Graham Hancock: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>OAbot
m Open access bot: url-access updated in citation with #oabot.
 
imported>Finlay McWalter
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
| caption            = Hancock in 2010
| caption            = Hancock in 2010
| birth_name        = Graham Bruce Hancock
| birth_name        = Graham Bruce Hancock
| birth_date        = {{birth date and age|1950|08|02|df=y}}
| birth_date        = {{birth date and age|df=yes|1950|08|02}}
| birth_place        = [[Edinburgh]], Scotland
| birth_place        = [[Edinburgh]], Scotland
| death_date        =  
| death_date        =  
Line 19: Line 19:
| website            = {{URL|grahamhancock.com}}
| website            = {{URL|grahamhancock.com}}
}}
}}
'''Graham Bruce Hancock''' (born 2 August 1950)<ref>{{cite web |date=13 November 2022 |title=Netflix series Ancient Apocalypse: All you need to know about presenter Graham Hancock |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/netflix-series-ancient-apocalypse-all-you-need-to-know-about-presenter-graham-hancock/articleshow/95458963.cms?from=mdr |accessdate=21 November 2022 |work=The Economic Times |publisher=India Times |edition=English}}</ref> is a British [[Journalism|journalist]] and author who promotes <!--This is NPOV. Do not change it to softer words (e.g., unconventional) or it will be reverted.-->[[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]]{{Sfn|Fagan|2006|pp=xvi, 27-28}}{{sfn|Defant|2017}} ideas about ancient [[civilization]]s and hypothetical [[lost lands]].<ref name="synop">{{cite web |year=2000 |title=Atlantis Reborn Again {programme synopsis} |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/atlantisrebornagain.shtml |access-date=1 September 2009 |work=Science & Nature: Horizon |publisher=[[BBC]]}}</ref> Hancock proposes that an advanced civilization with spiritual technology existed during the [[Last Glacial Period|last Ice Age]] until it was destroyed following [[Younger Dryas impact hypothesis|comet impacts]] around 12,900 years ago at the onset of the [[Younger Dryas]]. He speculates that survivors of this cataclysm passed on their knowledge to primitive [[hunter-gatherer]]s around the world, giving rise to all the [[Cradle of civilization|earliest known civilizations]] (such as [[ancient Egypt]], [[Sumer]], and [[Mesoamerica]]).  
'''Graham Bruce Hancock''' (born 2 August 1950)<ref>{{cite web |date=13 November 2022 |title=Netflix series Ancient Apocalypse: All you need to know about presenter Graham Hancock |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/netflix-series-ancient-apocalypse-all-you-need-to-know-about-presenter-graham-hancock/articleshow/95458963.cms?from=mdr |accessdate=21 November 2022 |work=The Economic Times |publisher=India Times |edition=English}}</ref> is a British author known for promoting <!--This is NPOV. Do not change it to softer words (e.g., unconventional) or it will be reverted.-->[[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]]{{Sfn|Fagan|2006|pp=xvi, 27-28}}{{sfn|Defant|2017}} explanations of ancient civilizations and hypothetical [[lost lands]].<ref name="synop">{{cite web |year=2000 |title=Atlantis Reborn Again {programme synopsis} |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/atlantisrebornagain.shtml |access-date=1 September 2009 |work=Science & Nature: Horizon |publisher=[[BBC]]}}</ref> Hancock argues that an advanced society with spiritual technology thrived during the [[Last Glacial Period|last Ice Age]] until [[Younger Dryas impact hypothesis|comet impacts]] triggered the [[Younger Dryas]] about 12,900 years ago. He maintains that survivors of the disaster shared their knowledge with [[hunter-gatherer]] communities in regions such as [[ancient Egypt]], [[Sumer]], and [[Mesoamerica]], sparking the [[Cradle of civilization|earliest known civilizations]].


Born in [[Edinburgh]], Hancock studied [[sociology]] at [[Durham University]] before working as a journalist, writing for a number of British newspapers and magazines. His first three books dealt with [[international development]], including ''Lords of Poverty'' (1989), a well-received critique of corruption in the [[Aid|aid system]]. Beginning with ''[[The Sign and the Seal]]'' in 1992, he shifted focus to speculative accounts of human [[prehistory]] and ancient civilizations, on which he has written a dozen books, most notably ''[[Fingerprints of the Gods]]'' and ''[[Magicians of the Gods]]''.  
Born in [[Edinburgh]], Hancock studied [[sociology]] at [[Durham University]] before joining British newspapers and magazines as a journalist. His first three books examined [[international development]], including ''Lords of Poverty'' (1989), a well-received critique of corruption in the [[Aid|aid system]]. Beginning with ''[[The Sign and the Seal]]'' in 1992, he shifted to speculative accounts of human [[prehistory]] and ancient civilizations, publishing a dozen books that include ''[[Fingerprints of the Gods]]'' and ''[[Magicians of the Gods]]''.


Experts have described Hancock's investigations of archaeological evidence, myths and historical documents as superficially resembling investigative journalism but lacking in accuracy, consistency, and impartiality.{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|p=87-91|2024}} They define his work as [[pseudoarchaeology]]{{Sfn|Fagan|2006|pp=xvi}}<ref>{{Cite web |last=Costopoulos |first=André |date=8 December 2022 |title=Consider This: Taking a closer look at pseudoarchaeology |url=https://www.ualberta.ca/the-quad/2022/12/consider-this-taking-a-closer-look-at-pseudoarchaeology.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221214174813/https://www.ualberta.ca/the-quad/2022/12/consider-this-taking-a-closer-look-at-pseudoarchaeology.html |archive-date=14 December 2022 |access-date=8 January 2023 |website=University of Alberta}}</ref> and [[pseudohistory]]{{sfn|Fritze|2009|pp=214–218}}<ref>{{Cite news |last=Hodge |first=Hugo |date=6 December 2022 |title=Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse series uses 'racist ideologies' to rewrite Indo-Pacific history, experts say |url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-07/experts-say-ancient-apocalypse-netflix-series-is-racist-untrue/101728298 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230105074845/https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-07/experts-say-ancient-apocalypse-netflix-series-is-racist-untrue/101728298 |archive-date=5 January 2023 |access-date=8 January 2023 |work=ABC News}}</ref> because they consider it to be [[Confirmation bias|biased towards preconceived conclusions]] by ignoring context, misrepresenting sources, [[cherry picking]], and withholding critical counter-evidence.{{Sfn|Fagan|2006|pp=27–28}}{{sfn|Fritze|2009|pp=218}} [[Anthropologist]] Jeb Card has described Hancock's writings as being [[paranormal]] in nature and his idea of an Ice Age civilization as a modern [[Mythology|mythological narrative]] that, due to its emphasis on alleged secret and spiritual knowledge (including [[psychic]] abilities and communing with souls and "powerful nonphysical beings" via the use of [[psychedelics]]), is incompatible with the archaeological [[scientific method]].<ref name=":1" /> Hancock portrays himself as a culture hero who fights the "dogmatism" of academics, presenting his work as more valid than professional archaeology{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=79}} and as "a path to truly understanding reality and the spiritual elements denied by [[Materialism|materialist]] science",<ref name=":1" /> though he often cites science in support of his ideas.{{sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=91}} He has not submitted his writings for [[scholarly peer review]], and they have not been published in [[Academic journal|academic journals]].{{Sfn|Regal|2009}}
Scholars describe Hancock's investigations of archaeological evidence, myths, and historical documents as mimicking investigative journalism while lacking accuracy, consistency, and impartiality.{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|p=87-91|2024}} They label his work [[pseudoarchaeology]]{{Sfn|Fagan|2006|pp=xvi}}<ref>{{Cite web |last=Costopoulos |first=André |date=8 December 2022 |title=Consider This: Taking a closer look at pseudoarchaeology |url=https://www.ualberta.ca/the-quad/2022/12/consider-this-taking-a-closer-look-at-pseudoarchaeology.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221214174813/https://www.ualberta.ca/the-quad/2022/12/consider-this-taking-a-closer-look-at-pseudoarchaeology.html |archive-date=14 December 2022 |access-date=8 January 2023 |website=University of Alberta}}</ref> and [[pseudohistory]]{{sfn|Fritze|2009|pp=214-218}}<ref>{{Cite news |last=Hodge |first=Hugo |date=6 December 2022 |title=Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse series uses "racist ideologies" to rewrite Indo-Pacific history, experts say |url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-07/experts-say-ancient-apocalypse-netflix-series-is-racist-untrue/101728298 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230105074845/https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-07/experts-say-ancient-apocalypse-netflix-series-is-racist-untrue/101728298 |archive-date=5 January 2023 |access-date=8 January 2023 |work=ABC News}}</ref> because they see it as [[Confirmation bias|biased toward preconceived conclusions]] that ignore context, misrepresent sources, [[cherry picking|cherry pick]] and omit evidence that contradicts his claims.{{Sfn|Fagan|2006|pp=27-28}}{{sfn|Fritze|2009|pp=218}} Hancock's idea of an advanced ice age civilization is seen as a variant of the [[hyperdiffusionism]] hypothesis that has been advocated by various authors since the 19th century.


He has also written two [[fantasy]] novels and in 2013 delivered a controversial [[TED (conference)|TEDx]] talk promoting the use of the psychoactive drink [[ayahuasca]]. His ideas have been the subject of several films as well as the [[Netflix]] series ''[[Ancient Apocalypse]]'' (2022). Hancock makes regular appearances on the podcast ''[[The Joe Rogan Experience]]'' to discuss his work.
[[Anthropologist]] Jeb Card characterizes Hancock's writings as [[paranormal]] and views his proposed Ice Age civilization as a modern [[Mythology|mythic narrative]] focused on secret and spiritual knowledge, with Hancock contending that members of the ice age civilisation had [[psychic]] abilities and communicated with "powerful nonphysical beings" through [[psychedelics|psychedelic]] use.<ref name=":1" /> Hancock portrays himself as a [[culture hero]] challenging the "dogmatism" of academics, presenting his work as more valid than professional archaeology{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=79}} and as "a path to truly understanding reality and the spiritual elements denied by [[Materialism|materialist]] science",<ref name=":1" /> even while citing science to support his ideas.{{sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=91}} He has not submitted his writings for [[scholarly peer review]], and they have not been published in [[Academic journal|academic journals]].{{Sfn|Regal|2009}}
 
Hancock has written two [[fantasy]] novels and in 2013 delivered a controversial [[TED (conference)|TEDx]] talk promoting the psychoactive drink [[ayahuasca]]. His ideas have inspired several films and he presented the [[Netflix]] series ''[[Ancient Apocalypse]]'' (2022) based on his theories. He makes regular appearances on the podcast ''[[The Joe Rogan Experience]]'' to promote his claims.


==Early life and journalism==
==Early life and journalism==
Graham Bruce Hancock was born in [[Edinburgh]], Scotland in 1950.<ref name="Observer1998">{{cite news|first=Andrew|last=Anthony|title=Riddler of the Sands|newspaper=[[The Observer]]|date=27 September 1998|page=18|url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-observer-graham-hancock-mummies-boy/87422990/|via=[[Newspapers.com]]}}</ref> He moved to India with his parents at the age of three, where his father worked as a surgeon. Having returned to the UK, he graduated from [[Durham University]] with a degree in sociology in 1973.<ref name="auto">{{cite web | url=https://grahamhancock.com/bio/ | title=Biography | access-date=12 Feb 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Durham University gazette, XX |url=http://reed.dur.ac.uk/xtf/view?docId=bookreader/DU_Gazettes/DUGazette20_3/dg203METS.xml#page/22/mode/2up |website=reed.dur.ac.uk |access-date=7 November 2018 }}</ref>
Graham Bruce Hancock was born in [[Edinburgh]], Scotland, in 1950.<ref name="Observer1998">{{cite news|first=Andrew|last=Anthony|title=Riddler of the Sands|newspaper=[[The Observer]]|date=27 September 1998|page=18|url=https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-observer-graham-hancock-mummies-boy/87422990/|via=[[Newspapers.com]]}}</ref> He moved to India with his parents at the age of three, where his father worked as a surgeon. After returning to the United Kingdom, he graduated from [[Durham University]] with a degree in sociology in 1973.<ref name="auto">{{cite web | url=https://grahamhancock.com/bio/ | title=Biography | access-date=12 Feb 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Durham University gazette, XX |url=http://reed.dur.ac.uk/xtf/view?docId=bookreader/DU_Gazettes/DUGazette20_3/dg203METS.xml#page/22/mode/2up |website=reed.dur.ac.uk |access-date=7 November 2018 }}</ref>


As a journalist, Hancock worked for many British papers, such as ''[[The Times]]'', ''[[The Sunday Times]]'', ''[[The Independent]]'', and ''[[The Guardian]]''. He co-edited ''[[New Internationalist]]'' magazine from 1976 to 1979 and was the East Africa correspondent of ''[[The Economist]]'' from 1981 to 1983.<ref name="auto" /><ref>{{Cite book |last= |url=http://archive.org/details/contemporaryauth147gale |title=Contemporary Authors |date=2006 |publisher=[[Gale Research]] |series=New Revision Series |volume=147 |pages=179–183 |chapter=Hancock, Graham}}</ref>{{sfn|Exum|2005|pp=236-239}} Before 1990, his works dealt mainly with problems of economic and social development. His 1989 book ''Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business'' was based on his experience writing about [[international aid]] for ''The Economist''. In the book, Hancock critiques the international aid system, stating in the book: "aid is not bad ... because it is sometimes misused, corrupt or crass; rather, it is inherently bad, bad to the bone, and utterly beyond reform". Critics agreed that Hancock's work was a powerful critique of the international aid system, though a number disagreed with Hancock's thesis that aid was inherently bad.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Jones |first=Eugene |date=May 1991 |title=Hancock, Graham. Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business . New York: The Atlantic Monthly Press, 1989, 234 pp., $@@-@@17.95 |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/1242750 |journal=American Journal of Agricultural Economics |volume=73 |issue=2 |pages=542–544 |doi=10.2307/1242750 |issn=0002-9092 |jstor=1242750|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Smith |first=Charles David |date=1994 |title=Review of Lords of Poverty; The Politics of Africa's Economic Recovery |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43158024 |journal=Labour, Capital and Society / Travail, capital et société |volume=27 |issue=1 |pages=140–142 |issn=0706-1706 |jstor=43158024}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hood |first=Howard A. |date=1990 |title=Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business. By Graham Hancock. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1989. Pp. xvi, 234. US$17.95 (hardbound). |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0731126500026287/type/journal_article |journal=International Journal of Legal Information |volume=18 |issue=1 |pages=72–73 |doi=10.1017/S0731126500026287 |issn=0731-1265|url-access=subscription }}</ref>
Hancock reported for British newspapers including ''[[The Times]]'', ''[[The Sunday Times]]'', ''[[The Independent]]'', and ''[[The Guardian]]''. He co-edited ''[[New Internationalist]]'' magazine from 1976 to 1979 and served as the East Africa correspondent for ''[[The Economist]]'' from 1981 to 1983.<ref name="auto" /><ref>{{Cite book |last= |url=http://archive.org/details/contemporaryauth147gale |title=Contemporary Authors |date=2006 |publisher=[[Gale Research]] |series=New Revision Series |volume=147 |pages=179-183 |chapter=Hancock, Graham}}</ref>{{sfn|Exum|2005|pp=236-239}} His first books focused on economic and social development in [[Developing country|developing countries]]. ''Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business'' (1989) drew on his reporting about [[international aid]] for ''The Economist'' and argued that entrenched corruption made the aid system irredeemable, describing it as "inherently bad, bad to the bone, and utterly beyond reform".<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Jones |first=Eugene |date=May 1991 |title=Hancock, Graham. Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business . New York: The Atlantic Monthly Press, 1989, 234 pp., $@@-@@17.95 |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/1242750 |journal=American Journal of Agricultural Economics |volume=73 |issue=2 |pages=542-544 |doi=10.2307/1242750 |issn=0002-9092 |jstor=1242750|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Smith |first=Charles David |date=1994 |title=Review of Lords of Poverty; The Politics of Africa's Economic Recovery |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43158024 |journal=Labour, Capital and Society / Travail, capital et société |volume=27 |issue=1 |pages=140-142 |issn=0706-1706 |jstor=43158024}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hood |first=Howard A. |date=1990 |title=Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business. By Graham Hancock. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1989. Pp. xvi, 234. US$17.95 (hardbound). |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0731126500026287/type/journal_article |journal=International Journal of Legal Information |volume=18 |issue=1 |pages=72-73 |doi=10.1017/S0731126500026287 |issn=0731-1265|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Reviewers praised the book's forceful critique of global aid, yet many disputed Hancock's conclusion that aid is inherently harmful.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Jones |first=Eugene |date=May 1991 |title=Hancock, Graham. Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business . New York: The Atlantic Monthly Press, 1989, 234 pp., $@@-@@17.95 |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/1242750 |journal=American Journal of Agricultural Economics |volume=73 |issue=2 |pages=542-544 |doi=10.2307/1242750 |issn=0002-9092 |jstor=1242750|url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Smith |first=Charles David |date=1994 |title=Review of Lords of Poverty; The Politics of Africa's Economic Recovery |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43158024 |journal=Labour, Capital and Society / Travail, capital et société |volume=27 |issue=1 |pages=140-142 |issn=0706-1706 |jstor=43158024}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hood |first=Howard A. |date=1990 |title=Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business. By Graham Hancock. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1989. Pp. xvi, 234. US$17.95 (hardbound). |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0731126500026287/type/journal_article |journal=International Journal of Legal Information |volume=18 |issue=1 |pages=72-73 |doi=10.1017/S0731126500026287 |issn=0731-1265|url-access=subscription }}</ref>


During his time as a journalist, he was criticized for being on what he described as "friendly personal terms" with dictator [[Siad Barre]] of [[Somalia]] (according to ''The Independent'', "he set up a company to publish government-approved coffee table books about Somalia as a multi-racial paradise").<ref name="indy" /> He was additionally criticized for having links to then dictator of [[Ethiopia]] [[Mengistu Haile Mariam]], which caused controversy when Hancock wrote a favourable profile of Barre for ''The Independent'', as, by his own admission, "various aspects of my trip were facilitated by the [Barre] regime". He admitted that he "definitely made a mistake" by establishing links to Mengistu.<ref name="indy">{{cite news |last=Beckett |first=Andy |date=29 July 1995 |title=The writer who found supermen in Antarctica |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/the-writer-who-found-supermen-in-antarctica-1593897.html |access-date=30 September 2024 |work=The Independent |location=London}}</ref>
Hancock later acknowledged missteps during this period, including what he described as "friendly personal terms" with Somali dictator [[Siad Barre]] and links to Ethiopian dictator [[Mengistu Haile Mariam]].<ref name="indy" /> He wrote a favorable profile of Barre for ''The Independent'', noting that the regime facilitated parts of his trip and conceding that he "definitely made a mistake" by establishing those connections.<ref name="indy">{{cite news |last=Beckett |first=Andy |date=29 July 1995 |title=The writer who found supermen in Antarctica |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/the-writer-who-found-supermen-in-antarctica-1593897.html |access-date=30 September 2024 |work=The Independent |location=London}}</ref> He has said that by 1987 he was "pretty much permanently stoned" because he believed cannabis improved his writing.<ref name="stoned">{{cite web | url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0c5nIvJH7w&t=390s | title=Graham Hancock - the War on Consciousness BANNED TED TALK | website=[[YouTube]] | date=15 March 2013 }}</ref>  


==Later writing==
==Later writing==
Since 1990, Hancock's works have focused mainly on speculative connections he makes between various archaeological, historical, and cross-cultural phenomena.{{citation needed|date= November 2022}} He has stated that from about 1987 he was "pretty much permanently stoned ... and I felt that it helped me with my work as a writer, and perhaps at some point it did",<ref name="stoned">{{cite web | url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0c5nIvJH7w&t=390s | title=Graham Hancock - the War on Consciousness BANNED TED TALK | website=[[YouTube]] | date=15 March 2013 }}</ref> while an article published in ''The Independent'' in 1995 claims that in 1989 he shifted from working for Barre to investigating the [[Ark of the Covenant]] (on which he wasn't able to enter due to being blocked by Ethiopian guards), which resulted in his 1992 book, ''[[The Sign and the Seal]]''.<ref name="indy" /> Other books include ''[[Fingerprints of the Gods]]'', ''[[Keeper of Genesis]]'',{{efn|''[[Keeper of Genesis]]'' was released in the US as ''Message of the Sphinx''.}} ''The Mars Mystery'', ''Heaven's Mirror'' (with wife Santha Faiia), ''Underworld: The Mysterious Origins of Civilization'', and ''Talisman: Sacred Cities, Secret Faith'' (with co-author [[Robert Bauval]]).
The publication of ''[[The Sign and the Seal|The Sign and the Seal: The Quest for the Lost Ark of the Covenant]]'' in 1992 marked a career transition from his earlier development reporting to books pursuing speculative through lines among archaeological, historical, and cross-cultural material. Reporting by ''The Independent'' in 1995 described how he pivoted in 1989 from work with the Barre regime to researching the [[Ark of the Covenant]], an effort that led to ''The Sign and the Seal''.<ref name="indy" /> His subsequent titles include ''[[Fingerprints of the Gods]]'', ''[[Magicians of the Gods]]'', ''[[Keeper of Genesis]]'',{{efn|''[[Keeper of Genesis]]'' was released in the US as ''Message of the Sphinx''.}} ''[[The Mars Mystery]]'', ''Heaven's Mirror'' (with Santha Faiia), ''Underworld: The Mysterious Origins of Civilization'', and ''Talisman: Sacred Cities, Secret Faith'' (with [[Robert Bauval]]).
 
Hancock's first novel, ''Entangled: The Eater of Souls'', launched a planned [[fantasy]] series in 2010 that follows "two brave young women" who "do battle with a demon who travels through time." The story emerged from his ayahuasca experiences, which he said gave him "a series of intense visions" revealing the characters and plot. He described writing it as "tremendous fun", free from the academic scrutiny of his non-fiction work, joking "What was there to lose when my critics already described my factual books as fiction?".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Scalzi |first=John |date=15 October 2010 |title=The Big Idea: Graham Hancock |url=https://whatever.scalzi.com/2010/10/15/the-big-idea-graham-hancock/ |access-date=2024-10-01 |website=Whatever |language=en-US}}</ref>
 
===''The Sign and the Seal'' (1992)===
''The Sign and the Seal'' chronicles Hancock's investigation of how the Ark of the Covenant might have traveled from [[History of ancient Israel and Judah|ancient Israel]] to [[Ethiopia]].<ref name="SignSeal">{{cite book |last=Hancock |first=Graham |title=The Sign and the Seal: The Quest for the Lost Ark of the Covenant |location=New York |publisher=Crown |year=1992 |isbn=0-517-57813-1}}</ref> He follows a path through [[Elephantine]] and [[Tana Qirqos]] and connects the story to [[Ethiopia in the Middle Ages|medieval Ethiopia]] and the [[Knights Templar]].<ref name="SignSeal" /> Jonathan Kirsch of the ''Los Angeles Times'' described the book as "part travelogue, part true-adventure, part mystery-thriller" yet concluded that it was "a whacking big dose of amateur scholarship alloyed with a fervid imagination."<ref name="Kirsch1992">{{cite news |last=Kirsch |first=Jonathan |title=Speculation Ladled on With a Heavy Hand |work=Los Angeles Times |date=1 April 1992 |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1992-04-01-vw-29-story.html |access-date=9 October 2025}}</ref> ''Kirkus Reviews'' noted Hancock's claim "that the Lost Ark of the Covenant really exists" and framed the project as an extension of his Ethiopian reportage and speculation.<ref name="KirkusSign">{{cite web |title=The Sign and the Seal |website=Kirkus Reviews |date=1 April 1992 |url=https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/graham-hancock/the-sign-and-the-seal/ |access-date=9 October 2025}}</ref>
 
===''Fingerprints of the Gods'' (1995)===
Hancock's ''[[Fingerprints of the Gods]]: The Evidence of Earth's Lost Civilization'' (1995) argues that an advanced society perished at the end of the last Ice Age and that its survivors transmitted astronomical and architectural knowledge to later cultures. The narrative reads monuments in the Americas, Africa, and Asia as fragments of that inheritance.{{sfn|Hancock|1995|loc=passim}} Archaeologist Garrett G. Fagan wrote that the book drags "artefacts, monuments, entire cities, or whole cultures" into a predetermined conclusion while ignoring their historical contexts.{{sfn|Fagan|2006|pp=35-36}} Kenneth Feder observed that Hancock's thesis reflected diffusionist arguments that had circulated for decades and concluded that it offered nothing original.<ref name="Feder2001">{{cite web |last=Feder |first=Kenneth |title=The Lost Civilization in Historical Perspective: Deja vu all over again |website=Hall of Ma'at |date=1 December 2001 |url=https://www.hallofmaat.com/lostciv/the-lost-civilization-in-historical-perspective/ |access-date=9 October 2025}}</ref>
 
===''The Message of the Sphinx'' (1996)===
''The Message of the Sphinx: A Quest for the Hidden Legacy of Mankind'', a.k.a. ''Keeper of Genesis'' in the United Kingdom, is a [[pseudoarchaeology]]<ref>{{cite book |last1=Derricourt |first1=Robin M. |title=Antiquity Imagined: The Remarkable Legacy of Egypt and the Ancient Near East |date=2015 |publisher=[[IB. Tauris]] |location=London |isbn=9780857726995 |page=37}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Henty |first1=Liz |title=Exploring Archaeoastronomy: A History of its Relationship with Archaeology and Esotericism |date=2022 |publisher=[[Oxbow Books]] |isbn=9781789257885 |pages=159-160}}</ref> book written by Hancock and Robert Bauval in 1996 which argues that the creation of the [[Great Sphinx of Giza|Sphinx]] and [[Giza pyramid complex|Pyramids]] occurred as far back as [[Paleolithic|10,500 BC]] using [[Astronomy|astronomical]] data. Working from the premise that the [[Giza pyramid complex]] encodes a message, the book begins with the fringe [[Sphinx water erosion hypothesis]], evidence that the authors believe suggests that deep erosion patterns on the flanks of the Sphinx were caused by thousands of years of heavy rain. The authors use computer simulations of the sky to claim that the pyramids, representing the three stars of [[Orion's Belt]], together with associated causeways and alignments, [[Orion correlation theory|constitute a record in stone]] of the celestial array at the vernal equinox in 10,500 BC. This moment, they contend, represents [[Zep Tepi]], the "First Time", often referenced in the hieroglyphic record. They state that the initiation rites of the Egyptian pharaohs replicate on Earth the Sun's journey through the stars in this remote era, and they suggest that the "[[Hall of Records]]" of a lost civilization may be located by treating the [[Giza Plateau]] as a template of these same ancient skies.<ref name="The Message of the Sphinx">{{cite book |title=The Message of the Sphinx: A Quest for the Hidden Legacy of Mankind |date=1996 |publisher=Crown Publishers | location=New York | first1=Graham |last1=Hancock |first2=Robert |last2=Bauval |author1-link=Graham Hancock |author2-link=Robert Bauval |oclc=34887732 |isbn=9780614968170}}</ref>
 
=== ''The Mars Mystery'' (1997) ===
In ''The Mars Mystery'' (1997), Hancock and his coauthors [[Robert Bauval]] and John Grigsby interpreted low-resolution [[Viking lander]] images of the [[Cydonia (Mars)|Cydonia]] region of Mars as evidence that the so-called "[[Face on Mars]]" and a "five sided pyramid" were created by an advanced Martian civilization later destroyed by a catastrophe,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Winstead |first=Bob |date=11 August 1998 |title=The Mars Mystery |url=http://edition.cnn.com/books/reviews/9808/11/mars.mystery.cnn/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190519061235/http://edition.cnn.com/books/reviews/9808/11/mars.mystery.cnn/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=19 May 2019 |access-date=26 April 2024 |website= |publisher=[[CNN]] |type=book review}}</ref> linking the "Face on Mars" to Egyptian mythology, and comparing the supposed Martian pyramid with Egyptian and Mesoamerican pyramids. They suggested that the "Face on Mars" represented a deliberate message to the people of Earth, in the words of reviewer [[David V. Barrett]]: "a warning that a Mars-like doom lies in wait for the Earth unless we take steps to avert it."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Barrett |first=David V. |date=1998-05-27 |title=Thursday's book: The Mars Mystery: a tale of the end of two worlds by Graham Hancock, Robert Bauval and John Grigsby (Michael Joseph, pounds 16.99 ) |url=https://www.the-independent.com/life-style/thursday-s-book-the-mars-mystery-a-tale-of-the-end-of-two-worlds-by-graham-hancock-robert-bauval-and-john-grigsby-michael-joseph-pounds-16-99-1156438.html |access-date=2025-10-30 |website=The Independent |language=en}}</ref>
 
=== ''Talisman'' (2004) ===
''Talisman: Sacred Cities, Secret Faith,'' coauthored with Robert Bauval, according to David V. Barrett, primarily focuses on "the stream of heterodox religious beliefs, from early Christianity to the 18th century.", including the [[Corpus Hermeticum|''Corpus Hermeticum'']] the [[Catharism|Cathars]], [[Rosicrucians]], the [[Freemasonry|Freemasons]] and the [[Knights Templar]]. The book makes a number of speculative claims, including that areas of Paris are inspired by Egyptian mythology, that there are links between [[Solomon's Temple]] and the [[World Trade Center (1973-2001)|Twin Towers]] as well as between the [[Star of David]] and [[The Pentagon]].<ref>London: Michael Joseph, 2004. {{ISBN|0-7181-4315-9}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{cite news |last=Barrett |first=David V. |author-link=David V. Barrett |date=19 August 2004 |title=Talisman: Sacred Cities, Secret Faith |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/preformtalisman-sacred-cities-secret-faith-by-graham-hancock--robert-bauvalpreform-557110.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170812023404/https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/talisman-sacred-cities-secret-faith-by-graham-hancock-robert-bauval-557110.html |archive-date=12 August 2017 |work=[[The Independent]] |type=book review}}</ref><ref name="pseudo-fact hunger">{{cite news |last=Thompson |first=Damian |date=12 January 2008 |title=How Da Vinci Code tapped pseudo-fact hunger |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1575347/How-Da-Vinci-Code-tapped-pseudo-fact-hunger.html |access-date=29 April 2019 |work=[[The Daily Telegraph]]}}</ref> David V. Barrett dismissed the book as "a mish-mash of badly-connected, half-argued theories" stating that at the end of the their book they begin "promulgating a version of the old [[Judeo-Masonic conspiracy theory|Jewish-Masonic plot]]", and journalist [[Damian Thompson]] later described Hancock and Bauval as fantasists.<ref name=":5" /><ref name="pseudo-fact hunger" />
 
=== ''Supernatural'' (2005) ===
Hancock's ''Supernatural: Meetings With the Ancient Teachers of Mankind'' appeared in 2005 and applied [[David Lewis-Williams]]' [[Neuropsychology|neuropsychological]] model to [[paleolithic]] [[Cave painting|cave art]], arguing that visionary experiences shaped the emergence of modern cognition.<ref name="Paranormal">{{cite book |last1=Wolfsblume |first1=Jack |url=https://archive.org/details/paranormal0000wolf/page/150/mode/2up?q=%22Meetings+With+the+Ancient+Teachers+of+Mankind%22+Hancock |title=Paranormal |date=2011 |publisher=Waverley Books |isbn=978-1-84934-086-1 |location=Glasgow |page=150 |via=the [[Internet Archive]]}}</ref>
 
===''Magicians of the Gods'' (2015)===
St. Martin's Press published ''[[Magicians of the Gods|Magicians of the Gods: The Forgotten Wisdom of Earth's Lost Civilization]]'' in 2015.<ref name="MAGICIANS OF THE GODS Kirkus Reviews">{{cite web |title=MAGICIANS OF THE GODS |url=https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/graham-hancock/magicians-of-the-gods/ |access-date=2 January 2023 |website=[[Kirkus Reviews]]}}</ref> In ''[[Magicians of the Gods]]: The Forgotten Wisdom of Earth's Lost Civilization'' (2015), Hancock revisits his Ice Age civilization hypothesis and links it to a proposed [[Younger Dryas impact hypothesis|Younger Dryas impact event]] that he argues purged the planet of advanced survivors.<ref name="Magicians">{{cite book |last=Hancock |first=Graham |title=Magicians of the Gods: The Forgotten Wisdom of Earth's Lost Civilization |location=New York |publisher=Thomas Dunne Books |year=2015 |isbn=9781250118400}}</ref> He interprets ancient monuments as repositories of encoded warnings from that culture.<ref name="Magicians" /> ''Kirkus Reviews'' dismissed the sequel as "for the Art Bell addict" and "risible and sure to sell."<ref name="KirkusMagicians">{{cite web |title=Magicians of the Gods |website=Kirkus Reviews |date=10 November 2015 |url=https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/graham-hancock/magicians-of-the-gods/ |access-date=9 October 2025}}</ref> Michael Taube of the ''Washington Times'' called it a "creative fairytale" even as he acknowledged its popularity.<ref name="Taube2015">{{cite news |last=Taube |first=Michael |title=Book review: Magicians of the Gods |work=The Washington Times |date=30 December 2015 |url=https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/30/book-review-magicians-of-the-gods/ |access-date=9 October 2025}}</ref> Geologist Marc J. Defant argued that Hancock constructs "a narrative on conjecture and selective evidence" and that the Younger Dryas impact claim does not substantiate his global conclusions.{{sfn|Defant|2017|pp=32-41}}


In his 1997 book ''The Mars Mystery'', Hancock speculated based on the low-resolution [[Viking lander|''Viking'' lander]] images that the [[Face on Mars|supposed face on the Cydonia region of Mars]], along with a purported "five sided pyramid", may have been the work of an advanced civilization on Mars that was later destroyed by a cataclysm.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Winstead |first=Bob |date=11 August 1998 |title=The Mars Mystery |url=http://edition.cnn.com/books/reviews/9808/11/mars.mystery.cnn/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190519061235/http://edition.cnn.com/books/reviews/9808/11/mars.mystery.cnn/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=19 May 2019 |access-date=26 April 2024 |website= |publisher=[[CNN]] |type=book review}}</ref> In Hancock's book ''Talisman: Sacred Cities, Secret Faith'',<ref>London: Michael Joseph, 2004. {{ISBN|0-7181-4315-9}}</ref> co-authored with Robert Bauval, the two put forward what sociologist of religion [[David V. Barrett]] called "a version of the old Jewish-Masonic plot so beloved by ultra-right-wing conspiracy theorists."<ref name=":5">{{cite news |last=Barrett |first=David V. |author-link=David V. Barrett |date=19 August 2004 |title=Talisman: Sacred Cities, Secret Faith |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/preformtalisman-sacred-cities-secret-faith-by-graham-hancock--robert-bauvalpreform-557110.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170812023404/https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/talisman-sacred-cities-secret-faith-by-graham-hancock-robert-bauval-557110.html |archive-date=12 August 2017 |work=[[The Independent]] |type=book review}}</ref> They suggest a connection between the pillars of [[Solomon's Temple]] and the [[World Trade Center (1973–2001)|Twin Towers]], and between the [[Star of David]] and [[The Pentagon]].<ref name="pseudo-fact hunger">{{cite news |last=Thompson |first=Damian |date=12 January 2008 |title=How Da Vinci Code tapped pseudo-fact hunger |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1575347/How-Da-Vinci-Code-tapped-pseudo-fact-hunger.html |access-date=29 April 2019 |work=[[The Daily Telegraph]]}}</ref> A contemporary review of ''Talisman'' by David V. Barrett for ''The Independent'' pointed to a lack of originality as well as basic factual errors, concluding that it was "a mish-mash of badly-connected, half-argued theories".<ref name=":5" /> In a 2008 piece for ''The Telegraph'' referencing ''Talisman'', journalist [[Damian Thompson]] described Hancock and Bauval as fantasists.<ref name="pseudo-fact hunger" /> Hancock's ''Supernatural: Meetings With the Ancient Teachers of Mankind'' was published in the UK in October 2005 and in the US in 2006.  In it, Hancock examines [[paleolithic]] [[Cave painting|cave art]] in the light of [[David Lewis-Williams]]' [[Neuropsychology|neuropsychological]] model, exploring its relation to the development of the fully modern human mind.<ref name="Paranormal">{{cite book |last1=Wolfsblume |first1=Jack |url=https://archive.org/details/paranormal0000wolf/page/150/mode/2up?q=%22Meetings+With+the+Ancient+Teachers+of+Mankind%22+Hancock |title=Paranormal |date=2011 |publisher=Waverley Books |isbn=978-1-84934-086-1 |location=Glasgow |page=150 |via=the [[Internet Archive]]}}</ref> In 2015, his book ''[[Magicians of the Gods|Magicians of the Gods: The Forgotten Wisdom of Earth's Lost Civilization]]'' was published by St. Martin's Press.<ref name="MAGICIANS OF THE GODS Kirkus Reviews">{{cite web |title=MAGICIANS OF THE GODS |url=https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/graham-hancock/magicians-of-the-gods/ |access-date=2 January 2023 |website=[[Kirkus Reviews]]}}</ref>
==Television and media==
Beginning in the 1990s, Hancock also fronted television documentaries that promoted his pseudoarchaeological claims. He appeared in ''[[The Mysterious Origins of Man]]'' (1996), wrote and presented ''Underworld: Flooded Kingdoms of the Ice Age'' (2002), and hosted ''Quest for the Lost Civilization'' (1998).<ref name="SkepticalOrigins">{{cite news |last=Thomas |first=Dave |date=March 1996 |title=NBC's Origins Show |url=http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070203134301/http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html |archive-date=3 February 2007 |access-date=19 February 2007 |publisher=[[Committee for Skeptical Inquiry]] |df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Quest for the Lost Civilization |url=https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0252165/ |via=www.imdb.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Mysterious Origins of Man — Full Cast & Crew |website=TV Guide |url=https://www.tvguide.com/movies/the-mysterious-origins-of-man/cast/2000314619/ |access-date=9 October 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Quest for the Lost Civilization |website=WorldCat |publisher=Acorn Media |date=1998 |url=https://search.worldcat.org/title/Quest-for-the-lost-civilization/oclc/41188358 |access-date=9 October 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Staff |title=Castles in the sea |work=The Guardian |date=6 February 2002 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/education/2002/feb/06/artsandhumanities.highereducation |access-date=9 October 2025}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Underworld: Flooded Kingdoms of the Ice Age |website=Rotten Tomatoes |date=2002 |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/underworld_flooded_kingdoms_of_the_ice_age |access-date=9 October 2025}}</ref> In 2022 he presented ''[[Ancient Apocalypse]]'', a widely viewed [[Netflix]] documentary series that critics and archaeologists condemned as pseudoscience.<ref name="Slate">{{cite news |last=Onion |first=Rebecca |date=18 November 2022 |title=The Ancient Absurdities of Ancient Apocalypse |url=https://slate.com/culture/2022/11/ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock-netflix-theory-explained.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231012084804/https://slate.com/culture/2022/11/ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock-netflix-theory-explained.html |archive-date=12 October 2023 |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] | access-date=2024-04-29| language=en-US |issn=1091-2339}}</ref><ref name="Netflix, l'archéologie et l'obscurantisme">{{cite news |last1=Riel-Salvatore |first1=Julien |date=22 November 2022 |title=Netflix, l'archéologie et l'obscurantisme |url=https://www.ledevoir.com/opinion/idees/771732/science-netflix-l-archeologie-et-l-obscurantisme |access-date=27 December 2023 |work=[[Le Devoir]] |language=fr |type=opinion}}</ref><ref name="Ancient Apocalypse is the most dangerous show">{{cite news |last1=Heritage |first1=Stuart |date=23 November 2022 |title=Ancient Apocalypse is the most dangerous show on Netflix |url=https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/23/ancient-apocalypse-is-the-most-dangerous-show-on-netflix |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231217221919/https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/23/ancient-apocalypse-is-the-most-dangerous-show-on-netflix |archive-date=17 December 2023 |access-date=27 December 2023 |work=[[The Guardian]]}}</ref>


In addition to writing, Hancock has been involved in a number of [[television documentaries]] about his pseudoarchaeological theories. 1996, he appeared in ''[[The Mysterious Origins of Man]]''.<ref name="SkepticalOrigins">{{cite news |last=Thomas |first=Dave |date=March 1996 |title=NBC's Origins Show |url=http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070203134301/http://www.csicop.org/sb/9603/origins.html |archive-date=3 February 2007 |access-date=19 February 2007 |publisher=[[Committee for Skeptical Inquiry]] |df=dmy-all}}</ref> He also wrote and presented the documentaries ''Underworld: Flooded Kingdoms of the Ice Age'' (2002) and ''Quest for the Lost Civilization'' (1998).<ref>{{cite web |title=Quest for the Lost Civilization |url=https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0252165/ |via=www.imdb.com}}</ref>{{better source needed|date=January 2023}} In 2022, he presented ''[[Ancient Apocalypse]]'', a [[Netflix]] documentary series that was widely viewed but panned by critics and academics.<ref name=":42">{{cite news |last1=Onion |first1=Rebecca |date=18 November 2022 |title=The Ancient Absurdities of Ancient Apocalypse |url=https://slate.com/culture/2022/11/ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock-netflix-theory-explained.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231012084804/https://slate.com/culture/2022/11/ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock-netflix-theory-explained.html |archive-date=12 October 2023 |access-date=27 December 2023 |work=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]]}}</ref><ref name="Netflix, l'archéologie et l'obscurantisme">{{cite news |last1=Riel-Salvatore |first1=Julien |date=22 November 2022 |title=Netflix, l'archéologie et l'obscurantisme |url=https://www.ledevoir.com/opinion/idees/771732/science-netflix-l-archeologie-et-l-obscurantisme |access-date=27 December 2023 |work=[[Le Devoir]] |language=fr |type=opinion}}</ref><ref name="Ancient Apocalypse is the most dangerous show">{{cite news |last1=Heritage |first1=Stuart |date=23 November 2022 |title=Ancient Apocalypse is the most dangerous show on Netflix |url=https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/23/ancient-apocalypse-is-the-most-dangerous-show-on-netflix |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231217221919/https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2022/nov/23/ancient-apocalypse-is-the-most-dangerous-show-on-netflix |archive-date=17 December 2023 |access-date=27 December 2023 |work=[[The Guardian]]}}</ref>
=== ''Ancient Apocalypse'' & ''The Americas'' (2022-2024) ===
{{Main|Ancient Apocalypse}}
Hancock's theories are the basis of ''Ancient Apocalypse'', a 2022 documentary series produced by [[Netflix]], where Hancock's son Sean is "senior manager of unscripted originals".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Moore |first=Kasey |date=2022-10-17 |title=Ancient Apocalypse: Graham Hancock to Present Netflix Original Docuseries |url=https://www.whats-on-netflix.com/news/ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock-to-present-netflix-original-docuseries/ |access-date=2022-10-20 |website=What's on Netflix }}</ref> In the series, Hancock outlines his long-held belief that there was an advanced civilization during the [[Last Glacial Period|last ice age]], that it was destroyed following [[Younger Dryas impact hypothesis|comet impacts]] around 12,000 years ago, and that its survivors [[Neolithic Revolution|introduced agriculture]], monumental architecture, and astronomy to [[hunter-gatherer]]s around the world.<ref name="Conversation"/> He attempts to show how several ancient monuments and natural features are evidence of this, and he repeatedly claims that archaeologists are ignoring or covering up this alleged evidence.<ref name="Slate" /><ref>{{cite news |first =Leslie Evans |last =Ogden |title=Hot Theory About Cool Event |url=https://www.naturalhistorymag.com/samplings/173475/hot-theory-about-cool-event/ |date=1 April 2018 |work=Natural History |access-date=13 October 2022}}</ref>


His first novel, ''Entangled: The Eater of Souls'', the first in a [[fantasy]] series, was published in 2010. The novel makes use of Hancock's prior research interests. He has noted: "What was there to lose, I asked myself, when my critics already described my factual books as fiction?"<ref>{{Cite web |last=Scalzi |first=John |date=15 October 2010 |title=The Big Idea: Graham Hancock |url=https://whatever.scalzi.com/2010/10/15/the-big-idea-graham-hancock/ |access-date=2024-10-01 |website=Whatever |language=en-US}}</ref>
Archaeologists and other experts say that the series presents pseudoscientific claims that lack evidence, [[Cherry picking|cherry picks]], and fails to present counter-evidence.<ref name="Conversation"/><ref>{{cite news |last1=Riel-Salvatore|first1=Julien |title=Netflix, l'archéologie et l'obscurantisme |page=A7 |url=https://www.ledevoir.com/opinion/idees/771732/science-netflix-l-archeologie-et-l-obscurantisme |work=[[Le Devoir]] |date=22 November 2022 |location= Montréal|accessdate=23 November 2022}}</ref> Other commentators criticized the series for unfounded accusations that "mainstream archaeology" conspires against Hancock's ideas.<ref name="Slate"/><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.courrierinternational.com/article/netflix-a-l-aube-de-notre-histoire-faut-il-croire-ce-que-raconte-graham-hancock) |title=Netflix. "À l'aube de notre histoire" : faut-il croire ce que raconte Graham Hancock ? |language=French |work=Courrier International |date=16 November 2022 |accessdate=20 November 2022}}</ref> Archaeologists linked Hancock's claims to "[[white supremacist]]" ideologies from the 19th century, which they say are insulting to the ancestors of indigenous peoples who built the monuments.<ref>Hodge, Hugo (7 December 2022) [https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-07/experts-say-ancient-apocalypse-netflix-series-is-racist-untrue/101728298 Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse series uses "racist ideologies" to rewrite Indo-Pacific history, experts say] ''[[ABC News (Australia)|ABC News]]'', Retrieved 7 December 2022.</ref> A Maltese archaeologist who appeared in an episode said her interview had been manipulated.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Arena |first1=Jessica |title=Maltese archaeologists push back against Netflix show's temple claims |url=https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/maltese-archaeologists-push-back-netflix-show-s-temple-claims.995910 |work=[[Times of Malta]] |date=20 November 2022 |accessdate=20 November 2022}}</ref> The [[Society for American Archaeology]] (SAA) objected to the classification of the series as a documentary and asked Netflix to relabel it as [[science fiction]]. The SAA argued that the show vilifies archaeologists with aggressive rhetoric, draws on theories associated with racist white supremacist ideologies, harms Indigenous peoples, emboldens extremists, and offers no archaeological evidence for an "advanced, global Ice Age civilization".<ref name="SAA_Dear_Bajaria_Corp">{{cite web | last1=Sandweiss | first1=Daniel H.  | title=Dear Ms. Bajaria and Ms. Corp | date=2022-11-30 |website=Society for American Archaeology | url=https://documents.saa.org/container/docs/default-source/doc-governmentaffairs/saa-letter-ancient-apocalypse.pdf |access-date= 2022-12-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221202174326/https://documents.saa.org/container/docs/default-source/doc-governmentaffairs/saa-letter-ancient-apocalypse.pdf |archive-date= 2022-12-02 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Benzine |first1=Vittoria |title=Archaeologists Ask Netflix to Reclassify Graham Hancock's "Unfounded" Netflix Docuseries "Ancient Apocalypse" as Fiction |url=https://news.artnet.com/art-world/archaeologists-graham-hancocks-ancient-apocalypse-fiction-2222060 |work=[[Artnet News]] |date=2 December 2022}}</ref>
 
Netflix released a second season titled "Ancient Apocalypse, The Americas" in October 2024. [[Keanu Reeves]] joined the cast and adventure.<ref>{{cite web |title=Ancient Apocalypse, The Americas |url=https://www.itn.co.uk/media-centre/ancient-apocalypse-americas |website=ITN Media Centre |date=2024-09-18 |access-date=2025-10-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Netflix Confirms Season 2 Of Ancient Apocalypse With Keanu Reeves To Guest |url=https://deadline.com/2024/09/ancient-apocalypse-season-2-netflix-with-keanu-reeves-graham-hancock-1236092704/ |work=Deadline |date=2024-09-18 |access-date=2025-10-07}}</ref> The season focused on sites and topics across North and South America, including [[White Sands National Park|White Sands]] fossil footprints in [[New Mexico]], large scale [[geoglyph]]s in the western [[Amazon rainforest|Amazon]], [[Easter Island|Rapa Nui]], [[Andean civilization|Andean]] centers such as [[Sacsayhuamán|Sacsayhuaman]], and monumental sites in [[Mesoamerica]] including [[Palenque]] and [[Chichen Itza]]. The narrative repeated Hancock's claim that a sophisticated [[Last Glacial Period|ice age]] culture transmitted [[astronomy]] and [[engineering]] knowledge to later populations after a cataclysm, and proposed cross cultural linkages among myths and iconography.<ref>{{cite web |title=Ancient Apocalypse, The Americas, Official Clip |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRNvCygbnTA |website=YouTube, Netflix |date=2024-10-15 |access-date=2025-10-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Ancient Apocalypse Season 2 episode listings |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/ancient_apocalypse/s02 |website=Rotten Tomatoes |date=2024-10-16 |access-date=2025-10-07}}</ref>
 
In July 2024, before release, producers dropped planned filming in the [[United States]] after objections by [[Indigenous peoples of the Americas|Indigenous groups]] to Hancock's portrayal of Native histories. [[The Guardian]] reported documented permit issues at [[Grand Canyon]] and [[Chaco Culture National Historical Park|Chaco Canyon]] and the subsequent relocation of production to other countries.<ref>{{cite news |title=Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse scraps US filming plans after outcry from Native American groups |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/01/netflix-ancient-apocalypse-canceled |work=The Guardian |date=2024-07-01 |access-date=2025-10-07}}</ref>
 
Season 2 content drew detailed rebuttals from academic specialists and science writers. Johnny Loftus wrote in [[Decider (website)|Decider]], "Ancient Apocalypse: The Americas is only interested in using legitimate scientific research as cheap fodder for the grandiose, unproven theories of one guy, who also seems convinced that every single archaeologist ever has been out to get him." He added that "Graham Hancock loves a sweeping turn of phrase like 'the fog of amnesia about our ancient past.' But what he loves more is to give voice to what feels like a lasting personal vendetta against entire fields of professional science." Critics argued that the White Sands trackways do not support a narrative of technological civilizers, that Amazonian [[geoglyph]]s and [[terra preta]] reflect regional developments rather than imported ice age knowledge, and that proposed long range iconographic links are subjective comparisons without testable mechanisms.<ref>{{cite web |title=Ancient Apocalypse Season 2 reviews and episode notes |url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/ancient_apocalypse/s02 |website=Rotten Tomatoes |date=2024-10-16 |access-date=2025-10-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Stream It Or Skip It, Ancient Apocalypse, The Americas on Netflix |url=https://decider.com/2024/10/17/ancient-apocalypse-the-americas-season-2-netflix-keanu-reeves-review/ |website=Decider |date=2024-10-17 |access-date=2025-10-07}}</ref><ref name="SAA_Dear_Bajaria_Corp"/>
 
===Other media appearances===
Hancock gave a [[TEDx]] lecture titled "The War on Consciousness", in which he described his use of [[ayahuasca]], an Amazonian brew containing a hallucinogenic compound [[N,N-Dimethyltryptamine|DMT]], and argued that adults should be allowed to responsibly use it for self-improvement and spiritual growth. He stated that for 24 years he was "pretty much permanently stoned" on cannabis, and that in 2011, six years after his first use of ayahuasca, it enabled him to stop using cannabis.<ref name="stoned"/> At the recommendation of TED's Science Board, the lecture was removed from the TEDx YouTube channel and moved to TED's main website where it "can be framed to highlight both [Hancock's] provocative ideas and the factual problems with [his] arguments".<ref>{{citation|url=https://blog.ted.com/open-for-discussion-graham-hancock-and-rupert-sheldrake/|title=News TEDx - Open for discussion: Graham Hancock and Rupert Sheldrake from TEDx Whitechapel|date=14 March 2013|website=TED Blog|access-date=28 December 2016}}</ref>
 
Hancock has appeared on ''[[The Joe Rogan Experience]]'' podcast several times. In April 2024 (episode #2136) Hancock debated [[Flint Dibble]],<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last1=Fallon |first1=Richard |last2=Guimont |first2=Edward |date=2024 |title=Introduction: Conceptualising heterodox palaeoscience |journal=Interdisciplinary Science Reviews |volume=49 |issue=3-4 |pages=313 |doi=10.1177/03080188241275300|bibcode=2024ISRv...49..307F |doi-access=free }}</ref> a professor of archeology at [[Cardiff University]],<ref name=":3" /> who strongly rebutted Hancock's unfounded ideas, leading even many of Hancock's backers "to see Dibble - and orthodox science - as the victor."<ref name=":3" /> Both Hancock and Dibble agreed that continuing archeological research would be a great benefit to humanity.


==Pseudoarchaeology==
==Pseudoarchaeology==
Experts consider Hancock's [[pseudoarchaeological]] work to be based on [[Cherry picking|cherry picked]] information and strident opposition to "mainstream archaeology". They suggest it superficially resembles investigative journalism, but is neither accurate, consistent, nor impartial. His ideas are built with references to myths, pseudoscience, outdated scientific models, and cutting-edge science depending on what suits his claims.{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|p=87-91|2024}} Hancock aims to erode trust in known facts and archaeological expertise, and he responds to criticism with accusations of censorship. Many of his supporters [[Echo chamber (media)|echo]] his rhetoric and label critics as disinformation agents.{{sfn|Conner|Hannah|MacMurray|2024|p=66-71}}
Experts describe Hancock's [[pseudoarchaeological]] work as a mix of [[Cherry picking|cherry picked]] information and a combative stance toward "mainstream archaeology".{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|p=87-91|2024}} They argue that it mimics investigative journalism while remaining inaccurate, inconsistent, and partial, blending myths, pseudoscience, outdated science, and selectively cited research to fit his claims.{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|p=87-91|2024}} Hancock encourages distrust of archaeological expertise and responds to criticism with accusations of censorship, a pattern many supporters echo when they label critics disinformation agents.{{sfn|Conner|Hannah|MacMurray|2024|p=66-71}}


{{Blockquote|text=[I]t’s not my job to be “balanced” or “objective”. On the contrary, by providing a powerful, persuasive single-minded case for the existence of a lost civilisation, I believe that I am merely restoring a little balance and objectivity to a previously unbalanced situation.... [I]t’s my job—and a real responsibility to be taken seriously—to undermine and cast doubt on the orthodox theory of history in every way that I can and to make the most eloquent and persuasive case that I am capable of making for the existence of a lost civilisation.|author=Graham Hancock{{sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=87}}|source=}}
Hammer and Swartz quote Hancock saying that his job is to undermine orthodox history and to make the strongest possible case for a lost civilization.{{sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=87}}


Pseudoarchaeologists mislead their audience by misrepresenting the current state of knowledge, taking quotes out of contexts, and withholding countervailing data. Historian of Ancient Rome [[Garrett G. Fagan]] pointed out two typical examples in Hancock's book ''[[Fingerprints of the Gods]]'' (1995):{{sfn|Fagan|2006|p=35–36}}
Pseudoarchaeologists mislead their audiences by misrepresenting the state of knowledge, taking quotes out of context, and withholding countervailing data. Historian of Ancient Rome and pseudoarchaeology critic [[Garrett G. Fagan]] highlighted two examples from Hancock's ''[[Fingerprints of the Gods]]'' (1995):{{sfn|Fagan|2006|p=35-36}}
* [[File:Piri_reis_world_map_01.jpg|alt=Torn piece of map with Arabic text|thumb|upright|Surviving fragment of the [[Piri Reis map]]]] Hancock wrote that "the best recent evidence suggests that"{{Sfn|Hancock|1995|p=14}} large regions of [[Antarctica]] may have been ice-free until about 6,000 years ago, referring to the [[Piri Reis map]] and [[Charles Hapgood|Hapgood]]'s work from the 1960s. What is left entirely unmentioned are the extensive studies of the Antarctic ice sheet by [[George H. Denton]], published in 1981, which showed the ice to be hundreds of thousands of years old.<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Last Great Ice Sheets |publisher=Wiley |year=1981 |isbn=978-0-471-06006-2 |editor-last=Denton |editor-first=George H. |editor-link=George H. Denton |editor-last2=Hughes |editor-first2=Terence J.}}</ref>{{Sfn|Fagan|2006|p=35}}
* [[File:Piri_reis_world_map_01.jpg|alt=Torn piece of map with Arabic text|thumb|upright|Surviving fragment of the [[Piri Reis map]]]] Hancock wrote that "the best recent evidence suggests that"{{Sfn|Hancock|1995|p=14}} large regions of [[Antarctica]] may have been ice-free until about 6,000 years ago, referring to the [[Piri Reis map]] and [[Charles Hapgood|Hapgood]]'s work from the 1960s. What is left entirely unmentioned are the extensive studies of the Antarctic ice sheet by [[George H. Denton]], published in 1981, which showed the ice to be hundreds of thousands of years old.<ref>{{Cite book |title=The Last Great Ice Sheets |publisher=Wiley |year=1981 |isbn=978-0-471-06006-2 |editor-last=Denton |editor-first=George H. |editor-link=George H. Denton |editor-last2=Hughes |editor-first2=Terence J.}}</ref>{{Sfn|Fagan|2006|p=35}}
* When discussing the ancient city of [[Tiwanaku]], Hancock presents it as a "mysterious site about which very little is known"{{sfn|Hancock|Faiia|2001|p=xxii}} at which "minimal archaeology has been done over the years",{{sfn|Hancock|Faiia|2001|p=xxii}} suggesting it dates to 17,000 years ago. Yet in the years prior to these statements, dozens of studies had been published, major excavations were conducted, and the site was [[Radiocarbon dating|radiocarbon dated]] by three sets of samples to around 1500 BC.{{Sfn|Fagan|2006|p=35-36}}
* When discussing the ancient city of [[Tiwanaku]], Hancock presents it as a "mysterious site about which very little is known"{{sfn|Hancock|Faiia|2001|p=xxii}} at which "minimal archaeology has been done over the years",{{sfn|Hancock|Faiia|2001|p=xxii}} suggesting it dates to 17,000 years ago. Yet in the years prior to these statements, dozens of studies had been published, major excavations were conducted, and the site was [[Radiocarbon dating|radiocarbon dated]] by three sets of samples to around 1500 BC.{{Sfn|Fagan|2006|p=35-36}}


=== Lost ice age civilization ===
=== Lost ice age civilization ===
[[File:Atlantis_map_1882_crop.jpg|thumb|A map showing the supposed extent of the Atlantean Empire, from [[Ignatius L. Donnelly]]'s [[Atlantis: The Antediluvian World]], 1882{{sfn|Donnelly|1882|p=295}}]]
[[File:Atlantis_map_1882_crop.jpg|thumb|A map showing the supposed extent of the Atlantean Empire, from [[Ignatius L. Donnelly]]'s ''[[Atlantis: The Antediluvian World]]'', 1882{{sfn|Donnelly|1882|p=295}}]]
<!--summary paragraph-->
<!--summary paragraph-->
Hancock's main thesis throughout most of his work is that there was an advanced civilization during the [[Last Glacial Period|last Ice Age]], which was destroyed as a result of a widespread natural disaster, causing the small number of survivors to travel the world, spreading their knowledge and giving rise to the [[Cradle of civilization|earliest known civilizations]]. He does not accept that these civilizations could have arisen independently or that faraway peoples developed the same ideas, arguing that they all came from one advanced ice age civilization. It is a form of [[hyperdiffusionism]]<ref name=":1">Jeb J. Card "[http://onlinedigeditions.com/publication/?i=634462&article_id=3531896&view=articleBrowser America Before as a Paranormal Charter]" ''The SAA Archaeological Record'' NOVEMBER 2019 - Volume 19 Number 5</ref> based on [[Ignatius L. Donnelly]]'s book ''[[Atlantis: The Antediluvian World]]'' (1882), an influence Hancock has cited.<ref name="Conversation">{{cite web |author-link= Flint Dibble |last1=Dibble |first1=Flint |date=18 November 2022 |title=With Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse, Graham Hancock has declared war on archaeologists |url=https://theconversation.com/with-netflixs-ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock-has-declared-war-on-archaeologists-194881 |website=[[The Conversation (website)|The Conversation]]}}</ref> The idea lacks concrete evidence, is [[Eurocentrism|biased towards western civilization]], and oversimplifies complex cultural developments.{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=92}}
Hancock's central thesis claims an advanced civilization flourished during the [[Last Glacial Period|last Ice Age]] before a global disaster destroyed it. He argues that a handful of survivors carried their knowledge across the world and seeded the [[Cradle of civilization|earliest known civilizations]]. He rejects the idea that these societies could have developed independently or arrived at similar ideas through convergence. Scholars identify the thesis as [[hyperdiffusionism]],<ref name=":1">Jeb J. Card "[http://onlinedigeditions.com/publication/?i=634462&article_id=3531896&view=articleBrowser America Before as a Paranormal Charter]" ''The SAA Archaeological Record'' NOVEMBER 2019 - Volume 19 Number 5</ref> heavily drawing on [[Ignatius L. Donnelly]]'s ''[[Atlantis: The Antediluvian World]]'' (1882), which Hancock cites as an influence.<ref name="Conversation">{{cite web |author-link= Flint Dibble |last1=Dibble |first1=Flint |date=18 November 2022 |title=With Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse, Graham Hancock has declared war on archaeologists |url=https://theconversation.com/with-netflixs-ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock-has-declared-war-on-archaeologists-194881 |website=[[The Conversation (website)|The Conversation]]}}</ref> Researchers state that the hypothesis lacks evidence, reflects a bias toward Western civilization, and oversimplifies complex cultural histories.{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=92}}


To explain the disappearance of his ice age civilization, Hancock embraces the [[Younger Dryas impact hypothesis]], which has little support in the scientific community.<ref name=":1" /> He argues that the civilization was destroyed around [[10th millennium BC|12,000 years ago]] by sudden climate change during the [[Younger Dryas]] [[Stadial and interstadial|cool period]], which he attributes to an [[impact winter]] caused by a massive meteor bombardment.<ref name="Conversation" />
To explain the disappearance of his ice age civilization, Hancock embraces the [[Younger Dryas impact hypothesis]], which has little support in the scientific community.<ref name=":1" /> He argues that the civilization was destroyed around [[10th millennium BC|12,000 years ago]] by sudden climate change during the [[Younger Dryas]] [[Stadial and interstadial|cool period]], which he attributes to an [[impact winter]] caused by a massive meteor bombardment.<ref name="Conversation" />


Hancock claims that the few survivors of the catastrophe arrived in places like [[ancient Egypt|Egypt]], [[Mesopotamia]], and [[Mesoamerica]], where they shared their knowledge and superior technology with primitive [[hunter-gatherer]]s – introducing them to [[Neolithic Revolution|agriculture]], monumental architecture, and astronomy.<ref name="Conversation" /> He believes the monuments they built encode astronomical data to warn future humans.<ref name=":1" /> The narrative assumes that the advanced civilization lacked a writing system that enabled them to leave a less ambiguous message. Hancock does not explain why this warning is not uniform across different cultures and is so hard to decode that generations of researchers missed it.{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=86}}
Hancock claims that the few survivors of the catastrophe reached regions such as [[ancient Egypt|Egypt]], [[Mesopotamia]], and [[Mesoamerica]], where they shared agricultural techniques, monumental architecture, and astronomy with [[hunter-gatherer]] communities.<ref name="Conversation" /> He believes the resulting monuments encode astronomical data intended to warn future generations.<ref name=":1" /> Critics note that the story assumes the Ice Age civilization lacked a reliable writing system, fails to explain why the warning appears differently across cultures, and relies on codes that professional researchers overlooked for generations.{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=86}} Hancock argues that this knowledge was passed down through [[Symbol|symbolism]].<ref name=":1" />


Hancock believes that these events are preserved in various [[myth]]s, such as [[Plato]]'s story of [[Atlantis]], and that the Atlanteans were remembered as "magicians and gods".<ref name=":1" />
Hancock believes that these events are preserved in various [[myth]]s, such as [[Plato]]'s story of [[Atlantis]], and that the Atlanteans were remembered as "magicians and gods".<ref name=":1" />
Line 67: Line 106:
Scholars [[Olav Hammer]] and Karen Swartz  write that Hancock's works are "based largely on an imaginative reinterpretation of artifacts and myths that divorces them from their immediate cultural and religious contexts."{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|p=81|2024}}  
Scholars [[Olav Hammer]] and Karen Swartz  write that Hancock's works are "based largely on an imaginative reinterpretation of artifacts and myths that divorces them from their immediate cultural and religious contexts."{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|p=81|2024}}  


==== Spiritual technology and Ice age civilization as myth ====
==== Spiritual technology and Ice Age civilization as myth ====
{{Blockquote|text=...in my view the science of the lost civilization was primarily focused upon what we now call ''[[Psychic|psi]]'' capacities that deployed the enhanced and focused power of human consciousness to channel energies and to manipulate matter.|author=Graham Hancock|title=America Before (2019)|source=p. 479}}
{{Blockquote|text=...in my view the science of the lost civilization was primarily focused upon what we now call ''[[Psychic|psi]]'' capacities that deployed the enhanced and focused power of human consciousness to channel energies and to manipulate matter.|author=Graham Hancock|title=America Before (2019)|source=p. 479}}
Hancock believes that the technology his lost Ice Age civilization possessed was primarily spiritual.{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=90}} According to anthropologist Jeb Card, in ''America Before'' (2019) Hancock describes his advanced Ice Age civilization as a "global-sea based society comparable with the late pre-industrial British Empire" with knowledge "that would seem like magic even today", with this knowledge suggested by Hancock to include [[psychic]] capabilities. Hancock suggests that the teachings of Atlanteans to later civilizations were "geometric, astronomical and spiritual" in nature, which were faciltated by the use of [[Psychoactive drug|psychotropic]] plants, such as [[ayahuasca]] and [[peyote]], used to access the Otherworld, allowing them to commune with souls and "powerful nonphysical beings".<ref name=":1" />
Hammer and Swartz report that Hancock portrays his lost Ice Age civilization as relying on spiritual technology that channels consciousness to manipulate matter.{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=90}} Anthropologist Jeb Card notes that ''America Before'' (2019) describes a "global sea-based society comparable with the late pre-industrial British Empire" whose knowledge "would seem like magic even today". He writes that Hancock credits the Atlanteans with [[psychic]] abilities and claims they delivered geometric, astronomical, and spiritual teachings through rituals involving [[Psychoactive drug|psychotropic]] plants such as [[ayahuasca]] and [[peyote]] to commune with "powerful nonphysical beings".<ref name=":1" />


He also proposed that they were able to move and shape large stones with the help of meditation and psychoactive plants,{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=90}} and asserted that granite blocks of the [[Great Pyramid of Giza]] were moved by "priests chanting", suggesting a form of [[acoustic levitation]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Wengrow |first=David |date=2022-12-22 |title=Apocalypse No! Pseudo-Archaeology, Ancient Tech-Lords, and Ordinary People. |url=https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock/ |access-date=2024-05-09 |language=en-US |issn=0027-8378}}</ref>
Hancock also argues that meditation and psychoactive plants enabled ancient builders to move large stones, asserting that granite blocks at the [[Great Pyramid of Giza]] were raised by "priests chanting", a scenario he links to [[acoustic levitation]].{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=90}}<ref>{{Cite news |last=Wengrow |first=David |date=2022-12-22 |title=Apocalypse No! Pseudo-Archaeology, Ancient Tech-Lords, and Ordinary People. |url=https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock/ |access-date=2024-05-09 |language=en-US |issn=0027-8378}}</ref> Archaeologist John Hoopes describes these views as effectively religious and rooted in [[New Age]] beliefs.<ref name="Slate" />


Archaeologist John Hoopes has described Hancock's claims as effectively religious in nature and rooted in [[New Age]] beliefs.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Onion |first=Rebecca |date=2022-11-19 |title=The Ancient Absurdities of Ancient Apocalypse |url=https://slate.com/culture/2022/11/ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock-netflix-theory-explained.html |access-date=2024-04-29 |work=Slate |language=en-US |issn=1091-2339}}</ref> Jeb Card stated that attempts to critique Hancock's work "using the criteria of professional archaeology is doomed to failure, as his goals are outside the goals of the [[Materialism|materialist]] practice of scientific archaeology", describing Hancock as part of the [[paranormal]] milieu, and the idea of the ice age civilization as a [[Myth|mythic narrative]] rooted in opposition to materialism, describing Hancock as "not a failed version of an archaeologist" but a "successful mythographer of a post-science age".<ref name=":1" /> Olav Hammer and Karen Swartz, both primarily scholars of [[new religious movement]]s, have also concurred with interpretation of Hancock as a creator of myths, describing him as a "[[Bricolage|bricoleur]] who creates a myth from a motley selection of cultural elements".{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|p=abstract|2024}}
Card maintains that evaluating Hancock with the tools of professional archaeology is futile because he works within a [[paranormal]] milieu and his ice age civilization serves as a [[Myth|mythic narrative]], labeling him "not a failed version of an archaeologist" but a "successful mythographer of a post-science age", and that Hancock's presents his theory as "a path to truly understanding reality and the spiritual elements denied by [[Materialism|materialist]] science".<ref name=":1" /> Hammer and Swartz, scholars of [[new religious movement]]s, likewise describe him as a "[[Bricolage|bricoleur]] who creates a myth from a motley selection of cultural elements".{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|p=abstract|2024}}


==== Racist implications ====
==== Racist implications ====
Archaeologists and the author [[Jason Colavito]] have criticised Hancock for the origins of some of his claims being drawn from racist sources. For instance, Hancock draws from the work of Donnelly, a proponent of the racist "[[Mound Builders#Pseudoarchaeology|mound builder myth]]", with Donnelly suggesting that the [[Indigenous peoples of the Americas]] were not capable of creating sophisticated structures, attributing their creation instead to white Atlanteans.<ref name="Conversation" /><ref name=":2">[[Jason Colavito]] [http://onlinedigeditions.com/publication/?m=16146&i=634462&view=articleBrowser&article_id=3531894&ver=html5 Whitewashing American Prehistory] ''The SAA Archaeological Record'' NOVEMBER 2019 - Volume 19 Number 5</ref> Hancock has distanced himself from this claim, yet failed to explain how a fully competent local population could serve as evidence for a lost civilization that transferred superior science and technology to them.{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=85, 89-90}}  
Archaeologists and author [[Jason Colavito]] criticize Hancock for drawing on racist sources. He cites Donnelly, whose "[[Mound Builders#Pseudoarchaeology|mound builder myth]]" argued that the [[Indigenous peoples of the Americas]] could not have built monumental structures and credited them to white Atlanteans.<ref name="Conversation" /><ref name=":2">[[Jason Colavito]] [http://onlinedigeditions.com/publication/?m=16146&i=634462&view=articleBrowser&article_id=3531894&ver=html5 Whitewashing American Prehistory] ''The SAA Archaeological Record'' NOVEMBER 2019 - Volume 19 Number 5</ref> Hancock distances himself from that conclusion yet does not explain how capable Indigenous societies support his story of a superior lost civilization transferring advanced science and technology to them.{{Sfn|Hammer|Swartz|2024|p=85, 89-90}}  


Although Hancock has identified the Atlanteans as indigenous Americans,<ref name=":2" /> he stated in ''Fingerprints of the Gods'' that Atlanteans were "white [and] auburn-haired".<ref name="Conversation" /> Hancock has based some of his work on outdated [[Scientific racism|race science]] and has argued for the presence of indigenous "[[Caucasian race|Caucasoids]]" and "[[Negroid]]s" in the Americas prior to 1492, which he claims are depicted in indigenous American art and mythology.<ref name="Conversation" />  
Although Hancock has identified the Atlanteans as Indigenous Americans,<ref name=":2" /> he wrote in ''Fingerprints of the Gods'' that they were "white [and] auburn-haired".<ref name="Conversation" /> He relies on outdated [[Scientific racism|race science]] to argue that pre-Columbian societies included "[[Caucasian race|Caucasoids]]" and "[[Negroid]]s", claims he bases on his readings of Indigenous art and mythology.<ref name="Conversation" />  


The [[Maya civilization|Maya]] were described by Hancock as only "semi-civilized" and their achievements as "generally unremarkable" to support the thesis that they inherited their calendar from a much older, far more advanced civilization.{{Sfn|Feder|2008|p=256}}
Hancock described the [[Maya civilization|Maya]] as "semi-civilized" with "generally unremarkable" achievements to support his thesis that they inherited their calendar from a much older society.{{Sfn|Feder|2008|p=256}} He denies being racist and has expressed support for Indigenous rights.<ref>{{Cite magazine |title=The Strange and Dangerous Right-Wing Freakout Over Ancient Apocalypse |url=https://newrepublic.com/article/169282/right-wing-graham-hancock-netflix-atlantis |access-date=2024-04-26 |magazine=The New Republic |issn=0028-6583}}</ref>
 
Hancock has denied that he is racist, and he has expressed support for native rights.<ref>{{Cite magazine |title=The Strange and Dangerous Right-Wing Freakout Over Ancient Apocalypse |url=https://newrepublic.com/article/169282/right-wing-graham-hancock-netflix-atlantis |access-date=2024-04-26 |magazine=The New Republic |issn=0028-6583}}</ref>


=== Orion correlation theory ===
=== Orion correlation theory ===
{{main|Orion correlation theory}}
{{main|Orion correlation theory}}
[[File:Orion Correlation 10,500 BC.png|thumb|Representation of the central tenet of the [[Orion correlation theory]] – the outline of the Giza pyramids superimposed over the stars in Orion's Belt. This alleged match has been rejected by astronomers.]]
One of the many recurring themes in several of Hancock's works has been an exposition on [[Robert Bauval]]'s Orion correlation theory (OCT). OCT posits that the relative locations of the three largest [[pyramid]]s of the [[Giza pyramid complex]] were chosen by the builders to reflect the three stars of [[Orion's Belt]] of the [[Orion (constellation)|constellation Orion]]. The pyramids are aligned to the cardinal direction within a fraction of a degree,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Dash |first=Glen |date=2012 |title=New Angles on the Great Pyramid |url=https://aeraweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/aeragram13_2.pdf |journal=Aeragram |volume=13 |issue=2 |pages=10–19}}</ref> however they are mismatched with Orion's Belt exceeding five degrees, according to astronomer [[Anthony Patrick Fairall|Tony Fairall]].{{Sfn|Fagan|2006|p=252-256}}
Hancock and Bauval's OCT was the subject of ''Atlantis Reborn'', an episode of the [[BBC]] documentary series ''[[Horizon (British TV series)|Horizon]]'' broadcast in 1999. The programme was critical of the theory, demonstrating that the constellation [[Leo (constellation)|Leo]] could be found amongst famous landmarks in New York and alleging that Hancock had selectively moved or ignored the locations of temples to support his argument.<ref name="synop"/> It concluded: "as long as you have enough points and you don't need to make every point fit, you can find virtually any pattern you want."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/atlantisrebornagain_transcript.shtml |title=Atlantis Reborn Again |work=BBC |date=14 December 2000 |access-date=21 November 2022}}</ref>
Following the broadcast, Hancock and Bauval complained to the [[Broadcasting Standards Commission]], but the commission found that "the programme makers acted in good faith in their examination of the theories".<ref>{{cite journal |date=30 November 2000 |title=Fairness Complaints |url=http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/bsc/pdfs/bulletin/bulletin37.pdf |format=PDF online reproduction |journal=The Bulletin |location=London |publisher=[[Broadcasting Standards Commission]] |volume=37 |pages=1–3 |author=Broadcasting Standards Commission |access-date=1 September 2009}}</ref> One complaint was upheld: that the programme unfairly omitted one of their arguments in rebuttal of astronomer [[Edwin Krupp]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/atlantisreborn_bsc_synopsis.shtml|title=Broadcasting Standards Commission - Synopsis of adjudication. Horizon: Atlantis Reborn (November 4th 1999)|publisher=British Broadcasting Corporation|access-date=2022-11-16}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite web |year=2000 |title=''Horizon: Atlantis Reborn'' and the Broadcasting Standards Commission |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/atlantisreborn_bsc.shtml |access-date=1 September 2009 |work=Science & Nature: Horizon |publisher=[[BBC]]}}</ref> The following year the BBC broadcast a revised version of the episode, ''Atlantis Reborn Again'', in which Hancock and Bauval provided further rebuttals to Krupp.<ref name="synop" /><ref name=":0" />
===''The Message of the Sphinx'' (1996)===
''The Message of the Sphinx: A Quest for the Hidden Legacy of Mankind'', a.k.a. ''Keeper of Genesis'' in the United Kingdom, is a [[pseudoarchaeology]]<ref>{{cite book |last1=Derricourt |first1=Robin M. |title=Antiquity Imagined: The Remarkable Legacy of Egypt and the Ancient Near East |date=2015 |publisher=[[IB. Tauris]] |location=London |isbn=9780857726995 |page=37}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Henty |first1=Liz |title=Exploring Archaeoastronomy: A History of its Relationship with Archaeology and Esotericism |date=2022 |publisher=[[Oxbow Books]] |isbn=9781789257885 |pages=159–160}}</ref> book written by Hancock and Robert Bauval in 1996 which argues that the creation of the [[Great Sphinx of Giza|Sphinx]] and [[Giza pyramid complex|Pyramids]] occurred as far back as [[Paleolithic|10,500 BC]] using [[Astronomy|astronomical]] data. Working from the premise that the [[Giza pyramid complex]] encodes a message, the book begins with the fringe [[Sphinx water erosion hypothesis]], evidence that the authors believe suggests that deep erosion patterns on the flanks of the Sphinx were caused by thousands of years of heavy rain. The authors go on to suggest, using computer simulations of the sky, that the pyramids&nbsp;— representing the three stars of [[Orion's Belt]]&nbsp;— along with associated causeways and alignments, [[Orion correlation theory|constitute a record in stone]] of the celestial array at the vernal equinox in 10,500 BC. This moment, they contend, represents [[Zep Tepi]], the "First Time", often referred to in the hieroglyphic record. They state that the initiation rites of the Egyptian pharaohs replicate on Earth the Sun's journey through the stars in this remote era, and they suggest that the "Hall of Records" of a lost civilization may be located by treating the [[Giza Plateau]] as a template of these same ancient skies.<ref name="The Message of the Sphinx">{{cite book |title=The Message of the Sphinx: A Quest for the Hidden Legacy of Mankind |date=1996 |publisher=Crown Publishers | location=New York | first1=Graham |last1=Hancock |first2=Robert |last2=Bauval |author1-link=Graham Hancock |author2-link=Robert Bauval |oclc=34887732 |isbn=9780614968170}}</ref>
=== ''Ancient Apocalypse'' (2022) ===
{{Main|Ancient Apocalypse}}
Hancock's theories are the basis of ''Ancient Apocalypse'', a 2022 documentary series produced by [[Netflix]], where Hancock's son Sean is "senior manager of unscripted originals".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Moore |first=Kasey |date=2022-10-17 |title=Ancient Apocalypse: Graham Hancock to Present Netflix Original Docuseries |url=https://www.whats-on-netflix.com/news/ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock-to-present-netflix-original-docuseries/ |access-date=2022-10-20 |website=What's on Netflix }}</ref> In the series, Hancock outlines his long-held belief that there was an advanced civilization during the [[Last Glacial Period|last ice age]], that it was destroyed following [[Younger Dryas impact hypothesis|comet impacts]] around 12,000 years ago, and that its survivors [[Neolithic Revolution|introduced agriculture]], monumental architecture, and astronomy to [[hunter-gatherer]]s around the world.<ref name="Conversation"/> He attempts to show how several ancient monuments and natural features are evidence of this, and he repeatedly claims that archaeologists are ignoring or covering up this alleged evidence.<ref name="Slate">{{cite web |last1=Onion |first1=Rebecca |title=The Ancient Absurdities of Ancient Apocalypse |url=https://slate.com/culture/2022/11/ancient-apocalypse-graham-hancock-netflix-theory-explained.html |website=[[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] |date=18 November 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |first =Leslie Evans |last =Ogden |title=Hot Theory About Cool Event |url=https://www.naturalhistorymag.com/samplings/173475/hot-theory-about-cool-event/ |date=1 April 2018 |work=Natural History |access-date=October 13, 2022}}</ref>


Archaeologists and other experts say that the series presents pseudoscientific claims that lack evidence, [[Cherry picking|cherry picks]], and fails to present counter-evidence.<ref name="Conversation"/><ref>{{cite news |last1=Riel-Salvatore|first1=Julien |title=Netflix, l'archéologie et l'obscurantisme |page=A7 |url=https://www.ledevoir.com/opinion/idees/771732/science-netflix-l-archeologie-et-l-obscurantisme |work=[[Le Devoir]] |date=22 November 2022 |location= Montréal|accessdate=23 November 2022}}</ref> Other commentators criticized the series for unfounded accusations that "mainstream archaeology" conspires against Hancock's ideas.<ref name="Slate"/><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.courrierinternational.com/article/netflix-a-l-aube-de-notre-histoire-faut-il-croire-ce-que-raconte-graham-hancock) |title=Netflix. "À l'aube de notre histoire" : faut-il croire ce que raconte Graham Hancock ? |language=French |work=Courrier International |date=16 November 2022 |accessdate=20 November 2022}}</ref> Archaeologists linked Hancock's claims to "white supremacist" ideologies from the 19th century, which they say are insulting to the ancestors of indigenous peoples who built the monuments.<ref>Hodge, Hugo (7 December 2022) [https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-07/experts-say-ancient-apocalypse-netflix-series-is-racist-untrue/101728298 Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse series uses 'racist ideologies' to rewrite Indo-Pacific history, experts say] ''[[ABC News (Australia)|ABC News]]'', Retrieved 7 December 2022.</ref> A Maltese archaeologist who appeared in an episode said her interview had been manipulated.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Arena |first1=Jessica |title=Maltese archaeologists push back against Netflix show's temple claims |url=https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/maltese-archaeologists-push-back-netflix-show-s-temple-claims.995910 |work=[[Times of Malta]] |date=20 November 2022 |accessdate=20 November 2022}}</ref> The [[Society for American Archaeology]] (SAA) objected to the classification of the series as a documentary and requested that Netflix reclassify it as [[science fiction]]. The SAA also stated:
[[File:Orion Correlation 10,500 BC.png|thumb|Representation of the central tenet of the [[Orion correlation theory]] showing the Giza pyramids aligned with the stars in Orion's Belt. Astronomers reject this alleged match.]]
{{Blockquote|text=the series repeatedly and vigorously dismisses archaeologists and the practice of archaeology with aggressive rhetoric, willfully seeking to cause harm to our membership and our profession in the public eye; ... the theory it presents has a long-standing association with racist, white supremacist ideologies; does injustice to Indigenous peoples; and emboldens extremists. ... After more than a century of professional archaeological investigations, we find no archaeological evidence to support the existence of an 'advanced, global Ice Age civilization'.<ref name="SAA_Dear_Bajaria_Corp">{{cite web | last1=Sandweiss | first1=Daniel H.  | title=Dear Ms. Bajaria and Ms. Corp | date=2022-11-30 |website=Society for American Archaeology | url=https://documents.saa.org/container/docs/default-source/doc-governmentaffairs/saa-letter-ancient-apocalypse.pdf |access-date= 2022-12-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221202174326/https://documents.saa.org/container/docs/default-source/doc-governmentaffairs/saa-letter-ancient-apocalypse.pdf |archive-date= 2022-12-02 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Benzine |first1=Vittoria |title=Archaeologists Ask Netflix to Reclassify Graham Hancock's 'Unfounded' Netflix Docuseries 'Ancient Apocalypse' as Fiction |url=https://news.artnet.com/art-world/archaeologists-graham-hancocks-ancient-apocalypse-fiction-2222060 |work=[[Artnet News]] |date=2 December 2022}}</ref>}}
Hancock frequently promotes [[Robert Bauval]]'s Orion correlation theory (OCT), which claims that the three largest [[pyramid]]s of the [[Giza pyramid complex]] were positioned to mirror the three stars of [[Orion's Belt]]. OCT notes that the pyramids align with the cardinal directions within a fraction of a degree,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Dash |first=Glen |date=2012 |title=New Angles on the Great Pyramid |url=https://aeraweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/aeragram13_2.pdf |journal=Aeragram |volume=13 |issue=2 |pages=10-19}}</ref> yet astronomer [[Anthony Patrick Fairall|Tony Fairall]] points out that the stellar alignment misses by more than five degrees.{{Sfn|Fagan|2006|p=252-256}}


== Other media appearances ==
Hancock and Bauval's OCT was the focus of ''Atlantis Reborn'', a 1999 episode of the [[BBC]] documentary series ''[[Horizon (British TV series)|Horizon]]''. The program mocked the theory by showing that the constellation [[Leo (constellation)|Leo]] could be mapped onto famous New York landmarks and argued that Hancock cherry-picked temple locations to suit his claims.<ref name="synop"/> It concluded, "as long as you have enough points and you don't need to make every point fit, you can find virtually any pattern you want."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/atlantisrebornagain_transcript.shtml |title=Atlantis Reborn Again |work=BBC |date=14 December 2000 |access-date=21 November 2022}}</ref>
Hancock gave a [[TEDx]] lecture titled "The War on Consciousness", in which he described his use of [[ayahuasca]], an Amazonian brew containing a hallucinogenic compound [[N,N-Dimethyltryptamine|DMT]], and argued that adults should be allowed to responsibly use it for self-improvement and spiritual growth. He stated that for 24 years he was "pretty much permanently stoned" on cannabis, and that in 2011, six years after his first use of ayahuasca, it enabled him to stop using cannabis.<ref name="stoned"/> At the recommendation of TED's Science Board, the lecture was removed from the TEDx YouTube channel and moved to TED's main website where it "can be framed to highlight both [Hancock's] provocative ideas and the factual problems with [his] arguments".<ref>{{citation|url=http://blog.ted.com/2013/03/14/open-for-discussion-graham-hancock-and-rupert-sheldrake|title=News TEDx – Open for discussion: Graham Hancock and Rupert Sheldrake from TEDx Whitechapel|date=14 March 2013|website=TED Blog|access-date=28 December 2016}}</ref>


Hancock has appeared on ''[[The Joe Rogan Experience]]'' podcast several times. In April 2024 (episode #2136) Hancock debated [[Flint Dibble]],<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last1=Fallon |first1=Richard |last2=Guimont |first2=Edward |date=2024 |title=Introduction: Conceptualising heterodox palaeoscience |journal=Interdisciplinary Science Reviews |volume=49 |issue=3–4 |pages=313 |doi=10.1177/03080188241275300|bibcode=2024ISRv...49..307F }}</ref> a professor of archeology at [[Cardiff University]],<ref name=":3" /> who strongly rebutted Hancock's unfounded ideas, leading even many of Hancock's backers to see Dibble – and orthodox science – as the victor.<ref name=":3" /> Both Hancock and Dibble agreed that continuing archeological research would be a great benefit to humanity.
After the broadcast, Hancock and Bauval complained to the [[Broadcasting Standards Commission]], which ruled that "the program makers acted in good faith in their examination of the theories".<ref>{{cite journal |date=30 November 2000 |title=Fairness Complaints |url=http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/bsc/pdfs/bulletin/bulletin37.pdf |format=PDF online reproduction |journal=The Bulletin |location=London |publisher=[[Broadcasting Standards Commission]] |volume=37 |pages=1-3 |author=Broadcasting Standards Commission |access-date=1 September 2009}}</ref> The commission upheld one complaint, agreeing that the program omitted a rebuttal of astronomer [[Edwin Krupp]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/atlantisreborn_bsc_synopsis.shtml|title=Broadcasting Standards Commission - Synopsis of adjudication. Horizon: Atlantis Reborn (November 4th 1999)|publisher=British Broadcasting Corporation|access-date=2022-11-16}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite web |year=2000 |title=''Horizon: Atlantis Reborn'' and the Broadcasting Standards Commission |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/atlantisreborn_bsc.shtml |access-date=1 September 2009 |work=Science & Nature: Horizon |publisher=[[BBC]]}}</ref> The BBC aired a revised version titled ''Atlantis Reborn Again'' the following year, allowing Hancock and Bauval to present additional responses to Krupp.<ref name="synop" /><ref name=":0" />


==In popular culture==
===In popular culture===
In 2009, [[Roland Emmerich]] released his blockbuster disaster movie ''[[2012 (film)|2012]]'', citing ''[[Fingerprints of the Gods]]'' in the credits as an inspiration for the film,<ref name="2012-credit-list">{{cite web|url=http://chicagoscifi.com/movies/0011/presskit_pages/credits.pdf|title=2012 (2009) Credit List|access-date=25 November 2009|publisher=chicagoscifi.com|archive-date=1 March 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120301092053/http://chicagoscifi.com/movies/0011/presskit_pages/credits.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> stating: "I always wanted to do a biblical flood movie, but I never felt I had the hook. I first read about the Earth's Crust Displacement Theory in Graham Hancock's ''Fingerprints of the Gods''."<ref>{{cite journal | url=http://www.timeout.com/film/features/show-feature/9039/roland-emmerichs-guide-to-disaster-movies.html | title=Roland Emmerich's guide to disaster movies | author=Jenkins, David | journal=[[Time Out (magazine)|Time Out]] | access-date=25 November 2009 | date=16 November 2009 | archive-date=16 November 2009 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091116122546/http://www.timeout.com/film/features/show-feature/9039/roland-emmerichs-guide-to-disaster-movies.html | url-status=dead }}</ref>
In 2009, [[Roland Emmerich]] released the disaster movie ''[[2012 (film)|2012]]'', citing ''[[Fingerprints of the Gods]]'' in the credits as an inspiration for the film,<ref name="2012-credit-list">{{cite web|url=http://chicagoscifi.com/movies/0011/presskit_pages/credits.pdf|title=2012 (2009) - Credit List|access-date=25 November 2009|publisher=chicagoscifi.com|archive-date=1 March 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120301092053/http://chicagoscifi.com/movies/0011/presskit_pages/credits.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> stating: "I always wanted to do a biblical flood movie, but I never felt I had the hook. I first read about the Earth's Crust Displacement Theory in Graham Hancock's ''Fingerprints of the Gods''."<ref>{{cite journal | url=http://www.timeout.com/film/features/show-feature/9039/roland-emmerichs-guide-to-disaster-movies.html | title=Roland Emmerich's guide to disaster movies | author=Jenkins, David | journal=[[Time Out (magazine)|Time Out]] | access-date=25 November 2009 | date=16 November 2009 | archive-date=16 November 2009 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091116122546/http://www.timeout.com/film/features/show-feature/9039/roland-emmerichs-guide-to-disaster-movies.html | url-status=dead }}</ref>


==Works==
==Works==
Line 117: Line 140:
* {{cite book | last = Hancock | first = Graham | title = Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business | publisher = [[Atlantic Monthly Press]]  | location = Boston | year = 1989 | isbn = 0-87113-253-2 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book | last = Hancock | first = Graham | title = Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business | publisher = [[Atlantic Monthly Press]]  | location = Boston | year = 1989 | isbn = 0-87113-253-2 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book | last = Hancock | first = Graham | title = [[The Sign and the Seal|The Sign and the Seal: The Quest for the Lost Ark of the Covenant]] | publisher = Crown | location = New York | year = 1992 | isbn = 0-517-57813-1 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book | last = Hancock | first = Graham | title = [[The Sign and the Seal|The Sign and the Seal: The Quest for the Lost Ark of the Covenant]] | publisher = Crown | location = New York | year = 1992 | isbn = 0-517-57813-1 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book | last = Hancock | first = Graham | title = [[Fingerprints of the Gods|Fingerprints of the Gods: The Evidence of Earth's Lost Civilization]] | publisher = Crown Publishers | location = New York | year = 1995 | isbn = 0-517-59348-3 }}
* {{cite book | last = Hancock | first = Graham | title = [[Fingerprints of the Gods|Fingerprints of the Gods: The Evidence of Earth's Lost Civilization]] | publisher = Crown Publishers | location = New York | year = 1995 | isbn = 0-517-59348-3 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book | last = Hancock | first = Graham |author2=Robert Bauval |author2-link=Robert Bauval | title = [[The Message of the Sphinx|The Message of the Sphinx: A Quest for the Hidden Legacy of Mankind]] | publisher = Crown Publishers | location = New York | year = 1996 | isbn = 0-517-70503-6 |ref=none}}  Published in the United Kingdom as {{cite book | last = Hancock | first = Graham | author2 = Robert Bauval | title = Keeper of Genesis: A Quest for the Hidden Legacy of Mankind | publisher = Heinemann | location = London | year = 1996 | isbn = 0-434-00302-6 | url-access = registration | url = https://archive.org/details/keeperofgenesisq0000bauv |ref=none}}
* {{cite book | last = Hancock | first = Graham |author2=Robert Bauval |author2-link=Robert Bauval | title = [[The Message of the Sphinx|The Message of the Sphinx: A Quest for the Hidden Legacy of Mankind]] | publisher = Crown Publishers | location = New York | year = 1996 | isbn = 0-517-70503-6 |ref=none}}  Published in the United Kingdom as {{cite book | last = Hancock | first = Graham | author2 = Robert Bauval | title = Keeper of Genesis: A Quest for the Hidden Legacy of Mankind | publisher = Heinemann | location = London | year = 1996 | isbn = 0-434-00302-6 | url-access = registration | url = https://archive.org/details/keeperofgenesisq0000bauv |ref=none}}
* {{cite book | last = Hancock | first = Graham | title = The Mars Mystery: A Tale of the End of Two Worlds | publisher = Michael Joseph | location = London | year = 1998 | isbn = 0-7181-4314-0 |ref=none}}
* {{cite book | last = Hancock | first = Graham | title = The Mars Mystery: A Tale of the End of Two Worlds | publisher = Michael Joseph | location = London | year = 1998 | isbn = 0-7181-4314-0 |ref=none}}
Line 131: Line 154:


===Video===
===Video===
* ''[[Pole to Pole with Michael Palin]]'' Crossing the Line (EP 5) (1992)
* ''[[Pole to Pole with Michael Palin]]'' - Crossing the Line (EP 5) (1992)
* ''Quest for the Lost Civilization'' Acorn Media (1998)
* ''The Mysterious Origins of Man'' (1996)
* ''Atlantis Reborn Again'' BBC Horizon (2000)
* ''Quest for the Lost Civilization'' - Acorn Media (1998)
* ''Earth Pilgrims'' Earth Pilgrims Inc. (2010)
* ''Atlantis Reborn Again'' - BBC Horizon (2000)
* "The War on Consciousness" [[TED (conference)#TEDx|TEDx]] (2013)
* ''Underworld: Flooded Kingdoms of the Ice Age'' (2002)
* ''Earth Pilgrims'' - Earth Pilgrims Inc. (2010)
* "The War on Consciousness" - [[TED (conference)#TEDx|TEDx]] (2013)
* [[Ancient Apocalypse]] (2022)
* [[Ancient Apocalypse]] (2022)


Line 146: Line 171:
===Works cited===
===Works cited===
* {{Cite book |last1=Conner |first1=Christopher T. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uoYIEQAAQBAJ |title=Conspiracy Theories and Extremism in New Times |last2=Hannah |first2=Matthew N. |last3=MacMurray |first3=Nicholas J. |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |year=2024 |isbn=978-1-6669-3309-3}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Conner |first1=Christopher T. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uoYIEQAAQBAJ |title=Conspiracy Theories and Extremism in New Times |last2=Hannah |first2=Matthew N. |last3=MacMurray |first3=Nicholas J. |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |year=2024 |isbn=978-1-6669-3309-3}}
* {{cite journal |last=Defant |first=Marc J. | title=Conjuring Up a Lost Civilization: An Analysis of the Claims Made by Graham Hancock in ''Magicians of the Gods'' |journal=Skeptic |volume=22 |number=3 |year=2017 |url=https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/defant-analysis-of-hancock-claims-in-magicians-of-the-gods/ |access-date=2022-11-14}}
* {{cite journal |last=Defant |first=Marc J. | title=Conjuring Up a Lost Civilization: An Analysis of the Claims Made by Graham Hancock in ''Magicians of the Gods'' |journal=Skeptic |volume=22 |number=3 |year=2017 |pages=32-41 |url=https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/defant-analysis-of-hancock-claims-in-magicians-of-the-gods/ |access-date=2022-11-14}}
*{{cite book |last=Donnelly| first=Ignatius L.|author-link=Ignatius L. Donnelly |year=1882|title=Atlantis: The Antediluvian World |location=New York |publisher=Harper & Bros |url=http://digital.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=4032 |page=295}}
*{{cite book |last=Donnelly| first=Ignatius L.|author-link=Ignatius L. Donnelly |year=1882|title=Atlantis: The Antediluvian World |location=New York |publisher=Harper & Bros |url=http://digital.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=4032 |page=295}}
*{{Cite book |last=Exum |first=Kaitlen J. |url=http://archive.org/details/currentbiography0000unse_u0t8 |title=Current Biography Yearbook, 2005 |date=2005 |publisher=The H.W. Wilson Company |isbn=978-0-8242-1056-4 |editor-last=Thompson |editor-first=Clifford |location=New York |pages=236–239 |chapter=Hancock, Graham}}
*{{Cite book |last=Exum |first=Kaitlen J. |url=http://archive.org/details/currentbiography0000unse_u0t8 |title=Current Biography Yearbook, 2005 |date=2005 |publisher=The H.W. Wilson Company |isbn=978-0-8242-1056-4 |editor-last=Thompson |editor-first=Clifford |location=New York |pages=236-239 |chapter=Hancock, Graham}}
* {{cite book |last=Fagan |first=Garrett G. |year=2006 |isbn=9780415305921 |url=https://archive.org/details/archaeologicalfa0000unse_e5v3 |title=Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public |author-link=Garrett G. Fagan |publisher=Psychology Press}}
* {{cite book |last=Fagan |first=Garrett G. |year=2006 |isbn=9780415305921 |url=https://archive.org/details/archaeologicalfa0000unse_e5v3 |title=Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public |author-link=Garrett G. Fagan |publisher=Psychology Press}}
* {{cite book |last=Hancock |first=Graham |year=1995 |title=Fingerprints of the Gods: The Evidence of Earth's Lost Civilization |location=New York |publisher=Crown |isbn=0-517-88729-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Feder |first=Kenneth |url=https://archive.org/details/fraudsmythsmyste0000fede_a0k0_6thed |title=Frauds, myths, and mysteries : science and pseudoscience in archaeology |publisher=McGraw-Hill Higher Education |year=2008 |isbn=9780073405292 |edition=6th |author-link=Kenneth Feder}}
* {{Cite book |last=Feder |first=Kenneth |url=https://archive.org/details/fraudsmythsmyste0000fede_a0k0_6thed |title=Frauds, myths, and mysteries : science and pseudoscience in archaeology |publisher=McGraw-Hill Higher Education |year=2008 |isbn=9780073405292 |edition=6th |author-link=Kenneth Feder}}
* {{cite book |last=Fritze |first=Ronald H. |authorlink=Ronald H. Fritze |year=2009 |title=Invented Knowledge: False History, Fake Science and Pseudo-religions |location=London |publisher=[[Reaktion Books]]}}
* {{cite book |last=Fritze |first=Ronald H. |authorlink=Ronald H. Fritze |year=2009 |title=Invented Knowledge: False History, Fake Science and Pseudo-religions |location=London |publisher=[[Reaktion Books]]}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Hammer |first1=Olav |last2=Swartz |first2=Karen |date=2024 |title=Graham Hancock, Prometheus for a New Age: Alternative Archaeology as Modern Mythmaking |journal=[[Nova Religio]] |publisher=[[University of Pennsylvania Press]] |volume=27 |issue=4 |pages=79–95 |doi=10.1353/nvr.2024.a929280}}
* {{Cite journal |last1=Hammer |first1=Olav |last2=Swartz |first2=Karen |date=2024 |title=Graham Hancock, Prometheus for a New Age: Alternative Archaeology as Modern Mythmaking |journal=[[Nova Religio]] |publisher=[[University of Pennsylvania Press]] |volume=27 |issue=4 |pages=79-95 |doi=10.1353/nvr.2024.a929280}}
* {{Cite book |last=Regal |first=Brian |title=Pseudoscience: A Critical Encyclopedia |publisher=Greenwood |year=2009 |isbn=978-0313355073 |author-link=Brian Regal |url=https://archive.org/details/Pseudoscience_A_Critical_Encyclopedia_by_Brian_Regal}}
* {{Cite book |last=Regal |first=Brian |title=Pseudoscience: A Critical Encyclopedia |publisher=Greenwood |year=2009 |isbn=978-0313355073 |author-link=Brian Regal |url=https://archive.org/details/Pseudoscience_A_Critical_Encyclopedia_by_Brian_Regal}}


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
* {{cite web |url=http://www.antiquityofman.com/hancock.html |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060504102244/http://www.antiquityofman.com/hancock.html |archive-date=4 May 2006 |title=An analysis of the quality of Graham Hancock's "science" |website=The Antiquity of Man}}
* {{cite web |url=http://www.antiquityofman.com/hancock.html |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060504102244/http://www.antiquityofman.com/hancock.html |archive-date=4 May 2006 |title=An analysis of the quality of Graham Hancock's "science" |website=The Antiquity of Man}}
* {{cite journal |last=Brass |first=Michael |date=2002 |url=http://www.csicop.org/si/show/tracing_graham_hancockrsquos_shifting_cataclysm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100426114404/http://www.csicop.org/si/show/tracing_graham_hancockrsquos_shifting_cataclysm |archive-date=2010-04-26 |title=Tracing Graham Hancock's Shifting Cataclysm |journal=[[Skeptical Inquirer]] |volume=26 |number=4 |pages=45–49}}
* {{cite journal |last=Brass |first=Michael |date=2002 |url=http://www.csicop.org/si/show/tracing_graham_hancockrsquos_shifting_cataclysm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100426114404/http://www.csicop.org/si/show/tracing_graham_hancockrsquos_shifting_cataclysm |archive-date=2010-04-26 |title=Tracing Graham Hancock's Shifting Cataclysm |journal=[[Skeptical Inquirer]] |volume=26 |number=4 |pages=45-49}}
* {{cite web |last=Carroll |first=R. T. |year=2009 |url=http://skepdic.com/atlantis.html |title=Atlantis |website=[[The Skeptic's Dictionary]] |access-date=2022-11-14}}
* {{cite web |last=Carroll |first=R. T. |year=2009 |url=http://skepdic.com/atlantis.html |title=Atlantis |website=[[The Skeptic's Dictionary]] |access-date=2022-11-14}}
* {{cite web |last=Fagan |first=Garrett |url=http://www.hallofmaat.com/modules.php?name=Articles&file=article&sid=18 |title=An Answer to Graham Hancock |website=In the Hall of Ma'at |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050419180218/http://www.hallofmaat.com/modules.php?name=Articles&file=article&sid=18 |archive-date=2005-04-19}}
* {{cite web |last=Fagan |first=Garrett |url=http://www.hallofmaat.com/modules.php?name=Articles&file=article&sid=18 |title=An Answer to Graham Hancock |website=In the Hall of Ma'at |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050419180218/http://www.hallofmaat.com/modules.php?name=Articles&file=article&sid=18 |archive-date=2005-04-19}}
Line 175: Line 201:
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:20th-century Scottish journalists]]
[[Category:20th-century Scottish journalists]]
[[Category:20th-century British male journalists]]
[[Category:21st-century Scottish novelists]]
[[Category:21st-century Scottish novelists]]
[[Category:Scottish male novelists]]
[[Category:21st-century Scottish male writers]]
[[Category:Alumni of St Cuthbert's Society, Durham]]
[[Category:Alumni of St Cuthbert's Society, Durham]]
[[Category:Atlantis proponents]]
[[Category:Atlantis proponents]]
Line 191: Line 220:
[[Category:The Times journalists]]
[[Category:The Times journalists]]
[[Category:Writers from Edinburgh]]
[[Category:Writers from Edinburgh]]
[[Category:Scottish male journalists]]

Latest revision as of 21:18, 31 December 2025

Template:Short description Template:Pp-sock Template:EngvarB Template:Use dmy dates Script error: No such module "infobox".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for clobbered parameters".Template:Wikidata image Graham Bruce Hancock (born 2 August 1950)[1] is a British author known for promoting pseudoscientificTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn explanations of ancient civilizations and hypothetical lost lands.[2] Hancock argues that an advanced society with spiritual technology thrived during the last Ice Age until comet impacts triggered the Younger Dryas about 12,900 years ago. He maintains that survivors of the disaster shared their knowledge with hunter-gatherer communities in regions such as ancient Egypt, Sumer, and Mesoamerica, sparking the earliest known civilizations.

Born in Edinburgh, Hancock studied sociology at Durham University before joining British newspapers and magazines as a journalist. His first three books examined international development, including Lords of Poverty (1989), a well-received critique of corruption in the aid system. Beginning with The Sign and the Seal in 1992, he shifted to speculative accounts of human prehistory and ancient civilizations, publishing a dozen books that include Fingerprints of the Gods and Magicians of the Gods.

Scholars describe Hancock's investigations of archaeological evidence, myths, and historical documents as mimicking investigative journalism while lacking accuracy, consistency, and impartiality.Template:Sfn They label his work pseudoarchaeologyTemplate:Sfn[3] and pseudohistoryTemplate:Sfn[4] because they see it as biased toward preconceived conclusions that ignore context, misrepresent sources, cherry pick and omit evidence that contradicts his claims.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Hancock's idea of an advanced ice age civilization is seen as a variant of the hyperdiffusionism hypothesis that has been advocated by various authors since the 19th century.

Anthropologist Jeb Card characterizes Hancock's writings as paranormal and views his proposed Ice Age civilization as a modern mythic narrative focused on secret and spiritual knowledge, with Hancock contending that members of the ice age civilisation had psychic abilities and communicated with "powerful nonphysical beings" through psychedelic use.[5] Hancock portrays himself as a culture hero challenging the "dogmatism" of academics, presenting his work as more valid than professional archaeologyTemplate:Sfn and as "a path to truly understanding reality and the spiritual elements denied by materialist science",[5] even while citing science to support his ideas.Template:Sfn He has not submitted his writings for scholarly peer review, and they have not been published in academic journals.Template:Sfn

Hancock has written two fantasy novels and in 2013 delivered a controversial TEDx talk promoting the psychoactive drink ayahuasca. His ideas have inspired several films and he presented the Netflix series Ancient Apocalypse (2022) based on his theories. He makes regular appearances on the podcast The Joe Rogan Experience to promote his claims.

Early life and journalism

Graham Bruce Hancock was born in Edinburgh, Scotland, in 1950.[6] He moved to India with his parents at the age of three, where his father worked as a surgeon. After returning to the United Kingdom, he graduated from Durham University with a degree in sociology in 1973.[7][8]

Hancock reported for British newspapers including The Times, The Sunday Times, The Independent, and The Guardian. He co-edited New Internationalist magazine from 1976 to 1979 and served as the East Africa correspondent for The Economist from 1981 to 1983.[7][9]Template:Sfn His first books focused on economic and social development in developing countries. Lords of Poverty: The Power, Prestige, and Corruption of the International Aid Business (1989) drew on his reporting about international aid for The Economist and argued that entrenched corruption made the aid system irredeemable, describing it as "inherently bad, bad to the bone, and utterly beyond reform".[10][11][12] Reviewers praised the book's forceful critique of global aid, yet many disputed Hancock's conclusion that aid is inherently harmful.[13][14][15]

Hancock later acknowledged missteps during this period, including what he described as "friendly personal terms" with Somali dictator Siad Barre and links to Ethiopian dictator Mengistu Haile Mariam.[16] He wrote a favorable profile of Barre for The Independent, noting that the regime facilitated parts of his trip and conceding that he "definitely made a mistake" by establishing those connections.[16] He has said that by 1987 he was "pretty much permanently stoned" because he believed cannabis improved his writing.[17]

Later writing

The publication of The Sign and the Seal: The Quest for the Lost Ark of the Covenant in 1992 marked a career transition from his earlier development reporting to books pursuing speculative through lines among archaeological, historical, and cross-cultural material. Reporting by The Independent in 1995 described how he pivoted in 1989 from work with the Barre regime to researching the Ark of the Covenant, an effort that led to The Sign and the Seal.[16] His subsequent titles include Fingerprints of the Gods, Magicians of the Gods, Keeper of Genesis,Template:Efn The Mars Mystery, Heaven's Mirror (with Santha Faiia), Underworld: The Mysterious Origins of Civilization, and Talisman: Sacred Cities, Secret Faith (with Robert Bauval).

Hancock's first novel, Entangled: The Eater of Souls, launched a planned fantasy series in 2010 that follows "two brave young women" who "do battle with a demon who travels through time." The story emerged from his ayahuasca experiences, which he said gave him "a series of intense visions" revealing the characters and plot. He described writing it as "tremendous fun", free from the academic scrutiny of his non-fiction work, joking "What was there to lose when my critics already described my factual books as fiction?".[18]

The Sign and the Seal (1992)

The Sign and the Seal chronicles Hancock's investigation of how the Ark of the Covenant might have traveled from ancient Israel to Ethiopia.[19] He follows a path through Elephantine and Tana Qirqos and connects the story to medieval Ethiopia and the Knights Templar.[19] Jonathan Kirsch of the Los Angeles Times described the book as "part travelogue, part true-adventure, part mystery-thriller" yet concluded that it was "a whacking big dose of amateur scholarship alloyed with a fervid imagination."[20] Kirkus Reviews noted Hancock's claim "that the Lost Ark of the Covenant really exists" and framed the project as an extension of his Ethiopian reportage and speculation.[21]

Fingerprints of the Gods (1995)

Hancock's Fingerprints of the Gods: The Evidence of Earth's Lost Civilization (1995) argues that an advanced society perished at the end of the last Ice Age and that its survivors transmitted astronomical and architectural knowledge to later cultures. The narrative reads monuments in the Americas, Africa, and Asia as fragments of that inheritance.Template:Sfn Archaeologist Garrett G. Fagan wrote that the book drags "artefacts, monuments, entire cities, or whole cultures" into a predetermined conclusion while ignoring their historical contexts.Template:Sfn Kenneth Feder observed that Hancock's thesis reflected diffusionist arguments that had circulated for decades and concluded that it offered nothing original.[22]

The Message of the Sphinx (1996)

The Message of the Sphinx: A Quest for the Hidden Legacy of Mankind, a.k.a. Keeper of Genesis in the United Kingdom, is a pseudoarchaeology[23][24] book written by Hancock and Robert Bauval in 1996 which argues that the creation of the Sphinx and Pyramids occurred as far back as 10,500 BC using astronomical data. Working from the premise that the Giza pyramid complex encodes a message, the book begins with the fringe Sphinx water erosion hypothesis, evidence that the authors believe suggests that deep erosion patterns on the flanks of the Sphinx were caused by thousands of years of heavy rain. The authors use computer simulations of the sky to claim that the pyramids, representing the three stars of Orion's Belt, together with associated causeways and alignments, constitute a record in stone of the celestial array at the vernal equinox in 10,500 BC. This moment, they contend, represents Zep Tepi, the "First Time", often referenced in the hieroglyphic record. They state that the initiation rites of the Egyptian pharaohs replicate on Earth the Sun's journey through the stars in this remote era, and they suggest that the "Hall of Records" of a lost civilization may be located by treating the Giza Plateau as a template of these same ancient skies.[25]

The Mars Mystery (1997)

In The Mars Mystery (1997), Hancock and his coauthors Robert Bauval and John Grigsby interpreted low-resolution Viking lander images of the Cydonia region of Mars as evidence that the so-called "Face on Mars" and a "five sided pyramid" were created by an advanced Martian civilization later destroyed by a catastrophe,[26] linking the "Face on Mars" to Egyptian mythology, and comparing the supposed Martian pyramid with Egyptian and Mesoamerican pyramids. They suggested that the "Face on Mars" represented a deliberate message to the people of Earth, in the words of reviewer David V. Barrett: "a warning that a Mars-like doom lies in wait for the Earth unless we take steps to avert it."[27]

Talisman (2004)

Talisman: Sacred Cities, Secret Faith, coauthored with Robert Bauval, according to David V. Barrett, primarily focuses on "the stream of heterodox religious beliefs, from early Christianity to the 18th century.", including the Corpus Hermeticum the Cathars, Rosicrucians, the Freemasons and the Knights Templar. The book makes a number of speculative claims, including that areas of Paris are inspired by Egyptian mythology, that there are links between Solomon's Temple and the Twin Towers as well as between the Star of David and The Pentagon.[28][29][30] David V. Barrett dismissed the book as "a mish-mash of badly-connected, half-argued theories" stating that at the end of the their book they begin "promulgating a version of the old Jewish-Masonic plot", and journalist Damian Thompson later described Hancock and Bauval as fantasists.[29][30]

Supernatural (2005)

Hancock's Supernatural: Meetings With the Ancient Teachers of Mankind appeared in 2005 and applied David Lewis-Williams' neuropsychological model to paleolithic cave art, arguing that visionary experiences shaped the emergence of modern cognition.[31]

Magicians of the Gods (2015)

St. Martin's Press published Magicians of the Gods: The Forgotten Wisdom of Earth's Lost Civilization in 2015.[32] In Magicians of the Gods: The Forgotten Wisdom of Earth's Lost Civilization (2015), Hancock revisits his Ice Age civilization hypothesis and links it to a proposed Younger Dryas impact event that he argues purged the planet of advanced survivors.[33] He interprets ancient monuments as repositories of encoded warnings from that culture.[33] Kirkus Reviews dismissed the sequel as "for the Art Bell addict" and "risible and sure to sell."[34] Michael Taube of the Washington Times called it a "creative fairytale" even as he acknowledged its popularity.[35] Geologist Marc J. Defant argued that Hancock constructs "a narrative on conjecture and selective evidence" and that the Younger Dryas impact claim does not substantiate his global conclusions.Template:Sfn

Television and media

Beginning in the 1990s, Hancock also fronted television documentaries that promoted his pseudoarchaeological claims. He appeared in The Mysterious Origins of Man (1996), wrote and presented Underworld: Flooded Kingdoms of the Ice Age (2002), and hosted Quest for the Lost Civilization (1998).[36][37][38][39][40][41] In 2022 he presented Ancient Apocalypse, a widely viewed Netflix documentary series that critics and archaeologists condemned as pseudoscience.[42][43][44]

Ancient Apocalypse & The Americas (2022-2024)

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Hancock's theories are the basis of Ancient Apocalypse, a 2022 documentary series produced by Netflix, where Hancock's son Sean is "senior manager of unscripted originals".[45] In the series, Hancock outlines his long-held belief that there was an advanced civilization during the last ice age, that it was destroyed following comet impacts around 12,000 years ago, and that its survivors introduced agriculture, monumental architecture, and astronomy to hunter-gatherers around the world.[46] He attempts to show how several ancient monuments and natural features are evidence of this, and he repeatedly claims that archaeologists are ignoring or covering up this alleged evidence.[42][47]

Archaeologists and other experts say that the series presents pseudoscientific claims that lack evidence, cherry picks, and fails to present counter-evidence.[46][48] Other commentators criticized the series for unfounded accusations that "mainstream archaeology" conspires against Hancock's ideas.[42][49] Archaeologists linked Hancock's claims to "white supremacist" ideologies from the 19th century, which they say are insulting to the ancestors of indigenous peoples who built the monuments.[50] A Maltese archaeologist who appeared in an episode said her interview had been manipulated.[51] The Society for American Archaeology (SAA) objected to the classification of the series as a documentary and asked Netflix to relabel it as science fiction. The SAA argued that the show vilifies archaeologists with aggressive rhetoric, draws on theories associated with racist white supremacist ideologies, harms Indigenous peoples, emboldens extremists, and offers no archaeological evidence for an "advanced, global Ice Age civilization".[52][53]

Netflix released a second season titled "Ancient Apocalypse, The Americas" in October 2024. Keanu Reeves joined the cast and adventure.[54][55] The season focused on sites and topics across North and South America, including White Sands fossil footprints in New Mexico, large scale geoglyphs in the western Amazon, Rapa Nui, Andean centers such as Sacsayhuaman, and monumental sites in Mesoamerica including Palenque and Chichen Itza. The narrative repeated Hancock's claim that a sophisticated ice age culture transmitted astronomy and engineering knowledge to later populations after a cataclysm, and proposed cross cultural linkages among myths and iconography.[56][57]

In July 2024, before release, producers dropped planned filming in the United States after objections by Indigenous groups to Hancock's portrayal of Native histories. The Guardian reported documented permit issues at Grand Canyon and Chaco Canyon and the subsequent relocation of production to other countries.[58]

Season 2 content drew detailed rebuttals from academic specialists and science writers. Johnny Loftus wrote in Decider, "Ancient Apocalypse: The Americas is only interested in using legitimate scientific research as cheap fodder for the grandiose, unproven theories of one guy, who also seems convinced that every single archaeologist ever has been out to get him." He added that "Graham Hancock loves a sweeping turn of phrase like 'the fog of amnesia about our ancient past.' But what he loves more is to give voice to what feels like a lasting personal vendetta against entire fields of professional science." Critics argued that the White Sands trackways do not support a narrative of technological civilizers, that Amazonian geoglyphs and terra preta reflect regional developments rather than imported ice age knowledge, and that proposed long range iconographic links are subjective comparisons without testable mechanisms.[59][60][52]

Other media appearances

Hancock gave a TEDx lecture titled "The War on Consciousness", in which he described his use of ayahuasca, an Amazonian brew containing a hallucinogenic compound DMT, and argued that adults should be allowed to responsibly use it for self-improvement and spiritual growth. He stated that for 24 years he was "pretty much permanently stoned" on cannabis, and that in 2011, six years after his first use of ayahuasca, it enabled him to stop using cannabis.[17] At the recommendation of TED's Science Board, the lecture was removed from the TEDx YouTube channel and moved to TED's main website where it "can be framed to highlight both [Hancock's] provocative ideas and the factual problems with [his] arguments".[61]

Hancock has appeared on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast several times. In April 2024 (episode #2136) Hancock debated Flint Dibble,[62] a professor of archeology at Cardiff University,[62] who strongly rebutted Hancock's unfounded ideas, leading even many of Hancock's backers "to see Dibble - and orthodox science - as the victor."[62] Both Hancock and Dibble agreed that continuing archeological research would be a great benefit to humanity.

Pseudoarchaeology

Experts describe Hancock's pseudoarchaeological work as a mix of cherry picked information and a combative stance toward "mainstream archaeology".Template:Sfn They argue that it mimics investigative journalism while remaining inaccurate, inconsistent, and partial, blending myths, pseudoscience, outdated science, and selectively cited research to fit his claims.Template:Sfn Hancock encourages distrust of archaeological expertise and responds to criticism with accusations of censorship, a pattern many supporters echo when they label critics disinformation agents.Template:Sfn

Hammer and Swartz quote Hancock saying that his job is to undermine orthodox history and to make the strongest possible case for a lost civilization.Template:Sfn

Pseudoarchaeologists mislead their audiences by misrepresenting the state of knowledge, taking quotes out of context, and withholding countervailing data. Historian of Ancient Rome and pseudoarchaeology critic Garrett G. Fagan highlighted two examples from Hancock's Fingerprints of the Gods (1995):Template:Sfn

  • Torn piece of map with Arabic text
    Surviving fragment of the Piri Reis map
    Hancock wrote that "the best recent evidence suggests that"Template:Sfn large regions of Antarctica may have been ice-free until about 6,000 years ago, referring to the Piri Reis map and Hapgood's work from the 1960s. What is left entirely unmentioned are the extensive studies of the Antarctic ice sheet by George H. Denton, published in 1981, which showed the ice to be hundreds of thousands of years old.[63]Template:Sfn
  • When discussing the ancient city of Tiwanaku, Hancock presents it as a "mysterious site about which very little is known"Template:Sfn at which "minimal archaeology has been done over the years",Template:Sfn suggesting it dates to 17,000 years ago. Yet in the years prior to these statements, dozens of studies had been published, major excavations were conducted, and the site was radiocarbon dated by three sets of samples to around 1500 BC.Template:Sfn

Lost ice age civilization

File:Atlantis map 1882 crop.jpg
A map showing the supposed extent of the Atlantean Empire, from Ignatius L. Donnelly's Atlantis: The Antediluvian World, 1882Template:Sfn

Hancock's central thesis claims an advanced civilization flourished during the last Ice Age before a global disaster destroyed it. He argues that a handful of survivors carried their knowledge across the world and seeded the earliest known civilizations. He rejects the idea that these societies could have developed independently or arrived at similar ideas through convergence. Scholars identify the thesis as hyperdiffusionism,[5] heavily drawing on Ignatius L. Donnelly's Atlantis: The Antediluvian World (1882), which Hancock cites as an influence.[46] Researchers state that the hypothesis lacks evidence, reflects a bias toward Western civilization, and oversimplifies complex cultural histories.Template:Sfn

To explain the disappearance of his ice age civilization, Hancock embraces the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis, which has little support in the scientific community.[5] He argues that the civilization was destroyed around 12,000 years ago by sudden climate change during the Younger Dryas cool period, which he attributes to an impact winter caused by a massive meteor bombardment.[46]

Hancock claims that the few survivors of the catastrophe reached regions such as Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Mesoamerica, where they shared agricultural techniques, monumental architecture, and astronomy with hunter-gatherer communities.[46] He believes the resulting monuments encode astronomical data intended to warn future generations.[5] Critics note that the story assumes the Ice Age civilization lacked a reliable writing system, fails to explain why the warning appears differently across cultures, and relies on codes that professional researchers overlooked for generations.Template:Sfn Hancock argues that this knowledge was passed down through symbolism.[5]

Hancock believes that these events are preserved in various myths, such as Plato's story of Atlantis, and that the Atlanteans were remembered as "magicians and gods".[5]

Hancock has accepted the fringe theories of other Atlantis proponents regarding several historic sites. For example that of geologist Robert M. Schoch, who contests that the Great Sphinx of Giza was carved over 11,500 years ago based on claims of the Sphinx having been eroded by water[64] or that of geologist Danny Hilman Natawidjaja, who believes Gunung Padang to be a 27,000 year old Atlantean structure.[65][66]

Scholars Olav Hammer and Karen Swartz write that Hancock's works are "based largely on an imaginative reinterpretation of artifacts and myths that divorces them from their immediate cultural and religious contexts."Template:Sfn

Spiritual technology and Ice Age civilization as myth

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

...in my view the science of the lost civilization was primarily focused upon what we now call psi capacities that deployed the enhanced and focused power of human consciousness to channel energies and to manipulate matter.

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Hammer and Swartz report that Hancock portrays his lost Ice Age civilization as relying on spiritual technology that channels consciousness to manipulate matter.Template:Sfn Anthropologist Jeb Card notes that America Before (2019) describes a "global sea-based society comparable with the late pre-industrial British Empire" whose knowledge "would seem like magic even today". He writes that Hancock credits the Atlanteans with psychic abilities and claims they delivered geometric, astronomical, and spiritual teachings through rituals involving psychotropic plants such as ayahuasca and peyote to commune with "powerful nonphysical beings".[5]

Hancock also argues that meditation and psychoactive plants enabled ancient builders to move large stones, asserting that granite blocks at the Great Pyramid of Giza were raised by "priests chanting", a scenario he links to acoustic levitation.Template:Sfn[67] Archaeologist John Hoopes describes these views as effectively religious and rooted in New Age beliefs.[42]

Card maintains that evaluating Hancock with the tools of professional archaeology is futile because he works within a paranormal milieu and his ice age civilization serves as a mythic narrative, labeling him "not a failed version of an archaeologist" but a "successful mythographer of a post-science age", and that Hancock's presents his theory as "a path to truly understanding reality and the spiritual elements denied by materialist science".[5] Hammer and Swartz, scholars of new religious movements, likewise describe him as a "bricoleur who creates a myth from a motley selection of cultural elements".Template:Sfn

Racist implications

Archaeologists and author Jason Colavito criticize Hancock for drawing on racist sources. He cites Donnelly, whose "mound builder myth" argued that the Indigenous peoples of the Americas could not have built monumental structures and credited them to white Atlanteans.[46][68] Hancock distances himself from that conclusion yet does not explain how capable Indigenous societies support his story of a superior lost civilization transferring advanced science and technology to them.Template:Sfn

Although Hancock has identified the Atlanteans as Indigenous Americans,[68] he wrote in Fingerprints of the Gods that they were "white [and] auburn-haired".[46] He relies on outdated race science to argue that pre-Columbian societies included "Caucasoids" and "Negroids", claims he bases on his readings of Indigenous art and mythology.[46]

Hancock described the Maya as "semi-civilized" with "generally unremarkable" achievements to support his thesis that they inherited their calendar from a much older society.Template:Sfn He denies being racist and has expressed support for Indigenous rights.[69]

Orion correlation theory

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:Orion Correlation 10,500 BC.png
Representation of the central tenet of the Orion correlation theory showing the Giza pyramids aligned with the stars in Orion's Belt. Astronomers reject this alleged match.

Hancock frequently promotes Robert Bauval's Orion correlation theory (OCT), which claims that the three largest pyramids of the Giza pyramid complex were positioned to mirror the three stars of Orion's Belt. OCT notes that the pyramids align with the cardinal directions within a fraction of a degree,[70] yet astronomer Tony Fairall points out that the stellar alignment misses by more than five degrees.Template:Sfn

Hancock and Bauval's OCT was the focus of Atlantis Reborn, a 1999 episode of the BBC documentary series Horizon. The program mocked the theory by showing that the constellation Leo could be mapped onto famous New York landmarks and argued that Hancock cherry-picked temple locations to suit his claims.[2] It concluded, "as long as you have enough points and you don't need to make every point fit, you can find virtually any pattern you want."[71]

After the broadcast, Hancock and Bauval complained to the Broadcasting Standards Commission, which ruled that "the program makers acted in good faith in their examination of the theories".[72] The commission upheld one complaint, agreeing that the program omitted a rebuttal of astronomer Edwin Krupp.[73][74] The BBC aired a revised version titled Atlantis Reborn Again the following year, allowing Hancock and Bauval to present additional responses to Krupp.[2][74]

In popular culture

In 2009, Roland Emmerich released the disaster movie 2012, citing Fingerprints of the Gods in the credits as an inspiration for the film,[75] stating: "I always wanted to do a biblical flood movie, but I never felt I had the hook. I first read about the Earth's Crust Displacement Theory in Graham Hancock's Fingerprints of the Gods."[76]

Works

Books

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Published in the United Kingdom as Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Video

  • Pole to Pole with Michael Palin - Crossing the Line (EP 5) (1992)
  • The Mysterious Origins of Man (1996)
  • Quest for the Lost Civilization - Acorn Media (1998)
  • Atlantis Reborn Again - BBC Horizon (2000)
  • Underworld: Flooded Kingdoms of the Ice Age (2002)
  • Earth Pilgrims - Earth Pilgrims Inc. (2010)
  • "The War on Consciousness" - TEDx (2013)
  • Ancient Apocalypse (2022)

Notes

Template:Notelist

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. a b c d e f g h i Jeb J. Card "America Before as a Paranormal Charter" The SAA Archaeological Record NOVEMBER 2019 - Volume 19 Number 5
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  16. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. London: Michael Joseph, 2004. Template:ISBN
  29. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  36. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  43. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. a b c d e f g h Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  48. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. Hodge, Hugo (7 December 2022) Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse series uses "racist ideologies" to rewrite Indo-Pacific history, experts say ABC News, Retrieved 7 December 2022.
  51. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  52. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  53. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  54. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  55. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  56. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  57. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  58. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  59. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  60. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  61. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  62. a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  63. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  64. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  65. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  66. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  67. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  68. a b Jason Colavito Whitewashing American Prehistory The SAA Archaeological Record NOVEMBER 2019 - Volume 19 Number 5
  69. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  70. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  71. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  72. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  73. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  74. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  75. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  76. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Works cited

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Further reading

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

External links

Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:Authority control