Connotation: Difference between revisions
imported>Arealheroo m Small punctuation change. |
imported>Uncreativenaming No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Cultural or emotional association}} | {{Short description|Cultural or emotional association}} | ||
{{distinguish|Implicature}} | |||
{{for|the technical term in semiotics|connotation (semiotics)}}{{redirect|Connote|Connote number|Waybill}} | {{for|the technical term in semiotics|connotation (semiotics)}}{{redirect|Connote|Connote number|Waybill}} | ||
A '''connotation''' is a commonly understood [[culture|cultural]] or [[emotional]] association that any given [[word]] or [[phrase]] carries, in addition to its explicit or [[Literal and figurative language|literal]] [[meaning (philosophy of language)|meaning]], which is its [[denotation]]. | A '''connotation''' is a commonly understood [[culture|cultural]] or [[emotional]] association that any given [[word]] or [[phrase]] carries, in addition to its explicit or [[Literal and figurative language|literal]] [[meaning (philosophy of language)|meaning]], which is its [[denotation]]. | ||
The majority of connotations can be described as either positive or negative, with regard to its pleasing or displeasing emotional connection.<ref>{{cite book|author=Peter A. White|title=Psychological Metaphysics|chapter=Feelings and JEA Sequences|date=27 March 2017|page=315|publisher=Routledge |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dCWEDgAAQBAJ&pg=PT315|isbn=978-1315473550}}</ref> For example, a stubborn person may be described as being either ''strong-willed'' or ''pig-headed''; although these have the same literal meaning (''stubborn''), ''strong-willed'' connotes [[admiration]] for the level of someone's will (a positive connotation), while ''pig-headed'' connotes frustration in dealing with someone (a negative connotation). | |||
Some words have such strong connotations that they are better known for the connotation they provide, rather than a dictionary definition. For instance, a significant amount of profanities, such as ''shit'' or ''fuck'' are commonly used for purposes entirely unrelated to their dictionary definition. | |||
==Usage== | ==Usage== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 19: | ||
Semiotic closure, as defined by [[Terry Eagleton]], concerns "a sealed world of ideological stability, which repels the disruptive, decentered forces of language in the name of an imaginary unity. [[Sign (semiotics)|Sign]]s are ranked by a certain covert violence into rigidly hierarchical order. . . . The process of forging ‘representations’ always involves this arbitrary closing of the signifying chain, constricting the free play of the signifier to a spuriously determinate meaning which can then be received by the subject as natural and inevitable".<ref>{{cite book|author=Terry Eagleton|title=Ideology: An Introduction|publisher=Verso|year=1991|page=197|isbn=0-86091-538-7}}</ref>{{Relevance inline |reason=Not completely irrelevant but given undue space here in relation to content that more directly deals with the notion of connotation; consider moving to [[Sign (semiotics)]] |date=January 2023}} | Semiotic closure, as defined by [[Terry Eagleton]], concerns "a sealed world of ideological stability, which repels the disruptive, decentered forces of language in the name of an imaginary unity. [[Sign (semiotics)|Sign]]s are ranked by a certain covert violence into rigidly hierarchical order. . . . The process of forging ‘representations’ always involves this arbitrary closing of the signifying chain, constricting the free play of the signifier to a spuriously determinate meaning which can then be received by the subject as natural and inevitable".<ref>{{cite book|author=Terry Eagleton|title=Ideology: An Introduction|publisher=Verso|year=1991|page=197|isbn=0-86091-538-7}}</ref>{{Relevance inline |reason=Not completely irrelevant but given undue space here in relation to content that more directly deals with the notion of connotation; consider moving to [[Sign (semiotics)]] |date=January 2023}} | ||
== Creation == | |||
Connotations in language are primarily created when a given word is only used in specific scenarios, rather than all scenarios which would fall under the dictionary definition.{{Citation needed|date=June 2026|reason=This is a theory I made up. I'm pretty sure it's true, but it does need back up from other sources.}} | |||
For instance, after the Norman invasion of England, [[Old French]], especially [[Old Norman|Norman]] variations, became widely used by people of power, such as landowners and royalty, while [[English language|English]] was still primarily used by the lower class.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Thomas J. Harran |url=http://archive.org/details/kenkyu-ronbun2 |title=kenkyu-ronbun2 |date=2013-12-20}}</ref> As such, [[French language|French]] words became associated with high society. Because of this, most French and French derived words are held to be formal and ornate compared to similar English words, at least by native English speakers.{{Citation needed|date=June 2026}} | |||
==Examples== | ==Examples== | ||
| Line 21: | Line 29: | ||
|[[Image:Cartoony heart.svg|100px|left|Example seven | |[[Image:Cartoony heart.svg|100px|left|Example seven | ||
.]] | .]] | ||
The denotation is a [[Representation (arts)|representation]] of a cartoon heart. The connotation is a | The denotation is a [[Representation (arts)|representation]] of a cartoon heart. The connotation is a symbol of love and affection. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Image:Cartoony red rose.svg|left|100px|Example one.]] | |[[Image:Cartoony red rose.svg|left|100px|Example one.]] | ||
The denotation of this example is a red [[rose]] with a green [[Plant stem|stem]]. The connotation is that it is a | The denotation of this example is a red [[rose]] with a green [[Plant stem|stem]]. The connotation is that it is a [[symbol]] of passion and love – this is what the rose represents. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Image:Cartoony cross.svg|100px|left|Example two.]] | | [[Image:Cartoony cross.svg|100px|left|Example two.]] | ||
The denotation is a brown cross. The | The denotation is a brown cross. The shape is widely associated with religion, specifically as a symbol of Christianity. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 43: | Line 51: | ||
*[[Intension]] | *[[Intension]] | ||
*[[Intensional definition]] | *[[Intensional definition]] | ||
*[[Implicature]] | |||
*[[Loaded language]] | *[[Loaded language]] | ||
*[[Metacommunicative competence]] | *[[Metacommunicative competence]] | ||
| Line 55: | Line 64: | ||
[[Category:Connotation| ]] | [[Category:Connotation| ]] | ||
[[Category:Concepts in logic]] | [[Category:Concepts in logic]] | ||
[[Category:Meaning (philosophy | [[Category:Meaning (philosophy)]] | ||
[[Category:Semantics]] | [[Category:Semantics]] | ||
[[Category:Subjective experience]] | [[Category:Subjective experience]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:34, 12 June 2026
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Distinguish". Script error: No such module "For".Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". A connotation is a commonly understood cultural or emotional association that any given word or phrase carries, in addition to its explicit or literal meaning, which is its denotation.
The majority of connotations can be described as either positive or negative, with regard to its pleasing or displeasing emotional connection.[1] For example, a stubborn person may be described as being either strong-willed or pig-headed; although these have the same literal meaning (stubborn), strong-willed connotes admiration for the level of someone's will (a positive connotation), while pig-headed connotes frustration in dealing with someone (a negative connotation).
Some words have such strong connotations that they are better known for the connotation they provide, rather than a dictionary definition. For instance, a significant amount of profanities, such as shit or fuck are commonly used for purposes entirely unrelated to their dictionary definition.
Usage
"Connotation" branches into a mixture of different meanings. These could include the contrast of a word or phrase with its primary, literal meaning (known as a denotation), with what that word or phrase specifically denotes. The connotation essentially relates to how anything may be associated with a word or phrase; for example, an implied value, judgement or feelings.[2]
Logic
In logic and semantics, connotation is roughly synonymous with intension. Connotation is often contrasted with denotation, which is more or less synonymous with extension. Alternatively, the connotation of the word may be thought of as the set of all its possible referents (as opposed to merely the actual ones). A word's denotation is the collection of things it refers to; its connotation is what it implies about the things it is used to refer to (a second level of meanings is termed connotative). The connotation of dog is (something like) four-legged canine carnivore. So, saying, "You are a dog" would connote that you were ugly or aggressive rather than literally denoting you as a canine.[3]
Related terms
It is often useful to avoid words with strong connotations (especially pejorative or disparaging ones) when striving to achieve a neutral point of view. A desire for more positive connotations, or fewer negative ones, is one of the main reasons for using euphemisms.[4]
Semiotic closure, as defined by Terry Eagleton, concerns "a sealed world of ideological stability, which repels the disruptive, decentered forces of language in the name of an imaginary unity. Signs are ranked by a certain covert violence into rigidly hierarchical order. . . . The process of forging ‘representations’ always involves this arbitrary closing of the signifying chain, constricting the free play of the signifier to a spuriously determinate meaning which can then be received by the subject as natural and inevitable".[5]Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Creation
Connotations in language are primarily created when a given word is only used in specific scenarios, rather than all scenarios which would fall under the dictionary definition.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
For instance, after the Norman invasion of England, Old French, especially Norman variations, became widely used by people of power, such as landowners and royalty, while English was still primarily used by the lower class.[6] As such, French words became associated with high society. Because of this, most French and French derived words are held to be formal and ornate compared to similar English words, at least by native English speakers.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Examples
The denotation is a representation of a cartoon heart. The connotation is a symbol of love and affection. |
The denotation of this example is a red rose with a green stem. The connotation is that it is a symbol of passion and love – this is what the rose represents. |
The denotation is a brown cross. The shape is widely associated with religion, specifically as a symbol of Christianity. |
See also
Script error: No such module "Side box".
- Context as Other Minds
- Double entendre
- Extension
- Extensional definition
- Intension
- Intensional definition
- Implicature
- Loaded language
- Metacommunicative competence
- Pun
- Semantic differential
- Semantic property
- Subtext
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Not all theories of linguistic meaning honor the distinction between literal meaning and (this kind of) connotation. See literal and figurative language.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".