Fallacies of illicit transference: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Circeus
mode ecological fallacy within body of article
 
imported>DreamRimmer bot II
m Bot: Implementing outcome of RfC: converting list-defined references from {{reflist|refs=…}} to <references>…</references> for VisualEditor compatibility
 
Line 19: Line 19:


==References==
==References==
{{reflist|refs=
<references>
<ref name="Hurley2014">{{citation|last=Hurley|first=Patrick|title=A Concise Introduction to Logic|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qGBQAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT182|edition=12th|year=2014|publisher=Cengage Learning|isbn=978-1-285-96556-7|pages=161, 172}}</ref>
<ref name="Hurley2014">{{citation|last=Hurley|first=Patrick|title=A Concise Introduction to Logic|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qGBQAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT182|edition=12th|year=2014|publisher=Cengage Learning|isbn=978-1-285-96556-7|pages=161, 172}}</ref>
}}
</references>


{{Fallacies}}
{{Fallacies}}

Latest revision as of 18:35, 17 December 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Unsubst". A fallacy of illicit transference is an informal fallacy occurring when an argument assumes there is no difference between a term in the distributive (referring to every member of a class) and collective (referring to the class itself as a whole) sense.[1]

There are two variations of this fallacy:[1]

  • Fallacy of composition – assumes what is true of the parts is true of the whole. This fallacy is also known as "arguing from the specific to the general."
Since Judy is so diligent in the workplace, this entire company must have an amazing work ethic.
Because this company is so corrupt, so must every employee within it be corrupt.

While fallacious, arguments that make these assumptions may be persuasive because of the representativeness heuristic.

See also

References

  1. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Navbox".


Template:Asbox