Standard Model: Difference between revisions
imported>Artem.G That's already in the article, and details on naming are not needed in the lead. Undid revision 1295044366 by 2A00:23C6:54FE:FB01:FD78:B083:5E02:E742 (talk) |
imported>Georg-Johann m →Gauge bosons: Typo: Use a description-list instead of an unordered-list. |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The '''Standard Model''' of [[particle physics]] is the [[Scientific theory|theory]] describing three of the four known [[fundamental force]]s ([[electromagnetism|electromagnetic]], [[weak interaction|weak]] and [[strong interaction]]s – excluding [[gravity]]) in the [[universe]] and classifying all known [[elementary particle]]s. It was developed in stages throughout the latter half of the 20th century, through the work of many scientists worldwide,<ref> | The '''Standard Model''' of [[particle physics]] is the [[Scientific theory|theory]] describing three of the four known [[fundamental force]]s ([[electromagnetism|electromagnetic]], [[weak interaction|weak]] and [[strong interaction]]s – excluding [[gravity]]) in the [[universe]] and classifying all known [[elementary particle]]s. It was developed in stages throughout the latter half of the 20th century, through the work of many scientists worldwide,<ref> | ||
{{cite book |author=R. Oerter | {{cite book |author=R. Oerter |title=The Theory of Almost Everything: The Standard Model, the Unsung Triumph of Modern Physics |publisher=[[Penguin Group]] |year=2006 |isbn=978-0-13-236678-6 |edition=Kindle |page=2}}</ref> with the current formulation being finalized in the mid-1970s upon [[experimental confirmation]] of the existence of [[quark]]s. Since then, proof of the [[top quark]] (1995), the [[tau neutrino]] (2000), and the [[Higgs boson]] (2012) have added further credence to the Standard Model. In addition, the Standard Model has predicted various properties of [[weak neutral current]]s and the [[W and Z bosons]] with great accuracy. | ||
Although the Standard Model is believed to be theoretically self-consistent{{notetag|There are mathematical issues regarding quantum field theories still under debate (see e.g. [[Landau pole]]), but the predictions extracted from the Standard Model by current methods applicable to current experiments are all self-consistent.<ref>{{cite book|chapter=25 |author=R. Mann |title=An Introduction to Particle Physics and the Standard Model |publisher=[[CRC Press]] |year=2010 |isbn=978-1-4200-8298-2 |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-mono/10.1201/9781420083002-25/beyond-standard-model-robert-mann?context=ubx&refId=4a659654-5432-4620-9f88-b125da855acd}}</ref>}} and has demonstrated some success in providing [[experimental prediction]]s, it leaves some [[ | Although the Standard Model is believed to be theoretically self-consistent{{notetag|There are mathematical issues regarding quantum field theories still under debate (see e.g. [[Landau pole]]), but the predictions extracted from the Standard Model by current methods applicable to current experiments are all self-consistent.<ref>{{cite book |chapter=25 |author=R. Mann |title=An Introduction to Particle Physics and the Standard Model |publisher=[[CRC Press]] |year=2010 |doi=10.1201/9781420083002-25 |isbn=978-1-4200-8298-2 |url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-mono/10.1201/9781420083002-25/beyond-standard-model-robert-mann?context=ubx&refId=4a659654-5432-4620-9f88-b125da855acd }}</ref>}} and has demonstrated some success in providing [[experimental prediction]]s, it leaves some [[Physics beyond the Standard Model|physical phenomena unexplained]] and so falls short of being a [[theory of everything|complete theory of fundamental interactions]].<ref name="NYT-20230911">{{cite news |last=Overbye |first=Dennis |author-link=Dennis Overbye |date=11 September 2023 |title=Don't Expect a 'Theory of Everything' to Explain It All |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/11/science/space/astronomy-universe-simulations.html |url-access=limited |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://archive.today/20230911043212/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/11/science/space/astronomy-universe-simulations.html |archivedate=11 September 2023 |accessdate=11 September 2023 |work=[[The New York Times]]}}</ref> For example, it does not fully explain [[baryon asymmetry|why there is more matter than anti-matter]], incorporate the full [[theory of gravitation]]<ref>{{cite book |isbn=978-1-59803-350-2 |oclc=288435552 |last1=Carroll |first1=Sean M. |title=Dark Matter, Dark Energy: The Dark Side of the Universe |last2=Rhoades |first2=Zachary H. |last3=Leven |first3=Jon |publisher=[[The Teaching Company]] |year=2007 |series=Guidebook Part 2 |location=Chantilly, VA |pages=59 |quote=...Standard Model of Particle Physics: The modern theory of elementary particles and their interactions ... It does not, strictly speaking, include gravity, although it's often convenient to include gravitons among the known particles of nature ... }}</ref> as described by [[general relativity]], or account for the [[accelerating expansion of the universe|universe's accelerating expansion]] as possibly described by [[dark energy]]. The model does not contain any viable [[dark matter]] particle that possesses all of the required properties deduced from observational [[physical cosmology|cosmology]]. It also does not incorporate [[neutrino oscillation]]s and their non-zero masses. | ||
The development of the Standard Model was driven by [[theoretical physics|theoretical]] and [[experimental physics|experimental]] particle physicists alike. The Standard Model is a paradigm of a [[quantum field theory]] for theorists, exhibiting a wide range of phenomena, including [[spontaneous symmetry breaking]], [[anomaly (physics)|anomalies]], and non-perturbative behavior. It is used as a basis for building more exotic models that incorporate [[hypothetical particle]]s, [[extra dimensions]], and elaborate symmetries (such as [[supersymmetry]]) to explain experimental results at variance with the Standard Model, such as the existence of dark matter and neutrino oscillations. | The development of the Standard Model was driven by [[theoretical physics|theoretical]] and [[experimental physics|experimental]] particle physicists alike. The Standard Model is a paradigm of a [[quantum field theory]] for theorists, exhibiting a wide range of phenomena, including [[spontaneous symmetry breaking]], [[anomaly (physics)|anomalies]], and non-perturbative behavior. It is used as a basis for building more exotic models that incorporate [[hypothetical particle]]s, [[extra dimensions]], and elaborate symmetries (such as [[supersymmetry]]) to explain experimental results at variance with the Standard Model, such as the existence of dark matter and neutrino oscillations. | ||
== Historical background == | == Historical background == | ||
{{ | {{see also|History of quantum field theory|History of subatomic physics|Julian Schwinger|John Clive Ward}} | ||
In 1928, [[Paul Dirac]] introduced the [[Dirac equation]], which implied the existence of [[antimatter]]. | In 1928, [[Paul Dirac]] introduced the [[Dirac equation]], which implied the existence of [[antimatter]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Husain |first=Nyla |date=18 November 2024 |title=January 1928: The Dirac equation unifies quantum mechanics and special relativity |url=https://www.aps.org/apsnews/2024/11/mathematical-intuition-dirac-quantum-mechanics |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241122085952/https://www.aps.org/apsnews/2024/11/mathematical-intuition-dirac-quantum-mechanics |archive-date=22 November 2024 |access-date=17 November 2025 |website=[[American Physics Society]] |language=en}}</ref> | ||
In 1954, [[Yang Chen-Ning]] and [[Robert Mills (physicist)|Robert Mills]] extended the concept of [[gauge theory]] for [[abelian group]]s, e.g. [[quantum electrodynamics]], to [[nonabelian group]]s to provide an explanation for [[strong interaction]]s.<ref name="YM">{{cite journal |author-link1=Chen-Ning Yang |first1=C. N. |last1=Yang |author-link2=Robert Mills (physicist) |first2=R. |last2=Mills |title=Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance |journal=[[Physical Review]] |volume=96 |issue=1 |pages=191–195 |year=1954 |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.96.191|bibcode = 1954PhRv...96..191Y |doi-access=free }}</ref> In 1957, [[Chien-Shiung Wu]] demonstrated [[parity (physics)|parity]] was not conserved in the [[weak interaction]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Cho|first=Adrian|title=Postage stamp to honor female physicist who many say should have won the Nobel Prize|date=5 February 2021|url=https://www.science.org/content/article/postage-stamp-honor-female-physicist-who-many-say-should-have-won-nobel-prize}}</ref> | In 1954, [[Yang Chen-Ning]] and [[Robert Mills (physicist)|Robert Mills]] extended the concept of [[gauge theory]] for [[abelian group]]s, e.g. [[quantum electrodynamics]], to [[nonabelian group]]s to provide an explanation for [[strong interaction]]s.<ref name="YM">{{cite journal |author-link1=Chen-Ning Yang |first1=C. N. |last1=Yang |author-link2=Robert Mills (physicist) |first2=R. |last2=Mills |title=Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance |journal=[[Physical Review]] |volume=96 |issue=1 |pages=191–195 |year=1954 |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.96.191 |bibcode = 1954PhRv...96..191Y |doi-access=free }}</ref> In 1957, [[Chien-Shiung Wu]] demonstrated [[parity (physics)|parity]] was not conserved in the [[weak interaction]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Cho |first=Adrian |title=Postage stamp to honor female physicist who many say should have won the Nobel Prize |date=5 February 2021 |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/postage-stamp-honor-female-physicist-who-many-say-should-have-won-nobel-prize }}</ref> | ||
In 1961, [[Sheldon Glashow]] combined the [[electromagnetism|electromagnetic]] and [[weak interaction]]s.<ref> | In 1961, [[Sheldon Glashow]] combined the [[electromagnetism|electromagnetic]] and [[weak interaction]]s.<ref> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|bibcode=1961NucPh..22..579G | |bibcode=1961NucPh..22..579G | ||
|doi=10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2 | |doi=10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2 | ||
}}</ref> In 1964, [[Murray Gell-Mann]] and [[George Zweig]] introduced quarks and that same year [[Oscar W. Greenberg]] implicitly introduced color charge of quarks.<ref>{{ | }}</ref> In 1964, [[Murray Gell-Mann]] and [[George Zweig]] introduced quarks and that same year [[Oscar W. Greenberg]] implicitly introduced color charge of quarks.<ref>{{citation |last=Greenberg |first=Oscar Wallace |title=Color Charge Degree of Freedom in Particle Physics |date=2009 |work=Compendium of Quantum Physics |pages=109–111 |editor-last=Greenberger |editor-first=Daniel |url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_32 |access-date=2024-09-17 |place=Berlin, Heidelberg |publisher=Springer |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_32 |isbn=978-3-540-70626-7 |editor2-last=Hentschel |editor2-first=Klaus |editor3-last=Weinert |editor3-first=Friedel |url-access=subscription }}</ref> In 1967 [[Steven Weinberg]]<ref> | ||
{{cite journal | {{cite journal | ||
|author=S. Weinberg | |author=S. Weinberg | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
|bibcode=1967PhRvL..19.1264W | |bibcode=1967PhRvL..19.1264W | ||
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264 | |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264 | ||
|doi-access=free | |doi-access=free | ||
}}</ref> and [[Abdus Salam]]<ref> | |||
{{cite conference | {{cite conference | ||
|author=A. Salam | |author=A. Salam | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321 | |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321 | ||
|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Peter W. Higgs 1964 508–509"> | |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="Peter W. Higgs 1964 508–509"> | ||
{{cite journal |author=P.W. Higgs |year=1964 |title=Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons |journal=[[Physical Review Letters]] |volume=13 |issue=16 |pages=508–509 |bibcode=1964PhRvL..13..508H |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="G.S. Guralnik, C.R. Hagen, T.W.B. Kibble 1964 585–587"> | {{cite journal |author=P.W. Higgs |year=1964 |title=Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons |journal=[[Physical Review Letters]] |volume=13 |issue=16 |pages=508–509 |bibcode=1964PhRvL..13..508H |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="G.S. Guralnik, C.R. Hagen, T.W.B. Kibble 1964 585–587"> | ||
{{cite journal | {{cite journal | ||
|author1=G.S. Guralnik |author2=C.R. Hagen |author3=T.W.B. Kibble |year=1964 | |author1=G.S. Guralnik |author2=C.R. Hagen |author3=T.W.B. Kibble |year=1964 | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
|bibcode=1964PhRvL..13..585G | |bibcode=1964PhRvL..13..585G | ||
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585 | |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585 | ||
|doi-access=free}}</ref> into Glashow's [[electroweak interaction]], giving it its modern form. | |doi-access=free | ||
}}</ref> into Glashow's [[electroweak interaction]], giving it its modern form. | |||
In 1970, Sheldon Glashow, John Iliopoulos, and Luciano Maiani introduced the [[GIM mechanism]], predicting the [[charm quark]].<ref name=":2">{{ | In 1970, Sheldon Glashow, John Iliopoulos, and Luciano Maiani introduced the [[GIM mechanism]], predicting the [[charm quark]].<ref name=":2">{{cite journal |last=Weinberg |first=S. |date=2004-05-01 |title=The making of the Standard Model |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s2004-01761-1 |journal=European Physical Journal C |language=en |volume=34 |issue=1 |pages=5–13 |doi=10.1140/epjc/s2004-01761-1 |arxiv=hep-ph/0401010 |bibcode=2004EPJC...34....5W |issn=1434-6052 }}</ref> In 1973 Gross and Wilczek and Politzer independently discovered that non-Abelian gauge theories, like the color theory of the strong force, have [[asymptotic freedom]].<ref name=":2" /> In 1976, Martin Perl discovered the [[tau lepton]] at the [[SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory|SLAC]].<ref>{{cite web |title=The Nobel Prize in Physics 1995 |url=https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1995/perl/facts/#:~:text=In%20a%20series%20of%20experiments,alongside%20two%20previously%20known%20families. |access-date=2024-09-17 |website=NobelPrize.org |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=magazine |first=STANFORD |date=2015-01-01 |title=In Memoriam |url=https://stanfordmag.org/contents/in-memoriam |access-date=2024-09-17 |website=stanfordmag.org |language=en }}</ref> In 1977, a team led by Leon Lederman at Fermilab discovered the bottom quark.<ref>{{cite web |title=Inquiring Minds {{!}} Discoveries at Fermilab - The Bottom Quark |url=https://www.fnal.gov/pub/inquiring/physics/discoveries/bottom_quark.html |access-date=2024-09-17 |website=www.fnal.gov }}</ref> | ||
The Higgs mechanism is believed to give rise to the [[mass]]es of all the [[elementary particle]]s in the Standard Model. This includes the masses of the [[W and Z bosons]], and the masses of the [[fermion]]s, i.e. the [[quark]]s and [[lepton]]s. | The Higgs mechanism is believed to give rise to the [[mass]]es of all the [[elementary particle]]s in the Standard Model. This includes the masses of the [[W and Z bosons]], and the masses of the [[fermion]]s, i.e. the [[quark]]s and [[lepton]]s. | ||
| Line 96: | Line 97: | ||
|bibcode=1974NuPhB..73....1H | |bibcode=1974NuPhB..73....1H | ||
|doi=10.1016/0550-3213(74)90038-8 | |doi=10.1016/0550-3213(74)90038-8 | ||
|display-authors=etal}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | |display-authors=etal | ||
}}</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite web | |||
|author=D. Haidt | |author=D. Haidt | ||
|date=4 October 2004 | |date=4 October 2004 | ||
| Line 106: | Line 109: | ||
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110520115858/http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/29168 | |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110520115858/http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/29168 | ||
|url-status=dead | |url-status=dead | ||
}}</ref> the electroweak theory became widely accepted and Glashow, Salam, and Weinberg shared the 1979 [[Nobel Prize in Physics]] for discovering it. The W<sup>±</sup> and Z<sup>0</sup> [[boson]]s were discovered experimentally in 1983; and the ratio of their masses was found to be as the Standard Model predicted.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Gaillard|first1=Mary K.|author-link1=Mary K. Gaillard|last2=Grannis|first2= Paul D. |last3=Sciulli|first3=Frank J.|title=The Standard Model of Particle Physics|date=January 1999|journal=Reviews of Modern Physics|doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S96|volume=71|issue=2 |pages=S96–S111|arxiv=hep-ph/9812285|bibcode=1999RvMPS..71...96G|s2cid=119012610}}</ref> | |||
The theory of the [[strong interaction]] (i.e. [[quantum chromodynamics]], QCD), to which many contributed, acquired its modern form in 1973–74 when [[asymptotic freedom]] was proposed<ref> | The theory of the [[strong interaction]] (i.e. [[quantum chromodynamics]], QCD), to which many contributed, acquired its modern form in 1973–74 when [[asymptotic freedom]] was proposed<ref> | ||
| Line 125: | Line 128: | ||
|bibcode=1973PhRvL..30.1346P | |bibcode=1973PhRvL..30.1346P | ||
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1346 | |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1346 | ||
|url=https://authors.library.caltech.edu/6668/1/POLprl73.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180719010018/https://authors.library.caltech.edu/6668/1/POLprl73.pdf |archive-date=2018-07-19 |url-status=live | |url=https://authors.library.caltech.edu/6668/1/POLprl73.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180719010018/https://authors.library.caltech.edu/6668/1/POLprl73.pdf |archive-date=2018-07-19 |url-status=live | ||
|doi-access=free | |doi-access=free | ||
}}</ref> (a development that made QCD the main focus of theoretical research)<ref>[[Dean Rickles]] (2014). ''A Brief History of String Theory: From Dual Models to M-Theory''. Springer, p. 11 n. 22.</ref> and experiments confirmed that the [[hadron]]s were composed of fractionally charged quarks.<ref> | |||
{{cite journal | {{cite journal | ||
|last1=Aubert |first1=J. | |last1=Aubert |first1=J. | ||
| Line 135: | Line 138: | ||
|volume=33 |issue=23 |pages=1404–1406 | |volume=33 |issue=23 |pages=1404–1406 | ||
|bibcode = 1974PhRvL..33.1404A | |bibcode = 1974PhRvL..33.1404A | ||
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1404 | |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1404 |doi-access=free | ||
|display-authors=etal | |display-authors=etal | ||
}}</ref><ref> | |||
{{cite journal | {{cite journal | ||
|last1=Augustin |first1=J. | |last1=Augustin |first1=J. | ||
| Line 145: | Line 148: | ||
|volume=33 |issue=23 |pages=1406–1408 | |volume=33 |issue=23 |pages=1406–1408 | ||
|bibcode = 1974PhRvL..33.1406A | |bibcode = 1974PhRvL..33.1406A | ||
|doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1406 | |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1406 |doi-access=free | ||
|display-authors=etal | |display-authors=etal | ||
}}</ref> | |||
The term "Standard Model" was introduced by [[Abraham Pais]] and [[Sam Treiman]] in 1975,<ref> | The term "Standard Model" was introduced by [[Abraham Pais]] and [[Sam Treiman]] in 1975,<ref> | ||
{{cite journal |last1=Pais |first1=A. |last2=Treiman |first2=S. B. |year=1975 |title=How Many Charm Quantum Numbers are There? |journal=[[Physical Review Letters]] |volume=35 |issue=23 |pages=1556–1559 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1556 |bibcode=1975PhRvL..35.1556P |doi-access=}}</ref> with reference to the electroweak theory with four quarks.<ref>{{ | {{cite journal |last1=Pais |first1=A. |last2=Treiman |first2=S. B. |year=1975 |title=How Many Charm Quantum Numbers are There? |journal=[[Physical Review Letters]] |volume=35 |issue=23 |pages=1556–1559 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1556 |bibcode=1975PhRvL..35.1556P |doi-access=}}</ref> with reference to the electroweak theory with four quarks.<ref>{{cite book |last=Cao |first=Tian Yu |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108566926 |title=Conceptual Developments of 20th Century Field Theories |date=1 October 2019 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-108-56692-6 |publication-date=1998 |page=320|doi=10.1017/9781108566926 |bibcode=2019code.book.....C |s2cid=243686857 }}</ref> [[Steven Weinberg]] has since claimed priority, explaining that he chose the term Standard [[Model]] out of a sense of modesty<ref>A [[model]] is a representation of reality, whereas a [[theory]] is an explanation of reality; this Wikipedia article and some of the literature refers to the Standard Model as a theory.</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Weinberg |first=Steven |title=This World and the Universe |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gnk0rnBQrR0&t=1080s |access-date=29 March 2022 |website=[[YouTube]] |date=20 April 2010 |publisher=Talks at Google}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |year=2015 |title=World Science Festival |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-y3DPJRVhE&t=435s |access-date=29 March 2022 |website=[[YouTube]]}}</ref>{{Better source needed|reason=The current source is insufficiently reliable ([[WP:NOTRS]]).|date=March 2022}} and used it in 1973 during a talk in Aix-en-Provence in France.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/201902/weinberg.cfm| title = Q&A with Standard Bearer Steven Weinberg}}</ref> | ||
== Particle content == | == Particle content == | ||
| Line 163: | Line 166: | ||
--> | --> | ||
The Standard Model includes 12 [[elementary particle]]s of [[Spin (physics)|spin]] {{1 | The Standard Model includes 12 [[elementary particle]]s of [[Spin (physics)|spin]] {{sfrac|1|2}}, known as [[fermion]]s.<ref name=":0">{{cite web |title=The Standard Model |url=https://www-project.slac.stanford.edu/e158/StandardModel.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060620190613/http://www-project.slac.stanford.edu/e158/StandardModel.html |archive-date=June 20, 2006 |access-date=January 18, 2024 |website=[[SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory]]}}</ref> Fermions respect the [[Pauli exclusion principle]], meaning that two [[Indistinguishable particles|identical fermions]] cannot simultaneously occupy the same quantum state in the same atom.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Eisert |first=Jens |date=January 22, 2013 |title=Pauli Principle, Reloaded |url=https://physics.aps.org/articles/v6/8 |journal=Physics |language=en |volume=6 |issue=4 |pages=8 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.040404|pmid=25166142 |arxiv=1210.5531 }}</ref> Each fermion has a corresponding [[antiparticle]], which are particles that have corresponding properties with the exception of [[Additive inverse|opposite]] [[Charge (physics)|charges]].<ref>{{cite web |date=January 24, 2002 |title=What is antimatter? |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-antimatter-2002-01-24/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140331153524/http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-antimatter-2002-01-24 |archive-date=March 31, 2014 |access-date=January 19, 2024 |website=[[Scientific American]]}}</ref> Fermions are classified based on how they interact, which is determined by the charges they carry, into two groups: [[Quark|quarks]] and [[Lepton|leptons]]. Within each group, pairs of particles that exhibit similar physical behaviors are then grouped into [[Generation (particle physics)|generations]] (see the table). Each member of a generation has a greater mass than the corresponding particle of generations prior. Thus, there are three generations of quarks and leptons.<ref name=":1">{{cite web |title=Standard Model - ATLAS Physics Cheat Sheet |url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759492/files/Standard%20Model%20-%20ATLAS%20Physics%20Cheat%20Sheet.pdf |access-date=2024-01-19 |website=[[ATLAS experiment|ATLAS]] |publisher=[[CERN]]}}</ref> As first-generation particles do not decay, they comprise all of ordinary ([[baryon]]ic) matter.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cooper |first=Keith |date=10 September 2022 |title=What is the Standard Model? |url=https://www.space.com/standard-model-physics |url-status=live |access-date=17 November 2025 |website=[[Space.com]] |language=en}}</ref> Specifically, all atoms consist of electrons orbiting around the [[atomic nucleus]], ultimately constituted of up and down quarks. On the other hand, second- and third-generation charged particles decay with very short [[Half-life|half-lives]] and can only be observed in high-energy environments. Neutrinos of all generations also do not decay, and pervade the universe, but rarely interact with baryonic matter. | ||
There are six quarks: [[up quark|up]], [[down quark|down]], [[charm quark|charm]], [[strange quark|strange]], [[top quark|top]], and [[bottom quark|bottom]].<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> Quarks carry [[color charge]], and hence interact via the [[strong interaction]]. The [[color confinement]] phenomenon results in quarks being strongly bound together such that they form color-neutral composite particles called [[hadron]]s; quarks cannot individually exist and must always bind with other quarks. Hadrons can contain either a quark-antiquark pair ([[meson]]s) or three quarks ([[baryon]]s).<ref>{{cite web |title=Color Charge and Confinement |url=https://fafnir.phyast.pitt.edu/particles/color.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020322100232/http://fafnir.phyast.pitt.edu/particles/color.html |archive-date=March 22, 2002 |access-date=January 8, 2024 |website=[[University of Pittsburgh]]}}</ref> The lightest baryons are the [[Nucleon|nucleons]]: the [[proton]] and [[neutron]]. Quarks also carry [[electric charge]] and [[weak isospin]], and thus interact with other fermions through [[electromagnetism]] and [[weak interaction]]. The six leptons consist of the [[electron]], [[electron neutrino]], [[muon]], [[muon neutrino]], [[tau (particle)|tau]], and [[tau neutrino]]. The leptons do not carry color charge, and do not respond to strong interaction. The charged leptons carry an [[electric charge]] of −1 ''[[Elementary charge|e]]'', while the three [[neutrino]]s carry zero electric charge. Thus, the neutrinos' motions are influenced by only the [[weak interaction]] and [[gravity]], making them difficult to observe. | There are six quarks: [[up quark|up]], [[down quark|down]], [[charm quark|charm]], [[strange quark|strange]], [[top quark|top]], and [[bottom quark|bottom]].<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> Quarks carry [[color charge]], and hence interact via the [[strong interaction]]. The [[color confinement]] phenomenon results in quarks being strongly bound together such that they form color-neutral composite particles called [[hadron]]s; quarks cannot individually exist and must always bind with other quarks. Hadrons can contain either a quark-antiquark pair ([[meson]]s) or three quarks ([[baryon]]s).<ref>{{cite web |title=Color Charge and Confinement |url=https://fafnir.phyast.pitt.edu/particles/color.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020322100232/http://fafnir.phyast.pitt.edu/particles/color.html |archive-date=March 22, 2002 |access-date=January 8, 2024 |website=[[University of Pittsburgh]]}}</ref> The lightest baryons are the [[Nucleon|nucleons]]: the [[proton]] and [[neutron]]. Quarks also carry [[electric charge]] and [[weak isospin]], and thus interact with other fermions through [[electromagnetism]] and [[weak interaction]]. The six leptons consist of the [[electron]], [[electron neutrino]], [[muon]], [[muon neutrino]], [[tau (particle)|tau]], and [[tau neutrino]]. The leptons do not carry color charge, and do not respond to strong interaction. The charged leptons carry an [[electric charge]] of −1 ''[[Elementary charge|e]]'', while the three [[neutrino]]s carry zero electric charge. Thus, the neutrinos' motions are influenced by only the [[weak interaction]] and [[gravity]], making them difficult to observe. | ||
| Line 174: | Line 177: | ||
In diagrams with multiple particle labels separated by '/', one particle label is chosen. In diagrams with particle labels separated by '<nowiki>|</nowiki>', the labels must be chosen in the same order. For example, in the four boson electroweak case the valid diagrams are WWWW, WWZZ, WWγγ, WWZγ. The conjugate of each listed vertex (reversing the direction of arrows) is also allowed.<ref>{{cite thesis |type=PhD |last=Lindon |first=Jack |date=2020 |title=Particle Collider Probes of Dark Energy, Dark Matter and Generic Beyond Standard Model Signatures in Events With an Energetic Jet and Large Missing Transverse Momentum Using the ATLAS Detector at the LHC |publisher=CERN |url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/2746537/ }}</ref>]] | In diagrams with multiple particle labels separated by '/', one particle label is chosen. In diagrams with particle labels separated by '<nowiki>|</nowiki>', the labels must be chosen in the same order. For example, in the four boson electroweak case the valid diagrams are WWWW, WWZZ, WWγγ, WWZγ. The conjugate of each listed vertex (reversing the direction of arrows) is also allowed.<ref>{{cite thesis |type=PhD |last=Lindon |first=Jack |date=2020 |title=Particle Collider Probes of Dark Energy, Dark Matter and Generic Beyond Standard Model Signatures in Events With an Energetic Jet and Large Missing Transverse Momentum Using the ATLAS Detector at the LHC |publisher=CERN |url=https://cds.cern.ch/record/2746537/ }}</ref>]] | ||
The Standard Model includes 4 kinds of [[gauge boson]]s of [[Spin (physics)|spin]] 1,<ref name=":0" /> with bosons being quantum particles containing an integer spin. The gauge bosons are defined as [[force carrier]]s, as they are responsible for mediating the [[fundamental interaction]]s. The Standard Model explains the four fundamental forces as arising from the interactions, with fermions [[Static forces and virtual-particle exchange|exchanging]] [[Virtual particle|virtual]] force carrier particles, thus mediating the forces. At a macroscopic scale, this manifests as a [[force]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Jaeger |first1=Gregg |year=2021 |title=Exchange Forces in Particle Physics |journal=Foundations of Physics |volume=51 |issue=1 | | The Standard Model includes 4 kinds of [[gauge boson]]s of [[Spin (physics)|spin]] 1,<ref name=":0" /> with bosons being quantum particles containing an integer spin. The gauge bosons are defined as [[force carrier]]s, as they are responsible for mediating the [[fundamental interaction]]s. The Standard Model explains the four fundamental forces as arising from the interactions, with fermions [[Static forces and virtual-particle exchange|exchanging]] [[Virtual particle|virtual]] force carrier particles, thus mediating the forces. At a macroscopic scale, this manifests as a [[force]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Jaeger |first1=Gregg |year=2021 |title=Exchange Forces in Particle Physics |journal=Foundations of Physics |volume=51 |issue=1 |article-number=13 |bibcode=2021FoPh...51...13J |doi=10.1007/s10701-021-00425-0 |s2cid=231811425}}</ref> As a result, they do not follow the Pauli exclusion principle that constrains fermions; bosons do not have a theoretical limit on their [[volume number density|spatial density]]. The types of gauge bosons are described below. | ||
; [[Electromagnetism]]: [[Photon]]s mediate the electromagnetic force, responsible for interactions between electrically charged particles. The photon is massless and is described by the theory of [[quantum electrodynamics]] (QED). | |||
; [[Strong interaction]]: [[Gluon]]s mediate the strong interactions, which binds quarks to each other by influencing the [[color charge]], with the interactions being described in the theory of [[quantum chromodynamics]] (QCD). They have no mass, and there are eight distinct gluons, with each being denoted through a color-anticolor charge combination (e.g. red–antigreen).{{NoteTag|Although nine color–anticolor combinations mathematically exist, gluons form color octet particles. As one color-symmetric combination is linear and forms a color singlet particles, there are eight possible gluons.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Cahn |first1=Robert N. |title=The Experimental Foundations of Particle Physics |last2=Goldbaher |first2=Gerson |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |year=2010 |isbn=978-0521521475 |edition=2nd |publication-date=August 31, 2009 |pages=306 |chapter=Quarks, gluons, and jets |chapter-url=http://hitoshi.berkeley.edu/129A/Cahn-Goldhaber/chapter10.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120714015451/http://hitoshi.berkeley.edu/129A/Cahn-Goldhaber/chapter10.pdf |archive-date=July 14, 2012 |url-status=live}}</ref>}} As gluons have an effective color charge, they can also interact amongst themselves. | |||
; [[Weak interaction]]: The [[W and Z bosons|{{SubatomicParticle|W boson+}}, {{SubatomicParticle|W boson-}}, and {{SubatomicParticle|Z boson}}]] gauge bosons mediate the weak interactions between all fermions, being responsible for [[Radioactive decay|radioactivity]]. They contain mass, with the {{SubatomicParticle|Z boson}} having more mass than the {{SubatomicParticle|W boson+-}}. The weak interactions involving the {{SubatomicParticle|W boson+-}} act only on [[Chirality (physics)|''left-handed'' particles and ''right-handed'' antiparticles]] respectively. The {{SubatomicParticle|W boson+-}} carries an electric charge of +1 and −1 and couples to the electromagnetic interaction. The electrically neutral {{SubatomicParticle|Z boson}} boson interacts with both left-handed particles and right-handed antiparticles. These three gauge bosons along with the photons are grouped together, as collectively mediating the [[electroweak]] interaction. | |||
; [[Gravitation]]: It is currently unexplained in the Standard Model, as the hypothetical mediating particle [[graviton]] has been proposed, but not observed.<ref>{{cite web |last=Hooper |first=Dan |date=2022-05-19 |title=What is the Standard Model of particle physics, and why are scientists looking beyond it? |url=https://www.astronomy.com/science/what-is-the-standard-model-of-particle-physics-and-why-are-scientists-looking-beyond-it/ |access-date=2024-01-20 |website=[[Astronomy Magazine]] |language=en-US}}</ref> This is due to the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and [[General relativity|Einstein's theory of general relativity]], regarded as being the best explanation for gravity. In general relativity, gravity is explained as being the geometric curving of spacetime.<ref>{{cite news |last=Butterworth |first=Jon |date=2014-06-01 |title=Gravity versus the Standard Model |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/life-and-physics/2014/jun/01/gravity-versus-the-standard-model |access-date=2024-01-20 |work=[[The Guardian]] |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> | |||
The [[Feynman diagram]] calculations, which are a graphical representation of the [[perturbation theory (quantum mechanics)|perturbation theory]] approximation, invoke "force mediating particles", and when applied to analyze [[particle accelerator|high-energy scattering experiments]] are in reasonable agreement with the data. However, perturbation theory (and with it the concept of a "force-mediating particle") fails in other situations. These include low-energy quantum chromodynamics, [[bound state]]s, and [[soliton]]s. The interactions between all the particles described by the Standard Model are summarized by the diagrams on the right of this section. | The [[Feynman diagram]] calculations, which are a graphical representation of the [[perturbation theory (quantum mechanics)|perturbation theory]] approximation, invoke "force mediating particles", and when applied to analyze [[particle accelerator|high-energy scattering experiments]] are in reasonable agreement with the data. However, perturbation theory (and with it the concept of a "force-mediating particle") fails in other situations. These include low-energy quantum chromodynamics, [[bound state]]s, and [[soliton]]s. The interactions between all the particles described by the Standard Model are summarized by the diagrams on the right of this section. | ||
| Line 442: | Line 445: | ||
== Fundamental interactions == | == Fundamental interactions == | ||
{{Main|Fundamental interaction}} | {{Main|Fundamental interaction}} | ||
The Standard Model describes three of the four fundamental interactions in nature; only gravity remains unexplained. In the Standard Model, such an interaction is described as an exchange of [[boson]]s between the objects affected, such as a [[photon]] for the electromagnetic force and a [[gluon]] for the strong interaction. Those particles are called [[force carrier]]s or messenger [[particles]].<ref>{{ | The Standard Model describes three of the four fundamental interactions in nature; only gravity remains unexplained. In the Standard Model, such an interaction is described as an exchange of [[boson]]s between the objects affected, such as a [[photon]] for the electromagnetic force and a [[gluon]] for the strong interaction. Those particles are called [[force carrier]]s or messenger [[particles]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://home.cern/science/physics/standard-model |title=The Standard Model |website=CERN |date=15 December 2023 }}</ref> | ||
{| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;" class="wikitable floatcenter" | {| style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto;" class="wikitable floatcenter" | ||
| Line 506: | Line 509: | ||
[[File:Fundamental Interactions.png|thumb|Fundamental Interactions of the Standard Model including the hypothetical graviton]] | [[File:Fundamental Interactions.png|thumb|Fundamental Interactions of the Standard Model including the hypothetical graviton]] | ||
Despite being perhaps the most familiar fundamental interaction, gravity is not described by the Standard Model, due to contradictions that arise when combining general relativity, the modern theory of gravity, and quantum mechanics.<ref>{{ | Despite being perhaps the most familiar fundamental interaction, gravity is not described by the Standard Model, due to contradictions that arise when combining general relativity, the modern theory of gravity, and quantum mechanics.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Ashtekar |first=Abhay |date=2005-09-29 |title=Gravity and the quantum |url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/198 |journal=New Journal of Physics |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=198 |doi=10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/198 |issn=1367-2630|arxiv=gr-qc/0410054 |bibcode=2005NJPh....7..198A }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Kuchař |first=Karel V. |date=2011-07-31 |title=Time and Interpretations of Quantum Gravity |url=https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0218271811019347 |journal=International Journal of Modern Physics D |language=en |volume=20 |issue=supp01 |pages=3–86 |doi=10.1142/S0218271811019347 |bibcode=2011IJMPD..20....3K |issn=0218-2718|url-access=subscription }}</ref> However, gravity is so weak at microscopic scales, that it is essentially unmeasurable. The [[graviton]] is postulated to be the mediating particle, but has not yet been proved to exist.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Carney |first=Daniel |date=2024 |title=Graviton detection and the quantization of gravity |url=https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.044009 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=109 |issue=4 |article-number=044009 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.109.044009|arxiv=2308.12988 |bibcode=2024PhRvD.109d4009C }}</ref> | ||
=== Electromagnetism === | === Electromagnetism === | ||
{{See also|Electromagnetism|Quantum electrodynamics}} | {{See also|Electromagnetism|Quantum electrodynamics}} | ||
Electromagnetism is the only long-range force in the Standard Model. It is mediated by photons and couples to electric charge.<ref>{{ | Electromagnetism is the only long-range force in the Standard Model. It is mediated by photons and couples to electric charge.<ref>{{cite web |date=2023-12-04 |title=The Standard Model |url=https://home.cern/science/physics/standard-model |access-date=2023-12-17 |website=CERN |language=en}}</ref> Electromagnetism is responsible for a wide range of phenomena including [[Electron shell|atomic electron shell structure]], [[chemical bonds]], [[electric circuit]]s and [[electronics]]. Electromagnetic interactions in the Standard Model are described by quantum electrodynamics. | ||
=== Weak | === Weak interaction === | ||
{{See also|Weak interaction|Electroweak interaction}} | {{See also|Weak interaction|Electroweak interaction}} | ||
The weak interaction is responsible for various forms of [[particle decay]], such as [[beta decay]]. It is weak and short-range, due to the fact that the weak mediating particles, W and Z bosons, have mass. W bosons have electric charge and mediate interactions that change the particle type (referred to as flavor) and charge. Interactions mediated by W bosons are [[charged current interaction]]s. Z bosons are neutral and mediate neutral current interactions, which do not change particle flavor. Thus Z bosons are similar to the photon, aside from them being massive and interacting with the neutrino. The weak interaction is also the only interaction to violate [[Parity violation|parity]] and [[CP violation|CP]]. Parity violation is maximal for charged current interactions, since the W boson interacts exclusively with left-handed fermions and right-handed antifermions. | The weak interaction is responsible for various forms of [[particle decay]], such as [[beta decay]]. It is weak and short-range, due to the fact that the weak mediating particles, W and Z bosons, have mass. W bosons have electric charge and mediate interactions that change the particle type (referred to as flavor) and charge. Interactions mediated by W bosons are [[charged current interaction]]s. Z bosons are neutral and mediate neutral current interactions, which do not change particle flavor. Thus Z bosons are similar to the photon, aside from them being massive and interacting with the neutrino. The weak interaction is also the only interaction to violate [[Parity violation|parity]] and [[CP violation|CP]]. Parity violation is maximal for charged current interactions, since the W boson interacts exclusively with left-handed fermions and right-handed antifermions. | ||
| Line 518: | Line 521: | ||
In the Standard Model, the weak force is understood in terms of the electroweak theory, which states that the weak and electromagnetic interactions become united into a single ''electroweak'' interaction at high energies. | In the Standard Model, the weak force is understood in terms of the electroweak theory, which states that the weak and electromagnetic interactions become united into a single ''electroweak'' interaction at high energies. | ||
=== Strong | === Strong interaction === | ||
{{See also|Strong interaction|Nuclear force|Quantum chromodynamics}} | {{See also|Strong interaction|Nuclear force|Quantum chromodynamics}} | ||
The strong | The strong interaction is responsible for hadronic and [[Nuclear binding energy|nuclear binding]]. It is mediated by gluons, which couple to color charge. Since gluons themselves have color charge, the strong force exhibits [[Color confinement|confinement]] and [[asymptotic freedom]]. Confinement means that only color-neutral particles can exist in isolation, therefore quarks can only exist in hadrons and never in isolation, at low energies. Asymptotic freedom means that the strong force becomes weaker, as the energy scale increases. The strong force overpowers the [[electrostatic]] repulsion of protons and quarks in nuclei and hadrons respectively, at their respective scales. | ||
While quarks are bound in hadrons by the fundamental strong interaction, which is mediated by gluons, nucleons are bound by an emergent phenomenon termed the ''residual strong force'' or ''[[nuclear force]]''. This interaction is mediated by mesons, such as the [[pion]]. The color charges inside the nucleon cancel out, meaning most of the gluon and quark fields cancel out outside of the nucleon. However, some residue is "leaked", which appears as the exchange of virtual mesons, | While quarks are bound in hadrons by the fundamental strong interaction, which is mediated by gluons, nucleons are bound by an emergent phenomenon termed the ''residual strong force'' or ''[[nuclear force]]''. This interaction is mediated by mesons, such as the [[pion]]. The color charges inside the nucleon cancel out, meaning most of the gluon and quark fields cancel out outside of the nucleon. However, some residue is "leaked", which appears as the exchange of virtual mesons, which result in an effective attractive force between nucleons. The (fundamental) strong interaction is described by quantum chromodynamics, which is a component of the Standard Model. | ||
== Tests and predictions == | == Tests and predictions == | ||
| Line 529: | Line 532: | ||
The Standard Model also predicted the existence of the [[Higgs boson]], which was found in 2012 at the [[Large Hadron Collider]], the final fundamental particle predicted by the Standard Model to be experimentally confirmed.<ref> | The Standard Model also predicted the existence of the [[Higgs boson]], which was found in 2012 at the [[Large Hadron Collider]], the final fundamental particle predicted by the Standard Model to be experimentally confirmed.<ref> | ||
{{cite arXiv|eprint=1407.2122|last1=Altarelli|first1=Guido|title=The Higgs and the Excessive Success of the Standard Model|class=hep-ph|year=2014}}</ref> | {{cite arXiv |eprint=1407.2122 |last1=Altarelli |first1=Guido |title=The Higgs and the Excessive Success of the Standard Model |class=hep-ph |year=2014 }}</ref> | ||
== Challenges == | == Challenges == | ||
| Line 602: | Line 605: | ||
|arxiv = hep-ph/9605393 | |arxiv = hep-ph/9605393 | ||
}}</ref> Although the Standard Model, as it now stands, can explain why neutrinos have masses, the specifics of neutrino mass are still unclear. It is believed that explaining neutrino mass will require an additional 7 or 8 constants, which are also arbitrary parameters.<ref> | }}</ref> Although the Standard Model, as it now stands, can explain why neutrinos have masses, the specifics of neutrino mass are still unclear. It is believed that explaining neutrino mass will require an additional 7 or 8 constants, which are also arbitrary parameters.<ref> | ||
{{cite arXiv|eprint=hep-ph/0606054|last1=Strumia|first1=Alessandro|title=Neutrino masses and mixings and...|year=2006}}</ref> | {{cite arXiv |eprint=hep-ph/0606054 |last1=Strumia |first1=Alessandro |title=Neutrino masses and mixings and ... |year=2006 }}</ref> | ||
* The Higgs mechanism gives rise to the [[hierarchy problem]] if some new physics (coupled to the Higgs) is present at high energy scales. In these cases, in order for the weak scale to be much smaller than the [[Planck scale]], severe fine tuning of the parameters is required; there are, however, other scenarios that include [[Asymptotic safety in quantum gravity|quantum gravity]] in which such fine tuning can be avoided.<ref> | * The Higgs mechanism gives rise to the [[hierarchy problem]] if some new physics (coupled to the Higgs) is present at high energy scales. In these cases, in order for the weak scale to be much smaller than the [[Planck scale]], severe fine tuning of the parameters is required; there are, however, other scenarios that include [[Asymptotic safety in quantum gravity|quantum gravity]] in which such fine tuning can be avoided.<ref> | ||
{{cite journal |title=Agravity |journal=Journal of High Energy Physics|volume=2014 |issue=6 |page = 080 |url = http://inspirehep.net/record/1286134 |arxiv = 1403.4226 |bibcode = 2014JHEP...06..080S |doi=10.1007/JHEP06(2014)080|pmid = 31258400|pmc = 6560704|last1 = Salvio|first1 = Alberto|last2 = Strumia|first2 = Alessandro|year = 2018 | {{cite journal |title=Agravity |journal=Journal of High Energy Physics|volume=2014 |issue=6 |page = 080 |url = http://inspirehep.net/record/1286134 |arxiv = 1403.4226 |bibcode = 2014JHEP...06..080S |doi=10.1007/JHEP06(2014)080|pmid = 31258400|pmc = 6560704|last1 = Salvio|first1 = Alberto|last2 = Strumia|first2 = Alessandro|year = 2018}}</ref> | ||
}}</ref> | |||
* The model is inconsistent with the emerging [[Lambda-CDM model]] of cosmology. Contentions include the absence of an explanation in the Standard Model of particle physics for the observed amount of [[cold dark matter]] (CDM) and its contributions to [[dark energy]], which are many orders of magnitude too large. It is also difficult to accommodate the observed predominance of matter over antimatter ([[matter]]/[[antimatter]] [[Baryon asymmetry|asymmetry]]). The [[isotropic|isotropy]] and [[Homogeneity (physics)|homogeneity]] of the visible universe over large distances seems to require a mechanism like cosmic [[Inflation (cosmology)|inflation]], which would also constitute an extension of the Standard Model. | * The model is inconsistent with the emerging [[Lambda-CDM model]] of cosmology. Contentions include the absence of an explanation in the Standard Model of particle physics for the observed amount of [[cold dark matter]] (CDM) and its contributions to [[dark energy]], which are many orders of magnitude too large. It is also difficult to accommodate the observed predominance of matter over antimatter ([[matter]]/[[antimatter]] [[Baryon asymmetry|asymmetry]]). The [[isotropic|isotropy]] and [[Homogeneity (physics)|homogeneity]] of the visible universe over large distances seems to require a mechanism like cosmic [[Inflation (cosmology)|inflation]], which would also constitute an extension of the Standard Model. | ||
| Line 624: | Line 622: | ||
* [[Generation (particle physics)|Generation]] | * [[Generation (particle physics)|Generation]] | ||
* [[Higgs mechanism]]: [[Higgs boson]], [[Alternatives to the Standard Higgs Model]] | * [[Higgs mechanism]]: [[Higgs boson]], [[Alternatives to the Standard Higgs Model]] | ||
* [[Lagrangian (field theory) | * [[Lagrangian (field theory)]] | ||
* Open questions: [[CP violation]], [[Neutrino mass]]es, [[QCD matter]], [[Quantum triviality]] | * Open questions: [[CP violation]], [[Neutrino mass]]es, [[QCD matter]], [[Quantum triviality]] | ||
* [[Quantum field theory]] | * [[Quantum field theory]] | ||
| Line 667: | Line 665: | ||
| title=An Introduction to Particle Physics and the Standard Model | | title=An Introduction to Particle Physics and the Standard Model | ||
| publisher=[[CRC Press]] | | publisher=[[CRC Press]] | ||
| doi=10.1201/9781420083002 | |||
| isbn=9780429141225 | | isbn=9780429141225 | ||
| url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-mono/10.1201/9781420083002/introduction-particle-physics-standard-model-robert-mann | | url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-mono/10.1201/9781420083002/introduction-particle-physics-standard-model-robert-mann | ||
| Line 718: | Line 717: | ||
| publisher=Cambridge University Press | | publisher=Cambridge University Press | ||
| isbn=978-0-521-47652-2 | | isbn=978-0-521-47652-2 | ||
| url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/dynamics-of-the-standard-model/FF8A95F0F22A67FABA729DBB39BA2816 | |||
}} Highlights dynamical and [[phenomenology (particle physics)|phenomenological]] aspects of the Standard Model. | }} Highlights dynamical and [[phenomenology (particle physics)|phenomenological]] aspects of the Standard Model. | ||
* {{cite book | * {{cite book | ||
| Line 724: | Line 724: | ||
| title=Group Theory for the Standard Model of Particle Physics and Beyond | | title=Group Theory for the Standard Model of Particle Physics and Beyond | ||
| publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]] | | publisher=[[Taylor & Francis]] | ||
| doi=10.1201/9781439895207 | |||
| isbn=9780429184550 | | isbn=9780429184550 | ||
| url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-mono/10.1201/9781439895207/group-theory-standard-model-particle-physics-beyond-ken-barnes | | url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-mono/10.1201/9781439895207/group-theory-standard-model-particle-physics-beyond-ken-barnes | ||
| Line 729: | Line 730: | ||
* {{cite book |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=QYlX6AL4CtwC |title=Elementary Particle Physics: Foundations of the Standard Model, Volume 2 |isbn=978-3-527-64890-0 |last1=Nagashima|first1=Yorikiyo|year=2013|publisher=Wiley}} 920 pages. | * {{cite book |url = https://books.google.com/books?id=QYlX6AL4CtwC |title=Elementary Particle Physics: Foundations of the Standard Model, Volume 2 |isbn=978-3-527-64890-0 |last1=Nagashima|first1=Yorikiyo|year=2013|publisher=Wiley}} 920 pages. | ||
* {{cite book |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=HbdEAgAAQBAJ |title=Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model |isbn=978-1-107-03473-0|last=Schwartz|first=Matthew D.|year=2014|publisher=Cambridge University}} 952 pages. | * {{cite book |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=HbdEAgAAQBAJ |title=Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model |isbn=978-1-107-03473-0|last=Schwartz|first=Matthew D.|year=2014|publisher=Cambridge University}} 952 pages. | ||
* {{cite book |url= https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-mono/10.1201/b22175/standard-model-beyond-paul-langacker |title=The Standard Model and Beyond |isbn=978-1-4200-7907-4|last=Langacker|first=Paul|year=2009|publisher=[[CRC Press]]}} 670 pages. Highlights [[finite group|group-theoretical]] aspects of the Standard Model. | * {{cite book |url= https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/oa-mono/10.1201/b22175/standard-model-beyond-paul-langacker |title=The Standard Model and Beyond |isbn=978-1-4200-7907-4|last=Langacker|first=Paul|year=2009|publisher=[[CRC Press]] |doi=10.1201/b22175 }} 670 pages. Highlights [[finite group|group-theoretical]] aspects of the Standard Model. | ||
=== Journal articles === | === Journal articles === | ||
| Line 748: | Line 749: | ||
|title=The Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model after the Discovery of a New Boson at the LHC | |title=The Electroweak Fit of the Standard Model after the Discovery of a New Boson at the LHC | ||
|journal=[[The European Physical Journal C]] | |journal=[[The European Physical Journal C]] | ||
|volume=72 |issue=11 | | |volume=72 |issue=11 |article-number=2205 | ||
|arxiv=1209.2716 | |arxiv=1209.2716 | ||
|doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2205-9 | |doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2205-9 | ||
| Line 779: | Line 780: | ||
|author=F. Wilczek | |author=F. Wilczek | ||
|year=2004 | |year=2004 | ||
|title=The Universe | |title=The Universe is a Strange Place | ||
|doi=10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.08.001 | |doi=10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.08.001 | ||
|journal=Nuclear Physics B: Proceedings Supplements | |journal=Nuclear Physics B: Proceedings Supplements | ||
| Line 792: | Line 793: | ||
{{Commons}} | {{Commons}} | ||
{{Wikiquote}} | {{Wikiquote}} | ||
* "[http://omegataupodcast.net/93-the-standard-model-of-particle-physics The Standard Model explained in Detail by CERN's John Ellis]" omega tau podcast. | * "[http://omegataupodcast.net/93-the-standard-model-of-particle-physics The Standard Model explained in Detail by CERN's John Ellis] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224030314/http://omegataupodcast.net/93-the-standard-model-of-particle-physics/ |date=24 February 2021 }}" omega tau podcast. | ||
* [http://home.web.cern.ch/about/physics/standard-model The Standard Model] on the CERN website explains how the basic building blocks of matter interact, governed by four fundamental forces. | * [http://home.web.cern.ch/about/physics/standard-model The Standard Model] on the CERN website explains how the basic building blocks of matter interact, governed by four fundamental forces. | ||
* [https://av.tib.eu/series/56 Particle Physics: Standard Model], [[Leonard Susskind]] lectures (2010). | * [https://av.tib.eu/series/56 Particle Physics: Standard Model], [[Leonard Susskind]] lectures (2010). | ||
{{Standard model of physics}} | {{Standard model of physics}} | ||
{{particles}} | {{particles}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:53, 19 November 2025
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Template:Use dmy dates Template:Standard model of particle physics
The Standard Model of particle physics is the theory describing three of the four known fundamental forces (electromagnetic, weak and strong interactions – excluding gravity) in the universe and classifying all known elementary particles. It was developed in stages throughout the latter half of the 20th century, through the work of many scientists worldwide,[1] with the current formulation being finalized in the mid-1970s upon experimental confirmation of the existence of quarks. Since then, proof of the top quark (1995), the tau neutrino (2000), and the Higgs boson (2012) have added further credence to the Standard Model. In addition, the Standard Model has predicted various properties of weak neutral currents and the W and Z bosons with great accuracy.
Although the Standard Model is believed to be theoretically self-consistentTemplate:Notetag and has demonstrated some success in providing experimental predictions, it leaves some physical phenomena unexplained and so falls short of being a complete theory of fundamental interactions.[2] For example, it does not fully explain why there is more matter than anti-matter, incorporate the full theory of gravitation[3] as described by general relativity, or account for the universe's accelerating expansion as possibly described by dark energy. The model does not contain any viable dark matter particle that possesses all of the required properties deduced from observational cosmology. It also does not incorporate neutrino oscillations and their non-zero masses.
The development of the Standard Model was driven by theoretical and experimental particle physicists alike. The Standard Model is a paradigm of a quantum field theory for theorists, exhibiting a wide range of phenomena, including spontaneous symmetry breaking, anomalies, and non-perturbative behavior. It is used as a basis for building more exotic models that incorporate hypothetical particles, extra dimensions, and elaborate symmetries (such as supersymmetry) to explain experimental results at variance with the Standard Model, such as the existence of dark matter and neutrino oscillations.
Historical background
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". In 1928, Paul Dirac introduced the Dirac equation, which implied the existence of antimatter.[4]
In 1954, Yang Chen-Ning and Robert Mills extended the concept of gauge theory for abelian groups, e.g. quantum electrodynamics, to nonabelian groups to provide an explanation for strong interactions.[5] In 1957, Chien-Shiung Wu demonstrated parity was not conserved in the weak interaction.[6]
In 1961, Sheldon Glashow combined the electromagnetic and weak interactions.[7] In 1964, Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig introduced quarks and that same year Oscar W. Greenberg implicitly introduced color charge of quarks.[8] In 1967 Steven Weinberg[9] and Abdus Salam[10] incorporated the Higgs mechanism[11][12][13] into Glashow's electroweak interaction, giving it its modern form.
In 1970, Sheldon Glashow, John Iliopoulos, and Luciano Maiani introduced the GIM mechanism, predicting the charm quark.[14] In 1973 Gross and Wilczek and Politzer independently discovered that non-Abelian gauge theories, like the color theory of the strong force, have asymptotic freedom.[14] In 1976, Martin Perl discovered the tau lepton at the SLAC.[15][16] In 1977, a team led by Leon Lederman at Fermilab discovered the bottom quark.[17]
The Higgs mechanism is believed to give rise to the masses of all the elementary particles in the Standard Model. This includes the masses of the W and Z bosons, and the masses of the fermions, i.e. the quarks and leptons.
After the neutral weak currents caused by Z boson exchange were discovered at CERN in 1973,[18][19][20][21] the electroweak theory became widely accepted and Glashow, Salam, and Weinberg shared the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics for discovering it. The W± and Z0 bosons were discovered experimentally in 1983; and the ratio of their masses was found to be as the Standard Model predicted.[22]
The theory of the strong interaction (i.e. quantum chromodynamics, QCD), to which many contributed, acquired its modern form in 1973–74 when asymptotic freedom was proposed[23][24] (a development that made QCD the main focus of theoretical research)[25] and experiments confirmed that the hadrons were composed of fractionally charged quarks.[26][27]
The term "Standard Model" was introduced by Abraham Pais and Sam Treiman in 1975,[28] with reference to the electroweak theory with four quarks.[29] Steven Weinberg has since claimed priority, explaining that he chose the term Standard Model out of a sense of modesty[30][31][32]Template:Better source needed and used it in 1973 during a talk in Aix-en-Provence in France.[33]
Particle content
The Standard Model includes members of several classes of elementary particles, which in turn can be distinguished by other characteristics, such as color charge.
All particles can be summarized as follows: Template:Elementary particles
Fermions
The Standard Model includes 12 elementary particles of spin Template:Sfrac, known as fermions.[34] Fermions respect the Pauli exclusion principle, meaning that two identical fermions cannot simultaneously occupy the same quantum state in the same atom.[35] Each fermion has a corresponding antiparticle, which are particles that have corresponding properties with the exception of opposite charges.[36] Fermions are classified based on how they interact, which is determined by the charges they carry, into two groups: quarks and leptons. Within each group, pairs of particles that exhibit similar physical behaviors are then grouped into generations (see the table). Each member of a generation has a greater mass than the corresponding particle of generations prior. Thus, there are three generations of quarks and leptons.[37] As first-generation particles do not decay, they comprise all of ordinary (baryonic) matter.[38] Specifically, all atoms consist of electrons orbiting around the atomic nucleus, ultimately constituted of up and down quarks. On the other hand, second- and third-generation charged particles decay with very short half-lives and can only be observed in high-energy environments. Neutrinos of all generations also do not decay, and pervade the universe, but rarely interact with baryonic matter.
There are six quarks: up, down, charm, strange, top, and bottom.[34][37] Quarks carry color charge, and hence interact via the strong interaction. The color confinement phenomenon results in quarks being strongly bound together such that they form color-neutral composite particles called hadrons; quarks cannot individually exist and must always bind with other quarks. Hadrons can contain either a quark-antiquark pair (mesons) or three quarks (baryons).[39] The lightest baryons are the nucleons: the proton and neutron. Quarks also carry electric charge and weak isospin, and thus interact with other fermions through electromagnetism and weak interaction. The six leptons consist of the electron, electron neutrino, muon, muon neutrino, tau, and tau neutrino. The leptons do not carry color charge, and do not respond to strong interaction. The charged leptons carry an electric charge of −1 e, while the three neutrinos carry zero electric charge. Thus, the neutrinos' motions are influenced by only the weak interaction and gravity, making them difficult to observe.
Gauge bosons
The Standard Model includes 4 kinds of gauge bosons of spin 1,[34] with bosons being quantum particles containing an integer spin. The gauge bosons are defined as force carriers, as they are responsible for mediating the fundamental interactions. The Standard Model explains the four fundamental forces as arising from the interactions, with fermions exchanging virtual force carrier particles, thus mediating the forces. At a macroscopic scale, this manifests as a force.[41] As a result, they do not follow the Pauli exclusion principle that constrains fermions; bosons do not have a theoretical limit on their spatial density. The types of gauge bosons are described below.
- Electromagnetism
- Photons mediate the electromagnetic force, responsible for interactions between electrically charged particles. The photon is massless and is described by the theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED).
- Strong interaction
- Gluons mediate the strong interactions, which binds quarks to each other by influencing the color charge, with the interactions being described in the theory of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). They have no mass, and there are eight distinct gluons, with each being denoted through a color-anticolor charge combination (e.g. red–antigreen).Template:NoteTag As gluons have an effective color charge, they can also interact amongst themselves.
- Weak interaction
- The [[W and Z bosons|Template:SubatomicParticle, Template:SubatomicParticle, and Template:SubatomicParticle]] gauge bosons mediate the weak interactions between all fermions, being responsible for radioactivity. They contain mass, with the Template:SubatomicParticle having more mass than the Template:SubatomicParticle. The weak interactions involving the Template:SubatomicParticle act only on left-handed particles and right-handed antiparticles respectively. The Template:SubatomicParticle carries an electric charge of +1 and −1 and couples to the electromagnetic interaction. The electrically neutral Template:SubatomicParticle boson interacts with both left-handed particles and right-handed antiparticles. These three gauge bosons along with the photons are grouped together, as collectively mediating the electroweak interaction.
- Gravitation
- It is currently unexplained in the Standard Model, as the hypothetical mediating particle graviton has been proposed, but not observed.[42] This is due to the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and Einstein's theory of general relativity, regarded as being the best explanation for gravity. In general relativity, gravity is explained as being the geometric curving of spacetime.[43]
The Feynman diagram calculations, which are a graphical representation of the perturbation theory approximation, invoke "force mediating particles", and when applied to analyze high-energy scattering experiments are in reasonable agreement with the data. However, perturbation theory (and with it the concept of a "force-mediating particle") fails in other situations. These include low-energy quantum chromodynamics, bound states, and solitons. The interactions between all the particles described by the Standard Model are summarized by the diagrams on the right of this section.
Higgs boson
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
The Higgs particle is a massive scalar elementary particle theorized by Peter Higgs (and others) in 1964, when he showed that Goldstone's 1962 theorem (generic continuous symmetry, which is spontaneously broken) provides a third polarisation of a massive vector field. Hence, Goldstone's original scalar doublet, the massive spin-zero particle, was proposed as the Higgs boson, and is a key building block in the Standard Model.[44] It has no intrinsic spin, and for that reason is classified as a boson with spin-0.[34]
The Higgs boson plays a unique role in the Standard Model, by explaining why the other elementary particles, except the photon and gluon, are massive. In particular, the Higgs boson explains why the photon has no mass, while the W and Z bosons are very heavy. Elementary-particle masses and the differences between electromagnetism (mediated by the photon) and the weak force (mediated by the W and Z bosons) are critical to many aspects of the structure of microscopic (and hence macroscopic) matter. In electroweak theory, the Higgs boson generates the masses of the leptons (electron, muon, and tau) and quarks. As the Higgs boson is massive, it must interact with itself.
Because the Higgs boson is a very massive particle and also decays almost immediately when created, only a very high-energy particle accelerator can observe and record it. Experiments to confirm and determine the nature of the Higgs boson using the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN began in early 2010 and were performed at Fermilab's Tevatron until its closure in late 2011. Mathematical consistency of the Standard Model requires that any mechanism capable of generating the masses of elementary particles must become visibleTemplate:Clarify at energies above Template:Val;[45] therefore, the LHC (designed to collide two Template:Val proton beams) was built to answer the question of whether the Higgs boson actually exists.[46]
On 4 July 2012, two of the experiments at the LHC (ATLAS and CMS) both reported independently that they had found a new particle with a mass of about Template:Val (about 133 proton masses, on the order of Template:Val), which is "consistent with the Higgs boson".[47][48] On 13 March 2013, it was confirmed to be the searched-for Higgs boson.[49][50]
Theoretical aspects
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
Construction of the Standard Model Lagrangian
| Parameters of the Standard Model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | Symbol | Description | Renormalization scheme (point) |
Value | |
| 1 | me | Electron mass | 0.511 MeV | ||
| 2 | mμ | Muon mass | 105.7 MeV | ||
| 3 | mτ | Tau mass | 1.78 GeV | ||
| 4 | mu | Up quark mass | μMS = 2 GeV | 1.9 MeV | |
| 5 | md | Down quark mass | μMS = 2 GeV | 4.4 MeV | |
| 6 | ms | Strange quark mass | μMS = 2 GeV | 87 MeV | |
| 7 | mc | Charm quark mass | μMS = mc | 1.32 GeV | |
| 8 | mb | Bottom quark mass | μMS = mb | 4.24 GeV | |
| 9 | mt | Top quark mass | On shell scheme | 173.5 GeV | |
| 10 | θ12 | CKM 12-mixing angle | 13.1° | ||
| 11 | θ23 | CKM 23-mixing angle | 2.4° | ||
| 12 | θ13 | CKM 13-mixing angle | 0.2° | ||
| 13 | δ | CKM CP violation Phase | 0.995 | ||
| 14 | g1 or gTemplate:' | U(1) gauge coupling | μMS = mZ | 0.357 | |
| 15 | g2 or g | SU(2) gauge coupling | μMS = mZ | 0.652 | |
| 16 | g3 or gs | SU(3) gauge coupling | μMS = mZ | 1.221 | |
| 17 | θQCD | QCD vacuum angle | ~0 | ||
| 18 | v | Higgs vacuum expectation value | 246 GeV | ||
| 19 | mH | Higgs mass | Template:Val | ||
Technically, quantum field theory provides the mathematical framework for the Standard Model, in which a Lagrangian controls the dynamics and kinematics of the theory. Each kind of particle is described in terms of a dynamical field that pervades space-time.[51] The construction of the Standard Model proceeds following the modern method of constructing most field theories: by first postulating a set of symmetries of the system, and then by writing down the most general renormalizable Lagrangian from its particle (field) content that observes these symmetries.
The global Poincaré symmetry is postulated for all relativistic quantum field theories. It consists of the familiar translational symmetry, rotational symmetry and the inertial reference frame invariance central to the theory of special relativity. The local SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1) gauge symmetry is an internal symmetry that essentially defines the Standard Model. Roughly, the three factors of the gauge symmetry give rise to the three fundamental interactions. The fields fall into different representations of the various symmetry groups of the Standard Model (see table). Upon writing the most general Lagrangian, one finds that the dynamics depends on 19 parameters, whose numerical values are established by experiment. The parameters are summarized in the table (made visible by clicking "show") above.
Quantum chromodynamics sector
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The quantum chromodynamics (QCD) sector defines the interactions between quarks and gluons, which is a Yang–Mills gauge theory with SU(3) symmetry, generated by . Since leptons do not interact with gluons, they are not affected by this sector. The Dirac Lagrangian of the quarks coupled to the gluon fields is given by where is a three component column vector of Dirac spinors, each element of which refers to a quark field with a specific color charge (i.e. red, blue, and green) and summation over flavor (i.e. up, down, strange, etc.) is implied.
The gauge covariant derivative of QCD is defined by , where
- Template:Math are the Dirac matrices,
- Template:Math is the 8-component () SU(3) gauge field,
- Template:Math are the 3 × 3 Gell-Mann matrices, generators of the SU(3) color group,
- Template:Math represents the gluon field strength tensor, and
- Template:Math is the strong coupling constant.
The QCD Lagrangian is invariant under local SU(3) gauge transformations; i.e., transformations of the form , where is 3 × 3 unitary matrix with determinant 1, making it a member of the group SU(3), and is an arbitrary function of spacetime.
Electroweak sector
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The electroweak sector is a Yang–Mills gauge theory with the symmetry group U(1) × SU(2)L, where the subscript sums over the three generations of fermions; , and are the left-handed doublet, right-handed singlet up type, and right handed singlet down type quark fields; and and are the left-handed doublet and right-handed singlet lepton fields.
The electroweak gauge covariant derivative is defined as , where
- Template:Mvar is the U(1) gauge field,
- Template:Math is the weak hypercharge – the generator of the U(1) group,
- Template:Math is the 3-component SU(2) gauge field,
- Template:Math are the Pauli matrices – infinitesimal generators of the SU(2) group – with subscript L to indicate that they only act on left-chiral fermions,
- Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar are the U(1) and SU(2) coupling constants respectively,
- () and are the field strength tensors for the weak isospin and weak hypercharge fields.
Notice that the addition of fermion mass terms into the electroweak Lagrangian is forbidden, since terms of the form do not respect U(1) × SU(2)L gauge invariance. Neither is it possible to add explicit mass terms for the U(1) and SU(2) gauge fields. The Higgs mechanism is responsible for the generation of the gauge boson masses, and the fermion masses result from Yukawa-type interactions with the Higgs field.
Higgs sector
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". In the Standard Model, the Higgs field is an SU(2)L doublet of complex scalar fields with four degrees of freedom: where the superscripts + and 0 indicate the electric charge of the components. The weak hypercharge of both components is 1. Before symmetry breaking, the Higgs Lagrangian is where is the electroweak gauge covariant derivative defined above and is the potential of the Higgs field. The square of the covariant derivative leads to three and four point interactions between the electroweak gauge fields and and the scalar field . The scalar potential is given by where , so that acquires a non-zero Vacuum expectation value, which generates masses for the Electroweak gauge fields (the Higgs mechanism), and , so that the potential is bounded from below. The quartic term describes self-interactions of the scalar field .
The minimum of the potential is degenerate with an infinite number of equivalent ground state solutions, which occurs when . It is possible to perform a gauge transformation on such that the ground state is transformed to a basis where and . This breaks the symmetry of the ground state. The expectation value of now becomes where has units of mass and sets the scale of electroweak physics. This is the only dimensional parameter of the Standard Model and has a measured value of ~Template:Val.
After symmetry breaking, the masses of the W and Z are given by and , which can be viewed as predictions of the theory. The photon remains massless. The mass of the Higgs boson is . Since and are free parameters, the Higgs's mass could not be predicted beforehand and had to be determined experimentally.
Yukawa sector
The Yukawa interaction terms are: where , , and are Template:Math matrices of Yukawa couplings, with the Template:Mvar term giving the coupling of the generations Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar, and h.c. means Hermitian conjugate of preceding terms. The fields and are left-handed quark and lepton doublets. Likewise, and are right-handed up-type quark, down-type quark, and lepton singlets. Finally is the Higgs doublet and is its charge conjugate state.
The Yukawa terms are invariant under the SU(2)L × U(1)Y gauge symmetry of the Standard Model and generate masses for all fermions after spontaneous symmetry breaking.
Fundamental interactions
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The Standard Model describes three of the four fundamental interactions in nature; only gravity remains unexplained. In the Standard Model, such an interaction is described as an exchange of bosons between the objects affected, such as a photon for the electromagnetic force and a gluon for the strong interaction. Those particles are called force carriers or messenger particles.[52]
| Property/Interaction | Gravitation | Electroweak | Strong | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weak | Electromagnetic | Fundamental | Residual | ||
| Mediating particles | align="center" Template:Not yet observed (Graviton hypothesised) |
W+, W− and Z0 | γ (photon) | Gluons | π, ρ and ω mesons |
| Affected particles | All particles | W+, W−: Left-handed fermions; Z0: All fermions | Electrically charged | Quarks, gluons | Hadrons |
| Acts on | Stress–energy tensor | Flavor | Electric charge | Color charge | |
| Bound states formed | Planets, stars, galaxies, galaxy groups | — | Atoms, molecules | Hadrons | Atomic nuclei |
| Strength at the scale of quarks (relative to electromagnetism) |
Template:Val (predicted) | Template:Val | 1 | 60 | Not applicable to quarks |
| Strength at the scale of protons/neutrons (relative to electromagnetism) |
Template:Val (predicted) | Template:Val | 1 | Not applicable to hadrons |
20 |
Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Gravity
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
Despite being perhaps the most familiar fundamental interaction, gravity is not described by the Standard Model, due to contradictions that arise when combining general relativity, the modern theory of gravity, and quantum mechanics.[54][55] However, gravity is so weak at microscopic scales, that it is essentially unmeasurable. The graviton is postulated to be the mediating particle, but has not yet been proved to exist.[56]
Electromagnetism
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Electromagnetism is the only long-range force in the Standard Model. It is mediated by photons and couples to electric charge.[57] Electromagnetism is responsible for a wide range of phenomena including atomic electron shell structure, chemical bonds, electric circuits and electronics. Electromagnetic interactions in the Standard Model are described by quantum electrodynamics.
Weak interaction
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The weak interaction is responsible for various forms of particle decay, such as beta decay. It is weak and short-range, due to the fact that the weak mediating particles, W and Z bosons, have mass. W bosons have electric charge and mediate interactions that change the particle type (referred to as flavor) and charge. Interactions mediated by W bosons are charged current interactions. Z bosons are neutral and mediate neutral current interactions, which do not change particle flavor. Thus Z bosons are similar to the photon, aside from them being massive and interacting with the neutrino. The weak interaction is also the only interaction to violate parity and CP. Parity violation is maximal for charged current interactions, since the W boson interacts exclusively with left-handed fermions and right-handed antifermions.
In the Standard Model, the weak force is understood in terms of the electroweak theory, which states that the weak and electromagnetic interactions become united into a single electroweak interaction at high energies.
Strong interaction
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The strong interaction is responsible for hadronic and nuclear binding. It is mediated by gluons, which couple to color charge. Since gluons themselves have color charge, the strong force exhibits confinement and asymptotic freedom. Confinement means that only color-neutral particles can exist in isolation, therefore quarks can only exist in hadrons and never in isolation, at low energies. Asymptotic freedom means that the strong force becomes weaker, as the energy scale increases. The strong force overpowers the electrostatic repulsion of protons and quarks in nuclei and hadrons respectively, at their respective scales.
While quarks are bound in hadrons by the fundamental strong interaction, which is mediated by gluons, nucleons are bound by an emergent phenomenon termed the residual strong force or nuclear force. This interaction is mediated by mesons, such as the pion. The color charges inside the nucleon cancel out, meaning most of the gluon and quark fields cancel out outside of the nucleon. However, some residue is "leaked", which appears as the exchange of virtual mesons, which result in an effective attractive force between nucleons. The (fundamental) strong interaction is described by quantum chromodynamics, which is a component of the Standard Model.
Tests and predictions
The Standard Model predicted the existence of the W and Z bosons, gluon, top quark and charm quark, and predicted many of their properties before these particles were observed. The predictions were experimentally confirmed with good precision.[58]
The Standard Model also predicted the existence of the Higgs boson, which was found in 2012 at the Large Hadron Collider, the final fundamental particle predicted by the Standard Model to be experimentally confirmed.[59]
Challenges
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". <templatestyles src="Unsolved/styles.css" />
- What gives rise to the Standard Model of particle physics?
- Why do particle masses and coupling constants have the values that we measure?
- Why are there three generations of particles?
- Why is there more matter than antimatter in the universe?
- Where does dark matter fit into the model? Does it even consist of one or more new particles?
Self-consistency of the Standard Model (currently formulated as a non-abelian gauge theory quantized through path-integrals) has not been mathematically proved. While regularized versions useful for approximate computations (for example lattice gauge theory) exist, it is not known whether they converge (in the sense of S-matrix elements) in the limit that the regulator is removed. A key question related to the consistency is the Yang–Mills existence and mass gap problem.
Experiments indicate that neutrinos have mass, which the classic Standard Model did not allow.[60] To accommodate this finding, the classic Standard Model can be modified to include neutrino mass, although it is not obvious exactly how this should be done.
If one insists on using only Standard Model particles, this can be achieved by adding a non-renormalizable interaction of leptons with the Higgs boson.[61] On a fundamental level, such an interaction emerges in the seesaw mechanism where heavy right-handed neutrinos are added to the theory. This is natural in the left-right symmetric extension of the Standard Model[62][63] and in certain grand unified theories.[64] As long as new physics appears below or around 1014 GeV, the neutrino masses can be of the right order of magnitude.
Theoretical and experimental research has attempted to extend the Standard Model into a unified field theory or a theory of everything, a complete theory explaining all physical phenomena including constants. Inadequacies of the Standard Model that motivate such research include:
- The model does not explain gravitation, although physical confirmation of a theoretical particle known as a graviton would account for it to a degree. Though it addresses strong and electroweak interactions, the Standard Model does not consistently explain the canonical theory of gravitation, general relativity, in terms of quantum field theory. The reason for this is, among other things, that quantum field theories of gravity generally break down before reaching the Planck scale. As a consequence, we have no reliable theory for the very early universe.
- Some physicists consider it to be ad hoc and inelegant, requiring 19 numerical constants whose values are unrelated and arbitrary.[65] Although the Standard Model, as it now stands, can explain why neutrinos have masses, the specifics of neutrino mass are still unclear. It is believed that explaining neutrino mass will require an additional 7 or 8 constants, which are also arbitrary parameters.[66]
- The Higgs mechanism gives rise to the hierarchy problem if some new physics (coupled to the Higgs) is present at high energy scales. In these cases, in order for the weak scale to be much smaller than the Planck scale, severe fine tuning of the parameters is required; there are, however, other scenarios that include quantum gravity in which such fine tuning can be avoided.[67]
- The model is inconsistent with the emerging Lambda-CDM model of cosmology. Contentions include the absence of an explanation in the Standard Model of particle physics for the observed amount of cold dark matter (CDM) and its contributions to dark energy, which are many orders of magnitude too large. It is also difficult to accommodate the observed predominance of matter over antimatter (matter/antimatter asymmetry). The isotropy and homogeneity of the visible universe over large distances seems to require a mechanism like cosmic inflation, which would also constitute an extension of the Standard Model.
Currently, no proposed theory of everything has been widely accepted or verified.
See also
- Yang–Mills theory
- Fundamental interaction:
- Gauge theory: Introduction to gauge theory
- Generation
- Higgs mechanism: Higgs boson, Alternatives to the Standard Higgs Model
- Lagrangian (field theory)
- Open questions: CP violation, Neutrino masses, QCD matter, Quantum triviality
- Quantum field theory
- Standard Model: Mathematical formulation of, Physics beyond the Standard Model
- Electron electric dipole moment
Notes
References
Further reading
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Introductory textbooks
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Advanced textbooks
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Highlights the gauge theory aspects of the Standard Model.
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Highlights dynamical and phenomenological aspects of the Standard Model.
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". 920 pages.
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". 952 pages.
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". 670 pages. Highlights group-theoretical aspects of the Standard Model.
Journal articles
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
External links
Template:Sister project Template:Sister project
- "The Standard Model explained in Detail by CERN's John Ellis Template:Webarchive" omega tau podcast.
- The Standard Model on the CERN website explains how the basic building blocks of matter interact, governed by four fundamental forces.
- Particle Physics: Standard Model, Leonard Susskind lectures (2010).
Template:Standard model of physics Template:Particles Template:Quantum field theories Template:Physics-footer Template:Portal bar
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Dean Rickles (2014). A Brief History of String Theory: From Dual Models to M-Theory. Springer, p. 11 n. 22.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ A model is a representation of reality, whereas a theory is an explanation of reality; this Wikipedia article and some of the literature refers to the Standard Model as a theory.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Cite thesis
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".