Bishop: Difference between revisions
imported>Johnmarkh →History in Christianity: changed unsupported 'most scholars' to 'many' and rem "is now" as questions have been raised for centuries |
imported>Nocny Kruczek Reference added |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
A '''bishop''' is an [[ordained]] member of the [[clergy]] who is entrusted with a position of [[Episcopal polity|authority and oversight]] in a religious institution. In [[Christianity]], bishops are normally responsible for the governance and administration of [[diocese]]s. The role or office of the bishop is called '''episcopacy''' or the '''episcopate'''. Organisationally, several [[Christian denomination]]s utilise ecclesiastical structures that call for the position of bishops, while other denominations have dispensed with this office, seeing it as a symbol of power. Bishops have also exercised political authority within their dioceses. | A '''bishop''' is an [[ordained]] member of the [[clergy]] who is entrusted with a position of [[Episcopal polity|authority and oversight]] in a religious institution. In [[Christianity]], bishops are normally responsible for the governance and administration of [[diocese]]s. The role or office of the bishop is called '''episcopacy''' or the '''episcopate'''. Organisationally, several [[Christian denomination]]s utilise ecclesiastical structures that call for the position of bishops, while other denominations have dispensed with this office, seeing it as a symbol of power. Bishops have also exercised political authority within their dioceses. | ||
Traditionally, bishops claim [[apostolic succession]], a direct historical lineage dating back to the original [[Twelve Apostles]] or [[Saint Paul]]. The bishops are by doctrine understood as those who possess the full [[Priest#Christianity|priesthood]] given by [[Jesus in Christianity|Jesus Christ]], and therefore may ordain other clergy, including other bishops.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Ten Frequently Asked Questions About the Reservation of Priestly Ordination to Men {{!}} USCCB |url=https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/vocations/priesthood/ten-frequently-asked-questions-about-the-reservation-of-priestly-ordination-to-men |access-date=2025-01-16 |website=www.usccb.org |language=en}}</ref> A person ordained as a [[deacon]], priest (i.e. [[presbyter]]), and then bishop is understood to hold the fullness of the [[Minister (Christianity)|ministerial]] priesthood, given responsibility by Christ to govern, teach and [[sanctify]] the [[Body of Christ]] (the Church). Priests, deacons and [[Laity|lay ministers]] co-operate and assist their bishops in [[pastor]]al ministry. | Traditionally, bishops claim [[apostolic succession]] and the [[Historical episcopate|historic episcopacy]], a direct historical lineage dating back to the original [[Twelve Apostles]] or [[Saint Paul]]. The bishops are by doctrine understood as those who possess the full [[Priest#Christianity|priesthood]] given by [[Jesus in Christianity|Jesus Christ]], and therefore may ordain other clergy, including other bishops.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Ten Frequently Asked Questions About the Reservation of Priestly Ordination to Men {{!}} USCCB |url=https://www.usccb.org/beliefs-and-teachings/vocations/priesthood/ten-frequently-asked-questions-about-the-reservation-of-priestly-ordination-to-men |access-date=2025-01-16 |website=www.usccb.org |language=en}}</ref> A person ordained as a [[deacon]], priest (i.e. [[presbyter]]), and then bishop is understood to hold the fullness of the [[Minister (Christianity)|ministerial]] priesthood, given responsibility by Christ to govern, teach and [[sanctify]] the [[Body of Christ]] (the [[Christian Church]]). Priests, deacons and [[Laity|lay ministers]] co-operate and assist their bishops in [[pastor]]al ministry. | ||
Some [[Pentecostal]] and other [[Protestant]] denominations have bishops who oversee congregations, though they do not necessarily claim apostolic succession. | Some [[Pentecostal]] and other [[Protestant]] denominations have bishops who oversee congregations, though they do not necessarily claim apostolic succession, with exception to those Pentecostals and Charismatics affiliated to churches founded by [[J. Delano Ellis]] and [[Paul S. Morton]]. | ||
== Etymology and terminology == | == Etymology and terminology == | ||
The English word ''bishop'' derives, via [[Latin]] {{lang|la|episcopus}}, [[Old English]] {{lang|ang|biscop}}, and [[Middle English]] {{lang|enm|bisshop}}, from the [[Ancient Greek|Greek]] word {{langx|grc|ἐπίσκοπος|epískopos|label=none}}, meaning "overseer" or "supervisor".<ref name="BIA">{{Cite book|last=Kashima|first=Tetsuden|url=http://archive.org/details/buddhisminameric00tets|title=Buddhism in America: the social organization of an ethnic religious institution|date=1977|location=Connecticut |publisher=Greenwood Press|isbn=978-0-8371-9534-6|pages=71}}</ref> Greek was the language of the early Christian church,<ref name="ccel_Earl" /> but the term {{transliteration|grc|epískopos}} did not originate in Christianity: it had been used in Greek for several centuries before the advent of Christianity.<ref name="BIA" | The English word ''bishop'' derives, via [[Latin]] {{lang|la|episcopus}}, [[Old English]] {{lang|ang|biscop}}, and [[Middle English]] {{lang|enm|bisshop}}, from the [[Ancient Greek|Greek]] word {{langx|grc|ἐπίσκοπος|epískopos|label=none}}, meaning "overseer" or "supervisor".<ref name="BIA">{{Cite book|last=Kashima|first=Tetsuden|url=http://archive.org/details/buddhisminameric00tets|title=Buddhism in America: the social organization of an ethnic religious institution|date=1977|location=Connecticut |publisher=Greenwood Press|isbn=978-0-8371-9534-6|pages=71}}</ref> Greek was the language of the early Christian church,<ref name="ccel_Earl" /> but the term {{transliteration|grc|epískopos}} did not originate in Christianity: it had been used in Greek for several centuries before the advent of Christianity.<ref name="BIA"/> | ||
The English words ''priest'' and ''presbyter'' both derive, via Latin, from the Greek word {{langx|grc|πρεσβύτερος|presbýteros|label=none}}, meaning "elder" or "senior", and not originally referring to priesthood.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://isvbible.com/catacombs/elders.htm|title=Elders|author=[[International Standard Version]]|access-date=January 6, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111105095216/http://isv.org/catacombs/elders.htm|archive-date=November 5, 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> | The English words ''priest'' and ''presbyter'' both derive, via Latin, from the Greek word {{langx|grc|πρεσβύτερος|presbýteros|label=none}}, meaning "elder" or "senior", and not originally referring to priesthood.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://isvbible.com/catacombs/elders.htm|title=Elders|author=[[International Standard Version]]|access-date=January 6, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111105095216/http://isv.org/catacombs/elders.htm|archive-date=November 5, 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
In the early Christian era the two terms were not always clearly distinguished, but {{transliteration|grc|epískopos}} is used in the sense of the order or office of bishop, distinct from that of {{transliteration|grc|presbýteros}}, in the writings attributed to [[Ignatius of Antioch]] in the second century.<ref name="ccel_Earl">{{Cite web | title = Early Christian Fathers | work = Christian Classics Ethereal Library | access-date = 2015-08-25 | url = http://www.ccel.org/ccel/richardson/fathers.vi.ii.iii.i.html }}</ref> | In the early Christian era the two terms were not always clearly distinguished, but {{transliteration|grc|epískopos}} is used in the sense of the order or office of bishop, distinct from that of {{transliteration|grc|presbýteros}}, in the writings attributed to [[Ignatius of Antioch]] in the second century.<ref name="ccel_Earl">{{Cite web | title = Early Christian Fathers | work = Christian Classics Ethereal Library | access-date = 2015-08-25 | url = http://www.ccel.org/ccel/richardson/fathers.vi.ii.iii.i.html }}</ref> | ||
== | == Christian episcopal development == | ||
The earliest organization of the [[Early centers of Christianity#Jerusalem|Church in Jerusalem]] was, according to most scholars, similar to that of Jewish [[synagogue]]s, but it had a council or college of ordained [[presbyters]] ({{langx|grc|πρεσβύτεροι||elders|label=none}}). In Acts 11:30<ref>{{bibleverse|Acts|11:30}}</ref> and Acts 15:22,<ref>{{bibleverse|Acts|15:22}}</ref> a collegiate system of government in Jerusalem is chaired by [[James, brother of Jesus|James the Just]], according to tradition the [[Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem#Jewish Bishops of Jerusalem|first bishop of the city]]. In Acts 14:23,<ref>{{bibleverse|Acts|14:23}}</ref> the [[Paul of Tarsus|Apostle Paul]] ordains presbyters in [[Early centers of Christianity#Anatolia|churches in Anatolia]].{{sfn|Hill|2007|p=}} The word ''presbyter'' was not yet distinguished from ''overseer'' ({{langx|grc|ἐπίσκοπος|episkopos|label=none}}, later used exclusively to mean ''bishop''), as in Acts 20:17,<ref>{{bibleverse|Acts|20:17}}</ref> Titus 1:5–7<ref>{{bibleverse|Titus|1:5–7}}</ref> and 1 Peter 5:1.<ref>{{bibleverse|1 Peter|5:1}}</ref>{{efn|"It seems that at first the terms 'episcopos' and 'presbyter' were used interchangeably ..."{{sfn|Cross & Livingstone|2005|p=211}}}}{{efn|"The general consensus among scholars has been that, at the turn of the first and second centuries, local congregations were led by bishops and presbyters whose offices were overlapping or indistinguishable."{{sfn|Mitchell, Young & Scott Bowie|2006|p=417}} }} The earliest writings of the [[Apostolic Fathers]], the [[Didache]] and the [[First Epistle of Clement]], for example, show the church used two terms for local church offices—presbyters (seen by many as an interchangeable term with {{transliteration|grc|episkopos}} or overseer) and deacon. | The earliest organization of the [[Early centers of Christianity#Jerusalem|Church in Jerusalem]] was, according to most scholars, similar to that of Jewish [[synagogue]]s, but it had a council or college of ordained [[presbyters]] ({{langx|grc|πρεσβύτεροι||elders|label=none}}). In Acts 11:30<ref>{{bibleverse|Acts|11:30}}</ref> and Acts 15:22,<ref>{{bibleverse|Acts|15:22}}</ref> a collegiate system of government in Jerusalem is chaired by [[James, brother of Jesus|James the Just]], according to tradition the [[Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem#Jewish Bishops of Jerusalem|first bishop of the city]]. In Acts 14:23,<ref>{{bibleverse|Acts|14:23}}</ref> the [[Paul of Tarsus|Apostle Paul]] ordains presbyters in [[Early centers of Christianity#Anatolia|churches in Anatolia]].{{sfn|Hill|2007|p=}} The word ''presbyter'' was not yet distinguished from ''overseer'' ({{langx|grc|ἐπίσκοπος|episkopos|label=none}}, later used exclusively to mean ''bishop''), as in Acts 20:17,<ref>{{bibleverse|Acts|20:17}}</ref> Titus 1:5–7<ref>{{bibleverse|Titus|1:5–7}}</ref> and 1 Peter 5:1.<ref>{{bibleverse|1 Peter|5:1}}</ref>{{efn|"It seems that at first the terms 'episcopos' and 'presbyter' were used interchangeably ..."{{sfn|Cross & Livingstone|2005|p=211}}}}{{efn|"The general consensus among scholars has been that, at the turn of the first and second centuries, local congregations were led by bishops and presbyters whose offices were overlapping or indistinguishable."{{sfn|Mitchell, Young & Scott Bowie|2006|p=417}} }} The earliest writings of the [[Apostolic Fathers]], the [[Didache]] and the [[First Epistle of Clement]], for example, show the church used two terms for local church offices—presbyters (seen by many as an interchangeable term with {{transliteration|grc|episkopos}} or overseer) and deacon. | ||
[[File:Augustine Lateran.jpg|thumb|upright|A 6th-century image of [[Augustine of Hippo|Saint Augustine]], bishop of [[Hippo Regius]]<ref name="WDL">{{cite web |url = http://www.wdl.org/en/item/8787/ |title = Bona, Algeria |website = [[World Digital Library]] |year = 1899 |access-date = 2013-09-25 }}</ref>]] | [[File:Augustine Lateran.jpg|thumb|upright|A 6th-century image of [[Augustine of Hippo|Saint Augustine]], bishop of [[Hippo Regius]]<ref name="WDL">{{cite web |url = http://www.wdl.org/en/item/8787/ |title = Bona, Algeria |website = [[World Digital Library]] |year = 1899 |access-date = 2013-09-25 }}</ref>]] | ||
In the [[First | In the [[First Epistle to Timothy]] and [[Epistle to Titus]] in the New Testament a more clearly defined episcopate can be seen. Both letters state that Paul had left Timothy in Ephesus and Titus in [[Early centers of Christianity#Greece|Crete]] to oversee the [[Church (congregation)|local church]].<ref>{{bibleverse|1 Timothy|1:3}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse|Titus|1:5}}</ref> Paul commands Titus to ordain presbyters/bishops and to exercise general oversight. John Zizioulas argues that "The task of the Bishop was from the beginning principally liturgical, consisting in the offering of the Divine Eucharist."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Zizioulas |first=John |title=Eucharist, Bishop, Church: The Unity of the Church in the Divine Eucharist and the Bishop During the First Three Centuries |date=2001 |publisher=Holy Cross Orthodox Press |pages=66}}</ref> The [[authorship of the Pauline epistles|authorship]] of both those letters is questioned by many scholars in the field and the question whether they reflect a first or second century structure of church hierarchy is among the arguments used in the debate as to their authenticity. | ||
Early sources are unclear but various groups of Christian communities may have had the bishop surrounded by a group or college functioning as leaders of the local churches.{{sfn|O'Grady|1997|p=140}}<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Handl|first=András|date=2016-01-01|title=Viktor I. (189 ?-199 ?) von Rom und die Entstehung des "monarchischen" Episkopats in Rom|journal=Sacris Erudiri|volume=55|pages=7–56|doi=10.1484/J.SE.5.112597|issn=0771-7776}}</ref> Eventually the head or "monarchic" bishop came to rule more clearly,{{sfn|Van Hove|1907}} and all local churches would eventually follow the example of the other churches and structure themselves after the model of the others with the one bishop in clearer charge,{{sfn|O'Grady|1997|p=140}} though the role of the body of presbyters remained important.{{sfn|Van Hove|1907}} | Early sources are unclear but various groups of Christian communities may have had the bishop surrounded by a group or college functioning as leaders of the local churches.{{sfn|O'Grady|1997|p=140}}<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Handl|first=András|date=2016-01-01|title=Viktor I. (189 ?-199 ?) von Rom und die Entstehung des "monarchischen" Episkopats in Rom|journal=Sacris Erudiri|volume=55|pages=7–56|doi=10.1484/J.SE.5.112597|issn=0771-7776}}</ref> Eventually the head or "monarchic" bishop came to rule more clearly,{{sfn|Van Hove|1907}} and all local churches would eventually follow the example of the other churches and structure themselves after the model of the others with the one bishop in clearer charge,{{sfn|O'Grady|1997|p=140}} though the role of the body of presbyters remained important.{{sfn|Van Hove|1907}} | ||
=== Apostolic Fathers === | === Apostolic Fathers === | ||
[[File:Byzantine - Saint Ignatius of Antioch - Walters 4820867.jpg|thumb|Ignatius, bishop of Antioch, student of [[John the Apostle]]]]Around the end of the [[Christianity in the 1st century|1st century]], the early church's organization became clearer in historical documents.{{citation needed|date=November 2021}} In the works of the Apostolic Fathers, and Ignatius of Antioch in particular, the role of the episkopos, or bishop, became more important or, rather, already was very important and being clearly defined. While Ignatius of Antioch offers the earliest clear description of '''monarchial bishops''' (a single bishop over all [[house church]]es in a city){{efn|{{quote|Blessed be God, who has granted unto you, who are yourselves so excellent, to obtain such an excellent bishop.|Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians 1:1<ref name="ccel_NN">{{Cite web | title = Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus| work = Christian Classics Ethereal Library | access-date = 2019-03-30 | url = https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.v.ii.i.html }}</ref>}}}} he is an advocate of monoepiscopal structure rather than describing an accepted reality. To the bishops and house churches to which he writes, he offers strategies on how to pressure house churches who do not recognize the bishop into compliance. Other contemporary Christian writers do not describe monarchial bishops, either continuing to equate them with the presbyters or speaking of {{transliteration|grc|episkopoi}} (bishops, plural) in a city. | |||
Around the end of the [[Christianity in the 1st century|1st century]], the church's organization became clearer in historical documents.{{citation needed|date=November 2021}} In the works of the Apostolic Fathers, and Ignatius of Antioch in particular, the role of the episkopos, or bishop, became more important or, rather, already was very important and being clearly defined. While Ignatius of Antioch offers the earliest clear description of monarchial bishops (a single bishop over all [[house church]]es in a city){{efn|{{quote|Blessed be God, who has granted unto you, who are yourselves so excellent, to obtain such an excellent bishop.|Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians 1:1<ref name="ccel_NN">{{Cite web | title = Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus| work = Christian Classics Ethereal Library | access-date = 2019-03-30 | url = https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.v.ii.i.html }}</ref>}}}} he is an advocate of | |||
[[Clement of Alexandria]] (end of the 2nd century) writes about the ordination of a certain Zachæus as bishop by the imposition of [[Saint Peter|Simon Peter Bar-Jonah's]] hands. The words bishop and ordination are used in their technical meaning by the same Clement of Alexandria.<ref>Clement, "Hom.", III, lxxii; cfr. ''[[Stromata]]'', VI, xiii, cvi; cf. "Const. Apost.", II, viii, 36</ref> The bishops in the 2nd century are defined also as the only clergy to whom the ordination to priesthood ([[presbyterate]]) and diaconate is entrusted: "a priest (presbyter) [[Laying on of hands|lays on hands]], but does not [[ordain]]." ({{transliteration|grc|cheirothetei ou cheirotonei}}).<ref>"Didascalia Syr.", IV; III, 10, 11, 20; Cornelius, "Ad Fabianum" in Eusebius, ''[[Church History (Eusebius)|Historia Ecclesiastica]]'', VI, xliii.</ref> | [[Clement of Alexandria]] (end of the 2nd century) writes about the ordination of a certain Zachæus as bishop by the imposition of [[Saint Peter|Simon Peter Bar-Jonah's]] hands. The words bishop and ordination are used in their technical meaning by the same Clement of Alexandria.<ref>Clement, "Hom.", III, lxxii; cfr. ''[[Stromata]]'', VI, xiii, cvi; cf. "Const. Apost.", II, viii, 36</ref> The bishops in the 2nd century are defined also as the only clergy to whom the ordination to priesthood ([[presbyterate]]) and diaconate is entrusted: "a priest (presbyter) [[Laying on of hands|lays on hands]], but does not [[ordain]]." ({{transliteration|grc|cheirothetei ou cheirotonei}}).<ref>"Didascalia Syr.", IV; III, 10, 11, 20; Cornelius, "Ad Fabianum" in Eusebius, ''[[Church History (Eusebius)|Historia Ecclesiastica]]'', VI, xliii.</ref> | ||
| Line 47: | Line 43: | ||
|issue=1 | |issue=1 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
=== Canonical age === | |||
[[File:Patriarch Stephen I, Madrid Skylitzes (cropped).jpg|thumb|282x282px|Patriarch Stephen I of Constantinople was ordained as bishop at the age of 19]]{{See also|List of youngest bishops}} | |||
As the bishop's role further developed into the 4th century, the [[First Council of Nicaea]] decreed that bishops should be ordained by at least three others.<ref>{{Cite web |title=CHURCH FATHERS: First Council of Nicaea (A.D. 325) |url=https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3801.htm |access-date=2025-07-27 |website=www.newadvent.org}}</ref> Age requirements for episcopal ordination or consecration were neither universal nor fixed in early Christian churches.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |title=CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Canonical Age |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01206c.htm |access-date=2025-07-27 |website=www.newadvent.org}}</ref> It was, however, universally required that a bishop be male. | |||
Lacking a definitive ecumenical age requirement for holy orders—between the early [[Ecumenical council|ecumenical councils]] of the [[Great Church|Great]] and imperial Roman churches, and after schism into the Latin and Greek churches—young men had been ordained, appointed, and/or enthroned as bishops, some as young as 5.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Flodoard de Reims |title=The "Annals" of Flodoard of Reims: 919-966 |last2=Fanning |first2=Steven |last3=Bachrach |first3=Bernard S. |date=2008 |publisher=University of Toronto press |isbn=978-1-4426-0001-0 |series=Readings in Medieval Civilizations and Cultures |location=Peterborough (Ont.)}}</ref> | |||
Notable younger Latin and Greek bishops have included: [[Hugh of Vermandois (bishop)|Hugh Vermandois]] (5); [[Luis Antonio Jaime de Borbón y Farnesio]] (8); [[Guido Ascanio Sforza di Santa Fiora]] (9); [[Pope Benedict IX|Benedict IX]] (11-20); [[Karol Ferdynand Vasa]] (11); [[Alexander Stewart (archbishop of St Andrews)|Alexander Stewart]] (11); [[Niccolò Caetani]] (13); [[Bruno of Augsburg|Bruno von Bayern]] (14); [[Odo of Bayeux]] (14); [[Alessandro Farnese (cardinal)|Alessandro Farnese]] (14); [[Cesare Borgia]] (15); [[Clemens August of Bavaria|Clemens August]] (15); [[Ranuccio Farnese (cardinal)|Ranuccio Farnese]] (16); [[Alfonso Carafa]] (16); [[James II of Cyprus]] (16) [[Theophylact of Constantinople|Theophylact]] (16); [[Ippolito de' Medici]] (17); [[Diomede Carafa (cardinal)|Diomede Carafa]] (19); [[Stephen I of Constantinople|Stephen I]] (19); [[Luis de Milà y de Borja]] (21); [[Nicolas de Besse]] (21); [[Clemente Grosso della Rovere]] (21); [[Niccolò Gaddi]] (22); [[Juan de Borja Lanzol de Romaní, el menor|Juan de Borja Lanzol de Romaní, ''el menor'']] (24); [[Gabriele Condulmer]] (later Eugene IV, aged 24) of Rome;<ref>{{Cite web |title=Pope Eugene IV (Gabriele Condulmer) |url=https://www.catholic-hierarchy.org/bishop/bcondu.html |access-date=2025-07-28 |website=Catholic Hierarchy}}</ref> [[Ludovico Ludovisi]] (25); [[Giovanni Michiel]] (25); [[Charles Borromeo]] (25); [[Pietro Riario]] (26); [[Mark Sittich von Hohenems Altemps]] (26); [[Jošt of Rožmberk|Jošt Rožmberk]] (26); [[Giuliano della Rovere]] (later Julius II, aged 27); [[Bonifazio Bevilacqua Aldobrandini]] (27); [[Philipp Ludwig von Sinzendorf]] (27); [[Pedro Luis de Borja Lanzol de Romaní]] (27); and [[Gerhard II (archbishop of Bremen and Hamburg)|Gerhard II Lippe]] (29). Throughout the [[Church of the East]], other notable younger bishops have included: [[Shimun XXIII Eshai]] (12);<ref>{{Cite web |title=Mar Eshai Shimun |url=https://marshimun.com/mar-eshai-shimun/ |access-date=2025-07-28 |website=Mar Shimun Memorial Foundation}}</ref> [[Shimun XIX Benyamin]] (16);<ref>{{Cite web |title=Mar Benyamin Shimun |url=https://marshimun.com/mar-benyamin-shimun/ |access-date=2025-08-09 |website=Mar Shimun Memorial Foundation |quote=Ordained Metropolitan at the age of sixteen on March 2, 1903 by his uncle Mar Rowil Shimun, Catholicos Patriarch XX, Mar Benyamin later succeeded him. Mar Rowil passed away on March 16th of that year and on March 30th Mar Benyamin was consecrated Catholicos Patriarch by Mar Iskhaq (Issac) Khnanishu, Metropolitan, and Mar Estapanos (Stephen), Bishop of Gawar. Mar Benyamin was known for his fair-minded adjudication of all, Assyrian, Turks and Kurds alike.}}</ref> [[Yohannan VIII Hormizd]] (16); [[Sargis Yosip]] (17);<ref>{{Cite web |date=2015 |title=Voice of the East |url=https://news.assyrianchurch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Voice-of-the-EastJuly-August-2015.pdf |website=Assyrian Church of the East News |page=6 |quote=Born on 10 April 1950 at Kirkuk; Consecrated Bishop in Baghdad by Mar Yosip Khnanishu Metropolitan on 19 February 1967. Living in USA since 2004. Senior-most Bishop of the Assyrian Church of the East.}}</ref> [[Shimun XVII Abraham]] (20);<ref>{{Cite web |title=Mar Auraham Shimun |url=https://marshimun.com/marauraham/ |access-date=2025-07-28 |website=Mar Shimun Memorial Foundation}}</ref> and [[Yosip Khnanisho|Yosip Khnaninsho]] (22).<ref>{{Cite web |title=Mar Yosip |url=https://www.maryosipparish.org/aboutus.aspx?TID=3 |access-date=2025-07-28 |website=Mar Yosip Parish}}</ref> | |||
During the Catholic Church's [[Council of Trent]], the [[Holy See]] dogmatically mandated a minimum canonical age of 30 for the episcopacy.<ref name=":3" /> The Eastern Orthodox Church would also impose a minimum age of 30 for the priesthood.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Namee |first=Matthew |date=2019-07-18 |title=How long do converts wait before ordination? |url=https://www.orthodoxhistory.org/2019/07/18/how-long-do-converts-wait-before-ordination/ |access-date=2025-07-27 |website=Orthodox History |language=en-US}}</ref> The [[Coptic Orthodox Church|Coptic Orthodox]] have adopted a minimum canonical age of at least 28 for the priesthood, including its specialized ministries leading to the [[Chorbishop|chorepiscopacy]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Sacrament of Priesthoood - CopticChurch.net |url=https://www.copticchurch.net/introduction-to-the-coptic-church/sacraments/7_priesthood |access-date=2025-07-27 |website=www.copticchurch.net}}</ref> For the office of bishop, the Eastern Orthodox Church imposed a minimum canonical age of 35.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Regulations Regarding the Auxiliary Bishops of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America |url=https://www.goarch.org/-/regulations-regarding-the-auxiliary-bishops-of-the-greek-orthodox-archdiocese-of-america |access-date=2025-08-09 |website=Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America |language=en-US |quote=The candidate for the office of Auxiliary Bishop must be a person of deep faith and ethos, a graduate of an academically accredited Orthodox Theological School of the highest level; be competent in both written and spoken Greek and English, and be known for his administrative and pastoral skills. Furthermore, the candidate must not be younger than 35 years of age, and must have at least five (5) years of recognized successful service in the Holy Archdiocese of America. The manner of enlisting a candidate for the office of Auxiliary Bishop in the catalogue of eligible Bishops is the same with the manner of enlisting a candidate for the office of a Hierarch in general.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Ordination |url=https://www.standrewsgreekorthodoxcathedral.co.uk/sacraments-and-lifecyle-events/ordination/ |access-date=2025-08-09 |website=St. Andrew's Greek Orthodox Cathedral |language=en-GB |quote=The bishop ensures every Christian’s membership of the Church of Christ throughout the world and throughout time. Throughout the world in the sense that all Orthodox bishops throughout the world recognise one another by commemorating one another in the diptychs (list of all canonical hierarchs), and throughout time in the sense that every Orthodox bishop can trace their ordination back to the Apostles — and, through them, to our Lord himself — in an unbroken line of succession. Each bishop is typically connected to a particular geographical area, called a diocese. According to the canons of the Church, there should never be more than one bishop with ecclesiastical authority over any particular geographical area. The episcopacy is the only order of the priesthood with mandatory celibacy in the Orthodox Church, and bishops are therefore chosen from monastic or widowed clergy. A bishop should be at least 35 years of age.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=A New Bishop for Our Diocese – Some Questions and Answers |url=https://www.dneoca.org/news_200823_1.html |access-date=2025-08-09 |website=Diocese of New England |quote=A special Diocesan Assembly is convened at which the gathered delegates (each parish body usually has a clergy and a lay delegate representing them at this special Assembly) nominate a candidate. The candidate must be a celibate (never-married or presently widowed) Orthodox Christian man of at least 35 years of age (in practice, of at least 30 years of age), who has no impediments that would impede his service as a bishop. In the Church, the word “impediment” means a specific condition or situation that might disqualify a person from holding a particular office, or carrying out a specific role.}}</ref> Overall, the [[Oriental Orthodox Churches]], the [[Assyrian Church of the East]] and Protestantism have not established a universal, canonical age. | |||
During the 20th century, the [[Holiness Pentecostalism|Holiness-Pentecostal]] [[Church of God in Christ]] elevated [[Clarence Leslie Morton Jr.]] (born 1942) into the episcopacy at the age of 20 in 1962.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Spelbring |first=Meredith |title=Bishop C.L. Morton dies: Preacher will be missed all over the world |url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/obituary/2020/04/20/cl-morton-detroit-obituary/2986248001/ |access-date=2025-08-09 |website=Detroit Free Press |language=en-US}}</ref> [[J. Delano Ellis]] (born 1944), co-founder of the [[Joint College of African-American Pentecostal Bishops]], was also elevated as bishop at the age of 26 in 1970.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web |title=About Bishop J. Delano Ellis, II |url=https://www.jdellisministries.com/about |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200919192857/https://www.jdellisministries.com/about |archive-date=September 19, 2020 |access-date=2025-08-09 |website=J.D. Ellis Ministries |language=en}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Cite web |date=September 20, 2020 |title=Beloved Cleveland Bishop J. Delano Ellis dies at age of 75 |url=https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local-news/cleveland-metro/beloved-cleveland-bishop-j-delano-ellis-dies-at-age-of-75 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200922202349/https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local-news/cleveland-metro/beloved-cleveland-bishop-j-delano-ellis-dies-at-age-of-75 |archive-date=September 22, 2020 |access-date=2025-08-09 |website=WEWS |language=en}}</ref> | |||
== Christian bishops and civil government == | == Christian bishops and civil government == | ||
{{see also|State church of the Roman Empire}} | {{see also|State church of the Roman Empire}} | ||
The efficient organization of the [[Roman Empire]] became the template for the organisation of the [[Great Church]] in the [[Christianity in the 4th century|4th century]], particularly after [[Constantine I and Christianity|Constantine's]] [[Edict of Milan]]. As the church moved from the shadows of privacy into the public forum it acquired land for churches, burials and [[clergy]]. In 391, [[Theodosius I]] decreed that any land that had been confiscated from the church by Roman authorities be returned.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Fourth Century Christianity » Imperial Laws and Letters Involving Religion AD, 364-395 |url=https://www.fourthcentury.com/imperial-laws-364/ |access-date=2025-07-27}}</ref> | |||
The efficient organization of the [[Roman Empire]] became the template for the organisation of the | |||
[[File:Husaby Church 2013 people on 11th Century gravestone.jpg|thumb|A bishop with other officials on an 11th-century grave in [[Sweden]]]] | [[File:Husaby Church 2013 people on 11th Century gravestone.jpg|thumb|A bishop with other officials on an 11th-century grave in [[Sweden]]]] | ||
The most usual term for the geographic area of a bishop's authority and ministry, the [[diocese]], began as part of the structure of the Roman Empire under [[Diocletian]]. As [[Fall of the Western Roman Empire|Roman authority began to fail in the western portion of the empire]], the church took over much of the civil administration. This can be clearly seen in the ministry of two [[pope]]s: [[Pope Leo I]] in the [[Christianity in the 5th century|5th century]], and [[Pope Gregory I]] in the [[Christianity in the 6th century|6th century]]. Both of these men were statesmen and public administrators in addition to their role as Christian pastors, teachers and leaders. In the [[Eastern Roman Empire|Eastern churches]], [[latifundia]] entailed to a bishop's [[Episcopal see|see]] were much less common, the state power did not collapse the way it did in the West, and thus the tendency of bishops acquiring civil power was much weaker than in the West. However, the role of Western bishops as civil authorities, often called [[Prince-Bishop|prince bishops]], continued throughout much of the [[Middle Ages]]. | The most usual term for the geographic area of a bishop's authority and ministry, the [[diocese]], began as part of the structure of the Roman Empire under [[Diocletian]]. As [[Fall of the Western Roman Empire|Roman authority began to fail in the western portion of the empire]], the church took over much of the civil administration.<ref>{{Cite web |title=CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Diocese |url=https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05001a.htm |access-date=2025-07-27 |website=www.newadvent.org}}</ref> This can be clearly seen in the ministry of two [[pope]]s: [[Pope Leo I]] in the [[Christianity in the 5th century|5th century]], and [[Pope Gregory I]] in the [[Christianity in the 6th century|6th century]]. Both of these men were statesmen and public administrators in addition to their role as Christian pastors, teachers and leaders. In the [[Eastern Roman Empire|Eastern churches]], [[latifundia]] entailed to a bishop's [[Episcopal see|see]] were much less common, the state power did not collapse the way it did in the West, and thus the tendency of bishops acquiring civil power was much weaker than in the West. However, the role of Western bishops as civil authorities, often called [[Prince-Bishop|prince bishops]], continued throughout much of the [[Middle Ages]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Library |first=Cosin's |title=Cosin’s Durham |url=https://cosinslibrary.webspace.durham.ac.uk/the-library/history/cosins-durham/ |access-date=2025-07-27 |website=Cosin's Library |language=en-GB}}</ref> | ||
=== Bishops holding political office === | === Bishops holding political office === | ||
| Line 62: | Line 68: | ||
[[File:Johann Otto von Gemmingen.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Johann Otto von Gemmingen]], [[Prince-Bishopric of Augsburg|Prince-Bishop of Augsburg]]]] | [[File:Johann Otto von Gemmingen.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Johann Otto von Gemmingen]], [[Prince-Bishopric of Augsburg|Prince-Bishop of Augsburg]]]] | ||
As well as being | As well as being [[archchancellor]]s of the [[Holy Roman Empire]] after the 9th century, bishops generally served as [[chancellor]]s to medieval monarchs, acting as head of the ''justiciary'' and chief [[chaplain]]. The [[Lord Chancellor]] of [[England]] was almost always a bishop up until the dismissal of [[Cardinal (Catholic Church)|Cardinal]] [[Thomas Wolsey]] by [[Henry VIII of England|Henry VIII]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Lords Chancellors |url=http://tudorplace.com.ar/Documents/Lords%20Chancellors.htm |access-date=2025-07-27 |website=tudorplace.com.ar}}</ref> Similarly, the position of [[Kanclerz]] in the [[Kingdom of Poland (1385–1569)|Polish kingdom]] was always held by a bishop until the [[Christianity in the 16th century|16th century]].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Góralski |first=Zbigniew |title=Urzędy i godności w dawnej Polsce |publisher=Ludowa Spółdzielnia Wydawnicza |year=1988 |isbn=83-205-3532-8 |edition=2nd |location=Warszawa |language=pl}}</ref> | ||
In modern times, the principality of [[Andorra]] is headed by [[Co-Princes of Andorra]], one of whom is the [[Roman Catholic Diocese of Urgell|Bishop of Urgell]] and the other, the sitting [[President of France]], an arrangement that began with the [[Paréage of Andorra (1278)]], and was ratified in the 1993 constitution of Andorra.<ref name="unesco">{{Cite web|author=Vela Palomares, Susanna|author2=Govern d'Andorra|author3=Ministry of Social Affairs and Culture|title=Andorra – First and second Paréages (feudal charters)|url=http://www.unesco.org/webworld/nominations/en/andorra/andorra.htm|publisher=United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization|year=1997|access-date=14 December 2010}}</ref> | In modern times, the principality of [[Andorra]] is headed by [[Co-Princes of Andorra]], one of whom is the [[Roman Catholic Diocese of Urgell|Bishop of Urgell]] and the other, the sitting [[President of France]], an arrangement that began with the [[Paréage of Andorra (1278)]], and was ratified in the 1993 constitution of Andorra.<ref name="unesco">{{Cite web|author=Vela Palomares, Susanna|author2=Govern d'Andorra|author3=Ministry of Social Affairs and Culture|title=Andorra – First and second Paréages (feudal charters)|url=http://www.unesco.org/webworld/nominations/en/andorra/andorra.htm|publisher=United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization|year=1997|access-date=14 December 2010}}</ref> | ||
The [[Pope|office of the Papacy]] is inherently held by the sitting Roman Catholic Bishop of Rome.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/apostolic-see|title=Apostolic See definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Collins |first=Roger |title=Keepers of the keys of heaven: a history of the papacy |chapter=Introduction |quote=One of the most enduring and influential of all human institutions,{{nbsp}}[...] No one who seeks to make sense of modern issues within Christendom – or, indeed, world history – can neglect the vital shaping role of the popes. |publisher=Basic Books |date=2009 |isbn=978-0-465-01195-7}}</ref> Though not originally intended to hold temporal authority, since the Middle Ages the power of the | The [[Pope|office of the Papacy]] is inherently held by the sitting Roman Catholic Bishop of Rome.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/apostolic-see|title=Apostolic See definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Collins |first=Roger |title=Keepers of the keys of heaven: a history of the papacy |chapter=Introduction |quote=One of the most enduring and influential of all human institutions,{{nbsp}}[...] No one who seeks to make sense of modern issues within Christendom – or, indeed, world history – can neglect the vital shaping role of the popes. |publisher=Basic Books |date=2009 |isbn=978-0-465-01195-7}}</ref> Though not originally intended to hold temporal authority, since the Middle Ages the power of the Roman papacy gradually expanded deep into the secular realm and for centuries the sitting Bishop of Rome was the most powerful governmental office in Central Italy.<ref name="Faus">{{cite book |last=Faus |first=José Ignacio Gonzáles |title=Autoridade da Verdade – Momentos Obscuros do Magistério Eclesiástico |language=es |chapter=VIII: Os papas repartem terras |pages=64–65 |isbn=85-15-01750-4 |publisher=Edições Loyola}}. See also chapter VI, O papa tem poder temporal absoluto (pages 49–55).</ref> In modern times, the Pope of Rome is also the sovereign Prince of [[Vatican City]], an internationally recognized [[micro-state]] located entirely within the city of Rome.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ewtn.com/library/HUMANITY/VATMOD.HTM |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050504134930/https://www.ewtn.com/library/HUMANITY/VATMOD.HTM |url-status=dead |archive-date=2005-05-04 |title=The Role of the Vatican in the Modern World }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title= The World's Most Powerful People|url= https://www.forbes.com/powerful-people/#tab:overall/|newspaper= Forbes|date= November 2014|access-date=6 November 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title= The World's Most Powerful People|url= https://www.forbes.com/powerful-people/|newspaper= Forbes|date= January 2013|access-date=27 September 2021}}</ref><ref name=Geopolitics>{{cite journal|last=Agnew|first=John|title=Deus Vult: The Geopolitics of Catholic Church|journal=Geopolitics|date=12 February 2010|volume=15|issue=1|pages=39–61|doi=10.1080/14650040903420388|s2cid=144793259}}</ref> | ||
In [[France]], prior to [[French Revolution|the Revolution]], representatives of the | In [[France]], prior to [[French Revolution|the Revolution]], representatives of the clergy—in practice, bishops and [[abbot]]s of the largest [[monastery|monasteries]]—comprised the [[Estates of the realm#First Estate|First Estate]] of the [[French States-General|Estates-General]]. This role was abolished after separation of church and state was implemented during the French Revolution.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The First Estate Facts, Overview & Key Information |url=https://schoolhistory.co.uk/notes/the-first-estate/ |access-date=2025-07-27 |website=School History |language=en-US}}</ref> | ||
In the 21st century, the more senior bishops of the [[Church of England]] continue to sit in the [[House of Lords]] of the [[Parliament of the United Kingdom]], as representatives of the [[established church]], and are known as [[Lords Spiritual]]. The [[Bishop of Sodor and Man]], whose diocese lies outside the [[United Kingdom]], is an [[ex officio member|''ex officio'' member]] of the [[Legislative Council of the Isle of Man]].<ref>{{cite web|title=The Lord Bishop|url=http://www.tynwald.org.im/about/tynday/TD2017/Documents/TD2017%20Prog.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171002071524/http://www.tynwald.org.im/about/tynday/TD2017/Documents/TD2017%20Prog.pdf |archive-date=2017-10-02 |url-status=live|work=Tynwald Day 2017|publisher=Tynwald|accessdate=29 November 2019|page=10|date=5 July 2017}}</ref> In the past, the [[Bishop of Durham]] had extensive vice-regal powers within his northern diocese, which was a [[county palatine]], the [[County Palatine of Durham]], (previously, [[Liberty of Durham]]) of which he was ''ex officio'' the [[earl]]. In the 19th century, a gradual process of reform was enacted, with the majority of the bishop's historic powers vested in [[The Crown]] by 1858.<ref name="durham1858">{{Cite legislation UK |type=act |year=1858 |chapter=45 |act=Durham County Palatine Act 1858 |section= |date=1858-07-23|accessdate= 2021-11-29}}</ref> | In the 21st century, the more senior bishops of the [[Church of England]] continue to sit in the [[House of Lords]] of the [[Parliament of the United Kingdom]], as representatives of the [[established church]], and are known as [[Lords Spiritual]]. The [[Bishop of Sodor and Man]], whose diocese lies outside the [[United Kingdom]], is an [[ex officio member|''ex officio'' member]] of the [[Legislative Council of the Isle of Man]].<ref>{{cite web|title=The Lord Bishop|url=http://www.tynwald.org.im/about/tynday/TD2017/Documents/TD2017%20Prog.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171002071524/http://www.tynwald.org.im/about/tynday/TD2017/Documents/TD2017%20Prog.pdf |archive-date=2017-10-02 |url-status=live|work=Tynwald Day 2017|publisher=Tynwald|accessdate=29 November 2019|page=10|date=5 July 2017}}</ref> In the past, the [[Bishop of Durham]] had extensive vice-regal powers within his northern diocese, which was a [[county palatine]], the [[County Palatine of Durham]], (previously, [[Liberty of Durham]]) of which he was ''ex officio'' the [[earl]]. In the 19th century, a gradual process of reform was enacted, with the majority of the bishop's historic powers vested in [[The Crown]] by 1858.<ref name="durham1858">{{Cite legislation UK |type=act |year=1858 |chapter=45 |act=Durham County Palatine Act 1858 |section= |date=1858-07-23|accessdate= 2021-11-29}}</ref> | ||
[[Eastern Orthodox Church|Eastern Orthodox]] bishops, along with all other members of the clergy, are [[canon law|canonically]] forbidden to hold political office.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Ukrainian schismatic synod allows "clergy" to run for political office, against Church canons |url=https://orthochristian.com/121464.html |access-date=2022-04-18 |website=OrthoChristian.Com}}</ref> Occasional exceptions to this rule are tolerated when the alternative is political chaos. In the [[Ottoman Empire]], the [[Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople|Patriarch of Constantinople]], for example, had de facto administrative, cultural and legal jurisdiction,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Eastern Orthodoxy - The church of Russia (1448–1800) {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Eastern-Orthodoxy/The-church-of-Russia-1448-1800 |access-date=2022-04-18 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref> as well as spiritual authority, over all | [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Eastern Orthodox]] bishops, along with all other members of the clergy, are [[canon law|canonically]] forbidden to hold political office.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Ukrainian schismatic synod allows "clergy" to run for political office, against Church canons |url=https://orthochristian.com/121464.html |access-date=2022-04-18 |website=OrthoChristian.Com}}</ref> Occasional exceptions to this rule are tolerated when the alternative is political chaos. In the [[Ottoman Empire]], the [[Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople|Patriarch of Constantinople]], for example, had de facto administrative, cultural and legal jurisdiction,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Eastern Orthodoxy - The church of Russia (1448–1800) {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Eastern-Orthodoxy/The-church-of-Russia-1448-1800 |access-date=2022-04-18 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref> as well as spiritual authority, over all Eastern Orthodox Christians of the empire, as part of the Ottoman [[Millet (Ottoman Empire)|millet]] system. An Eastern Orthodox bishop headed the [[Prince-Bishopric of Montenegro]] from 1516 to 1852, assisted by a secular ''[[guvernadur]]''. More recently, Archbishop [[Makarios III]] of [[Cyprus]], served as [[President of Cyprus|President]] of the [[Cyprus]] from 1960 to 1977, an extremely turbulent time period on the island.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Wuthnow|first=Robert |url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/1307463108 |title=The Encyclopedia of Politics and Religion: 2-volume Set |isbn=978-1-136-28493-9 |chapter=Orthodoxy, Greek |date=4 December 2013 |publisher=Routledge |oclc=1307463108 |quote=He continued as president and archbishop during the turbulent 1960s and 1970s, when Greek and Turkish Cypriots clashed over what Turks viewed as Greek efforts to disenfranchise them, and the governments of both Greece and Turkey intervened in Cypriot affairs.}}</ref> | ||
In 2001, [[Peter Hollingworth]], [[List of Companions of the Order of Australia|AC]], [[Order of the British Empire|OBE]] | In 2001, [[Peter Hollingworth]], [[List of Companions of the Order of Australia|AC]], [[Order of the British Empire|OBE]]—then the Anglican Archbishop of [[Anglican Diocese of Brisbane|Brisbane]]—was controversially appointed [[Governor-General of Australia]]. Although Hollingworth gave up his episcopal position to accept the appointment, it still attracted considerable opposition in a country which maintains a formal [[Separation of church and state|separation between Church and State]].<ref>{{Cite web |date=April 30, 2001 |last=Crampton |first=Dave |title=Church Vs State Issues Raised In Oz GG Appointment |url=https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0104/S00150/church-vs-state-issues-raised-in-oz-gg-appointment.htm?from-mobile=bottom-link-01 |access-date=2022-04-18 |website=www.scoop.co.nz}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2003-06-04 |title=A churchman cannot serve two masters |url=https://www.smh.com.au/national/a-churchman-cannot-serve-two-masters-20030604-gdgvfc.html |access-date=2022-04-18 |website=The Sydney Morning Herald |language=en}}</ref> | ||
=== Episcopacy during the English Civil War === | === Episcopacy during the English Civil War === | ||
{{main| | {{main|Episcopacy during the English Civil War}} | ||
During the period of the [[English Civil War]], the role of bishops as wielders of political power and as upholders of the established church became a matter of heated political controversy. [[Presbyterianism]] was the polity of most [[Reformed Christianity]] in Europe, and had been favored by many in England since the English Reformation. Since in the [[Apostolic Age|primitive | During the period of the [[English Civil War]], the role of bishops as wielders of political power and as upholders of the established church became a matter of heated political controversy. [[Presbyterianism]] was the polity of most [[Reformed Christianity]] in Europe, and had been favored by many in England since the English Reformation. Since in the [[Apostolic Age|primitive Church]] the offices of ''presbyter'' and {{transliteration|grc|episkopos}} were not clearly distinguished, many [[Puritans]] held that this was the only form of government the church should have. The Anglican divine, [[Richard Hooker]], objected to this claim in his famous work ''Of the Laws of Ecclesiastic Polity'' while, at the same time, defending Presbyterian ordination as valid (in particular [[John Calvin|Calvin's]] ordination of [[Theodore Beza|Beza]]). This was the official stance of the English Church until the Commonwealth, during which time, the views of Presbyterians and Independents ([[Congregationalists]]) were more freely expressed and practiced. | ||
== Christian churches == | == Christian churches == | ||
=== Catholic, Eastern | === Catholic, Eastern and Oriental Orthodox, Lutheran and Anglican churches === | ||
{{further|Bishops in the Catholic Church}} | {{further|Bishops in the Catholic Church}} | ||
[[File:Mitre (plain).svg|thumb|right|upright=0.45|A [[mitre]] is used as a symbol of the bishop's ministry in Western Christianity.]] | [[File:Mitre (plain).svg|thumb|right|upright=0.45|A [[mitre]] is used as a symbol of the bishop's ministry in Western Christianity.]] | ||
[[File:Template-Bishop.svg|thumb|right|upright=0.45|One form for the [[coat of arms]] of a Catholic bishop]] | [[File:Template-Bishop.svg|thumb|right|upright=0.45|One form for the [[coat of arms]] of a Catholic bishop]] | ||
[[File:Detalj ur vigseln mellan prins Oscar I och prinsessan Josefina, biskopar.jpg|thumb|250px|''Karl XIV Johans kröning'' by [[Per Krafft the Younger]] (1818) depicting [[Lutheranism|Evangelical-Lutheran]] bishops and priests in [[vestment]]s during the coronation of [[Charles XIV John]] in [[Stockholm Cathedral]].]] | |||
Bishops exercise leadership roles in the [[Catholic Church]], the [[Eastern Orthodox Church]], the [[Oriental Orthodox Churches]], certain [[Lutheranism|Evangelical-Lutheran Churches]], the [[Anglican Communion]], the [[Independent Catholic Churches|Independent Catholic churches]], the [[Continuing Anglican movement|Independent Anglican churches]], and certain other, smaller, denominations. | |||
The traditional role of a bishop is as pastor of a [[diocese]] (also called a bishopric, [[synod]], [[eparchy]] or see), and so to serve as a "diocesan bishop", or "eparch" as it is called in many Eastern Christian churches. Dioceses vary considerably in size, geographically and population-wise. Some dioceses around the [[Mediterranean Sea]] which were Christianised early are rather compact, whereas dioceses in areas of rapid modern growth in Christian commitment, as in some parts of [[Sub-Saharan Africa]], [[South America]] and the [[Far East]], are much larger and more populous. | |||
[[File:Mitra5.jpg|thumb|upright=0.9|Mitre worn by an Eastern bishop with [[icon]]s of Christ, the [[Theotokos]] (Mary, Mother of God) and [[John the Baptist|Forerunner]] (John the Baptist).{{citation needed|date=December 2024}}]] | |||
As well as traditional diocesan bishops, many churches have a well-developed structure of church leadership that involves a number of layers of authority and responsibility: | |||
As well as traditional diocesan bishops, many churches have a well-developed structure of church leadership that involves a number of layers of authority and responsibility | |||
{{glossary}} | {{glossary}} | ||
| Line 151: | Line 155: | ||
==== Duties ==== | ==== Duties ==== | ||
[[File:Confirmation VanderWeyden.png|thumb|upright|A bishop administering Confirmation. [[Rogier van der Weyden]], ''[[Seven Sacraments Altarpiece|The Seven Sacraments]]'', 15th century. In the Latin Church of the Catholic Church the administration of [[Confirmation]] is normally reserved to the local bishop.]] | [[File:Confirmation VanderWeyden.png|thumb|upright|A bishop administering Confirmation. [[Rogier van der Weyden]], ''[[Seven Sacraments Altarpiece|The Seven Sacraments]]'', 15th century. In the Latin Church of the Catholic Church the administration of [[Confirmation]] is normally reserved to the local bishop.]] | ||
[[File:Henning Toft Bro1 (bispevielse).jpg|thumb|upright|[[Church of Denmark|Danish Lutheran]] bishops wearing a [[cope]] over [[cassock]], [[surplice]], [[ruff (clothing)|ruff]] and [[pectoral cross]]]] | [[File:Henning Toft Bro1 (bispevielse).jpg|thumb|upright|[[Church of Denmark|Danish Lutheran]] bishops wearing a [[cope]] over [[cassock]], [[surplice]], [[ruff (clothing)|ruff]] and [[pectoral cross]]]] | ||
In | In Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Oriental Orthodoxy, [[High Church Lutheranism]], and Anglicanism, only a bishop can ordain other bishops, priests, and deacons.<ref name="COS2022">{{cite web |title=Ministry and Ministries |url=https://www.svenskakyrkan.se/ministry-and-ministries |publisher=[[Evangelical Lutheran Church of Sweden]] |access-date=4 February 2022 |language=English}}</ref> | ||
The bishop is the ordinary minister of the [[Sacraments of the Catholic Church|sacrament]] of confirmation in the Latin Church, and in the [[Old Catholic]] communion only a bishop may administer this sacrament. In the [[Lutheran]] and [[Anglican]] churches, the bishop normatively administers the rite of confirmation, although in those denominations that do not have an episcopal polity, confirmation is administered by the priest.<ref name="Wordsworth1911">{{cite book |last1=Wordsworth |first1=John |title=The National Church of Sweden |date=1911 |publisher=A. R. Mowbray & Company Limited |isbn=978-0-8401-2821-8 |page=168 |language=English |quote=This same archbishop compiled a code of the statues of his diocese, from which we may learn much as to the administration of the sacraments customary in Sweden. The three forms just named were to be taught to children by their parents and god-parents. Children of seven years old and upwards were to be confirmed by the bishop fasting—the implication that if they were confirmed at an earlier age they need not fast. No one was to be confirmed more than once, and parents were frequently to remind their children by whom and where they were confirmed. Bishops might change names in confirmation, and no one is to be admitted to minor orders without confirmation.}}</ref> However, in the [[Byzantine Rite|Byzantine]] and other Eastern rites, whether Eastern or Oriental Orthodox or [[Eastern Catholic]], [[chrismation]] is done immediately after [[baptism]], and thus the priest is the one who confirms, using chrism blessed by a bishop.<ref>[https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P3U.HTM Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1313] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927014929/https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P3U.HTM |date=27 September 2011 }}</ref> | The bishop is the ordinary minister of the [[Sacraments of the Catholic Church|sacrament]] of confirmation in the Latin Church, and in the [[Old Catholic]] communion only a bishop may administer this sacrament. In the [[Lutheran]] and [[Anglican]] churches, the bishop normatively administers the rite of confirmation, although in those denominations that do not have an episcopal polity, confirmation is administered by the priest.<ref name="Wordsworth1911">{{cite book |last1=Wordsworth |first1=John |title=The National Church of Sweden |date=1911 |publisher=A. R. Mowbray & Company Limited |isbn=978-0-8401-2821-8 |page=168 |language=English |quote=This same archbishop compiled a code of the statues of his diocese, from which we may learn much as to the administration of the sacraments customary in Sweden. The three forms just named were to be taught to children by their parents and god-parents. Children of seven years old and upwards were to be confirmed by the bishop fasting—the implication that if they were confirmed at an earlier age they need not fast. No one was to be confirmed more than once, and parents were frequently to remind their children by whom and where they were confirmed. Bishops might change names in confirmation, and no one is to be admitted to minor orders without confirmation.}}</ref> However, in the [[Byzantine Rite|Byzantine]] and other Eastern rites, whether Eastern or Oriental Orthodox or [[Eastern Catholic]], [[chrismation]] is done immediately after [[baptism]], and thus the priest is the one who confirms, using chrism blessed by a bishop.<ref>[https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P3U.HTM Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1313] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927014929/https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P3U.HTM |date=27 September 2011 }}</ref> | ||
==== Ordination of | ==== Ordination of bishops ==== | ||
Bishops in all of these communions are [[Holy Orders|ordained]] or consecrated by other bishops through the laying on of hands. Ordination of a bishop, and thus continuation of apostolic succession, takes place through a ritual centred on the [[imposition of hands]] and [[prayer]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dunn |first=Matt |date=2018-07-05 |title=Form and Matter in the Sacraments (Continued) |url=https://media.ascensionpress.com/2018/07/05/form-and-matter-in-the-sacraments-continued/ |access-date=2025-07-27 |website=Ascension Press Media |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=The Consecration (Ordination) Of An Orthodox Bishop |url=https://www.acrod.org/orthodox-christianity/articles/spirituallife/episcopal-consecration |access-date=2025-07-27 |website=American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese of North America |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=The Consecration of Bishops |url=https://www.churchofengland.org/prayer-and-worship/worship-texts-and-resources/book-common-prayer/ordaining-and-consecrating-1 |access-date=2025-07-27 |website=Church of England}}</ref> | |||
In Scandinavia and the Baltic region, Lutheran churches participating in the [[Porvoo Communion]] (those of Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, and Lithuania), as well as many non-Porvoo membership Lutheran churches (including those of Kenya, Latvia, and Russia), as well as the confessional [[Communion of Nordic Lutheran Dioceses]], believe that they ordain their bishops in the apostolic succession in lines stemming from the original apostles.<ref name="König2010">{{cite book|last=König|first=Andrea|title=Mission, Dialog und friedliche Koexistenz: Zusammenleben in einer multireligiösen und säkularen Gesellschaft : Situation, Initiativen und Perspektiven für die Zukunft|year=2010|publisher=Peter Lang|isbn=9783631609453|page=205|quote=Having said that, Lutheran bishops in Sweden or Finland, which retained apostolic succession, or other parts of the world, such as Africa or Asia, which gained it from Scandinavia, could easily be engaged to do something similar in Australia, as has been done in the United States, without reliance on Anglicans.}}</ref><ref name="Obare">{{cite web |author1=[[Walter Obare]] |title=Choose Life! |url=https://media.ctsfw.edu/Item/GetFullText/498 |publisher=[[Concordia Theological Seminary]] |language=English}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author1=Mark A. Granquist |author2=Jonathan Strom |author3=Mary Jane Haemig |author4=Robert Kolb |author5=Mark C. Mattes |title=Dictionary of Luther and the Lutheran Traditions |date=2017 |publisher=Baker Academic |isbn=978-1-4934-1023-1 |language=English}}</ref> ''The New Westminster Dictionary of Church History'' states that "In Sweden the apostolic succession was preserved because the Catholic bishops were allowed to stay in office, but they had to approve changes in the ceremonies."<ref>{{cite book|last1=Benedetto|first1=Robert |last2=Duke|first2=James O. |title=The New Westminster Dictionary of Church History: The Early, Medieval, and Reformation Eras |date=13 August 2008 |publisher=Westminster John Knox Press |isbn=978-0664224165 |page=594 |url=http://www.abebooks.com/book-search/isbn/0664224164/page-1/ |quote=In Sweden the apostolic succession was preserved because the Catholic bishops were allowed to stay in office, but they had to approve changes in the ceremonies.}}</ref> | |||
While traditional teaching maintains that any bishop with apostolic succession can validly perform the ordination of another bishop, some churches require two or three bishops participate, either to ensure sacramental validity or to conform with church law. | |||
===== Peculiar to the Catholic Church ===== | ===== Peculiar to the Catholic Church ===== | ||
[[Catholic]] doctrine holds that one bishop can validly ordain another (priest) as a bishop. Although a minimum of three bishops participating is desirable (there are usually several more) in order to demonstrate collegiality, canonically only one bishop is necessary.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-09-25 |title=One is not enough: Why new bishops need ‘co-consecrators’ |url=https://angelusnews.com/faith/new-la-bishops-co-consecrators/ |access-date=2025-07-27 |language=en-US}}</ref> The [[Second Vatican Council]]'s ''[[Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy]]'' stated that "when a bishop is consecrated, the laying of hands may be done by all the bishops present".<ref>Second Vatican Council, [https://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19631204_sacrosanctum-concilium_en.html ''Sacrosanctum Concilium''], paragraph 76, published on 4 December 1963, accessed on 15 July 2025</ref> | |||
The | |||
Apart from the ordination, which is always done by other bishops, there are different methods as to the actual selection of a candidate for ordination as bishop. | Apart from the ordination, which is always done by other bishops, there are different methods as to the actual selection of a candidate for ordination as bishop. The [[Dicastery for Bishops]] generally oversees the selection of new bishops, with recommendations sent for the approval of the pope.<ref>{{cite web|title=How Bishops Are Appointed|url=http://www.usccb.org/about/leadership/appointing-bishops.cfm|publisher=United States Conference of Catholic Bishops|access-date=January 7, 2014}}</ref> The papal nuncio usually solicits names from the bishops of a country, consults with priests and leading members of a laity, and then selects three to be forwarded to the [[Holy See]]. In Europe, some cathedral chapters have duties to elect bishops. The Eastern Catholic churches generally elect their own bishops. Most Eastern Orthodox churches allow varying amounts of formalised laity or [[lower clergy]] influence on the choice of bishops. This also applies in those Eastern churches which are in union with the pope, though it is required that he give assent. | ||
The pope, in addition to being the [[Bishop of Rome]] and spiritual head of the Catholic Church, is also the Patriarch of the Latin Church. Each bishop within the Latin Church is answerable directly to the Pope and not any other bishop except to metropolitans in certain oversight instances. | The pope, in addition to being the [[Bishop of Rome]] and spiritual head of the Catholic Church, is also the Patriarch of the Latin Church. Each bishop within the Latin Church is answerable directly to the Pope and not any other bishop except to metropolitans in certain oversight instances. In this instante, the pope uses the title ''Patriarch of the West'', although this title was dropped from use between 2006 and 2024, when Pope Francis reinstituted it.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0601225.htm |title=Catholic News Service |access-date=19 October 2008 |archive-url=http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20060308013147/http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0601225.htm |archive-date=8 March 2006 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref> | ||
===== Recognition of other churches' ordinations ===== | ===== Recognition of other churches' ordinations ===== | ||
The Catholic Church does recognise as valid (though illicit) ordinations done by breakaway Catholic, Old Catholic or Oriental bishops, and groups descended from them; it also regards as both valid and licit those ordinations done by bishops of the Eastern churches,{{efn|Section 16 of the Second Vatican Council's Decree on Ecumenism, [[Unitatis Redintegratio]] states: "To remove, then, all shadow of doubt, this holy Council solemnly declares that the Churches of the East, while remembering the necessary unity of the whole Church, have the power to govern themselves according to the disciplines proper to them, since these are better suited to the character of their faithful, and more for the good of their souls."}} so long as those receiving the ordination conform to other canonical requirements (for example, is an adult male) and an eastern orthodox rite of episcopal ordination, expressing the proper functions and sacramental status of a bishop, is used; this has given rise to the phenomenon of {{lang|la|[[episcopi vagantes]]}} (for example, clergy of the Independent Catholic groups which claim apostolic succession, though this claim is rejected by both Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy). With respect to Lutheranism, "the Catholic Church has never officially expressed its judgement on the validity of orders as they have been handed down by episcopal succession in these two national Lutheran churches" (the [[Evangelical Lutheran Church of Sweden]] and the [[Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland]]) though it does "question how the ecclesiastical break in the 16th century has affected the apostolicity of the churches of the Reformation and thus the apostolicity of their ministry".<ref>{{cite book|last=Sullivan|first=Francis Aloysius|title=From Apostles to Bishops: The Development of the Episcopacy in the Early Church |year=2001|publisher=Paulist Press|isbn=0809105349|page=4|quote=To my knowledge, the Catholic Church has never officially expressed its judgement on the validity of orders as they have been handed down by episcopal succession in these two national Lutheran churches.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://sakasti.evl.fi/sakasti.nsf/0/DA1B501CC09E109FC22577AE002A3DD8/$FILE/Report%20Justification%20in%20the%20Life%20of%20the%20Church.pdf|title=Roman Catholic – Lutheran Dialogue Group for Sweden and Finland, ''Justification in the Life of the Church'', section 297, page 101}}{{Dead link|date=June 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> | The Catholic Church does recognise as valid (though illicit) ordinations done by breakaway Catholic, Old Catholic or Oriental bishops, and groups descended from them; it also regards as both valid and licit those ordinations done by bishops of the Eastern churches,{{efn|Section 16 of the Second Vatican Council's Decree on Ecumenism, [[Unitatis Redintegratio]] states: "To remove, then, all shadow of doubt, this holy Council solemnly declares that the Churches of the East, while remembering the necessary unity of the whole Church, have the power to govern themselves according to the disciplines proper to them, since these are better suited to the character of their faithful, and more for the good of their souls."}} so long as those receiving the ordination conform to other canonical requirements (for example, is an adult male) and an eastern orthodox rite of episcopal ordination, expressing the proper functions and sacramental status of a bishop, is used; this has given rise to the phenomenon of {{lang|la|[[episcopi vagantes]]}} (for example, clergy of the Independent Catholic groups which claim apostolic succession, though this claim is rejected by both Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy). With respect to Lutheranism, "the Catholic Church has never officially expressed its judgement on the validity of orders as they have been handed down by episcopal succession in these two national Lutheran churches" (the [[Evangelical Lutheran Church of Sweden]] and the [[Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland]]) though it does "question how the ecclesiastical break in the 16th century has affected the apostolicity of the churches of the Reformation and thus the apostolicity of their ministry".<ref>{{cite book|last=Sullivan|first=Francis Aloysius|title=From Apostles to Bishops: The Development of the Episcopacy in the Early Church |year=2001|publisher=Paulist Press|isbn=0809105349|page=4|quote=To my knowledge, the Catholic Church has never officially expressed its judgement on the validity of orders as they have been handed down by episcopal succession in these two national Lutheran churches.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://sakasti.evl.fi/sakasti.nsf/0/DA1B501CC09E109FC22577AE002A3DD8/$FILE/Report%20Justification%20in%20the%20Life%20of%20the%20Church.pdf|title=Roman Catholic – Lutheran Dialogue Group for Sweden and Finland, ''Justification in the Life of the Church'', section 297, page 101}}{{Dead link|date=June 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> | ||
Since [[Pope Leo XIII]] issued the bull {{lang|la|[[Apostolicae curae]]}} in 1896, the Catholic Church has insisted that Anglican orders are invalid because of the Reformed changes in the Anglican ordination rites of the 16th century and divergence in understanding of the theology of priesthood, episcopacy and Eucharist. However, since the 1930s, Utrecht Old Catholic bishops (recognised by the Holy See as validly ordained) have sometimes taken part in the ordination of Anglican bishops. According to the writer Timothy Dufort, by 1969, all Church of England bishops had acquired Old Catholic lines of apostolic succession recognised by the Holy See.<ref>Timothy Dufort, ''The Tablet'', 29 May 1982, pp. 536–538.</ref> This development has been used to argue that the strain of apostolic succession has been re-introduced into Anglicanism, at least within the Church of England.<ref>Dufort, Timothy (29 May 1982). ''The Tablet''. pp. 536–538.</ref> However, other issues, such as the Anglican ordination of women, is at variance with Catholic understanding of Christian teaching, and have contributed to the reaffirmation of Catholic rejection of Anglican ordinations.<ref name="auto">Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, [http://www.ourladyswarriors.org/teach/ordisace2.htm ''Responsum ad Dubium Concerning the Teaching Contained in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis''], 25 October 1995; Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, [http://www.catholicculture.org/library/view.cfm?id=5189&repos=1&subrepos=&searchid=87187 Commentary, ''Concerning the Reply of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on the Teaching Contained in the Apostolic Letter "Ordinatio Sacerdotalis"''], 25 October 1995.</ref><ref name="auto1">{{cite news |last=Handley |first=Paul |date=27 May 2003 |title=Churches' Goal Is Unity, Not Uniformity Spokesman for Vatican Declares |work=Church Times| page=2}}</ref> | Since [[Pope Leo XIII]] issued the bull {{lang|la|[[Apostolicae curae]]}} in 1896, the Catholic Church has insisted that Anglican orders are invalid because of the Reformed changes in the Anglican ordination rites of the 16th century and divergence in understanding of the theology of priesthood, episcopacy and Eucharist. However, since the 1930s, Utrecht Old Catholic bishops (recognised by the Holy See as validly ordained) have sometimes taken part in the ordination of Anglican bishops. According to the writer Timothy Dufort, by 1969, all Church of England bishops had acquired Old Catholic lines of apostolic succession recognised by the Holy See.<ref>Timothy Dufort, ''The Tablet'', 29 May 1982, pp. 536–538.</ref> This development has been used to argue that the strain of apostolic succession has been re-introduced into Anglicanism, at least within the Church of England.<ref>Dufort, Timothy (29 May 1982). ''The Tablet''. pp. 536–538.</ref> However, other issues, such as the Anglican ordination of women, is at variance with Catholic understanding of Christian teaching, and have contributed to the reaffirmation of Catholic rejection of Anglican ordinations.<ref name="auto">Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, [http://www.ourladyswarriors.org/teach/ordisace2.htm ''Responsum ad Dubium Concerning the Teaching Contained in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221204162124/https://www.ourladyswarriors.org/teach/ordisace2.htm |date=4 December 2022 }}, 25 October 1995; Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, [http://www.catholicculture.org/library/view.cfm?id=5189&repos=1&subrepos=&searchid=87187 Commentary, ''Concerning the Reply of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on the Teaching Contained in the Apostolic Letter "Ordinatio Sacerdotalis"''], 25 October 1995.</ref><ref name="auto1">{{cite news |last=Handley |first=Paul |date=27 May 2003 |title=Churches' Goal Is Unity, Not Uniformity Spokesman for Vatican Declares |work=Church Times| page=2}}</ref> | ||
The Eastern Orthodox | The Eastern Orthodox Church does not accept the validity of any ordinations performed by the Independent Catholic or Independent Orthodox groups, as Eastern Orthodoxy considers to be spurious any consecration outside the church as a whole. Eastern Orthodoxy considers apostolic succession to exist only within themselves as the one true church, and not through any authority held by individual bishops; thus, if a bishop ordains someone to serve outside the (Eastern Orthodox) Church, the ceremony is ineffectual, and no ordination has taken place regardless of the ritual used or the ordaining prelate's position within the Eastern Orthodox Church. | ||
[[File:Priestly ordination.jpg|thumb|left|The consecrated bishop is the only minister of Holy Orders. Photo of pre-Vatican II ceremony.]] | [[File:Priestly ordination.jpg|thumb|left|The consecrated bishop is the only minister of Holy Orders. Photo of pre-Vatican II ceremony.]] | ||
The position of the Catholic Church is slightly different. Whilst it does recognise the validity of the orders of certain groups which separated from communion with Holy See (for instance, the ordinations of the Old Catholics in communion with Utrecht, as well as the [[Polish National Catholic Church]] | The position of the Catholic Church is slightly different. Whilst it does recognise the validity of the orders of certain groups which separated from communion with Holy See (for instance, the ordinations of the Old Catholics in communion with Utrecht, as well as the [[Polish National Catholic Church]], which received its orders directly from Utrecht, and was until recently part of that communion), Catholicism does not recognise the orders of any group whose teaching is at variance with what they consider the core tenets of Christianity; this is the case even though the clergy of the Independent Catholic groups may use the proper ordination ritual. There are also other reasons why the Holy See does not recognise the validity of the orders of the independent clergy: | ||
* They hold that the continuing practice among many | * They hold that the continuing practice among many independent clergy of one person receiving multiple ordinations in order to secure apostolic succession, betrays an incorrect and mechanistic theology of ordination. | ||
* They hold that the practice within | * They hold that the practice within independent groups of ordaining women (such as within certain member communities of the [[Anglican Communion]]) demonstrates an understanding of priesthood that they vindicate is totally unacceptable to the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches as they believe that the Universal Church does not possess such authority; thus, they uphold that any ceremonies performed by these women should be considered being sacramentally invalid.<ref name="auto"/><ref name="auto1"/> | ||
* The theology of male clergy within the Independent movement is also suspect according to the Catholics, as they presumably approve of the ordination of females, and may have even undergone an (invalid) ordination ceremony conducted by a woman. | * The theology of male clergy within the Independent movement is also suspect according to the Catholics, as they presumably approve of the ordination of females, and may have even undergone an (invalid) ordination ceremony conducted by a woman. | ||
[[File:JeffertsSchori.JPG|thumb|upright|[[Katharine Jefferts Schori]], | [[File:JeffertsSchori.JPG|thumb|upright|[[Katharine Jefferts Schori]], the 26th presiding bishop of the [[Episcopal Church (United States)]]]] | ||
Whilst members of the [[Independent Catholic]] movement take seriously the issue of valid orders, it is highly significant that the relevant Vatican Congregations tend not to respond to petitions from Independent Catholic bishops and clergy who seek to be received into communion with the Holy See, hoping to continue in some sacramental role. In those instances where the pope does grant reconciliation, those deemed to be clerics within the Independent Old Catholic movement are invariably admitted as laity and not priests or bishops. | Whilst members of the [[Independent Catholic]] movement take seriously the issue of valid orders, it is highly significant that the relevant Vatican Congregations tend not to respond to petitions from Independent Catholic bishops and clergy who seek to be received into communion with the Holy See, hoping to continue in some sacramental role. In those instances where the pope does grant reconciliation, those deemed to be clerics within the Independent Old Catholic movement are invariably admitted as laity and not priests or bishops. | ||
| Line 199: | Line 196: | ||
There is a mutual recognition of the validity of orders amongst Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Old Catholic, Oriental Orthodox and Assyrian Church of the East churches.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Roberson|first=Ronald|date=Spring 2010|title=The Dialogues of the Catholic Church with the Separated Eastern Churches|journal=U.S. Catholic Historian|volume=28|issue=2|pages=135–152|jstor=40731267|doi=10.1353/cht.0.0041|s2cid=161330476}}</ref> | There is a mutual recognition of the validity of orders amongst Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Old Catholic, Oriental Orthodox and Assyrian Church of the East churches.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Roberson|first=Ronald|date=Spring 2010|title=The Dialogues of the Catholic Church with the Separated Eastern Churches|journal=U.S. Catholic Historian|volume=28|issue=2|pages=135–152|jstor=40731267|doi=10.1353/cht.0.0041|s2cid=161330476}}</ref> | ||
Some provinces of the Anglican Communion have begun [[ordination of women|ordaining women]] as bishops in recent | Some provinces of the Anglican Communion have begun [[ordination of women|ordaining women]] as bishops in recent decades—for example, England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Cuba. The first woman to be consecrated a bishop within Anglicanism was [[Barbara Harris (bishop)|Barbara Harris]], who was ordained in the United States in 1989.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Doubek |first=James |date=2020-03-14 |title=Barbara C. Harris, First Female Bishop In Anglican Communion, Dies At 89 |url=https://www.npr.org/2020/03/14/815892227/barbara-c-harris-first-female-bishop-in-anglican-communion-dies-at-89 |access-date=2025-07-27 |work=NPR |language=en}}</ref> In 2006, Katharine Jefferts Schori, the Episcopal [[Episcopal Diocese of Nevada|Bishop of Nevada]], became the first woman to become the presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2006-11-05 |title=A Woman Is Installed as Top Episcopal Bishop (Published 2006) |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/05/us/a-woman-is-installed-as-top-episcopal-bishop.html |access-date=2025-07-27 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
[[File:Mikael Agricola by Albert Edelfelt.jpg|thumb|[[Mikael Agricola]] (1510–1557), a Finnish [[Lutheran]] clergyman and the [[List of bishops of Turku|Bishop of Turku]]]] | [[File:Mikael Agricola by Albert Edelfelt.jpg|thumb|[[Mikael Agricola]] (1510–1557), a Finnish [[Lutheran]] clergyman and the [[List of bishops of Turku|Bishop of Turku]]]] | ||
In the [[Evangelical Lutheran Church in America]] (ELCA) and the [[Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada]] (ELCIC), the largest Lutheran | In the [[Evangelical Lutheran Church in America]] (ELCA) and the [[Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada]] (ELCIC), the largest Lutheran church bodies in the United States and Canada, respectively, and roughly based on the [[Nordic countries|Nordic]] Lutheran national churches (similar to that of the Church of England), bishops are elected by Synod Assemblies, consisting of both lay members and clergy, for a term of six years, which can be renewed, depending upon the local synod's "constitution" (which is mirrored on either the ELCA or ELCIC's national constitution). Since the implementation of concordats between the ELCA and the [[Episcopal Church of the United States]] and the ELCIC and the [[Anglican Church of Canada]], all bishops, including the presiding bishop (ELCA) or the national bishop (ELCIC), have been consecrated using the historic succession in line with bishops from the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Sweden,<ref name="VelikoGros2005">{{cite book |last1=Veliko |first1=Lydia |last2=Gros |first2=Jeffrey |title=Growing Consensus II: Church Dialogues in the United States, 1992-2004 |date=2005 |publisher=USCCB Publishing |isbn=978-1-57455-557-8 |language=English |quote=In order to receive the historic episcopate, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America pledges that, following the adoption of this Concordat and in keeping with the collegiality and continuity of ordained ministry attested as early as canon 4 of the First Ecumenical Council (Nicea I, AD 325), at least three bishops already sharing in the sign of episcopal succession will be invited to participate in the installation of its next Presiding Bishop through prayer for the gift of the Holy Spirit and with the laying-on of hands. These participating bishops will be invited from churches of the Lutheran communion which share in the historic episcopate.}}</ref> with at least one Anglican bishop serving as co-consecrator.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elca.org/ecumenical/fullcommunion/episcopal/ccmresources/text.html|title=A Lutheran Proposal for a Revision of the Concordat of Agreement |archive-date=2011-05-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514195302/http://www2.elca.org/ecumenical/fullcommunion/Episcopal/CCMresources/text.html|date=19 August 1999 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elca.org/lutheranpartners/archives/histepi.html|last= Wright |first=J. Robert|title=The Historic Episcopate: An Episcopalian Viewpoint|work=Lutheran Partners|date=Spring 1999|volume= 15|issue=2|archive-date=2011-06-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604070238/http://www2.elca.org/lutheranpartners/archives/histepi.html }}</ref> | ||
Although ELCA agreed with the Episcopal Church to limit ordination to the bishop "ordinarily", ELCA pastor-''ordinators'' are given permission to perform the rites in "extraordinary" circumstance. In practice, "extraordinary" circumstance have included disagreeing with Episcopalian views of the episcopate, and as a result, ELCA pastors ordained by other pastors are not permitted to be deployed to Episcopal Churches (they can, however, serve in [[Presbyterian Church (USA)|Presbyterian Church USA]], United Methodist Church, [[Reformed Church in America]], and [[Moravian Church]] congregations, as the ELCA is in full communion with these denominations). The [[Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod]] (LCMS) and the [[Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod]] (WELS), the second and third largest Lutheran bodies in the United States and the two largest [[Confessional Lutheran]] bodies in North America, do not follow an episcopal form of governance, settling instead on a form of quasi-congregationalism patterned off what they believe to be the practice of the early church. The second largest of the three predecessor bodies of the ELCA, the [[American Lutheran Church]], was a congregationalist body, with national and synod presidents before they were re-titled as bishops (borrowing from the Lutheran churches in [[Germany]]) in the 1980s. With regard to ecclesial discipline and oversight, national and synod presidents typically function similarly to bishops in episcopal bodies.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.kencollins.com/explanations/why-12.htm|title=The Function of Bishops in the Ancient Church|work=kencollins.com}}</ref> | Although ELCA agreed with the Episcopal Church to limit ordination to the bishop "ordinarily", ELCA pastor-''ordinators'' are given permission to perform the rites in "extraordinary" circumstance. In practice, "extraordinary" circumstance have included disagreeing with Episcopalian views of the episcopate, and as a result, ELCA pastors ordained by other pastors are not permitted to be deployed to Episcopal Churches (they can, however, serve in [[Presbyterian Church (USA)|Presbyterian Church USA]], United Methodist Church, [[Reformed Church in America]], and [[Moravian Church]] congregations, as the ELCA is in full communion with these denominations). The [[Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod]] (LCMS) and the [[Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod]] (WELS), the second and third largest Lutheran bodies in the United States and the two largest [[Confessional Lutheran]] bodies in North America, do not follow an episcopal form of governance, settling instead on a form of quasi-congregationalism patterned off what they believe to be the practice of the early church. The second largest of the three predecessor bodies of the ELCA, the [[American Lutheran Church]], was a congregationalist body, with national and synod presidents before they were re-titled as bishops (borrowing from the Lutheran churches in [[Germany]]) in the 1980s. With regard to ecclesial discipline and oversight, national and synod presidents typically function similarly to bishops in episcopal bodies.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.kencollins.com/explanations/why-12.htm|title=The Function of Bishops in the Ancient Church|work=kencollins.com}}</ref> | ||
| Line 242: | Line 237: | ||
[[File:The Ordination of Bishop Asbury.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|[[Francis Asbury]]'s ordination as bishop by [[Thomas Coke (bishop)|Thomas Coke]] at the 1784 [[Christmas Conference]]]] | [[File:The Ordination of Bishop Asbury.jpg|thumb|upright=1.35|[[Francis Asbury]]'s ordination as bishop by [[Thomas Coke (bishop)|Thomas Coke]] at the 1784 [[Christmas Conference]]]] | ||
The collegial expression of episcopal leadership in the United Methodist Church is known as the [[United Methodist Council of Bishops|Council of Bishops]]. The Council of Bishops speaks to the church and through the church into the world and gives leadership in the quest for Christian unity and interreligious relationships.{{sfn|Anon|1980|p=}} The Conference of Methodist Bishops includes the United Methodist ''Council of Bishops'' plus bishops from affiliated autonomous Methodist or [[United and uniting churches|United]] | The collegial expression of episcopal leadership in the United Methodist Church is known as the [[United Methodist Council of Bishops|Council of Bishops]]. The Council of Bishops speaks to the church and through the church into the world and gives leadership in the quest for Christian unity and interreligious relationships.{{sfn|Anon|1980|p=}} The Conference of Methodist Bishops includes the United Methodist ''Council of Bishops'' plus bishops from affiliated autonomous Methodist or [[United and uniting churches|United]] churches. | ||
[[John Wesley]] consecrated Thomas Coke a "General Superintendent", and directed that Francis Asbury also be consecrated for the United States of America in 1784, where the [[Methodist Episcopal Church]] first became a separate [[religious denomination|denomination]] apart from the Church of England. Coke soon returned to England, but Asbury was the primary builder of the new church. At first he did not call himself bishop, but eventually submitted to the usage by the denomination. | [[John Wesley]] consecrated Thomas Coke a "General Superintendent", and directed that Francis Asbury also be consecrated for the United States of America in 1784, where the [[Methodist Episcopal Church]] first became a separate [[religious denomination|denomination]] apart from the Church of England. Coke soon returned to England, but Asbury was the primary builder of the new church. At first he did not call himself bishop, but eventually submitted to the usage by the denomination. | ||
Notable bishops in United Methodist history include Coke, Asbury, [[Richard Whatcoat]], [[Philip William Otterbein]], [[Martin Boehm]], [[Jacob Albright]], [[John Seybert]], [[Matthew Simpson]], [[John S. Stamm]], [[William Ragsdale Cannon]], Marjorie Matthews, [[Leontine T. Kelly]], [[William B. Oden]], [[Ntambo Nkulu Ntanda]], [[Joseph Sprague]], [[William Henry Willimon]], and [[Thomas Bickerton]]. | Notable bishops in United Methodist history include Coke, Asbury, [[Richard Whatcoat]], [[Philip William Otterbein]], [[Martin Boehm]], [[Jacob Albright]], [[John Seybert]], [[Matthew Simpson]], [[John S. Stamm]], [[William Ragsdale Cannon]], Marjorie Matthews, [[Leontine T. Kelly]], [[William B. Oden]], [[Ntambo Nkulu Ntanda]], [[Joseph Sprague]], [[William Henry Willimon]], and [[Thomas Bickerton]]. | ||
=== The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints === | === The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints === | ||
{{Main|Bishop (Latter Day Saints)}} | {{Main|Bishop (Latter Day Saints)}} | ||
In [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]], the [[Bishop (Latter Day Saints)| | In [[The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]], the [[Bishop (Latter Day Saints)|bishop]] is the leader of a local congregation, called a [[ward (LDS Church)|ward]]. As with most LDS priesthood holders, the bishop is a part-time lay minister and earns a living through other employment. As such, it is his duty to preside, call local leaders, and judge the worthiness of members for certain activities. The bishop does not deliver sermons at every service (generally asking members to do so), but is expected to be a spiritual guide for his congregation. It is therefore believed that he has both the right and ability to receive divine inspiration (through the [[Holy Spirit in Christianity|Holy Spirit]]) for the ward under his direction. Because it is a part-time position, all able members are expected to assist in the management of the ward by holding delegated lay positions (for example, women's and youth leaders, teachers) referred to as callings. The bishop is especially responsible for leading the youth,<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/general-handbook/6?lang=eng#title_number8| title = General Handbook, 6.1.2}}</ref> in connection with the fact that a bishop is the president of the [[Aaronic priesthood (LDS Church)|Aaronic priesthood]] in his ward (and is thus a form of Mormon [[Kohen]]). Although members are asked to confess serious sins to him, unlike the Catholic Church, he is not the instrument of divine forgiveness, but merely a guide through the repentance process (and a judge in case transgressions warrant excommunication or other official discipline). The bishop is also responsible for the physical welfare of the ward, and thus collects [[Tithe|tithing]] and [[fast offering]]s and distributes financial assistance where needed. | ||
A literal descendant of Aaron has "legal right" to act as a bishop<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/107.76?lang=eng| title = Doctrine and Covenants 107:76}}</ref> after being found worthy and ordained by the [[First Presidency (LDS Church)|First Presidency]].<ref name="Doctrine and Covenants 68:20">{{cite web| url = https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/68.20?lang=eng| title = Doctrine and Covenants 68:20}}</ref> In the absence of a literal descendant of Aaron, a [[high priest (Latter Day Saints)|high priest]] in the [[Melchizedek priesthood]] is called to be a bishop.<ref name="Doctrine and Covenants 68:20"/> Each bishop is selected from resident members of the ward by the [[stake (Latter Day Saints)|stake presidency]] with approval of the First Presidency, and chooses two ''counselors'' to form a ''bishopric''. An priesthood holder called as bishop must be ordained a high priest if he is not already one, unlike the similar function of branch president.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/general-handbook/6?lang=eng#title_number13| title = General Handbook, 6.2}}</ref> In special circumstances (such as a ward consisting entirely of young university students), a bishop may be chosen from outside the ward. Traditionally, bishops are married, though this is not always the case.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/1990/10/i-have-a-question/what-callings-are-open-to-single-members-of-the-church?lang=eng| title = Ensign, 1990 October, What callings are open to single members of the Church?}}</ref> A bishop is typically released after about five years and a new bishop is called to the position. Although the former bishop is released from his duties, he continues to hold the Aaronic priesthood office of bishop. Church members frequently refer to a former bishop as "Bishop" as a sign of respect and affection. | A literal descendant of Aaron has "legal right" to act as a bishop<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/107.76?lang=eng| title = Doctrine and Covenants 107:76}}</ref> after being found worthy and ordained by the [[First Presidency (LDS Church)|First Presidency]].<ref name="Doctrine and Covenants 68:20">{{cite web| url = https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/68.20?lang=eng| title = Doctrine and Covenants 68:20}}</ref> In the absence of a literal descendant of Aaron, a [[high priest (Latter Day Saints)|high priest]] in the [[Melchizedek priesthood]] is called to be a bishop.<ref name="Doctrine and Covenants 68:20"/> Each bishop is selected from resident members of the ward by the [[stake (Latter Day Saints)|stake presidency]] with approval of the First Presidency, and chooses two ''counselors'' to form a ''bishopric''. An priesthood holder called as bishop must be ordained a high priest if he is not already one, unlike the similar function of branch president.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/general-handbook/6?lang=eng#title_number13| title = General Handbook, 6.2}}</ref> In special circumstances (such as a ward consisting entirely of young university students), a bishop may be chosen from outside the ward. Traditionally, bishops are married, though this is not always the case.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/1990/10/i-have-a-question/what-callings-are-open-to-single-members-of-the-church?lang=eng| title = Ensign, 1990 October, What callings are open to single members of the Church?}}</ref> A bishop is typically released after about five years and a new bishop is called to the position. Although the former bishop is released from his duties, he continues to hold the Aaronic priesthood office of bishop. Church members frequently refer to a former bishop as "Bishop" as a sign of respect and affection. | ||
| Line 261: | Line 255: | ||
=== Irvingism === | === Irvingism === | ||
==== New Apostolic Church ==== | ==== New Apostolic Church ==== | ||
The [[New Apostolic Church]] (NAC) | The [[New Apostolic Church]] (NAC) teaches three classes of ministries: deacons, priests and apostles. The [[New Apostolic Church#Apostle ministry and exclusivism|apostles]], who are all included in the apostolate with the [[Chief Apostle]] as head, are the highest ministries. Of the several kinds of priestly ministries, the bishop is the highest. Nearly all bishops are set in line directly from the chief apostle. They support and help their superior apostle.{{cn|date=July 2025}} | ||
Of the several kinds of | |||
=== Pentecostalism === | === Pentecostalism === | ||
| Line 273: | Line 265: | ||
==== Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee) ==== | ==== Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee) ==== | ||
In the polity of the [[Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee)]], the international leader is the presiding bishop, and the members of the executive committee are executive bishops. Collectively, they supervise and appoint national and state leaders across the world. Leaders of individual states and regions are administrative bishops, who have jurisdiction over local churches in their respective states and are vested with appointment authority for local pastorates. All ministers are credentialed at one of three levels of licensure, the most senior of which is the rank of ordained bishop. To be eligible to serve in state, national, or international positions of authority, a minister must hold the rank of ordained bishop. | In the polity of the [[Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee)]], the international leader is the presiding bishop, and the members of the executive committee are executive bishops. Collectively, they supervise and appoint national and state leaders across the world. Leaders of individual states and regions are administrative bishops, who have jurisdiction over local churches in their respective states and are vested with appointment authority for local pastorates. All ministers are credentialed at one of three levels of licensure, the most senior of which is the rank of ordained bishop. To be eligible to serve in state, national, or international positions of authority, a minister must hold the rank of ordained bishop. | ||
=== Seventh-day Adventists === | === Seventh-day Adventists === | ||
| Line 283: | Line 270: | ||
According to the Seventh-day Adventist understanding of the doctrine of the church: | According to the Seventh-day Adventist understanding of the doctrine of the church: | ||
"The "elders" (Greek, {{transliteration|grc|presbuteros}}) or "bishops" ({{transliteration|grc|episkopos}}) were the most important officers of the church. The term elder means older one, implying dignity and respect. His position was similar to that of the one who had supervision of the synagogue. The term bishop means "overseer". Paul used these terms interchangeably, equating elders with overseers or bishops (Acts 20:17,[[Acts 20:28|28]]; Titus 1:5, 7). | "The "elders" (Greek, {{transliteration|grc|presbuteros}}) or "bishops" ({{transliteration|grc|episkopos}}) were the most important officers of the church. The term elder means older one, implying dignity and respect. His position was similar to that of the one who had supervision of the synagogue. The term bishop means "overseer". Paul used these terms interchangeably, equating elders with overseers or bishops (Acts 20:17, [[Acts 20:28|28]]; Titus 1:5, 7). | ||
"Those who held this position supervised the newly formed churches. Elder referred to the status or rank of the office, while bishop denoted the duty or responsibility of the office—"overseer". Since the apostles also called themselves elders (1 Peter 5:1; 2 John 1; 3 John 1), it is apparent that there were both local elders and itinerant elders, or elders at large. But both kinds of elder functioned as shepherds of the congregations.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Ministerial Association, General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists|title=Seventh-day Adventists Believe|date=1988|publisher=Review and Herald Publishing Association|location=Hagarstown, Maryland|pages=146, 147}}</ref>" | "Those who held this position supervised the newly formed churches. Elder referred to the status or rank of the office, while bishop denoted the duty or responsibility of the office—"overseer". Since the apostles also called themselves elders (1 Peter 5:1; 2 John 1; 3 John 1), it is apparent that there were both local elders and itinerant elders, or elders at large. But both kinds of elder functioned as shepherds of the congregations.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Ministerial Association, General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists|title=Seventh-day Adventists Believe|date=1988|publisher=Review and Herald Publishing Association|location=Hagarstown, Maryland|pages=146, 147}}</ref>" | ||
| Line 297: | Line 284: | ||
| access-date = 2014-09-07 | | access-date = 2014-09-07 | ||
| url = http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/07/19/more_baptist_pastors_adopt_bishop_title/?page=1 | | url = http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/07/19/more_baptist_pastors_adopt_bishop_title/?page=1 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> In some smaller Protestant denominations and independent churches, the term ''bishop'' is used in the same way as ''pastor'', to refer to the leader of the local congregation, and may be male or female. This usage is especially common in African-American churches, particularly through the [[Full Gospel Baptist Church Fellowship]]. | ||
In some smaller Protestant denominations and independent churches, the term ''bishop'' is used in the same way as ''pastor'', to refer to the leader of the local congregation, and may be male or female. This usage is especially common in African-American churches | |||
In the [[Church of Scotland]], which has a Presbyterian church structure, the word "bishop" refers to an ordained person, usually a normal parish minister, who has temporary oversight of a trainee minister. In the [[Presbyterian Church (USA)]], the term bishop is an expressive name for a Minister of Word and Sacrament who serves a congregation and exercises "the oversight of the flock of Christ."<ref name="presby">{{cite book|publisher= Presbyterian Church (USA) Office of the General Assembly|title= Book of Order (2009–2011)|location= Louisville|page= G-6.0202|url= http://www.presbycoalition.org/2009-11%20Book%20of%20Order.pdf|access-date= 7 September 2014|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140729184807/http://www.presbycoalition.org/2009-11%20Book%20of%20Order.pdf|archive-date= 29 July 2014|url-status= dead}}</ref> The term is traceable to the 1789 Form of Government of the PC (USA) and the Presbyterian understanding of the pastoral office.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.pcusa.org/site_media/media/uploads/oga/pdf/peter.pdf| title = "The Successor To Peter" |date=2000 |website=Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20231118220748/https://www.pcusa.org/site_media/media/uploads/oga/pdf/peter.pdf |archive-date= Nov 18, 2023 }}</ref> | In the [[Church of Scotland]], which has a Presbyterian church structure, the word "bishop" refers to an ordained person, usually a normal parish minister, who has temporary oversight of a trainee minister. In the [[Presbyterian Church (USA)]], the term bishop is an expressive name for a Minister of Word and Sacrament who serves a congregation and exercises "the oversight of the flock of Christ."<ref name="presby">{{cite book|publisher= Presbyterian Church (USA) Office of the General Assembly|title= Book of Order (2009–2011)|location= Louisville|page= G-6.0202|url= http://www.presbycoalition.org/2009-11%20Book%20of%20Order.pdf|access-date= 7 September 2014|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140729184807/http://www.presbycoalition.org/2009-11%20Book%20of%20Order.pdf|archive-date= 29 July 2014|url-status= dead}}</ref> The term is traceable to the 1789 Form of Government of the PC (USA) and the Presbyterian understanding of the pastoral office.<ref>{{cite web| url = http://www.pcusa.org/site_media/media/uploads/oga/pdf/peter.pdf| title = "The Successor To Peter" |date=2000 |website=Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20231118220748/https://www.pcusa.org/site_media/media/uploads/oga/pdf/peter.pdf |archive-date= Nov 18, 2023 }}</ref> [[Bishops in Calvinism|Reformed churches]] on the whole do not tend to have bishops, although there are exceptions. | ||
While not considered orthodox Christian, the [[Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica]] uses roles and titles derived from Christianity for its clerical hierarchy, including bishops who have much the same authority and responsibilities as in Catholicism. | While not considered orthodox Christian, the [[Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica]] uses roles and titles derived from Christianity for its clerical hierarchy, including bishops who have much the same authority and responsibilities as in Catholicism. | ||
The [[Salvation Army]] does not have bishops but has appointed leaders of geographical areas, known as Divisional Commanders. Larger geographical areas, called | The [[Salvation Army]] does not have bishops but has appointed leaders of geographical areas, known as Divisional Commanders. Larger geographical areas, called territories, are led by a territorial commander, who is the highest-ranking officer in that territory. | ||
Jehovah's Witnesses do not use the title ' | Jehovah's Witnesses do not use the title 'bishop' within their organizational structure, but appoint elders to be overseers (to fulfill the role of oversight) within their congregations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/congregations-organized/ |title= How Are Congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses Organised? |website=Jehovah’s Witnesses |access-date=4 August 2015}}</ref> | ||
[[File:Ingwer Ludwig Nommensen (1834–1918).png|thumb|upright=1.2|right|[[Ludwig Ingwer Nommensen]], the [[Germans|German]] Lutheran missionary from [[Rhenish Missionary Society]], also first Ephorus of the Batak Christian Protestant Church]] | [[File:Ingwer Ludwig Nommensen (1834–1918).png|thumb|upright=1.2|right|[[Ludwig Ingwer Nommensen]], the [[Germans|German]] Lutheran missionary from [[Rhenish Missionary Society]], also first Ephorus of the Batak Christian Protestant Church]] | ||
The [[Batak Christian Protestant Church]] of [[Indonesia]], the most prominent [[Protestantism in Indonesia|Protestant denomination in Indonesia]], uses the term ''Ephorus'' instead of ''bishop''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://iksynod.org/hkbp/ |website=Indiana-Kentucky Synod, ELCA |title= Global Missions in the Indiana-Kentucky Synod: Indonesia: the Huria Kristen Batak Protestan Church on the island of Sumatra|access-date=18 August 2018}}</ref> | The [[Batak Christian Protestant Church]] of [[Indonesia]], the most prominent [[Protestantism in Indonesia|Protestant denomination in Indonesia]], uses the term ''Ephorus'' instead of ''bishop''.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://iksynod.org/hkbp/ |website=Indiana-Kentucky Synod, ELCA |title=Global Missions in the Indiana-Kentucky Synod: Indonesia: the Huria Kristen Batak Protestan Church on the island of Sumatra |access-date=18 August 2018 |archive-date=19 November 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181119155734/https://iksynod.org/hkbp/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> | ||
In the Vietnamese syncretist religion of [[Caodaism]], bishops ({{lang|vi|giáo sư}}) comprise the fifth of nine hierarchical levels, and are responsible for spiritual and temporal education as well as record-keeping and ceremonies in their parishes. At any one time there are seventy-two bishops. Their authority is described in Section I of the text {{lang|vi|Tân Luật}} (revealed through seances in December 1926). Caodai bishops wear robes and headgear of embroidered silk depicting the Divine Eye and the Eight Trigrams. (The color varies according to branch.) This is the full ceremonial dress; the simple version consists of a seven-layered turban. | In the Vietnamese syncretist religion of [[Caodaism]], bishops ({{lang|vi|giáo sư}}) comprise the fifth of nine hierarchical levels, and are responsible for spiritual and temporal education as well as record-keeping and ceremonies in their parishes. At any one time there are seventy-two bishops. Their authority is described in Section I of the text {{lang|vi|Tân Luật}} (revealed through seances in December 1926). Caodai bishops wear robes and headgear of embroidered silk depicting the Divine Eye and the Eight Trigrams. (The color varies according to branch.) This is the full ceremonial dress; the simple version consists of a seven-layered turban. | ||
| Line 319: | Line 305: | ||
Traditionally, a number of items are associated with the office of a bishop, most notably the mitre and the [[crosier]]. Other vestments and insignia vary between Eastern and Western Christianity. | Traditionally, a number of items are associated with the office of a bishop, most notably the mitre and the [[crosier]]. Other vestments and insignia vary between Eastern and Western Christianity. | ||
In the Latin | In the Latin Church of the Catholic Church, the [[choir dress]] of a bishop includes the purple cassock with amaranth trim, [[rochet]], purple [[zucchetto]] (skull cap), purple [[biretta]], and pectoral cross. The [[cappa magna]] may be worn, but only within the bishop's own diocese and on especially solemn occasions.{{sfn|Stehle|1914|p=}} The mitre, zucchetto, and [[Stole (vestment)|stole]] are generally worn by bishops when presiding over liturgical functions. For liturgical functions other than the [[Mass in the Catholic Church|Mass]] the bishop typically wears the cope. Within his own diocese and when celebrating solemnly elsewhere with the consent of the local [[Ordinary (officer)|ordinary]], he also uses the crosier.{{sfn|Stehle|1914|p=}} When celebrating Mass, a bishop, like a [[Priest (Catholic Church)|priest]], wears the [[chasuble]]. The ''[[Caeremoniale Episcoporum]]'' recommends, but does not impose, that in solemn celebrations a bishop should also wear a [[dalmatic]], which can always be white, beneath the chasuble, especially when administering the sacrament of [[holy orders]], blessing an abbot or abbess, and dedicating a church or an altar.{{sfn|Stehle|1914|p=}} The ''Caeremoniale Episcoporum'' no longer makes mention of [[episcopal gloves]], [[episcopal sandals]], [[liturgical stockings]] (also known as [[buskins]]), or the accoutrements that it once prescribed for the bishop's horse. The coat of arms of a Latin Church Catholic bishop usually displays a [[galero]] with a cross and crosier behind the [[Escutcheon (heraldry)|escutcheon]]; the specifics differ by location and ecclesiastical rank (see [[Ecclesiastical heraldry]]). | ||
Anglican bishops generally make use of the mitre, crosier, ecclesiastical ring, purple cassock, purple zucchetto, and pectoral cross. However, the traditional choir dress of Anglican bishops retains its late mediaeval form, and looks quite different from that of their Catholic counterparts; it consists of a long rochet which is worn with a [[chimere]]. | Anglican bishops generally make use of the mitre, crosier, ecclesiastical ring, purple cassock, purple zucchetto, and pectoral cross. However, the traditional choir dress of Anglican bishops retains its late mediaeval form, and looks quite different from that of their Catholic counterparts; it consists of a long rochet which is worn with a [[chimere]]. | ||
In the [[Eastern Churches]] (Eastern Orthodox, [[Eastern Rite Catholic]]) a bishop will wear the [[mandyas]], [[panagia]] (and perhaps an [[enkolpion]]), [[sakkos]], omophorion and an Eastern-style mitre. Eastern bishops do not normally wear an episcopal ring; the faithful kiss (or, alternatively, touch their forehead to) the bishop's hand. To seal official documents, he will usually use an inked stamp. An Eastern bishop's coat of arms will normally display an Eastern-style mitre, cross, | In the [[Eastern Churches|Eastern churches]] (Eastern Orthodox, [[Eastern Rite Catholic]]) a bishop will wear the [[mandyas]], [[panagia]] (and perhaps an [[enkolpion]]), [[sakkos]], omophorion and an Eastern-style mitre. Eastern bishops do not normally wear an episcopal ring; the faithful kiss (or, alternatively, touch their forehead to) the bishop's hand. To seal official documents, he will usually use an inked stamp. An Eastern bishop's coat of arms will normally display an Eastern-style mitre, cross, Eastern-style crosier and a red and white (or red and gold) [[Ecclesiastical heraldry#Mantle|mantle]]. The arms of Oriental Orthodox bishops will display the episcopal insignia (mitre or turban) specific to their own liturgical traditions. Variations occur based upon jurisdiction and national customs. | ||
=== Cathedra === | === Cathedra === | ||
| Line 332: | Line 318: | ||
File:Bishop Trevor Williams.jpg|An Anglican bishop with a crosier, wearing a rochet under a red chimere and cuffs, a black tippet, and a pectoral cross | File:Bishop Trevor Williams.jpg|An Anglican bishop with a crosier, wearing a rochet under a red chimere and cuffs, a black tippet, and a pectoral cross | ||
File:BishopThom.jpg|An Episcopal bishop immediately before presiding at the Great Vigil of Easter in the [[narthex]] of St. Michael's Episcopal Cathedral in [[Boise, Idaho]]. | File:BishopThom.jpg|An Episcopal bishop immediately before presiding at the Great Vigil of Easter in the [[narthex]] of St. Michael's Episcopal Cathedral in [[Boise, Idaho]]. | ||
File:Ephorus HKBP (cropped).jpg|An Ephorus of the [[Batak Christian Protestant Church]] in [[Indonesia]], one of the largest [[Lutheran]] churches in [[Southeast Asia]], wearing | File:Ephorus HKBP (cropped).jpg|An Ephorus of the [[Batak Christian Protestant Church]] in [[Indonesia]], one of the largest [[Lutheran]] churches in [[Southeast Asia]], wearing white [[bands (neckwear)|bands]] and [[Geneva gown]] | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
== | ==In non-Christian religions== | ||
=== Buddhism === | === Buddhism === | ||
The leader of the [[Buddhist Churches of America]] (BCA) is their [[Bishop of the Buddhist Churches of America|bishop]],<ref>Numrich, P.D., 2013. Local Inter-Buddhist Associations in North America. In: Queen, C., Williams, D.R. (Eds.), ''American Buddhism: Methods and Findings in Recent Scholarship''. Routledge. p. 128</ref><ref>Murphy, T.F., United States Bureau of the Census (1941). ''Religious bodies, 1936''. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., p. 346 https://archive.org/details/religiousbodies10002unse</ref><ref name=":12">Ama, M. (2010) The Legal Dimensions of the Formation of Shin Buddhist Temples in Los Angeles. In: Williams, D.R., Moriya, T. (Eds.), ''Issei Buddhism in the Americas''. University of Illinois Press., p. 66-68</ref> The Japanese title for the bishop of the BCA is {{transliteration|ja|sochō}},<ref name=":12" /><ref>Willard, R. H., Wilson, C. G. & Baird, J. A. (1985). ''Sacred Places of San Francisco''. Presidio Press., p. 164</ref><ref>Quli, N. E. F. & Mitchell, S. A. (2015). Buddhist Modernism As Narrative: A Comparative Study of Jodo Shinshu and Zen. In: Mitchell, S. A. & Quli, N. E. F. (eds.) ''Buddhism beyond Borders: New Perspectives on Buddhism in the United States''. SUNY Press., p. 206</ref> although the English title is favored over the Japanese. When it comes to many other [[Buddhist Terms and Concepts|Buddhist terms]], the BCA chose to keep them in their original language (terms such as {{transliteration|sa|[[sangha]]}} and {{transliteration|sa|[[Dāna|dana]]}}), but with some words (including {{transliteration|ja|sochō}}), they changed/translated these terms into English words.<ref>Kashima, T. (1977). ''Buddhism in America : the social organization of an ethnic religious institution''. Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press., p. 41</ref><ref>Seager, R. H. (2012). ''Buddhism in America''. revised and expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press, p. 56</ref><ref>Fronsdal, G. (1998). Insight Meditation in the United States: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. In: Prebish, C. S., Tanaka, K. K., & Tanaka, K. K. (eds.) ''The Faces of Buddhism in America''. University of California Press., p. 169</ref> | The leader of the [[Buddhist Churches of America]] (BCA) is their [[Bishop of the Buddhist Churches of America|bishop]],<ref>Numrich, P.D., 2013. Local Inter-Buddhist Associations in North America. In: Queen, C., Williams, D.R. (Eds.), ''American Buddhism: Methods and Findings in Recent Scholarship''. Routledge. p. 128</ref><ref>Murphy, T.F., United States Bureau of the Census (1941). ''Religious bodies, 1936''. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., p. 346 https://archive.org/details/religiousbodies10002unse</ref><ref name=":12">Ama, M. (2010) The Legal Dimensions of the Formation of Shin Buddhist Temples in Los Angeles. In: Williams, D.R., Moriya, T. (Eds.), ''Issei Buddhism in the Americas''. University of Illinois Press., p. 66-68</ref> The Japanese title for the bishop of the BCA is {{transliteration|ja|sochō}},<ref name=":12" /><ref>Willard, R. H., Wilson, C. G. & Baird, J. A. (1985). ''Sacred Places of San Francisco''. Presidio Press., p. 164</ref><ref>Quli, N. E. F. & Mitchell, S. A. (2015). Buddhist Modernism As Narrative: A Comparative Study of Jodo Shinshu and Zen. In: Mitchell, S. A. & Quli, N. E. F. (eds.) ''Buddhism beyond Borders: New Perspectives on Buddhism in the United States''. SUNY Press., p. 206</ref> although the English title is favored over the Japanese. When it comes to many other [[Buddhist Terms and Concepts|Buddhist terms]], the BCA chose to keep them in their original language (terms such as {{transliteration|sa|[[sangha]]}} and {{transliteration|sa|[[Dāna|dana]]}}), but with some words (including {{transliteration|ja|sochō}}), they changed/translated these terms into English words.<ref>Kashima, T. (1977). ''Buddhism in America : the social organization of an ethnic religious institution''. Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press., p. 41</ref><ref>Seager, R. H. (2012). ''Buddhism in America''. revised and expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press, p. 56</ref><ref>Fronsdal, G. (1998). Insight Meditation in the United States: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. In: Prebish, C. S., Tanaka, K. K., & Tanaka, K. K. (eds.) ''The Faces of Buddhism in America''. University of California Press., p. 169</ref> | ||
| Line 350: | Line 336: | ||
{{Portal|Christianity}} | {{Portal|Christianity}} | ||
{{Div col}} | {{Div col}} | ||
* [[Anglican | * [[Anglican bishops]] | ||
* [[Appointment of Catholic bishops]] | * [[Appointment of Catholic bishops]] | ||
* [[Appointment of Church of England bishops]] | * [[Appointment of Church of England bishops]] | ||
| Line 416: | Line 402: | ||
[[Category:Bishops| ]] | [[Category:Bishops| ]] | ||
[[Category:Episcopacy]] | |||
[[Category:Christian terminology]] | [[Category:Christian terminology]] | ||
[[Category:Ecclesiastical titles]] | [[Category:Ecclesiastical titles]] | ||
[[Category:Methodism]] | [[Category:Methodism]] | ||
[[Category:Christian religious occupations|Bishop]] | [[Category:Christian religious occupations|Bishop]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:42, 24 December 2025
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". Template:Use dmy dates Template:Christianity A bishop is an ordained member of the clergy who is entrusted with a position of authority and oversight in a religious institution. In Christianity, bishops are normally responsible for the governance and administration of dioceses. The role or office of the bishop is called episcopacy or the episcopate. Organisationally, several Christian denominations utilise ecclesiastical structures that call for the position of bishops, while other denominations have dispensed with this office, seeing it as a symbol of power. Bishops have also exercised political authority within their dioceses.
Traditionally, bishops claim apostolic succession and the historic episcopacy, a direct historical lineage dating back to the original Twelve Apostles or Saint Paul. The bishops are by doctrine understood as those who possess the full priesthood given by Jesus Christ, and therefore may ordain other clergy, including other bishops.[1] A person ordained as a deacon, priest (i.e. presbyter), and then bishop is understood to hold the fullness of the ministerial priesthood, given responsibility by Christ to govern, teach and sanctify the Body of Christ (the Christian Church). Priests, deacons and lay ministers co-operate and assist their bishops in pastoral ministry.
Some Pentecostal and other Protestant denominations have bishops who oversee congregations, though they do not necessarily claim apostolic succession, with exception to those Pentecostals and Charismatics affiliated to churches founded by J. Delano Ellis and Paul S. Morton.
Etymology and terminology
The English word bishop derives, via Latin Script error: No such module "Lang"., Old English Script error: No such module "Lang"., and Middle English Script error: No such module "Lang"., from the Greek word Template:Langx, meaning "overseer" or "supervisor".[2] Greek was the language of the early Christian church,[3] but the term Script error: No such module "lang". did not originate in Christianity: it had been used in Greek for several centuries before the advent of Christianity.[2]
The English words priest and presbyter both derive, via Latin, from the Greek word Template:Langx, meaning "elder" or "senior", and not originally referring to priesthood.[4]
In the early Christian era the two terms were not always clearly distinguished, but Script error: No such module "lang". is used in the sense of the order or office of bishop, distinct from that of Script error: No such module "lang"., in the writings attributed to Ignatius of Antioch in the second century.[3]
Christian episcopal development
The earliest organization of the Church in Jerusalem was, according to most scholars, similar to that of Jewish synagogues, but it had a council or college of ordained presbyters (Template:Langx). In Acts 11:30[5] and Acts 15:22,[6] a collegiate system of government in Jerusalem is chaired by James the Just, according to tradition the first bishop of the city. In Acts 14:23,[7] the Apostle Paul ordains presbyters in churches in Anatolia.Template:Sfn The word presbyter was not yet distinguished from overseer (Template:Langx, later used exclusively to mean bishop), as in Acts 20:17,[8] Titus 1:5–7[9] and 1 Peter 5:1.[10]Template:EfnTemplate:Efn The earliest writings of the Apostolic Fathers, the Didache and the First Epistle of Clement, for example, show the church used two terms for local church offices—presbyters (seen by many as an interchangeable term with Script error: No such module "lang". or overseer) and deacon.
In the First Epistle to Timothy and Epistle to Titus in the New Testament a more clearly defined episcopate can be seen. Both letters state that Paul had left Timothy in Ephesus and Titus in Crete to oversee the local church.[12][13] Paul commands Titus to ordain presbyters/bishops and to exercise general oversight. John Zizioulas argues that "The task of the Bishop was from the beginning principally liturgical, consisting in the offering of the Divine Eucharist."[14] The authorship of both those letters is questioned by many scholars in the field and the question whether they reflect a first or second century structure of church hierarchy is among the arguments used in the debate as to their authenticity.
Early sources are unclear but various groups of Christian communities may have had the bishop surrounded by a group or college functioning as leaders of the local churches.Template:Sfn[15] Eventually the head or "monarchic" bishop came to rule more clearly,Template:Sfn and all local churches would eventually follow the example of the other churches and structure themselves after the model of the others with the one bishop in clearer charge,Template:Sfn though the role of the body of presbyters remained important.Template:Sfn
Apostolic Fathers
Around the end of the 1st century, the early church's organization became clearer in historical documents.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". In the works of the Apostolic Fathers, and Ignatius of Antioch in particular, the role of the episkopos, or bishop, became more important or, rather, already was very important and being clearly defined. While Ignatius of Antioch offers the earliest clear description of monarchial bishops (a single bishop over all house churches in a city)Template:Efn he is an advocate of monoepiscopal structure rather than describing an accepted reality. To the bishops and house churches to which he writes, he offers strategies on how to pressure house churches who do not recognize the bishop into compliance. Other contemporary Christian writers do not describe monarchial bishops, either continuing to equate them with the presbyters or speaking of Script error: No such module "lang". (bishops, plural) in a city.
Clement of Alexandria (end of the 2nd century) writes about the ordination of a certain Zachæus as bishop by the imposition of Simon Peter Bar-Jonah's hands. The words bishop and ordination are used in their technical meaning by the same Clement of Alexandria.[16] The bishops in the 2nd century are defined also as the only clergy to whom the ordination to priesthood (presbyterate) and diaconate is entrusted: "a priest (presbyter) lays on hands, but does not ordain." (Script error: No such module "lang".).[17]
At the beginning of the 3rd century, Hippolytus of Rome describes another feature of the ministry of a bishop, which is that of the Script error: No such module "Lang".: the primate of sacrificial priesthood and the power to forgive sins.[18]
Canonical age
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
As the bishop's role further developed into the 4th century, the First Council of Nicaea decreed that bishops should be ordained by at least three others.[19] Age requirements for episcopal ordination or consecration were neither universal nor fixed in early Christian churches.[20] It was, however, universally required that a bishop be male.
Lacking a definitive ecumenical age requirement for holy orders—between the early ecumenical councils of the Great and imperial Roman churches, and after schism into the Latin and Greek churches—young men had been ordained, appointed, and/or enthroned as bishops, some as young as 5.[21]
Notable younger Latin and Greek bishops have included: Hugh Vermandois (5); Luis Antonio Jaime de Borbón y Farnesio (8); Guido Ascanio Sforza di Santa Fiora (9); Benedict IX (11-20); Karol Ferdynand Vasa (11); Alexander Stewart (11); Niccolò Caetani (13); Bruno von Bayern (14); Odo of Bayeux (14); Alessandro Farnese (14); Cesare Borgia (15); Clemens August (15); Ranuccio Farnese (16); Alfonso Carafa (16); James II of Cyprus (16) Theophylact (16); Ippolito de' Medici (17); Diomede Carafa (19); Stephen I (19); Luis de Milà y de Borja (21); Nicolas de Besse (21); Clemente Grosso della Rovere (21); Niccolò Gaddi (22); Juan de Borja Lanzol de Romaní, el menor (24); Gabriele Condulmer (later Eugene IV, aged 24) of Rome;[22] Ludovico Ludovisi (25); Giovanni Michiel (25); Charles Borromeo (25); Pietro Riario (26); Mark Sittich von Hohenems Altemps (26); Jošt Rožmberk (26); Giuliano della Rovere (later Julius II, aged 27); Bonifazio Bevilacqua Aldobrandini (27); Philipp Ludwig von Sinzendorf (27); Pedro Luis de Borja Lanzol de Romaní (27); and Gerhard II Lippe (29). Throughout the Church of the East, other notable younger bishops have included: Shimun XXIII Eshai (12);[23] Shimun XIX Benyamin (16);[24] Yohannan VIII Hormizd (16); Sargis Yosip (17);[25] Shimun XVII Abraham (20);[26] and Yosip Khnaninsho (22).[27]
During the Catholic Church's Council of Trent, the Holy See dogmatically mandated a minimum canonical age of 30 for the episcopacy.[20] The Eastern Orthodox Church would also impose a minimum age of 30 for the priesthood.[28] The Coptic Orthodox have adopted a minimum canonical age of at least 28 for the priesthood, including its specialized ministries leading to the chorepiscopacy.[29] For the office of bishop, the Eastern Orthodox Church imposed a minimum canonical age of 35.[30][31][32] Overall, the Oriental Orthodox Churches, the Assyrian Church of the East and Protestantism have not established a universal, canonical age.
During the 20th century, the Holiness-Pentecostal Church of God in Christ elevated Clarence Leslie Morton Jr. (born 1942) into the episcopacy at the age of 20 in 1962.[33] J. Delano Ellis (born 1944), co-founder of the Joint College of African-American Pentecostal Bishops, was also elevated as bishop at the age of 26 in 1970.[34][35]
Christian bishops and civil government
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The efficient organization of the Roman Empire became the template for the organisation of the Great Church in the 4th century, particularly after Constantine's Edict of Milan. As the church moved from the shadows of privacy into the public forum it acquired land for churches, burials and clergy. In 391, Theodosius I decreed that any land that had been confiscated from the church by Roman authorities be returned.[36]
The most usual term for the geographic area of a bishop's authority and ministry, the diocese, began as part of the structure of the Roman Empire under Diocletian. As Roman authority began to fail in the western portion of the empire, the church took over much of the civil administration.[37] This can be clearly seen in the ministry of two popes: Pope Leo I in the 5th century, and Pope Gregory I in the 6th century. Both of these men were statesmen and public administrators in addition to their role as Christian pastors, teachers and leaders. In the Eastern churches, latifundia entailed to a bishop's see were much less common, the state power did not collapse the way it did in the West, and thus the tendency of bishops acquiring civil power was much weaker than in the West. However, the role of Western bishops as civil authorities, often called prince bishops, continued throughout much of the Middle Ages.[38]
Bishops holding political office
As well as being archchancellors of the Holy Roman Empire after the 9th century, bishops generally served as chancellors to medieval monarchs, acting as head of the justiciary and chief chaplain. The Lord Chancellor of England was almost always a bishop up until the dismissal of Cardinal Thomas Wolsey by Henry VIII.[39] Similarly, the position of Kanclerz in the Polish kingdom was always held by a bishop until the 16th century.[40]
In modern times, the principality of Andorra is headed by Co-Princes of Andorra, one of whom is the Bishop of Urgell and the other, the sitting President of France, an arrangement that began with the Paréage of Andorra (1278), and was ratified in the 1993 constitution of Andorra.[41]
The office of the Papacy is inherently held by the sitting Roman Catholic Bishop of Rome.[42][43] Though not originally intended to hold temporal authority, since the Middle Ages the power of the Roman papacy gradually expanded deep into the secular realm and for centuries the sitting Bishop of Rome was the most powerful governmental office in Central Italy.[44] In modern times, the Pope of Rome is also the sovereign Prince of Vatican City, an internationally recognized micro-state located entirely within the city of Rome.[45][46][47][48]
In France, prior to the Revolution, representatives of the clergy—in practice, bishops and abbots of the largest monasteries—comprised the First Estate of the Estates-General. This role was abolished after separation of church and state was implemented during the French Revolution.[49]
In the 21st century, the more senior bishops of the Church of England continue to sit in the House of Lords of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, as representatives of the established church, and are known as Lords Spiritual. The Bishop of Sodor and Man, whose diocese lies outside the United Kingdom, is an ex officio member of the Legislative Council of the Isle of Man.[50] In the past, the Bishop of Durham had extensive vice-regal powers within his northern diocese, which was a county palatine, the County Palatine of Durham, (previously, Liberty of Durham) of which he was ex officio the earl. In the 19th century, a gradual process of reform was enacted, with the majority of the bishop's historic powers vested in The Crown by 1858.[51]
Eastern Orthodox bishops, along with all other members of the clergy, are canonically forbidden to hold political office.[52] Occasional exceptions to this rule are tolerated when the alternative is political chaos. In the Ottoman Empire, the Patriarch of Constantinople, for example, had de facto administrative, cultural and legal jurisdiction,[53] as well as spiritual authority, over all Eastern Orthodox Christians of the empire, as part of the Ottoman millet system. An Eastern Orthodox bishop headed the Prince-Bishopric of Montenegro from 1516 to 1852, assisted by a secular guvernadur. More recently, Archbishop Makarios III of Cyprus, served as President of the Cyprus from 1960 to 1977, an extremely turbulent time period on the island.[54]
In 2001, Peter Hollingworth, AC, OBE—then the Anglican Archbishop of Brisbane—was controversially appointed Governor-General of Australia. Although Hollingworth gave up his episcopal position to accept the appointment, it still attracted considerable opposition in a country which maintains a formal separation between Church and State.[55][56]
Episcopacy during the English Civil War
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
During the period of the English Civil War, the role of bishops as wielders of political power and as upholders of the established church became a matter of heated political controversy. Presbyterianism was the polity of most Reformed Christianity in Europe, and had been favored by many in England since the English Reformation. Since in the primitive Church the offices of presbyter and Script error: No such module "lang". were not clearly distinguished, many Puritans held that this was the only form of government the church should have. The Anglican divine, Richard Hooker, objected to this claim in his famous work Of the Laws of Ecclesiastic Polity while, at the same time, defending Presbyterian ordination as valid (in particular Calvin's ordination of Beza). This was the official stance of the English Church until the Commonwealth, during which time, the views of Presbyterians and Independents (Congregationalists) were more freely expressed and practiced.
Christian churches
Catholic, Eastern and Oriental Orthodox, Lutheran and Anglican churches
Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote".
Bishops exercise leadership roles in the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Oriental Orthodox Churches, certain Evangelical-Lutheran Churches, the Anglican Communion, the Independent Catholic churches, the Independent Anglican churches, and certain other, smaller, denominations.
The traditional role of a bishop is as pastor of a diocese (also called a bishopric, synod, eparchy or see), and so to serve as a "diocesan bishop", or "eparch" as it is called in many Eastern Christian churches. Dioceses vary considerably in size, geographically and population-wise. Some dioceses around the Mediterranean Sea which were Christianised early are rather compact, whereas dioceses in areas of rapid modern growth in Christian commitment, as in some parts of Sub-Saharan Africa, South America and the Far East, are much larger and more populous.
As well as traditional diocesan bishops, many churches have a well-developed structure of church leadership that involves a number of layers of authority and responsibility:
<templatestyles src="Glossary/styles.css" />
-
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Archbishop
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Area bishop
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Assistant bishop
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Auxiliary bishop
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Catholicos
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Chorbishop
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Coadjutor bishop
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >General bishop
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Major archbishop
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Metropolitan bishop
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Patriarch
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Te Pīhopa
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Primate
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Presiding bishop or president bishop
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Suffragan bishop
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Supreme bishop
Template:Defn
<dt id="Script error: No such module "delink"." >Titular bishop
Template:Defn
Duties
In Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Oriental Orthodoxy, High Church Lutheranism, and Anglicanism, only a bishop can ordain other bishops, priests, and deacons.[57]
The bishop is the ordinary minister of the sacrament of confirmation in the Latin Church, and in the Old Catholic communion only a bishop may administer this sacrament. In the Lutheran and Anglican churches, the bishop normatively administers the rite of confirmation, although in those denominations that do not have an episcopal polity, confirmation is administered by the priest.[58] However, in the Byzantine and other Eastern rites, whether Eastern or Oriental Orthodox or Eastern Catholic, chrismation is done immediately after baptism, and thus the priest is the one who confirms, using chrism blessed by a bishop.[59]
Ordination of bishops
Bishops in all of these communions are ordained or consecrated by other bishops through the laying on of hands. Ordination of a bishop, and thus continuation of apostolic succession, takes place through a ritual centred on the imposition of hands and prayer.[60][61][62]
In Scandinavia and the Baltic region, Lutheran churches participating in the Porvoo Communion (those of Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, and Lithuania), as well as many non-Porvoo membership Lutheran churches (including those of Kenya, Latvia, and Russia), as well as the confessional Communion of Nordic Lutheran Dioceses, believe that they ordain their bishops in the apostolic succession in lines stemming from the original apostles.[63][64][65] The New Westminster Dictionary of Church History states that "In Sweden the apostolic succession was preserved because the Catholic bishops were allowed to stay in office, but they had to approve changes in the ceremonies."[66]
While traditional teaching maintains that any bishop with apostolic succession can validly perform the ordination of another bishop, some churches require two or three bishops participate, either to ensure sacramental validity or to conform with church law.
Peculiar to the Catholic Church
Catholic doctrine holds that one bishop can validly ordain another (priest) as a bishop. Although a minimum of three bishops participating is desirable (there are usually several more) in order to demonstrate collegiality, canonically only one bishop is necessary.[67] The Second Vatican Council's Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy stated that "when a bishop is consecrated, the laying of hands may be done by all the bishops present".[68]
Apart from the ordination, which is always done by other bishops, there are different methods as to the actual selection of a candidate for ordination as bishop. The Dicastery for Bishops generally oversees the selection of new bishops, with recommendations sent for the approval of the pope.[69] The papal nuncio usually solicits names from the bishops of a country, consults with priests and leading members of a laity, and then selects three to be forwarded to the Holy See. In Europe, some cathedral chapters have duties to elect bishops. The Eastern Catholic churches generally elect their own bishops. Most Eastern Orthodox churches allow varying amounts of formalised laity or lower clergy influence on the choice of bishops. This also applies in those Eastern churches which are in union with the pope, though it is required that he give assent.
The pope, in addition to being the Bishop of Rome and spiritual head of the Catholic Church, is also the Patriarch of the Latin Church. Each bishop within the Latin Church is answerable directly to the Pope and not any other bishop except to metropolitans in certain oversight instances. In this instante, the pope uses the title Patriarch of the West, although this title was dropped from use between 2006 and 2024, when Pope Francis reinstituted it.[70]
Recognition of other churches' ordinations
The Catholic Church does recognise as valid (though illicit) ordinations done by breakaway Catholic, Old Catholic or Oriental bishops, and groups descended from them; it also regards as both valid and licit those ordinations done by bishops of the Eastern churches,Template:Efn so long as those receiving the ordination conform to other canonical requirements (for example, is an adult male) and an eastern orthodox rite of episcopal ordination, expressing the proper functions and sacramental status of a bishop, is used; this has given rise to the phenomenon of Script error: No such module "Lang". (for example, clergy of the Independent Catholic groups which claim apostolic succession, though this claim is rejected by both Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy). With respect to Lutheranism, "the Catholic Church has never officially expressed its judgement on the validity of orders as they have been handed down by episcopal succession in these two national Lutheran churches" (the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Sweden and the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland) though it does "question how the ecclesiastical break in the 16th century has affected the apostolicity of the churches of the Reformation and thus the apostolicity of their ministry".[71][72]
Since Pope Leo XIII issued the bull Script error: No such module "Lang". in 1896, the Catholic Church has insisted that Anglican orders are invalid because of the Reformed changes in the Anglican ordination rites of the 16th century and divergence in understanding of the theology of priesthood, episcopacy and Eucharist. However, since the 1930s, Utrecht Old Catholic bishops (recognised by the Holy See as validly ordained) have sometimes taken part in the ordination of Anglican bishops. According to the writer Timothy Dufort, by 1969, all Church of England bishops had acquired Old Catholic lines of apostolic succession recognised by the Holy See.[73] This development has been used to argue that the strain of apostolic succession has been re-introduced into Anglicanism, at least within the Church of England.[74] However, other issues, such as the Anglican ordination of women, is at variance with Catholic understanding of Christian teaching, and have contributed to the reaffirmation of Catholic rejection of Anglican ordinations.[75][76]
The Eastern Orthodox Church does not accept the validity of any ordinations performed by the Independent Catholic or Independent Orthodox groups, as Eastern Orthodoxy considers to be spurious any consecration outside the church as a whole. Eastern Orthodoxy considers apostolic succession to exist only within themselves as the one true church, and not through any authority held by individual bishops; thus, if a bishop ordains someone to serve outside the (Eastern Orthodox) Church, the ceremony is ineffectual, and no ordination has taken place regardless of the ritual used or the ordaining prelate's position within the Eastern Orthodox Church.
The position of the Catholic Church is slightly different. Whilst it does recognise the validity of the orders of certain groups which separated from communion with Holy See (for instance, the ordinations of the Old Catholics in communion with Utrecht, as well as the Polish National Catholic Church, which received its orders directly from Utrecht, and was until recently part of that communion), Catholicism does not recognise the orders of any group whose teaching is at variance with what they consider the core tenets of Christianity; this is the case even though the clergy of the Independent Catholic groups may use the proper ordination ritual. There are also other reasons why the Holy See does not recognise the validity of the orders of the independent clergy:
- They hold that the continuing practice among many independent clergy of one person receiving multiple ordinations in order to secure apostolic succession, betrays an incorrect and mechanistic theology of ordination.
- They hold that the practice within independent groups of ordaining women (such as within certain member communities of the Anglican Communion) demonstrates an understanding of priesthood that they vindicate is totally unacceptable to the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches as they believe that the Universal Church does not possess such authority; thus, they uphold that any ceremonies performed by these women should be considered being sacramentally invalid.[75][76]
- The theology of male clergy within the Independent movement is also suspect according to the Catholics, as they presumably approve of the ordination of females, and may have even undergone an (invalid) ordination ceremony conducted by a woman.
Whilst members of the Independent Catholic movement take seriously the issue of valid orders, it is highly significant that the relevant Vatican Congregations tend not to respond to petitions from Independent Catholic bishops and clergy who seek to be received into communion with the Holy See, hoping to continue in some sacramental role. In those instances where the pope does grant reconciliation, those deemed to be clerics within the Independent Old Catholic movement are invariably admitted as laity and not priests or bishops.
There is a mutual recognition of the validity of orders amongst Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Old Catholic, Oriental Orthodox and Assyrian Church of the East churches.[77]
Some provinces of the Anglican Communion have begun ordaining women as bishops in recent decades—for example, England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Cuba. The first woman to be consecrated a bishop within Anglicanism was Barbara Harris, who was ordained in the United States in 1989.[78] In 2006, Katharine Jefferts Schori, the Episcopal Bishop of Nevada, became the first woman to become the presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church.[79]
In the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada (ELCIC), the largest Lutheran church bodies in the United States and Canada, respectively, and roughly based on the Nordic Lutheran national churches (similar to that of the Church of England), bishops are elected by Synod Assemblies, consisting of both lay members and clergy, for a term of six years, which can be renewed, depending upon the local synod's "constitution" (which is mirrored on either the ELCA or ELCIC's national constitution). Since the implementation of concordats between the ELCA and the Episcopal Church of the United States and the ELCIC and the Anglican Church of Canada, all bishops, including the presiding bishop (ELCA) or the national bishop (ELCIC), have been consecrated using the historic succession in line with bishops from the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Sweden,[80] with at least one Anglican bishop serving as co-consecrator.[81][82]
Although ELCA agreed with the Episcopal Church to limit ordination to the bishop "ordinarily", ELCA pastor-ordinators are given permission to perform the rites in "extraordinary" circumstance. In practice, "extraordinary" circumstance have included disagreeing with Episcopalian views of the episcopate, and as a result, ELCA pastors ordained by other pastors are not permitted to be deployed to Episcopal Churches (they can, however, serve in Presbyterian Church USA, United Methodist Church, Reformed Church in America, and Moravian Church congregations, as the ELCA is in full communion with these denominations). The Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod (LCMS) and the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS), the second and third largest Lutheran bodies in the United States and the two largest Confessional Lutheran bodies in North America, do not follow an episcopal form of governance, settling instead on a form of quasi-congregationalism patterned off what they believe to be the practice of the early church. The second largest of the three predecessor bodies of the ELCA, the American Lutheran Church, was a congregationalist body, with national and synod presidents before they were re-titled as bishops (borrowing from the Lutheran churches in Germany) in the 1980s. With regard to ecclesial discipline and oversight, national and synod presidents typically function similarly to bishops in episcopal bodies.[83]
Methodism
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
African Methodist Episcopal Church
In the African Methodist Episcopal Church, "Bishops are the Chief Officers of the Connectional Organization. They are elected for life by a majority vote of the General Conference which meets every four years."[84]
Christian Methodist Episcopal Church
In the Christian Methodist Episcopal Church in the United States, bishops are administrative superintendents of the church; they are elected by "delegate" votes for as many years deemed until the age of 74, then the bishop must retire. Among their duties, are responsibility for appointing clergy to serve local churches as pastor, for performing ordinations, and for safeguarding the doctrine and discipline of the church. The General Conference, a meeting every four years, has an equal number of clergy and lay delegates. In each Annual Conference, CME bishops serve for four-year terms. In 2010, Teresa E. Jefferson-Snorton was elected as a bishop, becoming the first woman to hold that position.[85] As of 2024, she remains the only female bishop in CME.[86]
United Methodist Church
In the United Methodist Church (the largest branch of Methodism in the world) bishops serve as administrative and pastoral superintendents of the church. They are elected for life from among the ordained elders (presbyters) by vote of the delegates in regional (called jurisdictional) conferences, and are consecrated by the other bishops present at the conference through the laying on of hands. In the United Methodist Church bishops remain members of the "Order of Elders" while being consecrated to the "Office of the Episcopacy". Within the United Methodist Church only bishops are empowered to consecrate bishops and ordain clergy. Among their most critical duties is the ordination and appointment of clergy to serve local churches as pastor, presiding at sessions of the Annual, Jurisdictional, and General Conferences, providing pastoral ministry for the clergy under their charge, and safeguarding the doctrine and discipline of the church. Furthermore, individual bishops, or the Council of Bishops as a whole, often serve a prophetic role, making statements on important social issues and setting forth a vision for the denomination, though they have no legislative authority of their own. In all of these areas, bishops of the United Methodist Church function very much in the historic meaning of the term. According to the Book of Discipline of the United Methodist Church, a bishop's responsibilities are:
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
Leadership.—Spiritual and Temporal—
- To lead and oversee the spiritual and temporal affairs of The United Methodist Church, which confesses Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, and particularly to lead the Church in its mission of witness and service in the world.
- To travel through the connection at large as the Council of Bishops (¶ 526) to implement strategy for the concern of the Church.
- To provide liaison and leadership in the quest for Christian unity in ministry, mission, and structure and in the search for strengthened relationships with other living faith communities.
- To organize such Missions as shall have been authorized by the General Conference.
- To promote and support the evangelistic vision of the whole Church.
- To discharge such other duties as the Discipline may direct.
Presidential Duties.—1. To preside in the General, Jurisdictional, Central, and Annual Conferences. 2. To form the districts after consultation with the district superintendents and after the number of the same has been determined by vote of the Annual Conference. 3. To appoint the district superintendents annually (¶¶ 517–518). 4. To consecrate bishops, to ordain elders and deacons, to consecrate diaconal ministers, to commission deaconesses and home missionaries, and to see that the names of the persons commissioned and consecrated are entered on the journals of the conference and that proper credentials are furnished to these persons.
Working with Ministers.—1. To make and fix the appointments in the Annual Conferences, Provisional Annual Conferences, and Missions as the Discipline may direct (¶¶ 529–533).
2. To divide or to unite a circuit(s), stations(s), or mission(s) as judged necessary for missionary strategy and then to make appropriate appointments. 3. To read the appointments of deaconesses, diaconal ministers, lay persons in service under the World Division of the General Board of Global Ministries, and home missionaries. 4. To fix the Charge Conference membership of all ordained ministers appointed to ministries other than the local church in keeping with ¶443.3. 5. To transfer, upon the request of the receiving bishop, ministerial member(s) of one Annual Conference to another, provided said member(s) agrees to transfer; and to send immediately to the secretaries of both conferences involved, to the conference Boards of Ordained Ministry, and to the clearing house of the General Board of Pensions written notices of the transfer of members and of their standing in the course of study if they are undergraduates.Template:Sfn
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
In each Annual Conference, United Methodist bishops serve for four-year terms, and may serve up to three terms before either retirement or appointment to a new Conference. United Methodist bishops may be male or female, with Marjorie Matthews being the first woman to be consecrated a bishop in 1980.
The collegial expression of episcopal leadership in the United Methodist Church is known as the Council of Bishops. The Council of Bishops speaks to the church and through the church into the world and gives leadership in the quest for Christian unity and interreligious relationships.Template:Sfn The Conference of Methodist Bishops includes the United Methodist Council of Bishops plus bishops from affiliated autonomous Methodist or United churches.
John Wesley consecrated Thomas Coke a "General Superintendent", and directed that Francis Asbury also be consecrated for the United States of America in 1784, where the Methodist Episcopal Church first became a separate denomination apart from the Church of England. Coke soon returned to England, but Asbury was the primary builder of the new church. At first he did not call himself bishop, but eventually submitted to the usage by the denomination.
Notable bishops in United Methodist history include Coke, Asbury, Richard Whatcoat, Philip William Otterbein, Martin Boehm, Jacob Albright, John Seybert, Matthew Simpson, John S. Stamm, William Ragsdale Cannon, Marjorie Matthews, Leontine T. Kelly, William B. Oden, Ntambo Nkulu Ntanda, Joseph Sprague, William Henry Willimon, and Thomas Bickerton.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the bishop is the leader of a local congregation, called a ward. As with most LDS priesthood holders, the bishop is a part-time lay minister and earns a living through other employment. As such, it is his duty to preside, call local leaders, and judge the worthiness of members for certain activities. The bishop does not deliver sermons at every service (generally asking members to do so), but is expected to be a spiritual guide for his congregation. It is therefore believed that he has both the right and ability to receive divine inspiration (through the Holy Spirit) for the ward under his direction. Because it is a part-time position, all able members are expected to assist in the management of the ward by holding delegated lay positions (for example, women's and youth leaders, teachers) referred to as callings. The bishop is especially responsible for leading the youth,[87] in connection with the fact that a bishop is the president of the Aaronic priesthood in his ward (and is thus a form of Mormon Kohen). Although members are asked to confess serious sins to him, unlike the Catholic Church, he is not the instrument of divine forgiveness, but merely a guide through the repentance process (and a judge in case transgressions warrant excommunication or other official discipline). The bishop is also responsible for the physical welfare of the ward, and thus collects tithing and fast offerings and distributes financial assistance where needed.
A literal descendant of Aaron has "legal right" to act as a bishop[88] after being found worthy and ordained by the First Presidency.[89] In the absence of a literal descendant of Aaron, a high priest in the Melchizedek priesthood is called to be a bishop.[89] Each bishop is selected from resident members of the ward by the stake presidency with approval of the First Presidency, and chooses two counselors to form a bishopric. An priesthood holder called as bishop must be ordained a high priest if he is not already one, unlike the similar function of branch president.[90] In special circumstances (such as a ward consisting entirely of young university students), a bishop may be chosen from outside the ward. Traditionally, bishops are married, though this is not always the case.[91] A bishop is typically released after about five years and a new bishop is called to the position. Although the former bishop is released from his duties, he continues to hold the Aaronic priesthood office of bishop. Church members frequently refer to a former bishop as "Bishop" as a sign of respect and affection.
Latter-day Saint bishops do not wear any special clothing or insignia the way clergy in many other churches do, but are expected to dress and groom themselves neatly and conservatively per their local culture, especially when performing official duties. Bishops (as well as other members of the priesthood) can trace their line of authority back to Joseph Smith, who, according to church doctrine, was ordained to lead the church in modern times by the ancient apostles Peter, James, and John, who were ordained to lead the Church by Jesus Christ.[92]
At the global level, the presiding bishop oversees the temporal affairs (buildings, properties, commercial corporations, and so on) of the worldwide church, including the church's massive global humanitarian aid and social welfare programs. The presiding bishop has two counselors; the three together form the presiding bishopric.[93] As opposed to ward bishoprics, where the counselors do not hold the office of bishop, all three men in the presiding bishopric hold the office of bishop, and thus the counselors, as with the presiding bishop, are formally referred to as "Bishop".[94]
Irvingism
New Apostolic Church
The New Apostolic Church (NAC) teaches three classes of ministries: deacons, priests and apostles. The apostles, who are all included in the apostolate with the Chief Apostle as head, are the highest ministries. Of the several kinds of priestly ministries, the bishop is the highest. Nearly all bishops are set in line directly from the chief apostle. They support and help their superior apostle.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
Pentecostalism
Church of God in Christ
In the Church of God in Christ (COGIC), the ecclesiastical structure is composed of large dioceses that are called "jurisdictions" within COGIC, each under the authority of a bishop, sometimes called "state bishops". They can either be made up of large geographical regions of churches or churches that are grouped and organized together as their own separate jurisdictions because of similar affiliations, regardless of geographical location or dispersion. Each state in the U.S. has at least one jurisdiction while others may have several more, and each jurisdiction is usually composed of between 30 and 100 churches. Each jurisdiction is then broken down into several districts, which are smaller groups of churches (either grouped by geographical situation or by similar affiliations) which are each under the authority of District Superintendents who answer to the authority of their jurisdictional/state bishop. There are currently over 170 jurisdictions in the United States, and over 30 jurisdictions in other countries. The bishops of each jurisdiction, according to the COGIC Manual, are considered to be the modern day equivalent in the church of the early apostles and overseers of the New Testament church, and as the highest ranking clergymen in the COGIC, they are tasked with the responsibilities of being the head overseers of all religious, civil, and economic ministries and protocol for the church denomination.[95] They also have the authority to appoint and ordain local pastors, elders, ministers, and reverends within the denomination. The bishops of the COGIC denomination are all collectively called "The Board of Bishops".[96] From the Board of Bishops, and the General Assembly of the COGIC, the body of the church composed of clergy and lay delegates that are responsible for making and enforcing the bylaws of the denomination, every four years, twelve bishops from the COGIC are elected as "The General Board" of the church, who work alongside the delegates of the General Assembly and Board of Bishops to provide administration over the denomination as the church's head executive leaders.[97] One of twelve bishops of the General Board is also elected the "presiding bishop" of the church, and two others are appointed by the presiding bishop himself, as his first and second assistant presiding bishops.
Bishops in the Church of God in Christ usually wear black clergy suits which consist of a black suit blazer, black pants, a purple or scarlet clergy shirt and a white clerical collar, which is usually referred to as "Class B Civic attire". Bishops in COGIC also typically wear the Anglican Choir Dress style vestments of a long purple or scarlet chimere, cuffs, and tippet worn over a long white rochet, and a gold pectoral cross worn around the neck with the tippet. This is usually referred to as "Class A Ceremonial attire". The bishops of COGIC alternate between Class A Ceremonial attire and Class B Civic attire depending on the protocol of the religious services and other events they have to attend.[96][95]
Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee)
In the polity of the Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee), the international leader is the presiding bishop, and the members of the executive committee are executive bishops. Collectively, they supervise and appoint national and state leaders across the world. Leaders of individual states and regions are administrative bishops, who have jurisdiction over local churches in their respective states and are vested with appointment authority for local pastorates. All ministers are credentialed at one of three levels of licensure, the most senior of which is the rank of ordained bishop. To be eligible to serve in state, national, or international positions of authority, a minister must hold the rank of ordained bishop.
Seventh-day Adventists
According to the Seventh-day Adventist understanding of the doctrine of the church:
"The "elders" (Greek, Script error: No such module "lang".) or "bishops" (Script error: No such module "lang".) were the most important officers of the church. The term elder means older one, implying dignity and respect. His position was similar to that of the one who had supervision of the synagogue. The term bishop means "overseer". Paul used these terms interchangeably, equating elders with overseers or bishops (Acts 20:17, 28; Titus 1:5, 7).
"Those who held this position supervised the newly formed churches. Elder referred to the status or rank of the office, while bishop denoted the duty or responsibility of the office—"overseer". Since the apostles also called themselves elders (1 Peter 5:1; 2 John 1; 3 John 1), it is apparent that there were both local elders and itinerant elders, or elders at large. But both kinds of elder functioned as shepherds of the congregations.[98]"
The above understanding is part of the basis of Adventist organizational structure. The world wide Seventh-day Adventist church is organized into local districts, conferences or missions, union conferences or union missions, divisions, and finally at the top is the general conference. At each level (with exception to the local districts), there is an elder who is elected president and a group of elders who serve on the executive committee with the elected president. Those who have been elected president would in effect be the "bishop" while never actually carrying the title or ordained as such because the term is usually associated with the episcopal style of church governance most often found in Catholic, Anglican, Methodist and some Pentecostal/Charismatic circles.
Others
Some Baptists also have begun taking on the title of bishop.[99] In some smaller Protestant denominations and independent churches, the term bishop is used in the same way as pastor, to refer to the leader of the local congregation, and may be male or female. This usage is especially common in African-American churches, particularly through the Full Gospel Baptist Church Fellowship.
In the Church of Scotland, which has a Presbyterian church structure, the word "bishop" refers to an ordained person, usually a normal parish minister, who has temporary oversight of a trainee minister. In the Presbyterian Church (USA), the term bishop is an expressive name for a Minister of Word and Sacrament who serves a congregation and exercises "the oversight of the flock of Christ."[100] The term is traceable to the 1789 Form of Government of the PC (USA) and the Presbyterian understanding of the pastoral office.[101] Reformed churches on the whole do not tend to have bishops, although there are exceptions.
While not considered orthodox Christian, the Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica uses roles and titles derived from Christianity for its clerical hierarchy, including bishops who have much the same authority and responsibilities as in Catholicism.
The Salvation Army does not have bishops but has appointed leaders of geographical areas, known as Divisional Commanders. Larger geographical areas, called territories, are led by a territorial commander, who is the highest-ranking officer in that territory.
Jehovah's Witnesses do not use the title 'bishop' within their organizational structure, but appoint elders to be overseers (to fulfill the role of oversight) within their congregations.[102]
The Batak Christian Protestant Church of Indonesia, the most prominent Protestant denomination in Indonesia, uses the term Ephorus instead of bishop.[103]
In the Vietnamese syncretist religion of Caodaism, bishops (Script error: No such module "Lang".) comprise the fifth of nine hierarchical levels, and are responsible for spiritual and temporal education as well as record-keeping and ceremonies in their parishes. At any one time there are seventy-two bishops. Their authority is described in Section I of the text Script error: No such module "Lang". (revealed through seances in December 1926). Caodai bishops wear robes and headgear of embroidered silk depicting the Divine Eye and the Eight Trigrams. (The color varies according to branch.) This is the full ceremonial dress; the simple version consists of a seven-layered turban.
Dress and insignia in Christianity
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
Traditionally, a number of items are associated with the office of a bishop, most notably the mitre and the crosier. Other vestments and insignia vary between Eastern and Western Christianity.
In the Latin Church of the Catholic Church, the choir dress of a bishop includes the purple cassock with amaranth trim, rochet, purple zucchetto (skull cap), purple biretta, and pectoral cross. The cappa magna may be worn, but only within the bishop's own diocese and on especially solemn occasions.Template:Sfn The mitre, zucchetto, and stole are generally worn by bishops when presiding over liturgical functions. For liturgical functions other than the Mass the bishop typically wears the cope. Within his own diocese and when celebrating solemnly elsewhere with the consent of the local ordinary, he also uses the crosier.Template:Sfn When celebrating Mass, a bishop, like a priest, wears the chasuble. The Caeremoniale Episcoporum recommends, but does not impose, that in solemn celebrations a bishop should also wear a dalmatic, which can always be white, beneath the chasuble, especially when administering the sacrament of holy orders, blessing an abbot or abbess, and dedicating a church or an altar.Template:Sfn The Caeremoniale Episcoporum no longer makes mention of episcopal gloves, episcopal sandals, liturgical stockings (also known as buskins), or the accoutrements that it once prescribed for the bishop's horse. The coat of arms of a Latin Church Catholic bishop usually displays a galero with a cross and crosier behind the escutcheon; the specifics differ by location and ecclesiastical rank (see Ecclesiastical heraldry).
Anglican bishops generally make use of the mitre, crosier, ecclesiastical ring, purple cassock, purple zucchetto, and pectoral cross. However, the traditional choir dress of Anglican bishops retains its late mediaeval form, and looks quite different from that of their Catholic counterparts; it consists of a long rochet which is worn with a chimere.
In the Eastern churches (Eastern Orthodox, Eastern Rite Catholic) a bishop will wear the mandyas, panagia (and perhaps an enkolpion), sakkos, omophorion and an Eastern-style mitre. Eastern bishops do not normally wear an episcopal ring; the faithful kiss (or, alternatively, touch their forehead to) the bishop's hand. To seal official documents, he will usually use an inked stamp. An Eastern bishop's coat of arms will normally display an Eastern-style mitre, cross, Eastern-style crosier and a red and white (or red and gold) mantle. The arms of Oriental Orthodox bishops will display the episcopal insignia (mitre or turban) specific to their own liturgical traditions. Variations occur based upon jurisdiction and national customs.
Cathedra
In Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Lutheran and Anglican cathedrals there is a special chair set aside for the exclusive use of the bishop. This is the bishop's cathedra and is often called the throne. In some Christian denominations, for example, the Anglican Communion, parish churches may maintain a chair for the use of the bishop when he visits; this is to signify the parish's union with the bishop.
-
Byzantine Rite Catholic bishop in non-liturgical clothing
-
An Anglican bishop with a crosier, wearing a rochet under a red chimere and cuffs, a black tippet, and a pectoral cross
-
An Episcopal bishop immediately before presiding at the Great Vigil of Easter in the narthex of St. Michael's Episcopal Cathedral in Boise, Idaho.
-
An Ephorus of the Batak Christian Protestant Church in Indonesia, one of the largest Lutheran churches in Southeast Asia, wearing white bands and Geneva gown
In non-Christian religions
Buddhism
The leader of the Buddhist Churches of America (BCA) is their bishop,[104][105][106] The Japanese title for the bishop of the BCA is Script error: No such module "lang".,[106][107][108] although the English title is favored over the Japanese. When it comes to many other Buddhist terms, the BCA chose to keep them in their original language (terms such as Script error: No such module "lang". and Script error: No such module "lang".), but with some words (including Script error: No such module "lang".), they changed/translated these terms into English words.[109][110][111]
Between 1899 and 1944, the BCA held the name Buddhist Mission of North America. The leader of the Buddhist Mission of North America was called Script error: No such module "lang". (superintendent/director) between 1899 and 1918. In 1918 the Script error: No such module "lang". was promoted to bishop (Script error: No such module "lang".).[112][113][114] However, according to George J. Tanabe, the title "bishop" was in practice already used by Hawaiian Shin Buddhists (in Honpa Hongwanji Mission of Hawaii) even when the official title was kantoku.[115]
Bishops are also present in other Japanese Buddhist organizations. Higashi Hongan-ji's North American District, Honpa Honganji Mission of Hawaii, Jodo Shinshu Buddhist Temples of Canada,[116] a Jodo Shu temple in Los Angeles, the Shingon temple Koyasan Buddhist Temple,[117] Sōtō Mission in Hawai‘i (a Soto Zen Buddhist institution),[118][119] and the Sōtō Zen Buddhist Community of South America (Script error: No such module "Lang".) all have or have had leaders with the title bishop. As for the Sōtō Zen Buddhist Community of South America, the Japanese title is Script error: No such module "lang"., but the leader is in practice referred to as "bishop".[120]
Tenrikyo
Tenrikyo is a Japanese New Religion with influences from both Shinto and Buddhism.[121] The leader of the Tenrikyo North American Mission has the title of bishop.[121][122]
See also
Script error: No such module "Portal".
<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>
- Anglican bishops
- Appointment of Catholic bishops
- Appointment of Church of England bishops
- Bishop in Europe
- Bishops in the Catholic Church
- Bishop of Alexandria, or Pope
- Bishops in the Church of Scotland
- Diocesan bishop
- Ecclesiastical polity (church governance)
- Ganzibra
- Gay bishops
- Hierarchy of the Catholic Church
- List of Catholic bishops of the United States
- List of metropolitans and patriarchs of Moscow
- List of types of spiritual teachers
- List of Lutheran bishops and archbishops
- Lists of patriarchs, archbishops, and bishops
- Lord Bishop
- Order of precedence in the Catholic Church
- Shepherd in religion
- Spokesperson bishops in the Church of England
- Suffragan Bishop in Europe
Notes
References
Citations
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Bibleverse".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Bibleverse".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Bibleverse".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Bibleverse".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Bibleverse".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Bibleverse".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Bibleverse".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Bibleverse".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Clement, "Hom.", III, lxxii; cfr. Stromata, VI, xiii, cvi; cf. "Const. Apost.", II, viii, 36
- ↑ "Didascalia Syr.", IV; III, 10, 11, 20; Cornelius, "Ad Fabianum" in Eusebius, Historia Ecclesiastica, VI, xliii.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".. See also chapter VI, O papa tem poder temporal absoluto (pages 49–55).
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Cite legislation UK
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1313 Template:Webarchive
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Second Vatican Council, Sacrosanctum Concilium, paragraph 76, published on 4 December 1963, accessed on 15 July 2025
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
- ↑ Timothy Dufort, The Tablet, 29 May 1982, pp. 536–538.
- ↑ Dufort, Timothy (29 May 1982). The Tablet. pp. 536–538.
- ↑ a b Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Responsum ad Dubium Concerning the Teaching Contained in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis Template:Webarchive, 25 October 1995; Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Commentary, Concerning the Reply of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on the Teaching Contained in the Apostolic Letter "Ordinatio Sacerdotalis", 25 October 1995.
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Numrich, P.D., 2013. Local Inter-Buddhist Associations in North America. In: Queen, C., Williams, D.R. (Eds.), American Buddhism: Methods and Findings in Recent Scholarship. Routledge. p. 128
- ↑ Murphy, T.F., United States Bureau of the Census (1941). Religious bodies, 1936. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., p. 346 https://archive.org/details/religiousbodies10002unse
- ↑ a b Ama, M. (2010) The Legal Dimensions of the Formation of Shin Buddhist Temples in Los Angeles. In: Williams, D.R., Moriya, T. (Eds.), Issei Buddhism in the Americas. University of Illinois Press., p. 66-68
- ↑ Willard, R. H., Wilson, C. G. & Baird, J. A. (1985). Sacred Places of San Francisco. Presidio Press., p. 164
- ↑ Quli, N. E. F. & Mitchell, S. A. (2015). Buddhist Modernism As Narrative: A Comparative Study of Jodo Shinshu and Zen. In: Mitchell, S. A. & Quli, N. E. F. (eds.) Buddhism beyond Borders: New Perspectives on Buddhism in the United States. SUNY Press., p. 206
- ↑ Kashima, T. (1977). Buddhism in America : the social organization of an ethnic religious institution. Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press., p. 41
- ↑ Seager, R. H. (2012). Buddhism in America. revised and expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press, p. 56
- ↑ Fronsdal, G. (1998). Insight Meditation in the United States: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. In: Prebish, C. S., Tanaka, K. K., & Tanaka, K. K. (eds.) The Faces of Buddhism in America. University of California Press., p. 169
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Tanabe, G. J. Jr. (2004). Grafting Identity: The Hawaiian Branches of the Bodhi Tree. In: Learman, L. (ed.) Buddhist Missionaries in the Era of Globalization. University of Hawaii Press., p. 84
- ↑ Ama, M. (2011). Immigrants to the Pure Land: The Modernization, Acculturation, and Globalization of Shin Buddhism, 1898-1941. University of Hawaii Press., pp. ix–x
- ↑ Prebish, C. S. (2010). Buddhism: A Modern Perspective. Penn State Press., p. 256
- ↑ Tanabe, G. J. Jr. (2004). Grafting Identity: The Hawaiian Branches of the Bodhi Tree. In: Learman, L. (ed.) Buddhist Missionaries in the Era of Globalization. University of Hawaii Press., p. 97
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Rocha, C. (2004). Being a Zen Buddhist Brazilian: Juggling Multiple Religious Identities in the Land of Catholicism. In: Learman, L. (ed.) Buddhist Missionaries in the Era of Globalization. University of Hawaii Press. pp. 140, 158
- ↑ a b Williams, D. R. & Moriya, T. (2010). Issei Buddhism in the Americas. University of Illinois Press., p. 135-137
- ↑ Yamakura, A. (2010). The United States–Japanese War and Tenrikyo Ministers in America. In: Williams, D. R. & Moriya, T. (eds.) Issei Buddhism in the Americas. University of Illinois Press., p. 142
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Sources
<templatestyles src="Refbegin/styles.css" />
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
External links
Template:Sister project Template:Sister project
- Methodist/Anglican Thoughts On Apostolic Succession by Gregory Neal
- Methodist Episcopacy: In Search of Holy Orders by Gregory Neal
- Template:Cite EB1911
- The Old Catholic Church, Province of the United States Template:Webarchive
- The Ecumenical Catholic Communion* The United Methodist Church: Council of Bishops
- Vatican Website with Canon Law of Catholic Church
Template:Lutheran Divine Service Template:Anglicanism (footer) Script error: No such module "navbox".