Shatranj: Difference between revisions
imported>PharaohCrab m changed images |
→Middle Persian literature: Cited source itself claims that this anecdote is legendary and not factual |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[File:Bayasanghori Shahnameh 5 (cropped).jpg|thumb|Two shatranj players in a detail from a [[Persian miniature painting]] of [[Shahname|Bayasanghori Shahname]] made in 1430]] | [[File:Bayasanghori Shahnameh 5 (cropped).jpg|thumb|Two shatranj players in a detail from a [[Persian miniature painting]] of [[Shahname|Bayasanghori Shahname]] made in 1430]] | ||
'''Shatranj''' ({{langx|ar|شطرنج}}, {{IPA|ar|ʃaˈtˤrandʒ|pron}}; from [[Middle Persian]] {{Transliteration|fa|chatrang}}) is an old form of [[chess]], as played in the [[Sasanian Empire]]. Its origins lie in the | '''Shatranj''' ({{langx|ar|شطرنج}}, {{IPA|ar|ʃaˈtˤrandʒ|pron}}; from [[Middle Persian]] {{Transliteration|fa|chatrang}}) is an old form of [[chess]], as played in the [[Sasanian Empire]]. Its origins lie in the Indian game of [[chaturanga]].<ref>{{cite web |author=Jean-Louis Cazaux |url=http://history.chess.free.fr/shatranj.htm |title=Shatranj |publisher=History.chess.free.fr |date=2012-04-20 |access-date=2013-11-23}}</ref> Modern [[chess]] gradually developed from this game, as it was introduced to Europe by contacts in Muslim [[Al-Andalus]] (modern Spain) and in [[Sicily]] in the 10th century. In modern [[Persian language|Persian]], the term is also used as the translation of chess.<ref>{{Cite web |title=شطرنج، دیکشنری آبادیس |url=https://abadis.ir/fatofa/%D8%B4%D8%B7%D8%B1%D9%86%D8%AC/ |language=fa}}</ref> | ||
==Etymology and | ==Etymology and history== | ||
[[File:Persianmss14thCambassadorfromIndiabroughtchesstoPersianCourt.jpg|thumb|[[Persia]]n manuscript from the 14th century describing how an ambassador from [[India]] brought chess to the [[Persia]]n court]] | |||
[[File: | [[File:A treatise on chess 2.jpg|thumb|Indian ambassador, probably sent by the [[Maukhari]] King [[Śarvavarman]] of [[Kannauj]], introducing chess to the Persian court of [[Khosrow I]]<ref name="ME">{{cite book |last1=Eder |first1=Manfred A. J. |title=South Asian Archaeology 2007 Proceedings of the 19th Meeting of the European Association of South Asian Archaeology in Ravenna, Italy, July 2007, Volume II |date=2010 |publisher=Archaeopress Archaeology |isbn=978-1-4073-0674-2 |page=69 |url=http://history.chess.free.fr/papers/Eder%202007-2.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160414233414/http://history.chess.free.fr/papers/Eder%202007-2.pdf |archive-date=2016-04-14 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Bakker |first1=Hans T. |author-link=Hans T. Bakker|title=The Huns in Central and South Asia. How Two Centuries of War against Nomadic Invaders from the Steps are Concluded by a Game of Chess between the Kings of India and Iran |date=2017 |url=https://www.academia.edu/34156496}}</ref>]] | ||
The name of the game in adjoining countries appears to be derived from chaturanga – chatrang in Persian, shatranj in Arabic, Chanderaki in Tibetan are examples. This suggests that the game, as well as its name, came from India. Also, as will appear, it was believed in Persia that the game arrived there from India.<ref name="ANCIENT">"The name of the game in adjoining countries appears to be derived from chaturanga – chatrang in Persian, shatranj in Arabic, chanderaki in Tibetan are examples. This suggests that the game, as well as its name, came from India. Also, as will appear, it was believed in Persia that the game arrived there from India."{{Cite book |url=http://archive.org/details/ancientboardgame0000unse |page=18|title=Ancient board games in perspective : papers from the 1990 British Museum colloquium, with additional contributions |date=2007 |location=London |publisher= British Museum Press |isbn=978-0-7141-1153-7}}</ref> | |||
The Persian word {{Transliteration|fa|shatranj}} ultimately derives from [[Sanskrit]] ({{langx|sa|चतुरङ्ग}}; {{IAST|caturaṅga}}) ({{IAST|catuḥ}}: "four"; {{IAST|anga}}: "arm"), referring to the game of the same name: [[Chaturanga]]. In [[Middle Persian]] the word appears as {{Transliteration|fa|chatrang}}, with the 'u' lost due to [[syncope (phonetics)|syncope]] and the 'a' lost to [[apocope]], such as in the title of the text {{Transliteration|fa|Mâdayân î chatrang}} ("Book of Chess") from the 7th century [[AD]]. | |||
The [[Kar-Namag i Ardashir i Pabagan]] refers to [[Ardashir I]] as a master of the game: "By the help of Providence, Ardeshir became more victorious and warlike than all, on the polo and the riding-ground, at Chatrang and Vine-Artakhshir,{{efn|''Vine-Artakhsir'' refers to the game later known as [[Nard (game)|Nard]].}} and in several other arts."<ref>{{cite web |title=The Karnamik-I-Ardashir, or The Records of Ardashir |url=http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/ardashir.html }}</ref> However, ''Karnamak'' contains many fables and legends, and this only establishes the popularity of chatrang at the time of its composition.{{sfn|Murray|1913}} | The [[Kar-Namag i Ardashir i Pabagan]] refers to [[Ardashir I]] as a master of the game: "By the help of Providence, Ardeshir became more victorious and warlike than all, on the polo and the riding-ground, at Chatrang and Vine-Artakhshir,{{efn|''Vine-Artakhsir'' refers to the game later known as [[Nard (game)|Nard]].}} and in several other arts."<ref>{{cite web |title=The Karnamik-I-Ardashir, or The Records of Ardashir |url=http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/ardashir.html }}</ref> However, ''Karnamak'' contains many fables and legends, and this only establishes the popularity of chatrang at the time of its composition.{{sfn|Murray|1913}} | ||
During the reign of the later [[Sassanid]] king [[Khosrau I]] (531–579), a gift from an Indian king (possibly a [[Maukhari Dynasty]] king of [[Kannauj]])<ref>{{cite web |title=The Enigma of Chess birth: The Old Texts: 6th, 7th and 8th centuries |author=Jean-Louis Cazaux |url=http://history.chess.free.fr/sources.htm |date=12 March 2004 |access-date=14 July 2007}}</ref> included a chess game with sixteen pieces of [[emerald]] and sixteen of [[ruby]] (green vs. red).{{sfn|Murray|1913}} The game came with a challenge which was successfully resolved by Khosrau's courtiers. This incident, originally referred to in the {{Transliteration|fa|Mâdayân î chatrang}} (c. 620 AD), is also mentioned in [[Ferdowsi]]'s [[Shahnameh|Shahnama]] (c. 1010). | |||
The rules of chaturanga seen in India today have enormous variation, but all involve four branches (''angas'') of the army: the horse (knight), the elephant (bishop), the chariot (rook) and the foot soldier (pawn), played on an 8×8 board. (However, there is some variation in the names in the pre-modern game in North India, which is still played in villages. The rook is called either the haathi (elephant) or quila (castle), but the bishop is called the feela, or camel, as the camel-mounted soldier was common.) Shatranj adapted much of the same rules as chaturanga, and also the basic 16-piece structure. In some later variants the darker squares were engraved. The game spread Westwards after the [[Islamic conquest of Persia]] and a considerable body of literature on game tactics and strategy was produced from the 8th century onwards.{{citation needed|date=December 2023}} | |||
During the reign of the later [[Sassanid]] king [[Khosrau I]] (531–579), a gift from an Indian king (possibly a [[Maukhari Dynasty]] king of [[Kannauj]])<ref>{{cite web |title=The Enigma of Chess birth: The Old Texts: 6th, 7th and 8th centuries |author=Jean-Louis Cazaux |url=http://history.chess.free.fr/sources.htm |date=12 March 2004 |access-date=14 July 2007}}</ref> included a chess game with sixteen pieces of [[emerald]] and sixteen of [[ruby]] (green vs. red).{{sfn|Murray|1913}} The game came with a challenge which was successfully resolved by Khosrau's courtiers. | |||
In early Indian chaturanga ({{abbr|c.|circa}} 500–700), the king could be {{chessgloss|captured}} and this ended the game. Persian shatranj (c. 700–800) introduced the idea of warning that the king was under attack (announcing ''check'' in modern terminology). This was done to avoid the early and accidental end of a game. Later the Persians added the additional rule that a king could not be moved into check or left in check. As a result, the king could not be captured,<ref name="dav22">{{Citation|last=Davidson|first=Henry|year=1949|title=A Short History of Chess|publisher=McKay|isbn= 0-679-14550-8}} (1981 paperback)*{{Citation|last=Emms|first=John|author-link=John Emms (chessmaster)|year=2004|title=Starting Out: Minor Piece Endgames|publisher=[[Everyman Chess]]|isbn= 1-85744-359-4|page=22}}</ref> and [[checkmate]] was the only decisive way of ending a game.<ref name="dav6364">{{Citation|last=Davidson|first=Henry|year=1949|title=A Short History of Chess|publisher=McKay|isbn= 0-679-14550-8}} (1981 paperback)*{{Citation|last=Emms|first=John|author-link=John Emms (chessmaster)|year=2004|title=Starting Out: Minor Piece Endgames|publisher=[[Everyman Chess]]|isbn= 1-85744-359-4|pages=63–64}}</ref> | |||
[[File:Chaturanga Chess Set.jpg|thumb|left|Antique North Indian Mughul shatranj chess set made from sandalwood]] | |||
With the spread of Islam, chess diffused into the [[Maghreb]] and then to [[Al-Andalus|Andalusian]] Spain. During the [[Islamic empires in India|Islamic conquest of India]] (c. 12th century), some forms came back to India as well, as evidenced in the North Indian term ''māt'' (mate, derivative from [[Persian language|Persian]] {{Transliteration|fa|māt}}) or the [[Bengali language|Bengali]] {{Transliteration|bn|borey}} (pawn, presumed derived from the [[Arabic language|Arabic]] {{Transliteration|ar|baidaq}}).<ref>{{cite web |title=Indian Chess Sets |author=Jean-Louis Cazaux |url=http://history.chess.free.fr/india.htm |date=16 June 2006 |access-date=14 July 2007}}</ref> | |||
Over the following centuries, chess became popular in Europe, eventually giving rise to modern chess.{{citation needed|date=December 2023}} | |||
{{clear}} | |||
==Rules== | ==Rules== | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
{| class="toccolours" style="float:left; margin-left:15px;" | {| class="toccolours" style="float:left; margin-left:15px;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="2" style="background:#ccf;"| Shatranj pieces | ! colspan="2" style="background:#ccf;" | Shatranj pieces | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[File:Chess klt45.svg|25px]][[File:Chess kdt45.svg|25px]] || shah ([[King (chess)|king]]) | | [[File:Chess klt45.svg|25px]][[File:Chess kdt45.svg|25px]] || shah ([[King (chess)|king]]) | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{clear left}} | {{clear left}} | ||
{{ | {{Chaturanga diagram 5x5 | ||
|tright | |tright | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
|Moves of the ferz | |Moves of the ferz | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Chaturanga diagram 5x5 | ||
|tright | |tright | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
|Moves of the alfil, which can jump over other pieces | |Moves of the alfil, which can jump over other pieces | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Chaturanga diagram 5x5 | tright | |bl|nl|rl|nl|bl|nl|ql|rl|ql|nl|rl|rl|xx|rl|rl|nl|ql|rl|ql|nl|bl|nl|rl|nl|bl| Complementarity of the shatranj pieces' movements, excluding king and pawn}} | ||
* '''Shāh''' ("king" in Persian) moves like the [[King (chess)|king in chess]]. | * '''Shāh''' ("king" in Persian) moves like the [[King (chess)|king in chess]]. | ||
* '''[[Ferz (chess)|Ferz]] (Wazir)''' ("[[adviser|counselor]]"; also spelled ''fers''; Arabic ''firz'', from Persian {{lang|fa|فرزين}} ''farzīn'') moves exactly one square diagonally, which makes it a rather weak piece. It was renamed "[[Queen (chess)|queen]]" in Europe. Even today, the word for the queen piece is ''ферзь'' (ferz) in Russian, ''vezér'' in Hungarian, ''vezir'' in Turkish, ''vazīr'' in Persian and ''wazīr'' in Arabic. It has analogue to the guards in [[xiangqi]]. | * '''[[Ferz (chess)|Ferz]] (Wazir)''' ("[[adviser|counselor]]"; also spelled ''fers''; Arabic ''firz'', from Persian {{lang|fa|فرزين}} ''farzīn'') moves exactly one square diagonally, which makes it a rather weak piece. It was renamed "[[Queen (chess)|queen]]" in Europe. Even today, the word for the queen piece is ''ферзь'' (ferz) in Russian, ''vezér'' in Hungarian, ''vezir'' in Turkish, ''vazīr'' in Persian and ''wazīr'' in Arabic. It has analogue to the guards in [[xiangqi]]. | ||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
* '''Piyadeh''' ("[[infantry]]man"; from Persian {{lang|fa|پیاده}} ''piyāde''; also called '''Sarbaz''' "[[soldier]]") in Persian and adopted later to ''Baydaq'' ({{lang|ar|بيدق}}) in Arabic (a new singular extracted by treating the Persian form as an Arabic [[broken plural]]), moves and captures like the [[Pawn (chess)|pawns]] in chess, but not moving two squares on the first move. When they reach the eighth rank, they are promoted to ferz. | * '''Piyadeh''' ("[[infantry]]man"; from Persian {{lang|fa|پیاده}} ''piyāde''; also called '''Sarbaz''' "[[soldier]]") in Persian and adopted later to ''Baydaq'' ({{lang|ar|بيدق}}) in Arabic (a new singular extracted by treating the Persian form as an Arabic [[broken plural]]), moves and captures like the [[Pawn (chess)|pawns]] in chess, but not moving two squares on the first move. When they reach the eighth rank, they are promoted to ferz. | ||
Pieces are shown on the diagrams and recorded in the notation using the equivalent modern symbols, as in the table above. In modern descriptions of shatranj, the names king, rook, knight and pawn are commonly used for shah, rukh, faras, and baidaq. However, the ferz and alfil are sometimes treated as distinct, and given their own symbols. Specific ferz and alfil symbols have been provisionally accepted for a future version of [[Unicode]].<ref name=shatranj>{{cite web |url=https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2024/24020-shatranj-symbols.pdf |title=Unicode request for ''shatranj'' symbols |last1=Bala |first1=Gavin Jared |last2=Miller |first2=Kirk |date=22 December 2023 |website=unicode.org |publisher=Unicode |access-date=4 February 2024 |quote=}}</ref><ref name=pipeline>{{cite web |url=https://unicode.org/alloc/Pipeline.html |title=Proposed New Characters: The Pipeline |author=Unicode |date= |website=unicode.org |publisher=The Unicode Consortium |access-date=4 February 2024 |quote=}}</ref> | Pieces are shown on the diagrams and recorded in the notation using the equivalent modern symbols, as in the table above. In modern descriptions of shatranj, the names king, rook, knight and pawn are commonly used for shah, rukh, faras, and baidaq. However, the ferz and alfil are sometimes treated as distinct, and given their own symbols. Specific ferz and alfil symbols have been provisionally accepted for a future version of [[Unicode]].<ref name="shatranj">{{cite web |url=https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2024/24020-shatranj-symbols.pdf |title=Unicode request for ''shatranj'' symbols |last1=Bala |first1=Gavin Jared |last2=Miller |first2=Kirk |date=22 December 2023 |website=unicode.org |publisher=Unicode |access-date=4 February 2024 |quote=}}</ref><ref name="pipeline">{{cite web |url=https://unicode.org/alloc/Pipeline.html |title=Proposed New Characters: The Pipeline |author=Unicode |date= |website=unicode.org |publisher=The Unicode Consortium |access-date=4 February 2024 |quote=}}</ref> | ||
[[File:Chess Set MET DP170393.jpg|thumb|[[Iran]]ian shatranj set, glazed [[fritware]], 12th century [[Nishapur]] ([[New York Metropolitan Museum of Art]])]] | |||
There were also other differences compared to modern chess: [[Castling]] was not allowed (it was invented much later). [[Stalemate|Stalemating]] the opposing king resulted in a win for the player delivering stalemate. Capturing all one's opponent's pieces apart from the king (''[[bare king|baring the king]]'') was a win, unless the opponent could capture the last piece on their next move, which was considered a draw in most places in the Islamic world (except for [[Medina]], where it was a win).{{sfn|Murray|1913}} | There were also other differences compared to modern chess: [[Castling]] was not allowed (it was invented much later). [[Stalemate|Stalemating]] the opposing king resulted in a win for the player delivering stalemate. Capturing all one's opponent's pieces apart from the king (''[[bare king|baring the king]]'') was a win, unless the opponent could capture the last piece on their next move, which was considered a draw in most places in the Islamic world (except for [[Medina]], where it was a win).{{sfn|Murray|1913}} | ||
| Line 97: | Line 99: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
[[File:The Vizier Buzurghmihr Showing the Game of Chess to King Khusraw Anushirwan, Page from a Manuscript of the Shahnama (Book of Kings) LACMA M.73.5.586.jpg|thumb|Early shatranj]] | [[File:The Vizier Buzurghmihr Showing the Game of Chess to King Khusraw Anushirwan, Page from a Manuscript of the Shahnama (Book of Kings) LACMA M.73.5.586.jpg|thumb|Early shatranj]] | ||
[[File:Cabinet des médailles, Paris - Ivory Chess King or Vizier, 9th Century.jpg|thumb|Ivory chess king or vizier, 9th century, | [[File:Cabinet des médailles, Paris - Ivory Chess King or Vizier, 9th Century.jpg|thumb|Ivory chess king or vizier, 9th century, Islamic art]] | ||
=== Middle Persian literature === | === Middle Persian literature === | ||
Three books written in [[Pahlavi scripts|Pahlavi]], ''[[Kar-Namag i Ardashir i Pabagan]]'', ''[[Khosrow and ridag]]'', and ''Wizārišn ī čhatrang'' ("Treatise on Chess"), also known as the ''Chatrang Nama'' ("Book of Chess"), all mention ''chatrang''. In ''Kār-nāmak'' it is said that Ardashīr "with the help of the gods became more victorious and experienced than all others in polo, horsemanship, chess, backgammon, and other arts," and in the small treatise on ''Khosrow and ridag'', the latter declares that he is superior to his comrades in chess, backgammon, and ''hašt pāy''. | Three books written in [[Pahlavi scripts|Pahlavi]], ''[[Kar-Namag i Ardashir i Pabagan]]'', ''[[Khosrow and ridag]]'', and ''Wizārišn ī čhatrang'' ("Treatise on Chess"), also known as the ''Chatrang Nama'' ("Book of Chess"), all mention ''chatrang''. In ''Kār-nāmak'' it is said that Ardashīr "with the help of the gods became more victorious and experienced than all others in polo, horsemanship, chess, backgammon, and other arts," and in the small treatise on ''Khosrow and ridag'', the latter declares that he is superior to his comrades in chess, backgammon, and ''hašt pāy''. | ||
According to [[Touraj Daryaee]], ''Kar-Namag i Ardashir i Pabagan'' is from 6th century.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Daryaee|first1=Touraj|title=Sasanian Persia: The Rise and Fall of an Empire|date=2009|publisher=I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd|isbn=9781850438984|page=114}}</ref> ''Wizārišn ī čhatrang'' was written in the 6th century.<ref>[http://www.rahamasha.net/uploads/2/3/2/8/2328777/chess.pdf Explanation of chess and disposition of backgammon] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150612220623/http://www.rahamasha.net/uploads/2/3/2/8/2328777/chess.pdf |date=2015-06-12 }}</ref> | |||
===Early Arabic literature=== | ===Early Arabic literature=== | ||
| Line 114: | Line 119: | ||
There is a passage referring to chess in a work said to be by [[al-Hasan al-Basri]], a philosopher from [[Basra]] who died in 728 AD.{{citation needed|date=February 2016}} The attribution of authorship is dubious, however. | There is a passage referring to chess in a work said to be by [[al-Hasan al-Basri]], a philosopher from [[Basra]] who died in 728 AD.{{citation needed|date=February 2016}} The attribution of authorship is dubious, however. | ||
===Player classification=== | [[File:Shams ud-Din Tabriz 1502-1504 BNF Paris.jpg|thumb|[[Shams Tabrizi|Shams-e-Tabrīzī]] as portrayed in a 1500 painting in a page of a copy of [[Rumi]]'s [[Rumi ghazal 163|poem dedicated to Shams]].]] | ||
=== Player classification === | |||
Al-Adli as well as As-Suli introduced classifications of players by their playing strength. Both of them specify five classes of players: | Al-Adli as well as As-Suli introduced classifications of players by their playing strength. Both of them specify five classes of players: | ||
* '''Aliyat''' (or aliya), grandees | * '''Aliyat''' (or aliya), grandees | ||
| Line 195: | Line 202: | ||
Note that the [[alfil]] (♗) moves two squares diagonally, jumping over intermediate pieces; this allows it to jump over the white knight to deliver the [[Discovered attack|discovered check]] from the second rook with 2.Bf5+. It was said that a nobleman (playing White) wagered his wife Dilārām on a chess game and this position arose. She appealed "Sacrifice your two Rooks, and not me."{{sfn|Murray|1913|p=311 (bottom)}} | Note that the [[alfil]] (♗) moves two squares diagonally, jumping over intermediate pieces; this allows it to jump over the white knight to deliver the [[Discovered attack|discovered check]] from the second rook with 2.Bf5+. It was said that a nobleman (playing White) wagered his wife Dilārām on a chess game and this position arose. She appealed "Sacrifice your two Rooks, and not me."{{sfn|Murray|1913|p=311 (bottom)}} | ||
== Shatranj variants == | |||
There were also many variants of shatranj, some using larger boards or new pieces. An early large board variant of shatranj was "complete shatranj" (''shatranj al-tamma'') which used a board of 10x10 squares and introduced two pieces called [[Dabbaba (chess)|dabbabas]] (siege engines).<ref>Cazaux & Knowlton (2017), pp. 21-22, 29.</ref> [[Ferdowsi|Ferdowsi's]] ''[[Shahnameh]],'' also discusses an alternative version of complete shatranj which uses the [[Camel (chess)|camel]] (shutur) piece instead of the dabbaba.<ref>Cazaux & Knowlton (2017), p. 23</ref>[[File:Citadel_shatranj.gif|thumb|Citadel shatranj (shatranj al-husun)]] | |||
The most popular variant was citadel chess (''shatranj al-husun''), which is discussed in many surviving manuscripts, such as in ''Nafa'is al-funun'' (''Treasury of the Sciences'') by the persian al-Amuli. This variant includes four extra squares on each corner of the board called citadels (husun). If a king reaches one of his opponent's citadels, the game is drawn.<ref name=":0">Cazaux & Knowlton (2017), p. 24.</ref> Some manuscripts depict the citadels as being attached diagonally, while others depict them as being attached directly beside the two [[Rook (chess)|rook]] squares.<ref name=":0" /> Other than these changes, the rules followed classical shatranj.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
There was also an even larger 10×11 board derivative; the 14th-century [[Tamerlane chess]], or {{Transliteration|fa|shatranj kamil}} (perfect chess), with a slightly different piece structure.<ref name="C&K">Cazaux, Jean-Louis and Knowlton, Rick (2017). ''A World of Chess'', pp. 31-33. McFarland. {{ISBN|9780786494279}}.</ref> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Latest revision as of 04:43, 27 December 2025
Template:Short description Template:For-multi
Shatranj (Template:Langx, Script error: No such module "IPA".; from Middle Persian Script error: No such module "lang".) is an old form of chess, as played in the Sasanian Empire. Its origins lie in the Indian game of chaturanga.[1] Modern chess gradually developed from this game, as it was introduced to Europe by contacts in Muslim Al-Andalus (modern Spain) and in Sicily in the 10th century. In modern Persian, the term is also used as the translation of chess.[2]
Etymology and history
The name of the game in adjoining countries appears to be derived from chaturanga – chatrang in Persian, shatranj in Arabic, Chanderaki in Tibetan are examples. This suggests that the game, as well as its name, came from India. Also, as will appear, it was believed in Persia that the game arrived there from India.[5]
The Persian word Script error: No such module "lang". ultimately derives from Sanskrit (Template:Langx; Script error: No such module "lang".) (Script error: No such module "lang".: "four"; Script error: No such module "lang".: "arm"), referring to the game of the same name: Chaturanga. In Middle Persian the word appears as Script error: No such module "lang"., with the 'u' lost due to syncope and the 'a' lost to apocope, such as in the title of the text Script error: No such module "lang". ("Book of Chess") from the 7th century AD.
The Kar-Namag i Ardashir i Pabagan refers to Ardashir I as a master of the game: "By the help of Providence, Ardeshir became more victorious and warlike than all, on the polo and the riding-ground, at Chatrang and Vine-Artakhshir,Template:Efn and in several other arts."[6] However, Karnamak contains many fables and legends, and this only establishes the popularity of chatrang at the time of its composition.Template:Sfn
During the reign of the later Sassanid king Khosrau I (531–579), a gift from an Indian king (possibly a Maukhari Dynasty king of Kannauj)[7] included a chess game with sixteen pieces of emerald and sixteen of ruby (green vs. red).Template:Sfn The game came with a challenge which was successfully resolved by Khosrau's courtiers. This incident, originally referred to in the Script error: No such module "lang". (c. 620 AD), is also mentioned in Ferdowsi's Shahnama (c. 1010).
The rules of chaturanga seen in India today have enormous variation, but all involve four branches (angas) of the army: the horse (knight), the elephant (bishop), the chariot (rook) and the foot soldier (pawn), played on an 8×8 board. (However, there is some variation in the names in the pre-modern game in North India, which is still played in villages. The rook is called either the haathi (elephant) or quila (castle), but the bishop is called the feela, or camel, as the camel-mounted soldier was common.) Shatranj adapted much of the same rules as chaturanga, and also the basic 16-piece structure. In some later variants the darker squares were engraved. The game spread Westwards after the Islamic conquest of Persia and a considerable body of literature on game tactics and strategy was produced from the 8th century onwards.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
In early Indian chaturanga (c. 500–700), the king could be Template:Chessgloss and this ended the game. Persian shatranj (c. 700–800) introduced the idea of warning that the king was under attack (announcing check in modern terminology). This was done to avoid the early and accidental end of a game. Later the Persians added the additional rule that a king could not be moved into check or left in check. As a result, the king could not be captured,[8] and checkmate was the only decisive way of ending a game.[9]
With the spread of Islam, chess diffused into the Maghreb and then to Andalusian Spain. During the Islamic conquest of India (c. 12th century), some forms came back to India as well, as evidenced in the North Indian term māt (mate, derivative from Persian Script error: No such module "lang".) or the Bengali Script error: No such module "lang". (pawn, presumed derived from the Arabic Script error: No such module "lang".).[10]
Over the following centuries, chess became popular in Europe, eventually giving rise to modern chess.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Rules
| File:Solid white.svg | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | File:Solid white.svg |
| 8 | a8 | b8 | c8 | d8 | e8 | f8 | g8 | h8 | 8 |
| 7 | a7 | b7 | c7 | d7 | e7 | f7 | g7 | h7 | 7 |
| 6 | a6 | b6 | c6 | d6 | e6 | f6 | g6 | h6 | 6 |
| 5 | a5 | b5 | c5 | d5 | e5 | f5 | g5 | h5 | 5 |
| 4 | a4 | b4 | c4 | d4 | e4 | f4 | g4 | h4 | 4 |
| 3 | a3 | b3 | c3 | d3 | e3 | f3 | g3 | h3 | 3 |
| 2 | a2 | b2 | c2 | d2 | e2 | f2 | g2 | h2 | 2 |
| 1 | a1 | b1 | c1 | d1 | e1 | f1 | g1 | h1 | 1 |
| File:Solid white.svg | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | File:Solid white.svg |
The initial setup in shatranj was essentially the same as in modern chess; however, the position of the white shah (king), on the right or left side was not fixed. Either the arrangement as in modern chess or as shown in the diagram were possible. In either case, the white and black shāh would be on the same file. The game was played with these pieces:
| Shatranj pieces | |
|---|---|
| File:Chess klt45.svgFile:Chess kdt45.svg | shah (king) |
| File:Chess qlt45.svgFile:Chess qdt45.svg | ferz or wazir (counselor or ferz) |
| File:Chess rlt45.svgFile:Chess rdt45.svg | rukh (rook) |
| File:Chess blt45.svgFile:Chess bdt45.svg | pīl, or "alfil" in Arabic (elephant or alfil) |
| File:Chess nlt45.svgFile:Chess ndt45.svg | asb or faras (horse or knight) |
| File:Chess plt45.svgFile:Chess pdt45.svg | sarbaz / piyadeh, or "baydaq" in Arabic (soldier, infantryman or pawn) |
- Shāh ("king" in Persian) moves like the king in chess.
- Ferz (Wazir) ("counselor"; also spelled fers; Arabic firz, from Persian Script error: No such module "Lang". farzīn) moves exactly one square diagonally, which makes it a rather weak piece. It was renamed "queen" in Europe. Even today, the word for the queen piece is ферзь (ferz) in Russian, vezér in Hungarian, vezir in Turkish, vazīr in Persian and wazīr in Arabic. It has analogue to the guards in xiangqi.
- Rukh ("chariot"; from Persian Script error: No such module "Lang". rokh) moves like the rook in chess.
- Pīl, alfil, aufin, and similar ("elephant"; from Persian Script error: No such module "Lang". pīl; al- is the Arabic for "the") moves exactly two squares diagonally, jumping over the square between. Each pīl could reach only one-eighth of the squares on the board, and because their circuits were disjoint, they could never capture one another. This piece might have had a different move sometimes in chaturanga, where the piece is also called "elephant". The pīl was replaced by the bishop in modern chess. Even today, the word for the bishop piece is alfil in Spanish, alfiere in Italian, fil in Turkish, fīl in Persian and Arabic, and слон ("elephant") in Russian. As chess spread from Iran northward to Russia, and westward into eastern Europe, south to Italy, and finally westward, it mostly retained the original name and look of the piece as an elephant. Usually, it was carved as a rounded shape with two blunt points representing the elephant's tusks. In Christian Europe, this piece became a bishop because the two points looked like a bishop's mitre to those unfamiliar with elephants in Western Europe. An early example of the bishop being used is the Lewis chessmen chess set of the 12th century. The elephant piece survives in xiangqi with the limitations that the elephant in xiangqi cannot jump over an intervening piece and is restricted to the owner's half of the board. In janggi, its movement was changed to become a slightly further-reaching version of the horse.
- Asb (Faras) (current meaning of "horse" in Persian, from old Persian Asp (Script error: No such module "Lang".)), moves like the knight in chess.
- Piyadeh ("infantryman"; from Persian Script error: No such module "Lang". piyāde; also called Sarbaz "soldier") in Persian and adopted later to Baydaq (Script error: No such module "Lang".) in Arabic (a new singular extracted by treating the Persian form as an Arabic broken plural), moves and captures like the pawns in chess, but not moving two squares on the first move. When they reach the eighth rank, they are promoted to ferz.
Pieces are shown on the diagrams and recorded in the notation using the equivalent modern symbols, as in the table above. In modern descriptions of shatranj, the names king, rook, knight and pawn are commonly used for shah, rukh, faras, and baidaq. However, the ferz and alfil are sometimes treated as distinct, and given their own symbols. Specific ferz and alfil symbols have been provisionally accepted for a future version of Unicode.[11][12]
There were also other differences compared to modern chess: Castling was not allowed (it was invented much later). Stalemating the opposing king resulted in a win for the player delivering stalemate. Capturing all one's opponent's pieces apart from the king (baring the king) was a win, unless the opponent could capture the last piece on their next move, which was considered a draw in most places in the Islamic world (except for Medina, where it was a win).Template:Sfn
The possible movements of the main shatranj pieces, excluding that of the king and pawn, are complementary to one another, and without any omission or redundancy occupy all available squares with respect to the central position of a 5x5 grid, as shown in the figure to the right.[13]
History
Middle Persian literature
Three books written in Pahlavi, Kar-Namag i Ardashir i Pabagan, Khosrow and ridag, and Wizārišn ī čhatrang ("Treatise on Chess"), also known as the Chatrang Nama ("Book of Chess"), all mention chatrang. In Kār-nāmak it is said that Ardashīr "with the help of the gods became more victorious and experienced than all others in polo, horsemanship, chess, backgammon, and other arts," and in the small treatise on Khosrow and ridag, the latter declares that he is superior to his comrades in chess, backgammon, and hašt pāy.
According to Touraj Daryaee, Kar-Namag i Ardashir i Pabagan is from 6th century.[14] Wizārišn ī čhatrang was written in the 6th century.[15]
Early Arabic literature
During the Islamic Golden Age, many works on shatranj were written, recording for the first time the analysis of opening moves, game problems, the knight's tour, and many more subjects common in modern chess books. Many of these manuscripts are missing, but their content is known due to compilation work done by the later authors.Template:Sfn
The earliest listing of works on chess is in the Fihrist, a general bibliography produced in 377 AH (988 AD) by Ibn al-Nadim.[16][17] It includes an entire section on the topic of chess, listing:
- Al-Adli's Kitab ash-shatranj ('Book of Chess')
- Ar-Razi's Latif fi 'sh-shatranj ('Fun with Chess')
- As-Suli's Kitab ash-shatranj (two volumes)
- Al-Lajlaj's Kitab mansubat ash-shatranj ('Book: Strategies of Chess')
- B. Aluqlidisi's Kitab majmu' fi mansubat ash-shatranj ('Book: Intent of Strategies of Chess')
There is a passage referring to chess in a work said to be by al-Hasan al-Basri, a philosopher from Basra who died in 728 AD.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". The attribution of authorship is dubious, however.
Player classification
Al-Adli as well as As-Suli introduced classifications of players by their playing strength. Both of them specify five classes of players:
- Aliyat (or aliya), grandees
- Mutaqaribat, proximes – players who could win 2–4 games out of 10 in the match against grandee. They received odds of a pawn from grandee (better players g-, a- or h-pawn, weaker ones d- or e-pawn).
- Third class – players who received odds of a ferz from grandee.
- Fourth class – received odds of a knight.
- Fifth class – received odds of a rook.
To determine a player's class, a series or match would be undertaken with a player of a known class without odds. If the player won 7 or more games out of 10, he belonged to a higher class.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Notable players
During the reign of the Arab caliphs, shatranj players of highest class were called aliyat or grandees.Template:Sfn There were only a few players in this category including:
- Jabir al-Kufi, Rabrab and Abun-Naam were three aliyat players during the rule of caliph al-Ma'mun.
- Al-Adli was the strongest player during the rule of caliph al-Wathiq. At this time he was the only player in aliyat category.
- Al-Razi (Persian polymath) in 847 won a match against an already old al-Adli in the presence of caliph al-Mutawakkil and so become a player of aliyat category.
- As-Suli was the strongest player during the reign of caliph al-Muktafi. Al-Razi was already dead and there were no players of comparable strength before as-Suli appeared on the scene. In the presence of al-Muktafi he easily won a match against a certain al-Mawardi and thus proved that he was the best player of that time. As-Suli considered Rabrab and al-Razi as the greatest of his predecessors.
- Al-Lajlaj was a pupil of as-Suli and also a great shatranj master of his time.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Gameplay
Openings
| File:Solid white.svg | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | File:Solid white.svg |
| 8 | a8 | b8 | c8 | d8 | e8 | f8 | g8 | h8 | 8 |
| 7 | a7 | b7 | c7 | d7 | e7 | f7 | g7 | h7 | 7 |
| 6 | a6 | b6 | c6 | d6 | e6 | f6 | g6 | h6 | 6 |
| 5 | a5 | b5 | c5 | d5 | e5 | f5 | g5 | h5 | 5 |
| 4 | a4 | b4 | c4 | d4 | e4 | f4 | g4 | h4 | 4 |
| 3 | a3 | b3 | c3 | d3 | e3 | f3 | g3 | h3 | 3 |
| 2 | a2 | b2 | c2 | d2 | e2 | f2 | g2 | h2 | 2 |
| 1 | a1 | b1 | c1 | d1 | e1 | f1 | g1 | h1 | 1 |
| File:Solid white.svg | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | File:Solid white.svg |
Openings in shatranj were usually called taʿbīya Script error: No such module "Lang". (pl. taʿbīyāt), Script error: No such module "Lang". in Arabic, which can be translated as "battle array". Due to slow piece development in shatranj, the exact sequence of moves was relatively unimportant. Instead players aimed to reach a specific position, tabiya, mostly ignoring the play of their opponent.
The works of al-Adli and as-Suli contain collections of tabiyat. Tabiyat were usually given as position on a half-board with some comments about them. The concrete sequence of moves to reach them was not specified. In his book Al-Lajlaj analyzed some tabiya in detail. He started his analysis from some given opening, for example "Double Mujannah" or "Mujannah–Mashaikhi", and then continued up to move 40, giving numerous variations.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Piece values
Both al-Adli and as-Suli provided estimation of piece values in their books on shatranj. They used a monetary system to specify piece values. For example, as-Suli gives piece values in dirhem, the currency in use in his time:Template:Sfn
| Piece | Value | Shape of piece sometimes found |
|---|---|---|
| king king | 2 | seat, representing a throne |
| rook rook | 5 | rectangular block with V-shaped cut in top, representing a chariot |
| File:Chess nlt45.svg knight | 3 | cone with beak-shaped sideways projection at top |
| File:Chess qlt45.svg ferz | 2 | seat, smaller than king, depicting a smaller throne |
| File:Chess blt45.svg alfil | 2 | cone with notch cut in top |
| the horses pawn | 1 | small cone, or sometimes a dome |
Mansubat
| File:Solid white.svg | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | File:Solid white.svg |
| 8 | a8 | b8 | c8 | d8 | e8 | f8 | g8 | h8 | 8 |
| 7 | a7 | b7 | c7 | d7 | e7 | f7 | g7 | h7 | 7 |
| 6 | a6 | b6 | c6 | d6 | e6 | f6 | g6 | h6 | 6 |
| 5 | a5 | b5 | c5 | d5 | e5 | f5 | g5 | h5 | 5 |
| 4 | a4 | b4 | c4 | d4 | e4 | f4 | g4 | h4 | 4 |
| 3 | a3 | b3 | c3 | d3 | e3 | f3 | g3 | h3 | 3 |
| 2 | a2 | b2 | c2 | d2 | e2 | f2 | g2 | h2 | 2 |
| 1 | a1 | b1 | c1 | d1 | e1 | f1 | g1 | h1 | 1 |
| File:Solid white.svg | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | File:Solid white.svg |
Persian chess masters composed many shatranj problems. Such shatranj problems were called manṣūba Script error: No such module "Lang". (pl. manṣūbāt), Script error: No such module "Lang".. This word can be translated from Arabic as "arrangement", "position" or "situation". Mansubat were typically composed in such a way that a win could be achieved as a sequence of checks. One's own king was usually threatened by immediate checkmate.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
One Mansuba is the Dilaram Problem. Black threatens immediate checkmate by 1...Ra2#, Ra8#, or either Rb4#. But White can win with a two-rook sacrifice:
- 1. Rh8+ Kxh8 2. Bf5+ Kg8 3. Rh8+ Kxh8 4. g7+ Kg8 5. Nh6Template:ChessAN
Note that the alfil (♗) moves two squares diagonally, jumping over intermediate pieces; this allows it to jump over the white knight to deliver the discovered check from the second rook with 2.Bf5+. It was said that a nobleman (playing White) wagered his wife Dilārām on a chess game and this position arose. She appealed "Sacrifice your two Rooks, and not me."Template:Sfn
Shatranj variants
There were also many variants of shatranj, some using larger boards or new pieces. An early large board variant of shatranj was "complete shatranj" (shatranj al-tamma) which used a board of 10x10 squares and introduced two pieces called dabbabas (siege engines).[18] Ferdowsi's Shahnameh, also discusses an alternative version of complete shatranj which uses the camel (shutur) piece instead of the dabbaba.[19]
The most popular variant was citadel chess (shatranj al-husun), which is discussed in many surviving manuscripts, such as in Nafa'is al-funun (Treasury of the Sciences) by the persian al-Amuli. This variant includes four extra squares on each corner of the board called citadels (husun). If a king reaches one of his opponent's citadels, the game is drawn.[20] Some manuscripts depict the citadels as being attached diagonally, while others depict them as being attached directly beside the two rook squares.[20] Other than these changes, the rules followed classical shatranj.[20]
There was also an even larger 10×11 board derivative; the 14th-century Tamerlane chess, or Script error: No such module "lang". (perfect chess), with a slightly different piece structure.[21]
See also
Notes
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ "The name of the game in adjoining countries appears to be derived from chaturanga – chatrang in Persian, shatranj in Arabic, chanderaki in Tibetan are examples. This suggests that the game, as well as its name, came from India. Also, as will appear, it was believed in Persia that the game arrived there from India."Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". (1981 paperback)*Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". (1981 paperback)*Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Something similar also holds for both modern chess (rook-knight-bishop and knight-queen), as well as Tamerlane chess (general-vizier-elephant-catapult-knight and rook-general-knight-camel-giraffe).
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Explanation of chess and disposition of backgammon Template:Webarchive
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Cazaux & Knowlton (2017), pp. 21-22, 29.
- ↑ Cazaux & Knowlton (2017), p. 23
- ↑ a b c Cazaux & Knowlton (2017), p. 24.
- ↑ Cazaux, Jean-Louis and Knowlton, Rick (2017). A World of Chess, pp. 31-33. McFarland. Template:ISBN.
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Bibliography
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Further reading
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
External links
- Shatranj, the medieval Arabian Chess by Jean-Louis Cazaux
- Shatranj by Hans L. Bodlaender, The Chess Variant Pages
- Unicode request for shatranj symbols
- The Time of Shatranj and the Aliyat by Miguel Villa
- ICC shatranj rules
- Shatranj at BoardGameGeekTemplate:EditAtWikidata
Template:Chess variants Script error: No such module "Navbox".