Siddhanta: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Javierfv1212
 
imported>FrescoBot
m Bot: link syntax and minor changes
 
Line 13: Line 13:
[[Tibetan Buddhism|Tibetan Buddhists]] developed the genre further and numerous ''siddhānta'' works were written by figures such as [[Rongzom Chökyi Zangpo|Rongzompa]], [[Chekawa Yeshe Dorje]], [[Sakya Pandita]], [[Longchenpa]], [[Jamyang Zhepa|Jamyang Shéba]], and [[Changkya Rölpé Dorjé]].<ref name=":0" /> According to Daniel Cozort, Jamyang's massive ''Great Exposition of Tenets'' "are the most comprehensive of the tenets texts" (in Tibetan Buddhism).<ref>Blo-bzaṅ-dkon-mchog, Daniel Cozort, Craig Preston (2003). ''Buddhist Philosophy: Losang Gönchok's Short Commentary to Jamyang Shayba's Root Text on Tenets,'' pp. xi-xii. Snow Lion Publications.</ref> During the 18th century, Thuken Losang Chökyi Nyima (1737–1802), a student of Changkya, wrote ''Crystal Mirror of Philosophical Systems.'' According to Roger R. Jackson, this text is "arguably the widest-ranging account of religious philosophies ever written in pre-modern Tibet." This work discusses all schools of Tibetan Buddhism, [[Chinese Buddhism]] and [[Religion in China|Chinese religions]] as well as [[Indian philosophy|Indian]], [[Religion in Mongolia|Mongolian]] and [[Kingdom of Khotan|Khotanese]] religious systems.<ref>Thuken Losang Chokyi Nyima, Jackson, Roger (editor) (2017). ''The Crystal Mirror of Philosophical Systems: A Tibetan Study of Asian Religious Thought.'' Simon and Schuster.</ref>  
[[Tibetan Buddhism|Tibetan Buddhists]] developed the genre further and numerous ''siddhānta'' works were written by figures such as [[Rongzom Chökyi Zangpo|Rongzompa]], [[Chekawa Yeshe Dorje]], [[Sakya Pandita]], [[Longchenpa]], [[Jamyang Zhepa|Jamyang Shéba]], and [[Changkya Rölpé Dorjé]].<ref name=":0" /> According to Daniel Cozort, Jamyang's massive ''Great Exposition of Tenets'' "are the most comprehensive of the tenets texts" (in Tibetan Buddhism).<ref>Blo-bzaṅ-dkon-mchog, Daniel Cozort, Craig Preston (2003). ''Buddhist Philosophy: Losang Gönchok's Short Commentary to Jamyang Shayba's Root Text on Tenets,'' pp. xi-xii. Snow Lion Publications.</ref> During the 18th century, Thuken Losang Chökyi Nyima (1737–1802), a student of Changkya, wrote ''Crystal Mirror of Philosophical Systems.'' According to Roger R. Jackson, this text is "arguably the widest-ranging account of religious philosophies ever written in pre-modern Tibet." This work discusses all schools of Tibetan Buddhism, [[Chinese Buddhism]] and [[Religion in China|Chinese religions]] as well as [[Indian philosophy|Indian]], [[Religion in Mongolia|Mongolian]] and [[Kingdom of Khotan|Khotanese]] religious systems.<ref>Thuken Losang Chokyi Nyima, Jackson, Roger (editor) (2017). ''The Crystal Mirror of Philosophical Systems: A Tibetan Study of Asian Religious Thought.'' Simon and Schuster.</ref>  


The term ''Siddhānta'' is also used in a different way by some Buddhist treatises like the ''[[Da zhidu lun|Da zhidu lun.]]'' In this text (and in the Chinese [[Tiantai]] school), the term ''Siddhāntas'' refers to four pedagogical principles used by the Buddha to teach others.<ref name=":10">Chappell, David W. (1987), "Is Tendai Buddhism Relevant to the Modern World?" (PDF), Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 14 (2/3), doi:10.18874/jjrs.14.2-3.1987.247-266, archived from the original on March 4, 2009, retrieved August 16, 2008</ref> According to David W. Chappell, the Four Siddhāntas are:<ref name=":10" /> <blockquote>(1) First of all, the Buddha used ordinary or mundane modes of expression,  
The term ''Siddhānta'' is also used in a different way by some Buddhist treatises like the ''[[Da zhidu lun]].'' In this text (and in the Chinese [[Tiantai]] school), the term ''Siddhāntas'' refers to four pedagogical principles used by the Buddha to teach others.<ref name=":10">Chappell, David W. (1987), "Is Tendai Buddhism Relevant to the Modern World?" (PDF), Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 14 (2/3), doi:10.18874/jjrs.14.2-3.1987.247-266, archived from the original on March 4, 2009, retrieved August 16, 2008</ref> According to David W. Chappell, the Four Siddhāntas are:<ref name=":10" /> <blockquote>(1) First of all, the Buddha used ordinary or mundane modes of expression,  


(2) then he individualized his teaching and adapted it to the capacities of his listeners,  
(2) then he individualized his teaching and adapted it to the capacities of his listeners,  
Line 28: Line 28:
In Indian [[astronomy and astrology]], Siddhanta (or Siddhantic) refers to a genre of texts that replaced the earlier tradition based on the ''[[Vedanga Jyotisha]]''. The Siddhanta ("established theory") genre emerged around the beginning of the first millennium CE. Compared to the ''Vedanga Jyotisha'', the Siddhanta texts discussed a wider range of topics including the [[nakshatra]]s, the [[zodiac signs]], precise calculations of the solar year, computations of planetary motions and positions, calculation of solar and lunar eclipses, and parallax.<ref>{{cite book |author=S. Balachandra Rao |chapter=Classical Astronomy in India - An Overview |editor=Thanu Padmanabhan |title=Astronomy in India: A Historical Perspective |year=2014 |publisher=Springer |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=grZTBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA4 |page=4 |isbn=9788184899986 }}</ref>
In Indian [[astronomy and astrology]], Siddhanta (or Siddhantic) refers to a genre of texts that replaced the earlier tradition based on the ''[[Vedanga Jyotisha]]''. The Siddhanta ("established theory") genre emerged around the beginning of the first millennium CE. Compared to the ''Vedanga Jyotisha'', the Siddhanta texts discussed a wider range of topics including the [[nakshatra]]s, the [[zodiac signs]], precise calculations of the solar year, computations of planetary motions and positions, calculation of solar and lunar eclipses, and parallax.<ref>{{cite book |author=S. Balachandra Rao |chapter=Classical Astronomy in India - An Overview |editor=Thanu Padmanabhan |title=Astronomy in India: A Historical Perspective |year=2014 |publisher=Springer |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=grZTBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA4 |page=4 |isbn=9788184899986 }}</ref>


Early [[Indian astronomy]] is transmitted in ''Siddhanta''s: [[Varahamihira]] (6th century) in his ''[[Pancha-Siddhantika]]'' contrasts five of these: The [[Surya Siddhanta]] besides the [[Paitamaha Siddhanta]]s (which is more similar to the "classical" ''Vedanga Jyotisha''), the [[Paulisha Siddhanta|Paulisha]] and [[Romaka Siddhanta|Romaka]] Siddhantas (directly based on Hellenistic astronomy) and the [[Vasishtha Siddhanta]].
Early [[Indian astronomy]] is transmitted in ''Siddhanta''s: [[Varahamihira]] (6th century) in his ''[[Pancha-Siddhantika]]'' contrasts five of these: The [[Surya Siddhanta]] besides the [[Paitamaha Siddhanta]]s (which is more similar to the "classical" ''Vedanga Jyotisha''), the [[Paulisha Siddhanta|Paulisha]] and [[Romaka Siddhanta|Romaka]] Siddhantas (directly based on Hellenistic astronomy, and also known through the [[Yavanajataka]]) and the [[Vasishtha Siddhanta]].


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 20:52, 6 September 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Script error: No such module "lang". (Devanagari: Script error: No such module "Lang". Template:Literal translation[1]) is a Sanskrit term denoting the established and accepted view of any particular school within Indian philosophy; literally "settled opinion or doctrine, dogma, axiom, received or admitted truth; any fixed or established or canonical text-book on any subject" (from siddha, adj. mfn.- accomplished, fulfilled; that has attained the highest object, thoroughly skilled or versed in).[2]

Hindu philosophy

This term is an established term within Hindu philosophy which denotes a specific line of development within a Hindu religious or philosophical tradition. The traditional schools of Hindu philosophy have had their siddhāntas established by their respective founders in the form of sūtras (aphorisms). The sūtras are commented by a major philosopher in the respective traditions to elaborate upon the established doctrine by quoting from the śāstras (scriptures) and using logic and pramāṇas (accepted source of knowledge). For example, in the tradition of Vedanta, the author of the Brahma Sūtra was Veda-Vyāsa and the commentators were Ādi Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja and Mādhavācārya (each of whom eventually set up sub-schools within Vedānta). Also, in the tradition of Pūrva Mīmāṁsā, the author of the sūtra was Jaimini and the commentator was Śabarasvāmi.

Buddhist philosophy

Siddhānta (Tibetan: grub mtha') is a genre of Buddhist literature, which is quite common in Tibetan Buddhism.[3] This genre has its antecedents in Pali suttas such as the Tevijja sutta and the Brahmajala sutta. These early Buddhist sources discuss the various worldviews of brahmins, sramanas and ascetics during the Buddha's time.[4] Buddhist scholastic literature later expanded the discussion to numerous other Buddhist and non-Buddhist views. Indian works which discuss various competing doctrines include the Kathavatthu, the Mahavibhasa, Bhaviveka's Blaze of Reasoning and Shantaraksita's Tattvasamgraha.[3]

Tibetan Buddhists developed the genre further and numerous siddhānta works were written by figures such as Rongzompa, Chekawa Yeshe Dorje, Sakya Pandita, Longchenpa, Jamyang Shéba, and Changkya Rölpé Dorjé.[3] According to Daniel Cozort, Jamyang's massive Great Exposition of Tenets "are the most comprehensive of the tenets texts" (in Tibetan Buddhism).[5] During the 18th century, Thuken Losang Chökyi Nyima (1737–1802), a student of Changkya, wrote Crystal Mirror of Philosophical Systems. According to Roger R. Jackson, this text is "arguably the widest-ranging account of religious philosophies ever written in pre-modern Tibet." This work discusses all schools of Tibetan Buddhism, Chinese Buddhism and Chinese religions as well as Indian, Mongolian and Khotanese religious systems.[6]

The term Siddhānta is also used in a different way by some Buddhist treatises like the Da zhidu lun. In this text (and in the Chinese Tiantai school), the term Siddhāntas refers to four pedagogical principles used by the Buddha to teach others.[7] According to David W. Chappell, the Four Siddhāntas are:[7]

(1) First of all, the Buddha used ordinary or mundane modes of expression,

(2) then he individualized his teaching and adapted it to the capacities of his listeners,

(3) he further altered it in order to respond to and diagnose the spiritual defects of his hearers, and

(4) finally all his teaching was based on the perfect and highest wisdom. The first three are conditioned and finite, whereas the last is inconceivable and ineffable.

Jain philosophical studies

For Jainism, the texts vary between the three primary sects, with Sthanakavasis believing in no textual authority. Both the Digambara and Śvetāmbara believe that the "purest" Jain teachings were contained within the Purvas, which have been mostly lost to antiquity. Of the surviving Jain scriptures, the Digambara tend to focus upon the Prakaranas; while the Śvetāmbara focus upon the Angas.

Astronomy

In Indian astronomy and astrology, Siddhanta (or Siddhantic) refers to a genre of texts that replaced the earlier tradition based on the Vedanga Jyotisha. The Siddhanta ("established theory") genre emerged around the beginning of the first millennium CE. Compared to the Vedanga Jyotisha, the Siddhanta texts discussed a wider range of topics including the nakshatras, the zodiac signs, precise calculations of the solar year, computations of planetary motions and positions, calculation of solar and lunar eclipses, and parallax.[8]

Early Indian astronomy is transmitted in Siddhantas: Varahamihira (6th century) in his Pancha-Siddhantika contrasts five of these: The Surya Siddhanta besides the Paitamaha Siddhantas (which is more similar to the "classical" Vedanga Jyotisha), the Paulisha and Romaka Siddhantas (directly based on Hellenistic astronomy, and also known through the Yavanajataka) and the Vasishtha Siddhanta.

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b c Changkya Rölpai Dorjé; Lopez, Donald (translator) (2019). Beautiful Adornment of Mount Meru, Translator's Introduction. Simon and Schuster.
  4. Changkya Rölpai Dorjé; Lopez, Donald (translator) (2019). Beautiful Adornment of Mount Meru, Introduction. Simon and Schuster.
  5. Blo-bzaṅ-dkon-mchog, Daniel Cozort, Craig Preston (2003). Buddhist Philosophy: Losang Gönchok's Short Commentary to Jamyang Shayba's Root Text on Tenets, pp. xi-xii. Snow Lion Publications.
  6. Thuken Losang Chokyi Nyima, Jackson, Roger (editor) (2017). The Crystal Mirror of Philosophical Systems: A Tibetan Study of Asian Religious Thought. Simon and Schuster.
  7. a b Chappell, David W. (1987), "Is Tendai Buddhism Relevant to the Modern World?" (PDF), Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 14 (2/3), doi:10.18874/jjrs.14.2-3.1987.247-266, archived from the original on March 4, 2009, retrieved August 16, 2008
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Template:Indian Philosophy