore| date=29 March 2022| access-date=8 January 2024}}</ref> | *** [[Molecular beam epitaxy]] (MBE)<ref name=UTP_1>{{cite web| title=Unlocking the Potential of Molecular Beam Epitaxy| author=Pelé, A-F.| url=https://www.eetimes.eu/unlocking-the-potential-of-molecular-beam-epitaxy| publisher=AspenCore| date=29 March 2022| access-date=8 January 2024}}</ref> | ||
** Ion beam deposition<ref name=IBD_1>{{cite web|url=https://sst.semiconductor-digest.com/2008/11/ion-beam-deposition-goes-300mm-with-avizas-new-tool|title=Ion beam deposition goes 300mm with Aviza's new tool| author=Vogler, D.| publisher=Gold Flag Media| date=19 November 2008| access-date=8 January 2024}}</ref> | ** Ion beam deposition<ref name=IBD_1>{{cite web|url=https://sst.semiconductor-digest.com/2008/11/ion-beam-deposition-goes-300mm-with-avizas-new-tool|title=Ion beam deposition goes 300mm with Aviza's new tool| author=Vogler, D.| publisher=Gold Flag Media| date=19 November 2008| access-date=8 January 2024}}</ref> | ||
** [[Plasma ashing]] (for complete photoresist removal/photoresist stripping, also known as dry strip,<ref>{{Cite book | ** [[Plasma ashing]] (for complete photoresist removal/photoresist stripping, also known as dry strip,<ref>{{Cite conference|book-title=2017 28th Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC)|doi=10.1109/ASMC.2017.7969207 |title=Characterization of thin carbonized photoresist layer and investigation of dry strip process through real-time monitored variable temperature control |date=2017 |last1=Ryu |first1=Je Hyeok |last2=Kim |first2=Byoung Hoon |last3=Yoon |first3=Sung Jin |pages=102–106 |isbn=978-1-5090-5448-0 }}</ref> historically done with a chemical solvent called a resist stripper,<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZzGoBQAAQBAJ&dq=photoresist+dry+strip&pg=PA8|title=Plasma Processing for VLSI|first1=Norman G.|last1=Einspruch|first2=Dale M.|last2=Brown|date=December 1, 2014|publisher=Academic Press|isbn=978-1-4832-1775-8 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref name=ASP_1>{{cite book| title=Aqueous Single Pass Single Wafer AI/Via Cleaning| author1=Verhaverbeke, S.| author2=Beaudry, C.| author3=Boelen, P.| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KSr1FWUgvz4C&dq=photoresist+dry+strip&pg=PA23| publisher=[[Electrochemical Society]]| pages=23–26| date=2004| isbn=978-1-56677-411-6| access-date=8 January 2024}}</ref> to allow wafers to undergo another round of photolithography) | ||
** Thermal treatments | ** Thermal treatments | ||
*** Rapid thermal processing (RTP), [[rapid thermal anneal]] | *** Rapid thermal processing (RTP), [[rapid thermal anneal]] | ||
| Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
*** [[Thermal oxidation]] | *** [[Thermal oxidation]] | ||
**** [[LOCOS]] | **** [[LOCOS]] | ||
** Laser lift-off (for [[LED]] production<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.disco.co.jp/eg/news/press/20151207.html|title=Laser Lift-Off(LLO) Ideal for high brightness vertical LED manufacturing - Press Release - DISCO Corporation|website=www.disco.co.jp|access-date=2019-05-26|archive-date=2019-06-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190614223935/http://www.disco.co.jp/eg/news/press/20151207.html|url-status= | ** Laser lift-off (for [[LED]] production<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.disco.co.jp/eg/news/press/20151207.html|title=Laser Lift-Off(LLO) Ideal for high brightness vertical LED manufacturing - Press Release - DISCO Corporation|website=www.disco.co.jp|access-date=2019-05-26|archive-date=2019-06-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190614223935/http://www.disco.co.jp/eg/news/press/20151207.html|url-status=dead}}</ref>) | ||
** Electrochemical deposition (ECD). See [[Electroplating]]. | ** Electrochemical deposition (ECD). See [[Electroplating]]. | ||
** [[Chemical-mechanical polishing]] (CMP) | ** [[Chemical-mechanical polishing]] (CMP) | ||
| Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
** [[Through-silicon via]] manufacture (for [[three-dimensional integrated circuit]]s) | ** [[Through-silicon via]] manufacture (for [[three-dimensional integrated circuit]]s) | ||
** Wafer mounting (wafer is mounted onto a metal frame using [[dicing tape]]) | ** Wafer mounting (wafer is mounted onto a metal frame using [[dicing tape]]) | ||
** [[Wafer backgrinding]] and polishing<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.disco.co.jp/eg/products/polisher_etcher/index.html|title=Product Information | Polishers - DISCO Corporation|website=www.disco.co.jp|access-date=2019-05-26|archive-date=2019-05-26|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190526221432/https://www.disco.co.jp/eg/products/polisher_etcher/index.html|url-status= | ** [[Wafer backgrinding]] and polishing<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.disco.co.jp/eg/products/polisher_etcher/index.html|title=Product Information | Polishers - DISCO Corporation|website=www.disco.co.jp|access-date=2019-05-26|archive-date=2019-05-26|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190526221432/https://www.disco.co.jp/eg/products/polisher_etcher/index.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> (reduces the thickness of the wafer for thin devices like a [[smartcard]] or [[PCMCIA card]] or wafer bonding and stacking, this can also occur during wafer dicing, in a process known as Dice Before Grind or DBG<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.disco.co.jp/eg/products/process/index.html|title=Product Information | DBG / Package Singulation - DISCO Corporation|website=www.disco.co.jp|access-date=2019-05-26|archive-date=2019-05-16|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190516224834/http://www.disco.co.jp/eg/products/process/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.orbotech.com/spts/about/resources/tech-insights/mems-tech-insights/plasma-dicing-dbg|title=Plasma Dicing (Dice Before Grind) | Orbotech|website=www.orbotech.com}}{{Dead link|date=January 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>) | ||
** [[Wafer bonding]] and stacking (for [[three-dimensional integrated circuit]]s and [[MEMS]]) | ** [[Wafer bonding]] and stacking (for [[three-dimensional integrated circuit]]s and [[MEMS]]) | ||
** [[Redistribution layer]] manufacture (for [[Wafer-level packaging|WLCSP]] packages) | ** [[Redistribution layer]] manufacture (for [[Wafer-level packaging|WLCSP]] packages) | ||
| Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
* [[Semiconductor fabrication#Device test|IC testing]] | * [[Semiconductor fabrication#Device test|IC testing]] | ||
Additionally steps such as [[Wright etch]] may be carried out. | Additionally, steps such as [[Wright etch]] may be carried out. | ||
[[Image:Comparison semiconductor process nodes.svg|thumb|Progress of miniaturization, and comparison of sizes of semiconductor manufacturing process nodes with some microscopic objects and visible light wavelengths]] | [[Image:Comparison semiconductor process nodes.svg|thumb|Progress of miniaturization, and comparison of sizes of semiconductor manufacturing process nodes with some microscopic objects and visible light wavelengths]] | ||
| Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
==Prevention of contamination and defects== | ==Prevention of contamination and defects== | ||
{{Main|Cleanroom}} | {{Main|Cleanroom}} | ||
When feature widths were far greater than about 10 [[micrometre]]s, semiconductor purity was not as big of an issue as it is today in device manufacturing. In the 1960s, workers could work on semiconductor devices in street clothing.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/digital-logic/12/288|title=From a Slice of Crystal to an IC Wafer - CHM Revolution|website=www.computerhistory.org}}</ref> As devices become more integrated, [[cleanroom]]s must become even cleaner. Today, fabrication plants are [[Pressurization|pressurized]] with filtered air to remove even the smallest particles, which could come to rest on the wafers and contribute to defects. The ceilings of semiconductor cleanrooms have [[fan filter unit]]s (FFUs) at regular intervals to constantly replace and filter the air in the cleanroom; semiconductor capital equipment may also have | When feature widths were far greater than about 10 [[micrometre]]s, semiconductor purity was not as big of an issue as it is today in device manufacturing. In the 1960s, workers could work on semiconductor devices in street clothing.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/digital-logic/12/288|title=From a Slice of Crystal to an IC Wafer - CHM Revolution|website=www.computerhistory.org}}</ref> As devices become more integrated, [[cleanroom]]s must become even cleaner. Today, fabrication plants are [[Pressurization|pressurized]] with filtered air to remove even the smallest particles, which could come to rest on the wafers and contribute to defects. The ceilings of semiconductor cleanrooms have [[fan filter unit]]s (FFUs) at regular intervals to constantly replace and filter the air in the cleanroom; semiconductor capital equipment may also have its own FFUs to clean air in the equipment's EFEM, which allows the equipment to receive wafers in FOUPs. The FFUs, combined with raised floors with grills, help ensure a laminar air flow, to ensure that particles are immediately brought down to the floor and do not stay suspended in the air due to turbulence. The workers in a semiconductor fabrication facility are required to wear [[cleanroom suit]]s to protect the devices from [[contamination]] by humans.<ref name=humanParticleShedding /> To increase yield, FOUPs and semiconductor capital equipment may have a mini environment with ISO class 1 level of dust, and FOUPs can have an even cleaner micro environment.<ref name="auto5"/><ref name="auto6"/> [[FOUP]]s and [[SMIF (interface)|SMIF]] pods isolate the wafers from the air in the cleanroom, increasing yield because they reduce the number of defects caused by dust particles. Also, fabs have as few people as possible in the cleanroom to make maintaining the cleanroom environment easier, since people, even when wearing cleanroom suits, shed large amounts of particles, especially when walking.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.chiphistory.org/159-asyst-smif-system|title=The ASYST SMIF system - Integrated with the Tencor Surfscan 7200|website=Chip History|access-date=2020-10-14|archive-date=2020-10-16|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201016072725/https://www.chiphistory.org/159-asyst-smif-system|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=humanParticleShedding >{{Cite web|url=https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Study_into_human_particle_shedding/62768|title=Study into human particle shedding|website=www.cleanroomtechnology.com|access-date=2020-10-14|archive-date=2020-10-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015035227/https://www.cleanroomtechnology.com/news/article_page/Study_into_human_particle_shedding/62768|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=globalFoundries >{{Cite web|url=https://www.pcmag.com/news/how-a-chip-gets-made-visiting-globalfoundries|title=How a Chip Gets Made: Visiting GlobalFoundries|first=Michael J.|last=Miller|date=February 15, 2018|website=PCMag Asia|access-date=November 23, 2023}}</ref> | ||
==Wafers== | ==Wafers== | ||
| Line 175: | Line 175: | ||
* ''Removal'' is any process that removes material from the wafer; examples include etch processes (either [[Etching (microfabrication)#Wet etching|wet]] or [[Etching (microfabrication)#Plasma etching|dry]]) and [[chemical-mechanical planarization]] (CMP). | * ''Removal'' is any process that removes material from the wafer; examples include etch processes (either [[Etching (microfabrication)#Wet etching|wet]] or [[Etching (microfabrication)#Plasma etching|dry]]) and [[chemical-mechanical planarization]] (CMP). | ||
* ''Patterning'' is the shaping or altering of deposited materials, and is generally referred to as [[Photolithography|lithography]]. For example, in conventional lithography, the wafer is coated with a chemical called a ''[[photoresist]]''; then, a machine called an aligner or ''[[stepper]]'' focuses a [[photomask|mask]] image on the wafer using short-wavelength light; the exposed regions (for "positive" resist) are washed away by a developer solution. The wafer then undergoes etching where materials not protected by the mask are removed. After removal or other processing, the remaining photoresist is removed by "dry" stripping/[[plasma ashing]]/resist ashing or by "wet" resist stripper chemistry.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eesemi.com/wafer-cleaning.htm|title=Wafer Cleaning Procedures; Photoresist or Resist Stripping; Removal of Films and Particulates|website=www.eesemi.com|access-date=2020-10-14|archive-date=2020-10-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015035229/https://www.eesemi.com/wafer-cleaning.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Wet etching was widely used in the 1960s and 1970s,<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tUJLAea0SMoC&dq=wet+etching+dry+etching&pg=PA1|title=Plasma Etching: Fundamentals and Applications|first=M.|last=Sugawara|date=May 28, 1998|publisher=OUP Oxford|isbn=978-0-19-159029-0 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eEYVBQAAQBAJ|title=Dry Etching Technology for Semiconductors|first=Kazuo|last=Nojiri|date=October 25, 2014|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-3-319-10295-5 |via=Google Books}}</ref> but it was replaced by dry etching/plasma etching starting at the 10 micron to 3 micron nodes.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tUJLAea0SMoC&q=Undercutting&pg=PA1|title=Plasma Etching: Fundamentals and Applications|first=M.|last=Sugawara|date=May 28, 1998|publisher=OUP Oxford|isbn=978-0-19-159029-0 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Smn6DwAAQBAJ&dq=wet+etching+dry+etching&pg=PA158|title=III-Nitrides Light Emitting Diodes: Technology and Applications|first1=Jinmin|last1=Li|first2=Junxi|last2=Wang|first3=Xiaoyan|last3=Yi|first4=Zhiqiang|last4=Liu|first5=Tongbo|last5=Wei|first6=Jianchang|last6=Yan|first7=Bin|last7=Xue|date=August 31, 2020|publisher=Springer Nature|isbn=978-981-15-7949-3 |via=Google Books}}</ref> This is because wet etching makes undercuts (etching under mask layers or resist layers with patterns).<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uZ07AAAAQBAJ&q=Undercutting|title=Dry Etching for Microelectronics|first=R. A.|last=Powell|date=December 2, 2012|publisher=Elsevier|isbn=978-0-08-098358-5 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zAjYDwAAQBAJ&dq=wet+etching+dry+etching&pg=PA48|title=Fundamentals of Layout Design for Electronic Circuits|first1=Jens|last1=Lienig|first2=Juergen|last2=Scheible|date=March 19, 2020|publisher=Springer Nature|isbn=978-3-030-39284-0 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=soHlnnTJ-qkC&q=Undercutting|title=Etching in Microsystem Technology|first=Michael|last=Köhler|date=July 11, 2008|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-3-527-61379-3 |via=Google Books}}</ref> Dry etching has become the dominant etching technique.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://semiengineering.com/highly-selective-etch-rolls-out-for-next-gen-chips/|title=Highly Selective Etch Rolls Out For Next-Gen Chips|first=Mark|last=LaPedus|date=March 21, 2022|website=Semiconductor Engineering}}</ref> | * ''Patterning'' is the shaping or altering of deposited materials, and is generally referred to as [[Photolithography|lithography]]. For example, in conventional lithography, the wafer is coated with a chemical called a ''[[photoresist]]''; then, a machine called an aligner or ''[[stepper]]'' focuses a [[photomask|mask]] image on the wafer using short-wavelength light; the exposed regions (for "positive" resist) are washed away by a developer solution. The wafer then undergoes etching where materials not protected by the mask are removed. After removal or other processing, the remaining photoresist is removed by "dry" stripping/[[plasma ashing]]/resist ashing or by "wet" resist stripper chemistry.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.eesemi.com/wafer-cleaning.htm|title=Wafer Cleaning Procedures; Photoresist or Resist Stripping; Removal of Films and Particulates|website=www.eesemi.com|access-date=2020-10-14|archive-date=2020-10-15|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015035229/https://www.eesemi.com/wafer-cleaning.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> Wet etching was widely used in the 1960s and 1970s,<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tUJLAea0SMoC&dq=wet+etching+dry+etching&pg=PA1|title=Plasma Etching: Fundamentals and Applications|first=M.|last=Sugawara|date=May 28, 1998|publisher=OUP Oxford|isbn=978-0-19-159029-0 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eEYVBQAAQBAJ|title=Dry Etching Technology for Semiconductors|first=Kazuo|last=Nojiri|date=October 25, 2014|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-3-319-10295-5 |via=Google Books}}</ref> but it was replaced by dry etching/plasma etching starting at the 10 micron to 3 micron nodes.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tUJLAea0SMoC&q=Undercutting&pg=PA1|title=Plasma Etching: Fundamentals and Applications|first=M.|last=Sugawara|date=May 28, 1998|publisher=OUP Oxford|isbn=978-0-19-159029-0 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Smn6DwAAQBAJ&dq=wet+etching+dry+etching&pg=PA158|title=III-Nitrides Light Emitting Diodes: Technology and Applications|first1=Jinmin|last1=Li|first2=Junxi|last2=Wang|first3=Xiaoyan|last3=Yi|first4=Zhiqiang|last4=Liu|first5=Tongbo|last5=Wei|first6=Jianchang|last6=Yan|first7=Bin|last7=Xue|date=August 31, 2020|publisher=Springer Nature|isbn=978-981-15-7949-3 |via=Google Books}}</ref> This is because wet etching makes undercuts (etching under mask layers or resist layers with patterns).<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uZ07AAAAQBAJ&q=Undercutting|title=Dry Etching for Microelectronics|first=R. A.|last=Powell|date=December 2, 2012|publisher=Elsevier|isbn=978-0-08-098358-5 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zAjYDwAAQBAJ&dq=wet+etching+dry+etching&pg=PA48|title=Fundamentals of Layout Design for Electronic Circuits|first1=Jens|last1=Lienig|first2=Juergen|last2=Scheible|date=March 19, 2020|publisher=Springer Nature|isbn=978-3-030-39284-0 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=soHlnnTJ-qkC&q=Undercutting|title=Etching in Microsystem Technology|first=Michael|last=Köhler|date=July 11, 2008|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-3-527-61379-3 |via=Google Books}}</ref> Dry etching has become the dominant etching technique.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://semiengineering.com/highly-selective-etch-rolls-out-for-next-gen-chips/|title=Highly Selective Etch Rolls Out For Next-Gen Chips|first=Mark|last=LaPedus|date=March 21, 2022|website=Semiconductor Engineering}}</ref> | ||
* ''Modification of electrical properties'' has historically entailed [[Semiconductor doping|doping]] transistor ''sources'' and ''drains'' and polysilicon. Doping consists of introducing impurities into the atomic structure of a semiconductor material | * ''Modification of electrical properties'' has historically entailed [[Semiconductor doping|doping]] transistor ''sources'' and ''drains'' and [[polysilicon]]. Doping consists of introducing impurities into the atomic structure of a semiconductor material in order to modify its electrical properties. Initially thermal diffusion with furnaces at 900-1200°C with gases containing dopants were used for doping wafers<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TzL5aUslKDUC&dq=thermal+diffusion+doping&pg=PA157 | title=Introduction to Microfabrication | isbn=978-0-470-02056-2 | last1=Franssila | first1=Sami | date=28 January 2005 | publisher=John Wiley & Sons }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.computerhistory.org/siliconengine/diffusion-process-developed-for-transistors/ | title=1954: Diffusion Process Developed for Transistors | the Silicon Engine | Computer History Museum }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aoGUEAAAQBAJ&dq=thermal+diffusion+doping&pg=PA245 | title=Semiconductor Microchips and Fabrication: A Practical Guide to Theory and Manufacturing | isbn=978-1-119-86780-7 | last1=Lian | first1=Yaguang | date=10 October 2022 | publisher=John Wiley & Sons }}</ref> and there was resistance against [[ion implantation]] as it still required a separate furnace<ref>{{cite conference |url=https://www.axcelis.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Major-Innovations-in-Beamline-Design.pdf |title=Review of Major Innovations in Beam Line Design |first1=Hilton |last1=Glavish |first2=Marvin |last2=Farley |conference=2018 22nd International Conference on Ion Implantation Technology (IIT) |doi=10.1109/IIT.2018.8807986}}</ref> but ion implantation ultimately prevailed in the 1970s<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.eelab.usyd.edu.au/ELEC5402/UserFiles/File/Lecture-Material-Others/MOS-History.pdf |title=History of Some Early Developments in Ion-Implantation Technology Leading to Silicon Transistor Manufacturing |first=Richard B. |last=Fair |journal=Proceedings of the IEEE |volume=86 |issue=1 |date=January 1998 |pages=111–137 |doi=10.1109/5.658764 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070902023701/http://www.eelab.usyd.edu.au/ELEC5402/UserFiles/File/Lecture-Material-Others/MOS-History.pdf |archive-date=2 September 2007 |url-status=dead |access-date=26 February 2024 }}</ref> as it offers better reproducibility of results during manufacturing of chips,<ref name="ion-implantation-in-silicon-technology" /> however diffusion is still used for manufacturing silicon photovoltaic cells.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Saga |first1=Tatsuo |title=Advances in crystalline silicon solar cell technology for industrial mass production |journal=NPG Asia Materials |date=July 2010 |volume=2 |issue=3 |pages=96–102 |doi=10.1038/asiamat.2010.82 }}</ref> Ion implantation is practical because of the high sensitivity of semiconductor devices to foreign atoms, as ion implantation does not deposit large numbers of atoms.<ref name="ion-implantation-in-silicon-technology" /> Doping processes with ion implantation are followed by [[furnace anneal]]ing<ref>{{cite book | chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-45298-0_15 | doi=10.1007/978-3-540-45298-0_15 | chapter=Ion implantation in CMOS Technology: Machine Challenges | title=Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials | date=2006 | pages=213–238 | publisher=Springer | isbn=978-3-540-23674-0 }}</ref><ref name="ion-implantation-in-silicon-technology" /> or, in advanced devices, by [[rapid thermal anneal]]ing (RTA) to activate the dopants. Annealing was initially done at 500 to 700°C, but this was later increased to 900 to 1100°C. Implanters can either process a single wafer at a time or several, up to 17, mounted on a rotating disk.<ref name="ion-implantation-in-silicon-technology" /> | ||
Modification of electrical properties now also extends to the reduction of a material's [[dielectric constant]] in [[low-κ dielectric|low-κ insulators]] via exposure to [[ultraviolet light]] in UV processing (UVP). Modification is frequently achieved by [[oxidation]], which can be carried out to create semiconductor-insulator junctions, such as in the local oxidation of [[silicon]] ([[LOCOS]]) to fabricate [[MOSFET|metal oxide field effect transistors]]. Modern chips have up to eleven or more metal levels produced in over 300 or more sequenced processing steps. | Modification of electrical properties now also extends to the reduction of a material's [[dielectric constant]] in [[low-κ dielectric|low-κ insulators]] via exposure to [[ultraviolet light]] in UV processing (UVP). Modification is frequently achieved by [[oxidation]], which can be carried out to create semiconductor-insulator junctions, such as in the local oxidation of [[silicon]] ([[LOCOS]]) to fabricate [[MOSFET|metal oxide field effect transistors]]. Modern chips have up to eleven or more metal levels produced in over 300 or more sequenced processing steps. | ||
A recipe in semiconductor manufacturing is a list of conditions under which a wafer will be processed by a particular machine in a processing step during manufacturing.<ref>{{cite conference | A recipe in semiconductor manufacturing is a list of conditions under which a wafer will be processed by a particular machine in a processing step during manufacturing.<ref>{{cite conference | title=Virtual Metrology Technique for Semiconductor Manufacturing |book-title=The 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings | doi=10.1109/IJCNN.2006.247284 | s2cid=1194426 }}</ref> Process variability is a challenge in semiconductor processing, in which wafers are not processed evenly or the quality or effectiveness of processes carried out on a wafer are not even across the wafer surface.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-threat-of-semiconductor-variability|title=The Threat of Semiconductor Variability - IEEE Spectrum|website=[[IEEE]]}}</ref> | ||
===Front-end-of-line (FEOL) processing=== | ===Front-end-of-line (FEOL) processing=== | ||
{{Main|FEOL}} | {{Main|FEOL}} | ||
Wafer processing is separated into FEOL and BEOL stages. FEOL processing refers to the formation of the [[transistor]]s directly in the [[silicon]]. The raw wafer is engineered by the growth of an ultrapure, virtually defect-free silicon layer through [[epitaxy]].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PsVVKz_hjBgC&dq=silicon+wafer+epitaxial+layer&pg=SA3-PA49|title=Handbook of Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology|first1=Yoshio|last1=Nishi|first2=Robert|last2=Doering|date=December 19, 2017|publisher=CRC Press|isbn=978-1-4200-1766-3 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VFMPEAAAQBAJ&dq=silicon+wafer+epitaxial+layer&pg=PA75|title=Microelectronic Materials|first=C. R. M.|last=Grovenor|date=October 5, 2017|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-351-43154-5 |via=Google Books}}</ref> In the most advanced [[logic device]]s, ''prior'' to the silicon epitaxy step, tricks are performed to improve the performance of the transistors to be built. One method involves introducing a ''straining step'' wherein a silicon variant such as [[silicon-germanium]] (SiGe) is deposited. Once the epitaxial silicon is deposited, the [[crystal lattice]] becomes stretched somewhat, resulting in improved electronic mobility. Another method, called ''[[silicon on insulator]]'' technology involves the insertion of an insulating layer between the raw silicon wafer and the thin layer of subsequent silicon epitaxy. This method results in the creation of transistors with reduced [[Parasitic element (electrical networks)|parasitic effects]]. Semiconductor equipment may have several chambers | Wafer processing is separated into FEOL and BEOL stages. FEOL processing refers to the formation of the [[transistor]]s directly in the [[silicon]]. The raw wafer is engineered by the growth of an ultrapure, virtually defect-free silicon layer through [[epitaxy]].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PsVVKz_hjBgC&dq=silicon+wafer+epitaxial+layer&pg=SA3-PA49|title=Handbook of Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology|first1=Yoshio|last1=Nishi|first2=Robert|last2=Doering|date=December 19, 2017|publisher=CRC Press|isbn=978-1-4200-1766-3 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VFMPEAAAQBAJ&dq=silicon+wafer+epitaxial+layer&pg=PA75|title=Microelectronic Materials|first=C. R. M.|last=Grovenor|date=October 5, 2017|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-351-43154-5 |via=Google Books}}</ref> In the most advanced [[logic device]]s, ''prior'' to the silicon epitaxy step, tricks are performed to improve the performance of the transistors to be built. One method involves introducing a ''straining step'' wherein a silicon variant such as [[silicon-germanium]] (SiGe) is deposited. Once the epitaxial silicon is deposited, the [[crystal lattice]] becomes stretched somewhat, resulting in improved electronic mobility. Another method, called ''[[silicon on insulator]]'' technology, involves the insertion of an insulating layer between the raw silicon wafer and the thin layer of subsequent silicon epitaxy. This method results in the creation of transistors with reduced [[Parasitic element (electrical networks)|parasitic effects]]. Semiconductor equipment may have several chambers that process wafers in processes such as deposition and etching. Many pieces of equipment handle wafers between these chambers in an internal nitrogen or vacuum environment to improve process control.<ref name="auto4"/> Wet benches with tanks containing chemical solutions were historically used for cleaning and etching wafers.<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XdY7DQAAQBAJ&dq=semiconductor+wet+bench&pg=PA287 | isbn=978-981-310-671-0 | title=Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology | date=3 March 2008 | publisher=World Scientific Publishing Company }}</ref> | ||
At the 90nm node, transistor channels made with strain engineering were introduced to improve drive current in PMOS transistors by introducing regions with Silicon-Germanium in the transistor. The same was done in NMOS transistors at the 20nm node.<ref name="auto9"/> | At the 90nm node, transistor channels made with strain engineering were introduced to improve drive current in PMOS transistors by introducing regions with Silicon-Germanium in the transistor. The same was done in NMOS transistors at the 20nm node.<ref name="auto9"/> | ||
In 2007, HKMG (high-k/metal gate) transistors were introduced by Intel at the 45nm node, which replaced polysilicon gates which in turn replaced metal gate (aluminum gate)<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FezIEAAAQBAJ&dq=aluminum+gate+transistor&pg=PA102 | title=75th Anniversary of the Transistor | isbn=978-1-394-20244-7 | last1=Nathan | first1=Arokia | last2=Saha | first2=Samar K. | last3=Todi | first3=Ravi M. | date=August 2023 | publisher=John Wiley & Sons }}</ref> technology in the 1970s.<ref>{{Cite conference | In 2007, HKMG (high-k/metal gate) transistors were introduced by Intel at the 45nm node, which replaced [[polysilicon]] gates which in turn replaced metal gate (aluminum gate)<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FezIEAAAQBAJ&dq=aluminum+gate+transistor&pg=PA102 | title=75th Anniversary of the Transistor | isbn=978-1-394-20244-7 | last1=Nathan | first1=Arokia | last2=Saha | first2=Samar K. | last3=Todi | first3=Ravi M. | date=August 2023 | publisher=John Wiley & Sons }}</ref> technology in the 1970s.<ref>{{Cite conference|title=High-k/metal gates in leading edge silicon devices |conference=2012 SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference |doi=10.1109/ASMC.2012.6212925 |s2cid=32122636 }}</ref> High-k dielectric such as hafnium oxide (HfO<sub>2</sub>) replaced silicon oxynitride (SiON), to prevent large amounts of leakage current in the transistor while allowing for continued scaling or shrinking of the transistors. However, HfO<sub>2</sub> is not compatible with polysilicon gates; it requires the use of a metal gate. Two approaches were used in production: gate-first and gate-last. Gate-first consists of depositing the high-k dielectric and then the gate metal such as Tantalum nitride whose workfunction depends on whether the transistor is NMOS or PMOS, polysilicon deposition, gate line patterning, source and drain ion implantation, dopant anneal, and silicidation of the polysilicon and the source and drain.<ref>Robertson, J., & Wallace, R. M. (2015). High-K materials and metal gates for CMOS applications. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 88, 1–41. doi:10.1016/j.mser.2014.11.001</ref><ref>{{cite conference |last=Frank |first=M. M. |date=2011 |title=High-k / metal gate innovations enabling continued CMOS scaling |book-title=2011 Proceedings of the European Solid-State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC) |doi=10.1109/essderc.2011.6044239}}</ref> In DRAM memories this technology was first adopted in 2015.<ref>{{Cite conference|title=Gate-first high-k/metal gate DRAM technology for low power and high performance products |conference=2015 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) |doi=10.1109/IEDM.2015.7409775 |s2cid=35956689 }}</ref> | ||
Gate-last consisted of first depositing the [[High-κ dielectric]], creating dummy gates, manufacturing sources and drains by ion deposition and dopant annealing, depositing an "interlevel dielectric (ILD)" and then polishing, and removing the dummy gates to replace them with a metal whose workfunction depended on whether the transistor was NMOS or PMOS, thus creating the metal gate. A third process, full silicidation (FUSI)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://sst.semiconductor-digest.com/2010/03/integrating-high-k/|title=Integrating high-k /metal gates: gate-first or gate-last? | Semiconductor Digest}}</ref> was not pursued due to manufacturing problems.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://sst.semiconductor-digest.com/2009/12/hkmg_-gate-first_vs/|title=IEDM 2009: HKMG gate-first vs gate-last options | Semiconductor Digest}}</ref> Gate-first became dominant at the 22nm/20nm node.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.eetimes.com/tracing-samsungs-road-to-14nm/ | title=Tracing Samsung's Road to 14nm | date=12 May 2015 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IXeQDwAAQBAJ&dq=hkmg+gate+last&pg=PA18 | isbn=978-1-78923-496-1 | title=Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor | date=August 2018 | publisher=BoD – Books on Demand }}</ref> HKMG has been extended from planar transistors for use in FinFET and nanosheet transistors.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://semiengineering.com/whats-after-finfets/|title=What's After FinFETs?|first=Mark|last=LaPedus|date=July 24, 2017|website=Semiconductor Engineering}}</ref> Hafnium silicon | Gate-last consisted of first depositing the [[High-κ dielectric]], creating dummy gates, manufacturing sources and drains by ion deposition and dopant annealing, depositing an "interlevel dielectric (ILD)" and then polishing, and removing the dummy gates to replace them with a metal whose workfunction depended on whether the transistor was NMOS or PMOS, thus creating the metal gate. A third process, full silicidation (FUSI)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://sst.semiconductor-digest.com/2010/03/integrating-high-k/|title=Integrating high-k /metal gates: gate-first or gate-last? | Semiconductor Digest}}</ref> was not pursued due to manufacturing problems.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://sst.semiconductor-digest.com/2009/12/hkmg_-gate-first_vs/|title=IEDM 2009: HKMG gate-first vs gate-last options | Semiconductor Digest}}</ref> Gate-first became dominant at the 22nm/20nm node.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.eetimes.com/tracing-samsungs-road-to-14nm/ | title=Tracing Samsung's Road to 14nm | date=12 May 2015 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IXeQDwAAQBAJ&dq=hkmg+gate+last&pg=PA18 | isbn=978-1-78923-496-1 | title=Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor | date=August 2018 | publisher=BoD – Books on Demand }}</ref> HKMG has been extended from planar transistors for use in FinFET and nanosheet transistors.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://semiengineering.com/whats-after-finfets/|title=What's After FinFETs?|first=Mark|last=LaPedus|date=July 24, 2017|website=Semiconductor Engineering}}</ref> Hafnium silicon | ||
oxynitride can also be used instead of Hafnium oxide.<ref>{{Cite book | oxynitride can also be used instead of Hafnium oxide.<ref>{{Cite conference|book-title=2006 International Electron Devices Meeting|doi=10.1109/IEDM.2006.346959 |s2cid=23881959 |title=High-Performance and Low-Power CMOS Device Technologies Featuring Metal/High-k Gate Stacks with Uniaxial Strained Silicon Channels on (100) and (110) Substrates |date=2006 |last1=Tateshita |first1=Y. |last2=Wang |first2=J. |last3=Nagano |first3=K. |last4=Hirano |first4=T. |last5=Miyanami |first5=Y. |last6=Ikuta |first6=T. |last7=Kataoka |first7=T. |last8=Kikuchi |first8=Y. |last9=Yamaguchi |first9=S. |last10=Ando |first10=T. |last11=Tai |first11=K. |last12=Matsumoto |first12=R. |last13=Fujita |first13=S. |last14=Yamane |first14=C. |last15=Yamamoto |first15=R. |last16=Kanda |first16=S. |last17=Kugimiya |first17=K. |last18=Kimura |first18=T. |last19=Ohchi |first19=T. |last20=Yamamoto |first20=Y. |last21=Nagahama |first21=Y. |last22=Hagimoto |first22=Y. |last23=Wakabayashi |first23=H. |last24=Tagawa |first24=Y. |last25=Tsukamoto |first25=M. |last26=Iwamoto |first26=H. |last27=Saito |first27=M. |last28=Kadomura |first28=S. |last29=Nagashima |first29=N. |pages=1–4 |isbn=1-4244-0438-X }}</ref><ref>{{Cite conference|book-title=2007 International Workshop on Physics of Semiconductor Devices|doi=10.1109/IWPSD.2007.4472451 |s2cid=25926459 |title=High-k/Metal Gates- from research to reality |date=2007 |last1=Narayanan |first1=V. |pages=42–45 |isbn=978-1-4244-1727-8 }}</ref><ref name="auto4"/><ref name="auto2">{{Cite web|url=https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-highk-solution|title=The High-k Solution - IEEE Spectrum|website=[[IEEE]]}}</ref><ref name="auto1">{{Cite conference|book-title=2007 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference|doi=10.1109/CICC.2007.4405765 |s2cid=1589266 |title=High-K/Metal Gate Technology: A New Horizon |date=2007 |last1=Khare |first1=Mukesh |pages=417–420 |isbn=978-1-4244-0786-6 }}</ref> | ||
Since the 16nm/14nm node, Atomic layer etching (ALE) is increasingly used for etching as it offers higher precision than other etching methods. In production, plasma ALE is commonly used, which removes materials unidirectionally, creating structures with vertical walls. Thermal ALE can also be used to remove materials isotropically, in all directions at the same time but without the capability to create vertical walls. Plasma ALE was initially adopted for etching contacts in transistors, and since the 7nm node it is also used to create transistor structures by etching them.<ref name="auto8"/> | Since the 16nm/14nm node, Atomic layer etching (ALE) is increasingly used for etching as it offers higher precision than other etching methods. In production, plasma ALE is commonly used, which removes materials unidirectionally, creating structures with vertical walls. Thermal ALE can also be used to remove materials isotropically, in all directions at the same time but without the capability to create vertical walls. Plasma ALE was initially adopted for etching contacts in transistors, and since the 7nm node it is also used to create transistor structures by etching them.<ref name="auto8"/> | ||
| Line 203: | Line 203: | ||
====Metal layers==== | ====Metal layers==== | ||
Once the various semiconductor devices have been [[Integrated circuit#circuitLayers|created]], they must be interconnected to form the desired electrical circuits. This occurs in a series of wafer processing steps collectively referred to as BEOL (not to be confused with ''back end'' of chip fabrication, which refers to the packaging and testing stages). BEOL processing involves creating metal interconnecting wires that are isolated by dielectric layers. The insulating material has traditionally been a form of SiO<sub>2</sub> or a [[silicate glass]], but | Once the various semiconductor devices have been [[Integrated circuit#circuitLayers|created]], they must be interconnected to form the desired electrical circuits. This occurs in a series of wafer processing steps collectively referred to as BEOL (not to be confused with ''back end'' of chip fabrication, which refers to the packaging and testing stages). BEOL processing involves creating metal interconnecting wires that are isolated by dielectric layers. The insulating material has traditionally been a form of SiO<sub>2</sub> or a [[silicate glass]], but new [[low-κ dielectric|low dielectric constant]] materials, also called low-κ dielectrics, are being used (such as silicon oxycarbide), typically providing dielectric constants around 2.7 (compared to 3.82 for SiO<sub>2</sub>), although materials with constants as low as 2.2 are being offered to chipmakers. | ||
BEoL has been used since 1995 at the 350nm and 250nm nodes (0.35 and 0.25 micron nodes), at the same time chemical mechanical polishing began to be employed. At the time, 2 metal layers for interconnect, also called metallization<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nC7wCAAAQBAJ&dq=integrated+circuit+metallization&pg=PA276 | title=Technology of Integrated Circuits | isbn=978-3-662-04160-4 | last1=Widmann | first1=D. | last2=Mader | first2=H. | last3=Friedrich | first3=H. | date=9 March 2013 | publisher=Springer }}</ref> was state-of-the-art.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/35-beol-origins-the-chip-history-center | title=BEOL Wiring Process for CMOS Logic }}</ref> | BEoL has been used since 1995 at the 350nm and 250nm nodes (0.35 and 0.25 micron nodes), at the same time, chemical mechanical polishing began to be employed. At the time, 2 metal layers for interconnect, also called metallization<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nC7wCAAAQBAJ&dq=integrated+circuit+metallization&pg=PA276 | title=Technology of Integrated Circuits | isbn=978-3-662-04160-4 | last1=Widmann | first1=D. | last2=Mader | first2=H. | last3=Friedrich | first3=H. | date=9 March 2013 | publisher=Springer }}</ref> was state-of-the-art.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.chiphistory.org/35-beol-origins-the-chip-history-center | title=BEOL Wiring Process for CMOS Logic }}</ref> | ||
Since the 22nm node, some manufacturers have added a new process called middle-of-line (MOL) which connects the transistors to the rest of the interconnect made in the BEoL process. The MOL is often based on tungsten and has upper and lower layers: the lower layer connects the junctions of the transistors, and an upper layer which is a tungsten plug that connects the transistors to the interconnect. Intel at the 10nm node introduced contact-over-active-gate (COAG) which, instead of placing the contact for connecting the transistor close to the gate of the transistor, places it directly over the gate of the transistor to improve transistor density.<ref name="auto7">{{Cite web|url=https://semiengineering.com/racing-to-107nm/|title=The Race To 10/7nm|first=Mark|last=LaPedus|date=May 22, 2017|website=Semiconductor Engineering}}</ref> | Since the 22nm node, some manufacturers have added a new process called middle-of-line (MOL) which connects the transistors to the rest of the interconnect made in the BEoL process. The MOL is often based on tungsten and has upper and lower layers: the lower layer connects the junctions of the transistors, and an upper layer which is a tungsten plug that connects the transistors to the interconnect. Intel at the 10nm node introduced contact-over-active-gate (COAG) which, instead of placing the contact for connecting the transistor close to the gate of the transistor, places it directly over the gate of the transistor to improve transistor density.<ref name="auto7">{{Cite web|url=https://semiengineering.com/racing-to-107nm/|title=The Race To 10/7nm|first=Mark|last=LaPedus|date=May 22, 2017|website=Semiconductor Engineering}}</ref> | ||
| Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
==Wafer metrology== | ==Wafer metrology== | ||
The highly serialized nature of wafer processing has increased the demand for [[metrology]] in between the various processing steps. For example, thin film metrology based on [[ellipsometry]] or [[reflectometry]] is used to tightly control the thickness of gate oxide, as well as the thickness, [[Refractive index#Complex refractive index|refractive index, and extinction coefficient]] of photoresist and other coatings.<ref name = "Löper2015">{{cite journal | last1 = Löper | first1 = Philipp | last2 = Stuckelberger | first2 = Michael | last3 = Niesen | first3 = Bjoern | last4 = Werner | first4 = Jérémie | last5 = Filipič | first5 = Miha | last6 = Moon | first6 = Soo-Jin | last7 = Yum | first7 = Jun-Ho | last8 = Topič | first8 = Marko | last9 = De Wolf | first9 = Stefaan | last10 = Ballif | first10 = Christophe | title = Complex Refractive Index Spectra of CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Thin Films Determined by Spectroscopic Ellipsometry and Spectrophotometry | journal = The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters | volume = 6 | issue = 1 | pages = 66–71 | year = 2015 | url = https://doi.org/10.1021/jz502471h | doi = 10.1021/jz502471h | pmid = 26263093 | access-date = 2021-11-16| url-access = subscription }}</ref> Wafer metrology equipment/tools, or wafer inspection tools are used to verify that the wafers haven't been damaged by previous processing steps up until testing; if too many [[Die (integrated circuit)|dies]] on one wafer have failed, the entire wafer is scrapped to avoid the costs of further processing. [[Virtual metrology]] has been used to predict wafer properties based on statistical methods without performing the physical measurement itself.<ref name="berlin-regression-methods">{{cite journal |author1=Hendrik Purwins |author2=Bernd Barak |author3=Ahmed Nagi |author4=Reiner Engel |author5=Uwe Höckele |author6=Andreas Kyek |author7=Srikanth Cherla |author8=Benjamin Lenz |author9=Günter Pfeifer |author10=Kurt Weinzierl | The highly serialized nature of wafer processing has increased the demand for [[metrology]] in between the various processing steps. For example, thin film metrology based on [[ellipsometry]] or [[reflectometry]] is used to tightly control the thickness of gate oxide, as well as the thickness, [[Refractive index#Complex refractive index|refractive index, and extinction coefficient]] of photoresist and other coatings.<ref name = "Löper2015">{{cite journal | last1 = Löper | first1 = Philipp | last2 = Stuckelberger | first2 = Michael | last3 = Niesen | first3 = Bjoern | last4 = Werner | first4 = Jérémie | last5 = Filipič | first5 = Miha | last6 = Moon | first6 = Soo-Jin | last7 = Yum | first7 = Jun-Ho | last8 = Topič | first8 = Marko | last9 = De Wolf | first9 = Stefaan | last10 = Ballif | first10 = Christophe | title = Complex Refractive Index Spectra of CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Thin Films Determined by Spectroscopic Ellipsometry and Spectrophotometry | journal = The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters | volume = 6 | issue = 1 | pages = 66–71 | year = 2015 | url = https://doi.org/10.1021/jz502471h | doi = 10.1021/jz502471h | pmid = 26263093 | access-date = 2021-11-16| url-access = subscription }}</ref> Wafer metrology equipment/tools, or wafer inspection tools are used to verify that the wafers haven't been damaged by previous processing steps up until testing; if too many [[Die (integrated circuit)|dies]] on one wafer have failed, the entire wafer is scrapped to avoid the costs of further processing. [[Virtual metrology]] has been used to predict wafer properties based on statistical methods without performing the physical measurement itself.<ref name="berlin-regression-methods">{{cite journal |author1=Hendrik Purwins |author2=Bernd Barak |author3=Ahmed Nagi |author4=Reiner Engel |author5=Uwe Höckele |author6=Andreas Kyek |author7=Srikanth Cherla |author8=Benjamin Lenz |author9=Günter Pfeifer |author10=Kurt Weinzierl |title=Regression Methods for Virtual Metrology of Layer Thickness in Chemical Vapor Deposition |journal=IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics |date=2014 |volume=19 |issue=1 |pages=1–8 |doi=10.1109/TMECH.2013.2273435 |s2cid=12369827 }}</ref> | ||
==Device test== | ==Device test== | ||
| Line 227: | Line 227: | ||
Once the front-end process has been completed, the semiconductor devices or chips are subjected to a variety of electrical tests to determine if they function properly. The percent of devices on the wafer found to perform properly is referred to as the '''yield'''. Manufacturers are typically secretive about their yields,<ref name="ceicm-chapter-3">{{Cite book |title=Cost Effective Integrated Circuit Manufacturing |url=https://smithsonianchips.si.edu/ice/cd/CEICM/SECTION3.pdf |chapter=Yield and Yield Management |chapter-url=https://smithsonianchips.si.edu/ice/cd/CEICM/SECTION3.pdf |publisher=Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation |isbn=1-877750-60-3 |date=1997 |access-date=2023-01-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230122020617/https://smithsonianchips.si.edu/ice/cd/CEICM/SECTION3.pdf |archive-date=2023-01-22 |url-status=bot: unknown }}</ref> but it can be as low as 30%, meaning that only 30% of the chips on the wafer work as intended. [[Process variation (semiconductor)|Process variation]] is one among many reasons for low yield. Testing is carried out to prevent faulty chips from being assembled into relatively expensive packages. | Once the front-end process has been completed, the semiconductor devices or chips are subjected to a variety of electrical tests to determine if they function properly. The percent of devices on the wafer found to perform properly is referred to as the '''yield'''. Manufacturers are typically secretive about their yields,<ref name="ceicm-chapter-3">{{Cite book |title=Cost Effective Integrated Circuit Manufacturing |url=https://smithsonianchips.si.edu/ice/cd/CEICM/SECTION3.pdf |chapter=Yield and Yield Management |chapter-url=https://smithsonianchips.si.edu/ice/cd/CEICM/SECTION3.pdf |publisher=Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation |isbn=1-877750-60-3 |date=1997 |access-date=2023-01-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230122020617/https://smithsonianchips.si.edu/ice/cd/CEICM/SECTION3.pdf |archive-date=2023-01-22 |url-status=bot: unknown }}</ref> but it can be as low as 30%, meaning that only 30% of the chips on the wafer work as intended. [[Process variation (semiconductor)|Process variation]] is one among many reasons for low yield. Testing is carried out to prevent faulty chips from being assembled into relatively expensive packages. | ||
The yield is often but not necessarily related to device (die or chip) size. As an example, in December 2019, TSMC announced an average yield of ~80%, with a peak yield per wafer of >90% for their [[5nm]] test chips with a [[Die (integrated circuit)|die]] size of 17.92 mm<sup>2</sup>. The yield went down to 32% with an increase in die size to 100 mm<sup>2</sup>.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/15219/early-tsmc-5nm-test-chip-yields-80-hvm-coming-in-h1-2020|title=Early TSMC 5nm Test Chip Yields 80%, HVM Coming in H1 2020|first=Dr Ian|last=Cutress|website=[[AnandTech]]|access-date=2020-04-12|archive-date=2020-05-25|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200525115643/https://www.anandtech.com/show/15219/early-tsmc-5nm-test-chip-yields-80-hvm-coming-in-h1-2020|url-status= | The yield is often but not necessarily related to device (die or chip) size. As an example, in December 2019, TSMC announced an average yield of ~80%, with a peak yield per wafer of >90% for their [[5nm]] test chips with a [[Die (integrated circuit)|die]] size of 17.92 mm<sup>2</sup>. The yield went down to 32% with an increase in die size to 100 mm<sup>2</sup>.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/15219/early-tsmc-5nm-test-chip-yields-80-hvm-coming-in-h1-2020|title=Early TSMC 5nm Test Chip Yields 80%, HVM Coming in H1 2020|first=Dr Ian|last=Cutress|website=[[AnandTech]]|access-date=2020-04-12|archive-date=2020-05-25|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200525115643/https://www.anandtech.com/show/15219/early-tsmc-5nm-test-chip-yields-80-hvm-coming-in-h1-2020|url-status=dead}}</ref> The number of killer defects on a wafer, regardless of die size, can be noted as the defect density (or D<sub>0</sub>) of the wafer per unit area, usually cm<sup>2</sup>. | ||
The fab [[Wafer testing|tests the chips on the wafer]] with an electronic tester that presses tiny probes against the chip. The machine marks each bad chip with a drop of dye. Currently, electronic dye marking is possible if wafer test data (results) are logged into a central computer database and chips are "binned" (i.e. sorted into virtual bins) according to predetermined test limits such as maximum operating frequencies/clocks, number of working (fully functional) cores per chip, etc. The resulting binning data can be graphed, or logged, on a wafer map to trace manufacturing defects and mark bad chips. This map can also be used during wafer assembly and packaging. Binning allows chips that would otherwise be rejected to be reused in lower-tier products, as is the case with GPUs and CPUs, increasing device yield, especially since very few chips are fully functional (have all cores functioning correctly, for example). [[eFUSE]]s may be used to disconnect parts of chips such as cores, either because they did not work as intended during binning, or as part of market segmentation (using the same chip for low, mid and high-end tiers). Chips may have spare parts to allow the chip to fully pass testing even if it has several non-working parts. | The fab [[Wafer testing|tests the chips on the wafer]] with an electronic tester that presses tiny probes against the chip. The machine marks each bad chip with a drop of dye. Currently, electronic dye marking is possible if wafer test data (results) are logged into a central computer database and chips are "binned" (i.e. sorted into virtual bins) according to predetermined test limits such as maximum operating frequencies/clocks, number of working (fully functional) cores per chip, etc. The resulting binning data can be graphed, or logged, on a wafer map to trace manufacturing defects and mark bad chips. This map can also be used during wafer assembly and packaging. Binning allows chips that would otherwise be rejected to be reused in lower-tier products, as is the case with GPUs and CPUs, increasing device yield, especially since very few chips are fully functional (have all cores functioning correctly, for example). [[eFUSE]]s may be used to disconnect parts of chips such as cores, either because they did not work as intended during binning, or as part of market segmentation (using the same chip for low, mid and high-end tiers). Chips may have spare parts to allow the chip to fully pass testing even if it has several non-working parts. | ||
| Line 265: | Line 265: | ||
Many toxic materials are used in the fabrication process.<ref>{{cite web |website=CNET |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/why-tech-pollutions-going-global/ |title=Why tech pollution's going global |date=April 25, 2002 |access-date=February 17, 2024}}</ref> These include: | Many toxic materials are used in the fabrication process.<ref>{{cite web |website=CNET |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/why-tech-pollutions-going-global/ |title=Why tech pollution's going global |date=April 25, 2002 |access-date=February 17, 2024}}</ref> These include: | ||
* poisonous elemental [[dopants]], such as [[arsenic]], [[antimony]], and [[phosphorus]]. | * poisonous elemental [[dopants]], such as [[arsenic]], [[antimony]], and [[phosphorus]]. | ||
* poisonous compounds, such as [[arsine]] and [[phosphine]] containing arsenic and phosphorus respectively, used in ion implantation doping, [[tungsten hexafluoride]], used in CVD deposition of tungsten in transistor interconnects, [[silane]] used for depositing polysilicon,<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rbazz2eNu6QC&q=silicon+epitaxy+cvd+gas|title=Epitaxial Silicon Technology|first=B.|last=Baliga|date=December 2, 2012|publisher=Elsevier|isbn=978-0-323-15545-8 |via=Google Books}}</ref> [[Trichlorosilane]] used to create high purity polysilicon which is used for silicon photovoltaics or for polysilicon for the Czochralski process used to make monocrystalline silicon wafers,<ref>{{cite web | url=https://news.metal.com/newscontent/101647120/photovoltaic-demand-drives-the-highest-price-of-trichlorosilane-to-reach-40000-per-ton-of-supply-shortage-support-continued-to-be-strong-in-the-short-term | title=Photovoltaic demand drives the highest price of trichlorosilane to reach 40,000 per ton of supply shortage support continued to be strong in the short term. | SMM }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web| title=Crystal Growth and Wafer Preparation | url=https://www.cityu.edu.hk/phy/appkchu/AP6120/2.PDF | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190819050430/http://www.cityu.edu.hk:80/phy/appkchu/AP6120/2.PDF | archive-date=2019-08-19}}</ref> or for depositing silicon films<ref>{{cite journal | doi=10.1149/2.0031502jss | title=By-Product Formation in a Trichlorosilane-Hydrogen System for Silicon Film Deposition | date=2015 | last1=Habuka | first1=Hitoshi | last2=Sakurai | first2=Ayumi | last3=Saito | first3=Ayumi | journal= | * poisonous compounds, such as [[arsine]] and [[phosphine]] containing arsenic and phosphorus respectively, used in ion implantation doping, [[tungsten hexafluoride]], used in CVD deposition of tungsten in transistor interconnects, [[silane]] used for depositing polysilicon,<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rbazz2eNu6QC&q=silicon+epitaxy+cvd+gas|title=Epitaxial Silicon Technology|first=B.|last=Baliga|date=December 2, 2012|publisher=Elsevier|isbn=978-0-323-15545-8 |via=Google Books}}</ref> [[Trichlorosilane]] used to create high purity polysilicon which is used for silicon photovoltaics or for polysilicon for the Czochralski process used to make monocrystalline silicon wafers,<ref>{{cite web | url=https://news.metal.com/newscontent/101647120/photovoltaic-demand-drives-the-highest-price-of-trichlorosilane-to-reach-40000-per-ton-of-supply-shortage-support-continued-to-be-strong-in-the-short-term | title=Photovoltaic demand drives the highest price of trichlorosilane to reach 40,000 per ton of supply shortage support continued to be strong in the short term. | SMM }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web| title=Crystal Growth and Wafer Preparation | url=https://www.cityu.edu.hk/phy/appkchu/AP6120/2.PDF |url-status=live | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190819050430/http://www.cityu.edu.hk:80/phy/appkchu/AP6120/2.PDF | archive-date=2019-08-19}}</ref> or for depositing silicon films<ref>{{cite journal | doi=10.1149/2.0031502jss | title=By-Product Formation in a Trichlorosilane-Hydrogen System for Silicon Film Deposition | date=2015 | last1=Habuka | first1=Hitoshi | last2=Sakurai | first2=Ayumi | last3=Saito | first3=Ayumi | journal=ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology | volume=4 | issue=2 | pages=P16–P19 | doi-access=free }}</ref> | ||
* highly reactive liquids, such as [[hydrogen peroxide]], fuming [[nitric acid]], [[sulfuric acid]], and [[hydrofluoric acid]], used in etching and cleaning. | * highly reactive liquids, such as [[hydrogen peroxide]], fuming [[nitric acid]], [[sulfuric acid]], and [[hydrofluoric acid]], used in etching and cleaning. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:52, 9 November 2025
Template:Semiconductor manufacturing processes
Semiconductor device fabrication is the process used to manufacture semiconductor devices, typically integrated circuits (ICs) such as microprocessors, microcontrollers, and memories (such as RAM and flash memory). It is a multiple-step photolithographic and physico-chemical process (with steps such as thermal oxidation, thin-film deposition, ion implantation, etching) during which electronic circuits are gradually created on a wafer, typically made of pure single-crystal semiconducting material. Silicon is almost always used, but various compound semiconductors are used for specialized applications. Steps such as etching and photolithography can be used to manufacture other devices, such as LCD and OLED displays.[1]
The fabrication process is performed in highly specialized semiconductor fabrication plants, also called foundries or "fabs",[2] with the central part being the "clean room". In more advanced semiconductor devices, such as modern 14/10/7 nm nodes, fabrication can take up to 15 weeks, with 11–13 weeks being the industry average.[3] Production in advanced fabrication facilities is completely automated, with automated material handling systems taking care of the transport of wafers from machine to machine.[4]
A wafer often has several integrated circuits, which are called dies as they are pieces diced from a single wafer. Individual dies are separated from a finished wafer in a process called die singulation, also called wafer dicing. The dies can then undergo further assembly and packaging.[5]
Within fabrication plants, the wafers are transported inside special sealed plastic boxes called FOUPs.[4] FOUPs in many fabs contain an internal nitrogen atmosphere[6][7] which helps prevent copper from oxidizing on the wafers. Copper is used in modern semiconductors for wiring.[8] The insides of the processing equipment and FOUPs is kept cleaner than the surrounding air in the cleanroom. This internal atmosphere is known as a mini-environment and helps improve yield, which is the number of working devices on a wafer. This mini environment is within an EFEM (equipment front end module)[9] which allows a machine to receive FOUPs, and introduces wafers from the FOUPs into the machine. Additionally, many machines also handle wafers in clean nitrogen or vacuum environments to reduce contamination and improve process control.[4] Fabrication plants need large amounts of liquid nitrogen to maintain the atmosphere inside production machinery and FOUPs, which are constantly purged with nitrogen.[6][7] There can also be an air curtain or a mesh[10] between the FOUP and the EFEM which helps reduce the amount of humidity that enters the FOUP and improves yield.[11][12]
Some of the companies that manufacture machines used in the industrial semiconductor fabrication process include ASML, Applied Materials, Tokyo Electron, and Lam Research.
Feature size
Script error: No such module "anchor". Script error: No such module "anchor". Script error: No such module "anchor". Script error: No such module "anchor". Script error: No such module "anchor". Script error: No such module "anchor". Script error: No such module "anchor".
Feature size (or process size) is determined by the width of the smallest lines that can be patterned in a semiconductor fabrication process; this measurement is known as the linewidth.[13][14] Patterning often refers to photolithography which allows a device design or pattern to be defined on the device during fabrication.[15] F2 is used as a measurement of area for different parts of a semiconductor device, based on the feature size of a semiconductor manufacturing process. Many semiconductor devices are designed in sections called cells, and each cell represents a small part of the device, such as a memory cell to store data. Thus F2 is used to measure the area taken up by these cells or sections.[16]
A specific semiconductor process has specific rules on the minimum size (width or CD/Critical Dimension) and spacing for features on each layer of the chip.[17] Normally, a new semiconductor process has smaller minimum sizes and tighter spacing. In some cases, this allows a simple die shrink of a currently produced chip design to reduce costs, improve performance,[17] and increase transistor density (number of transistors per unit area) without the expense of a new design.
Early semiconductor processes had arbitrary names for generations (viz., HMOS I/II/III/IV and CHMOS III/III-E/IV/V). Later each new generation process became known as a technology node[18] or process node,[19][20] designated by the process' minimum feature size in nanometers (or historically micrometers) of the process's transistor gate length, such as the "90 nm process". However, this has not been the case since 1994,[21] and the number of nanometers used to name process nodes (see the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors) has become more of a marketing term that has no standardized relation with functional feature sizes or with transistor density (number of transistors per unit area).[22]
Initially transistor gate length was smaller than that suggested by the process node name (e.g. 350 nm node); however, this trend reversed in 2009.[21] Feature sizes can have no connection to the nanometers (nm) used in marketing. For example, Intel's former 10 nm process actually has features (the tips of FinFET fins) with a width of 7 nm, so the Intel 10 nm process is similar in transistor density to TSMC's 7 nm process. As another example, GlobalFoundries' 12 and 14 nm processes have similar feature sizes.[23][24][22]
History
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
20th century
In 1955, Carl Frosch and Lincoln Derick, working at Bell Telephone Laboratories, accidentally grew a layer of silicon dioxide over the silicon wafer, for which they observed surface passivation effects.[26][27] By 1957 Frosch and Derick, using masking and predeposition, were able to manufacture silicon dioxide transistors; the first planar field effect transistors, in which drain and source were adjacent at the same surface.[28] At Bell Labs, the importance of their discoveries was immediately realized. Memos describing the results of their work circulated at Bell Labs before being formally published in 1957. At Shockley Semiconductor, Shockley had circulated the preprint of their article in December 1956 to all his senior staff, including Jean Hoerni,[29][30][31][32] who would later invent the planar process in 1959 while at Fairchild Semiconductor.[33][34]
In 1948, Bardeen patented an insulated-gate transistor (IGFET) with an inversion layer; Bardeen's concept forms the basis of MOSFET technology today.[35] An improved type of MOSFET technology, CMOS, was developed by Chih-Tang Sah and Frank Wanlass at Fairchild Semiconductor in 1963.[36][37] CMOS was commercialised by RCA in the late 1960s.[36] RCA commercially used CMOS for its 4000-series integrated circuits in 1968, starting with a 20Template:Nbspμm process before gradually scaling to a 10 μm process over the next several years.[38] Many early semiconductor device manufacturers developed and built their own equipment such as ion implanters.[39]
In 1963, Harold M. Manasevit was the first to document epitaxial growth of silicon on sapphire while working at the Autonetics division of North American Aviation (now Boeing). In 1964, he published his findings with colleague William Simpson in the Journal of Applied Physics.[40] In 1965, C.W. Mueller and P.H. Robinson fabricated a MOSFET (metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor) using the silicon-on-sapphire process at RCA Laboratories.[41]
Semiconductor device manufacturing has since spread from Texas and California in the 1960s to the rest of the world, including Asia, Europe, and the Middle East.
Wafer size has grown over time, from 25 mm (1 inch) in 1960, to 50 mm (2 inches) in 1969, 100 mm (4 inches) in 1976, 125 mm (5 inches) in 1981, 150 mm (6 inches) in 1983 and 200 mm in 1992.[42][43]
In the era of 2-inch wafers, these were handled manually using tweezers and held manually for the time required for a given process. Tweezers were replaced by vacuum wands as they generate fewer particles[44] which can contaminate the wafers. Wafer carriers or cassettes, which can hold several wafers at once, were developed to carry several wafers between process steps, but wafers had to be individually removed from the carrier, processed, and returned to the carrier, so acid-resistant carriers were developed to eliminate this time consuming process, so the entire cassette with wafers was dipped into wet etching and wet cleaning tanks. When wafer sizes increased to 100 mm, the entire cassette would often not be dipped as uniformly, and the quality of the results across the wafer became hard to control. By the time 150 mm wafers arrived, the cassettes were not dipped and were only used as wafer carriers and holders to store wafers, and robotics became prevalent for handling wafers. With 200 mm wafers, manual handling of wafer cassettes becomes risky as they are heavier.[45]
In the 1970s and 1980s, several companies migrated their semiconductor manufacturing technology from bipolar to MOSFET technology. Semiconductor manufacturing equipment has been considered costly since 1978.[46][47][48][49]
In 1984, KLA developed the first automatic reticle and photomask inspection tool.[50] In 1985, KLA developed an automatic inspection tool for silicon wafers, which replaced manual microscope inspection.[51]
In 1985, SGS (now STmicroelectronics) invented BCD, also called BCDMOS, a semiconductor manufacturing process using bipolar, CMOS and DMOS devices.[52] Applied Materials developed the first practical multi-chamber, or cluster wafer processing tool, the Precision 5000.[53]
Until the 1980s, physical vapor deposition was the primary technique used for depositing materials onto wafers, until the advent of chemical vapor deposition.[54] Equipment with diffusion pumps was replaced with those using turbomolecular pumps, as the latter do not use oil, which often contaminates wafers during processing in vacuum.[55]
200 mm diameter wafers were first used in 1990 and became the standard until the introduction of 300 mm diameter wafers in 2000.[56][57] Bridge tools were used in the transition from 150 mm wafers to 200 mm wafers[58] and in the transition from 200 mm to 300 mm wafers.[59][60] The semiconductor industry has adopted larger wafers to cope with the increased demand for chips as larger wafers provide more surface area per wafer.[61] Over time, the industry shifted to 300 mm wafers which brought along the adoption of FOUPs,[62] but many products that are not advanced are still produced in 200 mm wafers such as analog ICs, RF chips, power ICs, BCDMOS and MEMS devices.[63]
Some processes such as cleaning,[64] ion implantation,[65][66] etching,[67] annealing[68] and oxidation[69] started to adopt single wafer processing instead of batch wafer processing to improve the reproducibility of results.[70][71] A similar trend existed in MEMS manufacturing.[72] In 1998, Applied Materials introduced the Producer, a cluster tool that had chambers grouped in pairs for processing wafers, which shared common vacuum and supply lines but were otherwise isolated, which was revolutionary at the time as it offered higher productivity than other cluster tools without sacrificing quality, due to the isolated chamber design.[73][58]
21st century
The semiconductor industry is a global business today. The leading semiconductor manufacturers typically have facilities all over the world. Samsung Electronics, the world's largest manufacturer of semiconductors, has facilities in South Korea and the US. Intel, the second-largest manufacturer, has facilities in Europe and Asia as well as the US. TSMC, the world's largest pure play foundry, has facilities in Taiwan, China, Singapore, and the US. Qualcomm and Broadcom are among the biggest fabless semiconductor companies, outsourcing their production to companies like TSMC.[74] They also have facilities spread in different countries. As the average utilization of semiconductor devices increased, durability became an issue and manufacturers started to design their devices to ensure they last for enough time, and this depends on the market the device is designed for. This especially became a problem at the 10 nm node.[75][76]
Silicon on insulator (SOI) technology has been used in AMD's 130 nm, 90 nm, 65 nm, 45 nm and 32 nm single, dual, quad, six and eight core processors made since 2001.[77] During the transition from 200 mm to 300 mm wafers in 2001, many bridge tools were used which could process both 200 mm and 300 mm wafers.[78] At the time, 18 companies could manufacture chips in the leading edge 130nm process.[79]
In 2006, 450 mm wafers were expected to be adopted in 2012, and 675 mm wafers were expected to be used by 2021.[80]
Since 2009, "node" has become a commercial name for marketing purposes that indicates new generations of process technologies, without any relation to gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch.[81][82][83] For example, GlobalFoundries' 7 nm process was similar to Intel's 10 nm process, thus the conventional notion of a process node has become blurred.[84] Additionally, TSMC and Samsung's 10 nm processes are only slightly denser than Intel's 14 nm in transistor density. They are actually much closer to Intel's 14 nm process than they are to Intel's 10 nm process (e.g. Samsung's 10 nm processes' fin pitch is the same as that of Intel's 14 nm process: 42 nm).[85][86] Intel has changed the name of its 10 nm process to position it as a 7 nm process.[87] As transistors become smaller, new effects start to influence design decisions, such as self-heating of the transistors, and other effects, such as electromigration, have become more evident since the 16nm node.[88][89]
In 2011, Intel demonstrated Fin field-effect transistors (FinFETs), where the gate surrounds the channel on three sides, allowing for increased energy efficiency and lower gate delay—and thus greater performance—over planar transistors at the 22nm node, because planar transistors which only have one surface acting as a channel, started to suffer from short channel effects.[90][91][92][93][94] A startup called SuVolta created a technology called Deeply Depleted Channel (DDC) to compete with FinFET transistors; it uses very lightly doped planar transistors at the 65 nm node.[95]
By 2018, a number of transistor architectures had been proposed for the eventual replacement of FinFET, most of which were based on the concept of GAAFET:[96] horizontal and vertical nanowires, horizontal nanosheet transistors[97][98] (Samsung MBCFET, Intel Nanoribbon), vertical FET (VFET) and other vertical transistors,[99][100] complementary FET (CFET), stacked FET, vertical TFETs, FinFETs with III-V semiconductor materials (III-V FinFET),[101][102] several kinds of horizontal gate-all-around transistors such as nano-ring, hexagonal wire, square wire, and round wire gate-all-around transistors[103] and negative-capacitance FET (NC-FET) which uses drastically different materials.[104] FD-SOI was seen as a potential low cost alternative to FinFETs.[105]
As of 2019, 14 nanometer and 10 nanometer chips are in mass production by Intel, UMC, TSMC, Samsung, Micron, SK Hynix, Toshiba Memory and GlobalFoundries, with 7 nanometer process chips in mass production by TSMC and Samsung, although their 7 nanometer node definition is similar to Intel's 10 nanometer process. The 5 nanometer process began being produced by Samsung in 2018.[106] As of 2019, the node with the highest transistor density is TSMC's 5Template:Nbspnanometer N5 node,[107] with a density of 171.3Template:Nbspmillion transistors per square millimeter.[108] In 2019, Samsung and TSMC announced plans to produce 3 nanometer nodes. GlobalFoundries has decided to stop the development of new nodes beyond 12 nanometers to save resources, as it has determined that setting up a new fab to handle sub-12 nm orders would be beyond the company's financial abilities.[109]
From 2020 to 2023, there was a global chip shortage. During this shortage caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, many semiconductor manufacturers banned employees from leaving company grounds.[110] Many countries granted subsidies to semiconductor companies for building new fabrication plants or fabs. Many companies were affected by counterfeit chips.[111] Semiconductors have become vital to the world economy and the national security of some countries.[112][113][114] The US has asked TSMC to not produce semiconductors for Huawei, a Chinese company.[115] CFET transistors were explored, which stacks NMOS and PMOS transistors on top of each other. Two approaches were evaluated for constructing these transistors: a monolithic approach which built both types of transistors in one process, and a sequential approach which built the two types of transistors separately and then stacked them.[116]
List of steps
This is a list of processing techniques that are employed numerous times throughout the construction of a modern electronic device; this list does not necessarily imply a specific order, nor that all techniques are taken during manufacture as, in practice the order and which techniques are applied, are often specific to process offerings by foundries, or specific to an integrated device manufacturer (IDM) for their own products, and a semiconductor device might not need all techniques. Equipment for carrying out these processes is made by a handful of companies. All equipment needs to be tested before a semiconductor fabrication plant is started.[117] These processes are done after integrated circuit design. A semiconductor fab operates 24/7[118] and many fabs use large amounts of water, primarily for rinsing the chips.[119]
- Wafer processing (also called front end)[120]
- Wet cleans
- Cleaning by solvents such as acetone, trichloroethylene or ultrapure water sometimes while spinning the wafer
- Piranha solution
- RCA clean
- Wafer scrubbing
- Spin cleaning[121]
- Jet spray cleaning[121]
- Cryogenic aerosol[122]
- Megasonics[123]
- Immersion batch cleaning[124]
- Surface passivation
- Photolithography
- Photoresist coating (often as a liquid, on the entire wafer)
- Photoresist baking (solidification in an oven)
- Edge bead removal[125][126]
- Exposure (in a photolithography stepper, scanner or mask aligner)
- Post-Exposure Baking (PEB) improves the durability of the photoresist
- Development (removal of parts of the resist by application of a liquid developer, leaving only parts of the wafer exposed for ion implantation, layer deposition, etching, etc)
- Hardmask creation
- Ion implantation (in which dopants are embedded in the wafer, creating regions of increased or decreased conductivity)
- Etching (microfabrication)
- Dry etching (plasma etching)
- Reactive-ion etching (RIE)
- Deep reactive-ion etching (DRIE)
- Atomic layer etching (ALE)
- Reactive-ion etching (RIE)
- Wet etching
- Dry etching (plasma etching)
- Chemical vapor deposition (CVD)
- Metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), used in LEDs
- Atomic layer deposition (ALD)
- Physical vapor deposition (PVD)
- Sputtering
- Evaporation
- Epitaxy[116][128]
- Ion beam deposition[130]
- Plasma ashing (for complete photoresist removal/photoresist stripping, also known as dry strip,[131] historically done with a chemical solvent called a resist stripper,[132][133] to allow wafers to undergo another round of photolithography)
- Thermal treatments
- Rapid thermal processing (RTP), rapid thermal anneal
- Millisecond thermal processing, millisecond anneal, millisecond processing, flash lamp anneal (FLA)
- Laser anneal
- Furnace anneals
- Thermal oxidation
- Laser lift-off (for LED production[134])
- Electrochemical deposition (ECD). See Electroplating.
- Chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP)
- Wafer testing (where the electrical performance is verified using automatic test equipment, binning and/or laser trimming may also be carried out at this step)
- Wet cleans
- Die preparation
- Through-silicon via manufacture (for three-dimensional integrated circuits)
- Wafer mounting (wafer is mounted onto a metal frame using dicing tape)
- Wafer backgrinding and polishing[135] (reduces the thickness of the wafer for thin devices like a smartcard or PCMCIA card or wafer bonding and stacking, this can also occur during wafer dicing, in a process known as Dice Before Grind or DBG[136][137])
- Wafer bonding and stacking (for three-dimensional integrated circuits and MEMS)
- Redistribution layer manufacture (for WLCSP packages)
- Wafer bumping (for flip chip BGA (ball grid array), and WLCSP packages)
- Die cutting or wafer dicing
- IC packaging
- Die attachment (The die is attached to a leadframe using conductive paste or die attach film.[138][139])
- IC bonding: Wire bonding, thermosonic bonding, flip chip or tape automated bonding (TAB)
- IC encapsulation or integrated heat spreader (IHS) installation
- Molding (using special plastic molding compound that may contain glass powder as filler to control thermal expansion)
- Baking
- Electroplating (plates the copper leads of the lead frames with tin to make soldering easier)
- Laser marking or silkscreen printing
- Trim and form (separates the lead frames from each other, and bends the lead frame's pins so that they can be mounted on a printed circuit board)
- IC testing
Additionally, steps such as Wright etch may be carried out.
Prevention of contamination and defects
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". When feature widths were far greater than about 10 micrometres, semiconductor purity was not as big of an issue as it is today in device manufacturing. In the 1960s, workers could work on semiconductor devices in street clothing.[140] As devices become more integrated, cleanrooms must become even cleaner. Today, fabrication plants are pressurized with filtered air to remove even the smallest particles, which could come to rest on the wafers and contribute to defects. The ceilings of semiconductor cleanrooms have fan filter units (FFUs) at regular intervals to constantly replace and filter the air in the cleanroom; semiconductor capital equipment may also have its own FFUs to clean air in the equipment's EFEM, which allows the equipment to receive wafers in FOUPs. The FFUs, combined with raised floors with grills, help ensure a laminar air flow, to ensure that particles are immediately brought down to the floor and do not stay suspended in the air due to turbulence. The workers in a semiconductor fabrication facility are required to wear cleanroom suits to protect the devices from contamination by humans.[141] To increase yield, FOUPs and semiconductor capital equipment may have a mini environment with ISO class 1 level of dust, and FOUPs can have an even cleaner micro environment.[12][9] FOUPs and SMIF pods isolate the wafers from the air in the cleanroom, increasing yield because they reduce the number of defects caused by dust particles. Also, fabs have as few people as possible in the cleanroom to make maintaining the cleanroom environment easier, since people, even when wearing cleanroom suits, shed large amounts of particles, especially when walking.[142][141][143]
Wafers
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". A typical wafer is made out of extremely pure silicon that is grown into mono-crystalline cylindrical ingots (boules) up to 300 mm (slightly less than 12 inches) in diameter using the Czochralski process. These ingots are then sliced into wafers about 0.75 mm thick and polished to obtain a very regular and flat surface. During the production process wafers are often grouped into lots, which are represented by a FOUP, SMIF or a wafer cassette, which are wafer carriers. FOUPs and SMIFs can be transported in the fab between machines and equipment with an automated OHT (Overhead Hoist Transport) AMHS (Automated Material Handling System).[62] Besides SMIFs and FOUPs, wafer cassettes can be placed in a wafer box or a wafer carrying box.[144]
Processing
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". In semiconductor device fabrication, the various processing steps fall into four general categories: deposition, removal, patterning, and modification of electrical properties.
- Deposition is any process that grows, coats, or otherwise transfers a material onto the wafer. Available technologies include physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), electrochemical deposition (ECD), molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), and more recently, atomic layer deposition (ALD) among others. Deposition can be understood to include oxide layer formation, by thermal oxidation or, more specifically, LOCOS.
- Removal is any process that removes material from the wafer; examples include etch processes (either wet or dry) and chemical-mechanical planarization (CMP).
- Patterning is the shaping or altering of deposited materials, and is generally referred to as lithography. For example, in conventional lithography, the wafer is coated with a chemical called a photoresist; then, a machine called an aligner or stepper focuses a mask image on the wafer using short-wavelength light; the exposed regions (for "positive" resist) are washed away by a developer solution. The wafer then undergoes etching where materials not protected by the mask are removed. After removal or other processing, the remaining photoresist is removed by "dry" stripping/plasma ashing/resist ashing or by "wet" resist stripper chemistry.[145] Wet etching was widely used in the 1960s and 1970s,[146][147] but it was replaced by dry etching/plasma etching starting at the 10 micron to 3 micron nodes.[148][149] This is because wet etching makes undercuts (etching under mask layers or resist layers with patterns).[150][151][152] Dry etching has become the dominant etching technique.[153]
- Modification of electrical properties has historically entailed doping transistor sources and drains and polysilicon. Doping consists of introducing impurities into the atomic structure of a semiconductor material in order to modify its electrical properties. Initially thermal diffusion with furnaces at 900-1200°C with gases containing dopants were used for doping wafers[154][155][156] and there was resistance against ion implantation as it still required a separate furnace[157] but ion implantation ultimately prevailed in the 1970s[158] as it offers better reproducibility of results during manufacturing of chips,[39] however diffusion is still used for manufacturing silicon photovoltaic cells.[159] Ion implantation is practical because of the high sensitivity of semiconductor devices to foreign atoms, as ion implantation does not deposit large numbers of atoms.[39] Doping processes with ion implantation are followed by furnace annealing[160][39] or, in advanced devices, by rapid thermal annealing (RTA) to activate the dopants. Annealing was initially done at 500 to 700°C, but this was later increased to 900 to 1100°C. Implanters can either process a single wafer at a time or several, up to 17, mounted on a rotating disk.[39]
Modification of electrical properties now also extends to the reduction of a material's dielectric constant in low-κ insulators via exposure to ultraviolet light in UV processing (UVP). Modification is frequently achieved by oxidation, which can be carried out to create semiconductor-insulator junctions, such as in the local oxidation of silicon (LOCOS) to fabricate metal oxide field effect transistors. Modern chips have up to eleven or more metal levels produced in over 300 or more sequenced processing steps.
A recipe in semiconductor manufacturing is a list of conditions under which a wafer will be processed by a particular machine in a processing step during manufacturing.[161] Process variability is a challenge in semiconductor processing, in which wafers are not processed evenly or the quality or effectiveness of processes carried out on a wafer are not even across the wafer surface.[162]
Front-end-of-line (FEOL) processing
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
Wafer processing is separated into FEOL and BEOL stages. FEOL processing refers to the formation of the transistors directly in the silicon. The raw wafer is engineered by the growth of an ultrapure, virtually defect-free silicon layer through epitaxy.[163][164] In the most advanced logic devices, prior to the silicon epitaxy step, tricks are performed to improve the performance of the transistors to be built. One method involves introducing a straining step wherein a silicon variant such as silicon-germanium (SiGe) is deposited. Once the epitaxial silicon is deposited, the crystal lattice becomes stretched somewhat, resulting in improved electronic mobility. Another method, called silicon on insulator technology, involves the insertion of an insulating layer between the raw silicon wafer and the thin layer of subsequent silicon epitaxy. This method results in the creation of transistors with reduced parasitic effects. Semiconductor equipment may have several chambers that process wafers in processes such as deposition and etching. Many pieces of equipment handle wafers between these chambers in an internal nitrogen or vacuum environment to improve process control.[4] Wet benches with tanks containing chemical solutions were historically used for cleaning and etching wafers.[165]
At the 90nm node, transistor channels made with strain engineering were introduced to improve drive current in PMOS transistors by introducing regions with Silicon-Germanium in the transistor. The same was done in NMOS transistors at the 20nm node.[128]
In 2007, HKMG (high-k/metal gate) transistors were introduced by Intel at the 45nm node, which replaced polysilicon gates which in turn replaced metal gate (aluminum gate)[166] technology in the 1970s.[167] High-k dielectric such as hafnium oxide (HfO2) replaced silicon oxynitride (SiON), to prevent large amounts of leakage current in the transistor while allowing for continued scaling or shrinking of the transistors. However, HfO2 is not compatible with polysilicon gates; it requires the use of a metal gate. Two approaches were used in production: gate-first and gate-last. Gate-first consists of depositing the high-k dielectric and then the gate metal such as Tantalum nitride whose workfunction depends on whether the transistor is NMOS or PMOS, polysilicon deposition, gate line patterning, source and drain ion implantation, dopant anneal, and silicidation of the polysilicon and the source and drain.[168][169] In DRAM memories this technology was first adopted in 2015.[170]
Gate-last consisted of first depositing the High-κ dielectric, creating dummy gates, manufacturing sources and drains by ion deposition and dopant annealing, depositing an "interlevel dielectric (ILD)" and then polishing, and removing the dummy gates to replace them with a metal whose workfunction depended on whether the transistor was NMOS or PMOS, thus creating the metal gate. A third process, full silicidation (FUSI)[171] was not pursued due to manufacturing problems.[172] Gate-first became dominant at the 22nm/20nm node.[173][174] HKMG has been extended from planar transistors for use in FinFET and nanosheet transistors.[175] Hafnium silicon oxynitride can also be used instead of Hafnium oxide.[176][177][4][178][179]
Since the 16nm/14nm node, Atomic layer etching (ALE) is increasingly used for etching as it offers higher precision than other etching methods. In production, plasma ALE is commonly used, which removes materials unidirectionally, creating structures with vertical walls. Thermal ALE can also be used to remove materials isotropically, in all directions at the same time but without the capability to create vertical walls. Plasma ALE was initially adopted for etching contacts in transistors, and since the 7nm node it is also used to create transistor structures by etching them.[127]
Gate oxide and implants
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Front-end surface engineering is followed by growth of the gate dielectric (traditionally silicon dioxide), patterning of the gate, patterning of the source and drain regions, and subsequent implantation or diffusion of dopants to obtain the desired complementary electrical properties. In dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) devices, storage capacitors are also fabricated at this time, typically stacked above the access transistor (the now defunct DRAM manufacturer Qimonda implemented these capacitors with trenches etched deep into the silicon surface).
Back-end-of-line (BEOL) processing
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
Metal layers
Once the various semiconductor devices have been created, they must be interconnected to form the desired electrical circuits. This occurs in a series of wafer processing steps collectively referred to as BEOL (not to be confused with back end of chip fabrication, which refers to the packaging and testing stages). BEOL processing involves creating metal interconnecting wires that are isolated by dielectric layers. The insulating material has traditionally been a form of SiO2 or a silicate glass, but new low dielectric constant materials, also called low-κ dielectrics, are being used (such as silicon oxycarbide), typically providing dielectric constants around 2.7 (compared to 3.82 for SiO2), although materials with constants as low as 2.2 are being offered to chipmakers.
BEoL has been used since 1995 at the 350nm and 250nm nodes (0.35 and 0.25 micron nodes), at the same time, chemical mechanical polishing began to be employed. At the time, 2 metal layers for interconnect, also called metallization[180] was state-of-the-art.[181]
Since the 22nm node, some manufacturers have added a new process called middle-of-line (MOL) which connects the transistors to the rest of the interconnect made in the BEoL process. The MOL is often based on tungsten and has upper and lower layers: the lower layer connects the junctions of the transistors, and an upper layer which is a tungsten plug that connects the transistors to the interconnect. Intel at the 10nm node introduced contact-over-active-gate (COAG) which, instead of placing the contact for connecting the transistor close to the gate of the transistor, places it directly over the gate of the transistor to improve transistor density.[182]
Interconnect
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
Historically, the metal wires have been composed of aluminum. In this approach to wiring (often called subtractive aluminum), blanket films of aluminum are deposited first, patterned, and then etched, leaving isolated wires. Dielectric material is then deposited over the exposed wires. The various metal layers are interconnected by etching holes (called "vias") in the insulating material and then depositing tungsten in them with a CVD technique using tungsten hexafluoride; this approach can still be (and often is) used in the fabrication of many memory chips such as dynamic random-access memory (DRAM), because the number of interconnect levels can be small (no more than four). The aluminum was sometimes alloyed with copper for preventing recrystallization. Gold was also used in interconnects in early chips.[183]
More recently, as the number of interconnect levels for logic has substantially increased due to the large number of transistors that are now interconnected in a modern microprocessor, the timing delay in the wiring has become so significant as to prompt a change in wiring material (from aluminum to copper interconnect layer)[184] alongside a change in dielectric material in the interconnect (from silicon dioxides to newer low-κ insulators).[185][186] This performance enhancement also comes at a reduced cost via damascene processing, which eliminates processing steps. As the number of interconnect levels increases, planarization of the previous layers is required to ensure a flat surface prior to subsequent lithography. Without it, the levels would become increasingly crooked, extending outside the depth of focus of available lithography, and thus interfering with the ability to pattern. CMP (chemical-mechanical planarization) is the primary processing method to achieve such planarization, although dry etch back is still sometimes employed when the number of interconnect levels is no more than three. Copper interconnects use an electrically conductive barrier layer to prevent the copper from diffusing into ("poisoning") its surroundings, often made of tantalum nitride.[187][182] In 1997, IBM was the first to adopt copper interconnects.[188]
In 2014, Applied Materials proposed the use of cobalt in interconnects at the 22nm node, used for encapsulating copper interconnects in cobalt to prevent electromigration, replacing tantalum nitride since it needs to be thicker than cobalt in this application.[182][189]
Wafer metrology
The highly serialized nature of wafer processing has increased the demand for metrology in between the various processing steps. For example, thin film metrology based on ellipsometry or reflectometry is used to tightly control the thickness of gate oxide, as well as the thickness, refractive index, and extinction coefficient of photoresist and other coatings.[190] Wafer metrology equipment/tools, or wafer inspection tools are used to verify that the wafers haven't been damaged by previous processing steps up until testing; if too many dies on one wafer have failed, the entire wafer is scrapped to avoid the costs of further processing. Virtual metrology has been used to predict wafer properties based on statistical methods without performing the physical measurement itself.[2]
Device test
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
Once the front-end process has been completed, the semiconductor devices or chips are subjected to a variety of electrical tests to determine if they function properly. The percent of devices on the wafer found to perform properly is referred to as the yield. Manufacturers are typically secretive about their yields,[191] but it can be as low as 30%, meaning that only 30% of the chips on the wafer work as intended. Process variation is one among many reasons for low yield. Testing is carried out to prevent faulty chips from being assembled into relatively expensive packages.
The yield is often but not necessarily related to device (die or chip) size. As an example, in December 2019, TSMC announced an average yield of ~80%, with a peak yield per wafer of >90% for their 5nm test chips with a die size of 17.92 mm2. The yield went down to 32% with an increase in die size to 100 mm2.[192] The number of killer defects on a wafer, regardless of die size, can be noted as the defect density (or D0) of the wafer per unit area, usually cm2.
The fab tests the chips on the wafer with an electronic tester that presses tiny probes against the chip. The machine marks each bad chip with a drop of dye. Currently, electronic dye marking is possible if wafer test data (results) are logged into a central computer database and chips are "binned" (i.e. sorted into virtual bins) according to predetermined test limits such as maximum operating frequencies/clocks, number of working (fully functional) cores per chip, etc. The resulting binning data can be graphed, or logged, on a wafer map to trace manufacturing defects and mark bad chips. This map can also be used during wafer assembly and packaging. Binning allows chips that would otherwise be rejected to be reused in lower-tier products, as is the case with GPUs and CPUs, increasing device yield, especially since very few chips are fully functional (have all cores functioning correctly, for example). eFUSEs may be used to disconnect parts of chips such as cores, either because they did not work as intended during binning, or as part of market segmentation (using the same chip for low, mid and high-end tiers). Chips may have spare parts to allow the chip to fully pass testing even if it has several non-working parts.
Chips are also tested again after packaging, as the bond wires may be missing, or analog performance may be altered by the package. This is referred to as the "final test". Chips may also be imaged using x-rays.
Usually, the fab charges for testing time, with prices on the order of cents per second. Testing times vary from a few milliseconds to a couple of seconds, and the test software is optimized for reduced testing time. Multiple chip (multi-site) testing is also possible because many testers have the resources to perform most or all of the tests in parallel and on several chips at once.
Chips are often designed with "testability features" such as scan chains or a "built-in self-test" to speed testing and reduce testing costs. In certain designs that use specialized analog fab processes, wafers are also laser-trimmed during testing, in order to achieve tightly distributed resistance values as specified by the design.
Good designs try to test and statistically manage corners (extremes of silicon behavior caused by a high operating temperature combined with the extremes of fab processing steps). Most designs cope with at least 64 corners.
Device yield
Device yield or die yield is the number of working chips or dies on a wafer, given in percentage since the number of chips on a wafer (Die per wafer, DPW) can vary depending on the chips' size and the wafer's diameter. Yield degradation is a reduction in yield, which historically was mainly caused by dust particles, however since the 1990s, yield degradation is mainly caused by process variation, the process itself and by the tools used in chip manufacturing, although dust still remains a problem in many older fabs. Dust particles have an increasing effect on yield as feature sizes are shrunk with newer processes. Automation and the use of mini environments inside of production equipment, FOUPs and SMIFs have enabled a reduction in defects caused by dust particles. Device yield must be kept high to reduce the selling price of the working chips since working chips have to pay for those chips that failed, and to reduce the cost of wafer processing. Yield can also be affected by the design and operation of the fab.
Tight control over contaminants and the production process are necessary to increase yield. Contaminants may be chemical contaminants or be dust particles. "Killer defects" are those caused by dust particles that cause complete failure of the device (such as a transistor). There are also harmless defects. A particle needs to be 1/5 the size of a feature to cause a killer defect. So if a feature is 100 nm across, a particle only needs to be 20 nm across to cause a killer defect. Electrostatic electricity can also affect yield adversely. Chemical contaminants or impurities include heavy metals such as iron, copper, nickel, zinc, chromium, gold, mercury and silver, alkali metals such as sodium, potassium and lithium, and elements such as aluminum, magnesium, calcium, chlorine, sulfur, carbon, and fluorine. It is important for these elements to not remain in contact with the silicon, as they could reduce yield. Chemical mixtures may be used to remove these elements from the silicon; different mixtures are effective against different elements.
Several models are used to estimate yield. They are Murphy's model, Poisson's model, the binomial model, Moore's model and Seeds' model. There is no universal model; a model has to be chosen based on actual yield distribution (the location of defective chips). For example, Murphy's model assumes that yield loss occurs more at the edges of the wafer (non-working chips are concentrated on the edges of the wafer), Poisson's model assumes that defective dies are spread relatively evenly across the wafer, and Seeds's model assumes that defective dies are clustered together.[193]
Smaller dies cost less to produce (since more fit on a wafer, and wafers are processed and priced as a whole), and can help achieve higher yields since smaller dies have a lower chance of having a defect, due to their lower surface area on the wafer. However, smaller dies require smaller features to achieve the same functions of larger dies or surpass them, and smaller features require reduced process variation and increased purity (reduced contamination) to maintain high yields. Metrology tools are used to inspect the wafers during the production process and predict yield, so wafers predicted to have too many defects may be scrapped to save on processing costs.[191]
Die preparation
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Once tested, a wafer is typically reduced in thickness in a process also known as "backlap",[120]Template:Rp "backfinish", "wafer backgrind" or "wafer thinning"[194] before the wafer is scored and then broken into individual dies, a process known as wafer dicing. Only the good, unmarked chips are packaged.
Packaging
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
After the dies are tested for functionality and binned, they are packaged. Plastic or ceramic packaging involves mounting the die, connecting the die/bond pads to the pins on the package, and sealing the die. Tiny bondwires are used to connect the pads to the pins. In the 'old days' (1970s), wires were attached by hand, but now specialized machines perform the task. Traditionally, these wires have been composed of gold, leading to a lead frame (pronounced "leed frame") of solder-plated copper; lead is poisonous, so lead-free "lead frames" are now mandated by RoHS. Traditionally the bond pads are located on the edges of the die, however, Flip-chip packaging can be used to place bond pads across the entire surface of the die.
Chip scale package (CSP) is another packaging technology. A plastic dual in-line package, like most packages, is many times larger than the actual die hidden inside, whereas CSP chips are nearly the size of the die; a CSP can be constructed for each die before the wafer is diced.
The packaged chips are retested to ensure that they were not damaged during packaging and that the die-to-pin interconnect operation was performed correctly. A laser then etches the chip's name and numbers on the package. The steps involving testing and packaging of dies, followed by final testing of finished, packaged chips, are called the back end,[120] post-fab,[195] ATMP (Assembly, Test, Marking, and Packaging)[196] or ATP (Assembly, Test and Packaging) of semiconductor manufacturing, and may be carried out by OSAT (OutSourced Assembly and Test) companies which are separate from semiconductor foundries. A foundry is a company or fab performing manufacturing processes such as photolithography and etching that are part of the front end of semiconductor manufacturing.[197]
Hazardous materials
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Many toxic materials are used in the fabrication process.[198] These include:
- poisonous elemental dopants, such as arsenic, antimony, and phosphorus.
- poisonous compounds, such as arsine and phosphine containing arsenic and phosphorus respectively, used in ion implantation doping, tungsten hexafluoride, used in CVD deposition of tungsten in transistor interconnects, silane used for depositing polysilicon,[199] Trichlorosilane used to create high purity polysilicon which is used for silicon photovoltaics or for polysilicon for the Czochralski process used to make monocrystalline silicon wafers,[200][201] or for depositing silicon films[202]
- highly reactive liquids, such as hydrogen peroxide, fuming nitric acid, sulfuric acid, and hydrofluoric acid, used in etching and cleaning.
It is vital that workers not be directly exposed to these dangerous substances. The high degree of automation common in the IC fabrication industry helps to reduce the risks of exposure. Most fabrication facilities employ exhaust management systems, such as wet scrubbers, combustors, heated absorber cartridges, etc.,[203][204][205] to control the risk to workers and to the environment.
Timeline of commercial MOSFET nodes
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
See also
Script error: No such module "Portal". Template:Div col
- Deathnium
- Glossary of microelectronics manufacturing terms
- List of semiconductor scale examples
- MOSFET
- Multigate device
- Semiconductor industry
- International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors
- Semiconductor consolidation
- Local oxidation of silicon (LOCOS)
- List of integrated circuit manufacturers
- List of semiconductor fabrication plants
- Microfabrication
- Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International (SEMI)—the semiconductor industry trade association
- SEMI font for labels on wafers
- Etch pit density
- Passivation
- Planar process
- Transistor count
References
Further reading
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"., section 14.2.
- Wiki related to Chip Technology
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
External links
- Semiconductor industry glossary
- Wafer heating
- Designing a Heated Chuck for Semiconductor Processing Equipment
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d e Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Cite patent
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Patent
- ↑ Template:Patent
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d e Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead link
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Robertson, J., & Wallace, R. M. (2015). High-K materials and metal gates for CMOS applications. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 88, 1–41. doi:10.1016/j.mser.2014.11.001
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".