Atomic units: Difference between revisions
imported>Quondum article name |
imported>Citation bot Add: bibcode, doi, issue. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Atomic physics | #UCB_Category 74/157 |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|System of measurement}} | {{short description|System of measurement}} | ||
{{distinguish|Atomic mass unit}} | {{distinguish|Atomic mass unit}} | ||
The '''atomic units''' are a [[systems of measurement|system]] of [[natural units]] of measurement that is especially convenient for calculations in [[atomic physics]] and related scientific fields, such as [[computational chemistry]] and [[atomic spectroscopy]]. They were originally suggested and named by the physicist [[Douglas Hartree]].<ref name="Hartree1928">{{citation | The '''atomic units''' are a [[systems of measurement|system]] of [[natural units]] of measurement that is especially convenient for calculations in [[atomic physics]] and related scientific fields, such as [[computational chemistry]] and [[atomic spectroscopy]]. They were originally suggested and named by the physicist [[Douglas Hartree]].<ref name="Hartree1928"> | ||
{{citation | |||
| last1=Hartree | first1=D. R. | authorlink1=Douglas Hartree | | last1=Hartree | first1=D. R. | authorlink1=Douglas Hartree | ||
| title=The Wave Mechanics of an Atom with a Non-Coulomb Central Field. Part I. Theory and Methods | | title=The Wave Mechanics of an Atom with a Non-Coulomb Central Field. Part I. Theory and Methods | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
== Motivation == | == Motivation == | ||
Use of atomic units has been motivated on the grounds of accuracy and stability of reported values: since the values of the accepted values of the fundamental constants in atomic physics such as {{tmath| \hbar }}, {{tmath| m_\text{e} }}, {{tmath| e }} and {{tmath| c }} were not sufficiently stable or accurate, the values of calculations and measurements performed in different years could not be directly compared, which resulted in confusion. This led to suggestions that the results of quantum-mechanical calculations should be reported using units based directly on such constants.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Shull |first1=H. |last2=Hall |first2=G.G |title=Atomic Units |year=1959 |journal=Nature |volume=184 |issue=4698 |publisher=Nature Publishing Group |pages=1559–1560 |doi=10.1038/1841559a0 |bibcode=1959Natur.184.1559S }}</ref> | |||
In the context of atomic physics, using the atomic units system can be a convenient shortcut, eliminating symbols and numbers and reducing the order of magnitude of most numbers involved. | In the context of atomic physics, using the atomic units system can be a convenient shortcut, eliminating symbols and numbers and reducing the order of magnitude of most numbers involved. | ||
For example, the [[Hamiltonian operator]] in the [[Schrödinger equation]] for the [[helium]] atom with standard quantities, such as when using SI units, is<ref name="McQuarrie2008">{{cite book |last1=McQuarrie |first1=Donald A. |title=Quantum Chemistry |date=2008 |publisher=University Science Books |location=New York, NY |edition=2nd }}</ref>{{rp|[https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=zzxLTIljQB4C&pg=PA437 437]}} | For example, the [[Hamiltonian operator]] in the [[Schrödinger equation]] for the [[helium]] atom with standard quantities, such as when using SI units, is<ref name="McQuarrie2008">{{cite book |last1=McQuarrie |first1=Donald A. |title=Quantum Chemistry |date=2008 |publisher=University Science Books |location=New York, NY |edition=2nd }}</ref>{{rp|[https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=zzxLTIljQB4C&pg=PA437 437]}} | ||
| Line 22: | Line 25: | ||
: <math>\hat{H} = - \frac{1}{2} \nabla_1^2 - \frac{1}{2} \nabla_2^2 - \frac{2}{r_1} - \frac{2}{r_2} + \frac{1}{r_{12}} .</math> | : <math>\hat{H} = - \frac{1}{2} \nabla_1^2 - \frac{1}{2} \nabla_2^2 - \frac{2}{r_1} - \frac{2}{r_2} + \frac{1}{r_{12}} .</math> | ||
In this convention, the constants {{tmath|1= \hbar }}, {{tmath|1= m_\text{e} }}, {{tmath|1= 4 \pi \epsilon_0 }}, and {{tmath|1= e }} all correspond to the value {{tmath|1= 1 }} (see ''{{slink|#Definition}}'' below). | In this convention, the constants {{tmath|1= \hbar }}, {{tmath|1= m_\text{e} }}, {{tmath|1= 4 \pi \epsilon_0 }}, and {{tmath|1= e }} all correspond to the value {{tmath|1= 1 }} (see ''{{slink|#Definition}}'' below). | ||
The distances relevant to the physics expressed in SI units are naturally on the order of {{ | The distances relevant to the physics expressed in SI units are naturally on the order of {{val|e=-10|u=m}}, while expressed in atomic units distances are on the order of {{tmath|1= 1 a_0 }} (one [[Bohr radius]], the atomic unit of length). An additional benefit of expressing quantities using atomic units is that their values calculated and reported in atomic units do not change when values of fundamental constants are revised, since the fundamental constants are built into the conversion factors between atomic units and SI. | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
| Line 36: | Line 39: | ||
: ''Unit of action'', {{tmath|1= h \,/\, 2 \pi }}. | : ''Unit of action'', {{tmath|1= h \,/\, 2 \pi }}. | ||
: ''Unit of energy'', {{tmath|1= e^2 / a_\text{H} = 2 h c R = }} [...] | : ''Unit of energy'', {{tmath|1= e^2 / a_\text{H} = 2 h c R = }} [...] | ||
: ''Unit of time'', {{tmath|1= 1 \,/\, 4 \pi c R }}. | : ''Unit of time'', {{tmath|1= 1 \,/\, 4 \pi c R }}. | ||
|author=D.R. Hartree | |author=D.R. Hartree | ||
|title=''The Wave Mechanics of an Atom with a Non-Coulomb Central Field. Part I. Theory and Methods'' | |title=''The Wave Mechanics of an Atom with a Non-Coulomb Central Field. Part I. Theory and Methods'' | ||
| Line 42: | Line 45: | ||
Here, the modern equivalent of {{tmath|1= R }} is the [[Rydberg constant]] {{tmath|1= R_\infty }}, of {{tmath|1= m }} is the electron mass {{tmath|1= m_\text{e} }}, of {{tmath|1= a_\text{H} }} is the Bohr radius {{tmath|1= a_0 }}, and of {{tmath|1= h / 2 \pi }} is the reduced Planck constant {{tmath|1= \hbar }}. Hartree's expressions that contain {{tmath|1= e }} differ from the modern form due to a change in the definition of {{tmath|1= e }}, as explained below. | Here, the modern equivalent of {{tmath|1= R }} is the [[Rydberg constant]] {{tmath|1= R_\infty }}, of {{tmath|1= m }} is the electron mass {{tmath|1= m_\text{e} }}, of {{tmath|1= a_\text{H} }} is the Bohr radius {{tmath|1= a_0 }}, and of {{tmath|1= h / 2 \pi }} is the reduced Planck constant {{tmath|1= \hbar }}. Hartree's expressions that contain {{tmath|1= e }} differ from the modern form due to a change in the definition of {{tmath|1= e }}, as explained below. | ||
In 1957, Bethe and Salpeter's book ''Quantum mechanics of one-and two-electron atoms''<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bethe |first1=Hans A. |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-12869-5_1 |title=Introduction. Units | | In 1957, Bethe and Salpeter's book ''Quantum mechanics of one-and two-electron atoms''<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bethe |first1=Hans A. |last2=Salpeter |first2=Edwin E. |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-12869-5_1 |title=Introduction. Units |date=1957 |pages=2–4 |publisher=Springer |location=Berlin, Heidelberg |isbn=978-3-662-12871-8 |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-662-12869-5_1 }}</ref> built on Hartree's units, which they called '''atomic units''' abbreviated "a.u.". They chose to use {{tmath|1= \hbar }}, their unit of [[Action (physics)|action]] and [[angular momentum]] in place of Hartree's length as the base units. They noted that the unit of length in this system is the radius of the first [[Bohr model of the atom|Bohr orbit]] and their velocity is the electron velocity in Bohr's model of the first orbit. | ||
In 1959, Shull and Hall<ref name="ShullHall1959"> | In 1959, Shull and Hall<ref name="ShullHall1959"> | ||
| Line 54: | Line 57: | ||
|doi=10.1038/1841559a0 | |doi=10.1038/1841559a0 | ||
|bibcode = 1959Natur.184.1559S | s2cid=23692353 | |bibcode = 1959Natur.184.1559S | s2cid=23692353 | ||
}}</ref> advocated '''atomic units''' based on Hartree's model but again chose to use {{tmath|1= \hbar }} as the defining unit. They explicitly named the distance unit a "[[Bohr radius]]"; in addition, they wrote the unit of energy as {{tmath|1= H = m e^4 / \hbar^2 }} and called it a '''Hartree'''. These terms came to be used widely in quantum chemistry.<ref>{{ | }}</ref> advocated '''atomic units''' based on Hartree's model but again chose to use {{tmath|1= \hbar }} as the defining unit. They explicitly named the distance unit a "[[Bohr radius]]"; in addition, they wrote the unit of energy as {{tmath|1= H = m e^4 / \hbar^2 }} and called it a '''Hartree'''. These terms came to be used widely in quantum chemistry.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Levine |first1=Ira N. |title=Quantum chemistry |date=1991 |publisher=Prentice-Hall International |isbn=978-0-205-12770-2 |edition=4 |series=Pearson advanced chemistry series |location=Englewood Cliffs, NJ }}</ref>{{rp|349}} | ||
In 1973 McWeeny extended the system of Shull and Hall by adding [[permittivity]] in the form of {{tmath|1= \kappa_0 = 4 \pi \epsilon_0 }} as a defining or base unit.<ref name="McWeeny1973">{{cite journal | | In 1973 McWeeny extended the system of Shull and Hall by adding [[permittivity]] in the form of {{tmath|1= \kappa_0 = 4 \pi \epsilon_0 }} as a defining or base unit.<ref name="McWeeny1973">{{cite journal |last1=McWeeny |first1=R. |date=May 1973 |title=Natural Units in Atomic and Molecular Physics |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/243196a0 |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=243 |issue=5404 |pages=196–198 |doi=10.1038/243196a0 |bibcode=1973Natur.243..196M |s2cid=4164851 |issn=0028-0836|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref name="JerrardMcNeill1992">{{cite book |last1=Jerrard |first1=H. G. |last2=McNeill |first2=D. B. |date=1992 |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-011-2294-8_2 |title=Systems of units |location=Dordrecht |pages=3–8 |publisher=Springer Netherlands |isbn=978-0-412-46720-2 |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-94-011-2294-8_2 }}</ref> Simultaneously he adopted the SI definition of {{tmath|1= e }} so that his expression for energy in atomic units is {{tmath|1= e^2 / (4 \pi \epsilon_0 a_0) }}, matching the expression in the 8th SI brochure.<ref>{{SIbrochure8th|page=125}}. Note that this information is omitted in the 9th edition.</ref> | ||
== Definition == | == Definition == | ||
A set of base units in the atomic system as in one proposal are the electron rest mass, the magnitude of the electronic charge, the Planck constant, and the permittivity.<ref name="McWeeny1973"/>{{refn|{{citation |author1=Paul Quincey |author2=Peter J Mohr |author3=William D Phillips |title=Angles are inherently neither length ratios nor dimensionless |journal=Metrologia |volume=56 |date=2019 |issue=4 |page=043001 |doi=10.1088/1681-7575/ab27d7 |arxiv=1909.08389 |bibcode=2019Metro..56d3001Q |quote=In [the Hartree system of atomic] units, {{math|''m''<sub>e</sub>}}, {{math|''e''}}, {{math|''ħ''}} and {{math|1/4''πε''<sub>0</sub>}} are all set equal to unity. }} – | A set of base units in the atomic system as in one proposal are the electron rest mass, the magnitude of the electronic charge, the Planck constant, and the permittivity.<ref name="McWeeny1973"/>{{refn|{{citation |author1=Paul Quincey |author2=Peter J Mohr |author3=William D Phillips |title=Angles are inherently neither length ratios nor dimensionless |journal=Metrologia |volume=56 |date=2019 |issue=4 |page=043001 |doi=10.1088/1681-7575/ab27d7 |arxiv=1909.08389 |bibcode=2019Metro..56d3001Q |quote=In [the Hartree system of atomic] units, {{math|''m''<sub>e</sub>}}, {{math|''e''}}, {{math|''ħ''}} and {{math|1/4''πε''<sub>0</sub>}} are all set equal to unity. }} – this gives an equivalent set of defining constants.}} In the convention of the atomic units system that treats quantities as dimensionless, each of these takes the value 1; the corresponding values in the [[International System of Units]]<ref name="Brochure9_2019"> | ||
{{cite web | {{cite web | ||
|title = 9th edition of the SI Brochure | |title = 9th edition of the SI Brochure | ||
| Line 71: | Line 74: | ||
|+ Base atomic units{{cref|*}} | |+ Base atomic units{{cref|*}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! Symbol and Name | ||
! | ! Quantity | ||
! | ! Dimension{{cref|{{dagger}}}} | ||
! | ! Atomic system value{{cref|{{double dagger}}}} | ||
! SI value | |||
|- | |- | ||
| {{tmath|1= \hbar }}, [[reduced Planck constant]] || action | | {{tmath|1= \hbar }}, [[reduced Planck constant]] || action || ML<sup>2</sup>T<sup>−1</sup> || 1 || {{physconst|hbar|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="hbar">{{cite web |title=reduced Planck constant |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?hbar }}</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{tmath|1= e }}, [[elementary charge]] || charge | | {{tmath|1= e }}, [[elementary charge]] || charge || Q || 1 || {{physconst|e|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="e">{{cite web |title=elementary charge |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?e }}</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{tmath|1= m_\text{e} }}, [[electron rest mass]] || mass | | {{tmath|1= m_\text{e} }}, [[electron rest mass]] || mass || M || 1 || {{physconst|me|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="me">{{cite web |title=electron mass |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?me }}</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| {{tmath|1= 4 \pi \epsilon_0 }}, [[permittivity]] || permittivity | | {{tmath|1= 4 \pi \epsilon_0 }}, [[permittivity]] || permittivity || Q<sup>2</sup>W<sup>−1</sup>L<sup>−1</sup> || 1 || {{physconst|auperm|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="auperm">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of permittivity |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?auperm }}</ref> | ||
|} | |} | ||
===Table notes=== | === Table notes === | ||
*{{cnote|*|This | * {{cnote|*|This choice of base units was proposed by McWeeny; the choice is essentially arbitrary.}} | ||
*{{cnote|{{dagger}}| | * {{cnote|{{dagger}}|The base dimensions for [[dimensional analysis]] may chosen as M, L, T, Q. For convenience, the derived dimensions A (action, ML<sup>2</sup>T<sup>−1</sup>) and W (energy, ML<sup>2</sup>T<sup>−2</sup>) are also used.<ref name="McWeeny1973"/>}} | ||
*{{cnote|{{double dagger}}| | * {{cnote|{{double dagger}}|This column use the convention that uses the dimensionless equivalents of quantities.}} | ||
== Units == | == Units == | ||
Three of the defining constants (reduced Planck constant, elementary charge, and electron rest mass) are atomic units themselves – of [[action (physics)|action]],<ref>{{cite web |title=atomic unit of action |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?Ahbar }}</ref> [[electric charge]],<ref>{{cite web |title=atomic unit of charge |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?Ae }}</ref> and [[mass]],<ref>{{cite web |title=atomic unit of mass |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?Ame | Three of the defining constants (reduced Planck constant, elementary charge, and electron rest mass) are atomic units themselves – of [[action (physics)|action]],<ref name="Ahbar">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of action |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?Ahbar }}</ref> [[electric charge]],<ref name="Ae">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of charge |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?Ae }}</ref> and [[mass]],<ref name="Ame">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of mass |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?Ame }}</ref> respectively. Two named units are those of [[length]] ([[Bohr radius]] {{tmath|1= a_0 \equiv 4 \pi \epsilon_0 \hbar^2 / m_\text{e} e^2 }}) and [[energy]] ([[hartree]] {{tmath|1= E_\text{h} \equiv \hbar^2 / m_\text{e} a_0^2 }}). | ||
{|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 110: | Line 106: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[charge density|electric charge density]] || <math> e/a_0^3 </math> | | [[charge density|electric charge density]] || <math> e/a_0^3 </math> | ||
| {{physconst|auecd|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|auecd|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="aucd">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of charge density |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?aucd }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[electric current]] || <math> e E_\text{h} / \hbar </math> | | [[electric current]] || <math> e E_\text{h} / \hbar </math> | ||
| {{physconst|aucur|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|aucur|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="aucur">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of current |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?aucur }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[electric charge]] || <math>e</math> | | [[electric charge]] || <math>e</math> | ||
| {{physconst|auec|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|auec|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="Ae">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of charge |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?Ae }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[electric dipole moment]] || <math> e a_0 </math> | | [[electric dipole moment]] || <math> e a_0 </math> | ||
| {{physconst|auedm|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|auedm|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="auedm">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of electric dipole moment |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?auedm }}</ref> | ||
| {{math|≘}} {{val|2.541746473|u=[[debye|D]]}} | | {{math|≘}} {{val|2.541746473|u=[[debye|D]]}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[electric quadrupole]] moment || <math> e a_0^2 </math> | | [[electric quadrupole]] moment || <math> e a_0^2 </math> | ||
| {{physconst|aueqm|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|aueqm|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="aueqm">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of electric quadrupole moment |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?aueqm }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[electric potential]] || <math> E_\text{h} / e </math> | | [[electric potential]] || <math> E_\text{h} / e </math> | ||
| {{physconst|auepot|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|auepot|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="auep">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of electric potential |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?auep }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[electric field]] || <math>E_\text{h} / e a_0 </math> | | [[electric field]] || <math>E_\text{h} / e a_0 </math> | ||
| {{physconst|auef|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|auef|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="auefld">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of electric field |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?auefld }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[electric field gradient]] || <math>E_\text{h} / e a_0^2 </math> | | [[electric field gradient]] || <math>E_\text{h} / e a_0^2 </math> | ||
| {{physconst|auefg|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|auefg|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name= "auefg">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of electric field gradient |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?auefg }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[permittivity]] || <math> e^2 / a_0 E_\text{h} </math> | | [[permittivity]] || <math> e^2 / a_0 E_\text{h} </math> | ||
| {{physconst|auperm|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|auperm|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="auperm">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of permittivity |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?auperm }}</ref> | ||
| {{tmath|1= 4 \pi \epsilon_0 }} | | {{tmath|1= 4 \pi \epsilon_0 }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[electric polarizability]] || <math> e^2 a_0^2 / E_\text{h} </math> | | [[electric polarizability]] || <math> e^2 a_0^2 / E_\text{h} </math> | ||
| {{physconst|auepol|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|auepol|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="auepol">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of electric polarizability |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?auepol }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1st [[hyperpolarizability]] || <math>e^3 a_0^3 / E_\text{h}^2</math> | | 1st [[hyperpolarizability]] || <math>e^3 a_0^3 / E_\text{h}^2</math> | ||
| {{physconst|au1hypol|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|au1hypol|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="auhypol">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of 1st hyperpolarizability |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?auhypol }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2nd hyperpolarizability || <math>e^4 a_0^4 / E_\text{h}^3</math> | | 2nd hyperpolarizability || <math>e^4 a_0^4 / E_\text{h}^3</math> | ||
|{{physconst|au2hypol|ref=no}} | |{{physconst|au2hypol|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="au2hypol">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of 2nd hyperpolarizability |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?au2hypol }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[magnetic dipole moment]] || <math> \hbar e / m_\text{e} </math> | | [[magnetic dipole moment]] || <math> \hbar e / m_\text{e} </math> | ||
| {{physconst|aumdm|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|aumdm|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="aumdm">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of magnetic dipole moment |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?aumdm }}</ref> | ||
| {{tmath|1= 2 \mu_\text{B} }} | | {{tmath|1= 2 \mu_\text{B} }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[magnetic flux density]] || <math> \hbar/e a_0^2 </math> | | [[magnetic flux density]] || <math> \hbar/e a_0^2 </math> | ||
| {{physconst|aumfd|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|aumfd|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="aumfd">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of magnetic flux density |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?aumfd }}</ref> | ||
| {{math|≘}} {{val|2.3505|e=9|ul=G}} | | {{math|≘}} {{val|2.3505|e=9|ul=G}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[magnetizability]] || <math> e^2 a_0^2 / m_\text{e}</math> | | [[magnetizability]] || <math> e^2 a_0^2 / m_\text{e}</math> | ||
| {{physconst|aumag|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|aumag|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="aumag">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of magnetizability |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?aumag }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[action (physics)|action]] || <math>\hbar</math> | | [[action (physics)|action]] || <math>\hbar</math> | ||
| {{physconst|auact|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|auact|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="Ahbar">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of action |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?Ahbar }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[energy]] || <math> E_\text{h} </math> | | [[energy]] || <math> E_\text{h} </math> | ||
| {{physconst|auener|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|auener|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="Ahr">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of energy |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?Ahr }}</ref> | ||
| {{tmath|1= 2 h c R_\infty }}, {{tmath|1= \alpha^2 m_\text{e} c^2 }}, {{val|27.211386245988|(53)|ul=eV}}{{px2}}<ref name="hrev">{{cite web |title=Hartree energy in eV |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?hrev }}</ref> | |||
| {{tmath|1= 2 h c R_\infty }}, {{tmath|1= \alpha^2 m_\text{e} c^2 }}, {{val|27.211386245988|(53)|ul=eV}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
| [[force]] || <math>E_\text{h} / a_0 </math> | | [[force]] || <math>E_\text{h} / a_0 </math> | ||
| {{physconst|auforce|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|auforce|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="auforce">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of force |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?auforce }}</ref> | ||
| {{val|82.387|u=nN}}, {{val|51.421|u=eV·Å<sup>−1</sup>}} | | {{val|82.387|u=nN}}, {{val|51.421|u=eV·Å<sup>−1</sup>}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[length]] || <math> a_0 </math> | | [[length]] || <math> a_0 </math> | ||
| {{physconst|aulen|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|aulen|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="Abohrrada0">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of length |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?Abohrrada0 }}</ref> | ||
| {{tmath|1= \hbar / \alpha m_\text{e} c }}, {{val|0.529177|ul=Å}} | | {{tmath|1= \hbar / \alpha m_\text{e} c }}, {{val|0.529177|ul=Å}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[mass]] || <math>m_\text{e}</math> | | [[mass]] || <math>m_\text{e}</math> | ||
| {{physconst|aumass|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|aumass|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="Ame">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of mass |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?Ame }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[momentum]] || <math> \hbar/a_0 </math> | | [[momentum]] || <math> \hbar/a_0 </math> | ||
| {{physconst|aumom|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|aumom|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="aumom">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of momentum |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?aumom }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[time]] || <math>\hbar / E_\text{h}</math> | | [[time]] || <math>\hbar / E_\text{h}</math> | ||
| {{physconst|autime|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|autime|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="aut">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of time |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?aut }}</ref> | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[velocity]] || <math> a_0 E_\text{h} / \hbar </math> | | [[velocity]] || <math> a_0 E_\text{h} / \hbar </math> | ||
| {{physconst|auvel|ref=no}} | | {{physconst|auvel|ref=no}}{{px2}}<ref name="auvel">{{cite web |title=atomic unit of velocity |work={{harvnb|CODATA}} |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?auvel }}</ref> | ||
| {{tmath|1= \alpha c }} | | {{tmath|1= \alpha c }} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 264: | Line 212: | ||
=== Explicit units === | === Explicit units === | ||
* Many texts (e.g. Jerrard & McNiell,<ref name="JerrardMcNeill1992"/> Shull & Hall<ref name="ShullHall1959"/>) define the atomic units as quantities, without a transformation of the equations in use. As such, they do not suggest treating either quantities as dimensionless or changing the form of any equations. This is consistent with expressing quantities in terms of dimensional quantities, where the atomic unit is included explicitly as a symbol (e.g. {{tmath|1= m = 3.4~m_\text{e} }}, {{tmath|1= m = 3.4~\text{a.u. of mass} }}, or more ambiguously, {{tmath|1= m = 3.4~\text{a.u.} }}), and keeping equations unaltered with explicit constants.<ref name="Pilar2001">{{cite book | | * Many texts (e.g. Jerrard & McNiell,<ref name="JerrardMcNeill1992"/> Shull & Hall<ref name="ShullHall1959"/>) define the atomic units as quantities, without a transformation of the equations in use. As such, they do not suggest treating either quantities as dimensionless or changing the form of any equations. This is consistent with expressing quantities in terms of dimensional quantities, where the atomic unit is included explicitly as a symbol (e.g. {{tmath|1= m = 3.4~m_\text{e} }}, {{tmath|1= m = 3.4~\text{a.u. of mass} }}, or more ambiguously, {{tmath|1= m = 3.4~\text{a.u.} }}), and keeping equations unaltered with explicit constants.<ref name="Pilar2001">{{cite book |last1=Pilar |first1=Frank L. |title=Elementary Quantum Chemistry |year=2001 |publisher=Dover Publications |isbn=978-0-486-41464-5 |page=155 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XpGM7r69LdkC&pg=PA155 }}</ref> | ||
* Provision for choosing more convenient closely related quantities that are more suited to the problem as units than universal fixed units are is also suggested, for example based on the [[reduced mass]] of an electron, albeit with careful definition thereof where used (for example, a unit {{tmath|1= H_M = \mu e^4 / \hbar^2}}, where {{tmath|1= \mu = m_\text{e} M / (m_\text{e} + M) }} for a specified mass {{tmath|1= M }}).<ref name="ShullHall1959"/> | * Provision for choosing more convenient closely related quantities that are more suited to the problem as units than universal fixed units are is also suggested, for example based on the [[reduced mass]] of an electron, albeit with careful definition thereof where used (for example, a unit {{tmath|1= H_M = \mu e^4 / \hbar^2}}, where {{tmath|1= \mu = m_\text{e} M / (m_\text{e} + M) }} for a specified mass {{tmath|1= M }}).<ref name="ShullHall1959"/> | ||
| Line 271: | Line 219: | ||
* Hartree suggested that expression in terms of atomic units allows us "to eliminate various universal constants from the equations", which amounts to informally suggesting a transformation of quantities and equations such that all quantities are replaced by corresponding dimensionless quantities.<ref name="Hartree1928"/>{{rp|91}} He does not elaborate beyond examples. | * Hartree suggested that expression in terms of atomic units allows us "to eliminate various universal constants from the equations", which amounts to informally suggesting a transformation of quantities and equations such that all quantities are replaced by corresponding dimensionless quantities.<ref name="Hartree1928"/>{{rp|91}} He does not elaborate beyond examples. | ||
* McWeeny suggests that "... their adoption permits all the fundamental equations to be written in a dimensionless form in which constants such as {{tmath|1= e }}, {{tmath|1= m }} and {{tmath|1= h }} are absent and need not be considered at all during mathematical derivations or the processes of numerical solution; the units in which any calculated quantity must appear are implicit in its physical dimensions and may be supplied at the end." He also states that "An alternative convention is to interpret the symbols as the numerical measures of the quantities they represent, referred to some specified system of units: in this case the equations contain only pure numbers or dimensionless variables; ... the appropriate units are supplied at the end of a calculation, by reference to the physical dimensions of the quantity calculated. [This] convention has much to recommend it and is tacitly accepted in atomic and molecular physics whenever atomic units are introduced, for example for convenience in computation." | * McWeeny suggests that "... their adoption permits all the fundamental equations to be written in a dimensionless form in which constants such as {{tmath|1= e }}, {{tmath|1= m }} and {{tmath|1= h }} are absent and need not be considered at all during mathematical derivations or the processes of numerical solution; the units in which any calculated quantity must appear are implicit in its physical dimensions and may be supplied at the end." He also states that "An alternative convention is to interpret the symbols as the numerical measures of the quantities they represent, referred to some specified system of units: in this case the equations contain only pure numbers or dimensionless variables; ... the appropriate units are supplied at the end of a calculation, by reference to the physical dimensions of the quantity calculated. [This] convention has much to recommend it and is tacitly accepted in atomic and molecular physics whenever atomic units are introduced, for example for convenience in computation." | ||
* An informal approach is often taken, in which "equations are expressed in terms of atomic units simply by setting {{tmath|1= \hbar = m_\text{e} = e = 4 \pi \epsilon_0 = 1}}".<ref name="Pilar2001"/><ref>{{cite book | | * An informal approach is often taken, in which "equations are expressed in terms of atomic units simply by setting {{tmath|1= \hbar = m_\text{e} = e = 4 \pi \epsilon_0 = 1}}".<ref name="Pilar2001"/><ref>{{cite book |last1=Bishop |first1=David M. |title=Group Theory and Chemistry |year=1993 |publisher=Dover Publications |isbn=978-0-486-67355-4 |page=217 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=l4zv4dukBT0C&pg=PA217 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Drake |first1=Gordon W. F. |title=Springer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics |year=2006 |edition=2nd |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-0-387-20802-2 |page=5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Jj-ad_2aNOAC&pg=PA5 }}</ref> This is a form of shorthand for the more formal process of transformation between quantities that is suggested by others, such as McWeeny. | ||
== Physical constants == | == Physical constants == | ||
| Line 287: | Line 235: | ||
| [[classical electron radius]] || <math>r_\text{e}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{e^2}{m_\text{e} c^2}</math> || <math>\alpha^2 \,a_0 \approx 0.0000532 \,a_0</math> | | [[classical electron radius]] || <math>r_\text{e}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{e^2}{m_\text{e} c^2}</math> || <math>\alpha^2 \,a_0 \approx 0.0000532 \,a_0</math> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[reduced Compton wavelength]]<br/> of the electron || | | [[reduced Compton wavelength]]<br/> of the electron || <math>\lambda\!\!\!\bar{}_\text{e} = \frac{\hbar}{m_\text{e} c}</math> || <math>\alpha \,a_0 \approx 0.007297 \,a_0</math> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[proton mass]] || <math>m_\text{p}</math> || <math>\approx 1836 \,m_\text{e}</math> | | [[proton mass]] || <math>m_\text{p}</math> || <math>\approx 1836 \,m_\text{e}</math> | ||
| Line 307: | Line 255: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<!--The following <span> is to suppress minor oddity from {{refn|follow=x}} without {{refn|name=x}}--><span dummy="<ref name="CODATAx"></ref>"></span>{{refn|follow="CODATAx"|{{cite web |title=CODATA Internationally recommended 2022 values of the Fundamental Physical Constants |work=NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html |publisher=[[National Institute of Standards and Technology|NIST]] |ref={{harvid|CODATA}} }}}} | <!--The following <span> is to suppress minor oddity from {{refn|follow=x}} without {{refn|name=x}}--><span dummy="<ref name="CODATAx"></ref>"></span>{{refn|follow="CODATAx"|{{cite web |title=CODATA Internationally recommended 2022 values of the Fundamental Physical Constants |work=NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty |url=http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html |publisher=[[National Institute of Standards and Technology|NIST]] |ref={{harvid|CODATA}} }}}} | ||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:12, 5 October 2025
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Distinguish". The atomic units are a system of natural units of measurement that is especially convenient for calculations in atomic physics and related scientific fields, such as computational chemistry and atomic spectroscopy. They were originally suggested and named by the physicist Douglas Hartree.[1] Atomic units are often abbreviated "a.u." or "au", not to be confused with similar abbreviations used for astronomical units, arbitrary units, and absorbance units in other contexts.
Motivation
Use of atomic units has been motivated on the grounds of accuracy and stability of reported values: since the values of the accepted values of the fundamental constants in atomic physics such as Template:Tmath, Template:Tmath, Template:Tmath and Template:Tmath were not sufficiently stable or accurate, the values of calculations and measurements performed in different years could not be directly compared, which resulted in confusion. This led to suggestions that the results of quantum-mechanical calculations should be reported using units based directly on such constants.[2]
In the context of atomic physics, using the atomic units system can be a convenient shortcut, eliminating symbols and numbers and reducing the order of magnitude of most numbers involved. For example, the Hamiltonian operator in the Schrödinger equation for the helium atom with standard quantities, such as when using SI units, is[3]Template:Rp
but adopting the convention associated with atomic units that transforms quantities into dimensionless equivalents, it becomes
In this convention, the constants Template:Tmath, Template:Tmath, Template:Tmath, and Template:Tmath all correspond to the value Template:Tmath (see Template:Slink below). The distances relevant to the physics expressed in SI units are naturally on the order of Template:Val, while expressed in atomic units distances are on the order of Template:Tmath (one Bohr radius, the atomic unit of length). An additional benefit of expressing quantities using atomic units is that their values calculated and reported in atomic units do not change when values of fundamental constants are revised, since the fundamental constants are built into the conversion factors between atomic units and SI.
History
Hartree defined units based on three physical constants:[1]Template:Rp
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
Both in order to eliminate various universal constants from the equations and also to avoid high powers of 10 in numerical work, it is convenient to express quantities in terms of units, which may be called 'atomic units', defined as follows:
- Unit of length, Template:Tmath, on the orbital mechanics the radius of the 1-quantum circular orbit of the H-atom with fixed nucleus.
- Unit of charge, Template:Tmath, the magnitude of the charge on the electron.
- Unit of mass, Template:Tmath, the mass of the electron.
Consistent with these are:
- Unit of action, Template:Tmath.
- Unit of energy, Template:Tmath [...]
- Unit of time, Template:Tmath.
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Here, the modern equivalent of Template:Tmath is the Rydberg constant Template:Tmath, of Template:Tmath is the electron mass Template:Tmath, of Template:Tmath is the Bohr radius Template:Tmath, and of Template:Tmath is the reduced Planck constant Template:Tmath. Hartree's expressions that contain Template:Tmath differ from the modern form due to a change in the definition of Template:Tmath, as explained below.
In 1957, Bethe and Salpeter's book Quantum mechanics of one-and two-electron atoms[4] built on Hartree's units, which they called atomic units abbreviated "a.u.". They chose to use Template:Tmath, their unit of action and angular momentum in place of Hartree's length as the base units. They noted that the unit of length in this system is the radius of the first Bohr orbit and their velocity is the electron velocity in Bohr's model of the first orbit.
In 1959, Shull and Hall[5] advocated atomic units based on Hartree's model but again chose to use Template:Tmath as the defining unit. They explicitly named the distance unit a "Bohr radius"; in addition, they wrote the unit of energy as Template:Tmath and called it a Hartree. These terms came to be used widely in quantum chemistry.[6]Template:Rp
In 1973 McWeeny extended the system of Shull and Hall by adding permittivity in the form of Template:Tmath as a defining or base unit.[7][8] Simultaneously he adopted the SI definition of Template:Tmath so that his expression for energy in atomic units is Template:Tmath, matching the expression in the 8th SI brochure.[9]
Definition
A set of base units in the atomic system as in one proposal are the electron rest mass, the magnitude of the electronic charge, the Planck constant, and the permittivity.[7]Template:Refn In the convention of the atomic units system that treats quantities as dimensionless, each of these takes the value 1; the corresponding values in the International System of Units[10]Template:Rp are given in the table.
| Symbol and Name | Quantity | Dimension[[#cnote_Template:Dagger|[Template:Dagger]]] | Atomic system value[[#cnote_Template:Double dagger|[Template:Double dagger]]] | SI value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template:Tmath, reduced Planck constant | action | ML2T−1 | 1 | Template:PhysconstTemplate:Px2[11] |
| Template:Tmath, elementary charge | charge | Q | 1 | Template:PhysconstTemplate:Px2[12] |
| Template:Tmath, electron rest mass | mass | M | 1 | Template:PhysconstTemplate:Px2[13] |
| Template:Tmath, permittivity | permittivity | Q2W−1L−1 | 1 | Template:PhysconstTemplate:Px2[14] |
Table notes
- ^ *: This choice of base units was proposed by McWeeny; the choice is essentially arbitrary.
- [[#ref_Template:Dagger|^]] Template:Dagger: The base dimensions for dimensional analysis may chosen as M, L, T, Q. For convenience, the derived dimensions A (action, ML2T−1) and W (energy, ML2T−2) are also used.[7]
- [[#ref_Template:Double dagger|^]] Template:Double dagger: This column use the convention that uses the dimensionless equivalents of quantities.
Units
Three of the defining constants (reduced Planck constant, elementary charge, and electron rest mass) are atomic units themselves – of action,[15] electric charge,[16] and mass,[17] respectively. Two named units are those of length (Bohr radius Template:Tmath) and energy (hartree Template:Tmath).
Conventions
Different conventions are adopted in the use of atomic units, which vary in presentation, formality and convenience.
Explicit units
- Many texts (e.g. Jerrard & McNiell,[8] Shull & Hall[5]) define the atomic units as quantities, without a transformation of the equations in use. As such, they do not suggest treating either quantities as dimensionless or changing the form of any equations. This is consistent with expressing quantities in terms of dimensional quantities, where the atomic unit is included explicitly as a symbol (e.g. Template:Tmath, Template:Tmath, or more ambiguously, Template:Tmath), and keeping equations unaltered with explicit constants.[38]
- Provision for choosing more convenient closely related quantities that are more suited to the problem as units than universal fixed units are is also suggested, for example based on the reduced mass of an electron, albeit with careful definition thereof where used (for example, a unit Template:Tmath, where Template:Tmath for a specified mass Template:Tmath).[5]
A convention that eliminates units
In atomic physics, it is common to simplify mathematical expressions by a transformation of all quantities:
- Hartree suggested that expression in terms of atomic units allows us "to eliminate various universal constants from the equations", which amounts to informally suggesting a transformation of quantities and equations such that all quantities are replaced by corresponding dimensionless quantities.[1]Template:Rp He does not elaborate beyond examples.
- McWeeny suggests that "... their adoption permits all the fundamental equations to be written in a dimensionless form in which constants such as Template:Tmath, Template:Tmath and Template:Tmath are absent and need not be considered at all during mathematical derivations or the processes of numerical solution; the units in which any calculated quantity must appear are implicit in its physical dimensions and may be supplied at the end." He also states that "An alternative convention is to interpret the symbols as the numerical measures of the quantities they represent, referred to some specified system of units: in this case the equations contain only pure numbers or dimensionless variables; ... the appropriate units are supplied at the end of a calculation, by reference to the physical dimensions of the quantity calculated. [This] convention has much to recommend it and is tacitly accepted in atomic and molecular physics whenever atomic units are introduced, for example for convenience in computation."
- An informal approach is often taken, in which "equations are expressed in terms of atomic units simply by setting Template:Tmath".[38][39][40] This is a form of shorthand for the more formal process of transformation between quantities that is suggested by others, such as McWeeny.
Physical constants
Dimensionless physical constants retain their values in any system of units. Of note is the fine-structure constant Template:Tmath, which appears in expressions as a consequence of the choice of units. For example, the numeric value of the speed of light, expressed in atomic units, is Template:Tmath[41]Template:Rp
| Name | Symbol/Definition | Value in atomic units |
|---|---|---|
| speed of light | ||
| classical electron radius | ||
| reduced Compton wavelength of the electron |
||
| proton mass |
Bohr model in atomic units
Atomic units are chosen to reflect the properties of electrons in atoms, which is particularly clear in the classical Bohr model of the hydrogen atom for the bound electron in its ground state:
- Mass = 1 a.u. of mass
- Charge = −1 a.u. of charge
- Orbital radius = 1 a.u. of length
- Orbital velocity = 1 a.u. of velocity[41]Template:Rp
- Orbital period = 2π a.u. of time
- Orbital angular velocity = 1 radian per a.u. of time
- Orbital momentum = 1 a.u. of momentum
- Ionization energy = Template:Sfrac a.u. of energy
- Electric field (due to nucleus) = 1 a.u. of electric field
- Lorentz force (due to nucleus) = 1 a.u. of force
References
Template:SI units Template:Systems of measurement
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:SIbrochure8th. Note that this information is omitted in the 9th edition.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedCODATAx