Beta decay: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Somewhen
Description: Updated with suitably precice data from C-14 article.
 
imported>Quondum
trim excess from caption; fmt; rm superfluous "at cold temperatures"
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Type of radioactive decay}}
{{short description|Type of radioactive decay}}
[[Image:Beta-minus Decay.svg|thumb|240px|{{SubatomicParticle|Beta-}} decay in an [[atomic nucleus]] (the accompanying antineutrino is omitted). The inset shows beta decay of a free neutron. Neither of these depictions shows the intermediate [[Virtual particle|virtual]] {{SubatomicParticle|W boson-|link=yes}} boson.]]
[[Image:Beta-minus Decay.svg|thumb|upright=1.35|{{SubatomicParticle|Beta-}} decay in an [[atomic nucleus]] (the accompanying antineutrino is omitted). The inset shows beta decay of a free neutron. Neither of these depictions shows the intermediate [[Virtual particle|virtual]] {{SubatomicParticle|W boson-|link=yes}} boson.]]
{{Nuclear physics}}  
{{Nuclear physics}}  
In [[nuclear physics]], '''beta decay''' (β-decay) is a type of [[radioactive decay]] in which an [[atomic nucleus]] emits a [[beta particle]] (fast energetic [[electron]] or [[positron]]), transforming into an [[isobar (nuclide)|isobar]] of that nuclide. For example, beta decay of a [[neutron]] transforms it into a [[proton]] by the emission of an electron accompanied by an [[antineutrino]]; or, conversely a proton is converted into a neutron by the emission of a positron with a [[neutrino]] in what is called ''[[positron emission]]''. Neither the beta particle nor its associated (anti-)neutrino exist within the nucleus prior to beta decay, but are created in the decay process. By this process, unstable atoms obtain a more stable [[proton–neutron ratio|ratio of protons to neutrons]]. The probability of a nuclide decaying due to beta and other forms of decay is determined by its [[nuclear binding energy]]. The binding energies of all existing nuclides form what is called the nuclear band or [[valley of stability]].<ref name="konya74">
In [[nuclear physics]], '''beta decay''' (β-decay) is a type of [[radioactive decay]] in which an [[atomic nucleus]] emits a [[beta particle]] (fast energetic [[electron]] or [[positron]]), transforming into an [[isobar (nuclide)|isobar]] of that nuclide. For example, beta decay of a [[neutron]] transforms it into a [[proton]] by the emission of an electron accompanied by an [[antineutrino]]; or, conversely a proton is converted into a neutron by the emission of a positron with a [[neutrino]] in what is called ''[[positron emission]]''. Neither the beta particle nor its associated (anti-)neutrino exist within the nucleus prior to beta decay, but are created in the decay process. By this process, unstable atoms obtain a more stable [[proton–neutron ratio|ratio of protons to neutrons]]. The probability of a nuclide decaying due to beta and other forms of decay is determined by its [[nuclear binding energy]]. The binding energies of all existing nuclides form what is called the nuclear band or [[valley of stability]].<ref name="konya74">
Line 13: Line 13:
}}</ref> For either electron or positron emission to be energetically possible, the energy release ([[#Energy release|see below]]) or [[Q value (nuclear science)|''Q'' value]] must be positive.
}}</ref> For either electron or positron emission to be energetically possible, the energy release ([[#Energy release|see below]]) or [[Q value (nuclear science)|''Q'' value]] must be positive.


Beta decay is a consequence of the [[Weak interaction|weak force]], which is characterized by relatively long decay times. Nucleons are composed of [[up quark]]s and [[down quark]]s,<ref>{{cite journal
Beta decay is a consequence of the [[Weak interaction|weak force]], which is characterized by relatively long decay times. Nucleons are composed of [[up quark]]s and [[down quark]]s,<ref>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Bijker |first1=R.
  |last1=Bijker |first1=R.
  |last2=Santopinto |first2=E.
  |last2=Santopinto |first2=E.
Line 26: Line 27:
| s2cid=118499855 }}</ref> and the weak force allows a [[quark]] to change its [[flavour (particle physics)|flavour]] by means of a virtual [[W boson]] leading to creation of an electron/antineutrino or positron/neutrino pair. For example, a neutron, composed of two down quarks and an up quark, decays to a proton composed of a down quark and two up quarks.
| s2cid=118499855 }}</ref> and the weak force allows a [[quark]] to change its [[flavour (particle physics)|flavour]] by means of a virtual [[W boson]] leading to creation of an electron/antineutrino or positron/neutrino pair. For example, a neutron, composed of two down quarks and an up quark, decays to a proton composed of a down quark and two up quarks.


[[Electron capture]] is sometimes included as a type of beta decay,<ref>{{Cite book
[[Electron capture]] is sometimes included as a type of beta decay,<ref>
  |last1=Cottingham
{{cite book
|first1=W. N.
  |last1=Cottingham |first1=W. N.
  |last2=Greenwood
  |last2=Greenwood |first2=D. A.
|first2=D. A.
  |year=1986
  |year=1986
  |title=An introduction to nuclear physics
  |title=An introduction to nuclear physics
Line 38: Line 38:
  |url=https://archive.org/details/introductiontonu0000cott/page/40 }}</ref> because the basic nuclear process, mediated by the weak force, is the same. In electron capture, an inner atomic electron is captured by a proton in the nucleus, transforming it into a neutron, and an [[electron neutrino]] is released.
  |url=https://archive.org/details/introductiontonu0000cott/page/40 }}</ref> because the basic nuclear process, mediated by the weak force, is the same. In electron capture, an inner atomic electron is captured by a proton in the nucleus, transforming it into a neutron, and an [[electron neutrino]] is released.


==Description==
== Description ==
The two types of beta decay are known as ''beta minus'' and ''beta plus''. In beta minus (β<sup>−</sup>) decay, a neutron is converted to a proton, and the process creates an electron and an [[electron antineutrino]]; while in beta plus (β<sup>+</sup>) decay, a proton is converted to a neutron and the process creates a positron and an electron neutrino. β<sup>+</sup> decay is also known as [[positron emission]].<ref>{{Cite book
The two types of beta decay are known as ''beta minus'' and ''beta plus''. In beta minus (β<sup>−</sup>) decay, a neutron is converted to a proton, and the process creates an electron and an [[electron antineutrino]]; while in beta plus (β<sup>+</sup>) decay, a proton is converted to a neutron and the process creates a positron and an electron neutrino. β<sup>+</sup> decay is also known as [[positron emission]].<ref>
{{cite book
  |last1=Basdevant |first1=J.-L.
  |last1=Basdevant |first1=J.-L.
  |last2=Rich |first2=J.
  |last2=Rich |first2=J.
Line 46: Line 47:
  |title=Fundamentals in Nuclear Physics: From Nuclear Structure to Cosmology
  |title=Fundamentals in Nuclear Physics: From Nuclear Structure to Cosmology
  |publisher=[[Springer (publisher)|Springer]]
  |publisher=[[Springer (publisher)|Springer]]
  |isbn=978-0-387-01672-6 }}</ref>
  |isbn=978-0-387-01672-6
}}</ref>


Beta decay conserves a quantum number known as the [[lepton number]], or the number of electrons and their associated neutrinos (other leptons are the [[muon]] and [[Tau (particle)|tau]] particles). These particles have lepton number +1, while their antiparticles have lepton number −1. Since a proton or neutron has lepton number zero, β<sup>+</sup> decay (a positron, or antielectron) must be accompanied with an electron neutrino, while β<sup>−</sup> decay (an electron) must be accompanied by an electron antineutrino.
Beta decay conserves a quantum number known as the [[lepton number]], or the number of electrons and their associated neutrinos (other leptons are the [[muon]] and [[Tau (particle)|tau]] particles). These particles have lepton number +1, while their antiparticles have lepton number −1. Since a proton or neutron has lepton number zero, β<sup>+</sup> decay (a positron, or antielectron) must be accompanied with an electron neutrino, while β<sup>−</sup> decay (an electron) must be accompanied by an electron antineutrino.


An example of electron emission (β<sup>−</sup> decay) is the decay of [[carbon-14]] into [[nitrogen-14]] with a [[half-life]] of about 5,700 years:
An example of electron emission (β<sup>−</sup> decay) is the decay of [[carbon-14]] into [[nitrogen-14]] with a [[half-life]] of about 5,700 years:
:{{nuclide|carbon|14}} → {{nuclide|nitrogen|14}} + {{subatomic particle|electron}} + {{math|{{subatomic particle|electron antineutrino}}}}
: {{nuclide|carbon|14}} → {{nuclide|nitrogen|14}} + {{subatomic particle|electron}} + {{math|{{subatomic particle|electron antineutrino}}}}


In this form of decay, the original element becomes a new chemical element in a process known as [[nuclear transmutation]]. This new element has an unchanged [[mass number]] {{mvar|A}}, but an [[atomic number]] {{mvar|Z}} that is increased by one. As in all nuclear decays, the decaying element (in this case {{nuclide|carbon|14}}) is known as the ''parent nuclide'' while the resulting element (in this case {{nuclide|nitrogen|14}}) is known as the ''daughter nuclide''.
In this form of decay, the original element becomes a new chemical element in a process known as [[nuclear transmutation]]. This new element has an unchanged [[mass number]] {{mvar|A}}, but an [[atomic number]] {{mvar|Z}} that is increased by one. As in all nuclear decays, the decaying element (in this case {{nuclide|carbon|14}}) is known as the ''parent nuclide'' while the resulting element (in this case {{nuclide|nitrogen|14}}) is known as the ''daughter nuclide''.


Another example is the decay of hydrogen-3 ([[tritium]]) into [[helium-3]] with a half-life of about 12.3 years:
Another example is the decay of hydrogen-3 ([[tritium]]) into [[helium-3]] with a half-life of about 12.3 years:
:{{nuclide|hydrogen|3}} → {{nuclide|helium|3}} + {{subatomic particle|electron}} + {{math|{{subatomic particle|electron antineutrino}}}}
: {{nuclide|hydrogen|3}} → {{nuclide|helium|3}} + {{subatomic particle|electron}} + {{math|{{subatomic particle|electron antineutrino}}}}


An example of positron emission (β<sup>+</sup> decay) is the decay of [[magnesium-23]] into [[sodium-23]] with a half-life of about 11.3 s:
An example of positron emission (β<sup>+</sup> decay) is the decay of [[magnesium-23]] into [[sodium-23]] with a half-life of about 11.3&nbsp;s:
 
: {{nuclide|Magnesium|23}} → {{nuclide|Sodium|23}} + {{subatomic particle|positron}} + {{math|{{subatomic particle|electron neutrino}}}}
:{{nuclide|Magnesium|23}} → {{nuclide|Sodium|23}} + {{subatomic particle|positron}} + {{math|{{subatomic particle|electron neutrino}}}}
β<sup>+</sup> decay also results in nuclear transmutation, with the daughter element having an atomic number that is decreased by one.
β<sup>+</sup> decay also results in nuclear transmutation, with the daughter element having an atomic number that is decreased by one.


[[File:RaE1.jpg|thumb|A beta spectrum, showing a typical division of energy between electron and antineutrino]]
[[File:RaE1.jpg|thumb|A beta spectrum, showing a typical division of energy between electron and antineutrino]]
The beta spectrum, or distribution of energy values for the beta particles, is continuous. The total energy of the decay process is divided between the electron, the antineutrino, and the recoiling nuclide. In the figure to the right, an example of an electron with 0.40 MeV energy from the beta decay of <sup>210</sup>Bi is shown. In this example, the total decay energy is 1.16 MeV, so the antineutrino has the remaining energy: {{nowrap|1=1.16 MeV − 0.40 MeV = 0.76 MeV}}. An electron at the far right of the curve would have the maximum possible kinetic energy, leaving the energy of the neutrino to be only its small rest mass.
The beta spectrum, or distribution of energy values for the beta particles, is continuous. The total energy of the decay process is divided between the electron, the antineutrino, and the recoiling nuclide. In the figure to the right, an example of an electron with 0.40&nbsp;MeV energy from the beta decay of <sup>210</sup>Bi is shown. In this example, the total decay energy is 1.16&nbsp;MeV, so the antineutrino has the remaining energy: {{nowrap|1=1.16 MeV − 0.40 MeV = 0.76 MeV}}. An electron at the far right of the curve would have the maximum possible kinetic energy, leaving the energy of the neutrino to be only its small rest mass.


==History==
== History ==


===Discovery and initial characterization===
=== Discovery and initial characterization ===
Radioactivity was discovered in 1896 by [[Henri Becquerel]] in [[uranium]], and subsequently observed by [[Marie Curie|Marie]] and [[Pierre Curie]] in [[thorium]] and in the newly discovered elements [[polonium]] and [[radium]]. In 1899, [[Ernest Rutherford]] separated radioactive emissions into two types: alpha and beta (now beta minus), based on penetration of objects and ability to cause ionization. [[Alpha rays]] could be stopped by thin sheets of paper or aluminium, whereas beta rays could penetrate several millimetres of aluminium. In 1900, [[Paul Villard]] identified a still more penetrating type of radiation, which Rutherford identified as a fundamentally new type in 1903 and termed [[gamma ray]]s. Alpha, beta, and gamma are the first three letters of the [[Greek alphabet]].
Radioactivity was discovered in 1896 by [[Henri Becquerel]] in [[uranium]], and subsequently observed by [[Marie Curie|Marie]] and [[Pierre Curie]] in [[thorium]] and in the newly discovered elements [[polonium]] and [[radium]]. In 1899, [[Ernest Rutherford]] separated radioactive emissions into two types: alpha and beta (now beta minus), based on penetration of objects and ability to cause ionization. [[Alpha rays]] could be stopped by thin sheets of paper or aluminium, whereas beta rays could penetrate several millimetres of aluminium. In 1900, [[Paul Villard]] identified a still more penetrating type of radiation, which Rutherford identified as a fundamentally new type in 1903 and termed [[gamma ray]]s. Alpha, beta, and gamma are the first three letters of the [[Greek alphabet]].


Line 75: Line 76:
In 1901, Rutherford and [[Frederick Soddy]] showed that alpha and beta radioactivity involves the [[Nuclear transmutation|transmutation]] of atoms into atoms of other chemical elements. In 1913, after the products of more radioactive decays were known, Soddy and [[Kazimierz Fajans]] independently proposed their [[Radioactive displacement law of Fajans and Soddy|radioactive displacement law]], which states that beta (i.e., {{SubatomicParticle|Beta-}})&nbsp;emission from one element produces another element one place to the right in the [[periodic table]], while alpha emission produces an element two places to the left.
In 1901, Rutherford and [[Frederick Soddy]] showed that alpha and beta radioactivity involves the [[Nuclear transmutation|transmutation]] of atoms into atoms of other chemical elements. In 1913, after the products of more radioactive decays were known, Soddy and [[Kazimierz Fajans]] independently proposed their [[Radioactive displacement law of Fajans and Soddy|radioactive displacement law]], which states that beta (i.e., {{SubatomicParticle|Beta-}})&nbsp;emission from one element produces another element one place to the right in the [[periodic table]], while alpha emission produces an element two places to the left.


===Neutrinos===
=== Neutrinos ===


The study of beta decay provided the first physical evidence for the existence of the [[neutrino]]. In both alpha and gamma decay, the resulting alpha or gamma particle has a narrow energy [[Frequency distribution|distribution]], since the particle carries the energy from the difference between the initial and final nuclear states. However, the kinetic energy distribution, or spectrum, of beta particles measured by [[Lise Meitner]] and [[Otto Hahn]] in 1911 and by [[Jean Danysz]] in 1913 showed multiple lines on a diffuse background. These measurements offered the first hint that beta particles have a continuous spectrum.<ref name="Jensen">{{cite book
The study of beta decay provided the first physical evidence for the existence of the [[neutrino]]. In both alpha and gamma decay, the resulting alpha or gamma particle has a narrow energy [[Frequency distribution|distribution]], since the particle carries the energy from the difference between the initial and final nuclear states. However, the kinetic energy distribution, or spectrum, of beta particles measured by [[Lise Meitner]] and [[Otto Hahn]] in 1911 and by [[Jean Danysz]] in 1913 showed multiple lines on a diffuse background. These measurements offered the first hint that beta particles have a continuous spectrum.<ref name="Jensen">
{{cite book
  |last1=Jensen |first1=C.
  |last1=Jensen |first1=C.
  |year=2000
  |year=2000
Line 84: Line 86:
  |publisher=[[Birkhäuser Verlag]]
  |publisher=[[Birkhäuser Verlag]]
  |isbn=978-3-7643-5313-1
  |isbn=978-3-7643-5313-1
}}</ref> In 1914, [[James Chadwick]] used a magnetic [[spectrometer]] with one of [[Hans Geiger|Hans Geiger's]] new [[Geiger counter|counters]] to make more accurate measurements which showed that the spectrum was continuous.<ref name="Jensen" /><ref>{{cite journal |last=Chadwick |first=J. |year=1914 |title=Intensitätsverteilung im magnetischen Spektren der β-Strahlen von Radium B + C |journal=[[Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft]] |language=de |volume=16 |pages=383–391}}</ref> The results, which appeared to be in contradiction to the [[law of conservation of energy]], were validated by means of calorimetric measurements in 1929 by [[Lise Meitner]] and [[Wilhelm Orthmann]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Meitner |first1=Lise |last2=Orthmann |first2=Wilhelm |date=1930-03-01 |title=Über eine absolute Bestimmung der Energie der primären β-Strahlen von Radium E |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01339819 |journal=Zeitschrift für Physik |language=de |volume=60 |issue=3 |pages=143–155 |doi=10.1007/BF01339819 |bibcode=1930ZPhy...60..143M |issn=0044-3328}}</ref> If beta decay were simply electron emission as assumed at the time, then the energy of the emitted electron should have a particular, well-defined value.<ref name=Brown>{{cite journal
}}</ref> In 1914, [[James Chadwick]] used a magnetic [[spectrometer]] with one of [[Hans Geiger|Hans Geiger's]] new [[Geiger counter|counters]] to make more accurate measurements which showed that the spectrum was continuous.<ref name="Jensen" /><ref>{{cite journal |last=Chadwick |first=J. |year=1914 |title=Intensitätsverteilung im magnetischen Spektren der β-Strahlen von Radium B + C |journal=[[Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft]] |language=de |volume=16 |pages=383–391}}</ref> The results, which appeared to be in contradiction to the [[law of conservation of energy]], were validated by means of calorimetric measurements in 1929 by [[Lise Meitner]] and [[Wilhelm Orthmann]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Meitner |first1=Lise |last2=Orthmann |first2=Wilhelm |date=1930-03-01 |title=Über eine absolute Bestimmung der Energie der primären β-Strahlen von Radium E |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01339819 |journal=Zeitschrift für Physik |language=de |volume=60 |issue=3 |pages=143–155 |doi=10.1007/BF01339819 |bibcode=1930ZPhy...60..143M |issn=0044-3328}}</ref> If beta decay were simply electron emission as assumed at the time, then the energy of the emitted electron should have a particular, well-defined value.<ref name=Brown>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Brown |first1=L. M.
  |last1=Brown |first1=L. M.
  |year=1978
  |year=1978
Line 98: Line 101:
From 1920 to 1927, [[Charles Drummond Ellis]] (along with Chadwick and colleagues) further established that the beta decay spectrum is continuous. In 1933, Ellis and [[Nevill Mott]] obtained strong evidence that the beta spectrum has an effective upper bound in energy. [[Niels Bohr]] had suggested that the beta spectrum could be explained if [[conservation of energy]] was true only in a statistical sense, thus this [[Laws of science|principle]] might be violated in any given decay.<ref name=Brown/>{{rp|27}} However, the upper bound in beta energies determined by Ellis and Mott ruled out that notion. Now, the problem of how to account for the variability of energy in known beta decay products, as well as for conservation of momentum and angular momentum in the process, became acute.
From 1920 to 1927, [[Charles Drummond Ellis]] (along with Chadwick and colleagues) further established that the beta decay spectrum is continuous. In 1933, Ellis and [[Nevill Mott]] obtained strong evidence that the beta spectrum has an effective upper bound in energy. [[Niels Bohr]] had suggested that the beta spectrum could be explained if [[conservation of energy]] was true only in a statistical sense, thus this [[Laws of science|principle]] might be violated in any given decay.<ref name=Brown/>{{rp|27}} However, the upper bound in beta energies determined by Ellis and Mott ruled out that notion. Now, the problem of how to account for the variability of energy in known beta decay products, as well as for conservation of momentum and angular momentum in the process, became acute.


In a [[Electron neutrino#Pauli's letter|famous letter]] written in 1930, [[Wolfgang Pauli]] attempted to resolve the beta-particle energy conundrum by suggesting that, in addition to electrons and protons, atomic nuclei also contained an extremely light neutral particle, which he called the neutron. He suggested that this "neutron" was also emitted during beta decay (thus accounting for the known missing energy, momentum, and angular momentum), but it had simply not yet been observed. In 1931, [[Enrico Fermi]] renamed Pauli's "neutron" the "neutrino" ('little neutral one' in Italian). In 1933, Fermi published his landmark [[Fermi's interaction|theory for beta decay]], where he applied the principles of quantum mechanics to matter particles, supposing that they can be created and annihilated, just as the light quanta in atomic transitions. Thus, according to Fermi, neutrinos are created in the beta-decay process, rather than contained in the nucleus; the same happens to electrons. The neutrino interaction with matter was so weak that detecting it proved a severe experimental challenge. Further indirect evidence of the existence of the neutrino was obtained by observing the recoil of nuclei that emitted such a particle after absorbing an electron. Neutrinos were finally detected directly in 1956 by the American physicists [[Clyde Cowan]] and [[Frederick Reines]] in the [[Cowan–Reines neutrino experiment]].<ref>{{cite journal
In a [[Electron neutrino#Pauli's letter|famous letter]] written in 1930, [[Wolfgang Pauli]] attempted to resolve the beta-particle energy conundrum by suggesting that, in addition to electrons and protons, atomic nuclei also contained an extremely light neutral particle, which he called the neutron. He suggested that this "neutron" was also emitted during beta decay (thus accounting for the known missing energy, momentum, and angular momentum), but it had simply not yet been observed. In 1931, [[Enrico Fermi]] renamed Pauli's "neutron" the "neutrino" ('little neutral one' in Italian). In 1933, Fermi published his landmark [[Fermi's interaction|theory for beta decay]], where he applied the principles of quantum mechanics to matter particles, supposing that they can be created and annihilated, just as the light quanta in atomic transitions. Thus, according to Fermi, neutrinos are created in the beta-decay process, rather than contained in the nucleus; the same happens to electrons. The neutrino interaction with matter was so weak that detecting it proved a severe experimental challenge. Further indirect evidence of the existence of the neutrino was obtained by observing the recoil of nuclei that emitted such a particle after absorbing an electron. Neutrinos were finally detected directly in 1956 by the American physicists [[Clyde Cowan]] and [[Frederick Reines]] in the [[Cowan–Reines neutrino experiment]].<ref>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Cowan |first1=C. L. Jr.
  |last1=Cowan |first1=C. L. Jr.
  |last2=Reines |first2=F.
  |last2=Reines |first2=F.
Line 113: Line 117:
}}</ref> The properties of neutrinos were (with a few minor modifications) as predicted by Pauli and Fermi.
}}</ref> The properties of neutrinos were (with a few minor modifications) as predicted by Pauli and Fermi.


==={{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay and electron capture===
=== {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay and electron capture ===
In 1934, [[Frédéric Joliot-Curie|Frédéric]] and [[Irène Joliot-Curie]] bombarded aluminium with alpha particles to effect the nuclear reaction {{nuclide|Helium|4}}&nbsp;+&nbsp;{{nuclide|Aluminium|27}}&nbsp;→ {{nuclide|Phosphorus|30}}&nbsp;+&nbsp;{{nuclide|neutronium|1}}, and observed that the product isotope {{nuclide|Phosphorus|30}} emits a positron identical to those found in cosmic rays (discovered by [[Carl David Anderson]] in 1932). This was the first example of {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay ([[positron emission]]), which they termed [[artificial radioactivity]] since {{nuclide|Phosphorus|30}} is a short-lived nuclide which does not exist in nature. In recognition of their discovery, the couple were awarded the [[Nobel Prize in Chemistry]] in 1935.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1935/|title=The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1935|website=www.nobelprize.org|access-date=2018-04-25}}</ref>
In 1934, [[Frédéric Joliot-Curie|Frédéric]] and [[Irène Joliot-Curie]] bombarded aluminium with alpha particles to effect the nuclear reaction {{nuclide|Helium|4}}&nbsp;+&nbsp;{{nuclide|Aluminium|27}}&nbsp;→ {{nuclide|Phosphorus|30}}&nbsp;+&nbsp;{{nuclide|neutronium|1}}, and observed that the product isotope {{nuclide|Phosphorus|30}} emits a positron identical to those found in cosmic rays (discovered by [[Carl David Anderson]] in 1932). This was the first example of {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay ([[positron emission]]), which they termed [[artificial radioactivity]] since {{nuclide|Phosphorus|30}} is a short-lived nuclide which does not exist in nature. In recognition of their discovery, the couple were awarded the [[Nobel Prize in Chemistry]] in 1935.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1935/|title=The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1935|website=www.nobelprize.org|access-date=2018-04-25}}</ref>


The theory of [[electron capture]] was first discussed by [[Gian-Carlo Wick]] in a 1934 paper, and then developed by [[Hideki Yukawa]] and others. K-electron capture was first observed in 1937 by [[Luis Walter Alvarez|Luis Alvarez]], in the nuclide <sup>48</sup>V.<ref name=k>{{cite book
The theory of [[electron capture]] was first discussed by [[Gian-Carlo Wick]] in a 1934 paper, and then developed by [[Hideki Yukawa]] and others. K-electron capture was first observed in 1937 by [[Luis Walter Alvarez|Luis Alvarez]], in the nuclide <sup>48</sup>V.<ref name=k>
  |last=Segré
{{cite book
|first=E.
  |last=Segré |first=E.
  |year=1987
  |year=1987
  |chapter=K-Electron Capture by Nuclei
  |chapter=K-Electron Capture by Nuclei
  |editor1-last=Trower
  |editor1-last=Trower |editor1-first=P. W.
|editor1-first=P. W.
  |title=Discovering Alvarez: Selected Works of Luis W. Alvarez
  |title=Discovering Alvarez: Selected Works of Luis W. Alvarez
  |pages=[https://archive.org/details/discoveringalvar0000alva/page/11 11–12]
  |pages=[https://archive.org/details/discoveringalvar0000alva/page/11 11–12]
Line 128: Line 131:
  |isbn=978-0-226-81304-2
  |isbn=978-0-226-81304-2
  |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/discoveringalvar0000alva/page/11
  |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/discoveringalvar0000alva/page/11
  }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Nobel Prize in Physics 1968: Luis Alvarez |url=http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1968/alvarez-bio.html |publisher=[[The Nobel Foundation]] |access-date=2009-10-07 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal
  }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Nobel Prize in Physics 1968: Luis Alvarez |url=http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1968/alvarez-bio.html |publisher=[[The Nobel Foundation]] |access-date=2009-10-07 }}</ref><ref>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Alvarez |first1=L. W.
  |last1=Alvarez |first1=L. W.
  |year=1937
  |year=1937
Line 136: Line 140:
  |bibcode=1937PhRv...52..134A
  |bibcode=1937PhRv...52..134A
  |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.52.134
  |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.52.134
}}</ref> Alvarez went on to study electron capture in <sup>67</sup>Ga and other nuclides.<ref name=k /><ref>{{cite journal
}}</ref> Alvarez went on to study electron capture in <sup>67</sup>Ga and other nuclides.<ref name=k /><ref>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Alvarez |first1=L. W.
  |last1=Alvarez |first1=L. W.
  |year=1938
  |year=1938
Line 144: Line 149:
  |bibcode=1938PhRv...53..606A
  |bibcode=1938PhRv...53..606A
  |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.53.606
  |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.53.606
}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal
}}</ref><ref>
  |last1=Alvarez|first1=L. W.
{{cite journal
  |last1=Alvarez |first1=L. W.
  |year=1938
  |year=1938
  |title=The Capture of Orbital Electrons by Nuclei
  |title=The Capture of Orbital Electrons by Nuclei
Line 154: Line 160:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


===Non-conservation of parity===
=== Non-conservation of parity ===
In 1956, [[Tsung-Dao Lee]] and [[Chen Ning Yang]] noticed that there was no evidence that [[parity (physics)|parity]] was conserved in weak interactions, and so they postulated that this symmetry may not be preserved by the weak force. They sketched the design for an experiment for testing conservation of parity in the laboratory.<ref>{{cite journal
{{main|Wu experiment}}
In 1956, [[Tsung-Dao Lee]] and [[Chen Ning Yang]] noticed that there was no evidence that [[parity (physics)|parity]] was conserved in weak interactions, and so they postulated that this symmetry may not be preserved by the weak force. They sketched the design for an experiment for testing conservation of parity in the laboratory.<ref>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Lee |first1=T. D.
  |last1=Lee |first1=T. D.
  |last2=Yang |first2=C. N.
  |last2=Yang |first2=C. N.
Line 165: Line 173:
  |bibcode=1956PhRv..104..254L
  |bibcode=1956PhRv..104..254L
  |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.104.254
  |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.104.254
|doi-access=free
|doi-access=free
}}</ref> Later that year, [[Chien-Shiung Wu]] and coworkers conducted the [[Wu experiment]] showing an asymmetrical beta decay of [[cobalt-60|{{SimpleNuclide|cobalt|60}}]] at cold temperatures that proved that parity is not conserved in beta decay.<ref name="Wu1957" >{{cite journal
}}</ref> Later that year, [[Chien-Shiung Wu]] and coworkers showed experimentally that an asymmetrical beta emission from [[cobalt-60|{{SimpleNuclide|cobalt|60}}]] proved that parity is not conserved in beta decay.<ref name="Wu1957" >
{{cite journal
  |last1=Wu |first1=C.-S.
  |last1=Wu |first1=C.-S.
  |last2=Ambler |first2=E.
  |last2=Ambler |first2=E.
Line 179: Line 188:
  |bibcode=1957PhRv..105.1413W
  |bibcode=1957PhRv..105.1413W
  |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.105.1413
  |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.105.1413
|doi-access=free
|doi-access=free
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2013/10/15/channeling-ada-lovelace-chien-shiung-wu-courageous-hero-of-physics/|title=Channeling Ada Lovelace: Chien-Shiung Wu, Courageous Hero of Physics| first=Maia|last=Weinstock | website=scientificamerican.com}}</ref> This surprising result overturned long-held assumptions about parity and the weak force. In recognition of their theoretical work, Lee and Yang were awarded the [[Nobel Prize for Physics]] in 1957.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1957/ | title=The Nobel Prize in Physics 1957 |publisher=[[The Nobel Foundation]] |access-date=March 24, 2015}}</ref> However Wu, who was female, was not awarded the Nobel prize.<ref>{{cite web|last=Webb| first=Richard| title=Chien-Shiung Wu {{!}} Particle physicist denied a Nobel prize| website=newscientist.com| url=https://www.newscientist.com/people/chien-shiung-wu/| access-date=February 18, 2025}}</ref>
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2013/10/15/channeling-ada-lovelace-chien-shiung-wu-courageous-hero-of-physics/|title=Channeling Ada Lovelace: Chien-Shiung Wu, Courageous Hero of Physics| first=Maia|last=Weinstock | website=scientificamerican.com}}</ref><ref>
{{cite book
|last1=Laymon |first1=R.
|last2=Franklin |first2=A.
|date=2022
|title=Case Studies in Experimental Physics
|location=Cham
|publisher=[[Springer International Publishing]]
|pages=75–91
|doi=10.1007/978-3-031-12608-6_3
|isbn=978-3-031-12607-9
}}</ref> This surprising result overturned long-held assumptions about parity and the weak force. In recognition of their theoretical work, Lee and Yang were awarded the [[Nobel Prize for Physics]] in 1957.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1957/ | title=The Nobel Prize in Physics 1957 |publisher=[[The Nobel Foundation]] |access-date=March 24, 2015}}</ref> However Wu, who was female, was not awarded the Nobel prize.<ref>{{cite web|last=Webb| first=Richard| title=Chien-Shiung Wu {{!}} Particle physicist denied a Nobel prize| website=newscientist.com| url=https://www.newscientist.com/people/chien-shiung-wu/| access-date=February 18, 2025}}</ref>


==β<sup>−</sup> decay <span class="anchor" id="beta minus decay"></span>==
== β<sup>−</sup> decay <span class="anchor" id="beta minus decay"></span> ==
[[Image:Beta Negative Decay.svg|thumb|right|The leading-order [[Feynman diagram]] for {{SubatomicParticle|Beta-}}&nbsp;decay of a [[neutron]] into a [[proton]], [[electron]], and [[electron antineutrino]] via a virtual [[W boson|{{SubatomicParticle|W boson-}} boson]]. For higher-order diagrams see <ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ivanov|first1=A. N.|last2=Höllwieser|first2=R.| last3=Troitskaya|first3=N. I.|last4=Wellenzohn|first4=M.|last5=Berdnikov|first5=Ya. A.|date=2017-06-26|title=Precision theoretical analysis of neutron radiative beta decay to order O ( α 2 / π 2 )|journal=Physical Review D|language=en|volume=95| issue=11| page=113006|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.95.113006|issn=2470-0010|arxiv=1706.08687|bibcode=2017PhRvD..95k3006I| s2cid=119103283}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ivanov|first1=A. N.|last2=Höllwieser|first2=R.|last3=Troitskaya|first3=N. I.| last4=Wellenzohn|first4=M.|last5=Berdnikov|first5=Ya. A.|date=2018-11-30|title=Gauge properties of hadronic structure of nucleon in neutron radiative beta decay to order O(α/π) in standard ''V A'' effective theory with QED and linear sigma model of strong low-energy interactions|journal=International Journal of Modern Physics A|language=en|volume=33|issue=33|page=1850199| doi=10.1142/S0217751X18501993| issn=0217-751X|arxiv=1805.09702|bibcode=2018IJMPA..3350199I |s2cid=119088802}}</ref>]]
[[Image:Beta Negative Decay.svg|thumb|right|The leading-order [[Feynman diagram]] for {{SubatomicParticle|Beta-}}&nbsp;decay of a [[neutron]] into a [[proton]], [[electron]], and [[electron antineutrino]] via a virtual [[W boson|{{SubatomicParticle|W boson-}} boson]]. For higher-order diagrams see <ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ivanov |first1=A. N. |last2=Höllwieser |first2=R. |last3=Troitskaya |first3=N. I. |last4=Wellenzohn |first4=M. |last5=Berdnikov |first5=Ya. A. |date=2017-06-26 |title=Precision theoretical analysis of neutron radiative beta decay to order ''O''(''α''<sup>2</sup>/''π''<sup>2</sup>) |journal=Physical Review D |language=en |volume=95 | issue=11 |page=113006 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.95.113006 |issn=2470-0010 |arxiv=1706.08687 |bibcode=2017PhRvD..95k3006I |s2cid=119103283}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ivanov |first1=A. N. |last2=Höllwieser |first2=R. |last3=Troitskaya |first3=N. I. | last4=Wellenzohn |first4=M. |last5=Berdnikov |first5=Ya. A. |date=2018-11-30 |title=Gauge properties of hadronic structure of nucleon in neutron radiative beta decay to order ''O''(''α''/''π'') in standard ''V'' − ''A'' effective theory with QED and linear sigma model of strong low-energy interactions |journal=International Journal of Modern Physics A |language=en |volume=33 |issue=33 |page=1850199| doi=10.1142/S0217751X18501993 |issn=0217-751X |arxiv=1805.09702 |bibcode=2018IJMPA..3350199I |s2cid=119088802}}</ref>]]
In {{SubatomicParticle|Beta-}}&nbsp;decay, the [[weak interaction]] converts an [[atomic nucleus]] into a nucleus with [[atomic number]] increased by one, while emitting an electron ({{SubatomicParticle|Electron|link=yes}}) and an electron [[Neutrino#Antineutrinos|antineutrino]] ({{SubatomicParticle|Electron antineutrino}}). {{SubatomicParticle|Beta-}}&nbsp;decay generally occurs in neutron-rich nuclei.<ref name=Loveland>{{cite book
In {{SubatomicParticle|Beta-}}&nbsp;decay, the [[weak interaction]] converts an [[atomic nucleus]] into a nucleus with [[atomic number]] increased by one, while emitting an electron ({{SubatomicParticle|Electron|link=yes}}) and an electron [[Neutrino#Antineutrinos|antineutrino]] ({{SubatomicParticle|Electron antineutrino}}). {{SubatomicParticle|Beta-}}&nbsp;decay generally occurs in neutron-rich nuclei.<ref name=Loveland>
{{cite book
  |last=Loveland |first=W. D.
  |last=Loveland |first=W. D.
  |year=2005
  |year=2005
Line 193: Line 214:
  |isbn=978-0-471-11532-8
  |isbn=978-0-471-11532-8
}}</ref> The generic equation is:
}}</ref> The generic equation is:
: {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} → {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''+1}}|X′}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Electron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Antineutrino}}}}<ref name="konya74"/>
: {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} → {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''+1}}|X′}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Electron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Antineutrino}}}}<ref name="konya74"/>
where {{mvar|A}} and {{mvar|Z}} are the [[mass number]] and [[atomic number]]<!-- "charge" is linked from another place. "mass number" is paired with "atomic number" --> of the decaying nucleus, and X and X′ are the initial and final elements, respectively.
where {{mvar|A}} and {{mvar|Z}} are the [[mass number]] and [[atomic number]]<!-- "charge" is linked from another place. "mass number" is paired with "atomic number" --> of the decaying nucleus, and X and X′ are the initial and final elements, respectively.
Line 201: Line 221:
<!-- never use <math> for it, because symbols of particles may not be italicized! -->
<!-- never use <math> for it, because symbols of particles may not be italicized! -->


At the [[fundamental particle|fundamental]] level (as depicted in the [[Feynman diagram]] on the right), this is caused by the conversion of the negatively charged ({{math|−{{sfrac|1|3}} [[elementary charge|e]]}}) down quark to the positively charged ({{math|+{{sfrac|2|3}} e}}) up quark, which is promoted by a virtual [[W boson|{{SubatomicParticle|W boson-}} boson]]; the {{SubatomicParticle|W boson-}} boson subsequently decays into an electron and an electron antineutrino:
At the [[fundamental particle|fundamental]] level (as depicted in the [[Feynman diagram]] on the right), this is caused by the conversion of the negatively charged ({{math|−{{sfrac|1|3}} [[elementary charge|''e'']]}}) down quark to the positively charged ({{math|+{{sfrac|2|3}} ''e''}}) up quark, which is promoted by a virtual [[W boson|{{SubatomicParticle|W boson-}} boson]]; the {{SubatomicParticle|W boson-}} boson subsequently decays into an electron and an electron antineutrino:
:{{Subatomic particle|down quark}} → {{Subatomic particle|up quark}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Electron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Antineutrino}}}}.
:{{Subatomic particle|down quark}} → {{Subatomic particle|up quark}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Electron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Antineutrino}}}}.


==β<sup>+</sup> decay <span class="anchor" id="beta plus decay"></span>==
== β<sup>+</sup> decay <span class="anchor" id="beta plus decay"></span> ==
{{main|Positron emission}}
{{main|Positron emission}}
[[File:Electron Capture Decay.svg|thumb|The leading-order [[Feynman diagram]] for ''{{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}''&nbsp;decay of a [[proton]] into a [[neutron]], [[positron]], and [[electron neutrino]] via an intermediate virtual [[W boson|{{SubatomicParticle|W boson+}} boson]]]]
[[File:Electron Capture Decay.svg|thumb|The leading-order [[Feynman diagram]] for {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay of a [[proton]] into a [[neutron]], [[positron]], and [[electron neutrino]] via an intermediate virtual [[W boson|{{SubatomicParticle|W boson+}} boson]]]]
 
In {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay, or positron emission, the weak interaction converts an atomic nucleus into a nucleus with atomic number decreased by one, while emitting a positron ({{SubatomicParticle|Positron}}) and an [[electron neutrino]] ({{SubatomicParticle|Electron neutrino}}). ''{{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}''&nbsp;decay generally occurs in proton-rich nuclei. The generic equation is:


In {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay, or positron emission, the weak interaction converts an atomic nucleus into a nucleus with atomic number decreased by one, while emitting a positron ({{SubatomicParticle|Positron}}) and an [[electron neutrino]] ({{SubatomicParticle|Electron neutrino}}). {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay generally occurs in proton-rich nuclei. The generic equation is:
: {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} → {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''−1}}|X′}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Positron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Neutrino}}}}<ref name="konya74"/>
: {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} → {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''−1}}|X′}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Positron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Neutrino}}}}<ref name="konya74"/>
This may be considered as the decay of a proton inside the nucleus to a neutron:
This may be considered as the decay of a proton inside the nucleus to a neutron:
:p → n + {{SubatomicParticle|Positron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Neutrino}}}}<ref name="konya74"/>
: p → n + {{SubatomicParticle|Positron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Neutrino}}}}<ref name="konya74"/>


However, {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay cannot occur in an isolated proton because it requires energy, due to the [[mass]] of the neutron being greater than the mass of the proton. {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay can only happen inside nuclei when the daughter nucleus has a greater [[nuclear binding energy|binding energy]] (and therefore a lower total energy) than the mother nucleus. The difference between these energies goes into the reaction of converting a proton into a neutron, a positron, and a neutrino and into the kinetic energy of these particles. This process is opposite to negative beta decay, in that the weak interaction converts a proton into a neutron by converting an up quark into a down quark resulting in the emission of a {{SubatomicParticle|W boson+}} or the absorption of a {{SubatomicParticle|W boson-}}. When a {{SubatomicParticle|W boson+}} boson is emitted, it decays into a [[positron]] and an [[electron neutrino]]:
However, {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay cannot occur in an isolated proton because it requires energy, due to the [[mass]] of the neutron being greater than the mass of the proton. {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay can only happen inside nuclei when the daughter nucleus has a greater [[nuclear binding energy|binding energy]] (and therefore a lower total energy) than the mother nucleus. The difference between these energies goes into the reaction of converting a proton into a neutron, a positron, and a neutrino and into the kinetic energy of these particles. This process is opposite to negative beta decay, in that the weak interaction converts a proton into a neutron by converting an up quark into a down quark resulting in the emission of a {{SubatomicParticle|W boson+}} or the absorption of a {{SubatomicParticle|W boson-}}. When a {{SubatomicParticle|W boson+}} boson is emitted, it decays into a [[positron]] and an [[electron neutrino]]:
:{{Subatomic particle|up quark}} → {{Subatomic particle|down quark}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Positron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron neutrino}}}}.
: {{Subatomic particle|up quark}} → {{Subatomic particle|down quark}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Positron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron neutrino}}}}.


==Electron capture (K-capture/L-capture)==
== Electron capture (K-capture/L-capture) ==
{{main|Electron capture}}
{{main|Electron capture}}
[[File:Electron-capture.svg|alt=Leading-order EC Feynman diagrams|thumb|309x309px|The leading-order [[Feynman diagram]]s for [[electron capture]] decay. An [[electron]] interacts with an [[up quark]] in the nucleus via a [[W and Z bosons|W boson]] to create a [[down quark]] and [[electron neutrino]]. Two diagrams comprise the leading (second) order, though as a [[virtual particle]], the type (and charge) of the W-boson is indistinguishable.]]
[[File:Electron-capture.svg|alt=Leading-order EC Feynman diagrams|thumb|309x309px|The leading-order [[Feynman diagram]]s for [[electron capture]] decay. An [[electron]] interacts with an [[up quark]] in the nucleus via a [[W and Z bosons|W boson]] to create a [[down quark]] and [[electron neutrino]]. Two diagrams comprise the leading (second) order, though as a [[virtual particle]], the type (and charge) of the W-boson is indistinguishable.]]
In all cases where {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay (positron emission) of a nucleus is allowed energetically, so too is [[electron capture]] allowed. This is a process during which a nucleus captures one of its atomic electrons, resulting in the emission of a neutrino:
In all cases where {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay (positron emission) of a nucleus is allowed energetically, so too is [[electron capture]] allowed. This is a process during which a nucleus captures one of its atomic electrons, resulting in the emission of a neutrino:
: {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Electron}} → {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''−1}}|X′}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Neutrino}}}}
: {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Electron}} → {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''−1}}|X′}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Neutrino}}}}


An example of electron capture is one of the decay modes of [[krypton-81]] into [[bromine-81]]:
An example of electron capture is one of the decay modes of [[krypton-81]] into [[bromine-81]]:
:{{nuclide|Krypton|81}} + {{subatomic particle|electron}} → {{nuclide|Bromine|81}} + {{math|{{subatomic particle|electron neutrino}}}}
: {{nuclide|Krypton|81}} + {{subatomic particle|electron}} → {{nuclide|Bromine|81}} + {{math|{{subatomic particle|electron neutrino}}}}


All emitted neutrinos are of the same energy. In proton-rich nuclei where the energy difference between the initial and final states is less than 2{{math|''m''<sub>e</sub>''c''<sup>2</sup>}}, {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay is not energetically possible, and electron capture is the sole decay mode.<ref name="Zuber" />
All emitted neutrinos are of the same energy. In proton-rich nuclei where the energy difference between the initial and final states is less than 2{{math|''m''<sub>e</sub>''c''<sup>2</sup>}}, {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}}&nbsp;decay is not energetically possible, and electron capture is the sole decay mode.<ref name="Zuber" />


If the captured electron comes from the innermost shell of the atom, the [[Electron shell|K-shell]], which has the highest probability to interact with the nucleus, the process is called K-capture.<ref name="Jevremovic2009">{{cite book
If the captured electron comes from the innermost shell of the atom, the [[Electron shell|K-shell]], which has the highest probability to interact with the nucleus, the process is called K-capture.<ref name="Jevremovic2009">
{{cite book
  |last=Jevremovic |first=T.
  |last=Jevremovic |first=T.
  |year=2009
  |year=2009
Line 239: Line 258:
}}</ref> If it comes from the L-shell, the process is called L-capture, etc.
}}</ref> If it comes from the L-shell, the process is called L-capture, etc.


Electron capture is a competing (simultaneous) decay process for all nuclei that can undergo β<sup>+</sup> decay. The converse, however, is not true: electron capture is the ''only'' type of decay that is allowed in proton-rich nuclides that do not have sufficient energy to emit a positron and neutrino.<ref name="Zuber">{{cite book
Electron capture is a competing (simultaneous) decay process for all nuclei that can undergo β<sup>+</sup> decay. The converse, however, is not true: electron capture is the ''only'' type of decay that is allowed in proton-rich nuclides that do not have sufficient energy to emit a positron and neutrino.<ref name="Zuber">
{{cite book
  |last=Zuber |first=K.
  |last=Zuber |first=K.
  |year=2011
  |year=2011
Line 248: Line 268:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


==Nuclear transmutation==
== Nuclear transmutation ==
[[File:Table isotopes en.svg|250px|right|thumb|Graph of isotopes by type of nuclear decay. Orange and blue nuclides are unstable, with the black squares between these regions representing stable nuclides. The unbroken line passing below many of the nuclides represents the theoretical position on the graph of nuclides for which proton number is the same as neutron number. The graph shows that elements with more than 20 protons must have more neutrons than protons, in order to be stable.]]
[[File:Table isotopes en.svg|250px|right|thumb|Graph of isotopes by type of nuclear decay. Orange and blue nuclides are unstable, with the black squares between these regions representing stable nuclides. The unbroken diagonal line is where proton number is the same as neutron number.]]
{{See also|Nuclear drip line}}
{{See also|Nuclear drip line}}
If the proton and neutron are part of an [[atomic nucleus]], the above described decay processes [[Nuclear transmutation|transmute]] one chemical element into another. For example:
If the proton and neutron are part of an [[atomic nucleus]], the above described decay processes [[Nuclear transmutation|transmute]] one chemical element into another. For example:
Line 257: Line 277:
Na-22 _ _ -> Ne-22 + e+ + ve (beta_plus_decay)
Na-22 _ _ -> Ne-22 + e+ + ve (beta_plus_decay)
Na-22 + e- -> Ne-22 + ve _ _ (electron_capture)
Na-22 + e- -> Ne-22 + ve _ _ (electron_capture)
-->:{|border="0"
-->: {|border="0"
|- style="height:2em;"
|- style="height:2em;"
|{{nuclide|link=yes|caesium|137}}&nbsp;||&nbsp;||&nbsp;||→&nbsp;||{{nuclide|link=yes|barium|137}}&nbsp;||+&nbsp;||{{SubatomicParticle|link=yes|Electron}}&nbsp;||+&nbsp;||{{math|{{SubatomicParticle|link=yes|Electron Antineutrino}}}}&nbsp;||(beta minus decay)
|{{nuclide|link=yes|caesium|137}}&nbsp;||&nbsp;||&nbsp;||→&nbsp;||{{nuclide|link=yes|barium|137}}&nbsp;||+&nbsp;||{{SubatomicParticle|link=yes|Electron}}&nbsp;||+&nbsp;||{{math|{{SubatomicParticle|link=yes|Electron Antineutrino}}}}&nbsp;||(beta minus decay)
Line 268: Line 288:
Beta decay does not change the number&nbsp;({{mvar|A}}) of [[nucleon]]s in the nucleus, but changes only its [[electric charge|charge]]&nbsp;{{mvar|Z}}. Thus the set of all [[nuclide]]s with the same&nbsp;{{mvar|A}} can be introduced; these [[isobar (nuclide)|''isobaric'' nuclides]] may turn into each other via beta decay. For a given {{mvar|A}} there is one that is most stable. It is said to be beta stable, because it presents a local minimum of the [[mass excess]]: if such a nucleus has {{math|(''A'', ''Z'')}} numbers, the neighbour nuclei {{math|(''A'', ''Z''−1)}} and {{math|(''A'', ''Z''+1)}} have higher mass excess and can beta decay into {{math|(''A'', ''Z'')}}, but not vice versa. For all odd mass numbers {{mvar|A}}, there is only one known beta-stable isobar. For even&nbsp;{{mvar|A}}, there are up to three different beta-stable isobars experimentally known; for example, {{nuclide|tin|124}}, {{nuclide|tellurium|124}}, and {{nuclide|xenon|124}} are all beta-stable. There are about 350 known [[beta-decay stable isobars|beta-decay stable nuclides]].<ref name="nndc_Inte">{{Cite web | title=Interactive Chart of Nuclides | url=http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/ | publisher=National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory | access-date=2014-09-18 | archive-date=2018-10-10 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181010070007/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/  }}</ref>
Beta decay does not change the number&nbsp;({{mvar|A}}) of [[nucleon]]s in the nucleus, but changes only its [[electric charge|charge]]&nbsp;{{mvar|Z}}. Thus the set of all [[nuclide]]s with the same&nbsp;{{mvar|A}} can be introduced; these [[isobar (nuclide)|''isobaric'' nuclides]] may turn into each other via beta decay. For a given {{mvar|A}} there is one that is most stable. It is said to be beta stable, because it presents a local minimum of the [[mass excess]]: if such a nucleus has {{math|(''A'', ''Z'')}} numbers, the neighbour nuclei {{math|(''A'', ''Z''−1)}} and {{math|(''A'', ''Z''+1)}} have higher mass excess and can beta decay into {{math|(''A'', ''Z'')}}, but not vice versa. For all odd mass numbers {{mvar|A}}, there is only one known beta-stable isobar. For even&nbsp;{{mvar|A}}, there are up to three different beta-stable isobars experimentally known; for example, {{nuclide|tin|124}}, {{nuclide|tellurium|124}}, and {{nuclide|xenon|124}} are all beta-stable. There are about 350 known [[beta-decay stable isobars|beta-decay stable nuclides]].<ref name="nndc_Inte">{{Cite web | title=Interactive Chart of Nuclides | url=http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/ | publisher=National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory | access-date=2014-09-18 | archive-date=2018-10-10 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181010070007/http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/  }}</ref>


===Competition of beta decay types===
=== Competition of beta decay types ===
Usually unstable nuclides are clearly either "neutron rich" or "proton rich", with the former undergoing beta decay and the latter undergoing electron capture (or more rarely, due to the higher energy requirements, positron decay). However, in a few cases of odd-proton, odd-neutron radionuclides, it may be energetically favorable for the radionuclide to decay to an even-proton, even-neutron isobar either by undergoing beta-positive or beta-negative decay.  
Usually unstable nuclides are clearly either "neutron rich" or "proton rich", with the former undergoing beta decay and the latter undergoing electron capture (or more rarely, due to the higher energy requirements, positron decay). However, in a few cases of odd-proton, odd-neutron radionuclides, it may be energetically favorable for the radionuclide to decay to an even-proton, even-neutron isobar either by undergoing beta-positive or beta-negative decay.  


Three types of beta decay in competition are illustrated by the single isotope {{nuclide|copper|64|link=yes}} (29 protons, 35 neutrons), which has a half-life of about 12.7 hours.<ref name="Cu-64">[http://www.lnhb.fr/nuclides/Cu-64_tables.pdf Atomic and Nuclear Data: Chapter 12 Cu-64 ] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502181344/http://www.lnhb.fr/nuclides/Cu-64_tables.pdf |date=2024-05-02 }} Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel, 2011. Retrieved on 2024-05-01.</ref> This isotope has one unpaired proton and one unpaired neutron, so either the proton or the neutron can decay.<ref name="Copper-64">{{cite web |last1=Gilbert |first1=Thomas R. |title=Problem 20: Copper-64 is an unusual radionuclide |url=https://www.vaia.com/en-us/textbooks/chemistry/chemistry-the-science-in-context-5-edition/chapter-19/problem-20-copper-64-is-an-unusual-radionuclide-in-that-it-m/ |website=Chemistry The Science in Context |publisher=Vaia |access-date=2 May 2024 |archive-date=2 May 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502182148/https://www.vaia.com/en-us/textbooks/chemistry/chemistry-the-science-in-context-5-edition/chapter-19/problem-20-copper-64-is-an-unusual-radionuclide-in-that-it-m/ |url-status=live }}</ref> This particular nuclide is almost equally likely to undergo proton decay (by [[positron emission]], 18% or by [[electron capture]], 43%; both forming [[Isotopes of nickel|{{SimpleNuclide|Nickel|64}}]]) or neutron decay (by electron emission, 39%; forming [[Isotopes of zinc|{{SimpleNuclide|Zinc|64}}]]).<ref name="Cu-64"/><ref name="Copper-64"/>
Three types of beta decay in competition are illustrated by the single isotope {{nuclide|copper|64|link=yes}} (29 protons, 35 neutrons), which has a half-life of about 12.7 hours.<ref name="Cu-64">[http://www.lnhb.fr/nuclides/Cu-64_tables.pdf Atomic and Nuclear Data: Chapter 12 Cu-64 ] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502181344/http://www.lnhb.fr/nuclides/Cu-64_tables.pdf |date=2024-05-02 }} Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel, 2011. Retrieved on 2024-05-01.</ref> This isotope has one unpaired proton and one unpaired neutron, so either the proton or the neutron can decay.<ref name="Copper-64">{{cite web |last1=Gilbert |first1=Thomas R. |title=Problem 20: Copper-64 is an unusual radionuclide |url=https://www.vaia.com/en-us/textbooks/chemistry/chemistry-the-science-in-context-5-edition/chapter-19/problem-20-copper-64-is-an-unusual-radionuclide-in-that-it-m/ |website=Chemistry The Science in Context |publisher=Vaia |access-date=2 May 2024 |archive-date=2 May 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240502182148/https://www.vaia.com/en-us/textbooks/chemistry/chemistry-the-science-in-context-5-edition/chapter-19/problem-20-copper-64-is-an-unusual-radionuclide-in-that-it-m/ |url-status=live }}</ref> This particular nuclide is almost equally likely to undergo proton decay (by [[positron emission]], 18% or by [[electron capture]], 43%; both forming [[Isotopes of nickel|{{SimpleNuclide|Nickel|64}}]]) or neutron decay (by electron emission, 39%; forming [[Isotopes of zinc|{{SimpleNuclide|Zinc|64}}]]).<ref name="Cu-64"/><ref name="Copper-64"/>


===Stability of naturally occurring nuclides===
=== Stability of naturally occurring nuclides ===
Most naturally occurring nuclides on earth are beta stable. Nuclides that are not beta stable have [[half-life|half-lives]] ranging from under a second to periods of time significantly greater than the [[age of the universe]]. One common example of a long-lived isotope is the odd-proton odd-neutron nuclide {{nuclide|link=yes|Potassium|40}}, which undergoes all three types of beta decay ({{SubatomicParticle|Beta-}}, {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}} and electron capture) with a half-life of {{val|1.277|e=9|u=years}}.<ref>
Most naturally occurring nuclides on earth are beta stable. Nuclides that are not beta stable have [[half-life|half-lives]] ranging from under a second to periods of time significantly greater than the [[age of the universe]]. One common example of a long-lived isotope is the odd-proton odd-neutron nuclide {{nuclide|link=yes|Potassium|40}}, which undergoes all three types of beta decay ({{SubatomicParticle|Beta-}}, {{SubatomicParticle|Beta+}} and electron capture) with a half-life of {{val|1.277|e=9|u=years}}.<ref>
{{Cite web
{{cite web
  |title=WWW Table of Radioactive Isotopes, Potassium 40
  |title=WWW Table of Radioactive Isotopes, Potassium 40
  |publisher=Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  |publisher=Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Line 281: Line 301:
  |access-date=2014-09-18
  |access-date=2014-09-18
  |url=http://ie.lbl.gov/toi/nuclide.asp?iZA=190040
  |url=http://ie.lbl.gov/toi/nuclide.asp?iZA=190040
  |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131009123338/http://ie.lbl.gov/toi/nuclide.asp?iZA=190040
  |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131009123338/http://ie.lbl.gov/toi/nuclide.asp?iZA=190040
  |archive-date=2013-10-09
  |archive-date=2013-10-09
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


==Conservation rules for beta decay==
== Conservation rules for beta decay ==


===Baryon number is conserved===
=== Baryon number is conserved ===


<math display="block">B=\frac{n_q - n_{\bar{q}}}{3}</math>
<math display="block">B=\frac{n_\text{q} - n_{\bar{\text{q}}}}{3}</math>
where
where
* <math>n_q</math> is the number of constituent quarks, and
* <math>n_\text{q}</math> is the number of constituent quarks, and
* <math>n_{\overline{q}}</math> is the number of constituent antiquarks.
* <math>n_{\overline{\text{q}}}</math> is the number of constituent antiquarks.


Beta decay just changes [[neutron]] to [[proton]] or, in the case of positive beta decay ([[electron capture]]) [[proton]] to [[neutron]] so the number of individual [[quarks]] doesn't change. It is only the baryon flavor that changes, here labelled as the [[isospin]].
Beta decay just changes [[neutron]] to [[proton]] or, in the case of positive beta decay ([[electron capture]]) [[proton]] to [[neutron]] so the number of individual [[quarks]] doesn't change. It is only the baryon flavor that changes, here labelled as the [[isospin]].
Line 308: Line 327:
<math display="block">I_\text{z}=\frac{1}{2} (n_\text{u} - n_\text{d})</math>
<math display="block">I_\text{z}=\frac{1}{2} (n_\text{u} - n_\text{d})</math>


===Lepton number is conserved===
=== Lepton number is conserved ===


<math display="block">L \equiv n_{\ell} - n_{\bar{\ell}}</math>
<math display="block">L \equiv n_{\ell} - n_{\bar{\ell}}</math>
so all leptons have assigned a value of +1, antileptons &minus;1, and non-leptonic particles 0.  
so all leptons have assigned a value of +1, antileptons &minus;1, and non-leptonic particles 0.  
<math display="block">\begin{matrix}
<math display="block">\begin{matrix}
Line 318: Line 336:
\end{matrix}</math>
\end{matrix}</math>


===Angular momentum===
=== Angular momentum ===
For allowed decays, the net orbital angular momentum is zero, hence only spin quantum numbers are considered.
For allowed decays, the net orbital angular momentum is zero, hence only spin quantum numbers are considered.


Line 325: Line 343:
For forbidden decays, orbital angular momentum must also be taken into consideration.
For forbidden decays, orbital angular momentum must also be taken into consideration.


==Energy release==
== Energy release ==
The [[Q value (nuclear science)|{{mvar|Q}} value]] is defined as the total energy released in a given nuclear decay. In beta decay, {{mvar|Q}} is therefore also the sum of the kinetic energies of the emitted beta particle, neutrino, and recoiling nucleus. (Because of the large mass of the nucleus compared to that of the beta particle and neutrino, the kinetic energy of the recoiling nucleus can generally be neglected.) Beta particles can therefore be emitted with any [[kinetic energy]] ranging from 0 to {{mvar|Q}}.<ref name="konya74"/> A typical {{mvar|Q}} is around 1&nbsp;[[MeV]], but can range from a few [[keV]] to a few tens of MeV.
The [[Q value (nuclear science)|{{mvar|Q}} value]] is defined as the total energy released in a given nuclear decay. In beta decay, {{mvar|Q}} is therefore also the sum of the kinetic energies of the emitted beta particle, neutrino, and recoiling nucleus. (Because of the large mass of the nucleus compared to that of the beta particle and neutrino, the kinetic energy of the recoiling nucleus can generally be neglected.) Beta particles can therefore be emitted with any [[kinetic energy]] ranging from 0 to {{mvar|Q}}.<ref name="konya74"/> A typical {{mvar|Q}} is around 1&nbsp;[[MeV]], but can range from a few [[keV]] to a few tens of MeV.


Line 332: Line 350:


The following table gives some examples:
The following table gives some examples:
 
: {| class="wikitable zebra"
{| class="wikitable zebra"
|+ Examples of beta decay energies
|+ Examples of beta decay energies
|-
|-
Line 357: Line 374:
|}
|}
Tritium β<sup>−</sup> decay being used in the [[KATRIN]] experimental search for [[sterile neutrinos]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Mertens |first=Susanne |date=2015-01-01 |title=Status of the KATRIN Experiment and Prospects to Search for keV-mass Sterile Neutrinos in Tritium β-decay |journal=Physics Procedia |series=13th International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics, TAUP 2013 |volume=61 |pages=267–273 |doi=10.1016/j.phpro.2014.12.043 |issn=1875-3892|doi-access=free |bibcode=2015PhPro..61..267M }}</ref>
Tritium β<sup>−</sup> decay being used in the [[KATRIN]] experimental search for [[sterile neutrinos]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Mertens |first=Susanne |date=2015-01-01 |title=Status of the KATRIN Experiment and Prospects to Search for keV-mass Sterile Neutrinos in Tritium β-decay |journal=Physics Procedia |series=13th International Conference on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics, TAUP 2013 |volume=61 |pages=267–273 |doi=10.1016/j.phpro.2014.12.043 |issn=1875-3892|doi-access=free |bibcode=2015PhPro..61..267M }}</ref>
===β<sup>−</sup> decay===
 
=== β<sup>−</sup> decay ===
Consider the generic equation for beta decay
Consider the generic equation for beta decay
: {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} → {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''+1}}|X′}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Electron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Antineutrino}}}}.
: {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} → {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''+1}}|X′}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Electron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Antineutrino}}}}.
The {{mvar|Q}} value for this decay is
The {{mvar|Q}} value for this decay is
:<math chem>Q=\left[m_N\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right) - m_N\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}+1}X'}\right)-m_e-m_{\overline\nu_e}\right]c^2</math>,
: <math chem>Q=\left[m_\text{N}\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right) - m_\text{N}\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}+1}X'}\right)-m_\text{e}-m_{\overline\nu_\text{e}}\right]c^2</math>,
where <math chem>m_N\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right)</math> is the mass of the nucleus of the {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} atom, <math chem>m_e</math> is the mass of the electron, and <math chem>m_{\overline\nu_e}</math> is the mass of the electron antineutrino. In other words, the total energy released is the mass energy of the initial nucleus, minus the mass energy of the final nucleus, electron, and antineutrino. The mass of the nucleus {{mvar|m<sub>N</sub>}} is related to the standard [[atomic mass]] {{mvar|m}} by
where <math chem>m_\text{N}\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right)</math> is the mass of the nucleus of the {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} atom, <math chem>m_\text{e}</math> is the mass of the electron, and <math chem>m_{\overline\nu_\text{e}}</math> is the mass of the electron antineutrino. In other words, the total energy released is the mass energy of the initial nucleus, minus the mass energy of the final nucleus, electron, and antineutrino. The mass of the nucleus {{mvar|m<sub>N</sub>}} is related to the standard [[atomic mass]] {{mvar|m}} by
<math chem display="block">m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right)c^2=m_N\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right)c^2 + Z m_e c^2-\sum_{i=1}^Z B_i.</math>
<math chem display="block">m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right)c^2=m_\text{N}\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right)c^2 + Z m_\text{e} c^2-\sum_{i=1}^Z B_i.</math>
That is, the total atomic mass is the mass of the nucleus, plus the mass of the electrons, minus the sum of all ''electron'' binding energies {{mvar|B<sub>i</sub>}} for the atom. This equation is rearranged to find <math chem>m_N\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right)</math>, and <math chem>m_N\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}+1}X'}\right)</math> is found similarly. Substituting these nuclear masses into the {{math|Q}}-value equation, while neglecting the nearly-zero antineutrino mass and the difference in electron binding energies, which is very small for high-{{mvar|Z}} atoms, we have
That is, the total atomic mass is the mass of the nucleus, plus the mass of the electrons, minus the sum of all ''electron'' binding energies {{mvar|B<sub>i</sub>}} for the atom. This equation is rearranged to find <math chem>m_\text{N}\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right)</math>, and <math chem>m_\text{N}\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}+1}X'}\right)</math> is found similarly. Substituting these nuclear masses into the {{math|Q}}-value equation, while neglecting the nearly zero antineutrino mass and the difference in electron binding energies, which is very small for high-{{mvar|Z}} atoms, we have
<math chem display="block">Q=\left[m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right)-m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}+1}X'}\right)\right]c^2</math>
<math chem display="block">Q=\left[m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right)-m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}+1}X'}\right)\right]c^2</math>
This energy is carried away as kinetic energy by the electron and antineutrino.
This energy is carried away as kinetic energy by the electron and antineutrino.
Line 370: Line 388:
Because the reaction will proceed only when the {{mvar|Q}}&nbsp;value is positive, β<sup>−</sup> decay can occur when the mass of atom {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} is greater than the mass of atom {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''+1}}|X′}}.<ref name="Krane1987">{{cite book|author=Kenneth S. Krane|title=Introductory Nuclear Physics| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ConwAAAAMAAJ|date=5 November 1987|publisher=Wiley|isbn=978-0-471-80553-3}}</ref>
Because the reaction will proceed only when the {{mvar|Q}}&nbsp;value is positive, β<sup>−</sup> decay can occur when the mass of atom {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} is greater than the mass of atom {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''+1}}|X′}}.<ref name="Krane1987">{{cite book|author=Kenneth S. Krane|title=Introductory Nuclear Physics| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ConwAAAAMAAJ|date=5 November 1987|publisher=Wiley|isbn=978-0-471-80553-3}}</ref>


===β<sup>+</sup> decay===
=== β<sup>+</sup> decay ===
The equations for β<sup>+</sup> decay are similar, with the generic equation
The equations for β<sup>+</sup> decay are similar, with the generic equation
: {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} → {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''−1}}|X′}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Positron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Neutrino}}}}
: {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} → {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''−1}}|X′}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Positron}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Neutrino}}}}
giving
giving
<math chem display="block">Q=\left[m_N\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right) - m_N\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}-1}X'}\right)-m_e-m_{\nu_e}\right]c^2.</math>
<math chem display="block">Q=\left[m_\text{N}\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right) - m_\text{N}\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}-1}X'}\right)-m_\text{e}-m_{\nu_\text{e}}\right]c^2.</math>
However, in this equation, the electron masses do not cancel, and we are left with
However, in this equation, the electron masses do not cancel, and we are left with
<math chem display="block">Q=\left[m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right)-m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}-1}X'}\right)-2m_e\right]c^2.</math>
<math chem display="block">Q=\left[m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right)-m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}-1}X'}\right)-2m_\text{e}\right]c^2.</math>


Because the reaction will proceed only when the {{mvar|Q}}&nbsp;value is positive, β<sup>+</sup> decay can occur when the mass of atom {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} exceeds that of {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''−1}}|X′}} by at least twice the mass of the electron.<ref name="Krane1987" />
Because the reaction will proceed only when the {{mvar|Q}}&nbsp;value is positive, β<sup>+</sup> decay can occur when the mass of atom {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} exceeds that of {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''−1}}|X′}} by at least twice the mass of the electron.<ref name="Krane1987" />


===Electron capture===
=== Electron capture ===
The analogous calculation for electron capture must take into account the binding energy of the electrons. This is because the atom will be left in an excited state after capturing the electron, and the binding energy of the captured innermost electron is significant. Using the generic equation for electron capture
The analogous calculation for electron capture must take into account the binding energy of the electrons. This is because the atom will be left in an excited state after capturing the electron, and the binding energy of the captured innermost electron is significant. Using the generic equation for electron capture
: {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Electron}} → {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''−1}}|X′}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Neutrino}}}}
: {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{mvar|Z}}|X}} + {{SubatomicParticle|Electron}} → {{Physics particle|TL={{mvar|A}}|BL={{math|''Z''−1}}|X′}} + {{math|{{SubatomicParticle|Electron Neutrino}}}}
we have
we have
<math chem display="block">Q=\left[m_N\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right) + m_e - m_N\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}-1}X'}\right)-m_{\nu_e}\right]c^2,</math>
<math chem display="block">Q=\left[m_\text{N}\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right) + m_\text{e} - m_\text{N}\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}-1}X'}\right)-m_{\nu_\text{e}}\right]c^2,</math>
which simplifies to
which simplifies to
<math chem display="block">Q=\left[m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right) - m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}-1}X'}\right)\right]c^2-B_n,</math>
<math chem display="block">Q=\left[m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_\mathit{Z}X}\right) - m\left(\ce{^\mathit{A}_{\mathit{Z}-1}X'}\right)\right]c^2-B_\text{n},</math>
where {{mvar|B<sub>n</sub>}} is the binding energy of the captured electron.
where {{math|''B''<sub>n</sub>}} is the binding energy of the captured electron.


Because the binding energy of the electron is much less than the mass of the electron, nuclei that can undergo β<sup>+</sup> decay can always also undergo electron capture, but the reverse is not true.<ref name="Krane1987" />
Because the binding energy of the electron is much less than the mass of the electron, nuclei that can undergo β<sup>+</sup> decay can always also undergo electron capture, but the reverse is not true.<ref name="Krane1987" />


==Beta emission spectrum==
== Beta emission spectrum ==
[[File:Beta spectrum of RaE.jpg|thumb|Beta spectrum of <sup>210</sup>Bi. ''E''<sub>max</sub> = ''Q'' = 1.16 MeV is the maximum energy]]
[[File:Beta spectrum of RaE.jpg|thumb|Beta spectrum of <sup>210</sup>Bi. ''E''<sub>max</sub> = ''Q'' = 1.16&nbsp;MeV is the maximum energy]]
Beta decay can be considered as a [[Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics)|perturbation]] as described in quantum mechanics, and thus [[Fermi's Golden Rule]] can be applied. This leads to an expression for the kinetic energy spectrum {{math|''N''(''T'')}} of emitted betas as follows:<ref>{{cite web | last=Nave | first=C. R. |title=Energy and Momentum Spectra for Beta Decay | url=http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/beta2.html |work=[[HyperPhysics]] |access-date=2013-03-09}}</ref>
Beta decay can be considered as a [[Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics)|perturbation]] as described in quantum mechanics, and thus [[Fermi's Golden Rule]] can be applied. This leads to an expression for the kinetic energy spectrum {{math|''N''(''T'')}} of emitted betas as follows:<ref>{{cite web | last=Nave | first=C. R. |title=Energy and Momentum Spectra for Beta Decay | url=http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/beta2.html |work=[[HyperPhysics]] |access-date=2013-03-09}}</ref>
<math display="block">N(T) = C_L(T) F(Z,T) p E (Q-T)^2</math>
<math display="block">N(T) = C_L(T) F(Z,T) p E (Q-T)^2</math>
 
where {{mvar|T}} is the kinetic energy, {{mvar|C<sub>L</sub>}} is a shape function that depends on the forbiddenness of the decay (it is constant for allowed decays), {{math|''F''(''Z'', ''T'')}} is the Fermi Function (see below) with ''Z'' the charge of the final-state nucleus, {{math|1=''E'' = ''T'' + ''mc''<sup>2</sup>}} is the total energy, <math> p = \sqrt{(E/c)^2 - (mc)^2}</math> is the momentum, and {{mvar|Q}} is the [[Q value (nuclear science)|''Q'' value]] of the decay. The kinetic energy of the emitted neutrino is given approximately by {{mvar|Q}} minus the kinetic energy of the beta.
where {{mvar|T}} is the kinetic energy, {{mvar|C<sub>L</sub>}} is a shape function that depends on the forbiddenness of the decay (it is constant for allowed decays), {{math|''F''(''Z'', ''T'')}} is the Fermi Function (see below) with ''Z'' the charge of the final-state nucleus, {{math|1=''E'' = ''T'' + ''mc''<sup>2</sup>}} is the total energy, <math> p = \sqrt{(E/c)^2 - (mc)^2}</math> is the momentum, and {{mvar|Q}} is the [[Q value (nuclear science)|Q value]] of the decay. The kinetic energy of the emitted neutrino is given approximately by {{mvar|Q}} minus the kinetic energy of the beta.


As an example, the beta decay spectrum of <sup>210</sup>Bi (originally called RaE) is shown to the right.
As an example, the beta decay spectrum of <sup>210</sup>Bi (originally called RaE) is shown to the right.


===Fermi function===
=== Fermi function ===


The Fermi function that appears in the beta spectrum formula accounts for the Coulomb attraction / repulsion between the emitted beta and the final state nucleus. Approximating the associated wavefunctions to be spherically symmetric, the Fermi function can be analytically calculated to be:<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Fermi |first1=E. |year=1934 |title=Versuch einer Theorie der &beta;-Strahlen. I |journal=[[Zeitschrift für Physik]] |volume=88 |issue=3–4 |pages=161–177 |bibcode=1934ZPhy...88..161F |doi=10.1007/BF01351864|s2cid=125763380 }}</ref>
The Fermi function that appears in the beta spectrum formula accounts for the Coulomb attraction / repulsion between the emitted beta and the final state nucleus. Approximating the associated wavefunctions to be spherically symmetric, the Fermi function can be analytically calculated to be:<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Fermi |first1=E. |year=1934 |title=Versuch einer Theorie der &beta;-Strahlen. I |journal=[[Zeitschrift für Physik]] |volume=88 |issue=3–4 |pages=161–177 |bibcode=1934ZPhy...88..161F |doi=10.1007/BF01351864|s2cid=125763380 }}</ref>
<math display="block">F(Z,T)=\frac{2 (1+S)}{\Gamma(1+2S)^2} (2 p \rho)^{2S-2} e^{\pi \eta} |\Gamma(S+i \eta)|^2,</math>
<math display="block">F(Z,T)=\frac{2 (1+S)}{\Gamma(1+2S)^2} (2 p \rho)^{2S-2} e^{\pi \eta} |\Gamma(S+i \eta)|^2,</math>
where {{mvar|p}} is the final momentum, Γ the [[Gamma function]], and (if {{mvar|α}} is the [[fine-structure constant]] and {{math|''r''<sub>N</sub>}} the radius of the final state nucleus) {{tmath|1= S = \sqrt{1 - \alpha^2 Z^2} }}, <math>\eta = \pm Ze^2E/(\hbar cp)</math> (+ for electrons, − for positrons), and {{tmath|1= \rho = r_\text{N}/\hbar }}.


where {{mvar|p}} is the final momentum, Γ the [[Gamma function]], and (if {{mvar|α}} is the [[fine-structure constant]] and {{mvar|r<sub>N</sub>}} the radius of the final state nucleus) <math>S = \sqrt{1 - \alpha^2 Z^2}</math>, <math>\eta = \pm Ze^2E/(\hbar cp)</math> (+ for electrons, − for positrons), and <math>\rho = r_N/\hbar </math>.
For non-relativistic betas ({{math|''Q'' ≪ ''m''<sub>e</sub>''c''<sup>2</sup>}}), this expression can be approximated by:<ref>
 
{{cite book
For non-relativistic betas ({{math|''Q'' ≪ ''m''<sub>e</sub>''c''<sup>2</sup>}}), this expression can be approximated by:<ref>{{cite book
  |last1=Mott |first1=N. F.
  |last1=Mott |first1=N. F.
  |last2=Massey |first2=H. S. W.
  |last2=Massey |first2=H. S. W.
Line 418: Line 433:
  |lccn=34001940
  |lccn=34001940
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
<math display="block">F(Z,T) \approx \frac{2 \pi \eta}{1 - e^{- 2 \pi \eta}}.</math>
<math display="block">F(Z,T) \approx \frac{2 \pi \eta}{1 - e^{- 2 \pi \eta}}.</math>


Other approximations can be found in the literature.<ref>{{cite journal
Other approximations can be found in the literature.<ref>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Venkataramaiah |first1=P.
  |last1=Venkataramaiah |first1=P.
  |last2=Gopala |first2=K.
  |last2=Gopala |first2=K.
Line 433: Line 448:
  |bibcode=1985JPhG...11..359V
  |bibcode=1985JPhG...11..359V
  |doi=10.1088/0305-4616/11/3/014
  |doi=10.1088/0305-4616/11/3/014
|s2cid=250803189
|s2cid=250803189
}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal
}}</ref><ref>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Schenter |first1=G. K.
  |last1=Schenter |first1=G. K.
  |last2=Vogel |first2=P.
  |last2=Vogel |first2=P.
Line 446: Line 462:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


===Kurie plot===
=== Kurie plot ===
<!-- Note: Kurie is correct (see References below); no relation to the Curies -->
<!-- Note: Kurie is correct (see References below); no relation to the Curies -->


A '''Kurie plot''' (also known as a '''Fermi–Kurie plot''') is a graph used in studying beta decay developed by [[Franz N. D. Kurie]], in which the square root of the number of beta particles whose momentum (or energy) lies within a certain narrow range, divided by the Fermi function, is plotted against beta-particle energy.<ref>{{cite journal
A '''Kurie plot''' (also known as a '''Fermi–Kurie plot''') is a graph used in studying beta decay developed by [[Franz N. D. Kurie]], in which the square root of the number of beta particles whose momentum (or energy) lies within a certain narrow range, divided by the Fermi function, is plotted against beta-particle energy.<ref>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Kurie |first1=F. N. D. |author-link=Franz N. D. Kurie
  |last1=Kurie |first1=F. N. D. |author-link=Franz N. D. Kurie
  |last2=Richardson |first2=J. R.
  |last2=Richardson |first2=J. R.
Line 459: Line 476:
  |bibcode=1936PhRv...49..368K
  |bibcode=1936PhRv...49..368K
  |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.49.368
  |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.49.368
}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal
}}</ref><ref>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Kurie |first1=F. N. D. |author-link=Franz N. D. Kurie
  |last1=Kurie |first1=F. N. D. |author-link=Franz N. D. Kurie
  |year=1948
  |year=1948
Line 467: Line 485:
  |bibcode=1948PhRv...73.1207K
  |bibcode=1948PhRv...73.1207K
  |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.73.1207
  |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.73.1207
}}</ref> It is a straight line for allowed transitions and some forbidden transitions, in accord with the Fermi beta-decay theory. The energy-axis (x-axis) intercept of a Kurie plot corresponds to the maximum energy imparted to the electron/positron (the decay's {{mvar|Q}}&nbsp;value). With a Kurie plot one can find the limit on the effective mass of a neutrino.<ref>{{Cite journal
}}</ref> It is a straight line for allowed transitions and some forbidden transitions, in accord with the Fermi beta-decay theory. The energy-axis (x-axis) intercept of a Kurie plot corresponds to the maximum energy imparted to the electron/positron (the decay's {{mvar|Q}}&nbsp;value). With a Kurie plot one can find the limit on the effective mass of a neutrino.<ref>
{{Cite journal
  |last=Rodejohann |first=W.
  |last=Rodejohann |first=W.
  |year=2012
  |year=2012
Line 478: Line 497:
  |doi=10.1088/0954-3899/39/12/124008
  |doi=10.1088/0954-3899/39/12/124008
  |bibcode=2012JPhG...39l4008R
  |bibcode=2012JPhG...39l4008R
  |s2cid=119158221 }}</ref>
  |s2cid=119158221
}}</ref>


==Helicity (polarization) of neutrinos, electrons and positrons emitted in beta decay==
== Helicity (polarization) of neutrinos, electrons and positrons emitted in beta decay ==
After the discovery of parity non-conservation (see [[Beta decay#Non-conservation of parity|History]]), it was found that, in beta decay, electrons are emitted mostly with negative [[Chirality (physics)|helicity]], i.e., they move, naively speaking, like left-handed screws driven into a material (they have negative longitudinal [[Spin polarization|polarization]]).<ref>{{cite journal
After the discovery of parity non-conservation (see ''[[#Non-conservation of parity|§ History]]''), it was found that, in beta decay, electrons are emitted mostly with negative [[Chirality (physics)|helicity]], i.e., they move, naively speaking, like left-handed screws driven into a material (they have negative longitudinal [[Spin polarization|polarization]]).<ref>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Frauenfelder |first1=H.
  |last1=Frauenfelder |first1=H.
  |display-authors=etal.
  |display-authors=etal.
Line 490: Line 511:
  |bibcode= 1957PhRv..106..386F
  |bibcode= 1957PhRv..106..386F
  |doi=10.1103/physrev.106.386
  |doi=10.1103/physrev.106.386
}}</ref> Conversely, positrons have mostly positive helicity, i.e., they move like right-handed screws. Neutrinos (emitted in positron decay) have negative helicity, while antineutrinos (emitted in electron decay) have positive helicity.<ref>{{cite book
}}</ref> Conversely, positrons have mostly positive helicity, i.e., they move like right-handed screws. Neutrinos (emitted in positron decay) have negative helicity, while antineutrinos (emitted in electron decay) have positive helicity.<ref>
{{cite book
  |last1=Konopinski |first1=E. J.
  |last1=Konopinski |first1=E. J.
  |last2=Rose |first2=M. E.
  |last2=Rose |first2=M. E.
Line 503: Line 525:
The higher the energy of the particles, the higher their polarization.
The higher the energy of the particles, the higher their polarization.


==Types of beta decay transitions==
== Types of beta decay transitions ==
{{main|Beta decay transition}}
{{main|Beta decay transition}}
Beta decays can be classified according to the angular momentum ([[Angular momentum operator|{{mvar|L}}&nbsp;value]]) and total spin ([[Spin (physics)|{{mvar|S}}&nbsp;value]]) of the emitted radiation. Since total angular momentum must be conserved, including orbital and spin angular momentum, beta decay occurs by a variety of quantum state transitions to various nuclear angular momentum or spin states, known as "Fermi" or "Gamow–Teller" transitions. When beta decay particles carry no angular momentum ({{math|1=''L'' = 0}}), the decay is referred to as "allowed", otherwise it is "forbidden".
Beta decays can be classified according to the angular momentum ([[Angular momentum operator|{{mvar|L}}&nbsp;value]]) and total spin ([[Spin (physics)|{{mvar|S}}&nbsp;value]]) of the emitted radiation. Since total angular momentum must be conserved, including orbital and spin angular momentum, beta decay occurs by a variety of quantum state transitions to various nuclear angular momentum or spin states, known as "Fermi" or "Gamow–Teller" transitions. When beta decay particles carry no angular momentum ({{math|1=''L'' = 0}}), the decay is referred to as "allowed", otherwise it is "forbidden".
Line 509: Line 531:
Other decay modes, which are rare, are known as bound state decay and double beta decay.
Other decay modes, which are rare, are known as bound state decay and double beta decay.


===Fermi transitions===
=== Fermi transitions ===
A '''Fermi transition''' is a beta decay in which the spins of the emitted electron (positron) and anti-neutrino (neutrino) couple to total spin <math>S=0</math>, leading to an angular momentum change <math>\Delta J=0</math> between the initial and final states of the nucleus (assuming an allowed transition). In the non-relativistic limit, the nuclear part of the operator for a Fermi transition is given by
A '''Fermi transition''' is a beta decay in which the spins of the emitted electron (positron) and anti-neutrino (neutrino) couple to total spin {{tmath|1= S=0 }}, leading to an angular momentum change <math>\Delta J=0</math> between the initial and final states of the nucleus (assuming an allowed transition). In the non-relativistic limit, the nuclear part of the operator for a Fermi transition is given by
<math display="block"> \mathcal{O}_{F}=G_{V}\sum_{a} \hat{\tau}_{a\pm} </math>
<math display="block"> \mathcal{O}_\text{F}=G_\text{V}\sum_{a} \hat{\tau}_{a\pm} </math>
with <math>G_V</math> the weak vector coupling constant, <math>\tau_{\pm}</math> the [[isospin]] [[Ladder operator|raising and lowering operators]], and <math>a</math> running over all protons and neutrons in the nucleus.
with <math>G_\text{V}</math> the weak vector coupling constant, <math>\tau_{\pm}</math> the [[isospin]] [[Ladder operator|raising and lowering operators]], and <math>a</math> running over all protons and neutrons in the nucleus.


===Gamow–Teller transitions===
=== Gamow–Teller transitions ===
A '''Gamow–Teller transition''' is a beta decay in which the spins of the emitted electron (positron) and anti-neutrino (neutrino) couple to total spin <math>S=1</math>, leading to an angular momentum change <math>\Delta J=0,\pm 1</math> between the initial and final states of the nucleus (assuming an allowed transition).
A '''Gamow–Teller transition''' is a beta decay in which the spins of the emitted electron (positron) and anti-neutrino (neutrino) couple to total spin {{tmath|1= S=1 }}, leading to an angular momentum change <math>\Delta J=0,\pm 1</math> between the initial and final states of the nucleus (assuming an allowed transition).
In this case, the nuclear part of the operator is given by
In this case, the nuclear part of the operator is given by
<math display="block"> \mathcal{O}_{GT}=G_{A}\sum_{a} \hat{\sigma}_{a}\hat{\tau}_{a\pm} </math>
<math display="block"> \mathcal{O}_\text{GT}=G_\text{A}\sum_{a} \hat{\sigma}_{a}\hat{\tau}_{a\pm} </math>
with <math>G_{A}</math> the weak axial-vector coupling constant, and <math>\sigma</math> the [[Pauli matrices|spin Pauli matrices]], which can produce a spin-flip in the decaying nucleon.
with <math>G_\text{A}</math> the weak axial-vector coupling constant, and <math>\sigma</math> the [[Pauli matrices|spin Pauli matrices]], which can produce a spin-flip in the decaying nucleon.


===Forbidden transitions===
=== Forbidden transitions ===
{{Main|Beta decay transition}}
{{Main|Beta decay transition}}


Line 527: Line 549:
where {{math|1=Δ''π'' = 1 or −1}} corresponds to no parity change or parity change, respectively. The special case of a transition between isobaric analogue states, where the structure of the final state is very similar to the structure of the initial state, is referred to as "superallowed" for beta decay, and proceeds very quickly. The following table lists the Δ{{var|J}} and Δ{{var|π}} values for the first few values of&nbsp;{{mvar|L}}:
where {{math|1=Δ''π'' = 1 or −1}} corresponds to no parity change or parity change, respectively. The special case of a transition between isobaric analogue states, where the structure of the final state is very similar to the structure of the initial state, is referred to as "superallowed" for beta decay, and proceeds very quickly. The following table lists the Δ{{var|J}} and Δ{{var|π}} values for the first few values of&nbsp;{{mvar|L}}:


{|class="wikitable"
: {|class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! Forbiddenness !! Δ{{var|J}} !! Δ{{var|π}}
! Forbiddenness !! Δ{{var|J}} !! Δ{{var|π}}
Line 542: Line 564:
|}
|}


==Rare decay modes==
== Rare decay modes ==


===Bound-state β{{sup|−}} decay===
=== Bound-state β{{sup|−}} decay ===
A very small minority of free neutron decays (about four per million) are "two-body decays": the proton, electron and antineutrino are produced, but the electron fails to gain the 13.6 eV energy necessary to escape the proton, and therefore simply remains bound to it, as a neutral [[hydrogen atom]].<ref>[http://www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/Publications/ckm_byrne.pdf An Overview Of Neutron Decay] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170919055418/http://www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/Publications/ckm_byrne.pdf |date=2017-09-19 }} J. Byrne in Quark-Mixing, CKM Unitarity (H. Abele and D. Mund, 2002), see p.XV</ref> In this type of beta decay, in essence all of the neutron [[decay energy]] is carried off by the antineutrino.
A very small minority of free neutron decays (about four per million) are "two-body decays": the proton, electron and antineutrino are produced, but the electron fails to gain the 13.6&nbsp;eV energy necessary to escape the proton, and therefore simply remains bound to it, as a neutral [[hydrogen atom]].<ref>[http://www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/Publications/ckm_byrne.pdf An Overview Of Neutron Decay] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170919055418/http://www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/Publications/ckm_byrne.pdf |date=2017-09-19 }} J. Byrne in Quark-Mixing, CKM Unitarity (H. Abele and D. Mund, 2002), see p.XV</ref> In this type of beta decay, in essence all of the neutron [[decay energy]] is carried off by the antineutrino.


For fully ionized atoms (bare nuclei), it is possible in likewise manner for electrons to fail to escape the atom, and to be emitted from the nucleus into low-lying atomic bound states (orbitals). This cannot occur for neutral atoms with low-lying bound states which are already filled by electrons.
For fully ionized atoms (bare nuclei), it is possible in likewise manner for electrons to fail to escape the atom, and to be emitted from the nucleus into low-lying atomic bound states (orbitals). This cannot occur for neutral atoms with low-lying bound states which are already filled by electrons.


Bound-state β{{sup|−}} decays were predicted by [[Raymond Daudel|Daudel]], Jean, and Lecoin in 1947,<ref>{{cite journal| last1=Daudel | first1=Raymond | first2=Maurice | last2=Jean | first3=Marcel | last3=Lecoin | year=1947 | title=Sur la possibilité d'existence d'un type particulier de radioactivité phénomène de création e | journal=J. Phys. Radium | volume=8 | issue=8 | pages=238–243 | doi=10.1051/jphysrad:0194700808023800| url=https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00234057/document }}</ref> and the phenomenon in fully ionized atoms was first observed for [[isotopes of dysprosium|{{sup|163}}Dy{{sup|66+}}]] in 1992 by Jung et al. of the [[GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research|Darmstadt Heavy-Ion Research Center]]. Though neutral {{sup|163}}Dy is stable, fully ionized {{sup|163}}Dy{{sup|66+}} undergoes β{{sup|−}} decay into the K and L shells with a half-life of 47 days.<ref>{{cite journal
Bound-state β{{sup|−}} decays were predicted by [[Raymond Daudel|Daudel]], Jean, and Lecoin in 1947,<ref>{{cite journal| last1=Daudel | first1=Raymond | first2=Maurice | last2=Jean | first3=Marcel | last3=Lecoin | year=1947 | title=Sur la possibilité d'existence d'un type particulier de radioactivité phénomène de création e | journal=J. Phys. Radium | volume=8 | issue=8 | pages=238–243 | doi=10.1051/jphysrad:0194700808023800| url=https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00234057/document }}</ref> and the phenomenon in fully ionized atoms was first observed for [[isotopes of dysprosium|{{sup|163}}Dy{{sup|66+}}]] in 1992 by Jung et al. of the [[GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research|Darmstadt Heavy-Ion Research Center]]. Though neutral {{sup|163}}Dy is stable, fully ionized {{sup|163}}Dy{{sup|66+}} undergoes β{{sup|−}} decay into the K and L shells with a half-life of 47 days.<ref>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Jung |first1=M.
  |last1=Jung |first1=M.
  |display-authors=etal
  |display-authors=etal
Line 561: Line 584:
}}</ref> The resulting nucleus – [[isotopes of holmium|{{sup|163}}Ho{{sup|66+}}]] – is stable only in this almost fully ionized state and will decay via [[electron capture]] into {{sup|163}}Dy in the neutral state. Likewise, while being stable in the neutral state, the fully ionized [[Isotopes of thallium|{{sup|205}}Tl{{sup|81+}}]] undergoes bound-state β{{sup|−}} decay to [[isotopes of lead|{{sup|205}}Pb{{sup|81+}}]] with a half-life of {{val|291|33|27|}} days.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ca.infn.it/~oldeman/resneu/p1522_1.pdf |title=Bound-state beta decay of highly ionized atoms|access-date=June 9, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029205727/http://www.ca.infn.it/~oldeman/resneu/p1522_1.pdf |archive-date=October 29, 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bai |first1=M. |last2=Blaum |first2=K. |last3=Boev |first3=B. |last4=Bosch |first4=F. |last5=Brandau |first5=C. |last6=Cvetković |first6=V. |last7=Dickel |first7=T. |last8=Dillmann |first8=I. |last9=Dmytriiev |first9=D. |last10=Faestermann |first10=T. |last11=Forstner |first11=O. |last12=Franczak |first12=B. |last13=Geissel |first13=H. |last14=Gernhäuser |first14=R. |last15=Glorius |first15=J. |last16=Griffin |first16=C. J. |last17=Gumberidze |first17=A. |last18=Haettner |first18=E. |last19=Hillenbrand |first19=P.-M. |last20=Kienle |first20=P. |last21=Korten |first21=W. |last22=Kozhuharov |first22=Ch. |last23=Kuzminchuk |first23=N. |last24=Langanke |first24=K. |last25=Litvinov |first25=S. |last26=Menz |first26=E. |last27=Morgenroth |first27=T. |last28=Nociforo |first28=C. |last29=Nolden |first29=F. |last30=Pavićević |first30=M. K. |last31=Petridis |first31=N. |last32=Popp |first32=U. |last33=Purushothaman |first33=S. |last34=Reifarth |first34=R. |last35=Sanjari |first35=M. S. |last36=Scheidenberger |first36=C. |last37=Spillmann |first37=U. |last38=Steck |first38=M. |last39=Stöhlker |first39=Th. |last40=Tanaka |first40=Y. K. |last41=Trassinelli |first41=M. |last42=Trotsenko |first42=S. |last43=Varga |first43=L. |last44=Wang |first44=M. |last45=Weick |first45=H. |last46=Woods |first46=P. J. |last47=Yamaguchi |first47=T. |last48=Zhang |first48=Y. H. |last49=Zhao |first49=J. |last50=Zuber |first50=K. |title=Bound-State Beta Decay of {{sup|205}}Tl{{sup|81+}} Ions and the LOREX Project |collaboration=E121 Collaboration and LOREX Collaboration |journal=Physical Review Letters |date=2 December 2024 |volume=133 |issue=23 |pages=232701 |publisher=American Physical Society |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.232701 |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.232701|arxiv=2501.06029 }}</ref> The half-lives of neutral {{sup|163}}Ho and {{sup|205}}Pb are respectively 4570 years and {{val|1.73|e=7}} years. In addition, it is estimated that β{{sup|−}} decay is energetically impossible for natural atoms but theoretically possible when fully ionized also for <sup>193</sup>Ir, <sup>194</sup>Au, <sup>202</sup>Tl, <sup>215</sup>At, <sup>243</sup>Am, and <sup>246</sup>Bk.<ref name="bs-prediction">{{cite journal |last1=Liu |first1=Shuo |last2=Gao |first2=Chao |last3=Xu |first3=Chang |date=2021 |title=Investigation of bound state β<sup>−</sup> decay half-lives of bare atoms |url= |journal=Physical Review C |volume=104 |issue=2 |pages=024304 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024304 |bibcode=2021PhRvC.104b4304L |access-date=}}</ref>
}}</ref> The resulting nucleus – [[isotopes of holmium|{{sup|163}}Ho{{sup|66+}}]] – is stable only in this almost fully ionized state and will decay via [[electron capture]] into {{sup|163}}Dy in the neutral state. Likewise, while being stable in the neutral state, the fully ionized [[Isotopes of thallium|{{sup|205}}Tl{{sup|81+}}]] undergoes bound-state β{{sup|−}} decay to [[isotopes of lead|{{sup|205}}Pb{{sup|81+}}]] with a half-life of {{val|291|33|27|}} days.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ca.infn.it/~oldeman/resneu/p1522_1.pdf |title=Bound-state beta decay of highly ionized atoms|access-date=June 9, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029205727/http://www.ca.infn.it/~oldeman/resneu/p1522_1.pdf |archive-date=October 29, 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bai |first1=M. |last2=Blaum |first2=K. |last3=Boev |first3=B. |last4=Bosch |first4=F. |last5=Brandau |first5=C. |last6=Cvetković |first6=V. |last7=Dickel |first7=T. |last8=Dillmann |first8=I. |last9=Dmytriiev |first9=D. |last10=Faestermann |first10=T. |last11=Forstner |first11=O. |last12=Franczak |first12=B. |last13=Geissel |first13=H. |last14=Gernhäuser |first14=R. |last15=Glorius |first15=J. |last16=Griffin |first16=C. J. |last17=Gumberidze |first17=A. |last18=Haettner |first18=E. |last19=Hillenbrand |first19=P.-M. |last20=Kienle |first20=P. |last21=Korten |first21=W. |last22=Kozhuharov |first22=Ch. |last23=Kuzminchuk |first23=N. |last24=Langanke |first24=K. |last25=Litvinov |first25=S. |last26=Menz |first26=E. |last27=Morgenroth |first27=T. |last28=Nociforo |first28=C. |last29=Nolden |first29=F. |last30=Pavićević |first30=M. K. |last31=Petridis |first31=N. |last32=Popp |first32=U. |last33=Purushothaman |first33=S. |last34=Reifarth |first34=R. |last35=Sanjari |first35=M. S. |last36=Scheidenberger |first36=C. |last37=Spillmann |first37=U. |last38=Steck |first38=M. |last39=Stöhlker |first39=Th. |last40=Tanaka |first40=Y. K. |last41=Trassinelli |first41=M. |last42=Trotsenko |first42=S. |last43=Varga |first43=L. |last44=Wang |first44=M. |last45=Weick |first45=H. |last46=Woods |first46=P. J. |last47=Yamaguchi |first47=T. |last48=Zhang |first48=Y. H. |last49=Zhao |first49=J. |last50=Zuber |first50=K. |title=Bound-State Beta Decay of {{sup|205}}Tl{{sup|81+}} Ions and the LOREX Project |collaboration=E121 Collaboration and LOREX Collaboration |journal=Physical Review Letters |date=2 December 2024 |volume=133 |issue=23 |pages=232701 |publisher=American Physical Society |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.232701 |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.232701|arxiv=2501.06029 }}</ref> The half-lives of neutral {{sup|163}}Ho and {{sup|205}}Pb are respectively 4570 years and {{val|1.73|e=7}} years. In addition, it is estimated that β{{sup|−}} decay is energetically impossible for natural atoms but theoretically possible when fully ionized also for <sup>193</sup>Ir, <sup>194</sup>Au, <sup>202</sup>Tl, <sup>215</sup>At, <sup>243</sup>Am, and <sup>246</sup>Bk.<ref name="bs-prediction">{{cite journal |last1=Liu |first1=Shuo |last2=Gao |first2=Chao |last3=Xu |first3=Chang |date=2021 |title=Investigation of bound state β<sup>−</sup> decay half-lives of bare atoms |url= |journal=Physical Review C |volume=104 |issue=2 |pages=024304 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024304 |bibcode=2021PhRvC.104b4304L |access-date=}}</ref>


Another possibility is that a fully ionized atom undergoes greatly accelerated β decay, as observed for [[Isotopes of rhenium|{{sup|187}}Re]] by Bosch et al., also at Darmstadt. Neutral {{sup|187}}Re does undergo β{{sup|−}} decay, with half-life {{val|4.12|e=10}} years,{{NUBASE2020|ref}} but for fully ionized {{sup|187}}Re{{sup|75+}} this is shortened to only 32.9 years. This is because {{sup|187}}Re{{sup|75+}} is energetically allowed to undergo β{{sup|−}} decay to the first-excited state in {{sup|187}}Os{{sup|75+}}, a process energetically disallowed for natural {{sup|187}}Re.<ref>{{cite journal
Another possibility is that a fully ionized atom undergoes greatly accelerated β decay, as observed for [[Isotopes of rhenium|{{sup|187}}Re]] by Bosch et al., also at Darmstadt. Neutral {{sup|187}}Re does undergo β{{sup|−}} decay, with half-life {{val|4.12|e=10}} years,{{NUBASE2020|ref}} but for fully ionized {{sup|187}}Re{{sup|75+}} this is shortened to only 32.9 years. This is because {{sup|187}}Re{{sup|75+}} is energetically allowed to undergo β{{sup|−}} decay to the first-excited state in {{sup|187}}Os{{sup|75+}}, a process energetically disallowed for natural {{sup|187}}Re.<ref>
{{cite journal
  |last1=Bosch |first1=F.
  |last1=Bosch |first1=F.
  |display-authors=etal
  |display-authors=etal
Line 574: Line 598:
<br />"Note also, that the decay of bare <sup>187</sup>Re is dominated by the nonunique transition to the first excited state of <sup>187</sup>Os, since the decay to the ground state has a much smaller matrix element."</ref> Similarly, neutral [[Plutonium-241|{{sup|241}}Pu]] undergoes β{{sup|−}} decay with a half-life of 14.3 years, but in its fully ionized state the beta-decay half-life of {{sup|241}}Pu{{sup|94+}} decreases to 4.2 days.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Takahashi |first1=K. |last2=Boyd |first2=R. N. |last3=Mathews |first3=G. J. |last4=Yokoi |first4=K. |title=Bound-state beta decay of highly ionized atoms |journal=Physical Review C |date=1 October 1987 |volume=36 |issue=4 |pages=1522–1528 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevC.36.1522 |pmid=9954244 |bibcode=1987PhRvC..36.1522T |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13335547}}</ref> For comparison, the variation of decay rates of other nuclear processes due to chemical environment is [[radioactive decay#Changing rates|less than 1%]]. Moreover, current mass determinations cannot decisively determine whether {{sup|222}}Rn is energetically possible to undergo β{{sup|−}} decay (the decay energy given in AME2020 is (−6 ± 8) keV),{{AME2020 II|ref}}<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Belli |first1=P. |last2=Bernabei |first2=R. |last3=Cappella |first3=C. |last4=Caracciolo |first4=V. |last5=Cerulli |first5=R. |last6=Danevich |first6=F.A. |last7=Di Marco |first7=A. |last8=Incicchitti |first8=A. |last9=Poda |first9=D.V. |last10=Polischuk |first10=O.G. |last11=Tretyak |first11=V.I. |title=Investigation of rare nuclear decays with BaF<sub>2</sub> crystal scintillator contaminated by radium |date=2014 |journal=European Physical Journal A |volume=50 |issue=9 |pages=134–143 |doi=10.1140/epja/i2014-14134-6 |arxiv=1407.5844|bibcode=2014EPJA...50..134B |s2cid=118513731 }}</ref> but in either case it is predicted that β{{sup|−}} will be greatly accelerated for fully ionized {{sup|222}}Rn{{sup|86+}}.<ref name="bs-prediction" />
<br />"Note also, that the decay of bare <sup>187</sup>Re is dominated by the nonunique transition to the first excited state of <sup>187</sup>Os, since the decay to the ground state has a much smaller matrix element."</ref> Similarly, neutral [[Plutonium-241|{{sup|241}}Pu]] undergoes β{{sup|−}} decay with a half-life of 14.3 years, but in its fully ionized state the beta-decay half-life of {{sup|241}}Pu{{sup|94+}} decreases to 4.2 days.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Takahashi |first1=K. |last2=Boyd |first2=R. N. |last3=Mathews |first3=G. J. |last4=Yokoi |first4=K. |title=Bound-state beta decay of highly ionized atoms |journal=Physical Review C |date=1 October 1987 |volume=36 |issue=4 |pages=1522–1528 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevC.36.1522 |pmid=9954244 |bibcode=1987PhRvC..36.1522T |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13335547}}</ref> For comparison, the variation of decay rates of other nuclear processes due to chemical environment is [[radioactive decay#Changing rates|less than 1%]]. Moreover, current mass determinations cannot decisively determine whether {{sup|222}}Rn is energetically possible to undergo β{{sup|−}} decay (the decay energy given in AME2020 is (−6 ± 8) keV),{{AME2020 II|ref}}<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Belli |first1=P. |last2=Bernabei |first2=R. |last3=Cappella |first3=C. |last4=Caracciolo |first4=V. |last5=Cerulli |first5=R. |last6=Danevich |first6=F.A. |last7=Di Marco |first7=A. |last8=Incicchitti |first8=A. |last9=Poda |first9=D.V. |last10=Polischuk |first10=O.G. |last11=Tretyak |first11=V.I. |title=Investigation of rare nuclear decays with BaF<sub>2</sub> crystal scintillator contaminated by radium |date=2014 |journal=European Physical Journal A |volume=50 |issue=9 |pages=134–143 |doi=10.1140/epja/i2014-14134-6 |arxiv=1407.5844|bibcode=2014EPJA...50..134B |s2cid=118513731 }}</ref> but in either case it is predicted that β{{sup|−}} will be greatly accelerated for fully ionized {{sup|222}}Rn{{sup|86+}}.<ref name="bs-prediction" />


===Double beta decay===
=== Double beta decay ===
{{main|Double beta decay}}
{{main|Double beta decay}}
Some nuclei can undergo double beta decay (2β) where the charge of the nucleus changes by two units. Double beta decay is difficult to study, as it has an extremely long half-life. In nuclei for which both β&nbsp;decay and 2β are possible, the rarer 2β process is effectively impossible to observe. However, in nuclei where β&nbsp;decay is forbidden but 2β is allowed, the process can be seen and a half-life measured.<ref name="Bilenky">{{cite journal
Some nuclei can undergo double beta decay (2β) where the charge of the nucleus changes by two units. Double beta decay is difficult to study, as it has an extremely long half-life. In nuclei for which both β&nbsp;decay and 2β are possible, the rarer 2β process is effectively impossible to observe. However, in nuclei where β&nbsp;decay is forbidden but 2β is allowed, the process can be seen and a half-life measured.<ref name="Bilenky">
{{cite journal
  |last=Bilenky |first=S. M.
  |last=Bilenky |first=S. M.
  |year=2010
  |year=2010
Line 585: Line 610:
  |bibcode=2010PPN....41..690B
  |bibcode=2010PPN....41..690B
  |doi=10.1134/S1063779610050035
  |doi=10.1134/S1063779610050035
|hdl=10486/663891
|hdl=10486/663891
  |s2cid=55217197
  |s2cid=55217197
}}</ref> Thus, 2β is usually studied only for beta stable nuclei. Like single beta decay, double beta decay does not change {{mvar|A}}; thus, at least one of the nuclides with some given {{mvar|A}} has to be stable with regard to both single and double beta decay.
}}</ref> Thus, 2β is usually studied only for beta stable nuclei. Like single beta decay, double beta decay does not change {{mvar|A}}; thus, at least one of the nuclides with some given {{mvar|A}} has to be stable with regard to both single and double beta decay.


"Ordinary" 2β results in the emission of two electrons and two antineutrinos. If neutrinos are [[Majorana particle]]s (i.e., they are their own antiparticles), then a decay known as [[neutrinoless double beta decay]] will occur. Most neutrino physicists believe that neutrinoless 2β has never been observed.<ref name="Bilenky" />
"Ordinary" 2β results in the emission of two electrons and two antineutrinos. If neutrinos are [[Majorana particle]]s (i.e., they are their own antiparticles), then a decay known as [[neutrinoless double beta decay]] will occur. Most neutrino physicists believe that neutrinoless 2β has never been observed.<ref name="Bilenky" />


==See also==
== See also ==
* [[Common beta emitters]]
* [[Common beta emitters]]
*[[Neutrino]]
* [[Neutrino]]
*[[Betavoltaics]]
* [[Betavoltaics]]
*[[Particle radiation]]
* [[Particle radiation]]
*[[Radionuclide]]
* [[Radionuclide]]
*[[Tritium illumination]], a form of [[fluorescent lighting]] powered by beta decay
* [[Tritium illumination]], a form of [[fluorescent lighting]] powered by beta decay
*[[Pandemonium effect]]
* [[Pandemonium effect]]
*[[Total absorption spectroscopy]]
* [[Total absorption spectroscopy]]


==References==
== References ==
{{reflist|30em}}
{{reflist|30em}}


==Bibliography==
== Bibliography ==
* {{cite book
* {{cite book
  |last=Tomonaga |first=S.-I. |author-link=Sin-Itiro Tomonaga
  |last=Tomonaga |first=S.-I. |author-link=Sin-Itiro Tomonaga
Line 611: Line 636:
  |publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]]
  |publisher=[[University of Chicago Press]]
}}
}}
*{{cite book
* {{cite book
  |last=Tuli |first=J. K.
  |last=Tuli |first=J. K.
  |title=Nuclear Wallet Cards
  |title=Nuclear Wallet Cards
Line 620: Line 645:
}}
}}


==External links==
== External links ==
* [[Image:Ndslivechart.png]] '''[http://www-nds.iaea.org/livechart The Live Chart of Nuclides - IAEA ]''' with filter on decay type
* [[Image:Ndslivechart.png]] '''[http://www-nds.iaea.org/livechart The Live Chart of Nuclides IAEA ]''' with filter on decay type
*'''Beta decay simulation''' [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/legacy/beta-decay]
* '''Beta decay simulation''' [https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/legacy/beta-decay]


{{Nuclear processes}}
{{Nuclear processes}}

Revision as of 13:14, 19 June 2025

Template:Short description

File:Beta-minus Decay.svg
Template:SubatomicParticle decay in an atomic nucleus (the accompanying antineutrino is omitted). The inset shows beta decay of a free neutron. Neither of these depictions shows the intermediate virtual Template:SubatomicParticle boson.

Template:Nuclear physics In nuclear physics, beta decay (β-decay) is a type of radioactive decay in which an atomic nucleus emits a beta particle (fast energetic electron or positron), transforming into an isobar of that nuclide. For example, beta decay of a neutron transforms it into a proton by the emission of an electron accompanied by an antineutrino; or, conversely a proton is converted into a neutron by the emission of a positron with a neutrino in what is called positron emission. Neither the beta particle nor its associated (anti-)neutrino exist within the nucleus prior to beta decay, but are created in the decay process. By this process, unstable atoms obtain a more stable ratio of protons to neutrons. The probability of a nuclide decaying due to beta and other forms of decay is determined by its nuclear binding energy. The binding energies of all existing nuclides form what is called the nuclear band or valley of stability.[1] For either electron or positron emission to be energetically possible, the energy release (see below) or Q value must be positive.

Beta decay is a consequence of the weak force, which is characterized by relatively long decay times. Nucleons are composed of up quarks and down quarks,[2] and the weak force allows a quark to change its flavour by means of a virtual W boson leading to creation of an electron/antineutrino or positron/neutrino pair. For example, a neutron, composed of two down quarks and an up quark, decays to a proton composed of a down quark and two up quarks.

Electron capture is sometimes included as a type of beta decay,[3] because the basic nuclear process, mediated by the weak force, is the same. In electron capture, an inner atomic electron is captured by a proton in the nucleus, transforming it into a neutron, and an electron neutrino is released.

Description

The two types of beta decay are known as beta minus and beta plus. In beta minus (β) decay, a neutron is converted to a proton, and the process creates an electron and an electron antineutrino; while in beta plus (β+) decay, a proton is converted to a neutron and the process creates a positron and an electron neutrino. β+ decay is also known as positron emission.[4]

Beta decay conserves a quantum number known as the lepton number, or the number of electrons and their associated neutrinos (other leptons are the muon and tau particles). These particles have lepton number +1, while their antiparticles have lepton number −1. Since a proton or neutron has lepton number zero, β+ decay (a positron, or antielectron) must be accompanied with an electron neutrino, while β decay (an electron) must be accompanied by an electron antineutrino.

An example of electron emission (β decay) is the decay of carbon-14 into nitrogen-14 with a half-life of about 5,700 years:

Template:NuclideTemplate:Nuclide + Template:Subatomic particle + Template:Math

In this form of decay, the original element becomes a new chemical element in a process known as nuclear transmutation. This new element has an unchanged mass number Template:Mvar, but an atomic number Template:Mvar that is increased by one. As in all nuclear decays, the decaying element (in this case Template:Nuclide) is known as the parent nuclide while the resulting element (in this case Template:Nuclide) is known as the daughter nuclide.

Another example is the decay of hydrogen-3 (tritium) into helium-3 with a half-life of about 12.3 years:

Template:NuclideTemplate:Nuclide + Template:Subatomic particle + Template:Math

An example of positron emission (β+ decay) is the decay of magnesium-23 into sodium-23 with a half-life of about 11.3 s:

Template:NuclideTemplate:Nuclide + Template:Subatomic particle + Template:Math

β+ decay also results in nuclear transmutation, with the daughter element having an atomic number that is decreased by one.

File:RaE1.jpg
A beta spectrum, showing a typical division of energy between electron and antineutrino

The beta spectrum, or distribution of energy values for the beta particles, is continuous. The total energy of the decay process is divided between the electron, the antineutrino, and the recoiling nuclide. In the figure to the right, an example of an electron with 0.40 MeV energy from the beta decay of 210Bi is shown. In this example, the total decay energy is 1.16 MeV, so the antineutrino has the remaining energy: 1.16 MeV − 0.40 MeV = 0.76 MeV. An electron at the far right of the curve would have the maximum possible kinetic energy, leaving the energy of the neutrino to be only its small rest mass.

History

Discovery and initial characterization

Radioactivity was discovered in 1896 by Henri Becquerel in uranium, and subsequently observed by Marie and Pierre Curie in thorium and in the newly discovered elements polonium and radium. In 1899, Ernest Rutherford separated radioactive emissions into two types: alpha and beta (now beta minus), based on penetration of objects and ability to cause ionization. Alpha rays could be stopped by thin sheets of paper or aluminium, whereas beta rays could penetrate several millimetres of aluminium. In 1900, Paul Villard identified a still more penetrating type of radiation, which Rutherford identified as a fundamentally new type in 1903 and termed gamma rays. Alpha, beta, and gamma are the first three letters of the Greek alphabet.

In 1900, Becquerel measured the mass-to-charge ratio (Template:Math) for beta particles by the method of J.J. Thomson used to study cathode rays and identify the electron. He found that Template:Math for a beta particle is the same as for Thomson's electron, and therefore suggested that the beta particle is in fact an electron.[5]

In 1901, Rutherford and Frederick Soddy showed that alpha and beta radioactivity involves the transmutation of atoms into atoms of other chemical elements. In 1913, after the products of more radioactive decays were known, Soddy and Kazimierz Fajans independently proposed their radioactive displacement law, which states that beta (i.e., Template:SubatomicParticle) emission from one element produces another element one place to the right in the periodic table, while alpha emission produces an element two places to the left.

Neutrinos

The study of beta decay provided the first physical evidence for the existence of the neutrino. In both alpha and gamma decay, the resulting alpha or gamma particle has a narrow energy distribution, since the particle carries the energy from the difference between the initial and final nuclear states. However, the kinetic energy distribution, or spectrum, of beta particles measured by Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn in 1911 and by Jean Danysz in 1913 showed multiple lines on a diffuse background. These measurements offered the first hint that beta particles have a continuous spectrum.[6] In 1914, James Chadwick used a magnetic spectrometer with one of Hans Geiger's new counters to make more accurate measurements which showed that the spectrum was continuous.[6][7] The results, which appeared to be in contradiction to the law of conservation of energy, were validated by means of calorimetric measurements in 1929 by Lise Meitner and Wilhelm Orthmann.[8] If beta decay were simply electron emission as assumed at the time, then the energy of the emitted electron should have a particular, well-defined value.[9] For beta decay, however, the observed broad distribution of energies suggested that energy is lost in the beta decay process. This spectrum was puzzling for many years.

A second problem is related to the conservation of angular momentum. Molecular band spectra showed that the nuclear spin of nitrogen-14 is 1 (i.e., equal to the reduced Planck constant) and more generally that the spin is integral for nuclei of even mass number and half-integral for nuclei of odd mass number. This was later explained by the proton-neutron model of the nucleus.[9] Beta decay leaves the mass number unchanged, so the change of nuclear spin must be an integer. However, the electron spin is 1/2, hence angular momentum would not be conserved if beta decay were simply electron emission.

From 1920 to 1927, Charles Drummond Ellis (along with Chadwick and colleagues) further established that the beta decay spectrum is continuous. In 1933, Ellis and Nevill Mott obtained strong evidence that the beta spectrum has an effective upper bound in energy. Niels Bohr had suggested that the beta spectrum could be explained if conservation of energy was true only in a statistical sense, thus this principle might be violated in any given decay.[9]Template:Rp However, the upper bound in beta energies determined by Ellis and Mott ruled out that notion. Now, the problem of how to account for the variability of energy in known beta decay products, as well as for conservation of momentum and angular momentum in the process, became acute.

In a famous letter written in 1930, Wolfgang Pauli attempted to resolve the beta-particle energy conundrum by suggesting that, in addition to electrons and protons, atomic nuclei also contained an extremely light neutral particle, which he called the neutron. He suggested that this "neutron" was also emitted during beta decay (thus accounting for the known missing energy, momentum, and angular momentum), but it had simply not yet been observed. In 1931, Enrico Fermi renamed Pauli's "neutron" the "neutrino" ('little neutral one' in Italian). In 1933, Fermi published his landmark theory for beta decay, where he applied the principles of quantum mechanics to matter particles, supposing that they can be created and annihilated, just as the light quanta in atomic transitions. Thus, according to Fermi, neutrinos are created in the beta-decay process, rather than contained in the nucleus; the same happens to electrons. The neutrino interaction with matter was so weak that detecting it proved a severe experimental challenge. Further indirect evidence of the existence of the neutrino was obtained by observing the recoil of nuclei that emitted such a particle after absorbing an electron. Neutrinos were finally detected directly in 1956 by the American physicists Clyde Cowan and Frederick Reines in the Cowan–Reines neutrino experiment.[10] The properties of neutrinos were (with a few minor modifications) as predicted by Pauli and Fermi.

Template:SubatomicParticle decay and electron capture

In 1934, Frédéric and Irène Joliot-Curie bombarded aluminium with alpha particles to effect the nuclear reaction Template:Nuclide + Template:Nuclide → Template:Nuclide + Template:Nuclide, and observed that the product isotope Template:Nuclide emits a positron identical to those found in cosmic rays (discovered by Carl David Anderson in 1932). This was the first example of Template:SubatomicParticle decay (positron emission), which they termed artificial radioactivity since Template:Nuclide is a short-lived nuclide which does not exist in nature. In recognition of their discovery, the couple were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1935.[11]

The theory of electron capture was first discussed by Gian-Carlo Wick in a 1934 paper, and then developed by Hideki Yukawa and others. K-electron capture was first observed in 1937 by Luis Alvarez, in the nuclide 48V.[12][13][14] Alvarez went on to study electron capture in 67Ga and other nuclides.[12][15][16]

Non-conservation of parity

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". In 1956, Tsung-Dao Lee and Chen Ning Yang noticed that there was no evidence that parity was conserved in weak interactions, and so they postulated that this symmetry may not be preserved by the weak force. They sketched the design for an experiment for testing conservation of parity in the laboratory.[17] Later that year, Chien-Shiung Wu and coworkers showed experimentally that an asymmetrical beta emission from [[cobalt-60|Template:SimpleNuclide]] proved that parity is not conserved in beta decay.[18][19][20] This surprising result overturned long-held assumptions about parity and the weak force. In recognition of their theoretical work, Lee and Yang were awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1957.[21] However Wu, who was female, was not awarded the Nobel prize.[22]

β decay

[[Image:Beta Negative Decay.svg|thumb|right|The leading-order Feynman diagram for Template:SubatomicParticle decay of a neutron into a proton, electron, and electron antineutrino via a virtual [[W boson|Template:SubatomicParticle boson]]. For higher-order diagrams see [23][24]]] In Template:SubatomicParticle decay, the weak interaction converts an atomic nucleus into a nucleus with atomic number increased by one, while emitting an electron (Template:SubatomicParticle) and an electron antineutrino (Template:SubatomicParticle). Template:SubatomicParticle decay generally occurs in neutron-rich nuclei.[25] The generic equation is:

Template:Physics particleTemplate:Physics particle + Template:SubatomicParticle + Template:Math[1]

where Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar are the mass number and atomic number of the decaying nucleus, and X and X′ are the initial and final elements, respectively.

Another example is when the free neutron (Template:Nuclide) decays by Template:SubatomicParticle decay into a proton (Template:SubatomicParticle):

Template:SubatomicParticleTemplate:SubatomicParticle + Template:SubatomicParticle + Template:Math.

At the fundamental level (as depicted in the Feynman diagram on the right), this is caused by the conversion of the negatively charged (Template:Math) down quark to the positively charged (Template:Math) up quark, which is promoted by a virtual [[W boson|Template:SubatomicParticle boson]]; the Template:SubatomicParticle boson subsequently decays into an electron and an electron antineutrino:

Template:Subatomic particleTemplate:Subatomic particle + Template:SubatomicParticle + Template:Math.

β+ decay

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". [[File:Electron Capture Decay.svg|thumb|The leading-order Feynman diagram for Template:SubatomicParticle decay of a proton into a neutron, positron, and electron neutrino via an intermediate virtual [[W boson|Template:SubatomicParticle boson]]]]

In Template:SubatomicParticle decay, or positron emission, the weak interaction converts an atomic nucleus into a nucleus with atomic number decreased by one, while emitting a positron (Template:SubatomicParticle) and an electron neutrino (Template:SubatomicParticle). Template:SubatomicParticle decay generally occurs in proton-rich nuclei. The generic equation is:

Template:Physics particleTemplate:Physics particle + Template:SubatomicParticle + Template:Math[1]

This may be considered as the decay of a proton inside the nucleus to a neutron:

p → n + Template:SubatomicParticle + Template:Math[1]

However, Template:SubatomicParticle decay cannot occur in an isolated proton because it requires energy, due to the mass of the neutron being greater than the mass of the proton. Template:SubatomicParticle decay can only happen inside nuclei when the daughter nucleus has a greater binding energy (and therefore a lower total energy) than the mother nucleus. The difference between these energies goes into the reaction of converting a proton into a neutron, a positron, and a neutrino and into the kinetic energy of these particles. This process is opposite to negative beta decay, in that the weak interaction converts a proton into a neutron by converting an up quark into a down quark resulting in the emission of a Template:SubatomicParticle or the absorption of a Template:SubatomicParticle. When a Template:SubatomicParticle boson is emitted, it decays into a positron and an electron neutrino:

Template:Subatomic particleTemplate:Subatomic particle + Template:SubatomicParticle + Template:Math.

Electron capture (K-capture/L-capture)

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Leading-order EC Feynman diagrams
The leading-order Feynman diagrams for electron capture decay. An electron interacts with an up quark in the nucleus via a W boson to create a down quark and electron neutrino. Two diagrams comprise the leading (second) order, though as a virtual particle, the type (and charge) of the W-boson is indistinguishable.

In all cases where Template:SubatomicParticle decay (positron emission) of a nucleus is allowed energetically, so too is electron capture allowed. This is a process during which a nucleus captures one of its atomic electrons, resulting in the emission of a neutrino:

Template:Physics particle + Template:SubatomicParticleTemplate:Physics particle + Template:Math

An example of electron capture is one of the decay modes of krypton-81 into bromine-81:

Template:Nuclide + Template:Subatomic particleTemplate:Nuclide + Template:Math

All emitted neutrinos are of the same energy. In proton-rich nuclei where the energy difference between the initial and final states is less than 2Template:Math, Template:SubatomicParticle decay is not energetically possible, and electron capture is the sole decay mode.[26]

If the captured electron comes from the innermost shell of the atom, the K-shell, which has the highest probability to interact with the nucleus, the process is called K-capture.[27] If it comes from the L-shell, the process is called L-capture, etc.

Electron capture is a competing (simultaneous) decay process for all nuclei that can undergo β+ decay. The converse, however, is not true: electron capture is the only type of decay that is allowed in proton-rich nuclides that do not have sufficient energy to emit a positron and neutrino.[26]

Nuclear transmutation

File:Table isotopes en.svg
Graph of isotopes by type of nuclear decay. Orange and blue nuclides are unstable, with the black squares between these regions representing stable nuclides. The unbroken diagonal line is where proton number is the same as neutron number.

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". If the proton and neutron are part of an atomic nucleus, the above described decay processes transmute one chemical element into another. For example:

Template:Nuclide      →  Template:Nuclide  Template:SubatomicParticle  Template:Math  (beta minus decay)
Template:Nuclide      →  Template:Nuclide  Template:Math  Template:Math  (beta plus decay)
Template:Nuclide  Template:SubatomicParticle  →  Template:Nuclide  Template:Math      (electron capture)

Beta decay does not change the number (Template:Mvar) of nucleons in the nucleus, but changes only its charge Template:Mvar. Thus the set of all nuclides with the same Template:Mvar can be introduced; these isobaric nuclides may turn into each other via beta decay. For a given Template:Mvar there is one that is most stable. It is said to be beta stable, because it presents a local minimum of the mass excess: if such a nucleus has Template:Math numbers, the neighbour nuclei Template:Math and Template:Math have higher mass excess and can beta decay into Template:Math, but not vice versa. For all odd mass numbers Template:Mvar, there is only one known beta-stable isobar. For even Template:Mvar, there are up to three different beta-stable isobars experimentally known; for example, Template:Nuclide, Template:Nuclide, and Template:Nuclide are all beta-stable. There are about 350 known beta-decay stable nuclides.[28]

Competition of beta decay types

Usually unstable nuclides are clearly either "neutron rich" or "proton rich", with the former undergoing beta decay and the latter undergoing electron capture (or more rarely, due to the higher energy requirements, positron decay). However, in a few cases of odd-proton, odd-neutron radionuclides, it may be energetically favorable for the radionuclide to decay to an even-proton, even-neutron isobar either by undergoing beta-positive or beta-negative decay.

Three types of beta decay in competition are illustrated by the single isotope Template:Nuclide (29 protons, 35 neutrons), which has a half-life of about 12.7 hours.[29] This isotope has one unpaired proton and one unpaired neutron, so either the proton or the neutron can decay.[30] This particular nuclide is almost equally likely to undergo proton decay (by positron emission, 18% or by electron capture, 43%; both forming [[Isotopes of nickel|Template:SimpleNuclide]]) or neutron decay (by electron emission, 39%; forming [[Isotopes of zinc|Template:SimpleNuclide]]).[29][30]

Stability of naturally occurring nuclides

Most naturally occurring nuclides on earth are beta stable. Nuclides that are not beta stable have half-lives ranging from under a second to periods of time significantly greater than the age of the universe. One common example of a long-lived isotope is the odd-proton odd-neutron nuclide Template:Nuclide, which undergoes all three types of beta decay (Template:SubatomicParticle, Template:SubatomicParticle and electron capture) with a half-life of Template:Val.[31]

Conservation rules for beta decay

Baryon number is conserved

B=nqnq¯3 where

  • nq is the number of constituent quarks, and
  • nq is the number of constituent antiquarks.

Beta decay just changes neutron to proton or, in the case of positive beta decay (electron capture) proton to neutron so the number of individual quarks doesn't change. It is only the baryon flavor that changes, here labelled as the isospin.

Up and down quarks have total isospin I=12 and isospin projections Iz={12up quark12down quark

All other quarks have Template:Math.

In general Iz=12(nund)

Lepton number is conserved

Lnn¯ so all leptons have assigned a value of +1, antileptons −1, and non-leptonic particles 0. np+e+ν¯eL:0=0+11

Angular momentum

For allowed decays, the net orbital angular momentum is zero, hence only spin quantum numbers are considered.

The electron and antineutrino are fermions, spin-1/2 objects, therefore they may couple to total S=1 (parallel) or S=0 (anti-parallel).

For forbidden decays, orbital angular momentum must also be taken into consideration.

Energy release

The [[Q value (nuclear science)|Template:Mvar value]] is defined as the total energy released in a given nuclear decay. In beta decay, Template:Mvar is therefore also the sum of the kinetic energies of the emitted beta particle, neutrino, and recoiling nucleus. (Because of the large mass of the nucleus compared to that of the beta particle and neutrino, the kinetic energy of the recoiling nucleus can generally be neglected.) Beta particles can therefore be emitted with any kinetic energy ranging from 0 to Template:Mvar.[1] A typical Template:Mvar is around 1 MeV, but can range from a few keV to a few tens of MeV.

Since the rest mass of the electron is 511 keV, the most energetic beta particles are ultrarelativistic, with speeds very close to the speed of light. In the case of 187Re, the maximum speed of the beta particle is only 9.8% of the speed of light.

The following table gives some examples:

Examples of beta decay energies
Isotope Energy
(keV)
Decay mode
free
neutron
782.33 β
3H
(tritium)
18.59 β
11C 960.4
1982.4
β+
ε
14C 156.475 β
20F 5390.86 β
37K 5125.48
6147.48
β+
ε
163Ho 2.555 ε
187Re 2.467 β
210Bi 1162.2 β

Tritium β decay being used in the KATRIN experimental search for sterile neutrinos.[32]

β decay

Consider the generic equation for beta decay

Template:Physics particleTemplate:Physics particle + Template:SubatomicParticle + Template:Math.

The Template:Mvar value for this decay is

Q=[mN(AZAA2Z2AX)mN(AZ+1AA2Z+12AXA)memνe]c2,

where mN(AZAA2Z2AX) is the mass of the nucleus of the Template:Physics particle atom, me is the mass of the electron, and mνe is the mass of the electron antineutrino. In other words, the total energy released is the mass energy of the initial nucleus, minus the mass energy of the final nucleus, electron, and antineutrino. The mass of the nucleus Template:Mvar is related to the standard atomic mass Template:Mvar by m(AZAA2Z2AX)c2=mN(AZAA2Z2AX)c2+Zmec2i=1ZBi. That is, the total atomic mass is the mass of the nucleus, plus the mass of the electrons, minus the sum of all electron binding energies Template:Mvar for the atom. This equation is rearranged to find mN(AZAA2Z2AX), and mN(AZ+1AA2Z+12AXA) is found similarly. Substituting these nuclear masses into the Template:Math-value equation, while neglecting the nearly zero antineutrino mass and the difference in electron binding energies, which is very small for high-Template:Mvar atoms, we have Q=[m(AZAA2Z2AX)m(AZ+1AA2Z+12AXA)]c2 This energy is carried away as kinetic energy by the electron and antineutrino.

Because the reaction will proceed only when the Template:Mvar value is positive, β decay can occur when the mass of atom Template:Physics particle is greater than the mass of atom Template:Physics particle.[33]

β+ decay

The equations for β+ decay are similar, with the generic equation

Template:Physics particleTemplate:Physics particle + Template:SubatomicParticle + Template:Math

giving Q=[mN(AZAA2Z2AX)mN(AZ1AA2Z12AXA)memνe]c2. However, in this equation, the electron masses do not cancel, and we are left with Q=[m(AZAA2Z2AX)m(AZ1AA2Z12AXA)2me]c2.

Because the reaction will proceed only when the Template:Mvar value is positive, β+ decay can occur when the mass of atom Template:Physics particle exceeds that of Template:Physics particle by at least twice the mass of the electron.[33]

Electron capture

The analogous calculation for electron capture must take into account the binding energy of the electrons. This is because the atom will be left in an excited state after capturing the electron, and the binding energy of the captured innermost electron is significant. Using the generic equation for electron capture

Template:Physics particle + Template:SubatomicParticleTemplate:Physics particle + Template:Math

we have Q=[mN(AZAA2Z2AX)+memN(AZ1AA2Z12AXA)mνe]c2, which simplifies to Q=[m(AZAA2Z2AX)m(AZ1AA2Z12AXA)]c2Bn, where Template:Math is the binding energy of the captured electron.

Because the binding energy of the electron is much less than the mass of the electron, nuclei that can undergo β+ decay can always also undergo electron capture, but the reverse is not true.[33]

Beta emission spectrum

File:Beta spectrum of RaE.jpg
Beta spectrum of 210Bi. Emax = Q = 1.16 MeV is the maximum energy

Beta decay can be considered as a perturbation as described in quantum mechanics, and thus Fermi's Golden Rule can be applied. This leads to an expression for the kinetic energy spectrum Template:Math of emitted betas as follows:[34] N(T)=CL(T)F(Z,T)pE(QT)2 where Template:Mvar is the kinetic energy, Template:Mvar is a shape function that depends on the forbiddenness of the decay (it is constant for allowed decays), Template:Math is the Fermi Function (see below) with Z the charge of the final-state nucleus, Template:Math is the total energy, p=(E/c)2(mc)2 is the momentum, and Template:Mvar is the Q value of the decay. The kinetic energy of the emitted neutrino is given approximately by Template:Mvar minus the kinetic energy of the beta.

As an example, the beta decay spectrum of 210Bi (originally called RaE) is shown to the right.

Fermi function

The Fermi function that appears in the beta spectrum formula accounts for the Coulomb attraction / repulsion between the emitted beta and the final state nucleus. Approximating the associated wavefunctions to be spherically symmetric, the Fermi function can be analytically calculated to be:[35] F(Z,T)=2(1+S)Γ(1+2S)2(2pρ)2S2eπη|Γ(S+iη)|2, where Template:Mvar is the final momentum, Γ the Gamma function, and (if Template:Mvar is the fine-structure constant and Template:Math the radius of the final state nucleus) Template:Tmath, η=±Ze2E/(cp) (+ for electrons, − for positrons), and Template:Tmath.

For non-relativistic betas (Template:Math), this expression can be approximated by:[36] F(Z,T)2πη1e2πη.

Other approximations can be found in the literature.[37][38]

Kurie plot

A Kurie plot (also known as a Fermi–Kurie plot) is a graph used in studying beta decay developed by Franz N. D. Kurie, in which the square root of the number of beta particles whose momentum (or energy) lies within a certain narrow range, divided by the Fermi function, is plotted against beta-particle energy.[39][40] It is a straight line for allowed transitions and some forbidden transitions, in accord with the Fermi beta-decay theory. The energy-axis (x-axis) intercept of a Kurie plot corresponds to the maximum energy imparted to the electron/positron (the decay's Template:Mvar value). With a Kurie plot one can find the limit on the effective mass of a neutrino.[41]

Helicity (polarization) of neutrinos, electrons and positrons emitted in beta decay

After the discovery of parity non-conservation (see § History), it was found that, in beta decay, electrons are emitted mostly with negative helicity, i.e., they move, naively speaking, like left-handed screws driven into a material (they have negative longitudinal polarization).[42] Conversely, positrons have mostly positive helicity, i.e., they move like right-handed screws. Neutrinos (emitted in positron decay) have negative helicity, while antineutrinos (emitted in electron decay) have positive helicity.[43]

The higher the energy of the particles, the higher their polarization.

Types of beta decay transitions

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Beta decays can be classified according to the angular momentum ([[Angular momentum operator|Template:Mvar value]]) and total spin ([[Spin (physics)|Template:Mvar value]]) of the emitted radiation. Since total angular momentum must be conserved, including orbital and spin angular momentum, beta decay occurs by a variety of quantum state transitions to various nuclear angular momentum or spin states, known as "Fermi" or "Gamow–Teller" transitions. When beta decay particles carry no angular momentum (Template:Math), the decay is referred to as "allowed", otherwise it is "forbidden".

Other decay modes, which are rare, are known as bound state decay and double beta decay.

Fermi transitions

A Fermi transition is a beta decay in which the spins of the emitted electron (positron) and anti-neutrino (neutrino) couple to total spin Template:Tmath, leading to an angular momentum change ΔJ=0 between the initial and final states of the nucleus (assuming an allowed transition). In the non-relativistic limit, the nuclear part of the operator for a Fermi transition is given by 𝒪F=GVaτ^a± with GV the weak vector coupling constant, τ± the isospin raising and lowering operators, and a running over all protons and neutrons in the nucleus.

Gamow–Teller transitions

A Gamow–Teller transition is a beta decay in which the spins of the emitted electron (positron) and anti-neutrino (neutrino) couple to total spin Template:Tmath, leading to an angular momentum change ΔJ=0,±1 between the initial and final states of the nucleus (assuming an allowed transition). In this case, the nuclear part of the operator is given by 𝒪GT=GAaσ^aτ^a± with GA the weak axial-vector coupling constant, and σ the spin Pauli matrices, which can produce a spin-flip in the decaying nucleon.

Forbidden transitions

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

When Template:Math, the decay is referred to as "forbidden". Nuclear selection rules require high Template:Mvar values to be accompanied by changes in nuclear spin (Template:Mvar) and parity (Template:Mvar). The selection rules for the Template:Mvarth forbidden transitions are: ΔJ=L1,L,L+1;Δπ=(1)L, where Template:Math corresponds to no parity change or parity change, respectively. The special case of a transition between isobaric analogue states, where the structure of the final state is very similar to the structure of the initial state, is referred to as "superallowed" for beta decay, and proceeds very quickly. The following table lists the ΔTemplate:Var and ΔTemplate:Var values for the first few values of Template:Mvar:

Forbiddenness ΔTemplate:Var ΔTemplate:Var
Superallowed 0 No
Allowed 0, 1 No
First forbidden 0, 1, 2 Yes
Second forbidden 1, 2, 3 No
Third forbidden 2, 3, 4 Yes

Rare decay modes

Bound-state β decay

A very small minority of free neutron decays (about four per million) are "two-body decays": the proton, electron and antineutrino are produced, but the electron fails to gain the 13.6 eV energy necessary to escape the proton, and therefore simply remains bound to it, as a neutral hydrogen atom.[44] In this type of beta decay, in essence all of the neutron decay energy is carried off by the antineutrino.

For fully ionized atoms (bare nuclei), it is possible in likewise manner for electrons to fail to escape the atom, and to be emitted from the nucleus into low-lying atomic bound states (orbitals). This cannot occur for neutral atoms with low-lying bound states which are already filled by electrons.

Bound-state β decays were predicted by Daudel, Jean, and Lecoin in 1947,[45] and the phenomenon in fully ionized atoms was first observed for 163Dy66+ in 1992 by Jung et al. of the Darmstadt Heavy-Ion Research Center. Though neutral 163Dy is stable, fully ionized 163Dy66+ undergoes β decay into the K and L shells with a half-life of 47 days.[46] The resulting nucleus – 163Ho66+ – is stable only in this almost fully ionized state and will decay via electron capture into 163Dy in the neutral state. Likewise, while being stable in the neutral state, the fully ionized 205Tl81+ undergoes bound-state β decay to 205Pb81+ with a half-life of Template:Val days.[47][48] The half-lives of neutral 163Ho and 205Pb are respectively 4570 years and Template:Val years. In addition, it is estimated that β decay is energetically impossible for natural atoms but theoretically possible when fully ionized also for 193Ir, 194Au, 202Tl, 215At, 243Am, and 246Bk.[49]

Another possibility is that a fully ionized atom undergoes greatly accelerated β decay, as observed for 187Re by Bosch et al., also at Darmstadt. Neutral 187Re does undergo β decay, with half-life Template:Val years,Template:NUBASE2020 but for fully ionized 187Re75+ this is shortened to only 32.9 years. This is because 187Re75+ is energetically allowed to undergo β decay to the first-excited state in 187Os75+, a process energetically disallowed for natural 187Re.[50] Similarly, neutral 241Pu undergoes β decay with a half-life of 14.3 years, but in its fully ionized state the beta-decay half-life of 241Pu94+ decreases to 4.2 days.[51] For comparison, the variation of decay rates of other nuclear processes due to chemical environment is less than 1%. Moreover, current mass determinations cannot decisively determine whether 222Rn is energetically possible to undergo β decay (the decay energy given in AME2020 is (−6 ± 8) keV),Template:AME2020 II[52] but in either case it is predicted that β will be greatly accelerated for fully ionized 222Rn86+.[49]

Double beta decay

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Some nuclei can undergo double beta decay (2β) where the charge of the nucleus changes by two units. Double beta decay is difficult to study, as it has an extremely long half-life. In nuclei for which both β decay and 2β are possible, the rarer 2β process is effectively impossible to observe. However, in nuclei where β decay is forbidden but 2β is allowed, the process can be seen and a half-life measured.[53] Thus, 2β is usually studied only for beta stable nuclei. Like single beta decay, double beta decay does not change Template:Mvar; thus, at least one of the nuclides with some given Template:Mvar has to be stable with regard to both single and double beta decay.

"Ordinary" 2β results in the emission of two electrons and two antineutrinos. If neutrinos are Majorana particles (i.e., they are their own antiparticles), then a decay known as neutrinoless double beta decay will occur. Most neutrino physicists believe that neutrinoless 2β has never been observed.[53]

See also

References

Template:Reflist

Bibliography

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

External links

Script error: No such module "Navbox".

Template:Authority control

  1. a b c d e Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  9. a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. a b Atomic and Nuclear Data: Chapter 12 Cu-64 Template:Webarchive Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel, 2011. Retrieved on 2024-05-01.
  30. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  33. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  38. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  39. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  40. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  41. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  42. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  43. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. An Overview Of Neutron Decay Template:Webarchive J. Byrne in Quark-Mixing, CKM Unitarity (H. Abele and D. Mund, 2002), see p.XV
  45. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  46. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  47. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  48. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  49. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  50. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
    "Note also, that the decay of bare 187Re is dominated by the nonunique transition to the first excited state of 187Os, since the decay to the ground state has a much smaller matrix element."
  51. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  52. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  53. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".