Research university: Difference between revisions
imported>OAbot m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot. |
imported>Ahmetlii |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
===20th century=== | ===20th century=== | ||
Research universities were essential to the establishment of American [[hegemony]] by the end of the 20th century.<ref name="Marginson_Page_67">{{cite book |last1=Marginson |first1=Simon |author1-link=Simon Marginson |last2=Ordorika |first2=Imanol |author2-link=Imanol Ordorika Sacristán |editor1-last=Calhoun |editor1-first=Craig J. |editor2-last=Rhoten |editor2-first=Diana |editor1-link=Craig Calhoun |title=Knowledge Matters: The Public Mission of the Research University |date=2011 |publisher=Columbia University Press |location=New York |isbn=9780231151146 |pages=67–129 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KVysAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA67 |chapter='El central volumen de la fuerza': Global Hegemony in Higher Education and Research |access-date=9 February 2021 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013104/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Knowledge_Matters/KVysAgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA67&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> Most importantly, Berkeley, Chicago, Columbia, and Princeton (along with Birmingham and Cambridge in the UK) directly participated in the creation of the first [[nuclear weapon]]s (the [[Manhattan Project]]).<ref name="Herken_Page_48">{{cite book |last1=Herken |first1=Gregg |authorlink1=Gregg Herken |title=Brotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller |date=2003 |publisher=Henry Holt and Company |location=New York |isbn=0-8050-6589-X |page=48 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7s0NGIfflOgC&pg=PA48 |access-date=27 February 2023 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013109/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Brotherhood_of_the_Bomb/7s0NGIfflOgC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA48&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Reed_Page_122">{{cite book |last1=Reed |first1=Bruce Cameron |title=Manhattan Project: The Story of the Century |date=2020 |publisher=Springer Nature Switzerland |location=Cham |isbn=978-3-030-45733-4 |page=122 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9v_oDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA122 |access-date=17 December 2022 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013110/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Manhattan_Project/9v_oDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA122&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/voices/location/britain/|title=Britain|website=Voices of the Manhattan Project|publisher=Atomic Heritage Foundation|access-date=20 December 2023}}</ref> Besides that, Columbia and Harvard were instrumental in the early development of the [[Cinema of the United States|American film industry]] (Hollywood),<ref name="Decherney">{{cite book |last1=Decherney |first1=Peter |title=Hollywood and the Culture Elite: How the Movies Became American |date=2017 |publisher=Columbia University Press |location=New York |isbn=9780231133760 |pages=6–11 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FbC9zbrGKMcC&pg=PA6 |access-date=11 August 2019 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013113/https://books.google.com/books?id=FbC9zbrGKMcC&pg=PA6 |url-status=live }}</ref> MIT and Stanford were leaders in building the American [[military–industrial complex]]<ref>{{cite book |last1=Leslie |first1=Stuart W. |title=The Cold War and American Science: The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex at MIT and Stanford |date=1993 |publisher=Columbia University Press |location=New York |isbn=9780231079587 |pages=11–12 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6IchaV00dBkC&pg=PA11 |access-date=11 August 2019 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013115/https://books.google.com/books?id=6IchaV00dBkC&pg=PA11 |url-status=live }}</ref> and developing [[artificial intelligence]],<ref name="Boden_Page_734">{{cite book |last1=Boden |first1=Margaret A. |authorlink1=Margaret A. Boden |title=Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science, Volume 2 |date=2006 |publisher=Clarendon Press |location=Oxford |isbn=9780199292387 |pages=734–736 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nQMPIGd4baQC&pg=PA734 |access-date=27 February 2023 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Mind_as_Machine/nQMPIGd4baQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA734&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> and Berkeley and Stanford played a central role in the development of [[Silicon Valley]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Scott |first1=W. Richard |last2=Lara |first2=Bernardo |last3=Biag |first3=Manuelito |last4=Ris |first4=Ethan |last5=Liang |first5=Judy |editor1-last=Scott |editor1-first=W. Richard |editor2-last=Kirst |editor2-first=Michael W. |title=Higher Education and Silicon Valley: Connected But Conflicted |date=2017 |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |location=Baltimore |isbn=9781421423081 |page=65 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QtoxDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA65 |access-date=11 August 2019 |chapter=The Regional Economy of the San Francisco Bay Area |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://books.google.com/books?id=QtoxDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA65 |url-status=live }}</ref> The "most prestigious group of research universities" in the United States is the [[Association of American Universities]].<ref name="Smith_Page_78">{{cite book |last1=Smith |first1=Dean O. |title=Managing the Research University |date=2011 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=9780199793259 |page=78 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=neZkJ6kKhlUC&pg=PA78 |access-date=3 December 2023}}</ref> | Research universities were essential to the establishment of American [[hegemony]] by the end of the 20th century.<ref name="Marginson_Page_67">{{cite book |last1=Marginson |first1=Simon |author1-link=Simon Marginson |last2=Ordorika |first2=Imanol |author2-link=Imanol Ordorika Sacristán |editor1-last=Calhoun |editor1-first=Craig J. |editor2-last=Rhoten |editor2-first=Diana |editor1-link=Craig Calhoun |title=Knowledge Matters: The Public Mission of the Research University |date=2011 |publisher=Columbia University Press |location=New York |isbn=9780231151146 |pages=67–129 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KVysAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA67 |chapter='El central volumen de la fuerza': Global Hegemony in Higher Education and Research |access-date=9 February 2021 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013104/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Knowledge_Matters/KVysAgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA67&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> Most importantly, Berkeley, Chicago, Columbia, and Princeton (along with Birmingham and Cambridge in the UK) directly participated in the creation of the first [[nuclear weapon]]s (the [[Manhattan Project]]).<ref name="Herken_Page_48">{{cite book |last1=Herken |first1=Gregg |authorlink1=Gregg Herken |title=Brotherhood of the Bomb: The Tangled Lives and Loyalties of Robert Oppenheimer, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller |date=2003 |publisher=Henry Holt and Company |location=New York |isbn=0-8050-6589-X |page=48 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7s0NGIfflOgC&pg=PA48 |access-date=27 February 2023 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013109/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Brotherhood_of_the_Bomb/7s0NGIfflOgC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA48&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Reed_Page_122">{{cite book |last1=Reed |first1=Bruce Cameron |title=Manhattan Project: The Story of the Century |date=2020 |publisher=Springer Nature Switzerland |location=Cham |isbn=978-3-030-45733-4 |page=122 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9v_oDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA122 |access-date=17 December 2022 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013110/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Manhattan_Project/9v_oDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA122&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/voices/location/britain/|title=Britain|website=Voices of the Manhattan Project|publisher=[[Atomic Heritage Foundation]]|access-date=20 December 2023}}</ref> Besides that, Columbia and Harvard were instrumental in the early development of the [[Cinema of the United States|American film industry]] (Hollywood),<ref name="Decherney">{{cite book |last1=Decherney |first1=Peter |title=Hollywood and the Culture Elite: How the Movies Became American |date=2017 |publisher=Columbia University Press |location=New York |isbn=9780231133760 |pages=6–11 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FbC9zbrGKMcC&pg=PA6 |access-date=11 August 2019 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013113/https://books.google.com/books?id=FbC9zbrGKMcC&pg=PA6 |url-status=live }}</ref> MIT and Stanford were leaders in building the American [[military–industrial complex]]<ref>{{cite book |last1=Leslie |first1=Stuart W. |title=The Cold War and American Science: The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex at MIT and Stanford |date=1993 |publisher=Columbia University Press |location=New York |isbn=9780231079587 |pages=11–12 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6IchaV00dBkC&pg=PA11 |access-date=11 August 2019 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013115/https://books.google.com/books?id=6IchaV00dBkC&pg=PA11 |url-status=live }}</ref> and developing [[artificial intelligence]],<ref name="Boden_Page_734">{{cite book |last1=Boden |first1=Margaret A. |authorlink1=Margaret A. Boden |title=Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science, Volume 2 |date=2006 |publisher=Clarendon Press |location=Oxford |isbn=9780199292387 |pages=734–736 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nQMPIGd4baQC&pg=PA734 |access-date=27 February 2023 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://www.google.com/books/edition/Mind_as_Machine/nQMPIGd4baQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA734&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> and Berkeley and Stanford played a central role in the development of [[Silicon Valley]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Scott |first1=W. Richard |last2=Lara |first2=Bernardo |last3=Biag |first3=Manuelito |last4=Ris |first4=Ethan |last5=Liang |first5=Judy |editor1-last=Scott |editor1-first=W. Richard |editor2-last=Kirst |editor2-first=Michael W. |title=Higher Education and Silicon Valley: Connected But Conflicted |date=2017 |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |location=Baltimore |isbn=9781421423081 |page=65 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QtoxDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA65 |access-date=11 August 2019 |chapter=The Regional Economy of the San Francisco Bay Area |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://books.google.com/books?id=QtoxDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA65 |url-status=live }}</ref> The "most prestigious group of research universities" in the United States is the [[Association of American Universities]].<ref name="Smith_Page_78">{{cite book |last1=Smith |first1=Dean O. |title=Managing the Research University |date=2011 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=9780199793259 |page=78 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=neZkJ6kKhlUC&pg=PA78 |access-date=3 December 2023}}</ref> | ||
Since the 1960s, American research universities, especially the leading American public research [[university system]], the [[University of California]],<ref name="Altbach" /><ref name="Kerr_Page_413">{{cite book|last1=Kerr|first1=Clark|title=The Gold and the Blue: A Personal Memoir of the University of California, 1949–1967, Volume 1|date=2001|publisher=University of California Press|location=Berkeley|isbn=9780520223677|page=413|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jMEZ_47vXkAC&pg=PA413|access-date=3 October 2022|archive-date=14 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://books.google.com/books?id=jMEZ_47vXkAC&pg=PA413|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Marginson">{{cite book |last1=Marginson |first1=Simon |title=The Dream Is Over: The Crisis of Clark Kerr's California Idea of Higher Education |date=2016 |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |isbn=978-0-520-29284-0 |pages=51–55 |doi=10.1525/luminos.17 }}</ref> have served as models for research universities around the world.<ref name="Graham">{{cite book |last1=Graham |first1=Hugh Davis |author1-link=Hugh Davis Graham |last2=Diamond |first2=Nancy |title=The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the Postwar Era |date=1997 |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |location=Baltimore |isbn=9780801880636 |page=9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Eii-MTm3TYwC&pg=PA9 |access-date=7 April 2020 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://books.google.com/books?id=Eii-MTm3TYwC&pg=PA9 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Vest_Page_7">{{cite book |last1=Vest |first1=Charles M. |author1-link=Charles M. Vest |title=The American Research University from World War II to World Wide Web: Governments, the Private Sector, and the Emerging Meta-University |date=2007 |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |isbn=9780520934047 |page=7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-kHAKdNFBpUC&pg=PA7 |access-date=25 January 2022 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_American_Research_University_from_Wo/-kHAKdNFBpUC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA7&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> Having one or more universities based on the American model (including the use of [[English as a lingua franca]]) is a badge of "social progress and [[modernity]]" for the contemporary [[nation-state]].<ref name="Stevens_Page_129">{{cite book |last1=Stevens |first1=Mitchell L. |last2=Giebel |first2=Sonia |editor1-last=Hyvönen |editor1-first=Mats |editor2-last=Peters |editor2-first=Michael A. |editor3-last=Rider |editor3-first=Sharon |editor4-last=Besley |editor4-first=Tina |title=World Class Universities: A Contested Concept |date=2020 |publisher=Springer Nature Singapore |location=Singapore |isbn=9789811575983 |pages=123–137 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=no8REAAAQBAJ&pg=PA129 |access-date=27 February 2023 |chapter=The Paradox of the Global University |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://www.google.com/books/edition/World_Class_Universities/no8REAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA129&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> | Since the 1960s, American research universities, especially the leading American public research [[university system]], the [[University of California]],<ref name="Altbach" /><ref name="Kerr_Page_413">{{cite book|last1=Kerr|first1=Clark|title=The Gold and the Blue: A Personal Memoir of the University of California, 1949–1967, Volume 1|date=2001|publisher=University of California Press|location=Berkeley|isbn=9780520223677|page=413|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jMEZ_47vXkAC&pg=PA413|access-date=3 October 2022|archive-date=14 March 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://books.google.com/books?id=jMEZ_47vXkAC&pg=PA413|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Marginson">{{cite book |last1=Marginson |first1=Simon |title=The Dream Is Over: The Crisis of Clark Kerr's California Idea of Higher Education |date=2016 |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |isbn=978-0-520-29284-0 |pages=51–55 |doi=10.1525/luminos.17 |url=http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32075 }}</ref> have served as models for research universities around the world.<ref name="Graham">{{cite book |last1=Graham |first1=Hugh Davis |author1-link=Hugh Davis Graham |last2=Diamond |first2=Nancy |title=The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the Postwar Era |date=1997 |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |location=Baltimore |isbn=9780801880636 |page=9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Eii-MTm3TYwC&pg=PA9 |access-date=7 April 2020 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://books.google.com/books?id=Eii-MTm3TYwC&pg=PA9 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Vest_Page_7">{{cite book |last1=Vest |first1=Charles M. |author1-link=Charles M. Vest |title=The American Research University from World War II to World Wide Web: Governments, the Private Sector, and the Emerging Meta-University |date=2007 |publisher=University of California Press |location=Berkeley |isbn=9780520934047 |page=7 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-kHAKdNFBpUC&pg=PA7 |access-date=25 January 2022 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_American_Research_University_from_Wo/-kHAKdNFBpUC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA7&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> Having one or more universities based on the American model (including the use of [[English as a lingua franca]]) is a badge of "social progress and [[modernity]]" for the contemporary [[nation-state]].<ref name="Stevens_Page_129">{{cite book |last1=Stevens |first1=Mitchell L. |last2=Giebel |first2=Sonia |editor1-last=Hyvönen |editor1-first=Mats |editor2-last=Peters |editor2-first=Michael A. |editor3-last=Rider |editor3-first=Sharon |editor4-last=Besley |editor4-first=Tina |title=World Class Universities: A Contested Concept |date=2020 |publisher=Springer Nature Singapore |location=Singapore |isbn=9789811575983 |pages=123–137 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=no8REAAAQBAJ&pg=PA129 |access-date=27 February 2023 |chapter=The Paradox of the Global University |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://www.google.com/books/edition/World_Class_Universities/no8REAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA129&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
===21st century=== | ===21st century=== | ||
The Americans' continued dominance into the early 21st century has forced their European counterparts to confront the urgent need for reform to avoid "declining into an advanced form of feeder colleges for the best American universities."<ref name="Wittrock">{{cite book |last1=Wittrock |first1=Björn |editor1-last=Blückert |editor1-first=Kjell |editor2-last=Neave |editor2-first=Guy |editor3-last=Nybom |editor3-first=Thorsten |title=The European Research University: A Historical Parenthesis? |date=2006 |isbn=9781403970145 |pages=109–125 |location=New York |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ne5FDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA108 |access-date=15 August 2022 |chapter=The Legacy of Wilhelm von Humboldt and the Future of the European University |edition=2018 softcover reprint |doi=10.1007/978-1-137-10079-5_9 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_European_Research_University/ne5FDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA108&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> During that same timeframe, several wealthy [[petrostate]]s in the [[Persian Gulf]] region subsidized the creation of local branches of American universities.<ref name="Economist">{{cite news |title=How the Gulf's rulers want to harness the power of science |url=https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2025/01/07/how-the-gulfs-rulers-want-to-harness-the-power-of-science |access-date=17 January 2025 | | The Americans' continued dominance into the early 21st century has forced their European counterparts to confront the urgent need for reform to avoid "declining into an advanced form of feeder colleges for the best American universities."<ref name="Wittrock">{{cite book |last1=Wittrock |first1=Björn |editor1-last=Blückert |editor1-first=Kjell |editor2-last=Neave |editor2-first=Guy |editor3-last=Nybom |editor3-first=Thorsten |title=The European Research University: A Historical Parenthesis? |date=2006 |isbn=9781403970145 |pages=109–125 |location=New York |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ne5FDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA108 |access-date=15 August 2022 |chapter=The Legacy of Wilhelm von Humboldt and the Future of the European University |edition=2018 softcover reprint |doi=10.1007/978-1-137-10079-5_9 |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013043/https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_European_Research_University/ne5FDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA108&printsec=frontcover |url-status=live }}</ref> During that same timeframe, several wealthy [[petrostate]]s in the [[Persian Gulf]] region subsidized the creation of local branches of American universities.<ref name="Economist">{{cite news |title=How the Gulf's rulers want to harness the power of science |url=https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2025/01/07/how-the-gulfs-rulers-want-to-harness-the-power-of-science |access-date=17 January 2025 |newspaper=The Economist |date=7 January 2025 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20250107202843/https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2025/01/07/how-the-gulfs-rulers-want-to-harness-the-power-of-science |archive-date= 7 Jan 2025 }}</ref> When that approach proved insufficient to establish indigenous [[Knowledge ecosystem|research]] and [[startup ecosystem]]s (to support the planned long-term diversification of their economies away from [[petroleum]]), they started to build their own research universities from the ground up by recruiting Western-trained faculty and staff.<ref name="Economist" /> | ||
==Characteristics== | ==Characteristics== | ||
{{Prose|date=May 2022}} | {{Prose|date=May 2022}} | ||
John Taylor, Professor of Higher Education Management at the [[University of Liverpool]], defines the key characteristics of successful research universities as:<ref name= Taylor/> | John Taylor, Professor of Higher Education Management at the [[University of Liverpool]], defines the key characteristics of successful research universities as:<ref name= Taylor /> | ||
* "Presence of pure and applied research" | * "Presence of pure and applied research" | ||
* "Delivery of research-led teaching" | * "Delivery of research-led teaching" | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* "An international perspective" | * "An international perspective" | ||
Philip Altbach defines a different, although similar, set of key characteristics for what research universities need to become successful:<ref>{{cite journal|author=Philip G. Altbach|title= Advancing the national and global knowledge economy|year=2013|journal=Studies in Higher Education |volume=38|issue=3|pages=316–330|doi = 10.1080/03075079.2013.773222|hdl = 2345/bc-ir:103804|s2cid= 144178229}}</ref> | Philip Altbach defines a different, although similar, set of key characteristics for what research universities need to become successful:<ref>{{cite journal|author=Philip G. Altbach|title=Advancing the national and global knowledge economy|year=2013|journal=Studies in Higher Education |volume=38|issue=3|pages=316–330 |doi=10.1080/03075079.2013.773222 |hdl=2345/bc-ir:103804|s2cid=144178229}}</ref> | ||
* At the top of the academic hierarchy in a differentiated higher education system and receiving appropriate support | * At the top of the academic hierarchy in a differentiated higher education system and receiving appropriate support | ||
* Overwhelmingly [[Public university|public institutions]] | * Overwhelmingly [[Public university|public institutions]] | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
* Having enlightened and bold leadership | * Having enlightened and bold leadership | ||
Global [[College and university rankings#Global rankings|university rankings]] use metrics that primarily measure research to rank universities.<ref name="IHE 2010">{{cite web |url=http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/11/11/altbach |title=The State of the Rankings |work=[[Inside Higher Ed]] |author=Philip G. Altbach |date=11 November 2010 |access-date=11 June 2017 |archive-date=26 January 2013 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130126100058/http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/11/11/altbach |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=HEPI>{{cite web|url=http://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Hepi_International-university-rankings-For-good-or-for-ill-REPORT-89-10_12_16_Screen.pdf|title=International university rankings: For good or ill?|author=Bahram Bekhradnia|publisher=Higher Education Policy Institute|date=15 December 2016|access-date=26 May 2017|archive-date=15 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170215055236/http://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Hepi_International-university-rankings-For-good-or-for-ill-REPORT-89-10_12_16_Screen.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last1=Agafonow |first1=Alejandro |title=No Organizations for Today's Einsteins: Organizational Impacts on Scientific Discoveries |year=2021 |url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_69-2 |work=Handbook of Philosophy of Management |pages=1–23 |editor-last=Neesham |editor-first=Cristina |place=Cham |publisher=Springer International Publishing |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_69-2 |isbn=978-3-319-48352-8 |access-date=22 March 2022 |last2=Perez |first2=Marybel |series=Handbooks in Philosophy |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013057/https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_69-2 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription }}</ref> Some also have criteria for inclusion based on the concept of a research university such as teaching at both undergraduate and postgraduate level and conducting work in multiple faculties (''[[QS World University Rankings]]''),<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/policies-conditions/|title=Inclusion in Rankings|website=QS Intelligence Unit|access-date=9 August 2018|archive-date=7 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180807215456/http://www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/policies-conditions/|url-status=dead}}</ref> or teaching undergraduates, having a research output of more than | Global [[College and university rankings#Global rankings|university rankings]] use metrics that primarily measure research to rank universities.<ref name="IHE 2010">{{cite web |url=http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/11/11/altbach |title=The State of the Rankings |work=[[Inside Higher Ed]] |author=Philip G. Altbach |date=11 November 2010 |access-date=11 June 2017 |archive-date=26 January 2013 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130126100058/http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/11/11/altbach |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=HEPI>{{cite web|url=http://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Hepi_International-university-rankings-For-good-or-for-ill-REPORT-89-10_12_16_Screen.pdf|title=International university rankings: For good or ill?|author=Bahram Bekhradnia|publisher=Higher Education Policy Institute|date=15 December 2016|access-date=26 May 2017|archive-date=15 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170215055236/http://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Hepi_International-university-rankings-For-good-or-for-ill-REPORT-89-10_12_16_Screen.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last1=Agafonow |first1=Alejandro |title=No Organizations for Today's Einsteins: Organizational Impacts on Scientific Discoveries |year=2021 |url=https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_69-2 |work=Handbook of Philosophy of Management |pages=1–23 |editor-last=Neesham |editor-first=Cristina |place=Cham |publisher=Springer International Publishing |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_69-2 |isbn=978-3-319-48352-8 |access-date=22 March 2022 |last2=Perez |first2=Marybel |series=Handbooks in Philosophy |archive-date=14 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230314013057/https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_69-2 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription}}</ref> Some also have criteria for inclusion based on the concept of a research university such as teaching at both undergraduate and postgraduate level and conducting work in multiple faculties (''[[QS World University Rankings]]''),<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/policies-conditions/|title=Inclusion in Rankings|website=QS Intelligence Unit|access-date=9 August 2018|archive-date=7 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180807215456/http://www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/policies-conditions/|url-status=dead}}</ref> or teaching undergraduates, having a research output of more than 1,000 research papers over 5 years, and no more than 80% of activity in a single subject area (''[[Times Higher Education World University Rankings]])''.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/why-we-publish-world-university-rankings|title=This is why we publish the World University Rankings|date=16 January 2018|author=Phil Baty|access-date=9 August 2018|work=Times Higher Education|archive-date=10 August 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180810105112/https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/why-we-publish-world-university-rankings|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
The [[Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education]] in the United States designates institutions that spend on average at least $2.5 million on research and development annually as 'research universities and colleges', with further designations of 'research 2: high spending and doctorate production' and 'research 1: very high spending and doctorate production' for institutions spending over $5 million and awarding 20 or more doctorates per year and institutions spending over $50 million and awarding 70 or more doctorates per year respectively.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/carnegie-classification/research-designations/|title=2025 Research Activity Designations|website=Carnegie Classifications|access-date=13 February 2025}}</ref> {{as of|2025|post=,}} there were 187 R1 universities, 139 R2 universities and 216 other research universities in the US out of | The [[Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education]] in the United States designates institutions that spend on average at least $2.5 million on research and development annually as 'research universities and colleges', with further designations of 'research 2: high spending and doctorate production' and 'research 1: very high spending and doctorate production' for institutions spending over $5 million and awarding 20 or more doctorates per year and institutions spending over $50 million and awarding 70 or more doctorates per year respectively.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/carnegie-classification/research-designations/|title=2025 Research Activity Designations|website=Carnegie Classifications|access-date=13 February 2025}}</ref> {{as of|2025|post=,}} there were 187 R1 universities, 139 R2 universities and 216 other research universities in the US out of 3,941 total institutions classified.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/institutions/|title=Institution Search|website=Carnegie Classifications|access-date=13 February 2025}}</ref> | ||
==Worldwide distribution== | ==Worldwide distribution== | ||
The ''[[QS World University Rankings|QS World University Ranking]]'' for 2021 included | The ''[[QS World University Rankings|QS World University Ranking]]'' for 2021 included 1,002 research universities. The region with the highest number was [[Europe]], with 39.8%, followed by [[Asia]]/Pacific with 26.7%, the [[United States|US]] and [[Canada]] with 15.6%, [[Latin America]] with 10.8%, and the [[Middle East]] and [[Africa]] with 7%. All regions except the Middle East and Africa were represented in the top 100. The largest number of new entrants to the rankings were from [[East Asia]] and [[Eastern Europe]], followed by [[Southern Europe]].<ref>{{cite web|title=QS World University Rankings 2021 Supplement|url=https://www.topuniversities.com/student-info/qs-guides/qs-world-university-rankings-2021-supplement|website=Top Universities|publisher=Quacquarelli Symonds|access-date=18 September 2020|archive-date=22 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200922115255/https://www.topuniversities.com/student-info/qs-guides/qs-world-university-rankings-2021-supplement|url-status=live}}</ref> By individual country, the US had the most institutions with 151, followed by the UK with 84, China with 51 and Germany with 45. The top 200 showed a similar pattern with the US having 45 universities, the UK 26 and Germany 12.<ref>{{Cite web|date=28 May 2020|title=QS World University Rankings 2021|url=https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2021|access-date=18 September 2020|website=Top Universities|language=en|archive-date=9 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200609201234/https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2021|url-status=live}}</ref> By comparison, the [[Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education]] (2015) identified 115 US universities as "Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity" and a further 107 as "Doctoral Universities: Higher Research Activity", while Altbach estimated that there were around 220 research universities in the US in 2013.<ref name=Role/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/lookup/standard.php#standard_basic2005_list|website=Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education|publisher=University of Indiana|title=Standard Listings|access-date=11 August 2018|archive-date=30 July 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180730131504/http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/lookup/standard.php#standard_basic2005_list|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
The ''[[Academic Ranking of World Universities]]'' for 2020 showed a similar distribution, with 185 of their 500 ranked institutions coming from Europe, 161 from the Americas, 149 from Asia/Oceania and five from Africa. All regions except Africa were represented in the top 100, although the Americas were represented solely by universities from the United States and Canada.<ref>{{cite web |title=Statistics |url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Statistics-2020.html |access-date=18 September 2020 |website=Academic Ranking of World Universities 2020 |publisher=ShanghaiRanking Consultancy |archive-date=16 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210416181137/http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Statistics-2020.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> In | The ''[[Academic Ranking of World Universities]]'' for 2020 showed a similar distribution, with 185 of their 500 ranked institutions coming from Europe, 161 from the Americas, 149 from Asia/Oceania and five from Africa. All regions except Africa were represented in the top 100, although the Americas were represented solely by universities from the United States and Canada.<ref>{{cite web |title=Statistics |url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Statistics-2020.html |access-date=18 September 2020 |website=Academic Ranking of World Universities 2020 |publisher=ShanghaiRanking Consultancy |archive-date=16 April 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210416181137/http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Statistics-2020.html |url-status=dead}}</ref> In 2025, China had the most universities in the top 500, 113, followed by the US with 111, the UK with 37 and Germany with 35.<ref>{{Cite web |title=ShanghaiRanking's Academic Ranking of World Universities 2025 Press Release |url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/news/arwu/2025 |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=www.shanghairanking.com}}</ref> However, the top 200 shows the different pattern: the US with 58 followed by China with 39 and the UK with 18.<ref>{{Cite web |title=ShanghaiRanking's Academic Ranking of World Universities |url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/rankings/arwu/2025 |access-date=2025-08-20 |website=www.shanghairanking.com}}</ref> | ||
The | The 2026 ''[[Times Higher Education World University Rankings|Times Higher Education]]'' only gave a breakdown by country and only for its top 200; this again had the US at the top with 55, followed by the [[United Kingdom|UK]] with 26, [[Germany]] with 18 and [[China]] with 13. The top 200 featured one university from Africa, the [[University of Cape Town]] in [[South Africa]], but none from [[Latin America]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-10-09 |title=World University Rankings 2026 digital edition |url=https://www.timeshighereducation.com/digital-editions/world-university-rankings-2026-digital-edition |access-date=2025-10-22 |website=Times Higher Education (THE) |language=en}}</ref> The ''[[U.S. News & World Report]]'' Best Global Universities Ranking 2025 gave numbers by country for the 2250 universities ranked from more than 100 countries: China was the top, with 397, followed by the US with 280 and India with 118.<ref>{{Cite web |title=U.S. News Releases 2025-2026 Best Global Universities Rankings {{!}} Clarivate |url=https://clarivate.com/news/u-s-news-releases-2025-2026-best-global-universities-rankings/ |access-date=2025-08-20 |language=en-US}}</ref> However, the U.S. had 115 schools in the top 500, followed by China with 70 schools and the UK with 37.<ref>{{Cite web |title=2025-2026 Best Global Universities Rankings |url=https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/search |access-date=19 August 2025 |website=U.S. News}}</ref> The 2025 ''[[CWTS Leiden Ranking]]'' included 1,594 universities in the rankings from 77 countries/regions: China topped the list, with 356, followed by the US with 204 and the UK with 61.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Studies (CWTS) |first=Centre for Science and Technology |title=CWTS Leiden Ranking Traditional Edition |url=https://traditional.leidenranking.com/ |access-date=2025-11-04 |website=CWTS Leiden Ranking Traditional Edition |language=en}}</ref> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* [[History of European universities|History of European research universities]] | * [[History of European universities|History of European research universities]] | ||
* [[List of research universities in South Korea]] | * [[List of research universities in South Korea]] | ||
* [[List of research universities in Turkey]] | |||
* [[List of research universities in the United States]] | * [[List of research universities in the United States]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 30 December 2025
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
A research university or a research-intensive university is a university that is committed to research as a central part of its mission.[3][4][5][6] They are "the key sites of knowledge production", along with "intergenerational knowledge transfer and the certification of new knowledge" through the awarding of doctoral degrees, and continue to be "the very center of scientific productivity".[7] They can be public or private, and often have well-known brand names.[8]
Undergraduate courses at many research universities are often academic rather than vocational and may not prepare students for particular careers, but many employers value degrees from research universities because they teach fundamental life skills such as critical thinking.[9] Globally, research universities are overwhelmingly public institutions, while some countries like the United States and Japan also have well-known private research institutions.[3]
Institutions of higher education that are not research universities or do not aspire to that designation, such as liberal arts colleges, instead place more emphasis on student instruction or other aspects of tertiary education, whereas research university faculty members, in contrast, are under more pressure to publish or perish.[10]
History
19th century
The concept of the research university first arose in early 19th-century Prussia in Germany, where Wilhelm von Humboldt championed his vision of Template:Langx (the unity of teaching and research), as a means of producing an education that focused on the main areas of knowledge, including the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities, rather than on the previous goals of the university education, which was to develop an understanding of truth, beauty, and goodness.[11][12]
Roger L. Geiger, "the leading historian of the American research university,"[13] has argued that "the model for the American research university was established by five of the nine colonial colleges chartered before the American Revolution (Harvard, Yale, Pennsylvania, Princeton, and Columbia); five state universities (Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, and California); and five private institutions conceived from their inception as research universities (MIT, Cornell, Johns Hopkins, Stanford, and Chicago)."[14][15] The American research university first emerged in the late 19th century, when these fifteen institutions began to graft graduate programs derived from the German model onto undergraduate programs derived from the British model.[14] At Johns Hopkins, president Daniel Coit Gilman led the development of the American research university[1] by setting high standards for recruiting faculty and admitting students, and insisting that faculty members had to commit to both teaching and research.[16]
20th century
Research universities were essential to the establishment of American hegemony by the end of the 20th century.[17] Most importantly, Berkeley, Chicago, Columbia, and Princeton (along with Birmingham and Cambridge in the UK) directly participated in the creation of the first nuclear weapons (the Manhattan Project).[18][19][20] Besides that, Columbia and Harvard were instrumental in the early development of the American film industry (Hollywood),[21] MIT and Stanford were leaders in building the American military–industrial complex[22] and developing artificial intelligence,[23] and Berkeley and Stanford played a central role in the development of Silicon Valley.[24] The "most prestigious group of research universities" in the United States is the Association of American Universities.[25]
Since the 1960s, American research universities, especially the leading American public research university system, the University of California,[4][26][27] have served as models for research universities around the world.[28][29] Having one or more universities based on the American model (including the use of English as a lingua franca) is a badge of "social progress and modernity" for the contemporary nation-state.[30]
21st century
The Americans' continued dominance into the early 21st century has forced their European counterparts to confront the urgent need for reform to avoid "declining into an advanced form of feeder colleges for the best American universities."[31] During that same timeframe, several wealthy petrostates in the Persian Gulf region subsidized the creation of local branches of American universities.[32] When that approach proved insufficient to establish indigenous research and startup ecosystems (to support the planned long-term diversification of their economies away from petroleum), they started to build their own research universities from the ground up by recruiting Western-trained faculty and staff.[32]
Characteristics
Script error: No such module "Unsubst". John Taylor, Professor of Higher Education Management at the University of Liverpool, defines the key characteristics of successful research universities as:[6]
- "Presence of pure and applied research"
- "Delivery of research-led teaching"
- "Breadth of academic disciplines"
- "High proportion of postgraduate research programmes"
- "High levels of external income"
- "An international perspective"
Philip Altbach defines a different, although similar, set of key characteristics for what research universities need to become successful:[33]
- At the top of the academic hierarchy in a differentiated higher education system and receiving appropriate support
- Overwhelmingly public institutions
- Little competition from non-university research institutions, unless these have strong connections to the universities
- More funding than other universities to attract the best staff and students and support research infrastructure
- Adequate and sustained budgets
- Potential for income generation from student fees and intellectual property
- Suitable facilities
- Autonomy
- Academic freedom
A 2012 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report defined research universities, in the American context, as having values of intellectual freedom, initiative and creativity, excellence, and openness, with such additional characteristics as:[34]
- Being large and comprehensive – Clark Kerr's "multiversity"
- Emphasizing the undergraduate residential experience (flagged specifically as distinguishing American research universities from those in continental Europe)
- Integrating graduate education with research
- Having faculty engaged in research and scholarship
- Conducting research at high levels
- Having enlightened and bold leadership
Global university rankings use metrics that primarily measure research to rank universities.[35][36][37] Some also have criteria for inclusion based on the concept of a research university such as teaching at both undergraduate and postgraduate level and conducting work in multiple faculties (QS World University Rankings),[38] or teaching undergraduates, having a research output of more than 1,000 research papers over 5 years, and no more than 80% of activity in a single subject area (Times Higher Education World University Rankings).[39]
The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education in the United States designates institutions that spend on average at least $2.5 million on research and development annually as 'research universities and colleges', with further designations of 'research 2: high spending and doctorate production' and 'research 1: very high spending and doctorate production' for institutions spending over $5 million and awarding 20 or more doctorates per year and institutions spending over $50 million and awarding 70 or more doctorates per year respectively.[40] As of 2025,[update]Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". there were 187 R1 universities, 139 R2 universities and 216 other research universities in the US out of 3,941 total institutions classified.[41]
Worldwide distribution
The QS World University Ranking for 2021 included 1,002 research universities. The region with the highest number was Europe, with 39.8%, followed by Asia/Pacific with 26.7%, the US and Canada with 15.6%, Latin America with 10.8%, and the Middle East and Africa with 7%. All regions except the Middle East and Africa were represented in the top 100. The largest number of new entrants to the rankings were from East Asia and Eastern Europe, followed by Southern Europe.[42] By individual country, the US had the most institutions with 151, followed by the UK with 84, China with 51 and Germany with 45. The top 200 showed a similar pattern with the US having 45 universities, the UK 26 and Germany 12.[43] By comparison, the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education (2015) identified 115 US universities as "Doctoral Universities: Highest Research Activity" and a further 107 as "Doctoral Universities: Higher Research Activity", while Altbach estimated that there were around 220 research universities in the US in 2013.[3][44]
The Academic Ranking of World Universities for 2020 showed a similar distribution, with 185 of their 500 ranked institutions coming from Europe, 161 from the Americas, 149 from Asia/Oceania and five from Africa. All regions except Africa were represented in the top 100, although the Americas were represented solely by universities from the United States and Canada.[45] In 2025, China had the most universities in the top 500, 113, followed by the US with 111, the UK with 37 and Germany with 35.[46] However, the top 200 shows the different pattern: the US with 58 followed by China with 39 and the UK with 18.[47]
The 2026 Times Higher Education only gave a breakdown by country and only for its top 200; this again had the US at the top with 55, followed by the UK with 26, Germany with 18 and China with 13. The top 200 featured one university from Africa, the University of Cape Town in South Africa, but none from Latin America.[48] The U.S. News & World Report Best Global Universities Ranking 2025 gave numbers by country for the 2250 universities ranked from more than 100 countries: China was the top, with 397, followed by the US with 280 and India with 118.[49] However, the U.S. had 115 schools in the top 500, followed by China with 70 schools and the UK with 37.[50] The 2025 CWTS Leiden Ranking included 1,594 universities in the rankings from 77 countries/regions: China topped the list, with 356, followed by the US with 204 and the UK with 61.[51]
See also
- History of European research universities
- List of research universities in South Korea
- List of research universities in Turkey
- List of research universities in the United States
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". (At p. 8.)
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". (At p. 119.) This source refers to research universities as R1, a common shorthand for the highest level of American research universities recognized by the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". The quoted sentence is Crow and Dabars' paraphrasing of Geiger's analysis.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Template:School types Script error: No such module "Authority control".