Compact of Free Association: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>OAbot
m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot.
 
imported>00101984hjw
changing to more relevant link
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|US-Micronesia-Marshall Islands-Palau agreements}}
{{Short description|US-Micronesia-Marshall Islands-Palau agreements}}
[[File:Secretary Pompeo Holds Joint Press Availability in Kolonia (48464897742).jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|Representatives of the Compact states meeting in [[Kolonia]], [[Federated States of Micronesia|Micronesia]], in August 2019. Left to right: Former U.S. Secretary of State [[Mike Pompeo]], Former Micronesian President [[David Panuelo]], Marshallese President [[Hilda Heine]], and Palauan Vice President [[Raynold Oilouch]]]]
[[File:COFAOnTheGlobe.svg|thumb|300px|Map of COFA nations: Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of the Marshall Islands are in red; the United States is in blue]]
[[File:Secretary Pompeo Holds Joint Press Availability in Kolonia (48464897742).jpg|thumb|upright=1.3|Representatives of the Compact states meeting in [[Kolonia]], [[Federated States of Micronesia|Micronesia]], in August 2019. Left to right: U.S. Secretary of State [[Mike Pompeo]], Micronesian president [[David Panuelo]], Marshallese president [[Hilda Heine]], and Palauan vice president [[Raynold Oilouch]]]]
 
The '''Compacts of Free Association''' ('''COFA''') are international agreements establishing and governing the relationships of [[Associated state|free association]] between the [[United States]] and the three [[Oceania|Pacific Island]] [[sovereign state]]s of the [[Federated States of Micronesia]] (FSM), the [[Marshall Islands|Republic of the Marshall Islands]] (RMI), and the [[Palau|Republic of Palau]]. As a result, these countries are sometimes known as the '''Freely Associated States''' ('''FASs'''). All three agreements next expire in 2043.<ref>{{cite web |title=Interior Department Applauds Renewed Economic Assistance for Compacts of Free Association |url=https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/interior-department-applauds-renewed-economic-assistance-compacts-free-association |website=U.S. Department of Interior |access-date=5 February 2025}}</ref>
The '''Compacts of Free Association''' ('''COFA''') are international agreements establishing and governing the relationships of [[Associated state|free association]] between the [[United States]] and the three [[Oceania|Pacific Island]] [[sovereign state]]s of the [[Federated States of Micronesia]] (FSM), the [[Marshall Islands|Republic of the Marshall Islands]] (RMI), and the [[Palau|Republic of Palau]]. As a result, these countries are sometimes known as the '''Freely Associated States''' ('''FASs'''). All three agreements next expire in 2043.<ref>{{cite web |title=Interior Department Applauds Renewed Economic Assistance for Compacts of Free Association |url=https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/interior-department-applauds-renewed-economic-assistance-compacts-free-association |website=U.S. Department of Interior |access-date=5 February 2025}}</ref>


These countries, together with the [[Northern Mariana Islands|Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands]], formerly constituted the [[Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands]], a [[United Nations]] [[trusteeship]] administered by the [[United States Navy]] from 1947 to 1951, and by the [[United States Department of the Interior|US Department of the Interior]] from 1951 to 1986 (to 1994 for Palau).
These countries, together with the [[Northern Mariana Islands|Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands]], formerly constituted the [[Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands]], a [[United Nations]] [[United Nations trust territories|trusteeship]] administered by the [[United States Navy]] from 1947 to 1951, and by the [[United States Department of the Interior|U.S. Department of the Interior]] from 1951 to 1986 (to 1994 for Palau).


The compacts came into being as an extension of the US–UN territorial trusteeship agreement, which obliged the [[federal government of the United States]] "to promote the development of the people of the Trust Territory toward self-government or independence as appropriate to the particular circumstances of the Trust Territory and its peoples and the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned."<ref>{{cite web|title=About the Compact of Free Association|url=http://uscompact.org/about/cofa.php|publisher=United States Department of the Interior; Honolulu Field Office|website=uscompact.org|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170501020951/http://www.uscompact.org/about/cofa.php|archive-date=2017-05-01}}</ref> Under the compacts, the US federal government provides guaranteed financial assistance over a 15-year period administered through its [[Office of Insular Affairs]] in exchange for full international defense authority and responsibilities.
The compacts came into being as an extension of the US–UN territorial trusteeship agreement, which obliged the [[federal government of the United States]] "to promote the development of the people of the Trust Territory toward self-government or independence as appropriate to the particular circumstances of the Trust Territory and its peoples and the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned."<ref>{{cite web|title=About the Compact of Free Association|url=http://uscompact.org/about/cofa.php|publisher=United States Department of the Interior; Honolulu Field Office|website=uscompact.org|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170501020951/http://www.uscompact.org/about/cofa.php|archive-date=2017-05-01}}</ref> Under the compacts, the U.S. federal government provides guaranteed financial assistance over a 15-year period administered through its [[Office of Insular Affairs]] in exchange for full international defense authority and responsibilities.


The Compacts of Free Association were initiated by negotiators in 1980, and signed by the parties in the years 1982 and 1983.<ref name="Leibowitz1989">{{cite book|author=Arnold H. Leibowitz|title=Defining Status: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States Territorial Relations|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=s1NEdqvtd3IC&pg=PA651|date=1 January 1989|publisher=Martinus Nijhoff Publishers|isbn=0-7923-0069-6|pages=651–}}</ref> They were approved by the citizens of the Pacific states in [[plebiscites]] held in 1983.<ref>{{cite book|title=Compact of Free Association in the Micronesian States of Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia and the Marshall Islands: Environmental Impact Statement|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_6g4AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA62|year=1984|pages=62–}}</ref> Legislation on the compacts was adopted by the [[U.S. Congress]] in 1986, and signed into law on November 13, 1986.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/|title=Compact of Free Association|website=www.fsmlaw.org|access-date=6 May 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171008135732/http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/|archive-date=8 October 2017}}</ref>
The Compacts of Free Association were initiated by negotiators in 1980, and signed by the parties in the years 1982 and 1983.<ref name="Leibowitz1989">{{cite book|author=Arnold H. Leibowitz|title=Defining Status: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States Territorial Relations|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=s1NEdqvtd3IC&pg=PA651|date=1 January 1989|publisher=Martinus Nijhoff Publishers|isbn=0-7923-0069-6|pages=651–}}</ref> They were approved by the citizens of the Pacific states in [[plebiscites]] held in 1983.<ref>{{cite book|title=Compact of Free Association in the Micronesian States of Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia and the Marshall Islands: Environmental Impact Statement|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_6g4AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA62|year=1984|pages=62–}}</ref> Legislation on the compacts was adopted by the [[U.S. Congress]] in 1986, and signed into law on November 13, 1986.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/|title=Compact of Free Association|website=www.fsmlaw.org|access-date=6 May 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171008135732/http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/|archive-date=8 October 2017}}</ref>
Line 35: Line 37:


==Economic provisions==
==Economic provisions==
Each of the associated states actively participates in all Office of Insular Affairs technical assistance activities. The US gives only these countries access to many US domestic programs,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://usaspending.gov/index.php?q=node%2F3&fiscal_year=all&tab=By+Location|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308044156/https://www.usaspending.gov/index.php?q=node%2F3&fiscal_year=all&tab=By+Location|url-status=dead|archive-date=March 8, 2021|publisher=USASpending.gov|title=Prime Award Spending Data by Location}}</ref> including: disaster response and recovery and hazard mitigation programs under the [[Federal Emergency Management Agency]]; some [[US Department of Education]] programs, including the [[Pell Grant]]; and services provided by the [[National Weather Service]], the [[United States Postal Service]], the [[Federal Aviation Administration]], the [[Federal Communications Commission]], the [[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]], and US representation to the International Frequency Registration Board of the [[International Telecommunication Union]].<ref>{{harvnb|Palau COFA|1986|loc=Title 1}}</ref> The Compact area, while outside the customs area of the United States, is mainly duty-free for imports.<ref>{{harvnb|Palau COFA|1986|loc=Sections 241–242}}</ref>
Each of the associated states actively participates in all Office of Insular Affairs technical assistance activities. The U.S. gives only these countries access to many U.S. domestic programs,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://usaspending.gov/index.php?q=node%2F3&fiscal_year=all&tab=By+Location|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308044156/https://www.usaspending.gov/index.php?q=node%2F3&fiscal_year=all&tab=By+Location|url-status=dead|archive-date=March 8, 2021|publisher=USASpending.gov|title=Prime Award Spending Data by Location}}</ref> including: disaster response and recovery and hazard mitigation programs under the [[Federal Emergency Management Agency]]; some [[U.S. Department of Education]] programs, including the [[Pell Grant]]; and services provided by the [[National Weather Service]], the [[United States Postal Service]], the [[Federal Aviation Administration]], the [[Federal Communications Commission]], the [[Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation]], and U.S. representation to the International Frequency Registration Board of the [[International Telecommunication Union]].<ref>{{harvnb|Palau COFA|1986|loc=Title 1}}</ref> The Compact area, while outside the customs area of the United States, is mainly duty-free for imports.<ref>{{harvnb|Palau COFA|1986|loc=Sections 241–242}}</ref>


Most citizens of the associated states may live and work in the United States, and most US citizens and their spouses may live and work in the associated states.<ref>{{harvnb|Palau COFA|1986|loc=Section 141}}</ref><ref>Federated States of Micronesia COFA, Section 141.</ref> In 1996, the US [[Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act]] removed [[Medicaid]] benefits for resident foreigners from the states, even after the five-year waiting period that most other resident aliens have.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122148970&ft=1&f=1003|title=House Health Bill Would Help Pacific Island Migrants|date=6 January 2010|work=NPR.org|access-date=2 January 2016|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303201051/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122148970&ft=1&f=1003|archive-date=3 March 2016}}</ref> However, in December 2020, Congress restored Medicaid for Compact of Free Association communities.<ref>{{Cite web |title=COVID-19 Relief Bill Restores Medicaid Access for COFA Community |url=https://www.apiahf.org/press-release/covid-19-relief-bill-restores-medicaid-access-for-cofa-community/ |date=2020-12-21 |access-date=2023-12-19 |website=APIAHF |language=en-US |archive-date=2023-12-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231219070358/https://www.apiahf.org/press-release/covid-19-relief-bill-restores-medicaid-access-for-cofa-community/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>
Most citizens of the associated states may live and work in the United States, and most U.S. citizens and their spouses may live and work in the associated states.<ref>{{harvnb|Palau COFA|1986|loc=Section 141}}</ref><ref>Federated States of Micronesia COFA, Section 141.</ref> In 1996, the U.S. [[Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act]] removed [[Medicaid]] benefits for those from the COFA states living in the US, even after the five-year waiting period that most other resident aliens have.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122148970&ft=1&f=1003|title=House Health Bill Would Help Pacific Island Migrants|date=6 January 2010|work=NPR.org|access-date=2 January 2016|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303201051/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122148970&ft=1&f=1003|archive-date=3 March 2016}}</ref> However, in December 2020, Congress restored Medicaid for Compact of Free Association communities.<ref>{{Cite web |title=COVID-19 Relief Bill Restores Medicaid Access for COFA Community |url=https://www.apiahf.org/press-release/covid-19-relief-bill-restores-medicaid-access-for-cofa-community/ |date=2020-12-21 |access-date=2023-12-19 |website=APIAHF |language=en-US |archive-date=2023-12-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231219070358/https://www.apiahf.org/press-release/covid-19-relief-bill-restores-medicaid-access-for-cofa-community/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>


==Military provisions==
==Military provisions==
[[File:Marshall Islands Police patrol vessel Lomor and USCGC Oliver Berry - 180703-G-CA140-115.jpg|thumb|The [[USCGC Oliver F. Berry (WPC 1124)|USCGC ''Oliver Berry'']] and the [[RMIS Lomor (03)|RMIS ''Lomor'']] on a joint patrol.<ref name=Dvids2018-08-01>{{cite news |url=https://www.dvidshub.net/news/287463/feature-uscgc-oliver-berry-crew-sets-new-horizons-cutter-operations |title=USCGC Oliver Berry crew sets new horizons for cutter operations |work=[[Dvidshub]] |author=Amanda Levasseur, Sara Muir |date=2018-08-01 |access-date = 2018-08-09 |quote=In July Oliver Berry's crew set a new milestone by deploying over the horizon to the Republic of the Marshall Islands. The 4,400 nautical mile trip marked marking the furthest deployment of an FRC to date for the Coast Guard and is the first deployment of its kind in the Pacific. |archive-date= 2018-08-09 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180809090847/https://www.dvidshub.net/news/287463/feature-uscgc-oliver-berry-crew-sets-new-horizons-cutter-operations |url-status  = live}}</ref>]]
[[File:Marshall Islands Police patrol vessel Lomor and USCGC Oliver Berry - 180703-G-CA140-115.jpg|thumb|The [[USCGC Oliver F. Berry (WPC 1124)|USCGC ''Oliver Berry'']] and the [[RMIS Lomor (03)|RMIS ''Lomor'']] on a joint patrol.<ref name=Dvids2018-08-01>{{cite news |url=https://www.dvidshub.net/news/287463/feature-uscgc-oliver-berry-crew-sets-new-horizons-cutter-operations |title=USCGC Oliver Berry crew sets new horizons for cutter operations |work=[[Dvidshub]] |author=Amanda Levasseur, Sara Muir |date=2018-08-01 |access-date = 2018-08-09 |quote=In July Oliver Berry's crew set a new milestone by deploying over the horizon to the Republic of the Marshall Islands. The 4,400 nautical mile trip marked marking the furthest deployment of an FRC to date for the Coast Guard and is the first deployment of its kind in the Pacific. |archive-date= 2018-08-09 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180809090847/https://www.dvidshub.net/news/287463/feature-uscgc-oliver-berry-crew-sets-new-horizons-cutter-operations |url-status  = live}}</ref>]]
The COFA allows the United States to operate armed forces in Compact areas, and to demand land for operating bases, subject to negotiation, and excludes the militaries of other countries without US permission. The US in turn becomes responsible for protecting its affiliate countries, and responsible for administering all international defense treaties and affairs, though it may not declare war on their behalf. It is not allowed to use [[Nuclear weapon|nuclear]], [[Chemical weapon|chemical]], or [[biological weapons]] in Palauan territory.<ref>''Patterson, Carolyn Bennett, et al. "At the Birth of Nations: In the Far Pacific." National Geographic Magazine, October 1986 page 498. National Geographic Virtual Library, Accessed 17 May 2018.'' "The problem? The Palauans had voted for a constitution that banned nuclear devices. [[Lazarus Salii|Salii]] then initial a compact agreement with the US allowing American ships and planes of all types to operate in Palau. A court ruling held the compact illegal without a 75 percent referendum vote, a constitutional stipulation.  Salii dissented, arguing for a more flexible interpretation of the constitution: "It does not say we cannot allow nuclear-powered ships if they are in transit."
The Palau compact also allows the American military the option of using the nation's big island of Babelthuap for bases if the US should lose those in the Philippines."</ref> In the territories of the Marshall Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia, it is not allowed to store such weapons, except in times of national emergency, state of war, or when necessary to defend against an actual or impending attack on the US, the Marshall Islands, or the Federated States of Micronesia.<ref>[http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/t03art01.htm "FSM COFA, Section 324"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091010012433/http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/t03art01.htm |date=2009-10-10 }}.</ref>


Citizens of the associated states may serve in America's armed forces, and there is a high level of military enlistment by Compact citizens. For example, in 2008, the Federated States of Micronesia had a higher per-capita enlistment rate than any US state, and had more than five times the national per-capita average of casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan: nine soldiers out of a population of 107,000.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2010/0505/Uncle-Sam-wants-Micronesians-for-US-military|title=Uncle Sam wants Micronesians for US military|author=The Christian Science Monitor|date=5 May 2010|work=The Christian Science Monitor|access-date=2 January 2016|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160228033221/http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2010/0505/Uncle-Sam-wants-Micronesians-for-US-military|archive-date=28 February 2016}}</ref>
The COFA allows the United States to operate armed forces in Compact areas, and to demand land for operating bases, subject to negotiation, and excludes the militaries of other countries without U.S. permission. The U.S. in turn becomes responsible for protecting its affiliate countries, and responsible for administering all international defense treaties and affairs, though it may not declare war on their behalf. It is not allowed to use [[Nuclear weapon|nuclear]], [[Chemical weapon|chemical]], or [[biological weapons]] in Palauan territory.<ref>Patterson, Carolyn Bennett, et al. "At the Birth of Nations: In the Far Pacific." ''National Geographic Magazine'', October 1986 page 498. National Geographic Virtual Library, Accessed 17 May 2018. "The problem? The Palauans had voted for a constitution that banned nuclear devices. [[Lazarus Salii|Salii]] then initial a compact agreement with the U.S. allowing American ships and planes of all types to operate in Palau. A court ruling held the compact illegal without a 75 percent referendum vote, a constitutional stipulation.  Salii dissented, arguing for a more flexible interpretation of the constitution: "It does not say we cannot allow nuclear-powered ships if they are in transit." The Palau compact also allows the American military the option of using the nation's big island of Babelthuap for bases if the US should lose those in the Philippines."</ref> In the territories of the Marshall Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia, it is not allowed to store such weapons, except in times of national emergency, state of war, or when necessary to defend against an actual or impending attack on the U.S., the Marshall Islands, or the Federated States of Micronesia.<ref>[http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/t03art01.htm "FSM COFA, Section 324"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091010012433/http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/t03art01.htm |date=2009-10-10 }}.</ref>
 
Citizens of the associated states may serve in America's armed forces, and there is a high level of military enlistment by Compact citizens. For example, in 2008, the Federated States of Micronesia had a higher per-capita enlistment rate than any U.S. state, and had more than five times the national per-capita average of casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan: nine soldiers out of a population of 107,000.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2010/0505/Uncle-Sam-wants-Micronesians-for-US-military|title=Uncle Sam wants Micronesians for US military|author=The Christian Science Monitor|date=5 May 2010|work=The Christian Science Monitor|access-date=2 January 2016|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160228033221/http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2010/0505/Uncle-Sam-wants-Micronesians-for-US-military|archive-date=28 February 2016}}</ref>


==21st-century renewal and updates==
==21st-century renewal and updates==
In 2003, the compacts with the RMI and FSM were renewed for 20 years. These new compacts provided US$3.5 billion in funding for both countries. US$30 million will also be disbursed annually among [[American Samoa]], [[Guam]], [[Hawaii]], and the [[Northern Mariana Islands]] in "Compact Impact" funding. This funding helps the governments of these localities cope with the expense of providing services to immigrants from the RMI, FSM, and Palau. The US use of [[Kwajalein|Kwajalein Atoll]] for missile testing was renewed for the same period.<ref>[http://archives.pireport.org/archive/2003/December/12-18-01.htm BUSH SIGNS $3.5 BILLION PACIFIC COMPACT – December 18, 2003<!-- bot-generated title -->] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060103113251/http://archives.pireport.org/archive/2003/December/12-18-01.htm|date=January 3, 2006}} at archives.pireport.org</ref>  The new compacts also changed certain immigration rules. RMI and FSM citizens traveling to the US are now required to have [[Passport|passports]]. The [[United States Postal Service|US Postal Service]] was given the option to apply international postage rates for mail between the US and RMI/FSM, phased in over five years. The USPS began implementing the change in January 2006, but decided to resume domestic services and rates in November 2007.<ref>[http://www.fm/news/kp/2007/nov07_2.htm USPS DOMESTIC MAIL SERVICE RETURNS TO THE FSM AND RMI<!-- bot-generated title -->] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071128220311/http://www.fm/news/kp/2007/nov07_2.htm}} at www.fm</ref>
In 2003, the compacts with the RMI and FSM were renewed for 20 years. These new compacts provided US$3.5 billion in funding for both countries. US$30 million was also be disbursed annually among [[American Samoa]], [[Guam]], [[Hawaii]], and the [[Northern Mariana Islands]] in "Compact Impact" funding. This funding helped the governments of these localities cope with the expense of providing services to immigrants from the RMI, FSM, and Palau. The U.S. use of [[Kwajalein|Kwajalein Atoll]] for missile testing was renewed for the same period.<ref>[http://archives.pireport.org/archive/2003/December/12-18-01.htm BUSH SIGNS $3.5 BILLION PACIFIC COMPACT – December 18, 2003<!-- bot-generated title -->] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060103113251/http://archives.pireport.org/archive/2003/December/12-18-01.htm|date=January 3, 2006}} at archives.pireport.org</ref>  The new compacts also changed certain immigration rules. RMI and FSM citizens traveling to the U.S. are now required to have [[passport]]s. The [[United States Postal Service|US Postal Service]] was given the option to apply international postage rates for mail between the U.S. and RMI/FSM, phased in over five years. The USPS began implementing the change in January 2006, but decided to resume domestic services and rates in November 2007.<ref>[http://www.fm/news/kp/2007/nov07_2.htm USPS DOMESTIC MAIL SERVICE RETURNS TO THE FSM AND RMI<!-- bot-generated title -->] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071128220311/http://www.fm/news/kp/2007/nov07_2.htm}} at www.fm</ref>


The renewed compact, commonly called "Compact II," took effect for the FSM on June 25, 2004,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/|title=Compact of Free Association|access-date=2 January 2016|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160126050555/http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/|archive-date=26 January 2016}}</ref> and for RMI on June 30, 2004.
The renewed compact, commonly called "Compact II," took effect for the FSM on June 25, 2004,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/|title=Compact of Free Association|access-date=2 January 2016|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160126050555/http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/|archive-date=26 January 2016}}</ref> and for RMI on June 30, 2004.
[[Image:MapofTTPI.gif|thumb|250px|Map of the [[Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands]] (1962).]]
[[Image:MapofTTPI.gif|thumb|250px|Map of the [[Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands]] (1962).]]
The economic provisions of the Compact for Palau, which provided $18 million in annual subsidies and grants, expired on September 30, 2009, and the renewal talk was concluded in late 2010.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2011/06/166289.htm|title=Compact of Free Association with the Republic of Palau: Assessing the 15-year Review|publisher=US Department of State|access-date=2 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170405122644/https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2011/06/166289.htm|archive-date=5 April 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> US financial support for Palau is based on a [[continuing resolution]] passed by the US Congress.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2012/09/197539.htm|title=The Continued Free Association with the Republic of Palau Act of 2012|publisher=US Department of State|access-date=2 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200215162838/https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2012/09/197539.htm|archive-date=15 February 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> The Compact Trust Fund set up to replace US financial aid underperformed because of the [[Great Recession]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.islandsbusiness.com/news/index_dynamic/containerNameToReplace=MiddleMiddle/focusModuleID=130/focusContentID=17099/tableName=mediaRelease/overideSkinName=newsArticle-full.tpl|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111213232846/http://www.islandsbusiness.com/news/index_dynamic/containerNameToReplace%3DMiddleMiddle/focusModuleID%3D130/focusContentID%3D17099/tableName%3DmediaRelease/overideSkinName%3DnewsArticle-full.tpl|url-status=dead|title=Compact Trust Fund underperforms|archive-date=December 13, 2011}}</ref> The military and civil defense provisions remained until 2015.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO1106/S00397/compact-of-free-association-with-the-republic-of-palau.htm|title=Compact of Free Association with the Republic of Palau|access-date=2 January 2016|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304132303/http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO1106/S00397/compact-of-free-association-with-the-republic-of-palau.htm|archive-date=4 March 2016}}</ref>
The economic provisions of the Compact for Palau, which provided $18 million in annual subsidies and grants, expired on September 30, 2009, and the renewal talk was concluded in late 2010.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2011/06/166289.htm|title=Compact of Free Association with the Republic of Palau: Assessing the 15-year Review|publisher=US Department of State|access-date=2 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170405122644/https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2011/06/166289.htm|archive-date=5 April 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> U.S. financial support for Palau is based on a [[continuing resolution]] passed by the U.S. Congress.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2012/09/197539.htm|title=The Continued Free Association with the Republic of Palau Act of 2012|publisher=US Department of State|access-date=2 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200215162838/https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2012/09/197539.htm|archive-date=15 February 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> The Compact Trust Fund set up to replace U.S. financial aid underperformed because of the [[Great Recession]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.islandsbusiness.com/news/index_dynamic/containerNameToReplace=MiddleMiddle/focusModuleID=130/focusContentID=17099/tableName=mediaRelease/overideSkinName=newsArticle-full.tpl|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111213232846/http://www.islandsbusiness.com/news/index_dynamic/containerNameToReplace%3DMiddleMiddle/focusModuleID%3D130/focusContentID%3D17099/tableName%3DmediaRelease/overideSkinName%3DnewsArticle-full.tpl|url-status=dead|title=Compact Trust Fund underperforms|archive-date=December 13, 2011}}</ref> The military and civil defense provisions remained until 2015.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO1106/S00397/compact-of-free-association-with-the-republic-of-palau.htm|title=Compact of Free Association with the Republic of Palau|access-date=2 January 2016|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304132303/http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO1106/S00397/compact-of-free-association-with-the-republic-of-palau.htm|archive-date=4 March 2016}}</ref>


An amended Compact, enacted December 17, 2003, as Public Law 108-188, provided financial assistance to the Marshall Islands and Micronesia through 2023. The Compact of Free Association agreement with the Republic of Palau, enshrined in US Public Law 99-658, was followed by a Compact Review Agreement signed between the US and Palau in 2018, extending certain financial provisions through September 30, 2024.<ref>{{cite web |date=April 2, 2022 |title=Compacts of Free Association |url=https://www.doi.gov/oia/compacts-of-free-association |publisher=US Department of the Interior Office of Insular Affairs}}</ref>
An amended Compact, enacted December 17, 2003, as Public Law 108-188, provided financial assistance to the Marshall Islands and Micronesia through 2023. The Compact of Free Association agreement with the Republic of Palau, enshrined in US Public Law 99-658, was followed by a Compact Review Agreement signed between the U.S. and Palau in 2018, extending certain financial provisions through September 30, 2024.<ref>{{cite web |date=April 2, 2022 |title=Compacts of Free Association |url=https://www.doi.gov/oia/compacts-of-free-association |publisher=US Department of the Interior Office of Insular Affairs}}</ref>


In March 2022, President [[Joe Biden]] named Ambassador [[Joseph Y. Yun|Joseph Yun]] as [[US Special Presidential Envoy for Compact Negotiations]] to take over negotiation for amendment and continuation of COFA.<ref>{{Cite press release |last=Blinken |first=Anthony |date=March 22, 2022 |title=Announcing the Special Presidential Envoy for Compact Negotiations |publisher=US Department of State |url=https://www.state.gov/announcing-the-special-presidential-envoy-for-compact-negotiations/}}</ref> As of Monday, October 16, 2023, agreements to renew all three compacts for a period of 20 years have been formally signed by representatives of each Freely Associated State (FAS) and the U.S. State Department. Total funding for all three agreements is $7.1B paid over 20 years ($889M to Palau; $3.3B to the FSM; $2.3B to the RMI; and $634M for the U.S. Postal Service to offset continuing domestic rate mail service).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Legislative Proposal and Memorandums of Understanding |date=2023-10-25 |title=Cost breakdown of proposed Compact of Free Association Amendment Act of 2023 |url=https://naturalresources.house.gov/uploadedfiles/proposal_breakdown.pdf |access-date=2023-10-25 |website=U.S. House of Representatives}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-07-18 |title=Memorandum: House Committee on Natural Resources Indo-Pacific Oversight Hearing |url=https://naturalresources.house.gov/UploadedFiles/Hearing_Memo_--_IP_TF_Ov_Hrg_on_COFA_07.18.23.pdf |access-date=2023-10-25 |website=U.S. House of Representatives |pages=4–5}}</ref>
In March 2022, President [[Joe Biden]] named Ambassador [[Joseph Y. Yun|Joseph Yun]] as [[US Special Presidential Envoy for Compact Negotiations]] to take over negotiation for amendment and continuation of COFA.<ref>{{Cite press release |last=Blinken |first=Anthony |date=March 22, 2022 |title=Announcing the Special Presidential Envoy for Compact Negotiations |publisher=US Department of State |url=https://www.state.gov/announcing-the-special-presidential-envoy-for-compact-negotiations/}}</ref> On October 16, 2023, agreements to renew all three compacts for a period of 20 years were formally signed by representatives of each Freely Associated State (FAS) and the U.S. State Department. Total funding for all three agreements is $7.1B paid over 20 years ($889M to Palau; $3.3B to the FSM; $2.3B to the RMI; and $634M for the U.S. Postal Service to offset continuing domestic rate mail service).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Legislative Proposal and Memorandums of Understanding |date=2023-10-25 |title=Cost breakdown of proposed Compact of Free Association Amendment Act of 2023 |url=https://naturalresources.house.gov/uploadedfiles/proposal_breakdown.pdf |access-date=2023-10-25 |website=U.S. House of Representatives}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-07-18 |title=Memorandum: House Committee on Natural Resources Indo-Pacific Oversight Hearing |url=https://naturalresources.house.gov/UploadedFiles/Hearing_Memo_--_IP_TF_Ov_Hrg_on_COFA_07.18.23.pdf |access-date=2023-10-25 |website=U.S. House of Representatives |pages=4–5}}</ref>


Palau Finance Minister [[Kaleb Udui Jr.]] and U.S. Ambassador Yun signed Palau's COFA extension on May 22, 2023, with the island government previously requesting to advance their date more in line with the other two countries.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Admin |date=2023-05-22 |title=US-Palau Compact awaits congressional approval |url=https://www.pacificislandtimes.com/post/us-palau-compact-awaits-congressional-approval |access-date=2023-10-25 |website=pactimes |language=en}}</ref> On May 23, 2023, FSM negotiator Leo Falcam and a State Department representative signed Micronesia's extension at the U.S. embassy in [[Pohnpei]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-05-23 |title=U.S. signs agreement to continue Micronesia assistance under strategic pact |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-signs-agreement-continue-micronesia-assistance-under-strategic-pact-2023-05-23/ |access-date=2023-10-25}}</ref> Marshall Islands' Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade [[Jack Ading]], alongside Ambassador Yun, signed the RMI's agreement on October 16, 2023.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Blair |first=Chad |date=2023-10-18 |title=US, Marshall Islands Renew COFA Treaty For Another 20 Years |url=https://www.civilbeat.org/2023/10/us-marshall-islands-renew-cofa-treaty-for-another-20-years/ |access-date=2023-10-25 |website=Honolulu Civil Beat |language=en}}</ref>  Approval by each legislature, to include a funding mechanism in Congress, is the final step to bring each agreement into force. Legislation implementing the new agreements was enacted by the U.S. Congress in March 2024.
Palau Finance Minister [[Kaleb Udui Jr.]] and U.S. Ambassador Yun signed Palau's COFA extension on May 22, 2023, with the island government previously requesting to advance their date more in line with the other two countries.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Admin |date=2023-05-22 |title=US-Palau Compact awaits congressional approval |url=https://www.pacificislandtimes.com/post/us-palau-compact-awaits-congressional-approval |access-date=2023-10-25 |website=pactimes |language=en}}</ref> On May 23, 2023, FSM negotiator Leo Falcam and a State Department representative signed Micronesia's extension at the U.S. embassy in [[Pohnpei]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-05-23 |title=U.S. signs agreement to continue Micronesia assistance under strategic pact |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-signs-agreement-continue-micronesia-assistance-under-strategic-pact-2023-05-23/ |access-date=2023-10-25}}</ref> Marshall Islands' Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade [[Jack Ading]], alongside Ambassador Yun, signed the RMI's agreement on October 16, 2023.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Blair |first=Chad |date=2023-10-18 |title=US, Marshall Islands Renew COFA Treaty For Another 20 Years |url=https://www.civilbeat.org/2023/10/us-marshall-islands-renew-cofa-treaty-for-another-20-years/ |access-date=2023-10-25 |website=Honolulu Civil Beat |language=en}}</ref>  Approval by each legislature, to include a funding mechanism in Congress, is the final step to bring each agreement into force. Legislation implementing the new agreements was enacted by the U.S. Congress in March 2024.


==Potential associated states==
==Potential associated states==
[[File:Chronological dispersal of Austronesian people across the Pacific.svg|thumb|Overview of Pacific people's regions.]]
The former government of the United States [[unincorporated territory]] of [[Guam]], led by Governor [[Eddie Calvo]], campaigned for a [[plebiscite]] on Guam's future political status,<ref>{{Cite web |date=October 12, 2018 |title=Administration Remarks on the Plebiscite Vote |url=https://governor.guam.gov/press_release/administration-remarks-on-the-plebiscite-vote/ |website=Office of the Governor of Guam}}</ref> with free association following the model of the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau as one of the possible options.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.postguam.com/news/local/govguam-hopes-for-favorable-decision-on-plebiscite/article_36253956-cdf8-11e8-9666-0fe8bba7fddd.html |title=GovGuam hopes for favorable decision on plebiscite |first=Kevin |last=Kerrigan |first2=Gaynor D. |last2=Daleno |newspaper=The Guam Daily Post |date=October 13, 2018}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2018/10/11/guam-pushes-for-native-only-vote-on-us-relationship/|title=Guam pushes for native-only vote on US relationship|first=Jennifer|last=Sinco Kelleher|date=October 12, 2018|website=Navy Times}}</ref>
The former government of the United States [[unincorporated territory]] of [[Guam]], led by Governor [[Eddie Calvo]], campaigned for a [[plebiscite]] on Guam's future political status,<ref>{{Cite web |date=12 October 2018 |title=ADMINISTRATION REMARKS ON THE PLEBISCITE VOTE |url=https://governor.guam.gov/press_release/administration-remarks-on-the-plebiscite-vote/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20250416114416/https://governor.guam.gov/press_release/administration-remarks-on-the-plebiscite-vote/ |archive-date=16 April 2025 |access-date=16 April 2025 |website=Office of the Governor of Guam}}</ref> with free association following the model of the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau as one of the possible options.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.postguam.com/news/local/govguam-hopes-for-favorable-decision-on-plebiscite/article_36253956-cdf8-11e8-9666-0fe8bba7fddd.html|title=GovGuam hopes for favorable decision on plebiscite|first=Kevin Kerrigan and Gaynor D. Daleno &#124; The Guam Daily|last=Post|website=The Guam Daily Post|date=13 October 2018 |access-date=2019-10-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191007224633/https://www.postguam.com/news/local/govguam-hopes-for-favorable-decision-on-plebiscite/article_36253956-cdf8-11e8-9666-0fe8bba7fddd.html|archive-date=2019-10-07|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2018/10/11/guam-pushes-for-native-only-vote-on-us-relationship/|title=Guam pushes for native-only vote on US relationship|first=Jennifer|last=Sinco Kelleher|date=October 12, 2018|website=Navy Times}}</ref>
 
In [[Puerto Rico]], the ''[[Sovereigntism (Puerto Rico)|soberanista]]'' movement advocates for the territory to be granted a freely associated status. The [[2017 Puerto Rican status referendum|2017 status referendum]] presented "Independence/Free Association" as an option; if the majority of voters had chosen it, a second round of voting would have been held to choose between free association and full independence. In 2022, the US Congress introduced the Puerto Rico Status Act, which would hold a federally-sponsored referendum on the territory's status, with a free association status expected to be presented as an option.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/congressional-lawmakers-reach-consensus-puerto-rico-status-bill-call-p-rcna29672|title=Lawmakers reach consensus on Puerto Rico status bill, call for plebiscite|first=Nicole|last=Acevedo|date=May 19, 2022|website=NBC News}}</ref>


[[Kiribati]] is another state that may consider a CFA, as it would be a way to gain immigration access to escape rising sea levels, as it has been a stalwart U.S. ally in the Pacific. Kiribati is home to Tarawa atoll, which is the site of the costly [[Battle of Tarawa]] during World War II. The CFA would be a way to provide additional options for island difficulties, obtain extra development aid with limited natural resources, and unify it with other Micronesian people living in the Pacific (including the FSM, Marshall Islands, Guam, etc.).<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Pruett |first=Richard K. |date=Mar 5, 2020 |title=A United States-Kiribati Compact of Free Association would Yield Mutual Dividends |url=https://www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/united-states-kiribati-compact-free-association-will-have-mutual-benefits}}</ref> For example, the Marshall Islands and Kiribati already work together on regional security; in 2018, a joint patrol of the waters between the Marshall Islands and Kiribati was performed by the Marshall ship ''[[RMIS Lomor|Lomor]]'' and Kiribati’s {{ship|RKS|Teanoai|301|6}}.<ref name="marshallislandsjournal2018-02-162">{{cite news |author=Hilary Hosia |date=16 February 2018 |title=Kiribati, RMI joint sea patrol |url=http://marshallislandsjournal.com/?p=5460 |url-status=live |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20180809071546/http://marshallislandsjournal.com/?p=5460 |archivedate=9 August 2018 |work=[[The Marshall Islands Journal]] |quote=Patrol vessels Teanoai from the Republic of Kiribati and Lomor from Marshall Islands conducted joint operations and open ocean exercises last week following Teanoai's arrival in Majuro Thursday.}}</ref>
In [[Puerto Rico]], the ''[[Sovereigntism (Puerto Rico)|soberanista]]'' movement advocates for the territory to be granted a freely associated status. The [[2017 Puerto Rican status referendum|2017 status referendum]] presented "Independence/Free Association" as an option; if the majority of voters had chosen it, a second round of voting would have been held to choose between free association and full independence. In 2022, the U.S. Congress introduced the Puerto Rico Status Act, which would hold a federally-sponsored referendum on the territory's status, with a free association status expected to be presented as an option.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/congressional-lawmakers-reach-consensus-puerto-rico-status-bill-call-p-rcna29672 |title=Lawmakers reach consensus on Puerto Rico status bill, call for plebiscite |first=Nicole |last=Acevedo |date=May 19, 2022 |website=NBC News}}</ref>


Other possible CFA states include [[Nauru]].<ref name=":0" /> The number of CFA states so far has been limited, because it is reserved for only the closest allies of the US.<ref name=":0" /> Although the COFA is very expensive, support for the alliances has been popular in the US and considered mutually beneficial, with the small island nations warning the US of dangers in the Pacific regions, such as global warming and the encroaching influences of foreign powers.<ref name="Blair">{{Cite web |last=Blair |first=Chad |date=2024-03-10 |title=Congress Restores Federal Benefits To COFA Migrants As Part Of $7.1 Billion Aid Deal |url=https://www.civilbeat.org/2024/03/congress-restores-federal-benefits-to-cofa-migrants-as-part-of-7-1-billion-aid-deal/ |access-date=2024-07-02 |website=Honolulu Civil Beat |language=en}}</ref>
Former U.S. diplomat Richard K. Pruett suggested in 2020 that other possible CFA states could include [[Kiribati]], [[Nauru]] and [[Philippines]].<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Pruett |first=Richard K. |date=March 5, 2020 |title=A United States-Kiribati Compact of Free Association would Yield Mutual Dividends |url=https://www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/united-states-kiribati-compact-free-association-will-have-mutual-benefits |website=East-West Center}}</ref> The number of CFA states so far has been limited, because it is reserved for only the closest allies of the U.S.<ref name=":0" /> Although the CFA is very expensive, support for the alliances has been popular in the U.S. and considered mutually beneficial, with the small island nations warning the U.S. of dangers in the Pacific regions, such as global warming and the encroaching influences of foreign powers.<ref name="Blair">{{Cite web |last=Blair |first=Chad |date=March 10, 2024 |title=Congress Restores Federal Benefits To COFA Migrants As Part Of $7.1 Billion Aid Deal |url=https://www.civilbeat.org/2024/03/congress-restores-federal-benefits-to-cofa-migrants-as-part-of-7-1-billion-aid-deal/ |website=Honolulu Civil Beat |language=en}}</ref>


[[Greenland]] has also been listed as a potential CFA state, following the [[2024 US presidential election]]. Rasmus Leander Nielsen of the University of Greenland said that Greenlanders have discussed since the 1980s creating a [[compact of free association]] (COFA) with Denmark after independence, and that some have suggested a COFA with the United States instead.<ref name="dall20241105">{{Cite news |last=Dall |first=Anders |date=2024-11-05 |title=Trumps tidligere stabschef til DR: USA skal tage alvorlig snak med Grønland |url=https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/udland/trumps-tidligere-stabschef-til-dr-usa-skal-tage-alvorlig-snak-med-groenland |access-date=2025-01-18 |publisher=DR |language=da-DK}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Nielson |first1=Magnus |title=Fantasy Island: Greenland’s American destiny |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/fantasy-island-greenlands-american-destiny/ |website=EURACTIV |access-date=5 February 2025}}</ref> Barry Scott Zellen, a scholar of Arctic strategy at the [[United States Coast Guard Academy]], suggested Greenland could become an [[Territories of the United States|organized and unincorporated territory of the United States]] but with a clear pathway to eventual admission as a constituent state "not unlike that which Alaska followed". According to Zellen, "Greenlandic Inuit, who suffer from a long legacy of neglect and whose colonial experience, despite recent gains in autonomy, has not been entirely positive, may indeed stand to benefit in many ways" from this arrangement.<ref name="Barryuscga">{{cite web |last1=Zellen |first1=Barry Scott |title=Greenland as an American Territory: A Bad Idea, a Bold Idea … or a Beyond-the-Horizon Idea worth Studying? |url=https://uscga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/zellen-greenland-and-the-future.pdf |website=uscga.edu |publisher=[[United States Coast Guard Academy]] |access-date=January 11, 2025}}</ref>
[[Greenland]] has also been listed as a potential CFA state, following the [[2024 U.S. presidential election]]. Rasmus Leander Nielsen of the University of Greenland said that Greenlanders have discussed since the 1980s creating a [[compact of free association]] with Denmark after independence, and that some have suggested a COFA with the United States instead.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Dall |first=Anders |date=November 5, 2024 |title=Trumps tidligere stabschef til DR: USA skal tage alvorlig snak med Grønland |url=https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/udland/trumps-tidligere-stabschef-til-dr-usa-skal-tage-alvorlig-snak-med-groenland |publisher=DR |language=da-DK}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Nielson |first1=Magnus |title=Fantasy Island: Greenland's American destiny |url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/fantasy-island-greenlands-american-destiny/ |website=EURACTIV |date=January 20, 2025}}</ref> Barry Scott Zellen, a scholar of Arctic strategy at the [[United States Coast Guard Academy]], suggested Greenland could become an [[Territories of the United States|organized and unincorporated territory of the United States]] but with a clear pathway to eventual admission as a constituent state "not unlike that which Alaska followed". According to Zellen, "Greenlandic Inuit, who suffer from a long legacy of neglect and whose colonial experience, despite recent gains in autonomy, has not been entirely positive, may indeed stand to benefit in many ways" from this arrangement.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Zellen |first1=Barry Scott |title=Greenland as an American Territory: A Bad Idea, a Bold Idea … or a Beyond-the-Horizon Idea worth Studying? |url=https://uscga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/zellen-greenland-and-the-future.pdf |website=uscga.edu |publisher=[[United States Coast Guard Academy]] |date=May 2022}}</ref>


However, the majority of Greenlanders do not want to be part of the United States. In a survey conducted by Verian in Denmark for Berlingske and Sermitsiaq in January 2025, Greenlanders were asked: "Do you want Greenland to leave Denmark and become part of the United States?" The results show that 85% of Greenlanders do not want to leave the Realm and become part of the United States, while 6% want to leave and become part of the US, and 9% are undecided. <ref>https://www.veriangroup.com/news-and-insights/opinion-poll-greenland-2025</ref>
However, the majority of Greenlanders do not want to be part of the United States. In a survey conducted by Verian in Denmark for Berlingske and Sermitsiaq in January 2025, Greenlanders were asked: "Do you want Greenland to leave Denmark and become part of the United States?" The results show that 85% of Greenlanders do not want to leave the Realm and become part of the United States, while 6% want to leave and become part of the U.S., and 9% are undecided.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.veriangroup.com/news-and-insights/opinion-poll-greenland-2025 |title=Opinion poll in Greenland, January 2025 |date=29 January 2025 |website=Verian Group}}</ref>


==US fulfillment of commitments ==
==U.S. fulfillment of commitments ==
The United States' administration of the former trust territories now covered under the Compacts of Free Association has been subject to ongoing criticism over the past several decades.  A 1961 United Nations mission report initially noted deficiencies in "American administration in almost every area:  poor transportation, failure to settle war damage claims; failure to adequately compensate for land taken for military purposes; poor living conditions[;] inadequate economic development; inadequate education programs; and almost nonexistent medical care."<ref>{{cite book |last= McHenry |first= Donald F. |title= Micronesia: Trust Betrayed -- Altruism vs. Self Interest in American Foreign Policy |publisher= [[Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]] |year= 1975 |isbn= 0-87003-000-0 |url-access= registration |url= https://archive.org/details/micronesiatrustb0000mche }}</ref>  In 1971, congresswoman [[Patsy Mink]] further noted that "[A]fter winning the right to control Micronesia, [the US] proceeded to allow the islands to stagnate and decay through indifference and lack of assistance. . . . [T]he people are still largely impoverished and lacking in all of the basic amenities which we consider essential – adequate education, housing, good health standards, modern sanitation facilities."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mink |first1=Patsy T. |year=1970–71 |title=Micronesia: Our Bungled Trust |journal=Texas Int'l Law Forum |volume=6 |pages=181–208 |url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tilj6&div=16&g_sent=1&collection=journals |access-date=December 12, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304055631/http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals%2Ftilj6&div=16&g_sent=1&collection=journals |archive-date=March 4, 2016 }}</ref>
The United States' administration of the former trust territories now covered under the Compacts of Free Association has been subject to ongoing criticism over the past several decades.  A 1961 United Nations mission report initially noted deficiencies in "American administration in almost every area:  poor transportation, failure to settle war damage claims; failure to adequately compensate for land taken for military purposes; poor living conditions[;] inadequate economic development; inadequate education programs; and almost nonexistent medical care."<ref>{{cite book |last= McHenry |first= Donald F. |title= Micronesia: Trust Betrayed -- Altruism vs. Self Interest in American Foreign Policy |publisher= [[Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]] |year= 1975 |isbn= 0-87003-000-0 |url-access= registration |url= https://archive.org/details/micronesiatrustb0000mche }}</ref>  In 1971, congresswoman [[Patsy Mink]] further noted that "[A]fter winning the right to control Micronesia, [the U.S.] proceeded to allow the islands to stagnate and decay through indifference and lack of assistance. . . . [T]he people are still largely impoverished and lacking in all of the basic amenities which we consider essential – adequate education, housing, good health standards, modern sanitation facilities."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mink |first1=Patsy T. |year=1970–71 |title=Micronesia: Our Bungled Trust |journal=Texas Int'l Law Forum |volume=6 |pages=181–208 |url=http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tilj6&div.=.16&g_sent=1&collection=journals |access-date=December 12, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304055631/http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals%2Ftilj6&div=16&g_sent=1&collection=journals |archive-date=March 4, 2016 }}</ref>


After the compacts, criticism was also received by the [[United States House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific]] regarding the unfulfilled commitments of the United States to address the impacts of US nuclear testing in the Marshall Islands, which were included as part of the [[Pacific Proving Grounds]].  Speakers noted that while section 177 of the Compact of Free Association recognized the United States' responsibility "to address past, present and future consequences of the nuclear testing claims," less than $4 million was awarded out of a $2.2 billion judgment rendered by a [[Nuclear Claims Tribunal]] created under the RMI Compact, and the [[United States Court of Claims]] had dismissed two lawsuits to enforce the judgment.<ref>[https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-111hhrg56559/pdf/CHRG-111hhrg56559.pdf Oversight on the Compact of Free Association with the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI): Medical Treatment of the Marshallese People, U.S. Nuclear Tests, Nuclear Claims Tribunal, Forced Resettlement, Use of Kwajalein Atoll for Missile Programs and Land Use Development] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426045405/http://www.hcfa.house.gov/111/56559.pdf |date=2012-04-26 }}</ref> With respect to these unaddressed claims, medical practitioners also noted the potential widespread impacts of nuclear testing within the Pacific Proving Grounds, indicated by the prevalence of both radiogenic diseases, as well as heart disease, diabetes, and obesity associated with "[a] forced change in dietary patterns and lifestyle" resulting from US administration after the testing.<ref>Id. (testimony of Neal H. Palafox, MD); see also {{cite journal |last1=Yamada |first1=Seiji |year=2004 |title=Cancer, Reproductive Adnormalities, and Diabetes in Micronesia: The Effect of Nuclear Testing |journal=Pacific Health Dialog |volume=11 |issue=2 |pages=216–21 |pmid=16281703 |url=http://www.pacifichealthdialog.org.fj/Volume%2011/no2/PHD11%202%20p216%20221%20Yamada%20orig.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426045405/http://www.pacifichealthdialog.org.fj/Volume%2011/no2/PHD11%202%20p216%20221%20Yamada%20orig.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 26, 2012 |access-date=December 12, 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Yamada|first1=Seiji|last2=Akiyama|first2=Matthew|date=2013-01-27|title="For the good of mankind": The legacy of nuclear testing in Micronesia|url=http://socialmedicine.info/index.php/socialmedicine/article/view/682|journal=Social Medicine|language=en|volume=8|issue=2|pages=83–92|issn=1557-7112|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170814175032/http://www.socialmedicine.info/index.php/socialmedicine/article/view/682|archive-date=2017-08-14}}</ref> In 2011, lawmakers further noted that the US Congress had continuously failed to cover the costs of promised medical care and services to displaced compact citizens who migrate to the United States for health care, education, and employment opportunities, particularly since the passage of the [[Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://pacificmedia.org/archives/4293|title=Hawaii lawmakers ask feds to front Medicaid costs of COFA citizens - Pasifika Media Association|author=The Hawaii Independent|access-date=2 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306095323/http://pacificmedia.org/archives/4293|archive-date=6 March 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>
After the compacts, criticism was also received by the [[United States House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific]] regarding the unfulfilled commitments of the United States to address the impacts of U.S. nuclear testing in the Marshall Islands, which were included as part of the [[Pacific Proving Grounds]].  Speakers noted that while section 177 of the Compact of Free Association recognized the United States' responsibility "to address past, present and future consequences of the nuclear testing claims," less than $4 million was awarded out of a $2.2 billion judgment rendered by a [[Nuclear Claims Tribunal]] created under the RMI Compact, and the [[United States Court of Claims]] had dismissed two lawsuits to enforce the judgment.<ref>[https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-111hhrg56559/pdf/CHRG-111hhrg56559.pdf Oversight on the Compact of Free Association with the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI): Medical Treatment of the Marshallese People, U.S. Nuclear Tests, Nuclear Claims Tribunal, Forced Resettlement, Use of Kwajalein Atoll for Missile Programs and Land Use Development] ({{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426045405/http://www.hcfa.house.gov/111/56559.pdf |date=2012-04-26 }}).</ref> With respect to these unaddressed claims, medical practitioners also noted the potential widespread impacts of nuclear testing within the Pacific Proving Grounds, indicated by the prevalence of both radiogenic diseases, as well as heart disease, diabetes, and obesity associated with "[a] forced change in dietary patterns and lifestyle" resulting from U.S. administration after the testing.<ref>Id. (testimony of Neal H. Palafox, MD); see also {{cite journal |last1=Yamada |first1=Seiji |year=2004 |title=Cancer, Reproductive Adnormalities, and Diabetes in Micronesia: The Effect of Nuclear Testing |journal=Pacific Health Dialog |volume=11 |issue=2 |pages=216–21 |pmid=16281703 |url=http://www.pacifichealthdialog.org.fj/Volume%2011/no2/PHD11%202%20p216%20221%20Yamada%20orig.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426045405/http://www.pacifichealthdialog.org.fj/Volume%2011/no2/PHD11%202%20p216%20221%20Yamada%20orig.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 26, 2012 |access-date=December 12, 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Yamada|first1=Seiji|last2=Akiyama|first2=Matthew|date=2013-01-27|title="For the good of mankind": The legacy of nuclear testing in Micronesia|url=http://socialmedicine.info/index.php/socialmedicine/article/view/682|journal=Social Medicine|language=en|volume=8|issue=2|pages=83–92|issn=1557-7112|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170814175032/http://www.socialmedicine.info/index.php/socialmedicine/article/view/682|archive-date=2017-08-14}}</ref> In 2011, lawmakers further noted that the U.S. Congress had continuously failed to cover the costs of promised medical care and services to displaced compact citizens who migrate to the United States for health care, education, and employment opportunities, particularly since the passage of the [[Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://pacificmedia.org/archives/4293|title=Hawaii lawmakers ask feds to front Medicaid costs of COFA citizens - Pasifika Media Association|author=The Hawaii Independent|access-date=2 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306095323/http://pacificmedia.org/archives/4293|archive-date=6 March 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>


Questions regarding US responsibility have also been raised regarding the issue of numerous derelict war ships and oil tankers abandoned or destroyed by the US military in atolls and islands throughout the compact area.<ref>{{cite conference |url=http://www.iosc.org/papers_posters/IOSC%202003%20a186.pdf |title=Response to an Oil Spill from a Sunken WWII Oil Tanker in Yap |author=Trevor Gilbert |author2=Sefania Nawadra |author3=Andy Tafileichig |author4=Leonard Young |date=April 2003 |conference=2003 International Oil Spill Conference |location=Vancouver|access-date=December 12, 2011 |quote=The problem of more than 1000 WWII shipwrecks, amounting to over 3 million tons sunk across the pacific, has been with us for 60 years and will not fade away by continuing to ignore the issue |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426045405/http://www.iosc.org/papers_posters/IOSC%202003%20a186.pdf |archive-date=April 26, 2012 }}; see also [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7603993.stm WWII wrecks ‘threaten Micronesia’] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111115112816/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7603993.stm |date=2011-11-15 }};  [http://mic-network.blogspot.com/2009/04/assessing-potential-oil-spills-from.html Assessing potential oil spills from WWII Wrecks] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426045405/http://mic-network.blogspot.com/2009/04/assessing-potential-oil-spills-from.html |date=2012-04-26 }}</ref>
Questions regarding U.S. responsibility have also been raised regarding the issue of numerous derelict war ships and oil tankers abandoned or destroyed by the U.S. military in atolls and islands throughout the compact area.<ref>{{cite conference |url=http://www.iosc.org/papers_posters/IOSC%202003%20a186.pdf |title=Response to an Oil Spill from a Sunken WWII Oil Tanker in Yap |author=Trevor Gilbert |author2=Sefania Nawadra |author3=Andy Tafileichig |author4=Leonard Young |date=April 2003 |conference=2003 International Oil Spill Conference |location=Vancouver|access-date=December 12, 2011 |quote=The problem of more than 1000 WWII shipwrecks, amounting to over 3 million tons sunk across the pacific, has been with us for 60 years and will not fade away by continuing to ignore the issue |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426045405/http://www.iosc.org/papers_posters/IOSC%202003%20a186.pdf |archive-date=April 26, 2012 }}; see also [https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7603993.stm WWII wrecks ‘threaten Micronesia’] ;  [https://mic-network.blogspot.com/2009/04/assessing-potential-oil-spills-from.html Assessing potential oil spills from WWII Wrecks] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426045405/http://mic-network.blogspot.com/2009/04/assessing-potential-oil-spills-from.html |date=2012-04-26 }}</ref>


==Health care issues==
==Healthcare issues==
In 2009, the state of Hawaii, under the administration of then-Governor [[Linda Lingle]], attempted to restrict health care access for Compact citizens by eliminating all Compact residents of Hawaii from Med-QUEST, the state's comprehensive Medicaid coverage plan.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Saunders|first1=Aaron|last2=Schiff|first2=Teresa|last3=Rieth|first3=Katherine|last4=Yamada|first4=Seiji|last5=Maskarinec|first5=Gregory G.|last6=Riklon|first6=Sheldon|date=June 2010|title=Health as a human right: who is eligible?|journal=Hawaii Medical Journal|volume=69|issue=6 Suppl 3|pages=4–6|issn=0017-8594|pmc=3123152|pmid=20539993}}</ref> COFA residents were instead subject to Basic Health Hawaii, a limited health care plan under which "transportation services are excluded and patients can receive no more than ten days of medically necessary inpatient hospital care per year, twelve outpatient visits per year, and a maximum of four medication prescriptions per calendar month. . . . BHH covers dialysis treatments as an emergency medical service only, and the approximate ten to twelve prescription medications dialysis patients take per month are not fully covered. BHH . . . caus[es] cancer patients to exhaust their allotted doctors' visits within two to three months".<ref>{{cite court |litigants=Korab v. Koller |vol=2010 |reporter=WL |opinion=4688824 |court=D. Haw |date=Dec 10, 2010 |url=http://www.lejhawaii.org/medicalaccess/pleadings/Korab43.pdf |archive-date=March 14, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120314053239/http://www.lejhawaii.org/medicalaccess/pleadings/Korab43.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>
In 2009, the state of Hawaii, under the administration of Governor [[Linda Lingle]], attempted to restrict health care access for Compact citizens by eliminating all Compact residents of Hawaii from Med-QUEST, the state's comprehensive Medicaid coverage plan.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Saunders|first1=Aaron|last2=Schiff|first2=Teresa|last3=Rieth|first3=Katherine|last4=Yamada|first4=Seiji|last5=Maskarinec|first5=Gregory G.|last6=Riklon|first6=Sheldon|date=June 2010|title=Health as a human right: who is eligible?|journal=Hawaii Medical Journal|volume=69|issue=6 Suppl 3|pages=4–6|issn=0017-8594|pmc=3123152|pmid=20539993}}</ref> COFA residents were instead subject to Basic Health Hawaii, a limited health care plan under which "transportation services are excluded and patients can receive no more than ten days of medically necessary inpatient hospital care per year, twelve outpatient visits per year, and a maximum of four medication prescriptions per calendar month. . . . BHH covers dialysis treatments as an emergency medical service only, and the approximate ten to twelve prescription medications dialysis patients take per month are not fully covered. BHH . . . caus[es] cancer patients to exhaust their allotted doctors' visits within two to three months".<ref>{{cite court |litigants=Korab v. Koller |vol=2010 |reporter=WL |opinion=4688824 |court=D. Haw |date=Dec 10, 2010 |url=http://www.lejhawaii.org/medicalaccess/pleadings/Korab43.pdf |archive-date=March 14, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120314053239/http://www.lejhawaii.org/medicalaccess/pleadings/Korab43.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref>


Noting that such a policy likely constituted unlawful discrimination in violation of the [[Equal Protection Clause]], federal District Court Judge [[John Michael Seabright]] issued a [[preliminary injunction]] against the implementation of Basic Health Hawaii.<ref>Id. ("Defendants fail to show any particular State interest that is advanced by their decision to exclude COFA residents from the Old Programs. . . . [W]hile the court recognizes that BHH was created in response to the State's budget crisis, when applying strict scrutiny, the 'justification of limiting expenses is particularly inappropriate and unreasonable when the discriminated class consists of aliens'")</ref> In finding a high likelihood of irreparable harm, Judge Seabright took note of the "compelling evidence that BHH's limited coverage . . . is causing COFA Residents to forego much needed treatment because they cannot otherwise afford it".<ref>Id.; see also [http://www.yokwe.net/index.php?module=News&func=display&sid=2706 Judge Dismisses Hawaii’s Request for Dismissal of Suit against Basic Health Hawaii] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120204112905/http://www.yokwe.net/index.php?module=News&func=display&sid=2706 |date=2012-02-04 }} ("Micronesian community representatives reported that elimination of medical benefits has impacted many, including 27 who have died since Sept. 1, 2009")</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Shek|first1=Dina|last2=Yamada|first2=Seiji|date=November 2011|title=Health care for Micronesians and constitutional rights|journal=Hawaii Medical Journal|volume=70|issue=11 Suppl 2|pages=4–8|issn=0017-8594|pmc=3254229|pmid=22235150}}</ref> Lingle's successor, Governor [[Neil Abercrombie]] continued the state's appeal of the injunction to the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lejhawaii.org/medicalaccess/pleadings/10-483_notice_appeal_pi.pdf|title=Korab v. Koller, Civ. No. 10-c00483-JMS-KSC (Jan. 10, 2011)|website=lejhawaii.org|access-date=6 May 2018|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304092608/http://www.lejhawaii.org/medicalaccess/pleadings/10-483_notice_appeal_pi.pdf|archive-date=4 March 2016}}</ref> which ruled in favor of the state. When the United States Supreme Court refused to hear the case, the Abercrombie administration removed most COFA residents from Med-QUEST and transferred them onto Affordable Care Act plans.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Hagiwara|first1=Megan Kiyomi Inada|last2=Yamada|first2=Seiji|last3=Tanaka|first3=Wayne|last4=Ostrowski|first4=Deja Marie|date=2015-05-11|title=Litigation and Community Advocacy to Ensure Health Access for Micronesian Migrants in Hawai'i|url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/581386|journal=Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved|volume=26|issue=2|pages=137–145|doi=10.1353/hpu.2015.0065|pmid=25981094|s2cid=35055370|issn=1548-6869|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170830094252/https://muse.jhu.edu/article/581386|archive-date=2017-08-30|url-access=subscription}}</ref> In other states, notably Arkansas, which has a significant population of Marshallese, COFA residents have not been eligible for Medicaid.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=McElfish|first1=Pearl Anna|last2=Hallgren|first2=Emily|last3=Yamada|first3=Seiji|date=2015-02-25|title=Effect of US Health Policies on Health Care Access for Marshallese Migrants|journal=American Journal of Public Health|volume=105|issue=4|pages=637–643|doi=10.2105/ajph.2014.302452|issn=0090-0036|pmc=4358182|pmid=25713965}}</ref> In 2020, the United States Congress restored Medicaid eligibility for COFA residents with the [[Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021|Consolidated Appropriations Act]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/u-s-restores-medicaid-marshall-islands-exposing-longtime-injustice-experts-n1252632|title=U.S restores Medicaid for Marshall Islands, exposing longtime injustice, experts say|website=NBC News|date=January 2021 }}</ref>
Noting that such a policy likely constituted unlawful discrimination in violation of the [[Equal Protection Clause]], federal District Court Judge [[John Michael Seabright]] issued a [[preliminary injunction]] against the implementation of Basic Health Hawaii.<ref>Id. ("Defendants fail to show any particular State interest that is advanced by their decision to exclude COFA residents from the Old Programs.... [W]hile the court recognizes that BHH was created in response to the State's budget crisis, when applying strict scrutiny, the 'justification of limiting expenses is particularly inappropriate and unreasonable when the discriminated class consists of aliens'")</ref> In finding a high likelihood of irreparable harm, Judge Seabright took note of the "compelling evidence that BHH's limited coverage ... is causing COFA Residents to forego much needed treatment because they cannot otherwise afford it".<ref>Id.; see also [http://www.yokwe.net/index.php?module=News&func=display&sid=2706 Judge Dismisses Hawaii’s Request for Dismissal of Suit against Basic Health Hawaii] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120204112905/http://www.yokwe.net/index.php?module=News&func=display&sid=2706 |date=2012-02-04 }} ("Micronesian community representatives reported that elimination of medical benefits has impacted many, including 27 who have died since Sept. 1, 2009")</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Shek|first1=Dina|last2=Yamada|first2=Seiji|date=November 2011|title=Health care for Micronesians and constitutional rights|journal=Hawaii Medical Journal|volume=70|issue=11 Suppl 2|pages=4–8|issn=0017-8594|pmc=3254229|pmid=22235150}}</ref> Lingle's successor, Governor [[Neil Abercrombie]] continued the state's appeal of the injunction to the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lejhawaii.org/medicalaccess/pleadings/10-483_notice_appeal_pi.pdf|title=Korab v. Koller, Civ. No. 10-c00483-JMS-KSC (Jan. 10, 2011)|website=lejhawaii.org|access-date=6 May 2018|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304092608/http://www.lejhawaii.org/medicalaccess/pleadings/10-483_notice_appeal_pi.pdf|archive-date=4 March 2016}}</ref> which ruled in favor of the state. When the United States Supreme Court refused to hear the case, the Abercrombie administration removed most COFA residents from Med-QUEST and transferred them onto Affordable Care Act plans.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Hagiwara|first1=Megan Kiyomi Inada|last2=Yamada|first2=Seiji|last3=Tanaka|first3=Wayne|last4=Ostrowski|first4=Deja Marie|date=2015-05-11|title=Litigation and Community Advocacy to Ensure Health Access for Micronesian Migrants in Hawai'i|url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/581386|journal=Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved|volume=26|issue=2|pages=137–145|doi=10.1353/hpu.2015.0065|pmid=25981094|s2cid=35055370|issn=1548-6869|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170830094252/https://muse.jhu.edu/article/581386|archive-date=2017-08-30|url-access=subscription}}</ref> In other states, notably Arkansas, which has a significant population of Marshallese, COFA residents have not been eligible for Medicaid.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=McElfish|first1=Pearl Anna|last2=Hallgren|first2=Emily|last3=Yamada|first3=Seiji|date=2015-02-25|title=Effect of US Health Policies on Health Care Access for Marshallese Migrants|journal=American Journal of Public Health|volume=105|issue=4|pages=637–643|doi=10.2105/ajph.2014.302452|issn=0090-0036|pmc=4358182|pmid=25713965}}</ref> In 2020, the United States Congress restored Medicaid eligibility for COFA residents with the [[Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021|Consolidated Appropriations Act]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/u-s-restores-medicaid-marshall-islands-exposing-longtime-injustice-experts-n1252632|title=U.S restores Medicaid for Marshall Islands, exposing longtime injustice, experts say|website=NBC News|date=January 2021 }}</ref>


In 2024, access to COFA members to many federal programs was restored, such as [[Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program]], [[Temporary Assistance for Needy Families]], and [[Supplemental Security Income]] after it had been dropped in the 1990s after a welfare reform bill. Medicaid had already been restored in 2020.<ref name="Blair"/>
In 2024, access to COFA members to many federal programs was restored, such as [[Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program]], [[Temporary Assistance for Needy Families]], and [[Supplemental Security Income]] after it had been dropped in the 1990s after a welfare reform bill. Medicaid had already been restored in 2020.<ref name="Blair"/>


<!--==Footnotes==
== See also ==
{{reflist|group=note}}-->
* [[Associated state]]
* [[Proposed United States acquisition of Greenland]]
* [[Protectorate]]
* [[Sovereigntism (Puerto Rico)]]
* [[Territories of the United States]]


==References==
==References==
Line 97: Line 100:
* {{cite web|title=Compact of Free Association|url=http://palau.usembassy.gov/rop_cofa.pdf|publisher=Republic of Palau|access-date=29 March 2012|date=10 January 1986|ref={{harvid|Palau COFA|1986}}|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111006012927/http://palau.usembassy.gov/rop_cofa.pdf|archive-date=6 October 2011}}
* {{cite web|title=Compact of Free Association|url=http://palau.usembassy.gov/rop_cofa.pdf|publisher=Republic of Palau|access-date=29 March 2012|date=10 January 1986|ref={{harvid|Palau COFA|1986}}|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111006012927/http://palau.usembassy.gov/rop_cofa.pdf|archive-date=6 October 2011}}
* "Micronesia, Marshall Islands and Palau" is found at: {{Usc-title-chap|48|19}}
* "Micronesia, Marshall Islands and Palau" is found at: {{Usc-title-chap|48|19}}
== See also ==
* [[Associated state]]
* [[Protectorate]]
* [[Territories of the United States]]
* [[Sovereigntism (Puerto Rico)]]
* [[Proposed United States acquisition of Greenland]]


== External links ==
== External links ==
* [http://www.uscompact.org/ USCompact.org, USDOI Honolulu Field Office]
* [http://www.uscompact.org/ USCompact.org, USDOI Honolulu Field Office]
* [http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/ 1986 Compact of Free Association between RMI and FSM]
* [http://www.fsmlaw.org/compact/ 1986 Compact of Free Association between RMI and FSM]
* [http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1986/110386a.htm Proclamation by Ronald Reagan about the 1986 COFA between RMI and FSM] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060324065215/http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1986/110386a.htm |date=2006-03-24 }}
* [http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1986/110386a.htm Proclamation by Ronald Reagan about the 1986 COFA between RMI and FSM] ({{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060324065215/http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1986/110386a.htm |date=2006-03-24 }})
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20160422170636/http://pidp.eastwestcenter.org/pireport/special/cofa_special.htm Pacific Islands Report:  Compacts of Free Association Renegotiations (includes the text of the 2003 RMI and FSM COFAs)]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20160422170636/http://pidp.eastwestcenter.org/pireport/special/cofa_special.htm Pacific Islands Report:  Compacts of Free Association Renegotiations (includes the text of the 2003 RMI and FSM COFAs)]



Latest revision as of 20:48, 29 December 2025

Template:Short description

File:COFAOnTheGlobe.svg
Map of COFA nations: Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of the Marshall Islands are in red; the United States is in blue
File:Secretary Pompeo Holds Joint Press Availability in Kolonia (48464897742).jpg
Representatives of the Compact states meeting in Kolonia, Micronesia, in August 2019. Left to right: U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Micronesian president David Panuelo, Marshallese president Hilda Heine, and Palauan vice president Raynold Oilouch

The Compacts of Free Association (COFA) are international agreements establishing and governing the relationships of free association between the United States and the three Pacific Island sovereign states of the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), and the Republic of Palau. As a result, these countries are sometimes known as the Freely Associated States (FASs). All three agreements next expire in 2043.[1]

These countries, together with the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, formerly constituted the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, a United Nations trusteeship administered by the United States Navy from 1947 to 1951, and by the U.S. Department of the Interior from 1951 to 1986 (to 1994 for Palau).

The compacts came into being as an extension of the US–UN territorial trusteeship agreement, which obliged the federal government of the United States "to promote the development of the people of the Trust Territory toward self-government or independence as appropriate to the particular circumstances of the Trust Territory and its peoples and the freely expressed wishes of the peoples concerned."[2] Under the compacts, the U.S. federal government provides guaranteed financial assistance over a 15-year period administered through its Office of Insular Affairs in exchange for full international defense authority and responsibilities.

The Compacts of Free Association were initiated by negotiators in 1980, and signed by the parties in the years 1982 and 1983.[3] They were approved by the citizens of the Pacific states in plebiscites held in 1983.[4] Legislation on the compacts was adopted by the U.S. Congress in 1986, and signed into law on November 13, 1986.[5]

Associated states

Associated State Associated since Level of association UN membership Template:Reference heading
Marshall Islands 21 October 1986 United States provides defense, funding grants, and access to U.S. social services for citizens of these areas under the Compact of Free Association. Template:Ya [6]
Federated States of Micronesia 3 November 1986 Template:Ya [7]
Palau 1 October 1994 Template:Ya [8]

Economic provisions

Each of the associated states actively participates in all Office of Insular Affairs technical assistance activities. The U.S. gives only these countries access to many U.S. domestic programs,[9] including: disaster response and recovery and hazard mitigation programs under the Federal Emergency Management Agency; some U.S. Department of Education programs, including the Pell Grant; and services provided by the National Weather Service, the United States Postal Service, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Federal Communications Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and U.S. representation to the International Frequency Registration Board of the International Telecommunication Union.[10] The Compact area, while outside the customs area of the United States, is mainly duty-free for imports.[11]

Most citizens of the associated states may live and work in the United States, and most U.S. citizens and their spouses may live and work in the associated states.[12][13] In 1996, the U.S. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act removed Medicaid benefits for those from the COFA states living in the US, even after the five-year waiting period that most other resident aliens have.[14] However, in December 2020, Congress restored Medicaid for Compact of Free Association communities.[15]

Military provisions

File:Marshall Islands Police patrol vessel Lomor and USCGC Oliver Berry - 180703-G-CA140-115.jpg
The USCGC Oliver Berry and the RMIS Lomor on a joint patrol.[16]

The COFA allows the United States to operate armed forces in Compact areas, and to demand land for operating bases, subject to negotiation, and excludes the militaries of other countries without U.S. permission. The U.S. in turn becomes responsible for protecting its affiliate countries, and responsible for administering all international defense treaties and affairs, though it may not declare war on their behalf. It is not allowed to use nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons in Palauan territory.[17] In the territories of the Marshall Islands and the Federated States of Micronesia, it is not allowed to store such weapons, except in times of national emergency, state of war, or when necessary to defend against an actual or impending attack on the U.S., the Marshall Islands, or the Federated States of Micronesia.[18]

Citizens of the associated states may serve in America's armed forces, and there is a high level of military enlistment by Compact citizens. For example, in 2008, the Federated States of Micronesia had a higher per-capita enlistment rate than any U.S. state, and had more than five times the national per-capita average of casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan: nine soldiers out of a population of 107,000.[19]

21st-century renewal and updates

In 2003, the compacts with the RMI and FSM were renewed for 20 years. These new compacts provided US$3.5 billion in funding for both countries. US$30 million was also be disbursed annually among American Samoa, Guam, Hawaii, and the Northern Mariana Islands in "Compact Impact" funding. This funding helped the governments of these localities cope with the expense of providing services to immigrants from the RMI, FSM, and Palau. The U.S. use of Kwajalein Atoll for missile testing was renewed for the same period.[20] The new compacts also changed certain immigration rules. RMI and FSM citizens traveling to the U.S. are now required to have passports. The US Postal Service was given the option to apply international postage rates for mail between the U.S. and RMI/FSM, phased in over five years. The USPS began implementing the change in January 2006, but decided to resume domestic services and rates in November 2007.[21]

The renewed compact, commonly called "Compact II," took effect for the FSM on June 25, 2004,[22] and for RMI on June 30, 2004.

File:MapofTTPI.gif
Map of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (1962).

The economic provisions of the Compact for Palau, which provided $18 million in annual subsidies and grants, expired on September 30, 2009, and the renewal talk was concluded in late 2010.[23] U.S. financial support for Palau is based on a continuing resolution passed by the U.S. Congress.[24] The Compact Trust Fund set up to replace U.S. financial aid underperformed because of the Great Recession.[25] The military and civil defense provisions remained until 2015.[26]

An amended Compact, enacted December 17, 2003, as Public Law 108-188, provided financial assistance to the Marshall Islands and Micronesia through 2023. The Compact of Free Association agreement with the Republic of Palau, enshrined in US Public Law 99-658, was followed by a Compact Review Agreement signed between the U.S. and Palau in 2018, extending certain financial provisions through September 30, 2024.[27]

In March 2022, President Joe Biden named Ambassador Joseph Yun as US Special Presidential Envoy for Compact Negotiations to take over negotiation for amendment and continuation of COFA.[28] On October 16, 2023, agreements to renew all three compacts for a period of 20 years were formally signed by representatives of each Freely Associated State (FAS) and the U.S. State Department. Total funding for all three agreements is $7.1B paid over 20 years ($889M to Palau; $3.3B to the FSM; $2.3B to the RMI; and $634M for the U.S. Postal Service to offset continuing domestic rate mail service).[29][30]

Palau Finance Minister Kaleb Udui Jr. and U.S. Ambassador Yun signed Palau's COFA extension on May 22, 2023, with the island government previously requesting to advance their date more in line with the other two countries.[31] On May 23, 2023, FSM negotiator Leo Falcam and a State Department representative signed Micronesia's extension at the U.S. embassy in Pohnpei.[32] Marshall Islands' Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Jack Ading, alongside Ambassador Yun, signed the RMI's agreement on October 16, 2023.[33] Approval by each legislature, to include a funding mechanism in Congress, is the final step to bring each agreement into force. Legislation implementing the new agreements was enacted by the U.S. Congress in March 2024.

Potential associated states

The former government of the United States unincorporated territory of Guam, led by Governor Eddie Calvo, campaigned for a plebiscite on Guam's future political status,[34] with free association following the model of the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau as one of the possible options.[35][36]

In Puerto Rico, the soberanista movement advocates for the territory to be granted a freely associated status. The 2017 status referendum presented "Independence/Free Association" as an option; if the majority of voters had chosen it, a second round of voting would have been held to choose between free association and full independence. In 2022, the U.S. Congress introduced the Puerto Rico Status Act, which would hold a federally-sponsored referendum on the territory's status, with a free association status expected to be presented as an option.[37]

Former U.S. diplomat Richard K. Pruett suggested in 2020 that other possible CFA states could include Kiribati, Nauru and Philippines.[38] The number of CFA states so far has been limited, because it is reserved for only the closest allies of the U.S.[38] Although the CFA is very expensive, support for the alliances has been popular in the U.S. and considered mutually beneficial, with the small island nations warning the U.S. of dangers in the Pacific regions, such as global warming and the encroaching influences of foreign powers.[39]

Greenland has also been listed as a potential CFA state, following the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Rasmus Leander Nielsen of the University of Greenland said that Greenlanders have discussed since the 1980s creating a compact of free association with Denmark after independence, and that some have suggested a COFA with the United States instead.[40][41] Barry Scott Zellen, a scholar of Arctic strategy at the United States Coast Guard Academy, suggested Greenland could become an organized and unincorporated territory of the United States but with a clear pathway to eventual admission as a constituent state "not unlike that which Alaska followed". According to Zellen, "Greenlandic Inuit, who suffer from a long legacy of neglect and whose colonial experience, despite recent gains in autonomy, has not been entirely positive, may indeed stand to benefit in many ways" from this arrangement.[42]

However, the majority of Greenlanders do not want to be part of the United States. In a survey conducted by Verian in Denmark for Berlingske and Sermitsiaq in January 2025, Greenlanders were asked: "Do you want Greenland to leave Denmark and become part of the United States?" The results show that 85% of Greenlanders do not want to leave the Realm and become part of the United States, while 6% want to leave and become part of the U.S., and 9% are undecided.[43]

U.S. fulfillment of commitments

The United States' administration of the former trust territories now covered under the Compacts of Free Association has been subject to ongoing criticism over the past several decades. A 1961 United Nations mission report initially noted deficiencies in "American administration in almost every area: poor transportation, failure to settle war damage claims; failure to adequately compensate for land taken for military purposes; poor living conditions[;] inadequate economic development; inadequate education programs; and almost nonexistent medical care."[44] In 1971, congresswoman Patsy Mink further noted that "[A]fter winning the right to control Micronesia, [the U.S.] proceeded to allow the islands to stagnate and decay through indifference and lack of assistance. . . . [T]he people are still largely impoverished and lacking in all of the basic amenities which we consider essential – adequate education, housing, good health standards, modern sanitation facilities."[45]

After the compacts, criticism was also received by the United States House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific regarding the unfulfilled commitments of the United States to address the impacts of U.S. nuclear testing in the Marshall Islands, which were included as part of the Pacific Proving Grounds. Speakers noted that while section 177 of the Compact of Free Association recognized the United States' responsibility "to address past, present and future consequences of the nuclear testing claims," less than $4 million was awarded out of a $2.2 billion judgment rendered by a Nuclear Claims Tribunal created under the RMI Compact, and the United States Court of Claims had dismissed two lawsuits to enforce the judgment.[46] With respect to these unaddressed claims, medical practitioners also noted the potential widespread impacts of nuclear testing within the Pacific Proving Grounds, indicated by the prevalence of both radiogenic diseases, as well as heart disease, diabetes, and obesity associated with "[a] forced change in dietary patterns and lifestyle" resulting from U.S. administration after the testing.[47][48] In 2011, lawmakers further noted that the U.S. Congress had continuously failed to cover the costs of promised medical care and services to displaced compact citizens who migrate to the United States for health care, education, and employment opportunities, particularly since the passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act.[49]

Questions regarding U.S. responsibility have also been raised regarding the issue of numerous derelict war ships and oil tankers abandoned or destroyed by the U.S. military in atolls and islands throughout the compact area.[50]

Healthcare issues

In 2009, the state of Hawaii, under the administration of Governor Linda Lingle, attempted to restrict health care access for Compact citizens by eliminating all Compact residents of Hawaii from Med-QUEST, the state's comprehensive Medicaid coverage plan.[51] COFA residents were instead subject to Basic Health Hawaii, a limited health care plan under which "transportation services are excluded and patients can receive no more than ten days of medically necessary inpatient hospital care per year, twelve outpatient visits per year, and a maximum of four medication prescriptions per calendar month. . . . BHH covers dialysis treatments as an emergency medical service only, and the approximate ten to twelve prescription medications dialysis patients take per month are not fully covered. BHH . . . caus[es] cancer patients to exhaust their allotted doctors' visits within two to three months".[52]

Noting that such a policy likely constituted unlawful discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause, federal District Court Judge John Michael Seabright issued a preliminary injunction against the implementation of Basic Health Hawaii.[53] In finding a high likelihood of irreparable harm, Judge Seabright took note of the "compelling evidence that BHH's limited coverage ... is causing COFA Residents to forego much needed treatment because they cannot otherwise afford it".[54][55] Lingle's successor, Governor Neil Abercrombie continued the state's appeal of the injunction to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit,[56] which ruled in favor of the state. When the United States Supreme Court refused to hear the case, the Abercrombie administration removed most COFA residents from Med-QUEST and transferred them onto Affordable Care Act plans.[57] In other states, notably Arkansas, which has a significant population of Marshallese, COFA residents have not been eligible for Medicaid.[58] In 2020, the United States Congress restored Medicaid eligibility for COFA residents with the Consolidated Appropriations Act.[59]

In 2024, access to COFA members to many federal programs was restored, such as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and Supplemental Security Income after it had been dropped in the 1990s after a welfare reform bill. Medicaid had already been restored in 2020.[39]

See also

References

Citations

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  11. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  12. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  13. ↑ Federated States of Micronesia COFA, Section 141.
  14. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. ↑ Patterson, Carolyn Bennett, et al. "At the Birth of Nations: In the Far Pacific." National Geographic Magazine, October 1986 page 498. National Geographic Virtual Library, Accessed 17 May 2018. "The problem? The Palauans had voted for a constitution that banned nuclear devices. Salii then initial a compact agreement with the U.S. allowing American ships and planes of all types to operate in Palau. A court ruling held the compact illegal without a 75 percent referendum vote, a constitutional stipulation. Salii dissented, arguing for a more flexible interpretation of the constitution: "It does not say we cannot allow nuclear-powered ships if they are in transit." The Palau compact also allows the American military the option of using the nation's big island of Babelthuap for bases if the US should lose those in the Philippines."
  18. ↑ "FSM COFA, Section 324" Script error: No such module "webarchive"..
  19. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. ↑ BUSH SIGNS $3.5 BILLION PACIFIC COMPACT – December 18, 2003 Script error: No such module "webarchive". at archives.pireport.org
  21. ↑ USPS DOMESTIC MAIL SERVICE RETURNS TO THE FSM AND RMI Script error: No such module "webarchive". at www.fm
  22. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  29. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  36. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  43. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  46. ↑ Oversight on the Compact of Free Association with the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI): Medical Treatment of the Marshallese People, U.S. Nuclear Tests, Nuclear Claims Tribunal, Forced Resettlement, Use of Kwajalein Atoll for Missile Programs and Land Use Development (Script error: No such module "webarchive".).
  47. ↑ Id. (testimony of Neal H. Palafox, MD); see also Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  48. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  49. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".; see also WWII wrecks ‘threaten Micronesia’ ; Assessing potential oil spills from WWII Wrecks Script error: No such module "webarchive".
  51. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  52. ↑ Template:If all, [Script error: No such module "If empty". 2010 Template:Delink 4688824] (D. Haw Dec 10, 2010), archived from the original on March 14, 2012.Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
  53. ↑ Id. ("Defendants fail to show any particular State interest that is advanced by their decision to exclude COFA residents from the Old Programs.... [W]hile the court recognizes that BHH was created in response to the State's budget crisis, when applying strict scrutiny, the 'justification of limiting expenses is particularly inappropriate and unreasonable when the discriminated class consists of aliens'")
  54. ↑ Id.; see also Judge Dismisses Hawaii’s Request for Dismissal of Suit against Basic Health Hawaii Script error: No such module "webarchive". ("Micronesian community representatives reported that elimination of medical benefits has impacted many, including 27 who have died since Sept. 1, 2009")
  55. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  56. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  57. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  58. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  59. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Bibliography

External links

Template:Marshall Islands topics Template:Federated States of Micronesia topics Template:Palau topics