Self-similarity: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Bkell
m indefinite → arbitrary
 
imported>Gerda Arendt
In music: ce that sentence, including tense
Line 61: Line 61:
* Strict [[canon (music)|canons]] display various types and amounts of self-similarity, as do sections of [[fugue (music)|fugues]].
* Strict [[canon (music)|canons]] display various types and amounts of self-similarity, as do sections of [[fugue (music)|fugues]].
* A [[Shepard tone]] is self-similar in the frequency or wavelength domains.
* A [[Shepard tone]] is self-similar in the frequency or wavelength domains.
* The [[Denmark|Danish]] [[composer]] [[Per Nørgård]] has made use of a self-similar [[integer sequence]] named the 'infinity series' in much of his music.
* The Danish composer [[Per Nørgård]] made use of a self-similar [[integer sequence]] named the [[infinity series]] in much of his music.
* In the research field of [[music information retrieval]], self-similarity commonly refers to the fact that music often consists of parts that are repeated in time.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Foote |first1=Jonathan |title=Proceedings of the seventh ACM international conference on Multimedia (Part 1) |chapter=Visualizing music and audio using self-similarity |date=30 October 1999 |pages=77–80 |doi=10.1145/319463.319472 |url=http://musicweb.ucsd.edu/~sdubnov/CATbox/Reader/p77-foote.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809032554/http://musicweb.ucsd.edu/~sdubnov/CATbox/Reader/p77-foote.pdf |archive-date=9 August 2017|isbn=978-1581131512 |citeseerx=10.1.1.223.194 |s2cid=3329298 }}</ref> In other words, music is self-similar under temporal translation, rather than (or in addition to) under scaling.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Pareyon |first1=Gabriel |title=On Musical Self-Similarity: Intersemiosis as Synecdoche and Analogy |date=April 2011 |publisher=International Semiotics Institute at Imatra; Semiotic Society of Finland |isbn=978-952-5431-32-2 |page=240 |url=https://tuhat.helsinki.fi/portal/files/15216101/Pareyon_Dissertation.pdf |access-date=30 July 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170208034152/https://tuhat.helsinki.fi/portal/files/15216101/Pareyon_Dissertation.pdf |archive-date=8 February 2017}} (Also see [https://books.google.com/books?id=xQIynayPqMQC&pg=PA240&lpg=PA240&focus=viewport&vq=%221/f+noise+substantially+as+a+temporal+phenomenon%22 Google Books])</ref>
* In the research field of [[music information retrieval]], self-similarity commonly refers to the fact that music often consists of parts that are repeated in time.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Foote |first1=Jonathan |title=Proceedings of the seventh ACM international conference on Multimedia (Part 1) |chapter=Visualizing music and audio using self-similarity |date=30 October 1999 |pages=77–80 |doi=10.1145/319463.319472 |url=http://musicweb.ucsd.edu/~sdubnov/CATbox/Reader/p77-foote.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809032554/http://musicweb.ucsd.edu/~sdubnov/CATbox/Reader/p77-foote.pdf |archive-date=9 August 2017|isbn=978-1581131512 |citeseerx=10.1.1.223.194 |s2cid=3329298 }}</ref> In other words, music is self-similar under temporal translation, rather than (or in addition to) under scaling.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Pareyon |first1=Gabriel |title=On Musical Self-Similarity: Intersemiosis as Synecdoche and Analogy |date=April 2011 |publisher=International Semiotics Institute at Imatra; Semiotic Society of Finland |isbn=978-952-5431-32-2 |page=240 |url=https://tuhat.helsinki.fi/portal/files/15216101/Pareyon_Dissertation.pdf |access-date=30 July 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170208034152/https://tuhat.helsinki.fi/portal/files/15216101/Pareyon_Dissertation.pdf |archive-date=8 February 2017}} (Also see [https://books.google.com/books?id=xQIynayPqMQC&pg=PA240&lpg=PA240&focus=viewport&vq=%221/f+noise+substantially+as+a+temporal+phenomenon%22 Google Books])</ref>



Revision as of 18:22, 5 June 2025

Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates

File:KochSnowGif16 800x500 2.gif
A Koch snowflake has an infinitely repeating self-similarity when it is magnified.
File:Standard self-similarity.png
Standard (trivial) self-similarity[1]

In mathematics, a self-similar object is exactly or approximately similar to a part of itself (i.e., the whole has the same shape as one or more of the parts). Many objects in the real world, such as coastlines, are statistically self-similar: parts of them show the same statistical properties at many scales.[2] Self-similarity is a typical property of fractals. Scale invariance is an exact form of self-similarity where at any magnification there is a smaller piece of the object that is similar to the whole. For instance, a side of the Koch snowflake is both symmetrical and scale-invariant; it can be continually magnified 3x without changing shape. The non-trivial similarity evident in fractals is distinguished by their fine structure, or detail on arbitrarily small scales. As a counterexample, whereas any portion of a straight line may resemble the whole, further detail is not revealed.

Peitgen et al. explain the concept as such:

Template:QuoteSince mathematically, a fractal may show self-similarity under arbitrary magnification, it is impossible to recreate this physically. Peitgen et al. suggest studying self-similarity using approximations:Template:Quote

This vocabulary was introduced by Benoit Mandelbrot in 1964.[3]

Self-affinity

File:Self-affine set.png
A self-affine fractal with Hausdorff dimension = 1.8272

In mathematics, self-affinity is a feature of a fractal whose pieces are scaled by different amounts in the x and y directions. This means that to appreciate the self-similarity of these fractal objects, they have to be rescaled using an anisotropic affine transformation.

Definition

A compact topological space X is self-similar if there exists a finite set S indexing a set of non-surjective homeomorphisms {fs:sS} for which

X=sSfs(X)

If XY, we call X self-similar if it is the only non-empty subset of Y such that the equation above holds for {fs:sS}. We call

𝔏=(X,S,{fs:sS})

a self-similar structure. The homeomorphisms may be iterated, resulting in an iterated function system. The composition of functions creates the algebraic structure of a monoid. When the set S has only two elements, the monoid is known as the dyadic monoid. The dyadic monoid can be visualized as an infinite binary tree; more generally, if the set S has p elements, then the monoid may be represented as a p-adic tree.

The automorphisms of the dyadic monoid is the modular group; the automorphisms can be pictured as hyperbolic rotations of the binary tree.

A more general notion than self-similarity is self-affinity.

Examples

File:Feigenbaumzoom.gif
Self-similarity in the Mandelbrot set shown by zooming in on the Feigenbaum point at (−1.401155189..., 0)
File:Fractal fern explained.png
An image of the Barnsley fern which exhibits affine self-similarity

The Mandelbrot set is also self-similar around Misiurewicz points.

Self-similarity has important consequences for the design of computer networks, as typical network traffic has self-similar properties. For example, in teletraffic engineering, packet switched data traffic patterns seem to be statistically self-similar.[4] This property means that simple models using a Poisson distribution are inaccurate, and networks designed without taking self-similarity into account are likely to function in unexpected ways.

Similarly, stock market movements are described as displaying self-affinity, i.e. they appear self-similar when transformed via an appropriate affine transformation for the level of detail being shown.[5] Andrew Lo describes stock market log return self-similarity in econometrics.[6]

Finite subdivision rules are a powerful technique for building self-similar sets, including the Cantor set and the Sierpinski triangle.

Some space filling curves, such as the Peano curve and Moore curve, also feature properties of self-similarity.[7]

File:RepeatedBarycentricSubdivision.png
A triangle subdivided repeatedly using barycentric subdivision. The complement of the large circles becomes a Sierpinski carpet

In cybernetics

The viable system model of Stafford Beer is an organizational model with an affine self-similar hierarchy, where a given viable system is one element of the System One of a viable system one recursive level higher up, and for whom the elements of its System One are viable systems one recursive level lower down.

In nature

File:Flickr - cyclonebill - Romanesco.jpg
Close-up of a Romanesco broccoli

Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote". Self-similarity can be found in nature, as well. Plants, such as Romanesco broccoli, exhibit strong self-similarity.

In music

  • Strict canons display various types and amounts of self-similarity, as do sections of fugues.
  • A Shepard tone is self-similar in the frequency or wavelength domains.
  • The Danish composer Per Nørgård made use of a self-similar integer sequence named the infinity series in much of his music.
  • In the research field of music information retrieval, self-similarity commonly refers to the fact that music often consists of parts that are repeated in time.[8] In other words, music is self-similar under temporal translation, rather than (or in addition to) under scaling.[9]

See also

Template:Columns-list

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Self-affinity

  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Fractals

  1. Mandelbrot, Benoit B. (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature, p.44. Template:ISBN.
  2. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". PDF
  3. Comment j'ai découvert les fractales, Interview de Benoit Mandelbrot, La Recherche https://www.larecherche.fr/math%C3%A9matiques-histoire-des-sciences/%C2%AB-comment-jai-d%C3%A9couvert-les-fractales-%C2%BB
  4. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  5. Template:Cite magazine
  6. Campbell, Lo and MacKinlay (1991) "Econometrics of Financial Markets ", Princeton University Press! Template:ISBN
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". (Also see Google Books)