Light rail: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>KatVanHuis
Reorganisation of images.
imported>Timrollpickering
m Examples: remove needless piping, replaced: ChinaChina
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Redirect|LRT}}
{{Redirect|LRT}}
{{Distinguish|Interurban|Light railway|Light metro}}
{{Distinguish|Interurban|Light railway|Light metro}}
{{Cleanup merge|Semi-metro}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2023}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2023}}
[[File:Gold Line train on East 1st Street, July 2017.JPG|thumb|upright=1.2|In [[Los Angeles]], [[Transportation in Los Angeles|expansion of mass transit]] has been driven in large part by [[Los Angeles Metro Rail|light rail]].]]
{{multiple image
| total_width      = 320px
| perrow            = 1/2/2
| image1            = Gold Line train on East 1st Street, July 2017.JPG
| image2            = Granada 12 23 39 290000.jpeg
| image3            = 2014-05-30 MTR LIGHT RAIL (17) (14119561798).jpg
| image4            = Tvärbanan, Tranebergstunneln, 2016b.jpg
| image5            = Metro of Tunis Line 3.jpg


'''Light rail''' (or '''light rail transit''', abbreviated to '''LRT''') is a form of passenger [[urban rail transit]] that uses [[rolling stock]] derived from [[tram]] technology<ref name="Phil.-1975">{{cite journal|last=Vuchic|first=V.R.|title=Place of light rail transit in the family of transit modes.|journal= TRB Special Report|issue=161|publisher=[[Transportation Research Board]] |year=1975|url=https://swov.nl/en/publicatie/place-light-rail-transit-family-transit-modes-paper-presented-national-conference|access-date=1 July 2024}} National Conference of the Transportation Research Board</ref> while also having some features from heavy [[rapid transit]].
| footer            = From top, left to right: the [[E Line (Los Angeles Metro)|Gold Line]] in Los Angeles, where mass transit expansion has been driven in large part by light rail; the [[Granada Metro]], with underground light rail stations in the city centre; [[MTR Light Rail]] in Hong Kong, built to serve new towns; Stockholm’s [[Tvärbanan]], a circumferential light rail line built from former freight alignments, new tunnels, bridges, and street sections; and the [[Tunis Metro]], Africa’s first modern light rail, operating since 1985.}}


The term was coined in 1972 in the United States as an English equivalent for the German word ''[[Stadtbahn]]'', meaning "city railway".<ref name="Thompson">{{cite journal|last=Thompson|first=Gregory L.|title=Defining an Alternative Future: The Birth of the Light Rail Movement in North America|journal=Transportation Research Circular|issue=E-C058|publisher=[[Transportation Research Board]] |year=2003|url=http://pubsindex.trb.org/view.aspx?id=700149|access-date=26 December 2009}} From: 9th National Light Rail Transit Conference</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.sbp.de/en/presse/neue-eisenbahnbruecke-ueber-den-neckar/ |title=New railway bridge over the Neckar river |access-date=2024-06-24}}</ref> Different definitions exist in some countries, but in the United States, light rail operates primarily along exclusive [[Right_of_way#Rail_right_of_way|rights-of-way]] and uses either individual tramcars or [[multiple unit]]s coupled together, with a lower capacity and speed than a long [[heavy rail]] passenger train or rapid transit system.<ref name="APTA-def">{{cite web | url = http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Pages/glossary.aspx#8 | title = Fact Book Glossary – Mode of Service Definitions | publisher = [[American Public Transportation Association]] | year = 2015 | access-date = 6 January 2015 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180225200947/http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Pages/glossary.aspx#8 | archive-date = 25 February 2018 | url-status = dead }}</ref><ref name="FTA">{{cite web
'''Light rail''' (or '''light rail transit''', abbreviated to '''LRT''') is a form of passenger [[urban rail transit]] that uses [[rolling stock]] derived from [[tram]] technology<ref name="Phil.-1975">{{cite journal|last=Vuchic|first=V.R.|title=Place of light rail transit in the family of transit modes.|journal= TRB Special Report|issue=161|publisher=[[Transportation Research Board]] |year=1975|url=https://swov.nl/en/publicatie/place-light-rail-transit-family-transit-modes-paper-presented-national-conference|access-date=1 July 2024}} National Conference of the Transportation Research Board</ref><ref name="AASHTO">{{cite book |title=Transportation Glossary |date=2009 |publisher=AASHTO |isbn=978-1-56051-408-4 |page=65 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gPR_-VQQIAgC |language=en}}</ref> while also having some features from heavy [[rapid transit]].
 
The term was coined in 1972 in the United States as an English equivalent for the German word ''[[Stadtbahn]]'', meaning "city railroad".<ref name="Thompson">{{cite journal|last=Thompson|first=Gregory L.|title=Defining an Alternative Future: The Birth of the Light Rail Movement in North America|journal=Transportation Research Circular|issue=E-C058|publisher=[[Transportation Research Board]] |year=2003|url=http://pubsindex.trb.org/view.aspx?id=700149|access-date=26 December 2009}} From: 9th National Light Rail Transit Conference</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.sbp.de/en/presse/neue-eisenbahnbruecke-ueber-den-neckar/ |title=New railway bridge over the Neckar river |access-date=2024-06-24}}</ref> Different definitions exist in some countries, but in the United States, light rail operates primarily along exclusive [[Right of way#Rail right of way|rights-of-way]] and uses either individual tramcars or [[multiple unit]]s coupled together, with a lower capacity and speed than a long [[heavy rail]] passenger train or rapid transit system.<ref name="APTA-def">{{cite web | url = http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Pages/glossary.aspx#8 | title = Fact Book Glossary – Mode of Service Definitions | publisher = [[American Public Transportation Association]] | year = 2015 | access-date = 6 January 2015 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180225200947/http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Pages/glossary.aspx#8 | archive-date = 25 February 2018 | url-status = dead }}</ref><ref name="FTA">{{cite web
  |url = http://www.ntdprogram.gov/ntdprogram/Glossary.htm |title = National Transit Database Glossary |publisher = [[United States Department of Transportation|U.S. Department of Transportation]] [[Federal Transit Administration]] |date = 18 October 2013 |access-date = 6 January 2015 |url-status = dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131113002142/http://www.ntdprogram.gov/ntdprogram/Glossary.htm |archive-date = 13 November 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title = What is light rail? | work = Public transport A-Z | publisher = [[International Association of Public Transport]] | year = 2008 | url = http://www.uitp.org/Public-Transport/light-rail/index.cfm | access-date=29 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081013161641/http://www.uitp.org/Public-Transport/light-rail/index.cfm|archive-date=13 October 2008}}</ref><ref name="WILRT?">{{cite web | url=http://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/light_rail_bro.pdf | title=This Is Light Rail Transit | publisher=Transportation Research Board | pages=7–9 | access-date=6 January 2015 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180417103723/http://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/light_rail_bro.pdf | archive-date= 17 April 2018
  |url = http://www.ntdprogram.gov/ntdprogram/Glossary.htm |title = National Transit Database Glossary |publisher = [[United States Department of Transportation|U.S. Department of Transportation]] [[Federal Transit Administration]] |date = 18 October 2013 |access-date = 6 January 2015 |url-status = dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131113002142/http://www.ntdprogram.gov/ntdprogram/Glossary.htm |archive-date = 13 November 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title = What is light rail? | work = Public transport A-Z | publisher = [[International Association of Public Transport]] | year = 2008 | url = http://www.uitp.org/Public-Transport/light-rail/index.cfm | access-date=29 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081013161641/http://www.uitp.org/Public-Transport/light-rail/index.cfm|archive-date=13 October 2008}}</ref><ref name="WILRT?">{{cite web | url=http://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/light_rail_bro.pdf | title=This Is Light Rail Transit | publisher=Transportation Research Board | pages=7–9 | access-date=6 January 2015 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180417103723/http://www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/light_rail_bro.pdf | archive-date= 17 April 2018
| url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.lrta.org/explain.html | title=What is Light Rail? | publisher=[[Light Rail Transit Association]] (LRTA) | access-date=6 January 2015  
| url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.lrta.org/explain.html | title=What is Light Rail? | publisher=[[Light Rail Transit Association]] (LRTA) | access-date=6 January 2015  
Line 16: Line 26:
{{Train topics}}
{{Train topics}}


==Definition==
==Terminology==
{{Main|Passenger rail terminology}}
{{Main|Passenger rail terminology}}
The term ''light rail'' was coined in 1972 by the U.S. Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA; the precursor to the [[Federal Transit Administration]]) to describe new streetcar transformations that were taking place in Europe and the United States. In Germany, the term ''[[Stadtbahn]]'' (to be distinguished from ''[[S-Bahn]]'', which stands for ''Stadtschnellbahn'') was used to describe the concept, and many in UMTA wanted to adopt the direct translation, which is ''city rail'' (the Norwegian term, ''by bane'', means the same). However, UMTA finally adopted the term ''light rail'' instead.<ref>Gregory L. Thompson (2003), [http://trb.org/publications/circulars/ec058/03_01_Thompson.pdf ''Defining an Alternative Future: Birth of the Light Rail Movement in North America''] (PDF), Transportation Research Board.</ref> ''Light'' in this context is used in the sense of "intended for light loads and fast movement", rather than referring to physical weight. The infrastructure investment is also usually lighter than would be found for a heavy rail system.
The term ''light rail'' was introduced in 1972 by the U.S. Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA, predecessor to the [[Federal Transit Administration]]) to describe modernized streetcar systems in Europe and the United States.


The [[American Public Transportation Association]] (APTA), in its Glossary of Transit Terminology, defines light rail as:
In Germany, the concept was known as ''[[Stadtbahn]]'' ("city rail"), but UMTA adopted the term ''light rail'' instead. The word ''light'' refers to lighter infrastructure and capacity requirements compared with heavy rail, rather than to physical weight. Mode classification is usually based on the type of right-of-way.<ref>Gregory L. Thompson (2003), [http://trb.org/publications/circulars/ec058/03_01_Thompson.pdf ''Defining an Alternative Future: Birth of the Light Rail Movement in North America''] (PDF), Transportation Research Board.</ref><ref name="DUPTSV86">{{cite book |last1=Vuchic |first1=Vukan R. |title=Trends in the Development of Urban Passenger Transport Systems and Vehicles |date=1986 |publisher=Fisita |page=31}}</ref>
<blockquote>...a mode of transit service (also called streetcar, tramway, or trolley) operating passenger [[Railcar|rail cars]] singly (or in short, usually two-car or three-car, trains) on fixed rails in the right-of-way that is often separated from other traffic for part or much of the way. Light rail vehicles are typically driven electrically with power being drawn from an overhead electric line via a [[trolley pole|trolley [pole]]] or a [[Pantograph (rail)|pantograph]]; driven by an operator onboard the vehicle; and may have either high platform loading or low-level boarding using steps."<ref name="APTA-def" /></blockquote>


''Light rail'' is different from the [[British English]] term ''[[light railway]]'', long-used to distinguish railway operations carried out under a less rigorous set of regulations using lighter equipment at lower speeds from mainline railways.<ref>{{cite web |title=Definition of LIGHT RAILWAY |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/light%20railway |website=www.merriam-webster.com |access-date=24 November 2024 |language=en}}</ref> ''Light rail'' is a generic [[international English]] phrase for types of rail systems using modern streetcars/trams, which means more or less the same thing throughout the [[English-speaking world]]. ''Light rail'' systems can range from trams running in streets along with other traffic, to [[semi-metro]] systems having portions of grade separated track.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Armstrong-Wright |first1=Alan |title=Urban Transit Systems: Guidelines for Examining Options |date=1986 |publisher=World Bank |isbn=978-0-8213-0765-6 |page=1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-zBPJgAACAAJ |language=en}}</ref>
The [[American Public Transportation Association]] (APTA) defines light rail as:
<blockquote>...a mode of transit service (also called streetcar, tramway, or trolley) operating single cars or short trains on fixed rails, often partly separated from traffic. Vehicles are typically electric, powered from overhead lines via trolley pole or pantograph, operated by an onboard driver, and may feature either high-platform or low-floor boarding.<ref name="APTA-def" /></blockquote>


[[People mover]]s are even "lighter", in terms of capacity. [[Monorail]] is a separate technology that has been more successful in specialized services than in a commuter transit role.<ref name="GGW-19" />
In international usage, ''light rail'' generally denotes newer tram or streetcar systems, ranging from street-running lines to partly grade-separated networks.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Armstrong-Wright |first1=Alan |title=Urban Transit Systems: Guidelines for Examining Options |date=1986 |publisher=World Bank |isbn=978-0-8213-0765-6 |page=1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-zBPJgAACAAJ}}</ref> [[People mover]]s are typically lower in capacity, while [[monorail]] and [[automated guideway transit]] are separate technologies with more specialized applications.<ref name="GGW-19">{{Cite web |last=Johnson |first=Matt |date=4 April 2019 |title=Light rail? Heavy rail? Subway? Rail transit modes fall on a continuum |url=https://ggwash.org/view/71583/light-rail-heavy-rail-subway-rail-transit-modes-fall-on-a-continuum |access-date=2024-07-24 |website=Greater Greater Washington |language=en}}</ref>
''Light rail'' is distinct from the [[British English]] term ''[[light railway]]'', which refers to lightly regulated, low-speed mainline railways.<ref>{{cite web |title=Definition of LIGHT RAILWAY |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/light%20railway |website=www.merriam-webster.com |access-date=24 November 2024}}</ref>


===British English versus American English===
===Varieties of English===
[[File:Metrolink tram at Lower Moseley Street..jpg|thumb|The [[Manchester Metrolink]] is the first, largest and most-used light rail system in the [[United Kingdom|UK]].]]
[[File:Metrolink tram at Lower Moseley Street..jpg|thumb|The [[Manchester Metrolink]], the UK's largest light rail system]]
[[File:SEPTA Light Rail.jpg|thumb|[[SEPTA]]'s 101 trolley pulling into [[69th Street Transportation Center|69th Street Terminal]] near [[Philadelphia]]]]
[[File:SEPTA Light Rail.jpg|thumb|[[SEPTA]] trolley at [[69th Street Terminal]], near [[Philadelphia]]]]
{{Main|Tram|Streetcars in North America}}
{{Main|Tram|Streetcars in North America}}
The use of the generic term ''light rail'' avoids some serious incompatibilities between [[List of words having different meanings in British and American English|British and American English]]. The word ''tram'', for instance, is generally used in the UK and many former British colonies to refer to what is known in North America as a [[streetcar]], but in North America ''tram'' can instead refer to an [[aerial tramway]],<ref>{{cite web
The term ''light rail'' helps avoid regional differences in terminology. In the UK, Australia,<ref>{{Cite web |title=VICSIG |url=https://vicsig.net/index.php?page=trams |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=vicsig.net}}</ref> Ireland<ref>{{Cite web |title=Dublin Trams (Luas) - Maps, Timetables and Travel Information |url=https://www.dublinpublictransport.ie/dublin-trams |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=Dublin Public Transport - Maps, Timetables and Information |language=en-US}}</ref> and New Zealand<ref>{{Cite web |title=Trams Still Around New Zealand |url=https://www.nationalrailwaymuseum.nz/shop/trams-still-around-new-zealand/ |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=The National Railway Museum of New Zealand |language=en-NZ}}</ref> ''tram'' refers to a street-running rail vehicle, while in North America it can also mean an aerial tramway or, in amusement parks, a [[Trackless train|land train]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/tram |title=Tram (definition) |publisher=Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary |access-date=18 July 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.yesterland.com/dlhotel-tram.html |title=The Yesterland Hotel Tram |website=Yesterland.com |access-date=7 February 2013}}</ref> Similarly, ''trolley'' means ''streetcar'' in North America.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/trolley |title=Trolley (definition) |publisher=Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary |access-date=18 July 2007}}</ref>
  | url = http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/tram
  | title = Tram (definition)  
  | publisher = Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
  | access-date = 18 July 2007}}</ref> or, in the case of [[Disney Parks, Experiences and Products#Disney resorts|the Disney amusement parks]], even a [[land train]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.yesterland.com/dlhotel-tram.html |title=The Yesterland Hotel Tram |website=Yesterland.com |access-date=7 February 2013}}</ref> (The usual British term for an aerial tramway is ''cable car'', which in the US usually refers to a [[cable car (railway)|ground-level car pulled along by subterranean cables]].) The word [[trolley (disambiguation)|trolley]] is often used as a synonym for ''streetcar'' in the United States but is usually taken to mean a cart, particularly a shopping cart, in the UK and elsewhere.<ref>{{cite web
  | url = http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/trolley
  | title = Trolley (definition)
  | publisher = Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
  | access-date = 18 July 2007}}</ref> Many North American transportation planners reserve ''streetcar'' for traditional vehicles that operate exclusively in mixed traffic on city streets, while they use ''light rail'' to refer to more modern vehicles operating mostly in exclusive rights of way, since they may operate both side-by-side targeted at different passenger groups.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia
  | url = https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9048223/light-rail-transit
  | title = Light Rail Transit
  | encyclopedia = Encyclopædia Britannica
  | access-date = 18 July 2007}}</ref>


The difference between British English and American English terminology arose in the late 19th century when Americans adopted the term "street railway", rather than "tramway", with the vehicles being called "streetcars" rather than "trams". Some have suggested that the Americans' preference for the term "street railway" at that time was influenced by German emigrants to the United States<ref>{{cite web| url = http://citytransport.info/Trams02.htm | title = Trams, Streetcars, and Light Rail Vehicles  | first = Simon P. | last = Smiler | website = citytransport.info | access-date = 18 July 2007}}</ref> (who were more numerous than British immigrants in the industrialized Northeast), as it is the same as the German term for the mode, ''Straßenbahn'' (meaning "street railway"). A further difference arose because, while Britain abandoned all of its ''trams'' after World War II except in [[Blackpool tramway|Blackpool]], eight major North American cities ([[Toronto streetcar system|Toronto]], [[Boston-area streetcar lines|Boston]], [[SEPTA Subway-Surface Trolley Lines|Philadelphia]], [[San Francisco Municipal Railway|San Francisco]], [[Pittsburgh Light Rail|Pittsburgh]], [[Newark Light Rail|Newark]], [[RTA Rapid Transit|Cleveland]], and [[Streetcars in New Orleans|New Orleans]]) continued to operate large ''streetcar'' systems.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Plous | first = F.K. Jr.| url = http://www.planning.org/25anniversary/planning/1984jun.htm | title = A Desire Named Streetcar | journal = Planning | publisher = American Planning Association | date=June 1984 | access-date = 14 August 2007 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060303145955/http://www.planning.org/25anniversary/planning/1984jun.htm |archive-date = 3 March 2006}}</ref> When these cities upgraded to new technology, they called it ''light rail'' to differentiate it from their existing ''streetcars'' since some continued to operate both the old and new systems. Since the 1980s, [[Portland, Oregon]], has built all three types of system: a high-capacity [[MAX Light Rail|light rail system]] in dedicated lanes and rights-of-way, a low-capacity [[Portland Streetcar|streetcar system]] integrated with street traffic, and an [[Portland Aerial Tram|aerial tram system]].
In North America, ''streetcar'' commonly refers to older vehicles operating in mixed traffic, while ''light rail'' is used for newer systems that operate mostly on reserved track.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9048223/light-rail-transit |title=Light Rail Transit |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |access-date=18 July 2007}}</ref> The American term ''street railway'' (with vehicles called ''streetcars'') emerged in the 19th century, influenced by the German word ''Straßenbahn'' ("street railway").<ref>{{cite web| url = http://citytransport.info/Trams02.htm | title = Trams, Streetcars, and Light Rail Vehicles  | first = Simon P. | last = Smiler | website = citytransport.info | access-date=18 July 2007}}</ref> While Britain abandoned most tramways after World War II, several North American cities—including [[Toronto]], [[Boston]], [[Philadelphia]], [[San Francisco]], [[Pittsburgh]], [[Newark, New Jersey|Newark]], [[Cleveland]], and [[New Orleans]]—retained theirs.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Plous |first=F.K. Jr.|url=http://www.planning.org/25anniversary/planning/1984jun.htm |title=A Desire Named Streetcar |journal=Planning |publisher=American Planning Association |date=June 1984 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060303145955/http://www.planning.org/25anniversary/planning/1984jun.htm |archive-date=3 March 2006 |access-date=14 August 2007}}</ref> These cities later adopted the term ''light rail'' when introducing modern systems alongside older streetcars. Since the 1980s, [[Portland, Oregon]] has developed all three types: light rail, streetcar, and [[Aerial tramway|aerial tram]].


The opposite phrase ''heavy rail'', used for higher-capacity, higher-speed systems, also avoids some incompatibilities in terminology between British and American English, for instance in comparing the [[London Underground]] and the [[New York City Subway]]. Conventional rail technologies including [[high-speed rail|high-speed]], freight, [[commuter rail|commuter]], and [[rapid transit]] urban transit systems are considered "heavy rail". The main difference between light rail and heavy rail rapid transit is the ability for a light rail vehicle to operate in mixed traffic if the routing requires it.<ref>{{Cite book|url=http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/166970.aspx|title=Track Design Handbook for Light Rail Transit, Second Edition {{!}} Blurbs New {{!}} Blurbs {{!}} Publications|website=www.trb.org|date=2012 |doi=10.17226/22800 |language=en-US|access-date=15 February 2020 |last1=p.c. |first1=Metro Tech Consulting Services Engineering Architecture |last2=Consultants |first2=Track Guy |isbn=978-0-309-25824-1 }}</ref>
''Heavy rail'' refers to higher-capacity, higher-speed systems such as the [[London Underground]] or [[New York City Subway]]. Conventional passenger and freight railways are also classified as heavy rail. The main distinction is that light rail vehicles can, where necessary, operate in mixed street traffic.<ref>{{Cite book|last1=p.c. |first1=Metro Tech Consulting Services Engineering Architecture |last2=Consultants |first2=Track Guy |url=http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/166970.aspx|title=Track Design Handbook for Light Rail Transit, Second Edition|website=www.trb.org|date=2012 |doi=10.17226/22800 |bibcode=2012nap..book22800N |access-date=15 February 2020 |isbn=978-0-309-25824-1}}</ref>


==History==
==History==
{{Main|History of Trams|Light rail in North America|PCC car|Interurban}}
{{Main|History of Trams|Light rail in North America|PCC car|Interurban}}
=== Precursors ===
By the late 19th century, some cities began placing [[tram]]ways underground to reduce congestion. Early examples include the [[Park Avenue Tunnel (roadway)|Murray Hill Tunnel]] in New York, adapted for streetcars in 1870,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://forgotten-ny.com/2012/12/park-avenue-tunnel/ |title=Park Avenue Tunnel |date=6 December 2012 |access-date=15 October 2024}}</ref> Marseille's Noailles station in 1893,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.columbia.edu/~brennan/abandoned/38st.html |title=38th Street |access-date=15 October 2024}}</ref> and Boston's [[Tremont Street subway]] in 1897, the first purpose-built tram subway in North America and a precursor to today's [[MBTA Green Line]].<ref name="DG">{{cite news |newspaper=The Boston Daily Globe |url=http://members.aol.com/netransit/private/tss/tssnews.html |title=First Car off the Earth: Allston Electric Goes into the subway on schedule time |date=September 1, 1897|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050829090042/http://members.aol.com/netransit/private/tss/tssnews.html |archive-date=2005-08-29 }}</ref><ref name="dougmost">{{cite web |url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/magazine/2014/01/26/the-history-behind-boston-race-build-america-first-subway/jm0grRaspdAREUbDv4KXsI/story.html|title =The bigger dig|date=26 January 2014|access-date=8 February 2023|last=Most |first=Doug|publisher=Boston Globe}}</ref> London's [[Kingsway tramway subway]] opened in 1906 to connect tram networks and operated until 1952.<ref>{{NHLE|num=1378792|desc=Kingsway Tram Subway (northern section only)|grade=II|access-date=15 February 2025}}</ref>
[[File:CTA Skokie Swift, Skokie, IL in May 1964 (25819535271).jpg|thumb|Skokie Swift service in 1964]]
[[File:CTA Skokie Swift, Skokie, IL in May 1964 (25819535271).jpg|thumb|Skokie Swift service in 1964]]
The world's first electric tram operated in [[Sestroretsk]] near [[Saint Petersburg]], [[Russian Empire|Russia]], invented and operated on an experimental basis by [[Fyodor Pirotsky]] in 1880.<ref>C. N. Pyrgidis. ''Railway Transportation Systems: Design, Construction, and Operation''. CRC Press, 2016. p. 156</ref><ref>Ye. N. Petrova. ''St. Petersburg in Focus: Photographers of the Turn of the Century; in Celebration of the Tercentenary of St. Petersburg''. Palace Ed., 2003. p. 12</ref> The first tramway was the [[Gross-Lichterfelde tramway]] in [[Lichterfelde (Berlin)|Lichterfelde]] near Berlin in Germany, which opened in 1881.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Gross Lichterfelde Tramway was the worlds first electric tramway |url=https://www.mediastorehouse.com/fine-art-finder/artists/unknown-artist/gross-lichterfelde-tramway-worlds-first-electric-27992980.html |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=Media Storehouse Photo Prints |language=en-US}}</ref> It was built by [[Werner von Siemens]] who contacted Pirotsky. It initially drew current from the rails, with [[Overhead line|overhead wire]] being installed in 1883. The first [[interurban]] to emerge in the United States was the Newark and Granville Street Railway in Ohio, which opened in 1889.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Hilton |first1=George W. |title=The Electric Interurban Railways in America |last2=Due |first2=John F. |date=2000 |publisher=Stanford University Press |isbn=978-0-8047-4014-2 |edition=1. paperback print |location=Stanford, Calif |pages=8–9}}</ref>


An early example of the light rail concept was the "Shaker Heights Rapid Transit" which started in the 1920s, was renovated in 1980–1981 and is now part of [[RTA Rapid Transit]].<ref name="RTiA">{{cite book |last1=Middleton |first1=William D. |title=Metropolitan Railways: Rapid Transit in America |date=2003 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-253-34179-2 |pages=146, 147 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=foSEPTUE7NMC |language=en}}</ref> When the suburban rail [[Highland branch]] in Boston was converted to operation with regular trams (PCC cars) in 1959, creating an early type of [[Green Line D branch|light rail line]], passenger numbers rose quickly.<ref name=dana>{{cite magazine |title=Riverside Line Extension, 1959 |magazine=Transportation Bulletin |publisher=Connecticut Valley Chapter of the National Railway Historical Society |date=October 1960 – July 1961 |first=Edward |last=Dana |issue=65}}</ref>{{rp|8}} In 1964 [[Yellow_Line_(CTA)#The_Skokie_Swift|the Skokie Swift]] service started operating, it helped to model later US light rail systems.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Sisson |first=Patrick |date=2017-09-18 |title=When Chicago's Yellow Line was the future of urban transportation |url=https://chicago.curbed.com/2017/9/18/16324488/cta-yellow-line-chicago-skokie-history |work=Curbed Chicago |quote=Data collected from the initial experiment was used to design other light rail systems across the country...}}</ref>
=== Early systems ===
The "Shaker Heights Rapid Transit" in [[Cleveland]] (1920s) provided an early model of a suburban rail line upgraded for tram-like operation and is now part of the [[RTA Rapid Transit]].<ref name="RTiA">{{cite book |last1=Middleton |first1=William D. |title=Metropolitan Railways: Rapid Transit in America |date=2003 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-253-34179-2 |pages=146–147 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=foSEPTUE7NMC |language=en}}</ref> In Europe, a suburban railway in [[The Hague]] was converted to tram operation in 1927, while in Boston the [[Highland branch]] was converted in 1959 to create what became the [[Green Line D branch]], boosting ridership with modern PCC cars.<ref name="HTM/BMDH">{{cite book |title=Historische trams van HTM |date=July 1985 |publisher=Haagse Tramweg Maatschappij/Bureau Monumentenzorg Den Haag |page=3 |language=nl}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Sneltram (light rail) |url=https://nvbs.com/sneltram-en-light-rail/ |website=NVBS |access-date=18 August 2025 |language=nl-NL}}</ref><ref name=dana>{{cite magazine |title=Riverside Line Extension, 1959 |magazine=Transportation Bulletin |publisher=Connecticut Valley Chapter of the National Railway Historical Society |date=October 1960 – July 1961 |first=Edward |last=Dana |issue=65}}</ref>{{rp|8}} In 1964 Chicago's experimental [[Yellow Line (CTA)#The Skokie Swift|Skokie Swift]] demonstrated features later adopted by many U.S. light rail systems.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Sisson |first=Patrick |date=2017-09-18 |title=When Chicago's Yellow Line was the future of urban transportation |url=https://chicago.curbed.com/2017/9/18/16324488/cta-yellow-line-chicago-skokie-history |work=Curbed Chicago}}</ref> Many traditional tram and [[streetcar]] systems in the [[United Kingdom]], [[United States]], and elsewhere were closed after the 1950s as investment shifted to cars and buses. Leeds and Glasgow briefly built modernized tram lines during the 1940s,<ref name="LURS">{{cite book |last1=Skelsey |first1=Geoffrey |title=Brussels Metro to Grow As Pre-metro Shrinks |date=2018 |publisher=London Underground Railway Society}}</ref> but by 1962 Britain had abandoned all tramways except for [[Blackpool tramway|Blackpool]].<ref name=":2">{{cite web |last=Courtenay |first=Peter |year=2006 |title=Trams in the UK |url=http://www.thetrams.co.uk/tramsinuk.php |access-date=26 December 2009 |website=thetrams.co.uk}}</ref>


===Postwar===
=== Post-war emergence ===
Many original tram and [[Streetcar|streetcar systems]] in the [[United Kingdom]], [[United States]], and elsewhere were decommissioned starting in the 1950s as subsidies for the car increased. During the 1940s both Leeds and Glasgow added new lines to their tram networks, both with a light rail like exclusive alignement.<ref name="LURS">{{cite book |last1=Skelsey |first1=Geoffrey |title=Brussels Metro to Grow As Pre-metro Shrinks |date=2018 |publisher=London Underground Railway Society}}</ref> And yet, Britain abandoned all its tram systems, except for [[Blackpool tramway|Blackpool]], with the closure of [[Glasgow Corporation Tramways]] (one of the largest in Europe) in 1962.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thetrams.co.uk/tramsinuk.php|access-date=26 December 2009|title=Trams in the UK|first=Peter|last=Courtenay|website=thetrams.co.uk|year=2006}}</ref>
Many traditional tram and [[streetcar]] systems in the [[United Kingdom]], [[United States]], and elsewhere were closed after the 1950s as investment shifted to cars and buses. Leeds and Glasgow briefly built modernized tram lines during the 1940s,<ref name="LURS" /> but by 1962 Britain had abandoned all tramways except for [[Blackpool tramway|Blackpool]].<ref name=":2" /> Modern light rail developed largely in postwar [[West Germany]], where many tram networks were upgraded rather than abandoned. These ''[[Stadtbahn]]'' systems introduced features such as high-capacity vehicles, dedicated alignments, and underground city-center tunnels. With the exception of [[Hamburg, Germany|Hamburg]], nearly all large and most medium-sized German cities retained trams and modernized them into light rail.<ref name="Bottoms">{{cite conference|first=Glen|last=Bottoms|title=Continuing Developments in Light Rail Transit in Western Europe|publisher=[[Light Rail Transit Association]]|year=2000|conference=9th National Light Rail Transit Conference|location=Portland, Oregon|url=http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec058/15_01_Bottoms.pdf|access-date=26 December 2009}}</ref> Similar modernization took place in Zurich, Rotterdam, The Hague, [[Gothenburg tram network|Gothenburg]], Brussels, and in Central and Eastern Europe, notably [[Trams in Ostrava|Ostrava]].<ref name="RGI1985">{{cite journal |last1=Vuchic |first1=Vukan R. |title=Light Rail Transit: Ugly Duckling Becomes a Swan |journal=Railway Gazette International |date=1 November 1985 |volume=141 |issue=808 |page=829 |url=https://repository.upenn.edu/entities/publication/e7a3ebc5-330a-4afd-8466-7abadf0b08a8 |access-date=20 June 2025}}</ref><ref name="ACE21">{{cite journal |last1=Khairullina |first1=Elvira |title=Trams in the European Socialist countries in the 1960s and 1970s: From crisis to impetus |journal=Arquitectura Ciudad y Entorno |date=2021 |volume=16 |issue=46 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353073533 |access-date=25 March 2025}}</ref>


[[File:Edmonton LRT testing commerical c.1978.jpg|thumb|Testing a German LRV for the Edmonton LRT]]
In the United States, American planner H. Dean Quinby defined the concept of a "limited tramway" in 1962, distinguishing it from traditional streetcars by features such as articulated vehicles, multiple doors, and higher capacity.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Quinby |first=Henry D. |date=January 1962 |title=Major Urban Corridor Facilities: A New Concept |journal=Traffic Quarterly |publisher=Eno Foundation for Highway Traffic Control |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=242–259}}</ref>[[File:Edmonton LRT testing commerical c.1978.jpg|thumb|Testing a German LRV for the Edmonton LRT]]
===Emergence===
The term ''light rail transit'' was introduced in North America in 1972 to describe these upgraded systems.<ref name="Thompson" /> The first of the new generation opened in 1978 in [[Edmonton, Alberta]], using German [[Siemens-Duewag U2]] vehicles, followed by [[Calgary]] and [[San Diego, California|San Diego]]. These proved successful and inspired many more [[list of United States light rail systems by ridership|U.S.]], [[List of North American light rail systems by ridership|Canadian]], and Mexican light rail systems.
Although some traditional trolley or tram systems continued to exist in the US and elsewhere, the term "light rail" has come to mean a different type of rail system as modern light rail technology has primarily post-WWII West German origins. After World War II, Germany retained many of its streetcar networks and some of these evolved into model light rail systems (''[[Stadtbahn]]en''). With the exception of [[Hamburg, Germany|Hamburg]], all large and most medium-sized German cities maintain light rail networks.<ref name="Bottoms">{{cite conference|first=Glen|last=Bottoms|title=Continuing Developments in Light Rail Transit in Western Europe|publisher=[[Light Rail Transit Association]]|year=2000|conference=9th National Light Rail Transit Conference|location=Portland, Oregon|url=http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec058/15_01_Bottoms.pdf|access-date=26 December 2009}}</ref>


The concept of a "limited tramway" was proposed by American transport planner H. Dean Quinby in 1962. Quinby distinguished this new concept in rail transportation from historic streetcar or tram systems as:<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Quinby |first=Henry D. |date=January 1962 |title=Major Urban Corridor Facilities: A New Concept |journal=Traffic Quarterly |publisher=Eno Foundation for Highway Traffic Control |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=242–259 |via= |hdl-access=free |hdl=2027/uc1.$b3477}}</ref>
=== Global expansion ===
* having the capacity to carry more passengers
[[File:ET Addis asv2018-01 img07 Light Rail (cropped2).jpg|left|thumb|Light Rail in [[Addis Ababa]], Ethiopia]]
* operating with "three-section, articulated" transit vehicles
From the 1980s onward, light rail and modern tramways experienced a renewed expansion worldwide. In Europe, new networks were built in cities that had abandoned trams, including the reopening of the [[Nantes tramway]] in 1985, and systems in [[Grenoble tramway|Grenoble]], [[Tramways in Île-de-France|Paris]], [[Strasbourg tramway|Strasbourg]], [[Bordeaux tramway|Bordeaux]], [[Luas|Dublin]], [[Trams in Barcelona|Barcelona]], [[Bergen Light Rail|Bergen]]<ref>{{cite web |title=Nantes (France) |url=http://www.urbanrail.net/eu/fr/nan/nantes.htm |access-date=23 August 2025 |website=UrbanRail.net}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=21 December 2003 |title=First line opens in Bordeaux |url=https://www.railwaygazette.com/first-line-opens-in-bordeaux/26276.article |work=Railway Gazette International}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=UrbanRail.Net > Europe - Metros, Light Rail & Trams |url=https://www.urbanrail.net/eu/euromet.htm |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=www.urbanrail.net}}</ref> In Britain, modern light rail returned in the 1980s with the [[Tyne and Wear Metro]] (1980), [[Manchester Metrolink]] (1992), and [[South Yorkshire Supertram]] (1994) and [[Edinburgh Trams|Edinburgh]] (2014).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Butcher |first=Louise |date=25 January 2012 |title=Railways: light rail schemes |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN03307/SN03307.pdf |access-date=24 July 2024 |publisher=House of Commons Library |page=2}}</ref>
* having more doors to facilitate full utilization of the space
* faster and quieter in operation


The term ''light rail transit'' was introduced in North America in 1972 to describe this new concept of rail transportation.<ref name="Thompson" /> Prior to that time the abbreviation "LRT" was used for "[[Light metro|Light Rapid Transit]]" and "[[Light metro|Light Rail Rapid Transit]]".<ref>{{cite book |last=Wright |first=Gerald |date=Fall 1972 |title= Light Rapid Transit – the Immediate Answer for Edmonton |location=Edmonton, Alberta |publisher=The University Practicum in Rapid Transit – [[University of Alberta]] Extension Service}}</ref> An attempt by [[Boeing Vertol]] to introduce a [[US Standard Light Rail Vehicle|new American light rail vehicle]] in the 1970s was proven to have been a technical failure by the following decade.
In North America, the [[San Diego Trolley]] (1981)<ref>{{Cite web |title=MTS Historical Timeline |url=http://www.sdmts.com/MTS/timeline.asp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130820231050/http://www.sdmts.com/MTS/timeline.asp |archive-date=2013-08-20 |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=www.sdmts.com}}</ref> became a model for later projects, and the number of U.S. systems roughly doubled between the 1990s and 2010s with expansions in [[Portland, Oregon|Portland]], [[Los Angeles]], [[Denver]], [[Dallas]], [[Minneapolis]] and [[Seattle]].<ref>{{cite web |date=2015 |title=2015 Public Transportation Fact Book |url=https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/Resources/resources/statistics/Documents/FactBook/2015-APTA-Fact-Book-Appendix-A.pdf |website=APTA}}</ref> Canada added the [[Ion rapid transit|Ion]] in Waterloo and the [[Confederation Line]] in Ottawa (both 2019), while Australia introduced the [[Inner West Light Rail|Sydney Light Rail]] in 1997.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Inner West Light Rail {{!}} The Dictionary of Sydney |url=https://dictionaryofsydney.org/structure/inner_west_light_rail |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=dictionaryofsydney.org}}</ref>


=== Early systems ===
In Asia, the [[Toyama Light Rail]] opened in 2006 as Japan's first new tramway in decades,<ref>{{Cite web |title=富山市・富山地方鉄道・富山ライトレール,2020年3月21日から路面電車の南北接続を開始 〜運行形態や運賃などの概要を発表〜|鉄道ニュース|2019年11月6日掲載|鉄道ファン・railf.jp |url=https://railf.jp/news/2019/11/06/110000.html |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=鉄道ファン・railf.jp |language=ja}}</ref> along with a series of Chinese systems such as [[Trams in Shenyang|Shenyang]], [[Nanjing Trams|Nanjing]], [[Guangzhou Tram|Guangzhou]], [[Xijiao line|Beijing]] and [[Songjiang Tram|Shanghai Songjiang]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=China embraces light rail |url=https://www.railjournal.com/in_depth/china-embraces-light-rail/ |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=International Railway Journal |language=en-GB}}</ref>
[[File:Ostrava, Stadler Tango NF2 č. 1733 View from Tieto Towers.jpg|thumb|Ostrava tram stop with pedestrian underpass.]]
Prior to the systems in North America, besides Germany a few regions in Europe developed light rail like tram transport as early as the 1960s. Besides [[Gothenburg tram network|Gothenburg]], several cities in Central and Eastern Europe executed plans to modernise tram systems, notably in [[Trams in Ostrava|Ostrava]].<ref name="ACE21">{{cite journal |last1=Khairullina |first1=Elvira |title=Trams in the European Socialist countries in the 1960s and 1970s: from crisis to impetus. Soviet Union and Czechoslovak Socialist Republic |journal=Arquitectura Ciudad y Entorno |date=2021 |volume=16 |issue=46 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353073533_Trams_in_the_European_Socialist_countries_in_the_1960s_and_1970s_from_crisis_to_impetus_Soviet_Union_and_Czechoslovak_Socialist_Republic |access-date=25 March 2025}}</ref>


The first of the new light rail systems in North America began operation in 1978 when the Canadian city of [[Edmonton, Alberta]], adopted the German [[Siemens-Duewag U2]] system, followed three years later by [[Calgary, Alberta]], and [[San Diego, California]]. The concept proved popular, with there now being numerous [[list of United States light rail systems by ridership|light rail systems in the United States]] and [[List of North American light rail systems by ridership|in North America]].
In Africa and the Middle East, new light rail was introduced in [[Tunis Light Metro|Tunis]] (1985),<ref>{{Cite web |title=Tunis Light Rail Development |url=https://www.railway-technology.com/projects/tunisialightrail/ |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=Railway Technology |language=en-US}}</ref> [[Rabat–Salé tramway|Rabat]] (2011),<ref>{{Cite web |title=Straßenbahn Rabat - Salé tram |url=https://public-transport.net/tram/Rabat/index.html |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=public-transport.net |language=de}}</ref> [[Algiers tramway|Algiers]] (2011), [[Casablanca Tramway|Casablanca]] (2012), [[Jerusalem Light Rail|Jerusalem]] (2011), [[Dubai Tram|Dubai]] (2014), [[Addis Ababa Light Rail|Addis Ababa]] (2015) and [[Lusail Tram|Lusail]] (2022).<ref>{{cite news |date=20 September 2015 |title=Ethiopia opens $475 mln Addis Ababa light rail |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ethiopia-railway-idUSKCN0RK0E520150920 |work=Reuters}}</ref>


In Britain, modern light rail systems began to appear in the 1980s, starting with the [[Tyne and Wear Metro]] from 1980 and followed by the establishment of the [[Manchester Metrolink]] in 1992 and the [[South Yorkshire Supertram|Sheffield Supertram]] from 1994.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Butcher |first=Louise |date=25 January 2012 |title=Railways: light rail schemes |url=https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN03307/SN03307.pdf |access-date=24 July 2024 |publisher=House of Commons Library |page=2}}</ref>
In South America, projects included the [[Ayacucho Tram]] in [[Medellín]] (2016) and the [[VLT Carioca]] in [[Rio de Janeiro]] (2016).<ref>{{cite news |date=7 June 2016 |title=Rio de Janeiro opens first light rail line |url=https://www.railjournal.com/regions/central-south-america/rio-de-janeiro-opens-first-light-rail-line/ |work=International Railway Journal }}{{Dead link|date=October 2025 |bot=InternetArchiveBot }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Carr |first=Collin |date=2015-10-27 |title=Colombia's president opens Ayacucho tramway |url=https://railuk.com/rail-news/colombias-president-opens-ayacucho-tramway/ |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=Rail UK |language=en-US}}</ref>


==Types==
==Types==
It can be hard to distinguish what is called light rail, and other forms of urban and commuter rail. A system termed as a light rail in one city may be considered to be a streetcar or tram system in another. Conversely, some lines that are called "light rail" are very close to [[rapid transit]]. In recent years, new terms such as [[light metro]] have been used to describe medium-capacity rail systems. Some "diesel light rail" systems, such as [[Sprinter (rail service)|Sprinter]], bear little similarity to urban rail, and could alternatively be classified as commuter rail with light trains.
It can be hard to distinguish what is called light rail, and other forms of urban and commuter rail. A system termed as a light rail in one city may be considered to be a streetcar or tram system in another. Conversely, some lines that are called "light rail" are very close to [[rapid transit]]. In recent years, new terms such as [[light metro]] have been used to describe medium-capacity rail systems. Some "diesel light rail" systems, such as [[Sprinter (rail service)|Sprinter]], bear little similarity to urban rail, and could alternatively be classified as commuter rail with lightweight trains.
 
There is a history of what would now be considered light rail vehicles operating on heavy rail [[rapid transit]] tracks in the US, especially in the case of [[interurban streetcar]]s. Notable examples are [[Lehigh Valley Transit]] trains running on the [[Philadelphia and Western Railroad]] high-speed third rail line (now the [[Norristown High-Speed Line]]).
 
[[File:20230425 De Lijn 6138.jpg|thumb|upright=1.1|The [[Coast Tram]] operates over {{Cvt|67|km}} in Belgium connecting several town centres]]


===Flexibility===
Light rail corridors may constitute a fully segregated corridor, a dedicated [[Right-of-way (railroad)|right-of-way]] on a street, an on-street corridor shared with other traffic, a corridor shared with other public transport, or a corridor shared with pedestrians,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Light rail station infrastructure |url=https://www.publications.qld.gov.au/ckan-publications-attachments-prod/resources/9c8091e9-ca5e-4fb7-ab11-3a4b8f22fa77/ptim_11_light-rail-station-infrastructure-nov2020.pdf?ETag=88cd10876a9df0ea13955503fc732e9d |publisher=[[Department of Transport and Main Roads]] |page=19}}</ref> resulting in a much higher flexibility than [[rapid transit|heavy rail]].<ref>{{cite journal |title=This is Light Rail Transit |journal=TRB Circular |date=2003 |page=3 |url=https://www.apta.com/research-technical-resources/research-reports/policy-development-and-research-program-at-apta/ |access-date=18 March 2025}}</ref>
Light rail corridors may constitute a fully segregated corridor, a dedicated [[Right-of-way (railroad)|right-of-way]] on a street, an on-street corridor shared with other traffic, a corridor shared with other public transport, or a corridor shared with pedestrians,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Light rail station infrastructure |url=https://www.publications.qld.gov.au/ckan-publications-attachments-prod/resources/9c8091e9-ca5e-4fb7-ab11-3a4b8f22fa77/ptim_11_light-rail-station-infrastructure-nov2020.pdf?ETag=88cd10876a9df0ea13955503fc732e9d |publisher=[[Department of Transport and Main Roads]] |page=19}}</ref> resulting in a much higher flexibility than [[rapid transit|heavy rail]].<ref>{{cite journal |title=This is Light Rail Transit |journal=TRB Circular |date=2003 |page=3 |url=https://www.apta.com/research-technical-resources/research-reports/policy-development-and-research-program-at-apta/ |access-date=18 March 2025}}</ref>
[[File:20230425 De Lijn 6138.jpg|thumb|upright=1.1|The [[Coast Tram]] in Belgium operates over {{Cvt|67|km}} and connects several town centres.]]
 
Many systems have mixed characteristics. Indeed, with proper engineering, a rail line could run along a street, then go underground, and then run along an elevated viaduct. For example, the [[Los Angeles Metro Rail]]'s [[A Line (Los Angeles Metro)|A Line]] "light rail" has sections that could alternatively be described as a tramway, a light metro, and, in a narrow sense, rapid transit. This is especially common in the United States, where there is not a popularly perceived distinction between these different types of urban rail systems.
 
===Lower capacity===
===Lower capacity===
The most difficult distinction to draw is that between low-floor light rail and streetcar or tram systems. There is a significant amount of overlap between the technologies; similar rolling stock may be used for either, and it is common to classify streetcars or trams as a subcategory of light rail rather than as a distinct type of transportation. However, some distinctions can be made, though systems may combine elements of both.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=Streetcars vs LRT |url=https://www.edmontonstreetcars.ca/streetcarsversuslrt |access-date=22 July 2024 |website=Edmonton Radial Railway Society}}</ref> Low-floor light rail lines tend to follow a reserved right-of-way and with trains receiving priority at intersections, and tend not to operate in mixed traffic, enabling higher operating speeds.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite web |title=Light Rail |url=http://www.heritagetrolley.org/defLightRail.htm |access-date=2024-07-22 |publisher=Seashore Trolley Museum}}</ref> Light rail lines tend to have less frequent stops than tramways, and operate over a longer distance.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Walker |first=Jarrett |date=2010-03-26 |title=Streetcars vs Light Rail ... Is There a Difference? |url=https://humantransit.org/2010/03/streetcars-vs-light-rail-is-there-a-difference.html |access-date=2024-07-22 |website=Human Transit |language=en-US}}</ref> Light rail cars are often coupled into multiple units of two to four cars.<ref name=":1" />
The most difficult distinction to draw is that between low-floor light rail and streetcar or tram systems. There is a significant amount of overlap between the technologies; similar rolling stock may be used for either, and it is common to classify streetcars or trams as a subcategory of light rail rather than as a distinct type of transportation. However, some distinctions can be made, though systems may combine elements of both.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=Streetcars vs LRT |url=https://www.edmontonstreetcars.ca/streetcarsversuslrt |access-date=22 July 2024 |website=Edmonton Radial Railway Society}}</ref> Low-floor light rail lines tend to follow a reserved right-of-way and with trains receiving priority at intersections, and tend not to operate in mixed traffic, enabling higher operating speeds.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">{{Cite web |title=Light Rail |url=http://www.heritagetrolley.org/defLightRail.htm |access-date=2024-07-22 |publisher=Seashore Trolley Museum |archive-date=22 July 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240722091519/http://www.heritagetrolley.org/defLightRail.htm |url-status=dead }}</ref> Light rail lines tend to have less frequent stops than tramways, and operate over a longer distance.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Walker |first=Jarrett |date=2010-03-26 |title=Streetcars vs Light Rail ... Is There a Difference? |url=https://humantransit.org/2010/03/streetcars-vs-light-rail-is-there-a-difference.html |access-date=2024-07-22 |website=Human Transit |language=en-US}}</ref> Light rail cars are often coupled into multiple units of two to four cars.<ref name=":1" />
 
[[File:Stadtbahn Essen U17 5234 Berliner Platz 1910040748.jpg|thumb|''Berliner Platz'' station in [[Essen Stadtbahn|Essen]].]]


===Higher capacity===
===Higher capacity===
Light rail systems may also exhibit attributes of heavy rail systems, including having downtown subways, as in [[San Francisco Municipal Railway|San Francisco]] and [[Link light rail|Seattle]]. Light rail is designed to address a gap in interurban transportation between heavy rail and bus services, carrying high passenger numbers more quickly than local buses and more cheaply than heavy rail. It serves corridors in which heavy rail is impractical. [[Light metro]] systems are essentially hybrids of light rail and rapid transit.<ref name="GGW-19">{{Cite web |last=Johnson |first=Matt |date=4 April 2019 |title=Light rail? Heavy rail? Subway? Rail transit modes fall on a continuum |url=https://ggwash.org/view/71583/light-rail-heavy-rail-subway-rail-transit-modes-fall-on-a-continuum |access-date=2024-07-24 |website=Greater Greater Washington |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2016-01-19 |title=Light-Rail Transit (LRT) |url=https://policy.tti.tamu.edu/strategy/light-rail-transit/ |access-date=2024-07-24 |website=Transportation Policy Research |language=en-US}}</ref>
{{Redirect-distinguish|Semi-metro|#Premetro}}
Light rail systems may also exhibit attributes of rapid transit systems, including having downtown subways, as in [[Muni Metro|San Francisco]] and [[Link light rail|Seattle]]. These partially grade separated light rail lines are sometimes called "semi-metro". This type of light rail emerged when the first subway in Boston opened in 1897 and became popular again in Europe from the 1950s onwards.<ref name="DoT-URA">{{cite book |last1=Zupan |first1=Jeffrey |last2=Pushkarev |first2=Boris |title=Urban Rail in America: An Exploration of Criteria for Fixed-Guideway Transit |date=1 November 1980 |publisher=U.S. Department of Transportation |doi=10.21949/1527455 |url=https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/696 |access-date=20 June 2025 |language=English}}</ref> The development of technology for low-floor and catenary-free trams facilitates the construction of such mixed systems with only short and shallow underground sections below critical intersections as the required clearance height can be reduced significantly compared to conventional light rail vehicles.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.treehugger.com/public-transportation/low-clearance-rapid-transit-cheaper-subways-faster-trolleys.html|title=Low-clearance Rapid Transit: Cheaper than subways, faster than trolleys|website=TreeHugger|language=en|access-date=15 November 2019}}</ref>


Metro trains are larger and faster than light rail trains, with stops being further apart.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |title=Light Rail Transit (LRT) FAQs |url=https://www.torontoenvironment.org/campaigns/transit/LRTfaq#LRTvsstreetcarvssubway |access-date=2024-07-24 |website=Toronto Environmental Alliance}}</ref>
===Light rail operating on mainline railroads===
[[File:Cappel Stadtbahn02 2005-12-30.jpg|right|thumb|On the [[Karlsruhe Stadtbahn]], trams can share mainline tracks with heavy rail trains.]]
[[File:DulwichGroveStop.jpg|thumb|The [[Inner West Light Rail]] in [[Sydney]] runs mostly along a former heavy rail corridor.]]
{{Main|Tram-train}}
Light rail can be designed to address a gap in interurban transportation between mainline rail and bus services, carrying high passenger numbers more quickly than local buses and more cheaply than mainline trains. Around [[Karlsruhe]], [[Kassel]], and [[Saarbrücken]] in Germany, dual-voltage light rail trains partly use mainline railroad tracks, sharing these tracks with mainline rail trains. This allows commuters to ride directly into the city center, rather than taking a mainline train only as far as a central station and then having to change to a tram. In France, similar [[tram-train]]s are in use in Paris, [[Mulhouse]], and [[Strasbourg]]; further plans exist. In 2022, Spain opened the [[Cádiz Bay tram-train|Cádiz TramBahia]], where trams share track with [[Cercanías Cádiz|commuter]] and long-distance trains from the main terminus in the city and curve off to serve cities without a rail connection.
Some of the issues involved in such schemes are:<ref name="TAUR2010">{{cite journal |last1=Davidson |first1=Robert |title=Tram-trains: are they worth it? |journal=Tramways & Urban Transit |date=February 2010 |pages=47, 48}}</ref>
* compatibility of the safety systems
* power supply of the track to the power used by the vehicles (frequently different voltages, rarely third rail vs overhead wires)
* width of the vehicles to the position of the [[railway platform|platforms]]
* height of the platforms


===Mixed systems===
In some cases, tram-trains use previously abandoned or lightly used heavy rail lines in addition to or instead of still in use mainline tracks, like the [[Manchester Metrolink]]. In the [[San Diego]] region, the "SD&AE" freight line was used to create the initial stage of the light rail network of the [[San Diego Trolley]].<ref name="DPIFS1989">{{cite book |last1=Hoffman |first1=M. Allen |title=The Decision Process for Implementing Fixed-guideway Systems |date=1989 |pages=32–44 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HgshRAAACAAJ |language=en}}</ref> In the [[Netherlands]], this concept was first applied on the [[RijnGouweLijn]], and was followed by the [[RandstadRail]] project.
Many systems have mixed characteristics. Indeed, with proper engineering, a rail line could run along a street, then go underground, and then run along an elevated viaduct. For example, the [[Los Angeles Metro Rail]]'s [[A Line (Los Angeles Metro)|A Line]] "light rail" has sections that could alternatively be described as a tramway, a light metro, and, in a narrow sense, rapid transit. This is especially common in the United States, where there is not a popularly perceived distinction between these different types of urban rail systems. The development of technology for low-floor and catenary-free trams facilitates the construction of such mixed systems with only short and shallow underground sections below critical intersections as the required clearance height can be reduced significantly compared to conventional light rail vehicles.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.treehugger.com/public-transportation/low-clearance-rapid-transit-cheaper-subways-faster-trolleys.html|title=Low-clearance Rapid Transit: Cheaper than subways, faster than trolleys|website=TreeHugger|language=en|access-date=15 November 2019}}</ref>
 
===System-wide considerations===
Many light rail systems—even fairly old ones—have a combination of both on- and off-road sections. In some countries (especially in Europe), only the latter is described as light rail. In those places, trams running on mixed rights-of-way are not regarded as a light rail but considered distinctly as streetcars or trams. However, the requirement for saying that a rail line is "separated" can be quite low—sometimes just with concrete "buttons" to discourage automobile drivers from getting onto the tracks. Some systems such as [[Link light rail|Seattle's Link]] had on-road mixed sections but were closed to regular road traffic, with light rail vehicles and buses both operating along a common right-of-way (however, Link converted to full separation in 2019).
 
[[File:Modern trams (41097122804).jpg|thumb|Low floor light-rail vehicles on the [[Toronto streetcar system]]]]
 
===Floor height===
{{Main|Low floor}}
Low-floor LRVs have the advantage of a low-floor design, allowing them to load passengers directly from low-rise platforms that can be little more than raised curbs. High-floor light rail systems also exist, featuring larger stations.<ref name=":0" />


===Speed and stop frequency===
===Speed and stop frequency===
Reference speed from major light rail systems, including station stop time, is shown below.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.lightrailnow.org/myths/m_lrt012.htm|title=Light Rail Schedule Speed – Faster Than Bus, Competitive With Car|website=www.lightrailnow.org}}</ref>
Reference speed from major light rail systems, including station stop time, is shown below.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.lightrailnow.org/myths/m_lrt012.htm|title=Light Rail Schedule Speed – Faster Than Bus, Competitive With Car|website=www.lightrailnow.org}}</ref>
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
Line 120: Line 144:
However, low top speed is not always a differentiating characteristic between light rail and other systems. For example, the [[Siemens S70]] LRVs used in the [[Houston]] [[METRORail]] and other North American LRT systems have a top speed of {{convert|55-71.5|mph|km/h|sigfig=4}} depending on the system, while the trains on the all-underground [[Montreal Metro]] can only reach a top speed of {{convert|72|km/h|mph|sigfig=4}}. [[Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority|LACMTA]] light rail vehicles have higher top and average speeds than Montreal Metro or [[New York City Subway]] trains.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/12/30/link-light-rail-in-the-north-american-context/|title=Link Light Rail in the North American Context|date=30 December 2009}}</ref>
However, low top speed is not always a differentiating characteristic between light rail and other systems. For example, the [[Siemens S70]] LRVs used in the [[Houston]] [[METRORail]] and other North American LRT systems have a top speed of {{convert|55-71.5|mph|km/h|sigfig=4}} depending on the system, while the trains on the all-underground [[Montreal Metro]] can only reach a top speed of {{convert|72|km/h|mph|sigfig=4}}. [[Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority|LACMTA]] light rail vehicles have higher top and average speeds than Montreal Metro or [[New York City Subway]] trains.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://seattletransitblog.com/2009/12/30/link-light-rail-in-the-north-american-context/|title=Link Light Rail in the North American Context|date=30 December 2009}}</ref>


===System-wide considerations===
== Infrastructure ==
[[File:DLR unit 135 entering Canary Wharf station bound for Bank.jpg|thumb|The [[Docklands Light Railway]], a [[medium-capacity rail system]]]]
Light rail systems operate between heavy [[rapid transit]] and conventional street-level [[tram]]s.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Another Alternative: The Case for Light Rail, Part 2 |journal=Transit Journal |date=August 1975 |volume=1 |issue=3 |page=56 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q8HfMp3V8RIC |publisher=American Public Transit Association. |language=en}}</ref> Construction costs are typically lower than for metro systems, but building infrastructure can still be significant, sometimes leading to phased development or partial completion of lines.<ref name="TUB2009">{{cite book |last1=Duin |first1=Leen |title=The Urban Project: Architectural Intervention in Urban Areas |date=2009 |publisher=IOS Press |isbn=978-1-58603-999-8 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i6SKP1ss_ckC |access-date=31 March 2025 |page=80}}</ref><ref name="UTU1966">{{cite book |title=A Report on the ... Conference on Mass Transportation |date=1966 |publisher=United Transportation Union |page=53 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Tx9PAAAAMAAJ&q=%22semi-metro%22 |access-date=18 March 2025 |language=en}}</ref> Light rail vehicles can often be compatible with existing tram networks, avoiding the need for entirely separate infrastructure or rolling stock.<ref name="PT-PMO">{{cite book |last1=White |first1=Peter |title=Public transport: its planning, management and operation |date=2016 |location=New York |isbn=9781317383178 |edition=Edition 6 |chapter=Light rapid transit (LRT) (also known as light rail) |quote=In other cases, a tramway may be upgraded by extensive  construction  of  city-centre  tunnels,  and  some  stations  at  which  all  tickets are  sold  prior  to  boarding  the  vehicle  ('semi-metro'),  for  example  in  Stuttgart. An advantage of such systems is that trams can be diverted into relatively short sections  of  tunnel  as  they  are  built, rather  than  waiting  for  a major  portion  of the system to be completed before operations can commence.}}</ref><ref name="VK">{{cite web |last1=van Lith |first1=Joske |title=Geluidloos zoeven door Rennes |url=https://www.verkeerskunde.nl/artikel/geluidloos-zoeven-door-rennes |website=Verkeerskunde |date=10 December 2010 |access-date=2 February 2023 |language=Dutch}}</ref> In some cases, multiple at-grade branches are used to maximize the capacity of tunneled sections.<ref name="ECMT">{{cite book |last1=ECMT Round Tables |title=Economic Problems of Traffic Peaks |date=1975 |publisher=Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development |url=https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/economic-problems-of-traffic-peaks_9789282104132-en.html |access-date=31 March 2025 |page=39}}</ref><ref name="TQ:TRT2" />
Many light rail systems—even fairly old ones—have a combination of both on- and off-road sections. In some countries (especially in Europe), only the latter is described as light rail. In those places, trams running on mixed rights-of-way are not regarded as a light rail but considered distinctly as streetcars or trams. However, the requirement for saying that a rail line is "separated" can be quite low—sometimes just with concrete "buttons" to discourage automobile drivers from getting onto the tracks. Some systems such as [[Link light rail|Seattle's Link]] had on-road mixed sections but were closed to regular road traffic, with light rail vehicles and buses both operating along a common right-of-way (however, Link converted to full separation in 2019).
 
=== Tracks ===
 
==== Right-of-way ====
{{multiple image
| align            = right
| direction        = horizontal
| image1            = Outbound train on South Huntington Avenue (2), September 2022.JPG
| width1            = 140
| image2            = Inbound train at Allston Street station (2), August 2018.JPG
| width2            = 140
| image3            = Prudential Eastbound MBTA Green Line Platform, November 2024.jpg
| width3            = 140
| footer            = Light rail systems combine street-running or reserved tracks (category C/B, left/middle) with partially independent metro-like infrastructure (category A, right)
}}
 
[[File:KVB5208 Neußer Straße Gürtel.JPG|thumb|Elevated section in Cologne.]]
 
Light rail systems can be defined by their right-of-way type and operational features such as power supply and speed.<ref name="StateArt1">{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yJJKFV0uwHQC&q=permit+eventually&pg=PA9 |last1=De Leuw, Cather & Company |title=Light Rail Transit: A State of the Art Review |date=1976 |access-date=8 February 2023}}</ref><ref name="DUPTSV86" /><ref name="UPTS">{{cite book |last1=Vuchic |first1=Vukan R. |title=Urban Public Transportation Systems |date=14 January 2002 |publisher=University of Pennsylvania |pages=4, 5}}</ref> Three main categories of right-of-way can be categorized as:<ref name="DUPTSV86" />
 
* A: Fully independent tracks without road or pedestrian crossings.
* B: Reserved tracks with some level crossings.
* C: Street-running lines in mixed traffic.
 
Conventional tram lines typically operate on category C, light rail commonly uses category B with some sections of category A, while rapid transit generally operates entirely on category A.<ref name="DUPTSV86" /><ref name="UPTS" />
 
Grade-separated tracks correspond to fully independent right-of-way, while reserved tracks can be exclusive or semi-exclusive.<ref>{{cite book |title=Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual |date=2013 |publisher=Transportation Research Board |isbn=978-0-309-28344-1 |page=31/35 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6c_BngEACAAJ |language=en |chapter=2 Mode and service concepts}}</ref> Light rail operating entirely on independent tracks is sometimes also referred to as light rail rapid transit.<ref name="UTST" /> Dedicated stretches of track may designed to function similarly to regular [[Rapid transit|metro or rapid transit]] lines.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QLMkAQAAMAAJ&q=%22Semi-metro%22 |title=The Automobile and the Environment |date=1973 |quote=descending into tunnels in the style of conventional underground mass transit |access-date=9 February 2023}}</ref><ref name="Norley">{{cite book |last1=Norley |first1=Kym |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265616849 |title=Light rail: The semi-metro concept |date=2010 |page=4 |quote=Semi-metro: Light rail on reserved right of way over congested parts of line typically in tunnel or viaduct for grade separation designed to Metro standards, with priority surface light rail in other sections}}</ref> One key difference from rapid transit is that light rail lines may only have one or a few sections in tunnels and on viaducts.<ref name="ELT20132">{{cite book |last1=Cappelli |first1=Agostino |url=https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/3112304 |title=Environment, land use and transportation systems: selected papers |last2=Nocera |first2=Silvio |last3=Libardo |first3=Alessandra |date=2013 |page=42 |language=en |quote=Rather soon attention was given to Light Rapid Transit modes such as pre-metro and semi-metro (Hannover) employing heavy trams instead of light trains to run on open-air independent or semi-independent tracks, and just and just seldom using short bypass tunnels or fly-evers to skip congestion in central areas. |access-date=22 March 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Orski |first1=C.K. |date=1973 |title=New Transportation Service Concepts |url=https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/agsndtr70/318245.htm |journal=Proceedings of the International Conference on Transportation Research |pages=407 |access-date=9 February 2023}}</ref>
 
[[File:Huntington Avenue streetcar at Park Street station, 1897.jpg|thumb|Early light rail operations in the Tremont Street subway, 1897]][[File:Trendelacosta.JPG|thumb|The [[Tren de la Costa]] in [[Greater Buenos Aires]]]]
 
==== Track gauge ====
Light rail systems historically used various gauges, with [[narrow gauge railways|narrow gauge]] common early on. Most modern systems use [[standard gauge]], which allows standard maintenance equipment, easier transfer of rolling stock, tighter turns with [[articulated car]]s, and better low-floor accessibility. For example, the [[Tren de la Costa]] in [[Greater Buenos Aires]] was converted from broad to standard gauge to accommodate light rail vehicles.<ref name="Bottoms" />


Some systems, such as the [[AirTrain JFK]] in New York City, the [[Docklands Light Railway|DLR]] in London, and [[Kelana Jaya Line]] in [[Kuala Lumpur]], have dispensed with the need for an operator. The [[Vancouver]] [[SkyTrain (Vancouver)|SkyTrain]] was an early adopter of driverless vehicles, while the [[Toronto]] [[Scarborough RT|Scarborough rapid transit]] operated the same trains as Vancouver, but used drivers. In most discussions and comparisons, these specialized systems are generally not considered light rail but as [[medium-capacity rail system|light metro]] systems.
===Power sources===
Most light rail systems use [[overhead lines]] for electricity, avoiding hazards from an electrified [[third rail]]. Some systems use battery power for sections of track without overhead catenary,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-04-26 |title=Bi-modes, batteries and fuel cells |url=https://www.modernrailways.com/article/bi-modes-batteries-and-fuel-cells |access-date=2025-08-23 |website=www.modernrailways.com |language=en}}</ref> while a few light rail systems use [[Diesel engine|diesel]] power.<ref name="APTA-def" /><ref name=":3">{{Cite web |title=Light Rail Transit (LRT) FAQs |url=https://www.torontoenvironment.org/campaigns/transit/LRTfaq#LRTvsstreetcarvssubway |access-date=2024-07-24 |website=Toronto Environmental Alliance}}</ref>


==Variations==
====Ground-level power supply====
===Light rail operating on mainline railways===
{{Main|Ground-level power supply}}
[[File:Cappel Stadtbahn02 2005-12-30.jpg|right|thumb|On the [[Karlsruhe Stadtbahn]], trams can share mainline tracks with heavy rail trains.]]
[[File:DulwichGroveStop.jpg|thumb|The [[Inner West Light Rail]] in [[Sydney]] runs mostly along a former heavy rail corridor.]]
{{Main|Tram train}}
Around [[Karlsruhe]], [[Kassel]], and [[Saarbrücken]] in Germany, dual-voltage light rail trains partly use mainline railroad tracks, sharing these tracks with heavy rail trains. In the [[Netherlands]], this concept was first applied on the [[RijnGouweLijn]]. This allows commuters to ride directly into the city center, rather than taking a mainline train only as far as a central station and then having to change to a tram. In France, similar [[tram-train]]s are planned for Paris, [[Mulhouse]], and [[Strasbourg]]; further projects exist. In some cases, tram trains use previously abandoned or lightly used heavy rail lines in addition to or instead of still in use mainline tracks. In 2022, Spain opened the [[Cádiz Bay tram-train|Cádiz TramBahia]], where trams share track with [[Cercanías Cádiz|commuter]] and long-distance trains from the main terminus in the city and curve off to serve cities without a railway connection.


Some of the issues involved in such schemes are:
Conduit power was an early alternative to overhead wires in cities prohibiting them, used in London, Paris, Berlin, Marseille, Budapest, Prague, New York City, and Washington, D.C.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Post|first=Robert C.|title=Urban Mass Transit: The Life Story of a Technology|url=https://archive.org/details/urbanmasstransit00post|url-access=limited|publisher=[[Greenwood Press]]|year=2007|pages=[https://archive.org/details/urbanmasstransit00post/page/n61 45]–47|isbn=978-0-313-33916-5}}</ref>
* compatibility of the safety systems
* power supply of the track to the power used by the vehicles (frequently different voltages, rarely third rail vs overhead wires)
* width of the vehicles to the position of the [[railway platform|platforms]]
* height of the platforms


===Diesel light rail===
In Bordeaux, the tram network uses a ground-level third rail in the city center, segmented and powered only under trams to ensure safety. Outside the center, trams use overhead wires. The system is three times more expensive than conventional overhead wiring and has high maintenance costs but has proven popular, carrying up to 190,000 passengers per day.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.railway-technology.com/contractors/suburban/alstom/press17.html|access-date=26 December 2009|title=99% AVAILABILITY AND EXCEPTIONALLY HIGH PASSENGER LEVELS : THE BORDEAUX URBAN TRAMWAY IS A RESOUNDING SUCCESS|website=Railway-Technology.com|publisher=Net Resources International|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080613175705/http://www.railway-technology.com/contractors/suburban/alstom/press17.html|archive-date=13 June 2008}}</ref>
[[File:South Keys o-train station.jpg|thumb|left|upright=1.1|[[O-Train]] [[Line 2 (O-Train)|Line 2]] in [[Ottawa]] was built along a freight railway and is still used by freight traffic.]]
There is a history of what would now be considered light rail vehicles operating on heavy rail [[rapid transit]] tracks in the US, especially in the case of [[interurban streetcar]]s. Notable examples are [[Lehigh Valley Transit]] trains running on the [[Philadelphia and Western Railroad]] high-speed third rail line (now the [[Norristown High-Speed Line]]). Such arrangements are almost impossible now, due to the [[Federal Railroad Administration]] refusing (for crash safety reasons) to allow non-FRA compliant railcars (i.e., subway and light rail vehicles) to run on the same tracks at the same times as compliant railcars, which includes locomotives and standard railroad passenger and freight equipment.


Exceptions in the US, known as ''[[hybrid rail|diesel light rail]]'' (DLRT)) are fir intance: [[NJ Transit]] [[River Line (New Jersey Transit)|River Line]] from [[Camden, New Jersey|Camden]] to [[Trenton, New Jersey|Trenton]] and Austin's [[Capital MetroRail]], which have received exemptions to the provision that passenger rail operations occur only during daytime hours and [[Bordentown Secondary#Today|Conrail]] freight service only at night, with several hours separating one operation from the other. Also, [[O-Train]] [[Line 2 (O-Train)|Line 2]] in Ottawa also has freight service at certain hours. These diesel-powered transit systems are using [[lightweighting|lightweight]] trains; [[diesel multiple unit|diesel multiple unit (DMU)]] trains originally designed for mainline railroads.
===Signalling===


==Comparison to other rail transit modes==
==== Automatic train operation ====
With its mix of right-of-way types and train control technologies, LRT offers the widest range of latitude of any rail system in the design, engineering, and operating practices. The challenge in designing light rail systems is to realize the potential of LRT to provide fast, comfortable service while avoiding the tendency to overdesign that results in excessive capital costs beyond what is necessary to meet the public's needs.<ref>
{{Main|Automatic train operation}}
{{cite web
  |author1=Fazio, A. E. |author2=Hickey, T. R.
  | url = http://pubsindex.trb.org/document/view/default.asp?lbid=700178
  | title = Designing New Light Rail – Taking Engineering Beyond Vanilla
  | version = Circular E-C058: 9th National Light Rail Transit Conference
  | publisher = Transportation Research Board
  | year=2003
  | access-date = 10 November 2006
}}</ref>


{| class="wikitable"
[[Automatic train operation]] (ATO) monitors train position and speed, adjusting movements for safety and efficient operations, and is used in some light rail networks.<ref>{{Cite web |title=ATO: The Key to the Future of Rail? |url=https://criticalsoftware.com/multimedia/critical/en/q5rvGbO7c-CSW_-_Railway_-_White_Paper_-_Automatic_Train_Operation.pdf |access-date=24 July 2024 |publisher=[[Critical Software]]}}</ref>
|-
! style="width:15%;"|Alternative
! Differences
|-
| [[Rapid transit]]
| Light rail vehicles (LRVs) are distinguished from [[rapid transit|rapid rail transit]] (RRT) vehicles by their capability for operation in mixed traffic, generally resulting in a narrower car body and articulation to operate in a street traffic environment. With their large size, large turning radius, and often an electrified [[third rail]], RRT vehicles cannot operate in the street. Since LRT systems can operate in existing streets, they can often avoid the cost of expensive [[grade-separated]] subway and elevated segments that would be required with RRT.
|-
| [[Tram|Streetcars or trams]]
| Conversely, LRVs generally outperform traditional streetcars in terms of capacity and top-end speed, and almost all modern LRVs are capable of [[multiple-unit operation]]. The latest generation of LRVs is considerably larger and faster, typically {{convert|29|m|ftin|frac=8}} long with a maximum speed of around {{convert|105|km/h|mph|sigfig=3}}.<ref>{{cite web|title=Technical Data |url=http://references.transportation.siemens.com/refdb/showReference.do?r=1920&div=3&div=5&div=2&div=8&l=en |work=Light Rail Vehicle System Houston/Texas, USA |publisher=Siemens |year=2008 |access-date=18 March 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080427042721/http://references.transportation.siemens.com/refdb/showReference.do?r=1920&div=3&div=5&div=2&div=8&l=en |archive-date=27 April 2008 }}
</ref>
|-
|[[Heritage streetcar]]s
|A variation considered by many cities is to use historic or replica cars on their streetcar systems instead of modern LRVs. A heritage streetcar may not have the capacity and speed of an LRV, but it will add to the ambiance and historic character of its location.
|-
|[[Medium capacity system|Light metro]]
|A derivative of LRT is light rail rapid transit (LRRT), also referred to as ''light metro.'' Such railways are characterized by exclusive rights of way, advanced train control systems, short headway capability, and floor-level boarding. These systems approach the passenger capacity of full metro systems but can be cheaper to construct due to LRVs generally being smaller in size, turning tighter curves and climbing steeper grades than standard RRT vehicles, and having a smaller station size.
|-
|[[Interurban]]s
|The term ''interurban'' mainly refers to rail cars that run through streets like ordinary streetcars (trams), but also between cities or towns, often through rural environments. In the period 1900–1930, interurbans were very common in the US, especially in the [[Midwest]]. Some of them, like the [[Red Devil (interurban)|Red Devils]], the J. G. Brill [[Bullet (interurban)|Bullets]], and the [[Electroliner]]s, were the [[high-speed rail]]cars of their time, with an in-service speed of up to about {{convert|145|km/h|mph|0|abbr=on}}. In Europe, interurbans are making a comeback as "[[tram-train]]s" (locally known under different names) that operate on both the railway and light rail tracks, often with different voltages. The [[Karlsruhe Stadtbahn]] is one well-known example.
|}


===Typical rolling stock===
==Rolling stock==
The [[BART]] railcar in the following chart is ''not'' generally considered to be a "light rail" vehicle (it is a [[heavy rail]] vehicle), and is only included for comparison purposes.
Light rail routes are operated either with regular trams (with or without [[Types of trams#Low-floor|low floor]]) or with specially developed tramcars (light rail vehicles), such as the [[Stadtbahnwagen B|Stadtbahn-car 'type B']].<ref name="StateArt13">{{cite book |last1=De Leuw, Cather & Company |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yJJKFV0uwHQC&q=permit+eventually&pg=PA9 |title=Light Rail Transit: A State of the Art Review |date=1976 |access-date=8 February 2023}}</ref>{{Rp|page=55}} Many light rail systems (including in the United States),<ref>{{cite book |url=https://trid.trb.org/view/789880 |title=Sharing of Rail Transit Infrastructure by Streetcars and Larger Light Rail Vehicles: Design and Operational Issues |date=2006 |publisher=American Public Transportation Association |isbn=978-1-931594-23-3 |location=Washington, DC |access-date=20 November 2024}}</ref> are operated with larger and heavier vehicles than those on streetcar systems.<ref name="ELT20132"/>


=== Comparisons of rolling stock types ===
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! Type
! Type
| Rapid transit (heavy rail) || Light rail || Tram, or streetcar || Heritage streetcar
| '''Rapid transit (heavy rail)*''' || '''Light rail''' || '''Tram, or streetcar''' || '''Heritage streetcar'''
|-
|-
! Manufacturer
! Manufacturer
Line 201: Line 219:
! Weight (empty)
! Weight (empty)
| 63.1{{nbsp}}t
| 63.1{{nbsp}}t
| 48.6{{nbsp}}t<ref name="auto">{{cite web|title=Siemens S70 Low-floor Light Rail Vehicle|url=https://w3.usa.siemens.com/mobility/us/en/interurban-mobility/rail-solutions/high-speed-and-intercity-trains/Documents/Houston1_DataSheet_2014_LR.pdf|publisher=Siemens}}</ref>
| 48.6{{nbsp}}t<ref name="auto">{{cite web |title=Siemens S70 Low-floor Light Rail Vehicle |url=https://w3.usa.siemens.com/mobility/us/en/interurban-mobility/rail-solutions/high-speed-and-intercity-trains/Documents/Houston1_DataSheet_2014_LR.pdf |publisher=Siemens}}</ref>
| 28.8{{nbsp}}t
| 28.8{{nbsp}}t
| 23.5{{nbsp}}t<ref name="Gomaco Trolley Company">{{cite web|title=Gomaco Trolley Company|url=http://www.gomacotrolley.com/Resources/pages/birney_littlerock.html|publisher=Gomaco Trolley Company}}</ref>
| 23.5{{nbsp}}t<ref name="Gomaco Trolley Company">{{cite web |title=Gomaco Trolley Company |url=http://www.gomacotrolley.com/Resources/pages/birney_littlerock.html |publisher=Gomaco Trolley Company}}</ref>
|-
|-
! Capacity
! Capacity
| 150 max. || 72 seats, 220 max.<ref name="auto"/> || 30 seats, 157 max. || 40 seats, 50 max.<ref name="Gomaco Trolley Company"/>
| 150 max. || 72 seats, 220 max.<ref name="auto" />|| 30 seats, 157 max. || 40 seats, 50 max.<ref name="Gomaco Trolley Company" />
|-
|-
! Top speed
! Top speed
Line 214: Line 232:
| 4–10 vehicles || 2–5 vehicles || 1 vehicle || 1 vehicle
| 4–10 vehicles || 2–5 vehicles || 1 vehicle || 1 vehicle
|}
|}
''The [[BART]] railcar in the chart is not generally considered to be a "light rail" vehicle (it is a [[heavy rail]] vehicle), and is only included for comparison purposes.''


===Floor height===
==Related types of rail transit==
{{Main|Low floor}}
[[File:DLR unit 135 entering Canary Wharf station bound for Bank.jpg|thumb|The [[Docklands Light Railway]], a [[medium-capacity rail system|light metro system]]]]
Low-floor LRVs have the advantage of a low-floor design, allowing them to load passengers directly from low-rise platforms that can be little more than raised curbs. High-floor light rail systems also exist, featuring larger stations.<ref name=":0" />
 
=== Premetro ===
[[Premetro]] is largely equal to light rail: a type of public transport in which trams run partly grade separated, by using tunnels and/or viaducts. However, there is one clear distinguishing factor: premetro uses infrastructure that has been explicitly constructed with the ambition to transfer to use metro trains in the future.<ref name="TQ:TRT2">{{cite journal |date=1970 |title=The Rapid Tramway: A Feasible Solution to the Urban Transportation Problem |url=https://trid.trb.org/view/20191 |journal=Traffic Quarterly |volume=24 |issue=4 |issn=0041-0713 |access-date=7 April 2024}}</ref>{{Rp|page=521}}<ref name="StateArt13"/>{{Rp|page=9}}<ref>{{cite web |date=8 October 2009 |title=PREMETRO [1 record] |url=https://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tpv2alpha/alpha-eng.html?lang=eng&srchtxt=PREMETRO&i=1&index=ent |access-date=9 February 2023 |publisher=TERMIUM Plus®}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Transportation Research Board National Research Council |url=https://trid.trb.org/view/297446 |title=Urban Public Transportation Glossary |date=1989 |quote=pre-metro: a light rail transit system designed with provisions for easy conversion to rail rapid transit |access-date=16 February 2023}}</ref> It is usually also developed from an existing classic tram network. One prominent example is the premetro in Brussels, where several premetro lines have been or will be converted into full heavy rail metro lines.


==Infrastructure==
=== U-Stadtbahn ===
===Track gauge===
The [[Stadtbahn|U-Stadtbahn]] is also an intermediate transportation form between metro and tram. It has originated in Germany, adapting the existing tram networks. Here specially developed trams run underground through tunnels in central urban areas.<ref name="StateArt13" />{{Rp|page=10}}<ref name="GG21">{{cite book |last1=Harman |first1=Reg |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TjW-rQEACAAJ |title=High speed trains and the development and regeneration of cities |date=2006 |publisher=Greengauge 21 |location=London |page=19 |quote=Köln, like other major German cities served by ICE services over high-speed lines, has a regional rail system (Schnellbahn) and a substantial tramway system, part operated as Stadtbahn (semi metro).}}</ref><ref name="PO3">{{cite web |last1=Pedestrian Observations |date=29 October 2020 |title=Stadtbahn Systems |url=https://pedestrianobservations.com/2020/10/28/stadtbahn-systems/ |access-date=16 February 2023 }}</ref> Stadtbahn lines can be subdivided by looking at the types of rolling stock.
Historically, the [[track gauge]] has had considerable variations, with [[narrow gauge railways|narrow gauge]] common in many early systems. However, most light rail systems are now [[standard gauge]].<ref name="Bottoms" /> Older standard-gauge vehicles could not negotiate sharp turns as easily as narrow-gauge ones, but modern light rail systems achieve tighter turning radii by using [[articulated car]]s. An important advantage of the standard gauge is that standard railway maintenance equipment can be used on it, rather than custom-built machinery. Using standard gauges also allows light rail vehicles to be conveniently moved around using the same tracks as freight railways. Additionally, wider gauges (e.g. standard gauge) provide more floor clearance on [[low-floor tram]]s that have constricted pedestrian areas at the wheels, which is especially important for wheelchair access, as narrower gauges (e.g. metre gauge) can make it challenging or impossible to pass the tram's wheels. Furthermore, standard-gauge rolling stock can be switched between networks either temporarily or permanently, and both newly built and used standard-gauge rolling stock tends to be cheaper to buy, as more companies offer such vehicles.


===Power sources===
* There are lines where full-sized (i.e. {{Cvt|2.65|m}} wide) express trams run, with long wagon bodies: [[Cologne Stadtbahn|Cologne]], [[Frankfurt U-Bahn|Frankfurt]] and [[Stuttgart Stadtbahn|Stuttgart]], among others.
[[Overhead lines]] supply electricity to the vast majority of light rail systems.<ref name="APTA-def" /> This avoids the danger potentially presented by an electrified [[third rail]].<ref name=":3" /> The [[Docklands Light Railway]] uses an inverted third rail for its electrical power, which allows the electrified rail to be covered and the power drawn from the underside. Trams in [[Bordeaux tramway|Bordeaux]], France, use a [[Ground level power supply|special third-rail configuration]] where the power is only switched on beneath the trams, making it safe on city streets. Several systems in Europe and a few recently opened systems in North America use [[Diesel engine|diesel]]-powered trains.
* In some networks, narrower Stadtbahn trams with shorter wagon bodies were used at the start of the operation: [[Hanover Stadtbahn|Hannover]] ([[TW 6000|TW6000]]) and [[Bielefeld Stadtbahn|Bielefeld]] ([[Stadtbahnwagen M/N|Düwag M/N]]).
* From the end of the 20th century Stadtbahn lines with low-floor trams also appeared: [[Dortmund Stadtbahn|Dortmund]] (U43 & U44), [[Düsseldorf Stadtbahn|Düsseldorf]] (''Wehrhahnlinie'') and [[Cologne Stadtbahn|Cologne]] (1, 7, 9, 12 and 15).


===Ground-level power supply for trams===
===Light metro ===
[[File:Newcastle Light Rail Queens Wharf.jpg|thumb|Wireless light-rail vehicles of the [[Newcastle Light Rail]] system in [[Newcastle, New South Wales]]]]
Some systems, such as the [[AirTrain JFK]] in New York City, the [[Docklands Light Railway|DLR]] in London, and [[Kelana Jaya Line]] in [[Kuala Lumpur]], have dispensed with the need for an operator. The [[Vancouver]] [[SkyTrain (Vancouver)|SkyTrain]] was an early adopter of driverless vehicles, while the [[Toronto]] [[Scarborough RT|Scarborough rapid transit]] operated the same trains as Vancouver, but used drivers. In most discussions and comparisons, these specialized systems are generally not considered light rail but as [[medium-capacity rail system|light metro]] systems. Light metro systems are essentially hybrids of light rail and rapid transit.<ref name="GGW-19" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=2016-01-19 |title=Light-Rail Transit (LRT) |url=https://policy.tti.tamu.edu/strategy/light-rail-transit/ |access-date=2024-07-24 |website=Transportation Policy Research |language=en-US}}</ref>
{{Main|Ground-level power supply}}
When electric streetcars were introduced in the late 19th century, [[conduit current collection]] was one of the first ways of supplying power, but it proved to be much more expensive, complicated, and trouble-prone than [[overhead wires]]. When electric street railways became ubiquitous, conduit power was used in those cities that did not permit overhead wires. In Europe, it was used in London, Paris, Berlin, Marseille, Budapest, and Prague. In the United States, it was used in parts of New York City and Washington, D.C.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Post|first=Robert C.|title=Urban Mass Transit: The Life Story of a Technology|url=https://archive.org/details/urbanmasstransit00post|url-access=limited|publisher=[[Greenwood Press]]|year=2007|pages=[https://archive.org/details/urbanmasstransit00post/page/n61 45]–47|isbn=978-0-313-33916-5}}</ref> [[Third rail]] technology was investigated for use on the [[Gold Coast, Queensland|Gold Coast]] of Australia for the [[G:link]] light rail,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pb.com.au/gclightrail |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030319223746/http://www.pb.com.au/gclightrail/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=19 March 2003 |title=Gold Coast Light Rail Feasibility Study |publisher=Commonwealth Government, Gold Coast City Council & Queensland Government Queensland Transport |date=23 December 2004 }}</ref> though power from [[overhead line]]s was ultimately utilized for that system.


In the French city of [[Bordeaux]], the [[Bordeaux tramway|tramway network]] is powered by a [[Ground-level power supply|third rail]] in the city center, where the tracks are not always segregated from pedestrians and cars.<ref>{{Cite press release|title=Bordeaux Light Rail Route Will Operate Without Overhead Lines |publisher=[[American Public Transportation Association]] |year=2003 |url=http://www.apta.com/services/intnatl/intfocus/bordeaux.cfm |access-date=21 December 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201155854/http://www.apta.com/services/intnatl/intfocus/bordeaux.cfm |archive-date=1 December 2008 }}</ref> The third rail (actually two closely spaced rails) is placed in the middle of the track and divided into eight-metre sections, each of which is powered only while it is completely covered by a tram. This minimizes the risk of a person or animal coming into contact with a live rail. In outer areas, the trams switch to conventional [[Overhead lines|overhead wires]]. The Bordeaux power system costs about three times as much as a conventional overhead wire system and took 24 months to achieve acceptable levels of reliability, requiring the replacement of all the main cables and power supplies.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.railway-technology.com/contractors/suburban/alstom/press17.html|access-date=26 December 2009|title=99% AVAILABILITY AND EXCEPTIONALLY HIGH PASSENGER LEVELS : THE BORDEAUX URBAN TRAMWAY IS A RESOUNDING SUCCESS|website=Railway-Technology.com|publisher=Net Resources International|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080613175705/http://www.railway-technology.com/contractors/suburban/alstom/press17.html |archive-date = 13 June 2008}}</ref> Operating and maintenance costs of the innovative power system still remain high. However, despite numerous service outages, the system was a success with the public, gaining up to 190,000 passengers per day.
===Hybrid rail===
[[File:20070421 RivertonNJ D80 NearHiway73.jpg|left|thumb|[[NJ Transit]]'s [[River Line (NJ Transit)|River Line]] was the first [[hybrid rail]] service in the [[United States]].]]
In the [[United States]], [[interurban]]-style services are now rare, largely because the [[Federal Railroad Administration]] (FRA) does not permit non-compliant [[railcar]]s (such as [[rapid transit]] or light rail vehicles) to operate simultaneously with standard [[Rail freight transport|freight]] or [[Passenger train|passenger equipment]] on the same tracks for safety reasons.


===Automatic train operation===
Exceptions, known as [[hybrid rail]] in the United States, include [[NJ Transit]]'s [[River Line (New Jersey Transit)|River Line]] from [[Camden, New Jersey|Camden]] and [[Trenton, New Jersey|Trenton]] and the [[North County Transit District]]'s (NCTD) [[Sprinter (rail service)|Sprinter]] service in [[North County|northern San Diego County, California]]. These services operate under FRA waivers that allow passenger trains to run during daytime hours and freight trains at night, with several hours of temporal separation between the two. These diesel-powered systems use lightweight [[diesel multiple unit]]s (DMUs) originally designed for mainline railroads.
{{Main|Automatic train operation}}
[[Automatic train operation]] is employed on light rail networks, tracking the position and speed of a train and hence adjusting its movement for safety and efficiency.<ref>{{Cite web |title=ATO: The Key to the Future of Rail? |url=https://criticalsoftware.com/multimedia/critical/en/q5rvGbO7c-CSW_-_Railway_-_White_Paper_-_Automatic_Train_Operation.pdf |access-date=24 July 2024 |publisher=[[Critical Software]] |quote=Serving as a fundamental component of metro and light rail networks, ATO utilises sensors and communication systems to monitor train positions and speeds, automatically adjusting train movements to ensure safe and efficient operations.}}</ref>


==Comparison to road traffic==
===Very light rail===
[[File:Kaohsiung LRT Circular Line at Gate of Kaohsiung Port 20180621.jpg|thumb|[[Circular light rail]] in front of the Gate of [[Kaohsiung]], [[Taiwan]]]]
[[File:The Coventry Very Light Rail Vehicle during a public test on Saturday 17 May 2025 extended version.jpg|thumb|A Coventry Very Light Rail Vehicle]]
===Comparison with high capacity roads===
While the word ''light'' in "light rail" refers to the lighter capacity compared to heavy rail/rapid transit, however the same word refers to lightweight in "very light rail'. One example in passengers service is [[British Rail Class 139]] on the [[Stourbridge Town branch line]].
One line of light rail (requires 7.6 m, 25' right of way) has a theoretical capacity of up to 8 times more than one 3.7 m (12 foot) lane on a freeway, excluding busses, during peak times. Roads have ultimate capacity limits that can be determined by [[Traffic engineering (transportation)|traffic engineering]], and usually experience a chaotic breakdown inflow and a dramatic drop in speed (a [[traffic jam]]) if they exceed about 2,000 vehicles per hour per lane (each car roughly [[two-second rule (road)|two seconds]] behind another).<ref>Matt Lorenz and [[Lily Elefteriadou]] (2000) [http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/EC018/08_52.pdf ''A Probabilistic Approach to Defining Freeway Capacity and Breakdown''] (PDF), Transportation Research Board.</ref> Since most people who drive to work or on business trips do so alone, studies show that the average car occupancy on many roads carrying commuters is only about 1.5 people per car during the high-demand [[rush hour]] periods of the day.<ref>{{cite web|title=Highlights of the 2001 National Household Travel Survey: A-15 Vehicle Occupancy Per Vehicle Mile by Time of Day and Weekend Status|url=http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/highlights_of_the_2001_national_household_travel_survey/html/table_a15.html|publisher=US Department of Transportation|access-date=24 February 2016|archive-date=28 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170628142015/https://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/highlights_of_the_2001_national_household_travel_survey/html/table_a15.html|url-status=dead}}</ref>
This combination of factors limits roads carrying only automobile commuters to a maximum observed capacity of about 3,000 passengers per hour per lane. The problem can be mitigated by introducing high-occupancy vehicle ([[High-occupancy vehicle lane|HOV]]) lanes and [[ride-sharing]] programs, but in most cases, policymakers have chosen to add more lanes to the roads, despite a small risk that in unfavorable situations an extension of the road network might lead to increased travel times ([[Downs–Thomson paradox]], [[Braess's paradox]]).<ref>https://homepage.rub.de/Dietrich.Braess/Paradox-BNW.pdf (1968) end of chapter 4 retrieved 2023/02/27</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Ontario Expanding Highway 401 in Cambridge|url=https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/33297/ontario-expanding-highway-401-in-cambridge|access-date=2 December 2021|website=news.ontario.ca}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Ontario is finally widening Highway 401 through the GTA|url=https://www.blogto.com/city/2019/04/ontario-widening-highway-401/|access-date=2 December 2021|website=www.blogto.com|language=en}}</ref>


By contrast, light rail vehicles can travel in multi-car trains carrying a theoretical ridership up to 20,000 passengers per hour in much narrower [[Right-of-way (transportation)|rights-of-way]], not much more than two car lanes wide for a [[double track]] system.<ref>Tom Parkinson and Ian Fisher (1996) [http://nrc40.nas.edu/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=2603 ''Rail Transit Capacity''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090111162103/http://nrc40.nas.edu/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=2603 |date=11 January 2009 }}, Transportation Research Board.</ref> They can often be run through [[tramway tracks|existing city streets and parks]], or placed in the [[median (road)|medians of roads]]. If [[Street running train|run in streets]], trains are usually limited by city block lengths to about four 180-passenger vehicles (720 passengers). Operating on two-minute headways using traffic signal progression, a well-designed two-track system can handle up to 30 trains per hour per track, achieving peak rates of over 20,000 passengers per hour in each direction. More advanced systems with separate rights-of-way using [[Moving block|moving block signaling]] can exceed 25,000 passengers per hour per track.<ref>[http://www.trb.org/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=2326 ''Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual''], Transportation Research Board.</ref>
Very Light Rail developments with prefabricated track and onboard power (no Over Head Line) in the UK are aiming for £10 m per km<ref>{{cite web |date=25 September 2019 |title=Target cost and timescale revealed for Coventry very light rail scheme <!-- Bot generated title --> |url=http://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/target-cost-timescale-revealed-coventry-light-rail-scheme-25-09-2019// }}</ref> as opposed to convention tram rail and OHL at £20–£30 m per km.<ref>{{cite web |date=30 July 2019 |title=1 tram light rail track installation costs £20-£30 m per km is a good ball-park figure. <!-- Bot generated title --> |url=http://bathtrams.uk/4-cost-of-tram-light-rail-installation/ }}</ref> First tests in [[Coventry Very Light Rail|Coventry]] have started in 2025, a full line should be operation able by 2027.


===Practical considerations===
=== Comparison to other rail transit modes ===
Most light rail systems in the United States are limited by demand rather than capacity (by and large, most American LRT systems carry fewer than 4,000 persons per hour per direction), but Boston's and San Francisco's light rail lines carry 9,600 and 13,100 passengers per hour per track during rush hour.<ref name="Hanson 2004">{{cite book
With its mix of right-of-way types and train control technologies, LRT offers the widest range of latitude of any rail system in the design, engineering, and operating practices. The challenge in designing light rail systems is to realize the potential of LRT to provide fast, comfortable service while avoiding the tendency to overdesign that results in excessive capital costs beyond what is necessary to meet the public's needs.<ref>
  | last1 = Hanson
{{cite web |author1=Fazio, A. E. |author2=Hickey, T. R. |year=2003 |title=Designing New Light Rail – Taking Engineering Beyond Vanilla |url=http://pubsindex.trb.org/document/view/default.asp?lbid=700178 |access-date=10 November 2006 |publisher=Transportation Research Board |version=Circular E-C058: 9th National Light Rail Transit Conference}}</ref>
  | first1 = Susan
  | last2 = Giuliano
  | first2 = Genevieve
  | title = The geography of urban transportation
  | publisher = Guilford Press
  | year = 2004
  | isbn = 1-59385-055-7}}</ref> Elsewhere in North America, the [[Calgary]] [[C-Train]] and [[Monterrey Metro]] have higher light rail ridership than Boston or San Francisco. Systems outside North America often have much higher passenger volumes. The [[Manila Light Rail Transit System]] is one of the highest capacity ones, having been upgraded in a series of expansions to handle 40,000 passengers per hour per direction, and having carried as many as 582,989 passengers in a single day on its [[Manila Light Rail Transit System Line 1|Line 1]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lrta.gov.ph/press_release/press_release_090112_25yrRecordHigh.htm |title=LRT-1 sets 25-year high record ridership |publisher=Manila Light Rail Transit Authority |date=12 January 2009 |access-date=14 March 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326064515/http://www.lrta.gov.ph/press_release/press_release_090112_25yrRecordHigh.htm |archive-date=26 March 2009 }}
</ref> It achieves this volume by running four-car trains with a capacity of up to 1,350 passengers each at a frequency of up to 30 trains per hour. However, the Manila light rail system has full grade separation and as a result, has many of the operating characteristics of a metro system rather than a light rail system. A capacity of 1,350 passengers per train is more similar to the heavy rail than light rail.


====Bus rapid transit====
{| class="wikitable"
[[Bus rapid transit]] (BRT) is an alternative to LRT and many planning studies undertake a comparison of each mode when considering appropriate investments in transit corridor development. BRT systems can exhibit a more diverse range of design characteristics than LRT, depending on the demand and constraints that exist, and BRT using dedicated lanes can have a theoretical capacity of over 30,000 passengers per hour per direction (for example, the [[Guangzhou Bus Rapid Transit]] system operates up to 350 buses per hour per direction). For the effective operation of a bus or BRT system, buses must have priority at traffic lights and have their dedicated lanes, especially as bus frequencies exceed 30 buses per hour per direction. The higher theoretical of BRT relates to the ability of buses to travel closer to each other than rail vehicles and their ability to overtake each other at designated locations allowing express services to bypass those that have stopped at stations. However, to achieve capacities this high, BRT station footprints need to be significantly larger than a typical LRT station. In terms of cost of operation, each bus vehicle requires a single driver, whereas a light rail train may have three to four cars of much larger capacity in one train under the control of one driver, or no driver at all in fully automated systems, increasing the labor costs of BRT systems compared to LRT systems. BRT systems are also usually less fuel-efficient as they use non-electrified vehicles.
|-
! style="width:15%;" |Alternative
! Differences
|-
| [[Rapid transit]]
| [[rapid transit|Rapid rail transit]] (RRT) trains are larger and faster than light rail trains, with stops being further apart.<ref name=":3" /> Light rail vehicles (LRVs) are distinguished from RRT vehicles by their capability for operation in mixed traffic, generally resulting in a narrower car body and articulation to operate in a street traffic environment. With their large size, large turning radius, and often an electrified [[third rail]], RRT vehicles cannot operate in the street. Since LRT systems can operate in existing streets, they can often avoid the cost of expensive [[grade-separated]] subway and elevated segments that would be required with RRT.
|-
| [[Tram|Streetcars or trams]]
| Conversely, LRVs generally outperform traditional streetcars in terms of capacity and top-end speed, and almost all modern LRVs are capable of [[multiple-unit operation]]. The latest generation of LRVs is considerably larger and faster, typically {{convert|29|m|ftin|frac=8}} long with a maximum speed of around {{convert|105|km/h|mph|sigfig=3}}.<ref>{{cite web |year=2008 |title=Technical Data |url=http://references.transportation.siemens.com/refdb/showReference.do?r=1920&div=3&div=5&div=2&div=8&l=en |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080427042721/http://references.transportation.siemens.com/refdb/showReference.do?r=1920&div=3&div=5&div=2&div=8&l=en |archive-date=27 April 2008 |access-date=18 March 2008 |work=Light Rail Vehicle System Houston/Texas, USA |publisher=Siemens}}
</ref>
|-
|[[Heritage streetcar]]s
|A variation considered by many cities is to use historic or replica cars on their streetcar systems instead of modern LRVs. A heritage streetcar may not have the capacity and speed of an LRV, but it will add to the ambiance and historic character of its location.
|-
|[[Medium capacity system|Light metro]]
|A derivative of LRT is light rail rapid transit (LRRT), also referred to as ''light metro.'' Such railroads are characterized by exclusive rights of way, advanced train control systems, short headway capability, and floor-level boarding. These systems approach the passenger capacity of full metro systems but can be cheaper to construct due to LRVs generally being smaller in size, turning tighter curves and climbing steeper grades than standard RRT vehicles, and having a smaller station size.
|-
|[[Interurban]]s
|The term ''interurban'' mainly refers to rail cars that run through streets like ordinary streetcars (trams), but also between cities or towns, often through rural environments. In the period 1900–1930, interurbans were very common in the US, especially in the [[Midwest]]. Some of them, like the [[Red Devil (interurban)|Red Devils]], the J. G. Brill [[Bullet (interurban)|Bullets]], and the [[Electroliner]]s, were the [[high-speed rail]]cars of their time, with an in-service speed of up to about {{convert|145|km/h|mph|0|abbr=on}}. In Europe, interurbans are making a comeback as "[[tram-train]]s" (locally known under different names) that operate on both the railroad and light rail tracks, often with different voltages. The [[Karlsruhe Stadtbahn]] is one well-known example.
|}


An irregular ride experience, including sudden breaking and acceleration, results in a lower ride quality for passengers compared to LRT.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Urban Rail Development Handbook |publisher=PPIAF |page=73 |url=https://www.ppiaf.org/documents/5532 |access-date=9 April 2025}}</ref>
== Capacity ==
[[File:Kaohsiung LRT Circular Line at Gate of Kaohsiung Port 20180621.jpg|thumb|[[Circular light rail]] in front of the Gate of [[Kaohsiung]], [[Taiwan]]]]


====Capacity comparison====
=== Comparison with high-capacity roads ===
The peak passenger capacity per lane per hour depends on which types of vehicles are allowed on the roads. Typically roadways have 1,900 passenger cars per lane per hour (pcplph).<ref>{{cite book|title=NCHRP Report 599: Default Values for Highway Capacity and Level of Service Analyses|year = 2008|url=http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_599.pdf#page=13|publisher=NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM| doi=10.17226/22061 | isbn=978-0-309-43229-0 }}</ref> If only cars are allowed, the capacity will be less and will not increase when the traffic volume increases.
A single light rail line (requiring a 7.6 m [25&nbsp;ft] right-of-way) can carry up to eight times more passengers than a 3.7&nbsp;m (12&nbsp;ft) freeway lane during peak periods. Freeway lanes typically reach capacity at about 2,000 vehicles per hour, beyond which traffic flow breaks down and speeds collapse.<ref>Matt Lorenz and [[Lily Elefteriadou]] (2000) [http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/EC018/08_52.pdf ''A Probabilistic Approach to Defining Freeway Capacity and Breakdown''] (PDF), Transportation Research Board.</ref> With average commuter car occupancy of only 1.5 persons,<ref>{{cite web|title=Highlights of the 2001 National Household Travel Survey: A-15 Vehicle Occupancy Per Vehicle Mile by Time of Day and Weekend Status|url=http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/highlights_of_the_2001_national_household_travel_survey/html/table_a15.html|publisher=US Department of Transportation|access-date=24 February 2016|archive-date=28 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170628142015/https://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/highlights_of_the_2001_national_household_travel_survey/html/table_a15.html|url-status=dead}}</ref> freeways carry a maximum of about 3,000 passengers per lane per hour. HOV lanes and ride-sharing can improve this, but most jurisdictions expand roadway capacity instead, sometimes worsening congestion ([[Downs–Thomson paradox]], [[Braess's paradox]]).<ref>https://homepage.rub.de/Dietrich.Braess/Paradox-BNW.pdf (1968) end of chapter 4 retrieved 2023/02/27</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Ontario Expanding Highway 401 in Cambridge|url=https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/33297/ontario-expanding-highway-401-in-cambridge|access-date=2 December 2021|website=news.ontario.ca}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Ontario is finally widening Highway 401 through the GTA|url=https://www.blogto.com/city/2019/04/ontario-widening-highway-401/|access-date=2 December 2021|website=www.blogto.com|language=en}}</ref>


When there is a bus driving on this route, the capacity of the lane will be higher and will increase when the traffic level increases. And because the capacity of a light rail system is higher than that of a bus, there will be even more capacity when there is a combination of cars and light rail. Table 3 shows an example of peak passenger capacity.
By contrast, light rail trains operating in two-track rights-of-way as narrow as two car lanes can exceed 20,000 passengers per hour per direction, and over 25,000 with [[moving block]] signaling.<ref>Tom Parkinson and Ian Fisher (1996) [http://nrc40.nas.edu/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=2603 ''Rail Transit Capacity''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090111162103/http://nrc40.nas.edu/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=2603 |date=11 January 2009}}, Transportation Research Board.</ref><ref>[http://www.trb.org/news/blurb_detail.asp?id=2326 ''Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual''], Transportation Research Board.</ref>


Roadway person-throughput varies by permitted vehicle types. A typical car-only lane carries about 1,900 passenger cars per lane per hour (pcplph).<ref>{{cite book |url=http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_599.pdf#page=13 |title=NCHRP Report 599: Default Values for Highway Capacity and Level of Service Analyses |publisher=NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-309-43229-0 |doi=10.17226/22061}}</ref> Adding buses or light rail raises capacity, as shown below:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
!   !! Car !! Car + bus !! Car + light rail
! !! Car !! Car + bus !! Car + light rail
|-
|-
| Low volume || 900|| 1,650|| 2,250
| Low volume || 900 || 1,650 || 2,250
|-
|-
| Medium volume|| 900|| 2,350|| 3,250
| Medium volume || 900 || 2,350 || 3,250
|-
|-
| High volume|| 900|| 3,400|| 4,600
| High volume || 900 || 3,400 || 4,600
|-
|-
| colspan="4" style="text-align: center;" | '''Source:''' Edson & Tennyson, 2003{{Full citation needed|date=January 2020}}
| colspan="4" style="text-align: center;" | '''Source:''' Edson & Tennyson, 2003{{Full citation needed|date=January 2020}}
|}
|}


==Construction and operation costs==
=== Comparison with bus rapid transit ===
[[File:Central Station Kitchener Nov 2017.jpg|thumb|The [[Ion rapid transit|Ion]] system in [[Ontario]], [[Waterloo Region]] spurred massive development along its route before opening.]]
[[Bus rapid transit]] (BRT) is often compared with LRT in corridor planning. BRT in dedicated lanes can exceed 30,000 passengers per hour per direction, as in [[Guangzhou Bus Rapid Transit]], which operates up to 350 buses per hour. Achieving this requires large stations, bus priority at intersections, and overtaking lanes for express services. BRT labor and fuel costs are typically higher, since each bus requires a driver and most use non-electrified vehicles. Ride quality is also lower, with more abrupt braking and acceleration compared to rail.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Urban Rail Development Handbook |publisher=PPIAF |page=73 |url=https://www.ppiaf.org/documents/5532 |access-date=9 April 2025}}</ref>
The cost of light rail construction varies widely, largely depending on the amount of tunneling and elevated structures required. A survey of North American light rail projects<ref name=LRNOW>
{{cite web
|url        = http://www.lightrail.com/projects.htm
|title      = Status of North American Light Rail Projects
|publisher  = Light Rail Now
|year        = 2002
|access-date  = 23 November 2006
|url-status    = dead
|archive-url  = https://web.archive.org/web/20061028214006/http://www.lightrail.com/projects.htm
|archive-date = 28 October 2006}}</ref> shows that costs of most LRT systems range from $15&nbsp;million to over $100&nbsp;million per mile. [[Link Light Rail|Seattle's new light rail system]] is by far the most expensive in the US, at $179&nbsp;million per mile, since it includes extensive tunneling in poor soil conditions, elevated sections, and stations as deep as {{convert|180|ft|m}} below ground level.<ref>
{{cite web
| url = http://www.soundtransit.org/x1171.xml
| title = Link Light Rail Projects
| publisher = Sound Transit (Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority)
| year = 2006
| access-date = 23 November 2006
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20061117033414/http://www.soundtransit.org/x1171.xml |archive-date = 17 November 2006}}</ref> This results in costs more typical of subways or rapid transit systems than light rail. At the other end of the scale, four systems (Baltimore, Maryland; Camden, New Jersey; Sacramento, California; and Salt Lake City, Utah) incurred construction costs of less than $20&nbsp;million per mile. Over the US as a whole, excluding Seattle, new light rail construction costs average about $35&nbsp;million per mile.<ref name="LRNOW" />


By comparison, a freeway lane expansion typically costs $1.0&nbsp;million to $8.5&nbsp;million per [[lane]] mile for two directions, with an average of $2.3&nbsp;million.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/biz/construction/pdf/I-C_Const_Cost.pdf |title=Highway Construction Cost Comparison Survey Final Report |publisher=Washington State Department of Transportation |page=3 |date=April 2002 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090905215838/http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/biz/construction/pdf/I-C_Const_Cost.pdf |archive-date=5 September 2009}}</ref> However, freeways are frequently built in suburbs or rural areas, whereas light rail tends to be concentrated in urban areas, where right of way and property acquisition is expensive. Similarly, the most expensive US highway expansion project was the "[[Big Dig]]" in Boston, Massachusetts, which cost $200&nbsp;million per lane mile for a total cost of $14.6&nbsp;billion. A light rail track can carry up to 20,000 people per hour as compared with 2,000–2,200 vehicles per hour for one freeway lane.<ref>Traffic and Highway Engineering By Nicholas J. Garber, Lester A. Hoel, p. 37</ref> For example, in Boston and San Francisco, light rail lines carry 9,600 and 13,100 passengers per hour, respectively, in the peak direction during rush hour.<ref name="Hanson 2004"/>
=== Practical considerations ===
Most U.S. light rail systems are demand-limited, carrying under 4,000 passengers per hour per direction, though Boston and San Francisco reach 9,600 and 13,100 respectively.<ref name="Hanson 2004">{{cite book |last1=Hanson |first1=Susan |title=The geography of urban transportation |last2=Giuliano |first2=Genevieve |publisher=Guilford Press |year=2004 |isbn=1-59385-055-7}}</ref> Calgary's [[C-Train]] and Mexico's [[Monterrey Metro]] have higher ridership, while Manila's [[Light Rail Transit System]] exceeds 40,000 per hour per direction, operating four-car trains of up to 1,350 passengers at 30 trains per hour. Manila's system, however, is fully grade-separated and more comparable to a metro.<ref>{{cite web |date=12 January 2009 |title=LRT-1 sets 25-year high record ridership |url=http://www.lrta.gov.ph/press_release/press_release_090112_25yrRecordHigh.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090326064515/http://www.lrta.gov.ph/press_release/press_release_090112_25yrRecordHigh.htm |archive-date=26 March 2009 |access-date=14 March 2009 |publisher=Manila Light Rail Transit Authority}}</ref>


Combining highway expansion with LRT construction can save costs by doing both highway improvements and rail construction at the same time. As an example, Denver's [[Transportation Expansion Project]] rebuilt interstate highways 25 and 225 and added a light rail expansion for a total cost of $1.67&nbsp;billion over five years.<ref>{{cite news|first=Mark |last=Shaw |url=http://www.constructor.construction.com/coverStories/archives/2006-05.asp |title=Reinventing a Corridor: Denver's T-REX project nears completion after five years |work=Constructor |publisher=McGraw-Hill Construction |date=May–June 2006 |access-date=20 November 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061019180438/http://constructor.construction.com/coverStories/archives/2006-05.asp |archive-date=19 October 2006 }}</ref> The cost of {{convert|17|mi|km}} of highway improvements and {{convert|19|mi|km}} of double-track light rail worked out to $19.3&nbsp;million per highway lane-mile and $27.6&nbsp;million per LRT track-mile. The project came in under budget and 22 months ahead of schedule.<ref>{{cite news
==Costs and efficiency==
  | first=Kevin
[[File:Central Station Kitchener Nov 2017.jpg|thumb|The [[Ion rapid transit|Ion]] in [[Waterloo Region]], Ontario spurred major development along its route before opening.]]
  | last=Flynn
Light rail construction costs vary widely depending on tunneling and elevated structures. A survey of North American projects found most systems cost between $15&nbsp;million and $100&nbsp;million per mile, averaging $35&nbsp;million (excluding Seattle).<ref name=LRNOW>{{cite web |url=http://www.lightrail.com/projects.htm |title=Status of North American Light Rail Projects |publisher=Light Rail Now |year=2002 |access-date=23 November 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061028214006/http://www.lightrail.com/projects.htm |archive-date=28 October 2006}}</ref> Seattle's [[Link Light Rail]] reached $179&nbsp;million per mile due to tunneling, elevated sections, and deep stations,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.soundtransit.org/x1171.xml |title=Link Light Rail Projects |publisher=Sound Transit |year=2006 |access-date=23 November 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061117033414/http://www.soundtransit.org/x1171.xml |archive-date=17 November 2006}}</ref> while Baltimore, Camden, Sacramento, and Salt Lake City each built systems for under $20&nbsp;million per mile.
  | url=http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=1593&topicId=21355&docId=l:532872610
  | title=T-REX trains ready to roll
  | work=Rocky Mountain News (Denver, CO)
  | date=17 November 2006
| access-date=20 November 2006
  | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070322194149/http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=1593&topicId=21355&docId=l:532872610
  | archive-date=22 March 2007
| url-status=dead
  }}</ref>


LRT cost efficiency improves dramatically as ridership increases, as can be seen from the numbers above: the same rail line, with similar capital and operating costs, is far more efficient if it is carrying 20,000 people per hour than if it is carrying 2,400. The [[Calgary]], Alberta, [[C-Train]] used many common light rail techniques to keep costs low, including minimizing underground and elevated trackage, sharing transit malls with buses, leasing rights-of-way from freight railroads, and combining LRT construction with freeway expansion. As a result, Calgary ranks toward the less expensive end of the scale with capital costs of around $24&nbsp;million per mile.<ref name=McKendrick>
By comparison, freeway lane expansion averages $2.3&nbsp;million per lane-mile, but is usually built in less costly suburban or rural areas. The most expensive U.S. road project, Boston's [[Big Dig]], reached $200&nbsp;million per lane-mile.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/biz/construction/pdf/I-C_Const_Cost.pdf |title=Highway Construction Cost Comparison Survey Final Report |publisher=Washington State Department of Transportation |page=3 |date=April 2002 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090905215838/http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/biz/construction/pdf/I-C_Const_Cost.pdf |archive-date=5 September 2009}}</ref> A light rail track can carry up to 20,000 passengers per hour, compared with 2,000–2,200 vehicles per freeway lane,<ref>Traffic and Highway Engineering By Nicholas J. Garber, Lester A. Hoel, p. 37</ref> with Boston and San Francisco lines carrying 9,600 and 13,100 peak-hour passengers respectively.<ref name="Hanson 2004"/>
{{cite journal
[[File:Coming_in_on_the_priority_track_(4283902657).jpg|thumb|[[1 Line (Sound Transit)|Sound Transit]] Airport station]]
|author          = McKendrick
Joint highway–LRT projects can lower costs, as shown by Denver's [[Transportation Expansion Project]], which rebuilt 17&nbsp;mi of highway and added 19&nbsp;mi of light rail for $1.67&nbsp;billion, or $19.3&nbsp;million per highway lane-mile and $27.6&nbsp;million per rail mile. The project finished under budget and nearly two years early.<ref>{{cite news|first=Mark |last=Shaw |url=http://www.constructor.construction.com/coverStories/archives/2006-05.asp |title=Reinventing a Corridor: Denver's T-REX project nears completion after five years |work=Constructor |publisher=McGraw-Hill Construction |date=May–June 2006 |access-date=20 November 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061019180438/http://constructor.construction.com/coverStories/archives/2006-05.asp |archive-date=19 October 2006 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first=Kevin |last=Flynn |url=http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=1593&topicId=21355&docId=l:532872610 |title=T-REX trains ready to roll |work=Rocky Mountain News (Denver, CO) |date=17 November 2006 |access-date=20 November 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070322194149/http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=1593&topicId=21355&docId=l:532872610 |archive-date=22 March 2007 |url-status=dead}}</ref>
|title          = Calgary's C-Train – Effective Capital Utilization
|url             = http://www.calgarytransit.com/pdf/calgary_ctrain_effective_capital_utilization_TRB_paper.pdf
|version        = Joint International Light Rail Conference, St. Louis, Missouri
|publisher       = Calgary Transit
|year            = 2006
|access-date     = 11 February 2008
|display-authors = etal
|url-status        = dead
|archive-url     = https://web.archive.org/web/20111218235622/http://www.calgarytransit.com/pdf/calgary_ctrain_effective_capital_utilization_TRB_paper.pdf
|archive-date     = 18 December 2011}}
</ref>


However, Calgary's LRT ridership is much higher than any comparable US light rail system, at 300,000 passengers per weekday, and as a result, its capital efficiency is also much higher. Its capital costs were one-third those of the [[San Diego Trolley]], a comparably sized US system built at the same time, while by 2009 its ridership was approximately three times as high. Thus, Calgary's capital cost per passenger was much lower than that of San Diego. Its operating cost per passenger was also much lower because of its higher ridership. A typical C-Train vehicle costs only {{CAD|163|round=0|year=2006|link=yes}} per hour to operate, and since it averages 600 passengers per operating hour,<ref>
The Calgary [[CTrain]] minimized costs by avoiding tunnels and elevated sections, using existing rail corridors, and combining construction with freeway projects. Its capital cost was $24&nbsp;million per mile,<ref name=McKendrick>{{cite journal |author=McKendrick |title=Calgary's C-Train – Effective Capital Utilization |url=http://www.calgarytransit.com/pdf/calgary_ctrain_effective_capital_utilization_TRB_paper.pdf |version=Joint International Light Rail Conference, St. Louis, Missouri |publisher=Calgary Transit |year=2006 |access-date=11 February 2008 |display-authors=etal |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111218235622/http://www.calgarytransit.com/pdf/calgary_ctrain_effective_capital_utilization_TRB_paper.pdf |archive-date=18 December 2011}}</ref> about one-third that of the [[San Diego Trolley]]. By 2009, Calgary carried three times San Diego's ridership with lower capital and operating cost per passenger. Operating costs average C${{nowrap|163}} per train-hour, or about 27 cents per ride, compared with $1.50 for buses.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.calgarytransit.com/html/technical_information.html |title=LRT technical data |publisher=Calgary Transit |year=2006 |access-date=14 October 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061023084723/http://www.calgarytransit.com/html/technical_information.html |archive-date=23 October 2006}}</ref><ref name="McKendrick" />
{{cite web
  | url = http://www.calgarytransit.com/html/technical_information.html
  | title = LRT technical data
  | publisher = Calgary Transit
  | year=2006
  | access-date = 14 October 2006
  | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20061023084723/http://www.calgarytransit.com/html/technical_information.html
  | archive-date = 23 October 2006}}
</ref> Calgary Transit estimates that its LRT operating costs are only 27 cents per ride, versus $1.50 per ride on its buses.<ref name="McKendrick" />


Compared to buses, costs can be lower due to lower labor costs per passenger mile, higher ridership (observations show that light rail attracts more ridership than a comparable bus service)<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Scherer |first=Milena |date=January 2010 |title=Is Light Rail More Attractive to Users than Bus Transit?: Arguments Based on Cognition and Rational Choice |url=https://doi.org/10.3141/2144-02 |journal=Transportation Research Record |volume=2144 |pages=11–19 |doi=10.3141/2144-02 |s2cid=109351210 |via=SAGE Journals}}</ref> and faster average speed (reducing the number of vehicles needed for the same service frequency). While light rail vehicles are more expensive to buy, they have a longer useful life than buses, sometimes making for lower life-cycle costs. Compared to heavy rail investment costs are lower, however operating costs are higher than heavy rail.<ref name="Vuchic1972">{{cite journal |last1=Vuchic |first1=Vukan R. |title=Light Rail Transit Systems: A Definition and Evaluation |url=https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/33964 |journal=United States Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transportation Administration |access-date=21 February 2024 |date=1 October 1972|issue=730 }}</ref>
Light rail often has lower labor costs per passenger mile, attracts more riders than buses,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Scherer |first=Milena |date=January 2010 |title=Is Light Rail More Attractive to Users than Bus Transit?: Arguments Based on Cognition and Rational Choice |url=https://doi.org/10.3141/2144-02 |journal=Transportation Research Record |volume=2144 |pages=11–19 |doi=10.3141/2144-02 |s2cid=109351210 |via=SAGE Journals|url-access=subscription }}</ref> and achieves faster speeds with fewer vehicles required. Vehicles cost more upfront but last longer, reducing life-cycle costs. Compared with heavy rail, LRT has lower capital but higher operating costs.<ref name="Vuchic1972">{{cite journal |last1=Vuchic |first1=Vukan R. |title=Light Rail Transit Systems: A Definition and Evaluation |url=https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/33964 |journal=United States Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transportation Administration |access-date=21 February 2024 |date=1 October 1972|issue=730}}</ref>


=== Efficiency ===
Light rail energy efficiency is estimated at 120 passenger-miles per gallon of fuel equivalent, though performance varies with context.<ref>[http://www.buses.org/files/ComparativeEnergy.pdf Comparison of Energy Use & CO2 Emissions From Different Transportation Modes] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150529032904/http://www.buses.org/files/ComparativeEnergy.pdf |date=29 May 2015}} page 7, M.J. Bradley & Associates, May 2007</ref>
[[Energy efficiency in transportation#Trains|Energy efficiency]] for light rail may be 120 passenger miles per gallon of fuel (or equivalent), but variation is great, depending on circumstances.<ref>[http://www.buses.org/files/ComparativeEnergy.pdf Comparison of Energy Use & CO2 Emissions From Different Transportation Modes ] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150529032904/http://www.buses.org/files/ComparativeEnergy.pdf |date=29 May 2015 }} page 7, Results of Analysis. M.J. Bradley & Associates, May 2007</ref>


==Effects==
==Effects==
===Safety===
[[File:M_Ocean_View_train_at_Forest_Hill_station,_November_2018.jpg|thumb|[[Muni Metro]] [[Forest Hill station (Muni Metro)|Forest Hill station]]]]
 
=== Safety ===
An analysis of data from the 505-page National Transportation Statistics report<ref name="auto1">{{cite web|title=National Transportation Statistics 2013|url=http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/NTS_Entire_13Q4.pdf|publisher=U.S. Department of Transportation|access-date=24 February 2016|archive-date=25 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525173222/https://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/NTS_Entire_13Q4.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> published by the US Department of Transportation shows that light rail fatalities are higher than all other forms of transportation except motorcycle travel (31.5 fatalities per 100&nbsp;million miles).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a15110194/howre-ya-dying-fatality-data-from-various-types-of-transportation-feature|title=Dissected: Charting transportation mayhem in its many gory varieties.|first=Jeff|last=Sabatini|date=25 April 2014|website=Car and Driver}}</ref>
An analysis of data from the 505-page National Transportation Statistics report<ref name="auto1">{{cite web|title=National Transportation Statistics 2013|url=http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/NTS_Entire_13Q4.pdf|publisher=U.S. Department of Transportation|access-date=24 February 2016|archive-date=25 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525173222/https://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/NTS_Entire_13Q4.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> published by the US Department of Transportation shows that light rail fatalities are higher than all other forms of transportation except motorcycle travel (31.5 fatalities per 100&nbsp;million miles).<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a15110194/howre-ya-dying-fatality-data-from-various-types-of-transportation-feature|title=Dissected: Charting transportation mayhem in its many gory varieties.|first=Jeff|last=Sabatini|date=25 April 2014|website=Car and Driver}}</ref>


Line 355: Line 341:
{{Main|Health impact of light rail systems}}Studies have attributed light rail with a number of health impacts. Research has associated light rail positively with increased walking and decreased obesity.<ref>Edwards, R. D. (2008). "[[Public transit]], obesity, and medical costs: Assessing the magnitudes". ''Preventative Medicine'', 46, 14–21.</ref><ref>MacDonald, J. M., Stokes, R. J., Cohen, D. A., Kofner, A., and Ridgeway, G. K. (2010). "The effect of light rail transit on body mass index and physical activity". ''American Journal of Preventive Medicine'', 39(2), 105–112.</ref> Additionally, one electric light rail train produces nearly 99 percent less [[carbon monoxide]] and hydrocarbon emissions per mile than one automobile does.<ref>American Public Transit Association. (1993) Transit Fact Book, Washington, D.C. 104.</ref>
{{Main|Health impact of light rail systems}}Studies have attributed light rail with a number of health impacts. Research has associated light rail positively with increased walking and decreased obesity.<ref>Edwards, R. D. (2008). "[[Public transit]], obesity, and medical costs: Assessing the magnitudes". ''Preventative Medicine'', 46, 14–21.</ref><ref>MacDonald, J. M., Stokes, R. J., Cohen, D. A., Kofner, A., and Ridgeway, G. K. (2010). "The effect of light rail transit on body mass index and physical activity". ''American Journal of Preventive Medicine'', 39(2), 105–112.</ref> Additionally, one electric light rail train produces nearly 99 percent less [[carbon monoxide]] and hydrocarbon emissions per mile than one automobile does.<ref>American Public Transit Association. (1993) Transit Fact Book, Washington, D.C. 104.</ref>


==Tram and light rail transit systems worldwide==
==Examples==
{{Main|Tram and light rail transit systems|List of tram and light rail transit systems}}
{{Main|Tram and light rail transit systems|List of tram and light rail transit systems}}
Worldwide around 400 tram and light rail systems exist. Some date back to the 19th century, but many of the original tram and streetcar systems were closed down in the mid-20th century, except for many Central and Eastern European countries. Other cities that once closed down their streetcar networks are now restoring, or have already rebuilt, at least some of their former streetcar/tram systems.
Worldwide around 400 cities have one or more tram/light rail systems. Some date back to the 19th century, and by the 1930s almost 900 tram/light rail system existed. Many of the original tram and streetcar systems were closed down in the mid-20th century, except in most Central and Eastern European countries. Other cities that once closed down their streetcar networks are now restoring, or have already rebuilt, at least some of their former streetcar/tram systems.<ref name="UITP2023">{{cite book |title=The global tram and light rail landscape 2019-21 |page=2 |url=https://www.uitp.org/publications/the-global-tram-and-light-rail-landscape-2019-21/ |access-date=18 August 2025}}</ref>
<gallery widths="200" heights="150">
<gallery widths="200" heights="150">
File:Trendelacosta.JPG|The [[Tren de la Costa]] in [[Greater Buenos Aires]]
File:Raitiovaunu Hämeenkadulla.jpg|A light-rail vehicle on the [[Hämeenkatu]] street in [[Tampere]]  
File:Raitiovaunu Hämeenkadulla.jpg|A light-rail vehicle on the [[Hämeenkatu]] street in [[Tampere]]
File:KRMetrotram.jpg|Metrotram in [[Kryvyi Rih]] ([[Ukraine]]) was separated from the streets, but later connected to the existing tram network.
File:KRMetrotram.jpg|Metrotram in [[Kryvyi Rih]] ([[Ukraine]]) was separated from the streets, but later connected to the existing tram network.
File:StreetcarToronto.jpg|A light-rail vehicle, a part of the [[Toronto Transit Commission|TTC]] [[Toronto streetcar system|streetcar system]] in [[Toronto]]
File:0332 entering Kuanping Bridge (20230722103904).jpg|A light-rail vehicle of the [[Changchun Rail Transit]] in [[Changchun]], [[China]]
File:Porto Casa da Musica metro MP 26 lijn B (52067801106).jpg|[[Porto Metro|Porto metro]] light rail station in 2022
File:El Mourouj line By Ma7mix - panoramio.jpg|The [[Tunis Light Metro|light rail in Tunis, Tunisia]], was the first light rail system in Africa
File:20221009 VBZ 2109.jpg|Underground light rail stop in Zurich, 2022
File:Dubai Tram Alstom Citadis 402 near Al Sufouh.jpg|Tram in Dubai, UAE
File:Frankfurt Public Transit Feb70 064 (50557337936).jpg|[[Frankfurt U-Bahn]] light rail station in 1970
File:Citadis 302 n°839 Rouen Théâtre des Arts par Cramos.JPG|[[Rouen tramway]] subway portal in 2015
File:Moderus Gamma Poznań (cropped).jpg|Poznań underground station in 2019
File:Edirnekapi light metro.jpg|Istanbul underground station in 2020
File:Viagem inaugural do VLT carioca 03.jpg|A light-rail vehicle of the [[VLT Carioca]] in [[Rio de Janeiro]], Brazil
File:Viagem inaugural do VLT carioca 03.jpg|A light-rail vehicle of the [[VLT Carioca]] in [[Rio de Janeiro]], Brazil
File:Changchun LightRail Line3.jpg|A light-rail vehicle of the [[Changchun Rail Transit]] in [[Changchun]], [[People's Republic of China|China]]
File:Danjin Denggong Station Platform 20181226.jpg|[[Danhai light rail|Danhai]] elevated station in 2018
El Mourouj line By Ma7mix - panoramio.jpg|The [[Tunis Light Metro|light rail in Tunis, Tunisia]], was the first light rail system in Africa
File:Wuhan - Guanngu Streetcar - Wudayuan - P1520430.JPG|[[Trams in Wuhan|Light rail in Wuhan]]
</gallery>
</gallery>


Line 372: Line 365:
{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
{{div col|colwidth=22em}}
* [[General Motors streetcar conspiracy]]
* [[General Motors streetcar conspiracy]]
* [[H-Bahn]]
* [[Health impact of light rail systems]]
* [[Health impact of light rail systems]]
* [[History of tram and light rail transit systems by country]]
* [[History of tram and light rail transit systems by country]]
Line 385: Line 377:
* [[Railway electrification]]
* [[Railway electrification]]
* [[Rubber-tyred tram]]
* [[Rubber-tyred tram]]
* [[Streetcars in North America]]
{{div col end}}
{{div col end}}


Line 398: Line 389:


{{Public transport}}
{{Public transport}}
{{Trams}}


[[Category:Light rail| ]]
[[Category:Light rail| ]]
[[Category:Sustainable urban planning]]
[[Category:Sustainable urban planning]]
[[Category:Tram transport]]
[[Category:Tram transport]]

Latest revision as of 00:50, 2 November 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". Script error: No such module "Distinguish". Template:Cleanup merge Template:Use dmy dates Template:Multiple image

Light rail (or light rail transit, abbreviated to LRT) is a form of passenger urban rail transit that uses rolling stock derived from tram technology[1][2] while also having some features from heavy rapid transit.

The term was coined in 1972 in the United States as an English equivalent for the German word Stadtbahn, meaning "city railroad".[3][4] Different definitions exist in some countries, but in the United States, light rail operates primarily along exclusive rights-of-way and uses either individual tramcars or multiple units coupled together, with a lower capacity and speed than a long heavy rail passenger train or rapid transit system.[5][6][7][8][9]

Narrowly defined, light rail transit uses rolling stock that is similar to that of a traditional tram, while operating at a higher capacity and speed, often on an exclusive right-of-way. In broader usage, light rail transit can include tram-like operations mostly on streets.[10] Some light rail networks have characteristics closer to rapid transit. Only when these systems are fully grade-separated, they are referred to as light metros or light rail rapid transit (LRRT).[11]

Script error: No such module "sidebar".

Terminology

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The term light rail was introduced in 1972 by the U.S. Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA, predecessor to the Federal Transit Administration) to describe modernized streetcar systems in Europe and the United States.

In Germany, the concept was known as Stadtbahn ("city rail"), but UMTA adopted the term light rail instead. The word light refers to lighter infrastructure and capacity requirements compared with heavy rail, rather than to physical weight. Mode classification is usually based on the type of right-of-way.[12][13]

The American Public Transportation Association (APTA) defines light rail as:

...a mode of transit service (also called streetcar, tramway, or trolley) operating single cars or short trains on fixed rails, often partly separated from traffic. Vehicles are typically electric, powered from overhead lines via trolley pole or pantograph, operated by an onboard driver, and may feature either high-platform or low-floor boarding.[5]

In international usage, light rail generally denotes newer tram or streetcar systems, ranging from street-running lines to partly grade-separated networks.[14] People movers are typically lower in capacity, while monorail and automated guideway transit are separate technologies with more specialized applications.[15] Light rail is distinct from the British English term light railway, which refers to lightly regulated, low-speed mainline railways.[16]

Varieties of English

File:Metrolink tram at Lower Moseley Street..jpg
The Manchester Metrolink, the UK's largest light rail system
File:SEPTA Light Rail.jpg
SEPTA trolley at 69th Street Terminal, near Philadelphia

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The term light rail helps avoid regional differences in terminology. In the UK, Australia,[17] Ireland[18] and New Zealand[19] tram refers to a street-running rail vehicle, while in North America it can also mean an aerial tramway or, in amusement parks, a land train.[20][21] Similarly, trolley means streetcar in North America.[22]

In North America, streetcar commonly refers to older vehicles operating in mixed traffic, while light rail is used for newer systems that operate mostly on reserved track.[23] The American term street railway (with vehicles called streetcars) emerged in the 19th century, influenced by the German word Straßenbahn ("street railway").[24] While Britain abandoned most tramways after World War II, several North American cities—including Toronto, Boston, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Pittsburgh, Newark, Cleveland, and New Orleans—retained theirs.[25] These cities later adopted the term light rail when introducing modern systems alongside older streetcars. Since the 1980s, Portland, Oregon has developed all three types: light rail, streetcar, and aerial tram.

Heavy rail refers to higher-capacity, higher-speed systems such as the London Underground or New York City Subway. Conventional passenger and freight railways are also classified as heavy rail. The main distinction is that light rail vehicles can, where necessary, operate in mixed street traffic.[26]

History

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Precursors

By the late 19th century, some cities began placing tramways underground to reduce congestion. Early examples include the Murray Hill Tunnel in New York, adapted for streetcars in 1870,[27] Marseille's Noailles station in 1893,[28] and Boston's Tremont Street subway in 1897, the first purpose-built tram subway in North America and a precursor to today's MBTA Green Line.[29][30] London's Kingsway tramway subway opened in 1906 to connect tram networks and operated until 1952.[31]

File:CTA Skokie Swift, Skokie, IL in May 1964 (25819535271).jpg
Skokie Swift service in 1964

Early systems

The "Shaker Heights Rapid Transit" in Cleveland (1920s) provided an early model of a suburban rail line upgraded for tram-like operation and is now part of the RTA Rapid Transit.[32] In Europe, a suburban railway in The Hague was converted to tram operation in 1927, while in Boston the Highland branch was converted in 1959 to create what became the Green Line D branch, boosting ridership with modern PCC cars.[33][34][35]Template:Rp In 1964 Chicago's experimental Skokie Swift demonstrated features later adopted by many U.S. light rail systems.[36] Many traditional tram and streetcar systems in the United Kingdom, United States, and elsewhere were closed after the 1950s as investment shifted to cars and buses. Leeds and Glasgow briefly built modernized tram lines during the 1940s,[37] but by 1962 Britain had abandoned all tramways except for Blackpool.[38]

Post-war emergence

Many traditional tram and streetcar systems in the United Kingdom, United States, and elsewhere were closed after the 1950s as investment shifted to cars and buses. Leeds and Glasgow briefly built modernized tram lines during the 1940s,[37] but by 1962 Britain had abandoned all tramways except for Blackpool.[38] Modern light rail developed largely in postwar West Germany, where many tram networks were upgraded rather than abandoned. These Stadtbahn systems introduced features such as high-capacity vehicles, dedicated alignments, and underground city-center tunnels. With the exception of Hamburg, nearly all large and most medium-sized German cities retained trams and modernized them into light rail.[39] Similar modernization took place in Zurich, Rotterdam, The Hague, Gothenburg, Brussels, and in Central and Eastern Europe, notably Ostrava.[40][41]

In the United States, American planner H. Dean Quinby defined the concept of a "limited tramway" in 1962, distinguishing it from traditional streetcars by features such as articulated vehicles, multiple doors, and higher capacity.[42]

File:Edmonton LRT testing commerical c.1978.jpg
Testing a German LRV for the Edmonton LRT

The term light rail transit was introduced in North America in 1972 to describe these upgraded systems.[3] The first of the new generation opened in 1978 in Edmonton, Alberta, using German Siemens-Duewag U2 vehicles, followed by Calgary and San Diego. These proved successful and inspired many more U.S., Canadian, and Mexican light rail systems.

Global expansion

File:ET Addis asv2018-01 img07 Light Rail (cropped2).jpg
Light Rail in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

From the 1980s onward, light rail and modern tramways experienced a renewed expansion worldwide. In Europe, new networks were built in cities that had abandoned trams, including the reopening of the Nantes tramway in 1985, and systems in Grenoble, Paris, Strasbourg, Bordeaux, Dublin, Barcelona, Bergen[43][44][45] In Britain, modern light rail returned in the 1980s with the Tyne and Wear Metro (1980), Manchester Metrolink (1992), and South Yorkshire Supertram (1994) and Edinburgh (2014).[46]

In North America, the San Diego Trolley (1981)[47] became a model for later projects, and the number of U.S. systems roughly doubled between the 1990s and 2010s with expansions in Portland, Los Angeles, Denver, Dallas, Minneapolis and Seattle.[48] Canada added the Ion in Waterloo and the Confederation Line in Ottawa (both 2019), while Australia introduced the Sydney Light Rail in 1997.[49]

In Asia, the Toyama Light Rail opened in 2006 as Japan's first new tramway in decades,[50] along with a series of Chinese systems such as Shenyang, Nanjing, Guangzhou, Beijing and Shanghai Songjiang.[51]

In Africa and the Middle East, new light rail was introduced in Tunis (1985),[52] Rabat (2011),[53] Algiers (2011), Casablanca (2012), Jerusalem (2011), Dubai (2014), Addis Ababa (2015) and Lusail (2022).[54]

In South America, projects included the Ayacucho Tram in Medellín (2016) and the VLT Carioca in Rio de Janeiro (2016).[55][56]

Types

It can be hard to distinguish what is called light rail, and other forms of urban and commuter rail. A system termed as a light rail in one city may be considered to be a streetcar or tram system in another. Conversely, some lines that are called "light rail" are very close to rapid transit. In recent years, new terms such as light metro have been used to describe medium-capacity rail systems. Some "diesel light rail" systems, such as Sprinter, bear little similarity to urban rail, and could alternatively be classified as commuter rail with lightweight trains.

There is a history of what would now be considered light rail vehicles operating on heavy rail rapid transit tracks in the US, especially in the case of interurban streetcars. Notable examples are Lehigh Valley Transit trains running on the Philadelphia and Western Railroad high-speed third rail line (now the Norristown High-Speed Line).

File:20230425 De Lijn 6138.jpg
The Coast Tram operates over Template:Cvt in Belgium connecting several town centres

Flexibility

Light rail corridors may constitute a fully segregated corridor, a dedicated right-of-way on a street, an on-street corridor shared with other traffic, a corridor shared with other public transport, or a corridor shared with pedestrians,[57] resulting in a much higher flexibility than heavy rail.[58]

Many systems have mixed characteristics. Indeed, with proper engineering, a rail line could run along a street, then go underground, and then run along an elevated viaduct. For example, the Los Angeles Metro Rail's A Line "light rail" has sections that could alternatively be described as a tramway, a light metro, and, in a narrow sense, rapid transit. This is especially common in the United States, where there is not a popularly perceived distinction between these different types of urban rail systems.

Lower capacity

The most difficult distinction to draw is that between low-floor light rail and streetcar or tram systems. There is a significant amount of overlap between the technologies; similar rolling stock may be used for either, and it is common to classify streetcars or trams as a subcategory of light rail rather than as a distinct type of transportation. However, some distinctions can be made, though systems may combine elements of both.[59] Low-floor light rail lines tend to follow a reserved right-of-way and with trains receiving priority at intersections, and tend not to operate in mixed traffic, enabling higher operating speeds.[59][60] Light rail lines tend to have less frequent stops than tramways, and operate over a longer distance.[61] Light rail cars are often coupled into multiple units of two to four cars.[60]

File:Stadtbahn Essen U17 5234 Berliner Platz 1910040748.jpg
Berliner Platz station in Essen.

Higher capacity

Template:Redirect-distinguish Light rail systems may also exhibit attributes of rapid transit systems, including having downtown subways, as in San Francisco and Seattle. These partially grade separated light rail lines are sometimes called "semi-metro". This type of light rail emerged when the first subway in Boston opened in 1897 and became popular again in Europe from the 1950s onwards.[62] The development of technology for low-floor and catenary-free trams facilitates the construction of such mixed systems with only short and shallow underground sections below critical intersections as the required clearance height can be reduced significantly compared to conventional light rail vehicles.[63]

Light rail operating on mainline railroads

File:Cappel Stadtbahn02 2005-12-30.jpg
On the Karlsruhe Stadtbahn, trams can share mainline tracks with heavy rail trains.
File:DulwichGroveStop.jpg
The Inner West Light Rail in Sydney runs mostly along a former heavy rail corridor.

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Light rail can be designed to address a gap in interurban transportation between mainline rail and bus services, carrying high passenger numbers more quickly than local buses and more cheaply than mainline trains. Around Karlsruhe, Kassel, and Saarbrücken in Germany, dual-voltage light rail trains partly use mainline railroad tracks, sharing these tracks with mainline rail trains. This allows commuters to ride directly into the city center, rather than taking a mainline train only as far as a central station and then having to change to a tram. In France, similar tram-trains are in use in Paris, Mulhouse, and Strasbourg; further plans exist. In 2022, Spain opened the Cádiz TramBahia, where trams share track with commuter and long-distance trains from the main terminus in the city and curve off to serve cities without a rail connection. Some of the issues involved in such schemes are:[64]

  • compatibility of the safety systems
  • power supply of the track to the power used by the vehicles (frequently different voltages, rarely third rail vs overhead wires)
  • width of the vehicles to the position of the platforms
  • height of the platforms

In some cases, tram-trains use previously abandoned or lightly used heavy rail lines in addition to or instead of still in use mainline tracks, like the Manchester Metrolink. In the San Diego region, the "SD&AE" freight line was used to create the initial stage of the light rail network of the San Diego Trolley.[65] In the Netherlands, this concept was first applied on the RijnGouweLijn, and was followed by the RandstadRail project.

System-wide considerations

Many light rail systems—even fairly old ones—have a combination of both on- and off-road sections. In some countries (especially in Europe), only the latter is described as light rail. In those places, trams running on mixed rights-of-way are not regarded as a light rail but considered distinctly as streetcars or trams. However, the requirement for saying that a rail line is "separated" can be quite low—sometimes just with concrete "buttons" to discourage automobile drivers from getting onto the tracks. Some systems such as Seattle's Link had on-road mixed sections but were closed to regular road traffic, with light rail vehicles and buses both operating along a common right-of-way (however, Link converted to full separation in 2019).

File:Modern trams (41097122804).jpg
Low floor light-rail vehicles on the Toronto streetcar system

Floor height

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Low-floor LRVs have the advantage of a low-floor design, allowing them to load passengers directly from low-rise platforms that can be little more than raised curbs. High-floor light rail systems also exist, featuring larger stations.[59]

Speed and stop frequency

Reference speed from major light rail systems, including station stop time, is shown below.[66]

System Average speed (mph) Average speed (km/h)
Baltimore 24 39
Dallas (Red Line) 21 34
Dallas (Blue Line) 19 31
Denver (Alameda-Littleton) 38 61
Denver (Downtown-Littleton) 26 42
Los Angeles (Blue Line) 24 39
Los Angeles (Green Line) 38 61
Salt Lake City 24 39

However, low top speed is not always a differentiating characteristic between light rail and other systems. For example, the Siemens S70 LRVs used in the Houston METRORail and other North American LRT systems have a top speed of Template:Convert depending on the system, while the trains on the all-underground Montreal Metro can only reach a top speed of Template:Convert. LACMTA light rail vehicles have higher top and average speeds than Montreal Metro or New York City Subway trains.[67]

Infrastructure

Light rail systems operate between heavy rapid transit and conventional street-level trams.[68] Construction costs are typically lower than for metro systems, but building infrastructure can still be significant, sometimes leading to phased development or partial completion of lines.[69][70] Light rail vehicles can often be compatible with existing tram networks, avoiding the need for entirely separate infrastructure or rolling stock.[71][72] In some cases, multiple at-grade branches are used to maximize the capacity of tunneled sections.[73][74]

Tracks

Right-of-way

Template:Multiple image

File:KVB5208 Neußer Straße Gürtel.JPG
Elevated section in Cologne.

Light rail systems can be defined by their right-of-way type and operational features such as power supply and speed.[75][13][76] Three main categories of right-of-way can be categorized as:[13]

  • A: Fully independent tracks without road or pedestrian crossings.
  • B: Reserved tracks with some level crossings.
  • C: Street-running lines in mixed traffic.

Conventional tram lines typically operate on category C, light rail commonly uses category B with some sections of category A, while rapid transit generally operates entirely on category A.[13][76]

Grade-separated tracks correspond to fully independent right-of-way, while reserved tracks can be exclusive or semi-exclusive.[77] Light rail operating entirely on independent tracks is sometimes also referred to as light rail rapid transit.[11] Dedicated stretches of track may designed to function similarly to regular metro or rapid transit lines.[78][79] One key difference from rapid transit is that light rail lines may only have one or a few sections in tunnels and on viaducts.[80][81]

File:Huntington Avenue streetcar at Park Street station, 1897.jpg
Early light rail operations in the Tremont Street subway, 1897
File:Trendelacosta.JPG
The Tren de la Costa in Greater Buenos Aires

Track gauge

Light rail systems historically used various gauges, with narrow gauge common early on. Most modern systems use standard gauge, which allows standard maintenance equipment, easier transfer of rolling stock, tighter turns with articulated cars, and better low-floor accessibility. For example, the Tren de la Costa in Greater Buenos Aires was converted from broad to standard gauge to accommodate light rail vehicles.[39]

Power sources

Most light rail systems use overhead lines for electricity, avoiding hazards from an electrified third rail. Some systems use battery power for sections of track without overhead catenary,[82] while a few light rail systems use diesel power.[5][83]

Ground-level power supply

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Conduit power was an early alternative to overhead wires in cities prohibiting them, used in London, Paris, Berlin, Marseille, Budapest, Prague, New York City, and Washington, D.C.[84]

In Bordeaux, the tram network uses a ground-level third rail in the city center, segmented and powered only under trams to ensure safety. Outside the center, trams use overhead wires. The system is three times more expensive than conventional overhead wiring and has high maintenance costs but has proven popular, carrying up to 190,000 passengers per day.[85]

Signalling

Automatic train operation

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Automatic train operation (ATO) monitors train position and speed, adjusting movements for safety and efficient operations, and is used in some light rail networks.[86]

Rolling stock

Light rail routes are operated either with regular trams (with or without low floor) or with specially developed tramcars (light rail vehicles), such as the Stadtbahn-car 'type B'.[87]Template:Rp Many light rail systems (including in the United States),[88] are operated with larger and heavier vehicles than those on streetcar systems.[80]

Comparisons of rolling stock types

Type Rapid transit (heavy rail)* Light rail Tram, or streetcar Heritage streetcar
Manufacturer Rohr Siemens Skoda Gomaco Trolley Co.
Model BART A-Car S70 10T Replica Birney
Width Template:Convert Template:Convert Template:Convert Template:Convert
Length Template:Convert Template:Convert articulated Template:Convert articulated Template:Convert
Weight (empty) 63.1Template:Nbspt 48.6Template:Nbspt[89] 28.8Template:Nbspt 23.5Template:Nbspt[90]
Capacity 150 max. 72 seats, 220 max.[89] 30 seats, 157 max. 40 seats, 50 max.[90]
Top speed Template:Convert Template:Convert Template:Convert Template:Convert
Typical consist 4–10 vehicles 2–5 vehicles 1 vehicle 1 vehicle

The BART railcar in the chart is not generally considered to be a "light rail" vehicle (it is a heavy rail vehicle), and is only included for comparison purposes.

Related types of rail transit

File:DLR unit 135 entering Canary Wharf station bound for Bank.jpg
The Docklands Light Railway, a light metro system

Premetro

Premetro is largely equal to light rail: a type of public transport in which trams run partly grade separated, by using tunnels and/or viaducts. However, there is one clear distinguishing factor: premetro uses infrastructure that has been explicitly constructed with the ambition to transfer to use metro trains in the future.[74]Template:Rp[87]Template:Rp[91][92] It is usually also developed from an existing classic tram network. One prominent example is the premetro in Brussels, where several premetro lines have been or will be converted into full heavy rail metro lines.

U-Stadtbahn

The U-Stadtbahn is also an intermediate transportation form between metro and tram. It has originated in Germany, adapting the existing tram networks. Here specially developed trams run underground through tunnels in central urban areas.[87]Template:Rp[93][94] Stadtbahn lines can be subdivided by looking at the types of rolling stock.

Light metro

Some systems, such as the AirTrain JFK in New York City, the DLR in London, and Kelana Jaya Line in Kuala Lumpur, have dispensed with the need for an operator. The Vancouver SkyTrain was an early adopter of driverless vehicles, while the Toronto Scarborough rapid transit operated the same trains as Vancouver, but used drivers. In most discussions and comparisons, these specialized systems are generally not considered light rail but as light metro systems. Light metro systems are essentially hybrids of light rail and rapid transit.[15][95]

Hybrid rail

File:20070421 RivertonNJ D80 NearHiway73.jpg
NJ Transit's River Line was the first hybrid rail service in the United States.

In the United States, interurban-style services are now rare, largely because the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) does not permit non-compliant railcars (such as rapid transit or light rail vehicles) to operate simultaneously with standard freight or passenger equipment on the same tracks for safety reasons.

Exceptions, known as hybrid rail in the United States, include NJ Transit's River Line from Camden and Trenton and the North County Transit District's (NCTD) Sprinter service in northern San Diego County, California. These services operate under FRA waivers that allow passenger trains to run during daytime hours and freight trains at night, with several hours of temporal separation between the two. These diesel-powered systems use lightweight diesel multiple units (DMUs) originally designed for mainline railroads.

Very light rail

File:The Coventry Very Light Rail Vehicle during a public test on Saturday 17 May 2025 extended version.jpg
A Coventry Very Light Rail Vehicle

While the word light in "light rail" refers to the lighter capacity compared to heavy rail/rapid transit, however the same word refers to lightweight in "very light rail'. One example in passengers service is British Rail Class 139 on the Stourbridge Town branch line.

Very Light Rail developments with prefabricated track and onboard power (no Over Head Line) in the UK are aiming for £10 m per km[96] as opposed to convention tram rail and OHL at £20–£30 m per km.[97] First tests in Coventry have started in 2025, a full line should be operation able by 2027.

Comparison to other rail transit modes

With its mix of right-of-way types and train control technologies, LRT offers the widest range of latitude of any rail system in the design, engineering, and operating practices. The challenge in designing light rail systems is to realize the potential of LRT to provide fast, comfortable service while avoiding the tendency to overdesign that results in excessive capital costs beyond what is necessary to meet the public's needs.[98]

Alternative Differences
Rapid transit Rapid rail transit (RRT) trains are larger and faster than light rail trains, with stops being further apart.[83] Light rail vehicles (LRVs) are distinguished from RRT vehicles by their capability for operation in mixed traffic, generally resulting in a narrower car body and articulation to operate in a street traffic environment. With their large size, large turning radius, and often an electrified third rail, RRT vehicles cannot operate in the street. Since LRT systems can operate in existing streets, they can often avoid the cost of expensive grade-separated subway and elevated segments that would be required with RRT.
Streetcars or trams Conversely, LRVs generally outperform traditional streetcars in terms of capacity and top-end speed, and almost all modern LRVs are capable of multiple-unit operation. The latest generation of LRVs is considerably larger and faster, typically Template:Convert long with a maximum speed of around Template:Convert.[99]
Heritage streetcars A variation considered by many cities is to use historic or replica cars on their streetcar systems instead of modern LRVs. A heritage streetcar may not have the capacity and speed of an LRV, but it will add to the ambiance and historic character of its location.
Light metro A derivative of LRT is light rail rapid transit (LRRT), also referred to as light metro. Such railroads are characterized by exclusive rights of way, advanced train control systems, short headway capability, and floor-level boarding. These systems approach the passenger capacity of full metro systems but can be cheaper to construct due to LRVs generally being smaller in size, turning tighter curves and climbing steeper grades than standard RRT vehicles, and having a smaller station size.
Interurbans The term interurban mainly refers to rail cars that run through streets like ordinary streetcars (trams), but also between cities or towns, often through rural environments. In the period 1900–1930, interurbans were very common in the US, especially in the Midwest. Some of them, like the Red Devils, the J. G. Brill Bullets, and the Electroliners, were the high-speed railcars of their time, with an in-service speed of up to about Template:Convert. In Europe, interurbans are making a comeback as "tram-trains" (locally known under different names) that operate on both the railroad and light rail tracks, often with different voltages. The Karlsruhe Stadtbahn is one well-known example.

Capacity

File:Kaohsiung LRT Circular Line at Gate of Kaohsiung Port 20180621.jpg
Circular light rail in front of the Gate of Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Comparison with high-capacity roads

A single light rail line (requiring a 7.6 m [25 ft] right-of-way) can carry up to eight times more passengers than a 3.7 m (12 ft) freeway lane during peak periods. Freeway lanes typically reach capacity at about 2,000 vehicles per hour, beyond which traffic flow breaks down and speeds collapse.[100] With average commuter car occupancy of only 1.5 persons,[101] freeways carry a maximum of about 3,000 passengers per lane per hour. HOV lanes and ride-sharing can improve this, but most jurisdictions expand roadway capacity instead, sometimes worsening congestion (Downs–Thomson paradox, Braess's paradox).[102][103][104]

By contrast, light rail trains operating in two-track rights-of-way as narrow as two car lanes can exceed 20,000 passengers per hour per direction, and over 25,000 with moving block signaling.[105][106]

Roadway person-throughput varies by permitted vehicle types. A typical car-only lane carries about 1,900 passenger cars per lane per hour (pcplph).[107] Adding buses or light rail raises capacity, as shown below:

Car Car + bus Car + light rail
Low volume 900 1,650 2,250
Medium volume 900 2,350 3,250
High volume 900 3,400 4,600
Source: Edson & Tennyson, 2003Template:Full citation needed

Comparison with bus rapid transit

Bus rapid transit (BRT) is often compared with LRT in corridor planning. BRT in dedicated lanes can exceed 30,000 passengers per hour per direction, as in Guangzhou Bus Rapid Transit, which operates up to 350 buses per hour. Achieving this requires large stations, bus priority at intersections, and overtaking lanes for express services. BRT labor and fuel costs are typically higher, since each bus requires a driver and most use non-electrified vehicles. Ride quality is also lower, with more abrupt braking and acceleration compared to rail.[108]

Practical considerations

Most U.S. light rail systems are demand-limited, carrying under 4,000 passengers per hour per direction, though Boston and San Francisco reach 9,600 and 13,100 respectively.[109] Calgary's C-Train and Mexico's Monterrey Metro have higher ridership, while Manila's Light Rail Transit System exceeds 40,000 per hour per direction, operating four-car trains of up to 1,350 passengers at 30 trains per hour. Manila's system, however, is fully grade-separated and more comparable to a metro.[110]

Costs and efficiency

File:Central Station Kitchener Nov 2017.jpg
The Ion in Waterloo Region, Ontario spurred major development along its route before opening.

Light rail construction costs vary widely depending on tunneling and elevated structures. A survey of North American projects found most systems cost between $15 million and $100 million per mile, averaging $35 million (excluding Seattle).[111] Seattle's Link Light Rail reached $179 million per mile due to tunneling, elevated sections, and deep stations,[112] while Baltimore, Camden, Sacramento, and Salt Lake City each built systems for under $20 million per mile.

By comparison, freeway lane expansion averages $2.3 million per lane-mile, but is usually built in less costly suburban or rural areas. The most expensive U.S. road project, Boston's Big Dig, reached $200 million per lane-mile.[113] A light rail track can carry up to 20,000 passengers per hour, compared with 2,000–2,200 vehicles per freeway lane,[114] with Boston and San Francisco lines carrying 9,600 and 13,100 peak-hour passengers respectively.[109]

File:Coming in on the priority track (4283902657).jpg
Sound Transit Airport station

Joint highway–LRT projects can lower costs, as shown by Denver's Transportation Expansion Project, which rebuilt 17 mi of highway and added 19 mi of light rail for $1.67 billion, or $19.3 million per highway lane-mile and $27.6 million per rail mile. The project finished under budget and nearly two years early.[115][116]

The Calgary CTrain minimized costs by avoiding tunnels and elevated sections, using existing rail corridors, and combining construction with freeway projects. Its capital cost was $24 million per mile,[117] about one-third that of the San Diego Trolley. By 2009, Calgary carried three times San Diego's ridership with lower capital and operating cost per passenger. Operating costs average C$163 per train-hour, or about 27 cents per ride, compared with $1.50 for buses.[118][117]

Light rail often has lower labor costs per passenger mile, attracts more riders than buses,[119] and achieves faster speeds with fewer vehicles required. Vehicles cost more upfront but last longer, reducing life-cycle costs. Compared with heavy rail, LRT has lower capital but higher operating costs.[120]

Light rail energy efficiency is estimated at 120 passenger-miles per gallon of fuel equivalent, though performance varies with context.[121]

Effects

File:M Ocean View train at Forest Hill station, November 2018.jpg
Muni Metro Forest Hill station

Safety

An analysis of data from the 505-page National Transportation Statistics report[122] published by the US Department of Transportation shows that light rail fatalities are higher than all other forms of transportation except motorcycle travel (31.5 fatalities per 100 million miles).[123]

However, the National Transportation Statistics report published by the US Department of Transportation states that:[122]

Caution must be exercised in comparing fatalities across modes because significantly different definitions are used. In particular, Rail and Transit fatalities include incident-related (as distinct from accident-related) fatalities, such as fatalities from falls in transit stations or railroad employee fatalities from a fire in a workshed. Equivalent fatalities for the Air and Highway modes (fatalities at airports not caused by moving aircraft or fatalities from accidents in automobile repair shops) are not counted toward the totals for these modes. Thus, fatalities not necessarily directly related to in-service transportation are counted for the transit and rail modes, potentially overstating the risk for these modes.

Health impact

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".Studies have attributed light rail with a number of health impacts. Research has associated light rail positively with increased walking and decreased obesity.[124][125] Additionally, one electric light rail train produces nearly 99 percent less carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions per mile than one automobile does.[126]

Examples

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Worldwide around 400 cities have one or more tram/light rail systems. Some date back to the 19th century, and by the 1930s almost 900 tram/light rail system existed. Many of the original tram and streetcar systems were closed down in the mid-20th century, except in most Central and Eastern European countries. Other cities that once closed down their streetcar networks are now restoring, or have already rebuilt, at least some of their former streetcar/tram systems.[127]

See also

Template:Portal bar Template:Div col

Template:Div col end

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:Sister project

Template:Public transport Template:Trams

  1. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". National Conference of the Transportation Research Board
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". From: 9th National Light Rail Transit Conference
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Gregory L. Thompson (2003), Defining an Alternative Future: Birth of the Light Rail Movement in North America (PDF), Transportation Research Board.
  13. a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Template:NHLE
  32. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. Template:Cite magazine
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  41. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  42. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  43. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  48. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  51. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  52. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  53. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  54. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  55. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead link
  56. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  57. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  58. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  59. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  60. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  61. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  62. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  63. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  64. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  65. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  66. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  67. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  68. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  69. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  70. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  71. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  72. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  73. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  74. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  75. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  76. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  77. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  78. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  79. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  80. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  81. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  82. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  83. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  84. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  85. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  86. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  87. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  88. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  89. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  90. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  91. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  92. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  93. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  94. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  95. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  96. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  97. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  98. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  99. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  100. Matt Lorenz and Lily Elefteriadou (2000) A Probabilistic Approach to Defining Freeway Capacity and Breakdown (PDF), Transportation Research Board.
  101. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  102. https://homepage.rub.de/Dietrich.Braess/Paradox-BNW.pdf (1968) end of chapter 4 retrieved 2023/02/27
  103. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  104. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  105. Tom Parkinson and Ian Fisher (1996) Rail Transit Capacity Template:Webarchive, Transportation Research Board.
  106. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, Transportation Research Board.
  107. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  108. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  109. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  110. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  111. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  112. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  113. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  114. Traffic and Highway Engineering By Nicholas J. Garber, Lester A. Hoel, p. 37
  115. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  116. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  117. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  118. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  119. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  120. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  121. Comparison of Energy Use & CO2 Emissions From Different Transportation Modes Template:Webarchive page 7, M.J. Bradley & Associates, May 2007
  122. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  123. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  124. Edwards, R. D. (2008). "Public transit, obesity, and medical costs: Assessing the magnitudes". Preventative Medicine, 46, 14–21.
  125. MacDonald, J. M., Stokes, R. J., Cohen, D. A., Kofner, A., and Ridgeway, G. K. (2010). "The effect of light rail transit on body mass index and physical activity". American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(2), 105–112.
  126. American Public Transit Association. (1993) Transit Fact Book, Washington, D.C. 104.
  127. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".