Courage Under Fire: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Contrawwftw
improved bare url citation
imported>Οἶδα
 
Line 30: Line 30:
| runtime        = 116 minutes
| runtime        = 116 minutes
| language      = English
| language      = English
| budget        = $46 million<ref>{{cite web |work=the-numbers.com |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Courage-Under-Fire-(1996) |title=Courage Under Fire (1996) - Financial Information }}</ref>
| budget        = $46 million<ref>{{cite web |work=the-numbers.com |url=https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Courage-Under-Fire-(1996) |title=Courage Under Fire (1996) - Financial Information |access-date=August 18, 2023 |archive-date=December 20, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131220140514/http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1996/0CUFI.php |url-status=live }}</ref>
| gross          = $100.9 million
| gross          = $100.9 million
}}
}}


'''''Courage Under Fire''''' is a 1996 American [[war]] [[drama film]] directed by [[Edward Zwick]], and starring [[Denzel Washington]] and [[Meg Ryan]]. It is the second collaboration between Washington and director Zwick. The film was released in the United States on July 12, 1996, to positive reviews and grossed $100 million worldwide.
'''''Courage Under Fire''''' is a 1996 American [[war]] [[drama film]] directed by [[Edward Zwick]], and starring [[Denzel Washington]] and [[Meg Ryan]]. It is the second collaboration between Washington and director Zwick. The film was released in the United States on July 12, 1996, to positive reviews and grossed $100 million worldwide. It was also the first movie to be produced by Fox 2000 Pictures two years after the company was established in 1994.


==Plot==
==Plot==
While serving in the [[Persian Gulf War]], Lieutenant Colonel Nathaniel Serling fires on and destroys one of his own tanks during a confusing nighttime battle, killing his friend, Lieutenant Tom Boylar. The [[United States Army]] covers up the [[friendly fire]] incident, awards Serling a medal for bravery, and transfers him to a desk job.
While serving in the [[Persian Gulf War]], Lieutenant Colonel Nathaniel Serling fires on and destroys one of his own tanks during a confusing nighttime battle, killing his friend, Lieutenant Tom Boylar. The [[United States Army]] covers up the [[friendly fire]] incident, awards Serling a medal for bravery, and transfers him to a desk job.


Line 45: Line 46:
Serling is under pressure from the [[White House]] and his commander, Brigadier General Hershberg, to wrap things up quickly. Feeling guilty about the cover up in the friendly fire incident, Serling leaks the existence of a tape of the attack to newspaper reporter Tony Gartner. When Serling grills Monfriez during a car ride, Monfriez forces him to get out of the vehicle at gunpoint, then dies by suicide by driving into an oncoming train.
Serling is under pressure from the [[White House]] and his commander, Brigadier General Hershberg, to wrap things up quickly. Feeling guilty about the cover up in the friendly fire incident, Serling leaks the existence of a tape of the attack to newspaper reporter Tony Gartner. When Serling grills Monfriez during a car ride, Monfriez forces him to get out of the vehicle at gunpoint, then dies by suicide by driving into an oncoming train.


Serling tracks Ilario down, and Ilario finally tells him the truth. Monfriez wanted to flee, which would mean abandoning Rady. When Walden refused, he pulled a gun on her and Walden threatened him with a [[court-martial]] for mutiny and ordered that he surrender his gun. During the stand-off over Monfriez's gun Walden shot an enemy who suddenly appeared behind Monfriez; Monfriez thinking it was Walden firing at him shot her in the stomach, before backing off. The next morning, the enemy attacked again as a rescue party approached. Walden covered her men's retreat, firing an M16. Monfriez told the rescuers that Walden was dead, so they left without her. [[Napalm]] was then dropped on the entire area. Altameyer tried to expose Monfriez's lie at the time, but was too injured to speak, and Ilario remained silent, scared of the court-martial Walden had threatened them with.
Serling tracks Ilario down, and Ilario finally tells him the truth. Monfriez wanted to flee, which would mean abandoning Rady. When Walden refused, he pulled a gun on her and Walden threatened him with a [[court-martial]] for mutiny and ordered that he surrender his gun. During the stand-off over Monfriez's gun Walden shot an enemy who suddenly appeared behind Monfriez; Monfriez thinking it was Walden firing at him shot her in the stomach, before backing off.  
 
The next morning, the enemy attacked again as a rescue party approached. Walden covered her men's retreat, firing an M16. Monfriez told the rescuers that Walden was dead, so they left without her. [[Napalm]] was then dropped on the entire area. Altameyer tried to expose Monfriez's lie at the time, but was too injured to speak, and Ilario remained silent, scared of the court-martial Walden had threatened them with.


Serling presents his final report to Hershberg. Walden's young daughter receives the Medal of Honor at a White House ceremony. Later, Serling tells the truth to the Boylars about the manner of their son's death and says he cannot ask for forgiveness. The Boylars forgive him.
Serling presents his final report to Hershberg. Walden's young daughter receives the Medal of Honor at a White House ceremony. Later, Serling tells the truth to the Boylars about the manner of their son's death and says he cannot ask for forgiveness. Yet, the Boylars forgive him.


In the last moments, Serling has a flashback of when he was standing by Boylar's destroyed tank and a medevac Huey was lifting off with his friend's body. Serling suddenly realizes Walden was the pilot. At that moment he is able to let go of the feelings that he has developed for her, and returns to his family.
In the last moments, Serling has a flashback of when he was standing by Boylar's destroyed tank and a medevac Huey was lifting off with his friend's body. Serling suddenly realizes Walden was the pilot. At that moment he is able to let go of the feelings that he has developed for her, and returns to his family.
Line 64: Line 67:
*[[Scott Glenn]] as Tony Gartner, a ''[[Washington Post]]'' reporter and [[Vietnam War|Vietnam]] veteran
*[[Scott Glenn]] as Tony Gartner, a ''[[Washington Post]]'' reporter and [[Vietnam War|Vietnam]] veteran
*[[Tim Guinee]] as Warrant Officer One A. Rady
*[[Tim Guinee]] as Warrant Officer One A. Rady
*Tim Ransom as Captain Boylar
*Tim Ransom as Lieutenant Tom Boylar
*[[Sean Astin]] as Private Patella
*[[Sean Astin]] as Private Patella
*[[Ned Vaughn]] as First Lieutenant Chelli
*[[Ned Vaughn]] as First Lieutenant Chelli
Line 82: Line 85:


==Production==
==Production==
The Pentagon denied a request for access to military equipment for filming. Philip M. Strub, for the Pentagon, said of the film characters that "there wasn't a good soldier among them".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Seeyle |first1=Katharine Q. |title=When Hollywood's Big Guns Come Right From the Source |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/10/us/when-hollywood-s-big-guns-come-right-from-the-source.html?pagewanted=all |work=The New York Times |date=10 June 2002|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181230063322/https://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/10/us/when-hollywood-s-big-guns-come-right-from-the-source.html?pagewanted=all |archive-date=December 30, 2018 }}</ref> Lacking such access, the film-makers had to source equipment elsewhere, including having former [[Australian Army]] [[Centurion (tank)|Centurian tanks]] modified to resemble the [[M1 Abrams]] depicted in the production.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Anderson |first=Dennis |date=5 August 1996 |title='Courage' Technical Adviser: He Gives Tanks to Hollywood |url=https://www.southcoasttoday.com/story/entertainment/local/1996/08/05/courage-technical-adviser-he/50633865007/ |access-date=2025-06-24 |website=New Bedford Standard-Times |language=en-US}}</ref>
The Pentagon denied a request for access to military equipment for filming. Philip M. Strub, for the Pentagon, said of the film characters that "there wasn't a good soldier among them".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Seeyle |first1=Katharine Q. |title=When Hollywood's Big Guns Come Right From the Source |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/10/us/when-hollywood-s-big-guns-come-right-from-the-source.html?pagewanted=all |work=The New York Times |date=10 June 2002|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181230063322/https://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/10/us/when-hollywood-s-big-guns-come-right-from-the-source.html?pagewanted=all |archive-date=December 30, 2018 }}</ref> Lacking such access, the film-makers had to source equipment elsewhere, including having former [[Australian Army]] [[Centurion (tank)|Centurion tanks]] modified to resemble the [[M1 Abrams]] depicted in the production.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Anderson |first=Dennis |date=5 August 1996 |title='Courage' Technical Adviser: He Gives Tanks to Hollywood |url=https://www.southcoasttoday.com/story/entertainment/local/1996/08/05/courage-technical-adviser-he/50633865007/ |access-date=2025-06-24 |website=New Bedford Standard-Times |language=en-US}}</ref>


==Reception==
==Reception==
Line 91: Line 94:
*Worldwide gross: $100,860,818<ref name="the-numbers.com"/>
*Worldwide gross: $100,860,818<ref name="the-numbers.com"/>


The film opened #3 at the box office behind ''[[Independence Day (1996 film)|Independence Day]]'' and ''[[Phenomenon (film)|Phenomenon]]''.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=1996&wknd=28&p=.htm |work=boxofficemojo.com| title=July 12–14, 1996 | access-date=October 31, 2011}}</ref>
The film opened #3 at the box office behind ''[[Independence Day (1996 film)|Independence Day]]'' and ''[[Phenomenon (film)|Phenomenon]]''.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=1996&wknd=28&p=.htm | work=boxofficemojo.com | title=July 12–14, 1996 | access-date=October 31, 2011 | archive-date=December 26, 2011 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111226124320/http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=1996&wknd=28&p=.htm | url-status=live }}</ref>


===Critical response===
===Critical response===
<!-- Please note, when updating Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic ratings, you should also update the "accessdate" field within the citation tags to reflect the date on which you have updated them. -->
<!-- Please note, when updating Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic ratings, you should also update the "accessdate" field within the citation tags to reflect the date on which you have updated them. -->
The film received mostly positive reviews. As of June 15, 2022, the review aggregator website [[Rotten Tomatoes]] reported that 86% of critics gave the film a positive review based upon a sample of 56 reviews with an average rating of 7.3/10. The critical consensus states that the film is "an emotional and intriguing tale of a military officer who must review the merits of a fallen officer while confronting his own war demons. Effectively depicts the terrors of war as well as its heartbreaking aftermath."<ref name="RTFresh">{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/courage_under_fire/ |title=Courage Under Fire Movie Reviews |work=[[Rotten Tomatoes]] |publisher=IGN Entertainment |access-date=August 13, 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090327142327/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/courage_under_fire/ |archive-date=March 27, 2009 }}</ref> At the website [[Metacritic]], which uses a weighted average rating system, the film earned a generally favorable rating of 77/100 based on 19 mainstream critic reviews.<ref name="MetaCritic">{{cite web|url=https://www.metacritic.com/video/titles/courageunderfire?q=courage%20under%20fire|title=Courage Under Fire Reviews|website=[[Metacritic]]|access-date=August 13, 2009}}</ref> Audiences polled by [[CinemaScore]] gave the film an average grade of "A" on an A+ to F scale.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Home |url=https://www.cinemascore.com/ |access-date=August 25, 2023 |website=CinemaScore |language=en-US}}</ref>
The film received mostly positive reviews. As of June 15, 2022, the review aggregator website [[Rotten Tomatoes]] reported that 86% of critics gave the film a positive review based upon a sample of 56 reviews with an average rating of 7.3/10. The critical consensus states that the film is "an emotional and intriguing tale of a military officer who must review the merits of a slain officer while confronting his own war demons. Effectively depicts the terrors of war as well as its heartbreaking aftermath."<ref name="RTFresh">{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/courage_under_fire/ |title=Courage Under Fire Movie Reviews |work=[[Rotten Tomatoes]] |publisher=IGN Entertainment |access-date=August 13, 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090327142327/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/courage_under_fire/ |archive-date=March 27, 2009 }}</ref> At the website [[Metacritic]], which uses a weighted average rating system, the film earned a generally favorable rating of 77/100 based on 19 mainstream critic reviews.<ref name="MetaCritic">{{cite web|url=https://www.metacritic.com/video/titles/courageunderfire?q=courage%20under%20fire|title=Courage Under Fire Reviews|website=[[Metacritic]]|access-date=August 13, 2009}}</ref> Audiences polled by [[CinemaScore]] gave the film an average grade of "A" on an A+ to F scale.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Home |url=https://www.cinemascore.com/ |access-date=August 25, 2023 |website=CinemaScore |language=en-US}}</ref>
 
The movie was commended by several critics. [[James Berardinelli]] of the website ReelViews wrote that the film was, "As profound and intelligent as it is moving, and that makes this memorable motion picture one of 1996's best."<ref name="BerardinelliReview">{{cite news|last=Berardinelli|first=James|author-link=James Berardinelli|title=Courage under Fire|url=http://preview.reelviews.net/movies/c/courage_under.html|work=[[ReelViews]]|date=July 1996|access-date=August 13, 2008|archive-date=November 17, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221117175721/https://preview.reelviews.net/movies/c/courage_under.html|url-status=live}}</ref> [[Roger Ebert]] of the ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'' spoke positively of the film saying that while the ending "lays on the emotion a little heavily" the movie had been up until that point "a fascinating emotional and logistical puzzle—almost a courtroom movie, with the desert as the courtroom."<ref name="EbertReview">{{cite news|last=Ebert|first=Roger|author-link=Roger Ebert|title=Courage Under Fire|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/courage-under-fire-1996|work=[[Chicago Sun-Times]]|date=July 12, 1996|access-date=August 13, 2009}}</ref>


The movie was commended by several critics. [[James Berardinelli]] of the website ReelViews wrote that the film was, "As profound and intelligent as it is moving, and that makes this memorable motion picture one of 1996's best."<ref name="BerardinelliReview">{{cite news|last=Berardinelli|first=James|author-link=James Berardinelli |title=Courage under Fire|url=http://preview.reelviews.net/movies/c/courage_under.html|work=[[ReelViews]]|date= July 1996 |access-date=August 13, 2008}}</ref> [[Roger Ebert]] of the ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]'' spoke positively of the film saying that while the ending "lays on the emotion a little heavily" the movie had been up until that point "a fascinating emotional and logistical puzzle—almost a courtroom movie, with the desert as the courtroom."<ref name="EbertReview">{{cite news|last=Ebert|first=Roger|author-link=Roger Ebert|title=Courage Under Fire|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/courage-under-fire-1996|work=[[Chicago Sun-Times]]|date=July 12, 1996|access-date=August 13, 2009}}</ref>
Denzel Washington's acting was specifically lauded, as [[Peter Travers]] of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' wrote, "In Washington's haunted eyes, in the stunning cinematography of Roger Deakins (''[[Fargo (1996 film)|Fargo]]'') that plunges into the mad flare of combat, in the plot that deftly turns a whodunit into a meditation on character and in Zwick's persistent questioning of authority, ''Courage Under Fire'' honors its subject and its audience."<ref name="TraversReview">{{cite magazine|last=Travers|first=Peter|author-link=Peter Travers |title=Courage under Fire|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948783/courage_under_fire|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091228104804/http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948783/courage_under_fire|url-status=dead|archive-date=December 28, 2009|magazine=[[Rolling Stone]]|date= July 12, 1996 |access-date=August 13, 2008}}</ref> Additionally Peter Stack of the ''[[San Francisco Chronicle]]'' wrote that "Denzel Washington is riveting."<ref name="StackReview">{{cite news|last=Stack|first=Peter|title=Fired-Up Over 'Courage'|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/1996/07/12/DD61444.DTL|work=[[San Francisco Chronicle]]|date=July 12, 1996|access-date=August 13, 2009|archive-date=December 28, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091228000908/http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/1996/07/12/DD61444.DTL|url-status=live}}</ref>


Denzel Washington's acting was specifically lauded, as [[Peter Travers]] of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' wrote, "In Washington's haunted eyes, in the stunning cinematography of Roger Deakins (''[[Fargo (1996 film)|Fargo]]'') that plunges into the mad flare of combat, in the plot that deftly turns a whodunit into a meditation on character and in Zwick's persistent questioning of authority, ''Courage Under Fire'' honors its subject and its audience."<ref name="TraversReview">{{cite magazine|last=Travers|first=Peter|author-link=Peter Travers |title=Courage under Fire|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948783/courage_under_fire|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091228104804/http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/movie/5948783/courage_under_fire|url-status=dead|archive-date=December 28, 2009|magazine=[[Rolling Stone]]|date= July 12, 1996 |access-date=August 13, 2008}}</ref> Additionally Peter Stack of the ''[[San Francisco Chronicle]]'' wrote that "Denzel Washington is riveting."<ref name="StackReview">{{cite news|last=Stack|first=Peter |title=Fired-Up Over 'Courage'|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/1996/07/12/DD61444.DTL|work=[[San Francisco Chronicle]]|date=July 12, 1996|access-date=August 13, 2009}}</ref>
Matt Damon, on his way to stardom but not there yet, said he lost 40 pounds for his role despite only being scheduled for two days of shooting opposite Washington. When critics and reporters rarely mentioned his appearance in the film, Damon said he contemplated suicide for feeling so overlooked, even though A-List [[Steven Spielberg]] would later compliment Damon for his performance and cast him as the titular character in the war epic ''[[Saving Private Ryan]]''. After getting medicated, his mental health improved, along with his career recognition and prospects.<ref>{{cite news |title=Robin Williams and Matt Damon Interview for Good Will Hunting (1998) |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoQZaspjp74 |access-date=28 October 2024 |work=The Charlie Rose Show |publisher=[[PBS]] |archive-date=November 17, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241117022825/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoQZaspjp74 |url-status=live }}</ref>


Matt Damon, on his way to stardom but not there yet, said he lost 40 pounds for his role despite only being scheduled for two days of shooting opposite Washington. When critics and reporters rarely mentioned his appearance in the film, Damon said he contemplated suicide for feeling so overlooked, even though A-List [[Steven Spielberg]] would later compliment Damon for his performance and cast him as the titular character in the war epic ''[[Saving Private Ryan]]''. After getting medicated, his mental health improved, along with his career recognition and prospects.<ref>{{cite news |title=Robin Williams and Matt Damon Interview for Good Will Hunting (1998) |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoQZaspjp74 |access-date=28 October 2024 |work=The Charlie Rose Show |publisher=[[PBS]]}}</ref>
In 2025, ''[[The Hollywood Reporter]]'' listed ''Courage Under Fire'' as having the best stunts of 1996.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Doherty |first=Thomas |date=June 7, 2025 |title=The Best Stunts of All Time, Over Nearly 100 Years of the Oscars |work=[[The Hollywood Reporter]] |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lists/best-stunts-all-time-movies-oscars-stunt-design-100-years/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250720043450/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lists/best-stunts-all-time-movies-oscars-stunt-design-100-years/ |archive-date=July 20, 2025}}</ref>


===Accolades===
===Accolades===
Line 107: Line 112:


==Historical context==
==Historical context==
The [[Medal of Honor]] was awarded to [[Mary Edwards Walker]], an [[American Civil War]] physician, but not for valor in combat.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1977/06/11/archives/highest-medal-restored-to-war-heroine.html|title=Highest Medal Restored to War Heroine|date=June 11, 1977|work=The New York Times|access-date=April 3, 2018|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Her name was deleted from the Army Medal of Honor Roll in 1917 (along with over 900 other recipients); however, it was restored in 1977.<ref name=":Walker3">{{Cite book|title=Amazons to Fighter Pilots - A Biographical Dictionary of Military Women (Volume Two)|last=Pennington|first=Reina|publisher=Greenwood Press|year=2003|isbn=0-313-32708-4|location=Westport, Connecticut|pages=474–475}}</ref>
The [[Medal of Honor]] was awarded to [[Mary Edwards Walker]], an [[American Civil War]] physician, but not for valor in combat.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1977/06/11/archives/highest-medal-restored-to-war-heroine.html|title=Highest Medal Restored to War Heroine|date=June 11, 1977|work=The New York Times|access-date=April 3, 2018|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=April 4, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180404003428/https://www.nytimes.com/1977/06/11/archives/highest-medal-restored-to-war-heroine.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Her name was deleted from the Army Medal of Honor Roll in 1917 (along with over 900 other recipients); however, it was restored in 1977.<ref name=":Walker3">{{Cite book|title=Amazons to Fighter Pilots - A Biographical Dictionary of Military Women (Volume Two)|last=Pennington|first=Reina|publisher=Greenwood Press|year=2003|isbn=0-313-32708-4|location=Westport, Connecticut|pages=474–475}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 119: Line 124:
{{Edward Zwick}}
{{Edward Zwick}}


[[Category:1990s action drama films]]
[[Category:1996 American films]]
[[Category:1990s English-language films]]
[[Category:1990s political drama films]]
[[Category:1990s war films]]
[[Category:1996 action films]]
[[Category:1996 drama films]]
[[Category:1996 films]]
[[Category:1996 films]]
[[Category:1996 action films]]
[[Category:20th Century Fox films]]
[[Category:1990s war films]]
[[Category:1990s action drama films]]
[[Category:American political drama films]]
[[Category:American political drama films]]
[[Category:American war films]]
[[Category:American war films]]
[[Category:1990s English-language films]]
[[Category:Davis Entertainment films]]
[[Category:English-language action drama films]]
[[Category:English-language war films]]
[[Category:Films about armoured warfare]]
[[Category:Films about armoured warfare]]
[[Category:Films about the United States Army]]
[[Category:Films directed by Edward Zwick]]
[[Category:Films directed by Edward Zwick]]
[[Category:Films produced by John Davis]]
[[Category:Films produced by John Davis]]
Line 135: Line 148:
[[Category:Films shot in El Paso, Texas]]
[[Category:Films shot in El Paso, Texas]]
[[Category:Gulf War films]]
[[Category:Gulf War films]]
[[Category:20th Century Fox films]]
[[Category:Davis Entertainment films]]
[[Category:Films about the United States Army]]
[[Category:1990s political drama films]]
[[Category:1996 drama films]]
[[Category:1990s American films]]
[[Category:English-language action drama films]]
[[Category:English-language war films]]

Latest revision as of 03:33, 28 December 2025

Template:Short description Template:Use American English Template:Use mdy dates Script error: No such module "Hatnote". Template:Infobox film/short descriptionScript error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "[".

Courage Under Fire is a 1996 American war drama film directed by Edward Zwick, and starring Denzel Washington and Meg Ryan. It is the second collaboration between Washington and director Zwick. The film was released in the United States on July 12, 1996, to positive reviews and grossed $100 million worldwide. It was also the first movie to be produced by Fox 2000 Pictures two years after the company was established in 1994.

Plot

While serving in the Persian Gulf War, Lieutenant Colonel Nathaniel Serling fires on and destroys one of his own tanks during a confusing nighttime battle, killing his friend, Lieutenant Tom Boylar. The United States Army covers up the friendly fire incident, awards Serling a medal for bravery, and transfers him to a desk job.

Later, Serling is assigned to determine if, posthumously, Captain Karen Walden should be the first woman to receive the Medal of Honor. She was the commander of a Medevac Huey helicopter sent to rescue the crew of a shot-down Black Hawk helicopter. When Walden encountered an enemy T-54 tank, her crew destroyed it by dropping a fuel bladder onto the tank and igniting it with a flare gun. Her own helicopter was shot down soon after. The two crews were unable to join forces, and when the survivors were rescued the next day, Walden was reported dead.

Serling notices inconsistencies among the testimonies of Walden's crew. Specialist Andrew Ilario, the medic, praises Walden strongly. Staff Sergeant John Monfriez claims that Walden was a coward and that he led the crew in combat and improvised the fuel bladder weapon. Sergeant Steven Altameyer, who is dying of cancer in a hospital and was initially hard for Serling to find, complains about a fire in one of his few coherent comments. Warrant Officer Rady, the co-pilot, was injured early on and was unconscious throughout the ordeal. The crew of the Black Hawk claim that they heard firing from an M16 rifle, but Ilario and Monfriez claim it was out of ammo.

Serling is under pressure from the White House and his commander, Brigadier General Hershberg, to wrap things up quickly. Feeling guilty about the cover up in the friendly fire incident, Serling leaks the existence of a tape of the attack to newspaper reporter Tony Gartner. When Serling grills Monfriez during a car ride, Monfriez forces him to get out of the vehicle at gunpoint, then dies by suicide by driving into an oncoming train.

Serling tracks Ilario down, and Ilario finally tells him the truth. Monfriez wanted to flee, which would mean abandoning Rady. When Walden refused, he pulled a gun on her and Walden threatened him with a court-martial for mutiny and ordered that he surrender his gun. During the stand-off over Monfriez's gun Walden shot an enemy who suddenly appeared behind Monfriez; Monfriez thinking it was Walden firing at him shot her in the stomach, before backing off.

The next morning, the enemy attacked again as a rescue party approached. Walden covered her men's retreat, firing an M16. Monfriez told the rescuers that Walden was dead, so they left without her. Napalm was then dropped on the entire area. Altameyer tried to expose Monfriez's lie at the time, but was too injured to speak, and Ilario remained silent, scared of the court-martial Walden had threatened them with.

Serling presents his final report to Hershberg. Walden's young daughter receives the Medal of Honor at a White House ceremony. Later, Serling tells the truth to the Boylars about the manner of their son's death and says he cannot ask for forgiveness. Yet, the Boylars forgive him.

In the last moments, Serling has a flashback of when he was standing by Boylar's destroyed tank and a medevac Huey was lifting off with his friend's body. Serling suddenly realizes Walden was the pilot. At that moment he is able to let go of the feelings that he has developed for her, and returns to his family.

Cast

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Members of the Corps of Cadets of Texas A&M University were cast as soldiers in the basic training scenes.

Production

The Pentagon denied a request for access to military equipment for filming. Philip M. Strub, for the Pentagon, said of the film characters that "there wasn't a good soldier among them".[1] Lacking such access, the film-makers had to source equipment elsewhere, including having former Australian Army Centurion tanks modified to resemble the M1 Abrams depicted in the production.[2]

Reception

Box office

  • U.S. domestic gross: US$ 59,031,057 [3]
  • International: $41,829,761[3]
  • Worldwide gross: $100,860,818[3]

The film opened #3 at the box office behind Independence Day and Phenomenon.[4]

Critical response

The film received mostly positive reviews. As of June 15, 2022, the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes reported that 86% of critics gave the film a positive review based upon a sample of 56 reviews with an average rating of 7.3/10. The critical consensus states that the film is "an emotional and intriguing tale of a military officer who must review the merits of a slain officer while confronting his own war demons. Effectively depicts the terrors of war as well as its heartbreaking aftermath."[5] At the website Metacritic, which uses a weighted average rating system, the film earned a generally favorable rating of 77/100 based on 19 mainstream critic reviews.[6] Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "A" on an A+ to F scale.[7]

The movie was commended by several critics. James Berardinelli of the website ReelViews wrote that the film was, "As profound and intelligent as it is moving, and that makes this memorable motion picture one of 1996's best."[8] Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times spoke positively of the film saying that while the ending "lays on the emotion a little heavily" the movie had been up until that point "a fascinating emotional and logistical puzzle—almost a courtroom movie, with the desert as the courtroom."[9]

Denzel Washington's acting was specifically lauded, as Peter Travers of Rolling Stone wrote, "In Washington's haunted eyes, in the stunning cinematography of Roger Deakins (Fargo) that plunges into the mad flare of combat, in the plot that deftly turns a whodunit into a meditation on character and in Zwick's persistent questioning of authority, Courage Under Fire honors its subject and its audience."[10] Additionally Peter Stack of the San Francisco Chronicle wrote that "Denzel Washington is riveting."[11]

Matt Damon, on his way to stardom but not there yet, said he lost 40 pounds for his role despite only being scheduled for two days of shooting opposite Washington. When critics and reporters rarely mentioned his appearance in the film, Damon said he contemplated suicide for feeling so overlooked, even though A-List Steven Spielberg would later compliment Damon for his performance and cast him as the titular character in the war epic Saving Private Ryan. After getting medicated, his mental health improved, along with his career recognition and prospects.[12]

In 2025, The Hollywood Reporter listed Courage Under Fire as having the best stunts of 1996.[13]

Accolades

Denzel Washington was nominated for Best Actor at the 1996 Chicago Film Critics Association Awards, but lost to Billy Bob Thornton in Sling Blade.

Historical context

The Medal of Honor was awarded to Mary Edwards Walker, an American Civil War physician, but not for valor in combat.[14] Her name was deleted from the Army Medal of Honor Roll in 1917 (along with over 900 other recipients); however, it was restored in 1977.[15]

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b c Courage Under Fire – Box Office Data, DVD Sales, Movie News, Cast Information. The Numbers. Retrieved on May 11, 2013.
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

External links

Template:Sister project

Script error: No such module "Navbox".