Encyclopedia: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>KylieTastic
Reverted 1 edit by Mary Joy 20 Marcial (talk): Not helpful
 
imported>Scaledish
Reverted good faith edits by John George III (talk): Not posessive, and the statement was correct before: the total number of entries has increased as a result of online encyclopedias
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2025}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2025}}
{{Use American English|date=March 2025}}
{{Use American English|date=March 2025}}
[[File:Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica.jpg|thumb|300x300px|''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'' (right), a [[printed encyclopedia]] and [[Wikipedia]] (left), an [[online encyclopedia]]]]
[[File:Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica.jpg|thumb|357x357px|A laptop shows a Wikipedia page on "Encyclopedia", beside stacked volumes and an open page of the ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]''. ]]
An '''encyclopedia'''{{efn|Also spelled '''encyclopaedia''' in [[American and British English spelling differences|British English]]; from {{langx|grc|ἐγκύκλιος παιδεία|enkyklios paideia}}}} is a [[reference work]] or [[compendium]] providing summaries of [[knowledge]], either general or special, in a particular field or discipline.<ref>{{cite web |title=Encyclopedia. |url=http://library.rcc.edu/riverside/glossaryoflibraryterms.htm#e |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070803182506/http://library.rcc.edu/riverside/glossaryoflibraryterms.htm#e |archive-date=August 3, 2007}} Glossary of Library Terms. Riverside City College, Digital Library/Learning Resource Center. Retrieved on: November 17, 2007.</ref><ref name="what">{{cite web |url=https://eiu.libguides.com/ResearchHelp |title=What are Reference Resources? |publisher=Eastern Illinois University |access-date=December 17, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221122193111/https://eiu.libguides.com/ResearchHelp |archive-date=November 22, 2022}}</ref> Encyclopedias are divided into [[article (publishing)|articles]] or entries that are arranged [[Alphabetical order|alphabetically]] by article name<ref name="DOLencyclopedia">{{cite book |last1=Hartmann |first1=R. R. K. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=49NZ12icE-QC&q=%22encyclopedic%20dictionary%22%2Bencyclopedia&pg=PA49 |title=Dictionary of Lexicography |last2=James |first2=Gregory |publisher=Routledge |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-415-14143-7 |page=48 |access-date=July 27, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210114034551/https://books.google.com/books?id=49NZ12icE-QC&q=%22encyclopedic%20dictionary%22%2Bencyclopedia&pg=PA49 |archive-date=January 14, 2021 |url-status=}}</ref> or by thematic categories, or else are [[hyperlink]]ed and searchable.<ref name="webster">{{cite web |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/encyclopedia |title=Encyclopedia |website=Merriam-Webster |access-date=December 17, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220929221816/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/encyclopedia |archive-date=September 29, 2022}}</ref> Encyclopedia entries are longer and more detailed than those in most [[dictionary|dictionaries]].<ref name="DOLencyclopedia" /><ref name="humanities" /> Generally speaking, encyclopedia articles focus on ''[[fact]]ual information'' concerning the subject named in the article's title;<ref name="humanities">{{cite web |last=Bocco |first=Diana |date=August 30, 2022 |title=What is an Encyclopedia? |url=https://www.languagehumanities.org/what-is-an-encyclopedia.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220927200756/https://www.languagehumanities.org/what-is-an-encyclopedia.htm |archive-date=September 27, 2022 |access-date=January 24, 2023 |website=Language Humanities}}</ref> this is unlike dictionary entries, which focus on [[Linguistics|linguistic]] information about [[word]]s, such as their [[etymology]], meaning, [[pronunciation]], use, and [[grammar|grammatical]] forms.<ref name="humanities" /><ref name="bejoint">Béjoint, Henri (2000). [https://books.google.com/books?id=DJ8gwtomUpMC&dq=lexicography%20translated%20encyclopedia%20dictionary&pg=PA30 ''Modern Lexicography''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161230031758/https://books.google.com/books?id=DJ8gwtomUpMC&lpg=PA30&dq=lexicography%20translated%20encyclopedia%20dictionary&pg=PA30 |date=December 30, 2016}}, pp. 30–31. Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0-19-829951-6}}</ref><ref name="EB">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Encyclopaedia |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/186603/encyclopaedia |access-date=July 27, 2010 |quote=An English lexicographer, H.W. Fowler, wrote in the preface to the first edition (1911) of ''The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English language'' that a dictionary is concerned with the uses of words and phrases and with giving information about the things for which they stand only so far as current use of the words depends upon knowledge of those things. The emphasis in an encyclopedia is much more on the nature of the things for which the words and phrases stand. |archive-date=December 16, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101216021641/https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/186603/encyclopaedia |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="DOLei">{{cite book |last1=Hartmann |first1=R. R. K. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=49NZ12icE-QC&q=%22encyclopedic%20dictionary%22%2Bencyclopedia&pg=PA49 |title=Dictionary of Lexicography |last2=James |first2=Gregory |publisher=Routledge |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-415-14143-7 |page=49 |quote=In contrast with linguistic information, encyclopedia material is more concerned with the description of objective realities than the words or phrases that refer to them. In practice, however, there is no hard and fast boundary between factual and lexical knowledge. |access-date=July 27, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210114034551/https://books.google.com/books?id=49NZ12icE-QC&q=%22encyclopedic%20dictionary%22%2Bencyclopedia&pg=PA49 |archive-date=January 14, 2021 |url-status=}}</ref><ref name="OHEL22">{{cite book |last=Cowie |first=Anthony Paul |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nhnVF9Or_wMC |title=The Oxford History of English Lexicography, Volume I |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-415-14143-7 |page=22 |quote=An 'encyclopedia' (encyclopaedia) usually gives more information than a dictionary; it explains not only the words but also the things and concepts referred to by the words. |access-date=August 17, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210415131818/https://books.google.com/books?id=nhnVF9Or_wMC |archive-date=April 15, 2021 |url-status=}}</ref>
An '''encyclopedia'''{{efn|Also spelled '''encyclopaedia''' in [[American and British English spelling differences|British English]]; from {{langx|grc|ἐγκύκλιος παιδεία|enkyklios paideia}}}} is a [[reference work]] or [[compendium]] providing summaries of [[knowledge]], either general or special, in a particular field or discipline.<ref>{{cite web |title=Encyclopedia. |url=http://library.rcc.edu/riverside/glossaryoflibraryterms.htm#e |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070803182506/http://library.rcc.edu/riverside/glossaryoflibraryterms.htm#e |archive-date=August 3, 2007}} Glossary of Library Terms. Riverside City College, Digital Library/Learning Resource Center. Retrieved on: November 17, 2007.</ref><ref name="what">{{cite web |title=What are Reference Resources? |url=https://eiu.libguides.com/ResearchHelp |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221122193111/https://eiu.libguides.com/ResearchHelp |archive-date=November 22, 2022 |access-date=December 17, 2022 |publisher=Eastern Illinois University}}</ref> Encyclopedias are divided into [[article (publishing)|articles]] or entries that are arranged [[Alphabetical order|alphabetically]] by article name<ref name="DOLencyclopedia">{{cite book |last1=Hartmann |first1=R. R. K. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=49NZ12icE-QC&q=%22encyclopedic%20dictionary%22%2Bencyclopedia&pg=PA49 |title=Dictionary of Lexicography |last2=James |first2=Gregory |publisher=Routledge |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-415-14143-7 |page=48 |access-date=July 27, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210114034551/https://books.google.com/books?id=49NZ12icE-QC&q=%22encyclopedic%20dictionary%22%2Bencyclopedia&pg=PA49 |archive-date=January 14, 2021 |url-status=}}</ref> or by thematic categories, or else are [[hyperlink]]ed and searchable.<ref name="webster">{{cite web |title=Encyclopedia |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/encyclopedia |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220929221816/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/encyclopedia |archive-date=September 29, 2022 |access-date=December 17, 2022 |website=Merriam-Webster}}</ref> Encyclopedia entries are longer and more detailed than those in most [[dictionary|dictionaries]].<ref name="DOLencyclopedia" /><ref name="humanities">{{cite web |last=Bocco |first=Diana |date=August 30, 2022 |title=What is an Encyclopedia? |url=https://www.languagehumanities.org/what-is-an-encyclopedia.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220927200756/https://www.languagehumanities.org/what-is-an-encyclopedia.htm |archive-date=September 27, 2022 |access-date=January 24, 2023 |website=Language Humanities}}</ref> Generally speaking, encyclopedia articles focus on ''[[fact|factual information]]'' concerning the subject named in the article's title;<ref name="humanities" /> this is unlike dictionary entries, which focus on [[Linguistics|linguistic]] information about [[word]]s, such as their [[etymology]], meaning, [[pronunciation]], use, and [[grammar|grammatical]] forms.<ref name="humanities" /><ref name="bejoint">Béjoint, Henri (2000). [https://books.google.com/books?id=DJ8gwtomUpMC&dq=lexicography%20translated%20encyclopedia%20dictionary&pg=PA30 ''Modern Lexicography''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161230031758/https://books.google.com/books?id=DJ8gwtomUpMC&lpg=PA30&dq=lexicography%20translated%20encyclopedia%20dictionary&pg=PA30 |date=December 30, 2016}}, pp. 30–31. Oxford University Press. {{ISBN|0-19-829951-6}}</ref><ref name="EB">{{cite encyclopedia |title=Encyclopaedia |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/186603/encyclopaedia |access-date=July 27, 2010 |quote=An English lexicographer, H.W. Fowler, wrote in the preface to the first edition (1911) of ''The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English language'' that a dictionary is concerned with the uses of words and phrases and with giving information about the things for which they stand only so far as current use of the words depends upon knowledge of those things. The emphasis in an encyclopedia is much more on the nature of the things for which the words and phrases stand. |archive-date=December 16, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101216021641/https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/186603/encyclopaedia |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="DOLei">{{cite book |last1=Hartmann |first1=R. R. K. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=49NZ12icE-QC&q=%22encyclopedic%20dictionary%22%2Bencyclopedia&pg=PA49 |title=Dictionary of Lexicography |last2=James |first2=Gregory |publisher=Routledge |year=1998 |isbn=978-0-415-14143-7 |page=49 |quote=In contrast with linguistic information, encyclopedia material is more concerned with the description of objective realities than the words or phrases that refer to them. In practice, however, there is no hard and fast boundary between factual and lexical knowledge. |access-date=July 27, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210114034551/https://books.google.com/books?id=49NZ12icE-QC&q=%22encyclopedic%20dictionary%22%2Bencyclopedia&pg=PA49 |archive-date=January 14, 2021 |url-status=}}</ref><ref name="OHEL22">{{cite book |last=Cowie |first=Anthony Paul |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nhnVF9Or_wMC |title=The Oxford History of English Lexicography, Volume I |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-415-14143-7 |page=22 |quote=An 'encyclopedia' (encyclopaedia) usually gives more information than a dictionary; it explains not only the words but also the things and concepts referred to by the words. |access-date=August 17, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210415131818/https://books.google.com/books?id=nhnVF9Or_wMC |archive-date=April 15, 2021 |url-status=}}</ref>


Encyclopedias have existed for around 2,000 years and have evolved considerably during that time as regards language (written in a major international or a vernacular language), size (few or many volumes), intent (presentation of a global or a limited range of knowledge), cultural perspective (authoritative, ideological, didactic, utilitarian), authorship (qualifications, style), readership (education level, background, interests, capabilities), and the technologies available for their production and distribution (hand-written manuscripts, small or large print runs, Internet). As a valued source of reliable information compiled by experts, printed versions found a prominent place in [[libraries]], [[schools]] and other educational institutions.
Encyclopedias have existed for around 2,000 years<ref>{{Cite web |title=A Short History of the Greatest Encyclopedias of Past and Present |url=https://www.publishinghistory.com/encyclopedias.html |access-date=2025-06-05 |website=www.publishinghistory.com}}</ref> and have evolved considerably during that time as regards language (written in a major international or a vernacular language), size (few or many volumes), intent (presentation of a global or a limited range of knowledge), cultural perspective (authoritative, ideological, didactic, utilitarian), authorship (qualifications, style), readership (education level, background, interests, capabilities), and the technologies available for their production and distribution (hand-written manuscripts, small or large print runs, Internet). As a valued source of reliable information compiled by experts, printed versions found a prominent place in [[libraries]], [[schools]] and other educational institutions.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-12-06 |title=250 Years of the Encyclopaedia Britannica – And Chicago's Role in Its Success |url=https://www.wttw.com/playlist/2018/12/06/encyclopaedia-britannica |access-date=2025-06-05 |website=WTTW Chicago |language=en}}</ref>


In the 21st century, the appearance of [[Online encyclopedia|digital and open-source versions]] such as [[Wikipedia]] (together with the [[wiki]] website format) has vastly expanded the accessibility, authorship, readership, and variety of encyclopedia entries.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Hunter |first1=Dan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kUNpPa-P8BYC&dq=The+appearance+of+digital+and+open-source+versions+in+the+21st+century,+such+as+Wikipedia&pg=PA138 |title=Amateur Media: Social, Cultural and Legal Perspectives |last2=Lobato |first2=Ramon |last3=Richardson |first3=Megan |last4=Thomas |first4=Julian |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-78265-4 |language=en}}</ref>
In the 21st century, the appearance of [[Online encyclopedia|digital and open-source versions]] such as [[Wikipedia]] (together with the [[wiki]] website format) has vastly expanded the accessibility, authorship, readership, and variety of encyclopedia entries.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Hunter |first1=Dan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kUNpPa-P8BYC&dq=The+appearance+of+digital+and+open-source+versions+in+the+21st+century,+such+as+Wikipedia&pg=PA138 |title=Amateur Media: Social, Cultural and Legal Perspectives |last2=Lobato |first2=Ramon |last3=Richardson |first3=Megan |last4=Thomas |first4=Julian |date=2013 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-78265-4 |language=en}}</ref>
Line 17: Line 17:


==Characteristics==
==Characteristics==
{{original research|section|date=April 2022}}
<!-- "Encyclopedia article" redirects to this section; See 'what links here' and change redirects if the section title is changed. -->
<!-- "Encyclopedia article" redirects to this section; See 'what links here' and change redirects if the section title is changed. -->
The modern encyclopedia evolved from the [[dictionary]] in the 18th century; this lineage can be seen in the alphabetical order of print encyclopedias.<ref>As explained by Richard Yeo, ''Encyclopaedic Visions: Scientific Dictionaries and Enlightenment Culture'' (Cambridge: University Press, 2001 {{ISBN|978-0-521-15292-1}}</ref> Historically, both encyclopedias and dictionaries have been compiled by well-educated, well-informed content [[expert]]s, but they are significantly different in structure. A dictionary is a linguistic work that primarily focuses on an alphabetical listing of [[words]] and their [[definitions]]. [[Synonym]]ous words and those related by the subject matter are to be found scattered around the dictionary, giving no obvious place for in-depth treatment. Thus, a dictionary typically provides limited [[information]], [[wikt:Analysis|analysis]] or background for the word defined. While it may offer a definition, it may leave the reader lacking in [[understanding]] the meaning, significance or limitations of a [[Term (language)|term]], and how the term relates to a broader field of knowledge.
The modern encyclopedia evolved from the [[dictionary]] in the 18th century; this lineage can be seen in the alphabetical order of print encyclopedias.<ref>As explained by Richard Yeo, ''Encyclopaedic Visions: Scientific Dictionaries and Enlightenment Culture'' (Cambridge: University Press, 2001 {{ISBN|978-0-521-15292-1}}</ref> Historically, both encyclopedias and dictionaries have been compiled by well-educated authors, but they are significantly different in structure. A dictionary is a linguistic work that primarily focuses on an alphabetical listing of [[words]] and their [[definitions]]. [[Synonym]]ous words and those related by the subject matter are to be found scattered around the dictionary, giving no obvious place for in-depth treatment. Thus, a dictionary typically provides limited [[information]], [[wikt:Analysis|analysis]] or background for the word defined.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Dictionary vs. Encyclopedia - What's the Difference? |url=https://thisvsthat.io/dictionary-vs-encyclopedia |access-date=2025-06-05 |website=This vs. That |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last1=curious |first1=Patrick FROMAGET I. am very |last2=web |first2=I. love to learn about all types of subjects Thanks to my experience on the |last3=site :) |first3=I. share my discoveries with you on this |title=Differences Between Encyclopedia and Dictionary – AllDifferences |url=https://alldifferences.com/encyclopedia-vs-dictionary/ |access-date=2025-06-05 |language=en-US}}</ref> While it may offer a definition, it may leave the reader lacking in [[understanding]] the meaning, significance or limitations of a [[Term (language)|term]], and how the term relates to a broader field of knowledge.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=Encyclopedias |url=https://secondary.oslis.org/learn-to-research/plan/plan-possible-sources/encyclopedias |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250425092017/https://secondary.oslis.org/learn-to-research/plan/plan-possible-sources/encyclopedias |archive-date=April 25, 2025 |access-date=2025-06-05 |website=Oregon School Library Information System |language=en |url-status=live }}</ref>


To address those needs, an encyclopedia article is typically not limited to simple definitions, and is not limited to defining an individual word, but provides a more extensive meaning for a ''subject or [[list of academic disciplines|discipline]]''. In addition to defining and listing synonymous terms for the topic, the article can treat the topic's more extensive meaning in more depth and convey the most relevant accumulated knowledge on that subject. An encyclopedia article also often includes many [[map]]s and [[illustration]]s, as well as [[bibliography]] and [[statistics]].<ref name="humanities" /> An encyclopedia is, theoretically, not written to convince, although one of its goals is indeed to convince its reader of its veracity.
To address those needs, an encyclopedia article is typically not limited to simple definitions, and is not limited to defining an individual word, but provides a more extensive meaning for a ''subject or [[list of academic disciplines|discipline]]''. The Merriam-Webster definition of encyclopedia states that it is "a work that contains information on all branches of knowledge or treats comprehensively a particular branch of knowledge usually in articles arranged alphabetically often by subject".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-05-31 |title=Definition of ENCYCLOPEDIA |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/encyclopedia |access-date=2025-06-05 |website=www.merriam-webster.com |language=en}}</ref> In addition to defining and listing synonymous terms for the topic, the article can treat the topic's more extensive meaning in more depth and convey the most relevant accumulated knowledge on that subject. An encyclopedia article also often includes many [[map]]s and [[illustration]]s, as well as [[bibliography]] and [[statistics]].<ref name="humanities" />


In addition, sometimes books or reading lists are compiled from a compendium of articles (either wholly or partially taken) from a specific encyclopedia.
In addition, sometimes books or reading lists are compiled from a compendium of articles (either wholly or partially taken) from a specific encyclopedia.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-06-01 |title=Definition of COMPENDIUM |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/compendium |access-date=2025-06-05 |website=www.merriam-webster.com |language=en}}</ref>


=== Four major elements ===
=== Four major elements ===
Line 29: Line 28:
Four major elements define an encyclopedia: its subject matter, its scope, its method of organization, and its method of production:
Four major elements define an encyclopedia: its subject matter, its scope, its method of organization, and its method of production:


# Encyclopedias can be general, containing articles on topics in every field (the English-language ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'' and German ''[[Brockhaus Enzyklopädie|Brockhaus]]'' are well-known examples).<ref name="what" /> General encyclopedias may contain guides on how to do a variety of things, as well as embedded dictionaries and [[gazetteer]]s.{{Citation needed|date=February 2010}} There are also encyclopedias that cover a wide variety of topics from a particular cultural, ethnic, or national perspective, such as the ''[[Great Soviet Encyclopedia]]'' or ''[[Encyclopaedia Judaica]]''.
# Encyclopedias can be general, containing articles on topics in every field<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Wilkins |first=Paige |title=Guides: Types of Sources: Encyclopedias |url=https://libguides.wpi.edu/c.php?g=355432&p=2396449 |access-date=2025-06-05 |website=libguides.wpi.edu |language=en}}</ref> (the English-language ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'' and German ''[[Brockhaus Enzyklopädie|Brockhaus]]'' are well-known examples).<ref name="what" /> General encyclopedias may contain guides on how to do a variety of things, as well as embedded dictionaries and [[gazetteer]]s.<ref name=":1" /> There are also encyclopedias that cover a wide variety of topics from a particular cultural, ethnic, or national perspective, such as the ''[[Great Soviet Encyclopedia]]'' or ''[[Encyclopaedia Judaica]]''.<ref name=":0" />
# Works of encyclopedic scope aim to convey the important accumulated knowledge for their subject domain, such as an encyclopedia of [[medicine]], [[philosophy]] or [[law]]. Works vary in the breadth of material and the depth of discussion, depending on the [[target audience]].
# Works of encyclopedic scope aim to convey the important accumulated knowledge for their subject domain, such as an encyclopedia of [[medicine]], [[philosophy]] or [[law]]. Works vary in the breadth of material and the depth of discussion, depending on the [[target audience]].
# Some systematic methods of organization are essential to making an encyclopedia usable for reference. There have historically been two main methods of organizing printed encyclopedias: the [[alphabetical order|alphabetical]] method (consisting of several separate articles, organized in alphabetical order) and organization by [[hierarchy|hierarchical]] categories.<ref name="webster" /> The former method is today the more common, especially for general works. The fluidity of [[electronic media]], however, allows new possibilities for multiple methods of organization of the same content. Further, electronic media offer new capabilities for search, [[Subject indexing|indexing]] and [[cross reference]]. The [[epigraph (literature)|epigraph]] from [[Horace]] on the title page of the 18th century ''Encyclopédie'' suggests the importance of the structure of an encyclopedia: "What grace may be added to commonplace matters by the power of order and connection."
# Some systematic methods of organization are essential to making an encyclopedia usable for reference. There have historically been two main methods of organizing printed encyclopedias: the [[alphabetical order|alphabetical]] method (consisting of several separate articles, organized in alphabetical order) and organization by [[hierarchy|hierarchical]] categories.<ref name="webster" /> The former method is today the more common, especially for general works. The fluidity of [[electronic media]], however, allows new possibilities for multiple methods of organization of the same content. Further, electronic media offer new capabilities for search, [[Subject indexing|indexing]] and [[cross reference]]. The [[epigraph (literature)|epigraph]] from [[Horace]] on the title page of the 18th century ''Encyclopédie'' suggests the importance of the structure of an encyclopedia: "What grace may be added to commonplace matters by the power of order and connection."<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Allan |first=David |title=Some Methods and Problems in the History of Reading: Georgian England and the Scottish Enlightenme |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249409991 |journal=Journal of Historical Society |via=ResearchGate}}</ref>
# As modern multimedia and the information age have evolved, new methods have emerged for the collection, verification, summation, and presentation of information of all kinds. Projects such as [[Everything2]], [[Encarta]], [[h2g2]], and [[Wikipedia]] are examples of new forms of the encyclopedia as [[information retrieval]] becomes simpler. The method of production for an encyclopedia historically has been supported in both for-profit and non-profit contexts; such was the case of the ''[[Great Soviet Encyclopedia]]'' mentioned above which was entirely state-sponsored, while the ''Britannica'' was supported as a for-profit institution.
# As modern multimedia and the information age have evolved, new methods have emerged for the collection, verification, summation, and presentation of information of all kinds.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Miza |first=Jessica |date=2025-02-04 |title=Clarifying the Role of Encyclopedias in Research |url=https://www.atlas.org/blog/research-sources/clarifying-the-role-of-encyclopedias-in-research |access-date=2025-06-05 |website=www.atlas.org |language=en}}</ref> Projects such as [[Interpedia]], [[Everything2]], Microsoft [[Encarta]], [[h2g2]], and [[Wikipedia]] are examples of new forms of the encyclopedia as [[information retrieval]] becomes simpler. The method of production for an encyclopedia historically has been supported in both for-profit and non-profit contexts; such was the case of the ''[[Great Soviet Encyclopedia]]'' mentioned above which was entirely state-sponsored,<ref>{{Cite book |url=http://archive.org/details/greatsovietencyc0017unse |title=Great Soviet encyclopedia |date=1973 |publisher=New York, Macmillan |others=Internet Archive}}</ref> while the ''Britannica'' was supported as a for-profit institution.


=== Encyclopedic dictionaries ===
=== Encyclopedic dictionaries ===
Line 48: Line 47:
[[File:Plinio il vecchio, naturalis historia, 1446, manoscritto S. XI.1, 02.JPG|alt=Two pages from medieval manuscript of Pliny's Natural History|thumb|[[Pliny the Elder]]'s [[Natural History (Pliny)|''Natural History'']] is one of the oldest extant encyclopedias.]]
[[File:Plinio il vecchio, naturalis historia, 1446, manoscritto S. XI.1, 02.JPG|alt=Two pages from medieval manuscript of Pliny's Natural History|thumb|[[Pliny the Elder]]'s [[Natural History (Pliny)|''Natural History'']] is one of the oldest extant encyclopedias.]]


The earliest encyclopedic work to have survived to modern times is the [[Natural History (Pliny)|''Natural History'']] of [[Pliny the Elder]], a [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] statesman living in the 1st century AD,<ref name="humanities" /><ref name="chicago" /><ref name="history">{{cite web |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/encyclopaedia/History-of-encyclopaedias |title=History of Encyclopaedias |website=Britannica |access-date=December 9, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221006151548/https://www.britannica.com/topic/encyclopaedia/History-of-encyclopaedias |archive-date=October 6, 2022}}</ref><ref name="capsules">{{cite web |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/12/encyclopedias-are-time-capsules/419619/ |title=Encyclopedias Are Time Capsules |last=Nobel |first=Justin |date=December 9, 2015 |website=The Atlantic |access-date=December 17, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221205195631/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/12/encyclopedias-are-time-capsules/419619/ |archive-date=December 5, 2022}}</ref> a work indebted to [[Marcus Terentius Varro|Varro]] (1st century BCE).<ref>{{cite book|title=Histoire du livre et de l'édition |last=Sordet |first=Yann |publisher=Albin Michel |location=Paris |year=2021 |isbn=978-2-226-45767-7 |lang=fr |page=36}}</ref> He compiled a work of 37 chapters covering [[natural history]], architecture, medicine, [[geography]], geology, and all aspects of the world around him.<ref name="capsules" /> This work became very popular in [[Classical antiquity|antiquity]], was one of the first classical manuscripts to be printed in 1470, and has remained popular ever since as a source of information on the [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] world, and especially [[Roman art]], [[Roman technology]] and [[Roman engineering]].
The earliest encyclopedic work to have survived to modern times is the [[Natural History (Pliny)|''Natural History'']] of [[Pliny the Elder]], a [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] statesman living in the 1st century AD,<ref name="humanities" /><ref name="chicago" /><ref name="history">{{cite web |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/encyclopaedia/History-of-encyclopaedias |title=History of Encyclopaedias |website=Britannica |access-date=December 9, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221006151548/https://www.britannica.com/topic/encyclopaedia/History-of-encyclopaedias |archive-date=October 6, 2022}}</ref><ref name="capsules">{{cite web |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/12/encyclopedias-are-time-capsules/419619/ |title=Encyclopedias Are Time Capsules |last=Nobel |first=Justin |date=December 9, 2015 |website=The Atlantic |access-date=December 17, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221205195631/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/12/encyclopedias-are-time-capsules/419619/ |archive-date=December 5, 2022}}</ref> a work indebted to [[Marcus Terentius Varro|Varro]] (1st century BCE).<ref>{{cite book|title=Histoire du livre et de l'édition |last=Sordet |first=Yann |publisher=Albin Michel |location=Paris |year=2021 |isbn=978-2-226-45767-7 |language=fr |page=36}}</ref> He compiled a work of 37 chapters covering [[natural history]], architecture, medicine, [[geography]], geology, and all aspects of the world around him.<ref name="capsules" /> This work became very popular in [[Classical antiquity|antiquity]], was one of the first classical manuscripts to be printed in 1470, and has remained popular ever since as a source of information on the [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] world, and especially [[Roman art]], [[Roman technology]] and [[Roman engineering]].


The Spanish scholar [[Isidore of Seville]] was the first Christian writer to try to compile a ''[[summa]]'' of universal knowledge, the ''[[Etymologiae]]'' ({{Circa|600–625}}), also known by classicists as the ''Origines'' (abbreviated ''Orig''.). This encyclopedia—the first such Christian [[epitome]]—formed a huge compilation of 448 chapters in 20 books<ref>MacFarlane 1980:4; MacFarlane translates ''Etymologiae'' viii.</ref> based on hundreds of classical sources, including the {{Lang|la|Naturalis Historia}}. Of the ''Etymologiae'' in its time it was said ''quaecunque fere sciri debentur'', "practically everything that it is necessary to know".<ref>Braulio, ''Elogium'' of Isidore appended to Isidore's ''[[De viris illustribus]]'', heavily indebted itself to [[Jerome]].</ref><ref name="history" /> Among the areas covered were: [[grammar]], [[rhetoric]], [[mathematics]], [[geometry]], [[music]], [[astronomy]], [[medicine]], [[law]], the [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic Church]] and [[heretical]] sects, [[pagan]] [[philosopher]]s, [[language]]s, [[cities]], [[animal]]s and [[bird]]s, the [[Earth|physical world]], [[geography]], [[architecture|public buildings]], [[road]]s, [[metals]], [[rock (geology)|rock]]s, [[agriculture]], [[ship]]s, [[clothes]], [[food]], and [[tool]]s.
The Spanish scholar [[Isidore of Seville]] was the first Christian writer to try to compile a ''[[summa]]'' of universal knowledge, the ''[[Etymologiae]]'' ({{Circa|600–625}}), also known by classicists as the ''Origines'' (abbreviated ''Orig''.). This encyclopedia—the first such Christian [[epitome]]—formed a huge compilation of 448 chapters in 20 books<ref>MacFarlane 1980:4; MacFarlane translates ''Etymologiae'' viii.</ref> based on hundreds of classical sources, including the {{Lang|la|Naturalis Historia}}. Of the ''Etymologiae'' in its time it was said ''quaecunque fere sciri debentur'', "practically everything that it is necessary to know".<ref>Braulio, ''Elogium'' of Isidore appended to Isidore's ''[[De viris illustribus]]'', heavily indebted itself to [[Jerome]].</ref><ref name="history" /> Among the areas covered were: [[grammar]], [[rhetoric]], [[mathematics]], [[geometry]], [[music]], [[astronomy]], [[medicine]], [[law]], the [[Roman Catholic Church|Catholic Church]] and [[heretical]] sects, [[pagan]] [[philosopher]]s, [[language]]s, [[cities]], [[animal]]s and [[bird]]s, the [[Earth|physical world]], [[geography]], [[architecture|public buildings]], [[road]]s, [[metals]], [[rock (geology)|rock]]s, [[agriculture]], [[ship]]s, [[clothes]], [[food]], and [[tool]]s.
Line 54: Line 53:
Another Christian encyclopedia was the ''Institutiones divinarum et saecularium litterarum'' of [[Cassiodorus]] (543–560) dedicated to the Christian divinity and the seven liberal arts.<ref name="history" /><ref name="humanities" /> The encyclopedia of [[Suda]], a massive 10th-century Byzantine encyclopedia, had 30,000 entries (broadly alphabetically arranged), many drawing from ancient sources that have since been lost, and often derived from medieval [[Christianity|Christian]] compilers.<ref name="history" />
Another Christian encyclopedia was the ''Institutiones divinarum et saecularium litterarum'' of [[Cassiodorus]] (543–560) dedicated to the Christian divinity and the seven liberal arts.<ref name="history" /><ref name="humanities" /> The encyclopedia of [[Suda]], a massive 10th-century Byzantine encyclopedia, had 30,000 entries (broadly alphabetically arranged), many drawing from ancient sources that have since been lost, and often derived from medieval [[Christianity|Christian]] compilers.<ref name="history" />
[[File:Yongle Encyclopedia.jpg|thumb|The ''[[Yongle Encyclopedia]]'' is the largest paper encyclopedia of world history]]
[[File:Yongle Encyclopedia.jpg|thumb|The ''[[Yongle Encyclopedia]]'' is the largest paper encyclopedia of world history]]
From India, the [[Siribhoovalaya]] (Kannada: ಸಿರಿಭೂವಲಯ), variously dated to c. 800 AD, the 15th century, or an even more recent time, is a work of [[Kannada]] literature written by [[Kumudendu Muni]], a Jain monk. It is unique because rather than employing alphabets, it is composed entirely in [[Kannada numerals]]. Many philosophies which existed in the Jain classics are eloquently and skillfully interpreted in the work.
From India, the [[Siribhoovalaya]] (Kannada: ಸಿರಿಭೂವಲಯ), variously dated to c. 800 AD, the 15th century,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Sheth |first=Dr. Chayya |title=SIRIBHOOVALAYA |url=https://sarcouncil.com/download-article/SJAL-40-2023-1-5.pdf |journal=Sarcouncil Journal of Arts and Literature |volume=2 |issue=3 |pages=1–5 |via=sarcouncil.com}}</ref> or an even more recent time, is a work of [[Kannada]] literature written by [[Kumudendu Muni]], a Jain monk.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-10-07 |title=The Ancient Science of Kannada |url=https://projectshivoham.com/2024/10/07/the-ancient-science-of-kannada/ |access-date=2025-06-05 |website=Project Shivoham |language=en}}</ref> It is unique because rather than employing alphabets, it is composed entirely in [[Kannada numerals]]. Many philosophies which existed in the Jain classics are eloquently and skillfully interpreted in the work.


The 2nd century BC reference work ''[[Shiben]]'' has been described as a Chinese encyclopedia of genealogies, while the ''[[Huanglan]]'', completed in the 220s, was an early ''[[leishu]]'' encyclopedia. The ''[[Yiwen Leiju]]'', completed in 624, was a landmark literature encyclopedia of the early [[Tang dynasty]]. The enormous encyclopedic works of the ''[[Four Great Books of Song]]'', compiled by the 11th century during the early [[Song dynasty]] (960–1279), was a massive literary undertaking for the time. The last encyclopedia of the four, the ''[[Prime Tortoise of the Record Bureau]]'', amounted to 9.4&nbsp;million [[Chinese characters]] in 1,000 written volumes. The ''[[Yongle Encyclopedia]]'' (completed 1408) comprised 11,095 volumes, making it the largest paper encyclopedia in world history.{{Sfn|Fu|Cao|2019|p=297}}{{Sfn|Ditmanson|2018|p=255}}
The 2nd century BC reference work ''[[Shiben]]'' has been described as a Chinese encyclopedia of genealogies, while the ''[[Huanglan]]'', completed in the 220s, was an early ''[[leishu]]'' encyclopedia. The ''[[Yiwen Leiju]]'', completed in 624, was a landmark literature encyclopedia of the early [[Tang dynasty]]. The ''[[Tongdian]]'', ''[[Tongzhi (encyclopedia)|Tongzhi]]'' and ''[[Wenxian Tongkao]]'' were three comprehensive encyclopedias of the Tang, Song and Yuan dynasties, and were collectively referred to as the ''Three Tongs'' (''Santong'').  The enormous encyclopedic works of the ''[[Four Great Books of Song]]'', compiled by the 11th century during the early [[Song dynasty]] (960–1279), was a massive literary undertaking for the time. The last encyclopedia of the four, the ''[[Prime Tortoise of the Record Bureau]]'', amounted to 9.4&nbsp;million [[Chinese characters]] in 1,000 written volumes. The ''[[Yongle Encyclopedia]]'' (completed 1408) comprised 11,095 volumes, making it the largest paper encyclopedia in world history.{{Sfn|Fu|Cao|2019|p=297}}{{Sfn|Ditmanson|2018|p=255}}


There were many great encyclopedists throughout Chinese history, including the scientist and statesman [[Shen Kuo]] (1031–1095) with his ''[[Dream Pool Essays]]'' of 1088; the statesman, inventor, and agronomist [[Wang Zhen (official)|Wang Zhen]] (active 1290–1333) with his ''Nong Shu'' of 1313; and [[Song Yingxing]] (1587–1666) with his ''Tiangong Kaiwu''. Song Yingxing was termed the "[[Denis Diderot|Diderot]] of China" by British historian [[Joseph Needham]].<ref>Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 102.</ref>
There were many great encyclopedists throughout Chinese history, including the scientist and statesman [[Shen Kuo]] (1031–1095) with his ''[[Dream Pool Essays]]'' of 1088; the statesman, inventor, and agronomist [[Wang Zhen (official)|Wang Zhen]] (active 1290–1333) with his ''Nong Shu'' of 1313; and [[Song Yingxing]] (1587–1666) with his ''Tiangong Kaiwu''. Song Yingxing was termed the "[[Denis Diderot|Diderot]] of China" by British historian [[Joseph Needham]].<ref>Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 102.</ref>


== Printed encyclopedias ==
== Printed encyclopedias ==
Before the advent of the printing press, encyclopedic works were all hand-copied and thus rarely available, beyond wealthy patrons or monastic men of learning: they were expensive, and usually written for those extending knowledge rather than those using it. The introduction of [[printing]] from Asia allowed a wider diffusion of encyclopedias and every scholar could have his or her copy. [[Nuremberg Chronicle]] from 1493 is one of the best-documented early printed books—an [[incunabulum]]—and one of the first to successfully integrate illustrations and text. Both Latin and German editions were printed by [[Anton Koberger]] in Nuremberg.<ref>Cambridge Digital Library, University of Cambridge, http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/PR-INC-00000-A-00007-00002-00888/1 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121206053438/http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/PR-INC-00000-A-00007-00002-00888/1|date=2012-12-06}}</ref>The ''[[De expetendis et fugiendis rebus]]'' by [[Giorgio Valla]] was posthumously printed in 1501 by [[Aldo Manuzio]] in [[Venice]]. This work followed the traditional scheme of liberal arts. However, Valla added the translation of ancient Greek works on mathematics (firstly by [[Archimedes]]), newly discovered and translated. The ''Margarita Philosophica'' by [[Gregor Reisch]], printed in 1503, was a complete encyclopedia explaining the [[seven liberal arts]].
{{Additional citations|section|date=July 2025}}
[[File:Encyclopaedia Britannica 15 with 2002.jpg|thumb|Britannica 15th edition printed encyclopedias, 2002]]Before the advent of the printing press, encyclopedic works were all hand-copied and thus rarely available, beyond wealthy patrons or monastic men of learning: they were expensive, and usually written for those extending knowledge rather than those using it. The introduction of [[printing]] from Asia allowed a wider diffusion of encyclopedias and every scholar could have his or her copy. [[Nuremberg Chronicle]] from 1493 is one of the best-documented early printed books—an [[incunabulum]]—and one of the first to successfully integrate illustrations and text. Both Latin and German editions were printed by [[Anton Koberger]] in Nuremberg.<ref>Cambridge Digital Library, University of Cambridge, http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/PR-INC-00000-A-00007-00002-00888/1 {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121206053438/http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/PR-INC-00000-A-00007-00002-00888/1|date=2012-12-06}}</ref> The ''[[De expetendis et fugiendis rebus]]'' by [[Giorgio Valla]] was posthumously printed in 1501 by [[Aldo Manuzio]] in [[Venice]]. This work followed the traditional scheme of liberal arts. However, Valla added the translation of ancient Greek works on mathematics (firstly by [[Archimedes]]), newly discovered and translated. The ''Margarita Philosophica'' by [[Gregor Reisch]], printed in 1503, was a complete encyclopedia explaining the [[seven liberal arts]].


Financial, commercial, legal, and intellectual factors changed the size of encyclopedias. Middle classes had more time to read and encyclopedias helped them to learn more. Publishers wanted to increase their output so some countries like Germany started selling books missing alphabetical sections, to publish faster. Also, publishers could not afford all the resources by themselves, so multiple publishers would come together with their resources to create better encyclopedias. Later, rivalry grew, causing copyright to occur due to weak underdeveloped laws.
Financial, commercial, legal, and intellectual factors changed the size of encyclopedias. Middle classes had more time to read and encyclopedias helped them to learn more. Publishers wanted to increase their output so some countries like Germany started selling books missing alphabetical sections, to publish faster. Also, publishers could not afford all the resources by themselves, so multiple publishers would come together with their resources to create better encyclopedias. Later, rivalry grew, causing copyright to occur due to weak underdeveloped laws.
Line 76: Line 76:


===Encyclopedias in the United States===
===Encyclopedias in the United States===
In the United States, the 1950s and 1960s saw the introduction of several large popular encyclopedias, often sold on installment plans. The best known of these were ''[[World Book]]'' and ''[[Funk and Wagnalls]]''. As many as 90% were sold [[door to door]].<ref name="chicago">{{cite web |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-flash-encyclopedia-world-book-britannica-1210-20171205-story.html |title=Long before Google, there was the encyclopedia |last=Grossman |first=Ron |date=December 7, 2017 |website=Chicago Tribune |access-date=December 9, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221022091053/https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-flash-encyclopedia-world-book-britannica-1210-20171205-story.html |archive-date=October 22, 2022}}</ref> Jack Lynch says in his book ''[[You Could Look It Up]]'' that encyclopedia salespeople were so common that they became the butt of jokes. He describes their sales pitch saying, "They were selling not books but a lifestyle, a future, a promise of social mobility." A 1961 ''World Book'' ad said, "You are holding your family's future in your hands right now," while showing a feminine hand holding an order form.<ref>{{cite web |last=Onion |first=Rebecca |date=June 3, 2016 |title=How Two Artists Turn Old Encyclopedias Into Beautiful, Melancholy Art |website=Slate |url=https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/06/how-two-artists-turn-old-encyclopedias-into-beautiful-melancholy-art.html |access-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190923122858/https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/06/how-two-artists-turn-old-encyclopedias-into-beautiful-melancholy-art.html |url-status=live}}</ref> As of the 1990s, two of the most prominent encyclopedias published in the United States were ''[[Collier's Encyclopedia]]'' and ''[[Encyclopedia Americana]]''.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kister |first=K. F. |url=https://archive.org/details/kistersbestencyc00kist |title=Kister's Best Encyclopedias: A Comparative Guide to General and Specialized Encyclopedias |date=1994 |publisher=Oryx Press |isbn=0-89774-744-5 |edition=2nd |location=Phoenix, Arizona |pages=23 |author-link=Kenneth Kister}}</ref>
In the United States, the 1950s and 1960s saw the introduction of several large popular encyclopedias, often sold on installment plans. The best known of these were ''[[World Book]]'' and ''[[Funk and Wagnalls]]''. As many as 90% were sold [[door to door]].<ref name="chicago">{{cite web |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-flash-encyclopedia-world-book-britannica-1210-20171205-story.html |title=Long before Google, there was the encyclopedia |last=Grossman |first=Ron |date=December 7, 2017 |website=Chicago Tribune |access-date=December 9, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221022091053/https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-flash-encyclopedia-world-book-britannica-1210-20171205-story.html |archive-date=October 22, 2022}}</ref> Jack Lynch says in his book ''[[You Could Look It Up]]'' that encyclopedia salespeople were so common that they became the butt of jokes. He describes their sales pitch saying, "They were selling not books but a lifestyle, a future, a promise of social mobility." A 1961 ''World Book'' ad said, "You are holding your family's future in your hands right now," while showing a feminine hand holding an order form.<ref>{{cite web |last=Onion |first=Rebecca |date=June 3, 2016 |title=How Two Artists Turn Old Encyclopedias Into Beautiful, Melancholy Art |website=Slate |url=https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/06/how-two-artists-turn-old-encyclopedias-into-beautiful-melancholy-art.html |access-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-date=September 23, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190923122858/https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/06/how-two-artists-turn-old-encyclopedias-into-beautiful-melancholy-art.html |url-status=live}}</ref> As of the 1990s, two of the most prominent encyclopedias published in the United States were ''[[Collier's Encyclopedia]]'' and ''[[Encyclopedia Americana]]''.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kister |first=K. F. |url=https://archive.org/details/kistersbestencyc00kist |title=Kister's Best Encyclopedias: A Comparative Guide to General and Specialized Encyclopedias |date=1994 |publisher=Oryx Press |isbn=0-89774-744-5 |edition=2nd |location=Phoenix, Arizona |page=23 |author-link=Kenneth Kister}}</ref>


== Digital encyclopedias<span class="anchor" id="Digital"></span> ==
== Digital encyclopedias<span class="anchor" id="Digital"></span> ==
Line 82: Line 82:
By the late 20th century, encyclopedias were being published on [[CD-ROM]]s for use with [[personal computers]]. This was the usual way computer users accessed encyclopedic knowledge from the 1980s and 1990s. Later, [[DVD]] discs replaced CD-ROMs, and by the mid-2000s, [[internet encyclopedias]] were dominant and replaced disc-based software encyclopedias.<ref name="humanities" />
By the late 20th century, encyclopedias were being published on [[CD-ROM]]s for use with [[personal computers]]. This was the usual way computer users accessed encyclopedic knowledge from the 1980s and 1990s. Later, [[DVD]] discs replaced CD-ROMs, and by the mid-2000s, [[internet encyclopedias]] were dominant and replaced disc-based software encyclopedias.<ref name="humanities" />


CD-ROM encyclopedias were usually a [[macOS]] or [[Microsoft Windows]] (3.0, 3.1 or 95/98) application on a CD-ROM disc. The user would execute the encyclopedia's software program to see a menu that allowed them to start browsing the encyclopedia's articles, and most encyclopedias also supported a way to search the contents of the encyclopedia. The article text was usually [[hyperlink]]ed and also included [[photograph]]s, [[Digital audio|audio]] clips (for example in articles about historical speeches or musical instruments), and [[digital video|video clips]]. In the CD-ROM age, the video clips usually had a low resolution, often 160x120 or 320x240 pixels. Such encyclopedias which made use of photos, audio and video were also called [[Multimedia|multimedia encyclopedias]].  
CD-ROM encyclopedias were usually a [[macOS]] or [[Microsoft Windows]] (3.0, 3.1 or 95/98) application on a CD-ROM disc. The user would execute the encyclopedia's software program to see a menu that allowed them to start browsing the encyclopedia's articles, and most encyclopedias also supported a way to search the contents of the encyclopedia. The article text was usually [[hyperlink]]ed and also included [[photograph]]s, [[Digital audio|audio]] clips (for example in articles about historical speeches or musical instruments), and [[digital video|video clips]]. In the CD-ROM age, the video clips usually had a low resolution, often 160x120 or 320x240 pixels. Such encyclopedias which made use of photos, audio and video were also called [[Multimedia|multimedia encyclopedias]].


[[Microsoft]]'s ''[[Encarta]]'', launched in 1993, was a landmark example as it had no printed equivalent. Articles were supplemented with video and audio files as well as numerous high-quality images. After sixteen years, Microsoft discontinued the Encarta line of products in 2009.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|url=http://encarta.msn.com/guide_page_FAQ/FAQ.html |title=Important Notice: MSN Encarta to be Discontinued |publisher=MSN Encarta |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20091027213618/http://encarta.msn.com/guide_page_FAQ/FAQ.html |archivedate=October 27, 2009 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Other examples of CD-ROM encyclopedia are [[Grolier]] Multimedia Encyclopedia and ''Britannica''.
[[Microsoft]]'s ''[[Encarta]]'', launched in 1993, was a landmark example as it had no printed equivalent. It featured around 25,000 articles, supplemented with 7,000 high-quality images, 9 hours of audio files, and 30 videos. After sixteen years, Microsoft discontinued the Encarta line of products in 2009 with the rise of the Internet.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://mundobytes.com/que-fue-de-microsoft-encarta/ |title=Qué fue de Microsoft Encarta y por qué desapareció la legendaria enciclopedia digital |work=MundoBytes |publisher=AB Internet Networks }}<!-- English translation: https://mundobytes.com/en/What-happened-to-Microsoft-Encarta --></ref> Other examples of CD-ROM encyclopedia are [[Grolier]] Multimedia Encyclopedia and ''Britannica''.


Digital encyclopedias enable "Encyclopedia Services" (such as [[Wikimedia Enterprise]]) to facilitate programmatic access to the content.<ref>{{cite web |title=Encyclopedia Service Are About To Become A Huge Market |url=https://www.stillwatercurrent.com/encyclopedia-service-are-about-to-become-a-huge-market-investopedia-techpedia-wikipedia-baidu-baike/ |website=www.stillwatercurrent.com |access-date=September 27, 2021 |archive-date=September 27, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210927161417/https://www.stillwatercurrent.com/encyclopedia-service-are-about-to-become-a-huge-market-investopedia-techpedia-wikipedia-baidu-baike/ |url-status=live}}</ref>
Digital encyclopedias enable "Encyclopedia Services" (such as [[Wikimedia Enterprise]]) to facilitate programmatic access to the content.<ref>{{cite web |title=Encyclopedia Service Are About To Become A Huge Market |url=https://www.stillwatercurrent.com/encyclopedia-service-are-about-to-become-a-huge-market-investopedia-techpedia-wikipedia-baidu-baike/ |website=www.stillwatercurrent.com |access-date=September 27, 2021 |archive-date=September 27, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210927161417/https://www.stillwatercurrent.com/encyclopedia-service-are-about-to-become-a-huge-market-investopedia-techpedia-wikipedia-baidu-baike/ |url-status=live}}</ref>
Line 100: Line 100:
The [[English Wikipedia]], which was started in 2001, became the world's largest encyclopedia in 2004 at the 300,000 article stage.<ref>[http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004/07/07_3000k/ "Wikipedia Passes 300,000 Articles making it the worlds largest encyclopedia"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927210350/http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004/07/07_3000k/ |date=September 27, 2007}}, ''Linux Reviews'', 2004 Julich y 7.</ref> By late 2005, Wikipedia had produced over two million articles in more than 80 languages with content licensed under the [[copyleft]] [[GNU Free Documentation License]]. {{As of|August 2009|post=,}} Wikipedia had over 3 million articles in English and well over 10 million combined articles in over 250 languages. Today, Wikipedia has [[Special:Statistics|{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}]] articles in English, over 60 million combined articles in over 300 languages, and over 250 million combined pages including project and discussion pages.<ref>{{Cite web |title=List of Wikipedias - Meta |url=https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias |access-date=August 20, 2023 |website=meta.wikimedia.org |language=en}}</ref>
The [[English Wikipedia]], which was started in 2001, became the world's largest encyclopedia in 2004 at the 300,000 article stage.<ref>[http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004/07/07_3000k/ "Wikipedia Passes 300,000 Articles making it the worlds largest encyclopedia"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927210350/http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004/07/07_3000k/ |date=September 27, 2007}}, ''Linux Reviews'', 2004 Julich y 7.</ref> By late 2005, Wikipedia had produced over two million articles in more than 80 languages with content licensed under the [[copyleft]] [[GNU Free Documentation License]]. {{As of|August 2009|post=,}} Wikipedia had over 3 million articles in English and well over 10 million combined articles in over 250 languages. Today, Wikipedia has [[Special:Statistics|{{NUMBEROFARTICLES}}]] articles in English, over 60 million combined articles in over 300 languages, and over 250 million combined pages including project and discussion pages.<ref>{{Cite web |title=List of Wikipedias - Meta |url=https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias |access-date=August 20, 2023 |website=meta.wikimedia.org |language=en}}</ref>


Since 2002, other free encyclopedias appeared, including [[Hudong]] (2005–) and [[Baidu Baike]] (2006–) in Chinese, and Google's [[Knol]] (2008–2012) in English. Some MediaWiki-based encyclopedias have appeared, usually under a license compatible with Wikipedia, including [[Enciclopedia Libre Universal en Español|Enciclopedia Libre]] (2002–2021) in Spanish and [[Conservapedia]] (2006–), [[Scholarpedia]] (2006–), and [[Citizendium]] (2007–) in English, the latter of which had become inactive by 2014.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Herring |first=Mark Youngblood |title=Are libraries obsolete? an argument for relevance in the digital age |date=2014 |publisher=McFarland & Company |isbn=978-0-7864-7356-4 |location=Jefferson, N.C}}</ref>
Since 2002, other free encyclopedias appeared, including [[Hudong]] (2005–) and [[Baidu Baike]] (2006–) in Chinese, and Google's [[Knol]] (2008–2012) in English. Some MediaWiki-based encyclopedias have appeared, usually under a license compatible with Wikipedia, including the Spanish encyclopedia [[Enciclopedia Libre Universal en Español|Enciclopedia Libre]] (2002–2021) and the English encyclopedias [[Conservapedia]] (2006–), [[Scholarpedia]] (2006–), and [[Citizendium]] (2007–).


==See also==
==See also==
Line 119: Line 119:


== Notes ==
== Notes ==
{{Noteslist}}
{{Notelist}}


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 21:14, 7 November 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "other uses". Template:Pp-semi-indef Template:Pp-move Template:Use mdy dates Template:Use American English

File:Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica.jpg
A laptop shows a Wikipedia page on "Encyclopedia", beside stacked volumes and an open page of the Encyclopædia Britannica.

An encyclopediaTemplate:Efn is a reference work or compendium providing summaries of knowledge, either general or special, in a particular field or discipline.[1][2] Encyclopedias are divided into articles or entries that are arranged alphabetically by article name[3] or by thematic categories, or else are hyperlinked and searchable.[4] Encyclopedia entries are longer and more detailed than those in most dictionaries.[3][5] Generally speaking, encyclopedia articles focus on factual information concerning the subject named in the article's title;[5] this is unlike dictionary entries, which focus on linguistic information about words, such as their etymology, meaning, pronunciation, use, and grammatical forms.[5][6][7][8][9]

Encyclopedias have existed for around 2,000 years[10] and have evolved considerably during that time as regards language (written in a major international or a vernacular language), size (few or many volumes), intent (presentation of a global or a limited range of knowledge), cultural perspective (authoritative, ideological, didactic, utilitarian), authorship (qualifications, style), readership (education level, background, interests, capabilities), and the technologies available for their production and distribution (hand-written manuscripts, small or large print runs, Internet). As a valued source of reliable information compiled by experts, printed versions found a prominent place in libraries, schools and other educational institutions.[11]

In the 21st century, the appearance of digital and open-source versions such as Wikipedia (together with the wiki website format) has vastly expanded the accessibility, authorship, readership, and variety of encyclopedia entries.[12]

Etymology

Medieval manuscript containing the Greek phrase "enkúklios paideía"
A 15th-century manuscript of Institutio Oratoria. The Greek root of the word encyclopedia is highlighted.

The word encyclopedia comes from the Koine Greek Script error: No such module "Lang".,[13] transliterated Template:Transliteration Template:Gloss, from Template:Transliteration (Script error: No such module "Lang".) Template:Gloss[5][14] and Template:Transliteration (Script error: No such module "Lang".) Template:Gloss; together, the phrase literally translates as Template:Gloss.[15] However, the two separate words were reduced to a single word due to a scribal error[16] by copyists of a Latin manuscript edition of Quintillian in 1470.[17] The copyists took this phrase to be a single Greek word, Script error: No such module "Lang"., with the same meaning, and this spurious Greek word became the Neo-Latin word Script error: No such module "Lang"., which was in turn borrowed into English. Because of this compounded word, readers since the fifteenth century have often, and incorrectly, thought that the Roman authors Quintillian and Pliny described an ancient genre.[18] Following Noah Webster's spelling reform,Template:Sfn the spelling of the word varies between encyclopedia in American English, encyclopaedia in British English (although the spelling encyclopedia is increasingly gaining acceptance), and encyclopædia in certain specialized cases.Template:Sfn

Characteristics

The modern encyclopedia evolved from the dictionary in the 18th century; this lineage can be seen in the alphabetical order of print encyclopedias.[19] Historically, both encyclopedias and dictionaries have been compiled by well-educated authors, but they are significantly different in structure. A dictionary is a linguistic work that primarily focuses on an alphabetical listing of words and their definitions. Synonymous words and those related by the subject matter are to be found scattered around the dictionary, giving no obvious place for in-depth treatment. Thus, a dictionary typically provides limited information, analysis or background for the word defined.[20][21] While it may offer a definition, it may leave the reader lacking in understanding the meaning, significance or limitations of a term, and how the term relates to a broader field of knowledge.[22]

To address those needs, an encyclopedia article is typically not limited to simple definitions, and is not limited to defining an individual word, but provides a more extensive meaning for a subject or discipline. The Merriam-Webster definition of encyclopedia states that it is "a work that contains information on all branches of knowledge or treats comprehensively a particular branch of knowledge usually in articles arranged alphabetically often by subject".[23] In addition to defining and listing synonymous terms for the topic, the article can treat the topic's more extensive meaning in more depth and convey the most relevant accumulated knowledge on that subject. An encyclopedia article also often includes many maps and illustrations, as well as bibliography and statistics.[5]

In addition, sometimes books or reading lists are compiled from a compendium of articles (either wholly or partially taken) from a specific encyclopedia.[24]

Four major elements

Four major elements define an encyclopedia: its subject matter, its scope, its method of organization, and its method of production:

  1. Encyclopedias can be general, containing articles on topics in every field[25] (the English-language Encyclopædia Britannica and German Brockhaus are well-known examples).[2] General encyclopedias may contain guides on how to do a variety of things, as well as embedded dictionaries and gazetteers.[25] There are also encyclopedias that cover a wide variety of topics from a particular cultural, ethnic, or national perspective, such as the Great Soviet Encyclopedia or Encyclopaedia Judaica.[22]
  2. Works of encyclopedic scope aim to convey the important accumulated knowledge for their subject domain, such as an encyclopedia of medicine, philosophy or law. Works vary in the breadth of material and the depth of discussion, depending on the target audience.
  3. Some systematic methods of organization are essential to making an encyclopedia usable for reference. There have historically been two main methods of organizing printed encyclopedias: the alphabetical method (consisting of several separate articles, organized in alphabetical order) and organization by hierarchical categories.[4] The former method is today the more common, especially for general works. The fluidity of electronic media, however, allows new possibilities for multiple methods of organization of the same content. Further, electronic media offer new capabilities for search, indexing and cross reference. The epigraph from Horace on the title page of the 18th century Encyclopédie suggests the importance of the structure of an encyclopedia: "What grace may be added to commonplace matters by the power of order and connection."[26]
  4. As modern multimedia and the information age have evolved, new methods have emerged for the collection, verification, summation, and presentation of information of all kinds.[27] Projects such as Interpedia, Everything2, Microsoft Encarta, h2g2, and Wikipedia are examples of new forms of the encyclopedia as information retrieval becomes simpler. The method of production for an encyclopedia historically has been supported in both for-profit and non-profit contexts; such was the case of the Great Soviet Encyclopedia mentioned above which was entirely state-sponsored,[28] while the Britannica was supported as a for-profit institution.

Encyclopedic dictionaries

Some works entitled "dictionaries" are similar to encyclopedias, especially those concerned with a particular field (such as the Dictionary of the Middle Ages, the Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships, and Black's Law Dictionary). The Macquarie Dictionary, Australia's national dictionary, became an encyclopedic dictionary after its first edition in recognition of the use of proper nouns in common communication, and the words derived from such proper nouns.

Differences between encyclopedias and dictionaries

There are some broad differences between encyclopedias and dictionaries. Most noticeably, encyclopedia articles are longer, fuller and more thorough than entries in most general-purpose dictionaries.[3][29] There are differences in content as well. Generally speaking, dictionaries provide linguistic information about words themselves, while encyclopedias focus more on the things for which those words stand.[6][7][8][9] Thus, while dictionary entries are inextricably fixed to the word described, encyclopedia articles can be given a different entry name. As such, dictionary entries are not fully translatable into other languages, but encyclopedia articles can be.[6]

In practice, however, the distinction is not concrete, as there is no clear-cut difference between factual, "encyclopedic" information and linguistic information such as appear in dictionaries.[8][29][30] Thus encyclopedias may contain material that is also found in dictionaries, and vice versa.[30] In particular, dictionary entries often contain factual information about the thing named by the word.[29][30]

Pre-modern encyclopedias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Two pages from medieval manuscript of Pliny's Natural History
Pliny the Elder's Natural History is one of the oldest extant encyclopedias.

The earliest encyclopedic work to have survived to modern times is the Natural History of Pliny the Elder, a Roman statesman living in the 1st century AD,[5][31][32][33] a work indebted to Varro (1st century BCE).[34] He compiled a work of 37 chapters covering natural history, architecture, medicine, geography, geology, and all aspects of the world around him.[33] This work became very popular in antiquity, was one of the first classical manuscripts to be printed in 1470, and has remained popular ever since as a source of information on the Roman world, and especially Roman art, Roman technology and Roman engineering.

The Spanish scholar Isidore of Seville was the first Christian writer to try to compile a summa of universal knowledge, the Etymologiae (Template:Circa), also known by classicists as the Origines (abbreviated Orig.). This encyclopedia—the first such Christian epitome—formed a huge compilation of 448 chapters in 20 books[35] based on hundreds of classical sources, including the Script error: No such module "Lang".. Of the Etymologiae in its time it was said quaecunque fere sciri debentur, "practically everything that it is necessary to know".[36][32] Among the areas covered were: grammar, rhetoric, mathematics, geometry, music, astronomy, medicine, law, the Catholic Church and heretical sects, pagan philosophers, languages, cities, animals and birds, the physical world, geography, public buildings, roads, metals, rocks, agriculture, ships, clothes, food, and tools.

Another Christian encyclopedia was the Institutiones divinarum et saecularium litterarum of Cassiodorus (543–560) dedicated to the Christian divinity and the seven liberal arts.[32][5] The encyclopedia of Suda, a massive 10th-century Byzantine encyclopedia, had 30,000 entries (broadly alphabetically arranged), many drawing from ancient sources that have since been lost, and often derived from medieval Christian compilers.[32]

File:Yongle Encyclopedia.jpg
The Yongle Encyclopedia is the largest paper encyclopedia of world history

From India, the Siribhoovalaya (Kannada: ಸಿರಿಭೂವಲಯ), variously dated to c. 800 AD, the 15th century,[37] or an even more recent time, is a work of Kannada literature written by Kumudendu Muni, a Jain monk.[38] It is unique because rather than employing alphabets, it is composed entirely in Kannada numerals. Many philosophies which existed in the Jain classics are eloquently and skillfully interpreted in the work.

The 2nd century BC reference work Shiben has been described as a Chinese encyclopedia of genealogies, while the Huanglan, completed in the 220s, was an early leishu encyclopedia. The Yiwen Leiju, completed in 624, was a landmark literature encyclopedia of the early Tang dynasty. The Tongdian, Tongzhi and Wenxian Tongkao were three comprehensive encyclopedias of the Tang, Song and Yuan dynasties, and were collectively referred to as the Three Tongs (Santong). The enormous encyclopedic works of the Four Great Books of Song, compiled by the 11th century during the early Song dynasty (960–1279), was a massive literary undertaking for the time. The last encyclopedia of the four, the Prime Tortoise of the Record Bureau, amounted to 9.4 million Chinese characters in 1,000 written volumes. The Yongle Encyclopedia (completed 1408) comprised 11,095 volumes, making it the largest paper encyclopedia in world history.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

There were many great encyclopedists throughout Chinese history, including the scientist and statesman Shen Kuo (1031–1095) with his Dream Pool Essays of 1088; the statesman, inventor, and agronomist Wang Zhen (active 1290–1333) with his Nong Shu of 1313; and Song Yingxing (1587–1666) with his Tiangong Kaiwu. Song Yingxing was termed the "Diderot of China" by British historian Joseph Needham.[39]

Printed encyclopedias

Template:Additional citations

File:Encyclopaedia Britannica 15 with 2002.jpg
Britannica 15th edition printed encyclopedias, 2002

Before the advent of the printing press, encyclopedic works were all hand-copied and thus rarely available, beyond wealthy patrons or monastic men of learning: they were expensive, and usually written for those extending knowledge rather than those using it. The introduction of printing from Asia allowed a wider diffusion of encyclopedias and every scholar could have his or her copy. Nuremberg Chronicle from 1493 is one of the best-documented early printed books—an incunabulum—and one of the first to successfully integrate illustrations and text. Both Latin and German editions were printed by Anton Koberger in Nuremberg.[40] The De expetendis et fugiendis rebus by Giorgio Valla was posthumously printed in 1501 by Aldo Manuzio in Venice. This work followed the traditional scheme of liberal arts. However, Valla added the translation of ancient Greek works on mathematics (firstly by Archimedes), newly discovered and translated. The Margarita Philosophica by Gregor Reisch, printed in 1503, was a complete encyclopedia explaining the seven liberal arts.

Financial, commercial, legal, and intellectual factors changed the size of encyclopedias. Middle classes had more time to read and encyclopedias helped them to learn more. Publishers wanted to increase their output so some countries like Germany started selling books missing alphabetical sections, to publish faster. Also, publishers could not afford all the resources by themselves, so multiple publishers would come together with their resources to create better encyclopedias. Later, rivalry grew, causing copyright to occur due to weak underdeveloped laws. John Harris is often credited with introducing the now-familiar alphabetic format in 1704 with his English Lexicon Technicum: Or, A Universal English Dictionary of Arts and Sciences: Explaining not only the Terms of Art, but the Arts Themselves – to give its full title. Organized alphabetically, its content does indeed contain an explanation not merely of the terms used in the arts and sciences, but of the arts and sciences themselves. Sir Isaac Newton contributed his only published work on chemistry to the second volume of 1710.

Encyclopédie

<templatestyles src="Template:Quote_box/styles.css" />

Indeed, the purpose of an encyclopedia is to collect knowledge disseminated around the globe; to set forth its general system to the men with whom we live, and transmit it to those who will come after us, so that the work of preceding centuries will not become useless to the centuries to come; and so that our offspring, becoming better instructed, will at the same time become more virtuous and happy, and that we should not die without having rendered a service to the human race in the future years to come.

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Template:Excerpt

Encyclopædia Britannica

Template:Excerpt

Brockhaus Enzyklopädie

Template:Excerpt

Encyclopedias in the United States

In the United States, the 1950s and 1960s saw the introduction of several large popular encyclopedias, often sold on installment plans. The best known of these were World Book and Funk and Wagnalls. As many as 90% were sold door to door.[31] Jack Lynch says in his book You Could Look It Up that encyclopedia salespeople were so common that they became the butt of jokes. He describes their sales pitch saying, "They were selling not books but a lifestyle, a future, a promise of social mobility." A 1961 World Book ad said, "You are holding your family's future in your hands right now," while showing a feminine hand holding an order form.[42] As of the 1990s, two of the most prominent encyclopedias published in the United States were Collier's Encyclopedia and Encyclopedia Americana.[43]

Digital encyclopedias

Physical media

By the late 20th century, encyclopedias were being published on CD-ROMs for use with personal computers. This was the usual way computer users accessed encyclopedic knowledge from the 1980s and 1990s. Later, DVD discs replaced CD-ROMs, and by the mid-2000s, internet encyclopedias were dominant and replaced disc-based software encyclopedias.[5]

CD-ROM encyclopedias were usually a macOS or Microsoft Windows (3.0, 3.1 or 95/98) application on a CD-ROM disc. The user would execute the encyclopedia's software program to see a menu that allowed them to start browsing the encyclopedia's articles, and most encyclopedias also supported a way to search the contents of the encyclopedia. The article text was usually hyperlinked and also included photographs, audio clips (for example in articles about historical speeches or musical instruments), and video clips. In the CD-ROM age, the video clips usually had a low resolution, often 160x120 or 320x240 pixels. Such encyclopedias which made use of photos, audio and video were also called multimedia encyclopedias.

Microsoft's Encarta, launched in 1993, was a landmark example as it had no printed equivalent. It featured around 25,000 articles, supplemented with 7,000 high-quality images, 9 hours of audio files, and 30 videos. After sixteen years, Microsoft discontinued the Encarta line of products in 2009 with the rise of the Internet.[44] Other examples of CD-ROM encyclopedia are Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia and Britannica.

Digital encyclopedias enable "Encyclopedia Services" (such as Wikimedia Enterprise) to facilitate programmatic access to the content.[45]

Online

Template:Excerpt

Free encyclopedias

Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote".

File:Otros enciclopedias libres from EL.png
List of other free encyclopedias, from Enciclopedia Libre.

The concept of a free encyclopedia began with the Interpedia proposal on Usenet in 1993, which outlined an Internet-based online encyclopedia to which anyone could submit content that would be freely accessible. Early projects in this vein included Everything2 and Open Site. In 1999, Richard Stallman proposed the GNUPedia, an online encyclopedia which, similar to the GNU operating system, would be a "generic" resource. The concept was very similar to Interpedia, but more in line with Stallman's GNU philosophy.

It was not until Nupedia and later Wikipedia that a stable free encyclopedia project could be established on the Internet.

The English Wikipedia, which was started in 2001, became the world's largest encyclopedia in 2004 at the 300,000 article stage.[46] By late 2005, Wikipedia had produced over two million articles in more than 80 languages with content licensed under the copyleft GNU Free Documentation License. Template:As of Wikipedia had over 3 million articles in English and well over 10 million combined articles in over 250 languages. Today, Wikipedia has 1,186,539 articles in English, over 60 million combined articles in over 300 languages, and over 250 million combined pages including project and discussion pages.[47]

Since 2002, other free encyclopedias appeared, including Hudong (2005–) and Baidu Baike (2006–) in Chinese, and Google's Knol (2008–2012) in English. Some MediaWiki-based encyclopedias have appeared, usually under a license compatible with Wikipedia, including the Spanish encyclopedia Enciclopedia Libre (2002–2021) and the English encyclopedias Conservapedia (2006–), Scholarpedia (2006–), and Citizendium (2007–).

See also

Script error: No such module "Portal". Template:Div col

Template:Div col end

Notes

Template:Notelist

References

Template:Reflist

Cited works

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • C. Codoner, S. Louis, M. Paulmier-Foucart, D. Hüe, M. Salvat, A. Llinares, L'Encyclopédisme. Actes du Colloque de Caen, A. Becq (dir.), Paris, 1991.
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

External links

Template:Sister project Template:Sister project Template:Wikisource portal

Template:Authority control

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Glossary of Library Terms. Riverside City College, Digital Library/Learning Resource Center. Retrieved on: November 17, 2007.
  2. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. a b c d e f g h Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. a b c Béjoint, Henri (2000). Modern Lexicography Template:Webarchive, pp. 30–31. Oxford University Press. Template:ISBN
  7. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Ἐγκύκλιος παιδεία Template:Webarchive, Quintilian, Institutio Oratoria, 1.10.1, at Perseus Project
  14. ἐγκύκλιος Template:Webarchive, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek–English Lexicon, at Perseus Project
  15. παιδεία Template:Webarchive, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek–English Lexicon, at Perseus Project
  16. According to some accounts, such as the American Heritage Dictionary Template:Webarchive, copyists of Latin manuscripts took this phrase to be a single Greek word, Script error: No such module "Lang". Template:Transliteration.
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. As explained by Richard Yeo, Encyclopaedic Visions: Scientific Dictionaries and Enlightenment Culture (Cambridge: University Press, 2001 Template:ISBN
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. MacFarlane 1980:4; MacFarlane translates Etymologiae viii.
  36. Braulio, Elogium of Isidore appended to Isidore's De viris illustribus, heavily indebted itself to Jerome.
  37. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  38. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. Needham, Volume 5, Part 7, 102.
  40. Cambridge Digital Library, University of Cambridge, http://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/PR-INC-00000-A-00007-00002-00888/1 Template:Webarchive
  41. Denis Diderot; Jean le Rond d'Alembert. Encyclopédie. Template:Webarchive. University of Michigan Library: Scholarly Publishing Office and DLXS. Retrieved on: November 17, 2007.
  42. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  43. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. "Wikipedia Passes 300,000 Articles making it the worlds largest encyclopedia" Template:Webarchive, Linux Reviews, 2004 Julich y 7.
  47. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".