Lotus Software: Difference between revisions
imported>A. B. add Lotus Quickplace |
→Corporate culture: Added information about post merger corporate culture clashes. |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use American English|date=October 2025}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2025}} | |||
{{Short description|American technology company (1982–2018)}} | {{Short description|American technology company (1982–2018)}} | ||
{{Infobox company | {{Infobox company | ||
| name = Lotus Software | | name = Lotus Software | ||
| logo = Lotus Software wordmark.svg | | logo = Lotus Software wordmark.svg | ||
| type = Subsidiary | | type = [[Subsidiary]] | ||
| foundation = {{start date and age|1982}} (as Lotus Development Corporation) | | foundation = {{start date and age|1982}} (as Lotus Development Corporation) | ||
| defunct = {{end date and age|2018}} | | defunct = {{end date and age|2018}} | ||
| fate = Sold to [[HCL Technologies]] | | fate = Sold to [[HCL Technologies]] | ||
| location = [[Cambridge, Massachusetts | | location = [[Cambridge, Massachusetts]], U.S. | ||
| key_people = | | key_people = | ||
| industry = Computer software | | industry = Computer software | ||
| products = [[Lotus 1-2-3]]<br> [[Lotus Agenda]]<br>[[IBM Lotus Connections|Lotus Connections]]<br>[[IBM Lotus Domino|Lotus Domino]]<br>[[IBM Lotus Domino Web Access|Lotus Domino Web Access]]<br>[[IBM Lotus Expeditor|Lotus Expeditor]]<br>[[IBM Lotus Forms|Lotus Forms]] <br>[[IBM Lotus Freelance Graphics|Lotus Freelance Graphics]]<br>[[Lotus Improv]]<br>[[Lotus Magellan]]<br>[[Lotus Manuscript]]<br>[[Lotus Notes]]<br>Lotus Notes Traveler<br>Lotus Quickplace<br>Lotus Quickr<br>[[Lotus Sametime]] <br>[[Lotus SmartSuite]] <br>[[Lotus Symphony for DOS|Lotus Symphony]]<br>[[ | | products = [[Lotus 1-2-3]]<br> [[Lotus Agenda]]<br>[[IBM Lotus Connections|Lotus Connections]]<br>[[IBM Lotus Domino|Lotus Domino]]<br>[[IBM Lotus Domino Web Access|Lotus Domino Web Access]]<br>[[IBM Lotus Expeditor|Lotus Expeditor]]<br>[[IBM Lotus Forms|Lotus Forms]] <br>[[IBM Lotus Freelance Graphics|Lotus Freelance Graphics]]<br>[[Lotus Improv]]<br>[[Lotus Magellan]]<br>[[Lotus Manuscript]]<br>[[Lotus Notes]]<br>Lotus Notes Traveler<br>Lotus Quickplace<br>Lotus Quickr<br>[[Lotus Sametime]] <br>[[Lotus SmartSuite]] <br>[[Lotus Symphony for DOS|Lotus Symphony]]<br>[[Lotus Word Pro]]<br>LotusWorks<ref name="Kendall 333">{{cite journal |last=Kendall |first=Robert |date=15 September 1993 |title=LotusWorks 3.0 review |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gasgHhfj-RAC&q=lotusworks+database&pg=PA333 |journal=[[PC Magazine]] |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=333 |access-date=20 February 2018}}</ref><br>[[Lotus Foundations]]<br>[[IBM Lotus Web Content Management]] | ||
| revenue = | | revenue = | ||
| operating_income = | | operating_income = | ||
| net_income = | | net_income = | ||
| num_employees = | | num_employees = | ||
| parent = [[HCL Technologies|HCL]] | | parent = [[HCL Technologies|HCL]] | ||
| subsid = | | subsid = | ||
| homepage = [https://www.hcltechsw.com/notes Official website] | | homepage = [https://www.hcltechsw.com/notes Official website] | ||
| footnotes = | | footnotes = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 27: | Line 29: | ||
|author=Simon Sharwood |date=October 30, 2017}}</ref> was an American [[software]] company based in [[Massachusetts]]; it was sold to India's [[HCL Technologies]] in 2018. | |author=Simon Sharwood |date=October 30, 2017}}</ref> was an American [[software]] company based in [[Massachusetts]]; it was sold to India's [[HCL Technologies]] in 2018. | ||
Lotus is most commonly known for the [[Lotus 1-2-3]] [[spreadsheet]] application, the first feature-heavy, user-friendly, reliable, and [[WYSIWYG]]-enabled product to become widely available in the early days of the [[IBM PC]], when there was no [[graphical user interface]]. Much later, in conjunction with [[Ray Ozzie]]'s [[Iris Associates]], Lotus also released a [[groupware]] and [[email]] system, [[Lotus Notes]]. IBM purchased the company in 1995 for | Lotus is most commonly known for the [[Lotus 1-2-3]] [[spreadsheet]] application, the first feature-heavy, user-friendly, reliable, and [[WYSIWYG]]-enabled product to become widely available in the early days of the [[IBM PC]], when there was no [[graphical user interface]]. Much later, in conjunction with [[Ray Ozzie]]'s [[Iris Associates]], Lotus also released a [[groupware]] and [[email]] system, [[Lotus Notes]]. [[IBM]] purchased the company in 1995 for {{US$|3.5|link=yes}}{{nbsp}}billion (equivalent to ${{Inflation|US-GDP|3.5|1995|r=1}} billion in {{Inflation/year|US}}), primarily to acquire Lotus Notes and to establish a presence in the increasingly important [[client–server]] computing segment, which was rapidly making host-based products such as [[IBM OfficeVision]] obsolete.<ref>{{Citation| title=IBM takes fight to Microsoft with Lotus Symphony| first=John E.| last=Dunn| publisher=Techworld.com| date=18 September 2007| access-date=2007-12-10| url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/09/18/IBM-takes-fight-to-Microsoft-with-Lotus-Symphony_1.html}}</ref> | ||
On December 6, 2018, IBM announced the sale of Lotus Software/Domino to [[HCL Technologies|HCL]] for $1.8 billion.<ref name="techcrunch.com">{{Citation |title=IBM selling Lotus Notes/Domino business to HCL for $1.8B |date=7 December 2018 |url=https://techcrunch.com/2018/12/07/ibm-selling-lotus-notes-domino-business-to-hcl-for-1-8b |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071013203613/https://www.infoworld.com/article/07/09/18/IBM-takes-fight-to-Microsoft-with-Lotus-Symphony_1.html |archive-date=2007-10-13}}</ref> | On December 6, 2018, IBM announced the sale of Lotus Software/Domino to [[HCL Technologies|HCL]] for {{US$|1.8|link=no}}{{nbsp}}billion (equivalent to ${{Inflation|US-GDP|1.8|2018|r=1}} billion in {{Inflation/year|US}}).<ref name="techcrunch.com">{{Citation |title=IBM selling Lotus Notes/Domino business to HCL for $1.8B |date=7 December 2018 |url=https://techcrunch.com/2018/12/07/ibm-selling-lotus-notes-domino-business-to-hcl-for-1-8b |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071013203613/https://www.infoworld.com/article/07/09/18/IBM-takes-fight-to-Microsoft-with-Lotus-Symphony_1.html |archive-date=2007-10-13}}</ref> | ||
== History == | == History == | ||
| Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
|url=https://archive.org/details/ondemandlearning00hart |url-access=registration | |url=https://archive.org/details/ondemandlearning00hart |url-access=registration | ||
|isbn=978-0874255393 | |isbn=978-0874255393 | ||
|author=Arin E. Hartley |date=2000|publisher=Human Resource Development }}</ref> By the end of that year the company offered Executive Briefing System, [[presentation software]] for the [[Apple II]] | |author=Arin E. Hartley |date=2000|publisher=Human Resource Development }}</ref> By the end of that year the company offered Executive Briefing System, [[presentation software]] for the [[Apple II]],<ref name="callamaras198211">{{Cite magazine |last=Callamaras |first=Pete |date=November 1982 |title=Executive Briefing System |url=https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1982-11/page/n165/mode/1up?view=theater |access-date=2024-12-30 |magazine=BYTE |pages=164–169}}</ref> written by Kapor and Todd Agulnick.<ref name="scannell19871102sidebar">{{Cite magazine |last=Scannell |first=Ed |date=1987-11-02 |title=Lotus's first fruit not 1-2-3 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mUSIMiurpfYC&pg=PP92 |access-date=2025-06-08 |magazine=Computerworld |page=SR26 |volume=XXI |issue=44}}</ref> Kapor founded Lotus after leaving his post as head of development at [[VisiCorp]], the distributors of the [[VisiCalc]] [[spreadsheet]], and selling all his rights to VisiPlot and VisiTrend to VisiCorp. | ||
Shortly after Kapor left VisiCorp, he and Sachs produced an integrated spreadsheet and graphics program. Even though IBM and VisiCorp had a collaboration agreement whereby VisiCalc was being shipped simultaneously with the PC, Lotus had a superior product. Lotus released [[Lotus 1-2-3]] on January 26, 1983.<ref>{{cite web |website=ZDnet.com | Shortly after Kapor left VisiCorp, he and Sachs produced an integrated spreadsheet and graphics program. Even though IBM and VisiCorp had a collaboration agreement whereby VisiCalc was being shipped simultaneously with the PC, Lotus had a superior product. Lotus released [[Lotus 1-2-3]] on January 26, 1983.<ref>{{cite web |website=ZDnet.com | ||
| Line 51: | Line 53: | ||
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ES8EAAAAMBAJ}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |magazine=Infoworld | |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ES8EAAAAMBAJ}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |magazine=Infoworld | ||
|title=VisiCalc discontinued | |title=VisiCalc discontinued | ||
|date=June 2, 1986 |page=8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SC8EAAAAMBAJ}}</ref> By that year [[Forrester Research]] considered Lotus, [[Ashton-Tate]], Microsoft, and [[Borland]] the "Big Four" of personal computer software.<ref name="forbes19851021">{{Cite magazine |last=Forbes |first=Jim |date=1985-10-21 |title=Corporate Mergers Offer Clout |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jy8EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA24 | |date=June 2, 1986 |page=8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SC8EAAAAMBAJ}}</ref> | ||
By that year [[Forrester Research]] considered Lotus, [[Ashton-Tate]], Microsoft, and [[Borland]] the "Big Four" of personal computer software.<ref name="forbes19851021">{{Cite magazine |last=Forbes |first=Jim |date=1985-10-21 |title=Corporate Mergers Offer Clout |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jy8EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA24 |access-date=2025-03-16 |magazine=InfoWorld |page=24}}</ref> Softletter estimated that in 1986 the "Big Three" of Lotus (9%, more than $275 million), Microsoft (8%), and Ashton-Tate (6%) together had 23% of total revenue of the top 100 microcomputer software companies. Of the 15 million Americans who used a personal computer in their job, a quarter used 1-2-3.<ref name="computerworld19871102">{{Cite magazine |date=1987-11-02 |title=Lining up behind three visionaries |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mUSIMiurpfYC&pg=PP69 |access-date=2025-06-08 |magazine=Computerworld |page=SR3 |volume=XXI |issue=44}}</ref> Computer Intelligence estimated in 1987 that Lotus had 85% of the [[Fortune 1000]] PC financial analysis, with Microsoft second at 6%. It also estimated a 20% share of the presentation software market, second to Ashton-Tate and ahead of Microsoft's 6%.{{r|computerworld19871102interview}} A 1987 ''[[Computerworld]]'' survey gave Lotus a B grade for technology and product support, B+ for management, C+ for customer relations, and B− for marketing. Customers said that the company was slow to upgrade products, documentation and seminars were good but telephone support was poor, management had succeeded in defeating many competitors, customer relations had improved but [[copy protection]] was still the top complaint, and Jazz's failure showed that Lotus's ability to market products other than 1-2-3 and Symphony was unknown.<ref name="computerworld19871102reportcard">{{Cite magazine |date=1987-11-02 |title=Rating the Big Three |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mUSIMiurpfYC&pg=PP70 |access-date=2025-06-08 |magazine=Computerworld |page=SR4 |volume=XXI |issue=44}}</ref> | |||
In the late 1980s, Lotus developed [[Lotus Magellan]], a file management and indexing utility.<ref>{{cite magazine | In the late 1980s, Lotus developed [[Lotus Magellan]], a file management and indexing utility.<ref>{{cite magazine | ||
| Line 65: | Line 69: | ||
===Diversification and acquisition by IBM=== | ===Diversification and acquisition by IBM=== | ||
Lotus began its diversification from the desktop software business with its 1984 strategic founding investment in Ray Ozzie's Iris Associates, the creator of its [[Lotus Notes]] groupware platform. As a result of this early speculative move, Lotus gained significant experience in network-based communications years before other competitors in the PC world had even started thinking about networked computing or the [[Internet]]. Lotus initially brought Lotus Notes to market in 1989 and later reinforced its market presence by acquiring [[cc:Mail]] in 1991.<ref>{{Cite news|date=12 Feb 1991|title=Lotus to add electronic mail unit|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/12/business/company-news-lotus-to-add-electronic-mail-unit.html|access-date=7 July 2021}}</ref> | |||
During the 1980s Lotus remained dependent on retail customers<ref name="iw19891013">{{Cite magazine |last1=Watt |first1=Peggy |last2=Scannell |first2=Ed |date=1989-10-13 |title=Lotus to Unveil Notes Groupware Tool |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nzAEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA13 |access-date=2025-06-14 |magazine=InfoWorld |page=13 |volume=11 |issue=44}}</ref> of 1-2-3 and Symphony. ''[[Computerworld]]'' noted in 1987 that "the company has announced or acquired nearly a dozen products ... over the last two years, but none accounts for more than a few percentage points of the company's yearly revenue". The magazine added that, according to Lotus, "The spreadsheet is a hook ... into other major application markets such as word processing, data base management, graphics and communications".<ref name="scannell19871102">{{Cite magazine |last=Scannell |first=Ed |date=1987-11-02 |title=Lotus's hopes bound to spreadsheet juggernaut |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mUSIMiurpfYC&pg=PP89 |access-date=2025-06-08 |magazine=Computerworld |page=SR23 |volume=XXI |issue=44}}</ref> That year Manzi said that Lotus would release software for IBM's [[OS/2]] operating system before [[Microsoft Windows]], and his company announced 1-2-3 for [[IBM mainframe]].<ref name="computerworld19871102interview">{{Cite interview |last=Gates |first=Bill |interviewer=Paul Gillin |title=The great software debate |last2=Manzi |first2=Jim |last3=Esber |first3=Ed |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mUSIMiurpfYC&pg=PP73 |access-date=2025-06-08 |work=Computerworld |issue=44 |date=1987-11-02 |page=SR7 |volume=XXI}}</ref> | |||
In the 1990s, to compete with Microsoft's Windows applications, Lotus had to buy in products such as Ami Pro (word processor),<ref>"Ami Pro, also called just Ami initially, was a word processor sold by Samna and later Lotus Software, where it became Lotus Word Pro." {{cite web | In the 1990s, to compete with Microsoft's Windows applications, Lotus had to buy in products such as Ami Pro (word processor),<ref>"Ami Pro, also called just Ami initially, was a word processor sold by Samna and later Lotus Software, where it became Lotus Word Pro." {{cite web | ||
|title=AmiPro 3.x |url=https://winworldpc.com/product/amipro/3x |website=WinWorldPC.com}}</ref><ref>"There is much to recommend Ami Pro 2.0, the latest version of Lotus Corp.'s high-powered word processing program for Windows. {{cite news |newspaper=LA Times | |title=AmiPro 3.x |url=https://winworldpc.com/product/amipro/3x |website=WinWorldPC.com}}</ref><ref>"There is much to recommend Ami Pro 2.0, the latest version of Lotus Corp.'s high-powered word processing program for Windows. {{cite news |newspaper=LA Times | ||
|title=Lotus Ami Pro Program Is Hard to Beat |date=October 24, 1991 | |title=Lotus Ami Pro Program Is Hard to Beat |date=October 24, 1991 | ||
|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-10-24-fi-459-story.html}}</ref> Approach (database), and Threadz, which became [[Lotus Organizer]]. Several applications (1-2-3, Freelance Graphics, Ami Pro, Approach, and [[Lotus Organizer]]) were bundled together under the name [[Lotus SmartSuite]]. Although SmartSuite was bundled cheaply with many PCs and may initially have been more popular than [[Microsoft Office]], Lotus quickly lost its dominance in the desktop applications market with the transition from 16- to [[32-bit]] applications running on [[Windows 95]]. In large part due to its focusing much of its development resources on a suite of applications for | |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-10-24-fi-459-story.html}}</ref> Approach (database), and Threadz, which became [[Lotus Organizer]]. Several applications (1-2-3, Freelance Graphics, Ami Pro, Approach, and [[Lotus Organizer]]) were bundled together under the name [[Lotus SmartSuite]]. Although SmartSuite was bundled cheaply with many PCs and may initially have been more popular than [[Microsoft Office]], Lotus quickly lost its dominance in the desktop applications market with the transition from 16- to [[32-bit]] applications running on [[Windows 95]]. In large part due to its focusing much of its development resources on a suite of applications for the commercially unsuccessful OS/2, Lotus was late in delivering its suite of 32-bit products and failed to capitalize on the transition to the new version of Windows. The last significant new release was the SmartSuite Millennium Edition, released in 1999.<ref>{{cite web | ||
|website=CNN.com | |website=CNN.com | ||
|date=December 9, 1999 | |date=December 9, 1999 | ||
| Line 85: | Line 93: | ||
|url=https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21639384 |date=October 26, 2014}}</ref> | |url=https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21639384 |date=October 26, 2014}}</ref> | ||
Lotus | In 1994, Lotus acquired Iris Associates. By then large companies bought Notes for their employees,<ref name="noteshistory">{{Cite web |date=2003-09-29 |title=The History of Notes and Domino |url=http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/lotus/library/ls-NDHistory/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050112024610/http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/lotus/library/ls-NDHistory/ |archive-date=2005-01-12 |access-date=October 24, 2011 |website=IBM developerWorks |publisher=IBM}}</ref> Lotus's dominant groupware position attracted IBM, which needed to make a strategic move away from host-based messaging products and to establish a stronger presence in client-server computing, but it also soon attracted competition from [[Microsoft Exchange Server]].<ref name=forbes19980810>{{cite magazine | ||
|magazine=[[Forbes]] | |||
In the second quarter of 1995, IBM launched a hostile bid | |title=The decline and fall of Lotus | ||
|url=https://www.forbes.com/forbes/1998/0810/6203106a.html | |||
|date=1998-08-10}}</ref> In the second quarter of 1995, IBM launched a hostile bid<ref name=AcquiredGone/> with a $60-per-share tender offer when Lotus' stock was only trading at $32. Jim Manzi looked for potential white knights and forced IBM to increase its bid to $64.50 per share for a $3.5 billion buyout of Lotus in July 1995.<ref>{{Citation| first=Barbara| last=Darrow| title=Jim Manzi| date=12 December 2003| publisher=CRN.com | |||
|url=http://www.crn.com/sections/special/hof/hof03.jhtml;?articleId=18825870&_requestid=226714}}{{dead link|date=January 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> On October 11, 1995, Manzi announced his resignation from what had become the Lotus Development division of IBM; he left with stock worth $78 million. | |url=http://www.crn.com/sections/special/hof/hof03.jhtml;?articleId=18825870&_requestid=226714}}{{dead link|date=January 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> On October 11, 1995, Manzi announced his resignation from what had become the Lotus Development division of IBM; he left with stock worth $78 million. | ||
===Assimilation of name, website, and branding=== | ===Assimilation of name, website, and branding=== | ||
While IBM allowed Lotus to develop, market, and sell its products under its own brand name, a restructuring in January 2001<ref>{{Cite web|title=Lotus restructuring may lead to tighter IBM control|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/lotus-restructuring-may-lead-to-tighter-ibm-control/|access-date=2020-07-14|website=CNET|language=en}}</ref> brought it more in line with its parent company, IBM. | While IBM allowed Lotus to develop, market, and sell its products under its own brand name, a restructuring in January 2001<ref>{{Cite web|title=Lotus restructuring may lead to tighter IBM control|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/lotus-restructuring-may-lead-to-tighter-ibm-control/|access-date=2020-07-14|website=CNET|language=en}}</ref> brought it more in line with its parent company, IBM. IBM moved vital marketing and management functions from Cambridge, Massachusetts, to IBM's New York office. | ||
Gradually, the Lotus.com website changed its "About us" section to eliminate references to "Lotus Development Corporation". The Lotus.com web page in 2001 clearly showed the company as "Lotus Development Corporation" with "a word from its CEO" by 2002, the "About us" section was removed from its site menu, and the Lotus logo was replaced with the IBM logo. By 2003 an "About Lotus" link returned to the Lotus.com page on its sidebar, but this time identifying the company as "Lotus software from IBM" and showing in its contact information "Lotus Software, IBM Software Group". By 2008 the Lotus.com domain name stopped showing a standalone site, instead redirecting to www.ibm.com/software/lotus, and in 2012 the site discontinued all reference to Lotus Software in favor of IBM Collaboration Solutions. | Gradually, the Lotus.com website changed its "About us" section to eliminate references to "Lotus Development Corporation". The Lotus.com web page in 2001 clearly showed the company as "Lotus Development Corporation" with "a word from its CEO" by 2002, the "About us" section was removed from its site menu, and the Lotus logo was replaced with the IBM logo. By 2003 an "About Lotus" link returned to the Lotus.com page on its sidebar, but this time identifying the company as "Lotus software from IBM" and showing in its contact information "Lotus Software, IBM Software Group". By 2008 the Lotus.com domain name stopped showing a standalone site, instead redirecting to www.ibm.com/software/lotus, and in 2012 the site discontinued all reference to Lotus Software in favor of IBM Collaboration Solutions. | ||
| Line 103: | Line 113: | ||
Lotus's first employee was Janet Axelrod, who created the Human Resources organization and was the central figure in creating the Lotus culture. As she continued to build her organization and play a central role with senior management, she eventually hired [[Freada Klein]] as the first director of employee relations.{{citation needed|date=April 2022}} | Lotus's first employee was Janet Axelrod, who created the Human Resources organization and was the central figure in creating the Lotus culture. As she continued to build her organization and play a central role with senior management, she eventually hired [[Freada Klein]] as the first director of employee relations.{{citation needed|date=April 2022}} | ||
In 1995 Lotus had over 4,000 employees worldwide; IBM's acquisition of Lotus was greeted with apprehension by many Lotus employees, who feared that the corporate culture of "Big Blue" would smother their creativity. To the surprise of many employees and journalists, IBM initially adopted a very hands-off, laissez-faire attitude toward its new acquisition.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.strategy-business.com/article/18930?gko=264ad|title=Post-Merger Integration: How I.B.M. and Lotus Work Together|last=Rifkin|first=Glenn|website=strategy+business|access-date=2020-03-02}}</ref> | In 1995 Lotus had over 4,000 employees worldwide; IBM's acquisition of Lotus was greeted with apprehension by many Lotus employees, who feared that the corporate culture of "Big Blue" would smother their creativity. To the surprise of many employees and journalists, IBM initially adopted a very hands-off, laissez-faire attitude toward its new acquisition. | ||
What most did not know what that Lotus president, Jim Manzi, made IBM president Lou Gerstner sign a two year moratorium that said he would make no sweeping changes to Lotus operations for a minimum of two years. | |||
It gave a false sense of acceptance of the modern corporate culture and the minute the moratorium was up, the big, blue, bureaucratic culture quickly overwhelmed it.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.strategy-business.com/article/18930?gko=264ad|title=Post-Merger Integration: How I.B.M. and Lotus Work Together|last=Rifkin|first=Glenn|website=strategy+business|access-date=2020-03-02}}</ref> | |||
However, by 2000 the assimilation of Lotus was well underway. While the mass employee defections that IBM feared did not materialize, many long-time Lotus employees did complain about the transition to IBM's culture—IBM's [[employee benefits]] programs, in particular, were singled out as inferior to Lotus's very progressive programs.{{Citation needed|date=April 2011}} | However, by 2000 the assimilation of Lotus was well underway. While the mass employee defections that IBM feared did not materialize, many long-time Lotus employees did complain about the transition to IBM's culture—IBM's [[employee benefits]] programs, in particular, were singled out as inferior to Lotus's very progressive programs.{{Citation needed|date=April 2011}} | ||
| Line 170: | Line 184: | ||
[[Category:Defunct software companies of the United States]] | [[Category:Defunct software companies of the United States]] | ||
[[Category:Former IBM subsidiaries]] | [[Category:Former IBM subsidiaries]] | ||
[[Category:Defunct computer companies based in Massachusetts]] | |||
Latest revision as of 06:35, 20 November 2025
Template:Use American English Template:Use mdy dates Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherTemplate:Main otherScript error: No such module "Check for clobbered parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Lotus Software (called Lotus Development Corporation before its acquisition by IBM)[1] was an American software company based in Massachusetts; it was sold to India's HCL Technologies in 2018.
Lotus is most commonly known for the Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet application, the first feature-heavy, user-friendly, reliable, and WYSIWYG-enabled product to become widely available in the early days of the IBM PC, when there was no graphical user interface. Much later, in conjunction with Ray Ozzie's Iris Associates, Lotus also released a groupware and email system, Lotus Notes. IBM purchased the company in 1995 for Template:US$Template:Nbspbillion (equivalent to $Template:Inflation billion in Template:Inflation/year), primarily to acquire Lotus Notes and to establish a presence in the increasingly important client–server computing segment, which was rapidly making host-based products such as IBM OfficeVision obsolete.[2]
On December 6, 2018, IBM announced the sale of Lotus Software/Domino to HCL for Template:US$Template:Nbspbillion (equivalent to $Template:Inflation billion in Template:Inflation/year).[3]
History
Template:Plain image with caption Lotus was founded in 1982 by partners Mitch Kapor and Jonathan Sachs with backing from Ben Rosen.[4] By the end of that year the company offered Executive Briefing System, presentation software for the Apple II,[5] written by Kapor and Todd Agulnick.[6] Kapor founded Lotus after leaving his post as head of development at VisiCorp, the distributors of the VisiCalc spreadsheet, and selling all his rights to VisiPlot and VisiTrend to VisiCorp.
Shortly after Kapor left VisiCorp, he and Sachs produced an integrated spreadsheet and graphics program. Even though IBM and VisiCorp had a collaboration agreement whereby VisiCalc was being shipped simultaneously with the PC, Lotus had a superior product. Lotus released Lotus 1-2-3 on January 26, 1983.[7] The name referred to the three ways the product could be used, as a spreadsheet, graphing tool, and database manager. The last two functions were less often used in practice, but 1-2-3 was the most powerful spreadsheet program available.
Lotus was almost immediately successful, becoming the world's third largest microcomputer software company in 1983 with $53 million in sales in its first year,[8] compared to its business plan forecast of $1 million in sales. In 1982, Jim Manzi — a graduate of Colgate University and The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy — came to Lotus as a management consultant with McKinsey & Company and became an employee four months later. In October 1984, he was named president, and in April 1986, he was appointed CEO, succeeding Kapor. In July of that same year, he also became chairman of the board. Manzi remained at the head of Lotus until 1995.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Dominance
As the popularity of the personal computer grew, Lotus quickly came to dominate the spreadsheet market. Lotus introduced other office products such as Ray Ozzie's Symphony in 1984 and the Jazz office suite for the Apple Macintosh computer in 1985. Jazz did very poorly in the market (in Guy Kawasaki's book The Macintosh Way, Lotus Jazz was described as being so bad, "even the people who pirated it returned it").[9] Also in 1985, Lotus bought Software Arts and discontinued its VisiCalc program.[10][11]
By that year Forrester Research considered Lotus, Ashton-Tate, Microsoft, and Borland the "Big Four" of personal computer software.[12] Softletter estimated that in 1986 the "Big Three" of Lotus (9%, more than $275 million), Microsoft (8%), and Ashton-Tate (6%) together had 23% of total revenue of the top 100 microcomputer software companies. Of the 15 million Americans who used a personal computer in their job, a quarter used 1-2-3.[13] Computer Intelligence estimated in 1987 that Lotus had 85% of the Fortune 1000 PC financial analysis, with Microsoft second at 6%. It also estimated a 20% share of the presentation software market, second to Ashton-Tate and ahead of Microsoft's 6%.Template:R A 1987 Computerworld survey gave Lotus a B grade for technology and product support, B+ for management, C+ for customer relations, and B− for marketing. Customers said that the company was slow to upgrade products, documentation and seminars were good but telephone support was poor, management had succeeded in defeating many competitors, customer relations had improved but copy protection was still the top complaint, and Jazz's failure showed that Lotus's ability to market products other than 1-2-3 and Symphony was unknown.[14]
In the late 1980s, Lotus developed Lotus Magellan, a file management and indexing utility.[15] In this period, Manuscript, a word processor, Lotus Agenda, an innovative personal information manager (PIM) which flopped, and Improv, a ground-breaking modeling package (and spreadsheet) for the NeXT platform, were released. Improv also flopped, and none of these products significantly impacted the market.
"Look and feel" lawsuits
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Lotus was involved in several lawsuits, of which the most significant was the "look and feel" cases which started in 1987. Lotus sued Paperback Software and Mosaic for copyright infringement, false and misleading advertising, and unfair competition over their low-cost clones of 1-2-3, VP Planner and Twin, and sued Borland over its Quattro spreadsheet. This led Richard Stallman, founder of the Free Software Foundation, to found the League for Programming Freedom (LPF) and hold protests outside Lotus Development offices.[16] Paperback and Mosaic lost and went out of business; Borland won and survived. The LPF filed an amicus curiae brief in the Borland case.[17]
Diversification and acquisition by IBM
Lotus began its diversification from the desktop software business with its 1984 strategic founding investment in Ray Ozzie's Iris Associates, the creator of its Lotus Notes groupware platform. As a result of this early speculative move, Lotus gained significant experience in network-based communications years before other competitors in the PC world had even started thinking about networked computing or the Internet. Lotus initially brought Lotus Notes to market in 1989 and later reinforced its market presence by acquiring cc:Mail in 1991.[18]
During the 1980s Lotus remained dependent on retail customers[19] of 1-2-3 and Symphony. Computerworld noted in 1987 that "the company has announced or acquired nearly a dozen products ... over the last two years, but none accounts for more than a few percentage points of the company's yearly revenue". The magazine added that, according to Lotus, "The spreadsheet is a hook ... into other major application markets such as word processing, data base management, graphics and communications".[20] That year Manzi said that Lotus would release software for IBM's OS/2 operating system before Microsoft Windows, and his company announced 1-2-3 for IBM mainframe.[21]
In the 1990s, to compete with Microsoft's Windows applications, Lotus had to buy in products such as Ami Pro (word processor),[22][23] Approach (database), and Threadz, which became Lotus Organizer. Several applications (1-2-3, Freelance Graphics, Ami Pro, Approach, and Lotus Organizer) were bundled together under the name Lotus SmartSuite. Although SmartSuite was bundled cheaply with many PCs and may initially have been more popular than Microsoft Office, Lotus quickly lost its dominance in the desktop applications market with the transition from 16- to 32-bit applications running on Windows 95. In large part due to its focusing much of its development resources on a suite of applications for the commercially unsuccessful OS/2, Lotus was late in delivering its suite of 32-bit products and failed to capitalize on the transition to the new version of Windows. The last significant new release was the SmartSuite Millennium Edition, released in 1999.[24][25]
All new development of the suite was ended in 2000, with ongoing maintenance being moved overseas. The last update release was in 2014.[26]
In 1994, Lotus acquired Iris Associates. By then large companies bought Notes for their employees,[27] Lotus's dominant groupware position attracted IBM, which needed to make a strategic move away from host-based messaging products and to establish a stronger presence in client-server computing, but it also soon attracted competition from Microsoft Exchange Server.[28] In the second quarter of 1995, IBM launched a hostile bid[1] with a $60-per-share tender offer when Lotus' stock was only trading at $32. Jim Manzi looked for potential white knights and forced IBM to increase its bid to $64.50 per share for a $3.5 billion buyout of Lotus in July 1995.[29] On October 11, 1995, Manzi announced his resignation from what had become the Lotus Development division of IBM; he left with stock worth $78 million.
Assimilation of name, website, and branding
While IBM allowed Lotus to develop, market, and sell its products under its own brand name, a restructuring in January 2001[30] brought it more in line with its parent company, IBM. IBM moved vital marketing and management functions from Cambridge, Massachusetts, to IBM's New York office.
Gradually, the Lotus.com website changed its "About us" section to eliminate references to "Lotus Development Corporation". The Lotus.com web page in 2001 clearly showed the company as "Lotus Development Corporation" with "a word from its CEO" by 2002, the "About us" section was removed from its site menu, and the Lotus logo was replaced with the IBM logo. By 2003 an "About Lotus" link returned to the Lotus.com page on its sidebar, but this time identifying the company as "Lotus software from IBM" and showing in its contact information "Lotus Software, IBM Software Group". By 2008 the Lotus.com domain name stopped showing a standalone site, instead redirecting to www.ibm.com/software/lotus, and in 2012 the site discontinued all reference to Lotus Software in favor of IBM Collaboration Solutions.
IBM discontinued development of IBM Lotus Symphony in 2012 with the final release of version 3.0.1, moving future development effort to Apache OpenOffice, and donating the source code to the Apache Software Foundation.[31] Later that year, IBM announced it was discontinuing the Lotus brand[32] and on March 13, 2013, IBM announced the availability of IBM Notes and Domino 9.0 Social Edition,[33] replacing prior versions of IBM Lotus Notes and IBM Lotus Domino and marking the end of Lotus as an active brand.
On December 6, 2018, IBM announced the selling of Lotus Software/Domino to HCL for $1.8 billion.[3]
Corporate culture
Lotus's first employee was Janet Axelrod, who created the Human Resources organization and was the central figure in creating the Lotus culture. As she continued to build her organization and play a central role with senior management, she eventually hired Freada Klein as the first director of employee relations.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
In 1995 Lotus had over 4,000 employees worldwide; IBM's acquisition of Lotus was greeted with apprehension by many Lotus employees, who feared that the corporate culture of "Big Blue" would smother their creativity. To the surprise of many employees and journalists, IBM initially adopted a very hands-off, laissez-faire attitude toward its new acquisition.
What most did not know what that Lotus president, Jim Manzi, made IBM president Lou Gerstner sign a two year moratorium that said he would make no sweeping changes to Lotus operations for a minimum of two years.
It gave a false sense of acceptance of the modern corporate culture and the minute the moratorium was up, the big, blue, bureaucratic culture quickly overwhelmed it.[34]
However, by 2000 the assimilation of Lotus was well underway. While the mass employee defections that IBM feared did not materialize, many long-time Lotus employees did complain about the transition to IBM's culture—IBM's employee benefits programs, in particular, were singled out as inferior to Lotus's very progressive programs.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Lotus's headquarters in Cambridge were initially divided into two buildings, the Lotus Development Building (LDB) on the banks of the Charles River and the Rogers Street building, adjacent to the CambridgeSide Galleria. However, in 2001, President and General Manager Al Zollar decided to keep the lease of LDB. The subsequent migration of employees across the street (and into home offices) generally coincided with the final departure of employees from the company. Later, IBM's offices at 1 Rogers St supported mobile employees, the Watson Research Center on User interface, and IBM DataPower.
Products
IBM sponsored the "Lotus Greenhouse", a community web site featuring software from IBM and its business partners.
Discontinued products
- Lotus Connections
- Lotus Domino
- Lotus Domino Web Access
- Lotus Expeditor
- Lotus Forms
- Lotus Foundations
- LotusLive
- Lotus Mashups
- Lotus Notes
- Lotus Notes Traveler
- IBM Lotus Quickr, which replaces Lotus QuickPlace
- Lotus Sametime
- IBM Lotus Web Content Management
- Lotus SmartSuite including Lotus 1-2-3, Lotus Word Pro, Lotus Freelance Graphics, Lotus Approach, Lotus Organizer (discontinued on 30-Sep-2014)[35]
- Lotus Domino Document Manager (discontinued on 30-Sep-2012)
- Lotus Agenda
- Lotus cc:Mail
- Lotus HAL
- Lotus Impress
- Lotus Improv
- Lotus Jazz
- Lotus Magellan
- Lotus Manuscript
- Lotus Marketplace
- Lotus Symphony (DOS version)
- IBM Lotus Symphony[36]
- LotusWorks[37] (formerly AlphaWorks, bought from Alpha Software in May 1990)[38]
References
External links
Template:Finance links historical
- Lotus.com Official website (Archive)
- Oral history interview with Jonathan Sachs discusses the development of Lotus 1-2-3, Charles Babbage Institute, University of Minnesota
Template:Lotus Software Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:Authority control
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ "Ami Pro, also called just Ami initially, was a word processor sold by Samna and later Lotus Software, where it became Lotus Word Pro." Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ "There is much to recommend Ami Pro 2.0, the latest version of Lotus Corp.'s high-powered word processing program for Windows. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead link
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Software withdrawal and discontinuance of support: Lotus SmartSuite, Lotus Organizer and Lotus 123
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Pages with script errors
- Pages with broken file links
- Software companies established in 1982
- American companies established in 1982
- Lotus Software software
- IBM acquisitions
- Companies based in Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Software companies based in Massachusetts
- 1982 establishments in Massachusetts
- 1995 mergers and acquisitions
- Defunct software companies of the United States
- Former IBM subsidiaries
- Defunct computer companies based in Massachusetts