Geosynchronous orbit: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>GreenC bot
 
Space elevator: Fixed a factual error. The attention on a space elevator tether is not used to haul objects upward along it any more than the tension of a climbing rope hauls someone upward.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Orbit keeping the satellite at a fixed longitude above the equator}}
{{Short description|Orbit keeping the satellite at a fixed longitude above the equator}}
{{Good article}}
{{Good article}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2020}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2020}}
Line 12: Line 12:
== History ==
== History ==
[[File:Clarke sm.jpg|thumb|upright|The geosynchronous orbit was popularised by the science fiction author [[Arthur C. Clarke]], and is thus sometimes called the Clarke Orbit.]]
[[File:Clarke sm.jpg|thumb|upright|The geosynchronous orbit was popularised by the science fiction author [[Arthur C. Clarke]], and is thus sometimes called the Clarke Orbit.]]
In 1929, [[Herman Potočnik]] described both geosynchronous orbits in general and the special case of the geostationary Earth orbit in particular as useful orbits for [[space station]]s.<ref>{{cite book |last=Noordung |first=Hermann |url=https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AHerman_Poto%C4%8Dnik_Noordung_-_Das_Problem_der_Befahrung_des_Weltraums.pdf&page=102 |title=Das Problem der Befahrung des Weltraums: Der Raketen-Motor |publisher=Richard Carl Schmidt & Co. |year=1929 |location=Berlin |pages=98–100 |format=PDF}}</ref> The first appearance of a geosynchronous [[orbit]] in popular literature was in October 1942, in the first [[Venus Equilateral]] story by [[George O. Smith]],<ref name="VE">"(Korvus's message is sent) to a small, squat building at the outskirts of Northern Landing. It was hurled at the sky. ... It ... arrived at the relay station tired and worn, ... when it reached a space station only five hundred miles above the city of North Landing." {{cite book |last=Smith |first=George O.|author-link=George O. Smith |title=The Complete Venus Equilateral |date=1976 |publisher=[[Ballantine Books]] |location=New York |isbn=978-0-345-28953-7 |pages=3–4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lj8H3R4J5GUC&q=squat}}</ref> but Smith did not go into details. British [[science fiction]] author [[Arthur C. Clarke]] popularised and expanded the concept in a 1945 paper entitled ''Extra-Terrestrial Relays – Can Rocket Stations Give Worldwide Radio Coverage?'', published in ''[[Wireless World]]'' magazine. Clarke acknowledged the connection in his introduction to ''The Complete Venus Equilateral''.<ref name="VEintro">"It is therefore quite possible that these stories influenced me subconsciously when ... I worked out the principles of synchronous communications satellites ...", {{cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/arthurcclarkeaut00mcal/page/54 |page=54 |title=Arthur C. Clarke |first=Neil |last=McAleer |year=1992 |isbn=978-0-809-24324-2 |publisher=Contemporary Books}}</ref><ref name="clarke"/> The orbit, which Clarke first described as useful for broadcast and relay communications satellites,<ref name="clarke">{{cite magazine |first=Arthur C. |last=Clarke |author-link=Arthur C. Clarke |url=http://www.clarkefoundation.org/docs/ClarkeWirelessWorldArticle.pdf |title=Extra-Terrestrial Relays – Can Rocket Stations Give Worldwide Radio Coverage? |date=October 1945 |magazine=[[Wireless World]] |pages=305–308 |access-date=March 4, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090318000548/http://www.clarkefoundation.org/docs/ClarkeWirelessWorldArticle.pdf |archive-date=March 18, 2009}}</ref> is sometimes called the Clarke Orbit.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=[[NASA]] |url=http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/basics/bsf5-1.php |title=Basics of Space Flight Section 1 Part 5, Geostationary Orbits |access-date=August 25, 2019 |editor=Phillips Davis}}</ref> Similarly, the collection of artificial satellites in this orbit is known as the Clarke Belt.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://web.mit.edu/m-i-t/science_fiction/jenkins/jenkins_4.html |title=Orbit Wars: Arthur C. Clarke and the Global Communications Satellite |last= Mills |first=Mike |magazine=The Washington Post Magazine |date=August 3, 1997 |pages=12–13 |access-date=August 25, 2019}}</ref>
In 1929, [[Herman Potočnik]] described both geosynchronous orbits in general and the special case of the geostationary Earth orbit in particular as useful orbits for [[space station]]s.<ref>{{cite book |last=Noordung |first=Hermann |url=https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AHerman_Poto%C4%8Dnik_Noordung_-_Das_Problem_der_Befahrung_des_Weltraums.pdf&page=102 |title=Das Problem der Befahrung des Weltraums: Der Raketen-Motor |publisher=Richard Carl Schmidt & Co. |year=1929 |location=Berlin |pages=98–100 |format=PDF}}</ref> The first appearance of a geosynchronous [[orbit]] in popular literature was in October 1942, in the first [[Venus Equilateral]] story by [[George O. Smith]],<ref name="VE">"(Korvus's message is sent) to a small, squat building at the outskirts of Northern Landing. It was hurled at the sky. ... It ... arrived at the relay station tired and worn, ... when it reached a space station only five hundred miles above the city of North Landing." {{cite book |last=Smith |first=George O.|author-link=George O. Smith |title=The Complete Venus Equilateral |date=1976 |publisher=[[Ballantine Books]] |location=New York |isbn=978-0-345-28953-7 |pages=3–4 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lj8H3R4J5GUC&q=squat}}</ref> but Smith did not go into details. British [[science fiction]] author [[Arthur C. Clarke]] popularised and expanded the concept in a 1945 paper entitled ''Extra-Terrestrial Relays – Can Rocket Stations Give Worldwide Radio Coverage?'', published in ''[[Wireless World]]'' magazine. Clarke acknowledged the connection in his introduction to ''The Complete Venus Equilateral''.<ref name="VEintro">"It is therefore quite possible that these stories influenced me subconsciously when ... I worked out the principles of synchronous communications satellites ...", {{cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/arthurcclarkeaut00mcal/page/54 |page=54 |title=Arthur C. Clarke |first=Neil |last=McAleer |year=1992 |isbn=978-0-809-24324-2 |publisher=Contemporary Books}}</ref><ref name="clarke"/> The orbit, which Clarke first described as useful for broadcast and relay communications satellites,<ref name="clarke">{{cite magazine |first=Arthur C. |last=Clarke |author-link=Arthur C. Clarke |url=http://www.clarkefoundation.org/docs/ClarkeWirelessWorldArticle.pdf |title=Extra-Terrestrial Relays – Can Rocket Stations Give Worldwide Radio Coverage? |date=October 1945 |magazine=[[Wireless World]] |pages=305–308 |access-date=March 4, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090318000548/http://www.clarkefoundation.org/docs/ClarkeWirelessWorldArticle.pdf |archive-date=March 18, 2009}}</ref> is sometimes called the Clarke Orbit.<ref>{{cite web |publisher=[[NASA]] |url=http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/basics/bsf5-1.php |title=Basics of Space Flight Section 1 Part 5, Geostationary Orbits |access-date=August 25, 2019 |editor=Phillips Davis}}</ref> Similarly, the collection of artificial satellites in this orbit is known as the Clarke Belt.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://web.mit.edu/m-i-t/science_fiction/jenkins/jenkins_4.html |title=Orbit Wars: Arthur C. Clarke and the Global Communications Satellite |last= Mills |first=Mike |magazine=The Washington Post Magazine |date=August 3, 1997 |pages=12–13 |access-date=August 25, 2019}}</ref>


Line 20: Line 21:
The first geosynchronous satellite was designed by [[Harold Rosen (electrical engineer)|Harold Rosen]] while he was working at [[Hughes Aircraft]] in 1959. Inspired by [[Sputnik 1]], he wanted to use a geostationary (geosynchronous equatorial) satellite to globalise communications. Telecommunications between the US and Europe was then possible between just 136 people at a time, and reliant on [[high frequency]] radios and an [[Submarine communications cable|undersea cable]].<ref name=dm>{{Cite magazine|first=Jack|last=McClintock|date=November 9, 2003|url=http://discovermagazine.com/2003/nov/communications|title=Communications: Harold Rosen – The Seer of Geostationary Satellites|website=Discover Magazine |access-date=August 25, 2019}}</ref>
The first geosynchronous satellite was designed by [[Harold Rosen (electrical engineer)|Harold Rosen]] while he was working at [[Hughes Aircraft]] in 1959. Inspired by [[Sputnik 1]], he wanted to use a geostationary (geosynchronous equatorial) satellite to globalise communications. Telecommunications between the US and Europe was then possible between just 136 people at a time, and reliant on [[high frequency]] radios and an [[Submarine communications cable|undersea cable]].<ref name=dm>{{Cite magazine|first=Jack|last=McClintock|date=November 9, 2003|url=http://discovermagazine.com/2003/nov/communications|title=Communications: Harold Rosen – The Seer of Geostationary Satellites|website=Discover Magazine |access-date=August 25, 2019}}</ref>


Conventional wisdom at the time was that it would require too much [[rocket]] power to place a satellite in a geosynchronous orbit and it would not survive long enough to justify the expense,<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/harold-rosen-1926-2017-53790|title=Harold Rosen, 1926–2017|publisher=Caltech|last=Perkins|first=Robert|date=January 31, 2017 |access-date=August 25, 2019}}</ref> so early efforts were put towards constellations of satellites in [[low Earth orbit|low]] or [[Medium Earth Orbit|medium]] Earth orbit.<ref name="lat"/> The first of these were the passive [[Project Echo|Echo balloon satellites]] in 1960, followed by [[Telstar 1]] in 1962.<ref>{{cite book|title=Beyond The Ionosphere: Fifty Years of Satellite Communication|year=1997|chapter-url=https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4217/ch6.htm |first=Daniel R.|last=Glover |editor=Andrew J Butrica|publisher=NASA |chapter=Chapter 6: NASA Experimental Communications Satellites, 1958-1995|bibcode=1997bify.book.....B}}</ref> Although these projects had difficulties with signal strength and tracking that could be solved through geosynchronous satellites, the concept was seen as impractical, so Hughes often withheld funds and support.<ref name="lat">{{Cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-syncom-satellite-20130726-dto-htmlstory.html|title=How a satellite called Syncom changed the world|first=Ralph|last=Vartabedian|newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=July 26, 2013 |access-date=August 25, 2019}}</ref><ref name=dm/>
Conventional wisdom at the time was that it would require too much [[rocket]] power to place a satellite in a geosynchronous orbit and it would not survive long enough to justify the expense,<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/harold-rosen-1926-2017-53790 |title=Harold Rosen, 1926–2017|publisher=Caltech|last=Perkins|first=Robert|date=January 31, 2017 |access-date=August 25, 2019}}</ref> so early efforts were put towards constellations of satellites in [[low Earth orbit|low]] or [[Medium Earth Orbit|medium]] Earth orbit.<ref name="lat"/> The first of these were the passive [[Project Echo|Echo balloon satellites]] in 1960, followed by [[Telstar 1]] in 1962.<ref>{{cite book|title=Beyond The Ionosphere: Fifty Years of Satellite Communication|year=1997|chapter-url=https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4217/ch6.htm |first=Daniel R.|last=Glover |editor=Andrew J Butrica|publisher=NASA |chapter=Chapter 6: NASA Experimental Communications Satellites, 1958-1995|bibcode=1997bify.book.....B}}</ref> Although these projects had difficulties with signal strength and tracking that could be solved through geosynchronous satellites, the concept was seen as impractical, so Hughes often withheld funds and support.<ref name="lat">{{Cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-syncom-satellite-20130726-dto-htmlstory.html|title=How a satellite called Syncom changed the world|first=Ralph|last=Vartabedian|newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=July 26, 2013 |access-date=August 25, 2019}}</ref><ref name=dm/>


By 1961, Rosen and his team had produced a cylindrical prototype with a diameter of {{convert|76|cm|in}}, height of {{convert|38|cm|in}}, weighing {{convert|11.3|kg|lb}}; it was light, and small, enough to be placed into orbit by then-available rocketry, was [[Spin-stabilisation|spin stabilised]] and used dipole antennas<!-- As a physicist/engineer, I boldly changed the grammatical number of “antenna”, in the belief that a single antenna could not have been economically/logistically efficient. A reliable source should be sought, however. --> producing a pancake-shaped waveform.  <!-- “pancake-shaped waveform” is plainly nonsense: Most likely what was intended is to insinuate that dispersion out of a preferred plane was limited; it‘s plausible that it reflects nothing more than our colleague misconstruing a graphic that was  intended to convey something entirely different. --><ref>{{cite web|url=https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraft/display.action?id=1963-031A|publisher=NASA|title=Syncom 2|editor=David R. Williams |access-date=September 29, 2019}}</ref> In August 1961, they were contracted to begin building the working satellite.<ref name=dm/> They lost [[Syncom#Syncom 1|Syncom 1]] to electronics failure, but Syncom 2 was successfully placed into a geosynchronous orbit in 1963. Although its [[inclined orbit]] still required moving antennas, it was able to relay TV transmissions, and allowed for US President [[John F. Kennedy]] to phone Nigerian prime minister [[Abubakar Tafawa Balewa]] from a ship on August 23, 1963.<ref name="lat"/><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.historychannel.com.au/this-day-in-history/worlds-first-geosynchronous-satellite-launched/|title=World's First Geosynchronous Satellite Launched|publisher=Foxtel|date=June 19, 2016|website=History Channel|access-date=August 25, 2019|archive-date=December 7, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191207144926/https://www.historychannel.com.au/this-day-in-history/worlds-first-geosynchronous-satellite-launched/|url-status=dead}}</ref>
By 1961, Rosen and his team had produced a cylindrical prototype with a diameter of {{convert|76|cm|in}}, height of {{convert|38|cm|in}}, weighing {{convert|11.3|kg|lb}}; it was light, and small, enough to be placed into orbit by then-available rocketry, was [[Spin-stabilisation|spin stabilised]] and used dipole antennas<!-- As a physicist/engineer, I boldly changed the grammatical number of "antenna", in the belief that a single antenna could not have been economically/logistically efficient. A reliable source should be sought, however. --> producing a pancake-shaped waveform.  <!-- "Pancake-shaped waveform" is plainly nonsense: Most likely what was intended is to insinuate that dispersion out of a preferred plane was limited; it's plausible that it reflects nothing more than our colleague misconstruing a graphic that was  intended to convey something entirely different. --><ref>{{cite web|url=https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraft/display.action?id=1963-031A|publisher=NASA|title=Syncom 2|editor=David R. Williams |access-date=September 29, 2019}}</ref> In August 1961, they were contracted to begin building the working satellite.<ref name=dm/> They lost [[Syncom#Syncom 1|Syncom 1]] to electronics failure, but Syncom 2 was successfully placed into a geosynchronous orbit in 1963. Although its [[inclined orbit]] still required moving antennas, it was able to relay TV transmissions, and allowed for US President [[John F. Kennedy]] to phone Nigerian prime minister [[Abubakar Tafawa Balewa]] from a ship on August 23, 1963.<ref name="lat"/><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.historychannel.com.au/this-day-in-history/worlds-first-geosynchronous-satellite-launched/|title=World's First Geosynchronous Satellite Launched|publisher=Foxtel|date=June 19, 2016|website=History Channel|access-date=August 25, 2019|archive-date=December 7, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191207144926/https://www.historychannel.com.au/this-day-in-history/worlds-first-geosynchronous-satellite-launched/|url-status=dead}}</ref>


Today there are hundreds of geosynchronous satellites providing [[remote sensing]], navigation and communications.<ref name=dm/><ref name=sdc20150426 />
Today there are hundreds of geosynchronous satellites providing [[remote sensing]], navigation and communications.<ref name=dm/><ref name=sdc20150426 />
Line 29: Line 30:


== Types ==
== Types ==
=== Geostationary orbit ===
=== Geostationary orbit ===
{{main|Geostationary orbit}}
{{Main|Geostationary orbit}}
[[File:Geostat.gif|thumb|The geostationary satellite (green) always remains above the same marked spot on the equator (brown).]]
[[File:Geostat.gif|thumb|The geostationary satellite (green) always remains above the same marked spot on the equator (brown).]]
A geostationary equatorial orbit (GEO) is a circular geosynchronous orbit in the plane of the Earth's equator with a radius of approximately {{convert|42164|km|mi|0|abbr=on}} (measured from the center of the Earth).<ref name="smad"/>{{rp|156}} A satellite in such an orbit is at an altitude of approximately {{convert|35786|km|mi|0|abbr=on}} above mean sea level. It maintains the same position relative to the Earth's surface. If one could see a satellite in geostationary orbit, it would appear to hover at the same point in the sky, i.e., not exhibit [[diurnal motion]], while the Sun, Moon, and stars would traverse the skies behind it. Such orbits are useful for [[telecommunications satellite]]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Telecommunications_Integrated_Applications/Orbits |title=Orbits |publisher=[[ESA]] |access-date=October 1, 2019 |date=October 4, 2018}}</ref>
A geostationary equatorial orbit (GEO) is a circular geosynchronous orbit in the plane of the Earth's equator with a radius of approximately {{convert|42164|km|mi|0|abbr=on}} (measured from the center of the Earth).<ref name="smad"/>{{rp|156}} A satellite in such an orbit is at an altitude of approximately {{convert|35786|km|mi|0|abbr=on}} above mean sea level. It maintains the same position relative to the Earth's surface. If one could see a satellite in geostationary orbit, it would appear to hover at the same point in the sky, i.e., not exhibit [[diurnal motion]], while the Sun, Moon, and stars would traverse the skies behind it. Such orbits are useful for [[telecommunications satellite]]s.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Telecommunications_Integrated_Applications/Orbits |title=Orbits |publisher=[[ESA]] |access-date=October 1, 2019 |date=October 4, 2018}}</ref>


Line 42: Line 43:


=== Elliptical and inclined geosynchronous orbits ===
=== Elliptical and inclined geosynchronous orbits ===
[[File:Qzss-45-0.09.jpg|left|thumb|A quasi-[[zenith]] satellite orbit]]
[[File:Qzss-45-0.09.jpg|left|thumb|A quasi-[[zenith]] satellite orbit]]


Line 64: Line 64:


====Quasi-zenith orbit====
====Quasi-zenith orbit====
The [[Quasi-Zenith Satellite System]] (QZSS) is a four-satellite system that operates in a geosynchronous orbit at an inclination of 42° and a 0.075 eccentricity.<ref>{{citation |title=Interface Specifications for QZSS |version=version 1.7 |url=http://qz-vision.jaxa.jp/USE/is-qzss/index_e.html |date=2016-07-14 |author=Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency |pages=7–8 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130406032030/http://qz-vision.jaxa.jp/USE/is-qzss/index_e.html |archive-date=2013-04-06}}</ref> Each satellite dwells over [[Japan]], allowing signals to reach receivers in [[urban canyons]] then passes quickly over Australia.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://qzss.go.jp/en/technical/technology/orbit.html |title=Quasi-Zenith Satellite Orbit (QZO) |access-date=2018-03-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180309194252/http://qzss.go.jp/en/technical/technology/orbit.html |archive-date=2018-03-09 |url-status=live}}</ref>
The [[Quasi-Zenith Satellite System]] (QZSS) is a four-satellite system that operates in a geosynchronous orbit at an inclination of 42° and a 0.075 eccentricity.<ref>{{citation |title=Interface Specifications for QZSS |version=version 1.7 |url=http://qz-vision.jaxa.jp/USE/is-qzss/index_e.html |date=2016-07-14 |author=Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency |pages=7–8 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130406032030/http://qz-vision.jaxa.jp/USE/is-qzss/index_e.html |archive-date=2013-04-06}}</ref> Each satellite dwells over [[Japan]], allowing signals to reach receivers in [[urban canyons]], then passes quickly over Australia.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://qzss.go.jp/en/technical/technology/orbit.html |title=Quasi-Zenith Satellite Orbit (QZO) |access-date=2018-03-10 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180309194252/http://qzss.go.jp/en/technical/technology/orbit.html |archive-date=2018-03-09 |url-status=live}}</ref>


==Launch==
==Launch==
Line 83: Line 83:


==Proposed orbits==
==Proposed orbits==
===Statite proposal===
===Statite proposal===
A [[statite]] is a hypothetical satellite that uses [[Radiation pressure#Solar radiation pressure|radiation pressure]] from the Sun against a [[solar sail]] to modify its orbit.<ref name="st"/>
A [[statite]] is a hypothetical satellite that uses [[Radiation pressure#Solar radiation pressure|radiation pressure]] from the Sun against a [[solar sail]] to modify its orbit.<ref name="st"/>
Line 90: Line 89:


===Space elevator===
===Space elevator===
A further form of geosynchronous orbit is the theoretical [[space elevator]]. If a mass orbiting above the geostationary belt is tethered to the earth’s surface, and the mass is accelerated to maintain an orbital period equal to one sidereal day, then since the orbit now requires more downward force than is supplied by gravity alone.  The tether will become tensioned by the extra centripetal force required, and this tension force is available to hoist objects up the tether structure.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.niac.usra.edu/files/studies/final_report/521Edwards.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.niac.usra.edu/files/studies/final_report/521Edwards.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |title=The Space Elevator NIAC Phase II Final Report |date=1 March 2003 |first=Bradley C. |last=Edwards |page=26 |publisher=[[NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts]]}}</ref>
A further form of geosynchronous orbit is the theoretical [[space elevator]]. If a mass orbiting above the geostationary belt is tethered to the earth’s surface, and the mass is accelerated to maintain an orbital period equal to one sidereal day, then since the orbit now requires more downward force than is supplied by gravity alone the tether will become tensioned by the extra centripetal force required, and this tension will keep the tether structure stable as a crawler carries objects up/down along it.<ref>{{cite web |last=Edwards |first=Bradley C. |date=1 March 2003 |title=The Space Elevator NIAC Phase II Final Report |url=http://www.niac.usra.edu/files/studies/final_report/521Edwards.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.niac.usra.edu/files/studies/final_report/521Edwards.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |publisher=[[NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts]] |page=26}}</ref>


== Retired satellites ==
== Retired satellites ==
[[File:Debris-GEO1280.jpg|thumb|alt=Earth from space, surrounded by small white dots|A computer-generated image of space debris. Two debris fields are shown: around geosynchronous space and low Earth orbit.]]
[[File:Debris-GEO1280.jpg|thumb|alt=Earth from space, surrounded by small white dots|A computer-generated image of space debris. Two debris fields are shown: around geosynchronous space and low Earth orbit.]]
Geosynchronous satellites require some [[Orbital station-keeping|station-keeping]] in order to remain in position, and once they run out of thruster fuel and are no longer useful they are moved into a higher [[graveyard orbit]]. It is not feasible to deorbit geosynchronous satellites, for to do so would take far more fuel than would be used by slightly elevating the orbit; and atmospheric drag is negligible, giving GSOs lifetimes of thousands of years.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nasa.gov/news/debris_faq.html |title=Frequently Asked Questions: Orbital Debris |publisher=NASA |date=September 2, 2011 |access-date=February 9, 2020 |archive-date=March 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200323170238/https://www.nasa.gov/news/debris_faq.html |url-status=dead}}</ref>
Geosynchronous satellites require some [[Orbital station-keeping|station-keeping]] in order to remain in position, and once they run out of thruster fuel and are no longer useful they are moved into a higher [[graveyard orbit]]. It is not feasible to deorbit geosynchronous satellites, for to do so would take far more fuel than would be used by slightly elevating the orbit; and atmospheric drag is negligible, giving GSOs lifetimes of thousands of years.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.nasa.gov/news/debris_faq.html |title=Frequently Asked Questions: Orbital Debris |publisher=NASA |date=September 2, 2011 |access-date=February 9, 2020 |archive-date=March 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200323170238/https://www.nasa.gov/news/debris_faq.html |url-status=dead}}</ref>


Line 100: Line 100:
=== Space debris ===
=== Space debris ===
{{main|Space debris#Characterization}}
{{main|Space debris#Characterization}}
Space debris in geosynchronous orbits typically has a lower collision speed than at LEO since most GSO satellites orbit in the same plane, altitude and speed; however, the presence of satellites in [[eccentric orbit]]s allows for collisions at up to 4&nbsp;km/s. Although a collision is comparatively unlikely, GSO satellites have a limited ability to avoid any debris.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://physicsworld.com/a/space-debris-threat-to-geosynchronous-satellites-has-been-drastically-underestimated/ |title=Space debris threat to geosynchronous satellites has been drastically underestimated |date=December 12, 2017 |website=Physics World |first=Marric |last=Stephens}}</ref>
Space debris in geosynchronous orbits typically has a lower collision speed than at LEO since most GSO satellites orbit in the same plane, altitude and speed; however, the presence of satellites in [[eccentric orbit]]s allows for collisions at up to 4&nbsp;km/s. Although a collision is comparatively unlikely, GSO satellites have a limited ability to avoid any debris.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://physicsworld.com/a/space-debris-threat-to-geosynchronous-satellites-has-been-drastically-underestimated/ |title=Space debris threat to geosynchronous satellites has been drastically underestimated |date=December 12, 2017 |website=Physics World |first=Marric |last=Stephens}}</ref>


Line 133: Line 134:


===Ground track===
===Ground track===
In the special case of a geostationary orbit, the [[ground track]] of a satellite is a single point on the [[equator]]. In the general case of a geosynchronous orbit with a non-zero [[inclination]] or [[Eccentricity (orbit)|eccentricity]], the ground track is a more or less distorted figure-eight, returning to the same places once per sidereal day.<ref name="smad"/>{{rp|122}}
In the special case of a geostationary orbit, the [[ground track]] of a satellite is a single point on the [[equator]]. In the general case of a geosynchronous orbit with a non-zero [[inclination]] or [[Eccentricity (orbit)|eccentricity]], the ground track is a more or less distorted figure-eight, returning to the same places once per sidereal day.<ref name="smad"/>{{rp|122}}


Line 174: Line 174:
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120204054322/http://www.braeunig.us/space/orbmech.htm Orbital Mechanics] (Rocket and Space Technology)
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120204054322/http://www.braeunig.us/space/orbmech.htm Orbital Mechanics] (Rocket and Space Technology)
* {{APOD |date=11 April 2012 |title=Time lapse of Geostationary Satellites Beyond the Alps}}
* {{APOD |date=11 April 2012 |title=Time lapse of Geostationary Satellites Beyond the Alps}}
{{Navboxes
{{Navboxes
|title = Related articles
|title = Related articles
Line 184: Line 185:
{{DEFAULTSORT:Geosynchronous Orbit}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Geosynchronous Orbit}}
[[Category:Earth orbits]]
[[Category:Earth orbits]]
[[Category:Planetary rings]]
[[Category:Satellite broadcasting]]
[[Category:Satellite broadcasting]]
[[Category:Satellites in geosynchronous orbit|+]]
[[Category:Satellites in geosynchronous orbit|+]]
[[Category:Planetary rings]]

Revision as of 12:26, 4 June 2025

Template:Short description Template:Good article Template:Use mdy dates

File:Geosynchronous orbit.gif
Animation (not to scale) showing geosynchronous satellite orbiting the Earth

A geosynchronous orbit (sometimes abbreviated GSO) is an Earth-centered orbit with an orbital period that matches Earth's rotation on its axis, 23 hours, 56 minutes, and 4 seconds (one sidereal day). The synchronization of rotation and orbital period means that, for an observer on Earth's surface, an object in geosynchronous orbit returns to exactly the same position in the sky after a period of one sidereal day. Over the course of a day, the object's position in the sky may remain still or trace out a path, typically in a figure-8 form, whose precise characteristics depend on the orbit's inclination and eccentricity. A circular geosynchronous orbit has a constant altitude of Script error: No such module "convert"..[1]

A special case of geosynchronous orbit is the geostationary orbit (often abbreviated GEO), which is a circular geosynchronous orbit in Earth's equatorial plane with both inclination and eccentricity equal to 0. A satellite in a geostationary orbit remains in the same position in the sky to observers on the surface.[1]

Communications satellites are often given geostationary or close-to-geostationary orbits, so that the satellite antennas that communicate with them do not have to move but can be pointed permanently at the fixed location in the sky where the satellite appears.[1]

History

File:Clarke sm.jpg
The geosynchronous orbit was popularised by the science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke, and is thus sometimes called the Clarke Orbit.

In 1929, Herman Potočnik described both geosynchronous orbits in general and the special case of the geostationary Earth orbit in particular as useful orbits for space stations.[2] The first appearance of a geosynchronous orbit in popular literature was in October 1942, in the first Venus Equilateral story by George O. Smith,[3] but Smith did not go into details. British science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke popularised and expanded the concept in a 1945 paper entitled Extra-Terrestrial Relays – Can Rocket Stations Give Worldwide Radio Coverage?, published in Wireless World magazine. Clarke acknowledged the connection in his introduction to The Complete Venus Equilateral.[4][5] The orbit, which Clarke first described as useful for broadcast and relay communications satellites,[5] is sometimes called the Clarke Orbit.[6] Similarly, the collection of artificial satellites in this orbit is known as the Clarke Belt.[7]

File:Syncom 2 side.jpg
Syncom 2: The first functional geosynchronous satellite

In technical terminology, the geosynchronous orbits are often referred to as geostationary if they are roughly over the equator, but the terms are used somewhat interchangeably.[8][9] Specifically, geosynchronous Earth orbit (GEO) may be a synonym for geosynchronous equatorial orbit,[10] or geostationary Earth orbit.[11]

The first geosynchronous satellite was designed by Harold Rosen while he was working at Hughes Aircraft in 1959. Inspired by Sputnik 1, he wanted to use a geostationary (geosynchronous equatorial) satellite to globalise communications. Telecommunications between the US and Europe was then possible between just 136 people at a time, and reliant on high frequency radios and an undersea cable.[12]

Conventional wisdom at the time was that it would require too much rocket power to place a satellite in a geosynchronous orbit and it would not survive long enough to justify the expense,[13] so early efforts were put towards constellations of satellites in low or medium Earth orbit.[14] The first of these were the passive Echo balloon satellites in 1960, followed by Telstar 1 in 1962.[15] Although these projects had difficulties with signal strength and tracking that could be solved through geosynchronous satellites, the concept was seen as impractical, so Hughes often withheld funds and support.[14][12]

By 1961, Rosen and his team had produced a cylindrical prototype with a diameter of Script error: No such module "convert"., height of Script error: No such module "convert"., weighing Script error: No such module "convert".; it was light, and small, enough to be placed into orbit by then-available rocketry, was spin stabilised and used dipole antennas producing a pancake-shaped waveform. [16] In August 1961, they were contracted to begin building the working satellite.[12] They lost Syncom 1 to electronics failure, but Syncom 2 was successfully placed into a geosynchronous orbit in 1963. Although its inclined orbit still required moving antennas, it was able to relay TV transmissions, and allowed for US President John F. Kennedy to phone Nigerian prime minister Abubakar Tafawa Balewa from a ship on August 23, 1963.[14][17]

Today there are hundreds of geosynchronous satellites providing remote sensing, navigation and communications.[12][1]

Although most populated land locations on the planet now have terrestrial communications facilities (microwave, fiber-optic), which often have latency and bandwidth advantages, and telephone access covering 96% of the population and internet access 90% as of 2018,[18] some rural and remote areas in developed countries are still reliant on satellite communications.[19][20]

Types

Geostationary orbit

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:Geostat.gif
The geostationary satellite (green) always remains above the same marked spot on the equator (brown).

A geostationary equatorial orbit (GEO) is a circular geosynchronous orbit in the plane of the Earth's equator with a radius of approximately Script error: No such module "convert". (measured from the center of the Earth).[21]Template:Rp A satellite in such an orbit is at an altitude of approximately Script error: No such module "convert". above mean sea level. It maintains the same position relative to the Earth's surface. If one could see a satellite in geostationary orbit, it would appear to hover at the same point in the sky, i.e., not exhibit diurnal motion, while the Sun, Moon, and stars would traverse the skies behind it. Such orbits are useful for telecommunications satellites.[22]

A perfectly stable geostationary orbit is an ideal that can only be approximated. In practice the satellite drifts out of this orbit because of perturbations such as the solar wind, radiation pressure, variations in the Earth's gravitational field, and the gravitational effect of the Moon and Sun, and thrusters are used to maintain the orbit in a process known as station-keeping.[21]Template:Rp

Eventually, without the use of thrusters, the orbit will become inclined, oscillating between 0° and 15° every 55 years. At the end of the satellite's lifetime, when fuel approaches depletion, satellite operators may decide to omit these expensive manoeuvres to correct inclination and only control eccentricity. This prolongs the life-time of the satellite as it consumes less fuel over time, but the satellite can then only be used by ground antennas capable of following the N-S movement.[21]Template:Rp

Geostationary satellites will also tend to drift around one of two stable longitudes of 75° and 255° without station keeping.[21]Template:Rp

Elliptical and inclined geosynchronous orbits

File:Qzss-45-0.09.jpg
A quasi-zenith satellite orbit

Many objects in geosynchronous orbits have eccentric and/or inclined orbits. Eccentricity makes the orbit elliptical and appear to oscillate E-W in the sky from the viewpoint of a ground station, while inclination tilts the orbit compared to the equator and makes it appear to oscillate N-S from a groundstation. These effects combine to form an analemma (figure-8).[21]Template:Rp

Satellites in elliptical/eccentric orbits must be tracked by steerable ground stations.[21]Template:Rp

Tundra orbit

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

The Tundra orbit is an eccentric geosynchronous orbit, which allows the satellite to spend most of its time dwelling over one high latitude location. It sits at an inclination of 63.4°, which is a frozen orbit, which reduces the need for stationkeeping.[23] At least two satellites are needed to provide continuous coverage over an area.[24] It was used by the Sirius XM Satellite Radio to improve signal strength in the northern US and Canada.[25]

Quasi-zenith orbit

The Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) is a four-satellite system that operates in a geosynchronous orbit at an inclination of 42° and a 0.075 eccentricity.[26] Each satellite dwells over Japan, allowing signals to reach receivers in urban canyons, then passes quickly over Australia.[27]

Launch

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Script error: No such module "Multiple image".

Geosynchronous satellites are launched to the east into a prograde orbit that matches the rotation rate of the equator. The smallest inclination that a satellite can be launched into is that of the launch site's latitude, so launching the satellite from close to the equator limits the amount of inclination change needed later.[28] Additionally, launching from close to the equator allows the speed of the Earth's rotation to give the satellite a boost. A launch site should have water or deserts to the east, so any failed rockets do not fall on a populated area.[29]

Most launch vehicles place geosynchronous satellites directly into a geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO), an elliptical orbit with an apogee at GSO height and a low perigee. On-board satellite propulsion is then used to raise the perigee, circularise and reach GSO.[28][30]

Once in a viable geostationary orbit, spacecraft can change their longitudinal position by adjusting their semi-major axis such that the new period is shorter or longer than a sidereal day, in order to effect an apparent "drift" Eastward or Westward, respectively. Once at the desired longitude, the spacecraft's period is restored to geosynchronous.[31]

Proposed orbits

Statite proposal

A statite is a hypothetical satellite that uses radiation pressure from the Sun against a solar sail to modify its orbit.[32]

It would hold its location over the dark side of the Earth at a latitude of approximately 30 degrees. It would return to the same spot in the sky every 24 hours from an Earth-based viewer's perspective, so be functionally similar to a geosynchronous orbit.[32][33]

Space elevator

A further form of geosynchronous orbit is the theoretical space elevator. If a mass orbiting above the geostationary belt is tethered to the earth’s surface, and the mass is accelerated to maintain an orbital period equal to one sidereal day, then since the orbit now requires more downward force than is supplied by gravity alone the tether will become tensioned by the extra centripetal force required, and this tension will keep the tether structure stable as a crawler carries objects up/down along it.[34]

Retired satellites

Earth from space, surrounded by small white dots
A computer-generated image of space debris. Two debris fields are shown: around geosynchronous space and low Earth orbit.

Geosynchronous satellites require some station-keeping in order to remain in position, and once they run out of thruster fuel and are no longer useful they are moved into a higher graveyard orbit. It is not feasible to deorbit geosynchronous satellites, for to do so would take far more fuel than would be used by slightly elevating the orbit; and atmospheric drag is negligible, giving GSOs lifetimes of thousands of years.[35]

The retirement process is becoming increasingly regulated and satellites must have a 90% chance of moving over 200 km above the geostationary belt at end of life.[36]

Space debris

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Space debris in geosynchronous orbits typically has a lower collision speed than at LEO since most GSO satellites orbit in the same plane, altitude and speed; however, the presence of satellites in eccentric orbits allows for collisions at up to 4 km/s. Although a collision is comparatively unlikely, GSO satellites have a limited ability to avoid any debris.[37]

Debris less than 10 cm in diameter cannot be seen from the Earth, making it difficult to assess their prevalence.[38]

Despite efforts to reduce risk, spacecraft collisions have occurred. The European Space Agency telecom satellite Olympus-1 was struck by a meteoroid on August 11, 1993, and eventually moved to a graveyard orbit,[39] and in 2006 the Russian Express-AM11 communications satellite was struck by an unknown object and rendered inoperable,[40] although its engineers had enough contact time with the satellite to send it into a graveyard orbit. In 2017 both AMC-9 and Telkom-1 broke apart from an unknown cause.[41][38][42]

Properties

File:Geosynchronous no geostationary orbit.gif
The orbit of a geosynchronous satellite at an inclination, from the perspective of an off-Earth observer (ECI) and of an observer rotating around the Earth at its spin rate (ECEF).

A geosynchronous orbit has the following properties:

Period

All geosynchronous orbits have an orbital period equal to exactly one sidereal day.[43] This means that the satellite will return to the same point above the Earth's surface every (sidereal) day, regardless of other orbital properties.[44][21]Template:Rp This orbital period, T, is directly related to the semi-major axis of the orbit through the formula:

T=2πa3μ

where:

Template:Mvar is the length of the orbit's semi-major axis
μ is the standard gravitational parameter of the central body[21]Template:Rp

Inclination

A geosynchronous orbit can have any inclination.

Satellites commonly have an inclination of zero, ensuring that the orbit remains over the equator at all times, making it stationary with respect to latitude from the point of view of a ground observer (and in the ECEF reference frame).[21]Template:Rp

Another popular inclinations is 63.4° for a Tundra orbit, which ensures that the orbit's argument of perigee does not change over time.[23]

Ground track

In the special case of a geostationary orbit, the ground track of a satellite is a single point on the equator. In the general case of a geosynchronous orbit with a non-zero inclination or eccentricity, the ground track is a more or less distorted figure-eight, returning to the same places once per sidereal day.[21]Template:Rp

See also

Script error: No such module "Portal".

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. "(Korvus's message is sent) to a small, squat building at the outskirts of Northern Landing. It was hurled at the sky. ... It ... arrived at the relay station tired and worn, ... when it reached a space station only five hundred miles above the city of North Landing." Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. "It is therefore quite possible that these stories influenced me subconsciously when ... I worked out the principles of synchronous communications satellites ...", Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. a b c d e f g h i j k Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. a b <templatestyles src="Citation/styles.css"/>Template:Citation/make link, Forward, Robert, "Statite: Spacecraft That Utilizes Sight Pressure and Method of Use", published Script error: No such module "auto date formatter". Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
  33. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  43. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

External links

Script error: No such module "navboxes". Script error: No such module "Navbox". Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:SpaceflightScript error: No such module "navboxes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Template:Authority control